Next Article in Journal
Autonomous Deployment of Underwater Acoustic Monitoring Devices Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: The Flying Hydrophone
Previous Article in Journal
Mapping and Discriminating Rural Settlements Using Gaofen-2 Images and a Fully Convolutional Network
Open AccessArticle

Research on Absolute Calibration of GNSS Receiver Delay through Clock-Steering Characterization

by 1,2,3,*, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3 and 1,2,3
1
National Time Service Center, Chinese Academy of Science, Xi’an 710600, China
2
Technology and Engineering Center for Space Utilization, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100039, China
3
Key Laboratory of Precise Navigation and Timing Technology, Chinese Academy Science, Xi’an 710600, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(21), 6063; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20216063
Received: 23 September 2020 / Revised: 22 October 2020 / Accepted: 22 October 2020 / Published: 25 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensors)
The receiver delay has a significant impact on global navigation satellite system (GNSS) time measurement. This article comprehensively analyzes the difficulty, composition, principle, and calculation of GNSS receiver delay. A universal method, based on clock-steering characterization, is proposed to absolutely calibrate all types of receivers. We use a hardware simulator to design several experiments to test the performance of GNSS receiver delay for different receiver types, radio frequency (RF) signals, operation status and time-to-phase (TtP). At first, through the receivers of Novatel and Septentrio, the channel delay of Septentrio is 2 ns far lower than 65 ns for Novatel, and for the inter-frequency bias of GLONASS L1, Septentrio tends to increase within 10 ns compared with decreasing of Novatel within 5 ns. Secondly, a representative receiver of UniNav-BDS (BeiDou) is chosen to test the influence of Ttp which may be ignored by users. Under continuous operation, the receiver delay shows a monotone reduction of 10 ns as TtP increased by 10 ns. However, under on-off operation, the receiver delay represents periodic variation. Through a zero-baseline comparison, we verifies the relation between receiver delay and TtP. At last, the article analyzes instrument errors and measurement errors in the experiment, and the combined uncertainty of absolute calibration is calculated with 1.36 ns. View Full-Text
Keywords: receiver delay; absolute calibration; clock-steering; pulse-per-second (PPS); TtC (time-to-code); TtP (time-to-phase) receiver delay; absolute calibration; clock-steering; pulse-per-second (PPS); TtC (time-to-code); TtP (time-to-phase)
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, F.; Zhang, H.; Huang, L.; Li, X.; Feng, P. Research on Absolute Calibration of GNSS Receiver Delay through Clock-Steering Characterization. Sensors 2020, 20, 6063.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop