Next Article in Journal
Soil Horizons Harbor Differing Fungal Communities
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of Univariate Diversity Metrics to the Study of the Population Ecology of the Lizard Lacerta bilineata in an Ecotonal Habitat
Previous Article in Journal
Marine Crabs of Guinea-Bissau, with Emphasis on the Deep Fauna, Supported by an Integrative Taxonomy
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Review of Ixodid Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) Associated with Lacerta spp. (Reptilia: Lacertidae) from the Caucasus and Adjacent Territory
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Detection of Glacial Refugia and Post-Glacial Colonization Routes of Morphologically Cryptic Marsh Frog Species (Anura: Ranidae: Pelophylax) Using Environmental Niche Modeling

by
Spartak N. Litvinchuk
1,*,
Dmitriy V. Skorinov
1,
Alexander Yu. Ivanov
2 and
Oleg A. Ermakov
3
1
Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tikhoretsky pr. 4, 194064 St. Petersburg, Russia
2
Department of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, Penza State University, 40 Krasnaya Street, 440026 Penza, Russia
3
Department of Zoology and Ecology, Penza State University, 40 Krasnaya Street, 440026 Penza, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2024, 16(2), 94; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16020094
Submission received: 26 December 2023 / Revised: 25 January 2024 / Accepted: 28 January 2024 / Published: 1 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Herpetofauna of Eurasia)

Abstract

:
Studying the distribution of morphologically cryptic animal species is always a very difficult task. Because most marsh frog species (the Pelophylax ridibundus complex) are cryptic, we used molecular markers to identify them. Three marsh frog species (P. ridibundus, P. kurtmuelleri and P. cf. bedriagae) inhabit the northern part of Western Palearctic. We created a database of localities and built models of their modern distribution. These models showed that the most suitable habitats are on the north of the Mediterranean region for P. cf. bedriagae, temperate Europe for P. ridibundus, and the Balkan coastal areas for P. kurtmuelleri. The projection of the modern ecological niches under the late-Quaternary climatic conditions showed that the range of P. kurtmuelleri remained largely unchanged during the period, whereas the ranges of P. cf. bedriagae and especially P. ridibundus changed greatly over time. During the Last Glacial Maximum, the presumed range of P. cf. bedriagae covered a relatively large area in the north of the Mediterranean region and the south of European Russia. Glacial refugia of P. ridibundus were apparently located in the northern Balkans, the northern coast of the Black and Azov seas, and possibly in Western Europe. The northward long-distance post-glacial dispersal of P. ridibundus occurred from refugia in the northeastern Balkans and the Black-Azov seas region. Since the Late Pleistocene, suitable habitats for P. cf. bedriagae in southern Russia began to decline, but local habitats for P. ridibundus become more suitable. Therefore, a mosaic of populations consisting of these both species and their hybrids has now been found here.

1. Introduction

Analysis of species distribution is very important for studying the processes of speciation and the formation of ecological niches, as well as their changes under the influence of various environmental factors [1]. Ecological niche models of species distributions are becoming increasingly popular and accurate [2]. They are used to find the most suitable habitats for species and to predict the expansion and contraction of a species’ range under climate change [3,4]. Models have been used to understand the ecological requirements, study niche segregation, and facilitate field work by predicting potential distribution areas and improving their conservation, and for many other purposes [5]. The modeling can also determine the boundaries of both past and future ranges of species [6,7,8]. For example, the question of how the Quaternary glaciations influenced changes in biota is of significant scientific interest, and modeling can reconstruct the dynamics of species distributions in the late Quaternary [9,10,11].
Marsh frogs of the Pelophylax ridibundus complex are a group widespread in the Western Palearctic from northwestern Spain, France, and Great Britain in the west to the Kamchatka peninsula in the east and from the outskirts of St. Petersburg (Russia) in the north to West China, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, North Syria, East Libya, Malta, and Sardinia in the south [12,13,14,15,16]. The frogs inhabit various biotopes including forest, bushland, meadow, forest-steppe, steppe, semi-desert, and desert and survive well in anthropogenic and agricultural landscapes. The complex composition has not yet been sufficiently studied. At the moment, it includes about a dozen described and undescribed taxa. According to phylogenetic relationships and distribution patterns, the complex can be divided into western and eastern groups [17,18]. The western group includes P. ridibundus (Pallas, 1771) and P. kurtmuelleri (Gayda, 1940). The eastern group consists of numerous species and lineages, namely P. cypriensis Plötner, Baier, Akn, Mazepa, Schreiber, Beerli, Litvinchuk, Bilgin, Borkin, and Uzzell, 2012, P. caralitanus (Arikan, 1988), P. cerigensis (Beerli, Hotz, Tunner, Heppich, and Uzzell, 1994), P. persicus (Schneider, 1799), P. terentievi (Mezhzherin, 1992), the Anatolian (“P. cf. bedriagae”), Cilician, Euphrates, Iranian, Balkhash, and Syrdarya lineages [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Because most of these species are morphologically cryptic, boundaries of their ranges are extremely insufficiently studied. A particular difficulty is that various species of the complex are actively introduced into new regions, because they are used for food, as laboratory animals, or carried by tadpoles when water bodies are artificially stocked with fish [24,25,26].
Phylogenetic relationships in this complex have been repeatedly studied [17,18,19,22,27,28,29,30]. However, only one environmental modeling study has been conducted that examined the range changes history of P. kurtmuelleri from the late Pleistocene to the present [31]. However, the main problem with this study was that the analysis was carried out using data on the distribution of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplotypes, which often, due to asymmetric introgression, provide highly distorted data on the position of the species’ range boundaries [32].
High spatial resolution paleoclimate surfaces for global land areas, such as WorldClim [33] and PaleoClim [34], provide a good opportunity for tracing shifts in range boundaries of various species during the late Quaternary. Amphibians and marsh frogs in particular are very suitable subjects for reconstructing their past distribution dynamics using ecological niche modeling because they are strongly associated with suitable terrestrial or semi-aquatic habitats and are not capable of long-distance migrations (like, for example, some birds). Using the method of the multiplex PCR for identification of cryptic marsh frog species, we studied vast areas of the East European Plain to identify patterns of their distribution and revealed here alleles of three marsh frog species (P. ridibundus, P. kurtmuelleri and P. cf. bedriagae). Therefore, the aims of our study were (1) to define recent ranges of these three species and (2) to identify the positions of their glacial refugia and post-glacial colonisation routes, using ecological niche modeling methods.

2. Materials and Methods

We used PCR-based analyses to identify three cryptic marsh frog species. In order to exclude the effect of mtDNA asymmetric introgression, we used only nuclear DNA (nuDNA) data for niche modeling. To determine species-specific nuDNA alleles, we analyzed the intron-1 of the nuclear serum albumin gene (SAI-1) fragments using the methods described by Hauswaldt et al. [35] and Ermakov et al. [36]. In total, we studied 389 specimens from 156 localities. Thus, the total database, including our and previously published nuDNA data, consists of 694 localities (Table S1). As it turned out, 240 populations were of hybrid origin and were excluded from the niche modeling analysis. “Pure” populations (>75% own alleles) were observed in 454 localities: 243 P. cf. bedriagae, 29 P. kurtmuelleri, and 182 P. ridibundus. Invasive populations beyond the native distributional ranges, as well as species and lineages closely related to P. cf. bedriagae (such as P. caralitanus, P. cerigensis, P. persicus, and others) were not included in our modeling analysis.
Studying the distribution of mtDNA haplotypes is very useful for analyzing changes in the past ranges, especially in hybridizing species [37]. Discordant patterns of introgression of mtDNA haplotypes and nuDNA alleles across a hybrid zone were observed in many species [38,39]. A variety of processes (e.g., natural selection associated with the environment or adaptive introgression, sex-biased dispersal, asymmetric reproductive isolation, and stochasticity associated with the increased effects of drift on maternally inherited mtDNA), can explain these discordances [40]. An asymmetric mtDNA introgression can often indicate changes in the position of the hybrid zone in the past. If one hybridizing species displaces another, their hybrid zone will move, and such hybrid zones can move significant distances [41].
We used the method described by Ermakov et al. [36] to separate the mtDNA (fragments of the subunit 1 of the cytochromec-oxidase gene) of P. cf. bedriagae from the other two marsh frog species. To identify haplotypes of P. ridibundus and P. kurtmuelleri, we used an endonuclease restriction analysis [33] or the multiplex PCR of the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2) gene fragments with two species-specific forward primers (for P. ridibundus ND2Pr 5′-TAT AAT CGC GGT GAC TGG GA-3′ and for P. kurtmuelleri ND2Pk 5′-GGG TCA GGC TTG GAT TAA ATT TT-3′) and a single reverse primer (ND2R1 5′-GCT TTT GGG CCC ATA CCC-3′). Summarizing all of our data and the previously published data [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82], the total results included in our database of both the nuclear (nuDNA) and mtDNA gene analyses consisted of 1176 localities and 5234 specimens (Figure 1; Table S1).
As a tissue sample, we used a toe fixed in a 96% alcohol solution. The samples are stored in the tissue collections of the Institute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg, Russia) and the Penza State University (Penza, Russia). For the extraction of DNA, we used the DNA-Extran-2 kit (Syntol, Moscow, Russia); for PCR, we used the 2X Taq M master mix green kit (Alkor Bio, St. Petersburg, Russia). The PCR mixture (50 μL) contained 50–100 ng of DNA, 0.5 μM of each primer, and 25 μL of 2X Taq M master mix green kit. The following method for the amplification ND2 gene species-specific fragments was used: initial denaturation for 15 min at 95 °C, followed by 36 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 64 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension for 10 min at 72 °C. This method allowed receiving PCR products with lengths of 811 bp for P. ridibundus and 431 bp for P. kurtmuelleri. We used an electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gel to determine the differences between amplified species-specific fragments.
To predict ecological niches, current and past (the late-Quaternary) ranges of three marsh frog species, we constructed species distribution models. We applied recent methodological recommendations to compute robust ecological niche models with MaxEnt 3.4.4 [2,83], such as occurrence filtering (with MaxEnt), using multiple combinations of model parameters (features and regularization multipliers), and multiple statistical criteria for model selection.
Altitude and 19 bioclimatic layers representative of the climatic data over ~1950–2000 were extracted from the WorldClim database (http://www.worldclim.org, accessed on 26 June 2023) to build the model under the current climatic conditions. Ten additional layers were considered: the aridity index (Global Aridity and Potential Evapo-Transpiration; http://www.cgiar-csi.org/data/global-aridity-and-pet-database, accessed on 26 June 2023), the global percent of tree coverage (https://github.com/globalmaps/gm_ve_v1, accessed on 26 June 2023), and eight land cover variables (spatial homogeneity of global habitat, broadleaf forests, needle leaf forests, mixed forests and shrubs, and barren, herbaceous, and cultivated vegetation; https://www.earthenv.org/, accessed on 26 June 2023). To consider topography in the model, two landscape layers were calculated with QGIS: terrain roughness and terrain roughness index. Layers had a 30 arc seconds spatial resolution, and all analyses were conducted under the WGS 84 projection with a species-specific mask covering to the area of occurrence of these three marsh frog species and adjacent regions (from 30° N to 63° N and 6° W to 62° E).
Before generating the model, we calculated Pearsons’s correlation coefficients for all pairs of 19 bioclimatic variables using ENMTools [84] to eliminate predictor collinearity. For correlated pairs (|r| > 0.75), we excluded the variable that appeared the least biologically important for marsh frogs. The resulting dataset contained seven bioclimatic variables: Bio 2 (mean diurnal range; °C × 10), Bio 4 (temperature seasonality; CV × 100), Bio 8 (mean temperature of wettest quarter; °C × 10), Bio 9 (mean temperature of driest quarter; °C × 10), Bio 14 (precipitation of driest month; mm), Bio 15 (precipitation seasonality; CV), and Bio 19 (precipitation of coldest quarter; mm). A jackknife analysis was used to estimate the relative contributions of variables to the MaxEnt model.
We ran the MaxEnt for 10 replicates with 30% random test percentage testing. For the calibration, we evaluated models created with distinct regularization multipliers (0.5 to 6 at intervals of 0.5) and feature classes (resulted from all combinations of linear, quadratic, product, threshold, and hinge response types). The number of background points was 20,000. The best parameter settings of statistical significance (partial ROC), predictive power (omission rates E = 5%), and complexity level (AICc) obtained using the R package kuenm [85] were applied to build the models. Additionally, the model performance was evaluated using the Area Under the Curve (AUC; ranging 0–1) and the True Skill Statistic (TSS; ranging from −1 to +1) of the 10-percentile training omission threshold [86]. The ClogLog output format (ranging 0–1) was chosen for processing the resulting maps [87]. The altitudes for each locality were extracted using the QGIS Point Sampling Tool Plugin (https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/pointsamplingtool/, accessed on 26 June 2023).
To project the current ecological niches of three marsh frog species on climate conditions during the late Quaternary, we applied seven sets of uncorrelated bioclimatic layers (Bio 2, Bio 4, Bio 8, Bio 9, Bio 14, Bio 15, and Bio 19) with a 2.5 arc minutes spatial resolution. Bioclimatic layers representative of the climatic data over 4.2–0.3 ka (Late Holocene), 8.3–4.2 ka (Mid Holocene), 11.7–8.3 ka (Early Holocene), 12.9–11.7 ka (Late Pleistocene, Younger Dryas Stadial), 14.7–12.9 ka (Late Pleistocene, Greenland Interstade 1), 17.0–14.7 ka (Late Pleistocene, Heinrich Stadial 1), and ~21 ka (Last Glacial Maximum) were extracted from the PaleoClim database (http://www.paleoclim.org/, accessed on 26 June 2023).

3. Results

3.1. Current Distribution of Water Frog Species

The native range of P. ridibundus covers most of Europe from northeastern Spain and eastern France in the west to the eastern part of the Volga-Kama Region in Russia (Permskiy Kray and Bashkortostan) in the east, and from the ~55–57° N parallel in the north to the northern foothills of the Alps and Balkans, the northern coastal of the Black and Azov seas, and the Volga River delta in the south (Figure 1). Isolated populations are known in the Mangyshlak peninsula (West Kazakhstan), the southern foothills of the Alps (Switzerland) and Bornholm Island (Denmark). The species inhabits plains and foothills (median 113 m a.s.l.) from the Caspian Sea level (−27 m a.s.l.) up to ~1552 m a.s.l. in the French Alps. The majority of localities (98%) are scattered below 1000 m a.s.l.
It is important to note that “alien” nuDNA alleles of P. kurtmuelleri and P. cf. bedriagae were observed almost throughout the entire range of P. ridibundus. Additionally, in many populations of P. ridibundus, we found alien mtDNA haplotypes of various water frog species. Moreover, numerous populations of P. ridibundus in the east were characterized by only P. cf. bedriagae mtDNA haplotypes (Figure 1). Among the populations of P. ridibundus, the amount of nuDNA alleles and mtDNA haplotypes of P. cf. bedriagae was significantly higher in the east than in the west (nuDNA: r = 0.230, df = 1.180, p = 0.002; mtDNA: r = 0.397, df = 1.164, p = 0.000). Additionally, numerous populations of P. ridibundus in Central Europe were characterized by mtDNA haplotypes of P. lessonae (Camerano, 1882). Therefore, the number of these mtDNA haplotypes was significantly greater in the west than in the east (r = 0.369, df = 1.164, p = 0.000). Mitochondrial haplotypes of P. perezi (López-Seoane, 1885) were observed in southwestern populations (Spain) of P. ridibundus only.
The Balkan marsh frog (P. kurtmuelleri) inhabits Greece (except for the easternmost areas), Albania, Macedonia, Montenegro, southern Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and southern Croatia (Figure 1). Isolated populations are known in islands of Croatia, Montenegro, and Greece. The species inhabits foothills from the sea level up to ~802 m a.s.l. (in median 97 m a.s.l.). Most localities (83%) are scattered below 500 m a.s.l. In some cases, nuDNA alleles of the species (3–67%) were observed far beyond the species range within the populations of P. ridibundus (Table S1). For example, such localities were revealed in Russia, Lithuania, Poland, and the Czech Republic. Mitochondrial haplotypes of P. kurtmuelleri were widely scattered through the range of P. ridibundus, and were also found in Thracian populations of P. cf. bedriagae (Table S1).
The native range of P. cf. bedriagae covers the western and northern parts of Turkey and nearby regions of Greece, northwestern Iran, the Caucasus, the Crimea, western Kazakhstan, and some regions in the south of European Russia (Figure 1). Isolated populations are known in the Greek islands. The species was recorded on plains and foothills from the Caspian Sea level up to ~2273 m a.s.l. in Turkey (median 359 m a.s.l.). The majority of the localities (82%) were scattered below 1500 m a.s.l. Several populations of the species were revealed in Ukraine and Russia, far beyond the species range (Table S1).
High admixtures of P. cf. bedriagae and “P. ridibundus” nuDNA alleles were observed in the southern part of the P. cf. bedriagae range in Turkey (Figure 1), but it should be noted that P. caralitanus and the Euphrates lineage are characterized by a presence of the same SAI-1 alleles as P. ridibundus. Also we revealed that among populations of P. cf. bedriagae, the amount of nuDNA alleles and mtDNA haplotypes of P. ridibundus was significantly higher in the north than in the south (nuDNA: r = 0.172, df = 1.241, p = 0.007; mtDNA: r = 0.141, df = 1.241, p = 0.028). Mitochondrial haplotypes of P. kurtmuelleri were only found in the north and west parts of the P. cf. bedriagae range, but P. cerigensis, P. caralitanus, P. persicus, and the Euphrates and Cilician lineages were observed in south only (Figure 1; Table S1).

3.2. Distribution Modeling of Species under the Current Environmental Conditions

To calibrate models, we assessed 372 replicates for each species. All of them were statistically significant when compared with a null model of random prediction. Of these significant models, no model met the omission criterion of 5%, and only a single (P. cf. bedriagae) model and two (P. kurtmuelleri) or three (P. ridibundus) models were statistically significant among the models meeting AICc criteria. Performance metrics for the parameter settings used for creating the final models are given in Table S2. Barren land, mean temperature of driest quarter (Bio 9), and mean temperature of wettest quarter (Bio 8) were the variables with the highest percentage contributions (39%, 31%, and 11%, respectively) among the parameters included in the P. cf. bedriagae model. The average AUC and TSS evaluations were 0.881 (SD = 0.014) and 0.419 (SD = 0.070) indicating a good predictive power of the final model. Of the parameters included in the P. ridibundus model, precipitation of driest month (Bio 14), habitat homogeneity, and cultivated vegetation were the variables with the highest percentage contributions (24%, 20%, and 16%, respectively). The average AUC and TSS evaluations were 0.918 (SD = 0.010) and 0.529 (SD = 0.028) indicating a high predictive power of the final model. Precipitation of the coldest quarter (Bio 19), mean temperature of driest quarter (Bio 9), and barren land were the variables with the highest percentage contributions (37%, 20%, and 12%, respectively) in the P. kurtmuelleri model. The average AUC and TSS evaluations were 0.981 (SD = 0.008) and 0.781 (SD = 0.076), indicating a high predictive power of the final model.
The averages of the selected model for P. cf. bedriagae identified areas with high levels of suitability across the Balkan, Anatolian, and Crimea peninsulas; most Mediterranean islands; the Caucasus; northern Iran; and some regions in the south of European Russia and northwestern Kazakhstan (Figure 2A). Some regions were also quite suitable (e.g., in North Africa, Western Europe, the Apennine peninsula, and Middle Asia), but native populations of the species were absent here. The suitability of habitats for P. cf. bedriagae declined toward the temperate zone of Europe. The model for P. ridibundus, in contrast, identified suitable areas in temperate Europe, as well as some regions in north of the Apennine, Balkan, and Crimea peninsulas and the Caucasus (Figure 2B). The model for P. kurtmuelleri identified suitable areas across the Balkan peninsula (Figure 2C). Some additional areas (e.g., in North Africa; Western Europe; the Apennine, Anatolian and Crimea peninsulas; most Mediterranean islands; the Caucasus; and North Iran), where native populations of P. kurtmuelleri are currently absent, displayed suitable habitats as well.

3.3. Distribution of Species at the Late-Quaternary

In order to consistently analyze shifts in the past range boundaries of three marsh frog species, we used projections of modern ecological niches onto climatic conditions of the late Quaternary. The presumed range of P. cf. bedriagae covered a relatively large territory during the Last Glacial Maximum (~21 ka), mostly coinciding with the recent range of the species’ distribution (Figure 3). In addition, the species appears to have been more widely distributed in the Eastern Balkans, and areas with suitable conditions were even located along the Po River valley and the dry bottom of the northern Adriatic. During warming at the end of the late Pleistocene (17.0–11.7 ka), suitable areas for P. cf. bedriagae strongly contracted in the Caucasus but expanded in the western Balkans, Apennines, and even Western Europe (Figure 3). In the Holocene, the situation began to change in the opposite direction. The potential range of P. cf. bedriagae in the west shrank, but in the east, the species’ distribution became wider. In general, however, in the Holocene the boundaries of the range have not changed much.
During the Last Glacial Maximum (~21 ka) the presumed range of P. ridibundus covered the northern Balkans, the northern Black-Azov seas region, the western Caucasus, and the south of European Russia, as well as perhaps some areas in Western Europe (Figure 4). During the warmer Heinrich Stadial 1 (17.0–14.7 ka), the presumed range limits of P. ridibundus were further reduced and covered only some areas in France, the northern Adriatic, the northern Balkans, and the northern Black-Azov Sea region (Figure 4). However, the northward expansion of species (especially in the Azov Sea region) already began at the end of the Pleistocene (14.7–11.7 ka). Since the beginning of the Holocene (11.7 ka), the range of P. ridibundus apparently began to rapidly expand northward and reached its recent margins around the border of the early and mid-Holocene (8.3 ka).
During the late Quaternary, the presumed range of P. kurtmuelleri was located in the Balkan coastal areas and remained largely unchanged during the period (Figure 5). Apparently, only the degree of habitat suitability in eastern Greece and the Dinaric Alps has changed repeatedly.

4. Discussion

The recent range of P. ridibundus extends over a vast territory of temperate Europe (Figure 1). However, it should be noted that in many populations of the species, the introgression of nuDNA genes of closely related P. cf. bedriagae and P. kurtmuelleri was observed (Table S1). This may be due to the spread of nuDNA genes from populations located near hybrid zones and recent human-mediated introductions (over the whole range). In some regions, the widespread mtDNA introgression of P. lessonae and P. perezi genes has been observed and associated with the participation of local P. ridibundus in the hemiclonal reproduction of hybridogenous species, such as P. esculentus (Linnaeus, 1758) and P. grafi (Crochet, Dubois, Ohler, and Tunner, 1995), respectively [12,62]. Moreover, the emergence of some isolated populations of P. ridibundus outside the main species range (e.g., southern Switzerland) may be associated with hybridolysis in the P. esculentus populations [26,75].
In some parts of the range of P. ridibundus, we did not find own mtDNA, but only alien mtDNA (Figure 1; Table S1). For example, populations of the species in Kaliningrad province (the Baltic part of Russia) were characterized by only mtDNA haplotypes of P. lessonae and P. kurtmuelleri. It is important to note that the native range of P. kurtmuelleri is many hundreds of kilometers away from this area. This situation is likely related to the post-glacial expansion into the region of refugee populations of P. ridibundus, which are characterized by P. kurtmuelleri mtDNA. Most likely, such refugee populations of P. ridibundus were located in the northern Balkans. This assumption is also supported by our niche modeling data, which show that the Balkans were suitable for the habitat of P. ridibundus and P. kurtmuelleri in the Last Glacial Maximum and the end of the late Pleistocene (Figure 4). At the Younger Dryas Stadial (12.9–11.7 ka), the refugee populations of P. ridibundus could have spread north along the Carpathians, reaching the Baltic Region at the Early Holocene (Figure 6). Additional evidence of this post-glacial dispersal of P. ridibundus is provided by Early Holocene paleontological records in Moldova and western Ukraine [88]. The paleontological records dating from the end of Early Holocene are also known from northern Germany [89,90,91]. A similar post-glacial colonization route was considered for green toads of the genus Bufotes Rafinesque, 1815 [32,92].
On the other side, nuDNA alleles of P. cf. bedriagae are particularly widespread in Moldova, Ukraine, and Russia (Figure 1; Table S1), which is difficult to explain through recent human-mediated introductions. These regions are quite far north from the hybrid zones of P. ridibundus and P. cf. bedriagae in the Balkans, Crimea, and southern Russia [47,63,93]. This may be due to the post-glacial northward dispersal of marsh frogs along the shores of the Black and Azov seas from refugia located near the hybrid zones of P. ridibundus and P. cf. bedriagae in the north of the Balkans and the south of European Russia [53].
However, we assume that changes in the range boundaries of P. ridibundus and P. cf. bedriagae in the post-glacial period may have had the greatest impact on the recent distribution of nuDNA alleles and mtDNA haplotypes of these species, at least in the east of the P. ridibundus range. This hypothesis is confirmed by the distribution of mtDNA haplotypes. In many populations of P. ridibundus in the east of European Russia, haplotypes of P. cf. bedriagae predominated (Figure 1; Table S1). As a rule, such a situation occurs when one species is gradually replaced by another [41]. Indeed, according to our niche modeling data, refugia of P. cf. bedriagae could be located in the East Balkans, the Anatolian peninsula, the Caucasus, and south of European Russia. However, since the Heinrich Stadial 1 (17.0–14.7 ka) habitats suitable for P. cf. bedriagae in the south of European Russia began to decline (Figure 3) and vice versa; over time, living conditions for P. ridibundus become more suitable (Figure 4). Nevertheless, the process of replacing one species by another apparently did not proceed very quickly, and therefore we can observe mosaics of the populations of both P. ridibundus and P. cf. bedriagae and wide distribution of their hybrids in this region (Figure 1). This trend may be similar to that observed in other hybridizing amphibian species. For example, in tree frogs Hyla arborea (Linnaeus, 1758) and H. orientalis Bedriaga, 1890 hybrid zones located in the refugee zone in the Balkans are much narrower than those located outside them in Poland [10]. Perhaps we see a similar picture in these marsh frogs, where P. ridibundus and P. cf. bedriagae’s Balkan hybrid zone is much narrower than those located in southern Russia [63,93].
The northward post-glacial dispersal of P. kurtmuelleri from the Balkan refugium appears to have been blocked by competition and hybridization with two other marsh frog species living to the north and east. Therefore, the current native range of P. kurtmuelleri has not changed much since the late Pleistocene [31]. However, current human-mediated introductions of P. kurtmuelleri to other regions of southern Europe, some Mediterranean islands, and North Africa [12,24,94,95], which have quite suitable habitats according to our niche modeling analyses (Figure 2), have been very successful.
Although direct paleontological evidence does not yet exist, according to our niche modeling data, in addition to the traditional Mediterranean marsh frog refugia, such as the Balkan and Anatolian peninsulas and the Caucasus, which are common for most Western Palearctic amphibians [96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107], other extra-Mediterranean refugia could also exist [94,108,109,110,111,112]. During the Last Glacial Maximum (~21 ka), the refugee regions in the northern Black-Azov seas region and the south of European Russia were covered by steppe herb-shrub vegetation, with small groves mainly located in ravines [113,114]. Recently, such habitats have been quite suitable for the populations of marsh frogs in the steppes and deserts of southern Russia [115,116].
The existence of extra-Mediterranean refugia is also confirmed by data obtained on other amphibian species. Thus, the presumed refugia of Pelobates vespertinus (Pallas, 1771), Lissotriton vulgaris (Linnaeus, 1758), and Bombina bombina (Linnaeus, 1761) were located in the northern Black Sea region and the south of European Russia [117,118,119,120,121]. The presence of other extra-Mediterranean refugia (e.g., the Carpathians, the Codri Hills, and the Danubian Plain) was also assumed for Triturus cristatus (Laurenti, 1768), T. dobrogicus (Kiritzescu, 1903), Lissotriton vulgaris (Linnaeus, 1758), Lissotriton montandoni (Boulenger, 1880), Pelobates vespertinus (Pallas, 1771), Bombina variegata (Linnaeus, 1758), Rana arvalis Nilsson, 1842, and R. temporaria Linnaeus, 1758 [41,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d16020094/s1, Table S1: Locality data partitioned according to nuDNA composition and mtDNA type (only populations within the native ranges of P. cf. bedriagae, P. kurtmuelleri, and P. ridibundus). Table S2: Performance metrics for parameter settings used for creating the present time model and relative contribution (%) of variables.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.N.L. and O.A.E.; methodology, S.N.L., D.V.S., A.Y.I. and O.A.E.; validation, S.N.L., D.V.S., A.Y.I. and O.A.E.; formal analysis, S.N.L., D.V.S., A.Y.I. and O.A.E.; investigations, S.N.L., D.V.S., A.Y.I. and O.A.E.; resources, S.N.L., D.V.S., A.Y.I. and O.A.E.; data curation, S.N.L., D.V.S., A.Y.I. and O.A.E.; writing—original draft preparation, S.N.L.; writing—review and editing, S.N.L., D.V.S., A.Y.I. and O.A.E.; visualization, S.N.L.; supervision, S.N.L. and O.A.E.; project administration, S.N.L. and O.A.E.; funding acquisition, S.N.L. and O.A.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wiens, J.J. Speciation and ecology revisited: Phylogenetic niche conservatism and the origin of species. Evolution 2004, 58, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sillero, N.; Barbosa, A.M. Common mistakes in ecological niche models. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2021, 35, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wiens, J.A.; Stralberg, D.; Jongsomjit, D.; Howell, C.A.; Snyder, M.A. Niches, models, and climate change: Assessing the assumptions and uncertainties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 19729–19736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Elith, J.; Franklin, J. Species Distribution Modeling. Enc. Biodiv. 2013, 6, 692–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alvarado-Serrano, D.F.; Knowles, L.L. Ecological niche models in phylogeographic studies: Applications, advances and precautions. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2014, 14, 233–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bartlein, P.J.; Hostetler, S.W. Modeling paleoclimates. Dev. Quart. Sci. 2004, 1, 565–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sillero, N.; Carretero, M.A. Modelling the past and future distribution of contracting species. The Iberian lizard Podarcis carbonelli (Squamata: Lacertidae) as a case study. Zool. Anz. J. Comp. Zool. 2013, 252, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. González-Fernández, A.; Manjarrez, J.; García-Vázquez, U.; D’Addario, M.; Sunny, A. Present and future ecological niche modeling of garter snake species from the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. PeerJ 2018, 6, e4618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gassert, F.; Schulte, U.; Husemann, M.; Ulrich, W.; Rödder, D.; Hochkirch, A.; Engel, E.; Meyer, J.; Habel, J.C. From southern refugia to the northern range margin: Genetic population structure of the common wall lizard, Podarcis muralis. J. Biogeogr. 2013, 40, 1475–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dufresnes, C.; Berroneau, M.; Dubey, S.; Litvinchuk, S.N.; Perrin, N. The effect of phylogeographic history on species boundaries: A comparative framework in Hyla tree frogs. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Macaluso, L.; Bertini, A.; Carnevale, G.; Eronen, J.T.; Martinetto, E.; Saarinen, J.; Villa, A.; Capasso, F.; Delfino, M. A combined palaeomodelling approach reveals the role as selective refugia of the Mediterranean peninsulas. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 2023, 625, 111699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Plötner, J. Die Westpaläarktische Wasserfrösche; Laurenti-Verlag: Bielefeld, Germany, 2005; p. 160. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sánchez-Montes, G.; Recuero, E.; Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, J.; Gomez-Mestre, I.; Martínez-Solano, I. Species assignment in the Pelophylax ridibundus × P. perezi hybridogenetic complex based on 16 newly characterised microsatellite markers. Herpetol. J. 2016, 26, 99–108. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lyapkov, S.M.; Ermakov, O.A.; Titov, S.V. Distribution and origin of two forms of the marsh frog Pelophylax ridibundus complex (Anura, Ranidae) from Kamchatka, based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA data. Zool. Zh. 2017, 96, 1384–1391. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jablonski, D.; Wynn, A.; Masroor, R.; Papenfuss, T.; Litvinchuk, S.N.; Mazepa, G. The genus Pelophylax (Amphibia, Ranidae) in Pakistan: Museum collections and possible distribution. Herpetozoa 2021, 34, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Papežík, P.; Sciberras, A.; Benovics, M.; Sciberras, J.; Deidun, A.; Mikulíček, P. Far from Home: Tracing the non-native origin of water frogs (genus Pelophylax) in Malta by molecular markers. Biol. Invasions 2024, preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Akın, C.; Bilgin, C.C.; Beerli, P.; Westaway, R.; Ohst, T.; Litvinchuk, S.N.; Uzzell, T.; Bilgin, M.; Hotz, H.; Guex, G.-D.; et al. Phylogeographic patterns of genetic diversity in eastern Mediterranean water frogs were determined by geological processes and climate change in the Late Cenozoic. J. Biogeogr. 2010, 37, 2111–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Plötner, J.; Baier, F.; Akın, C.; Mazepa, G.; Schreiber, R.; Beerli, P.; Litvinchuk, S.N.; Bilgin, C.C.; Borkin, L.; Uzzell, T. Genetic data reveal that water frogs of Cyprus (genus Pelophylax) are an endemic species of Messinian origin. Zoosyst. Evol. 2012, 88, 261–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bülbül, U.; Matsui, M.; Kutrup, B.; Eto, K. Taxonomic relationships among Turkish water frogs as revealed by phylogenetic analyses using mtDNA gene sequences. Zool. Sci. 2011, 12, 930–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pesarakloo, A.; Rastegar-Pouyani, E.; Rastegar-Pouyani, N.; Kami, H.; Najibzadeh, M.; Khosravani, A.; Oraie, H. The first taxonomic revaluation of the Iranian water frogs of the genus Pelophylax (Anura: Ranidae) using sequences of the mitochondrial genome. Mitochondrial DNA 2017, 28, 392–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dufresnes, C.; Litvinchuk, S.N. Diversity, distribution and molecular species delimitation in frogs and toads from the Eastern Palearctic. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2022, 195, 695–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ualiyeva, D.; Ermakov, O.A.; Litvinchuk, S.N.; Guo, X.; Ivanov, A.Y.; Xu, R.; Li, J.; Xu, F.; Arifulova, I.I.; Kaptyonkina, A.G.; et al. Diversity, phylogenetic relationships and distribution of marsh frogs (the Pelophylax ridibundus complex) from Kazakhstan and Northwest China. Diversity 2022, 14, 869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Safaei-Mahroo, B.; Ghaffari, H.; Niamir, A. A synoptic review of the Amphibians of Iran: Bibliography, taxonomy, synonymy, distribution, conservation status, and identification key to the eggs, larvae, and adults. Zootaxa 2023, 5279, 1–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dufresnes, C.; Denoël, M.; Di Santo, L.; Dubey, S. Multiple uprising invasions of Pelophylax water frogs, potentially inducing a new hybridogenetic complex. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dufresnes, C.; Leuenberger, J.; Amrhein, V.; Bühler, C.; Thiébaud, J.; Bohnenstengel, T.; Dubey, S. Invasion genetics of marsh frogs (Pelophylax ridibundus sensu lato) in Switzerland. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2018, 123, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Litvinchuk, S.N.; Ivanov, A.Y.; Lukonina, S.A.; Ermakov, O.A. A record of alien Pelophylax species and widespread mitochondrial DNA transfer in Kaliningradskaya Oblast’ (the Baltic coast, Russia). BioInvasions Rec. 2020, 9, 599–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Plötner, J.; Ohst, T. New hypotheses on the systematic of the western Palearctic water frog complex (Anura, Ranidae). Mitt. Mus. Zoosystematics Evol. 2001, 77, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lymberakis, P.; Poulakakis, N.; Manthalou, G.; Tsigenopoulos, C.S.; Magoulas, A.; Mylonas, M. Mitochondrial phylogeography of Rana (Pelophylax) populations in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 44, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hofman, S.; Pabijan, M.; Osikowski, A.; Litvinchuk, S.N.; Szymura, J.M. Phylogenetic relationships among four new complete mitogenome sequences of Pelophylax (Amphibia: Anura) from the Balkans and Cyprus. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 2016, 27, 3434–3437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Svinin, A.O.; Dedukh, D.V.; Borkin, L.J.; Ermakov, O.A.; Ivanov, A.Y.; Litvinchuk, J.S.; Zamaletdinov, R.I.; Mikhaylova, R.I.; Trubyanov, A.B.; Skorinov, D.V.; et al. Genetic structure, morphological variation, and gametogenic peculiarities in water frogs (Pelophylax) from northeastern European Russia. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2021, 59, 646–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Papežík, P.; Mikulíček, P.; Benovics, M.; Balogová, M.; Choleva, L.; Doležálková-Kaštánková, M.; Lymberakis, P.; Mizsei, E.; Papežíková, S.; Poulakakis, N.; et al. Comparative mitochondrial phylogeography of water frogs (Ranidae: Pelophylax spp.) from the southwestern Balkans. Vert. Zool. 2023, 73, 525–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dufresnes, C.; Mazepa, G.; Jablonski, D.; Oliveira, R.C.; Wenseleers, T.; Shabanov, D.A.; Auer, M.; Ernst, R.; Koch, C.; Ramírez-Chaves, H.E.; et al. Fifteen shades of green: The evolution of Bufotes toads revisited. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2019, 141, 106615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fick, S.E.; Hijmans, R.J. WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2017, 37, 4302–4315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Brown, J.L.; Hill, D.J.; Dolan, A.M.; Carnaval, A.C.; Haywood, A.M. PaleoClim, high spatial resolution paleoclimate surfaces for global land areas. Sci. Data 2018, 5, 180254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hauswaldt, J.S.; Höer, M.; Ogielska, M.; Christiansen, D.G.; Dziewulska-Szwajkowska, D.; Czernicka, E.; Vences, M. A simplified molecular method for distinguishing among species and ploidy levels in European water frogs (Pelophylax). Mol. Ecol. Res. 2012, 12, 797–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ermakov, O.; Ivanov, A.; Titov, S.; Svinin, A.; Litvinchuk, S.N. New multiplex PCR method for identification of East European green frog species and their hybrids. Russ. J. Herpetol. 2019, 26, 367–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wielstra, B.; Arntzen, J.W. Exploring the effect of asymmetric mitochondrial DNA introgression on estimating niche divergence in morphologically cryptic species. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Toews, D.P.L.; Brelsford, A. The biogeography of mitochondrial and nuclear discordance in animals. Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21, 3907–3930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sequeira, F.; Bessa-Silva, A.; Tarroso, P.; Sousa-Neves, T.; Vallinoto, M.; Gonçalves, H.; Martínez-Solano, I. Discordant patterns of introgression across a narrow hybrid zone between two cryptic lineages of an Iberian endemic newt. J. Evol. Biol. 2019, 33, 202–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Buggs, R.J.A. Empirical study of hybrid zone movement. Heredity 2007, 99, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wielstra, B.; Burke, T.; Butlin, R.K.; Avcı, A.; Üzüm, N.; Bozkurt, E.; Olgun, K.; Arntzen, J.W. A genomic footprint of hybrid zone movement in crested newts. Evol. Lett. 2017, 1, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Akin Pekşen, Ç. Molecular Evolution and Phylogeography of the Eastern Mediterranean Water Frog (Pelophylax) Complex. Ph.D. Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, 2015; 342p. [Google Scholar]
  43. Plötner, J.; Akın Pekşen, Ç.; Baier, F.; Uzzell, T.; Bilgin, C.C. Genetic evidence for human-mediated introduction of Anatolian water frogs (Pelophylax cf. bedriagae) to Cyprus (Amphibia: Ranidae). Zool. Middle East 2015, 61, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ohst, T. Genetische Einflüsse Allochthoner Wasserfrösche auf Endemische Wasserfroschpopulationen (R. kl. esculenta Komplex). Ph.D. Thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2008; p. 126. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ermakov, O.A.; Simonov, E.P.; Ivanov, A.J.; Zamaletdinov, R.I.; Fayzulin, A.I. Genetic characteristics of marsh frog (Pelophylax ridibundus complex) from the Western Caucasus based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA data. Мoлекулярная генетика гидрoбиoнтoв/[oтв. ред. БА Лёвин].–Ярoславль: Филигрань, 2016.–78 с.–(РАН, Институт биoлoгии внутренних вoд им. ИД Папанина. Труды; вып. 2016, 73, 70–76. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  46. Dubey, S.; Dufresnes, C. An extinct vertebrate preserved by its living hybridogenetic descendant. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kukushkin, O.V.; Ivanov, A.Y.; Ermakov, O.A. Genetic heterogeneity of the marsh frog (Pelophylax (ridibundus) complex; Anura, Ranidae) population in Crimea revealed by mitochondrial and nuclear DNA analyses. Univ. Proc. Volga Reg. Nat. Sci. Zool. Penza 2018, 3, 32–54. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Faizulin, A.I.; Kukushkin, O.V.; Ivanov, A.Y.; Ermakov, O.A. Preliminary data on the molecular genetic structure of Pelophylax ridibundus (Amphibia: Anura: Ranidae) from the southern part of the Crimean Peninsula, based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA analysis. Curr. Stud. Herpetol. 2017, 17, 56–65. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Plötner, J.; Köhler, F.; Uzzell, T.; Beerli, P.; Schreiber, R.; Guex, G.-D.; Hotz, H. Evolution of serum albumin intron-1 is shaped by a 50 truncated non-long terminal repeat retrotransposon in western Palearctic water frogs (Neobatrachia). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009, 53, 784–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ermakov, O.A.; Fayzulin, A.I.; Askenderov, A.D.; Ivanov, A.J. Molecular-genetic characteristics of marsh frog from the Republic of Dagestan (based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA data). Izv. Samarskogo Nauchnogo Tsentra Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk 2016, 18, 94–97. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  51. Ivanov, A.Y.; Korzikov, V.A.; Alekseev, S.K.; Ermakov, O.A. Molecular and genetic characteristic of marsh frogs of Pelophylax ridibundus s.l. from Top Poochye. In Modern Problems of Zoology, Ecology and Conservancy; Ostapenko, V.A., Ed.; Selskokhozyaystvennye Tekhnologii: Moscow, Russia, 2015; pp. 228–232. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  52. Veith, M.; Kosuch, J.; Vences, M. Climatic oscillations triggered post-Messinian speciation of Western Palearctic brown frogs (Amphibia, Ranidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 26, 310–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Litvinchuk, S.N.; Matiushova, M.I.; Bezman-Moseyko, O.S.; Lada, G.A.; Skorinov, D.V.; Rosanov, J.M.; Borkin, L.J. Distribution, population systems, and peculiarities of hybrid gametogenesis in water frogs (Pelophylax esculentus complex) in the Dniester River valley (Moldova). Russ. J. Herpetol. 2023, 30, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Barkhatov, A.S.; Snegin, E.A. Identification of cryptic forms of the hybridogenic complex of European water frogs (Pelophylax esculentus complex) in the conditions of transformed biotopes of the south of the Central Russian Upland based on DNA markers. Ecol. Genet. 2022, 20, 247–260. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Snegin, E.; Barkhatov, A.; Sychev, A.; Snegina, E. Species composition of green frogs (Pelophylax esculentus complex) of the Belgorod agglomeration based on DNA markers. BIO Web Conf. 2021, 30, 04008. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ermakov, O.A.; Zaks, M.M.; Titov, S.V. Diagnostics and distribution of “western” and “eastern” forms of marsh frog Pelophylax ridibundus s. l. in the Penza province (on data of analysis of mtDNA cytochrome oxidase gene). Vestn. Tambov St. Univ. 2013, 18, 2999–3002. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  57. Vershinin, V.L.; Sitnikova, I.A.; Vershinina, S.D.; Trofimov, A.G.; Lebedinsky, A.A.; Miura, I.J. Mitochondrial heteroplasmia in marsh frog (Pelophylax ridibundus Pallas, 1771). Genetica Moscow 2019, 55, 972–977. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  58. Miura, I.; Vershinin, V.; Vershinina, S.; Lebedinskii, A.; Trofimov, A.; Sitnikov, I.; Ito, M. Hybridogenesis in the water frogs from western Russian territory: Intrapopulation variation in genome elimination. Genes 2021, 12, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kolenda, K.; Pietras-Lebioda, A.; Hofman, S.; Ogielska, M.; Pabijan, M. Preliminary genetic data suggest the occurrence of the Balkan water frog, Pelophylax kurtmuelleri, in southwestern Poland. Amphib.-Reptil. 2017, 38, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bellati, A.; Chiocchio, A.; Razzetti, E.; Bisconti, R.; Canestrelli, D. A hotchpotch of water frogs in northern Italy. Biol. Invasions 2023, 25, 2737–2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zimić, A.; Vrhovac, B.; Šunje, E.; Ćurić, A.; Kalamujić Stroil, B. Molecular identification of green frogs (Anura: Ranidae: Pelophylax) of Western Balkans (Bosnia & Herzegovina and Montenegro). In Symposium of Biologists and Ecologists of Republic of Srpska with International Participation—SBERS2020; Jojić, D., Ed.; University of Banja Luka: Banja Luka, Herzegovina, 2020; pp. 152+presentation. [Google Scholar]
  62. Plötner, J.; Uzzell, T.; Beerli, P.; Spolsky, C.; Ohst, T.; Litvinchuk, S.N.; Guex, G.-D.; Reyer, H.-U.; Hotz, H. Widespread unidirectional transfer of mitochondrial DNA: A case in western Palaearctic water frogs. J. Evol. Biol. 2008, 21, 668–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hotz, H.; Beerli, P.; Uzzell, T.; Guex, G.-D.; Pruvost, N.B.M.; Schreiber, R.; Plötner, J. Balancing a cline by influx of migrants: A genetic transition in water frogs of eastern Greece. J. Hered. 2013, 104, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Vucić, M.; Jelić, D.; Klobučar, G.I.V.; Prkljačić, B.; Jelić, M. Molecular identification of species and hybrids of water frogs (genus Pelophylax) from Lake Skadar, Southeast Adriatic drainages (Amphibia: Ranidae). Salamandra 2018, 54, 147–157. [Google Scholar]
  65. Jelić, M.; Franjević, D.; Džikić, D.; Korlević, P.; Vucić, M.; Jelić, D.; Becking, T.; Grandjean, F.; Klobučar, G. Hybrid swarm as a result of hybridization between two alien and two native water frog species (genus Pelophylax) in Central Croatia: Crna Mlaka fishpond acting as a species melting pot? Biol. Invasions 2022, 24, 3291–3304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Doležálková-Kaštánková, M.; Pyszko, P.; Choleva, L. Early development survival of Pelophylax water frog progeny is primarily affected by paternal genomic input. Front. Biosci. 2022, 27, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Mayer, M.; Hawlitschek, O.; Zahn, A.; Glaw, F. Composition of twenty green frog populations (Pelophylax) across Bavaria, Germany. Salamandra 2013, 49, 31–44. [Google Scholar]
  68. Hawlitschek, O.; Morinière, J.; Dunz, A.; Franzen, M.; Rödder, D.; Glaw, F.; Haszprunar, G. Comprehensive DNA barcoding of the herpetofauna of Germany. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2015, 16, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Herczeg, D.; Vörös, J.; Christiansen, D.G.; Benovics, M.; Mikulíček, P. Taxonomic composition and ploidy level among European water frogs (Anura: Ranidae: Pelophylax) in eastern Hungary. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2017, 55, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Weigand, H.; Lopez de Llergo, J.C.; Frantz, A.C. Genomic basis for an informed conservation management of Pelophylax water frogs in Luxembourg. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 12, e8810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Hoffmann, A.; Plötner, J.; Pruvost, N.B.M.; Christiansen, D.G.; Röthlisberger, S.; Choleva, L.; Mikulíček, P.; Cogălniceanu, D.; Sas-Kovács, I.; Shabanov, D.; et al. Genetic diversity and distribution patterns of diploid and polyploid hybrid water frog populations (Pelophylax esculentus complex) across Europe. Mol. Ecol. 2015, 24, 4371–4391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ermakov, O.A.; Fayzulin, A.I.; Zaks, M.M.; Kaybeleva, E.I.; Zaripova, F.F. Distribution «western» and «eastern» forms of marsh frog Pelophylax ridibundus s. l. in the Samara and Saratov region (on data of analysis of mtDNA and nDNA). Izvestiya Samarskogo Nauchnogo Tsentra Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk 2014, 16, 409–412. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  73. Zamaletdinov, R.I.; Pavlov, A.V.; Zaks, M.M.; Ivanov, A.Y.; Ermakov, O.A. Molecular-genetic characteristic of Pelophylax esculentus complex from the eastern range of distribution (Volga region, Tatarstan Republic). Vest. Tambov St. Univ. Biol. 2015, 3, 54–66. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Svinin, A.O.; Ivanov, A.Y.; Zaks, M.M.; Litvinchuk, S.N.; Borkin, L.J.; Rosanov, J.M.; Ermakov, O.A. Distribution of the “eastern” and “western” forms of the marsh frog, Pelophylax ridibundus, and their participation in the origin of hemiclonal hybrids, P. esculentus in Mari El Republic. Curr. Stud. Herpetol. 2015, 15, 120–129. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  75. Dubey, S.; Maddalena, T.; Bonny, L.; Jeffries, D.L.; Dufresnes, C. Population genomics of an exceptional hybridogenetic system of Pelophylax water frogs. BMC Evol. Biol. 2019, 19, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Matson, C.W.; Lambert, M.M.; McDonald, T.J.; Autenrieth, R.L.; Donnelly, K.C.; Islamzadeh, A.; Politov, D.I.; Bickham, J.W. Evolutionary toxicology: Population-level effects of chronic contaminant exposure on the marsh frogs (Rana ridibunda) of Azerbaijan. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Holsbeek, G.; Mergeay, J.; Hotz, H.; Plötner, J.; Volckaert, F.A.M.; De Meester, L. A cryptic invasion within an invasion and widespread introgression in the European water frog complex: Consequences of uncontrolled commercial trade and weak international legislation. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17, 5023–5035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Doležálková-Kaštánková, M.; Pruvost, N.B.M.; Plötner, J.; Reyer, H.-U.; Janko, K.; Choleva, L. All-male hybrids of a tetrapod Pelophylax esculentus share its origin and genetics of maintenance. Biol. Sex Diff. 2018, 9, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Zangl, L.; Daill, D.; Schweiger, S.; Gassner, G.; Koblmüller, S. A reference DNA barcode library for Austrian amphibians and reptiles. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0229353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Holsbeek, G.; Maes, G.E.; De Meester, L.; Volckaert, F.A.M. Conservation of the introgressed European water frog complex using molecular tools. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18, 1071–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Mikulíček, P.; Kautman, M.; Demovič, B.; Janko, K. When a clonal genome finds its way back to a sexual species: Evidence from ongoing but rare introgression in the hybridogenetic water frog complex. J. Evol. Biol. 2014, 27, 628–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Dubey, S.; Leuenberger, J.; Perrin, N. Multiple origins of invasive and ‘native’ water frogs (Pelophylax spp.) in Switzerland. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2014, 112, 442–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Phillips, S.J.; Anderson, R.P.; Schapire, R.E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 2006, 190, 231–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Warren, D.L.; Glor, R.E.; Turelli, M. ENMTools: A toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography 2010, 33, 607–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Cobos, M.E.; Peterson, A.T.; Barve, N.; Osorio-Olvera, L. kuenm: An R package for detailed development of ecological niche models using Maxent. PeerJ 2019, 7, e6281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Allouche, O.; Tsoar, A.; Kadmon, R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 43, 1223–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Phillips, S.J.; Anderson, R.P.; Dudík, M.; Schapire, R.E.; Blair, M.E. Opening the black box: An open-source release of Maxent. Ecography 2017, 40, 887–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ratnikov, V.Y. Fossil remains of modern amphibian and reptile species as the material for studying of their areas history. Tr. Nauchno-Issledovatel’skogo Instituta Geol. Voronezhskogo Gos. Univ. Voronezh 2009, 59, 1–91. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  89. Böhme, G.; Günther, R. Osteological studies in the European water frogs Rana ridibunda, Rana lessonae and Ranaesculenta” (Anura, Ranidae). Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin 1979, 55, 203–215. [Google Scholar]
  90. Böhme, G. Skelettreste von Amphibien (Urodela, Salenia) aus dem fossilen Tierbautensystem von Pisede bei Malchin. Teil 1: Taxonomie und Biostrationomie. Wissenschaft. Zeitschr. Humbolt-Univer. Berlin Math.-Nat. R. 1983, 32, 657–670. [Google Scholar]
  91. Böhme, G. Skelettreste von Amphibien (Urodela, Salenia) aus dem fossilen Tierbautensystem von Pisede bei Malchin. Teil 2: Palaookologische und faunengeschichtliche Auswertung. Wissenschaft. Zeitschr. Humbolt-Univer. Berlin Math.-Nat. R. 1983, 32, 671–680. [Google Scholar]
  92. Höglund, J.; Bolender, L.; Cortazar-Chinarro, M.; Meurling, S.; Laurila, A.; Hermaniuk, A.; Dufresnes, C. Low neutral and immunogenetic diversity in northern fringe populations of the green toad Bufotes viridis: Implications for conservation. Conserv. Genet. 2022, 23, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sagonas, K.; Karameta, E.; Kotsakiozi, P.; Poulakakis, N. Cross-species testing of nuclear markers in Pelophylax water frogs in Greece and examination of their power to detect genetic admixture. Amphib.-Reptil. 2020, 41, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bellati, A.; Razzetti, E.; Resteghini, M.; Sacchi, R.; Pellitteri-Rosa, D.; Casiraghi, M.; Bernini, F.; Galeotti, P.; Fasola, M. First molecular characterization of invasive alien populations of Pelophylax kurtmuelleri (Gayda, 1940) and new records from Italy. In Atti IX Congresso Nazionale della Societas Herpetologica Italica; Scillitani, G., Liuzzi, C., Lorusso, L., Mastropasqua, F., Ventrella, P., Eds.; Pineta: Conversano, Italy, 2013; pp. 287–289. [Google Scholar]
  95. Bellati, A.; Bassu, L.; Nulchis, V.; Corti, C. Detection of alien Pelophylax species in Sardinia (western Mediterranean, Italy). BioInvasions Rec. 2019, 8, 8–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hewitt, G.M. Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1996, 58, 247–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hewitt, G. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 2000, 405, 907–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Hewitt, G.M. Speciation, hybrid zones and phylogeography—Or seeing genes in space and time. Mol. Ecol. 2001, 10, 537–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Hewitt, G.M. Quaternary phylogeography: The roots of hybrid zones. Genetica 2011, 139, 617–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Taberlet, P.; Cheddadi, R. Quaternary refugia and persistence of biodiversity. Science 2002, 297, 2009–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Taberlet, P.; Fumagalli, L.; Wust-Saucy, A.-G.; Cosson, J.-F. Comparative phylogeography and post-glacial colonization route in Europe. Mol. Ecol. 1998, 7, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Petit, R.J.; Aguinagalde, I.; de Beaulieu, J.-L.; Bittkau, C.; Brewer, S.; Cheddadi, R.; Ennos, R.; Fineschi, S.; Grivet, D.; Lascoux, M.; et al. Glacial refugia: Hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity. Science 2003, 300, 1563–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Schmitt, T. Molecular biogeography of Europe: Pleistocene cycles and post-glacial trends. Front. Zool. 2007, 4, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Bhagwat, S.A.; Willis, K.J. Species persistence in northerly glacial refugia of Europe: A matter of chance or biogeographical traits? J. Biogeogr. 2008, 35, 464–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Habel, J.C.; Drees, C.; Schmitt, T.; Assmann, T. Review refugial areas and post-glacial colonizations in the Western Palearctic. In Relict Species: Phylogeography and Conservation Biology; Habel, J.C., Assmann, T., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 189–197. [Google Scholar]
  106. Nève, G.; Verlaque, R. Genetic differentiation between and among refugia. In Relict Species: Phylogeography and Conservation Biology; Habel, J.C., Assmann, T., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 277–294. [Google Scholar]
  107. Feliner, G.N. Southern European glacial refugia: A tale of tales. Taxon 2011, 60, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Provan, J.; Bennett, K.D. Phylogeographic insights into cryptic glacial refugia. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23, 564–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Schmitt, T. Biogeographical and evolutionary importance of the European high mountain systems. Front. Zool. 2009, 6, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Stewart, J.R.; Lister, A.M.; Barnes, I.; Dalén, L. Refugia revisited: Individualistic responses of species in space and time. Proc. R. Soc. B 2010, 277, 661–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Varga, Z. Extra-Mediterranean refugia, post-glacial vegetation history and area dynamics in Eastern Central Europe. In Relict Species: Phylogeography and Conservation Biology; Habel, J.C., Assmann, T., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 57–87. [Google Scholar]
  112. Ratnikov, V. Do northern species of amphibians and reptiles of Eurasia need southern refugia? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Grichuk, V.P. Vegetation of Europe in the Late Pleistocene. In Paleogeography of Europe for the Last 100 Thousand Years; Gerasimov, I.P., Velichko, A.A., Eds.; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1982; pp. 92–109. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  114. Allen, J.R.M.; Hickler, T.; Singarayer, J.S.; Sykes, M.T.; Valdes, P.J.; Huntley, B. Last glacial vegetation of northern Eurasia. Quart. Sci. Rew. 2010, 29, 2604–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kireev, V.A. Fauna of Kalmykia. Amphibians and Reptiles; Kalmytskoe Knizhnoe Izdatel’stvo: Elista, Russia, 1983; p. 113. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  116. Belik, V. Recourses of Biodiversity of the Steppe Don River Region. Amphibians and Reptiles; Lap Lambert Academic Publishing: Saarbrücken, Germany, 2011; p. 94. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  117. Schmitt, T.; Varga, Z. Extra-Mediterranean refugia: The rule and not the exception? Front. Zool. 2012, 9, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Litvinchuk, S.N.; Crottini, A.; Federici, S.; De Pous, P.; Donaire, D.; Andreone, F.; Kalezić, M.L.; Džukić, G.; Lada, G.A.; Borkin, L.J.; et al. Phylogeographic patterns of genetic diversity in the common spadefoot toad, Pelobates fuscus (Anura: Pelobatidae), reveals evolutionary history, post-glacial range expansion and secondary contact. Organ. Div. Evol. 2013, 13, 433–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Dufresnes, C.; Perrin, N. Effect of biogeographic history on population vulnerability in European amphibians. Conserv. Biol. 2014, 29, 1235–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Skorinov, D.V.; Litvinchuk, S.N. Tracing glacial refugia of the smooth newt (Lissotriton vulgaris) based on species distribution modelling. Vest. St. Petersburg St. Univ. Biol. 2016, 3, 136–143. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Dufresnes, C.; Suchan, T.; Smirnov, N.A.; Denoël, M.; Rosanov, J.M.; Litvinchuk, S.N. Revisiting a speciation classic: Comparative analyses support sharp but leaky transitions between Bombina toads. J. Biogeogr. 2021, 48, 548–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Babik, W.; Branicki, W.; Sandera, M.; Litvinchuk, S.; Borkin, L.J.; Irwin, J.T.; Rafinski, J. Mitochondrial phylogeography of the moor frog, Rana arvalis. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13, 1469–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Roček, Z.; Šandera, M. Distribution of Rana arvalis in Europe: A historical perspective. Zeitschr. Feldherpetol. 2008, Suppl. 13, 135–150. [Google Scholar]
  124. Knopp, T.; Merilä, J. The post-glacial recolonization of Northern Europe by Rana arvalis as revealed by microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA analyses. Heredity 2009, 102, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Litvinchuk, S.N.; Borkin, L.J. Evolution, Systematics and Distribution of Crested Newts (Triturus cristatus complex) in the Territory of Russia and Adjacent Countries; Evropeyskiy dom: St. Petersburg, Russia, 2009; pp. 592+24. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  126. Teacher, A.G.F.; Garner, T.W.J.; Nichols, R.A. European phylogeography of the common frog (Rana temporaria): Routes of post-glacial colonization into the British Isles, and evidence for an Irish glacial refugium. Heredity 2009, 102, 490–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Wielstra, B.; Babik, W.; Arntzen, J.W. The crested newt Triturus cristatus recolonized temperate Eurasia from an extra-Mediterranean glacial refugium. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2015, 114, 574–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Vörös, J.; Mikulíček, P.; Major, A.; Recuero, E.; Arntzen, J.W. Phylogeographic analysis reveals northerly refugia for the riverine amphibian Triturus dobrogicus (Caudata: Salamandridae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 119, 974–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. van Rensburg, A.J.; Robin, M.; Phillips, B.; Buskirk, J.V. European common frog (Rana temporaria) recolonized Switzerland from multiple glacial refugia in northern Italy via trans-and circum-Alpine routes. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 11, 15984–15994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Distribution of alleles (nuDNA) and haplotypes (mtDNA) of water frog species in the Western Palearctic. The range of P. cf. bedriagae is designated by the blue area, P. ridibundus by the red area, and P. kurtmuelleri by the green area. B is P. cf. bedriagae, R is P. ridibundus, K is P. kurtmuelleri, L is P. lessonae, CA is P. caralitanus, CE is P. cerigensis, PE is P. persicus, P is P. perezi, E is the Euphrates lineage, and CI is the Cilician lineage. Pie diameter reflects the sample size. Other details are in Table S1.
Figure 1. Distribution of alleles (nuDNA) and haplotypes (mtDNA) of water frog species in the Western Palearctic. The range of P. cf. bedriagae is designated by the blue area, P. ridibundus by the red area, and P. kurtmuelleri by the green area. B is P. cf. bedriagae, R is P. ridibundus, K is P. kurtmuelleri, L is P. lessonae, CA is P. caralitanus, CE is P. cerigensis, PE is P. persicus, P is P. perezi, E is the Euphrates lineage, and CI is the Cilician lineage. Pie diameter reflects the sample size. Other details are in Table S1.
Diversity 16 00094 g001
Figure 2. Average predictions of suitable areas for Pelophylax cf. bedriagae (A), P. ridibundus (B), and P. kurtmuelleri (C) distributions under the current climate conditions. All areas with red (high suitability), green (medium), and blue (low) colors likely represent suitable environmental conditions. Black dots are the localities of each species used in the construction of ecological niche models.
Figure 2. Average predictions of suitable areas for Pelophylax cf. bedriagae (A), P. ridibundus (B), and P. kurtmuelleri (C) distributions under the current climate conditions. All areas with red (high suitability), green (medium), and blue (low) colors likely represent suitable environmental conditions. Black dots are the localities of each species used in the construction of ecological niche models.
Diversity 16 00094 g002
Figure 3. Predicted suitable regions for Pelophylax cf. bedriagae distribution under the Last Glacial Maximum (~21 ka), the end of the late Pleistocene (17.0–11.7 ka), and the Holocene (11.7–0 ka) climatic conditions. The degrees of habitat suitability (dark is high-suitable, and light is little-suitable) correlates with the intensity of the blue color. Territories covered by glaciers are in grey. The red lines indicate the limits of the current range of the species.
Figure 3. Predicted suitable regions for Pelophylax cf. bedriagae distribution under the Last Glacial Maximum (~21 ka), the end of the late Pleistocene (17.0–11.7 ka), and the Holocene (11.7–0 ka) climatic conditions. The degrees of habitat suitability (dark is high-suitable, and light is little-suitable) correlates with the intensity of the blue color. Territories covered by glaciers are in grey. The red lines indicate the limits of the current range of the species.
Diversity 16 00094 g003
Figure 4. Predicted suitable regions for Pelophylax ridibundus distribution under the Last Glacial Maximum (~21 ka), the end of the late Pleistocene (17.0–11.7 ka), and the Holocene (11.7–0 ka) climatic conditions.
Figure 4. Predicted suitable regions for Pelophylax ridibundus distribution under the Last Glacial Maximum (~21 ka), the end of the late Pleistocene (17.0–11.7 ka), and the Holocene (11.7–0 ka) climatic conditions.
Diversity 16 00094 g004
Figure 5. Predicted suitable regions for Pelophylax kurtmuelleri distribution under the Last Glacial Maximum (~21 ka), the end of the late Pleistocene (17.0–11.7 ka), and the Holocene (11.7–0 ka) climatic conditions.
Figure 5. Predicted suitable regions for Pelophylax kurtmuelleri distribution under the Last Glacial Maximum (~21 ka), the end of the late Pleistocene (17.0–11.7 ka), and the Holocene (11.7–0 ka) climatic conditions.
Diversity 16 00094 g005
Figure 6. Dynamics of the ranges of Pelophylax cf. bedriagae (blue), P. ridibundus (red), and P. kurtmuelleri (green) during the Late-Quaternary. The approximate locations of glacial refugia are designated by darker blue, red and green areas. Routes of post-glacial colonization of P. ridibundus according to the LGM predictions and the distribution of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA markers (Figure 1) are indicated by red arrows. Photo credit: SNL (P. ridibundus from Moscow Province).
Figure 6. Dynamics of the ranges of Pelophylax cf. bedriagae (blue), P. ridibundus (red), and P. kurtmuelleri (green) during the Late-Quaternary. The approximate locations of glacial refugia are designated by darker blue, red and green areas. Routes of post-glacial colonization of P. ridibundus according to the LGM predictions and the distribution of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA markers (Figure 1) are indicated by red arrows. Photo credit: SNL (P. ridibundus from Moscow Province).
Diversity 16 00094 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Litvinchuk, S.N.; Skorinov, D.V.; Ivanov, A.Y.; Ermakov, O.A. Detection of Glacial Refugia and Post-Glacial Colonization Routes of Morphologically Cryptic Marsh Frog Species (Anura: Ranidae: Pelophylax) Using Environmental Niche Modeling. Diversity 2024, 16, 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16020094

AMA Style

Litvinchuk SN, Skorinov DV, Ivanov AY, Ermakov OA. Detection of Glacial Refugia and Post-Glacial Colonization Routes of Morphologically Cryptic Marsh Frog Species (Anura: Ranidae: Pelophylax) Using Environmental Niche Modeling. Diversity. 2024; 16(2):94. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16020094

Chicago/Turabian Style

Litvinchuk, Spartak N., Dmitriy V. Skorinov, Alexander Yu. Ivanov, and Oleg A. Ermakov. 2024. "Detection of Glacial Refugia and Post-Glacial Colonization Routes of Morphologically Cryptic Marsh Frog Species (Anura: Ranidae: Pelophylax) Using Environmental Niche Modeling" Diversity 16, no. 2: 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16020094

APA Style

Litvinchuk, S. N., Skorinov, D. V., Ivanov, A. Y., & Ermakov, O. A. (2024). Detection of Glacial Refugia and Post-Glacial Colonization Routes of Morphologically Cryptic Marsh Frog Species (Anura: Ranidae: Pelophylax) Using Environmental Niche Modeling. Diversity, 16(2), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16020094

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop