Next Article in Journal
Design and Reliability Analysis of a Novel Redundancy Topology Architecture
Previous Article in Journal
Use of Robotic Devices for Gait Training in Patients Diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis: Current State of the Art
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Identification of Activation Isotopes in a CS-30 Cyclotron Vault

by
Alhussain A. Abuhoza
1,
Hamoud A. Kassim
2,
Ahmed A. Alghamdi
1,
Faisal M. Alrumayan
3,
Mehenna Arib
3,
Ibrahim J. Aljammaz
3 and
Meshari ALQahtani
1,*
1
Nuclear Science Research Institute, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia
2
Physics and Astronomy Department, College of Science, King Saud University (KSU), P.O. Box 145111, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia
3
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, P.O. Box 3354, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2022, 22(7), 2581; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072581
Submission received: 24 February 2022 / Revised: 24 March 2022 / Accepted: 24 March 2022 / Published: 28 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)

Abstract

:
A CS-30 cyclotron has been in operation at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSHRC) since 1982. The CS-30 cyclotron has been used to produce medical radioisotopes for positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Some of the nuclear reactions of radionuclide production are associated with the intense release of a wide range of fast neutrons. In this work, we investigated the radionuclides produced from neutron interactions with the cyclotron facility walls. Activation isotopes were determined by performing gamma ray spectrometry utilizing a high-purity germanium (HPGe) detector. The major radionuclides found were 152Eu, 154Eu, 134Cs, 65Zn and 60Co. Activation isotope accumulation had increased the dose rate inside the facility. The surface dose rates were measured at all of the surrounding walls. The maximum surface dose rate was found to be 1.2 µSv/h, which is much lower than the permissible occupational exposure of 15 µSv/h based daily 5 work hours.

1. Introduction

Particle accelerators, such as cyclotrons for medical isotope production, are usually surrounded by thick concrete structures [1,2]. Most medical cyclotrons have been used to perform (p, n), (p,   α ) and (d, 2n) reactions to produce radionuclides [3]. The generated alpha particles had low penetrating power, while the produced neutrons penetrated the air and struck the walls of the cyclotron room. Then, neutrons induced radioactive nuclides in the inner concrete wall through several fast and thermal neutron interactions [4,5,6,7,8]. The accumulation of radionuclides in the cyclotron facility walls raised the occupational exposure of workers. In addition, concrete wall activation might lead to an issue of radioactive waste management in the case of facility decommissioning [9,10,11].
Several experimental and modeling studies have investigated fast- and thermal-neutron-induced isotopes using gamma spectroscopy detection methods. Martínez-Serrano et al. [12] predicted the activity levels of several neutron-induced radionuclides in the wall of the cyclotron facility at the University of Malaga using MCNPX code [13]. The calculation of radioactivity as a function of wall depth revealed the presence of 152Eu, 154Eu, 60Co, 134Cs, 46Sc, 54Mn and 65Zn. Furthermore, Kambali et al. [14] utilized gamma spectroscopy using a NaI(Tl) detector in addition to TALYS code to determine the activation radionuclides of the CS-30 cyclotron of the BATAN center. The study stated that the major isotopes observed in the measured gamma spectrum and in accordance with the simulation were 60Co and 134Cs. Yamaguchi and coworkers [15] detected several neutron-induced radionuclides, namely 46Sc, 60Co, 65Zn, 134Cs, 152Eu, 22Na and 54Mn, in the medical compact cyclotron room at Gunma University Hospital. In addition, the study showed that the neutron capture (n,γ) reaction was the predominant neutron reaction with wall elements, and that radionuclide activity decreased exponentially through the wall depth. Fujibuchi et al. [16] performed gamma spectrometry using a HPGe detector on several concrete samples taken from the cyclotron room. Only two distinct long-lived radionuclides, 60Co and 152Eu, were identified, since the measurements were taken two years after shutting down the cyclotron.
S. Vichi et al. [17] implemented a Monte Carlo simulation code and validated a simulation by experimental work to evaluate the activation of bunkers at the S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital in Italy and Bern University Hospital at Switzerland. The most active radionuclides in the concrete walls of the two bunkers were revealed to be 46Sc, 60Co, 65Zn, 134Cs, 152Eu, 22Na and 54Mn. Radionuclide activities were found to be within the range of 0.01 to 2 Bq/g. Most observed radionuclides had a good correlation between Monte Carlo results and experimental measurements, except for 152Eu, 46Sc and 65Zn.
In a recent article, Go Yoshida et al. [18] performed an accelerator decommissioning study by conducting a series of surveys in synchrotron radiation facilities in Japan to evaluate the activation of walls and accelerator beam components. Various dosimeters were used to measure ambient neutron flux at various locations of the facilities. It was found that thermal neutron fluxes ranged between 100 and 102 cm−2s−1, corresponding to activities of 10−5 and 10−3 Bq·g−1. In addition, the maximum measured dose rate was found to be 5 µSv/h.
In this study, the activation isotopes in the CS-30 cyclotron vault walls at KFSHRC were investigated and identified utilizing an HPGe detection system. The gamma spectrum was analyzed thoroughly by considering the interacting neutron energies and vault wall elements. Furthermore, a Geant4 simulation was conducted to obtain the generated neutron spectrum from the proton beam bombardment of the CS-30 internal and external targets. Through a combinatory analysis of simulations, chemical analysis of the wall concrete and gamma ray spectrometry measurements, 10 radionuclides were identified. Finally, surface dose rates were measured in four locations to identify the maximum dose rate in the facility.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The CS-30 Cyclotron Facility

The CS-30 cyclotron at KFSHRC has been under full operation since 1982, producing PET and SPECT radioisotopes such as F-18 and Tl-201 [19]. The CS-30 is a positive ion machine capable of accelerating protons, deuterons, helium-3 and helium-4 of different energies. However, in the last three decades, a 26.5 MeV monoenergetic proton beam has primarily been used for the production of medical imaging isotopes. Currently, an IBA Cyclone 30 has been used as a major isotope production cyclotron at KFSHRC due to its high reliability, low exposure and dual-beam extraction capability [20]. However, the CS-30 is being kept as a backup cyclotron for producing medical isotopes in the case of a shortage because of its high running cost compared to the IBA Cyclone 30. The CS-30 cyclotron is housed in a 10 m long, 8 m wide and 6 m tall building with a wall thickness of 2.1 m. A 3D model of the CS-30 cyclotron and beam lines is shown in Figure 1.
The chemical composition of the concrete wall was analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (model: ELAN 9000, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The ICP-MS sensitivity was measured by identifying the millions of counts per second (Mcps) per milligram per liter (mg/L), and it varied from one chemical element to another. For the PerkinElmer model 9000, the measurement sensitivity was greater than 30 Mcps/mg/L and 10 Mcps/mg/L for U and Mg, respectively. An ELAN 9000 model has a coefficient of variation (%RSD) of less than 3% RSD for a 10 µg/L multielement solution [21]. ELAN 9000 ICP-MS was utilized to analyze the chemical composition of vault wall 1. The results demonstrated that the wall was composed of elements commonly used in the construction of radiation shielding, such as Ca, Fe, Zn and Mg, although several other elements were also present in the solid mixtures, as listed in Table 1.
In the past four decades, CS-30 has been used to produce six PET and SPECT radionuclides (13N, 18F, 123I, 81Rb, 67Ga and 201Pb). The production of these radionuclides is associated with the release of neutrons due to proton interaction with targets and targets’ holding materials. Thus, the induced neutrons of the PET and SPECT production reactions require further investigation to identify the neutron spectra via Monte Carlo simulation code. All the produced radionuclides with the average beam time and beam current are listed in Table 2.

2.2. The Geant4 Model

Geant4 is a powerful Monte-Carlo-based toolkit that simulates the passage of particles through matter [22]. Geant4 (version 10.05) code was built to determine the neutron spectra generated from the proton beam interaction with targets. Two types of CS-30 targets were simulated. The internal target consists of a 1 mm-thick copper plate. Furthermore, the internal targets (124Te, 68Zn and 203Tl) were electrodeposited on the copper plate (thickness = 0.25 µm). On the other hand, the external targets were simulated as aluminum capsules with a 3 cm radius and 2.4 cm thick. The inner target radius was simulated with a 2 cm radius and 1 cm thick and was placed 1 mm deep inside the capsule. The external targets were used for 16O, 18O and NatKr isotopes. Figure 2 shows Geant4-simulated internal and external targets.
The proton beam was simulated as a monodirectional point source of 26.5 MeV with 106 number of events. A binary cascade model was selected to simulate the passage of primary protons and secondaries through targets. In addition, a high-precision neutron package was included to transport fast neutrons down to thermal energies. The neutron spectra were recorded on the back-end of the targets. The simulated bombarding of targets with the proton beam resulted in wide neutron spectra, as shown in Figure 3.
The neutron yield had a significantly higher intensity for internal targets. Furthermore, all three internal targets almost have the same identical neutron spectrum, since all of the three targets have an extremely low thickness and hence the neutrons were released mainly from proton beam interactions with the holding copper plate. Nevertheless, the external targets showed varied neutron spectra. The 16O target has the lowest neutron intensity since released neutrons are not among the main nuclear reaction utilized to produce 13N. Furthermore, the neutron induced mainly from the proton beam interaction with the front thin layer of the aluminum capsule. Neutron spectra were generated through Geant4 simulation as guidance to perceive radionuclides out of neutron interactions in addition to the gamma spectrometry inside the CS-30 facility.

2.3. Gamma Spectroscopy System

The gamma-ray spectra from the vault wall were measured using a HPGe detector (model: GX4019, CANBERRA, Meriden, CT, USA) coupled with a Multi-Channel Analyzer (MCA) (model: 927, ORTEC, Oak Ridge, TN, USA). The system was calibrated using gamma button sources, namely 60Co and 22Na. The HPGe-obtained energy resolution (FWHM) was found to be 2.92 keV, or 0.25% at 1173 keV. The HPGe was placed in a perpendicular orientation to the wall at a height of 1.5 m off the floor, 0° relative to the proton beam direction and 0.25 m from the wall at four locations, as pinpointed in Figure 1. The gamma spectra were collected for 5 h for each position using 16K channel data memory. Furthermore, the surface dose rate of gamma radiations emitted from the walls of the cyclotron vault were measured using two different Geiger survey meters, calibrated at the secondary standard dosimetry laboratory of KFSHRC with a traceability to BIPM.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Activation Radionuclides

Figure 4 illustrates the gamma spectra in the vicinity of location 4, which was pointed out in Figure 1. The most intense gamma peaks were analyzed thoroughly by considering the concentration of chemical elements in the wall and their natural abundance as well as potential neutron interactions based on cross-sectional data. For more sufficient analysis, any radionuclide with multiple gamma lines were investigated and advocated for by comparing the intensity of gamma lines with radionuclide abundant yields. Consequently, 10 radionuclides were determined as the byproducts of interactions of neutrons with wall elements. The radioisotopes were induced out of fast, thermal neutron and proton interactions.
58Co, 54Mn and 40K radionuclides were generated by fast neutron interactions. The 58Co isotope was produced by (n, 2n) and (n, p) reactions with cobalt and nickel elements, respectively, while 54Mn was generated through (n, p) interactions with iron. Furthermore, 40K is a natural radioactive isotope, but this work suggested that 40K was also created in the wall through neutron interactions with the 40Ca isotope. Calcium has the majority concentration in the wall, and most neutron interaction byproducts with 40Ca are stable isotopes. However, a 40Ca (n, p) 40K reaction produced a radioisotope and has a relatively high fast neutron cross-section as well.
On the other hand, the radioisotopes of 152Eu, 154Eu, 134Cs, 65Zn, 60Co and 59Fe were produced by thermal neutron capture reactions. 152Eu, 154Eu and 134Cs radioisotopes were observed clearly in the gamma spectra even with an insignificant amount of wall concentration due to their high neutron capture cross-sections. Nevertheless, 65Zn and 60Co have relatively high concentrations and neutron capture cross-sections. Furthermore, 59Fe was observed due to the high concentration of iron in the wall. However, 59Fe gamma lines had the lowest intensities, since the half-life of 59Fe is the lowest among the detected radioisotopes.
In contrast to all the recorded isotopes that were induced from direct neutron activation reactions, the 56Co radionuclide was produced from a (p, n) interaction with the 56Fe isotope. The interacted protons were induced from fast neutron (n, p) interactions inside the walls. Table 3 summarizes the nuclear reactions, half-lives, and the maximum neutron cross-sections with the respective neutron energies. Neutron cross-section values were obtained using the recent ENDF/B-VIII library [23]. Tabled cross-section values give an indication of radioisotopes’ production probability since the neutron spectra from the proton beam reaction with targets had a wide range of energies.
To conclude, neutron cross-sections, half-lives and isotope abundances in the wall are the three main factors for radioisotopes’ presence. All three factors were plotted for all radionuclides except 56Co, as shown in Figure 5. Obviously, the produced radioisotopes mainly had either high neutron cross-sections, such as 152Eu and 154Eu, or relatively high abundance in the wall, as clearly seen for the other radioisotopes. However, the variation in the mentioned three factors in addition to the operation duration demonstrated the appearance and absence of isotopes in other CS-30 cyclotron facilities (e.g., Sc-46) [14]. Note that the existing CS-30 facility is in a cooling phase, and only used occasionally as a backup for SPECT isotope production.

3.2. Dose Rates Inside the CS-30 Vault

The measured dose rates of gamma radiation near the cyclotron vault walls were 0.96, 1.2, 1.0 and 0.6 µSv/h. The highest dose rate was recorded at wall 2, which is located near the target rooms and facing the beam line. In addition, wall 2 is the closest wall to the two of the external targets (18O and NatKr). On the other hand, the lowest value was obtained at wall 4, which is located behind the beam line. There were slight differences between the measured dose rates due to the direction of the proton beam and wall to the target distance as well. The cyclotron surface dose rates were measured and had insignificant dose rate values.
Reducing the number of secondary neutrons would lead to a decrease in the dose rate inside the facility. Using a thick moderator (e.g., polyethylene) followed by a high thermal neutron cross-section material, such as boron, would thermalize and absorb generated neutrons, thus decreasing activation in the wall and reducing or maintain the dose rate inside the CS-30 facility. For future cyclotron facilities, Eu and Co elements must be refined from concrete compositions since both of them interacted with thermal neutrons and produced the most active and long-lived radionuclides, as shown previously in the literature [16], and their extremely high neutron cross-sections, as pointed out in Table 3.

4. Conclusions

The activation of the concrete wall of a CS-30 facility was investigated. CS-30 proton beam bombardment with a target generated a wide spectrum of neutron energies up to 26.2 MeV. The neutron flux was responsible for the wall activation over a long period of CS-30 operation. Fast neutrons interacted with walls, after which they slowed down and were absorbed through neutron capture reactions. The major radionuclides observed in the gamma spectrum and identified as a product of thermal neutron capture were 152Eu, 154Eu, 134Cs, 65Zn, 60Co and 59Fe. Furthermore, 152Eu and 154Eu have low abundances in the wall but both have high thermal neutron cross-sections, while 134Cs and 60Co have relatively high neutron cross-sections and abundances. 65Zn and 59Fe have high abundances and low neutron capture cross-sections. On the other hand, fast neutron interactions with the wall produced three radionuclides, namely 58Co, 54Mn and 40K. Furthermore, the fast neutron interactions produced recoil protons that interacted with 56Fe to originate 56Co.
The accumulation of radionuclides in the CS-30 facility walls lead to a slight increase in the dose rate. The dose rates from the four walls of the facility were measured using a Geiger survey meter. The maximum and minimum dose rates were 1.2 µSv/h and 0.6 µSv/h, respectively. The variation in the dose rates was due to the distance between the target location and proton beam direction. In order to minimize the wall activation, beam targets must be followed by thick neutron shielding with hydrogen content (e.g., polyethylene) and a high thermal neutron cross-section absorber (e.g., boron) to maintain or reduce the dose rate level of the facility. For low-activated concrete, the concrete composition must be purified from Eu and Co contents since both have extremely high neutron capture cross-sections and thus produce long-lived radionuclides with high activity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.A. (Alhussain A. Abuhoza), H.A.K. and F.M.A.; methodology, A.A.A. (Alhussain A. Abuhoza), H.A.K. and A.A.A. (Ahmed A. Alghamdi); simulation code, A.A.A. (Alhussain A. Abuhoza) and A.A.A. (Ahmed A. Alghamdi); writing—review and editing, A.A.A. (Alhussain A. Abuhoza), M.A. (Meshari ALQahtani), H.A.K. and A.A.A. (Ahmed A. Alghamdi); supervision, I.J.A., M.A. (Mehenna Arib) and F.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the NSTIP Strategic Technologies Program in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, grant number 14-MAT-1233-20.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Amr Hendy and Mohammed Mansour for their technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Cyclotron Produced Radionuclides: Principles and Practice; IAEA Technical Reports Series No. 465; IAEA: Austria, Vienna, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Cyclotron Produced Radionuclides: Guidelines for Setting Up a Facility; IAEA Technical Reports Series No. 471; IAEA: Austria, Vienna, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  3. Vallabhajosula, S. Molecular Imaging in Oncology, 1st ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 45–56. [Google Scholar]
  4. Méndez, R.; Iñiguez, M.P.; Martí-Climent, J.M.; Peñuelas, I.; Vega-Carrillo, H.R.; Barquero, R. Study of the neutron field in the vicinity of an unshielded PET cyclotron. Phys. Med. Biol. 2005, 50, 5141–5152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gallerani, R.; Cicoria, G.; Fantuzzi, E.; Marengo, M.; Mostacci, D. Neutron production in the operation of a 16.5 MeV PETrace cyclotron. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2008, 50, 939–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tripathy, S.P.; Paul, S.; Sahoo, G.S.; Suman, V.; Sunil, C.; Joshi, D.S.; Bandyopadhyay, T. Measurement of fast neutron spectra from the interaction of 20 MeV protons with thick Be and C targets using CR-39 detector. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2014, 318, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tang, Y.; Li, S.; Yang, Y.; Chen, W.; Wei, H.; Wang, G.; Yang, J.; Liao, J.; Luo, S.; Liu, N. A simple and convenient method for production of 89Zr with high purity. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2016, 118, 326–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Fernández, F.; Amgarou, K.; Domingo, C.; García, M.J.; Quincoces, G.; Marti-Climent, J.M.; Méndez, R.; Barquero, R. Neutron spectrometry in a PET cyclotron with a Bonner sphere system. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2007, 126, 371–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sarkar, P.K. Neutron dosimetry in the particle accelerator environment. Radiat. Meas. 2010, 45, 1476–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Masumoto, K.; Toyoda, A.A.; Eda, K.; Izumi, Y.; Shibata, T. Evaluation of radioactivity induced in the accelerator building and its application to decontamination work. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2003, 255, 465–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mukherjee, B. Radiation safety issues relevant to proton therapy and radioisotope production medical cyclotrons. Radiat. Prot. Environ 2012, 35, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pelowitz, D.B.; Durkee, J.W.; Elson, J.S.; Fensin, M.L.; Hendricks, J.S.; James, M.R.; Johns, R.C.; McKinney, G.W.; Mashnik, S.G.; Verbeke, J.M.; et al. MCNPX 2.7. 0 Extensions; Report LA-UR-11–02295; Los Alamos National Laboratory: Los Alamos, NM, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  13. Martínez-Serrano, J.J.; Díez de Los Ríos, A. Prediction of neutron induced radioactivity in the concrete walls of a PET cyclotron vault room with MCNPX. Med. Phys. 2010, 37, 6015–6021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kambali, I.; Suryanto, H.; Parwanto, P. Identification and Angular Distribution of Residual Radionuclides Detected on the Wall of BATAN’s Cyclotron Cave. Atom Indones. 2016, 42, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yamaguchi, I.; Kimura, K.I.; Fujibuchi, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Saito, K.; Otake, H. Radiation safety management of residual long-lived radioactivity distributed in an inner concrete wall of a medical cyclotron room. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2011, 146, 167–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fujibuchi, T.; Nohtomi, A.; Baba, S.; Sasaki, M.; Komiya, I.; Umedzu, Y.; Honda, H. Distribution of residual long-lived radioactivity in the inner concrete walls of a compact medical cyclotron vault room. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2015, 29, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Vichi, S.; Zagni, F.; Cicoria, G.; Infantino, A.; Riga, S.; Zeller, M.; Carzaniga, T.S.; Nesteruk, K.P.; Braccini, S.; Marengo, M.; et al. Activation studies of a PET cyclotron bunker. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2019, 161, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yoshida, G.; Matsumura, H.; Masumoto, K.; Nakamura, H.; Toyoda, A.; Nobuhara, F.; Iwai, S.; Nishikawa, K.; Hayashi, K.; Ishioka, J.; et al. Investigation into activation of accelerators at various synchrotron radiation facilities in Japan. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2021, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alrumayan, F.; Shawoo, M.; Vora, M. September. Status report of the cyclotrons C-30, CS-30 and RDS-111 at KFSHRC, Saudi Arabia. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Cyclotrons and their Applications, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 16 September 2013. [Google Scholar]
  20. IBA. Available online: https://www.iba-radiopharmasolutions.com/sites/default/files/2020–08/cbr_c30_v5_r00.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2022).
  21. Perkinelmer. Available online: https://resources.perkinelmer.com/lab-solutions/resources/docs/SPC_ELAN9000.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2022).
  22. Agostinelli, S.; Allison, J.; Amako, K.A.; Apostolakis, J.; Araujo, H.; Arce, P.; Asai, M.; Axen, D.; Banerjee, S.; Barrand, G.J.N.I.; et al. GEANT4—A simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2003, 506, 250–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Brown, D.A.; Chadwick, M.B.; Capote, R.; Kahler, A.C.; Trkov, A.; Herman, M.W.; Sonzogni, A.A.; Danon, Y.; Carlson, A.D.; Dunn, M.; et al. ENDF/B-VIII. 0: The 8th major release of the nuclear reaction data library with CIELO-project cross sections, new standards and thermal scattering data. Nucl. Data Sheets 2018, 148, 1–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Layout of the CS-30 vault.
Figure 1. Layout of the CS-30 vault.
Sensors 22 02581 g001
Figure 2. Geant4-simulated CS-30 targets: (left) external target and (right) internal target.
Figure 2. Geant4-simulated CS-30 targets: (left) external target and (right) internal target.
Sensors 22 02581 g002
Figure 3. Neutron spectra produced from a simulated 26.5 MeV proton beam bombarding internal and external targets.
Figure 3. Neutron spectra produced from a simulated 26.5 MeV proton beam bombarding internal and external targets.
Sensors 22 02581 g003
Figure 4. Gamma-ray spectrum of the CS-30 cyclotron vault wall 4.
Figure 4. Gamma-ray spectrum of the CS-30 cyclotron vault wall 4.
Sensors 22 02581 g004
Figure 5. Maximum neutron cross-sections of nuclear reactions (top); half-lives of the isotopes (middle); and abundances of the radioactive isotopes in the wall (bottom).
Figure 5. Maximum neutron cross-sections of nuclear reactions (top); half-lives of the isotopes (middle); and abundances of the radioactive isotopes in the wall (bottom).
Sensors 22 02581 g005
Table 1. Chemical composition of the CS-30 cyclotron’s concrete wall.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the CS-30 cyclotron’s concrete wall.
ElementConcentrationElementConcentration
(mg/kg)
ElementConcentration
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
Li12As17.5Fe53,139
B1383Rb11.3Co4.6
Ne437Nb1.6Ni31.1
Na588Mo7.9Cu30.4
Mg3788Ag2.2Zn4586
Al2690Cd0.4Ga1.6
K2326Sn26.4Hf0.3
Ca152,501Xe3.9Ta0.4
V18Cs1W1.8
Cr48Eu0.1Pb102.8
Mn675Yb0.12U0.9
Table 2. List of CS-30-produced PET and SPECT isotopes.
Table 2. List of CS-30-produced PET and SPECT isotopes.
Nuclear ReactionAverage Beam Time per Year (h/Year)Beam Current (µA)
16O (p, α) 13N7315
18O (p, n) 18F130020
124Te (p, 2n) 123I62518
NatKr (p, n) 81Rb -- 81mKr39030
68Zn (p, 2n) 67Ga31550
203Tl (p, 3n) 201Pb -- 201Tl520100
Table 3. The observed radionuclides and their nuclear reactions; cross-sections values were taken from the ENDF/VIII.0 neutron library.
Table 3. The observed radionuclides and their nuclear reactions; cross-sections values were taken from the ENDF/VIII.0 neutron library.
Interaction TypeActivation
Radionuclide
Nuclear ReactionHalf-Life
(Years)
Maximum Neutron
Cross-Section
Fast neutron interaction58Co (1)59Co (n, 2n) 58Co1.94 × 10−18.30 × 10−1 b at En = 17 MeV
58Co (2)58Ni (n, p) 58Co6.40 × 10−1 b at En = 9.5 MeV
54Mn54Fe (n, p) 54Mn8.55 × 10−15.10 × 10−1 b at En = 10 MeV
40K40Ca (n, p) 40K1.28 × 1096.30 × 10−1 b at En = 8 MeV
Thermal neutron interaction 59Fe58Fe (n, γ) 59Fe1.22 × 10−19.21 × 10 b at En = 360 eV
152Eu151Eu (n, γ) 152Eu1.35 × 1016.76 × 105 b at En = 0.01 meV
154Eu153Eu (n, γ) 154Eu8.59 × 1001.86 × 104 b at En = 0.01 meV
134Cs133Cs (n, γ) 134Cs2.06 × 1001.58 × 103 b at En = 22.5 eV
65Zn64Zn (n, γ) 65Zn6.70 × 10−15.88 × 10 b at En = 281 eV
60Co59Co (n, γ) 60Co5.27 × 1001.87 × 103 b at En = 0.01 meV
Proton interaction56Co56Fe (p, n) 56Co2.11 × 10−1-
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abuhoza, A.A.; Kassim, H.A.; Alghamdi, A.A.; Alrumayan, F.M.; Arib, M.; Aljammaz, I.J.; ALQahtani, M. Identification of Activation Isotopes in a CS-30 Cyclotron Vault. Sensors 2022, 22, 2581. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072581

AMA Style

Abuhoza AA, Kassim HA, Alghamdi AA, Alrumayan FM, Arib M, Aljammaz IJ, ALQahtani M. Identification of Activation Isotopes in a CS-30 Cyclotron Vault. Sensors. 2022; 22(7):2581. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072581

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abuhoza, Alhussain A., Hamoud A. Kassim, Ahmed A. Alghamdi, Faisal M. Alrumayan, Mehenna Arib, Ibrahim J. Aljammaz, and Meshari ALQahtani. 2022. "Identification of Activation Isotopes in a CS-30 Cyclotron Vault" Sensors 22, no. 7: 2581. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072581

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop