Next Article in Journal
Wrist-to-Tibia/Shoe Inertial Measurement Results Translation Using Neural Networks
Previous Article in Journal
Decoupling and Cloaking of Rectangular and Circular Patch Antennas and Interleaved Antenna Arrays with Planar Coated Metasurfaces at C-Band Frequencies—Design and Simulation Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Malware Classification Models for Heterogeneous Data

Department of Cyber Security, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
Sensors 2024, 24(1), 288; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010288
Submission received: 4 November 2023 / Revised: 30 December 2023 / Accepted: 1 January 2024 / Published: 3 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Internet of Things)

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) has found widespread application in various domains. Additionally, ML-based techniques have been employed to address security issues in technology, with numerous studies showcasing their potential and effectiveness in tackling security problems. Over the years, ML methods for identifying malicious software have been developed across various security domains. However, recent research has highlighted the susceptibility of ML models to small input perturbations, known as adversarial examples, which can significantly alter model predictions. While prior studies on adversarial examples primarily focused on ML models for image processing, they have progressively extended to other applications, including security. Interestingly, adversarial attacks have proven to be particularly effective in the realm of malware classification. This study aims to explore the transparency of malware classification and develop an explanation method for malware classifiers. The challenge at hand is more complex than those associated with explainable AI for homogeneous data due to the intricate data structure of malware compared to traditional image datasets. The research revealed that existing explanations fall short in interpreting heterogeneous data. Our employed methods demonstrated that current malware detectors, despite high classification accuracy, may provide a misleading sense of security and measuring classification accuracy is insufficient for validating detectors.
Keywords: adversarial learning; IoT; deep learning; interpretability; XAI for CTI applications; XAI for cybersecurity data adversarial learning; IoT; deep learning; interpretability; XAI for CTI applications; XAI for cybersecurity data

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bae, H. Evaluation of Malware Classification Models for Heterogeneous Data. Sensors 2024, 24, 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010288

AMA Style

Bae H. Evaluation of Malware Classification Models for Heterogeneous Data. Sensors. 2024; 24(1):288. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010288

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bae, Ho. 2024. "Evaluation of Malware Classification Models for Heterogeneous Data" Sensors 24, no. 1: 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010288

APA Style

Bae, H. (2024). Evaluation of Malware Classification Models for Heterogeneous Data. Sensors, 24(1), 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010288

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop