Next Article in Journal
Terahertz Time-Domain Spectroscopic Study of Tricalcium Silicate
Previous Article in Journal
A Critical Review of Deep Learning-Based Multi-Sensor Fusion Techniques
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Deep Learning Based Infrared Thermal Image Analysis of Complex Pavement Defect Conditions Considering Seasonal Effect

Sensors 2022, 22(23), 9365; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239365
by Sindhu Chandra 1, Khaled AlMansoor 2, Cheng Chen 3, Yunfan Shi 2 and Hyungjoon Seo 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sensors 2022, 22(23), 9365; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239365
Submission received: 2 November 2022 / Revised: 27 November 2022 / Accepted: 28 November 2022 / Published: 1 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Sensing and Imaging)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The following comments must be carefully revised. (1) The following work should be cited and discussed, including “Improvement of generalization ability of deep CNN via implicit regularization in two-stage training process,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 15844-15869, 2018. “Faster Mean-shift: GPU-accelerated clustering for cosine embedding-based cell segmentation and tracking.” Medical Image Analysis 71 (2021): 102048. “VoxelEmbed: 3D instance segmentation and tracking with voxel embedding based deep learning,” International Workshop on Machine Learning in Medical Imaging. Springer, Cham, 2021. “Pseudo RGB-face recognition,” IEEE Sensors Journal, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3197235. (2) The specific model of deep learning (e.g. the number of convolution kernels, step size, etc) and the reason for designing this architecture should be further introduced. (3) The optimization curve of the objective function of the deep learning model with the iterative process should be presented. (4) The experimental setup of the proposed deep learning model and comparison methods should be reported in detail, such as batch size. (5) The structural complexity and reasoning speed of the model are encouraged to display. (6) More technical details should be added in the second part to help understand the method used.

Author Response

Thanks for the comments and the detailed response to the reviewer's comments is attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is a very interesting and meaningful work. But the paper still needs to consider the following questions.

1. It is necessary to further elaborate the research status and add more recent references.

2.The comparison of experiments should increase the comparison of more advanced methods.

Author Response

Thanks for the comments and the detailed response to the reviewer's comments is attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

In this paper the authors present a Deep learning based infrared thermal image analysis of complex pavement defect condition, for the winter and summer seasons, the results showed a better generalization for the samples taken in sunny summer. here some comments:

·        the text is clearly written which facilitates its understanding, however, a minor spelling revision to the text is recommended

·        Authors are recommended to increase the number of articles referenced in the introduction

·        Authors are encouraged to highlight the main contributions of the paper in the introduction.

·        in figure 1 there are parts that are not clear, for example the results of the confusion matrix, it is recommended to improve its quality

·        It is recommended to discuss in greater depth the results obtained,

 

Author Response

Thanks for the comments and the detailed response to the reviewer's comments is attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors should carefully review the comments and make careful modifications. In the current version, many key comments were only answered perfunctorily without corresponding modifications in the manuscript, including comment#1(all the recommended related work should be cited in the paper), #3(The figure of the optimization curve is still not added), #5(the reasoning speeds should be summarized in a table), and #6(technical detail of proposed method should be added).

Author Response

Thanks for the comments and a file for detailed responses is attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop