Next Article in Journal
Fabrication of an SPR Sensor Surface with Antifouling Properties for Highly Sensitive Detection of 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene Using Surface-Initiated Atom Transfer Polymerization
Next Article in Special Issue
Tip-Enhanced Raman Imaging and Nano Spectroscopy of Etched Silicon Nanowires
Previous Article in Journal
Retinal Identification Based on an Improved Circular Gabor Filter and Scale Invariant Feature Transform
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rice Seed Cultivar Identification Using Near-Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging and Multivariate Data Analysis
Open AccessArticle

An Approach for Characterizing and Comparing Hyperspectral Microscopy Systems

1
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of South Alabama, 150 Jaguar Dr., SH 4129, Mobile, AL 36688, USA
2
Department of Pharmacology, University of South Alabama, 5851 USA Dr. N., Mobile, AL 36688, USA
3
Center for Lung Biology, University of South Alabama, 5851 USA Dr. N., Mobile, AL 36688, USA
4
Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Alabama, 5851 USA Dr. N., Mobile, AL 36688, USA
5
College of Engineering, University of South Alabama, 150 Jaguar Dr., Mobile, AL 36688, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2013, 13(7), 9267-9293; https://doi.org/10.3390/s130709267
Received: 27 May 2013 / Revised: 8 July 2013 / Accepted: 15 July 2013 / Published: 19 July 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spectral Imaging at the Microscale and Beyond)
Hyperspectral imaging and analysis approaches offer accurate detection and quantification of fluorescently-labeled proteins and cells in highly autofluorescent tissues. However, selecting optimum acquisition settings for hyperspectral imaging is often a daunting task. In this study, we compared two hyperspectral systems—a widefield system with acoustic optical tunable filter (AOTF) and charge coupled device (CCD) camera, and a confocal system with diffraction gratings and photomultiplier tube (PMT) array. We measured the effects of system parameters on hyperspectral image quality and linear unmixing results. Parameters that were assessed for the confocal system included pinhole diameter, laser power, PMT gain and for the widefield system included arc lamp intensity, and camera gain. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the root-mean-square error (RMS error) were measured to assess system performance. Photobleaching dynamics were studied. Finally, theoretical sensitivity studies were performed to estimate the incremental response (sensitivity) and false-positive detection rates (specificity). Results indicate that hyperspectral imaging assays are highly dependent on system parameters and experimental conditions. For detection of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing cells in fixed lung tissues, a confocal pinhole of five airy disk units, high excitation intensity and low detector gain were optimal. The theoretical sensitivity studies revealed that widefield hyperspectral microscopy was able to detect GFP with fewer false positive occurrences than confocal microscopy, even though confocal microscopy offered improved signal and noise characteristics. These studies provide a framework for optimization that can be applied to a variety of hyperspectral imaging systems. View Full-Text
Keywords: hyperspectral imaging; spectral analysis; microscopy; confocal; widefield; signal to noise ratio; photobleaching hyperspectral imaging; spectral analysis; microscopy; confocal; widefield; signal to noise ratio; photobleaching
MDPI and ACS Style

Annamdevula, N.S.; Sweat, B.; Favreau, P.; Lindsey, A.S.; Alvarez, D.F.; Rich, T.C.; Leavesley, S.J. An Approach for Characterizing and Comparing Hyperspectral Microscopy Systems. Sensors 2013, 13, 9267-9293.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop