Next Article in Journal
Automatic Association of Chats and Video Tracks for Activity Learning and Recognition in Aerial Video Surveillance
Next Article in Special Issue
PERFORM: A System for Monitoring, Assessment and Management of Patients with Parkinson’s Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Rapid Material Appearance Acquisition Using Consumer Hardware
Previous Article in Special Issue
Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks
Review

Survey on Fall Detection and Fall Prevention Using Wearable and External Sensors

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2014, 14(10), 19806-19842; https://doi.org/10.3390/s141019806
Received: 18 September 2014 / Revised: 10 October 2014 / Accepted: 16 October 2014 / Published: 22 October 2014
(This article belongs to the Collection Sensors for Globalized Healthy Living and Wellbeing)
According to nihseniorhealth.gov (a website for older adults), falling represents a great threat as people get older, and providing mechanisms to detect and prevent falls is critical to improve people’s lives. Over 1.6 million U.S. adults are treated for fall-related injuries in emergency rooms every year suffering fractures, loss of independence, and even death. It is clear then, that this problem must be addressed in a prompt manner, and the use of pervasive computing plays a key role to achieve this. Fall detection (FD) and fall prevention (FP) are research areas that have been active for over a decade, and they both strive for improving people’s lives through the use of pervasive computing. This paper surveys the state of the art in FD and FP systems, including qualitative comparisons among various studies. It aims to serve as a point of reference for future research on the mentioned systems. A general description of FD and FP systems is provided, including the different types of sensors used in both approaches. Challenges and current solutions are presented and described in great detail. A 3-level taxonomy associated with the risk factors of a fall is proposed. Finally, cutting edge FD and FP systems are thoroughly reviewed and qualitatively compared, in terms of design issues and other parameters. View Full-Text
Keywords: machine learning; kinect; environment awareness; mobile applications machine learning; kinect; environment awareness; mobile applications
Show Figures

MDPI and ACS Style

Delahoz, Y.S.; Labrador, M.A. Survey on Fall Detection and Fall Prevention Using Wearable and External Sensors. Sensors 2014, 14, 19806-19842. https://doi.org/10.3390/s141019806

AMA Style

Delahoz YS, Labrador MA. Survey on Fall Detection and Fall Prevention Using Wearable and External Sensors. Sensors. 2014; 14(10):19806-19842. https://doi.org/10.3390/s141019806

Chicago/Turabian Style

Delahoz, Yueng S., and Miguel A. Labrador 2014. "Survey on Fall Detection and Fall Prevention Using Wearable and External Sensors" Sensors 14, no. 10: 19806-19842. https://doi.org/10.3390/s141019806

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop