Next Article in Journal
The Effects of Isometric Fatigue on Trunk Muscle Stiffness: Implications for Shear-Wave Elastography Measurements
Next Article in Special Issue
Improved Speech Spatial Covariance Matrix Estimation for Online Multi-Microphone Speech Enhancement
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamic Smoothing, Filtering and Differentiation of Signals Defining the Path of the UAV
Previous Article in Special Issue
Performance Analysis of Active Structural Acoustic Control Applied to a Washing Machine
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Three-Dimensional Acoustic Device for Testing the All-Directional Anisotropic Characteristics of Rock Samples

Sensors 2022, 22(23), 9473; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239473
by Kai Zhang 1, Shengqing Li 1,*, Yuanda Su 1, Baohai Tan 1, Wenjie Wu 2 and Shoutao Xin 3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Sensors 2022, 22(23), 9473; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239473
Submission received: 7 November 2022 / Revised: 27 November 2022 / Accepted: 1 December 2022 / Published: 4 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Technology in Acoustic Signal Processing)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Interesting paper in which the authors propose a three-dimensional measurement device was designed on the basis of the cross-hole sonic logging method. For obtaining the full-wave wave  forms in all directions, including the arrival times and velocities of the longitudinal and shear. Thus, the anisotropic physical characterizations of the material are obtaining. The subject is interesinting and the producto can be useful, the paper is well written and structured, so it should be accepted after minor changes.

1)      The authors must explain how the arrival time is obtained. Threshold method? Akaike method?

2)      What happens if longitudinal and shear waves are mixed? How do you determine the arrival time in this case?

3)      Figure 9: There are outsider points. Why?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

You have provided general information in the abstract section. Please give a summary of your work in the abstract section. Although your work is experimental, you did not discuss them sufficiently in the result section. Also, is it necessary to change the 2nd and 3rd part as the title? because the result should be considered as part of discussion and conclusion. There are experimental studies done in the article. but not enough discussion and conclusions have been written. I also found that the authors cited too much. Please reduce them.

Although your article is a good experimental work, it has not been adequately presented.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Check english grammar

Back to TopTop