Next Article in Journal
Application of WGM Resonances to the Measurement of the Temperature Increment of Ho and Ho-Yb Doped Optical Fibers Pumped at 1125 and 975 nm
Next Article in Special Issue
Dynamically Controlling Offloading Thresholds in Fog Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Colour-Balanced Edge-Guided Digital Inpainting: Applications on Artworks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficient Implementation of NIST LWC ESTATE Algorithm Using OpenCL and Web Assembly for Secure Communication in Edge Computing Environment

Identification of IoT Actors

Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Taehong Kim
Sensors 2021, 21(6), 2093;
Received: 31 January 2021 / Revised: 28 February 2021 / Accepted: 9 March 2021 / Published: 17 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Edge/Fog Computing Technologies for IoT Infrastructure)
The Internet of Things (IoT) is a leading trend with numerous opportunities accompanied by advantages as well as disadvantages. Parallel with IoT development, significant privacy and personal data protection challenges are also growing. In this regard, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is often considered the world’s strongest set of data protection rules and has proven to be a catalyst for many countries around the world. The concepts and interaction of the data controller, the joint controllers, and the data processor play a key role in the implementation of the GDPR. Therefore, clarifying the blurred IoT actors’ relationships to determine corresponding responsibilities is necessary. Given the IoT transformation reflected in shifting computing power from cloud to the edge, in this research we have considered how these computing paradigms are affecting IoT actors. In this regard, we have introduced identification of IoT actors according to a new five-computing layer IoT model based on the cloud, fog, edge, mist, and dew computing. Our conclusion is that identifying IoT actors in the light of the corresponding IoT data manager roles could be useful in determining the responsibilities of IoT actors for their compliance with data protection and privacy rules. View Full-Text
Keywords: Internet of things; IoT actor; data manager; GDPR; computing Internet of things; IoT actor; data manager; GDPR; computing
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hadzovic, S.; Mrdovic, S.; Radonjic, M. Identification of IoT Actors. Sensors 2021, 21, 2093.

AMA Style

Hadzovic S, Mrdovic S, Radonjic M. Identification of IoT Actors. Sensors. 2021; 21(6):2093.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hadzovic, Suada, Sasa Mrdovic, and Milutin Radonjic. 2021. "Identification of IoT Actors" Sensors 21, no. 6: 2093.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop