Next Article in Journal
Monitoring Fatigue Damage of Modular Bridge Expansion Joints Using Piezoceramic Transducers
Next Article in Special Issue
Ionic Liquid-Polypyrrole-Gold Composites as Enhanced Enzyme Immobilization Platforms for Hydrogen Peroxide Sensing
Previous Article in Journal
Quantitative Evaluation of Broadband Photoacoustic Spectroscopy in the Infrared with an Optical Parametric Oscillator
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 18
Issue 11
10.3390/s18113972
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A NiFe Alloy Reduced on Graphene Oxide for Electrochemical Nonenzymatic Glucose Sensing

by
Zhe-Peng Deng
1,2,
Yu Sun
3,
Yong-Cheng Wang
1,* and
Jian-De Gao
4
1
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2
Gansu Computing Center, Lanzhou 730030, China
3
Experiment Center of Northwest University for Nationalities, Lanzhou 730030, China
4
College of Pharmacy, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2018, 18(11), 3972; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113972
Submission received: 17 October 2018 / Revised: 7 November 2018 / Accepted: 13 November 2018 / Published: 15 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biosensors Incorporating Nano-particles)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

A NiFe alloy nanoparticle/graphene oxide hybrid (NiFe/GO) was prepared for electrochemical glucose sensing. The as-prepared NiFe/GO hybrid was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The results indicated that NiFe alloy nanoparticles can be successfully deposited on GO. The electrochemical glucose sensing performance of the as-prepared NiFe/GO hybrid was studied by cyclic voltammetry and amperometric measurement. Results showed that the NiFe/GO-modified glassy carbon electrode had sensitivity of 173 μA mM−1 cm−2 for glucose sensing with a linear range up to 5 mM, which is superior to that of commonly used Ni nanoparticles. Furthermore, high selectivity for glucose detection could be achieved by the NiFe/GO hybrid. All the results demonstrated that the NiFe/GO hybrid has promise for application in electrochemical glucose sensing.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Glucose sensing is important in many fields, such as medical diagnostics and the food industry [1]. The earliest glucose sensing was reported by Clark and Lyons in 1962, using a biological enzyme [2]. Since then, biological enzymes such as glucose oxidase and glucose dehydrogenase have been widely used for glucose sensing. However, biological enzymes are susceptible to external conditions such as temperature, humidity, and pH, among others, which lead to the instability of the biological enzymes [3,4,5]. The expensive price and complicated mobilizing methods of biological enzymes also restrict their application [6]. Therefore, to address these problems, the research focus has been transferred to the development of electrochemical nonenzymatic glucose sensors.
Due to its high stability and sensitivity, nonenzymatic electrochemical technology is a good choice for glucose sensing [7]. Various nanoparticles have been reported for constructing electrochemical nonenzymatic biosensors, such as noble metal Pt nanoparticles (Pt NPs) [3,8,9], Au NPs [10,11], and Pd NPs [12,13]. However, the expensive price of these noble metals restricts their practical application. Furthermore, noble metal-constructed electrochemical glucose sensors are usually poisoned by chloride ions present in the body’s blood [14]. In order to exploit cheap electrochemical nonenzymatic glucose biosensors, considerable attention has been focusing on non-noble metal materials, such as Ni NPs [15,16,17], Co(OH)2 nanotubes [18], and Cu NPs [19,20]. Recent studies reveal that bimetallic materials [21], especially bimetal alloys, exhibit better catalytic performance than that of monometallic counterparts [22]. Xu et al. and Chen et al. both found that a Pt–Ni alloy exhibited enhanced sensitivity for glucose sensing [23,24]. Besides, a PtRu alloy [25], PtAu alloy [26], PtCo alloy [27], CoCu alloy [28], and NiCo alloy [29] have been used in glucose sensing.
A support material is also important in electrochemical glucose sensors [30]. Carbon-based materials (especially carbon nanotubes and graphene) have been extensively used to load the electrochemical catalyst due to their excellent conductivity, such as in loading cupric oxide [31] or growing copper nanoparticles [32] on carbon nanotubes (CNTs) for electrochemical glucose sensing. Graphene and its oxide (graphene oxide, GO) have triggered researchers’ interest since 2004 because of their good electrical conductivity and large specific surface area. Due to these exceptional properties, graphene and GO have often been chosen as the supporting material in electrochemistry [33]. GO loaded with NiS [34], NiCo alloy [29], and CuS NPs [35] have been applied for electrochemical glucose sensing.
Based on the above considerations, we tried to study the alloying of commonly used Ni NPs in the scope of glucose detection with Feon GO, because the NiFe alloy shows high electrochemical performance in various processes [36,37,38,39]. To the best of our knowledge, the NiFe alloy nanoparticle/graphene oxide hybrid (NiFe/GO) has never been reported for electrochemical glucose sensing. The NiFe/GO hybrid reveals better electrocatalytic performance towards glucose oxidation than the commonly used Ni NPs. The high performance of NiFe alloy nanoparticles and the superior conductivity of GO endow the NiFe/GO biosensor with the capacity to achieve the electrochemical sensing of glucose in a wide concentration range.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

All reagents used in experiments were of analytical grade. Graphite powder was purchased from Alfa Aesar (Shanghai, China). Nickel sulfate hexahydrate, iron sulfate heptahydrate, hydrazine hydrate (80 wt%), and glucose were procured from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Ascorbic acid (AA), uric acid (UA), and dopamine (DA) were purchased from Acros (Shanghai, China). Deionized water (18.2 MΩ·cm) was used in all experiments.

2.2. Preparation of GO

GO was prepared by a modified Hummers’ method [40]. Two grams of graphite and 1 g NaNO3 were mixed with 50 mL H2SO4 (95%) in a 250 mL flask within an ice bath to keep a low temperature (note that the ice bath is important and necessary). Then, 6 g KMnO4 was added slowly into the above suspension with vigorous stirring. In this adding process, the reaction temperature was kept below 20 °C. After that, the mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. Subsequently, 60 mL H2O was added slowly with vigorous agitation. The reaction temperature was increased rapidly up to 95 °C, and the color of the suspension changed to yellow. Then, 10 mL of 30% H2O2 was added to the mixture. Finally, the obtained product was washed by rinsing with 5% HCl and then deionized water for several times until the pH of filtrate reached 7. After drying in a vacuum dryer, GO as a gray powderwas obtained.

2.3. Preparation of the NiFe/GO Composite

For the preparation of the NiFe/GO composite (for example, the ratio of Ni to Fe is 1:1, denoted as NiFe/GO), 0.1 g of the as-prepared GO, 278.1 mg FeSO4·7H2O (1 mmol), and 262.9 mg NiSO4·6H2O (1 mmol) were added to 10 mL deionized water. The mixture was sonicated for 30 min to get an evenly dispersed solution. Then, 15 mL hydrazine hydrate was dropped slowly into the above solution followed by refluxing at 100 °C for 3 h under N2 atmosphere. After reaction, the obtained NiFe/GO composite was washed using deionized water for several times. Finally, the washed NiFe/GO composite was dried in a vacuum for further use. Other composites (different Ni-to-Fe mass ratios, such as Ni1Fe4/GO, Ni4Fe1/GO, Ni/GO, and Fe/GO) were prepared by adjusting the ratio of Ni and Fe. NiFe alloy NPs were also prepared for comparison using the same method without adding GO.

2.4. Preparation of the NiFe/GO Hybrid Modified Electrode

Five milligrams of NiFe/GO hybrid was dispersed in 1 mL of solution containing 0.5 mL ethyl alcohol and 0.5 mL deionized water. The above solution was sonicated for 30 min to get an evenly dispersed mixture. After sonicating, a certain amount of the mixture was dropped onto a bare glassy carbon electrode (GCE), followed by adding 2 μL Nafion solution (0.5%) to entrap the NiFe/GO. The prepared electrode was denoted as NiFe/GO/GCE. For comparison, Ni/GO/GCE, Fe/GO/GCE, and NiFe/GCE were fabricated similarly.

2.5. Apparatus and Measurements

The morphologies of the NiFe/GO composite were collected with a G2F30 electron microscope (Tecnai, Hillsboro, OR, USA). XRD data were conducted on a D/max-2400 diffractometer (Rigaku, Beijing, China ) operating at a voltage of 40 kV and a current of 40 mA, using Cu-K radiation as the X-ray source. Electrochemical characterization was performed on a CHI 660C electrochemical workstation (CH Instruments Ins, Shanghai, China) with the modified GCE as the working electrode, Pt wire as the counter electrode, and Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) as the reference electrode. All voltages used in the manuscript refer to the Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) electrode.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Characterization

The TEM image of the NiFe/GO composite is displayed in Figure 1. As shown in Figure 1a, NiFe alloy with diameter of about 100 nm are loaded on the GO. Figure 1b–d shows the element mapping of the NiFe alloy. It can be seen clearly that the Ni and Fe elements are evenly distributed in the NiFe alloy. This proves the successful preparation of the NiFe alloy. Figure 2 shows the XRD pattern of NiFe/GO to further investigate the crystalline structure. The diffraction patterns located at 44.5°, 51.9°, and 76.4° can be ascribed to the diffraction of the (111), (200), and (220) crystal planes of the NiFe alloy, respectively [41]. No peaks of GO could be found due to its small amount.

3.2. Electrochemical Measurements

Figure 3 shows the typical cyclic voltammograms of the as-prepared GCE, GO/GCE, Fe/GO/GCE, Ni/GO/GCE, and NiFe/GO/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution in the presence of 1.0 mM glucose. It can be seen from Figure 3 that GCE, GO/GCE, and Fe/GO/GCE show very small current in the whole voltage range. Oxidation peaks between 0.50 to 0.55 V can be observed for Ni/GO/GCE and NiFe/GO/GCE, which can be ascribed to the oxidation of Ni2+ to Ni3+. The Ni3+ accounts for the oxidation of glucose [15]. When Fe was added to Ni to form the NiFe alloy, the current clearly increased. This indicates that the NiFe alloy has higher performance for electrochemical glucose detection.
To illustrate the effect of GO, the performance of NiFe/GCE and NiFe/GO/GCE were investigated. As shown in Figure 4, NiFe/GCE has only negligible current and the redox peaks can be seen in the inset figure. NiFe/GO/GCE shows much larger current than that of NiFe/GCE, indicating GO is important in the composite electrode. The GO not only acts as the support to protect the NiFe alloy from aggregation, but also plays an important role for electronic transmission.
Furthermore, the effect of the ratio between the Ni and Fe elements were investigated. As shown in Figure 5, Ni1Fe4/GO/GCE shows the smallest current. With the increase of Ni amount, NiFe/GO/GCE shows the biggest current. Conversely, a greater amount of Ni decreases the current for Ni4Fe1/GO/GCE. So, NiFe/GO/GCE was used for further research.
In order to improve the electrocatalytic performance of NiFe/GO/GCE, the loading amount of NiFe/GO was studied. Figure 6 shows the cyclic voltammogram (CV) curves of NiFe/GO/GCE with different amounts of NiFe/GO loaded onto the GCE. It can be seen that the current increases gradually from the loading amount of 30 to 75 μg NiFe/GO. When the loading amount exceeds 60 μg, the current decreases. So, 60 μg is the optimum loading amount and is used in the later experiments. This phenomenon can be explained by the change of catalytic sites. At first, increasing the loading amount of the NiFe alloy increased the number of catalytic sites. However, an excessive loading amount limited the mass transfer process, leading to the decrease of current [19].
Cyclic voltammetric measurements were performed at increased scan rates to better understand the electrocatalytic properties of the NiFe/GO/GCE electrode for glucose oxidation. As demonstrated in Figure 7a, cathodic peak currents of NiFe/GO/GCE increased with the increasing scan rate. Figure 7b illustrates the relationship between the cathodic peak current and scan rate. It can be seen that the cathodic peak currents increase linearly with the used scan rates. This result manifested that the rate-determining step was surface reaction control rather than diffusion control, which is favorable for quantitative analysis.

3.3. Amperometric Response Towards Glucose Sensing

Amperometric measurement was carried out to show the current response of the NiFe/GO/GCE electrode towards the continuous addition of various concentrations of glucose, which was carried out in vigorously stirred electrolyte. As shown in Figure 8a, the NiFe/GO/GCE electrode consistently generates a fast current response upon the addition of glucose with concentration from 50 to 400 μM. According to the amperometric current, the corresponding calibration curve was plotted in Figure 8b. It can be seen that the NiFe/GO/GCE sensor showed a wide linear sensing range, from 0.05 to 5 mM (R2 = 0.9994), and a sensitivity of 173 μA mM−1 cm−2. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) is 0.05 mM, while the limit of detection (LOD) is 9 μM at a signal/noise ratio of 3. At low concentrations, as shown in the inset in Figure 8b, the NiFe/GO/GCE sensor also showed a sensitivity of 148 μA mM−1 cm−2, which was close to that at high concentrations. As shown in Table 1, the performance of our sensor was compared with the previously reported sensors based on Ni materials. Our sensor is comparable to the previously reported sensors. The high sensitivity can be ascribed to the high electrocatalytic activity of the NiFe alloy and the excellent electronic transmission performance of GO.

3.4. Specificity and Reproducibility of the NiFe/GO/GCE Electrode

Dopamine (DA), ascorbic acid (AA), and uric acid (UA) coexist in human blood, which influences the electrochemical nonenzymatic glucose sensing. To investigate the effect of DA, AA, and UA on glucose sensing, an amperometric response test was carried out. Figure 9 shows the amperometric response current with the addition of DA, AA, UA, and glucose. It can be seen that the current generated by DA, AA, and UA in normal physiological concentrations are only 4.1%, 1.9%, and 2.6%, respectively, compared to that of glucose. This research demonstrates that the NiFe/GO/GCE electrode possesses specificity for glucose sensing and thus can be used in real-world sensing applications.
To check the reproducibility of our manufacturing operation, we fabricated two electrodes in the same conditions and tested their double-layer capacitance (Cdl). Cyclic voltammograms were carried out in 0.1 M NaOH solution at scan rates from 10 to 100 mV s−1 (Figure 10a,b). Then, the electrochemically active surface area was estimated by testing the capacitive current at non-Faraday regions at different scan rates, from which the double-layer capacitance (Cdl) was determined by plotting the △J = (Ja − Jc) at 0.10 V versus Ag/AgCl against the scan rate, as shown in Figure 10c. The linear slope is equivalent to double the Cdl, which can be used to represent the electrochemically active surface area [48]. From Figure 10c, it can be seen that the two fabricated electrodes have almost the same linear slope, revealing the same electrochemically active surface area of the two electrodes fabricated in the same conditions. That is, our fabrication process is reliable.

3.5. Practical Applications

For practical analysis, the NiFe/GO/GCE electrode was used to detect the glucose concentration in human serum by amperometric measurement. Briefly, 20 μL of serum was injected into 15 mL of 0.1 M NaOH solution, and then the current response at +0.55 V on NiFe/GO/GCE was recorded. The recovery value was confirmed by standard injection of glucose with a known concentration to the above sample, then recording the current at +0.55 V. As listed in Table 2, the recovery values of all three samples were close to 100%, indicating good practical application potential of the NiFe/GO/GCE electrode.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a NiFe/GO/GCE electrochemical glucose sensor has been successfully fabricated. The addition of the Fe element into Ni nanoparticles to form NiFe alloy nanoparticles improved the electrochemical performance of the glucose sensor, which showed higher current than the Ni/GO electrode. In addtion, the GO not only acts as a support to load the NiFe alloy from aggregation, but also plays an important role for electronic transmission. The NiFe/GO/GCE showed best performance when the ratio of Fe to Ni was 1:1. It was determined that 60 μg is the optimum loading amount in the tested conditions. The NiFe/GO/GCE electrode exhibited excellent sensitivity (173 μA mM−1 cm−2) and a wide detection linear range (up to 5 mM). In addition, the NiFe/GO/GCE electrode shows high selectivity for glucose detection and can be applied to glucose detection in human serum. All results demonstrate that the NiFe/GO/GCE electrode is a promising candidate in the development of cheap, stable, and sensitive nonenzymatic glucose sensors.

Author Contributions

Data curation, Z.D.; Formal analysis, Z.D., Y.S. and J.D.; Investigation, Z.D., Y.S. and J.D.; Resources, Y.W.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Y.W. and Z.D.; Writing—review and editing, Z.D., Y.S. and Y.W.; Project Administration, Y.W.; Funding acquisition, J.D. All the authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 21263023; Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province, grant number 1606RJZA209; Central Universities Fundamental Research Foundation, grant number 31920160055; and the Youth Science Foundation of Gansu Province, grant number 17JR5RA282. The APC was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province, grant number 17JR5RA172.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the reviewers and editors for their great help and useful suggestions, and thank Jingwei Huang and MDPI English Editing Service for their help in English editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Scognamiglio, V. Nanotechnology in glucose monitoring: Advances and challenges in the last 10 years. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 47C, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Clark, L.C.; Lyons, C. Electrode systems for continuous monitoring in cardiovascular surgery. Ann. Ny. Acad. Sci. 1962, 102, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Niu, X.H.; Shi, L.B.; Zhao, H.L.; Lan, M.B. Advanced strategies for improving the analytical performance of Pt-based nonenzymatic electrochemical glucose sensors: A minireview. Anal. Methods 2016, 8, 1755–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gnana kumar, G.; Amala, G.; Gowtham, S.M. Recent advancements, key challenges and solutions in non-enzymatic electrochemical glucose sensors based on graphene platforms. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 36949–36976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xie, J.D.; Gu, S.; Zhang, H. Microwave deposition of palladium catalysts on graphite spheres and reduced graphene oxide sheets for electrochemical glucose Sensing. Sensors 2017, 17, 2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, M.H.; Yang, Y.H.; Liu, Y.L.; Shen, G.L.; Yu, R.Q. Platinum nanoparticles-doped sol-gel/carbon nanotubes composite electrochemical sensors and biosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2006, 21, 1125–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Niu, X.; Li, X.; Pan, J.; He, Y.; Qiu, F.; Yan, Y. Recent advances in non-enzymatic electrochemical glucose sensors based on non-precious transition metal materials: Opportunities and challenges. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 84893–84905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ma, L.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Tong, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z. Pt catalyzed formation of a Ni@Pt/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite: Preparation and electrochemical sensing application for glucose detection. Anal. Methods 2018, 10, 3845–3850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jin, L.; Meng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, S.; Zhang, Z.; Li, C.; Shang, L.; Shen, Y. Ultrasmall Pt nanoclusters as robust peroxidase mimics for colorimetric detection of glucose in human serum. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 10027–10033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Jiang, L.; Xue, Q.; Jiao, C.; Liu, H.; Zhou, Y.; Ma, H.; Yang, Q. A non-enzymatic nanoceria electrode for non-invasive glucose monitoring. Anal. Methods 2018, 10, 2151–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, W.; Zhang, R.; Xu, S.; Cai, J.; Zhu, X.; Zhu, Y.; Wei, W.; Liu, X.; Luo, J. Molecularly imprinted polymeric nanoparticles decorated with Au NPs for highly sensitive and selective glucose detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 100, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Xiao, X.Y.; Montano, G.A.; Edwards, T.L.; Washburn, C.M.; Brozik, S.M.; Wheeler, D.R.; Burckel, D.B.; Polsky, R. Lithographically defined 3D nanoporous nonenzymatic glucose sensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 3641–3646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, Q.; Wang, Q.; Qi, K.; Xue, T.; Liu, C.; Zheng, W.; Cui, X. In situ preparation of porous Pd nanotubes on a GCE for non-enzymatic electrochemical glucose sensors. Anal. Methods 2015, 7, 8605–8610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, J. Electrochemical glucose biosensors. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 814–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Huang, J.; He, Y.; Jin, J.; Li, Y.; Dong, Z.; Li, R. A novel glucose sensor based on MoS2 nanosheet functionalized with Ni nanoparticles. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 136, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shu, Y.; Yan, Y.; Chen, J.; Xu, Q.; Pang, H.; Hu, X. Ni and NiO nanoparticles decorated metal–organic framework nanosheets: Facile synthesis and high-performance nonenzymatic glucose detection in human serum. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 22342–22349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mao, Y.; Tian, S.; Gong, S.; Qin, Y.; Han, J.; Deng, S. A broad-spectrum sweet taste sensor based on Ni(OH)2/Ni electrode. Sensors 2018, 18, 2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Huang, M.; Luo, X.; He, D.; Jiang, P. Hierarchical Co(OH)2 nanotube arrays grown on carbon cloth for use in non-enzymatic glucose sensing. Anal. Methods 2017, 9, 5903–5909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, J.; Dong, Z.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, J.; Yang, H.; Li, S.; Guo, S.; Jin, J.; Li, R. High performance non-enzymatic glucose biosensor based on copper nanowires–carbon nanotubes hybrid for intracellular glucose study. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2013, 182, 618–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, M.; Zhang, G.; Peng, W.; Li, Y.; Fan, X.; Zhang, F. Preparation of cuprous oxide mesoporous spheres with different pore sizes for non-enzymatic glucose detection. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Huang, J.; Hu, G.; Ding, Y.; Pang, M.; Ma, B. Mn-doping and NiFe layered double hydroxide coating: Effective approaches to enhancing the performance of α-Fe2O3 in photoelectrochemical water oxidation. J. Catal. 2016, 340, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yeh, T.H.; Liu, C.W.; Chen, H.S.; Wang, K.W. Preparation of carbon-supported PtM (M = Au, Pd, or Cu) nanorods and their application in oxygen reduction reaction. Electrochem. Commun. 2013, 31, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sun, Y.; Yang, H.; Yu, X.; Meng, H.; Xu, X. A novel non-enzymatic amperometric glucose sensor based on a hollow Pt-Ni alloy nanotube array electrode with enhanced sensitivity. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 70387–70394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, C.C.; Chen, L.C. Synthesis and characterization of Pd-Ni core-shell nanocatalysts for alkaline glucose electrooxidation. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 53333–53339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, J.; Liang, X.; Cui, L.; Liu, H.; Xie, J.; Liu, W. A novel non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on Pt3Ru1 alloy nanoparticles with high density of surface defects. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 80, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. He, W.; Sun, Y.; Xi, J.; Abdurhman, A.A.M.; Ren, J.; Duan, H. Printing graphene-carbon nanotube-ionic liquid gel on graphene paper: Towards flexible electrodes with efficient loading of PtAu alloy nanoparticles for electrochemical sensing of blood glucose. Anal. Chim. Acta 2016, 903, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhao, A.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, P.; Xiao, S.; Wang, L.; Dong, Y.; Yuan, H.; Li, P.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, X.; et al. 3D nanoporous gold scaffold supported on graphene paper: Freestanding and flexible electrode with high loading of ultrafine PtCo alloy nanoparticles for electrochemical glucose sensing. Anal. Chim. Acta 2016, 938, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Suneesh, P.V.; Sara Vargis, V.; Ramachandran, T.; Nair, B.G.; Satheesh Babu, T.G. Co–Cu alloy nanoparticles decorated TiO2 nanotube arrays for highly sensitive and selective nonenzymatic sensing of glucose. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2015, 215, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sheng, Q.; Liu, D.; Zheng, J. NiCo alloy nanoparticles anchored on polypyrrole/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for nonenzymatic glucose sensing. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 6658–6665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Han, B.; Pan, M.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Jiao, J.; Zhang, C.; Chen, Q. Facile synthesis of β-Lactoglobulin-Functionalized reduced graphene oxide and trimetallic PtAuPd nanocomposite for electrochemical sensing. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Jiang, L.C.; Zhang, W.D. A highly sensitive nonenzymatic glucose sensor based on CuO nanoparticles-modified carbon nanotube electrode. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 25, 1402–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wu, H.X.; Cao, W.M.; Li, Y.; Liu, G.; Wen, Y.; Yang, H.F.; Yang, S.P. In situ growth of copper nanoparticles on multiwalled carbon nanotubes and their application as non-enzymatic glucose sensor materials. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 3734–3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Radhakrishnan, S.; Kim, S.J. Facile fabrication of NiS and a reduced graphene oxide hybrid film for nonenzymatic detection of glucose. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 44346–44352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yan, X.; Gu, Y.; Li, C.; Zheng, B.; Li, Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, M. A non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on the CuS nanoflakes–reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite. Anal. Methods 2018, 10, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yu, X.; Yang, P.; Chen, S.; Zhang, M.; Shi, G. NiFe alloy protected silicon photoanode for efficient water splitting. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1601805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bin, D.; Yang, B.; Li, C.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Xia, Y. In situ growth of NiFe alloy nanoparticles embedded into N-doped bamboo-like carbon nanotubes as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for Zn Air batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 26178–26187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, G.; Zheng, D.; Liu, D.; Harris, J.; Si, J.; Ding, T.; Qu, D. Highly efficient Ni Fe based oxygen evolution catalyst prepared by a novel pulse electrochemical approach. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 247, 722–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Torabinejad, V.; Aliofkhazraei, M.; Assareh, S.; Allahyarzadeh, M.H.; Rouhaghdam, A.S. Electrodeposition of Ni-Fe alloys, composites, and nano coatings—A review. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 691, 841–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hummers, W.S., Jr.; Offeman, R.E. Preparation of graphitic oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, J.; Tang, W.; Huang, J.; Jin, J.; Ma, J. Polyethyleneimine decorated graphene oxide-supported Ni1-xFex bimetallic nanoparticles as efficient and robust electrocatalysts for hydrazine fuel cells. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 3155–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hui, S.; Zhang, J.; Chen, X.; Xu, H.; Ma, D.; Liu, Y.; Tao, B. Study of an amperometric glucose sensor based on Pd–Ni/SiNW electrode. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2011, 155, 592–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mei, H.; Wu, W.; Yu, B.; Wu, H.; Wang, S.; Zhang, X.; Xia, Q. Electrochemical sensor for detection of glucose based on Ni@Pt core-shell nanoparticles supported on carbon. Electroanalysis 2016, 28, 671–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, X.; Liu, J.; Ji, X.; Jiang, J.; Ding, R.; Hu, Y.; Hu, A.; Huang, X. Ni/Al layered double hydroxide nanosheet film grown directly on Ti substrate and its application for a nonenzymatic glucose sensor. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2010, 147, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, Z.; Guo, Y.; Dong, C. A high performance nonenzymatic electrochemical glucose sensor based on polyvinylpyrrolidone–graphene nanosheets–nickel nanoparticles–chitosan nanocomposite. Talanta 2015, 137, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gao, H.; Xiao, F.; Ching, C.B.; Duan, H. One-step electrochemical synthesis of PtNi nanoparticle-graphene nanocomposites for nonenzymatic amperometric glucose detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 3049–3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hu, Y.; He, F.; Ben, A.; Chen, C. Synthesis of hollow Pt–Ni–graphene nanostructures for nonenzymatic glucose detection. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2014, 726, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Song, F.; Hu, X. Ultrathin cobalt manganese layered souble hydroxide is an efficient oxygen evolution catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 16481–16484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sensors 18 03972 g001
Figure 1. (a) TEM image of the NiFe/GO composite and (b–d) element mapping of the NiFe alloy.
Figure 1. (a) TEM image of the NiFe/GO composite and (b–d) element mapping of the NiFe alloy.
Sensors 18 03972 g001
Sensors 18 03972 g002
Figure 2. XRD pattern of the NiFe/GO composite.
Figure 2. XRD pattern of the NiFe/GO composite.
Sensors 18 03972 g002
Sensors 18 03972 g003
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of GCE, GO/GCE, Fe/GO/GCE, Ni/GO/GCE, and NiFe/GO/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution in the presence of 1.0 mM glucose at a scan rate of 10 mV/s. Inset: CVs of GCE and GO/GCE.
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of GCE, GO/GCE, Fe/GO/GCE, Ni/GO/GCE, and NiFe/GO/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution in the presence of 1.0 mM glucose at a scan rate of 10 mV/s. Inset: CVs of GCE and GO/GCE.
Sensors 18 03972 g003
Sensors 18 03972 g004
Figure 4. CVs of NiFe/GCE and NiFe/GO/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution in the presence of 1.0 mM glucose at a scan rate of 10 mV/s. Inset: CV of NiFe/GCE.
Figure 4. CVs of NiFe/GCE and NiFe/GO/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution in the presence of 1.0 mM glucose at a scan rate of 10 mV/s. Inset: CV of NiFe/GCE.
Sensors 18 03972 g004
Sensors 18 03972 g005
Figure 5. CVs of Ni1Fe4/GO/GCE, NiFe/GO/GCE, and Ni4Fe1/GO/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution in the presence of 1.0 mM glucose at a scan rate of 10 mV/s.
Figure 5. CVs of Ni1Fe4/GO/GCE, NiFe/GO/GCE, and Ni4Fe1/GO/GCE in 0.1 M NaOH solution in the presence of 1.0 mM glucose at a scan rate of 10 mV/s.
Sensors 18 03972 g005
Sensors 18 03972 g006
Figure 6. The effect of modification amount on the performance of the electrode.
Figure 6. The effect of modification amount on the performance of the electrode.
Sensors 18 03972 g006
Sensors 18 03972 g007
Figure 7. (a) Cyclic voltammograms of NiFe/GO/GCE at different scan rates from 20 to 90 mV/s in 0.1 M NaOH with 1.0 mM glucose. (b) Plot of cathode current vs the scan rate.
Figure 7. (a) Cyclic voltammograms of NiFe/GO/GCE at different scan rates from 20 to 90 mV/s in 0.1 M NaOH with 1.0 mM glucose. (b) Plot of cathode current vs the scan rate.
Sensors 18 03972 g007
Sensors 18 03972 g008
Figure 8. (a) Amperometric currents measured with the continuous addition of glucose with concentration from 50 to 400 μM at 0.55 V for NiFe/GO/GCE, and (b) the corresponding calibration curve. Inset: calibration curve at low concentrations.
Figure 8. (a) Amperometric currents measured with the continuous addition of glucose with concentration from 50 to 400 μM at 0.55 V for NiFe/GO/GCE, and (b) the corresponding calibration curve. Inset: calibration curve at low concentrations.
Sensors 18 03972 g008
Sensors 18 03972 g009
Figure 9. Amperometric response of the NiFe/GO/GCE electrode with interference by dopamine (DA), ascorbic acid (AA), and uric acid (UA) at physiological concentrations.
Figure 9. Amperometric response of the NiFe/GO/GCE electrode with interference by dopamine (DA), ascorbic acid (AA), and uric acid (UA) at physiological concentrations.
Sensors 18 03972 g009
Sensors 18 03972 g010
Figure 10. Cyclic voltammograms with different scan rates in the potential range of 0.0 V to 0.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl, where no Faradaic processes occur for the first (a) and second fabrication (b) of the electrode. Charging current density differences for the first and second fabrications (c) of the electrode are plotted against scan rates.
Figure 10. Cyclic voltammograms with different scan rates in the potential range of 0.0 V to 0.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl, where no Faradaic processes occur for the first (a) and second fabrication (b) of the electrode. Charging current density differences for the first and second fabrications (c) of the electrode are plotted against scan rates.
Sensors 18 03972 g010
Table 1. Comparison of our sensor to other Ni-based sensors.
Table 1. Comparison of our sensor to other Ni-based sensors.
MaterialsSensitivity
(μA mM−1 cm−2)		Linear RangeReference
Pd−Ni/Si nanowires190.70–20 mM[42]
Ni−Pt66.90.1–30.1 mM[43]
Ni/Al LDH nanosheet24.455 μM−10 mM[44]
PVP–GNs–NiNPs–CS103.80.1 μM–0.5 mM[45]
PtNi–ERGO/GCE20.4Up to 35 mM[46]
HollowPt–Ni–graphene30.30.5–20.0 mM[47]
Table 2. Amperometric detection of glucose in serum.
Table 2. Amperometric detection of glucose in serum.
SampleConcentration
(mmol L−1)		RSD (%)Added
(mmol L−1)		Found
(mmol L−1)		Recovery (%)
19.33.5110.198
25.83.116.799
37.13.418.099

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Deng, Z.-P.; Sun, Y.; Wang, Y.-C.; Gao, J.-D. A NiFe Alloy Reduced on Graphene Oxide for Electrochemical Nonenzymatic Glucose Sensing. Sensors 2018, 18, 3972. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113972

AMA Style

Deng Z-P, Sun Y, Wang Y-C, Gao J-D. A NiFe Alloy Reduced on Graphene Oxide for Electrochemical Nonenzymatic Glucose Sensing. Sensors. 2018; 18(11):3972. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113972

Chicago/Turabian Style

Deng, Zhe-Peng, Yu Sun, Yong-Cheng Wang, and Jian-De Gao. 2018. "A NiFe Alloy Reduced on Graphene Oxide for Electrochemical Nonenzymatic Glucose Sensing" Sensors 18, no. 11: 3972. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113972

APA Style

Deng, Z.-P., Sun, Y., Wang, Y.-C., & Gao, J.-D. (2018). A NiFe Alloy Reduced on Graphene Oxide for Electrochemical Nonenzymatic Glucose Sensing. Sensors, 18(11), 3972. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113972

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop