Next Article in Journal
Insight into the Population Genetics of the Walleye Pollock Gadus chalcogrammus (Pallas, 1814) in the Northwestern Pacific from Microsatellite Multiplex Assay Study
Previous Article in Journal
A Molecular-Informed Species Inventory of the Order Ceramiales (Rhodophyta) in the Narragansett Bay Area (Rhode Island and Massachusetts), USA
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Piscivorous Vertebrates That May Pose a Risk to the Critically Endangered Mandra Shemaya, Alburnus mandrensis (Drensky, 1943) (Actinopterygii; Leuciscidae)

1
National Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
Bulgarian Society for Protection of Birds, 8002 Burgas, Bulgaria
3
Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
4
Center for Interdisciplinary Investigations, Shumen University “Konstantin Preslavski”, 115 Universitetska Str., 9700 Shumen, Bulgaria
5
Department of Biology, Shumen University “Konstantin Preslavski”, 115 Universitetska Str., 9700 Shumen, Bulgaria
6
Unit for Integrative Zoology, Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Vienna, Djerassiplatz 1, 1030 Vienna, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2024, 16(9), 555; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16090555
Submission received: 29 June 2024 / Revised: 30 August 2024 / Accepted: 3 September 2024 / Published: 6 September 2024

Abstract

:
In the present study, we provide a checklist of the predators that may impact the population of the critically endangered Mandra shemaya (Alburnus mandrensis Drensky, 1943). This endemic fish only inhabits the basin of Mandra Lake in the Burgas district (SE Bulgaria) and data on its biology are scarce. We have confirmed the presence of the Mandra shemaya in Mandra Lake for the last six years (including 2024) and provided an analysis on the potential predatory pressures on A. mandrensis. The recently recorded presence of a highly invasive piscivorous predatory fish in Mandra Lake is considered potentially dangerous for the sustainability of native fish species.

1. Introduction

The Leuciscidae family includes 94 genera and more than 670 species [1]. One of these species, the Mandra shemaya, Alburnus mandrensis (Drensky, 1943), has a rather restricted range and inhabits only the Mandra Lake and some of its tributaries in the district of Burgas city (southeastern Bulgaria). The biology of the species is poorly documented, and the position of the leuciscid in the trophic food web is not well understood. The Mandra shemaya has been listed under the Red list category as “Critically Endangered B1ab(ii,iii)” by the IUCN [2]. Besides the limited range of the species (extent of occurrence < 100 km2), ref. [2] recognized the most important risks for the species to be related to the deterioration of its habitat and the pollution of the Mandra Lake aquatic system with domestic and industrial toxins. The impoundment of the spawning waters was listed as an additional threat.
Mandra Lake belongs to the Burgas Lakes complex. These lakes are among Europe’s most important locations for bird conservation as they provide permanent or transient habitat for a great variety of avian species [3,4,5,6]. The Burgas wetland complex is inhabited by a great variety of piscivorous vertebrates (predominantly birds), which use the fish resources of the freshwater basins and the Black Sea for feeding. Some predators are facultative fish eaters and, in several species, fish are consumed only sporadically. Some of the piscivorous species rely exclusively on fish for nutrition. In limnic habitats, the piscivorous vertebrates may be very important top predators, which may severely impact fish populations (see [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]).
In the present study, we assessed the risk of carnivorous vertebrate diminishing the population of the critically endangered A. mandrensis. Additionally, we provided an analysis on the potential pressure that the non-native piscivorous fish species are placing on the local population of Mandra shemaya.

2. Materials and Methods

The presence of the piscivorous birds in the vicinity of Mandra Lake was monitored in regular intervals of 15 days from the early spring of 2010 and the presence was documented (Appendix A). The main objective was to monitor all bird species that are known to consume fish, regardless of the method of predation or quantity. We recorded the taxonomic specifics of all detected specimens, their ontogenetic status, and specific features, if present. We divided the bird species into categories concerning their diet and feeding ethology, annual presence, the density of their population, and the potential impact that the species may put on the population of A. mandrensis. Data on the diet and the feeding behavior of piscivorous bird species in Bulgaria are rather scarce. For our analysis, we selected relevant information from publications that provide such data within Europe. For several species, we used information from other continents because the data were recognized as important for our study (see Table 1).
We recorded the presence of piscivorous birds in the range of Mandra Lake and grouped the species into the following four categories:
“Resident” referred to species that bred in the area and remained there throughout the year;
“Breeding” referred to species that bred in the area, but were not present for some seasons of the year;
“Migrant” referred to species that appeared in the area during migrations;
“Wintering” referred to species that were detected in the area during the winter. Some species were included in more than one category as part of the birds of one species may display different behavior (e.g., some birds may be nesting, and other parts of the population may be only migrating through the region).
The monitoring of the fish species in Mandra Lake started in the spring of 2018 and is still ongoing. We studied the anglers catch in irregular intervals of about 20 days during the active fishing season. During the field surveys, we recorded the presence of grass snake (Natrix natrix) and dice snake (Natrix tesselata). We also documented the spraints and prints of the European otter (Lutra lutra). Data on the diet and the feeding behavior of non-avian piscivorous vertebrates was found in relevant articles (see Table 2).
Keeping in mind the high conservation status of A. mandrensis and the anthropogenic pressure on the habitat, we assessed the threat that every predator species may represent for the Mandra shemaya. Changes in the ecological equilibrium may lead to an increase in the number of some predatory species, and we provide our expert opinion concerning the potential of the piscivorous predators to harm the population of A. mandrensis in extreme conditions. We assessed the potential risk of every predator species as follows:
“No” in case no impact is expected in any circumstance;
“Very low” in case both the population density, as well as the presence regularity of the predator increase drastically in a short time, it would not threaten the fish population;
“Low” in case both population density, as well as the presence regularity of the predator increase gradually, it would not threaten the fish population;
“Moderate” in case both population density, as well as the presence regularity of the predator increase gradually, it may threaten the fish population;
“High” in case the increase in the predator’s population may lead to extinction of the Mandra shemaya.

3. Results

During our field survey, we confirmed the presence of Mandra shemaya in Mandra Lake and its tributaries—Sredetska, Fakiiska, and Izvorska rivers. One unconfirmed report was provided for the presence of A. mandrensis in the Promed Dam near Mandra Lake. Data on the longest spawning migration was from the region of Prohod village on the Sredetska river. This is the furthermost locality of mature specimens upstream of the river mouth. The largest specimen detected was with a total length of 16.6 cm standard length (Sl).
A total of 36 piscivorous bird species were detected in the vicinity of Mandra Lake (Table 1). Five species were identified as a “moderate” potential threat for A. mandrensis; these include the great white pelican, the pygmy cormorant, the great cormorant, the great egret, and the great heron. The most of the piscivorous birds inhabiting the location were considered to represent a “Low” risk for the endangered fish species, even in case of an increase in their populations and presence in the region. For nine species, the assessment was that they represent a “Very low” potential threat, because they do not rely largely on fish as a food source, however they rarely consume and only as an addition to their main diet. Other criteria for the assessment of “Very low” risk was that the species was rarely found in the habitat.
Seven piscivorous fish species, two snakes, one terrapin, and one mammal were identified as potential risks for A. mandrensis (Table 2). The terapod vertebrates from that list represented a “Low” or “Very low” risk for the endangered fish species. Three of the piscivorous fishes were assessed as a moderate threat and the invasive Largemouth bass was assessed as highly dangerous for the population of the Mandra shemaya.

4. Discussion

According to [8], predation by piscivorous birds is considered a substantial threat to the aquaculture industry; however, for the local population of fish, this is not the main threat. The impact of piscivorous birds, such as grey herons, great crested grebes, and even of Cormorants, on fish populations may be massive but it is not leading to the significant diminishing of prey fish. The combined impact of all piscivorous birds on fish populations is often much lower than that of commercial fishing (see [15]). It was reported by [73] that the commercial catches may be 10–20 times higher than the consumption by predatory birds. According to the author, in the European limnic ecosystems, the fishermen catch was 4–12 times as much as the cormorant catch. Most predatory birds switch easily between the species of fish they are capturing [74] and birds are seldom a real threat for a particular fish species. This is the reason why practices like eradication of piscivorous birds were largely abandoned in the past (see [75]). In the case of A. mandrensis, no avian species was recognized as a danger to the endangered species’ population. Mandra Lake is inhabited by over 20 species of fish, some of which are found in abundance—Carassius gibelio, Rutilus rutilus, etc. (K.V., T.S., N.K., personal unpublished data), so the food basis for predatory birds is present. Even specialized piscivorous species that consume fish in large quantities, like the grey heron, great egret, great cormorant, great white pelican, were not recognized as a severe threat in the present article. These are local species, which have been an object of intense monitoring in the last 14 years, and none of them were found specifically to prey on A. mandrensis. According to our observations, the hunting ecology of the pygmy cormorant may represent a special threat for the Mandra shemaya; however, this species is not that numerous so as to be regarded as highly dangerous for the fish population.
The non-avian piscivorous species, which hunt in the lake, were also numerous. Among them the only mammal was the European otter. The otter feeds on fish, but is rather opportunistic in its diet (see [72]). The number of these predators is relatively too low to represent a threat for the fish populations of Mandra Lake. Of the piscivorous reptiles, the only one specialized for preying on fish is the dice snake (N. tessellata) [70]. The consumption of very few prey items per active season by this snake limits the potential of this species to significantly impact the populations of critically endangered fish species. The other reptile species (N. natrix and T. selegans complex) rely to lower degree on fish consumption [69,70].
Fish predators like the European perch (Perca fluviatilis), the Northern pike (Esox lucius) and the Pike-perch (Zander lucioperca) represent a more significant danger [56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66]. All of these species were numerous and are presumed to feed on A. mandrensis. We propose that the long-term coexistence and ethological co-evolution at the local level of the shemaya and the native carnivore fishes resulted in the prey fish’s adaptation to the pressure from said predators. We also admit that the local piscivorous fish species regulates the population of A. mandrensis; however, their impact is not destructive.
The Jaguar cichlid was detected only once in Mandra Lake, and we propose that this species would not be able to overwinter in the local climatic conditions. The newly detected presence of numerous sub-adult and adult specimens of the Largemouth black bass (Micropterus salmoides) in Mandra Lake and its adjacent water basins (see [76]) is, however, rather alarming. The Largemouth black bass was included in the list of the 100 most dangerous invasive species [77] and can inflict catastrophic effects in the new habitats it invades [78,79]. Here we have to stress that Mandra Lake is inhabited by another invasive centrarhid—the pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus). This fact increases the risk for the local ichthyofauna. When both invasive centrarchids coexist, they prevail over the native fish species and create an imbalance in the ecosystem—the pumpkinseeds may appear in great numbers and totally dominate other fish species [80]. Unfortunately, the authors of the present study were not able to find sound scientific source concerning the eradication of a particular invasion of M. salmoides. In the current situation, immediate measures have to be undertaken to diminish the impact of M. salmoides in Mandra Lake. In particular, educational work with the local fishermen has to be provided and the “catch and release” fishing of the Largemouth black bass has to be terminated. New releases of that predator have to be banned.
Our findings demonstrate that, in addition to anthropogenic threats (related to pollution and habitat deterioration), which were recognized by [2], in recent years the invasion of predatory alien fish species have to be regarded as a rather alarming factor. The infestation Mandra Lake with M. salmoides could be regarded as a direct and already activated mechanism that is reducing the resources of the critically endangered Mandra shemaya.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.D., K.V. and N.N.; methodology, D.D., N.K., K.V. and N.N.; validation, T.R.S., V.M., I.D. and N.N.; formal analysis, K.V., T.R.S., N.K. and N.N.; investigation, V.M., I.D., N.K., K.V. and N.N.; resources, V.M., I.D., N.K., K.V. and N.N.; data curation, V.M., I.D. and N.K.; writing—original draft preparation, D.D., V.M. and N.N.; writing—review and editing, D.D., T.R.S., V.M., I.D., K.V., N.K. and N.N.; visualization, D.D. and N.N.; supervision, T.R.S. and N.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was partly supported by the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science under grants: RD-08-80/09.02.2022, RD-08-113/20.02.2023, and RD-08-108/30.01.2024.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All collected specimens, measurement databases, and photographic material were stored and can be provided, in case of scientific interest, by the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Images of some important piscivorous birds that inhabit the vicinity of Mandra Lake: (a) great white pelican (Pelecanus onocrotalus), (b) great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), (c) grey heron (Ardea cinerea), (d) pygmy cormorant (Microcarbo pygmeus).
Figure A1. Images of some important piscivorous birds that inhabit the vicinity of Mandra Lake: (a) great white pelican (Pelecanus onocrotalus), (b) great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), (c) grey heron (Ardea cinerea), (d) pygmy cormorant (Microcarbo pygmeus).
Diversity 16 00555 g0a1

References

  1. Fricke, R.; Eschmeyer, W.N.; Van der Laan, R. (Eds.) Eschmeyer’s Catalog of Fish: Genera, Species, References. Electronic Version Accessed. 2024. Available online: http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp (accessed on 24 June 2024).
  2. Freyhof, J.; Kottelat, M. Alburnus mandrensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: E.T135598A4156894. 2008. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/135598/4156894 (accessed on 22 August 2024).
  3. Solakov, D. Wetlands of international importance for Bulgaria. NEAR Curriculum in Natural Environmental Science. Terre Environ. 2010, 88, 129–135. [Google Scholar]
  4. Michev, T.M.; Profirov, L.A.; Karaivanov, N.P.; Michev, B.T. Migration of soaring birds over Bulgaria. Acta Zool. Bulg. 2012, 64, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mladenov, V.R.; Kovacheva, D.M.; Georgieva, R.G.; Rusev, D.Z.; Kornilev, Y.V. Burgas Wetlands, Bulgaria: A Conservation Area of European Priority for Roosting of the Pygmy Cormorant, Microcarbo pygmeus (Pallas, 1773). Acta Zool. Bulg. 2015, 67, 435–442. [Google Scholar]
  6. Michev, T.M.; Profirov, L.; Michev, B.T.; Hristov, L.A.; Ignatov, A.L.; Stoynov, E.H.; Chipev, N.H. Long-term changes in autumn migration of selected soaring bird species at Burgas Bay, Bulgaria. Acta Zool. Bulg. 2018, 70, 57–68. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chapleau, F.; Findlay, C.S.; Szenasy, E. Impact of piscivorous fish introductions on fish species richness of small lakes in Gatineau Park, Québec. Écoscience 1997, 4, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Blackwell, B.F.; Dolbeer, R.A.; Tyson, L.A. Lethal Control of Piscivorous Birds at Aquaculture Facilities in the Northeast United States: Effects on Populations. N. Am. J. Aquac. 2000, 62, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Belant, J.L.; Tyson, L.A.; Mastrangelo, P.A. Effects of Lethal Control at Aquaculture Facilities on Populations of Piscivorous Birds. Wildl. Soc. Bull. (1973–2006) 2000, 28, 379–384. [Google Scholar]
  10. Collis, K.; Roby, D.D.; Craig, D.P.; Adamany, S.; Adkins, J.Y.; Lyons, D.E. Colony Size and Diet Composition of Piscivorous Waterbirds on the Lower Columbia River: Implications for Losses of Juvenile Salmonids to Avian Predation. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 2002, 131, 537–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mous, P.J.; Dekker, W.; De Leeuw, J.J.; Van Eerden, M.R.; Van Densen, W. Interactions in the utilisation of small fish by piscivorous fish and birds, and the fishery in Ijsselmeer. In Interactions between Fish and Birds: Implications for Management, Fishing News Books; Cowx, I.G., Ed.; Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK, 2003; pp. 84–118. [Google Scholar]
  12. Steinmetz, J.; Kohler, S.L.; Soluk, D.A. Birds are overlooked top predators in aquatic food webs. Ecology 2003, 84, 1324–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Beckmann, C.; Biro, P.; Post, J. Asymmetric impact of piscivorous birds on size-structured fish populations. Can. J. Zool. 2006, 84, 1584–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Harris, C.M.; Calladine, J.R.; Wernham, C.V.; Park, K.J. Impacts of piscivorous birds on salmonid populations and game fisheries in Scotland: A review. Wildl. Biol. 2008, 14, 395–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Žydelis, R.; Kontautas, A. Piscivorous birds as top predators and fishery competitors in the lagoon ecosystem. Hydrobiologia 2008, 611, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lyons, D.E.; Roby, D.D.; Adkins, J.Y.; Loschl, P.J.; Kerr, L.R.; Marcella, T.K.; Evans, A.F.; Hostetter, N.J.; Collis, K.; Kuligowski, D.R.; et al. Impacts of piscivorous birds on native anadromous fishes in the mid-Columbia River. In Impacts of Avian Predation on Salmonid Smolts from the Columbia and Snake Rivers; Roby, D.D., Ed.; A Synthesis Report to the U.S.; Army Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla District, Bird Research Northwest: Walla Walla, WA, USA, 2011; pp. 49–80. Available online: www.birdresearchnw.org (accessed on 24 June 2024).
  17. Otieno, N. Economic impact of predatory piscivorous birds on small-scale aquaculture farms in Kenya. Aquac. Rep. 2019, 15, 100220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kalas, J.; Heggberget, T.; Bjorn, P.; Reitan, O. Feeding behaviour and diet of goosanders (Mergus merganser) in relation to salmonid seaward migration. Aquat. Living Resour. 1993, 6, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bur, M.T.; Stapanian, M.A.; Bernhardt, G.; Turner, M.W. Fall diets of red-breasted merganser (Mergus serrator) and walleye (Sander vitreus) in Sandusky Bay and adjacent waters of western Lake Erie. Am. Midl. Nat. 2008, 159, 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Doornbos, G. Winter food habits of Smew (Mergus albellus L.) on Lake Yssel, the Netherlands: Species and size selection in relation to fish stocks. Ardea 1979, 67, 42–48. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kleinschmidt, B.; Burger, C.; Dorsch, M.; Nehls, G.; Heinänen, S.; Morkūnas, J.; Žydelis, R.; Moorhouse-Gann, R.J.; Hipperson, H.; Symondson, W.O.C.; et al. The diet of red-throated divers (Gavia stellata) overwintering in the German Bight (North Sea) analysed using molecular diagnostics. Mar. Biol. 2019, 166, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Polak, M.; Ciach, M. Behaviour of black-throated diver Gavia arctica and red-throated diver Gavia stellata during autumn migration stopover. Ornis Svec. 2007, 17, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gwiazda, R. Foraging ecology of the Great Crested Grebe (Podiceps cristatus L.) at a mesotrophic-eutrophic reservoir. Hydrobiologia 1997, 353, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kloskowski, J. Food provisioning in red-necked grebes (Podiceps grisegena) at common carp (Cyprinus carpio) ponds. Hydrobiologia 2004, 525, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. O’Sullivan, R. Food provisioning of Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis chicks. Ir. Birds 2015, 10, 175–178. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sonntag, N.; Garthe, S.; Adler, S. A freshwater species wintering in a brackish environment: Habitat selection and diet of Slavonian grebes in the southern Baltic Sea. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2009, 84, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guillet, A.; Furness, R.W. Energy requirements of a great white pelican (Pelecanus onocrotalus) population and its impact on fish stocks. J. Zool. 1985, 205, 573–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pyrovetsi, M.D.; Economidis, P.S. The diet of Dalmatian pelicans (Pelecanus crispus) breeding at lake Mikriprespa National park, Greece. Isr. J. Zool. 1998, 44, 9–17. [Google Scholar]
  29. Liordos, V.; Goutner, V. Diet of the great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo L. 1758) at two Greek colonies. J. Biol. Res. 2007, 7, 51–57. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kiss, J.; Rekasi, J. Data concerning diet and nesting of Pygmy Cormorant (Phalacrocorax pygmeus) in the Danube Delta, Romania. Analele Ştiinţifice Sci. Ann. INCDDD–Tulcea Editura Tehnică 2002, 8, 104–110. [Google Scholar]
  31. Montesinos-Navarro, A.; Santoul, F.; Green, A.J. The diet of the night heron and a purple heron in the Guadalquivir marshes. Ardeola 2008, 55, 161–167. [Google Scholar]
  32. Quiroga, M.A.; Leon, E.J.; Olguin, P.F.; Beltzer, A.H. Diet of Black-crowned Night-herons (Nycticorax nycticorax) in a wetland of the Paraná River’ s alluvial valley. Ekoloji 2013, 22, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Golden, N.; Parsons, B.; Ottinger, M. Black-Crowned Night-Herons (Nycticorax nycticorax). Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol 2003, 70, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hall, C.; Kress, S. Diet of nestling black-crowned night-herons in a mixed species colony: Implications for tern conservation. Wilson J. Ornithol. 2008, 120, 637–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Endo, N.; Sawara, Y. Diel rhythmic activity and foraging site utilization of the Black-crowned Night Heron (Nycticorax nycticorax) in its breeding season. Jpn. J. Ornithol. 2000, 48, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Frederick, P.C.; Spalding, M.G.; Sepälveda, M.S.; Williams, G.E.; Nico, L.; Robins, R. Exposure of great egret (Ardea albus) nestlings to mercury through diet in the Everglades ecosystem. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. Int. J. 1999, 18, 1940–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Voslamber, B.; Platteeuw, M.; van Eerden, M.R. Individual differences in feeding habits in a newly established Great Egret Casmerodius albus population: Key factors for recolonisation. Ardea 2010, 98, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Britto, V.O.; Bugoni, L. The contrasting feeding ecology of great egrets and roseate spoonbills in limnetic and estuarine colonies. Hydrobiologia 2015, 744, 187–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Privileggi, N.; Colla, A.; Vicario, G. Food of the Little Egret Egretta garzetta and of the Great Egret Ardea alba in the Valle Canal Novo (Marano Lagoon, Udine, Italy). Avocetta 2009, 33, 57–86. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gilbert, G.; Tyler, G.A.; Dunn, C.J.; Ratcliffe, N.; Smith, K.W. The influence of habitat management on the breeding success of the Great Bittern Botaurus stellaris in Britain. Ibis 2007, 149, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gautier-Clerc, M.; Kayser, Y.; Kiss, B. Diet and clutch size of Squacco Heron (Ardeola ralloides) in the Danube Delta (Romania). Ann. Danub. Delta Institue 2004, 10, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  42. Jakubas, D.; Mioduszewska, A. Diet composition and food consumption of the grey heron (Ardea cinerea) from breeding colonies in northern Poland. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2005, 51, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ekblad, C.; Tikkanen, H.; Sulkava, S.; Laaksonen, T. Diet and breeding habitat preferences of White-tailed Eagles in a northern inland environment. Polar Biol. 2020, 43, 2071–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Reid, R.; Grant, J.R.; Broad, R.A.; Carss, D.N.; Marquiss, M. The breeding season diet of White-tailed Eagles in Scotland. Scott. Birds 2023, 43, 305–318. [Google Scholar]
  45. Francour, P.; Thibault, J.C. The diet of breeding osprey Pandion haliaetus on Corsica: Exploitation of a coastal marine environment. Bird Study 1996, 43, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Scott, P.; Duncan, P.; Green, J.A. Food preference of the Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus differs along a rural–urban gradient. Bird Study 2015, 62, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Snow, D.W.; Perrins, C.M. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Volume 1: Non-Passerines; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1998; p. 1694. [Google Scholar]
  48. Del Hoyo, J.; Elliott, A.; Sargatal, J. Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vol. 3: Hoatzin to Auks; Lynx Edicions: Barcelona, Spain, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ramos, R.; Ramírez, F.; Sanpera, C.; Jover, L.; Ruiz, X. Diet of Yellow-legged Gull (Larus michahellis) chicks along the Spanish Western Mediterranean coast: The relevance of refuse dumps. J. Ornithol. 2009, 150, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Roby, D.D.; Collis, K.; Nelson, S.K.; Larson, K.W.; Couch, C.; Klavon, P.J. Caspian Tern Nesting Ecology and Diet in San Francisco Bay and Interior Oregon; US Fish and Wildlife Service: Portland, OR, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  51. Dostine, P.L.; Morton, S.R. Feeding Ecology of the Whiskered Tern, Chlidonias hybrida, in the Alligator Rivers Region, Northern-Territory. Wildl. Res. 1989, 16, 549–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Green, E. Tern Diet in the UK and Ireland: A Review of Key Prey Species and Potential Impacts of Climate Change; RSPB Report; RSPB: Sandy, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  53. Granadeiro, J.P.; Monteiro, L.R.; Silva, M.C.; Furness, R.W. Diet of common terns in the Azores, Northeast Atlantic. Waterbirds 2002, 25, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Čech, M.; Čech, P. Non-fish prey in the diet of an exclusive fish-eater: The Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis. Bird Study 2015, 62, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vejřik, L.; Vejřiková, I.; Blabolil, P.; Eloranta, A.P.; Kočvara, L.; Peterka, J.; Sajdlová, Z.; Chung, S.; Šmejkal, M.; Kiljunen, M.; et al. European catfish (Silurus glanis) as a freshwater apex predator drives ecosystem via its diet adaptability. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Diehl, S. Effects of habitat structure on resource availability, diet and growth of benthivorous perch, Perca fluviatilis. Oikos 1993, 67, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Keast, A. Diet overlaps and feeding relationships between the year classes in the yellow perch (Perca flavescens). Environ. Biol. Fishes 1977, 2, 53–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Brown, P.B.; Dabrowski, K.; Garling, D.L. Nutrition and feeding of yellow perch (Perca flavescens). J. Appl. Ichthyol. 1996, 12, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kratochvil, M.; Peterka, J.; Kubecka, J.; Matena, J.; Vasek, M.; Vanickova, I.; Seda, J. Diet of larvae and juvenile perch, Perca fluviatilis performing diel vertical migrations in a deep reservoir. Folia Zool. 2008, 57, 313. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ginter, K.; Kangur, K.; Kangur, A.; Kangur, P.; Haldna, M. Diet patterns and ontogenetic diet shift of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.) fry in lakes Peipsi and Võrtsjärv (Estonia). Hydrobiologia 2011, 660, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Argillier, C.; Barral, M.; Irz, P. Growth and diet of the pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.) in two French reservoirs. Fish. Aquat. Life 2012, 20, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hempel, M.; Neukamm, R.; Thiel, R. Effects of introduced round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) on diet composition and growth of zander (Sander lucioperca), a main predator in European brackish waters. Aquat. Invasions 2016, 11, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lorenzoni, M.; Corboli, M.; Doerr, A.J.M.; Giovinazzo, G.; Selvi, S.; Mearelli, M. Diets of Micropterus salmoides Lac. and Esox lucius L. in Lake Trasimeno (Umbria, Italy) and their diet overlap. Bull. Fr. Peche Piscic. 2002, 365–366, 537–547. [Google Scholar]
  64. Alp, A.; Yeğen, V.; Apaydin Yağci, M.; Uysal, R.; Biçen, E.; Yağci, A. Diet composition and prey selection of the pike, Esox lucius, in Civril Lake, Turkey. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2008, 24, 670–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pedreschi, D.; Mariani, S.; Coughlan, J.; Voigt, C.C.; O’Grady, M.; Caffrey, J.; Kelly-Quinn, M. Trophic flexibility and opportunism in pike Esox lucius. J. Fish Biol. 2015, 87, 876–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sandlund, O.T.; Museth, J.; Øistad, S. Migration, growth patterns, and diet of pike (Esox lucius) in a river reservoir and its inflowing river. Fish. Res. 2016, 173, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Agasen, E.V.; Julian, P.C.; Mauria, R.R.; Nenita, S.K. Biological investigation of Jaguar Guapote Parachromis managuensis (Gunther) in Taal Lake, Philippines. J. Environ. Sci. Manag. 2006, 9, 20–30. [Google Scholar]
  68. García-Berthou, E. Ontogenetic diet shifts and interrupted piscivoryin introduced largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. J. Cover. All Asp. Limnol. Mar. Biol. 2002, 87, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pérez-Santigosa, N.; Florencio, M.; Hidalgo-Vila, J.; Díaz-Paniagua, C. Does the exotic invader turtle, Trachemys scripta elegans, compete for food with coexisting native turtles? Amphib.-Reptil. 2011, 32, 167–175. [Google Scholar]
  70. Weiperth, A.; Gaebele, T.; Potyó, I.; Puky, M. A global overview of the diet of the dice snake (Natrix tessellate) from a geographical perspective: Foraging in atypical habitats and feeding spectrum widening helps colonization and survival under suboptimal conditions for a piscivorous snake. Zool. Stud. 2014, 53, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Georgiev, D. Diet of the Otter Lutra lutra in Different Habitats of South-Eastern Bulgaria. IUCN Otter Spec. Group Bull. 2006, 23, 10. [Google Scholar]
  72. Natchev, N.; Petkov, Z.; Dashev, G.; Atanasova, I.; Chipev, N. Dietary specifications reflect the feeding behaviour of the European otter (Lutra lutra) in “Strandzha” Natural Park (Bulgaria). Acta Sci. Nat. 2015, 2, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Suter, W. Der Einfluß fischfressender Vogelarten auf Süßwasserfisch-Bestände—eine Übersicht. J. Ornithol. 1991, 132, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wiese, F.K.; Parrish, J.K.; Thompson, C.W.; Maranto, C. Ecosystem-based management of predator–prey relationships: Piscivorous birds and salmonids. Ecol. Appl. 2008, 18, 681–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Marquiss, M.; Carss, D. Avian Piscivores: Basis for Policy; National Rivers Authority: Rotherham, UK, 1994; p. 106. [Google Scholar]
  76. Valkanov, K.; Kolev, N.; Koynova, T.; Natchev, N. New records of Largemouth Black Bass, Micropterus salmoides (Lacépède, 1802) (Pisces, Centrarchidae), in Bulgaria. Check List 2023, 19, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lowe, S.; Browne, M.; Boudjelas, S.; De Poorter, M. 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species a selection fromthe Global Invasive Species Database. Aliens 2000, 12, 12. [Google Scholar]
  78. Azuma, M. Ecological disturbance by two alien fish species to the indigenous community of a small lake in western Japan. Int. Ver. Theor. Undangewandte Limnol. Verhandlungen 2001, 27, 3794–3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Han, J.H.; Paek, W.K.; An, K.G. Exotic species, Micropterus salmoides, as a key bioindicator influencing the reservoir health and fish community structure. J. Asia-Pac. Biodivers. 2016, 9, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hossain, M.M.; Perhar, G.; Arhonditsis, G.B.; Matsuishi, T.; Goto, A.; Azuma, M. Examination of the effects of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) and bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) on the ecosystem attributes of lake Kawahara-oike, Nagasaki, Japan. Ecol. Inform. 2013, 18, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Avian piscivorous species, which inhabit or can be detected in the vicinity of Mandra lake (SE Bulgaria).
Table 1. Avian piscivorous species, which inhabit or can be detected in the vicinity of Mandra lake (SE Bulgaria).
Common NameLatin NamePresence in Mandra Lake AreaPiscivorousPotential Impact on A. mandrensis Data on DietDetected since 2010,
Maximum Specimens per Day
Common merganserMergus merganserWinteringObligatoryVery low[18]3 ind
Red-breasted merganserMergus serratorWintering, migrantObligatoryVery low[19] 10 ind
SmewMergellus albellusWintering, migrantObligatoryLow[20] 30 ind
Red-throated loonGavia stellataWintering, migrantObligatoryNo[21,22]1 ind
Black-throated loonGavia arcticaWintering, migrantObligatoryNo[22]3 ind.
Great crested grebePodiceps cristatusResidentObligatoryLow[23] 8000 ind.
Red-necked grebePodiceps grisegenaMigrantFacultativeNo[24]5 ind
Little grebeTachybaptus ruficollisResidentFacultativeVery low[25]700 ind.
Black-necked grebePodiceps nigricollisWintering, migrantObligatoryNoVM, ID, DD, personal data50 ind.
Horned grebePodiceps auritusWintering, migrantObligatoryNo[26]1 ind.
Great white pelicanPelecanus onocrotalus Wintering, migrantObligatoryModerate[27] 10,000 ind.
Dalmatian pelicanPelecanus crispusWintering, migrantObligatoryLow[28] 1300 ind.
Great cormorantPhalacrocorax carboResidentObligatoryModerate[29] 20,000 ind.
Pygmy cormorantMicrocarbo pygmeusResidentObligatoryModerate[30] 16,000 ind.
Purple heronArdea purpureaBreeding, migrantFacultativeNo[31] 15 ind.
Black-crowned night heronNycticorax nycticoraxBreeding, migrantFacultativeLow[32,33,34,35]100 ind.
Great egretArdea albaWintering, migrantFacultativeModerate[36,37,38]1200 ind.
Little egretEgretta garzettaBreeding, migrantFacultativeLow[39] 70 ind.
Eurasian bitternBotaurus stellarisWinteringObligatoryVery low[40] 20 ind.
Squacco heronArdeola ralloidesBreeding, migrantFacultativelow[41]90 ind.
Grey heronArdea cinereaResidentFacultativeModerate[42]200 ind.
White-tailed eagleHaliaeetus albicillaResidentFacultativeVery low[43,44]16 ind.
OspreyPandion haliaetusMigrantObligatoryVery low[45]10 ind.
Black-headed gull Chroicocephalus ridibundusWintering, migrantFacultativeLow[46]5000 ind.
Great black-headed gullIchthyaetus ichthyaetusWintering, migrantObligatoryLow[47]128 ind.
Mediterranean gullLarus melanocephalusMigrantFacultativeNo[48]20 ind.
Slender-billed gullLarus geneiMigrantFacultativeNo[47]400 ind.
Little gullLarus minutusMigrantFacultativeNo[48]300 ind.
Yellow-legged gull Larus michahellisResidentFacultativeLow[49]3500 ind.
Caspian ternHydroprogne caspiaMigrantObligatoryLow[50]85 ind
Black ternChlidonias nigerMigrantExceptionallyVery lowVM, ID, DD,
Personal data
3800 ind.
White-winged ternChlidonias leucopterusMigrantFacultativeLowVM, ID, DD,
Personal data
800 ind.
Whiskered ternChlidonias hybridaMigrantFacultativeLow[51] 1000 ind.
Gull-billed ternGelochelidon niloticaMigrantFacultativeVery low[48]120 ind.
Common ternSterna hirundoBreeding, migrantObligatoryLow[52,53] 300 ind.
Common kingfisher Alcedo atthisResidentObligatoryVery low[54] 20 ind.
Table 2. Non-avian piscivorous vertebrates, which inhabit Mandra Lake (SE Bulgaria) or its vicinity. “Resident” were considered species that inhabited permanently the Mandra Lake; “Sporadic” were considered species that were found only occasionally in Mandra Lake; “Obligatory” were considered species, which rely exclusively on fish in their diet; “Predominantly” were considered species that consume mainly fish, but also consume other prey; “Facultative” were considered species that occasionally feed on fish; “Permanent” were considered local species, which were detected regularly in Mandra lake; “Invasive” were considered non-native species that were detected to inhabit Mandra Lake.
Table 2. Non-avian piscivorous vertebrates, which inhabit Mandra Lake (SE Bulgaria) or its vicinity. “Resident” were considered species that inhabited permanently the Mandra Lake; “Sporadic” were considered species that were found only occasionally in Mandra Lake; “Obligatory” were considered species, which rely exclusively on fish in their diet; “Predominantly” were considered species that consume mainly fish, but also consume other prey; “Facultative” were considered species that occasionally feed on fish; “Permanent” were considered local species, which were detected regularly in Mandra lake; “Invasive” were considered non-native species that were detected to inhabit Mandra Lake.
Vertebrate GroupCommon NameLatin NameResidentPiscivorousPotential Impact on A. mandrensis Data on DietDetected since 2018
FishEuropean welsSilurus glanisResidentObligatoryLow[55] Permanent
FishEuropean perchPerca fluviatilisResidentFacultativeModerate[56,57,58,59] Permanent
FishPike-perch Sander luciopercaResidentObligatroryModerate[60,61,62]Permanent
FishNorthern pikeEsox luciusResidentObligatoryModerate[63,64,65,66]Permanent
FishEurasian ruffeGymnocephalus cernuusResidentFacultativeVery lowData DeficiencyInvasive,
detected in 2002 and 2022
FishJaguar cichlidParachromis managuensisSporadicObligatoryVery low[67] Invasive, detected in 2023
FishLargemouth bassMicropterus salmoidesResident?ObligatoryHigh[68]Invasive, detected in 2022, 2023
Reptile (Turtle)Red-eared slider complexTrachemys scryptaResidentFacultativeVery low[69] Invasive,
Detected 2018–2023
Reptile (Snake)Grass snakeNatrix natrixResidentFacultativeVery low[70] Permanent
Reptile (Snake)Dice snakeNatrix tessellataResidentPredominantlyLow[70] Permanent
MammalEuropean otterLutra lutraResidentFacultativeVery low[71,72] Permanent
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dimitrov, D.; Stefanov, T.R.; Mladenov, V.; Dimchev, I.; Valkanov, K.; Kolev, N.; Natchev, N. Piscivorous Vertebrates That May Pose a Risk to the Critically Endangered Mandra Shemaya, Alburnus mandrensis (Drensky, 1943) (Actinopterygii; Leuciscidae). Diversity 2024, 16, 555. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16090555

AMA Style

Dimitrov D, Stefanov TR, Mladenov V, Dimchev I, Valkanov K, Kolev N, Natchev N. Piscivorous Vertebrates That May Pose a Risk to the Critically Endangered Mandra Shemaya, Alburnus mandrensis (Drensky, 1943) (Actinopterygii; Leuciscidae). Diversity. 2024; 16(9):555. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16090555

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dimitrov, Dimitar, Tihomir R. Stefanov, Vladimir Mladenov, Ivaylo Dimchev, Kiril Valkanov, Nikolay Kolev, and Nikolay Natchev. 2024. "Piscivorous Vertebrates That May Pose a Risk to the Critically Endangered Mandra Shemaya, Alburnus mandrensis (Drensky, 1943) (Actinopterygii; Leuciscidae)" Diversity 16, no. 9: 555. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16090555

APA Style

Dimitrov, D., Stefanov, T. R., Mladenov, V., Dimchev, I., Valkanov, K., Kolev, N., & Natchev, N. (2024). Piscivorous Vertebrates That May Pose a Risk to the Critically Endangered Mandra Shemaya, Alburnus mandrensis (Drensky, 1943) (Actinopterygii; Leuciscidae). Diversity, 16(9), 555. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16090555

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop