Next Article in Journal
Cable Monitoring Using Broadband Power Line Communication
Previous Article in Journal
RSS/TDoA-Based Source Localization in Microwave UWB Sensors Networks Using Two Anchor Nodes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A New Optical Configuration for the Surface Encoder with an Expanded Z-Directional Measuring Range

1
Precision Nanometrology Laboratory, Department of Finemechanics, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8579, Japan
2
Division of Mechanical and Space Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2022, 22(8), 3010; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22083010
Submission received: 18 March 2022 / Revised: 8 April 2022 / Accepted: 11 April 2022 / Published: 14 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Optical Sensors)

Abstract

:
This paper proposes a new optical configuration for a two-axis surface encoder that can measure the in-plane (X-axis) and out-of-plane (Z-axis) displacements of a positioning stage. The two-axis surface encoder is composed of a scale grating and a sensor head. A transparent grating is employed in the sensor head for measurement of the Z-directional displacement of the scale grating based on the Fizeau-type measurement method; a reference beam reflected from the transparent grating and the zeroth-order diffracted beam from the scale grating are superimposed to generate an interference signal. A pair of prisms and a beam splitter are also employed in the sensor head, so that the positive and negative first-order diffracted beams can be superimposed over a long working distance to generate an interference signal for measurement of the X-directional displacement of the scale grating. Focusing on the new, extended Z-directional measurement mechanism, proof-of-principle experiments were carried out to verify the feasibility of the proposed optical configuration for the surface encoder that can measure the uni-directional displacements of a scale grating along the X- and Z-axis. Experimental results from the developed optical configuration demonstrated the achievement of a Z-directional measuring range of ±1.5 mm.

1. Introduction

Machine tools and measuring instruments are required to be improved for the miniaturization of semiconductor devices and for the improvement in the fabrication accuracy of optical elements. Precision stage systems are often employed in such machine tools and measuring instruments for precision positioning [1,2,3,4]. A nanometric resolution, as well as high throughput capability, is necessary for such a positioning stage used in ultra-precision applications [5,6,7]. In the closed-loop control of a positioning stage, the accuracy and resolution of the positioning are greatly influenced by the performance of displacement sensors employed in the positioning system [8,9,10,11]. Therefore, such displacement sensors are expected to have a high resolution, as well as a large measuring range.
Laser interferometers and linear encoders are widely used for the measurement of the position of a linear stage [12,13,14,15]. A laser interferometer is vulnerable to environmental factors since its optical path is proportional to its measuring range. For high-precision measurement, it is thus necessary to strictly control the air pressure, temperature and humidity [16,17,18]. In contrast, the optical path of a linear encoder is proportional to the distance between its scale grating surface and its sensor head, which is quite small compared to that of a laser interferometer, and thus a linear encoder is expected to be more stable under environmental disturbances [19]. However, due to the limited working distance of a linear encoder, a laser interferometer-based measuring system is often employed for the measurement of multi-axis displacement of a positioning stage [20,21,22]. In such a measurement system, consisting of multiple interferometers, it is sometimes difficult to align the motion axis of a positioning stage with the measurement axis of a displacement sensor due to restrictions emanating from the mechanical structure of the system; this results in a measurement error called Abbe error [20,23]. In the case where the distance between the motion axis of the stage and the measurement axis of the displacement sensor is long, the reading of the displacement sensor could be seriously affected by Abbe error. This is a problem that cannot be ignored when carrying out nanometric measurement of stage displacement. In addition, multi-axis laser interferometer-based measuring systems tend to be large and complicated.
A better solution for measurement of a multi-axis stage system is to employ a surface encoder [24,25,26]. The surface encoder consists of an XY scale grating and a sensor head. The sensor head is equipped with an XY reference grating which has a grating pattern identical to that of the scale grating. Superposing the diffracted laser beams from these two gratings can generate interference signals that can be employed to measure the multi-axis displacement of the scale grating. The entire system can thus be simplified while also reducing the size of the optical sensor head. In addition, Abbe error can be avoided because there is only one measurement point [20,23]. A three-degrees-of-freedom (DOF) surface encoder capable of measuring X- and Y-directional in-plane displacements and Z-directional out-of-plane displacement has already been developed [24,25]. Furthermore, a six-DOF surface encoder has also been proposed [26] by combining a three-DOF displacement surface encoder and a three-DOF laser autocollimator [27] in such a way that they share the same measurement laser beam. Meanwhile, in these surface encoders, the measurement principle of the Z-directional displacement is based on the interference of the first-order diffracted beams from the scale grating and the reference grating; namely, it is based on the Michelson-type measurement method, whose non-common optical path is relatively longer than that of a common path measurement method such as Fizeau-type measurement methods [28,29]. A longer non-common optical path means that the sensor is more sensitive to environmental disturbances. Moreover, the Z-directional measuring range of the conventional surface encoder is limited to several hundred micrometers due to the nature of its optical design; when the scale grating moves along the Z-direction, the first-order diffracted beams shift with respect to the reference beam, making it difficult to overlap them with each other, and interference signals cannot be generated. Therefore, it is difficult to employ a conventional surface encoder for the measurement of a stage system whose Z-directional travel range exceeds the tiny Z-directional measuring range of the surface encoders.
In response to the background described above, in this paper, a Fizeau-type optical configuration for the surface encoder with an expanded out-of-plane Z-directional measuring range was newly designed and constructed. The surface encoder satisfied the measurement of the Z-directional out-of-plane displacement of a stage with a large measuring range. We describe the basic principle of the newly developed surface encoder, and the experiments carried out to verify the feasibility of the proposed method. It should be noted that the experiments described in this paper are for proof-of-principle, focusing on the new, extended Z-measurement mechanism in the proposed surface encoder. For the sake of simplicity, the surface encoder was designed to carry out measurement of uni-directional displacement of a scale grating in the Z- and X-directions by employing fewer optical components.

2. Design of the Two-Axis Surface Encoder

Figure 1 shows the optical design of the newly proposed surface encoder. It is composed of a sensor head and a scale grating. It uses a laser diode (LD, HL6750MG, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA) with a wavelength of 685 nm as the light source. The polarization state of the laser beam is adjusted to P-polarization with respect to a polarizing beam splitter (PBS, PBS-20-6700, Sigmakoki, Japan). The laser beam passes through the PBS and is transferred into a circularly polarized beam after passing through a quarter-wave plate (QWP, WPW-20C-4M-45/70, Sigmakoki, Japan), whose fast axis is set to 45 degrees with respect to the polarization direction of the incident laser beam. A transparent grating, with a line grating pattern with a period identical to that of the scale grating (1 μm), is employed in the sensor head. The transparent grating is fabricated using the same system as the scale grating, except it is not coated with chromium and reflective aluminum layers [25,30,31,32]. A part of the laser beam is reflected from the surface of the transparent grating, while the rest is projected onto the scale grating. The propagation directions of the first-order diffracted beams from the scale grating are aligned to be parallel with the zeroth-order diffracted beam, using the transparent grating. The polarization states of the diffracted beams, after passing through the QWP, become S-polarization, and then the diffracted beams are reflected by the PBS. Then, the diffracted beams enter a Δx-assembly and a Δz-assembly for measurement of the X- and Z-directional displacements Δx and Δz of the scale grating, respectively.
Figure 2a shows the schematic of the Δx-assembly extracted from Figure 1a, and Figure 2b shows its three-dimensional view. As can be seen in the figures, the positive and negative first-order diffracted beams are reflected at Prisms 1 and 2 (RPB2-10-550, Sigmakoki, Japan), respectively, to be superimposed on a beam splitter (BS, model: BSS10R, Thorlabs). A photodiode (PD1, S1336-44BQ, Hamamatsu Photonics, Shizuoka, Japan) is prepared to observe the interference signal generated as the consequence of superimposing the first-order diffracted beams.
The electric fields of the positive and negative first-order diffracted beams E±1 can be expressed by the following equation:
E ± 1 = A ± 1 exp i φ ± 1
where A±1 are the complex amplitudes, and φ±1 are the phase shifts that can be calculated as follows:
φ ± 1 = ± 2 π Δ x g + 2 π 1 + cos θ Δ z λ
where g, λ, θ are the period of the scale grating, the light wavelength of the laser and the diffraction angle of the first-order diffracted beams, respectively. Δx can be obtained by the interference signal generated by the positive and negative first-order diffracted beams. The electric field of the interference signal can be obtained as follows:
E x = E + 1 + E 1
Consequently, the intensity of the interference signal Ix observed by PD 1 can be calculated as the conjugated complex multiplication of Ex as follows:
I x = 1 2 E x E x ¯ = 1 2 A + 1 2 + A 1 2 + A + 1 A 1 cos 4 π g Δ x
The normalized AC component Sx of Ix can thus be obtained as follows:
S x = cos 4 π g Δ x
Finally, the X-directional displacement Δx can be obtained as follows:
Δ x = cos 1 S x g 4 π
Similarly, Δz can be obtained by the Δz-assembly. Figure 3a shows the schematic of the Δz-assembly extracted from Figure 1a, and Figure 3b shows its three-dimensional view. As can be seen in the figures, the zeroth-order diffracted beam from the scale grating and the reference beam reflected from the transparent grating are reflected at Prism 3 (RPB2-07-550, Sigmakoki, Japan). Then, the generated interference signal is detected by another photodiode (PD2, S1336-44BQ, Hamamatsu Photonics, Shizuoka, Japan).
Now, the electric fields of the zeroth-order diffracted beam from the scale grating and the reference beams E0 and Eref, respectively, can be expressed as follows:
E 0 = A 0 exp i φ 0
E ref = A ref
where A0 and Aref are the complex amplitude, and φ0 is the phase shift of E0 that can be expressed as follows:
φ 0 = 4 π Δ z λ
As can be seen in Equations (7) and (8), E0 will be affected by the Z-directional displacement of the scale grating, while Eref will not be affected. The electric field of the interference beam Ez, which is generated by superimposing the zeroth-order diffracted beam from the scale grating and the reference beam, can be expressed as follows:
E z = E 0 + E ref
Then, the intensity of the interference signal Iz can be obtained by:
I z = 1 2 E z E z ¯ = 1 2 A 0 2 + A ref 2 + A 0 A ref cos 4 π λ Δ z
The AC component of the interference signal Iz, denoted as Sz, can be expressed by the following equation:
S z = cos 4 π λ Δ z
Finally, Δz can be calculated as follows:
Δ z = cos 1 S z λ 4 π
Figure 4a shows the schematic of the conventional surface encoder where the first-order diffracted beams could be shifted when the scale grating is moved along the Z-direction. As can be seen in Figure 4a, the first-order diffracted beams from the scale grating shift with respect to the reference beam when the scale grating travels along the Z-axis, making it difficult to superimpose them on the PD unit and to generate interference signals. On the contrary, in the newly proposed surface encoder shown in Figure 4b, due to the symmetrical optical configuration of the first-order diffracted beams with respect to the beam splitter, the two diffracted beams still overlap and interfere with each other on PD 1. The working distance of the sensor head can thus be expanded; namely, the Z-directional measuring range can be expanded. In this setup, the main factors affecting the Z-directional measuring range are the sizes of the transparent grating, the PBS and the prisms. Moreover, as can be seen in Figure 4a, the non-common optical paths of the measurement beams and reference beams in the conventional surface encoder are relatively long. In contrast, in the newly proposed surface encoder shown in Figure 4b, the zeroth-order diffracted beam from the scale grating has almost the same optical path as the reference beam; the non-common optical path is only twice the distance between the scale grating and the transparent grating. The reduced non-common optical path is expected to improve the measurement resolution and stability of the surface encoder.
It should be noted that in this paper, attention was paid to the proposal of the optical configuration for the surface encoder to expand its Z-directional measuring range. To avoid losing the focus of the study, and for the sake of simplicity, the optical components for measurement of the bi-directional displacement, which were implemented in the conventional surface encoders [25,26], have thus been omitted in the newly proposed surface encoder.

3. Testing of the Prototype Two-Axis Surface Encoder

Figure 5a shows a schematic of the prototype sensor head for the proposed two-axis surface encoder. The size of the prototype sensor head was 110 mm (X) × 115 mm (Z) × 40 mm (Y). The LD unit was designed to have a laser diode with a light wavelength of 685 nm, a collimating lens with a focal length of 4.6 mm and an aperture with a diameter of 1 mm. A scale grating with a pitch of 1 µm over a length of 10 mm was fabricated based on the interference lithography, utilizing a dual-beam interferometer [25,30,31,32], and was used as the scale for the proposed surface encoder. A transparent grating fabricated using the same fabrication system as the scale grating was also employed. The initial working distance between the scale grating and the sensor head was designed to be 9 mm. Using the scale grating and the transparent grating together, the first-order diffracted beams, with an angle of diffraction of 43.24 degrees, were aligned to be parallel with the zeroth-order diffracted beam; this contributed to reducing the size of the sensor head. The beam splitter, with dimensions of 12 mm × 8 mm × 1 mm, was placed in the optical path of the first-order diffracted beams. Prisms 1 and 2, with dimensions of 10 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm, were placed symmetrically on both sides of the beam splitter. Figure 5b shows a photograph of the developed prototype sensor head.
Figure 6 shows the experimental setup constructed for the evaluation of the basic performance of the developed surface encoder. A 10 mm square scale grating was mounted on an XZ PZT stage (P-620.2CL, Physik Instrumente, GmbH, Kirchen, Germany), which was mounted on an XZ manual stage (TSD-602SDM, Sigmakoki, Japan). The XZ PZT stage was used to generate a displacement of the scale grating with a resolution of 0.2 nm over a travel range of 50 μm along the X- and Z-directions. Because of the short travel range of the XZ PZT stage, an XZ manual stage with a travel range of ±6.5 mm was employed to move the scale grating over a long distance to evaluate the measuring range of the developed surface encoder along the Z-axis. The sensor head was mounted on a Y manual stage (LV-642-1, Chuo Precision Industrial, Tokyo, Japan), which was used for adjusting the position of the sensor head in the Y-direction so that the laser beam could be projected onto the middle of the scale grating.
Experiments were carried out using the developed setup. At first, for the verification of the proposed principle for measurement of the two-axis displacements, the X- and Z-directional translational motions of the scale grating given by the XZ PZT stage were measured by the surface encoder. In the experiment, a displacement command was applied to the XZ PZT stage to move the scale grating continuously at a fixed speed of 400 nm/s along the X- and Z-directions, respectively. The displacements were calculated utilizing the interference signals obtained by the PDs. Data were collected at a sampling rate of 1 kHz. Figure 7 shows the results. The nonlinear error components are also indicated in the figure. These nonlinear errors are caused by interpolation errors, which are associated with the subdivision of the interference signal within one signal period. The peak-to-valley amplitudes of the periodic error component, corresponding to the interpolation errors, were evaluated to be approximately ±1 nm and ±15 nm in the measurements of the X- and Z-directional displacements, respectively. The periods of the observed interference signals (500 nm and 342.5 nm for the measurement of Δx and Δz, respectively), agreed well with those predicted from the theoretical equations. Interpolation errors can be caused by imperfections in optical elements, nonlinearities in signal processing systems such as analog circuits and AD converters, and alignment errors between the sensor head and the scale grating [33,34].
