Next Article in Journal
Understanding External Influences on Target Detection and Classification Using Camera Trap Images and Machine Learning
Next Article in Special Issue
Cyber-Threat Detection System Using a Hybrid Approach of Transfer Learning and Multi-Model Image Representation
Previous Article in Journal
The Method of Evaluation of Radio Altimeter Methodological Error in Laboratory Environment
Previous Article in Special Issue
A New Intrusion Detection System for the Internet of Things via Deep Convolutional Neural Network and Feature Engineering
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Convergence Analysis of Path Planning of Multi-UAVs Using Max-Min Ant Colony Optimization Approach

Sensors 2022, 22(14), 5395; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22145395
by Muhammad Shafiq 1, Zain Anwar Ali 1,*, Amber Israr 1, Eman H. Alkhammash 2, Myriam Hadjouni 3 and Jari Juhani Jussila 4
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Sensors 2022, 22(14), 5395; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22145395
Submission received: 24 May 2022 / Revised: 29 June 2022 / Accepted: 18 July 2022 / Published: 19 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cybersecurity Issues in Smart Grids and Future Power Systems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In the paper, the two hybrid optimization algorithms compares for the path planning. The first hybrid algorithm is a combination of the Max-Min Ant Colony Optimization algorithm (MMACO) with the Differential Evolution approach. The second hybrid algorithm is a combination of MMACO with the Cauchy Mutant approach.  To reduce noise and disturbance in operation along with improvement of robustness in the flying, MMACO combines with Differential Evolution and Cauchy Mutant operator. Each algorithm was run on a UAV and traveled a predetermined path to evaluate their approaches.

1. The summary and conclusion of the paper need to be further modified and refined to summarize the main innovations and contributions of the paper.

2. In the experiment part, in addition to simulation, it is suggested to add actual experiments. Based on the relevant experimental data, further analysis and summary.

3. It is suggested to add the comparative analysis and verification between the proposed algorithm and other algorithms.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer the compliance reply is attached for your kind consideration.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

1. Please check the typo error in the manuscript.

2. The language has to be thoroughly revised and rewritten.

3. What is the name of the simulator, and what if the drones fly in urban environments?

4. Why did you consider the obstacle as mountains?

5. Explain the scenarios in clear?

6. Please check figures and equations, because figure-3 is missing and equation numbers are repeated.

7. In the case of the ant algorithm searching for food, the other ants can follow the previous ants, but in the real how the drone can follow the other drones.

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer the compliance reply is attached for your kind consideration.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Equation numbers are the same on both the fourth and sixth pages please change it. Expect this question everything is clear.

Back to TopTop