Next Article in Journal
Sparking the Interest of Girls in Computer Science via Chemical Experimentation and Robotics: The Qui-Bot H2O Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
Smart Scheduling of Electric Vehicles Based on Reinforcement Learning
Previous Article in Special Issue
Computation of Gait Parameters in Post Stroke and Parkinson’s Disease: A Comparative Study Using RGB-D Sensors and Optoelectronic Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Wearables for Movement Analysis in Healthcare

by
Paolo Capodaglio
1,2,* and
Veronica Cimolin
3,*
1
Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Unit and Research Lab for Biomechanics, Rehabilitation and Ergonomics, Ospedale San Giuseppe, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, via Cadorna 90, 28824 Piancavallo di Oggebbio, Italy
2
Department Surgical Sciences, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
3
Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milan, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2022, 22(10), 3720; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103720
Submission received: 2 May 2022 / Accepted: 10 May 2022 / Published: 13 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wearables for Movement Analysis in Healthcare)
Quantitative movement analysis is widely used in clinical practice and research to objectively and thoroughly investigate movement disorder. Conventionally, body segment kinematic and kinetic parameters are measured in gait laboratories, using marker-based optoelectronic systems, force plates, and electromyographic systems. Although movement analysis is considered accurate, the availability of specific laboratories, high costs, and dependency on trained users sometimes limit its use in clinical practice. A variety of available compact wearable sensors have allowed researchers and clinicians to pursue applications in which individuals are monitored in the home and community settings, in different fields, such as movement analysis. Wearable sensors may contribute to the out-patient implementation of quantitative movement analysis for clinical purposes, thereby reducing evaluation times and unobtrusively and continuously providing objective and quantifiable data on the patients’ capabilities.
We invited authors to submit their latest results in the field, either research articles or reviews articles, aimed at promoting novel wearable technology for movement analysis, methods for sensor signal processing, as well as on field experiences of their applications in healthcare. In total, 15 papers were accepted for publication in this Special Issue of Sensors, entitled “Wearables for Movement Analysis in Healthcare”. They are summarized in the subsequent paragraphs.
The papers could be divided into three main categories: methodological applications, clinical applications, and sport applications.
In terms of the methodological category, Zago et al. [1] estimated the gait parameters based on inertial sensors with machine learning techniques in healthy participants. Lueken et al. [2] presented a recently developed platform for a wireless body sensor network with customizable applications with a sensor setup for gait analysis during everyday life monitoring. Amitrano et al. [3] described a new wearable e-textile based system, named SWEET Sock, for the remote monitoring of biomedical signals and validated it by evaluating the agreement with an optoelectronic system for gait analysis on a set of free walk acquisitions.
In clinical applications, wearable sensors were used in several pathological states, such as stroke [4,5,6], obese [7,8], and elderly [9] patients; patients with lower limb amputation [10]; patients with Parkinson’s disease [4,11,12]; and patients hospitalized for knee joint rehabilitation [13]. In particular, wearable systems were used both to quantify the functional limitations of the patients, during several movements (gait [5,7,8,9], upper limb [6,11], time up and go test [10], and unconstraint activities at home [12]) and to evaluate their accuracy and precision in comparison with the gold standard [4]. These papers support the clinical usability of wearable technology for clinical movement assessment.
The applications in sport are more limited and they are focused on running and drop jump, forward sprint, and change in direction. Kim et al. [14] validated inertial measurement units (IMUs) for measuring ankle joint with a motion capture system during running in healthy individuals. Di Paolo et al. [15] quantified joint kinematics through a wearable sensor system in multidirectional high-speed complex movements after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, and validated it against a gold standard optoelectronic marker-based system. They demonstrated the use of wearable sensors as an alternative tool for motion capture system for assessing the performance and rehabilitation of athletes.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zago, M.; Tarabini, M.; Delfino Spiga, M.; Ferrario, C.; Bertozzi, F.; Sforza, C.; Galli, M. Machine-Learning Based Determination of Gait Events from Foot-Mounted Inertial Units. Sensors 2021, 21, 839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lueken, M.; Mueller, L.; Decker, M.G.; Bollheimer, C.; Leonhardt, S.; Ngo, C. Evaluation and Application of a Customizable Wireless Platform: A Body Sensor Network for Unobtrusive Gait Analysis in Everyday Life. Sensors 2020, 20, 7325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Amitrano, F.; Coccia, A.; Ricciardi, C.; Donisi, L.; Cesarelli, G.; Capodaglio, E.M.; D’Addio, G. Design and Validation of an E-Textile-Based Wearable Sock for Remote Gait and Postural Assessment. Sensors 2020, 20, 6691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cimolin, V.; Vismara, L.; Ferraris, C.; Amprimo, G.; Pettiti, G.; Lopez, R.; Galli, M.; Cremascoli, R.; Sinagra, S.; Mauro, A.; et al. Computation of Gait Parameters in Post Stroke and Parkinson’s Disease: A Comparative Study Using RGB-D Sensors and Optoelectronic Systems. Sensors 2022, 22, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Schifino, G.; Cimolin, V.; Pau, M.; da Cunha, M.J.; Leban, B.; Porta, M.; Galli, M.; Souza Pagnussat, A. Functional Electrical Stimulation for Foot Drop in Post-Stroke People: Quantitative Effects on Step-to-Step Symmetry of Gait Using a Wearable Inertial Sensor. Sensors 2021, 21, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Schwarz, A.; Bhagubai, M.M.C.; Wolterink, G.; Held, J.P.O.; Luft, A.R.; Veltink, P.H. Assessment of Upper Limb Movement Impairments after Stroke Using Wearable Inertial Sensing. Sensors 2020, 20, 4770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pau, M.; Capodaglio, P.; Leban, B.; Porta, M.; Galli, M.; Cimolin, V. Kinematics Adaptation and Inter-Limb Symmetry during Gait in Obese Adults. Sensors 2021, 21, 5980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cimolin, V.; Gobbi, M.; Buratto, C.; Ferraro, S.; Fumagalli, A.; Galli, M.; Capodaglio, P. A Comparative Analysis of Shoes Designed for Subjects with Obesity Using a Single Inertial Sensor: Preliminary Results. Sensors 2022, 22, 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pau, M.; Mulas, I.; Putzu, V.; Asoni, G.; Viale, D.; Mameli, I.; Leban, B.; Allali, G. Smoothness of Gait in Healthy and Cognitively Impaired Individuals: A Study on Italian Elderly Using Wearable Inertial Sensor. Sensors 2020, 20, 3577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Valle, M.S.; Casabona, A.; Sapienza, I.; Laudani, L.; Vagnini, A.; Lanza, S.; Cioni, M. Use of a Single Wearable Sensor to Evaluate the Effects of Gait and Pelvis Asymmetries on the Components of the Timed Up and Go Test, in Persons with Unilateral Lower Limb Amputation. Sensors 2021, 22, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Romano, P.; Pournajaf, S.; Ottaviani, M.; Gison, A.; Infarinato, F.; Mantoni, C.; De Pandis, M.F.; Franceschini, M.; Goffredo, M. Sensor Network for Analyzing Upper Body Strategies in Parkinson’s Disease versus Normative Kinematic Patterns. Sensors 2021, 21, 3823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Habets, J.G.V.; Herff, C.; Kubben, P.L.; Kuijf, M.L.; Temel, Y.; Evers, L.J.W.; Bloem, B.R.; Starr, P.A.; Gilron, R.; Little, S. Rapid Dynamic Naturalistic Monitoring of Bradykinesia in Parkinson’s Disease Using a Wrist-Worn Accelerometer. Sensors 2021, 21, 7876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Prill, R.; Walter, M.; Królikowska, A.; Becker, R. A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Applications of Wearable Movement Sensors for Knee Joint Rehabilitation. Sensors 2021, 21, 8221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kim, B.H.; Hong, S.H.; Oh, I.W.; Lee, Y.W.; Kee, I.H.; Lee, S.Y. Measurement of Ankle Joint Movements Using IMUs during Running. Sensors 2021, 21, 4240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Di Paolo, S.; Lopomo, N.F.; Della Villa, F.; Paolini, G.; Figari, G.; Bragonzoni, L.; Grassi, A.; Zaffagnini, S. Rehabilitation and Return to Sport Assessment after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Quantifying Joint Kinematics during Complex High-Speed Tasks through Wearable Sensors. Sensors 2021, 21, 2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Capodaglio, P.; Cimolin, V. Wearables for Movement Analysis in Healthcare. Sensors 2022, 22, 3720. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103720

AMA Style

Capodaglio P, Cimolin V. Wearables for Movement Analysis in Healthcare. Sensors. 2022; 22(10):3720. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103720

Chicago/Turabian Style

Capodaglio, Paolo, and Veronica Cimolin. 2022. "Wearables for Movement Analysis in Healthcare" Sensors 22, no. 10: 3720. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103720

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop