Correction: Min, J.-Y.; Min, K.-B. Comparisons of Two Bioelectrical Impedance Devices and Manual versus Sensor-Based Short Physical Performance Batteries for Assessment of Muscle Mass and Physical Performance. Sensors 2023, 23, 6026
Text Correction
- In Abstract, instead of “Forty-one older adults were measured for ASM and physical performance with two BIA devices”, it should read: “Forty older adults were measured for ASM and physical performance with two BIA devices”.
- Section 2.1, Study Population, Paragraph 1, instead of “Forty-one individuals (men (n = 27) and women (n = 14)) volunteered”, it should read: “Forty individuals (men (n = 26) and women (n = 14)) volunteered”.
- Section 2.1, Study Population, Paragraph 3, and Institutional Review Board Statement section, instead of “All procedures used in this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB no. BOHUN 2023-01-066)”, it should read: “(IRB no. BOHUN 2023-02-014)”.
- Section 2.4, Statistical Analysis, Paragraph 1, instead of “We had recruited 41 participants with an anticipated dropout rate of 15%”, it should read: “We had recruited 40 participants with an anticipated dropout rate of 11%”.
- There was a mistake in the published version of Table 1. The number of study population should be “40” instead of “41”. The mean + SD for the males should be “26 (65.00%)” instead of “27 (65.85%)”.
Variables | Mean ± SD |
---|---|
Age (years) | 74.49 ± 3.57 |
Male, n (%) | 26 (65.00%) |
Weight (kg) | 63.49 ± 9.40 |
Height (cm) | 162.02 ± 7.28 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.15 ± 2.99 |
Reference
- Min, J.-Y.; Min, K.-B. Comparisons of two bioelectrical impedance devices and manual versus sensor-based short physical performance batteries for assessment of muscle mass and physical performance. Sensors 2023, 23, 6026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Min, J.-Y.; Min, K.-B. Correction: Min, J.-Y.; Min, K.-B. Comparisons of Two Bioelectrical Impedance Devices and Manual versus Sensor-Based Short Physical Performance Batteries for Assessment of Muscle Mass and Physical Performance. Sensors 2023, 23, 6026. Sensors 2024, 24, 2003. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24062003
Min J-Y, Min K-B. Correction: Min, J.-Y.; Min, K.-B. Comparisons of Two Bioelectrical Impedance Devices and Manual versus Sensor-Based Short Physical Performance Batteries for Assessment of Muscle Mass and Physical Performance. Sensors 2023, 23, 6026. Sensors. 2024; 24(6):2003. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24062003
Chicago/Turabian StyleMin, Jin-Young, and Kyoung-Bok Min. 2024. "Correction: Min, J.-Y.; Min, K.-B. Comparisons of Two Bioelectrical Impedance Devices and Manual versus Sensor-Based Short Physical Performance Batteries for Assessment of Muscle Mass and Physical Performance. Sensors 2023, 23, 6026" Sensors 24, no. 6: 2003. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24062003
APA StyleMin, J.-Y., & Min, K.-B. (2024). Correction: Min, J.-Y.; Min, K.-B. Comparisons of Two Bioelectrical Impedance Devices and Manual versus Sensor-Based Short Physical Performance Batteries for Assessment of Muscle Mass and Physical Performance. Sensors 2023, 23, 6026. Sensors, 24(6), 2003. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24062003