The crosstalk error of the prototype surface ender in each axis was investigated. Figure 8 shows the results. The interference signals IX and IZ were received simultaneously while the scale grating was made to travel along the X- and Z-directions by the XZ PZT stage. Figure 8a shows the variations in Δz when the scale grating was moved along the X-direction, which indicates the crosstalk error of the prototype surface encoder with respect to the X-directional translational motion. Similarly, Figure 8b shows the variations in Δx when the scale grating was moved along the Z-direction. It can be seen from Figure 8 that the crosstalk errors were approximately 13 nm and 20 nm with respect to the X- and Z-directional translational motions, respectively. Both the linear and nonlinear components were included in the crosstalk errors. The linear components of the crosstalk errors were considered to be caused by the misalignment between the axis of the sensor head and the axis of the scale grating, and the misalignment between the axis of the optical elements and the axis of the sensor head. Those linear components can be reduced by a more accurate alignment, as well as via a compensation process. Figure 9 shows the results of the nonlinear component of the crosstalk error after removing the linear component. It can be seen that the peak-to-valley amplitudes of the crosstalk error were 3 nm and 13 nm when the encoder was moved along the X- and Z-directions, respectively. Additionally, the nonlinear component of this crosstalk error showed a periodicity with respect to the movement of the scale grating. The crosstalk error component Δz showed the same period as that of the X-directional interference signal, which was half of the grating period g (=500 nm). Meanwhile, the crosstalk error component Δx had the same period as that of the Z-directional interference signal, which was half of the light wavelength λ (=342.5 nm).
Figure 10 shows a schematic of the experimental setup for testing the Z-directional measuring range of the surface encoder. In the experiments, the Z-directional offset Δwd in a step of 1 mm was given to the scale grating using the XZ manual stage. Compensations for the offset, amplitude and phase of the interference signals were carried out for measurements at each Z-position of the scale grating.
Figure 11 and Figure 12 show the results. As can be seen in the figures, there were no significant changes in the amplitudes of the interpolation errors and crosstalk errors when Δwd was applied to the scale grating; these results indicated that the change in the working distance of the sensor head over a range of ±1.5 mm did not affect the measurement of the X- and Z-directional displacements of the scale grating.

4. Conclusions

A new optical configuration for a surface encoder, capable of measuring the X-directional in-plane displacement and the Z-directional out-of-plane displacement of a scale grating has been proposed. To achieve a long Z-directional measuring range, a Fizeau-type measurement method, which uses the interference signal of the zeroth-order diffraction beam from the scale grating and the reference beam from the transparent grating, has been employed, while the X-directional displacement measurement has been realized through utilizing the interference signal of the positive and negative first-order diffracted beams. A prototype surface encoder, which has been designed with compact dimensions of 110 mm (X) × 115 mm (Z) × 40 mm (Y), has been constructed, and the feasibility of the proposed measurement method has been verified in experiments. Experimental results demonstrated that the developed surface encoder has good linearity for measurement of both the X- and Z-directional displacements, with interpolation errors of ±1 nm and ±15 nm, respectively. The peak-to-valley amplitudes of crosstalk errors were evaluated to be 13 nm and 20 nm in the Z- and X-directions, respectively. Through the experiments, it was revealed that the developed surface encoder had a Z-directional measuring range of ±1.5 mm, which has been expanded from that of the conventional surface encoder. It should be noted that although only the X-directional first-order diffracted beams were utilized in this prototype surface encoder, the Y-directional first-order diffracted beams are also available. They can be utilized to extend the proposed two-axis surface encoder to a three-axis surface encoder by adding a Δy-assembly, which is identical to the Δx-assembly, for measurement of Y-directional displacement. It should be noted that attention has been paid in this paper to the proposal of the new, extended Z-measurement mechanism in the surface encoder, and the developed prototype sensor head can carry out measurement of only uni-directional displacement of the scale grating along the X- and Z-directions. Future work will include a detailed investigation of the causes of the periodic crosstalk error components, and the modification of the optical configuration for measurement of the bi-directional displacements along the three (X-, Y- and Z-) axes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.G., Y.S. and Y.H.; Methodology, W.G., Y.S. and Y.H.; Software, Y.H.; Validation, Y.H.; Formal Analysis, Y.H.; Investigation, Y.H. and R.S.; Resources, Y.S. and W.G.; Data Curation, Y.H., H.M. and Y.S.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Y.H. and Y.S.; Writing—Review and Editing, W.G. and Y.S.; Visualization, W.G. and Y.S.; Supervision, W.G.; Project Administration, W.G.; Funding Acquisition, W.G. and Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) GrantNumber 20H00211.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gao, W. Precision Nanometrology: Sensors and Measuring Systems for Nanomanufacturing; Springer: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lan, H.; Ding, Y.; Liu, H.; Lu, B. Review of wafer stage for nanoimprint lithography. Microel. Eng. 2007, 84, 684–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Erkorkmaz, K.; Gorniak, J.M.; Gordon, D.J. Precision machine tool X-Y stage utilizing a planar air bearing arrangement. CIRP Ann. 2010, 59, 425–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kim, W.J.; Trumper, D.L. High-precision magnetic levitation stage for photolithography. Precis. Eng. 1998, 22, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shinno, H.; Yoshioka, H.; Gokan, T.; Sawano, H. A newly developed three-dimensional profile scanner with nanometer spatial resolution. CIRP Ann. 2010, 59, 525–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Buice, E.S.; Otten, D.; Yang, R.H.; Smith, S.T.; Hocken, R.J.; Trumper, D.L. Design evaluation of a single-axis precision controlled positioning stage. Precis. Eng. 2009, 33, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, W.J.; Verma, S.; Shakir, H. Design and precision construction of novel magnetic-levitation-based multi-axis nanoscale positioning systems. Precis. Eng. 2007, 31, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tomita, Y.; Koyanagawa, Y.; Satoh, F. A surface motor-driven precision positioning system. Precis. Eng. 1994, 16, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, C.H.; Jywe, W.Y.; Jeng, Y.R.; Hsu, T.H.; Li, Y.T. Design and control of a long-traveling nano-positioning stage. Precis. Eng. 2010, 34, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gao, W.; Dejima, S.; Yanai, H.; Katakura, K.; Kiyono, S.; Tomita, Y. A surface motor- driven planar motion stage integrated with an XYθZ surface encoder for precision positioning. Precis. Eng. 2004, 28, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Newport Corp. XM Series Catalogue. Available online: http://www.newport.com (accessed on 14 February 2022).
  12. Teimel, A. Technology and applications of grating interferometers in high-precision measurement. Precis. Eng. 1992, 14, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Otsuka, J.; Ichikawa, S.; Masuda, T.; Suzuki, K. Development of a small ultraprecision positioning device with 5 nm resolution. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2005, 16, 2186–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hashimoto, S.; Ohishi, K.; Ohishi, T.; Ishikawa, T.; Kosaka, K.; Egashira, Y.; Kubota, H.; Ohmi, T. Development of an Ultra-Precision Stage Control System Using Nonresonant Ultrasonic Motor. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the IEEE, Roanoke, VA, USA, 2–6 November 2003; pp. 1331–1336. [Google Scholar]
  15. Low, K.S.; Keck, M.T. Advanced precision linear stage for industrial automation applications. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2003, 52, 785–789. [Google Scholar]
  16. Heinrich, S.; Ulrich, N.R.; Tilo, P.; Horst, K. Optical Methods for Dimensional Metrology in Production Engineering. CIRP Ann. 2002, 51, 685–699. [Google Scholar]
  17. Heilmann, R.K.; Chen, C.G.; Konkola, P.T.; Schattenburg, M.L. Dimensional metrology for nanometre-scale science and engineering: Towards sub-nanometre accurate encoders. Nanotechnology 2004, 15, S504–S511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gao, W.; Kim, S.W.; Bosse, H.; Haitjema, H.; Chen, Y.L.; Lu, X.D.; Knapp, W.; Weckenmann, A.; Estler, W.T.; Kunzmann, H. Measurement technologies for precision positioning. CIRP Ann. 2015, 64, 773–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kimura, A.; Gao, W.; Arai, Y.; Lijiang, Z. Design and construction of a two-degree- of-freedom linear encoder for nanometric measurement of stage position and straightness. Precis. Eng. 2010, 34, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Steinmetz, C.R. Sub-micron position measurement and control on precision machine tools with laser interferometry. Precis. Eng. 1990, 12, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dian, S.Y.; Arai, Y.; Gao, W. Precision positioning control of a sawyer motor- based two-axis planar motion stage. Int. J. Surf. Sci. Eng. 2009, 3, 253–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Keysight Technologies. Laser Interferometer Position and Calibration Systems. Available online: http://www.keysight.com (accessed on 14 February 2022).
  23. Bryan, J.B. The Abbe principle revisited: An updated interpretation. Precis. Eng. 1979, 1, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gao, W.; Kimura, A. A three-axis displacement sensor with nanometric resolution. CIRP Ann. 2007, 56, 529–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kimura, A.; Gao, W.; Kim, W.J.; Hosono, K.; Shimizu, Y.; Shi, L. A sub-nanometric three-axis surface encoder with short-period planar gratings for stage motion measurement. Precis. Eng. 2012, 36, 576–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, X.; Gao, W.; Muto, H.; Shimizu, Y.; Ito, S.; Dian, S. A six-degree-of-freedom surface encoder for precision positioning of a planar motion stage. Precis. Eng. 2013, 37, 771–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gao, W.; Saito, Y.; Muto, H.; Arai, Y.; Shimizu, Y. A three-axis autocollimator for detection of angular error motions of a precision stage. CIRP Ann. 2011, 60, 515–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, S.M.; Zhang, G.F. A review on interferometry for geometric measurement. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2018, 29, 102001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gao, W.; Haitjema, H.; Fang, F.Z.; Leach, R.K.; Cheung, C.F.; Savio, E.; Linares, J.M. On-machine and in-process surface metrology for precision manufacturing. CIRP Ann. 2019, 68, 843–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Shi, L.; Zeng, L. Fabrication of optical mosaic gratings: A self-referencing alignment method. Opt. Express. 2011, 19, 8985–8993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shimizu, Y. Laser interference lithography for fabrication of planar scale gratings for optical metrology. Nanomanuf Metrol. 2021, 4, 3–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, L. New formulation of the Fourier model method for crossed surface-relief gratings. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1997, 14, 2758–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Keem, T.; Gonda, S.; Misumi, I.; Huang, Q.; Kurosawa, T. Removing nonlinearity of a homodyne interferometer by adjusting the gains of its quadrature detector systems. Appl. Opt. 2004, 43, 2443–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sanchez-Brea, L.M.; Morlanes, T. Metrological errors in optical encoders. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2008, 19, 115104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Optical design of the surface encoder: (a) XZ view; (b) three-dimensional view.
Figure 1. Optical design of the surface encoder: (a) XZ view; (b) three-dimensional view.
Sensors 22 03010 g001
Figure 2. The optical design of Δx-assembly: (a) XZ view; (b) three-dimensional view.
Figure 2. The optical design of Δx-assembly: (a) XZ view; (b) three-dimensional view.
Sensors 22 03010 g002
Figure 3. The optical design of Δz-assembly: (a) XZ view; (b) three-dimensional view.
Figure 3. The optical design of Δz-assembly: (a) XZ view; (b) three-dimensional view.
Sensors 22 03010 g003
Figure 4. Optical configurations of the conventional surface encoder and the newly proposed surface encoder: (a) A schematic of the conventional surface encoder; (b) A schematic of the newly proposed surface encoder.
Figure 4. Optical configurations of the conventional surface encoder and the newly proposed surface encoder: (a) A schematic of the conventional surface encoder; (b) A schematic of the newly proposed surface encoder.
Sensors 22 03010 g004
Figure 5. Prototype sensor head: (a) A three-dimensional model; (b) a photograph.
Figure 5. Prototype sensor head: (a) A three-dimensional model; (b) a photograph.
Sensors 22 03010 g005
Figure 6. Experimental setup.
Figure 6. Experimental setup.
Sensors 22 03010 g006
Figure 7. Interpolation errors: (a) Interpolation error in measurement of Δx; (b) interpolation error in measurement of Δz.
Figure 7. Interpolation errors: (a) Interpolation error in measurement of Δx; (b) interpolation error in measurement of Δz.
Sensors 22 03010 g007
Figure 8. Crosstalk errors: (a) Readings of Δx and Δz when the X-directional displacement was applied; (b) Readings of Δx and Δz when the Z-directional displacement was applied.
Figure 8. Crosstalk errors: (a) Readings of Δx and Δz when the X-directional displacement was applied; (b) Readings of Δx and Δz when the Z-directional displacement was applied.
Sensors 22 03010 g008
Figure 9. Non-linear component in the crosstalk error: (a) Reading of Δx and the nonlinear component of the reading of Δz when the X-directional displacement was applied; (b) reading of Δz and the nonlinear component of the reading of Δx when the Z-directional displacement was applied.
Figure 9. Non-linear component in the crosstalk error: (a) Reading of Δx and the nonlinear component of the reading of Δz when the X-directional displacement was applied; (b) reading of Δz and the nonlinear component of the reading of Δx when the Z-directional displacement was applied.
Sensors 22 03010 g009
Figure 10. Schematic of the experimental setup for testing the Z-axis measuring range of the surface encoder.
Figure 10. Schematic of the experimental setup for testing the Z-axis measuring range of the surface encoder.
Sensors 22 03010 g010
Figure 11. Variations in amplitudes of the interpolation errors as the change in the Z-directional offset Δwd: (a) Measurement of Δx; (b) Measurement of Δz.
Figure 11. Variations in amplitudes of the interpolation errors as the change in the Z-directional offset Δwd: (a) Measurement of Δx; (b) Measurement of Δz.
Sensors 22 03010 g011
Figure 12. Variations in amplitudes of the crosstalk errors as the change in the Z-directional offset Δwd: (a) Reading of Δz when the scale was moved along the X-direction in a range of ±1.5 mm; (b) Reading of Δx when the scale was moved along Z-direction in a range of ±1.5 mm.
Figure 12. Variations in amplitudes of the crosstalk errors as the change in the Z-directional offset Δwd: (a) Reading of Δz when the scale was moved along the X-direction in a range of ±1.5 mm; (b) Reading of Δx when the scale was moved along Z-direction in a range of ±1.5 mm.
Sensors 22 03010 g012
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hong, Y.; Sato, R.; Shimizu, Y.; Matsukuma, H.; Gao, W. A New Optical Configuration for the Surface Encoder with an Expanded Z-Directional Measuring Range. Sensors 2022, 22, 3010. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22083010

AMA Style

Hong Y, Sato R, Shimizu Y, Matsukuma H, Gao W. A New Optical Configuration for the Surface Encoder with an Expanded Z-Directional Measuring Range. Sensors. 2022; 22(8):3010. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22083010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hong, Yifan, Ryo Sato, Yuki Shimizu, Hiraku Matsukuma, and Wei Gao. 2022. "A New Optical Configuration for the Surface Encoder with an Expanded Z-Directional Measuring Range" Sensors 22, no. 8: 3010. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22083010

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop