Next Article in Journal
Development of a Novel Methodology to Assess the Corrosion Threshold in Concrete Based on Simultaneous Monitoring of pH and Free Chloride Concentration
Next Article in Special Issue
Damage Detection of Concrete-Filled Square Steel Tube (CFSST) Column Joints under Cyclic Loading Using Piezoceramic Transducers
Previous Article in Journal
Dense RGB-D Semantic Mapping with Pixel-Voxel Neural Network
Previous Article in Special Issue
Absolute Position Coding Method for Angular Sensor—Single-Track Gray Codes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Feasibility Study on Timber Moisture Monitoring Using Piezoceramic Transducer-Enabled Active Sensing

1
School of Urban Construction, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434023, China
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2018, 18(9), 3100; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18093100
Submission received: 18 August 2018 / Revised: 5 September 2018 / Accepted: 12 September 2018 / Published: 14 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Sensors and Smart Structures)

Abstract

:
In recent years, the piezoceramic transducer-enabled active sensing technique has been extensively applied to structural damage detection and health monitoring, in civil engineering. Being abundant and renewable, timber has been widely used as a building material in many countries. However, one of the more challenging applications of timber, in construction, is the potential damage caused by moisture. Increased moisture may cause easier warping of timber components and encourage corrosion of integrated metal members, on top of potentially causing rot and decay. However, despite numerous efforts to inspect and monitor the moisture content of timber, there lacks a method that can provide truly real time, quantitative, and non-invasive measurement of timber moisture. Thus, the research presented in this paper investigated the feasibility of moisture-content monitoring using an active sensing approach, as enabled by a pair of the Lead Zirconate Titanate (PZT) transducers bonded on the surface of a timber specimen. Using a pair of transducers in an active sensing scheme, one patch generated a designed stress wave, while another patch received the signal. While the active sensing was active, the moisture content of the timber specimen was gradually increased from 0% to 60% with 10% increments. The material properties of the timber correspondingly changed under varying timber moisture content, resulting in a measurable differential in stress wave attenuation rates among the different specimens used. The experimental results indicated that the received signal energy and the moisture content of the timber specimens show a parabolic relationship. Finally, the feasibility and reliability of the presented method, for monitoring timber moisture content, are discussed.

1. Introduction

Timber, which is a ubiquitous natural resource, is used widely across many countries as a building material [1,2]. Timber is an inhomogeneous, anisotropic organic material whose mechanical properties are affected by several factors, such as its specific cellular structure, as well as the physical, and chemical conditions of the surrounding environment. Moisture content (MC) is one of the key influencing factors. Different moisture content can cause variations in timber properties, such as in the strength, the stiffness, and the physical volume. Moisture may even initiate decay or encourage the growth of fungi, which reduces the mechanical strength of the timber [3]. Therefore, given the vast number of timber-based structures around the globe, the investigation for determining a reliable detection method of moisture content in timber and wooden structures is of great significance.
Traditionally, wood moisture content is estimated by weighing the wood [4]. By comparing the weight of the wet wood to that of its dried (i.e., using an oven) condition, the moisture mass can be estimated. Recently, with the rapid development in structural health monitoring methods [5,6,7,8,9,10,11] and damage detection technologies [12,13], the identification of moisture content in timber and wooden structures has attracted much attention. For instance, Brischke et al. [14,15] and Fredriksson et al. [16,17] determined the moisture content of wood by measuring the change of electrical resistance due to the presence of absorbed moisture. Subsequently, Yamamoto et al. [18] used a modified confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) system to observe in-situ microcracks on wooden surfaces, and measure the change in resistivity, to obtain information about moisture content. Casans et al. [19] proposed an analog circuit, for high resistance measurement of fiber materials, to estimate the moisture content of wood, based on the measurements of resistance in the fiber material and its relationship with moisture content. Fredriksson et al. [20] and Björngrim et al. [21] applied conductivity measurement methods to evaluate the moisture content of wooden structures. Similarly, radio frequency techniques [22,23,24,25,26], capacitance measurements [27,28,29,30,31,32], fiber optics [33,34,35], and X-ray techniques [36,37,38,39,40] were all used to assess the moisture content of wood, and provide new ideas for nondestructive evaluation of wood moisture contents. Recently, Rodriguez–Abad et al. [41] and Reci et al. [42] employed the wave signal, based on the ultrasonic method, and the Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) method to estimate the moisture content of wood, respectively, and they discovered noticeable changes in measurement data when the wood moisture content changed. However, most of the above-mentioned methods are qualitative in nature. In addition, due to the need for manually driven external excitation, the above methods are not suitable for real time monitoring.
Recently, methods for structural damage detection [43,44,45,46] and health monitoring [47,48,49,50,51,52,53] have been developed to identify the damage status and health of structures, in real time. In particular, the active sensing method is based on the piezoelectric effect of piezoelectric materials through which health monitoring and damage detection in structures are achieved. Piezoceramic transducers based on Lead Zirconate Titanate (PZT) are widely used in the active sensing method due to their several advantages, such as rapid response [54], energy harvesting capacity [55,56], low cost, ease of implementation [57,58,59,60,61], and the dual effects of both sensing and actuating [62,63,64]. Wand et al. [65] and Roh [66] proposed the active sensing monitoring technique to diagnose the damage of composite plates, by embedding multiple piezoelectric patches into a composite structure. Subsequently, this technique is widely applied in the damage detection and structural health monitoring in civil and mechanical engineering, such as for damage detection in a pipeline system [67,68,69], timber structures [70], monitoring of bolt looseness [71,72,73,74], damage detection in concrete structures [75,76,77], monitoring of soil water content [78], soil freeze–thaw process [79], bond slip detection of composite concrete structures [80,81], and debonding in adhesively-bonded structures [82,83]. However, the study of moisture-content monitoring in timber or wooden structures, using PZT transducer-enabled active sensing approach, has not been reported.
In this research, we propose the usage of a PZT transducer-enabled active sensing method to monitor timber moisture content and carry out experimental feasibility studies by using timber specimens. For each specimen, one PZT patch served as the actuator and another served as the sensor. The actuator generates stress waves that propagate through the structure and are received by the sensors. As the propagation characteristics of the stress wave are sensitive to timber moisture content, the stress wave energy will change correspondingly. A wavelet packet-based energy index was applied to evaluate the moisture content. The results indicated that this method can estimate the moisture content in timber structure quantitatively and accurately.

2. Principles

2.1. Active Sensing Method

The active sensing method as enabled by PZTs was used to estimate the moisture content in timber samples. In this method, one PZT patch (“PZT1”) generates a stress wave that propagates across the sample and is received by another PZT patch (“PZT2”). Both patches are bonded to the top and bottom surfaces of the sample. Changes in the sample lead to changes in the received signal. Figure 1 depicts the application of the method to a timber sample in both dry and wet conditions. A designed, directional stress wave containing frequency components from 100 Hz to 500 kHz was generated by PZT1 and received by PZT2. Due to the change in the timber moisture content, the material properties of the timber will change and result in a corresponding change in the stress wave attenuation ratio in timber. To quantify the timber moisture content, a wavelet packet-based energy approach was used (Section 2.2).

2.2. Wavelet Packet-Based Energy Approach

The wavelet packet analysis approach has several desirable characteristics, such as high time-frequency resolution, and it can effectively decompose and analyze frequency signals across much of the frequency spectrum. Wavelet packet analysis can also be used to obtain data insight, in both time and frequency domains. The wavelet packet-based energy approach is often used in structural analysis to compute the energy of received signals [84,85]. In this investigation, a wavelet packet-based energy analysis was used to compute the received wave signal energy under different moisture content in timber specimens, which is given as follows:
First, the original signal S received by the PZT sensor was decomposed by an n-level wavelet packet decomposition into 2n signal subsets with different frequency bands. The signal subset Xj, where j was the frequency band (j = 1, 2, …, 2 n ), could be expressed as,
X j = [ X j , 1 , X j , 2 , , X j , m ]
where m was the data sampling of the decomposed signal subset.
Second, the energy of the signal subset E i , j , could be defined as
E i , j = X j 2 = X j , 1 2 + X j , 2 2 + + X j , m 2
where i was the ith measurement.
The energy vector of the signal at the ith measurement could be given as,
E i = [ E i , 1 , E i , 2 , , E i , 2 n ]
Finally, based on the definition of the energy vector Ei, the total energy E of the received original signal at the ith measurement could be computed as,
E = j = 1 2 n E i , j
In this paper, the received wave signal energy under different moisture content in timber specimens was computed via the wavelet packet-based energy method.

3. Experimental Setup

3.1. Timber Specimen

In this experiment, a total of three timber specimens with the same dimensions (200 mm × 100 mm × 20 mm) were fabricated using the same pine wood from North America. For each test specimen, a pair of PZT disks (10 mm diameter, 0.2 mm thick, purchased from Beijing Ultrasonic) were mounted onto predetermined positions, using epoxy (Loctite Heavy Duty 5 min epoxy) (Figure 2). In this research, the type of the PZT sensors used was PZT-5H. The PZT sensor was a sandwiched structure, with two electrode layers and one layer of PZT material.
Moisture content (MC) has different definitions in the literature; for the purposes of this paper, the MC of the timber specimens in this study was defined as:
M C = m w a t e r m d r y × 100 % = m w e t m d r y m d r y × 100 %
where MC was the moisture content of the timber specimen, mwater was the mass of water within the timber specimen, mdry was the mass of the dry timber specimen, mwet was the total mass of the wet timber specimen. In this study, mdry of the timber specimen was determined by the Chinese national standard (GB/T 1931–2009) [86]. According to the standard protocol, the timber specimens were placed in an oven and baked at a temperature of (103 ± 2) °C for 8 h, then the mass of the timber specimens was weighed and recorded on an electronic scale. Subsequently, the selected specimens were weighed every 2 h. The mdry of the timber specimens were determined when the difference between the two most-recent measurements did not exceed 0.5%.

3.2. Experimental Setup

The experimental setup consisted of a data acquisition system (National Instruments (NI) USB-6361), timber specimens, an electronic scale and a monitoring terminal (a laptop), as shown in Figure 3. During the test, an electronic scale was used (Accuracy: 0.01 g) to measure the mass of the wet timber specimen, after it was immersed into clean water until the MC reached the designed value (60%) (Figure 4a). The moisture content of the timber specimen gradually increased from 0% to 60% with 10% increments. When the MC of the timber specimen reached the designed value, the timber specimen was placed into a Ziploc sealed plastic bag for more than 12 h (Figure 4b) to ensure the uniformity of moisture in the timber. At every 10% MC increase, a swept sine excitation signal was input to the PZT actuator to transmit a stress wave towards the other end of the specimen. PZT patches were layered in epoxy for waterproofing. Experimental details of swept sine wave signals are shown in Table 1.

4. Results and Discussions

The signals received by the PZT sensors, in the time domain, under different moisture-content levels (0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, and 60%) are shown in Figure 5. The data indicated that the amplitude of the signal received by the PZT sensor decreased when the moisture content in the timber specimen increased. As water provides an attenuating effect for stress waves, such an inverse correlation might be expected. On the other hand, despite sharing the same overall trend, each specimen still exhibited unique characteristics in the received signal, perhaps due to minor non-uniformities among specimens, including epoxy thickness and electrode welding.
In order to analyze the changes in stress wave response, the energy of the received signal was estimated using the wavelet packet-based energy method (Figure 6). The observed trend in the wavelet packet-based energy of the three timber specimens indicated a decrease in signal energy with the increase of the moisture content. Furthermore, the correlation between signal energy and MC suggested a parabolic relationship. However, there was a slight difference in the energy value of the three timber specimens for the same moisture-content levels. The reason for the slight discrepancies could be the natural inhomogeneity of timber, which significantly affects the stress wave propagation.
The experimental results showed that piezoceramic transducers hold great promise for use in the monitoring of moisture content of wooden structures through an active sensing method. On the other hand, certain challenges should be addressed prior to practical applications. First, although the moisture content of timber and wooden structures could be estimated directly from the time domain response and processed by the wavelet packet-based energy index, these methods could not be used to identify moisture-content distribution in timber and wooden structures. Second, the research did not consider certain aspects, such as the temperature, the species of wood, the geometry of the samples, as well as any boundary conditions, defects, and properties of the epoxy. Controlling for these parameters may lead to further insight into the results.

5. Conclusions

This paper demonstrated, for the first time, the use of PZT-enabled active sensing techniques to monitor the moisture content of timber specimens in real time. The amplitude of the wave signal received by PZT sensor decreased with the increase of moisture content in the timber specimens. The energy of the received signals, computed by using the wavelet packet-based energy approach, could be employed to quantitatively evaluate the change in moisture content of the timber specimens. Additionally, a parabolic relationship was found between the stress wave signal energy and the moisture content of the timber specimens. The experimental results revealed that the active sensing technique, based on PZT transducers, was effective and sensitive to be able to monitor the moisture content of the timber specimens, in real time. Future work in this area could include an investigation of the sensitivity and reliability of the method, the feasibility of the proposed method for quantitatively monitoring the moisture content on a larger scale, and in-service timber structures and structural elements. However, the investigations also need to consider additional influencing factors, such as the bonding layer, temperature, humidity, boundary conditions, and the microstructure of the wood.

Author Contributions

J.Z., J.J. and S.-C.M.H. conceived and designed the experiments; J.Z. performed the experiments; Y.L. and Y.H. analyzed the data; J.Z. and J.J. wrote the paper. S.-C.M.H. proofread and revised the paper.

Funding

The research was partially supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51778065) and Research Project of Hubei Provincial Department of Education of China (No. D20151304).

Acknowledgments

The experimental study was supported by the Smart Materials and Structures Laboratory (SMSL) of University of Houston.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Choi, F.C.; Li, J.; Samali, B.; Crews, K. Application of modal-based damage-detection method to locate and evaluate damage in timber beams. J. Wood Sci. 2007, 53, 394–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Moody, R. Timber bridges—A rebirth. Woodl. Manag. 1994, 15, 18–20. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dietsch, P.; Franke, S.; Franke, B.; Gamper, A.; Winter, S. Methods to determine wood moisture content and their applicability in monitoring concepts. J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 2015, 5, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. EN 13183-1. Moisture Content of a Piece of Sawn Timber—Part 1: Determination by Oven Dry Method; European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  5. Annamdas, V.G.M.; Bhalla, S.; Soh, C.K. Applications of structural health monitoring technology in Asia. Struct. Health Monit. 2017, 16, 324–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kudela, P.; Radzienski, M.; Ostachowicz, W.; Yang, Z. Structural health monitoring system based on a concept of Lamb wave focusing by the piezoelectric array. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2018, 108, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Farrar, C.R.; Worden, K. Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mitra, M.; Gopalakrishnan, S. Guided wave based structural health monitoring: A review. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 053001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chang, P.C.; Flatau, A.; Liu, S.C. Health monitoring of civil infrastructure. Struct. Health Monit. 2003, 2, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tanasoiu, V.; Miclea, C.; Tanasoiu, C. Nondestructive testing techniques and piezoelectric ultrasonics transducers for wood and built in wooden structures. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 2002, 4, 949–957. [Google Scholar]
  11. Balageas, D.; Fritzen, C.P.; Güemes, A. (Eds.) Structural Health Monitoring; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; Volume 90. [Google Scholar]
  12. Palacz, M. Spectral Methods for Modelling of Wave Propagation in Structures in Terms of Damage Detection—A Review. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, K.; Deng, Q.; Cai, L.; Ho, S.; Song, G. Damage detection of a concrete column subject to blast loads using embedded piezoceramic transducers. Sensors 2018, 18, 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Brischke, C.; Rapp, A.O.; Bayerbach, R. Measurement system for long-term recording of wood moisture content with internal conductively glued electrodes. Build. Environ. 2008, 43, 1566–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Otten, K.A.; Brischke, C.; Meyer, C. Material moisture content of wood and cement mortars—Electrical resistance-based measurements in the high ohmic range. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 153, 640–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fredriksson, M.; Wadsö, L.; Johansson, P. Small resistive wood moisture sensors: A method for moisture content determination in wood structures. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2013, 71, 515–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fredriksson, M.; Claesson, J.; Wadsö, L. The influence of specimen size and distance to a surface on resistive moisture content measurements in wood. Math. Probl. Eng. 2015, 2015, 215758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yamamoto, H.; Sakagami, H.; Kijidani, Y.; Matsumura, J. Dependence of microcrack behavior in wood on moisture content during drying. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2013, 2013, 802639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Casans, S.; Iakymchuk, T.; Rosado-Muñoz, A. High resistance measurement circuit for fiber materials: Application to moisture content estimation. Measurement 2018, 119, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fredriksson, M.; Wadsö, L.; Johansson, P. Methods for determination of duration of surface moisture and presence of water in gaps in wood joints. Wood Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 913–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Björngrim, N.; Hagman, O.; Wang, X.A. Moisture content monitoring of a timber footbridge. BioResources 2016, 11, 3904–3913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cai, Y.; Hayashi, K. New monitoring concept of moisture content distribution in wood during RF/vacuum drying. J. Wood Sci. 2007, 53, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, H.; Yang, L.; Cai, Y.; Sugimori, M.; Hayashi, K. Effect of EMC and air in wood on the new in-process moisture content monitoring concept under radiofrequency/vacuum (RF/V) drying. J. Wood Sci. 2010, 56, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, X. Radio Frequency Evaluation of Oriented Strand Board; Mississippi State University: Starkville, MS, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Donohoe, J.P.; Steele, P.H. In-plane moisture content and specific gravity evaluation of oriented strandboard using a radio frequency technique. For. Prod. J. 2010, 60, 622–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bogdanov, G.; Wiggins, J.; Bertagnolli, K.; Ludwig, R. Moisture content monitoring in a high-pressure gasket material using an RF method. AIP Conf. Proc. 2013, 1511, 1474–1481. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jazayeri, S.; Ahmet, K. Detection of transverse moisture gradients in timber by measurements of capacitance using a multiple-electrode arrangement. For. Prod. J. 2000, 50, 27. [Google Scholar]
  28. EN 13183-3. Moisture Content of a Piece of Sawn Timber—Part 3: Estimation by Capacitance Method; European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  29. Green, J.; Dyer, I. Measurement of humidity. Anaesth. Intensive Care Med. 2009, 10, 45–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, J.; Luo, Y.S.; Liu, S.G. Nondestructive testing method of wood moisture content based on a planar capacitance sensor model. For. Stud. China 2010, 12, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guo, C.; Luo, Y.S.; Gao, Y.; Liu, S.G. Model and Algorithm for Wood Moisture Content Detection by Capacitance Sensor. In Advanced Materials Research; Trans Tech Publications: Zürich, Switzerland, 2013; Volume 753, pp. 2396–2399. [Google Scholar]
  32. Guo, C.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Q.; Liu, S. Model and a New Numerical Method Based on the Problem of Lumber Moisture Content Detection. J. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2014, 11, 3073–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Muto, S.; Suzuki, O.; Amano, T.; Morisawa, M. A plastic optical fibre sensor for real-time humidity monitoring. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2003, 14, 746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Heusinkveld, B.G.; Berkowicz, S.M.; Jacobs, A.F.G.; Hillen, W.C.A.M.; Holtslag, A.A.M. A new remote optical wetness sensor and its applications. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2008, 148, 580–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Alwis, L.; Sun, T.; Grattan, K.T.V. Optical fibre-based sensor technology for humidity and moisture measurement: Review of recent progress. Measurement 2013, 46, 4052–4074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Deku, S.; Pere, P. Wood moisture content measurement by X-ray exposure method. J. For. Res. 1997, 8, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Watanabe, K.; Saito, Y.; Avramidis, S.; Shida, S. Non-destructive measurement of moisture distribution in wood during drying using digital X-ray microscopy. Dry. Technol. 2008, 26, 590–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tanaka, T.; Avramidis, S.; Shida, S. Evaluation of moisture content distribution in wood by soft X-ray imaging. J. Wood Sci. 2009, 55, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hultnäs, M.; Fernandez-Cano, V. Determination of the moisture content in wood chips of Scots pine and Norway spruce using Mantex Desktop Scanner based on dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J. Wood Sci. 2012, 58, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, C.K.; Oh, J.K.; Hong, J.P.; Lee, J.J. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with digital radiograph for evaluating moisture content of green wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rodríguez-Abad, I.; Martínez-Sala, R.; García-García, F.; Capuz-Lladró, R. Non-destructive methodologies for the evaluation of moisture content in sawn timber structures: Ground-penetrating radar and ultrasound techniques. Near Surf. Geophys. 2010, 8, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Reci, H.; Maï, T.C.; Sbartaï, Z.M.; Pajewski, L.; Kiri, E. Non-destructive evaluation of moisture content in wood using ground-penetrating radar. Geosci. Instrum. Methods Data Syst. 2016, 5, 575–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Wang, D.; Song, H.; Zhu, H. Numerical and experimental studies on damage detection of a concrete beam based on PZT admittances and correlation coefficient. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 49, 564–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, D.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H.; Zhu, H. Experimental study on damage detection in timber specimens based on an electromechanical impedance technique and RMSD-based mahalanobis distance. Sensors 2016, 16, 1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Xu, J.; Hao, J.; Li, H.; Luo, M.; Guo, W.; Li, W. Experimental Damage Identification of a Model Reticulated Shell. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kong, Q.; Robert, R.H.; Silva, P.; Mo, Y.L. Cyclic crack monitoring of a reinforced concrete column under simulated pseudo-dynamic loading using piezoceramic-based smart aggregates. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Song, G.; Wang, C.; Wang, B. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of Civil Structures; MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  48. Li, X.; Cui, H.; Zhang, B.; Yuan, C. Experimental study of a structural health monitoring method based on piezoelectric element array. In Proceedings of the 3rd Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC), Chongqing, China, 3–5 October 2017. [Google Scholar]
  49. Perez-Ramirez, C.A.; Jaen-Cuellar, A.Y.; Valtierra-Rodriguez, M.; Dominguez-Gonzalez, A.; Osornio-Rios, R.A.; Romero-Troncoso, R.D.J.; Amezquita-Sanchez, J.P. A two-step strategy for system identification of civil structures for Structural Health Monitoring using wavelet transform and genetic algorithms. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yan, S.; Ma, H.; Li, P.; Song, G.; Wu, J. Development and Application of a Structural Health Monitoring System Based on Wireless Smart Aggregates. Sensors 2017, 17, 1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wang, F.; Ho, S.C.M.; Huo, L.; Song, G. A Novel Fractal Contact-Electromechanical Impedance Model for Quantitative Monitoring of Bolted Joint Looseness. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 40212–40220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, Y.; Divsholi, B.S.; Soh, C.K. A reusable PZT transducer for monitoring initial hydration and structural health of concrete. Sensors 2010, 10, 5193–5208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Xu, J.; Wang, C.; Li, H.; Zhang, C.; Hao, J.; Fan, S. Health Monitoring of Bolted Spherical Joint Connection Based on Active Sensing Technique Using Piezoceramic Transducers. Sensors 2018, 18, 1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gu, H.; Song, G.; Dhonde, H.; Mo, Y.L.; Yan, S. Concrete early-age strength monitoring using embedded piezoelectric transducers. Smart Mater. Struct. 2006, 15, 1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pillatsch, P.; Xiao, B.L.; Shashoua, N.; Gramling, H.M.; Yeatman, E.M.; Wright, P.K. Degradation of bimorph piezoelectric bending beams in energy harvesting applications. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 035046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Caliò, R.; Rongala, U.B.; Camboni, D.; Milazzo, M.; Stefanini, C.; De Petris, G.; Oddo, C.M. Piezoelectric energy harvesting solutions. Sensors 2014, 14, 4755–4790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Zheng, Y.; Chen, D.; Zhou, L.; Huo, L.; Ma, H.; Song, G. Evaluation of the Effect of Fly Ash on Hydration Characterization in Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC) at Very Early Ages Using Piezoceramic Transducers. Sensors 2018, 18, 2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kong, Q.; Fan, S.; Bai, X.; Mo, Y.L.; Song, G. A novel embeddable spherical smart aggregate for structural health monitoring: Part, I. Fabrication and electrical characterization. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 095050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, D.; Song, H.; Zhu, H. Embedded 3D electromechanical impedance model for strength monitoring of concrete using a PZT transducer. Smart Mater. Struct. 2014, 23, 115019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kong, Q.; Fan, S.; Mo, Y.L.; Song, G. A novel embeddable spherical smart aggregate for structural health monitoring: Part II Numerical and experimental verifications. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 095051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Feng, Q.; Kong, Q.; Jiang, J.; Liang, Y.; Song, G. Detection of Interfacial Debonding in a Rubber–Steel-Layered Structure Using Active Sensing Enabled by Embedded Piezoceramic Transducers. Sensors 2017, 17, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Song, G.; Zhou, X.; Binienda, W. Thermal deformation compensation of a composite beam using piezoelectric actuators. Smart Mater. Struct. 2003, 13, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Song, G.; Olmi, C.; Gu, H. An overheight vehicle–bridge collision monitoring system using piezoelectric transducers. Smart Mater. Struct. 2007, 16, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Song, G.; Sethi, V.; Li, H.N. Vibration control of civil structures using piezoceramic smart materials: A review. Eng. Struct. 2006, 28, 1513–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, C.S.; Chang, F.K. Built-in diagnostics for impact damage identification of composite structures. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA, USA, 8–10 September 1999; pp. 8–10. [Google Scholar]
  66. Roh, Y.S. Built-in Diagnostics for Identifying an Anomaly in Plates Using Wave Scattering. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  67. Du, G.; Kong, Q.; Wu, F.; Ruan, J.; Song, G. An experimental feasibility study of pipeline corrosion pit detection using a piezoceramic time reversal mirror. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 037002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Du, G.; Kong, Q.; Zhou, H.; Gu, H. Multiple cracks detection in pipeline using damage index matrix based on piezoceramic transducer-enabled stress wave propagation. Sensors 2017, 17, 1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Feng, Q.; Kong, Q.; Song, G. Damage detection of concrete piles subject to typical damage types based on stress wave measurement using embedded smart aggregates transducers. Measurement 2016, 88, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Zhang, J.; Huang, Y.; Zheng, Y. A Feasibility Study on Timber Damage Detection Using Piezoceramic-Transducer-Enabled Active Sensing. Sensors 2018, 18, 1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Huo, L.; Wang, F.; Li, H.; Song, G. A fractal contact theory based model for bolted connection looseness monitoring using piezoceramic transducers. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 104010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, F.; Huo, L.; Song, G. A piezoelectric active sensing method for quantitative monitoring of bolt loosening using energy dissipation caused by tangential damping based on the fractal contact theory. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 27, 015023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Yin, H.; Wang, T.; Yang, D.; Liu, S.; Shao, J.; Li, Y. A smart washer for bolt looseness monitoring based on piezoelectric active sensing method. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Song, G.; Li, W.; Wang, B.; Ho, S.C.M. A review of rock bolt monitoring using smart sensors. Sensors 2017, 17, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Park, S.; Ahmad, S.; Yun, C.B.; Roh, Y. Multiple crack detection of concrete structures using impedance-based structural health monitoring techniques. Exp. Mech. 2006, 46, 609–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Feng, Q.; Xiao, H.; Kong, Q.; Liang, Y.; Song, G. Damage detection of concrete piles subject to typical damages using piezoceramic based passive sensing approach. J. Vibroeng. 2016, 18, 345–352. [Google Scholar]
  77. Yang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Lu, Y. Sensitivity of PZT impedance sensors for damage detection of concrete structures. Sensors 2008, 8, 327–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kong, Q.; Chen, H.; Mo, Y.L.; Song, G. Real-time monitoring of water content in sandy soil using shear mode piezoceramic transducers and active sensing—A feasibility study. Sensors 2017, 17, 2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kong, Q.; Wang, R.; Song, G.; Yang, Z.J.; Still, B. Monitoring the soil freeze-thaw process using piezoceramic-based smart aggregate. J. Cold Reg. Eng. 2014, 28, 06014001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kim, S.D.; In, C.W.; Cronin, K.E.; Sohn, H.; Harries, K. Reference-free NDT technique for debonding detection in CFRP-strengthened RC structures. J. Struct. Eng. 2007, 133, 1080–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Qin, F.; Kong, Q.; Li, M.; Mo, Y.L.; Song, G.; Fan, F. Bond slip detection of steel plate and concrete beams using smart aggregates. Smart Mater. Struct. 2015, 24, 115039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Roth, W.; Giurgiutiu, V. Adhesive disbond detection using piezoelectric wafer active sensors. In Structural Health Monitoring and Inspection of Advanced Materials, Aerospace, and Civil Infrastructure; International Society for Optics and Photonics: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2015; Volume 9437, p. 94370S. [Google Scholar]
  83. Xu, B.; Zhang, T.; Song, G.; Gu, H. Active interface debonding detection of a concrete-filled steel tube with piezoelectric technologies using wavelet packet analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2013, 36, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kim, H.; Melhem, H. Damage detection of structures by wavelet analysis. Eng. Struct. 2004, 26, 347–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kong, Q.; Feng, Q.; Song, G. Water presence detection in a concrete crack using smart aggregates. Int. J. Smart Nano Mater. 2015, 6, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. GB/T 1931-2009. Method for Determination of the Moisture Content of Wood (ISO 3130: 1975, Wood-Determination of Moisture Content for Physical and Mechanical Tests, MOD); Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Stress-wave-based active sensing approach to monitor timber moisture content. (a) Dry timber (relatively stronger wave detected by PZT2); (b) timber with higher moisture-content level (relatively weaker wave detected by PZT1).
Figure 1. Stress-wave-based active sensing approach to monitor timber moisture content. (a) Dry timber (relatively stronger wave detected by PZT2); (b) timber with higher moisture-content level (relatively weaker wave detected by PZT1).
Sensors 18 03100 g001
Figure 2. Timber specimens. (PZT2 is at the same position, on the back side). From left to right: Specimen 1, Specimen 2, Specimen 3.
Figure 2. Timber specimens. (PZT2 is at the same position, on the back side). From left to right: Specimen 1, Specimen 2, Specimen 3.
Sensors 18 03100 g002
Figure 3. The experimental setup.
Figure 3. The experimental setup.
Sensors 18 03100 g003
Figure 4. Moisture exposure. (a) Immersed in water; (b) contained in Ziploc sealed plastic bag.
Figure 4. Moisture exposure. (a) Immersed in water; (b) contained in Ziploc sealed plastic bag.
Sensors 18 03100 g004
Figure 5. Sensor signal response for timber specimens. (a) Specimen 1; (b) specimen 2; (c) specimen 3.
Figure 5. Sensor signal response for timber specimens. (a) Specimen 1; (b) specimen 2; (c) specimen 3.
Sensors 18 03100 g005
Figure 6. Energy indices of timber specimen with different moisture content. (a) Specimen 1; (b) specimen 2; (c) specimen 3.
Figure 6. Energy indices of timber specimen with different moisture content. (a) Specimen 1; (b) specimen 2; (c) specimen 3.
Sensors 18 03100 g006
Table 1. Experimental details of the swept sine wave signal.
Table 1. Experimental details of the swept sine wave signal.
Start Frequency (Hz)Stop Frequency (kHz)Amplitude (V)Period (s)
100500101

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Huang, Y.; Jiang, J.; Ho, S.-C.M. A Feasibility Study on Timber Moisture Monitoring Using Piezoceramic Transducer-Enabled Active Sensing. Sensors 2018, 18, 3100. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18093100

AMA Style

Zhang J, Li Y, Huang Y, Jiang J, Ho S-CM. A Feasibility Study on Timber Moisture Monitoring Using Piezoceramic Transducer-Enabled Active Sensing. Sensors. 2018; 18(9):3100. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18093100

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jicheng, Yong Li, Yongshui Huang, Jinwei Jiang, and Siu-Chun M. Ho. 2018. "A Feasibility Study on Timber Moisture Monitoring Using Piezoceramic Transducer-Enabled Active Sensing" Sensors 18, no. 9: 3100. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18093100

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop