Next Article in Journal
A 0.3 V PNN Based 10T SRAM with Pulse Control Based Read-Assist and Write Data-Aware Schemes for Low Power Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Coherently Radiating Periodic Structures to Reduce the Number of Phase Shifters in a 2-D Phased Array
Previous Article in Journal
A Miniature, Fiber-Optic Vibrometer for Measuring Unintended Acoustic Output of Active Hearing Implants during Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Analytical Design Technique for a Wideband Wilkinson Power Divider Using Dual-Band Topology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On the Use of Ridge Gap Waveguide Technology for the Design of Transverse Stub Resonant Antenna Arrays

by
Javier Benavides-Vazquez
1,2,*,
Jose-Luis Vazquez-Roy
2 and
Eva Rajo-Iglesias
2
1
Indra Sistemas, S.A., 28850 Torrejon de Ardoz, Spain
2
Signal Theory and Communications Department, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganes, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2021, 21(19), 6590; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196590
Submission received: 31 August 2021 / Revised: 27 September 2021 / Accepted: 30 September 2021 / Published: 2 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection RF and Microwave Communications)

Abstract

:
This paper presents some considerations on the design of a novel antenna consisting of the combination of a transverse stubs (TS) array excited by Ridge Gap Waveguides (RGWs), as well as a discussion of the experimental results obtained from a prototype that was manufactured and measured. A combination of Continuous Transverse Stubs (CTSs) is used as the starting point. Subsequently, the CTSs are modified to include some metallic blockers that split each CTS into a combination (array) of shorter TSs. This is performed in order to excite each individual TS column using a different RGW; thus, ensuring a close to uniform field distribution in the transverse plane of the TS arrays. Hence, the directivity of the antenna is increased. As a series-feed configuration is considered, the antenna keeps a resonant behaviour, having a narrow-band response. A Corporate Feeding Network (CFN) using the aforementioned RGW technology placed in the same layer as the rest of the antenna is included in the design. The radiating area of the antenna is, finally, 5.88 λ 0 × 7.12 λ 0 with a simulated peak gain of 26.2 dBi and a Side Lobe Level (SLL) below −13 dB. A prototype is manufactured and tested. The simulated and measured radiation patterns maintain similar shapes to those of the simulations, with very similar angular widths in both main planes, although the frequency corresponding to the highest directivity changes to 31.8 GHz. A matching bandwidth of 517 MHz and a gain of 24.5 is, finally, achieved at that frequency.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, with the trend of moving up in frequency communication services, it is common to see antennas working at very high-frequency bands. Moreover, antenna integration has become a key issue for the radio-frequency community.
Some applications, such as on-the-move SATCOM communications, are following the aforementioned trends, besides many others. Consequently, very compact designs are needed in order to integrate these antennas above different structures (aircraft, ground vehicles, etc.). As for any other satellite application, the gain of an antenna is a key performance indicator.
In this context, Continuous Transverse Stub (CTS) arrays appear as interesting candidates for the antenna designer. With very high directivity values, compact designs and high aperture efficiencies, these elements have demonstrated several benefits over other antenna designs (e.g., slotted waveguides or microstrip patches) [1,2,3].
In their series-feed resonant form, i.e., terminating the antenna with a short circuit [4], narrowband responses are expected. For those cases in which a true-time delay implementation [5] is selected, e.g., [6], wider bandwidths can be achieved at the cost of increasing the design and manufacturing complexity by using a parallel feed strategy.
Considering a resonant design where the radiating elements are located in the positions of the maxima of a standing wave, a λ g spacing between consecutive CTS radiating elements is needed. For this reason, a low-loss dielectric is used in the host waveguide to avoid grating lobes in the resulting radiation pattern by making λ g < λ 0 . On the contrary, air-filled stubs are used in our proposal in the radiating part of the antenna. Figure 1 depicts this situation.
When radiating CTSs are used in a Parallel-Plate Waveguide (PPW) structure, a uniform E-field distribution is only achieved inside the stubs when Perfect Magnetic Conductor (PMC) boundary conditions are used in their lateral ends. Any other field distribution will result in a loss of directivity. In our case, PEC boundary conditions are used laterally to enclose the full structure so the fundamental mode for the stubs is the T E 10 , but due to the long width of the elements, many higher order modes can be present depending on the excitation mechanism used.
RGW technology [7,8,9], with the so-called Bed of Nails (BoN) [10], can readily be employed to excite slot antennas [11,12,13] and this approach can also be used to excite a CTS, as shown in Figure 2, that shows the conventional CTS implementation in a PPW (I), the same laterally infinite structure but excited by a centred RGW (II), and, finally, the RGW exciting a CTS (III) which is laterally limited by a PEC BC imposed by two metallic blockers.
In order to prove that exciting an array (column) of CTSs using RGW increases the directivity in comparison with a standard PPW implementation, some simple tests are carried out using simulation schemes such as the one shown in Figure 3. The models contain linear arrays of TSs, which are laterally terminated with PEC boundary conditions. Note that the stubs are now made as deep grooves in a solid sheet metal. The directivity is found to be higher in the RGW case compared to the PPW case due to the field distribution achieved in the stubs. The lateral extent of the stubs is of the order of the wavelength.
In a first attempt, and with the idea of achieving a field distribution in the stubs as uniform as possible, equally spaced RGWs fed with the same amplitude are used to excite CTSs arranged in a linear array in the way showed in Figure 4a. The aim is also to achieve a distribution as symmetrical as possible. The simulation results show a not so clean field distribution in the cross section due to the uncontrolled excitation of higher order modes, so it was decided to split each individual CTS into smaller TSs by means of metallic blockers such as the ones described in Figure 2 (III). Hence, the resulting antenna could be assimilated to an N × N TS array (see Figure 4b).
As a result, in [14], a proof of concept is designed and simulated in order to check the potential of an 8 × 8 antenna array at 31 GHz, integrating RGW technology with TS radiating elements. A 1:8 power splitter implemented in air-gap RGW technology is also designed to properly excite the eight ridges that feed the TS elements. Given that the obtained results are promising, a prototype is manufactured and measured. The results of those previous simulations and the subsequent measurements are discussed next, as well as the convenience of using solutions based on the aforementioned combination of elements.

2. Antenna Design

2.1. Bed of Nails (BoN)

The Bed of Nails (BoN),composed of rectangular pins, was employed in order to guarantee that no field could propagate outside the path provided by the ridges, ensuring, hence, a quasi-uniform field distribution along the modified CTS radiating elements.
This structure was based on the principle that no modes can propagate in between a Perfect Magnetic Conductor (PMC) in parallel with a Perfect Electric Conductor (PEC) [15], provided that the height separating both plates, h g , is less than λ g / 4 [9]. Moreover, it was required to have a pin height, h p , of around λ 0 / 4 , in order to ensure the PMC condition at the top of the pin while having a PEC boundary sustaining the BoN, and a small pin period as compared to the free space wavelength.
Two different propagating sections were considered: the first regarding the CFN, in which the quasi-TEM mode in between the upper surface of the ridge and the upper metallic plate was going to propagate through air, and the second regarding the radiating part of the structure, in which the substrate RT/duroid™ 5880LZ ( ϵ r = 2 , t a n δ = 0.0027 ) was employed.
By simulating a unit cell comprising both the pin itself and the dielectric gap above it, and setting a periodic boundary in all directions except in the upper and lower parts of the pin which were set to be electric boundaries, it was possible to obtain the dispersion diagram; hence, checking that no modes were going to propagate at the operating frequencies. This analysis had to be conducted both considering air and RT/duroid™ 5880LZ as the dielectrics placed above the pin. Table 1 shows the resulting geometry for the design of the BoN.
As it can be observed in Figure 5, neither when using the 5880LZ substrate, nor with air, did the modes propagate at the desired operating frequencies.

2.2. Corporate Feeding Network

In order to feed the eight ridges which excite the TS columns, a CFN of size 1 × 8 was employed (see Figure 6). This CFN made use of RGW + BoN technology and employed air as the dielectric confining the propagating field along the ridges. This was preferred in terms of ohmic losses rather than using a different dielectric.
Firstly, a WR28 (standardized waveguide which can operate at the centre frequency of 31 GHz) to ridge gap waveguide transition was designed after [16]. This design is shown in Figure 7.
Regarding the CFN design, λ / 4 sections were used to match the input of every −3 dB power splitter in the corporate network. This type of element was also used at the outputs of the CFN, since the impedance seen at the input of the RGW of the radiating part of the structure had to be compensated due to the use of different dielectrics at each side of the discontinuity.
The CFN distributes the power equally at each arm split. This behaviour can be clearly seen in Figure 8, where the magnitude of the vertical component of the electric field is displayed.
For the purpose of simulating the CFN, CST Studio Suite® with its Time Domain Solver was employed [17]. Figure 9 shows both the reflection and transmission coefficients for the corporate feeding network. This structure included the WR28-to-ridge transition, which was, indeed, the feeding port (number one). As the structure was symmetric, only the transmission to the right-hand side output ports (two to five) was considered. A good impedance matching at the input port was observed for the frequency of operation (in fact, this structure exhibited a wideband response, as expected), as well as a good transmission to all output ports with an Insertion Loss of around 1 dB.

2.3. Radiating Structure

The schematic of the antenna design can be found in Figure 10, while all geometric parameters related with the antenna are summarized in Table 2.
Figure 11 shows the instantaneous electric field components E z and E x on cutting planes at the ridges and the aperture level. Although Figure 11a shows a slight phase shift from left to right in the excitation of the TS, Figure 11b shows a field maxima in practically all the radiating elements; therefore, enabling broadside radiation.
Regarding the transverse plane, Figure 12 displays the instantaneous E x field distribution inside the first TS row at the nominal frequency. It can be seen how the field distribution fills much of the aperture. This would obviously contribute to the increase in the antenna directivity.
Finally, Figure 13 includes the simulation response of the designed antenna in input matching and radiation patterns. A maximum gain of 26.2 dBi was expected at 31 GHz.

3. Experimental Results and Discussion

Figure 14 shows a picture of the manufactured prototype, where the excitation network and the substrate arrangement can be identified, as well as the assembled antenna in the anechoic chamber showing the radiating side with the TS array. The antenna was manufactured using conventional milling techniques.
After measuring the antenna, it was found that, the desired radiation response had shifted in a matched bandwidth towards the high frequencies (Figure 15) and the best radiation results were obtained at 31.8 GHz (Figure 16), which corresponded to a 2.7% shift from the target frequency. It was also observed how the E-field pattern was tilted 2 , approximately.
Based on the results obtained, a study of the effect of the substrate permittivity on the antenna response was carried out. For this purpose, different simulations were performed for ±2% variations in that value. These variations may be related not only to the manufacturing tolerances of the substrate, but also to the presence of small air gaps due to the lack of flatness of the substrate itself and the metal parts that make up the antenna.
Figure 17 shows the simulated S 11 for the nominal permittivity and for ±2% variations. Clearly, the effective permittivity was lower than initially assumed for the ideal substrate. As we were using the dielectric as a form of a slow-wave implementation, its exact value when manufacturing the prototype was critical. The distance in between adjacent maxima positions of the standing wave strongly depended on this value, so if it changed with respect to the selected one when designing the antenna, the radiating stubs would not be precisely placed at the top of each standing wave maximum; thus, affecting the impedance matching of the antenna and, also, altering the radiation patterns with some possible main lobe tilting and a side lobe appearance.
Figure 18 represents the simulated E-plane and H-plane radiation patterns for different permittivities at 30.5, 31 and 31.5 GHz. As can be seen, due to the ±2% variation in the relative permittivity, some differences were observed in the radiation patterns. The strongest variations were produced for the lowest analysed frequency, i.e., 30.5 GHz, with some tilting observed and the appearance of a secondary lobe near the main one. Figure 19 represents the E-plane E θ radiation patterns measured at three different frequencies. It can be seen how those patterns corresponded approximately to those represented in Figure 18 (left column), relating again to a permittivity lower than the nominal one.
In Table 3, all simulated and measured results are shown and compared. Table 4 shows a comparison with other similar antennas employing CTS technology, in particular with a true-time delay implementation.

4. Conclusions and Future Work

It was demonstrated how the integration between RGW technology and radiating TSs made it possible to obtain a close to uniform field distribution at each row in the array. This behaviour had a direct impact on the maximization of the antenna gain, which resulted in a peak value of 24.5 dBi in the measurements. Moreover, pencil-beam broadside radiation patterns were obtained in both principal planes, with a maximum angular width of around 8 for the worst case.
Good results were obtained both at simulation and measurement levels, both in impedance matching and radiation characteristics. Specifically, measurements showed an absolute matching bandwidth of 517 MHz. On the other hand, the best radiation results were obtained at 31.8 GHz. Besides this 2.5% frequency shift, the E-plane radiation pattern showed a small main lobe tilt. The H-plane measured radiation pattern agreed well with simulations in its main lobe. A small increment in the SLL was observed in both principal planes.
RGW technology allows to implement the CFN in the same layer as for the TS array, which produced a direct simplification for the manufacturing process. This fact also made the antenna very compact.
This prototype could be suitable for narrowband applications requiring flat and compact antenna arrays with a high gain if the described problematic effects could be mitigated, namely:
  • The exact value of the substrate’s relative permittivity plays a critical role on the antenna performance, given that its resonant response is directly affected by this figure. As per commented before, when this value changes, the standing wave maxima positions move. This fact has a direct impact on the impedance bandwidth as well as on the E-plane radiation patterns, both in terms of the main lobe tilt and gain.
  • There is a trade-off between the enhancement of the antenna directivity, achieved thanks to the good illumination obtained at the antenna aperture, and the insertion losses produced at the CFN that are used to feed the array. The evaluation of this trade-off is part of the work being conducted in ongoing research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.B.-V., J.-L.V.-R. and E.R.-I.; methodology, J.B.-V. and J.-L.V.-R.; software, J.B.-V.; validation, J.B.-V., J.-L.V.-R. and E.R.-I.; formal analysis, J.B.-V.; investigation, J.B.-V. and J.-L.V.-R.; resources, J.-L.V.-R. and E.R.-I.; data curation, J.B.-V.; writing—original draft preparation, J.B.-V.; writing—review and editing, J.B.-V., J.-L.V.-R. and E.R.-I.; visualization, J.B.-V.; supervision, J.-L.V.-R. and E.R.-I.; project administration, E.R.-I.; funding acquisition, E.R.-I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded in part by the Spanish State Research Agency under project PID2019-107688RB-C21.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Francisco Pizarro-Torres (Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Chile) for assistance in the antenna manufacturing and Luis Fernando Herran-Ontañon (Universidad de Oviedo, Spain) for their help with the anechoic chamber measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BCBoundary Condition
BoNBed of Nails
CFNCorporate Feeding Network
CTSContinuous Transverse Stub
PECPerfect Electric Conductor
PMCPerfect Magnetic Conductor
PPWParallel-Plate Waveguide
RGWRidge Gap Waveguide
SLLSide Lobe Level
TEMTransverse Electro-Magnetic
TSTransverse Stub

References

  1. Milroy, W.W. The Continuous Transverse (CTS) array: Basic theory, experiment, and application. In Proceedings of the Antenna Applications Symposium, Monticello, IL, USA, 25–27 September 1991; Volume 1, pp. 253–283. [Google Scholar]
  2. Milroy, W.W. Continuous Transverse Stub Element Devices and Methods of Making Same. U.S. Patent US5266961A, 30 November 1991. [Google Scholar]
  3. Henderson, W.H.; Milroy, W.W. Wireless communication applications of the continuous transverse stub (CTS) array at microwave and millimeter wave frequencies. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACES International Conference on Wireless Communications and Applied Computational Electromagnetics, Honolulu, HI, USA, 3–7 April 2005; pp. 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pucci, E.; Zaman, A.U.; Rajo-Iglesias, E.; Kildal, P.S.; Kishk, A. Study of Q-factors of ridge and groove gap waveguide resonators. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 2013, 7, 900–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Milroy, W.; Coppedge, S.; Ekmekji, A.; Hashemi-Yeganeh, S.; Buczeks, S. True-Time-Delay Feed Network for CTS Array. U.S. Patent 2006/0202899 A1, 14 September 2006. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ettorre, M.; Foglia Manzillo, F.; Casaletti, M.; Sauleau, R.; Capet, N. A compact and high-gain Ka-band multibeam continuous transverse stub antenna. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 19–24 July 2015; pp. 671–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kildal, P.S.; Zaman, A.; Rajo-Iglesias, E.; Alfonso, E.; Valero-Nogueira, A. Design and experimental verification of ridge gap waveguide in bed of nails for parallel-plate mode suppression. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 2011, 5, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rajo-Iglesias, E.; Ferrando-Rocher, M.; Zaman, A.U. Gap Waveguide Technology for Millimeter-Wave Antenna Systems. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2018, 56, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kildal, P.; Alfonso, E.; Valero-Nogueira, A.; Rajo-Iglesias, E. Local Metamaterial-Based Waveguides in Gaps Between Parallel Metal Plates. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2009, 8, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Silveirinha, M.; Fernandes, C.; Costa, J. Electromagnetic Characterization of Textured Surfaces Formed by Metallic Pins. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2008, 56, 2695–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Zaman, A.U.; Kildal, P.S. Slot antenna in ridge gap waveguide technology. In Proceedings of the 2012 6th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP), Prague, Czech Republic, 26–30 March 2012; pp. 3243–3244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Liu, J.; Vosoogh, A.; Zaman, A.U.; Yang, J. A Slot Array Antenna With Single-Layered Corporate-Feed Based on Ridge Gap Waveguide in the 60 GHz Band. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2019, 67, 1650–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zarifi, D.; Farahbakhsh, A.; Zaman, A.U.; Kildal, P.S. Design and Fabrication of a High-Gain 60-GHz Corrugated Slot Antenna Array with Ridge Gap Waveguide Distribution Layer. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2016, 64, 2905–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Benavides-Vazquez, J.; Vazquez-Roy, J.L.; Rajo-Iglesias, E. High-gain Resonant Continuous Transverse Stub Array Using Ridge Gap-Waveguide Technology. In Proceedings of the 2020 14th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Copenhagen, Denmark, 15–20 March 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Domínguez, A.T.; González, J.M.F.; Alonso, J.M.I.; Sierra-Pérez, M. Design proposal for Ridge Gap Waveguide and comparison with other technologies in Ka to W bands. In Proceedings of the 2016 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Davos, Switzerland, 10–15 April 2016; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Zaman, A.U.; Kildal, P. Wide-Band Slot Antenna Arrays With Single-Layer Corporate-Feed Network in Ridge Gap Waveguide Technology. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2014, 62, 2992–3001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Systèmes, D. Electromagnetic Simulation Solvers. 2021. Available online: https://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/products/cst-studio-suite/solvers/ (accessed on 15 August 2021).
  18. You, Q.; Lu, Y.; You, Y.; Wang, Y.; Hao, Z.C.; Huang, J. Wideband Full-Corporate-Feed Waveguide Continuous Transverse Stub Antenna Array. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 76673–76681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ettorre, M.; Manzillo, F.F.; Casaletti, M.; Sauleau, R.; Le Coq, L.; Capet, N. Continuous Transverse Stub Array for Ka-Band Applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2015, 63, 4792–4800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Potelon, T.; Ettorre, M.; Le Coq, L.; Bateman, T.; Francey, J.; Lelaidier, D.; Seguenot, E.; Devillers, F.; Sauleau, R. A Low-Profile Broadband 32-Slot Continuous Transverse Stub Array for Backhaul Applications in E -Band. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017, 65, 6307–6316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Array of open-circuited CTSs in resonant configuration.
Figure 1. Array of open-circuited CTSs in resonant configuration.
Sensors 21 06590 g001
Figure 2. Basic CTS in a PPW (I), a CTS excited by an RGW (II) and a laterally-limited CTS excited by an RGW (III).
Figure 2. Basic CTS in a PPW (I), a CTS excited by an RGW (II) and a laterally-limited CTS excited by an RGW (III).
Sensors 21 06590 g002
Figure 3. Comparison between a single ridge exciting a column of CTSs (left-hand figure) and a PPW design (right-hand figure), both with lateral PEC boundary conditions.
Figure 3. Comparison between a single ridge exciting a column of CTSs (left-hand figure) and a PPW design (right-hand figure), both with lateral PEC boundary conditions.
Sensors 21 06590 g003
Figure 4. CTS excitation by means of a combination of RGW: conventional CTSs (a) and short TSs (b).
Figure 4. CTS excitation by means of a combination of RGW: conventional CTSs (a) and short TSs (b).
Sensors 21 06590 g004
Figure 5. Dispersion diagrams of the unit cell pin configuration for air (left) and RT/duroid™ 5880LZ (right).
Figure 5. Dispersion diagrams of the unit cell pin configuration for air (left) and RT/duroid™ 5880LZ (right).
Sensors 21 06590 g005
Figure 6. CFN implemented with air gap RGW (note the substrate used in the slow-wave RGW that feeds the TS array).
Figure 6. CFN implemented with air gap RGW (note the substrate used in the slow-wave RGW that feeds the TS array).
Sensors 21 06590 g006
Figure 7. WR28 to RGW transition.
Figure 7. WR28 to RGW transition.
Sensors 21 06590 g007
Figure 8. Magnitude of the normalized E z at f 0 = 31 GHz shown in the air gap of the CFN.
Figure 8. Magnitude of the normalized E z at f 0 = 31 GHz shown in the air gap of the CFN.
Sensors 21 06590 g008
Figure 9. Simulated S-parameters of the corporate feeding network.
Figure 9. Simulated S-parameters of the corporate feeding network.
Sensors 21 06590 g009
Figure 10. Schematic of the proposed antenna design.
Figure 10. Schematic of the proposed antenna design.
Sensors 21 06590 g010
Figure 11. Simulated normalized E z ( t ) at the ridge level in the radiating section (ridges fed from the left side) and E x ( t ) at the aperture level at 31 GHz.
Figure 11. Simulated normalized E z ( t ) at the ridge level in the radiating section (ridges fed from the left side) and E x ( t ) at the aperture level at 31 GHz.
Sensors 21 06590 g011
Figure 12. Simulated normalized E x ( t ) field component at the cross section for the first row at 31 GHz (TS vertical limits indicated in black; y and z dimensions not to scale).
Figure 12. Simulated normalized E x ( t ) field component at the cross section for the first row at 31 GHz (TS vertical limits indicated in black; y and z dimensions not to scale).
Sensors 21 06590 g012
Figure 13. Simulated S 11 and gain radiation patterns for the antenna at 31 GHz.
Figure 13. Simulated S 11 and gain radiation patterns for the antenna at 31 GHz.
Sensors 21 06590 g013
Figure 14. Manufactured prototype: excitation network and substrate arrangement (left) and assembled antenna in anechoic chamber showing the radiating side (right).
Figure 14. Manufactured prototype: excitation network and substrate arrangement (left) and assembled antenna in anechoic chamber showing the radiating side (right).
Sensors 21 06590 g014
Figure 15. Measured S 11 for the manufactured antenna.
Figure 15. Measured S 11 for the manufactured antenna.
Sensors 21 06590 g015
Figure 16. Measured normalized radiation pattern at 31.8 GHz.
Figure 16. Measured normalized radiation pattern at 31.8 GHz.
Sensors 21 06590 g016
Figure 17. Measured vs. simulated S 11 for different permittivities.
Figure 17. Measured vs. simulated S 11 for different permittivities.
Sensors 21 06590 g017
Figure 18. Simulated radiation patterns at 30.5, 31 and 31.5 GHz for different substrate permittivities.
Figure 18. Simulated radiation patterns at 30.5, 31 and 31.5 GHz for different substrate permittivities.
Sensors 21 06590 g018
Figure 19. Measured E-plane radiation patterns ( E θ ) for different frequencies.
Figure 19. Measured E-plane radiation patterns ( E θ ) for different frequencies.
Sensors 21 06590 g019
Table 1. BoN geometry.
Table 1. BoN geometry.
ParameterParameter DescriptionValue (mm)
h p Pin height2.42
sPin side width1
pPin period1.75
w s Separation between a ridge and its adjacent pin column1.75
h g Height of the substrate gap1.27
h a i r Height of the air gap0.5
Table 2. Antenna geometry.
Table 2. Antenna geometry.
ParameterParameter DescriptionValue (mm)
w t r a n s Ridge width of the WR28 transition0.75
w i m p λ 0 / 4 ridge impedance transformers width1.5
w c o r p Corporate feeding ridges width1
h a i r Air gap at the feeding network0.5
h g Substrate height at the radiating section1.27
l s TS length2
w s TS width0.9
d r Distance between ridges8.75
d s Distance between TS8
l i Matching section length (dielectric discontinuity)1.69
w i Matching section width (dielectric discontinuity)2.25
Table 3. Comparison between simulation and measurement results.
Table 3. Comparison between simulation and measurement results.
ParameterParameter DescriptionSimulation 31 GHzMeasurement 31.8 GHz
BMatching bandwidth ( R L  > 10 dB)446 MHz517 MHz
GAntenna gain26.2 dB24.5 dB
Δ θ 3 dB E E-plane angular width (−3 dB)7.8 8
Δ θ 3 dB H H-plane angular width (−3 dB)7 6 . 5
S L L E E-plane SLL−13.2 dB−13.1 dB
S L L H H-plane SLL−13.8 dB−8.7 dB
Table 4. Comparison with other similar state of the art antennas.
Table 4. Comparison with other similar state of the art antennas.
ReferenceElectrical Size ( λ 0 2 )Percentage Bandwidth (%)Gain (dBi)
[18] 12.3 × 6.7 42.4>26.8
[19] 26.1 × 16.9 1228.9
[20] 43.2 × 25.1 1930.8
This work 5.88 × 7.12 1.6324.5
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Benavides-Vazquez, J.; Vazquez-Roy, J.-L.; Rajo-Iglesias, E. On the Use of Ridge Gap Waveguide Technology for the Design of Transverse Stub Resonant Antenna Arrays. Sensors 2021, 21, 6590. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196590

AMA Style

Benavides-Vazquez J, Vazquez-Roy J-L, Rajo-Iglesias E. On the Use of Ridge Gap Waveguide Technology for the Design of Transverse Stub Resonant Antenna Arrays. Sensors. 2021; 21(19):6590. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196590

Chicago/Turabian Style

Benavides-Vazquez, Javier, Jose-Luis Vazquez-Roy, and Eva Rajo-Iglesias. 2021. "On the Use of Ridge Gap Waveguide Technology for the Design of Transverse Stub Resonant Antenna Arrays" Sensors 21, no. 19: 6590. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196590

APA Style

Benavides-Vazquez, J., Vazquez-Roy, J. -L., & Rajo-Iglesias, E. (2021). On the Use of Ridge Gap Waveguide Technology for the Design of Transverse Stub Resonant Antenna Arrays. Sensors, 21(19), 6590. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196590

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop