Next Article in Journal
Time-Sensitive Networking to Improve the Performance of Distributed Functional Safety Systems Implemented over Wi-Fi
Previous Article in Journal
Demonstration of a Modular Prototype End-to-End Simulator for Aquatic Remote Sensing Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Highly Sensitive and Selective Optical Sensor for the On-Line Detection of Cesium in Water

1
CNRS, Photophysique et Photochimie Supramoléculaires et Macromoléculaires, ENS Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, 4 Avenue des Sciences, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
2
Institut d’Alembert—FR 3242, ENS Paris-Saclay, 4 Avenue des Sciences, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2023, 23(18), 7826; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23187826
Submission received: 10 July 2023 / Revised: 15 August 2023 / Accepted: 26 August 2023 / Published: 12 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Sensors)

Abstract

:
In this study, we have undertaken the development of two fluorescent sensors based on calixarene compounds for the purpose of detecting cesium in water. By introducing the sulfonate functional groups, we have considerably improved the water solubility of sensors, enabling complete dissolution of products in aqueous media and direct analysis of polluted water samples. Through rigorous experiments, we have demonstrated that the complexation of Cs+ ions with sensors 1 and 2 in water leads to a remarkable enhancement of fluorescence. This fluorescence enhancement serves as a reliable indication of cesium presence and allows for sensitive detection. To further advance the practical application of our sensors, we have successfully integrated calixarene sensors 1 and 2 into a microfluidic sensor chip. This integration has enabled real-time, on-line measurements and has resulted in the development of a portable detection device capable of detecting cesium ions in water samples at parts per billion (ppb) levels. This device holds great promise for environmental monitoring and assessment, providing a convenient and efficient solution for cesium detection. Our work represents a significant advancement in the field of cesium detection, displaying the efficacy of calixarene-based fluorescent sensors and their integration into microfluidic systems. The enhanced water solubility, fluorescence response, and portability of our detection device offers tremendous potential for applications in environmental monitoring, water quality assessment, and emergency response scenarios where rapid and accurate cesium detection is crucial.

1. Introduction

Cesium, although relatively scarce on Earth with an abundance ranking of 45th and a concentration of 3 ppm in the Earth’s crust [1], exhibits a remarkable array of properties that render it captivating for a wide range of scientific applications. These properties include its electropositive nature, ductility as metal, large atomic radius, and high alkalinity. Notably, cesium’s applications encompass the efficient conversion of solar energy in perovskite compounds [2], the improvement of timing accuracy in atomic clocks [3], or even the treatment of cancers within the field of medicine [4].
The radioactive isotopes 134Cs (t1/2 = 2.1 years) and 137Cs (t1/2 = 30 years), generated through uranium, thorium, or polonium fission, represent highly toxic substances in terms of both biochemical and radioactive properties, and they constitute nuclear waste. The Fukushima nuclear power plant accident, triggered by the Tohoku tsunami in March 2011, resulted in a substantial release of radioactive materials, including cesium, into the environment. This event elevated concerns regarding cesium contamination in the anthroposphere. Cesium’s biochemical toxicity stems from its ability to replace potassium in muscles and red blood cells, potentially leading to cardiac and carcinogenic diseases [5]. Furthermore, cesium serves as a chemical tracer in thermal reactors, such as those in nuclear power plants [6]. Consequently, the detection of trace amounts of cesium has garnered significant interest.
The quantification of cesium levels can be achieved through various methods, including atomic absorption spectroscopy [7], inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry [8], and radioanalysis [9]. However, these techniques necessitate sophisticated and costly equipment. Consequently, the development of portable devices has become highly appealing in terms of cost-effectiveness and ease of use. Promising approaches involve leveraging techniques such as electrochemistry [10], colorimetric detection utilizing functionalized gold nanoparticles and Prussian blue [11], on-chip microplasma [12], and field-effect transistors (EG-FET) [13]. Notably, a recent study has demonstrated the utilization of fluorescent CsPbBr3 perovskite immobilized in an ionic liquid membrane for low-cost sensing purposes [14].
In this particular context, the utilization of fluorescent sensors [15,16] offers numerous advantages in terms of sensitivity, selectivity, and response time. In the detection of Cs+ ions, multiple fluorescent molecular probes have been documented in the scientific literature [17,18,19,20,21] with the calixarene biscrown ether [22,23,24,25,26,27,28] being identified as the most efficient. Previously, we presented the synthesis, binding characteristics, and photophysical properties of a calix [4]arene-bis(crown-6-ether) incorporating a dioxycoumarin fluorophore within both crowns [29]. Additionally, a water-soluble analogue, containing sulfonate groups, has demonstrated intriguing complexing properties for cesium, exhibiting exceptional selectivity toward Li+, Mg2+, Ca2+, and Na+ ions [30]. These compounds are also K+ selective when the ratio of stability constants is greater than 500. Expanding upon this investigation, we have further integrated conjugation-extended coumarin units into the calix [4]arene framework, which exhibit a significantly larger Stokes shift when compared to the conventional coumarin fluorophore [14].
In our pursuit of fluorescent sensor development, various configurations have been explored [31,32,33,34,35,36]. Our long-standing approach involves combining a specific molecular fluorescent sensor with a microfluidic device, which has yielded successful results in previous studies targeting heavy metal detection (lead [37], mercury [38]). These achievements were accomplished using microfluidic chips that were efficiently filled with both the analyte and fluorescent molecular sensors via a syringe pump. In the previous case, since our fluorescent probes were not soluble in water, we have performed the measurements by using an organo-aqueous solvent, typically a mixture of acetonitrile and water.
Continuing our ongoing program aimed at continuous cesium detection in water, our current focus is on the development of a novel microfluidic device for on-line cesium detection. To achieve this, we have employed the calixarene-based fluorescent sensors 1 and 2 (Figure 1). In this manuscript, we present the photophysical properties of these fluorescent sensors alongside the details of our microfluidic setup. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of their sensing performance specifically tailored for cesium detection.
By integrating the calixarene-based fluorescent sensors into our microfluidic device, we aim to establish a robust and efficient system for real-time, on-line cesium detection in water. This approach not only offers enhanced sensitivity and selectivity but also enables continuous monitoring, overcoming the limitations of conventional detection methods. The presented results highlight the promising potential of our integrated system for applications in environmental monitoring, water quality assessment, and other relevant fields requiring continuous cesium detection capabilities.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Salts

The calixarene-based fluorescent sensor 1 was synthesized according to the previous procedure [30] by the chlorosulfonylation of a calixarene coumarin crown compound followed by hydrolysis of the chlorosulfonyl groups.
NMR 1H (300 MHz, (D2O)) 2.45 (6H, m, CH3), 3.15–3.35 (8H, m), 3.60–3.75 (8H, m), 3.75–3.85 (4H, m), 3.88–3.96 (4H, m), 4.07 (8H, br s), 4.11–4.27 (8H, m), 6.23 (2H, s), 7.03 (2H, s), 7.29 (2H, s), 7.60 (8H, s);
NMR 13C (75 MHz, D2O) 18.9 (CH3), 37.7 (Ar–CH2–Ar); 69.1, 69.5, 69.7, 69.8, 70.4, 70.9, 71.0 (O–CH2); 103.0, 111.3 (CHar); 113.3 (Cq), 114.5, 127.5 (CHar); 134.6, 134.7, 138.3, 138.4, 146.0, 150.4, 154.1, 157.5, 159.2, 162.2, 165.9 (Cq);
MSm/z (ESI2): 724.9 ([M–2Na]22), 475.6 ([M–3Na]32), 351.0 ([M–4Na]42).
The synthesis of the compound 2 was performed according to [39] with the iodination of Calix-COU-Sulf 1 with NIS and TFA in a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of acetonitrile and methanol followed by Sonogashira cross-coupling reactions between the iodo calixarene and phenylacethylene compound in the presence of CuI and Pd(PPh3)4.
NMR 1H (400 MHz, MeOD): δ (ppm) 7.63 (s, 8Hcalix), 7.59–7.57 (m, 4H, CHar), 7.39–7.38 (m, 6H, CHar), 7.23 (s, 2H, CHcoumarine), 6.99 (s, 2H, CHcoumarine), 4.30–4.23 (m, 16H, OCH2), 3.92–3.86 (m, 24H, CH2 + OCH2), 2.76 (s, 6H, CH3).
NMR 13C-DEPT-135 (100 MHz, MeOD): δ (ppm) 131.34 (CHar), 129.29 (CHar), 128.69 (CHar), 126.79 (CHar), 111.51 (CHar), 102.15 (CHar), 70.74 (OCH2), 70.53 (2OCH2), 70.31 (OCH2), 69.97 (OCH2), 69.87 (OCH2), 69.31 (OCH2), 69.26 (OCH2), 37.17 (CH2), 18.83 (CH3).
HMRS (TOF MS ES+): found: [M−3Na]3− = 542.4223; Calc. for C80H68Na4O28S4 [M−2Na]2− = 542.4225.
The cesium, potassium, lithium, calcium, and magnesium salts used in our study and obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Quentin Fallavier, France were of the highest quality ‘99.99% metal basis’ available and were vacuum dried over P2O5 before use.

2.2. Spectroscopic Measurements

The UV/V absorption spectra was acquired in a 1 cm optical length quartz cuvette using a double-beam Varian Cary 5000 spectrophotometer (Les Ulis, France) equipped with deuterated/halogen lamps. Corrected emission spectra was obtained utilizing a Jobin–Yvon Spex FluoroMax (Palaiseau, France) spectrofluorometer with a xenon light source. A right-angle configuration was used. To determine the fluorescence quantum yields, quinine sulfate dihydrate in 0.5 N sulfuric acid was employed as a standard with a known quantum yield (ΦF = 0.546) [40]. It is important to note that the estimated experimental error associated with these measurements was less than 10%. During emission measurements, strict precautions were taken to maintain accuracy. The absorbance at the excitation wavelength was deliberately kept below 0.1, ensuring that any potential interference or self-absorption effects were minimized. Titration experiments were performed by adding a cesium solution to the ligand 1 and 2. The complexation constants were determined via global analysis of the evolution of all absorption and/or emission spectra using the Specfit Global Analysis System V3.0 for the 32-bit Windows system. This software uses singular value decomposition and non-linear regression modelling via the Levenberg–Marquardt method.

2.3. Microfluidic Device

The device depicted in Figure 2 represents a significant component of our experimental setup. It comprised a Y-shaped microchannel fabricated from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) obtained from Dow Corning, which was affixed to a glass substrate (standard microscope slide measuring 50 mm long × 25 mm wide) [37]. The microchannel dimension was typically 200 μm wide and 100 μm high. To facilitate effective mixing of the fluorescent probe solution and cesium solution, a passive mixer with ridges 60 μm wide and 30 μm high, analogous to that described by Stroock et al. [41], was incorporated into the device. The microfluidic circuit was continuously supplied with pressurized water (0.4 bar) from a dedicated tank, utilizing capillaries with an inner diameter of 250 µm. Each channel of the circuit was equipped with a flow regulator (Bronkhorst μ-FLOW L01) to precisely control the flow rates at the circuit inlets (0.65 mL/h). Injection of the probe and cesium solutions was achieved using valves equipped with 750 µm inner diameter injection loops (Upchurch V451). The concentration of the probes 1 and 2 in water were fixed at 4 µM.
To excite the fluorescent probes, an SMA connectorized LED emitting at a wavelength of 365 nm (UVLED365-10E, Optoprim, Vanves, France) was employed. The excitation light was filtered using an optical filter with a 10 nm bandwidth centered at 370 nm (Semrock FF01-370/10-25, Optoprim, Vanves, France). A fused silica ball lens was utilized to focus the light beam onto an optical fiber. The optical fiber, connected to the LED via an SMA optical connector, was inserted into the PDMS circuit in close proximity to the microfluidic channel. To enable heterodyne detection of the fluorescence, the LED was supplied with square signals at a frequency of 77 Hz by a low-frequency generator [37].
Fluorescent light was collected using a Thorlabs FT100UMT fiber (core size 1000 µm, bandwidth 300–1200 nm, numerical aperture 0.39) and directed through a high-pass filter (Semrock FF01-550/200-25, Optoprim, Vanves, France) positioned at the entrance of the photomultiplier tube (Hamamatsu H10722-210, Hamamatsu, Massy, France). The voltage signal generated was then routed to a lock-in amplifier (Signal Recovery 7265 DSP, Hi-Tech DETECTION SYSTEMS, Massy, France) and acquired on a computer via an RS232 bus. The recorded voltage signal typically reached approximately 100 millivolts, considerably exceeding the signal-to-noise ratio of one, ensuring reliable and accurate measurements.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Complexing Properties with Cesium

Prior to fabricating the microfluidic sensor, an assessment was conducted to examine the complexing properties of compound 2 and a comparative analysis was conducted with the results obtained for compound 1 (Figure 3). Similar to compound 1, the introduction of cesium ions led to a bathochromic shift of 8 nm in the absorption spectra, which manifested as the emergence of an isobestic point observed at 374 nm. Such effect can be attributed to the interaction of the bound cation with the oxygen of the coumarin. In comparison to Calix-COU-Sulf 1, the absorbance exhibited only a marginal increase. This observation can be attributed to the screening effect stemming from the presence of sulfonate functional groups [30].
Through meticulous analysis of the absorption spectra of compound 2, utilizing the SPECFIT program, it was discerned that successive formation of 1:1 and 2:1 (metal to ligand) complexes with cesium ion occurred. This observation aligns with the presence of two binding crown-ether complexation sites within 2. The stability constants K11 and K12 for these complexes are determined by employing the following equations:
M + L M L K 11 = [ M L ] M [ L ]
M + M L M 2 L K 21 = [ M 2 L ] M L [ M ] .
While the overall binding constant β21 can be defined as
2 M + L M 2 L β 21 = [ M 2 L ] [ M ] 2 L .
The stability constants of the complexes of Cs+ with 2 were determined to be Log K11 = 4.22 ± 0.02 and Log K21 = 3.91 ± 0.07 (Table 1). These values are consistent with those observed for compound 1 and other calixarene-based cesium fluorescent sensors [25], indicating comparable binding capabilities. The ratio of K21/K11 is 0.49, indicating equivalent complexation sites. Such an effect is observed because of the participation of the sulfonate group on the complexation. Figure 4 presents the speciation diagrams depicting the formation of species resulting from the assay. As shown in Figure 4, at low cation concentrations, only complex 1 to 1 is formed, while complex 2 to 1 is formed at higher concentrations. In order to form 90% of the complex M2L, the concentration of Cs+ has to be 2 mM.
It should be noted that both compound 1 and 2 exhibits high fluorescence efficiency, and the fluorescence quantum yield is around 0.4 for both compounds. Since these compounds have a high molar extinction coefficient, the brightness defined as ФF × ε is high for 1 and 2, which is a significant advantage for sensor applications.
Similar to compound 1, the addition of cesium induces an increase in fluorescence intensity without causing a shift in the spectra. The fluorescence enhancement exhibits linearity within the concentration range of 0 to 50 µM cesium, with an overall twofold increase. Notably, the fluorescence response ΔIF of compound 2 is less pronounced compared to compound 1. Detailed data are reported in Table 1.

3.2. Microfluidic Device

The implementation of microfluidics for the fluorescence-based detection of heavy metals in water offers significant advantages, including low sensor molecule consumption, portability of the device, and high sensitivity and selectivity. In our previous approaches, both the analyte and sensor solutions were continuously flowing and mixing within the system. The complexation of the sensor with the analyte led to a noticeable change in the fluorescent signal, which was detected at the flow endpoint. However, this configuration relied on syringe pumps, requiring manual manipulation to change the solutions in the syringes and increase the risk of fluorescent sensor adsorption onto the microfluidic system walls.
In our ongoing program focused on the continuous detection of cesium in water, we are exploring the use of an injection loop configuration. This approach ensures a continuous flow by applying pressure upstream and utilizing a regulated flow meter. Since our fluorescent probes 1 and 2 are completely soluble in water, we can use them without cosolvents (acetonitrile, methanol). Thus, the analyte and sensor solutions are injected into the system through an injection loop and pushed at a controlled flow rate through the microdevice (0.5–1 mL/h for each solution). Notably, the microdevice is solely traversed by water flowing at the same rate, enhancing the system’s longevity. The setup is depicted in Figure 2.
To supply pressure to the microfluidic chip, we employ a configuration that offers several advantages. Two capillaries are immersed in a tank of ultra-pure water, subjected to an air pressure of 0.4 bar, enabling the precise delivery of water to the two input channels of the microsystem. The flow rates in each channel are carefully regulated using flow regulators, ensuring optimal control.
Additionally, each channel incorporates a two-position valve, commonly utilized in chromatography, facilitating the injection of the probe 1 or 2 and analyte solutions. This setup has notable benefits, including limited contact of the chemicals with the PDMS channels solely during the measurement process, effectively preventing adsorption issues on the microchannel walls. Consequently, the chip remains consistently clean, significantly extending its lifespan.
The measurement time is meticulously optimized by adjusting the length of the injection loop. This optimization strikes a balance between obtaining prompt results and acquiring sufficient statistical data, thereby enhancing result reliability and improving the signal-to-noise ratio.
Upon mixing with the passive mixer, the complexation of the ligand with the analyte occurs within the microchannel. The resulting fluorescence signal is then collected at its end of the microfluidic channel. Moreover, the solution is excited perpendicularly to the microchannel using an LED (365 nm), achieved through an optical fiber embedded in the PDMS. Finally, the emission is collected at a 90° angle through an optical fiber connected to a photomultiplier tube (PMT) with a high-pass filter.
The signal obtained has a profile of an asymmetrical plateau whose level depends on the intensity of the measured fluorescence (see Figure 5). According to the diameter of the capillaries, the theoretical plateau is shown in blue in Figure 5 starting at t1 = 45 s and finishing at t2 = 45 + 610 s. The obtained signal rises for 150 s and reaches the plateau during 300 s. The signal then decreases slowly to reach the initial value of the noise due to the flow of pure water.
The shape and the duration of each sequence (stage) depend primarily on the geometry of the microfluidic channels and on the flow rates. The profiles are heavily caused by axial and radial dispersion phenomena. Indeed, the axial elongation of the flow due to the laminar Poiseuille flow coupled to the radial diffusion of the products due to their concentration gradient causes the Taylor dispersion phenomenon [42]. This phenomenon is important in cylindrical tubes whereas it becomes negligible in the area of PDMS microfluidic system because of the herringbone structures and the relatively large Peclet number.
The stability of the system was comprehensively assessed, and the findings, illustrated in Figure 6, demonstrate its complete reversibility. The relative errors for the signal of the ligand 2 and the ligand 2 complexed with Cs+ (20 µM) is less than 0.8%. It is also interesting to note that, thanks to the lock-in detection, the signal-over-noise ratio is very good (S/N > 50). Remarkably, the system promptly returns to its initial level by simply adjusting the concentration of cesium. This reversible behavior highlights the robustness and reliability of the system, emphasizing its potential for the precise and controlled detection of cesium.
In order to detect cesium, the detection process involved the utilization of probe sensors 1 and 2. The concentration of the probe solution was carefully selected based on the targeted cesium content for detection. The injection loops’ “probe” and “cesium” channels (see Figure 7) were supplied with either the probe solution and cesium solutions of known concentrations to establish a calibration curve or with the probe solution and the analyte effluent obtained from the bypass circuit. This approach facilitated the assessment of fluorescence changes upon the addition of various cesium concentrations. As previously observed in the cuvette, a significant enhancement of the fluorescence emission is observed upon complexation with cesium.
The sensitivity of compounds 1 and 2 towards Cs+ ions was assessed following the established standard protocol as described in previous studies [43]. The detection limit was determined based on the generated calibration curve (Figure 7b) using Equation (1), as outlined below.
D L = K × σ / S
where K = 3 is the detection factor for the detection limit, σ is the standard deviation of the blank, and S is the slope of the calibration curve.
The standard deviation of the blank has been calculated with sufficient data measurements (100 points)
In an aqueous solution, the detection limit for compound 1 was determined to be 153 nM (21 ppb), while for compound 2 it was found to be 205 nM (28 ppb). Notably, the detection limit achieved in our microfluidic circuit was lower than that in conventional spectrofluorimeters, thanks to the improved signal-to-noise ratio of our detection device. To the best of our knowledge, this water-soluble sensor stands among the most sensitive sensors reported in the literature [10].

4. Conclusions

In this study, we have successfully designed and developed a sensor for cesium ion detection. The sensor utilizes molecular fluorescent probes based on calixarene crowns functionalized with coumarins, which exhibit high fluorescence intensity (ΦF > 0.3). Upon complexation with cesium in water, these probes undergo significant changes in their photophysical properties, including absorption and fluorescence. Analysis of the assay curves revealed the formation of two complexes with stoichiometries of 1:1 and 2:1 (M:L), with high stability constants (>104) accompanied by a remarkable enhancement in fluorescence. The detection limit has been found to be 600 nM for both compounds in the cuvette.
To enable practical applications, we developed a microfluidic device that incorporates these fluorescent probes and facilitates continuous feeding for analysis. The device demonstrated excellent sensitivity in detecting cesium in water, with detection limits of 153 nM for compound 1 and 205 nM for compound 2. These results are highly promising and suggest the potential for integrating such sensors into portable devices, enabling rapid and cost-effective monitoring of Cs+ in water.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-P.L., J.D. and I.L.; methodology, A.D. and L.J.; validation, C.M. and R.G.; investigation, A.D., L.J. and V.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.D. and L.J.; writing—review and editing, C.M., J.-P.L. and I.L.; visualization, R.G.; supervision, I.L.; project administration, J.D.; funding acquisition, J.D. and I.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge EDF for funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Turekian, K.K.; Wedepohl, K.H. Distribution of the Elements in Some Major Units of the Earth’s Crust. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1961, 72, 175–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yuan, S.; Chen, D.; Li, X.; Zhong, J.; Xu, X. In Situ Crystallization Synthesis of CsPbBr(3) Perovskite Quantum Dot-Embedded Glasses with Improved Stability for Solid-State Lighting and Random Upconverted Lasing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 18918–18926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Campbell, G.K.; Phillips, W.D. Ultracold atoms and precise time standards. Philos Trans. A Math Phys. Eng. Sci. 2011, 369, 4078–4089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Murphy, M.K.; Piper, R.K.; Greenwood, L.R.; Mitch, M.G.; Lamperti, P.J.; Seltzer, S.M.; Bales, M.J.; Phillips, M.H. Evaluation of the new cesium-131 seed for use in low-energy x-ray brachytherapy. Med. Phys. 2004, 31, 1529–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Melnikov, P.; Zanoni, L.Z. Clinical effects of cesium intake. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2010, 135, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Svane, M.; Hagström, M.; Davidsson, K.O.; Boman, J.; Pettersson, J.B.C. Cesium as a Tracer for Alkali Processes in a Circulating Fluidized Bed Reactor. Energy Fuels 2006, 20, 979–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Groll, H.; Schnürer-Patschan, C.; Kuritsyni, Y.; Niemax, K. Wavelength modulation diode laser atomic absorption spectrometry in analytical flames. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 1994, 49, 1463–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ohno, T.; Muramatsu, Y. Determination of radioactive cesium isotope ratios by triple quadrupole ICP-MS and its application to rainwater following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2014, 29, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Thornton, B.; Ohnishi, S.; Ura, T.; Odano, N.; Fujita, T. Continuous measurement of radionuclide distribution off Fukushima using a towed sea-bed gamma ray spectrometer. Deep. Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2013, 79, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cyniak, J.S.; Kocobolska, L.; Bojdecka, N.; Gajda-Walczak, A.; Kowalczyk, A.; Wagner, B.; Nowicka, A.M.; Sakurai, H.; Kasprzak, A. Synthesis of pi-extended and bowl-shaped sumanene-ferrocene conjugates and their application in highly selective and sensitive cesium cations electrochemical sensors. Dalton Trans. 2023, 52, 3137–3147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fu, J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, S.L.; Yuan, W.L.; Zhang, G.H.; Zhu, Q.H.; Chen, H.; He, L.; Tao, G.H. Ultralow-cost portable device for cesium detection via perovskite fluorescence. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 425, 127981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Joffrion, J.B.; Mills, D.; Clower, W.; Wilson, C.G. On-Chip Microplasmas for the Detection of Radioactive Cesium Contamination in Seawater. Micromachines 2017, 8, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Qiu, J.; Fu, L.; Wang, H.; Zou, R.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Wu, A. Colorimetric detection of Cs+ based on the nonmorphological transition mechanism of gold nanoparticles in the presence of Prussian blue. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 2241–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nguy, T.P.; Kilinc, V.; Hayakawa, R.; Henry-de-Villeneuve, C.; Raimundo, J.-M.; Wakayama, Y.; Charrier, A. Affinity driven ion exchange EG-OFET sensor for high selectivity and low limit of detection of cesium in seawater. Sens. Actuators B 2022, 351, 130956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khan, S.A.; Alam, M.Z.; Mohasin, M.; Ahmad, S.; Salma, U.; Parveen, H.; Mukhtar, S.; Al-Anazi, M.; Alotaibi, F.A.; Abdelaziz, M.A. Ultrasound-Assisted Synthesis of Chalcone: A Highly Sensitive and Selective Fluorescent Chemosensor for the Detection of Fe(3+) in Aqueous Media. J. Fluoresc. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, D.; Sedgwick, A.C.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Akkaya, E.U.; Yoon, J.; James, T.D. Fluorescent chemosensors: The past, present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 7105–7123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kumar, N.; Leray, I.; Depauw, A. Chemically derived optical sensors for the detection of cesium ions. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 310, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guria, U.N.; Mahapatra, A.K.; Ghosh, A.K.; Bindal, R.C. Fluorescent chemosensor for lethal cesium detection using thin film membrane. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 1687–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ji, H.F.; Dabestani, R.; Brown, G.M. A supramolecular fluorescent probe, activated by protons to detect cesium and potassium ions, mimics the function of a logic gate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9306–9307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Seo, H.S.; Karim, M.M.; Lee, S.H. Selective fluorimetric recognition of cesium ion by 15-crown-5-anthracene. J. Fluoresc. 2008, 18, 853–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Radaram, B.; Mako, T.; Levine, M. Sensitive and selective detection of cesium via fluorescence quenching. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 16276–16278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kilinc, V.; Henry-de-Villeneuve, C.; Nguy, T.P.; Wakayama, Y.; Charrier, A.M.; Raimundo, J.M. Novel and Innovative Interface as Potential Active Layer in Chem-FET Sensor Devices for the Specific Sensing of Cs(). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 47635–47641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jung, S.H.; Park, J.S.; Choi, Y.; Kim, S.K.; Jung, J.H. Calix[4]arene-based fluorescent probe and the adsorption capacity of its electrospun nanofibrous film for the cesium cation as an adsorbent. Supramol. Chem. 2016, 29, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Choi, Y.; Kim, H.; Lee, J.K.; Lee, S.H.; Lim, H.B.; Kim, J.S. Cesium ion-selective electrodes based on 1,3-alternate thiacalix 4 biscrown-6,6. Talanta 2004, 64, 975–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chitry, F.; Pellet-Rostaing, S.; Nicod, L.; Gass, J.L.; Foos, J.; Guy, A.; Lemaire, M. New cesium-selective hydrophilic ligands: UV measures of their interactions toward Cs and Cs/Na separation by nanofiltration complexation. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 4121–4128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. ArnaudNeu, F.; Asfari, Z.; Souley, B.; Vicens, J. Binding properties of calix[4]-bis-crowns towards alkali cations. New J. Chem. 1996, 20, 453–463. [Google Scholar]
  27. Benco, J.S.; Nienaber, H.A.; Dennen, K.; McGimpsey, W.G. A fluoroionophore for detection of potassium ions: 9-anthryl-substituted azacrown ether covalently linked to a 1,3-alternate calix[4]arene. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2002, 152, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, S.K.; Sessler, J.L.; Gross, D.E.; Lee, C.H.; Kim, J.S.; Lynch, V.M.; Delmau, L.H.; Hay, B.P. A Calix[4]arene Strapped Calix[4]pyrrole: An Ion-Pair Receptor Displaying Three Different Cesium Cation Recognition Modes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5827–5836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Leray, I.; Asfari, Z.; Vicens, J.; Valeur, B. Photophysics of calix 4 biscrown-based ditopic receptors of caesium containing one or two dioxocoumarin fluorophores. J. Fluoresc. 2004, 14, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Souchon, V.; Leray, I.; Valeur, B. Selective detection of cesium by a water-soluble fluorescent molecular sensor based on a calix 4 arene-bis(crown-6-ether). Chem. Commun. 2006, 4224–4226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, R.; Wang, X. Sensing of inorganic ions in microfluidic devices. Sens. Actuators B 2021, 329, 129171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gómez-Hens, A.; Fernández-Romero, J.M. Microfluidic Systems in Analytical Chemistry. Encycl. Anal. Chem. 2017, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lafleur, J.P.; Senkbeil, S.; Jensen, T.G.; Kutter, J.P. Gold nanoparticle-based optical microfluidic sensors for analysis of environmental pollutants. Lab Chip 2012, 12, 4651–4656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Johnson, R.D.; Gaualas, V.G.; Daunert, S.; Bachas, L.G. Microfluidic ion-sensing devices. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 613, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Basabe-Desmonts, L.; Benito-Lopez, F.; Gardeniers, H.; Duwel, R.; van den Berg, A.; Reinhoudt, D.N.; Crego-Calama, M. Fluorescent sensor array in a microfluidic chip. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 390, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, H.; Rao, B.A.; Jeong, J.W.; Mallick, S.; Kang, S.-M.; Choi, J.S.; Lee, C.-S.; Son, Y.-A. A highly selective dual-channel Cu2+ and Al3+ chemodosimeter in aqueous systems: Sensing in living cells and microfluidic flows. Sens. Actuators B 2015, 210, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, L.Y.; Wu, T.; Lefevre, J.P.; Leray, I.; Delaire, J.A. Fluorimetric lead detection in a microfluidic device. Lab. Chip. 2009, 9, 2818–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bell, J.; Climent, E.; Hecht, M.; Buurman, M.; Rurack, K. Combining a Droplet-Based Microfluidic Tubing System with Gated Indicator Releasing Nanoparticles for Mercury Trace Detection. ACS Sens. 2016, 1, 334–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Depauw, A.; Dossi, E.; Kumar, N.; Fiorini-Debuisschert, C.; Huberfeld, G.; Ha-Thi, M.H.; Rouach, N.; Leray, I. A Highly Selective Potassium Sensor for the Detection of Potassium in Living Tissues. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 14902–14911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Demas, J.N.; Crosby, G.A. Measurement of Photoluminescence Quantum Yields-Review. J. Phys. Chem. 1971, 75, 991–1024. [Google Scholar]
  41. Stroock, A.D.; Dertinger, S.K.; Ajdari, A.; Mezic, I.; Stone, H.A.; Whitesides, G.M. Chaotic mixer for microchannels. Science 2002, 295, 647–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Squires, T.M.; Quake, S.R. Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2005, 77, 977–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Loock, H.-P.; Wentzell, P.D. Detection limits of chemical sensors: Applications and misapplications. Sens. Actuators B 2012, 173, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of molecular probes 1 and 2.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of molecular probes 1 and 2.
Sensors 23 07826 g001
Figure 2. (a) Scheme of the microfluidic device for on-line detection of Cs+; (b) photograph of the complete detection system.
Figure 2. (a) Scheme of the microfluidic device for on-line detection of Cs+; (b) photograph of the complete detection system.
Sensors 23 07826 g002
Figure 3. Progressive changes in the absorption (a) and emission (b) spectra of compound 2 (2.4 μM) upon the introduction of cesium acetate in water (0 to 1.2 mM of Cs+ from red to blue). The inset of (b) displays a calibration curve, highlighting the correlation between cesium concentration and fluorescence intensity (λexc = 405 nm, λem = 450 nm).
Figure 3. Progressive changes in the absorption (a) and emission (b) spectra of compound 2 (2.4 μM) upon the introduction of cesium acetate in water (0 to 1.2 mM of Cs+ from red to blue). The inset of (b) displays a calibration curve, highlighting the correlation between cesium concentration and fluorescence intensity (λexc = 405 nm, λem = 450 nm).
Sensors 23 07826 g003
Figure 4. Calculated speciation diagram of 2 (2.4 µM) and its 1:1 and 2:1 complexes with Cs+ from the titration curve and the binding constant extracted from data presented in Figure 2 using Equations (1) and (2).
Figure 4. Calculated speciation diagram of 2 (2.4 µM) and its 1:1 and 2:1 complexes with Cs+ from the titration curve and the binding constant extracted from data presented in Figure 2 using Equations (1) and (2).
Sensors 23 07826 g004
Figure 5. Fluorescence profile inside the microfluidic chip upon the addition of 2 (4 µM).
Figure 5. Fluorescence profile inside the microfluidic chip upon the addition of 2 (4 µM).
Sensors 23 07826 g005
Figure 6. Sequential injection of compound 2 samples (1.84 µM). The sensor alone exhibits the low-level signal, while sensor + Cs+ represents the highest level (20 µM). This sequential injection approach demonstrates the system’s sensitivity and reversibility.
Figure 6. Sequential injection of compound 2 samples (1.84 µM). The sensor alone exhibits the low-level signal, while sensor + Cs+ represents the highest level (20 µM). This sequential injection approach demonstrates the system’s sensitivity and reversibility.
Sensors 23 07826 g006
Figure 7. (a) Variation of the measured fluorescence intensity of 1 (4 µM) at the output of the microfluidic circuit for different concentrations of cesium acetate; (b) calibration curve for the determination of Cs+ ions by 1 (4 µM) in H2O. The error bar represents the standard deviation.
Figure 7. (a) Variation of the measured fluorescence intensity of 1 (4 µM) at the output of the microfluidic circuit for different concentrations of cesium acetate; (b) calibration curve for the determination of Cs+ ions by 1 (4 µM) in H2O. The error bar represents the standard deviation.
Sensors 23 07826 g007
Table 1. Photophysical and complexing properties of 1 and 2.
Table 1. Photophysical and complexing properties of 1 and 2.
12
Log K114.10 ± 0.044.22 ± 0.02
Log K213.82 ± 0.053.91 ± 0.07
K21/K110.50.49
ε (M−1.cm−1)21,00037,500
ΦF0.390.43
ΔIFexc)2.5 (365 nm)2 (405 nm)
LOD (µM)0.60.6
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Depauw, A.; Jonusauskaite, L.; Ghasemi, R.; Lefevre, J.-P.; Mongin, C.; Génot, V.; Delaire, J.; Leray, I. A Highly Sensitive and Selective Optical Sensor for the On-Line Detection of Cesium in Water. Sensors 2023, 23, 7826. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23187826

AMA Style

Depauw A, Jonusauskaite L, Ghasemi R, Lefevre J-P, Mongin C, Génot V, Delaire J, Leray I. A Highly Sensitive and Selective Optical Sensor for the On-Line Detection of Cesium in Water. Sensors. 2023; 23(18):7826. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23187826

Chicago/Turabian Style

Depauw, Alexis, Laura Jonusauskaite, Rasta Ghasemi, Jean-Pierre Lefevre, C. Mongin, Valérie Génot, Jacques Delaire, and Isabelle Leray. 2023. "A Highly Sensitive and Selective Optical Sensor for the On-Line Detection of Cesium in Water" Sensors 23, no. 18: 7826. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23187826

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop