Next Article in Journal
Real-Time Seam Extraction Using Laser Vision Sensing: Hybrid Approach with Dynamic ROI and Optimized RANSAC
Previous Article in Journal
A Zinc Oxide Interconnected Hydroxypropyl-Beta-Cyclodextrin/rGO Nanocomposite as an Electrocatalyst for Melatonin Detection: An Ultra-Sensitive Electrochemical Sensor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Research on Measurement of Coal–Water Slurry Solid–Liquid Two-Phase Flow Based on a Coriolis Flow Meter and a Neural Network

1
School of Mechanical and Precision Instrument Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China
2
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yan’an University, Yan’an 716000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2025, 25(11), 3267; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25113267
Submission received: 26 March 2025 / Revised: 19 May 2025 / Accepted: 20 May 2025 / Published: 22 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)

Abstract

The development of coal–water slurry (CWS), a new type of coal-based chemical product in China, has garnered increasing attention as a potential substitute for petroleum resources. The Coriolis mass flow meter is widely used in industrial measurement due to its low uncertainty and its ability to simultaneously measure fluid density and mass flow rate, with a single-phase measurement error as low as 0.1%. However, significant errors still exist in multiphase flow measurement scenarios. To address this issue, we designed and constructed a CWS liquid–solid two-phase flow measurement platform to investigate the flow measurement errors of CWS in Coriolis mass flow meters under various conditions. A deep learning correction framework was developed to mitigate the significant measurement errors in liquid–solid two-phase flow. Based on the theoretical support provided by repeatability experiments, two correction models were established: (1) An error correction model based on a BP neural network was developed, which provided corrections for the measurement errors of CWS liquid–solid two-phase flow. The first correction results showed that the corrected error of the predictive model was 3.98%, a significant improvement compared to the 5.11% error measured by the X company’s meter. (2) Building on this, a second correction model was established through algorithm optimization, successfully reducing the corrected error of the predictive model to 1.01%. Through this study, we aim at providing a new technical approach for Coriolis mass flow meters in the field of liquid–solid two-phase flow measurement, enhancing measurement accuracy, reducing costs, and offering more reliable data support for industrial process control and scientific research.
Keywords: coal–water slurry (CWS); error; deep learning coal–water slurry (CWS); error; deep learning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, J.; Kong, L.; Ma, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, C.; Wu, D. Research on Measurement of Coal–Water Slurry Solid–Liquid Two-Phase Flow Based on a Coriolis Flow Meter and a Neural Network. Sensors 2025, 25, 3267. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25113267

AMA Style

Liu J, Kong L, Ma J, Zhang X, Wang C, Wu D. Research on Measurement of Coal–Water Slurry Solid–Liquid Two-Phase Flow Based on a Coriolis Flow Meter and a Neural Network. Sensors. 2025; 25(11):3267. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25113267

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Jie, Lingfei Kong, Jiahao Ma, Xuemei Zhang, Chengjie Wang, and Dongze Wu. 2025. "Research on Measurement of Coal–Water Slurry Solid–Liquid Two-Phase Flow Based on a Coriolis Flow Meter and a Neural Network" Sensors 25, no. 11: 3267. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25113267

APA Style

Liu, J., Kong, L., Ma, J., Zhang, X., Wang, C., & Wu, D. (2025). Research on Measurement of Coal–Water Slurry Solid–Liquid Two-Phase Flow Based on a Coriolis Flow Meter and a Neural Network. Sensors, 25(11), 3267. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25113267

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop