Next Article in Journal
Enabling the Orchestration of IoT Slices through Edge and Cloud Microservice Platforms
Next Article in Special Issue
SNAPS: Sensor Analytics Point Solutions for Detection and Decision Support Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Rateless Coded Uplink Transmission Design for Multi-User C-RAN
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 19
Issue 13
10.3390/s19132979
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Single-Step Formation of Ni Nanoparticle-Modified Graphene–Diamond Hybrid Electrodes for Electrochemical Glucose Detection

by
Naiyuan Cui
1,2,
Pei Guo
2,3,
Qilong Yuan
2,4,
Chen Ye
2,5,
Mingyang Yang
2,5,
Minghui Yang
6,
Kuan W. A. Chee
4,7,
Fei Wang
1,*,
Li Fu
8,
Qiuping Wei
9,
Cheng-Te Lin
2,5,* and
Jingyao Gao
2,5,*
1
MOE Key Laboratory for Non-Equilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
2
Key Laboratory of Marine Materials and Related Technologies, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Marine Materials and Protective Technologies, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering (NIMTE), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China
3
Department of Physics, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110000, China
4
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham, Ningbo 315100, China
5
College of Material Science and Optoelectronic Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19 A Yuquan Rd., Shijingshan District, Beijing 100049, China
6
Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering (NIMTE), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China
7
Laser Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 226100, China
8
College of Materials and Environmental Engineering, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China
9
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2019, 19(13), 2979; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19132979
Submission received: 16 May 2019 / Revised: 16 June 2019 / Accepted: 29 June 2019 / Published: 5 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Electrochemical Sensors for Biomedical Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The development of accurate, reliable devices for glucose detection has drawn much attention from the scientific community over the past few years. Here, we report a single-step method to fabricate Ni nanoparticle-modified graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes via a catalytic thermal treatment, by which the graphene layers are directly grown on the diamond surface using Ni thin film as a catalyst, meanwhile, Ni nanoparticles are formed in situ on the graphene surface due to dewetting behavior. The good interface between the Ni nanoparticles and the graphene guarantees efficient charge transfer during electrochemical detection. The fabricated electrodes exhibit good glucose sensing performance with a low detection limit of 2 μM and a linear detection range between 2 μM–1 mM. In addition, this sensor shows great selectivity, suggesting potential applications for sensitive and accurate monitoring of glucose in human blood.

1. Introduction

Diabetes, caused by the improper secretion of insulin, is one of the most serious and prevalent metabolic diseases in human beings. In order to monitor blood insulin levels, a reliable and accurate technique for the detection of blood glucose concentration is of importance [1,2,3,4]. To date, there have been many sensing approaches, for example, electrochemical [5], spectrophotometric [5], surface plasma resonance [6], and fluorescence methods [7], which are effective for glucose detection. Among these techniques, electrochemical glucose sensors have particular advantages, including process simplicity, high sensitivity, good selectivity, and low production costs. Generally, electrochemical sensors applied for the recognition of glucose oxidase can be classified as two types: enzymatic and non-enzymatic sensors [8,9]. Enzymatic glucose sensors may be easily influenced by external environmental conditions, such as temperature, pH value, humidity etc. [10,11], therefore non-enzymatic glucose sensors have drawn more attention from the scientific community over the past few years.
In recent years, great efforts have been devoted to exploring pragmatic and reliable non-enzymatic glucose sensors [12,13,14,15]. Until now, nanomaterials including metals and their oxides (such as Au, Ag, Co, Cu, Ni, Co3O4, NiCoO2, and NiO), as well as alloy systems (Ni–Pd, Cu–Pd, Ni–Cr etc.), have been developed as electrode materials for non-enzymatic glucose detection [16,17,18,19]. Among these nanomaterials, nickel and its derivatives have drawn great attention due to their non-toxicity, low cost, and excellent electrocatalytic activity for glucose oxidation, as NiOOH is an outstanding oxidizing agent in alkaline medium [20]. Moreover, according to Toghill’s work [20], nickel has been demonstrated to be the most sensitive electrode material applied for recognition of non-enzymatic glucose. Therefore, many non-enzymatic glucose sensors have been fabricated by decorating the substrate electrode with Ni nanoparticles (Ni NPs) or nanocomposites. You et al. prepared a glucose sensing electrode by dispersion of Ni NPs inside graphite-like carbon [21], and Safavi et al. mixed nano-sized nickel hydroxide with ionic liquid and graphite powder to fabricate a composite electrode for detecting glucose [22]. However, the simple combination of Ni nanomaterials and the substrate electrode still has a problem with long-term electrochemical stability in the electrolyte environment, owing to the weak interfacial interaction (van der Waals forces) between them. In order to solve this issue, the development of Ni NPs-modified electrochemical electrodes with a strong covalent binding at their interface is of significance for glucose detection [12,23,24,25].
Graphene, one of the attractive two-dimensional materials, has drawn enormous attention owing to its unique physical properties, for instance, high carrier mobility (≈15,000 cm2/V·s), good chemical stability, and high specific surface area (≈2600 m2/g) [26,27]. Graphene-based electrochemical sensors have experienced extensive application in electroanalysis and enabled the development of biosensors with high sensitivity and specificity [28,29,30]. In common cases, such sensors were fabricated by depositing graphene sheets upon the surface of a glassy carbon electrode (GCE), followed by the decoration of Ni NPs on the graphene surface [31,32]. Again, this sensing platform has the same problem of weak adhesion at the interface of Ni NPs/graphene and graphene/GCE through van der Waals interactions [33].
In this contribution, we developed a single-step method to fabricate Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes via a catalytic thermal treatment process. A sp3-to-sp2 conversion method was proposed in our previous study to directly grow few-layer graphene on the surface of diamond, using metal film as a catalyst and diamond itself as a carbon source [28,30]. In this study, during catalytic annealing for graphene growth, Ni NPs could be simultaneously formed on the surface of graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes due to the aggregation of Ni thin films into Ni NPs based on the dewetting behavior. The fabricated glucose sensors have a low detection limit of 2 μM with a linear electrochemical detection range from 2 μM to 1 mM. The better sensing performance is credited to the enhanced electrocatalytic activity of Ni NPs and the covalent bonding between Ni NPs and graphene.

2. Materials and Methods

We first purchased single-crystal high-pressure and high-temperature (HPHT) diamonds with a size of 3.5 × 3.5 × 1 mm and (1 0 0) orientation from the Shenzhen Tiantian Xiangshang Diamond Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, China. In order to remove the surface contaminants from the diamonds, we immersed diamond substrate into a piranha solution composed of 70% H2SO4 and 30% H2O2 in volume (purchased from the Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) at 50 °C for 4 h. The treated diamonds were further cleaned in deionized water and ethanol for 10 min, respectively, by ultrasonic cleaning. The clean diamonds were then deposited with a 50 nm-thick Ni film on their surface via an e-beam system under the pressure of 1.4 × 10−5 Torr, and a deposition rate of 0.5 Å/s (MUE-ECO, Chigasaki, Japan). After the deposition process, we placed the Ni/diamond substrate in a tube furnace system, followed by thermally treating them in 8 sccm H2 flow at 1020 °C for 15 min (BTF-1200C-II-SL, Hefei, China). We finally fabricated a device for the electrochemical experiment by immobilizing the as-prepared sample on a plastic substrate with silver wire connected to it through silver paint. The other exposed area was protected with silicone resin.
Some characterization methods were applied to investigate our samples. We first determined the chemical composition change to the diamonds before and after thermal treatment using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS AXIS ULTR DLD, Kratos Analytical, Manchester, UK). Following that, we used Raman spectroscopy (Renishaw inVia Reflex, Renishaw plc, Wotton-under-Edge, UK) to characterize the quality of the diamonds and obtained graphene. A field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM QUANTA 250 FEG, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) was then applied to observe the surface morphology of the samples. Finally, we conducted some electrochemical experiments with an Autolab workstation (PGSTAT 302F, Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland) to investigate the electrochemical performance of our device.

3. Results and Discussion

Our proposed process for the fabrication of Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes based on sp3-to-sp2 conversion during catalytic annealing is illustrated in Figure 1a. In brief, a piece of HPHT diamond was pre-deposited with a 50 nm-thick Ni thin film, followed by setting it in a tube furnace system with H2 flow. After annealing at 1020 °C for 15 min, the system was naturally cooled down. The chemical components of the surface of the diamond before and after the catalytic annealing process were characterized by XPS analysis. As shown in Figure 1b, after annealing, the survey scan indicated that the sample surface contained Ni, O, and C signals. Additionally, in Figure 1c, the surface of pristine diamond was composed of complete sp3 C–C bonds except for some oxygen-containing groups [34]. In contrast, the ratio between the sp2 and sp3 bonds of the sample increased equal to 1:1 after the sp3-to-sp2 conversion process. The quality of the in situ formed graphene was examined by Raman spectroscopy. As presented in Figure 1d, the typical peaks located at 1351, 1586, and 2699 cm−1 can be assigned to the D-peak, G-peak, and 2D-peak of graphene, respectively [35]. The narrow (≈70) full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the 2D-peak and the I2D/IG ratio (≈0.69) suggests the characteristics of few-layer graphene, while the TEM image shown in the inset of Figure 1d indicates that few-layer graphene was directly formed on the diamond surface after catalytic thermal treatment. Moreover, the low ID/IG ratio (<0.1) indicates that the graphene transformed from the diamond has low defect content [36]. The graphene layers played a role as electrical conducting films, and the good interface between the Ni nanoparticles and the graphene guaranteed an efficient charge transfer during electrochemical detection.
Figure 2a–d presents a comparison of the surface morphology between the HPHT diamond, the Ni thin film-coated diamond, and the Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid, respectively. In Figure 2a,b, both the pristine and 50 nm-thick Ni film-coated diamond substrates exhibit a smooth and flat surface with some void defects. After thermal treatment at 1020 °C, the sample surface becomes coarse and a high density of uniformly distributed nanoparticles are formed, as shown in Figure 2c,d. The EDS analysis was performed to acquire the elemental content of these nanoparticles, and only C and Ni peaks can be seen, corresponding to the observation from the XPS survey plot. Thus, we conclude that these nanoparticles are composed of Ni, and as an example, the Ni NPs has a diameter of ≈178 nm. The mechanism for single-step formation of Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid is proposed as an anisotropic etching process, as illustrated in Figure 2e. It can be explained that at high temperature (1020 °C), the carbon atoms may diffuse and dissolve into Ni thin film and this solid–solution reaction proceeds laterally along the steps on the surface of the diamond. As there have been some void defects incorporated in and on the HPHT diamond, Ni etching behavior becomes more severe at the defect region, leading to the promotion of solid–solution reaction [37]. Meanwhile, Ni thin film would gradually aggregate into Ni NPs with various sizes due to the dewetting phenomenon at high temperature [38]. During the cooling process, the supersaturated carbon atoms in the Ni NPs would precipitate to form graphene layers through an out-diffusion process [39]. As a result, a Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid may have a larger specific active surface area and better electrocatalytic activity for further electrochemical detection.
The Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrids were further fabricated into electrodes for electrochemical experiments, and for comparison, a graphene–diamond hybrid without decoration of Ni NPs was also prepared by immersing the sample in an etching solution (2 g CuSO4 and 10 mL HCl in 10 mL DI water) [40]. Based on the cyclic voltammetry (CV) method, Figure 3a shows the electrocatalytic performance of graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes with and without Ni NPs modification in 0.5 M NaOH electrolyte containing 5 mM glucose. Obviously, the peak current density of the Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid shows a remarkable increase with a 20-fold improvement compared to the graphene–diamond hybrid without Ni NPs decoration. Such significant enhancement can be explained as follows [41]: (1) Ni NPs provide additional active sites during the electrocatalytic process and (2) the covalent bonding between Ni NPs and the graphene–diamond hybrid surface reduces the interfacial charge transfer resistance. The Nyquist plots of the graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes with and without Ni NPs modification in 1 M KCl solution containing 5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] and 5 mM K4[Fe(CN)6] are presented in Figure 3c, and in Figure 3b, the corresponding fitting equivalent circuit is applied to analyze the measured impedance data. The fitting parameters are listed in Table 1: Re, Rf, and Rc represent the resistance of electrolyte, the film electrode, and the charge transfer, respectively. Constant phase elements Qc and Qd represent the capacitance of the film electrode and the double layer. In the low frequency region, the Warburg resistance is represented by Zw. The marked decrease of the Rc of Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid (0.6 Ω cm2, as without decoration: 353.8 Ω cm2) may be credited to the enhanced charge transfer, which means that the better interface between Ni NPs and the graphene–diamond hybrid due to the proposed in situ formation process, leading to the acceleration of the charge transfer rate [42]. In addition, the Rf of our sample (6.2 Ω cm2) is lower than that of the undecorated graphene–diamond hybrid (430.4 Ω cm2), because of the enhancement of electrical conductivity of the electrodes with Ni NPs modification [43].
The sensing performance of Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes for detecting glucose was investigated by changing the scan rate of CV measurement, and the results are shown in Figure 4a. A pair of redox peaks can be observed at the potential range between 0–0.6 V. As reported [41], the two peaks originate from the redox reaction of Ni3+/Ni2+ couple, the reaction equations of which can be described as follows:
Ni + 2OH− → Ni(OH)2 + 2e−
Ni(OH)2 + OH− → NiOOH + H2O + e−
NiOOH + glucose → Ni(OH)2 + gluconolactone
With an increase of scan rate, the anodic and cathodic peak currents increase monotonically, simultaneously accompanying the positive shift of the oxidation peak and the negative shift of the reduction peak, resulting in an increase of the peak separation because a higher over-potential needs to be applied to achieve the same electron transfer rate [44]. As displayed in Figure 4b, the current density of oxidation and reduction peaks as a function of the scan rate has a high correlation coefficient of 0.996 and 0.991, respectively, suggesting a surface-controlled process for glucose detection. Figure 4c presents the CV responses of Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes in 0.5 M NaOH electrolyte containing different glucose concentrations at 100 mV s−1. The peak current density of our glucose sensors linearly increases with the increase of glucose concentration, and the oxidation peak shows a right shift when glucose concentration increases, which can be attributed to the limited diffusion of glucose on the surface of the electrode [45]. In Figure 4d, the linear fitting curve can be expressed as: I (mA) = 0.2777 log C (μM) + 0.6960 with a high correlation coefficient of 0.998. As a result, the low detection limit (LOD) of our glucose sensors is 2 μM, determined using the expression: LOD = 3sb/S, where S is the slope of the linear plot and sb is the blank measurement in Figure 4d.
A comparison of our sample with other Ni NPs-modified carbon-based electrodes is presented in Table 2, indicating the improved performance of our hybrid electrode in glucose detection [45,46,47,48]. Except Ni NPs, other nanomaterials such as cobalt phthalocyanine and CuO nanoflakes have also been used for sensing glucose and exhibit good electrochemical activity [49,50]. In our sensor the graphene layers play a role as electrical conducting films, and the good interface between the Ni nanoparticles and graphene guarantees efficient charge transfer during electrochemical detection, compared with pristine graphene–diamond. The improved sensing performance can be attributed to the high electrocatalytic activity of Ni NPs, and compared with the work reported by Wang [48], the interface between Ni NPs and graphene presents better performance than the interface of Ni NPs/graphene nanosheets/GCE, which results in a wider linear range of detection.
The selectivity of the sensor is quite significant for non-enzymatic sensors because many interfering substances with a higher electron transfer rate are easily oxidized, resulting in an interfering oxidation current for glucose detection. In our study, various interfering substances such as uric acid, ascorbic acid, and sugars (galactose, mannitol) (each 0.1 mM) were used to examine the selectivity of our glucose sensors using an amperometric method. As the results show in Figure 5, our Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid electrode has good glucose specificity against other interfering substances, including sugars.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we proposed a single-step method to fabricate Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes for electrochemical glucose detection. Based on the sp3-to-sp2 conversion process, few-layer graphene decorated with Ni NPs could be formed simultaneously on the diamond surface. Compared to the undecorated sample, we demonstrated that Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes have superior electrocatalytic performance in glucose detection, showing a linear dynamic range of between 2 μM–1 mM and a low detection limit of 2 μM. The improved sensing performance can be attributed to the high electrocatalytic activity of Ni NPs, as well as a good interface between Ni NPs and graphene based on our single-step formation process. The glucose sensors have the potential for efficient monitoring of blood glucose levels or other diabetic conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.C.; investigation, N.C. and P.G.; formal analysis, C.Y. and M.Y. (Mingyang Yang); methodology, M.Y. (Minghui Yang) and K.W.A.C.; data curation, Q.W. and J.G.; original draft, J.G.; review and editing, Q.Y. and L.F.; resource and Funding acquisition, F.W. and C.-T.L.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51573201, 51501209, and 201675165), the NSFC-Zhejiang Joint Fund for the Integration of Industrialization and Informatization (U1709205), the Scientific Instrument Developing Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (YZ201640), the Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFZD-SW-409), the Science and Technology Major Project of Ningbo (2016S1002 and 2016B10038), and the International S&T Cooperation Program of Ningbo (2017D10016) for financial support. The Chinese Academy of Sciences for Hundred Talents Program, the Chinese Central Government for Thousand Young Talents Program, the 3315 Program of Ningbo, and the Key Technology of Nuclear Energy (CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team, 2014) also assisted. And The APC was funded by the NSFC-Zhejiang Joint Fund for the Integration of Industrialization and Informatization (U1709205).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ci, S.; Huang, T.; Wen, Z.; Cui, S.; Mao, S.; Steeber, D.A.; Chen, J. Nickel oxide hollow rnicrosphere for non-enzyme glucose detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 54, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fu, S.; Fan, G.; Yang, L.; Li, F. Non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on Au nanoparticles decorated ternary Ni-Al layered double hydroxide/single-walled carbon nanotubes/graphene nanocomposite. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 152, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Heidari, H.; Habibi, E. Amperometric enzyme-free glucose sensor based on the use of a reduced graphene oxide paste electrode modified with electrodeposited cobalt oxide nanoparticles. Microchim. Acta 2016, 183, 2259–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kim, D.-M.; Moon, J.-M.; Lee, W.-C.; Yoon, J.-H.; Choi, C.S.; Shim, Y.-B. A potentiometric non-enzymatic glucose sensor using a molecularly imprinted layer bonded on a conducting polymer. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 91, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Qiao, N.; Zheng, J. Nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on glassy carbon electrode modified with a nanocomposite composed of nickel hydroxide and graphene. Microchim. Acta 2012, 177, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Amjadi, M.; Shokri, R.; Hallaj, T. Interaction of glucose-derived carbon quantum dots with silver and gold nanoparticles and its application for the fluorescence detection of 6-thioguanine. Luminesence 2017, 32, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chen, J.; Gao, Y.; Ma, Q.; Hu, X.; Xu, Y.; Lu, X. Turn-off fluorescence sensor based on the 5,10,15,20-(4-sulphonatophenyl) porphyrin (TPPS4)-Fe2+ system: Detecting of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and glucose in the actual sample. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 268, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Clark, L.C.; Lyons, C. Electrodes systems for continuous monitoring in cardiovascular surgery. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1963, 102, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jothi, L.; Jayakumar, N.; Jaganathan, S.K.; Nageswaran, G. Ultrasensitive and selective non-enzymatic electrochemical glucose sensor based on hybrid material of graphene nanosheets/graphene nanoribbons/nickel nanoparticle. Mater. Res. Bull. 2018, 98, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, D.; Liu, Q.; Wang, K.; Qian, J.; Dong, X.; Yang, Z.; Du, X.; Qiu, B. Enhanced non-enzymatic glucose sensing based on copper nanoparticles decorated nitrogen-doped graphene. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 54, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Said, K.; Ayesh, A.I.; Qamhieh, N.N.; Awwad, F.; Mahmoud, S.T.; Hisaindee, S. Fabrication and characterization of graphite oxide-nanoparticle composite based field effect transistors for non-enzymatic glucose sensor applications. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 694, 1061–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nie, H.; Yao, Z.; Zhou, X.; Yang, Z.; Huang, S. Nonenzymatic electrochemical detection of glucose using well-distributed nickel nanoparticles on straight multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 30, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Soomro, R.A.; Ibupoto, Z.H.; Uddin, S.; Abro, M.I.; Willander, M. Electrochemical sensing of glucose based on novel hedgehog-like NiO nanostructures. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 209, 966–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Liao, Q.; Liu, S.; Kang, Z.; Zhang, Y. Nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on in situ reduction of Ni/NiO-graphene nanocomposite. Sensors 2016, 16, 1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, Y.; Su, L.; Manuzzi, D.; de los Monteros, H.V.E.; Jia, W.; Huo, D.; Hou, C.; Lei, Y. Ultrasensitive and selective non-enzymatic glucose detection using copper nanowires. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 31, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chou, C.-H.; Chen, J.-C.; Tai, C.-C.; Sun, I.W.; Zen, J.-M. A nonenzymatic glucose sensor using nanoporous platinum electrodes prepared by electrochemical alloying/dealloying in a water-insensitive zinc chloride-1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ionic liquid. Electroanalysis 2008, 20, 771–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ding, Y.; Wang, Y.; Su, L.; Bellagamba, M.; Zhang, H.; Lei, Y. Electrospun Co3O4 nanofibers for sensitive and selective glucose detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 26, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tang, X.; Zhang, B.; Xiao, C.; Zhou, H.; Wang, X.; He, D. Carbon nanotube template synthesis of hierarchical NiCoO2 composite for non-enzyme glucose detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 222, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, P.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, G.; Feng, F. A highly sensitive nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on CuO nanowires. Microchim. Acta 2012, 176, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Toghill, K.E.; Compton, R.G. Electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose sensors: A perspective and an evaluation. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2010, 5, 1246–1301. [Google Scholar]
  21. You, T.Y.; Niwa, O.; Chen, Z.L.; Hayashi, K.; Tomita, M.; Hirono, S. An amperometric detector formed of highly dispersed Ni nanoparticles embedded in a graphite-like carbon film electrode for sugar determination. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 5191–5196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Safavi, A.; Maleki, N.; Farjami, E. Fabrication of a glucose sensor based on a novel nanocomposite electrode. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009, 24, 1655–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shen, Z.; Gao, W.; Li, P.; Wang, X.; Zheng, Q.; Wu, H.; Ma, Y.; Guan, W.; Wu, S.; Yu, Y.; et al. Highly sensitive nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on nickel nanoparticle-attapulgite-reduced graphene oxide-modified glassy carbon electrode. Talanta 2016, 159, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yuan, B.; Xu, C.; Deng, D.; Xing, Y.; Liu, L.; Pang, H.; Zhang, D. Graphene oxide/nickel oxide modified glassy carbon electrode for supercapacitor and nonenzymatic glucose sensor. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 88, 708–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, Y.; Xiao, X.; Sun, Y.; Shi, Y.; Dai, H.; Ni, P.; Hu, J.; Li, Z.; Song, Y.; Wang, L. Electrochemical deposition of nickel nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide film for nonenzymatic glucose sensing. Electroanalysis 2013, 25, 959–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, X.; Ye, C.; Li, X.; Cui, N.; Wu, T.; Du, S.; Wei, Q.; Fu, L.; Yin, J.; Lin, C.-T. Highly sensitive and selective potassium ion detection based on graphene Hall effect biosensors. Materials 2018, 11, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sun, H.; Chen, D.; Wu, Y.; Yuan, Q.; Guo, L.; Dai, D.; Chee, K.W.A.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, P.; Jiang, N.; et al. High quality graphene films with a clean surface prepared by an UV/ozone assisted transfer process. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 3855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gao, J.; Yuan, Q.; Ye, C.; Guo, P.; Du, S.; Lai, G.; Yu, A.; Jiang, N.; Fu, L.; Lin, C.-T.; et al. Label-free electrochemical detection of vanillin through low-defect graphene electrodes modified with Au nanoparticles. Materials 2018, 11, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Loan, P.T.; Wu, D.; Ye, C.; Li, X.; Tra, V.T.; Wei, Q.; Fu, L.; Yu, A.; Li, L.-J.; Lin, C.-T. Hall effect biosensors with ultraclean graphene film for improved sensitivity of label-free DNA detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 99, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yuan, Q.; Liu, Y.; Ye, C.; Sun, H.; Dai, D.; Wei, Q.; Lai, G.; Wu, T.; Yu, A.; Fu, L.; et al. Highly stable and regenerative graphene–diamond hybrid electrochemical biosensor for fouling target dopamine detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 111, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pham, T.S.; Fu, L.; Mahon, P.; Lai, G.; Yu, A. Fabrication of beta-cyclodextrin-functionalized reduced graphene oxide and its application for electrocatalytic detection of carbendazim. Electrocatalysis 2016, 7, 411–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, H.; Ji, X.; Wang, B.; Wang, N.; Li, X.; Ni, R.; Ren, J. An ultra-sensitive acetylcholinesterase biosensor based on reduced graphene oxide-Au nanoparticles-beta-cyclodextrin/Prussian blue-chitosan nanocomposites for organophosphorus pesticides detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 65, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Azizi, A.; Eichfeld, S.; Geschwind, G.; Zhang, K.; Jiang, B.; Mukherjee, D.; Hossain, L.; Piasecki, A.F.; Kabius, B.; Robinson, J.A.; et al. Freestanding van der Waals heterostructures of graphene and transition metal dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 4882–4890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gao, J.; Zhang, H.; Ye, C.; Yuan, Q.; Chee, K.; Su, W.; Yu, A.; Yu, J.; Lin, C.T.; Dai, D.; et al. Electrochemical Enantiomer Recognition Based on sp-to-sp Converted Regenerative Graphene/Diamond Electrode. Nanomaterials 2018, 12, 1050. [Google Scholar]
  35. Islam, M.S.; Tamakawa, D.; Tanaka, S.; Makino, T.; Hashimoto, A. Polarized microscopic laser Raman scattering spectroscopy for edge structure of epitaxial graphene and localized vibrational mode. Carbon 2014, 77, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, J.; Xu, H.; Zhang, J. Raman Spectroscopy of Graphene. Acta Chim. Sin. 2014, 72, 301–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kanada, S.; Nagai, M.; Ito, S.; Matsumoto, T.; Ogura, M.; Takeuchi, D.; Yamasaki, S.; Inokuma, T.; Tokuda, N. Fabrication of graphene on atomically flat diamond (111) surfaces using nickel as a catalyst. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2017, 75, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alburquenque, D.; Del Canto, M.; Arenas, C.; Tejo, F.; Pereira, A.; Escrig, J. Dewetting of Ni thin films obtained by atomic layer deposition due to the thermal reduction process: Variation of the thicknesses. Thin Solid Film. 2017, 638, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nagai, M.; Nakanishi, K.; Takahashi, H.; Kato, H.; Makino, T.; Yamasaki, S.; Matsumoto, T.; Inokuma, T.; Tokuda, N. Anisotropic diamond etching through thermochemical reaction between Ni and diamond in high-temperature water vapour. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guo, L.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, H.; Dai, D.; Cui, J.; Li, M.; Xu, Y.; Xu, M.; Du, Y.; Jiang, N.; et al. Direct formation of wafer-scale single-layer graphene films on the rough surface substrate by PECVD. Carbon 2018, 129, 456–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ji, Z.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Q.; Shen, X.; Li, N.; Ma, H.; Yang, J.; Wang, J. One-step thermal synthesis of nickel nanoparticles modified graphene sheets for enzymeless glucose detection. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 506, 678–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Li, S.-J.; Xia, N.; Lv, X.-L.; Zhao, M.-M.; Yuan, B.-Q.; Pang, H. A facile one-step electrochemical synthesis of graphene/NiO nanocomposites as efficient electrocatalyst for glucose and methanol. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 190, 809–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ngo, Y.L.; Sui, L.; Ahn, W.; Chung, J.S.; Hur, S.H. NiMn2O4 spinel binary nanostructure decorated on three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide hydrogel for bifunctional materials in non-enzymatic glucose sensor. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 19318–19327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Guilin, L.; Huanhuan, H. Ni0.31Co0.69S2 nanoparticles uniformly anchored on a porous reduced graphene oxide framework for a high-performance non-enzymatic glucose sensor. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 4922. [Google Scholar]
  45. Lu, L.-M.; Zhang, L.; Qu, F.-L.; Lu, H.-X.; Zhang, X.-B.; Wu, Z.-S.; Huan, S.-Y.; Wang, Q.-A.; Shen, G.-L.; Yu, R.-Q. A nano-Ni based ultrasensitive nonenzymatic electrochemical sensor for glucose: Enhancing sensitivity through a nanowire array strategy. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009, 25, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Toghill, K.E.; Xiao, L.; Phillips, M.A.; Compton, R.G. The non-enzymatic determination of glucose using an electrolytically fabricated nickel microparticle modified boron-doped diamond electrode or nickel foil electrode. Sens. Actuators B 2010, 147, 642–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Arvinte, A.; Sesay, A.M.; Virtanen, V. Carbohydrates electrocatalytic oxidation using CNT-NiCo-oxide modified electrodes. Talanta 2011, 84, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, B.; Li, S.M.; Liu, J.H.; Yu, M. Preparation of nickel nanoparticle/graphene composites for non-enzymatic electrochemical glucose biosensor applications. Mater. Res. Bull 2014, 49, 521–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Devasenathipathy, R.; Karuppiah, C.; Chen, S.-M.; Palanisamy, S.; Lou, B.-S.; Ali, M.A.; Al-Hemaid, F.M.A. A sensitive and selective enzyme-free amperometric glucose biosensor using a composite from multi-walled carbon nanotubes and cobalt phthalocyanine. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 26762–26768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, T.-W.; Palanisamy, S.; Chen, S.-M.; Velusamy, H.K.R.; Ramaraj, S.K. A novel non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on melamine supported CuO nanoflakes modified electrode. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2017, 8, 852–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sensors 19 02979 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) The preparation process of Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes. (b) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey scan and (c) high-resolution C1s spectra of the diamond surface before and after the catalytic annealing process. (d) Raman spectrum of the obtained composite electrodes. Inset of (d) TEM image of the hybrid electrode.
Figure 1. (a) The preparation process of Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes. (b) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey scan and (c) high-resolution C1s spectra of the diamond surface before and after the catalytic annealing process. (d) Raman spectrum of the obtained composite electrodes. Inset of (d) TEM image of the hybrid electrode.
Sensors 19 02979 g001
Sensors 19 02979 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images showing the surface morphology of (a) high-pressure and high-temperature (HPHT) diamond; (b) Ni thin film-coated diamond; (c,d) Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid. (e) The mechanism for single-step formation of Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes.
Figure 2. SEM images showing the surface morphology of (a) high-pressure and high-temperature (HPHT) diamond; (b) Ni thin film-coated diamond; (c,d) Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid. (e) The mechanism for single-step formation of Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes.
Sensors 19 02979 g002
Sensors 19 02979 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) responses of the graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes with and without Ni NPs modification in 0.5 M NaOH electrolyte containing 5 mM glucose at a scan rate of 20 mV s−1. (b) An equivalent circuit and (c) Nyquist plots of the graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes with and without Ni NPs modification with a frequency between 0.01–100,000 Hz and amplitude of 10 mV.
Figure 3. (a) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) responses of the graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes with and without Ni NPs modification in 0.5 M NaOH electrolyte containing 5 mM glucose at a scan rate of 20 mV s−1. (b) An equivalent circuit and (c) Nyquist plots of the graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes with and without Ni NPs modification with a frequency between 0.01–100,000 Hz and amplitude of 10 mV.
Sensors 19 02979 g003
Sensors 19 02979 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) CV responses of Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes for glucose detection as a function of various scan rates (from inner to outer curves): 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 150, and 200 mV s−1 in 0.5 M NaOH electrolyte containing 5 mM glucose and (b) the corresponding current density of oxidation and reduction peaks. (c) CV responses of Ni NPs-modified samples in 0.5 M NaOH electrolyte containing different glucose concentrations at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1. (d) Current density of devices as a function of glucose concentration.
Figure 4. (a) CV responses of Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid electrodes for glucose detection as a function of various scan rates (from inner to outer curves): 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 150, and 200 mV s−1 in 0.5 M NaOH electrolyte containing 5 mM glucose and (b) the corresponding current density of oxidation and reduction peaks. (c) CV responses of Ni NPs-modified samples in 0.5 M NaOH electrolyte containing different glucose concentrations at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1. (d) Current density of devices as a function of glucose concentration.
Sensors 19 02979 g004
Sensors 19 02979 g005 550
Figure 5. Non-enzymatic amperometric responses for the detection of glucose and interfering substances.
Figure 5. Non-enzymatic amperometric responses for the detection of glucose and interfering substances.
Sensors 19 02979 g005
Table
Table 1. The fitting parameters of the fitting equivalent circuit.
Table 1. The fitting parameters of the fitting equivalent circuit.
Re (ohm)Qc (F)ncRf (ohm)Qd (F)ndRc (ohm)Zw
(ohm−1·s0.5/cm2)
Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond hybrid194.81.3 × 10−60.90103.77.6 × 10−50.811.360.002
Graphene–diamond hybrid127.77.3 × 10−70.8471731.0 × 10−30.5458967 × 10−4
Table
Table 2. Glucose sensing performance using Ni NPs-modified carbon-based electrodes.
Table 2. Glucose sensing performance using Ni NPs-modified carbon-based electrodes.
Linear Range (mM)Low Detection Limit (μM)Ref.
Ni NPs/Boron doped diamond0.1–102.7[46]
NiCoO/Carbon nanotube0.01–12.126.0[47]
Ni NPs/Graphene nanosheets0.005–0.551.9[48]
Ni NPs-modified graphene–diamond0.002–12.0This work

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cui, N.; Guo, P.; Yuan, Q.; Ye, C.; Yang, M.; Yang, M.; Chee, K.W.A.; Wang, F.; Fu, L.; Wei, Q.; et al. Single-Step Formation of Ni Nanoparticle-Modified Graphene–Diamond Hybrid Electrodes for Electrochemical Glucose Detection. Sensors 2019, 19, 2979. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19132979

AMA Style

Cui N, Guo P, Yuan Q, Ye C, Yang M, Yang M, Chee KWA, Wang F, Fu L, Wei Q, et al. Single-Step Formation of Ni Nanoparticle-Modified Graphene–Diamond Hybrid Electrodes for Electrochemical Glucose Detection. Sensors. 2019; 19(13):2979. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19132979

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cui, Naiyuan, Pei Guo, Qilong Yuan, Chen Ye, Mingyang Yang, Minghui Yang, Kuan W. A. Chee, Fei Wang, Li Fu, Qiuping Wei, and et al. 2019. "Single-Step Formation of Ni Nanoparticle-Modified Graphene–Diamond Hybrid Electrodes for Electrochemical Glucose Detection" Sensors 19, no. 13: 2979. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19132979

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop