Next Article in Journal
An IMU-Aided Body-Shadowing Error Compensation Method for Indoor Bluetooth Positioning
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review of Microfiber-Based Temperature Sensors
Previous Article in Journal
A 750 K Photocharge Linear Full Well in a 3.2 μm HDR Pixel with Complementary Carrier Collection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fabry-Perot Interferometric High-Temperature Sensing Up to 1200 °C Based on a Silica Glass Photonic Crystal Fiber
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Overhead Transmission Line Sag Estimation Using a Simple Optomechanical System with Chirped Fiber Bragg Gratings. Part 1: Preliminary Measurements

1
Department of Power Systems, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
2
Institute of Electronics and Information Technology, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2018, 18(1), 309; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010309
Submission received: 27 November 2017 / Revised: 14 January 2018 / Accepted: 18 January 2018 / Published: 20 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical Fiber Sensors 2017)

Abstract

:
A method of measuring the power line wire sag using optical sensors that are insensitive to high electromagnetic fields was proposed. The advantage of this technique is that it is a non-invasive measurement of power line wire elongation using a unique optomechanical system. The proposed method replaces the sag of the power line wire with an extension of the control sample and then an expansion of the attached chirped fiber Bragg grating. This paper presents the results of the first measurements made on real aluminum-conducting steel-reinforced wire, frequently used for power line construction. It has been shown that the proper selection of the CFBG (chirped fiber Bragg grating) transducer and the appropriate choice of optical parameters of such a sensor will allow for high sensitivity of the line wire elongation and sag while reducing the sensitivity to the temperature. It has been shown that with a simple optomechanical system, a non-invasive measurement of the power line wire sag that is insensitive to temperature changes and the influence of high electromagnetic fields can be achieved.

1. Introduction

Fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors can be used to measure many physical quantities, such as strain, stress, elongation, temperature [1], and refractive index [2]. The advantage of optical method based research is the lack of influence on the tested object, the ability to perform non-invasive measurements which can be performed in a wide variety of fields such as mechanical structures diagnostics or even medicine [3]. Among the FBG structures are some significant gratings in which the period is not uniform [4]. Many studies have been published demonstrating the promising properties of periodic structures with non-uniform periods, especially chirped fiber Bragg gratings [5]. These structures can be used for separated parameter monitoring [6], independent strain and temperature measurement [5,7,8], dispersion compensation [9,10], or structural health monitoring [11]. Tapered fibers with CFBG have significantly improved strain sensitivity [12]. The CFBG sensors can also be used with inexpensive interrogators [13] and their specially-designed structures can be used as optical filters [14,15,16]. The loads of the overhead power transmission lines can be measured using a few uniform FBGs. In some embodiments, each grating is bonded directly to the conductor with epoxy [17], which makes it difficult to disassemble when the sensor head cracks. There are also known systems for distributed monitoring of overhead transmission lines with fiber Bragg grating sensor networks [18]. Such systems are very promising because they can be used to provide multiple types of information for smart grids. FBG sensors can be fairly used to monitor the strain of transmission line wire. In this case, the strain of the conductor is directly proportional to the ampacity of the cable [19]. In such systems, the strain of the grating cannot be widely adjusted because the optical fiber extends equally with the power line conductor. In this paper, the authors would like to present the construction of sensing heads where the CFBG is attached to the so-called control sample steel plate whose dimensional adjustment allows for the control of the sensitivity and measuring range. Among the various methods of constructing these periodic structure based sensors, this is the first method proposed to the best of our knowledge in which the CFBG can be implemented with the strain and sag of power lines can be measured using a special optomechanical system and the control specimen. Today, modern power systems and smart grids are required to have the operational flexibility of electrical power transmission whilst preserving the appropriate safety margin [20,21]. In the context of overhead transmission lines (OTL), the above approach can be implemented by dynamic line rating (DLR) systems [22,23,24,25]. The DLR systems allow for the continuous monitoring of operating conditions and the electromechanical state of the OTL span [20,26] or of the whole line [27]. The most important parameters determining the safe operation of the OTL, among others, are the sag and strain of the wire, which are direct functions of its actual temperature resulting from a load of electric current and atmospheric conditions [28,29,30]. The unquestionable advantages of fiber-optic and FBG sensors are the insensitivity of the measurement to the strong electromagnetic field, the speed of measurement, the non-invasive installation of the sensor on the conductor, the small power demand for the supply of the measuring system, and not needed a complex sensor or radio [31]. At present, the dynamic development of the FBG based monitoring systems is observed [32,33]. Using OTL monitoring and its actual state [28], the current wire elongation sag is a critical parameter in determining the distance from the ground or obstacle [34] that is affecting the operational safety.
This article aims to present the results of the application of the CFBG-based sensor for power line strain (relative elongation) to calculate its sag, as an alternative to the standard FBG sensors.

2. Materials and Methods

The chirped gratings, compared to conventional FBGs where the period of the refractive index perturbations is constant along the grating length, are characterized by a variable period in the internal structure. Chirps in gratings may take many different forms. The period may vary linearly with the length of the grating, it may be quadratic, and so on. The chirp could also be symmetrical where the period varies by increasing or decreasing around the pitch in the middle of a grating. Generally, modifications applied to the internal structure of the gratings leads to a change of its spectral characteristic. The most widely used CFBGs have a widened spectrum which makes them possible to be used in many areas, including dispersion compensators, mirrors for specialized photonic sensing systems, and sensing elements replacing conventional FBGs. Their widened characteristics allow them to measure not only the wavelength shift, but also the width of the spectra [35]. The proposed method for the power line sag estimation utilizes a simple optomechanical system which allows for the line’s sag change to be converted to the CFBG optical parameter change. The idea of the system is presented in Figure 1. Similar solutions were presented in [17,18] where a sensing head was mounted on an energized power line conductor and the ground voltage was connected directly by fiber-optic cables in the light spectrum processing devices.
The system shown in Figure 1 allows for the elongation and sag measurement of the OTL wire. The light source was a superluminescent light emitting diode (SLED). The Thorlabs S5FC1005S (Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA) was attached to a single-mode optical fiber used as a transmission light-guide. The light emitted from the SLED source illuminated the sensing CFBG with a 1 nm/cm chirp, inscribed on the hydrogen-loaded SMF-28 part at the end of the fiber. The optical fiber with the CFBG sensor was connected/glued to a thinned plate which was 1 mm in thickness and made of steel (1.0037 S235JR UNI according to the norm EN 10025). The shape of the control plate is shown in Figure 2. The plate is screwed to the semi-circular clamps fixing the control plate with the CFBG sensor to an OTL wire (Figure 2). The elongation of the OTL wire causes the clamps to move apart and increase the tension of the control plate, which is monotonically extending the length of its measuring section with the CFBG attached.
The idea of the whole optomechanical system is illustrated schematically in Figure 2 and the cross-section is shown in Figure 3. Figure 2b shows the proposed shape of the sensing plate which provides the non-uniform strain while the whole section is extended. The sensing grating was attached to the plate keeping the direction of the chirp shown in the figure below. Grating sections with the most extended periods are placed on the plate segment which is mostly elongated which provides the best response to the spectrum FWHM in the case of wire elongation.
The light from the light source (SLED) was directed to the CFBG sensor via an optical circulator. The optical spectrum reflected from the elongated CFBG was returned through the optical circulator to the optical spectrum analyzer (OSA). Thermal expansion and additional mechanical loads on the OTL wire cause variations in the length of the measured wire section surrounded by attached clamps as shown in Figure 2. In such cases, the response of the single-mode fiber with the inscribed CFBG results in the widening of the spectral characteristics which is caused by the nonlinearity of the strain applied to the transducer.
The full-width half-maximum (FWHM) comparison of the spectral characteristics of the signals reflected from the Bragg sensor with the value assigned to the reference length of the segment gives information on the current elongation of the OTL wire. At the same time, changes in the wire surrounding temperature cause spectral shifts to the whole CFBG spectrum and do not affect the FWHM. The linear relationship between the elongation of the conductor, its temperature, and its stress allow for the determination of the elongation value. In the case of this sensor, the matrix equation of the processing can be written as:
[ O P 1 O P 2 ] = [ S C 11 S C 12 S C 21 S C 22 ] × [ T Δ l ]
where SCij (i = 1–2, j = 1–2) is the sensitivity coefficients that are defining the optical parameters sensitivity of the CFBG sensor OPi on the temperature T along with the elongation Δl. Let us denote the matrix of coefficients SC as:
M = [ S C 11 S C 12 S C 21 S C 22 ] = f ( Δ l , T )
The optical parameter OP1 denotes the full-width at half maximum (FWHM) of the measured CFBG spectrum, while the OP2 parameter reflects the spectral shift (SSH). Thus, it can be assumed that OP1 and OP2 depend upon the relative elongation Δl and temperature T (Equations (3) and (4)):
O P 1 = f 1 [ Δ l , T ]
O P 2 = f 2 [ Δ l , T ]
In this case, we will look for the temperature values and maximum stress without knowing the value of matrix M. Let us denote the vector of the searching values as sv. This vector contains the value of the engineering strain e and the temperature T so that we can write:
s v = [ Δ l , T ]
The measurement values vector mv can be defined as follows:
m v = [ O P 1 , O P 2 ] = [ F W H M C F B G , S S H C F B G ]
where FWHMCFBG is the full-width at half maximum of the CFBG spectrum and SSHCFBG denotes its spectral shift. Equation (1) can be written in the matrix form as follows:
m v = M s v
The matrix M has 2 × 2 dimensions, is symmetrical for all vectors x 2 , and is real. As a result of the measurements, the sensitivity matrix M is determined and the vector of searching values sv can be calculated based on the measured magnitude vector mv. Measuring the optical parameters of the CFBG, such as FWHMCFBG and SSHCFBG allows for the determination of the fiber temperature T and elongation ∆l according to the matrix equation below:
[ O P 1 O P 2 ] = [ C S C 11 C S C 12 C S C 21 C S C 22 ] × [ T Δ l ]
where CSCij are the complex sensitivity coefficients (i = 1, 2, j = 1, 2). The value ∆l which appears in Equation (8) is the relative elongation length measured between the clamps of sensing head (lref) mounted on the conductor.
The conductor sag D can be calculated as a function of Δl, according to the reference conductor length Lref. The overhead transmission line conductor’s sag-tension calculations are typically based on the catenary equation, which describes an entirely flexible rope rigidly fixed at both ends. The catenary equation is defined using hyperbolic sine or cosine functions. However, it can be reliably approximated by a parabola. The main difference between a catenary equation and the parabolic approximation is that catenary assumes a constant weight per unit length through the conductor while the parabolic equation assumes an invariable weight per unit horizontal length. This simplification causes the sag calculation with the parabolic approximation to be smaller than when it is estimated with the catenary equation.
The shape of a catenary is a function of the conductor weight per unit length weight w, the horizontal component of tension H, span length S, and the maximum sag of the conductor D. The exact catenary equation uses hyperbolic functions, as shown in Equation (9). The right side of the Equation (9) is an approximation of the hyperbolic cosine using the Maclaurin series expansion:
y ( x ) = H w cosh ( ( w H x ) 1 ) = w ( x 2 ) 2 H .
For a flat span, the low point is at the center and the wire sag D is found by substituting x = S/2. Exact and approximate formulas for the sag calculations is shown in Equation (10):
D = H w ( cosh ( w S 2 H ) 1 ) = w S 2 8 H .
The parabolic approximation is sufficiently accurate as long as the sag in the span does not exceed 5% of its length [36]. The power line sag D varies with the conductor temperature, ice, wind loading, and time as the conductor creeps. The horizontal tension H is equal to the conductor tension in the middle of the span shown in Figure 4. At the endpoints where the wire is fixed to the insulators, the conductor tension F is equal to the horizontal tension H plus the conductor weight per unit length w multiplied by the sag D, according to Equation (11) [36]:
F = H + w D .
It is common to perform sag-tension calculations using only the horizontal tension component H, but the average of the horizontal and support point tension F is usually shown. The conductor length in the span can be calculated with the application of a catenary equation using Equation (12). The right side of Equation (12) corresponds to a parabolic approximation of the catenary function:
L = 2 H w sinh ( S w 2 H ) = S ( 1 + S 2 w 2 24 H 2 ) .
The total conductor length can be expressed as a function of sag D as shown in the Equation (13):
L = S + 8 D 2 3 S .
Using Equation (13), we can write the formula for the conductor sag dependence D upon the span length S and the conductor length L, shown below:
D = 3 S ( L S ) 8 .
The difference between the conductor length L and span length S is defined as the conductor slack. Equation (14) shows that small changes in the slack give significant changes in the conductor sag. As it was mentioned above, conductor sag depends mainly on the total conductor length L when the span length S remains constant. The temperature dependency of the conductor length L is typically calculated using Equation (15):
L 2 = α A S L 1 ( T 2 T 1 ) + β L 1 ( σ 2 σ 1 ) ,
where index 1 and 2 are the beginning and end states, respectively; L1, L2: the conductor length in the span; T1, T2 are the conductor temperature; αAS is the thermal elongation coefficient for ACSR; σ1, σ2 are the conductor stress; and β and the wire elastic elongation coefficient.
The typically temperature-tension calculation of the power line span is performed using Equation (16) [36] and solved using iterative methods:
σ 2 S 2 g 2 2 24 β σ 2 2 = σ 1 S 2 g 1 2 24 β σ 1 2 α β ( T 2 T 1 ) ,
where S is the span length; σ1, σ2 = H/A is the wire stress; g = w/A is volumetric weight; A is the wire cross-sectional area; and β = 1/γ is the wire elastic elongation coefficient. For ACSR 26/7 Hawk conductors, typically α = 18.7 × 10−6 1/K, γ = 75,000 MPa, A = 276.2 mm2, w = 9.52 N/m, and g = 34.47 N/(m·mm2) [37]. In such cases, we need to measure tension, stress, or the wire temperature to estimate the total length of the wire in the span and then calculate sag. Sometimes, a calculation of the bare conductor temperature can be done using the methods presented in [28,29,30] based on weather parameters, electric current, or conductor tension measurements. The algorithm for conductor sag calculation was investigated by [26] and is presented in Figure 5.
This paper introduces a direct method for calculation of the sag D based on a single spot conductor elongation measurement with a CFBG sensor. Assuming that the horizontal tension H and conductor thermal elongation is constant over the span, the relative elongation measurement Δl of the selected 10 cm wire segment covered with the sensing head clamps provides the data required for the calculation of the total wire length L, as described with Equations (17)–(20). According to previous considerations, the relative wire elongation Δl could be appointed as a function of the sensor FWHM spectral width as shown below:
Δ l = C OP 1 Δ F W H M C F B G ,
E = Δ l l r e f = C OP 1 l r e f Δ F W H M C F B G ,
where E is the relative elongation coefficient as a measured FWHM function; COP1 is the experimentally evaluated elongation sensor sensitivity coefficient; lref is the reference distance of the installed sensor clamps on the conductor; and Δl is the elongation of the wire segment covered by the sensing head and measured by the CFBG sensor.
L = L r e f ( 1 + E ) .
Assuming the above (Equation (19)), the conductor sag dependence D (Equation (14)) we acquire the following form:
D = 3 S ( L r e f ( 1 + E ) S ) 8 .
According to Equations (14) and (19), it is shown that for OTL wire sag calculation is enough to measure an elongation of a particular section of the wire.

3. Results

The surveys were performed on a real overhead power transmission line. The measurement system was mounted directly on a 110 kV OTL power line wire which was energized. The proper construction of the optomechanical system, provided its compact size and weight, makes it negligible to the mechanical workings of the power line. Figure 6 shows a photograph of the measurement system mounted on an ACSR 26/7 Hawk wire.
The influence of temperature variations on the measurement system described above was measured for a short segment of the power line wire with the mounted complete system (clamps, steel plate with attached optical fiber). The OTL wire segment was placed in a climate-control chamber with a temperature range established at 10–90 °C. Figure 7a shows the spectral characteristics of the CFBG reflected signal measured for border cases of the surrounding temperature: 10 °C and 90 °C. The increase of the surrounding temperature of the wire changes the CFBG spectral characteristic by shifting the whole spectrum to longer wavelengths. The spectrum is not widened so the FWHM parameter of the sensor output characteristics has a quasi-constant character. However, the shift of the spectrum could be distinguished and measured and in this paper is called SSH (spectral shift).
In the case of chirped Bragg gratings, distinguishing the center wavelength is difficult because of the non-regular character of its spectra. In the processing characteristics shown in this paper, the SSH parameter is calculated based on the half spectral width of the appointed FWHM. Another situation occurs when the wire length changes due to the mechanical elongation which is shown in Figure 7b. The FWHM value sharply increases with the growth of the measured elongation, which promises that in the described measurement system it could be used as a determinant of the power line sag. Figure 8 shows the characteristics of the dependency of SSH on the wire elongation and the surrounding temperature variations in the selected ranges.
The graph depicted above shows that the spectral shift calculated as a half wavelength width of FWHM depends on both elongation and temperature. In the case of temperature variations, the transformation of the measured temperature to SSH has a linear character. The temperature sensitivity of the considered monitoring system configuration is associated with a thermal expansion coefficient of the material which the testing plate is made of along with the material of the OTL wire. The shift determined for the different elongation values results directly from the widening of the signal spectrum. As opposed to the SSH parameter, the FWHM spectral width depends only on the elongation of the measurement section and is practically insensitive to the temperature changes. Figure 9 shows the changing characteristics of the FWHM width dependent on the changes of elongation and temperature in the same ranges as in the case shown in Figure 8.
According to Figure 9, the total wire elongation in the span and the wire sag can be anticipated as a function of FWHM and the initial state span parameters. Let us assume that the power line span is S = 300 m and constructed with ACSR 26/7 Hawk conductors that have a per unit length weight w = 9.75 N/m [37]. The mechanical characteristics of the span describe that, for a wire temperature of 10 °C, the horizontal tension is H = 14,600 N. Using Equation (12), it is then possible to calculate the reference wire length Lref (Equation (21)) and reference sag Dref (Equation (22)):
L r e f = 300 ( 1 + 300 2 9.75 2 24 14,600 2 ) = 300.502 m ,
D r e f = 3 300 ( 300.502 300 ) 8 = 7.514 m .
The initial conditions shown above are matched for an OTL span right after installing the wire on the poles. Weather conditions cause changes in the elongation of the wire due to icing, ambient temperature, wind speed and angle, and solar radiation. The elongation is also associated with the conductor temperature arising from the electric current flow. As a result of the total wire length L, changes in the power line sag D also vary. In the proposed optomechanical system, the variations of the length of the measured section affect the measured CFBGFWHM spectral width. Characteristics shown in Figure 10 and Figure 11 present how the power line sag will be influenced by the elongation of the testing OTL wire segment and how the FWHM spectral width is affected by sag changes of the power line with the initial parameters described by Equations (21) and (22).
The coefficients OP1 and OP2 are two different parameters of the Bragg grating spectrum that will change due to the induced elongation or temperature changes. The matrix equation of the temperature and elongation sensor processing will take the form of Equation (8). Taking into account the results obtained from the measurements, it allows us to write the matrix equation in the form below:
[ F W H M C F B G S S H C F B G ] = [ 0.00010 0.00603 0.02261 0.00484 ] × [ T Δ l ] ,
where CSC11 is the sensitivity of FWHMCFBG to temperature (CSC11 = 0.1 pm/K), CSC21 is the sensitivity of SSHCFBG to the temperature (CSC21 = 22.61 pm/K), CSC12 is the sensitivity of FWHMCFBG to the elongation of testing section (CSC12 = 6.03 pm/μm), and CSC22 is the sensitivity of SSHCFBG to the elongation of the testing section (CSC22 = 4.84 pm/μm).
By analyzing Equation (23), it could be seen that the simultaneous measurement of the temperature and elongation is possible if, for the proposed monitoring system, we designate two different parameters of the CFBG which show different sensitivities for the measured quantities. It is only possible if the inequality condition OP1OP2 is also met, which is fulfilled because FWHMCFBGSSHCFBG. Analysis of Equation (23) allows us to conclude that with the known (determined experimentally) sensitivities of FWHMCFBG and SSHCFBG for the temperature and elongation, the measured quantities of CSC11, CSC21, CSC12, and CSC22 could be determined simultaneously. The matrix of algebraic complements of all sensor sensitivities CSC11, CSC12 along with CSC21, CSC22 have been calculated using Equation (24) and the received values have been shown in Equation (25):
d 11 = ( 1 ) 1 + 1 C S C 22 = C S C 22 ,       d 12 = ( 1 ) 1 + 2 C S C 21 = C S C 21 d 21 = ( 1 ) 2 + 1 C S C 12 = C S C 12 ,       d 22 = ( 1 ) 2 + 2 C S C 11 = C S C 11 .
By the condition of the non-zero matrix determinant of Equation (24), it is possible to construct its complementary matrix based on Equation (24), which we will now write in the form:
[ T Δ l ] = 1 0 , 00014 [ 0.00484 0.00603 0.02261 0.00010 ] × [ F W H M C F B G S S H C F B G ] ,
where det: the matrix determinant form of Equation (23) moreover, equals:
d e t = C S C 11 C S C 22 C S C 21 C S C 12 .
The fulfilled condition of the various sensitivity ratios of FWHMCFBG and SSHCFBG for the temperature and elongation gives the possibility of simultaneous determination of both quantities by measuring the spectrum shift (SSHCFBG) and the spectral width of the CFBG characteristic (FWHMCFBG).

4. Discussion

The proposed method has a low cross-sensitivity, as seen in the final matrix of the processing system in Equation (25). An analytical determination of the OTL sag was proposed based on the CFBG spectra measurements mounted directly on the Hawk wire using the special semicircular screwed clamps forming the whole sensing head. Empirical studies have confirmed the low cross-sensitivity values (CSC11 = 0.1 pm/K, CSC21 = 22.61 pm/K, CSC12 = 6.03 pm/μm and CSC22 = 4.84 pm/μm). We have shown that such use of CFBGs and the suitable optomechanical system allows for the monitoring of the relative wire elongation and the OTL sag D. The presented method is non-sensitive to temperature changes (the FWHM width used for the determination of elongation is practically insensitive to thermal variations), provides repeatability of measurements (by the mechanical construction of clamps and the whole sensing head) and it is non-invasive .
It is also worth mentioning that the design of the sensing head protects the optical fiber because changing the wire length within the possible elongation range does not damage the optical fiber. Additionally, the mass of the sensing head is negligible relative to the mass of the entire wire in the span so the sensor does not affect the object being measured. Figure 11 shows the dependency of the calculated sag of the power line with the assumed initial parameters on the measured FWHM spectral width. The potential of the method is increased by the use of a chirped fiber Bragg grating CFBG whose spectral characteristics are broader (more extensive) than in the case of a conventional FBG.
If the spectral response of the CFBG/FBG were to be measured using an interrogator (for example, based on an FBG optical filter) and not using an OSA, the measurement would be more accurate since the measured spectra would be broader and changes in its width would be measured more accurately by the interrogator.

5. Conclusions

In this article, we have presented a method that monitors the state of an OTL and measures its relative elongation and its actual sag. It is based on the new construction of CFBG sensors and is insensitive to the ambient temperature, the electromagnetic field and any other external typically influencing parameters. Insensitivity has been achieved by the structure of the sensing head that consists of clamps and the special monotonically, non-uniformly extendable steel plate that the CFBG is attached to. The proposed system can be non-invasively and directly embedded on the power line wire. The use of the Bragg grating with a linearly variable period allows for more considerable variation in the optical spectrum than standard FBGs, which translates into an increased sensitivity and accuracy. The obtained sensitivity of the FWHM width to elongation was 0.00603 nm/μm, and at the same time, the FWHM is practically insensitive to temperature changes (sensitivity coefficient reduced to 0.0001 nm/K). This condition allows for the determination of the wire elongation independently of temperature variations. In addition to the determination of the OTL wire extension, the proposed method also allows for the measuring of the temperature around of power line wire by meeting the conditions of the sensitivity matrix equation.
Furthermore, the use of chirped fiber Bragg grating with a broad spectrum is advantageous because its spectrum is approximately ten times wider than the usual FBG. The measurements using a CFBG will be more precise than the standard FBG which has a much narrower range. Thus, the proposed system is entirely applicable in a configuration in which the spectra of the grating are interrogated with an optical filter (for example, a filter based on homogeneous FBG). Such a combination can be very interesting because it offers the possibility to eliminate the OSA and use a simple interrogator based on an optical filter.
The measurement point fixing system is designed for use for an indefinite time, which is of crucial economic importance. Additionally, such a designed system ensures the stability of its components on the OTL wire without any adverse effect on its strength, mainly due to the non-invasive fixing method. In the case of possible damages to the delicate components of the sensor system, it is possible to replace them with new ones with the same parameters. An important feature is the independence of the measurement from the influence of the outside temperature and the unavoidable electromagnetic field at the measurement site.
It should be noted that all determined sensitivity coefficients and final results are also dependent on the geometry of the transducer and the initial parameters of the CFBG sensor together with the control plate. Future work will involve an investigation into a sensitivity analysis for the function of changes of the parameters mentioned above and on the metrological conditions of the whole system.

Author Contributions

This work was realized with the collaboration of all authors. Michal Wydra, Piotr Kisala and Piotr Kacejko contributed to the idea of this work. Michal Wydra, Piotr Kisala and Damian Harasim conceived and designed the experiments; Damian Harasim and Michal Wydra performed the experiments; Piotr Kisala, Michal Wydra and Damian Harasim analyzed the data. Michal Wydra wrote the biggest part of the article and contributed all the work referred to the transmission lines and sag-tension calculations using presented optomechanical measuring system designed by Piotr Kisala. Mechanical simulations and all the optical part of the manuscript was contributed by Piotr Kisala and Damian Harasim. Piotr Kacejko provided the funding. All the authors contributed to the production of the paper, the discussion of the results and the reviewing process of the intellectual content of the article and finally approved the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cięszczyk, S.; Kisała, P. Inverse problem of determining periodic surface profile oscillation defects of steel materials with a fiber Bragg grating sensor. Appl. Opt. 2016, 55, 1412–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cięszczyk, S.; Harasim, D.; Kisała, P. A novel simple TFBG spectrum demodulation method for RI quantification. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2017, 29, 2264–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nowocień, S.; Mroczka, J. Hybrid model of arm for analysis of regional blood oxygenation in non-invasive optical diagnostics. Proc. SPIE 2017, 10330, 103301A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kashyap, R.; McKee, P.F.; Campbell, R.J.; Williams, D.L. Novel method of producing all fibre photoinduced chirped gratings. Electron. Lett. 1994, 30, 995–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kisała, P. Generation of a zone chirp in uniform Bragg grating as a way of obtaining double functionality of a sensor. Metrol. Meas. Syst. 2012, 19, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Palaniappan, J.; Ogin, S.L.; Thorne, A.M.; Reed, G.T.; Crocombe, A.D.; Capell, T.F.; Tjin, S.C.; Mohanty, L. Disbond growth detection in composite–composite single-lap joints using chirped FBG sensors. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68, 2410–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Nand, A.; Kitcher, D.J.; Wade, S.A.; Baxter, G.W.; Jones, R.; Collins, S.F. strain-independent temperature measurements using a standard and a chirped fibre Bragg grating. In Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Optical Fibre Technology/Australian Optical Society (ACOFT/AOS 2006), Melbourne, Australia, 10–13 July 2006; pp. 51–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maheshwari, M.; Tjin, S.C.; Yang, Y.; Asundi, A. Wavelength-shifted chirped FBGs for temperature compensated strain measurement. Sens. Actuators A 2017, 265, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chettouh, S.; El-Akrmi, A.; Triki, H.; Hamaizi, Y. Spectral properties of nonlinearly chirped fiber Bragg gratings for optical communications. Optik 2017, 147, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, J.; Dong, X.; Shi, Z. Tunable chirped fiber Bragg grating based on the D-shaped fiber. Opt. Commun. 2008, 281, 2077–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rito, R.L.; Crocombe, A.D.; Ogin, S.L. Health monitoring of composite patch repairs using CFBG sensors: Experimental study and numerical modeling. Compos. Part A 2017, 100, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Osuch, T.; Markowski, K.; Jędrzejewski, K. Fiber-optic strain sensors based on linearly chirped tapered fiber Bragg gratings with tailored intrinsic chirp. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 16, 7508–7514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fröjdh, K.; Hedin, G.; Helmfrid, S. Strain and temperature measurement using a 9.5-m continuous chirped fiber Bragg grating with millimeter resolution. Proc. SPIE 2017, 10323, 103238D-1–103238D-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guo, T.; Tam, H.Y.; Albert, J. Chirped and tilted fiber Bragg grating edge filter for in-fiber sensor interrogation. In Proceedings of the CLEO: Science and Innovations 2011, Baltimore, MD, USA, 1–6 May 2011; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Bennion, I. Fabricating fiber edge filters with an arbitrary spectral response based on tilted chirped grating structures. Meas. Sci. Technol. 1998, 10, L1–L3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guo, T.; Tam, H.-Y.; Albert, J. Linearly chirped and weakly tilted fiber Bragg grating edge filters for in-fiber sensor interrogation. Proc. SPIE 2017, 7753, 77537V-1–77537V-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bjerkan, L. Application of fiber-optic Bragg grating sensors in monitoring environmental loads of overhead power transmission lines. Appl. Opt. 2000, 39, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Huang, Q.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Q.; Ning, Y.; Cao, Y. New type of fiber optic sensor network for smart grid interface of transmission system. In Proceedings of the IEEE PES General Meeting, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 25–29 July 2010; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rosolem, J. Smart fiber optic sensors for applications in electrical power systems. In Frontiers Science Technology; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 97–109. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ramachandran, P.; Vittal, V. On-line monitoring of sag in overhead transmission lines with leveled spans. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual North American Power Symposium (NAPS 2006), Carbondale, IL, USA, 17–19 September 2006; pp. 405–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Klein, K.M.; Springer, P.L.; Black, W.Z. Real-time ampacity and ground clearance software for integration into smart grid technology. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2010, 25, 1768–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Seppa, T.O. Accurate ampacity determination: Temperature-sag model for operational real time ratings. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 1995, 10, 1460–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Black, C.R.; Chisholm, W.A. Key considerations for the selection of dynamic thermal line rating systems. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2015, 30, 2154–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wydra, M.; Kacejko, P. Power system state estimation accuracy enhancement using temperature measurements of overhead line conductors. Metrol. Meas. Syst. 2016, 23, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wydra, M.; Kacejko, P. Power system state estimation using wire temperature measurements for model accuracy enhancement. In Proceedings of the IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe), Ljubljana, Slovenia, 9–12 October 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ramachandran, P.; Vittal, V.; Heydt, G.T. Mechanical state estimation for overhead transmission lines with level spans. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2008, 23, 908–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Malhara, S.; Vittal, V. Mechanical state estimation of overhead transmission lines using tilt sensors. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2010, 25, 1282–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mazur, K.; Wydra, M.; Ksiezopolski, B. Secure and time-aware communication of wireless sensors monitoring overhead transmission lines. Sensors 2017, 17, 1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. IEEE. IEEE 738-2012 Standard for Calculating the Current—Temperature Relationship of Bare Overhead Conductors; IEEE Power and Energy Society: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  30. Iglesias, J.; Watt, G.; Douglass, D.; Morgan, V.; Stephen, R.; Bertinat, M.; Muftic, D.; Puffer, R.; Guery, D.; Ueda, S.; et al. Guide for Thermal Rating Calculations of Overhead Lines; CIGRE- International Council on Large Electric Systems: Paris, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chintakindi, R.; Srinath Rajesh, S.P. Vital role of FBG sensors—2012 developments in electrical power systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Power, Energy and Control (ICPEC), Sri Rangalatchum Dindigul, India, 6–8 February 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mao, N.Q.; Ma, G.M.; Zhou, H.Y.; Li, C.R.; Li, B.Y. The online monitoring system of transmission lines weight based on fiber sensing technology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis (CMD), Xi’an, China, 25–28 September 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Barón, F.E.; Álvarez-Botero, G.; Amortegui, F.; Pastor, D.; Varón, M. Temperature measurements on overhead lines using Fiber Bragg Grating sensors. In Proceedings of the IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), Torino, Italy, 22–25 May 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Balangó, D.; Németh, B.; Göcsei, G. Predicting conductor sag of power lines in a new model of dynamic line rating. In Proceedings of the IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC), Seattle, WA, USA, 7–10 June 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kashyap, R. Chirped Fiber Bragg Gratings. In Fiber Bragg Gratings, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2010; Chapter 7; pp. 301–345. ISBN 9780123725790. [Google Scholar]
  36. Grigsby, L.L. Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Ranton, FL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  37. Power Cable Catalogue. Available online: http://www.fpe.com.pl/materialy/pliki/17.pdf (accessed on 8 November 2017).
Figure 1. The overhead transmission line wire sag measurement system where: 1: the ACSR 26/7 Hawk conductor; 2: the measuring clamps/sensing head; 3a: the optical fiber; 3b: the inscribed chirped fiber Bragg grating; 4: the light source with a stabilized super-luminescent diode; 5: the optical circulator; 6: the optical spectrum analyzer; and 7: the computer/gateway.
Figure 1. The overhead transmission line wire sag measurement system where: 1: the ACSR 26/7 Hawk conductor; 2: the measuring clamps/sensing head; 3a: the optical fiber; 3b: the inscribed chirped fiber Bragg grating; 4: the light source with a stabilized super-luminescent diode; 5: the optical circulator; 6: the optical spectrum analyzer; and 7: the computer/gateway.
Sensors 18 00309 g001
Figure 2. (a) the optomechanical system using a chirped fiber Bragg grating and a mechanical strain transformer where: 1: the ACSR 26/7 (Hawk) conductor; 2a: the optical fiber; 2b: the chirped fiber Bragg grating; 3: the thinned steel plate; 4: the semi-circular screwed clamps, lref: reference sensing head length; and (b) the strain distribution in the proposed steel testing plate while extending the measurement section.
Figure 2. (a) the optomechanical system using a chirped fiber Bragg grating and a mechanical strain transformer where: 1: the ACSR 26/7 (Hawk) conductor; 2a: the optical fiber; 2b: the chirped fiber Bragg grating; 3: the thinned steel plate; 4: the semi-circular screwed clamps, lref: reference sensing head length; and (b) the strain distribution in the proposed steel testing plate while extending the measurement section.
Sensors 18 00309 g002
Figure 3. The cross-section of the sensing head of the power line sag measurement system where: 1, 2a, 3, and 4 are elements equivalent to those shown in Figure 2.
Figure 3. The cross-section of the sensing head of the power line sag measurement system where: 1, 2a, 3, and 4 are elements equivalent to those shown in Figure 2.
Sensors 18 00309 g003
Figure 4. The conductor length, sag, clearance, and tension in a transmission line span.
Figure 4. The conductor length, sag, clearance, and tension in a transmission line span.
Sensors 18 00309 g004
Figure 5. The sag estimation process reproduced from [26].
Figure 5. The sag estimation process reproduced from [26].
Sensors 18 00309 g005
Figure 6. The CFBG based optomechanical system for the power line sag estimation in real conditions.
Figure 6. The CFBG based optomechanical system for the power line sag estimation in real conditions.
Sensors 18 00309 g006
Figure 7. (a) a comparison of the spectra measured for the CFBG mounted in the proposed OTL wire monitoring system for 10 °C and 90 °C surrounding temperatures; (b) a comparison of the spectra measured for CFBG: FWHM_1 refers to the measurement directly after mounting the system on the wire and FWHM_2 refers to the measurement after 0.1% relative elongation.
Figure 7. (a) a comparison of the spectra measured for the CFBG mounted in the proposed OTL wire monitoring system for 10 °C and 90 °C surrounding temperatures; (b) a comparison of the spectra measured for CFBG: FWHM_1 refers to the measurement directly after mounting the system on the wire and FWHM_2 refers to the measurement after 0.1% relative elongation.
Sensors 18 00309 g007
Figure 8. The comparison of SSH dependency on (a) the elongation of the testing plate; and (b) the changes of the CFBG sensor surrounding temperature.
Figure 8. The comparison of SSH dependency on (a) the elongation of the testing plate; and (b) the changes of the CFBG sensor surrounding temperature.
Sensors 18 00309 g008
Figure 9. The characteristics of the FWHM spectral width dependency on (a) the relative elongation; and (b) the ambient temperature of the proposed system.
Figure 9. The characteristics of the FWHM spectral width dependency on (a) the relative elongation; and (b) the ambient temperature of the proposed system.
Sensors 18 00309 g009
Figure 10. (a) The dependency of the OTL wire sag related with the elongation of the proposed measurement system plate calculated for the initial conditions described in Equations (21) and (22); and (b) the dependency of the measured FWHM for different sag values of the monitored OTL line.
Figure 10. (a) The dependency of the OTL wire sag related with the elongation of the proposed measurement system plate calculated for the initial conditions described in Equations (21) and (22); and (b) the dependency of the measured FWHM for different sag values of the monitored OTL line.
Sensors 18 00309 g010
Figure 11. The dependency of the OTL wire sag as a function of the measured FWHM.
Figure 11. The dependency of the OTL wire sag as a function of the measured FWHM.
Sensors 18 00309 g011

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wydra, M.; Kisala, P.; Harasim, D.; Kacejko, P. Overhead Transmission Line Sag Estimation Using a Simple Optomechanical System with Chirped Fiber Bragg Gratings. Part 1: Preliminary Measurements. Sensors 2018, 18, 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010309

AMA Style

Wydra M, Kisala P, Harasim D, Kacejko P. Overhead Transmission Line Sag Estimation Using a Simple Optomechanical System with Chirped Fiber Bragg Gratings. Part 1: Preliminary Measurements. Sensors. 2018; 18(1):309. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wydra, Michal, Piotr Kisala, Damian Harasim, and Piotr Kacejko. 2018. "Overhead Transmission Line Sag Estimation Using a Simple Optomechanical System with Chirped Fiber Bragg Gratings. Part 1: Preliminary Measurements" Sensors 18, no. 1: 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010309

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop