Next Article in Journal
Integrated Microcantilever for Joint Thermal Analysis of Trace Hazardous Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Optimal Viewpoint Assistance for Cooperative Manipulation Using D-Optimality
Previous Article in Special Issue
Er3+/Yb3+ Co-Doped Fluorotellurite Glass Fiber with Broadband Luminescence
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Simultaneous Achievement of Low Loss, Large Effective Mode Area and Wide Transmission Band Hollow-Core Anti-Resonant Optical Fibers

1
School of Microelectronics and Communication Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
2
Hubei Key Laboratory of Intelligent Wireless Communications, Hubei Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Internet of Things Technology, College of Electronics and Information Engineering, South-Central Minzu University, Wuhan 430074, China
3
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, College of Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2025, 25(10), 3003; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25103003
Submission received: 2 March 2025 / Revised: 27 March 2025 / Accepted: 28 April 2025 / Published: 9 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Specialty Optical Fiber-Based Sensors)

Abstract

A novel nested structure of hollow-core anti-resonant optical fiber is proposed to achieve low loss, large effective mode area, and wide transmission band simultaneously in the near-infrared range of 1200–2200 nm. It is composed of six elliptical cladding tubes nested with six large circular cladding tubes, and six small circular cladding tubes are introduced in the gap of the elliptical tubes. The transmission characteristics of the hollow-core anti-resonant optical fiber are numerically investigated using the full-vector finite element method. The effects of structural parameters such as the cladding tube thickness and the tube diameters on the fiber transmission characteristics are analyzed in detail. The results indicate that within the wavelength range of 1200–2200 nm, the confinement loss remains below 0.017 dB/km, and the minimum confinement loss can be as low as 1.2 × 10−4 dB/km at 1500 nm. The effective mode area remains as large as ~1142.5 μm2. It should be noted that in the wide wavelength range of 1000 nm, the dispersion exhibits excellent characteristics ranging from 0.7 to 1.4 ps/(nm·km). Our fiber can find potential applications in ultra-long-distance and ultra-high-power transmission systems with a wide operating wavelength band.

1. Introduction

Hollow-core anti-resonant fiber (HC-ARF) is a type of hollow-core fiber that offers advantages over other types with the features of simple structure and utilizing air as the material for transmitting light. This leads to excellent characteristics such as low dispersion, low time delay, and high damage threshold [1]. Due to its unique merits, HC-ARFs have become a hot topic in the field of optical fibers and have a wide range of applications, such as fiber sensing, laser transmission [2], mid-infrared lasers [3], etc. With the increasing requirements of optical transmission systems, such as longer transmission distances, faster transmission bit rates, and high-power delivery, it is necessary to dedicate efforts toward exploring high-performance hollow-core anti-resonant fibers.
Currently, great progress has been made on the structure of HC-ARFs to realize better performance, including low confinement loss and high birefringence, etc. In 2018, a nested-tube anti-resonant fiber was proposed, achieving a confinement loss of 2 dB/km at 1512 nm and a loss below 16 dB/km in the wavelength range of 1302–1637 nm [4]. Also, a nested-type HC-ARF consisting of six nested tubes was proposed to achieve a confinement loss of 1.3 dB/km at 1450 nm and a loss below 1.4 dB/km in the wavelength range of 1420–1460 nm [5]. In 2019, Bradley et al. further optimized the structure and fabricated a nested-type fiber with a loss of only 0.65 dB/km in the C and L communication bands [6]. Also, in 2019, a nested HC-ARF composed of six nested tubes was designed, realizing a loss below 10 dB/km in the wavelength range of 1240–1940 nm, with the lowest loss of 6.6 dB/km at 1550 nm [7]. In 2020, a nested HC-ARF was realized, consisting of six nested tubes with an ultralow loss of 0.32 dB/km in the wavelength range of 1530–1625 nm [8]. In 2021, a nested structure with five cladding tubes was fabricated, with the loss reduced to 0.22 dB/km at 1625 nm [9], and a connected-ring HC-ARF was designed with a minimum loss of 3.69 × 10−3 dB/km [10]. In 2022, a three-nested structure was proposed to achieve a loss below 0.174 dB/km in the wavelength range of 1530–1565 nm and below 0.22 dB/km in the wavelength range of 1260–1360 nm, respectively [11]. In 2023, a novel crescent-shaped core HC-ARF was introduced to realize a loss of less than 0.1 dB/km over a band range of 600 nm and a significant birefringence of less than 10−5 through asymmetric shaping [12]. A new five-tube nested double C-type HC-ARF was realized to obtain single-polarization single-mode transmission at 1550 nm with a bandwidth of 150 nm and an ultra-low confinement loss of 2.8 × 10−3 dB/km [2]. A negatively curved core AR-HCF was studied to realize a high birefringence of 1.3 × 10−4 and a low confinement loss of 6.1 dB/km at 1550 nm [13]. Still in 2023, a HC-ARF with a nested and double-cladding structure was presented to obtain the minimum confinement loss of 4 × 10−4 dB/km at 1550 nm and a high-order mode loss ratio of up to 20,000 [14].
In order to further optimize the performance of HC-ARF, a novel nested HC-ARF is proposed in this paper to realize low confinement loss and a large effective mode area with a wide operating wavelength range simultaneously. In the cladding region, six elliptical tubes are combined and nested with six large circular tubes, and six small circular tubes are introduced in the gaps of the elliptical tubes. Different cladding tube thicknesses and cladding layer thicknesses are utilized to reduce the confinement loss, enhance the effective mode area, and increase the transmission band. The effects of different structural parameters on the confinement loss and the effective mode area are investigated in detail according to the priority of their influences on performance.

2. Structure Design and Basic Theory

The structural design is considered in the order of decreasing confinement loss, enlarging the effective mode area, and widening the operating wavelength band. The involved structural parameters include the number of cladding tubes N, the thicknesses of the elliptical and circular cladding tubes, the thicknesses of the cladding layer, the core diameter, the size of the elliptical cladding tube, and the diameter of the small circular cladding tube.
Figure 1a shows the cross-section of the HC-ARF structure with the number of cladding tubes N = 6, and each cladding tube contains one small circular cladding tube and one elliptical tube nested within a large circular cladding tube. The core diameter is Dc, the elliptical cladding tube has a long axis of d1 and a short axis of a1, the diameter of the large circular cladding tubes is d3, the diameter of the small circular cladding tubes is d2, the thickness of the elliptical and large circular cladding tubes is t, the thickness of the small circular cladding tubes is t1, and the thickness of the cladding layer is t2. The outermost layer is a perfectly matched layer (PML), typically set to be 2–3 times the wavelength. Both the cladding tubes and the cladding layer are silica, whose refractive index is wavelength-dependent and can be calculated using the Sellmeier equation [15].
According to the anti-resonance condition, when the wavelength satisfies the anti-resonance condition, the optical mode field is confined to the core region. However, when the wavelength satisfies the resonance condition, optical mode field leakage occurs. Figure 1b,c show the electric field distribution of the fundamental mode in the x-polarization and y-polarization, respectively, at the wavelength of 1550 nm. It can be observed that the optical mode field is well confined within the fiber core at the anti-resonance wavelength.
A full-vector finite element method combined with PML boundary conditions is adopted to analyze the properties of the proposed HC-ARF.
The confinement loss and the dispersion are the crucial parameters to measure the transmission characteristics of the HC-ARF, which can be calculated as [16,17]:
C L = 40 π I m ( n e f f ) λ I n ( 10 )
D = λ c × d 2 Re ( n eff ) d λ 2
where neff is the effective mode refractive index, Im (neff) and Re (neff) are the imaginary and real part of the effective mode refractive index, λ is the wavelength, and c is the speed of light.
The effective mode area is another important parameter to measure the performance of the fiber, which is [18]:
A e f f = ( Ω E 2 d x d y ) 2 Ω E 4 d x d y
where E is the transverse component of the electric field propagating inside the fiber, and Ω is the cross section of the fiber.

3. Analysis of Results and Discussion

The effects of the number of cladding tubes N, as the most important parameter, on the confinement loss are studied first. Based on the practical application requirements, the initial data are set as follows: Dc = 50 µm, d1= 40 μm, a1 = 35 μm, d2 = 14 μm, d3 = 24 μm, t = 0.5 μm, t1 = 1 μm, and t2 = 1.3 μm. The variation of the confinement loss as a function of the wavelength with different numbers of cladding tubes N = 4, 5, 6, and 7 for x and y polarizations is shown in Figure 2. It can be seen that the overall confinement loss is lowest for N = 6. This is mainly because the greater the number of cladding tubes, the stronger the ability to confine the light, which has lower confinement loss [19]. However, it is not the greater the number, the lower the confinement loss. The reason is that with the increase of N, the cladding tube gap will decrease, which can strengthen the resonance between the cladding tubes and cause increased confinement loss. Therefore, in the subsequent analysis, the number of cladding tubes N = 6 is adopted, as shown in Figure 1a.
The reason why the nested cladding tubes are selected can be observed from Figure 3, which illustrates the variation of confinement loss with the nested and non-nested structures. It is evident that the nested tube structure exhibits lower confinement loss compared to the non-nested tube structure. It is easily understandable that adding nested tubes can effectively reduce the adverse effects caused by the gaps between the tubes, thereby increasing the ability to constrain light.
The influences of the parameters on the performance of the HC-ARF are investigated one by one within the wavelength range of 1200–2200 nm. The thickness of the elliptical and large circular cladding tubes, t, has the strongest effects, which can be calculated based on the following equation [20]:
t = ( 2 m + 1 ) λ 4 ( n 1 2 n 0 2 ) 1 2 1
where n1 represents the refractive index of silicon, n0 represents the refractive index of air, λ represents the wavelength, and m represents the order of resonance. The wavelength band is relatively wide with m = 1 and m = 2.
Figure 4a,b show the effects of t on the confinement loss and the effective mode area with λ = 1550 nm for different m, and other initial parameters remain unchanged, respectively. As can be seen from Figure 4a, both the confinement losses and the effective mode area increase with the increase of t. The physical reason is that the narrowed gap between the cladding tubes, due to the increased t, can strengthen the resonance between the cladding tubes, resulting in increased confinement loss and effective mode area. It can be observed that the overall effective mode area remains above 1000 µm2, and the minimum confinement loss of 7.04 × 10−4 dB/km is obtained at t = 0.28 μm. As indicated in Figure 4b, the overall confinement losses deteriorate, with values above the order of 10. Thus, m = 1 is adopted.
To determine the optimal value of t, the confinement loss as a function of the wavelength for different t, with other initial parameters remaining unchanged, is shown in Figure 5. It can be seen that for t = 0.28 μm, the lowest loss of 2.79 × 10−4 dB/km is achieved at λ = 1450 nm, and the overall loss is below 0.39 dB/km. When t = 0.3 μm, the lowest loss of 6.45 × 10−4 dB/km is obtained at λ = 1200 nm with the overall loss below 0.13 dB/km. For t = 0.36 μm, the lowest loss of 9.43 × 10−4 dB/km is reached at λ = 1250 nm, with the overall loss below 3.09 dB/km. When t = 0.48 μm, the lowest loss of 3.8 × 10−3 dB/km is obtained at λ = 2150 nm, with the overall loss below 0.16 dB/km. For t = 0.5 μm, the lowest loss is 6.85 × 10−3 dB/km at λ = 1700 nm, with the overall loss below 2.04 dB/km. The comparison indicates that the lowest confinement loss can be achieved at t = 0.3 μm. As a consequence, the optimal t is determined to be 0.3 μm.
Figure 6a,b show the influence of the thickness of small circular cladding tubes t1 and the cladding layer t2, with other initial parameters remaining unchanged, respectively. As can be seen from Figure 6a, the minimum confinement loss of 2.85 × 10−4 dB/km is obtained at t1 = 0.5 μm, and the effective mode area almost keeps stabilizing at ~1100 μm2. As shown in Figure 6b, the effects of the thickness of the cladding layer t2 on the effective mode area are negligible. The variation of the thickness of the cladding layer t2 has less impact on the confinement loss than that of the thickness of the elliptical and large circular cladding tubes t and the small circular cladding tubes t1. This is because the farther the distance from the core, the smaller the impact on the core mode. In particular, the minimum confinement loss of 1.03 × 10−4 dB/km is realized at t2 =1.7 μm for both polarizations. Therefore, it is reasonable to set t1 = 0.5 μm and t2 = 1.7 μm.
Figure 7 presents the confinement loss and the effective mode area as a function of the wavelength with optimized tube thickness t, t1 and t2 and other initial parameters remain unchanged. It can be observed that in the transmission band of 1000 nm, the confinement loss can reach the minimum value of 7.91 × 10−5 dB/km at 1500 nm, with a large effective mode area of 1096.3 μm2 simultaneously. It should be pointed out that the maximum confinement loss of y polarization is less than 0.018 dB/km, illustrating the excellent performance of low confinement loss.
Figure 8 shows the effects of the core diameter Dc on the confinement loss and the effective mode area at λ = 1550 nm, with other initial parameters remaining unchanged. It can be observed that the effective mode area increases with the core diameter, and the minimum confinement loss of 8.48 × 10−5 dB/km can be achieved at Dc = 51 μm, with a large effective mode area of 1142.5 μm2 together. It should be noted that it is not that the larger the core diameter, the lower the confinement loss. It has been proven that larger core diameters often pose challenges in ensuring single-mode transmission and may increase the losses of other higher-order modes in the fiber [21]. Consequently, Dc = 51 μm is adopted.
Figure 9 depicts the influences of the diameter of small circular cladding tubes d2 on the confinement loss and the effective mode area at λ = 1550 nm, with other initial parameters remaining unchanged. It is clear that the effects of d2 on the effective mode area can be neglected, and the maximum confinement loss is less than 0.1 dB/km. Especially, the minimum confinement loss of 5.42 × 10−5 dB/km for x-polarization and 8.48 × 10−5 dB/km for y-polarization can be realized at d2 = 14 μm with an effective mode area of 1142.5 μm2, demonstrating the realization of ultralow loss and large effective mode area at the same time. Therefore, the optimal value of d2 is 14 μm.
Figure 10 shows the effects of the long axis of the elliptical cladding tube d1 on the confinement loss and the effective mode area at λ = 1550 nm, with other initial parameters remaining unchanged. It can be seen that the effective mode area slightly increases with d1, and the minimum confinement loss of 5.42 × 10−5 dB/km is obtained at d1 = 40 μm for both polarizations, with an effective mode area of 1142.5 μm2. It is easier to understand that the increase of d1 can lead to easy mode coupling from the core to the cladding, thereby to increase the effective mode area. Hence, the optimized d1 is determined to be 40 μm.
Based on the optimized parameters of t = 0.3 μm, t1 = 0.5 μm, t2 = 1.7 μm, Dc = 51 μm, d2 = 14 μm, and d1 = 40 μm, the optimization of the confinement loss and the effective mode area as a function of the wavelength is given in Figure 11. From Figure 11a, it can be observed that the effective mode area of ~1142 μm2 can be achieved, and the confinement loss is below 0.017 dB/km for y-polarization. Particularly, the minimum confinement loss of 1.2 × 10−4 dB/km is obtained at λ = 1500 nm for y-polarization. As can be seen from Figure 11b, the value of the dispersion ranges from 0.7 to 1.4 ps/(nm.km), exhibiting excellent dispersion characteristics of the designed HC-ARF, implying that the optimized structure has the ability to realize ultralow loss and a large effective mode area with excellent dispersion characteristics within a wide wavelength range simultaneously.
The preparation technology of optical fibers is a crucial aspect of development. It has been indicated that the HC-ARFs offer advantages such as a simple structure and feasible manufacturing, making them more suitable for practical use. The commonly used preparation processes for HC-ARFs include stacking, extrusion, and 3D printing, among which the bundle stacking method is particularly well-suited for the practical fabrication of the optical fiber designed in this study. The process involves stacking multiple preform optical fibers and subjecting them to thermal treatment. This technique uses thermal expansion and curing processes to form a hollow-core and anti-resonant structures. By controlling the arrangement, the stacking method, and the thermal treatment of the optical fibers, it is possible to achieve the desired parameters such as hollow-core diameter, periodicity, and anti-resonant structure dimensions under certain conditions. However, it has been found that errors may occur in HC-ARFs when using the stacking method, including deformation, collapse, and displacement of the anti-resonant tubes. Among these, the displacement of the anti-resonant tubes has the least impact on the optical fiber’s transmission performance, provided that an appropriate distance between the anti-resonant tubes is maintained during preparation. Thus, with the help of the stacking method and pressure-assisted joining technology, the new type of HC-ARF proposed in this paper can be successfully fabricated in the future, provided that the errors are kept minimal.
In order to illustrate the competitiveness of the proposed HC-ARF, the comparisons with other reported structures are listed in Table 1. It can be demonstrated that the HC-ARF presented in this paper exhibits better performance in terms of a wider transmission window, lower confinement loss, and dispersion value, as well as a larger effective mode area. In particular, the excellent characteristics of low confinement loss and dispersion, a large effective mode area, and a wide operating wavelength band can be realized simultaneously.

4. Conclusions

We have designed a novel hollow-core anti-resonant fiber that realizes a low confinement loss of less than 0.017 dB/km, a large effective mode area of ~1142 μm2, and a low dispersion of 0.7–1.4 ps/(nm·km) at the same time, in the operating wavelength range from 1200 nm to 2200 nm, with a wide transmission band of up to 1000 nm. The full-vector finite element method, combined with perfectly matched layer boundary conditions, has been adopted to analyze the influences of structural parameters on the performance of the fiber. It has been demonstrated that in the wavelength range of 1200–2200 nm, the confinement loss remains below 0.017 dB/km, and the minimum loss of 1.2 × 10−4 dB/km can be achieved at 1500 nm. At the commonly used communication wavelength of 1550 nm, the confinement loss is as low as 1.73 × 10−3 dB/km. The simultaneous achievement of low loss and a large effective mode area, along with excellent dispersion characteristics in a wide wavelength band, illustrates the outstanding performance of the proposed HC-ARF. The new design has the ability to provide valuable insights for the practical application of low-loss and large mode area hollow-core anti-resonant fibers to meet the requirements of long-distance, high-power transmission with a large transmission window simultaneously.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.P.S.; software, L.H.; formal analysis, X.H.; investigation, M.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.C.; supervision, W.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 62105373, 62171487); Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (grant number 2023AFC012, 2024AFA030); Knowledge Innovation Program of Wuhan-Shuguang Project (grant number 2022010801020408).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data and code of this work will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Shen, W.; Du, J.; Sun, L.; Wang, C.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, K.; Chen, B.; He, Z. Low-Latency and High-Speed Hollow-Core Fiber Optical Interconnection at 2-Micron Waveband. J. Light Technol. 2020, 38, 3874–3882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gong, Y.; Meng, Y. Single-Polarization Single-Mode Broadband Ultra-Low Loss Hollow-Core Anti-Resonant Fiber with Nested Double C-Type Cladding Tubes. Opt. Commun. 2024, 552, 130062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ding, W.; Wang, Y.Y.; Gao, S.F.; Wang, M.L.; Wang, P. Recent Progress in Low-Loss Hollow-Core Anti-Resonant Fibers and Their Applications. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2020, 26, 4400312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gao, S.F.; Wang, Y.Y.; Ding, W.; Jiang, D.L.; Gu, S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, P. Hollow-core conjoined-tube negative-curvature fiber with ultralow loss. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bradley, T.D.; Hayes, J.R.; Chen, Y.; Jasion, G.T.; Sandoghchi, S.R.; Slavík, R.; Fokoua, E.N.; Bawn, S.; Sakr, H.; Davidson, I.A.; et al. Record Low-Loss 1.3 dB/km Data Transmitting Antiresonant Hollow Core Fiber. In Proceedings of the 2018 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC), Rome, Italy, 23–27 September 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bradley, T.D.; Jasion, G.T.; Hayes, J.R.; Chen, Y.; Hooper, L.; Sakr, H.; Alonso, M.; Taranta, A.; Saljoghei, A.; Mulvad, H.C.; et al. Antiresonant Hollow Core Fiber with 0.65 dB/km Attenuation across the C and L Telecommunication Bands. In Proceedings of the 45th European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC 2019), Dublin, Ireland, 22–26 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sakr, H.; Bradley, T.D.; Hong, Y.; Jasion, G.T.; Hayes, J.R.; Kim, H.; Davidson, I.A.; Fokoua, E.N.; Chen, Y.; Bottrill, K.R.; et al. Ultrawide Bandwidth Hollow Core Fiber for Interband Short Reach Data Transmission. In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference Postdeadline Papers 2019, San Diego, CA, USA, 3–7 March 2019. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jasion, G.T.; Bradley, T.D.; Harrington, K.; Sakr, H.; Chen, Y.; Fokoua, E.N.; Davidson, I.A.; Taranta, A.; Hayes, J.R.; Richardson, D.J.; et al. Hollow Core NANF with 0.28 dB/km Attenuation in the C and L Bands. In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference Postdeadline Papers 2020, San Diego, CA, USA, 8–12 March 2020. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sakr, H.; Bradley, T.D.; Jasion, G.T.; Fokoua, E.N.; Sandoghchi, S.R.; Davidson, I.A.; Taranta, A.; Guerra, G.; Shere, W.; Chen, Y.; et al. Hollow Core NANFs with Five Nested Tubes and Record Low Loss at 850, 1060, 1300 and 1625 nm. In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2021, Washington, DC, USA, 6–11 June 2021. [Google Scholar]
  10. Yang, B.; Liu, X.; Jia, W.; Liu, S.; Mei, K.; Ge, T.; Yang, D.; Liu, Y.; Lan, T.; Wang, Z. Low Loss Hollow-Core Connecting-Circle Negative-Curvature Fibers. IEEE Photonics J. 2021, 13, 7200710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jasion, G.T.; Sakr, H.; Hayes, J.R.; Sandoghchi, S.R.; Hooper, L.; Fokoua, E.N.; Saljoghei, A.; Mulvad, H.C.; Alonso, M.; Taranta, A.; et al. 0.174 dB/km Hollow Core Double Nested Antiresonant Nodeless Fiber (DNANF). In Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2022, San Diego, CA, USA, 6–10 March 2022. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, Y.; Dng, H.; Hong, Y.; Gao, S.; Ding, W. Crescent-Shaped Anti-Resonant Hollow Core Fiber. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2024, 30, 4300508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ma, M.; Chen, K.; Ma, Y.; Bi, R.; She, X.; Shu, X. Highly Birefringent Anti-Resonant Hollow-Core Fiber with a Low Loss. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2023, 35, 1106–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. An, M.; Ma, J.; Luo, B.; Huang, L.; Hu, T.; Jia, H. Low confinement loss single-mode hollow core anti-resonant fiber covering the O + E + S + C + L + U band. Opt. Eng. 2023, 62, 075104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Malitson, I.H. Interspecimen Comparison of the Refractive Index of Fused Silica. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1965, 55, 1205–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Poletti, F. Nested antiresonant nodeless hollow core fiber. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 23807–23828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Snyder, A.W.; Love, J. Optical Waveguide Theory; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhou, D.; Zhou, J.; Du, Y.; Zhang, R.; Zou, H. The Research on Large-Mode-Area Anti-Bending, Polarization-Insensitive, and Non-Resonant Optical Fibers. Electronics 2024, 13, 1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wei, C.; Menyuk, C.R.; Hu, J. Impact of Cladding Tubes in Chalcogenide Negative Curvature Fibers. IEEE Photonics J. 2016, 8, 2200509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Litchinitser, N.M.; Abeeluck, A.K.; Headley, C.; Eggleton, B.J. Antiresonant reflecting photonic crystal optical waveguides. Opt. Lett. 2002, 27, 1592–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhang, J.; Cao, J.; Yang, B.; Liu, X.; Cheng, Y.; Bao, C.; Xie, S.; Dong, L.; Hao, Q. Ultralow loss hollow-core negative curvature fibers with nested elliptical antiresonance tubes. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 17437–17450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, Y.Y.; Hasan, M.I.; Hassan, M. Effect of the second ring of anti-resonant tubes in negative-curvature fibers. Opt. Express 2019, 28, 1168–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Structural diagram of the designed HC-ARF; (b) X-polarized mode field distribution of the optical fiber at λ = 1550 nm; (c) Y-polarized mode field distribution of the optical fiber at λ = 1550 nm.
Figure 1. (a) Structural diagram of the designed HC-ARF; (b) X-polarized mode field distribution of the optical fiber at λ = 1550 nm; (c) Y-polarized mode field distribution of the optical fiber at λ = 1550 nm.
Sensors 25 03003 g001
Figure 2. Variation of confinement loss for different numbers of tubes N. (a) x-polarization; (b) y-polarization.
Figure 2. Variation of confinement loss for different numbers of tubes N. (a) x-polarization; (b) y-polarization.
Sensors 25 03003 g002
Figure 3. Variation of confinement loss in nested and non-nested fibers.
Figure 3. Variation of confinement loss in nested and non-nested fibers.
Sensors 25 03003 g003
Figure 4. Variation of confinement loss and effective mode area with the thickness of the elliptical and large circular cladding tubes t at λ = 1550 nm. (a) when m = 1; (b) when m = 2.
Figure 4. Variation of confinement loss and effective mode area with the thickness of the elliptical and large circular cladding tubes t at λ = 1550 nm. (a) when m = 1; (b) when m = 2.
Sensors 25 03003 g004
Figure 5. Variation of confinement loss with the wavelength for different thicknesses of the elliptical and large circular cladding tubes t.
Figure 5. Variation of confinement loss with the wavelength for different thicknesses of the elliptical and large circular cladding tubes t.
Sensors 25 03003 g005
Figure 6. (a) Variation of confinement loss and effective mode area for different small circular cladding tubes thickness t1 at λ = 1550 nm. (b) Variation of confinement loss and effective mode area for different cladding layer thicknesses t2 at λ = 1550 nm.
Figure 6. (a) Variation of confinement loss and effective mode area for different small circular cladding tubes thickness t1 at λ = 1550 nm. (b) Variation of confinement loss and effective mode area for different cladding layer thicknesses t2 at λ = 1550 nm.
Sensors 25 03003 g006
Figure 7. Variation of confinement loss and effective mode area with optimized tube thickness t, t1 and t2.
Figure 7. Variation of confinement loss and effective mode area with optimized tube thickness t, t1 and t2.
Sensors 25 03003 g007
Figure 8. Variation of confinement loss and effective mode area with different core diameters.
Figure 8. Variation of confinement loss and effective mode area with different core diameters.
Sensors 25 03003 g008
Figure 9. Variation of confinement loss and effective mode area corresponding to different small circular cladding tube diameters d2.
Figure 9. Variation of confinement loss and effective mode area corresponding to different small circular cladding tube diameters d2.
Sensors 25 03003 g009
Figure 10. Variation of confinement loss and effective mode area corresponding to different small circular cladding tube diameters d1.
Figure 10. Variation of confinement loss and effective mode area corresponding to different small circular cladding tube diameters d1.
Sensors 25 03003 g010
Figure 11. (a) Final optimization results of designed HC-ARF. (b) The dispersion of designed HC-ARF.
Figure 11. (a) Final optimization results of designed HC-ARF. (b) The dispersion of designed HC-ARF.
Sensors 25 03003 g011
Table 1. Comparison of the performance of proposed HC-ARF with other reported HC-ARFs.
Table 1. Comparison of the performance of proposed HC-ARF with other reported HC-ARFs.
Ref.Fiber StructurePerformance Metrics
Transmission Window (μm)Overall Confinement Loss (dB/km)Minimum Confinement Loss (dB/km)Dispersion (ps/(nm·km))Effective Mode Area (μm2)Reference
2019Sensors 25 03003 i001(200)
1000–1200
<0.1~~~[22]
2022Sensors 25 03003 i002(640)
1140–1780
<0.0054 × 10−4@1550~~[21]
2022Sensors 25 03003 i003(365)
1260–1625
<0.014 × 10−4@1550~~[14]
2023Sensors 25 03003 i004(100)
1525–1625
<100.016@1550−5~
2023Sensors 25 03003 i005(500)
1200–1700
≤0.0650.039@15001.020–1.222750
This workSensors 25 03003 i006(1000)
1200–2200
<0.0171.2 × 10−4@15000.7–1.41145
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, M.; Cui, Y.; Hua, X.; Ni, W.; Shum, P.P.; Huang, L. Simultaneous Achievement of Low Loss, Large Effective Mode Area and Wide Transmission Band Hollow-Core Anti-Resonant Optical Fibers. Sensors 2025, 25, 3003. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25103003

AMA Style

Liu M, Cui Y, Hua X, Ni W, Shum PP, Huang L. Simultaneous Achievement of Low Loss, Large Effective Mode Area and Wide Transmission Band Hollow-Core Anti-Resonant Optical Fibers. Sensors. 2025; 25(10):3003. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25103003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Min, Yingqi Cui, Xiangyu Hua, Wenjun Ni, Perry Ping Shum, and Lei Huang. 2025. "Simultaneous Achievement of Low Loss, Large Effective Mode Area and Wide Transmission Band Hollow-Core Anti-Resonant Optical Fibers" Sensors 25, no. 10: 3003. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25103003

APA Style

Liu, M., Cui, Y., Hua, X., Ni, W., Shum, P. P., & Huang, L. (2025). Simultaneous Achievement of Low Loss, Large Effective Mode Area and Wide Transmission Band Hollow-Core Anti-Resonant Optical Fibers. Sensors, 25(10), 3003. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25103003

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop