Next Article in Journal
Online Testing Method for the Fine Spectral Characteristics of Narrow-Band Interference Filters Based on a Narrow-Linewidth Tunable Laser
Previous Article in Journal
Smart Grid Security: An Effective Hybrid CNN-Based Approach for Detecting Energy Theft Using Consumption Patterns
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 24
Issue 4
10.3390/s24041150
Review Report
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Study on Sensor Fault-Tolerant Control for Central Air-Conditioning Systems Using Bayesian Inference with Data Increments

Sensors 2024, 24(4), 1150; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24041150
by Guannan Li 1,2,3,4, Chongchong Wang 1, Lamei Liu 1,*, Xi Fang 5, Wei Kuang 1 and Chenglong Xiong 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sensors 2024, 24(4), 1150; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24041150
Submission received: 23 December 2023 / Revised: 17 January 2024 / Accepted: 19 January 2024 / Published: 9 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Fault Diagnosis & Sensors)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This paper presents an in-situ selective incremental calibration method for the data-driven fault-tolerant control in central air conditioning systems. The paper conducts a detailed literature review, and presents the proposed method and the evaluation results clearly. In general the paper is in a good shape.

 

A minor suggestion: in both abstract and conclusion, instead of showing “reduced to”, consider showing “reduced from XXX to YYY” or simply showing “reduced by ZZZ%”. This gives readers a clear understanding of the benefits achieved by your method.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

In general, this paper's quality of English is good.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

(1) In the manuscript, PPD stands for Predicted Percentage Dissatisfaction, but this is not explained in the abstract where the abbreviation appears first.

(2) In the case study, the choice of Ttz1, T sa, T chws as experimental sensors over other sensors needs further explanation.

(3) Table 2 shows a calibration time of 12:10, which contradicts the calibration time of 12:30 in Figure 5.

(4) Whether in SDN or data volume experiments, in some specific cases, the results of IC are superior to international standard industrial classifications. Is there any additional explanation for these? Different experimental phenomena may explain these results.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Appropriate English corrections are required.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Please see the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Moderate editing of English language required.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

All the recommendations and suggestions have been incorporated by the authors. Therefore, I recommend this manuscript for acception.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

English language and style are fine.

Back to TopTop