Next Article in Journal
Population Structure and Genetic Diversity of the Spotted Sleeper Odontobutis interrupta (Odontobutidae), a Fish Endemic to Korea
Next Article in Special Issue
There and Back Again—The Igatu Hotspot Siliciclastic Caves: Expanding the Data for Subterranean Fauna in Brazil, Chapada Diamantina Region
Previous Article in Journal
A Cocktail of Plankton and Organochlorines for Whale Shark in the Foraging Areas of Nosy Be (Madagascar)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Feihu Dong, a New Hotspot Cave of Subterranean Biodiversity from China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Subterranean Species of the Vjetrenica Cave System in Bosnia and Herzegovina

1
SubBio Lab, Department of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Karst Research Institute at Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, 6230 Postojna, Slovenia
3
ADIPA: Society for Research & Conservation of Croatian Natural Diversity, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
4
Department of Environmental Science, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2023, 15(8), 912; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15080912
Submission received: 5 July 2023 / Revised: 31 July 2023 / Accepted: 4 August 2023 / Published: 6 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hotspots of Subterranean Biodiversity—2nd Volume)

Abstract

:
The Western Balkan’s Vjetrenica Cave in southern Bosnia and Herzegovina is renowned for high richness of subterranean species. However, the data on its fauna have been published only in monographs printed in a small number of copies, making them hardly accessible to the wider scientific community. To overcome this issue, we compiled the data from published monographs with the data from our own recent field surveys. Further, as they are connected via water channels or small crevices in bedrock, we defined the Vjetrenica Cave System as a system comprising Vjetrenica and Bjelušica Caves and Lukavac Spring. Altogether, 93 troglobiotic, i.e., obligate subterranean aquatic (48) and terrestrial (45), taxa were reported for the system, verifying the Vjetrenica Cave System as the second richest locality in subterranean biodiversity in the world. The global uniqueness of the system is also reflected in the fact that as many as 40 troglobiotic species were described from the system. Finally, we reviewed the factors endangering this unique subterranean community and questioned whether it will withstand human-induced changes and pressures due to infrastructural development in southern Bosnia and Herzegovina.

1. Introduction

The Western Balkan’s Dinaric Karst is one of the global hotspots of subterranean biodiversity [1,2]. The long history of research in subterranean habitats [3] resulted in recognition of two geographically distant hotspots of species richness. The northwestern one, situated in southwestern Slovenia and northwestern Croatia, and the southeastern one, geographically settled at the territories bordering Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and Montenegro [4,5,6,7]. Besides being exceptionally rich in subterranean taxa, each of the two bears its own unmistakable “crown gem” cave. While the updated subterranean species list of the northwestern gem, the Postojna-Planina Cave System (PPCS), was published fairly recently in the first special issue of Subterranean Hotspots [8], similar presentation of the southeastern gem, the Vjetrenica Cave, was already published 13 years ago [9]. The paper, however, did not include the species list. In addition to the paper, two extensive monographs have been published on Vjetrenica, both including data on its fauna but also paleontological and cultural heritage [10,11,12]. Yet, due to a limited number of copies and an outdated overview of fauna, there was a need to assemble and present the updated species list for the cave itself and the accompanying system.
In this contribution, we present the updated list of obligate subterranean taxa of the Vjetrenica Cave System, which includes not only Vjetrenica Cave but also Bjelušica Cave and Lukavac Spring; both are confirmed to be connected to Vjetrenica via water channels or crevices in bedrock. We mark the species that have been found in recent studies, and comment on dubious findings. We conclude with emphasizing the threats and conservation issues of the subterranean communities in southern Bosnia and Herzegovina.

History of Biological Studies of Vjetrenica Cave

The first document mentioning an undefined cave characterized by strong winds, similar to those occurring in Vjetrenica, was written 2000 years ago [13]. Pliny the Elder’s (Plinius Senior) script mentions it in a way that it leaves us little doubt about the described cave being Vjetrenica. Archaeological artefacts demonstrate that the entrance parts of the cave were used by the poljes’ settlers already in the Neolithic (7000–3000 BC) [12], while prehistoric animals, including leopards and hyenas, push its usage even further into past [14,15,16]. Up to 19th century, Vjetrenica was only occasionally mentioned in naturalists’ manuscripts regarding Popovo Polje or the cave itself [13,17,18]. This largely changed with the annexation of modern Bosnia and Herzegovina territories, including Popovo Polje and Vjetrenica, by the Austro-Hungarian Empire (1878) [19,20,21,22]. Only a few decades before that, the first subterranean animal, Leptodirus hochenwartii Schmidt, 1832, from the Postojna Cave was described, and speleobiology—the biology of subterranean habitats—was born [23]. Southward extension of the empire suddenly enabled naturalists and admirers of subterranean caves to sample specialized fauna in Vjetrenica and other caves in Popovo Polje [24].
Thanks to its early recognition and proximity of the railway, Vjetrenica gained a lot of research interest in the early stages of speleobiology. By the end of the 19th and beginning of 20th century, some of the most eminent European scientists studied its fauna, transforming it into one of the most intensively sampled caves in the world [25,26,27,28,29]. Although preceded in sampling by K.W. Verhoeff [9], the earliest efforts to summarize its subterranean richness were made by Czech archeologist, geographer, paleontologist, and biologist Karel Absolon. Absolon [24] recognized Vjetrenica and the wider area of Popovo Polje as a hotspot of subterranean life and described some of Vjetrenica’s outstanding life forms. The pace of discovery continued between the two World Wars [30,31,32,33,34], resulting in the cave’s first species inventory by Wolf in 1937 [35]. As in other localities listed in his catalogues, Wolf did not pay attention to the “cave-adaptiveness” or ecology of animals occurring in Vjetrenica, fusing surface and subterranean taxa. Stanko Karaman [32,33,36,37] described a dozen specialized aquatic species from Vjetrenica and other caves in the vicinity, additionally emphasizing the uniqueness of area’s aquatic fauna. Decades of sampling and numerous field excursions to Vjetrenica inspired Slovenian speleobiologist Boris Sket [11] to publish the first thorough overview, providing a special emphasis on troglobionts and stygobionts. In his comprehensive overview, he reported 40 stygobionts and 35 troglobionts, clearly placing Vjetrenica among the top ranked subterranean biodiversity hotspots [11,38]. Despite the exceptional results, the cave’s inventory list did not stop at 75 species. Ozimec and Lučić [9] updated it and reported 101 troglobiotic species, however, without providing an actual list. The last in a series of inventories including specialists (stygobionts and troglobionts) and non-specialists (troglophiles and trogloxenes) was published by Ozimec and nearly 30 collaborators [12]. Their count comprised 41 troglobionts and 55 stygobionts for a total of 96 cave-dwelling species.
During a century and a half of systematic research in the area, Vjetrenica Cave received the majority of sampling efforts [9,11,12,39]. Herein, we chose a slightly different approach. In addition to carefully evaluating and updating Vjetrenica’s subterranean fauna, we compiled an inventory list by combining it with the two nearby localities, the Lukavac Spring and the Bjelušica Cave (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The main reason for their inclusion is their historical omission from similar inventories despite the fact they naturally contribute to the Vjetrenica Cave System [11]. In 2015, a simultaneous diving expedition into Lukavac and Donja Vjetrenica (lower part of the Vjetrenica Cave) resulted in confirmation of the connectedness of the two—divers from each side met under water (G. Balasz, personal communication). The other cave, Bjelušica, opens on a slope above the Vjetrenica Cave. It contains a small stream that disappears in the gravel floor. According to the spatial position of Bjelušica’s main channel, and reappearance of the water flow in Vjetrenica’s channel “Vilino gumno”, we conclude that the two caves are connected (Figure 2).

2. Geographical Setting and Description of the Vjetrenica Cave System

2.1. Geographic Setting

Due to its importance for the public recognition of the Dinaric Karst and the research fields of speleobiology, hydrology, and karstology [11,12,40,41,42,43], the Vjetrenica Cave System must be set into a wider context, which includes Popovo Polje and the sinking river feeding it, the Trebišnjica River. The Trebišnjica River drains from the boundary of the Black Sea and the Adriatic Sea drainages, first appearing at the surface below the ridge of Lebršnik (1985 m a.s.l.) and the area of Čemerno as the Mušnica River and its tributaries. Surface waters disappear in a series of ponors in the southwestern part of Gatačko Polje (930–950 m a.s.l.), reappear again in Cerničko (810 m a.s.l.) and Fatničko Polje (460–500 m a.s.l.), and finally occur as the Trebišnjica River in the resurgences beneath the town of Bileća. The two largest resurgences are Nikšička Vrela (325 m a.s.l.) and the now-submerged Dejanova Pećina (Dejan’s Cave at 327 m a.s.l.) [44]. Before the alteration of its natural course, Trebišnjica flowed through Bilećko Polje and the city of Trebinje, across one of the largest karst poljes in the Dinaric Karst, Popovo Polje, on its way to the sinkhole Ponikva in Hutovo [45] (Figure 1). With 96.5 km of surface flow, Trebišnjica was the largest sinking river in Europe. In summers, it sank downstream from the city of Trebinje, making approximately 60 km of its flow seasonal [44]. Subterranean waters disappearing in Popovo Polje re-appear through resurgences in the Neretva River valley and a series of springs in the background of the city of Dubrovnik, the best known being the Ombla Spring (–15 m b.s.l.) [44,46].
The infrastructural works in the second half of the 20th century modified Trebišnjica’s natural flow through several stages. The first stage included damming of Bilećko Polje, including the major springs of Trebišnjica, by changing it into a 20 km long artificial lake. Waters from the reservoir, which are accumulated behind a 120 m high dam, are used for the hydropower plant Trebinje I at Grančarevo (constructed between 1968–1975) [47,48]. With more than 1280 km3 of water, Bilećko Jezero (Bileća Lake) is one of the largest lakes in the Dinaric Karst. Another dam, 35 m high and accumulating waters for the hydropower plant Trebinje II, was built in 1981. Along with it, a 60 km channel in the lower portions of the Popovo Polje was built to dispatch waters to the hydropower plant Čapljina. As a side effect, the channel prevented the polje’s natural flooding and enabled its agricultural exploitation [44]. Consequently, interventions have had a large impact on the surface and subterranean watercourses in the area [44,49,50], decimating the local fauna and pushing some of the narrowly endemic species to the very edge of existence [51,52,53].
The largest portion of the Trebišnjica runs through the 65 km long Popovo Polje, one of the largest karstic fields in the Dinaric Karst. Due to its proximity to the Adriatic Sea (only 15 km airline distance), Popovo Polje is characterized by dry winters and mild, wet summers. The mean annual air temperature is around 11.4 °C, while the mean annual precipitation is approximately 1680 mm [12,54]. Both the polje and the major geomorphological elements, including locally more than 3 km thick Mesozoic limestones, are orientated NW–SE, in the so-called Dinaric direction. Based on its surface morphology, Popovo Polje is divided in two parts: the upper and lower Trebinjska Šuma and Popovo Polje, respectively. Trebinjska Šuma (šuma meaning woods) is a highly karstified area, dipping in the southeast–northwest (275–250 m a.s.l.) direction and extending from the city of Trebinje to Poljica [12,55]. Differently from the upper part of the polje, the lower part is covered in alluvial sediments, thickening towards its northwest end and reaching up to 25 m at the lowest part of the polje (220 m a.s.l.) [56]. Before the channelization, more than 500 ponors and estavelas were present in the polje, with the most impressive one being large caves (Plitica, Baba u Strujićima, Provalija, Doljašnica, Crnulja, Žira, and Ponikva) in the polje’s lower part [44].

2.2. The Vjetrenica Cave System

For a cave whose entrance is characterized by winds reaching up to 89 km/h (Roman Ozimec, personal data), there is no wonder it bears a name meaning “a windy place” in local languages [9,10,12,23]. Similar to the polje, the Vjetrenica Cave System developed in the Mesozoic limestones, predominantly during the Cretaceous age, stretching in the NW–SE direction, and is situated in the outskirts of the Zavala Village in Popovo Polje, Bosnia and Herzegovina (42.8458, 17.9838) [55]. The whole system comprises three parts: the Vjetrenica and Bjelušica Caves and the Lukavac Spring (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
Bjelušica (42.84538, 17.97794) is a rather simple, 80 m long cave linked to Vjetrenica by a water drip, reappearing in its “Vilino gumno” channel. Bjelušica opens on a slope westwards to Vjetrenica. Lukavac Spring (42.84646, 17.98456) lies northwards of Vjetrenica, 20 m lower than the cave’s entrance, at the level of the polje (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Although it has been long-hypothesized to be connected to Donja Vjetrenica, this was undoubtedly confirmed only recently by cave diving (G. Balasz, personal communication). Hydrologically, Lukavac Spring presents one of the outflows from the system [57].
The main part of the system, Vjetrenica Cave, is a relatively large and complex cave [12] (Figure 2), with the main channels reaching up to a couple of tens of meters in cross-section. The last topological surveys extended its length to 7324 m, with a vertical extent of 159 m [12]. Three quarters of Vjetrenica’s length, the lowest point reaching 43 m in depth, are below the cave’s entrance. Although the extant entrance is facing into Popovo Polje at the downstream end of the cave, 1500 m into the cave, there is a drainage divide [12], with the water past it presumably flowing towards the Adriatic Sea and the Neretva valley [44]. Due to the inclination of the layers and the overall topography of the cave, it comprises numerous syphons, occasional lakes, and streams of different sizes. Three levels can be recognized in the cave [12]. The most easily reachable and the most explored is the middle level, comprising predominantly horizontal passages—Glavni kanal, Radovanovićev kanal, Gornji Absolonov kanal, Leopardov kanal, Waleski kanal, Skriveni glavni kanal, and Ravanjski kanal (Figure 2). The lowest level of Vjetrenica consists of hydrologically active or even submerged passages, including Donja Vjetrenica, Donji Absolonov kanal, and Radovanovićev kanal. The potential third level, the uppermost, which is rich in domes and chimneys, extends along the whole cave and offers potential for future speleological surveys.

3. Compiling the List of Taxa

The herein presented list derives from the recently published monograph on Vjetrenica [12], additional records from the SubBio Lab (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia), and Jozef Grego. The existing list was critically evaluated, and species with dubious or not sufficiently known sampling origin were removed from the list. To provide support for the relevancy of the listed taxa, we supplemented the list with information on the year when the animal was last collected considering the period of the last 23 years. This information was retrieved from the database SubBioDB, which is managed by SubBio Lab (University of Ljubljana), as well as R. Ozimec’s and J. Grego’s field notes. In addition to the overview of the species, we provide the data on the species conservation statuses at national and international levels (Table 1).

4. The Overview of Troglobiotic Species in the Vjetrenica Cave System

4.1. General Overview

Altogether, 93 different subterranean species have been recorded and are considered as present in the Vjetrenica Cave System: 48 aquatic and 45 terrestrial (Table 1). Overall, 40 species have been scientifically described from the system: 35 from Vjetrenica, 4 from Bjelušica, and 2 from Lukavac (Table 1). Field surveys executed from the onset of the 21st century confirmed 50% of taxa previously reported from the system (Table 1).
Among a plethora of species, dozens of subterranean taxa inhabiting the system have been recognized as threatened. According to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (VIR), there are ten threatened taxa (Table 1): two endangered (EN), four vulnerable (VU), three of least concern (LC), and one near threatened (NT). According to the Red List of Bosnia and Herzegovina (VIR), there are fourteen threatened taxa: five endangered (EN) and nine data deficient (DD) (Table 1).

4.2. Comments to Selected Aquatic Taxonomic Groups

One of the most distinguishing characteristics of the Dinaric subterranean fauna is the presence of aquatic sessile and filtering species, deriving from marine or historically rich lacustrine fauna [58,59]. Three of these peculiar species were reported from the Vjetrenica Cave; the only subterranean tubeworm in the world, Marifugia cavatica; the only cave cnidarian, Velkovrhia enigmatica; and one of only a handful of subterranean clams, Congeria kusceri (Table 1; Figure 3C). Marifugia cavatica can be observed in the waters of the lower Vjetrenica’s channels [60]. The presence of the other two species is highly questionable and needs additional confirmation. Even though V. enigmatica was reported from a cave in Croatia, it has been recently confirmed only in two caves from 500 km distant Ljubljanica River catchment in Slovenia [61]. Moreover, there are some indices that the data on Velkovrhia in Vjetrenica might be a result of an experimental error (Sket, personal communication). The second questionable species is Congeria kusceri, whose shell was presumably collected in an unknown part of Vjetrenica Cave [12]. Recent and intensive diving explorations in the lower parts of the cave did not result in finding live individuals (B. Jalžić and G. Balazs, personal communication). However, as it occurs in other caves in Popovo Polje, with the closest confirmed locality being the 1.7 km away Baba u Čvaljini Cave, its presence in the system cannot be completely ruled out.
The Vjetrenica Cave System harbors one of the most remarkable examples of single-genus diversity. There are as many as nine different species of the subterranean amphipod genus Niphargus [11,62] present in the system. To our knowledge, this exceptional richness is the highest number of subterranean congeners occurring in a single locality in the world, followed only by the community of six Niphargus species in the Postojna-Planina Cave System in Slovenia [8]. The co-occurring species largely differ in both general morphology and body size (ranging from the 3 mm large N. factor to the spiny and more than 30 mm long N. balcanicus (Figure 3A)). The species exploit a wide variety of habitats, including water drips, interstitial waters, and phreatic channels [62]. These characteristics have been related to the evolutionary effects of diminishing competition among closely related species [62,63]. In addition, more amphipod species were found in Vjetrenica, including Hadzia fragilis [32] and the largest and the bulkiest among all Dinaric amphipods, the monotypic Typhlogammarus mrazeki [64] (Figure 4C).
High species richness of “shrimp-like” crustaceans (Figure 3B) belonging to two different orders can be found within the system. Three species belong to the decapod family Atyiidae [65], which exhibited multiple transitions into the circum-Mediterranean subterranean habitats [66]. The fourth species is a monotypic Mysidae species found only in Vjetrenica’s phreatic waters, Troglomysis vjetrenicensis [67].
The largest and the most outstanding animal of the subterranean habitats in the Dinaric Karst is the olm Proteus anguinus [68] (Figure 3D). Even though once commonly distributed in caves of Popovo Polje, it seems that its population largely disappeared from caves that had been cut off from the Trebišnjica River following to its channelization [51]. In Vjetrenica Cave, the olm can be found in its lower parts in partly or completely submerged channels. Recently, olm populations from southern Dinarides, including those bound to the Trebišnjica River catchment, were recognized as a separate species-level lineage [69]. Considering the changes of the water regime in Popovo Polje, the olm’s southern populations seem to be even more vulnerable than previously thought and highly threatened.
Figure 4. The cave hygropetric, specialized subterranean microhabitat was first described from Vjetrenica Cave [70]. Some of the specialized animals inhabiting it include (A) the semi-aquatic cave beetle Hadesia vasiceki; (B) the predatory cave leech Dina absoloni; (C) the bulkiest of all Dinaric subterranean amphipods, Typhlogammarus mrazeki; and (D) a highly troglomorphic and predatory Trechini beetle, Scotoplanetes arenstorffianus (Photo: Teo Delić).
Figure 4. The cave hygropetric, specialized subterranean microhabitat was first described from Vjetrenica Cave [70]. Some of the specialized animals inhabiting it include (A) the semi-aquatic cave beetle Hadesia vasiceki; (B) the predatory cave leech Dina absoloni; (C) the bulkiest of all Dinaric subterranean amphipods, Typhlogammarus mrazeki; and (D) a highly troglomorphic and predatory Trechini beetle, Scotoplanetes arenstorffianus (Photo: Teo Delić).
Diversity 15 00912 g004

4.3. Comments on Selected Terrestrial Taxonomic Groups

The most notable characteristics of Vjetrenica’s terrestrial fauna is the existence of the species living in the special cave habitat, the so-called hygropetric [70]. The cave hygropetric is a specialized type of subterranean habitat, first recognized and described from Vjetrenica’s depths. It refers to water flowing over the cave walls, forming a thin laminar flow or, sometimes, strong turbulent currents [70,71]. Organic matter dissolved in the water flowing down the vertical walls enables formation of microbial communities [72], which are scraped off the walls and used as nutrients by various groups of arthropods. Species or communities bound to this peculiar habitat are known only from the “hygropetricolous arc” spanning throughout the Dinaric Karst and Italian Prealps [71,72,73,74] and geographically distant Caucasus [75,76].
Probably the most known of all the hygropetricolous animals is the elusive beetle genus Hadesia, first to be recognized for its peculiar ecology and a semi-aquatic lifestyle [77,78]. Vjetrenica’s Hadesia vasiceki (Figure 4A) bears some of the characteristics common to all terrestrial taxa inhabiting hygropetricolous habitats, including long claws, densely pubescent body, and mouthparts modified for scraping and grazing on organic matter [79]. The other hygropetricolous beetle in Vjetrenica, Nauticiella stygivaga, is rarely encountered. Following its description in 2002 [80] and despite many attempts, only two specimens were found in the cave’s deeper sections in 2021 [81]. This semi-aquatic habitat is also exploited by the largest of Vjetrenica’s amphipods, Typhlogammarus mrazeki [82] (Figure 4C), and the cave leech, Dina absoloni [83] (Figure 4B). Both species are known to climb the vertical walls and confront the hygropetric’s waters in search of prey. In addition to the animals occurring in the water flow itself, a couple of them are known to occur at the edges of the hygropetric, presumably exploiting similar nutrient resources or preying on smaller invertebrates feeding on it. These include the millipede Typhloiulus edentulus, for which modified grazing mouthparts were also reported [84], and one of the most troglomorphic representatives of subterranean Trechini beetles in Europe, the predatory Scotoplanetes arenstorffianus [85,86] (Figure 4D).
Another remarkable characteristic of terrestrial fauna in the Vjetrenica Cave System is the high diversity of arachnids (Table 1), including mites (Acari), spiders (Araneae), harvestmen (Opiliones), palpigrades (Palpigradi), and pseudoscorpions (Pseudoscorpiones) [12]. The most recognizable among them are surely the large Dysderidae spiders, Stalagtia hercegovinensis (Figure 5A) and Stalitella noseki, which do not produce webs but freely walk and prey within the cave [87,88]. The predatory Travunia vjetrenicae (Figure 5B) is a member of a small opilionid family, Travuniidae, encompassing less than a dozen species worldwide. Despite its small size but due to its robust and spiny pedipalps, Travunia is considered a fierce predator of smaller invertebrates [89]. Some of the arachnids, including palpigrades, are rarely encountered due to its small size. Only a couple of millimeters long, Eukoenenia remyi [90] is, despite being a terrestrial animal, often found gliding on the calcite crusts on the surface of water pools (own observation).
Another species-rich group is the myriapods, including both diplopods and chilopods. Diplopods inhabit a wide variety of habitats, from the ones in transition to surface habitats to the already-mentioned cave hygropetric. Differences in their natural histories are well reflected onto morphologies, which range from the relatively short and round Typhloglomeris coeca (Figure 5C) to the elongated Typhloiulus edentulus [12,84]. The predatory chilopods are represented by three subterranean species, relatively small Lithobius matulici, and a large and highly troglomorphic Lithobius sketi [91,92] (Figure 5D).
High variability in size and ecology can also be noted in gastropods, whose representatives range in size from only two and a half millimeters to a centimeter and a half [12]. All of them except Spelaeoconcha paganettii (Figure 6A) are endemic to either Popovo Polje or the southeastern Dinaric Karst [12].
Besides hygropetric beetles, all three families with numerous subterranean representatives in the Balkans were recorded in Vjetrenica. The family Leiodidae is, besides Hadesia and Nauticiella, represented by Graciliella apfelbecki (Figure 6B), one of the largest (8 mm) and extremely troglomorphic leiodid species [93]. In addition to Scotoplanetes, the family Carabidae is represented by two congeners, Neotrechus dalmatinus dalmatinus and Neotrechus suturalis otiosus [12], and another presumably ecologically specialized species, Adriaphaenops pretneri [94]. Finally, the third family commonly distributed in the Balkan’s subterranean habitats, Staphylinidae, is known by a yet undescribed species of Nonveilleria [12] and Troglamaurops ganglbaueri (SubBioDB) (Figure 6C).

5. Comments on Some of the Non-Troglobiotic Species Adding to the Conservation Importance of the Vjetrenica Cave System

Even though this paper is oriented towards presenting the list of obligate subterranean species, we need to bring forward some non-troglobiotic species that occur in the Vjetrenica Cave System. Three fish species found in subterranean waters of Vjetrenica Cave and are listed among endangered species. Two species, Delminichthys ghetaldii (Steindachner, 1882) and Squalius svallize Heckel & Kner, 1858, are declared as vulnerable under the IUCN criteria, while the third species, Phoxinus lumaireul (Schinz, 1840) is considered of least concern [95]. In addition, Delminichthys ghetaldii is considered endangered by the Red List of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Preceding the regulation of Trebišnjica (Figure 1), all three species were abundant in Popovo Polje. Moreover, the local inhabitants were exploiting them as a food source [13]. However, these customs gradually changed by the end of 1960s due to anthropogenic activities and the downfall of the limited habitats of fish species [96].
As for bats, five occasionally occurring species were recorded; all are listed as of least concern on the IUCN Red List. Additionally, are three Vespertilionidae species, namely Myotis emarginatus (E. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1806), M. nattereri (Kuhl, 1817), and Plecotus cf. kolombatovici, and two Rhinolophidae species, namely Rhinolophus ferrumequinum (Schreber, 1774) and R. hipposideros (Bechstein, 1800) [12,97,98]. In addition, three of these species have a higher threat status according to the Red List of Bosnia and Herzegovina; M. emarginatus and R. ferrumequinum are listed as vulnerable, while R. hipposideros is considered as endangered. Generally, the low number of bat species is presumably related to prevalent winds or limited size, which make Vjetrenica and Bjelušica, respectively, less suitable for hibernation or the establishment of nursery colonies.

6. Discussion

6.1. General Overview and Significance of the New Species List

Differently from most of the existing overviews of Vjetrenica’s fauna, which focus only on the specialized fauna of the cave itself [9,10,11,12,13], we chose to broaden our scope by inclusion of the two nearby localities: Bjelušica Cave and Lukavac Spring. Their inclusion resulted in the listing of additional troglobiotic taxa and, finally, a higher number of troglobiotic species in the whole system than in the cave alone (Table 1). Due to morphological differences and the connectedness of the system’s localities, not all of the listed species are found in all of them. Vjetrenica remains the richest locality with 85 troglobiotic species, followed by Bjelušica with 26 and, finally, Lukavac with 22 species.
Despite the long tradition of speleological surveying and high numbers of troglobiotic species, we are far from the final point of knowledge on both the Vjetrenica Cave System and its specialized fauna. Further increases in numbers of troglobiotic taxa may be expected by systematic sampling of overlooked microhabitats or taxa in addition to the usage of novel sampling and analytical techniques. Epikarst, which often includes its own specialized communities [99,100] and was never subjected to a thorough research in Vjetrenica, presents one of such habitats. Similarly, collembolans probably present the most illustrative example of overlooked taxa. Only two species of Verhoeffiella are listed for the whole system [12] (Figure 6D), although more species belonging to different genera and even families are known from it (Lukić M., personal communication). Finally, numbers might further increase by identification of morphologically cryptic species, which are repeatedly identified among specialized subterranean taxa, including Dinaric collembolans [101,102,103].

6.2. Monitoring of the Subterranean Communities

The proximity of the railway and infrastructural development along with the fascination about its size and accessibility changed Vjetrenica into a show cave more than half a century ago. E. Pretner questioned the rationality of this move already before its opening in 1960s. He proposed not to set the tourist needs ahead of the conservation of the cave and its peculiar fauna [39]. Tourism paved the way to educate visitors about the functioning and meaning of karst and karstic phenomena. At the same time, the arrangement of pathways and the growing number of visitors, as stressed already by Pretner, present a constant threat to fragile subterranean habitats [104]. Although relatively late, the monitoring scheme in Vjetrenica started in 2016, with an idea to detect changes in the physical and hydrological status of the cave and its microclimate, habitat conditions, the quantity of fauna, as well as modifications in its taxonomic composition. Both can serve as an alarm system for predicting potentially detrimental changes [105,106]. Along with the monitoring of fauna, special interest has been directed towards monitoring of the so-called lampenflora [107], the autotrophic communities developing near artificial light in caves. Algae, bryophytes, mosses, or plants otherwise absent from internal parts of the caves can alter the composition of subterranean communities by providing easily accessible nutrients to some of the species. Additional upgrades of monitoring practices will be assessed by the constant and long-term monitoring of physical parameters such as air and water temperature and the pH of the water and ground or air composition. Implementation of diverse and complementary monitoring practices is of crucial importance, as Vjetrenica and the whole area of Popovo Polje, due to its proximity to Dubrovnik (Figure 1), receive a growing number of tourists. In recent years, the number of tourists rose to more than 17,000 visitors in 2022, while the only exception was around 6000 visitors in 2020, which was heavily affected by the coronavirus pandemic [108]. Compared to the pre-Balkan war years, the number of visitors more than doubled after the cave’s reopening. Such an increase presents additional pressure on subterranean ecosystems, calls for additional conservationist attention, and enhances the need for precise and thorough monitoring schemes.

6.3. Past, Present, and Future Threats and Conservation

Due to its geographical setting and connectedness to the Trebišnjica River, tourism does not present the largest issue for the Vjetrenica Cave System. This can be recognized in the progressing industrialization and engineering coupled with a growing need for agricultural land, which triggered construction of a series of dams over the course of the Trebišnjica, with its channelization and the transformation of the lower parts of the polje into agricultural land [44,109,110]. Before its damming and channelization, 155 sinkholes and estaveles existed in the polje [44]. Following the changes, Trebišnjica’s hydrological networks, both surface and subterranean, were largely changed [43,44,45,46,47]. Excluding all of its natural meanders and overflowing areas caused the decimation of locally rich and endemic surface and subterranean fauna [51,52,69,111,112,113]. Despite its uniqueness on the world scale, destruction of Popovo Polje and Vjetrenica were only seldom documented by a couple series of publications, nature conservation actions, and scientific appeals for their conservation [43,46,47,48,49,50,51].
The effect of these anthropogenic alterations were never properly studied in Vjetrenica or in Popovo Polje. However, some hallmarks, like meters-thick layers of dry tubes of M. cavatica in Ponor Crnulja [114], testify to the irreversible changes. Iconic species such as C. kusceri and M. cavatica seem to have disappeared from some of most known localities in the Popovo Polje. Some papers report the catastrophic aftermath of these changes, resulting in extirpation of more than 99% of local populations [51]. In addition to changes of the water regimes, the land use also changed dramatically. Before channelization, the lower parts of the polje were flooded on average 240 (204–303) days per year [44]. Following channelization, approximately two-thirds of Popovo Polje was changed into agricultural land [109,110], coupling the changes in quantity of water with the potential changes in its quality. Although none of the available studies were executed on Vjetrenica’s or Trebišnjica’s subterranean fauna, increased concentrations of salt or nitrates were shown to have detrimental effects on subterranean communities [115,116,117].
As if not all of this was enough, the whole area of Popovo Polje suffered additional obstruction due to disintegration of Yugoslavia in the Balkan Wars during the 1990s [118,119]. The surroundings of the entrances to the Vjetrenica Cave System (Vjetrenica, Bjelušica, and Lukavac Spring) were literally changed into minefields. The wider area was demined in numerous actions following the war; still, some parts of the area may remain inapproachable—like the ridges above Vjetrenica’s entrance.
Although the whole system, along with the Trebišnjica River, remains largely affected by the anthropogenic influence, not everything is being lost. Both Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Republic of Srpska proposed Vjetrenica as a future Natura 2000 site, and some of the species were listed on the IUCN’s list of endangered and vulnerable species [95]. To further promote the uniqueness of the system and the accompanying Trebišnjica Basin, a Biospeleological Museum was founded in 2016 in close proximity to the system’s entrances [120]. Finally, the attempts for conservation of these sites were crowned by an official application for the inclusion of Vjetrenica and the surrounding landscapes under the UNESCO’s world heritage conservation scheme [121]. This might be a proper place to question how the possible inclusion of the Vjetrenica System onto UNESCO’s list might help against the growing pressures, represented by the ambitious economic-developmental plans of Gornji Horizonti, which are already transforming landscapes in the Trebišnjica Basin. The Gornji Horizonti comprise an infrastructural plan for building additional series of dams and channels meant to feed a set of hydropower plants by draining waters from different, interconnected poljes or even drainages [44,45,122,123,124,125]. Despite the deluge of “green deals”, “sustainability”, and similar terms on the continental level [126] and the known effect of damming rivers on biodiversity [127,128], for now, it seems that nature and its conservation, along with the human wellbeing, are put aside.

6.4. Concluding Remarks

Only successful conservation attempts will enable further usage of Vjetrenica as a show cave, a touristic development of the area, and a scientific work, both in Vjetrenica and other parts of the system. For us, the scientific perspective is of a vital importance. Herein, we will list only two topics connected to evolutionary patterns and the mechanisms underlying them, wherein Vjetrenica’s role cannot be overlooked. Vjetrenica’s subterranean amphipod assemblage presents the richest subterranean amphipod community in the world. It comprises nine Niphargus congeners, largely differing in morphology and spatial use, and additional representatives of other amphipod families [11,62,63]. At least the Niphargus community was shown to originate through the mechanisms of adaptive radiation [129]. However, and despite the soundness of the topic, only the first steps towards understanding the mechanisms of community assembling have been made. In addition to this, Vjetrenica is renowned by its semi-aquatic hygropetricolous environment [70] and its peculiar inhabitants. The mechanisms and processes underlying the assembling of the hygropetricolous communities remain even less studied than those underlying the assembling of the niphargid communities.
Fieldworks expeditions after 2000 resulted in the repeated collection of approximately 50 percent of all the species recorded from the system. These are mostly larger taxa (Table 1), which are taxonomic groups that at least some of the authors, or their collaborators, are studying. Data on 50 percent of listed species, including hydrobiid snails or specialized trematodes, remain only literature-based and clearly demonstrate the lack of taxonomists in the scientific field. For most of the species, their presence in the system remains to be confirmed. Therefore, we found no better way to demonstrate how needy we are of both systematic sampling and thorough recording of the species occurring in the Vjetrenica Cave System.
The whole system, along with the Popovo Polje and the Trebišnjica River, present a unique combination of natural history and cultural heritage coupled with tourism and business opportunities. Long-term sustainability of the whole area is largely dependable on a wide variety of factors, including local inhabitants, scientists, farmers, decision makers and governmental agencies, employees in the tourism and energetic sectors, etc. With so many variable groups of interest, this is the right place to ask if we can cope with the burden and whether we, as a community, will be successful in attempts to preserve the second richest subterranean locality in the world?

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.C.C. and T.P.; original draft preparation, T.D.; review and editing, M.Z., R.O. and D.C.C.; visualization, T.D.; corresponding author T.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was partially funded by the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS program P1-0184), the CEPF-funded project “SubBIOCODE—Developing new tools for rapid assessment of subterranean biodiversity in Bosnia and Herzegovina” to SubBio Lab and Biodiversa+, the European Biodiversity Partnership under the 2021–2022 BiodivProtect joint call for research proposals, co-funded by the European Commission (GA N°101052342), and with the funding organizations Ministry of Universities and Research (Italy), Agencia Estatal de Investigación—Fundación Biodiversidad (Spain), Fundo Regional para a Ciência e Tecnologia (Portugal), Suomen Akatemia—Ministry of the Environment (Finland), Belgian Science Policy Office (Belgium), Agence Nationale de la Recherche (France), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft e.V.—BMBF-VDI/VDE INNOVATION + TECHNIK GMBH (Germany), Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Forderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Switzerland), Fonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Austria), and the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, and Innovation (Slovenia) and the Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development, and Innovation Funding (Romania).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study; all of the data is available in the study and the references cited.

Acknowledgments

The authors dedicate the paper to drivers of exploration in Vjetrenica: late professor Boris Sket (1936–2023), who’s years of research in Vjetrenica and the wider area of Popovo Polje brought international recognition to it, and late Nikša Vuletić (1975–2022), director of the public enterprise Vjetrenica, who was a big supporter of research in Vjetrenica. In addition, the leading author would like to express gratitude to Ivo Lučić, for his generous help with the documentation on Popovo Polje and Vjetrenica, and my dear friends Martina Pavlek, Marko Lukić, Tvrtko Dražina, Branko Jalžić (all CBSS, Zagreb), Roman Lohaj, and Jozef Grego for their expertise in the selected taxonomic groups.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Culver, D.C.; Deharveng, L.; Bedos, A.; Lewis, J.J.; Madden, M.; Reddell, J.R.; Sket, B.; Trontelj, P.; White, D. The Mid-Latitude Biodiversity Ridge in Terrestrial Cave Fauna. Ecography 2006, 29, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zagmajster, M.; Malard, F.; Eme, D.; Culver, D.C. Subterranean biodiversity patterns from global to regional scales. In Cave Ecology, 1st ed.; Moldovan, O.T., Kovač, L., Halse, S., Eds.; Ecological Studies; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 195–227. [Google Scholar]
  3. Schmidt, F. Beitrag zu Krain’s Fauna. Leptodirus Hochenwartii, n. g., n. sp. Illyrisches Blatt. 1832, 3, 9–10. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zagmajster, M.; Culver, D.C.; Sket, B. Species richness patterns of obligate subterranean beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) in a global biodiversity hotspot–effect of scale and sampling intensity. Divers. Distrib. 2008, 14, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sket, B. Diversity Patterns in Dinaric Karst. In Encyclopedia of Caves, 2nd ed.; White, W.B., Culver, D.C., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 228–238. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bregović, P.; Zagmajster, M. Understanding Hotspots within a Global Hotspot—Identifying the Drivers of Regional Species Richness Patterns in Terrestrial Subterranean Habitats. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2016, 9, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Borko, Š.; Altermatt, F.; Zagmajster, M.; Fišer, C. A Hotspot of Groundwater Amphipod Diversity on a Crossroad of Evolutionary Radiations. Divers. Distrib. 2022, 28, 2765–2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zagmajster, M.; Polak, S.; Fišer, C. Postojna-Planina Cave System in Slovenia, a Hotspot of Subterranean Biodiversity and a Cradle of Speleobiology. Diversity 2021, 13, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ozimec, R.; Lučić, I. The Vjetrenica cave (Bosnia & Herzegovina)–one of the world’s most prominent biodiversity hotspots for cave-dwelling fauna. Subterr. Biol. 2009, 7, 17–24. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lučić, I. Vjetrenica: Pogled u Dušu Zemelje, 1st ed.; Lučić, I.: Zagreb, Croatia, 2003; p. 322. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sket, B. Životinjski svijet Vjetrenice. In Vjetrenica: Pogled u Dušu Zemlje, 1st ed.; Lučić, I., Ed.; Lučić, I.: Zagreb, Croatia, 2003; pp. 147–248. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ozimec, R.; Baković, N.; Bakšić, D.; Basara, D.; Bevanda, L.; Brajković, H.; Brancelj, A.; Erhard, C.; Gašić, Z.; Grego, J.; et al. Vjetrenica—Cave Biodiversity Hotspot of the Dinarides; Ozimec, R., Ed.; Public Enterprise Vjetrenica: Ravno, Bosnia and Herzegovina; ADIPA: Zagreb, Croatia, 2021; p. 356. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lučić, I. Presvlačenje krša. Povijest Poznavanja Dinarskog Krša na Primjeru Popovog Polja, 1st ed.; Synopsis: Zagreb, Croatia, 2018; p. 680. [Google Scholar]
  14. Malez, M.; Pepeonik, Z. Entdeckung des ganzen Skelettes eines fossilen Leoparden in der Vjetrenica—Höhle auf dem Popovo Polje (Herzegowina). Bull. Sci. Que Sect. A 1969, 14, 5–6. [Google Scholar]
  15. Miculinić, K. Fossil Remains of Leopard (Panthera pardus) from Vjetrenica Cave, Popovo Polje, BiH. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  16. Diedrich, C.G. Late Pleistocene leopards across Europe–northernmost European German population, highest elevated records in the Swiss Alps, complete skeletons in the Bosnia Herzegowina Dinarids and comparison to the Ice Age cave art. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2013, 76, 167–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Korać, J.V. Trebinje. Istorijski Pregled. Knjiga I; Zavičajni Muzej: Trebinje, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1966; p. 240. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pamučina, J. Rizvanbegovića. In Ljetopisi; Čokorilo, P., Pamučina, J., Skenderova, S., Eds.; Veselin Masleša: Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1976; pp. 83–88. [Google Scholar]
  19. Riedel, J. Eine Ventarole in der Herzegovina. Mitteilungen Der Sect. Für Höhlenkunde 1888, 2, 13–16. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cvijić, J. Karst, Geografska Monografija, 1st ed.; Državna štamparija: Beograd, Srbija, 1895; p. 176. [Google Scholar]
  21. Katzer, F. Geologischer Fuerer durch Bosnien und die Herzegovina. In Herausgegeben Anlässlich des IX. Internationalen Geologencongresses von der Landesregierung in Sarajevo, 1st ed.; Landesdruckerei: Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1903; p. 280. [Google Scholar]
  22. Richter, E. Prilozi zemljopisu Bosne i Hercegovine. Glas. Zemalj. Muzeja 1905, 7, 257–414. [Google Scholar]
  23. Polak, S. Importance of discovery of the first cave beetle Leptodirus hochenwartii Schmidt, 1832. Endins 2005, 28, 71–80. [Google Scholar]
  24. Absolon, K. Výsledky Výskumných cest po Bálkaně. Časopis Morav. Mus. Zemsk. 1916, 2, 245–249. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nosek, A. Die Arachniden der herzegowinischen Höhlen. Verh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien. 1905, 55, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Schäferna, K. O novem slepem blesivci Typhlogammarus n. sbg. Vestn. Kral. Ceske Spol. Nauk. Praha 1906, 26, 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  27. Müller, J. Diagnosen neuer Höhlensilphiden. Zool. Anz. 1910, 36, 184–186. [Google Scholar]
  28. Müller, J. Zwei neue Höhlensilphiden aus den österreichischen Karstländern. Wien. Entomol. Ztg. 1911, 30, 175–176. [Google Scholar]
  29. Absolon, K. Über Scotoplanetes arenstorffianus nov. subg., nov. spec., eine neue Anophthalmentype (Coleoptera Carabidae) aus dem Ponor-Gebiete der Trebišnjica in Südosthercegovina. Koleopterol. Rundsch. 1913, 2, 93–100. [Google Scholar]
  30. Absolon, K. Les grandes amphipodes aveugles dans les grottes Balkaniques. Compte Rendu de la 51e Session, Association Francaise Pour l’Avancement des Sciences 1927, 51, 291–295. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hadži, J. Contribution to the knowledge of fauna of cave Vjetrenica. (Pseudoscorpionidea: Neobisium (Blothus) vjetrenicae sp. n., Opilionidea: Travunia vjetrenicae sp. n., Nelima troglodytes Roewer). Glas. Srp. Kralj. Akad. 1932, 75, 103–157. [Google Scholar]
  32. Karaman, S.L. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Süsswasser-Amphipoden. Prirodosl. Razpr. 1932, 2, 179–232. [Google Scholar]
  33. Karaman, S. Über zwei neue Isopoden der Gruppe Asellus aus Jugoslavien. Extr. Recl. Trav. Offer. A J. Georg. 1933, 1, 103–113. [Google Scholar]
  34. Stammer, H.J. Einige seltene oder neue Höhlentiere. Zool. Anz. 1933, 6, 263–266. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wolf, B. Animalium Cavernarum Catalogus. II.—Cavernarum Catalogus; Junk Verl: Wien, Austria, 1937; p. 616. [Google Scholar]
  36. Karaman, S. Dve nove vrste podzemnih amfipoda Popova Polja u Hercegovini. O nekim amfipodima—Izopodima Balkana i. njihovoj sistematici [CLXIII]. In Posebna Izdanja. Odjeljenje Prirodno-Matematickih Nauka; Srpska Akademija Nauka: Belgrade, Yugoslavia, 1950; pp. 101–118. [Google Scholar]
  37. Karaman, S. Prilozi poznavanju nifarga Hercegovine i južne Dalmacije. Prirodosl. Istraživanja 1952, 25, 45–55. [Google Scholar]
  38. Culver, D.C.; Sket, B. Hotspots of subterranean biodiversity in caves and wells. J. Cave Karst Stud. 2000, 62, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pretner, E. Kako zaštititi pećinsku faunu Vjetrenice kod Zavale? In Proceedings of the Treći Jugoslavenski Speleološki Kongres, Sarajevo, Jugoslavija, 21–27 June 1962; pp. 169–174. [Google Scholar]
  40. Cvijić, J. Das Karstphänomen. Versuch einer morphologischen Monographie. Geogr. Abh. 1898, 5, 217–329. [Google Scholar]
  41. Bonacci, O. Karst Hydrology with Special References to the Dinaric Karst, 1st ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1987; p. 194. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ford, D.; Williams, P. Karst Hydrogeology and Geomorphology; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: West Sussex, UK, 2007; p. 562. [Google Scholar]
  43. Milanović, P. Karst of Eastern Herzegovina, the Dubrovnik Littoral and Western Montenegro. Env. Earth Sci. 2015, 74, 15–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Milanović, P. Karst of East Herzegovina and Dubrovnik Littoral, 1st ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; p. 316. [Google Scholar]
  45. Bonacci, O. Hazards caused by natural and anthropogenic changes of catchment area in karst. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2004, 4, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Roje-Bonacci, T.; Bonacci, O. The possible negative consequences of underground dam and reservoir construction and operation in coastal karst areas: An example of the hydro-electric power plant (HEPP) Ombla near Dubrovnik (Croatia). Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, 13, 2041–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Milanović, P. Hidrologija Karsta i Metode Istraživanja, HE ‘Trebišnjica’, 1st ed.; Institut za korišćenje i zaštitu voda na kršu: Trebinje, Jugoslavija, 1979; p. 302. [Google Scholar]
  48. Milanović, P. Uticaj hidrosistema Trebišnjica na režim površinskih i podzemnih voda u Popovom polju. Naš krš 1983, IX/14-15, 41–52. [Google Scholar]
  49. Milanović, P. Water Resources Engineering in Karst, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004; p. 328. [Google Scholar]
  50. Stevanović, Z.; Eftimi, R. Karstic sources of water supply for large consumers in Southeastern Europe–sustainability, disputes and advantages. Geol. Croat. 2010, 63, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Čučković, S. The influence of the change in the water-course regime of the Trebišnjica water-system on the fauna of the karst underground regions. Naš Krš 1983, 9, 129–142. [Google Scholar]
  52. Bilandžija, H.; Puljas, S.; Gerdol, M. Hidden from our sight, but not from our impact: The conservation issues of Cave Bivalves. Preprints 2021, e2021050023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Reier, S.; Bogutskaya, N.; Palandačić, A. Comparative Phylogeography of Phoxinus, Delminichthys, Phoxinellus and Telestes in Dinaric Karst: Which factors have influenced their current distributions? Diversity 2022, 14, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bakšić, D.; Paar, D.; Buzjak, N.; Lučić, I. Microclimatic monitoring in Vjetrenica Cave, B&H. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Symposium “Man and Karst”, Bijakovići, Međugorje, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 13–16 October 2011; Lučić, I., Mulaomerović, J., Eds.; Centre for Karst and Speleology: Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2011; pp. 13–14. [Google Scholar]
  55. Čičić, S. Geološka građa terena šire okoline Popova polja i pećine Vjetrenica. Naš krš 2002, 35, 3–16. [Google Scholar]
  56. Resulović, H.; Vlahinić, M. Characteristics of soil and specificities of drainage of karstic field Popovo Polje (Yugoslavia). Poljopr. I Šumarstvo 1983, 29, 65–79. [Google Scholar]
  57. Spahić, M. Pećina Vjetrenica u Popovu polju–novo shvatanje speleogeneze. Acta Geogr. Bosniae Et Herzegovinae 2015, 4, 55–67. [Google Scholar]
  58. Sket, B. The nature of biodiversity in hypogean waters and how it is endangered. Biodivers. Conserv. 1999, 8, 1319–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bilandžija, H.; Morton, B.; Podnar, M.; Četković, H. Evolutionary history of relict Congeria (Bivalvia: Dreissenidae): Unearthing the subterranean biodiversity of the Dinaric Karst. Front. Zool. 2013, 10, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Kupriyanova, E.K.; Ten Tove, H.A.; Sket, B.; Zakšek, V.; Trontelj, P.; Rouse, G.W. Evolution of the unique freshwater cave dwelling tube worm Marifugia cavatica (Annelida: Serpulidae). Syst. Biodivers. 2009, 7, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zagmajster, M.; Delić, T.; Prevorčnik, S.; Zakšek, V. New records and unusual morphology of the cave hydrozoan Velkovrhia enigmatica Matjašič & Sket, 1971 (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Bougainvilliidae). Nat. Slov. 2013, 15, 13–22. [Google Scholar]
  62. Trontelj, P.; Blejec, A.; Fišer, C. Ecomorphological convergence of cave communities. Evolution 2012, 66, 3852–3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Fišer, C.; Blejec, A.; Trontelj, P. Niche-based mechanisms operating within extreme habitats: A case study of subterranean amphipod communities. Biol. Lett. 2012, 8, 578–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Karaman, G. XXXVIII. Contribution to the Knowledge of the Amphipoda. On the genus Typhlogammarus (Schäferna) (fam. Gammaridae) from Yugoslavia. Fragm. Balc. Musei Maced. Sci. Nat. 1972, 9, 21–34. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zakšek, V.; Sket, B.; Trontelj, P. Phylogeny of the cave shrimp Troglocaris: Evidence of a young connection between Balkans and Caucasus. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 42, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Christodoulou, M.; Anastasiadou, C.; Jugovic, J.; Tzomos, T. Freshwater shrimps (Atyidae, Palaemonidae, Typhlocarididae) in the broader mediterranean region: Distribution, life strategies, threats, conservation challenges and taxonomic issues. In A Global Overview of the Conservation of Freshwater Decapod Crustaceans; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 199–236. [Google Scholar]
  67. Wittmann, K.J.; Ariani, A.P.; Daneliya, M. The Mysidae (Crustacea: Peracarida: Mysida) in fresh and oligohaline waters of the Mediterranean. Taxonomy, biogeography, and bioinvasion. Zootaxa 2016, 4142, 1–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Recknagel, H.; Trontelj, P. From cave dragons to genomics: Advancements in the study of subterranean tetrapods. BioScience 2022, 72, 54–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Recknagel, H.; Zakšek, V.; Delić, T.; Gorički, Š.; Trontelj, P. Multiple transitions between realms shape relict lineages of Proteus cave salamanders. Mol. Ecol. 2023, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sket, B. The cave hygropetric-a little known habitat and its inhabitants. Arch. Für Hydrobiol. 2004, 160, 413–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Giachino, P.M.; Vailati, D. Kircheria beroni, a new genus and new species of subterranean hygropetricolous Leptodirinae from Albania (Coleoptera, Cholevidae). Subterr. Biol. 2006, 4, 103–116. [Google Scholar]
  72. Engel, A.S.; Paoletti, M.G.; Beggio, M.; Dorigo, L.; Pamio, A.; Gomiero, T.; Furlan, C.; Brilli, M.; Dreon, A.L.; Bertoni, R.; et al. Comparative microbial community composition from secondary carbonate (moonmilk) deposits: Implications for the Cansiliella servadeii cave hygropetric food web. Int. J. Speleol. 2013, 42, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Delić, T. First record of a specialized hygropetricolous cave beetle, genus Croatodirus (Coleoptera: Leiodidae), in Slovenia. Nat. Slo. 2017, 19, 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  74. Lukić, M.; Fišer, C.; Delić, T.; Bilandžija, H.; Pavlek, M.; Komerički, A.; Dražina, T.; Jalžić, B.; Ozimec, R.; Slapnik, R.; et al. Subterranean Fauna of the Lukina Jama–Trojama Cave System in Croatia: The Deepest Cave in the Dinaric Karst. Diversity 2023, 15, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Vargovitsh, R.S. Cave Water Walker: An Extremely Troglomorphic Troglaphorura gladiator gen. et sp. nov. (Collembola, Onychiuridae) from Snezhnaya Cave in the Caucasus. Zootaxa 2019, 4619, 267–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Vargovitsh, R.S. Deep troglomorphy: New arrhopalitidae (Collembola: Symphypleona) of different life forms from the Snezhnaya cave system in the Caucasus. Diversity 2022, 14, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Moldovan, O.T.; Jalžić, B.; Erichsen, E. Adaptation of the mouthparts in some subterranean Cholevinae (Coleoptera, Leiodidae). Nat. Croat. 2004, 13, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  78. Perreau, M.; Pavićević, D. The genus Hadesia Müller, 1911 and the phylogeny of Anthroherponina (Coleoptera, Leiodidae, Cholevinae, Leptodirini). In Advances in the Studies of the Fauna of the Balkan Peninsula, 1st ed.; Pavićević, D., Perreau, M., Eds.; Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia: Beograd, Serbia, 2008; pp. 215–239. [Google Scholar]
  79. Polak, S.; Delić, T.; Kostanjšek, R.; Trontelj, P. Molecular phylogeny of the cave beetle genus Hadesia (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae: Leptodirini), with a description of a new species from Montenegro. Arthropod Syst. Phylogeny 2016, 74, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Moravec, J.M.; Mlejnek, R.M. Nauticiella stygivaga gen. n. et sp. n., a new amphibiontic cavernicolous beetle from the Vjetrenica Cave, Herzegovina (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae: Leptodirini). Acta Soc. Zool. Bohem. 2002, 66, 293–302. [Google Scholar]
  81. Delić, T.; Lohaj, R.; Brestovansky, J.; Čaha, D.; Jalžić, B. Questioning the monophyly of Anthroherponina (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae: Leptodirini) and description of three new, ecologically ultraspecialized subterranean species. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2023, in press. [Google Scholar]
  82. Karaman, G.S. On two new or interesting Amphipoda from Italy and Montenegro (contribution to the knowledge of the Amphipoda 290). Ecol. Montenegrina 2016, 8, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sket, B.; Dovc, P.; Jalzic, B.; Kerovec, M.; Kucinic, M.; Trontelj, P. A cave leech (Hirudinea, Erpobdellidae) from Croatia with unique morphological features. Zool. Scr. 2001, 30, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Antić, D.; Dražina, T.; Rađa, T.; Lučić, L.; Makarov, S. Review of the genus Typhloiulus Latzel, 1884 in the Dinaric region, with a description of four new species and the first description of the male of Typhloiulus insularis Strasser, 1938 (Diplopoda: Julida: Julidae). Zootaxa 2018, 4455, 258–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Lakota, J.; Lohaj, R.; Dunay, G. Taxonomical and ecological notes on the genus Scotoplanetes Absolon, with the description of a new species from Montenegro (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Trechini). Nat. Cro. 2010, 19, 99–110. [Google Scholar]
  86. Pavićević, D.; Popović, M. A new species of Scotoplanetes Absolon, 1913 (Coleoptera; Carabidae; Trechini) from Durmitor Mt., Montenegro. Biol. Serb. 2023, 45, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  87. Absolon, K.; Kratochvíl, J. Zur Kenntnis der höhlenbewohnenden Araneae der illyrischen Karstgebiete. Mitteilungen Über Höhlen Und Karstforschung 1932, 3, 73–81. [Google Scholar]
  88. Deeleman-Reinhold, C.L. The genus Rhode and the harpacteine genera Stalagtia, Folkia, Minotauria and Kaemis (Araneae, Dysteridae) of Yugoslavia and Crete, with remarks on the genus Harpactea. Rev. Arachnol. 1993, 10, 105–135. [Google Scholar]
  89. Kury, A.B.; Mendes, A.C. Taxonomic status of the European genera of Travuniidae (Arachnida, Opiliones, Laniatores). Mun. Ent. Zool. 2007, 2, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  90. Condé, B. Eukoenenia remyi n. sp., palpigrade cavernicole d’Herzégovine. Ann. Spéléol. 1974, 29, 53–56. [Google Scholar]
  91. Dányi, L.; Balázs, G.; Tuf, I.H. Taxonomic status and behavioural documentation of the troglobiont Lithobius matulici (Myriapoda, Chilopoda) from the Dinaric Alps: Are there semiaquatic centipedes in caves? ZooKeys 2019, 848, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zapparoli, M. The present knowledge on the European fauna of Lithobiomorpha (Chilopoda). Bull. Brit. Myr. Grp. 2003, 19, 20–41. [Google Scholar]
  93. Njunjić, I.; Perreau, M.; Hendriks, K.; Schilthuizen, M.; Deharveng, L. The cave beetle genus Anthroherpon is polyphyletic; molecular phylogenetics and description of Graciliella n. gen.(Leiodidae, Leptodirini). Contrib. Zool. 2016, 85, 337–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Lohaj, R.; Lakota, J.; Quéinnec, E.; Pavićević, D.; Čeplík, D. Studies on Adriaphaenops Noesske with the description of five new species from the Dinarides (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Trechini). Zootaxa 2016, 4205, 501–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2023. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed on 8 June 2023).
  96. Palandačić, A.; Matschiner, M.; Zupančič, P.; Snoj, A. Fish migrate underground: The example of Delminichthys adspersus (Cyprinidae). Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21, 1658–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Mazija, M.; Rnjak, D. Rezultati istraživanja šišmiša u odabranim skloništima na dijeu Popovog polja u općini Ravno, Bosna i Hercegovina. Hypsugo 2016, 1, 20–29. [Google Scholar]
  98. Zagmajster, M. Zanimivosti Vjetrenice na Popovem polju. Glas podzemlja 2006, 1, 66–67. [Google Scholar]
  99. Pipan, T.; Culver, D.C. Epikarst communities: Biodiversity hotspots and potential water tracers. Environ. Geol. 2007, 53, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Culver, D.C.; Brancelj, A.; Pipan, T. Epikarst communities. In Encyclopedia of Caves, 3rd ed.; White, W.B., Culver, D.C., Pipan, T., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2019; pp. 399–406. [Google Scholar]
  101. Trontelj, P.; Douady, C.J.; Fišer, C.; Gibert, J.; Gorički, Š.; Lefébure, T.; Zakšek, V. A molecular test for cryptic diversity in ground water: How large are the ranges of macro-stygobionts? Freshw. Biol. 2009, 54, 727–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lukić, M.; Delić, T.; Pavlek, M.; Deharveng, L.; Zagmajster, M. Distribution pattern and radiation of the European subterranean genus Verhoefiella (Collembola, Entomobryidae). Zool. Scr. 2020, 49, 86–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Hlebec, D.; Podnar, M.; Kučinić, M.; Harms, D. Molecular analyses of pseudoscorpions in a subterranean biodiversity hotspot reveal cryptic diversity and microendemism. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 430. [Google Scholar]
  104. Sket, B. Prilog za zaštitu nekih speleobioloških značajnih objekata. Naš Krš 1983, 9, 123–127. [Google Scholar]
  105. Piano, E.; Nicolosi, G.; Mammola, S.; Balestra, V.; Baroni, B.; Bellopede, R.; Cumino, E.; Muzzulini, N.; Piquet, A.; Isaia, M. A literature-based database of the natural heritage, the ecological status and tourism-related impacts in show caves worldwide. Nat. Conserv. 2020, 50, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Culver, D.C.; Sket, B. Biological monitoring in caves. Acta Carsologica 2002, 31, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Mulec, J. Lampenflora. In Encyclopedia of Caves, 3rd ed.; White, W.B., Culver, D.C., Pipan, T., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2019; pp. 635–641. [Google Scholar]
  108. Davor Baković, V.D. Direktora Vjetrenice: Rekordna Prošla Godina, Optimistično Čekamo Novu Ljetnu Sezonu. Available online: https://visitbih.ba/davor-bakovic-v-d-direktora-vjetrenice-rekordna-prosla-godina-optimisticno-cekamo-novu-ljetnu-sezonu/ (accessed on 28 July 2023).
  109. Paunović, A.S.; Bokić, Z.; Braeković, B. Investigations of the susceptibility of peach cvs, clingstone peaches and nectarines to powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca pannosa (Wall) Lev var persicae) in ecological conditions of Popovo Polje. Jugosl. Vocar. 1985, 19, 131–137. [Google Scholar]
  110. Ćustovic, H.; Cero, M. Condition of Ameliorative Issues and Land Consolidation Measures in Area of Popovo Polje Area, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Unpublished Work. Available online: https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/reu/europe/documents/LANDNET/2007/Bosnia.pdf. (accessed on 28 July 2023).
  111. Darwall, W.; Carrizo, S.; Numa, C.; Barrios, V.; Freyhof, J.; Smith, K. Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas in the Mediterranean Basin Hotspot: Informing Species Conservation and Development Planning in Freshwater Ecosystems (Vol. 52), 1st ed.; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 1–86. [Google Scholar]
  112. Freyhof, J. Threatened Freshwater Fishes and Molluscs of the Balkan, Potential Impact of Hydropower Projects. ECA Watch Austria & EuroNatur; Unpublished Report. Available online: https://www.balkanrivers.net/uploads/legacy/Threatened-freshwater-fishes-and-molluscs_final.pdf (accessed on 23 June 2023).
  113. Oikonomou, A.; Leprieur, F.; Leonardos, I.D. Biogeography of freshwater fishes of the Balkan Peninsula. Hydrobiologia 2014, 738, 205–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Sket, B.; Paragamian, K.; Trontelj, P. A census of the obligate subterranean fauna of the Balkan Peninsula. In Balkan Biodiversity, 1st ed.; Griffiths, H.I., Kryštufek, B., Reed, J.M., Eds.; Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 309–322. [Google Scholar]
  115. Gerhardt, A. Sensitivity towards Nitrate: Comparison of groundwater versus surface water crustaceans. J. Soil. Water. Sci. 2020, 4, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Di Lorenzo, T.; Di Marzio, W.D.; Fiasca, B.; Galassi, D.M.P.; Korbel, K.; Iepure, S.; Pereira, J.L.; Reboleira, A.S.P.; Schmidt, S.I.; Hose, G.C. Recommendations for ecotoxicity testing with stygobiotic species in the framework of groundwater environmental risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 681, 292–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kokalj, A.J.; Fišer, Ž.; Dolar, A.; Novak, S.; Drobne, D.; Bračko, G.; Fišer, C. Screening of NaCl salinity sensitivity across eight species of subterranean amphipod genus Niphargus. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 236, 113456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Fagan, A.; Sircar, I. Environmental politics in the Western Balkans: River basin management and non-governmental organisation (NGO) activity in Herzegovina. Env. Polit. 2010, 19, 808–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Naimark, N.M.; Case, H. Yugoslavia and Its Historians: Understanding the Balkan Wars of the 1990s, 1st ed.; Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USA, 2003; p. 296. [Google Scholar]
  120. Ozimec, R. Otvoren prvi biospeleološki muzej u svijetu: Biospeleološki muzej Vjetrenica. Subterranea Croat. 2016, 14, 49–50. [Google Scholar]
  121. World Heritage Convention Tentative List (Vjetrenica Cave). Available online: https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/1975/ (accessed on 15 June 2023).
  122. Milanović, P.; Glišić, R.; Ðorđević, B.; Dašić, T.; Sudar, N. Uticaj delimičnog prevođenja voda iz slivova Bune i Bregave u sliv Trebišnjice. Vodoprivreda 2012, 44, 255–257. [Google Scholar]
  123. Mirković, U.B. Techno-economic analysis for the construction of the supply tunnel of hpp “Dabar” with the application of TBM technology. Tehnika 2019, 74, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Posljedice Megaprojekta “Gornji Horizonti”: Ostaje li Hercegovina bez Vode i Kako Izbjeći Apokalipsu. Available online: https://www.klix.ba/vijesti/bih/posljedice-megaprojekta-gornji-horizonti-ostaje-li-hercegovina-bez-vode-i-kako-izbjeci-apokalipsu/200916105 (accessed on 28 July 2023).
  125. Projekat Gornji Horizonti: Početak Kraja Neretve i Hercegovine Kakvu Poznajemo? Available online: https://abrasmedia.info/projekat-gornji-horizonti-pocetak-kraja-neretve-i-hercegovine-kakvu-poznajemo/ (accessed on 28 July 2023).
  126. Fišer, C.; Borko, Š.; Delić, T.; Kos, A.; Premate, E.; Zagmajster, M.; Altermatt, F. The European green deal misses Europe’s subterranean biodiversity hotspots. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 6, 1403–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Brunke, M. Colmation and depth filtration within streambeds: Retention of particles in hyporheic interstices. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 1999, 84, 99–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Brenna, A.; Surian, N.; Mao, L. Alteration of gravel-bed river morphodynamics in response to multiple anthropogenic disturbances: Insights from the sediment-starved Parma River (northern Italy). Geomorphology 2021, 389, 107845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Borko, Š.; Trontelj, P.; Seehausen, O.; Moškrič, A.; Fišer, C. A subterranean adaptive radiation of amphipods in Europe. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. General position of the Vjetrenica Cave System in relation to the major landscape elements, defining the functioning of the Trebišnjica River and Popovo Polje (A). The hydropower plants Trebinje I and Trebinje II formed Bileća and Trebinje Lakes, respectively (dams marked by red lines). Downwards from the city of Trebinje, Trebišnjica is channelized on its way across Popovo Polje (presented in light green). Surface entrances to the Vjetrenica Cave System, marked in the satellite image (B), are situated in the northwestern part of the Popovo Polje; numbers refer to 1—Bjelušica Cave, 2—Vjetrenica Cave and 3—Lukavac Spring. The same image shows the natural (green) and artificial (red) course of the Trebišnjica River. View of the Popovo Polje from the Vjetrenica Cave’s entrance (C) (Photo by T. Delić).
Figure 1. General position of the Vjetrenica Cave System in relation to the major landscape elements, defining the functioning of the Trebišnjica River and Popovo Polje (A). The hydropower plants Trebinje I and Trebinje II formed Bileća and Trebinje Lakes, respectively (dams marked by red lines). Downwards from the city of Trebinje, Trebišnjica is channelized on its way across Popovo Polje (presented in light green). Surface entrances to the Vjetrenica Cave System, marked in the satellite image (B), are situated in the northwestern part of the Popovo Polje; numbers refer to 1—Bjelušica Cave, 2—Vjetrenica Cave and 3—Lukavac Spring. The same image shows the natural (green) and artificial (red) course of the Trebišnjica River. View of the Popovo Polje from the Vjetrenica Cave’s entrance (C) (Photo by T. Delić).
Diversity 15 00912 g001
Figure 2. Three entrances to the Vjetrenica Cave System: 1—Bjelušica cave, 2—Vjetrenica cave, and 3—Lukavac spring (numbered as in Figure 1) and their relative positions on a simplified plan of the System (adapted from [12]). The main parts of the system are color coded on the right side. (Photo by E. Premate and T. Delić).
Figure 2. Three entrances to the Vjetrenica Cave System: 1—Bjelušica cave, 2—Vjetrenica cave, and 3—Lukavac spring (numbered as in Figure 1) and their relative positions on a simplified plan of the System (adapted from [12]). The main parts of the system are color coded on the right side. (Photo by E. Premate and T. Delić).
Diversity 15 00912 g002
Figure 3. Diverse stygobionts reported from the Vjetrenica cave system: (A) the spiny amphipod Niphargus balcanicus, (B) cave shrimp Spelaeocaris sp., (C) the subterranean tubeworm Marifugia cavatica, along with the cave mussel Congeria kusceri, and (D) the olm Proteus anguinus (Photo: Teo Delić).
Figure 3. Diverse stygobionts reported from the Vjetrenica cave system: (A) the spiny amphipod Niphargus balcanicus, (B) cave shrimp Spelaeocaris sp., (C) the subterranean tubeworm Marifugia cavatica, along with the cave mussel Congeria kusceri, and (D) the olm Proteus anguinus (Photo: Teo Delić).
Diversity 15 00912 g003
Figure 5. The examples of the striking terrestrial arthropod diversity in the Vjetrenica Cave System: (A) large and predatory spider Stalagtia hercegovinensis; (B) tiny opilionid Travunia vjetrenicae; (C) one of few subterranean representatives of Glomeridellidae family, Typhloglomeris coeca; and (D) the large and troglomorphic Lithobius sketi, named after late speleobiologist Boris Sket (1936–2023) (Photo: Teo Delić).
Figure 5. The examples of the striking terrestrial arthropod diversity in the Vjetrenica Cave System: (A) large and predatory spider Stalagtia hercegovinensis; (B) tiny opilionid Travunia vjetrenicae; (C) one of few subterranean representatives of Glomeridellidae family, Typhloglomeris coeca; and (D) the large and troglomorphic Lithobius sketi, named after late speleobiologist Boris Sket (1936–2023) (Photo: Teo Delić).
Diversity 15 00912 g005
Figure 6. Additional diversity is brought into the system by (A) a rich molluscan community, including both aquatic and terrestrial species, such as Speleaoconcha paganettii, and (B) rich subterranean beetles fauna, including one of the largest leiodid beetles, Graciliella apfelbecki, (C) the tiny and elusive Troglamaurops ganglbaueri, and (D) the poorly studied collembolans, depicted by Verhoeffiella longicornis (Photo: Roman Ozimec and Teo Delić).
Figure 6. Additional diversity is brought into the system by (A) a rich molluscan community, including both aquatic and terrestrial species, such as Speleaoconcha paganettii, and (B) rich subterranean beetles fauna, including one of the largest leiodid beetles, Graciliella apfelbecki, (C) the tiny and elusive Troglamaurops ganglbaueri, and (D) the poorly studied collembolans, depicted by Verhoeffiella longicornis (Photo: Roman Ozimec and Teo Delić).
Diversity 15 00912 g006
Table 1. The list of troglobiotic taxa recorded in the Vjetrenica Cave System in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Ecological classification is marked with A—aquatic and T—terrestrial. Presence of the species in a specific part of the system, i.e., V—Vjetrenica Cave, B—Bjelušica Cave, and L—Lukavac Spring, is marked with “✔”. The asterisk denotes if the cave/spring is a type locality for the respective species. The last two columns mark species conservation status: IUCN—categories according to IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; BIH—categories according to Red List of Threatened Species of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Categories refer to EN—endangered, VU—vulnerable, NT—near threatened, LC—least concern, and DD—data deficient. Data on species and the last collection year (labelled “Year” in the table) were retrieved from SubBio Lab’s database, SubBioDB (2023), Ozimec et al. (2021), and J. Grego (Personal communication).
Table 1. The list of troglobiotic taxa recorded in the Vjetrenica Cave System in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Ecological classification is marked with A—aquatic and T—terrestrial. Presence of the species in a specific part of the system, i.e., V—Vjetrenica Cave, B—Bjelušica Cave, and L—Lukavac Spring, is marked with “✔”. The asterisk denotes if the cave/spring is a type locality for the respective species. The last two columns mark species conservation status: IUCN—categories according to IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; BIH—categories according to Red List of Threatened Species of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Categories refer to EN—endangered, VU—vulnerable, NT—near threatened, LC—least concern, and DD—data deficient. Data on species and the last collection year (labelled “Year” in the table) were retrieved from SubBio Lab’s database, SubBioDB (2023), Ozimec et al. (2021), and J. Grego (Personal communication).
Higher GroupFamilySpeciesA/TCave/SpringYearRed List
VBLIUCNBIH
RhabdocoellaScutariellidaeScutariella stammeri Matjašič, 1958A✔* /
Stygodyticola hadzii Matjašič, 1958A✔* /
Subtelsonia perianalis Matjašič, 1958A /
Troglocaridicola spelaeocaridis Matjašič, 1958A /
Troglocaridicola capreolaria herzegovinensis Matjašič, 1970A /
TricladidaGeoplanidaeRhynchodemus sp.T 2021
TrematodaStenakridaeCaudotestis protei (Prudhoe, 1945) Yamaguti, 1958A✔* /
NemerteaProstomatidaeProstoma hercegovinense Tarman, 1961A✔* /
Polychaeta SerpulidaeMarifugia cavatica Absolon & Hrabe, 1930A 2021
Hirudinea ErpobdellidaeDina absoloni Johansson, 1913A ✔* 2021
Gastropoda CyclophoridaePholeoteras euthrix Sturany, 1904T 2016LC
EllobiidaeZospeum troglobalcanicum Absolon, 1916T 2016
EmmericiidaeEmmericia ventricosa Brusina, 1870A /VU
HydrobiidaeKerkia briani Rysiewska & Osikowski, 2020A 2020
Narentiana vjetrenicae Radoman, 1973A✔* ✔*/EN
Pseudamnicola troglobia Bole, 1961A/
MoitessieriidaeLanzaia vjetrenicae Kuščer, 1933A✔* /VU
Paladilhiopsis absoloni (Wagner, 1914)A /LC
Iglicopsis butoti Falniowski & Hofman, 2021A 2010
OrientalinidaeRadomaniola montana (Radoman, 1973)A /
PristilomatidaeVitrea spelaea (Wagner, 1914)T 2016EN
Gyralina candida (Wagner, 1909)A /
SpelaeoconchidaeSpelaeoconcha paganettii polymorpha Wagner, 1914T✔* 2016LC
FerussaciidaeCecilioides spelaea Wagner, 1914T
AgardhiellidaeAgardhiella biarmata (O.Boettger, 1880)T
ZonitidaeAegopis spelaeus Wagner, 1914T✔* 2016NT
Bivalvia DreissenidaeCongeria kusceri Bole, 1962A /VU
Diplopoda GlomeridellidaeTyphloglomeris coeca Verhoeff, 1898T2014
JulidaeTyphloiulus edentulus Attems, 1951T✔* /
PolydesmidaeBrachydesmus stygivagus Verhoeff, 1899T 2021
TrichopolydesmidaeVerhoeffodesmus sp.T 2021
Chilopoda LithobiidaeLithobius matulici Verhoeff, 1899T 2021
Lithobius sketi Matic & Darabantu, 1968T✔* 2021
Eupolybothrus leostygis (Verhoeff, 1899)T /
Palpigradi EukoeneniidaeEukoenenia remyi Conde, 1974T✔* 2014
AcariLabidostommatidaeLabidostomma longipes Willmann, 1940T 2020
Opiliones SironidaeCyphophthalmus sp.T 2021
TravuniidaeTravunia vjetrenicae Hadži, 1933T✔* 2021
Pseudoscorpiones ChtonidaeChthonius occultus Beier, 1939T 2013 EN
Neobisium vjetrenicae Hadži, 1932T✔* / EN
Roncus anophthalmus (Ellingsen, 2013)T /
Araneae DysderidaeStalagtia hercegovinensis (Nosek, 1905)T✔* 2020
Stalitella noseki Absolon & Kratochvil, 1933T✔* /
LinyphiidaeTroglohyphantes salax (Kulczynski, 1914)T /
NesticidaeKryptonesticus fagei (Kratochvil, 1933)T /
Copepoda CyclopidaeAcanthocyclops troglophilus (Kiefer, 1932)A✔* /
Diacyclops charon (Kiefer, 1931)A /
Diacyclops karamani (Kiefer, 1932)A✔* /
Diacyclops tantalus (Kiefer, 1937)A✔* /
Eucyclops inarmatus Kiefer, 1932A✔* /
DiaptomidaeTroglodiaptomus sketi Petkovski, 1978A /
Ostracoda CyprididaePseudocypridopsis hartmanni Petkovski et al., 2009A✔* /
Pseudocypridopsis sywulai Petkovski et al., 2009A /
EntocytheridaeSphaeromicola stammeri Klie, 1930A /
Amphipoda HadziidaeHadzia fragilis Karaman S., 1932A✔* 2021 DD
NiphargidaeNiphargus hercegovinensis Karaman S., 1950A 2000 DD
Niphargus kolombatovici Karaman S., 1950A 2003 DD
Niphargus factor Karaman G. & Sket, 1990A✔* 2005
Niphargus boskovici Karaman S., 1952A✔* 2021 DD
Niphargus trullipes Sket, 1958 A✔* 2021 DD
Niphargus vjetrenicensis Karaman S., 1932A✔* 2021 DD
Niphargus balcanicus (Absolon, 1927)A✔* 2021 DD
Niphargus cvijici Karaman S., 1950A / DD
Niphargus zavalanus Karaman S., 1950A ✔*/ DD
TyphlogammaridaeTyphlogammarus mrazeki (Schäferna, 1907)A 2021
Isopoda AsellidaeProasellus hercegovinensis (Karaman S., 1933)A✔*2021
Proasellus anophtalmus (Karaman S., 1934)A /
MicroparasellidaeMicrocharon sp.A /
SphaeromatidaeMonolistra hercegoviniensis Absolon, 1916A✔* 2021
TrichoniscidaeAlpioniscus heroldii (Verhoeff, 1931)T 2021
Cyphonethes herzegowinensis (Verhoeff, 1900)T 2021
Decapoda AtyidaeSpelaeocaris pretneri Matjašič, 1956A 2003
Spelaeocaris hercegovinensis (Babić, 1922)A✔* 2021
Troglocaris anophthalma periadriatica Jugovic et al., 2012A✔* 2021
Mysida MysidaeTroglomysis vjetrenicensis Stammer, 1933A✔* 2000
Collembola EntomobryidaeVerhoeffiella verdemontana Lukić & Deharveng, 2018T 2014
Verhoeffiella longicornis (Absolon, 1900)T 2021
Diplura CampodeidaePlusiocampa remyi Condé, 1947T✔* 2021
Thysanura NicoletiidaeColetinia sp.T /
Coleoptera CarabidaeNeotrechus dalmatinus dalmatinus (Miller L., 1861)T2021
Scotoplanetes arenstorffianus Absolon, 1913T✔* 2021 EN
Adriaphaenops pretneri Scheibel, 1935T✔* / EN
Neotrechus suturalis otiosus (Obenberger, 1917)T /
Speluncarius anophthalmus (Reitter, 1886)T /
LeiodidaeSpeonesiotes schweitzeri Jeannel, 1941T✔* 2014
Speonesiotes narentinus latitarsis (Apfelbeck, 1919)T /
Graciliella apfelbecki apfelbecki (Müller J., 1910)T✔* 2021
Hadesia vasiceki Müller J., 1911T✔* 2021
Nauticiella stygivaga Moravec & Mlejnek, 2002T✔* 2021
Anthroherpon primitivum (Absolon, 1913)T /
StaphylinidaeTroglamaurops ganglbaueri (Winkler, 1925)T 2021
Nonveilleria sp.T /
Urodela ProteidaeProteus anguinus Laurenti, 1768A 2021VUEN
852622
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Delić, T.; Pipan, T.; Ozimec, R.; Culver, D.C.; Zagmajster, M. The Subterranean Species of the Vjetrenica Cave System in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Diversity 2023, 15, 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15080912

AMA Style

Delić T, Pipan T, Ozimec R, Culver DC, Zagmajster M. The Subterranean Species of the Vjetrenica Cave System in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Diversity. 2023; 15(8):912. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15080912

Chicago/Turabian Style

Delić, Teo, Tanja Pipan, Roman Ozimec, David C. Culver, and Maja Zagmajster. 2023. "The Subterranean Species of the Vjetrenica Cave System in Bosnia and Herzegovina" Diversity 15, no. 8: 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15080912

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop