Next Article in Journal
Comparative Chloroplast Genome Analysis in High-Yielding Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Aspects in Freshwater Fauna Conservation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Taxonomic Revision of the South African Genus Plastologus Schoenherr, 1842 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Cyclominae) †

by
Michael Košťál
Independent Researcher, Šoporňa 1602, SK-925 52 Šoporňa, Slovakia
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D5999076-3653-486B-9B4F-24B87912177E, urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:83FC1130-0382-44EA-89A0-DE5BC5F412A7, urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4C697FB6-47EC-466F-95EF-BDD03B57A8F1.
Diversity 2024, 16(11), 664; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16110664
Submission received: 26 September 2024 / Revised: 8 October 2024 / Accepted: 10 October 2024 / Published: 29 October 2024

Abstract

:
Plastologus Schoenherr, 1842, hitherto a monotypic genus belonging to the tribe Hipporhinini, is herein revised for the first time. Three species are recognized as valid based on morphological characters, all distributed in southern regions of South Africa. In addition to the type species of the genus, Plastologus costatus Boheman, 1842, the following two species are described as new to the science: P. boroveci Košťál sp. n. and P. punctatus Košťál sp. n.

1. Introduction

The genus Plastologus was described from South Africa in 1842 by Schoenherr [1] reporting P. costatus Boheman, 1842, a species described from “Terra Caffrorum” in the same paper just two pages after the generic description [2], as the type species of the newly described genus. Plastologus was regarded since that time as a monotypic genus, and that fact combined with its rarity has resulted in the absence of material of the genus in collections. Correctly enough, Schoenherr [1], certainly based on Boheman’s note “Gronops generi proximum”, indicated the relationship of Plastologus with Gronops Schoenherr, 1823, i.e., with the today’s subfamily Cyclominae.
Lacordaire [3] mentioned Plastologus under the newly described tribe “Rhytirhinides” [sic], currently Rhythirrinini. Much later, Louw [4], without studying female terminalia, also placed this genus provisionally in the Rhythirrinini. This misplacement was adopted one year later in the world catalogue of weevil supraspecific taxa [5] by Alonso-Zarazaga and Lyal. In 2010, Oberprieler [6], mainly based on the structure of ovipositors, reclassified Cyclominae and placed Plastologus in the tribe Hipporhinini. This placement, albeit with many unclarities, remains valid as recently reconfirmed by Oberprieler [7].
In 2011, 2016, 2019 and 2023, Roman Borovec carried four of his numerous field trips to South Africa focused on the collecting of terricolous weevils, mainly of the subfamily Entiminae. I accompanied him in 2023. The main collecting method during these trips was sifting in arid and semiarid habitats. This method is suitable for obtaining small and medium-sized, often very interesting or new species of not only entimines but also cyclomines. Sifting allowed us to gain a short series of the very rarely collected genus Plastologus. Two species collected during the first three trips turned out to be new to science and are here described. Specimens of P. costatus allowed me to redescribe this species since the holotype of P. costatus is heavily damaged and does not allow for any kind of dissection.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

Thirty-five specimens of this extremely rarely collected genus from both institutional collections and my own or my colleague’s collected material, including the type specimen of Plastologus costatus were studied. Types were designated according to Article 16.4. and 72.4.5. of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature [8].
Data under holotype and paratype specimens are quoted verbatim in their line sequence on the label. Individual labels are indicated in the quoting using the mark “/” separating labels. Label data of non-type specimens examined are cited in an unified style.

2.2. Measurements

All measurements were made using a stereomicroscope Intraco Micro NSZ-810 (Tachlovice, Czech Republic). The body length was interpreted as the distance between the anterior margin of the head capsule and the apex of elytra. The length of the rostrum (Rl) was taken in dorsal view from the line connecting the anterior margin of the head capsule to the apex of the rostrum mandibles excluded. The width of the rostrum (Rw) was taken at the rostrum base. The stoutness of the rostrum was expressed as the ratio length/width (Rl/Rw), the length of the rostrum as the ratio rostrum length/pronotum length (Rl/Pl). The length of the pronotum (Pl) was taken along the midline from its base to its anterior margin, whereas its width was measured transversely at its widest point. The length of elytra (El) was expressed as the distance from the middle of the transverse line joining most anterior points of the elytral base to the elytral apex. The width of elytra (Ew) was taken transversely at their widest point. Elytral proportions were expressed as the ratio El/Ew. The width of the pronotum at its base in comparison to the width of elytra at their base reflects the ratio of the elytral width at their base and the distance between most lateral points of humeri (Ewb/Pwb).

2.3. Descriptions

Redescriptions and descriptions are unified to a maximum extent. In the redescription of the genus, its peculiar character clusters are pointed out, whereas in the redescriptions and descriptions of species, only their distinctive characters are given omitting common characters of the genus already mentioned in the description of the genus.

2.4. Diagnosis

Each species was unequivocally specified by a cluster of characters typical but not necessarily unique to this species.

2.5. Terminology

I followed the online glossary of weevil characters by C.H.C. Lyal [9].

2.6. Biological Notes

As the host plants of almost all Cyclominae are unknown, only the type of habitat and the collecting method could be given.

2.7. Distribution

The distribution of all treated species is reported as the name of the province in South Africa, the locality name, GPS coordinates, and marked on the map of the area of the genus distribution.

2.8. Illustrations

Photos of the habitus were taken with the high resolution camera (Canon EOS 50D, Tokyo, Japan) connected with a macro zoom lens (Canon MP-E 65 mm). Male genitalia were dissected from moisturized specimens, treated for three days in 10% KOH, rinsed in distilled water, and photographed in glycerol with the same camera connected to the laboratory microscope (Intraco Micro LMI T PC, Tachlovice, Czechia). Multilayer pictures were stacked using the software Combine ZP 1.0 and processed by Adobe Photoshop 9.

2.9. Acronyms and Abbreviations

Institutional depositories are abbreviated according to The Insect and Spider Collections of the World Website [10]. Private depositories are abbreviated by four capital letters.

2.10. Depositories

Institutional and private collections housing the material studied are abbreviated as follows:
BMNHThe Natural History Museum, London, UK (M. Barclay);
BMSANational Museum Bloemfontein, Bloemfontein, South Africa (B. Muller);
MKPCMichael Košťál, private collection, Šoporňa, Slovakia;
NHRSNaturhistoriska riksmuseet, Stockholm, Sweden (J. Bergsten);
NMPCNárodní muzeum Praha, Praha, Czech Republic (J. Hájek);
RBPCRoman Borovec, Sloupno, Czech Republic;
TMSADitsong National Museum of Natural History, Pretoria, South Africa (W.P. Strumpher).

2.11. Abbreviations in Descriptions

E = elytra (elytral); Ewb = width of elytra at base; l = length; P = pronotum (pronotal); Pwb = width of pronotum at base; R = rostrum; V1 = ventrite 1; V2 = ventrite 2; V1–2 = ventrites 1 and 2 combined; V3–4 = ventrites 3 and 4 combined; V5 = ventrite 5; w = width; ~ = approximately.

3. Results

3.1. Taxonomy

3.1.1. Plastologus Schoenherr

Plastologus Schoenherr, 1842: 139 [1] (type species: Plastologus costatus Boheman, 1842). Boheman, 1842: 141 [2]. Lacordaire, 1863: 297 [3]. Louw, 1998: 25 [4]. Alonso-Zarazaga and Lyal, 1999: 142 [5]. Oberprieler, 2010: 12 [6]; 2014: 495 [7].
Synonyms. None.

3.1.2. Genus Characteristics

Redescription. Small Hipporhinini, 2.83–3.83 mm long, body subround, elytra at base only slightly wider than pronotum at base (Ewb/Pwb 1.10–1.25). Whole body including legs, rostrum, and venter except for antennae, tarsi, and medial part of head capsule in prosternal emargination covered with confluently, tile-like arranged, irregularly angular, partially imbricate, shiny to semi-shiny adpressed scales of various colors completely concealing integument; head including epifrons, pronotum, and elytra sparsely covered with adpressed to arch-like, elongate (l/w 4–6), shiny black and rarely intermixed white scales being on head and pronotum oriented anteriad, on elytra posteriad.
Rostrum longer than wide (Rl/Rw 1.5–2.1), epifrons with parallel sides, without protuberances above eyes, with two longitudinal carinae separated by medial sulcus being deepest at base, epistome relatively large, with suberect setae, mandibles bi- to oligosetose; scrobes medium long, divergent posteriad, their upper edge running toward middle of eye, lower edge toward lower eye margin. Antennal scape at apex clavate, with two strikingly long, erected spatula-shaped scales, funicle 7-segmented, segment 7 seemingly jointed with club, segment 1 always longer than segments 2–4 combined, segments 2–6 more or less isodiametric, segment 7 markedly transverse, all segments, especially segment 7, with more or less long setae, club spindle-shaped, pubescent, at most with very small setae. Eyes irregularly oval, almost flat.
Pronotum shorter than long, mediobasally with two large bulges separated by deep sulcus, in anterior part with two longitudinal ridges confluent with bulges in basal part, and delineating relatively deep but on bottom flat impression. Sides of pronotum with two very deep lateral and broad longitudinal impressions being at midlength interrupted by thin transverse ribs. Scutellum inapparent.
Elytra subglobose, in lateral view very strongly convex on disc, humeri small, without posthumeral impression. Odd interstriae at least in basal part of elytra vaulted, in apical part convex to flat. Striae formed by rows of anteriorly large and posteriorly smaller deep punctures narrower or as wide as interstriae.
Anterior margin of prosternum deeply emarginated, pre-coxal bridge of about 1/10 of prosternum length, slightly wider than post-coxal bridge, procoxal cavities broadly fused, their diameter usually larger than 0.7 of prosternum length; distance of metacoxal cavities measured from their inner margin about 2.2 × larger than the distance of mesocoxal cavities, mesosternal process flat, transverse, V1 always longer than V2, V5 of approximately same length as V3–4.
Legs robust, especially femora with preapical emargination, inner edge of tibiae sinuate, tarsi conspicuously thin, short, tarsomere 3 at most as wide as long, never widened, claws free, strongly divergent.
Male genitalia with tegmen without parameroid lobes, its diameter of half manubrium length, temones up to 2 × as long as median lobe, internal sack with several sclerites and rich structure. Female genitalia characterized by spermatheca with well developed ramus and nodulus, ovipositor with proximal gonocoxites large, laterally longly narrowly extended anteriad, distal gonocoxites (Figure 1a,b) at apex with several setae, and with long, strong, claw-like, laterally curved sharp styli without setae, sternite VIII (Figure 1c,d) cup-shaped.
Comparative notes. Plastologus is a unique genus in the tribe Hipporhinini. It differs from all other genera of this tribe in its globose, very convex body, elytra in dorsal view almost regularly rounded, without parallel or subparallel sections of their outline, elytral disc in lateral view, especially in females clearly convex. In some extent, this genus might be related to Gronops (Schoenherr, 1823) or Notogronops Marshall, 1821, especially due to the similar type of vestiture. However, both named genera have a very differently shaped body.
Biological notes. The biology of species in the genus is unknown. Adults were very rarely sifted from the litter under shrubs, especially those from the family Chenopodiaceae.
Distribution. This genus is endemic to South Africa, hitherto collected in the Western Cape and Eastern Cape provinces.

3.1.3. Treatment of Species

Plastologus costatus (Figure 2a–h)
Plastologus costatus Boheman, 1842: 141 [2]. Alonso-Zarazaga and Lyal, 1999: 142 [5]. Oberprieler, 1999: 7 [6].
Type locality. “Terra Caffrorum” (Eastern Cape, South Africa).
Type series. This species was described from an unspecified number of specimens. In coll. Schoenherr (NHRS) known to contain species described by Boheman, there was no specimen of P. costatus. Through the courtesy of J. Bergsten I was informed that the type of P. costatus was taken on loan by S. Louw (BMSA) a long time ago, who in the meantime has passed away. In 2022, I visited BMSA, and with the help of B. Muller, we found one complete but pinned and therefore damaged, 3.79 mm long male labeled “Caffra-ria./Typus [printed red label]/359 85/Riksmuseum Stockholm/Plastologus costatus [newly added large handwritten label]” perfectly corresponding to Boheman’s description. For clarity, I labeled this specimen with the printed red label “HOLOTYPUS Plastologus costatus Boheman Michael Košťál vid. 2024”. The holotype will be returned to NHRS.
Synonyms. None.
Redescription. Male. Body stout, subround. Head: Rostrum medium long (Rl/Pl 0.8), stout (Rl/Rw 2.1), black, in lateral view unevenly moderately curved, slightly widened from base to antennal insertion, then strongly tapered to apex; in dorsal view parallel to shortly behind base, then abruptly widened due to prominent lower scrobe edge and moderately widened to antennal insertion, then markedly tapered to apex; longitudinal carinae on epifrons prominent. Head between eyes broad, with deep, narrow longitudinal impression. Antennae dark brown with somewhat paler basal part of scape, inserted before 0.7 of rostrum length, segment 1 as long as 1.4 × segments 2–4 combined, club about twice as long as wide. Pronotum: Black, wider than long (Pl/Pw 0.82), widest behind base, at about 1/3 of its length, sides in basal third rounded, then subconically narrowed anteriad, convex on disc; two large bulges in basal part not extraordinary prominent, moderately vaulted, their separating sulcus deep, relatively broad, two ridges delineating very deep impression in anterior part strongly prominent, two longitudinal broad impressions on sides interrupted by high transverse ribs sometimes almost reaching level of lateral part of pronotum. Elytra: Black, in dorsal view with almost regularly rounded sides; widest behind 1/3 of their length, at base moderately wider than pronotum (Ewb/Pwb 1.18), humeri round, slightly prominent; clearly convex on disc; interstriae much thinner than striae, as wide as 0.2–0.5 width of striae, odd interstriae except interstria 1markedly vaulted, especially in anterior part of elytra, interstria 3 at base with striking bulge, even interstriae very thin, irregular, compressed by large, irregularly chained punctures forming wide striae, puncture diameter only slightly diminishing toward apex; entire surface covered with adpressed shiny blackish to brownish scales, in about half of elytral length with relatively thin, transverse band of almost equal width, slightly arcuate posteriad, formed by adpressed whitish scales, apical 1/4 of elytra semidensely covered with same whitish scales. Prosternum: Anterior margin with very deep, strikingly broad, irregularly arcuate emargination. Venter: Mesosternal process transverse, 2.1 × as wide as long, flat, its anterior and posterior margins almost parallel and rectilinear; metasternum moderately concave; V1 in median part with moderate impression, V2 in anteromedian part flat, both ventrites with sparsely distributed, relatively large punctures, each with subrecumbent, elongate pale scale, suture between V1 and V2 clearly arcuate anteriad, V1 1.9 × as long as V2, V1–2 2.4 × as long as V3–4, V3–4 1.1 × as long as V5.
Legs: Blackish, apart from basic vestiture with subrecumbent to suberect, semisparsely distributed, elongate whitish scales. Penis: Figure 2e–g, its body short, robust, with subparallel sides, apex in dorsal view with distinct emargination or incision, body in lateral view moderately arcuate, relatively thin. Spermatheca: Figure 2h, corpus moderately massive, ramus and nodulus of approximately equal size, subparallel, cornu medium long, moderately bent.
Female. Elytra in lateral view very strongly convex on disc. Metasternum flat, V1 without impression.
Variability. Body length ♂♂ 2.98–3.79 mm, ♀♀ 3.00–3.73 mm. This species varies quite considerably in the color of the vestiture, some specimens may have transverse bands and the apical part of elytra covered instead of whitish with creamy scales, which can also reach lateral parts of elytra making thereby confluent the pale transverse band with the pale apical part of elytra. The structure of the pronotum and vaulted odd elytral interstriae vary to a minimum extent.
Diagnosis. This species is easily recognizable by the vaulted odd elytral interstriae from base to apex, the striae formed by large, almost confluent, irregularly spaced punctures, the lack of any shiny areas on the elytral disc, structure of the pronotum and the clearly incised apex of the penis.
Comparative notes. Out of the three known species in the genus, Plastologus costatus is most closely related to P. punctatus, from which it differs in the less stout rostrum, strikingly vaulted odd elytral interstriae being convex from base to apex, striae formed especially in basal part by large, deep, irregularly shaped, almost confluent punctures, and in the incised apex of the penis.
Biological notes. There are only few data on the biology of P. costatus. Based on data of the examined material, I can assume that the species is a litter dweller preferring dry bushy vegetation with predominating Chenopodiaceae.
Distribution. South Africa (Eastern Cape).
Non-type material examined. South Africa (Eastern Cape): Uitenhage (1, BMNH); Willowmore 16 km NE, 660 m, S33°9.6′ E23°35.2′, 7.xi.2023, leg. Košťál (5 ♂♂ 6 ♀♀ MKPC, 1 ♂ 2 ♀♀ RBPC, 1 ♀ TMSA); same data but 8.xi.2023 (2 ♀♀ MKPC, 1 ♂ RBPC).
Plastologus boroveci Košťál sp. n. (Figure 3a–h)
LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D5999076-3653-486B-9B4F-24B87912177E
Type locality. Calitzdorp (Western Cape, South Africa).
Type series. Holotype: completely preserved, 3.63 mm long male with dissected genitalia in glycerol labeled “RSA Western Cape 301 m E Calitzdorp sifting 33°31.965′ S, 21°42.415′ E 6.xi.2011 R. Borovec leg./Sifted detritus and dead leaves below Chenopodiaceae shrubs/HOLOTYPUS Plastologus boroveci sp. n. Michael Košťál des. 2024 [printed red label] (NMPC). Paratypes (same designating label but instead “HOLOTYPUS” “PARATYPUS”): same labeling as holotype (6 ♂♂ 3 ♀♀ MKPC, 2 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀ RBPC); “RSA Western Cape 278 m E of Calitzdorp 33°31.965′ S, 21°42.415′ E R. Borovec lgt. 25.xi.2016/Sifted detritus and died leaves bellow Chenopodiaceae shrubs” (1 ♀ TMSA).
Description. Male. Body stout, subround. Head: Rostrum medium long (Rl/Pl 0.8), stout (Rl/Rw 2.0), black, in lateral view its upper outline very slightly curved to antennal insertion, then abruptly slanting towards apex, its lower outline almost rectilinear from base to shortly before apex; in dorsal view sides of epifrons parallel to antennal insertion, widening of rostrum outline shortly behind its base due to prominent lower scrobe edge very slight to inapparent, from antennal insertion rostrum outline moderately tapered to apex; longitudinal carinae on epifrons moderately prominent. Head between eyes broadly deeply impressed. Antennae inserted behind 0.7 of rostrum length, their scape reddish-brown, segments and club dark brown, segment 1 as long as 1.4 × segments 2–4 combined, club about twice as long as wide. Pronotum: Black, wider than long (Pl/Pw 0.81), widest in basal part at about 0.4 of its length, sides in basal half very slightly rounded, then slightly roundly narrowed anteriad, in lateral view in basal part vaulted, in apical part flat; two large bulges in basal part strongly vaulted, their separating sulcus narrow to moderately broad, two ridges delineating shallow impression in anterior part moderately prominent, two longitudinal broad impressions on sides interrupted by low, sometimes almost indistinct transverse ribs never reaching level of lateral part of pronotum. Elytra: Black, in dorsal view subround, more slightly rounded in medial third; widest at 1/6 of their length, at base moderately wider than pronotum (Ewb/Pwb 1.25), humeri round, not prominent; moderately convex on disc; interstriae in basal part of equal width as striae, in apical part up to 2 × as wide as striae, all interstriae except interstria 3 being elevated at base flat to very slightly convex, striae formed by almost regular rows of medium deep, round punctures, puncture diameter substantially diminishing toward apex; entire surface covered with adpressed, shiny blackish, brownish to golden scales, before midlength with medium thick, almost rectilinear transverse band reaching from suture to interstria 9, and formed by adpressed whitish to creamy, often intermixed scales, apical 1/4 of elytra irregularly covered with same type of paler scales. Prosternum: Anterior margin with very deep, U-shaped to arcuate emargination. Venter: Mesosternal process rectangular, 1.8 × as wide as long, flat, its anterior margin very slightly arcuate, posterior margin rectilinear; metasternum very slightly concave; V1 in median part with impression, V2 in median part flat, both ventrites with sparsely distributed, large punctures, each with recumbent to subrecumbent, elongate pale scale, suture between V1 and V2 moderately arcuate anteriad, V1 1.3 × as long as V2, V1–2 2.6 × as long as V3–4, V3–4 as long as V5. Legs: Blackish, apart from basic vestiture with suberect to erect, semidensely distributed, markedly elongate whitish scales. Penis: Figure 3e–g, its body short, robust, with slightly rounded sides, apex in dorsal view truncate, body in lateral view moderately arcuate, relatively thick. Spermatheca: Figure 2h, corpus moderately massive, ramus moderately larger than nodulus, slightly divergent, cornu medium long, thick, markedly bent.
Female. Elytra in lateral view very strongly convex on disc. Metasternum flat, V1 without impression.
Variability. Body length ♂♂ 2.87–3.80 mm, ♀♀ 3.27–3.83 mm. This species varies considerably in the color of the vestiture, some specimens have a transverse band and the apical part of elytra covered with shiny creamy to brown scales giving the elytra an almost unicolorous gold appearance. Other specimens, especially females, have the medial part of the transverse band enlarged into a triangular white macula strongly contrasting with the dark elytral vestiture behind the macula. The structure of the pronotum and elytra varies to a minimum extent, especially the form of striae and interstriae.
Diagnosis. This species is easily recognizable by the flat elytral interstriae, well separated, almost regularly spaced punctures forming striae, shiny area often present on elytral disc, and by the truncate apex of the penis.
Comparative notes. Plastologus boroveci is a unique species. It differs from P. costatus and P. punctatus in its relatively broad elytral interstriae being at least as wide as striae, in the posterior elytral area often twice as wide as striae, and in the truncate apex of the penis. Moreover, it differs from P. costatus in flat elytral interstriae.
Etymology. I name this species after its collector, my friend and colleague Roman Borovec, an eminent specialist in Palaearctic and Afrotropical Entiminae.
Biological notes. There is no data on the biology of this species except data on the type specimens I examined, which were sifted out from the litter under low bushes in a dry habitat.
Distribution. South Africa (Western Cape).
Non-type material examined. None.
Plastologus punctatus Košťál sp. n. (Figure 4a–e)
LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:83FC1130-0382-44EA-89A0-DE5BC5F412A7
Type locality. Ladismith (Western Cape, South Africa).
Type series. Holotype: completely preserved, 2.83 mm long male with dissected genitalia in glycerol labeled “RSA Western Cape 277 m S Ladismith to Riversdale 33°40.566′ S, 21°10.527′ E 27.x.2019 R. Borovec lgt./Sifted detritus and dead leaves below Chenopodiaceae shrubs/HOLOTYPUS Plastologus boroveci sp. n. Michael Košťál des. 2024 [printed red label] (NMPC).
Description. Male. Body stout, somewhat irregularly subround. Head: Rostrum relatively short (Rl/Pl 0.9), remarkably stout (Rl/Rw 1.5), black, in lateral view widened from base to antennal insertion, then tapered to apex, its upper outline from base to antennal insertion almost rectilinear, then abruptly slanting to apex, lower outline to shortly before apex rectilinear; in dorsal view almost parallel from base to antennal insertion, lower scrobe edge almost not protruding from rostrum outline, from antennal insertion moderately tapered to apex; longitudinal carinae on epifrons only feebly visible. Head between eyes broad, with deep, relatively broad longitudinal impression. Antennae dark brown except reddish-brown scape, inserted at 0.7 of rostrum length, segment 1 1.3 × as long as segments 2–4 combined, club slightly less than twice as long as wide. Pronotum: wider than long (Pl/Pw 0.79), widest at 0.4 of its length, sides up to 4/5 of its length subparallel, moderately irregular, then rounded anteriad, in lateral view in basal part vaulted, in apical part flat; two large bulges in basal part markedly vaulted, prominent, their separating sulcus deep, relatively broad, two ridges delineating shallow impression not prominent, two longitudinal broad impressions on sides interrupted by low, flat transverse ribs by far not reaching level of lateral part of pronotum. Elytra: Black, in dorsal view with rounded sides; widest shortly before 1/3 of their length, at base very slightly wider than pronotum (Ewb/Pwb 1.10), humeri small, rounded, not prominent; convex on disc; interstriae, especially in anterior part, considerably thinner than striae, as wide as 0.5–0.8 width of striae, odd interstriae except interstria 1 slightly vaulted in same extent from base to apex, interstria 3 at base somewhat more vaulted but not forming bulge, even interstriae thin, in anterior part thinner and moderately irregular due to compression by large punctures forming striae, striae formed in anterior part by semidensely, somewhat irregularly chained, medium deep, well separated subround punctures being hardly smaller toward apex; entire surface covered with shiny black and bronzy scales, in about half of elytral length with transverse band similar to that in P. costatus, in posterior part with irregular macula formed by same type of scales as transverse band reaching from interstria 1 to 5. Prosternum: Anterior margin with very deep, round incision. Venter: Mesosternal process rectangular, 1.6 × as wide as long, flat, its anterior margin slightly rounded, posterior margin emarginated; metasternum concave; V1 in median part with marked impression, V2 in anteromedian part flat, both ventrites with semidensely distributed, conspicuously large punctures, each with subrecumbent, elongate pale scale, suture between V1 and V2 moderately arcuate anteriad, V1 1.7 × as long as V2, V1–2 2.9 × as long as V3–4, V3–4 0.9 × as long as V5. Legs: Blackish, apart from basic vestiture with recumbent to subrecumbent, semisparsely distributed, relatively short, thin pale scales. Penis: Figure 4c–e, body robust, short, with almost parallel sides, apex in dorsal view broadly rounded, body in lateral view relatively thick.
Female. Unknown.
Variability. I know only the type specimen.
Diagnosis. This species can be recognized by the stout rostrum (Rl/Rw 1.5) with hardly noticeable longitudinal carinae on the epifrons, moderately vaulted odd elytral interstriae from the base to the apex, striae formed by subrounded, well separated, medium deep punctures along their entire length, and by the rounded apex of the penis in dorsal view.
Comparative notes. Plastologus punctatus is probably most closely related to P. costatus from which it differs in the stouter rostrum, only moderately vaulted odd elytral interstriae being slightly convex from base to apex, striae formed by medium large, subround, well separated, medium deep punctures, and in the regularly rounded apex of the penis. From P. boroveci, it differs strikingly in having vaulted elytral interstriae, stouter rostrum, and penis, which is not truncate at the apex.
Etymology. The Latin adjective “punctatus” meaning punctured refers to elytral interstriae formed by chained subrounded punctures.
Biological notes. No data.
Distribution. South Africa (Western Cape).
Non-type material examined. None.

3.2. Key to the Species

1.
Punctures forming irregular striae in anterior half of elytra deep, irregularly chained, often polygonal; even interstriae here strikingly curvilinear, with thin septa between punctures, odd interstriae except interstria 1 clearly convex to ridge-like from base to apex. Two large bulges in mediobasal part of pronotum irregularly, moderately convex. Apex of penis in dorsal view emarginate to incised (Figure 2g)…………………………………………….…………………….… P. costatus Boheman
-
Punctures forming almost regular striae in anterior half of elytra shallow to medium deep, regularly chained, subround to round; even interstriae here straight or almost straight, odd interstriae except interstria 3 at base flat to slightly vaulted, never ridge-like. Two large bulges in mediobasal part of pronotum regularly, strongly convex. Apex of penis in dorsal view truncate or rounded. ………………..…….… 2
2.
Rostrum relatively thin (Rl/Rw~2.0), funicular segment 1 of antennae longer, 1.4 × as long as segments 2–4 combined. Diameter of punctures forming basal section of elytral striae 1 and 2 smaller than width of interstria 2, distal margin of pale transverse band on elytra rectilinear. Apex of penis in dorsal view truncate (Figure 3g). ………………………………………..………………………..………… P. boroveci sp. n.
-
Rostrum relatively thick (Rl/Rw~1.5), funicular segment 1 of antennae shorter, 1.3 × as long as segments 2–4 combined. Diameter of punctures forming basal section of elytral striae 1 and 2 is larger than width of interstria 2, distal margin of the pale transverse band on elytra arcuate. Apex of penis in dorsal view is broadly rounded (Figure 4e). ……………….…………….… P. punctatus sp. n.

4. Discussion

The genus Plastologus Schoenherr, 1842 was hitherto regarded as a monotypic genus endemic to South Africa [4,5,6,7]. Surprisingly, during his three field trips to the province Western Cape (South Africa) in the period 2011–2019, R. Borovec succeeded in collecting another two species of this genus, which are described in this revision. On the other hand, bearing in mind the enormous biodiversity in South African habitats, especially dry and semidry ones, the surprise is not that unexpected. The fauna of small terricolous species of subfamilies Entiminae and Cyclominae is in this region very poorly known. Very recently, two new genera of cyclomines with several new species were described from the Northern Cape and Western Cape provinces, namely Boroveciella Košťál, 2021 [11] and Nanophryodotus Košťál, 2023 [12]. Only the genus Ophryodotus Pascoe, 1887 today containing eight species [6], which is now the subject of a revision, clearly indicates an enormous specific diversity with perhaps up to 20 species. Quite recently, there was even a new tribe of very small terricolous entimines described from dry to very dry habitats containing six new genera [13].
Based on the above mentioned facts and taking into account a small size of many cyclomines, their flightless, cryptic, mostly unknown biology, a need for the very special collecting method, a high level of endemism, and large territories of their presupposed occurrence (Figure 5) it is absolutely sure that there are many more new genera and species to be described. This may be easily also a case of further new Plastologus species, albeit this genus is so rare.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All data used in this study are based on dried insect specimens deposited in publicly accessible institutional depositories (listed in Section 2.10) or in depositories of our colleagues (ibid). All data used in this study are not subject of any legal or commercial restriction.

Acknowledgments

My thanks are due to all curators and colleagues named in Section 2.10 who provided me with the material from museums or private collections. My special thanks go to Roman Borovec, who collected two new species of the genus and allowed me their study.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schoenherr, C.J. Genera et Species Curculionidum, cum Synonymia Hujus Familiae. Species Novae aut Hactenus Minus Cognitae, Descriptionibus Dom. Leonardo Gyllenhal, C.H. Boheman, O.J. Fåhraeus et Entomologies Aliis Illustratae. Tomus Sextus.—Pars Secunda. Suplementum continens; Roret: Parisiis, France; Fleischer: Lipsiae, Germany, 1842; p. 495. [Google Scholar]
  2. Boheman, C.H. New taxa. In Schoenherr, C.J. Genera et Species Curculionidum, cum Synonymia Hujus Familiae. Species Novae aut Hactenus Minus Cognitae, Descriptionibus Dom. Leonardo Gyllenhal, C.H. Boheman, O.J. Fåhraeus et Entomologies Aliis Illustratae. Tomus Sextus.—Pars Secunda. Suplementum continens; Roret: Parisiis, France; Fleischer: Lipsiae, Germany, 1842; p. 495. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lacordaire, J.T. Histoire Naturelle des Insectes. Genera des Coléoptèresou Exposé Méthodique et Critique de tous les Genres Proposésjusqu’ci dans cet Ordre d’Insectes; Tome Sixième; Roret: Paris, France, 1863; p. 637. [Google Scholar]
  4. Louw, S. Solving the riddle: Combining life-history analysis and morphological comparison in weevil systematics. In Taxonomy, Ecology and Distribution of Curculionoidea (Coleoptera: Polyphaga), Proceedings of a Symposium. XX. International Congress of Entomology, Florence, Italy, 28 August 1966; Colonnelli, E., Louw, S., Osella, G., Eds.; ATTI, Museo Regionale de Scienze Naturali: Torino, Italy, 1998; pp. 19–26. [Google Scholar]
  5. Alonso-Zarazaga, M.A.; Lyal, C.H.C. A World Catalogue of Families and Genera of Curculionoidea (Insecta: Coleoptera) (Excepting Scolitidae and Platypodidae); Entomopraxis, S.C.P.: Barcelona, Spain, 1999; p. 315. [Google Scholar]
  6. Oberprieler, R.G. A reclassification of the weevil subfamily Cyclominae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Zootaxa 2010, 2515, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Oberprieler, R.G. 3.7.4 Cyclominae Schoenherr, 1826. In Coleoptera, Beetles. Volume 3: Morphology and Systematics (Phytophaga); Handbook of Zoology: Arthropoda: Insecta; Leschen, R.A.B., Beutel, R.G., Eds.; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 483–502. [Google Scholar]
  8. ICZN. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 4th ed.; Adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences; International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, BMNH: London, UK, 1999; p. 306. [Google Scholar]
  9. International Weevil Community Website. Glossary of Weevil Characters. Available online: https://weevil.myspecies.info/glossary-weevil-characters (accessed on 7 September 2024).
  10. The Insect and Spider Collections of the World Website. Available online: http://hbs.bishopmuseum.org/codens/codens-inst.html (accessed on 7 September 2024).
  11. Košťál, M. Boroveciella gen. n. from South Africa, with three new species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Hipporhinini). Koleopt. Rdsch. 2021, 91, 211–226. [Google Scholar]
  12. Košťál, M. Nanophryodotus gen. n. from South Africa, with three new species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Hipporhinini). Koleopt. Rdsch. 2023, 92, 195–208. [Google Scholar]
  13. Meregalli, M.; Borovec, R.; Cervella, P.; Santovito, A.; Toševski, I.; Ottati, S.; Nakládal, O. The Namaini, a new weevil tribe with six new genera from South Africa (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Entiminae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2021, 20, 95–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Plastologus costatus. (a) styli of distal gonocoxite, (c) sternite VIII (spiculum ventrale) (b) Plastologus boroveci sp. n. (b) styli of distal gonocoxite (d) sternite VIII (spiculum ventrale). Not to scale.
Figure 1. Plastologus costatus. (a) styli of distal gonocoxite, (c) sternite VIII (spiculum ventrale) (b) Plastologus boroveci sp. n. (b) styli of distal gonocoxite (d) sternite VIII (spiculum ventrale). Not to scale.
Diversity 16 00664 g001
Figure 2. Plastologus costatus. (a) body in dorsal view (male), (b) body in dorsal view (female), (c) body in lateral view (male), (d) body in lateral view (female), (e) penis in ventral view, (f) penis in lateral view, (g) apex of penis in dorsal view, (h) spermatheca. Not to scale.
Figure 2. Plastologus costatus. (a) body in dorsal view (male), (b) body in dorsal view (female), (c) body in lateral view (male), (d) body in lateral view (female), (e) penis in ventral view, (f) penis in lateral view, (g) apex of penis in dorsal view, (h) spermatheca. Not to scale.
Diversity 16 00664 g002
Figure 3. Plastologus boroveci sp. n. (a) body in dorsal view (male), (b) body in dorsal view (female), (c) body in lateral view (male), (d) body in lateral view (female), (e) penis in ventral view, (f) penis in lateral view, (g) apex of penis in dorsal view, (h) spermatheca. Not to scale.
Figure 3. Plastologus boroveci sp. n. (a) body in dorsal view (male), (b) body in dorsal view (female), (c) body in lateral view (male), (d) body in lateral view (female), (e) penis in ventral view, (f) penis in lateral view, (g) apex of penis in dorsal view, (h) spermatheca. Not to scale.
Diversity 16 00664 g003
Figure 4. Plastologus punctatus sp. n. (a) body in dorsal view (male), (b) body in lateral view (male), (c) penis in ventral view, (d) penis in lateral view, (e) apex of penis in dorsal view. Not to scale.
Figure 4. Plastologus punctatus sp. n. (a) body in dorsal view (male), (b) body in lateral view (male), (c) penis in ventral view, (d) penis in lateral view, (e) apex of penis in dorsal view. Not to scale.
Diversity 16 00664 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of the genus Plastologus: P. costatus—red square; P. boroveci—blue square; P. punctatus—yellow square.
Figure 5. Distribution of the genus Plastologus: P. costatus—red square; P. boroveci—blue square; P. punctatus—yellow square.
Diversity 16 00664 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Košťál, M. A Taxonomic Revision of the South African Genus Plastologus Schoenherr, 1842 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Cyclominae). Diversity 2024, 16, 664. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16110664

AMA Style

Košťál M. A Taxonomic Revision of the South African Genus Plastologus Schoenherr, 1842 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Cyclominae). Diversity. 2024; 16(11):664. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16110664

Chicago/Turabian Style

Košťál, Michael. 2024. "A Taxonomic Revision of the South African Genus Plastologus Schoenherr, 1842 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Cyclominae)" Diversity 16, no. 11: 664. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16110664

APA Style

Košťál, M. (2024). A Taxonomic Revision of the South African Genus Plastologus Schoenherr, 1842 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Cyclominae). Diversity, 16(11), 664. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16110664

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop