Next Article in Journal
Effects of Water Stress on Growth and Leaf Water Physiology of Major Plants in the Qaidam Basin
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Habitat on the Impact of Non-Native Fishes on Native Ichthyofauna in a Group of Lakes of the Lower Doce River, Espírito Santo, Southeastern Brazil
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Proposed Method for Assessing the Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Carcharhinus melanopterus (Quoy and Gaimard, 1824) in Shallow Waters Using a UAV: A Study Conducted in Koh Tao, Thailand
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integrating Egg Case Morphology and DNA Barcoding to Discriminate South American Catsharks, Schroederichthys bivius and S. chilensis (Carcharhiniformes: Atelomycteridae)

by
Carlos Bustamante
1,2,*,
Carolina Vargas-Caro
1,2,
María J. Indurain
1,2,3 and
Gabriela Silva
1,2,3
1
CHALLWA, Laboratorio de Biología Pesquera, Instituto de Ciencias Naturales Alexander von Humboldt, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y de Recursos Biológicos, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta 1240000, Chile
2
Programa de Conservación de Tiburones, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y de Recursos Biológicos, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta 1240000, Chile
3
Magíster en Ecología de Sistemas Acuáticos, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta 1240000, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2025, 17(9), 651; https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090651
Submission received: 20 August 2025 / Revised: 10 September 2025 / Accepted: 12 September 2025 / Published: 16 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shark Ecology)

Abstract

Catsharks are benthic elasmobranchs that share spatial niches with littoral and demersal bony fishes. The genus Schroederichthys includes five species, two of which, S. chilensis and S. bivius, occur in the waters of Chile. These species are morphologically similar and are often misidentified because of their overlapping external features and color patterns. To improve species discrimination, we analyzed the egg case morphology of both species based on 36 egg cases (12 S. chilensis, 24 S. bivius) collected from gravid females captured as bycatch in artisanal fisheries between Iquique and Puerto Montt (July–December 2021). Nine morphometric variables were measured and standardized using the total egg case length. Although the egg cases were similar in general appearance, multivariate analyses revealed significant interspecific differences, with egg case height and anterior border width emerging as the most diagnostic variables. Linear discriminant analysis achieved a 100% classification accuracy within this dataset. To confirm species identity, 24 tissue samples (12 per species) were sequenced for the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene. The haplotypes corresponded to previously published sequences from Chile (S. chilensis) and Argentina (S. bivius), with reciprocal monophyly and 100% bootstrap support. While COI barcoding provided robust confirmation, the core contribution of this study lies in the identification of species-specific egg case morphometrics. Together, these findings establish a dual-track toolkit, egg case morphology for primary discrimination and COI barcodes for confirmatory validation, that can be incorporated into bycatch monitoring and biodiversity assessments, supporting the conservation of poorly known catsharks in the Southeast Pacific.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Colored catsharks (Carcharhiniformes: Atelomycteridae) are benthic elasmobranchs that share spatial niches with littoral and demersal bony fishes such as soles, hakes, and eels. However, unlike most bony fishes, catsharks possess life-history traits such as low fecundity, late sexual maturity, and relatively high longevity, which render them particularly vulnerable to overfishing [1]. These characteristics present significant conservation challenges [2]. Over the past two decades, global assessments of shark conservation status have highlighted the susceptibility of small-bodied species to threats posed by incidental capture in fisheries [3], with some populations facing serious risks of depletion or local extinction [4].
Within Atelomycteridae, the subfamily Schroederichthyinae comprises six species, five of which are restricted to the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of Central and South America, and the recently described Akheilos suwartanai White, Fahmi, Weigmann, 2019, from Indonesia, which extends the subfamily beyond the Americas [5]. The genus Schroederichthys includes S. chilensis (Guichenot, 1848), distributed from southern Peru to central Chile; S. bivius (Smith, 1838), occurring from southern Chile to northern Argentina; S. maculatus (Springer, 1966) from the western Atlantic; S. saurisqualus (Soto, 2001) from southern Brazil; and S. tenuis (Springer, 1966) from northern Brazil to Suriname [6,7,8]. In Chilean waters, S. chilensis and S. bivius are thought to occur sympatrically over part of their latitudinal range, although they differ in depth preference: S. chilensis occupies subtidal rocky reefs between the Paracas Peninsula (14° S) and Chiloé Island (42° S), whereas S. bivius occurs on the upper continental slope between Valdivia (39° S) and the Magallanes region (54° S), and potentially extends east into the southwestern Atlantic [9].
Although catsharks are relatively abundant along the Chilean coast [10,11], there is a lack of biological and taxonomic data on S. chilensis, and the available information on S. bivius is geographically restricted, with studies focused primarily on Argentina [12,13]. Morphological differentiation between the two species is subtle and based on external features, such as body proportions, nasal flap shape, and dorsal coloration [14]. However, these characteristics are often obscured by phenotypic plasticity, ontogeny, and sexual dimorphism [13], making accurate identification challenging without comparative materials. Springer [14] noted in his global review of catsharks that “it has never been clearly and exhaustively established how to differentiate specimens of S. chilensis from S. bivius,” a taxonomic uncertainty that persists to this day. Early anatomical studies also suggested intrageneric heterogeneity within the genus [6], a view reinforced by White et al. [5] and Soares and Mathubara [15], who argued that S. bivius and S. chilensis may represent morphologically distinct lineages within the Schroederichthyinae.
Egg case morphology has long been recognized as a valuable character system in elasmobranch taxonomy. These structures frequently exhibit species-specific variations in size, shape, surface features, and pigmentation [16,17,18,19] and have been used in a wide range of studies, from reproductive ecology to phylogenetic inference [20,21,22,23,24,25]. Molecular tools, particularly mitochondrial DNA barcoding of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, have emerged as robust complementary methods for species identification [26,27,28,29].
For Schroederichthys chilensis and S. bivius, whose overlapping external morphologies often hinder identification, COI barcoding may provide an independent line of evidence to support species delimitation. When integrated with egg case morphometrics, molecular data can significantly improve taxonomic resolution in ecological and fisheries contexts, particularly in cases where adult specimens are unavailable or damaged. Given the current lack of comparative information on egg case morphology and genetic variation in South American catsharks, this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of egg case morphometrics and mitochondrial COI sequences in distinguishing S. chilensis from S. bivius. This dual framework may provide a baseline for accurate species identification and offers practical tools for fisheries bycatch monitoring, biodiversity assessment, and conservation planning in the Southeast Pacific.

2. Materials and Methods

A total of 36 egg cases from Schroederichthys chilensis (n = 12) and S. bivius (n = 24) were collected from the uteri of 18 individuals incidentally captured as bycatch in artisanal gillnet and longline fisheries along the Chilean coast. Between July and December 2021, specimens of S. chilensis were obtained from Iquique (20° S) and Valparaíso (33° S), and S. bivius was obtained from Puerto Montt (41° S). For each egg case, the identity of the corresponding female was confirmed using the external diagnostic characters described by Springer [14] and Lamilla and Bustamante [30]. The uterus of origin (left or right) was recorded to test for potential intraspecific morphological differences and rule out any confounding effects on species discrimination. The egg cases were preserved in 70% ethanol for subsequent morphological analysis. In parallel, muscle tissue samples were collected from all gravid females and preserved in 90% ethanol for molecular analysis.
Egg case morphological terminology followed the established methodologies described in the literature [19,21,24]. Nine morphometric variables were recorded for each egg case (Figure 1), including total egg case length (LEC), egg case height (HEC), lateral keel length (LK), anterior border width (WAB), anterior case width (WAC), anterior waist width (WAW), posterior base width (WPB), posterior case width (WPC), and posterior waist width (WPW). Additional measurements of the anterior and posterior length of tendrils (LTE) and the respiratory fissures (RF) were recorded but excluded from comparative analyses because tendrils are prone to natural breakage, which compromises measurement replicability, and the observation of respiratory fissures is highly subjective, limiting the consistency of this variable. All measurements were recorded to the nearest 0.01 mm using a digital caliper and expressed as proportions of LEC to minimize size-related effects. Values are reported as mean ± standard deviation (s.d.). The spatial orientation of each egg (anterior and dorsal surfaces) was determined based on its position within the uterus, following the criteria described by Gomes and de Carvalho [31]. An independent two-sample t-test was conducted to evaluate potential differences in egg case length (LEC) and posterior case width (WPC) between the species (S. chilensis vs. S. bivius). To compare the differences in LEC and WPC between the left and right uteri within individual females, a paired t-test was used following confirmation of normality and homogeneity of variances [32].
Morphometric measurements were used to characterize each egg case, with the identity of the egg-bearing female included as a grouping factor to account for potential non-independence among samples. Analyses were conducted in RStudio (version 2025.09.0) using the MorphoTools2 package (version 1.0.2.1) [33]. The normality of each variable was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, and the homogeneity of variance was tested using Levene’s test. Variables were log-transformed where necessary to meet the assumptions of the parametric analysis. To identify and reduce redundancy among variables, Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated, and highly correlated pairs (|r| ≥ 0.95) were excluded from analysis. The resulting dataset was used to construct a Euclidean distance matrix for hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis (PCA), allowing for a visual assessment of morphometric similarity among specimens. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was performed to assess the discriminatory power of the retained variables [34], generating discriminant functions that maximized the separation between the predefined groups. The assumption of homogeneity of the covariance matrices was evaluated using Box’s M test [33]. These analyses facilitated the identification of distinct morphotypes associated with species identity. To validate the classification performance, a cross-validation procedure was performed using the k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) method, which reassigns each specimen to its most likely group based on its morphometric profile and proximity to the group centroids.
Total genomic DNA was extracted from 24 individuals (12 S. chilensis and 12 S. bivius) using the standard phenol–chloroform protocol [35]. These samples corresponded directly to the gravid females from which egg cases were obtained, establishing a one-to-one correspondence between the morphological and molecular datasets. A fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene was amplified using the universal primers described by Ward et al. [36], as follows: PCR amplifications were carried out in 10 µL reactions containing 1 µL of genomic DNA (20–50 ng), 5.9 µL of Milli-Q H2O, 1 µL of 10× buffer with MgCl2 (15 mM), 1 µL of dNTPs (2 mM), 0.5 µL of each primer, and 0.1 µL of Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/µL). The thermal cycling profile consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 54 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. Amplified PCR products were purified using ExoSAP-IT (USB Products, Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) by incubation at 37 °C for 45 min, followed by enzyme inactivation at 80 °C for 15 min. Sequencing was performed bidirectionally at the Austral-Omics Sequencing Facility (Valdivia, Chile). Sequence chromatograms were manually checked for base-calling errors, and variable sites were verified by comparing forward and reverse reads. Primer sequences were trimmed, and consensus sequences were assembled for each individual. Intraspecific genetic distances (p) were estimated using pairwise comparisons under the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) model [37] in MEGA v7 [38]. The K2P distance matrix was also used to construct a neighbor-joining (NJ) tree in GENEIOUS [39], with node support assessed using 1000 bootstrap replicates. Novel haplotypes were deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under the accession numbers PX250298–PX250321. While GenBank remains a repository for homologous sequences of Schroederichthys, we acknowledge the risk of misidentified entries and therefore relied on previously validated haplotypes from Chile and Argentina to ensure confidence in species identity. The final alignments for COI included additional Scyliorhinidae species as outgroups to provide a phylogenetic framework for species discrimination (Table 1).

3. Results

3.1. Description of the Egg Cases

The egg cases of Schroederichthys chilensis (Figure 2a,b; Table 2) were relatively small, with a pronounced anterior waist and no horns or tendrils at the anterior end of the egg case. The surface was smooth on both the dorsal and ventral faces and was covered with a thin layer of fine filaments. The overall color was light brown. Near the anterior respiratory fissures, a bundle of fibrils originated that matched the thickness of the posterior horns. Posteriorly, the egg cases exhibited two well-developed horns, each giving rise to a long, robust tendril. These tendrils gradually tapered, reaching approximately one-third of their original diameter at the distal end of the tendril.
The egg cases of S. bivius (Figure 2c,d; Table 2) were similar in general shape and size to those of S. chilensis but had several distinguishing features. Like S. chilensis, the anterior end of S. bivius egg cases lacked horns and tendrils; however, they displayed a characteristic double waist at the anterior margin. The color was light brown, and the surface texture was smooth. Fine filaments formed elongated thread-like cords near the anterior respiratory fissures. The posterior horns gave rise to tendrils that narrowed abruptly, tapering to approximately one-third of the egg case length before terminating in delicate filamentous tips.

3.2. Morphometric Analyses

All morphometric variables met the assumption of normality, as assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test (p > 0.05). Within each species, no significant differences were detected in egg case length (LEC) or posterior case width (WPC) between the left and right uteri, indicating the absence of intra-individual asymmetry in these measurements. For S. bivius, paired t-tests showed no significant differences in LEC (t = −0.0916, p = 0.8872) or WPC (t = −1.0162, p = 0.3313), and for S. chilensis, the results were similarly non-significant (LEC: t = −0.6094, p = 0.8125; WPC: t = 1.4363, p = 0.2104). Interspecific comparisons revealed a significant difference in posterior case width, with S. chilensis exhibiting broader egg cases than S. bivius (t = 5.952, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the egg case length between species (t = 0.5223, p = 0.604). All morphometric variables met the assumptions of normality (Shapiro–Wilk test, p > 0.05) and homogeneity of variance (Levene’s test, p > 0.05). Following correlation filtering, eight variables were retained for multivariate analyses. Hierarchical clustering of Euclidean distance values revealed two non-overlapping groups corresponding to the two species (Figure 3). This strong species-level separation was consistent across individuals. The mean intraspecific dissimilarity was low (1.1–1.3 standardized Euclidean units), whereas interspecific dissimilarity was comparatively high (4.9 standardized Euclidean units), confirming a clear morphometric divergence between the two species.
The PCA ordination revealed a clear separation between S. bivius and S. chilensis along the first two principal components, with PC1 and PC2 explaining 67.84% and 12.88% of the total variance, respectively (Figure 4a). The eigenvector biplot (Figure 4b) shows that the most influential variables along PC1 included anterior case width (WAC), lateral keel length (LK), egg case height (HEC), anterior border width (WAB), and posterior case width (WPC), all of which contributed to the species-level differentiation. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) further supported species discrimination. Box’s M-test indicated homogeneity of covariance matrices (χ2 = 2.72, df = 3, p = 0.437). Two variables, WAB and HEC, significantly contributed to group separation. The classification model correctly assigned all egg cases to their respective species, achieving 100% classification accuracy within this dataset. All S. bivius (n = 24) and S. chilensis (n = 12) egg cases were accurately classified based on the retained morphometric variables (Table 3). The k-nearest neighbor classification analysis showed that the highest number of correct classifications was at k = 3 and reflected the LDA results.

3.3. Molecular Analyses

A total of 24 high-quality COI sequences were obtained (12 S. chilensis, 12 S. bivius), corresponding directly to the gravid females from which egg cases were analyzed. The sequence lengths ranged from 685 to 763 bp after trimming. No insertions, deletions, or stop codons were observed. Intraspecific K2P genetic distances were low (0.0021 for S. chilensis, 0.0018 for S. bivius), whereas interspecific divergence was 0.053, consistent with species-level separation in elasmobranchs. Two haplotypes were detected in S. bivius and one in S. chilensis, all of which matched previously published sequences from Argentina and Chile, respectively. Phylogenetic comparisons were performed using 67 sequences and 30 closely related species. The neighbor-joining tree based on K2P distances showed two well-supported clades corresponding to S. chilensis and S. bivius, with 100% bootstrap support (Figure 5). No haplotypes were shared among the species. All sequences were grouped with reference sequences, confirming the correct species assignment and reflecting the current taxonomy of the Atelomycteridae family.

4. Discussion

This study provides an integrative approach to distinguish between two morphologically similar catshark species, Schroederichthys bivius and S. chilensis, using a combination of egg case morphometrics and mitochondrial DNA barcoding. Although both species produce externally similar egg cases, quantitative analyses revealed consistent species-specific differences, with egg case height and anterior border width emerging as robust diagnostic traits for species identification. The strong discriminatory signal was confirmed by linear discriminant analysis, which achieved 100% classification accuracy within the dataset. These findings validate the strong diagnostic power of reproductive characteristics and highlight the utility of egg case morphology as a practical tool for taxonomic identification in the absence of adults in the population. While this study did not explore environmental drivers, it aligns with previous reports [40], which suggested that the tendril structure of Schroederichthys egg cases enhances attachment to the structurally complex kelps, such as Lessonia trabeculata. This substrate specificity likely exerts selective pressure on stable morphological traits, such as posterior tendrils and consistent egg case shape, supporting their use as reliable taxonomic markers. The observed interspecific differences in egg case morphometrics appear to be robust across various environmental conditions, reinforcing the value of these characteristics for species-level identification.
The COI barcoding provided independent confirmation of species identity, recovering two reciprocally monophyletic clades with strong bootstrap support and no haplotype sharing. Intraspecific divergence was low, whereas interspecific divergence (5.3%) was well within the range typically observed among closely related elasmobranch taxa [26,27,28,29]. The neighbor-joining phylogeny showed reciprocal monophyly with 100% bootstrap support and no shared haplotypes, supporting previous studies that used COI as a robust marker for species identification in elasmobranchs [41,42]. These findings reinforce the value of DNA barcoding as a confirmatory tool that reinforces morphological findings, particularly in taxonomically challenging groups such as scyliorhinids [43,44,45]. In this study, COI barcoding was applied as a confirmatory marker because it remains the most widely applied and standardized barcode in vertebrate taxonomy. Although single-gene barcoding is limited in its phylogenetic resolution, it provides a robust baseline for species-level validation. Future studies should expand to multilocus or genomic approaches (e.g., NADH2, SNPs, RADseq) to test species boundaries across broader ranges and potential contact zones.
Egg case morphology has played an important role in elasmobranch taxonomy, and our findings add to the growing body of work that recognizes its value beyond reproductive biology. Previous studies have shown that the morphology of egg cases reflects both phylogenetic constraints and ecological adaptations [18,21]. Our comparative analysis confirmed the presence of stable, species-specific egg case features in South American catsharks and supports their continued use in systematic, evolutionary, and field-based identification studies of this group [43]. In practice, these morphometric characters may provide a rapid and non-lethal method for identifying species in fisheries bycatch, biodiversity surveys, and museum collections. When uncertainty persists, COI barcoding can be applied as a confirmatory layer, offering a straightforward workflow that integrates field identification and molecular verification. Such dual-track approaches can be readily adopted by fishery observer programs and national biodiversity monitoring initiatives, ensuring accurate species records even in the absence of adult specimens. Linking egg case occurrence with habitat information, such as the role of kelp forests as keystone habitats, further connects taxonomy to ecosystem-based management and conservation planning.
From a taxonomic perspective, our results are consistent with recent revisions of catshark systematics. Historically placed within Scyliorhinidae, recent systematic revisions have recognized the family Atelomycteridae, with Schroederichthyinae as one of its subfamilies [5]. The description of A. suwartanai from Indonesia extends the distribution of this subfamily beyond South America, underscoring its previously underestimated diversity. Earlier anatomical studies also suggested that S. bivius and S. chilensis differ substantially from the “neotenic group” (S. maculatus, S. saurisqualus, and S. tenuis), raising the possibility that Chilean–Patagonian species represent a distinct lineage within the group [6,45]. Recently, Soares and Mathubara [15], using a robust phylogenetic framework based on 143 morphological traits and NADH2 gene sequences, confirmed the placement of Schroederichthys within Atelomycteridae and demonstrated that S. bivius and S. chilensis formed a well-supported monophyletic clade distinct from other scyliorhinids. Our results reinforce this updated classification, providing additional evidence from egg case morphology and mitochondrial COI data, highlighting the evolutionary distinctiveness of these species. The diagnostic egg case traits identified here are consistent with their separation from traditional Scyliorhinidae and support the monophyly of Schroederichthys within the Atelomycteridae.
Geographically, S. bivius and S. chilensis span broad latitudinal and bathymetric ranges along the southeastern Pacific, with a likely overlap between approximately 39°S (Valdivia) and 42°S (Chiloé Island). While S. chilensis is typically found in shallower subtidal zones, S. bivius occupies deeper shelves and upper continental slope habitats. However, field identification of either species remains difficult due to overlapping external features and high phenotypic plasticity in coloration and body proportions. Springer [14] originally distinguished S. bivius from S. chilensis by its pointed snout, narrower head, larger eyes, and longer nasal flaps. However, the diagnosis of these species remains incomplete and has not been comprehensively updated using modern morphometric or molecular tools.
Despite these advances, several limitations must be considered. Our sample sizes were modest, and the geographic coverage was restricted to Chilean waters. Future research should expand sampling across the full distributional range of both species, particularly in zones of potential sympatry. Additional studies should explore ontogenetic variation in egg-case morphology and incorporate environmental drivers (e.g., temperature and substrate) that may influence phenotypic traits. From a genetic perspective, multilocus or genome-wide approaches would strengthen species delimitation and test hypotheses, such as cryptic diversity or hybridization in contact zones.
Although S. bivius and S. chilensis are not currently the targets of commercial fisheries, they are often caught as bycatch in both artisanal and industrial fisheries along the Chilean coast [10]. However, no quantitative estimates of fishing mortality have been reported [11], leaving the impact on their populations unassessed. Given the low reproductive output and life-history traits of catsharks, such as late maturity, low fecundity, and long lifespan, unmonitored bycatch poses a clear conservation risk to these species [46,47]. These risks are exacerbated in coastal and demersal ecosystems, where habitat degradation compounds fishing mortality. Kelp forests, which dominate many subtidal zones along the Chilean coast, act as critical nursery and refuge habitats for diverse fish assemblages, enhancing the survival and recruitment of early life stages [48,49]. Therefore, the loss or fragmentation of these foundational habitats may indirectly affect the persistence of small benthic elasmobranchs, including Schroederichthys species, by altering prey availability and reducing shelter from predators [50]. In this context, the integrative framework developed here provides operational tools for monitoring and conservation efforts. Morphometric analysis of egg cases offers a rapid and non-invasive method for identifying species in the field, whereas COI barcoding provides a confirmatory layer when morphology alone is inconclusive. Together, these approaches form a dual-track identification workflow that can be directly incorporated into bycatch observer programs, biodiversity surveys and museum collections. Linking species-specific egg case occurrence with habitat information, such as the role of kelp forests as nurseries, connects species-level taxonomy with ecosystem-based management. As human activities intensify pressures on coastal ecosystems, adopting such integrated identification tools will be essential to strengthen biodiversity assessments, mitigate bycatch impacts, and guide effective conservation of South American catsharks in the Southeast Pacific.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.B.; methodology, C.B. and C.V.-C.; formal analysis, M.J.I. and G.S.; writing—original draft preparation, C.V.-C., M.J.I. and G.S.; writing—review and editing, C.B.; funding acquisition, C.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo de Chile (ANID FONDECYT), grant number 11220358.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study did not involve animal experimentation or harm. Specimens were obtained as bycatch from commercial fisheries, according to Chilean Law.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge T. Valencia, who contributed to the initial sampling stage of this project. Special thanks to I. Contreras, F. Concha, R. Oliva, R. Pedrero, F. Palacios, K. Górski, and to the staff of “Programa de Conservación de Tiburones”, who aided specimen sorting and sampling.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dulvy, N.K.; Pacoureau, N.; Rigby, C.L.; Pollom, R.A.; Jabado, R.W.; Ebert, D.A.; Finucci, B.; Pollock, C.M.; Cheok, J.; Derrick, D.H.; et al. Overfishing drives over one-third of all sharks and rays toward a global extinction crisis. Curr. Biol. 2021, 31, 4773–4787.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pacoureau, N.; Carlson, J.K.; Kindsvater, H.K.; Rigby, C.L.; Winker, H.; Simpfendorfer, C.A.; Charvet, P.; Pollom, R.A.; Barreto, R.; Sherman, C.S.; et al. Conservation successes and challenges for wide-ranging sharks and rays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2216891120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sherman, C.S.; Simpfendorfer, C.A.; Pacoureau, N.; Matsushiba, J.H.; Yan, H.F.; Walls, R.H.L.; Rigby, C.L.; VanderWright, W.J.; Jabado, R.W.; Pollom, R.A.; et al. Half a century of rising extinction risk of coral reef sharks and rays. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dulvy, N.K.; Pacoureau, N.; Matsushiba, J.H.; Yan, H.F.; VanderWright, W.J.; Rigby, C.L.; Finucci, B.; Sherman, C.S.; Jabado, R.W.; Carlson, J.K.; et al. Ecological erosion and expanding extinction risk of sharks and rays. Science 2024, 386, eadn1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. White, W.T.; Fahmi; Weigmann, S. A new genus and species of catshark (Carcharhiniformes: Scyliorhinidae) from eastern Indonesia. Zootaxa 2019, 4691, 444–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gomes, U.L.; Peters, G.O.; De Carvalho, M.R.; Gadig, O.B.F. Anatomical investigation of the slender catshark Schroederichthys tenuis Springer, 1966, with notes on intrageneric relationships (Chondrichthyes: Carcharhiniformes: Scyliorhinidae). Zootaxa 2006, 1119, 29–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Weigmann, S. Annotated checklist of the living sharks, batoids and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes) of the world, with a focus on biogeographical diversity. J. Fish Biol. 2016, 88, 837–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ebert, D.A.; Dando, M.; Fowler, S. Sharks of the World. A Complete Guide; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 429–433. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bornatowski, H.; Santos, L.; Robert, M.D.C.; Weiser, P.A. Occurrence of the narrowmouth catshark Schroederichthys bivius (Chondrichthyes: Scyliorhinidae) in southern Brazil. Mar. Biodivers. Rec. 2014, 7, e51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lamilla, J.; Bustamante, C.; Roa, R.; Acuña, E.; Vargas-Caro, C. Estimación del Descarte de Condrictios en Pesquerías Artesanales; Universidad Austral de Chile: Valdivia, Chile, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bustamante, C.; Acuña, E.; Tapia-Jopia, C.; Vargas-Caro, C. Actualización del Plan de Acción Nacional Para la Conservación y Manejo de Tiburones de Chile; Universidad de Antofagasta: Antofagasta, Chile, 2023; pp. 211–232. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sánchez, F.; Marí, N.R.; Bernardele, J.C. Distribución, abundancia relativa y alimentación de pintarroja Schroederichthys bivius Müller & Henle, 1838 en el Océano Atlántico sudoccidental. Rev. Biol. Mar. Oceanogr. 2009, 44, 453–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Colonello, J.H.; Cortés, F.; Belleggia, M. Male-biased sexual size dimorphism in sharks: The narrowmouth catshark Schroederichthys bivius as case study. Hydrobiologia 2020, 847, 1873–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Springer, S. A revision of the catsharks, family Scyliorhinidae. NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS Circ. 1979, 422, 1–153. [Google Scholar]
  15. Soares, K.D.A.; Mathubara, K. Combined phylogeny and new classification of catsharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii: Carcharhiniformes). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2022, 195, 761–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ishiyama, R. Studies on the rays and skates belonging to the family Rajidae, found in Japan and adjacent regions. 1 Egg-capsule of ten species. Jap. J. Ichthyol. 1950, 1, 30–36. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nakaya, K. Taxonomy, comparative anatomy and phylogeny of Japanese catsharks, Scyliorhinidae. Mem. Fac. Fish. Hokkaido Univ. 1975, 23, 1–94. [Google Scholar]
  18. Musick, J.A.; Ellis, J.K. Reproductive evolution of chondrichthyans. In Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Chondrichthyes: Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras; Hamlett, W.C., Ed.; Science Publishers: Enfield, NH, USA, 2005; pp. 45–79. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ebert, D.A.; Compagno, L.J.V.; Cowley, P.D. Reproductive biology of catsharks (Chondrichthyes: Scyliorhinidae) off the west coast of southern Africa. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2006, 63, 1053–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dulvy, N.K.; Reynolds, J.D. Evolutionary transitions among egg-laying, live-bearing and maternal inputs in sharks and rays. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1997, 264, 1309–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Flammang, B.E.; Ebert, D.A.; Cailliet, G.M. Egg cases of the genus Apristurus (Chondrichthyes: Scyliorhinidae): Phylogenetic and ecological implications. Zoology 2007, 110, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kyne, P.M.; Simpfendorfer, C.A. Deepwater Chondrichthyans. In Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives II: Biodiversity, Adaptive Physiology, and Conservation; Carrier, J.C., Musick, J.A., Heithaus, M.R., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010; pp. 37–114. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mabragaña, E.; Figueroa, D.; Scenna, L.; Díaz de Astarloa, J.; Colonello, J.; Delpiani, G. Chondrichthyan egg cases from the south-west Atlantic Ocean. J. Fish Biol. 2011, 79, 1261–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bustamante, C.; Kyne, P.M.; Bennett, M.B. Comparative morphology of the egg cases of Asymbolus analis, Asymbolus rubiginosus and Figaro boardmani (Carcharhiniformes: Scyliorhinidae) from southern Queensland, Australia. J. Fish Biol. 2013, 83, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mancusi, C.; Massi, D.; Baino, R.; Cariani, A.; Crobe, V.; Ebert, D.A.; Ferrari, A.; Gordon, C.A.; Hoff, G.R.; Iglesias, S.P.; et al. An identification key for Chondrichthyes egg cases of the Mediterranean and Black Sea. Eur. Zool. J. 2021, 88, 436–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hebert, P.D.N.; Cywinska, A.; Ball, S.L.; deWaard, J.R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2003, 270, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Holmes, B.H.; Steinke, D.; Ward, R.W. Identification of shark and ray fins using DNA barcoding. Fish. Res. 2009, 95, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Naylor, G.J.P.; Caira, J.N.; Jensen, K.; Rosana, K.A.M.; Straube, N.; Lakner, C. Elasmobranch Phylogeny: A Mitochondrial Estimate Based on 595 Species. In Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives, 2nd ed.; Carrier, J.C., Musick, J.A., Heithaus, M.R., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; pp. 31–56. [Google Scholar]
  29. Veríssimo, A.; Zaera-Perez, D.; Leslie, R.; Iglésias, S.P.; Séret, B.; Grigoriou, P.; Sterioti, A.; Gubili, C.; Barría, C.; Duffy, C.; et al. Molecular diversity and distribution of eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean dogfishes Squalus highlight taxonomic issues in the genus. 2017. Zool. Scr. 2017, 46, 414–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lamilla, J.; Bustamante, C. Guía Para el Reconocimiento de: Tiburones, Rayas y Quimeras de Chile; Oceana: Santiago, Chile, 2005; pp. 31–32. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gomes, U.L.; de Carvalho, M.R. Egg capsules of Schroederichthys tenuis and Scyliorhinus haeckelii (Chondrichthyes, Scyliorhinidae). Copeia 1995, 1995, 232–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fay, M.P.; Proschan, M.A. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney or t-test? On assumptions for hypothesis tests and multiple interpretations of decision rules. Stat. Surv. 2010, 4, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Šlenker, M.; Koutecký, P.; Marhold, K. MorphoTools2: An R package for multivariate morphometric analysis. Bioinformatics 2022, 38, 2954–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Venables, W.N.; Ripley, B.D. Exploratory Multivariate Analysis. In Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th ed.; Venables, W.N., Ripley, B.D., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 301–330. [Google Scholar]
  35. Sambrook, J.; Russell, D.W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ward, R.D.; Zemlak, T.S.; Innes, B.H.; Last, P.R.; Hebert, P.D. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2005, 360, 1847–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary Rrte of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1980, 16, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones-Havas, S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C.; et al. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1647–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Trujillo, J.; Pardo, L.M.; Vargas-Chacoff, L.; Valdivia, N. Sharks in the forest: Relationships between kelp physical-complexity attributes and egg deposition sites of the red-spotted catshark. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2018, 610, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cardeñosa, D.; Fields, A.T.; Shea, S.K.H.; Feldheim, K.A.; Chapman, D.D. Relative contribution to the shark fin trade of Indo-Pacific and Eastern Pacific pelagic thresher sharks. Anim. Conserv. 2021, 24, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Domingues, R.R.; Bunholi, I.V.; Pinhal, D.; Antunes, A.; Mendonça, F.F. From molecule to conservation: DNA-based methods to overcome frontiers in the shark and ray fin trade. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2021, 13, 231–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Soares, K.D.A.; de Carvalho, M.R. The catshark genus Scyliorhinus (Chondrichthyes: Carcharhiniformes: Scyliorhinidae): Taxonomy, morphology and distribution. Zootaxa 2019, 4601, 1–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Soares, K.D.A.; de Carvalho, M.R. Phylogenetic relationship of catshark species of the genus Scyliorhinus (Chondrichthyes, Carcharhiniformes, Scyliorhinidae) based on comparative morphology. Zoosyst. Evol. 2020, 96, 345–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Soares, K.D.A.; Zanini, F. Redescription and anatomical investigation of Schroederichthys maculatus Springer, 1966 and S. saurisqualus Soto, 2001 with comments on their systematics (Chondrichthyes: Carcharhiniformes: Atelomycteridae). Zool. Anz. 2023, 302, 224–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dulvy, N.K.; Acuña, E.; Bustamante, C.; Chiaramonte, G.E.; Cuevas, J.M.; Herman, K.; Pompert, J.; Velez-Zuazo, X. Schroederichthys bivius. In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; IUCN: Cambridge, UK, 2020; p. e.T39347A2906921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dulvy, N.K.; Acuña, E.; Bustamante, C.; Herman, K.; Velez-Zuazo, X. Schroederichthys chilensis. In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; IUCN: Cambridge, UK, 2020; p. e.T44585A124433964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Carr, M.H. Effects of Macroalgal Assemblages on the Recruitment of Temperate Zone Reef Fishes. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1989, 126, 59–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pérez-Matus, A.; Micheli, F.; Konar, B.; Shears, N.; Low, N.H.N.; Okamoto, D.K.; Wernberg, T.; Krumhansl, K.A.; Ling, S.D.; Kingsford, M.; et al. Kelp forests as nursery and foundational habitat for reef fishes. Ecology 2025, 106, e70007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lefcheck, J.S.; Hughes, B.B.; Johnson, A.J.; Pfirrmann, B.W.; Rasher, D.B.; Smyth, A.R.; Williams, B.L.; Beck, M.W.; Orth, R.J. Are coastal habitats important nurseries? A meta-analysis. Conserv. Lett. 2019, 12, e12645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of a catshark-type egg case, showing measurements from the dorsal and lateral views. Abbreviations represent egg case length (LEC), egg case height (HEC), lateral keels (LK), anterior border width (WAB), anterior case width (WAC), anterior waist width (WAW), posterior base width (WPB), posterior case width (WPC) and posterior waist width (WPW), tendrils (T), length of tendrils (LTE) and respiratory fissures (RF). Adapted from Bustamante et al. [24].
Figure 1. Schematic representation of a catshark-type egg case, showing measurements from the dorsal and lateral views. Abbreviations represent egg case length (LEC), egg case height (HEC), lateral keels (LK), anterior border width (WAB), anterior case width (WAC), anterior waist width (WAW), posterior base width (WPB), posterior case width (WPC) and posterior waist width (WPW), tendrils (T), length of tendrils (LTE) and respiratory fissures (RF). Adapted from Bustamante et al. [24].
Diversity 17 00651 g001
Figure 2. Egg cases of Chilean catsharks: (a,b) Schroederichthys chilensis and (c,d) S. bivius in the dorsal (a,c) and (b,d) lateral views. The scale bar represents a length of 20 mm.
Figure 2. Egg cases of Chilean catsharks: (a,b) Schroederichthys chilensis and (c,d) S. bivius in the dorsal (a,c) and (b,d) lateral views. The scale bar represents a length of 20 mm.
Diversity 17 00651 g002
Figure 3. Comparative analysis of the left and right egg cases (associated with the uteri) of Chilean catsharks (Schroederichthys chilensis and S. bivius) based on the Euclidean distance of eight morphometric variables standardized by the total egg case length.
Figure 3. Comparative analysis of the left and right egg cases (associated with the uteri) of Chilean catsharks (Schroederichthys chilensis and S. bivius) based on the Euclidean distance of eight morphometric variables standardized by the total egg case length.
Diversity 17 00651 g003
Figure 4. Principal component analysis (a) and eigenvector biplot (b) of the morphometric analysis of egg cases from Chilean catsharks (Schroederichthys chilensis and S. bivius) based on the Euclidean distance of eight morphometric variables standardized by the total egg case length.
Figure 4. Principal component analysis (a) and eigenvector biplot (b) of the morphometric analysis of egg cases from Chilean catsharks (Schroederichthys chilensis and S. bivius) based on the Euclidean distance of eight morphometric variables standardized by the total egg case length.
Diversity 17 00651 g004
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of Chilean catsharks (Carcharhiniformes: Atelomycteridae) inferred from novel and reference COI sequences using a Neighbor-Joining (NJ) tree based on K2P parameter distances. The species Carcharhinus brachyurus was used as an outgroup representative to root the tree. Bootstrap support at branch nodes is shown (with a *) when > 80%. Families are represented outside the tip labels of the tree.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of Chilean catsharks (Carcharhiniformes: Atelomycteridae) inferred from novel and reference COI sequences using a Neighbor-Joining (NJ) tree based on K2P parameter distances. The species Carcharhinus brachyurus was used as an outgroup representative to root the tree. Bootstrap support at branch nodes is shown (with a *) when > 80%. Families are represented outside the tip labels of the tree.
Diversity 17 00651 g005
Table 1. List of colored catsharks (Atelomycteridae) and related species within the Carcharhiniformes (including the outgroup) used in this study. The COI sequence accession numbers from the NCBI GenBank database are indicated. Novel sequences are indicated in bold.
Table 1. List of colored catsharks (Atelomycteridae) and related species within the Carcharhiniformes (including the outgroup) used in this study. The COI sequence accession numbers from the NCBI GenBank database are indicated. Novel sequences are indicated in bold.
SpeciesLocalityAccession Number
Carcharhiniformes: Atelomycteridae
Atelomycterus baliensisIndonesia: BaliEU398568, EU398569
Atelomycterus erdmanniIndonesiaKP769787
Atelomycterus fasciatusAustralia: Western AustraliaEU398570
Atelomycterus marmoratusPhilippines: CebuOQ386292, OQ386496
Atelomycterus marnkalhaAustralia: QueenslandEU398574, EU398577
Aulohalaelurus labiosusAustralia: Western AustraliaEU398581, HQ955988, JN312813
Schroederichthys biviusArgentinaEU074581–EU074586
Schroederichthys biviusChile: ValdiviaPX250298–PX250303
Schroederichthys biviusChile: Puerto MonttPX250304–PX250309
Schroederichthys chilensisChile: CoquimboMK982882, MK982902
Schroederichthys chilensisChile: IquiquePX250310, PX250311
Schroederichthys chilensisChile: ValparaísoPX250312–PX250315
Schroederichthys chilensisChile: San AntonioPX250316–PX250321
Carcharhiniformes: Scyliorhinidae
Cephaloscyllium laticepsAustralia: VictoriaHQ956280
Cephaloscyllium pictumIndonesia: Nusa Tenggara BaratEU398676
Cephaloscyllium silasiIndiaKF899711
Cephaloscyllium variegatumAustralia: TasmaniaHQ956282
Poroderma africanumSouth Africa: Western CapeOR138385, OR138381
Poroderma pantherinumSouth Africa: Western CapeOR138386, OR138391
Scyliorhinus caniculaUSA: WashingtonKJ709897, JN641232
Scyliorhinus capensisSouth Africa: Western CapeOR138392
Scyliorhinus stellarisMaltaKJ709900
Carcharhiniformes: Pentanchidae
Apristurus brunneusUSA: WashingtonJQ353982
Apristurus melanoasperCanada: NewfoundlandMW339366
Apristurus nasutusChile: CoquimboKU737638
Apristurus profundorumCanada: NewfoundlandMW339382
Holohalaelurus punctatusSouth AfricaOR138367, OR138368
Holohalaelurus reganiSouth Africa: Western CapeOR138372, OR138373
Asymbolus analisAustraliaHM902609
Asymbolus parvusAustralia: Western AustraliaEU398564
Asymbolus rubiginosusAustraliaEU398567
Carcharhiniformes: Carcharhinidae
Carcharhinus brachyurus 1South Korea: Jeju islandMT995631
1 Species included as an outgroup.
Table 2. Measurements of the egg cases of Schroederichthys chilensis and S. bivius from Chilean waters. The mean values and standard deviations are expressed as percentages of LEC. The abbreviations used for each measurement are presented in Figure 1.
Table 2. Measurements of the egg cases of Schroederichthys chilensis and S. bivius from Chilean waters. The mean values and standard deviations are expressed as percentages of LEC. The abbreviations used for each measurement are presented in Figure 1.
MeasurementSchroederichthys chilensisSchroederichthys bivius
Mean (s.d.)Range (mm)Mean (s.d.)Range (mm)
LEC52.3 (3.8)45.2–57.152.8 (3.2)45.0–58.6
HEC11.0 (1.8)7.8–13.74.9 (1.6)2.5–10.0
LK3.3 (0.4)2.8–4.02.0 (0.9)0.1–3.7
WAB14.0 (0.4)13.3–14.69.1 (1.3)7.2–13.4
WAC17.4 (0.9)15.7–18.513.0 (1.5)10.2–16.6
WAW16.9 (1.1)14.9–18.214.9 (1.1)13.0–18.1
WPB5.8 (1.3)4.1–7.76.7 (1.8)3.2–9.2
WPC24.2 (1.7)21.2–26.219.7 (2.3)12.2–23.8
WPW18.7 (1.5)16.1–20.313.7 (2.0)10.7–18.1
Table 3. Species classifications (‘as.’, e.g., as. S. chilensis) of Chilean catsharks (Schroederichthys chilensis and S. bivius) by using a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) based on eight egg case morphometric measurements.
Table 3. Species classifications (‘as.’, e.g., as. S. chilensis) of Chilean catsharks (Schroederichthys chilensis and S. bivius) by using a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) based on eight egg case morphometric measurements.
Taxonnas. S. chilensisas. S. biviusn CorrectPercentage Correct
S. chilensis1212012100
S. bivius2402424100
Total36122436100
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bustamante, C.; Vargas-Caro, C.; Indurain, M.J.; Silva, G. Integrating Egg Case Morphology and DNA Barcoding to Discriminate South American Catsharks, Schroederichthys bivius and S. chilensis (Carcharhiniformes: Atelomycteridae). Diversity 2025, 17, 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090651

AMA Style

Bustamante C, Vargas-Caro C, Indurain MJ, Silva G. Integrating Egg Case Morphology and DNA Barcoding to Discriminate South American Catsharks, Schroederichthys bivius and S. chilensis (Carcharhiniformes: Atelomycteridae). Diversity. 2025; 17(9):651. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090651

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bustamante, Carlos, Carolina Vargas-Caro, María J. Indurain, and Gabriela Silva. 2025. "Integrating Egg Case Morphology and DNA Barcoding to Discriminate South American Catsharks, Schroederichthys bivius and S. chilensis (Carcharhiniformes: Atelomycteridae)" Diversity 17, no. 9: 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090651

APA Style

Bustamante, C., Vargas-Caro, C., Indurain, M. J., & Silva, G. (2025). Integrating Egg Case Morphology and DNA Barcoding to Discriminate South American Catsharks, Schroederichthys bivius and S. chilensis (Carcharhiniformes: Atelomycteridae). Diversity, 17(9), 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17090651

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop