Next Article in Journal
Diversity of the Summer Phytoplankton of 43 Waterbodies in Bulgaria and Its Potential for Water Quality Assessment
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Fungal Diversity before and after Discoloration of Rubberwood in Xishuangbanna
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Parasites in Imported Edible Fish and a Systematic Review of the Pathophysiology of Infection and the Potential Threat to Australian Native Aquatic Species

by
Michelle Williams
*,
Marta Hernandez-Jover
and
Shokoofeh Shamsi
School of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences & Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2023, 15(4), 470; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15040470
Submission received: 20 February 2023 / Revised: 15 March 2023 / Accepted: 18 March 2023 / Published: 23 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Biodiversity Conservation)

Abstract

:
Previous research has shown that certain types of edible fish imported into Australia are infected with Euclinostomum/Isoparorchis digenetic trematodes. In the present study, imported Channa fish were examined for parasites which were then morphologically identified to the lowest taxonomic unit possible. Here we provide the first Australian report of Pallisentis sp. Van Cleave, 1928 (Prevalence (P) 35.9%) of family Quadrigyridae; Genarchopsis sp. Ozaki, 1925 (P. 16.5%), family Derogenidae and Senga sp. Dollfus, 1934 (P. 4.8%) in edible imported Channa fish (n = 103). Pallisentis sp. and Senga sp. have invasive hold fast organs which cause significant mechanical damage to fish intestinal structures and Euclinostomum/Isoparorchis cause severe pathology and loss of marketability in infected fish. These exotic parasites, if introduced into Australia, have the potential to negatively impact the health, fecundity, resilience and marketability of native and commercial fish species. Biosecurity is a constant ontogenesis of novel hypothesis based on current scientific discoveries. To further increase understanding of how parasitism impacts fish health, a systematic literature review was conducted and the pathophysiology of infection described. Potential exposure pathways and parasite host associations in Australia are discussed.

1. Introduction

Fish-borne parasites introduced to regions where the parasite is unrecognized have the potential to inflict significant economic hardship on the commercial fisheries industry [1] through detrimental retardation of growth, fecundity and increased mortality [2,3,4]. Additionally, countries with phylogenetically homogenous native aquatic fauna to imported fish may be at high risk for co-introduction of parasites which may impact the health and survival of native aquatic species [5]. Transported invasive parasite species which become established in the environment are a high biodiversity risk across ecosystems for the emergence of aquatic diseases and decline in native animal populations [6,7].
It is generally accepted that the trade and release of ornamental fish into Australian waterways has been responsible for the introduction of many aquatic parasite species [5]; the cestode Bothriocephalus acheilognathi Yamaguti, 1934 syn. Schyzocotyle acheilognathi Brabec, Waeschenbach, Scholz, Littlewood & Kuchta, 2015 [8], monogeneans Gyrodactylus bullatarudis Turnbull, 1956, G. macracanthus Hukuda, 1940, Dactylogyrus extensus Mueller & Van Cleave, 1932, D. anchoratus (Dujardin, 1845) Wagener, 1857 [9] and the parasitic copepod Lernaea cyprinacea syn. Lernaea cyprinacea cyprinacea Linnaeus, 1758 are now established in many species of native Australian fish [10,11]. However, the risk posed by parasites in imported edible fish which, due to weaknesses in the supply chain, may find their way into the aquatic environment, is rarely considered (Figure 1). Australian biosecurity is considered exemplary and the nation’s import conditions for edible fish stringent [12,13]. However, Australian importation commodity codes and trade data indicate that some fresh or chilled fish for human consumption originates from countries with endemic infection of parasites alien to Australia [14,15] and many of these fish-borne parasites have been demonstrated to cause significant damage to fish and other aquatic or native species [16,17,18,19,20].
Metacercariae of many parasitic flukes and larval nematodes can be very resilient. These infectious stages of a parasite can remain viable for long periods in refrigerated, salted, pickled and frozen fish products [21,22,23,24,25,26]. The introduction of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) into Australia, from frozen imported edible shrimp [27], used by recreational fishers as bait or repackaged in Australia as bait [28], highlighted this possible but previously little-considered exposure pathway. It also provided a salient reminder of the social, environmental and economic repercussions associated with a biosecurity breach [29]. Although oxymoronic, the introduction of WSSV into Australia was a lesson in biosecurity needing to anticipate the unexpected.
In Williams, et al. [30] six predictor variables were used for a risk scoring system to identify countries which may be at high risk of seafood supply chain breaches. All countries scored were given an anonymous and unique numerical identifier and 200 parasites were collected from fish imported to Australia from Country 22 (Country 22 = unique numerical identifier). In Williams, et al. [31], zoonotic/potentially zoonotic parasites, Isoparorchis sp. Southwell, 1913 and Euclinostomum sp. Travassos, 1928 were identified from the 200 parasites previously collected. Non-zoonotic parasites in the present study were collected from Channa Scopoli, 1777 species fish originating from Country 22.
Channa species are freshwater predatory fish which are distributed from Asia to the Middle East [32]. Member species are an important source of dietary protein in many countries and are commercially farmed and exported (food and aquarium trade) [33] from some regions. The preferred habitat of Channa species are ponds/ditches and, as adults, swamps, stagnant and muddy streams/water [34]. Due to the carnivorous and voracious predation of frogs, immature turtles and small fish/fish fry, Channa species are vulnerable to heavy intestinal parasite infection [35].
To further the understand the risk posed by parasites present in imported edible fish, the aim of the present study was to identify ‘non-zoonotic’ parasites from Channa fish collected in Williams, et al. [30] to the lowest taxonomic unit possible using morphological methodology. The secondary aim was to explore the pathophysiology of fish parasitism associated with non-zoonotic species identified in this study and Isoparorchis sp./Euclinostomum identified in Williams, et al. [31] through a systematic review of published literature. The tertiary aim was to explore and discuss the availably of suitable host species and the potential of each parasite to develop a successful lifecycle in Australia.
In the present study, we investigate parasitic helminths Pallisentis sp. (Acanthocephala: Quadriguyridae), Genarchopsis sp. (Trematoda: Derogenidae), Senga sp. (Cestoda: Bothriocephalidae), Isoparorchis sp. (Trematoda: Isoparorchiidae) and Euclinostomum sp. (Trematoda: Clinostomidae). The potential exposure pathways discussed include the availability of both suitable intermediate, if applicable, and final hosts in Australia according to the lifecycle of each parasite.
The purpose of this study was to identify non-zoonotic parasites from Channa fish imported into Australia, not to disadvantage the fish export market of any developing country. Therefore, information which may lead to the identification of any country is absent from this manuscript. This may include auxiliary tables, figures, fish species and citations. Citation omitted from this manuscript to maintain country confidentiality are indicated with (*).

2. Materials and Method

2.1. Parasite Collection and Preparation

Zoonotic/potentially zoonotic parasite species, Isoparorchis sp. and Euclinostomum sp. were previously identified in Williams, et al. [31] and non-zoonotic parasite species were identified in the present study. All non-zoonotic parasites were obtained from edible Channa fish (n = 103 individual Channa fish of the same species). The method for parasite collection and preparation is described in detail in Williams, et al. [30] and included the methods for fish examination found in Shamsi and Suthar [36] and the pepsin digestion method found in Bier, et al. [37]. Parasites were stored in 70% ethanol until morphological identification. In the present study, whole specimens were slide mounted in lactophenol and morphological examination followed descriptions in published literature.

2.2. Morphological Identification

The morphometric characteristics of importance were measured for selected specimens, using a calibrated eyepiece micrometre (BX-43 Olympus Microscope, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and compared with descriptions in published literature. Unless otherwise stated, all measurements are given in millimetres. Measurement ranges are given in length x width mm format or as length or width only. An Upright Motorized Microscope ECLIPSE Ni-E, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan was used for image capture of specimens.

2.3. Parasite Population Calculations

The prevalence (P), mean intensity (MI) and mean abundance (MA) of the parasites Genarchopsis, Pallisentis and Senga genera, described in the present study, followed calculations in Bush, et al. [38]:
P = (number of infected fish/total number of examined fish) × 100;
MI = (number of parasites/number of infected hosts);
MA = number of parasites/total number of examined hosts.
Parasite population calculations have been provided for parasite genera Genarchopsis, Pallisentis and Senga (Table 1). For Pallisentis (B) sp. 1, Pallisentis (P) gomptii, Genarchopsis sp. 1 and Genarchopsis paithanensis the number of parasites and the number of infected fish only have been provided (Table 1).

2.4. Literature Search

For each parasite species Pallisentis (Brevitritospinus) sp., or Pallisentis (Pallisentis) sp., Senga sp. and Genarchopsis sp. identified in the present study and Euclinostomum sp. and Isoparorchis sp. identified in Williams, et al. [31], a literature search for English text articles was conducted via Google Scholar and Charles Sturt University (CSU) PRIMO search engines. Where full text articles were not available, CSU interlibrary loan was used to obtain a copy of the publication wherever possible. The Charles Sturt University PRIMO search engine maintains an account with all major scholarly journals. There were no time limitations for publications sourced. The search terms used for the literature search included: “each parasite name” AND histopathology OR pathophysiology OR histochemical. Results from review articles were excluded. For each paper, we compiled datasets on hosts infected, anatomical site of infection, geographic locality where hosts were identified infected and observations of the physiological consequences of infection in order to provide a general overview of the risks to fish health.

3. Results

3.1. Prevalence of Helminths in Fish

In this study, Pallisentis sp. (n = 97 in total), Genarchopsis sp. (n = 36 in total) and Senga sp. (n = 5 in total) parasites were recovered from 103 imported Channa species fish. All Channa fish examined in this study were the same species. Many of the parasite specimens were damaged, therefore, provisional identification to a species level has only been made in some instances. Of the 97 Pallisentis sp., 7 females were identified as Pallisentis (P) gomptii (n = 7/97) and 1 adult male identified as Pallisentis (B) sp. 1 (n = 1/97). There were 36 Genarchopsis sp. in total identified, inclusive of 3 Genarchopsis paithanensis (n = 3/36) and 1 Genarchopsis folliculata (n = 1/36) herein identified as Genarchopsis sp. 1. A total of 5 cestodes were identified as Senga species.
Pallisentis sp. was the most prevalent parasite infecting Channa fish (P 35.9%), followed by Genarchopsis sp. (P 16.5%) and Senga sp. with a prevalence of 4.8% (Table 1). Adult and cystacanths of Pallisentis (Pallisentis (P.)) sp. were recovered. Cystacanths without exception were encysted in clear capsules attached to the intestinal mesentery. Adult Pallisentis (P.) sp. were all found with the proboscis embedded in the intestinal wall or intestinal mesentery. The proboscis of one adult male specimen of Pallisentis (Brevitritospinus (B.)) sp. was embedded in fish musculature. Genarchopsis sp. were found free in the abdominal cavity. All Senga sp. were obtained from the lumen of the intestine. The exterior colour of the tapeworms reflected the fish intestinal contents.

3.2. Morphological Identification of Helminths from Consumer Ready Channa Fish

3.2.1. Genarchopsis Species Ozaki, 1925, Family Derogenidae Nicoll, 1910, Class Trematoda

Genarchopsis Species General Observations

Many specimens were damaged and identification to a species level was not possible. A total of 36 specimens were identified as Genarchopsis species based on descriptions in Shimazu, et al. [39] and Urabe, et al. [40]. General observation of damaged Genarchopsis species are as follows: Specimens range in size and width between different species. The posterior is bluntly pointed. The acetabulum surrounding the ventral and oral suckers is muscular. Ventral suckers range from slightly post equatorial to situated at the anterior section of the posterior third of the body. The posterior body angles away at the ventral sucker from the anterior body by ~10–45° depending on the species. In general, the ventral sucker is approximately twice as long and one and a half times as wide as the oral sucker. Vitellaria number varies from one to four between species and occurs at the posterior end of the body.

Genarchopsis paithanensis 

Three reproducing adult specimens (n = 3/36) were identified as Genarchopsis paithanensis based on descriptions in Pardeshi and Hiware [41]. Genarchopsis paithanensis (Figure 2A–C) are 1.5–3.85 mm in length. Width at the ventral sucker (VS) is 0.4–0.5 mm, at the anterior body 0.4–0.9 mm and the posterior body 0.25–0.32 mm. The oral sucker is 0.2–0.25 × 0.52–0.45 mm and the VS 0.4–0.62 × 0.37–0.55 mm. The body angles away by approximately 45° at the ventral sucker. The vitelline gland is a single heart-shaped granular mass and is situated at the posterior extremity of the body. The right arm of the vitelline gland is 0.05 × 0.03–0.035 mm and the left arm 0.045 × 0.035 mm. The uterus is distinctive and multi coiled. Egg is engorged from the anterior body above the VS. Mature eggs are oval in shape (0.04–0.05 mm long) and have a distinct polar filament. There are two testes (T) situated in the posterior third below the ventral sucker along the opposing sides of the lateral body line which are 0.08 × 0.09 mm (T1) and 0.08 × 0.08 mm (T2).

Genarchopsis sp. 1

One reproducing adult specimen (n = 1/36) was close to descriptions for G. folliculata in Bhadauria and Dandotia [42] and identification was based on four vitelline glands which are of similar size; vitelline 1 (V1) (0.065 × 0.06 mm); V2 (0.66 × 0.05 mm); V3 (0.065 × 0.04 mm) and V4 (0.055 × 0.05 mm). Many other morphological features are indistinct or damaged. The specimen is 1.30 mm in length and 0.16 mm wide. The oral and VS are not able to be accurately measured. The uterus is multi coiled and contains many oval eggs (0.045 × 0.02 mm).

3.2.2. Senga sp. Dollfus, 1934, Family Bothriocephalidae Blanchard, 1849, Class Cestoda

Two reproducing adult specimens were identified as Senga sp. (Figure 2D–E) according to descriptions in Koiri and Roy [43], Majid and Shinde [44] and Pardeshi and Hiware [45]. The scolex is rounded and crowned with a single circle of 46–50 elongated hooks which attach to a short neck. Hooks are pointed at the posterior end and are 0.06–0.062 mm long and 0.01 mm wide. Mature proglottids are wider than long (0.15–0.22 × 1.0–1.5 mm). Testes are very small, round and evenly distributed in each segment. Eggs are numerous within the uterus and are oval with no operculate (0.045 × 0.022–0.025 mm). The cirrus pouch is oval in shape. Three reproducing adult other specimens with damaged scolex were identified as Senga species based upon morphology of the undamaged scolex/hooks and the mature proglottids.

3.2.3. Pallisentis Species Van Cleave, 1928, Family Quadrigyridae Van Cleave, 1920, Class Eoacanthocephala

Ninety-seven individuals of Pallisentis sp. in total were recovered. Amin, et al. [46] established Pallisentis and Brevitritospinus as a subgenus of Pallisentis based on proboscis hook sizes. The armature of the proboscis of Pallisentis (B.) has posterior two rows of proboscis hooks approximately half as long as the hooks in the top two rows. The armature of Pallisentis (P.), however, has proboscis hooks which decline gradually in size from anterior to posterior. Selected specimens which were measured were allotted to either subgenera according to proboscis hook size or for damaged specimens, as Pallisentis sp.

Pallisentis (Brevitritospinus) sp. 1

One adult male specimen only (n = 1/97) in the present study was identified as belonging to Pallisentis (B.) (Figure 2F). The internal structures of this specimen were indistinct; however, all other features followed descriptions in Gupta and Verma [47] and Gautam, et al. [48] for Pallisentis (B.) cavasii. No female Pallisentis (B.) specimens were identified. The measurements for the male specimen in the present study are as follows: body 2.97 mm long, 0.25 mm wide at the collar, 0.27 mm at the anterior trunk and 0.10 mm wide at the posterior trunk. Proboscis is globular and first row of hooks are very robust and only slightly recurved with others appearing to be relatively straight. First (0.05 mm) and second (0.045 mm) row of proboscis hooks are close in length. Third (0.026 mm) to fourth (0.02 mm) row of hooks are similar in length and approximately half the length of hooks in the first two rows. The base of the proboscis hook appears deeply embedded in the proboscis wall. There are 15 collar spines with 10–11 spines per row and 0.015–0.02 mm distance between each spine. Collar spines measure 0.025 × 0.02 mm. There is a very small gap between the end of the collar spines and commencement of trunk spines (0.065 mm). Trunk spines are arranged in 18 rows and there are 14–20 spines per row which decrease at the posterior end of trunk to 2–3 spines. Trunk spines (0.025 × 0.01 mm) are forked at the proximal end and there is 0.02–0.025 mm between each spine.

Pallisentis (Pallisentis) gomptii

Seven adult female specimens (n = 7/97) were very close to descriptions in Gautam, et al. [48] and Gupta and Verma [47] for Pallisentis (P.) gomptii (Figure 2G). No male specimens were examined to confirm species identity. The body length range is 6.5–10.0. The body width range is 0.32–0.60 at the collar and 0.22–0.50 at the posterior trunk. Immediately following the collar, the width at the anterior body flares slightly (0.45–0.70). There are four circles of proboscis hooks with ten hooks per row. Hooks in the first row are 0.06–0.08, the second row 0.045–0.075, the third row 0.035–0.06 and in the fourth row 0.025–0.045. Collar spines are arranged in 14–15 rows with 15–17 spines per row. Collar spines are 0.02–0.04 in length and there is 0.02–0.09 distance between each spine. A spineless area (0.1–0.22) separates trunk and collar spines. Trunk spines are only conical in shape. There is no cuticular thickening at the base of proboscis hooks or trunk spines. Trunk spines do not extend to the posterior end of the trunk and are arranged in 60–70 rows each with 14–15 spines per circle. Trunk spines are 0.015–0.035 in length with 0.03–0.08 between each adjacent spine.

3.3. Literature Search Results

The literature search results have been included in Figure 3 and information obtained from the search has been included in Table 2 and the manuscript text.

3.3.1. Euclinostomum sp., Travassos, 1928, Pathophysiology

Euclinostomum species of family Clinostomidae are haemophagic digenean parasites [49] which are able to infect an extensive species range [50]. Euclinostomum sp. feed on host blood both directly from the internal organs of the host as well as extracorporeally [49]. The pathogenicity to the host is dependent on the site where metacercariae encyst. Skin encystation has an irritating effect/thickens skin and fish are very likely to self-mutilate [21,50]. Encystation of the host muscle is associated with abnormal swimming behaviours and mass mortality [51,52]. Gross histopathological changes have been observed in the host kidney and liver when metacercariae encyst in these organs [1].
The teleostean kidney and liver are metabolically critical organs for gaseous exchange, excretion of toxins, hemopoiesis and osmoregulation [53]. In addition, the liver is important for metabolism of proteins, carbohydrates, lipids and functions to store glycogen, to catabolise fatty acids and synthesise amino acids [54]. It is considered the significant damage to both the liver and kidney resultant of parasitism would limit fish survival. In addition, impairment of hemopoiesis in conjunction with a very efficient haemophagic parasite may induce anaemia which has been demonstrated to impair fish growth, diminish health and increase mortality [55,56].
Table 2. Previous reports of host parasitism and pathophysiology identified following literature review. Fish pathophysiology column includes histopathology and any perceived or measured effects. N/D indicates not discussed.
Table 2. Previous reports of host parasitism and pathophysiology identified following literature review. Fish pathophysiology column includes histopathology and any perceived or measured effects. N/D indicates not discussed.
Species of ParasiteHost InfectedSite of InfectionGeographical LocalityFish PathophysiologyReference
Euclinostomum ardeolae El-Naffar & Khalifa, 1981Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758)KidneyEgyptGrey/black cysts Ahmed, et al. [57]
Euclinostomum heterostomum (Rudolphi, 1809) Travassos, 1928 Spotted snakehead, Channa punctata (Bloch, 1793)Liver, kidney & viscera IndiaHeavily parasitized fish lethargic Bhargavi, et al. [58]
Euclinostomum heterostomumMozambique tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus (Peters, 1852)High in muscleMultiple locations, Venda and Lebowa, southern AfricaLoss of consumer confidence. Britz, et al. [51]
Euclinostomum heterostomumRedbelly tilapia, Tilapia zillii syn. Coptodon zillii (Gervais, 1848)Body cavity, skin, eyeOpi Lake, NigeriaPronounced inflammation & roughened skin. Ex-cysted metacercariae associated damage from burrowing through host organs. Fish blindness, myositis, muscle bumps. Decreased fish marketability.Echi, et al. [21]
Euclinostomum heterostomumRedbelly tilapia T. zillii syn. Coptodon zillii SkinNigeriaCo-infection with other clinostomatids causes cysts, ulcers, degeneration of skin/muscle, necrosis. Echi, et al. [59]
Euclinostomum heterostomumStriped snakehead, Channa striata (Bloch, 1793)Body cavity, muscles, liver, gill opening, intestine, kidneys & ovariesBhopal, IndiaFish with reduced glomeruli size, severe degeneration/necrosis of hemopoietic tissue and tubule cells with hypertrophied nuclei & epithelial cells detached. Occlusion of tubular lumen.Kaur, et al. [60]
Euclinostomum heterostomumSpotted snakehead, C. punctataLiverBhopal, IndiaDegeneration & necrosis of liver tissue with enucleated hepatocytes. Kaur, et al. [61]
Euclinostomum heterostomumApistogramma ramirezi syn. Mikrogeophagus ramirez (Myers & Harry, 1948)Encysted skinImported from Hong Kong to Purdue University, USAIrritating effect, rubbing against rocks & self-trauma.Kazacos and Appel [50]
Euclinostomum heterostomumGuppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters, 1859MusculatureChonburi Province, ThailandLocalised degeneration & necrosis where parasite present.Laoprasert, et al. [62]
Euclinostomum heterostomumStriped snakehead, C. striata and Spotted snakehead, C. punctataLiverN/DRupture & loss of hepatocyte distinct shape. Vacuolation of cytoplasm. Hypertrophy of hepatocytes. Perilobular space of liver shows vacuolation, loosening of hepatic tissue & necrosis. Laxma Reddy, et al. [63]
Euclinostomum heterostomumRedbelly tilapia, T. zillii syn. Coptodon zillii Encapsulated mostly in peritoneum of the kidney some musculatureNile, Giza governorate, EgyptParasite cyst wall merged with renal interstitium & glomerular structures. Intense inflammatory cells extending into surrounding renal tissue. Significant glomerular & interstitial congestion, tubular epithelium with haemorrhages, vacuolization & necrosis.Mahdy, et al. [64]
Euclinostomum heterostomumAfrican catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822)MuscleBuffeldoorn Dam & Seshego Dam Lebowa, South AfricaHeavy infestations likely to occur in ponds with high fish density if intermediate snail host is present. Loss consumer confidence.Mashego and Saayman [65]
Euclinostomum heterostomumNile tilapia, O. niloticusKidneyCommercial markets Cairo & fisherman Kafr El Sheikh, EgyptThick fibrous area surrounding parasite. Degenerative renal tissue, tubules & congested blood vessels. Some sections showed changes to glomeruli and Bowman’s capsule.Mohamed, et al. [66]
Euclinostomum clarias (Dubois, 1930) Dollfus, 1932 African catfish, C. gariepinusLiverNigeriaHepatic degeneration, necrosis/fibrosis, inflammation of bile duct, severe damage result of larval migration.Onucha [67]
Euclinostomum heterostomumWild caught croaking gourami, Trichopsis vittata (Cuvier, 1831), Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendens Regan, 1910 and crescent betta, Betta imbellis Ladiges, 1975MusculatureSouthern ThailandTubercle-like thickened areas on skin.Pinky, et al. [68]
Euclinostomum heterostomumSpotted snakehead, C. punctataLiver, kidney, peritoneum, muscle, and ovaryLocal fish market, Aligarh, North India Tissue damage, infiltration immune cells cyst wall, chronic inflammation, granulomas. Liver degeneration hepatocytes, cytoplasmic vacuolation, nuclear alterations, mallory body formation, fibrosis, necrosis. Kidney distortion/dilation renal tubules, vacuolar degeneration, hypertrophy/hyperplasia tubular epithelial cells, occlusion tubules, fibrosis, haemorrhage, congestion glomeruli.Shareef and Abidi [1]
Euclinostomum heterostomumGuppy, P. reticulata culturedMuscleKidchakan Supamattaya Aquatic Animal Health Research Center, Songkhla, southern ThailandAbnormal swimming behaviour. Fish death severe infection.Suanyuk, et al. [52]
Euclinostomum ardeolaeNile tilapia, O. niloticusKidneyThe Nile, EgyptCysts embedded kidney exerting pressure on tissue, black discolouration.Tayel, et al. [69]
Isoparorchis hypselobagri (Billet, 1898) Ejsmont, 1932 (probably Isoparorchis trisimilitubis)Wallago, Wallago attu (Bloch & Schneider, 1801)Swim bladderIndiaInfected fish unsuitable for human consumption. Patches of black pigments in the muscles and viscera of its hosts. Causes mortality and great economic loss. Adult parasites excrete poisonous metabolic substances within swim bladder. Ammonia is converted to urea. Urea high depending on parasite number.Adak and Manna [70]
Isoparorchis hypselobagri (probably Isoparorchis trisimilitubis)Wallago, W. attuSwim bladderIndiaAmmonia major excretory product. Amount of excreted ammonia differs depending on parasite number. Ammonotelic and ammonia can be formed by the action of several enzymes in Schistosoma mansoni as well.Adak and Manna [71]
Isoparorchis hypselobagri (probably Isoparorchis trisimilitubis or Isoparorchis sp. 3)Wallago, W. attuSwim bladderDhaka, BangladeshJuvenile forms caused massive tissue damage, resulting erosions and tunnels in musculature, exudate, discoloration connective tissue, extreme melanisation, mixed inflammatory responses. Alam [72]
Isoparorchis hypselobagri (probably Isoparorchis trisimilitubis)Wallago, W. attuAir bladderKakraiya lake, Jahangirabad, IndiaInkspot disease.Choudhary, et al. [73]
Isoparorchis hypselobagri (probably Isoparorchis trisimilitubis)Long-whiskered catfish, Mystus aor syn. Sperata aor (Hamilton, 1822)Day’s mystus, Mystus bleekeri (Day, 1877)Muscles, swim bladder, visceral organs, body cavity, viscera, some in the mouth, urinary system, biliary system, ovariesKuliarchar & Upazila rivers, IndiaExtensive tissue damage including inflammation, necrosis, and empty spaces with fragmented blood capillaries, tissue debris, lymphocytes and fluids. Infected liver, swim bladder and kidney showed vacuolation and massive melanisation.Farhana and Khanum [74]
Isoparorchis hypselobagri (probably Isoparorchis trisimilitubis)Spotted snakehead, C. punctataFins, liver, ovaries, abdominal cavityKhookas bundh, Jaipur, IndiaNecrosis of fin tissues, scale loss. Necrotic areas with extensive inflammatory exudate formation were seen throughout the viscera. Liver reduced in size. Haemorrhage of intestinal wall.Mahajan, et al. [18]
Isoparorchis hypselobagri (probably Isoparorchis trisimilitubis)Red-crowned roofed turtle Kachuga kachuga syn. Batagur kachuga (Gray, 1831)Body cavityHyderabad, IndiaN/D however this turtle is critically endangered in India and likely extinct Bangladesh.Simha [75], Praschag, et al. [76]
Isoparorchis hypselobagriPungtungia herzi, Herzenstein, 1892 Acheilognathus koreensis syn. Tanakia koreensis (Kim & Kim, 1990), Squalidus japonicus coreanus syn. Squalidus japonicus (Sauvage, 1883) and Odontobutis platycephala Iwata & Jeon, 1985Muscle & lesions skinSaengbiryang-myeon, Sancheong-gun, Gyeongsangnam-do, KoreaInkspot disease, muscle and skin swellings and lesions.Sohn and Na [77]
Isoparorchis hypselobagri (probably Isoparorchis trisimilitubis)Mystus seenghala, syn. Sperata seenghala (Sykes, 1839)Swim bladderRiver Godavari, Rajahmundry, India‘‘Ink spot disease’’.Vankara, et al. [78]
Genarchopsis goppo Ozaki, 1925 Striped snakehead, C. striataIntestineWarangal, IndiaHistopathological changes include shortening and destruction of villi, vacuolation of sub mucous cells, dilation of blood vessels thickening of muscles and necrosis. In the infected fish carbohydrates, glycogen, protein and lipid contents are increased significantly to compensate for parasite presence. Laxmareddy and Benarjee [17]
Genarchopsis paithanensis Pardeshi & Hiware, 2012 Zig-zag eel, Mastacembelus armatus (Lacepède, 1800)IntestineIndiaDamage sub and mucosal layer and dilation blood vessels, destruction and extrusion of intestinal villi, inframammary and hyperplastic fibrosis. Pardeshi and Hiware [79]
Genrachopsis goppoStriped snakehead, C. striataIntestineWarangal, IndiaSevere damage to villi and other layers of intestine. Infections interfere with digestion and absorption of food material causing metabolic disturbances. Excretory products and metabolic end products excreted into intestine produce toxicity, interfere with protein metabolism of host. Host tissue may show decrease in protein content.Reddy and Benarjee [16]
Genrachopsis goppoSpotted snakehead, C. punctataIntestineKakatiya, IndiaGlycogen content increased during infections to compensate for parasite needs.Vinatha, et al. [80]
Pallisentis (P.) nagpurensis Bhalerao, 1931Gibelion catla, Catla catla syn. Labeo catla (Hamilton, 1822) and roho labeo, Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822)N/DHyderabad, IndiaOverall protein in liver and intestine by 17%–26%. Amino acids increased by 14%–48.8% with highest increase in liver.Kumar [81]
Pallisentis punctatin (misspelling likely Pallisentis (Brevitritospinus) punctati)Spotted snakehead, C. punctataDigestive tractHyderabad, IndiaMetabolic enzymes, succinate dehydrogenase and lactate dehydrogenase activity higher in infected fish. Oxidative stress enzymes lipid peroxidation, glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase increased in infected fish.Latha, et al. [82]
Pallisentis (P) nagapurensisStriped snakehead, C striataIntestineWarangal district, Andhra Pradesh, IndiaComplete disruption intestinal mucosa and submucosa, thickened lamina propria, damage epithelial cells, mucosal folding & clumps. Villi shrunken, infected intestine enlarged and slightly inflamed. Laxma Reddy and Benarjee [83]
Pallisentis (P) celatus (Van Cleave, 1928) Baylis, 1933 Asian swamp eel, Monopterus albus (Zuiew, 1793)IntestineN/DMechanical damage to intestinal epidermis & muscle layer. LI Chun-tao, et al. [84]
Acanthocephalan species not specifiedSpotted snakehead, C. punctataIntestineRiver Gomti, Lucknow, IndiaDamage of intestinal tissues, shortening of villi, granuloma site of attachment. Erosion villi tip, necrosis & hyperplasia.Verma and Saxena [85]
Senga sp. Dollfus, 1934Zig-zag eel, M. armatus & Snakehead, Channa sp. Scopoli, 1777IntestineMaharashtra State, IndiaDamage intestinal villi, granuloma site of attachment.Bhure and Nanware [86]
Senga mastacembelusae sp. nov. (not a valid species but Senga sp. likely)Zig-zag eel, M. armatusIntestineGodavari Basin, IndiaSignificant mechanical damage. Scolex deeply penetrating intestinal layers & damage mucosa, submucosa, muscularis mucosa. Intestinal villi architecture destruction & granuloma at scolex attachment.Fartade and Fartade [87]
Senga rostellarae (probably Senga pahangensis or Senga filiformis)Indonesian snakehead, Channa micropeltes (Cuvier, 1831)IntestineKenyir Lake, MalaysiaIntestine with severe villus damage, destruction of villi epithelium and necrosis. Cross section of cestode showed increase of goblet cells and generated necrosis and severe damage to fish intestine. Conditions likely cause of death in fish due to haemorrhage and malabsorption of nutrients.Hassan, et al. [88]
Senga species (probably Senga malayana for C. striata and Senga vishakapatnamensis for C. punctata)Striped snakehead, C. striata & spotted snakehead, C. punctataIntestineUnknownExcess mucus secretion, severe degeneration and necrosis in mucosal, submucosal, serosa layer and muscular layers at attachment. Ruptured serosa layer, vacuolization in tunica muscularis and lamina propria, shortened, fused and irregular shaped villous processes.Kaur [89]
Senga sp. Zig-zag eel, M. armatusIntestineIndiaShortening, flattening and damage of villi and cyst formation in the intestine of fish. Nanware and Bhure [90]
Senga sp.Striped snakehead, C. striataIntestineKaigaon Toka, IndiaMechanical damage to intestinal tissue including shortening & damage to villi, thickening of the muscle layer, destruction of villi, hold fast penetration of the mucosa & damage to mucous & submucous membranes.Shirsat, et al. [91]
Senga sp.Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendensIntestineAurangabad district, IndiaDestruction & extrusion of intestinal villi, fibroblast cell & plasma cell.Wankhede, et al. [92]

3.3.2. Genarchopsis sp. Pathophysiology

Genarchopsis sp. are digenetic trematodes of family Derogenidae which infect freshwater fish distributed throughout Japan, South East Asia [93] and the Indian sub-continent [17]. Lifecycle information may be incomplete due to possible misidentification of Genarchopsis sp. Supplementary Table S1 (S1) includes synonymised species. Severe histopathology has been described in both striped and spotted snakehead, Channa sp. Scopoli, 1777 in India. Reddy and Benarjee [16] demonstrated infection of the intestine with G. goppo resulted in severe intestinal damage which limited food digestion and protein absorption and Laxmareddy and Benarjee [17] observed intestinal necrosis. In infected snakehead, carbohydrate, glycogen, protein and lipid production are increased significantly to compensate for parasite needs [80] and host tissue showed a decrease in protein [17].
The liver is the principal organ of glucose homeostasis and lipid storage [54] and the cascade of increased metabolic changes described by Vinatha, et al. [80] is indicative of parasite-induced physiological challenges in fish [94]. Lipids are crucial for fish growth, reproduction, vision, osmoregularity, thermal adaptation and immune response [95]. If a consequence of fish parasitism by Genarchopsis spp. is mobilisation of lipid reserves and increased glucose homeostasis it is expected that aquaculture and native fish species will exhibit decreased growth, compromised immune function and reduced fecundity. Reddy and Benarjee [16] comment that G. goppo excretory products produce toxicity in the host intestine which aligns with reports of ammonia excretion in other digenetic species Isoparorchis sp. and Schistosoma mansoni [71].

3.3.3. Isoparorchis sp., Southwell, 1913, Pathophysiology

Isoparorchis species are digenetic trematodes of family Isoparorchiidae. Shimazu, et al. [39], using a combined morphological and molecular method, provided clarity to the species within the genus Isoparorchis and conclusions in the study point to member species being regionally endemic. Infection with Isoparorchis spp. may result in ‘‘Ink spot disease’’ [73,78] which manifests in characteristic patches of black pigment in host fish muscle, viscera and fins often causing scale loss [70,71]. Migrating juvenile metacercaria cause massive tissue erosion and tunnels in fish musculature and necrosis at the site of infection with abundant inflammatory exudate [72]. Infection may lead to economic loss due to the death of aquacultured fish [18]. Adult parasites excrete ammonia in infected fish [70,71] and ammonia is recognised as extremely toxic to fish if allowed to accumulate in the body [96]. The teleostean gills are the major site of ammonia excretion; however, smaller quantities of ammonia are excreted by the kidneys [97]. It is assumed the significant physical damage to the kidney described by Mahajan, et al. [18] and Farhana and Khanum [74] would limit the ability of infected fish to effectively excrete ammonia. Parasitisation of the spleen has also been reported with a significant decrease in mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH) [18,74].

3.3.4. Pallisentis (P.) and Pallisentis (B.) Pathophysiology

Pallisentis (B.) and Pallisentis (P.) are acanthocephalan parasites which infect fresh-water fish. The pathogenicity of adult acanthocephalans is determined by the magnitude of infection and the extent of mechanical damage exerted by proboscis hooks and the collar and trunk spines which penetrate at the site of attachment [98,99]. Figure 2F,G illustrate the invasive potential of the proboscis hooks and collar spines and in cases of heavy fish infection, it seems clear that mechanical damage may result at the site of attachment. Significant damage to intestinal structure and villi accompanied by necrosis and hyperplasia is associated with Pallisentis (P.) and Pallisentis (B.) in fish [83,84,85]. In a study of cultivated fresh water fish, Catla (Gibelion catla) and roho labeo (Labeo rohita) infected with Pallisentis nagpurensis (syn. (P.) nagpurensis) Bhalerao, 1931 the pathological damage observed in the fish hosts correlated with appreciable changes to protein and amino acid metabolism. Both of these metabolic pathways are associated with tissue repair mechanisms following parasitism [81]. This is supported in Latha, et al. [82] who found carbohydrate metabolism and lipid peroxidation significantly increased in spotted snakehead infected with Pallisentis (B.) punctati Gupta, Gupta & Singhal, 2015 in response to parasite-induced damage and physiological stress. Verma and Saxena [85] found acanthocephalan infection in spotted snakehead damaged intestinal digestive and absorptive efficacy and affected fish general health and growth. Plasma loss from the intestine at the site of parasite attachment has also been widely reported in fish infected with acanthocephalan parasites [100,101]. Fish infection correlated with a decrease in fish body lipids [102] and stored energy [103]. Lipids in fish are significant influencers of reproduction, growth, immune response, osmoregularity behaviours, vision and thermal conversion [95]. It is expected that a depletion in lipid reserves would have a great impact on production of commercial species and survival of native fish populations.

3.3.5. Senga Species Pathophysiology

Senga species of family Bothriocephalidae [104] are cestodes of freshwater fish [105]. Great taxonomic uncertainty exists in genera Senga with many species identified morphologically as novel based on extremely minor differences in morphological and morphometric characteristics. Table S1 includes species which have been synonymised. There are still a number of new species of Senga yet to be confirmed as valid. At present, there are 16 valid Senga sp.
Senga sp. attach to the submucosal intestinal surface of the fish with a scolex which has ~30–70 rostellar hooks depending on the Senga species [45]. Intestinal mechanical damage described in fish hosts [87,91] appears commensurate with such an invasive hold fast organ. Excess mucus secretion degenerating to necrosis in the intestinal mucosal, submucosal and serosa layer has been reported [89,91]. Histopathology reports of infected intestine describe ruptured serosal layer, vacuoles in both the lamina propria and tunica muscularis, significant damage and necrosis to intestinal villi [88,89,90]. Destruction of intestinal villi is conspicuous in fish infected with Senga sp. [86,87,88,106].
The integrity of the fish intestine is fundamental to maintaining fish health. The interaction between a healthy intestinal microbial population is essential to a functional innate and adaptive immune system [107]. Feed digestibility and absorption through intestinal barriers is a consequence of the absorptive area of villi [108]. This is supported in Hassan, et al. [88], Shaharom [106] and Shirsat, et al. [91] who concluded that the damage to the intestine caused by Senga sp. was consistent with an outcome of fish death due to haemorrhage and/or malabsorption of nutrients. In aquaculture systems economic loss due to growth retardation, increased mortality, increased pathogen susceptibility and reduced quality of edible flesh have been described [86,87].

4. Discussion

In the present study Pallisentis, Senga and Genarchopsis species were identified in imported edible consumer ready Channa fish from Country 22. Together with Euclinostomum and Isoparorchis species identified in a previous study [31] of imported fish, all parasite species have been demonstrated to cause severe pathophysiology in infected fish. It must be clearly stated that the fish examined in both studies were frozen and providing appropriate freezing temperature was maintained along the supply chain the parasite risk has been effectively negated. However, at the time this study was conducted (2020), fish were permitted entry into Australia fresh or chilled and this affects the infective potential of all parasites described. However, presence of a parasite in imported edible fish is only a threat to Australian native and commercial aquatic species if a viable exposure pathway can be identified and there are suitable hosts for parasites to successfully complete their life cycle and become established. In Section 3.3.1, Section 3.3.2, Section 3.3.3, Section 3.3.4 and Section 3.3.5 the pathophysiology of fish infection with each respective parasite is detailed and in Section 4, viable exposure pathways and aquatic creatures present in Australia which may be vulnerable to infection are discussed.
Parasites endemic to Australia share evolutionary pathways with native fish, are a natural component of the ecosystem, and interactions between parasite and host fish are considered to produce non-clinical or non-pathogenic infections [109]. However, alien parasites introduced to a new geographical location may cause disastrous clinical outcomes in indigenous fish species, the hypothesis being that naïve fish lack innate immunity to the alien parasite [7,110,111]. Extreme clinical outcomes and mortality in indigenous fish populations can be exacerbated when introduced parasites have low host specificity/host switch and are able to infect multiple indigenous fish species [7,112,113], are introduced to countries with phylogenetically homogenous native/introduced aquatic fauna [5] and are highly fecund and reproduce rapidly [111,114]. Alien parasites, for example Isoparorchis species, which have as yet unrecognised potential to reach maturity in humans/other mammals/aquatic creatures may also cause widespread environmental contamination, exposing indigenous fish species to infection.
There are ~280 species of Australian native fish and 22 of these are at various stages of population vulnerability [115,116]. The concomitant health impacts on fish infected with parasites discussed in this study may include retardation of fish growth, increased mortality [55,56,91,95], impaired fecundity, decreased thermal adaption, compromised immune response, poor food conversion [17,74,80,85,94,95], ammonia accumulation, decreases in blood MCH [18,71,74], loss of marketability [78,80] and other negative health indicators. The pathophysiology of infection described in this manuscript pertains, in the main, to fish species which are the natural hosts for each parasite. Evidence therefore suggests that the clinical outcomes for naïve Australian fish would be devastating if these parasites were to be introduced.
Table 2 and Figure 4 include host and parasite lifecycle information relevant to the discussion. At present Euclinostomum has not been reported in native or aquacultured fish in Australia. However, co-infection of E. heterostomum and Clinostomum tilapiae is reported in Mozambique tilapia (O. mossambicus) from South Africa [51]. Co-infection of E. heterostomum, C. tilapiae and Clinostomum complanatum (Rudolphi, 1814) Braun, 1899 has been reported in redbelly (Tilapia zillii) from Iran [21]. The demonstrated co-infection potential of Euclinostomum and Clinostomum is supported by conclusions in Shareef and Abidi [49] who describe a shared “functional and evolutionary significance” between the closely related genera. Co-infection of Euclinostomum and Clinostomum has also been identified in the piscivorous little egret [117]. Both Mozambique tilapia (O. mossambicus) and redbelly tilapia (Tilapia zillii syn. Coptodon zillii) are highly suitable hosts and have been introduced into Australia. Successful breeding populations have been established at a number of localities in Queensland, Victoria and Western Australia [118]. Of particular concern for Australian native fish and regional aquaculture are populations of Mozambique tilapia (O. mossambicus) within 3 km of the Murray–Darling Basin (MDB) [118]. Clinostomum complanatum was recorded in the body cavity of Mozambique tilapia (O. mossambicus) from Queensland waters [119]; however, so far E. heterostomum has not been identified. Tilapia (Oreochromis species) and other cichlid fish belong to family Cichlidae. Cichlids are also vulnerable to infection with E. heterostomum [120,121,122]. Approximately 17 species of cichlids have been introduced to Australian waterways [123]. Euclinostomum is considered to have little host specificity [50] and although Cichlidae fish appear to be the preferred host this genus of parasite has also been identified in gourami Trichopsis Canestrini, 1860 species, crescent betta Betta imbellis [124] of family Osphronemidae, the guppy (Poecilia reticulata, family Poeciliidae) [52] and air-breathing catfish (Clarias species, family Clariidae) [67].
Neither of the freshwater snails which serve as intermediate hosts to E. heterostomum have been identified in Australia. However, Indoplanorbis sp. Annandale & Prashad, 1921 and Lymnaea sp. Lamarck, 1799 snails were collected from gill mud of edible fish imported into Australia in Williams, et al. [30]. In Australia, the temperate indigenous freshwater snail, Lymnaea tomentosa syn. Austropeplea tomentosa (L. Pfeiffer, 1855), the introduced Lymnaea viridis syn. Orientogalba viridis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1832) and Lymnaea columella syn. Pseudosuccinea columella Say, 1817 serve as suitable intermediate hosts for Fasciola hepatica Linnaeus, 1758 [125]. It is considered, if viable Euclinostomum metacercariae were introduced into Australia, there could be suitable host fish/snail species to establish a lifecycle. Co-introduction of the snail intermediate hosts may enhance this potential. Certainly, Australia hosts numerous species of heron and cormorants as well as cattle egrets [126] which are recognised as suitable definitive hosts for this parasite [127,128,129,130]. Mashego and Saayman [65] concluded heavy infestations are likely to occur in ponds where a suitable snail intermediate is present, making impounded native and aquaculture species vulnerable. As noted by Bhargavi, et al. [58] fish become lethargic when heavily infected and this may facilitate the transmission potential to piscivorous birds. In a study of little egrets captured at a fish farm in Egypt Euclinostomum was the most prevalent (44%) [117] parasite identified. In addition, metacercariae encysted in fish may result in loss of consumer confidence and market value [1,21,64].
Genarchopsis species have not been described in Australia. Only one species of fish identified as a suitable host in Bangladesh, the tank goby Glossogobius giuris (Hamilton, 1822), is found in Australia [131]. However, Australia does host eight other species belonging to the genus Glossogobius Gill, 1859 [132,133,134] which may be suitable hosts of Genarchopsis sp. In Japan, Tridentiger sp. are susceptible to infection. Tridentiger trigonocephalus (Gill, 1859) was introduced into Australia via eggs/and or larvae in ship ballast water or adhered to oyster shells [135]. It is unknown if a brackish water species of fish could be a suitable host for this parasite. Fish of family Channidae from the Indian sub-continent have been widely described as suitable hosts for Genarchopsis sp. Abol-Munafi, et al. [136] indicates that snakehead of Channa genus have been released into the Australian environment by fish enthusiasts. However, the veracity of this report could not be confirmed. There is also an anecdotal report of striped snakehead (Channa striata) found in QLD [137]. The freshwater snail Gabbia travancorica (W. H. Benson, 1860), according to Bagni and Galli [138], has not been identified in Australia. However, there are 21 species of Gabbia Tryon, 1865 widely distributed around Australia which may prove to be suitable intermediate hosts. There is only one record of the second intermediate ostracod host Stenocypris malcolmsoni (Brady, 1886) in Australia [139] and no record of Eucypris capensis Daday, 1910 (sensu Martens 1986). However, Eucypris virens (Jurine, 1820) [140], Eucypris lateraria (King, 1855), Eucypris crinita (Henry, 1923), Eucypris pratensis Eagar, 1970 and Eucypris thomsoni Chapman, 1963 have been identified in the Australasian Region [141]. Australia has availability of closely related first and second intermediate hosts and fish species susceptible to infection. Channa species in all Australian states apart from Northern Territory are restricted species. The potential threat of Channa sp. illegally brought into Australia and propagated for food [142] should be noted particularly as species within this genus in previous studies were identified as highly parasitised with a great diversity of parasites [30].
Only Isoparorchis tandani Johnston, 1927 is present in Australia and it is unknown if intermediate hosts within the lifecycle of I. tandani would be suitable for imported species of Isoparorchis. Isoparorchis sp. in Bangladesh is the exception to regional endemicity [39] with less host specificity demonstrated. In Bangladesh, host fish include two species of family Channidae, two from family Schilbeidae, and one representative each from families Bagridae and Siluridae [39,143,144]. This may be partially accounted for by the identification of two species of this parasite in Bangladesh, Isoparorchis hypselobagri (Billet, 1898) Ejsmont, 1932 redescribed as Isoparorchis trisimilitubis Southwell, 1913 or Isoparorchis sp. 3 [39]. Isoparorchis sp. have also been identified in the stomach of a crocodile (Assam, India) [75], the body cavity of the red-crowned roofed turtle (Kachuga kachuga syn. Batagur kachuga (Hyderabad State, India)) [75,76], the intestine of a checkered keelback snake Tropidonotus piscator syn. Xenochrophis piscator (Schneider, 1799) (Hyderabad, India) [145] and encysted in the liver of the Indian bullfrog Rana tigrina syn. Hoplobatrachus tigerinus (Daudin, 1802) (India) [146]. Isoparorchis sp. identified in the stomach or intestine of species other than fish is considered to be a result of consumption of parasitized fish. However, where metacercariae have encysted in the liver or migrated to the body cavity it suggests these species may be suitable hosts for this parasite. The reports of aberrant hosts in India and Bangladesh may support a hypothesis that Isoparorchis sp. in these countries are less host specific and may pose a threat to Australian fish, freshwater turtles or frogs if introduced. Species of bullfrogs belonging to Hoplobatrachus and turtles of Batagur species are not identified in Australia. However, there are many freshwater frogs and turtles with a critical, near threatened or vulnerable conservation status [147,148]. In addition, viable reproducing adult Isoparorchis sp. have been recovered from humans in India [18,149,150], China [151] and a pig in India [152]. No record exists in Australia of human infection from I. tandani. It is possible that species of Isoparorchis from India or China are able to reach maturity, or survive for prolonged periods, in mammals. A viable reproducing adult digenean has been retrieved from the gall bladder of the pig in India [152] which shows that migration from the stomach has occurred and in Manipur, India reproducing adult Isoparorchis have often been retrieved from human patients after treatment [149]. Ashford and Crewe 2003 also report expelled adult worms from humans following treatment [151]. Should mammalian infection occur broad environmental contamination may result from parasite eggs shed in faeces. Recovery of Isoparorchis eggs from human faeces has also been reported [151,153].
Infestation renders the fish visually unacceptable for human consumption [71]. Compounds such as ammonia generated through fish spoilage is a significant problem in the food industry and is associated with human health problems which include diarrhoea, vomiting, oedema and hypotension [154]. It is unknown how ammonia, the major excretory product of Isoparorchis in fish [71], would affect spoilage of commercial species and if this compound may be responsible for cases of human infection described in literature.
Smales, et al. [155] conducted a comprehensive study of acanthocephalans infecting Australian freshwater fish. Species of Pallisentis (B.) and Pallisentis (P.) were not identified nor were any acanthocephalans belonging to the same order. Cyclops strenuous Fischer, 1851 is also absent from Australia; however, there are many freshwater invertebrate species introduced or native to Australia which may have potential to become suitable hosts. According to Smales, et al. [155] acanthocephalans introduced into Australia may be unable to establish in native freshwater fish species due to the dry climate, and absence of suitable invertebrate intermediate hosts. Many acanthocephalans manipulate host behaviours to ensure infected intermediate hosts are preferentially consumed [156,157,158]. In addition, acanthocephalans have unique adaptions which place their eggs in the most advantageous place to be consumed by intermediate hosts [159,160]. The egg of Pallisentis (P.) nagpurensis demonstrates this type of adaption [161]. In the absence of a suitable fish host in Australia is seems unlikely these genera of acanthocephalans would develop a successful life cycle if introduced.
There has so far been only one report of Senga species in Australia. Senga scleropagis was identified by Blair [162] infecting the intestine of freshwater fish, Southern saratoga Scleropages leichardti Günther, 1864, from the Wenlock River, Cape York peninsula, Australia. This species is considered valid in Kuchta [104]. It is unknown if Senga sp. are widespread amongst Australian freshwater fish or if the lack of any report since Blair in 1978 is a reflection of fewer studies in the parasite fauna of freshwater fish. However, M. leuckarti syn. M. leuckarti leuckarti (Claus, 1857) has been described as the dominant copepod zooplankton in various freshwater bodies of Australia [163,164,165]. Thermocyclops crassus syn. T. crassus crassus (Fischer, 1853) along with four other Thermocyclops Kiefer, 1927 copepod species have been described in Northern Queensland and in the same study T. rylovi an East African/Central and South Asian species was described for the first time in Australia [166]. All are drought and salinity tolerant copepod species [167].
The Bonylip barb Osteochilus hasseltii syn. O. vittatus (Valenciennes, 1842), a cyprinid fish species, Malaysia, has been identified highly infected with plerocercoids of Senga species. Several cyprinid species of fish have been introduced to Australia via the aquarium trade; the common goldfish, Carassius auratus (Linnaeus, 1758), Common carp, Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758 [5], Rosy Barb, Puntius conchonius syn. Pethia conchonius (Hamilton, 1822), Roach, Rutilus rutilus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Tench Tinca tinca (Linnaeus, 1758) [168]. It is therefore possible that a successful lifecycle may establish more broadly across Australia if other Senga species were introduced. Bothriocephalideans are in general stenoxenous [104]. It is important that a suitable copepod and fish host be present in Australia for a Senga sp. successful lifecycle to establish.

5. Conclusions

There seems little doubt that the costs to aquatic, human and animal health of introduced parasites can be enormous. The challenge to Australian biosecurity is to anticipate and respond to a myriad of threats posed by parasites and the commensals hidden in imported seafood products and packaging. Australian importation commodity codes (2020) indicate these edible parasitised fish may be imported fresh or chilled. Mud, snails, other debris, vegetation and food remains have been previously identified in fish packaging of infected fish [30] and parasites identified in viscera, which was required to be removed, in consumer-ready fish imported into Australia [30]. The Australian biosecurity risks could certainly be mitigated with greater support for fish processors in the exporting country to reach food safety compliance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d15040470/s1, Table S1: A list of species which have at present been synonymised or had prefix or suffix updated.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.W., M.H.-J. and S.S.; methodology, M.W., M.H.-J. and S.S.; software, M.W.; validation, M.W.; formal analysis, M.W.; investigation, M.W.; resources, M.W.; data curation, M.W.; writing—original draft preparation, M.W.; review and editing, M.H.-J., S.S. and M.W.; visualization, M.W., M.H.-J. and S.S.; supervision, M.H.-J. and S.S.; project administration, M.W., M.H.-J. and S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Michelle Williams is the grateful recipient of the PhD scholarship from Australian Research Training Program Scholarship through Charles Sturt University. Authors would like to acknowledge Di Barton for proof reading the MS before submission and Lesley Warner for her help with the male Pallisentis (B.) specimen.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Shareef, P.; Abidi, S.M. Studies on the epidemiology and histopathology of Euclinostomum heterostomum (Trematoda; Digenea) infection in Channa punctata from North India. Arch. Pol. Fish 2015, 23, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Torrissen, O.; Jones, S.; Asche, F.; Guttormsen, A.; Skilbrei, O.T.; Nilsen, F.; Horsberg, T.E.; Jackson, D. Salmon lice–impact on wild salmonids and salmon aquaculture. J. Fish Dis. 2013, 36, 171–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Tavares-Dias, M.; Martins, M.L. An overall estimation of losses caused by diseases in the Brazilian fish farms. J. Parasit. Dis. 2017, 41, 913–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Scholz, T. Parasites in cultured and feral fish. Vet. Parasitol. 1999, 84, 317–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Trujillo-González, A.; Becker, J.A.; Vaughan, D.B.; Hutson, K.S. Monogenean parasites infect ornamental fish imported to Australia. Parasitol. Res. 2018, 117, 995–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Williams, C.F.; Britton, J.R.; Turnbull, J.F. A risk assessment for managing non-native parasites. Biol. Invasions 2013, 15, 1273–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Peeler, E.J.; Oidtmann, B.C.; Midtlyng, P.J.; Miossec, L.; Gozlan, R.E. Non-native aquatic animals introductions have driven disease emergence in Europe. Biol. Invasions 2011, 13, 1291–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Dove, A.; Cribb, T.; Mockler, S.; Lintermans, M. The Asian fish tapeworm, Bothriocephalus acheilognathi, in Australian freshwater fishes. Mar. Freshw. Res. 1997, 48, 181–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dove, A.D.M.; Ernst, I. Concurrent invaders—Four exotic species of Monogenea now established on exotic freshwater fishes in Australia. Int. J. Parasitol. 1998, 28, 1755–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hassan, M.; Beatty, S.; Morgan, D.; Doupé, R.; Lymbery, A. An introduced parasite, Lernaea cyprinacea L., found on native freshwater fishes in the south west of Western Australia. J. R. Soc. West. Aust. 2008, 91, 149–153. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhu, X.; Barton, D.P.; Wassens, S.; Shamsi, S. Morphological and genetic characterisation of the introduced copepod Lernaea cyprinacea Linnaeus (Cyclopoida: Lernaeidae) occurring in the Murrumbidgee catchment, Australia. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2020, 72, 876–886. [Google Scholar]
  12. Whittington, R.J.; Chong, R. Global trade in ornamental fish from an Australian perspective: The case for revised import risk analysis and management strategies. Prev. Vet. Med. 2007, 81, 92–116. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Quartey, S.H.; Wells, S. The fishing industry’s perception of its contribution towards the sustainability of the Eyre Peninsula region, Australia. Australas. J. Reg. Stud. 2019, 25, 135–176. [Google Scholar]
  14. BICON. Case: Finfish (Excluding Salmonid) for Human Consumption Effective: 07 Apr 2020. Available online: https://bicon.agriculture.gov.au/BiconWeb4.0/ImportConditions/Questions/EvaluateCase?elementID=0000067916&elementVersionID=360 (accessed on 15 April 2020).
  15. FRDC. Seafood Import and Export by Volume. In Seafood Trade Data; The Fisheries Research and Development Corporation: Canberra, Australia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  16. Reddy, B.L.; Benarjee, G. Histochemical studies on Genarchopsis goppo from fresh water murrel, Channa striatus. Asian J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 6, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  17. Laxmareddy, B.; Benarjee, G. Intestinal histopathology of trematode infected fish, Channa striatus. BioLIfe 2013, 1, 29–31. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mahajan, C.; Agrawal, N.; John, M.; Katta, V. Effect of the digenean Isoparorchis hypselobagri (Billet, 1898) on an airbreathing fish Channa punctatus (Bloch) with particular reference to biochemical and haematological changes. J. Fish Dis. 1979, 2, 519–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pinto, R.; Barros, L.; Tortelly, L.; Teixeira, R.; Gomes, D. Prevalence and pathology of helminths of ciconiiform birds from the Brazilian swamplands. J. Helminthol. 2004, 78, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mihalca, A.; Fictum, P.; Škorič, M.; Sloboda, M.; Kärvemo, S.; Ghira, I.; Carlsson, M.; Modrý, D. Severe granulomatous lesions in several organs from Eustrongylides larvae in a free-ranging dice snake, Natrix tessellata. Vet. Pathol. 2007, 44, 103–105. [Google Scholar]
  21. Echi, P.; Eyo, J.; Okafor, F.; Onyishi, G.; Ivoke, N. First record of Co–infection of three clinostomatid parasites in cichlids (Osteichthyes: Cichlidae) in a tropical freshwater lake. Iran. J. Public Health 2012, 41, 86–90. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fan, P. Viability of metacercariae of Clonorchis sinensis in frozen or salted freshwater fish. Int. J. Parasitol. 1998, 28, 603–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Grabda, J.; Bier, J.W. Cultivation as an estimate for infectivity of larval Anisakis simplex from processed herring. J. Food Prot. 1988, 51, 734–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sirisinha, S.; Chawengkirttikul, R.; Sermswan, R. Immunodiagnosis of opisthorchiasis. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 1991, 22, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Mas, C.S.; Bargues, M.D. Human liver flukes: A review. Res. Rev. Parasitol. 1997, 57, 145–218. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yossepowitch, O.; Gotesman, T.; Assous, M.; Marva, E.; Zimlichman, R.; Dan, M. Opisthorchiasis from imported raw fish. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004, 10, 2122–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Knibb, W.; Le, C.; Katouli, M.; Bar, I.; Lloyd, C. Assessment of the origin of white spot syndrome virus DNA sequences in farmed Penaeus monodon in Australia. Aquaculture 2018, 494, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Loynes, K. White Spot Disease in Australia up to 2017: A Chronology; Science Technology and Natural Resources: Canberra, Australia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  29. FRDC. Summary Overview: Economic Impact of 2016 White Spot Disease Outbreak; Fisheries Research and Development Corporation: Deacon West, Australia, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  30. Williams, M.; Hernandez-Jover, M.; Williams, T.; Shamsi, S. A risk scoring system for seafood supply chain breaches and examination of freshwater fish imported to Australia. FQS Food Qual. Saf. 2021, 5, fyab004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Williams, M.; Hernandez-Jover, M.; Shamsi, S. Parasites of zoonotic interest identified in selected imported freshwater fish. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2021, 26, e00138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Conte-Grand, C.; Britz, R.; Dahanukar, N.; Raghavan, R.; Pethiyagoda, R.; Tan, H.H.; Hadiaty, R.K.; Yaakob, N.S.; Rüber, L. Barcoding snakeheads (Teleostei, Channidae) revisited: Discovering greater species diversity and resolving perpetuated taxonomic confusions. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Scott, D.; Moore, J.W.; Herborg, L.-M.; Murray, C.C.; Serrao, N.R. A non-native snakehead fish in British Columbia, Canada: Capture, genetics, isotopes, and policy consequences. Manag. Biol. Invasions 2013, 4, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Alam, M.J.; Andriyono, S.; Sektiana, S.P.; Rahman, M.M.; Kim, H.-W. The molecular characterization of complete mitochondrial genome of spotted snakehead fish, Channa punctata (Bloch 1793). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2019, 4, 547–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Chowdhury, S.Z.; Hossain, M.M.M. Isolation and characterization of internal parasites in snakehead. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud. 2015, 2, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shamsi, S.; Suthar, J. A revised method of examining fish for infection with zoonotic nematode larvae. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 227, 13–16. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bier, J.W.; Jackson, G.J.; Adams, A.M.; Rude, R.A. Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Chapter 19, Parasitic Animals in Foods. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/LaboratoryMethods/ucm071468.htm (accessed on 20 February 2018).
  38. Bush, A.O.; Lafferty, K.D.; Lotz, J.M.; Shostak, A.W. Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. J. Parasitol. 1997, 83, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Shimazu, T.; Cribb, T.H.; Miller, T.L.; Urabe, M.; Van Ha, N.; Binh, T.T.; Shed’ko, M.B. Revision of Isoparorchis Southwell, 1913 (Digenea, Hemiuroidea, Isoparorchiidae), parasites of the air bladder of freshwater catfishes: A molecular and morphological study. Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci. Ser. A 2014, 40, 15–51. [Google Scholar]
  40. Urabe, M.; Nishimura, T.; Shimazu, T. Taxonomic revision of three species of the genus Genarchopsis (Digenea: Hemiuroidea: Derogenidae) in Japan by molecular phylogenetic analyses. Parasitol. Int. 2012, 61, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Pardeshi, P.; Hiware, C. Comparative Study on Species of Genarchosis Parasitizing Mastacembelus armatus Lecepede (1800). BIOINFOLET Q. J. Life Sci. 2012, 9, 79–83. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bhadauria, S.; Dandotia, M. Studies on the trematode parasites of fresh water fishes with special reference to Gwalior region. II: On one new genus and some unknown and known species. Riv. Parassitol. 1984, 45, 341–383. [Google Scholar]
  43. Koiri, R.; Roy, B. The occurrence of a new piscine tapeworm Senga Dollfus, 1934 (Pseudophyllidea: Bothriocephalidae) in Monopterus cuchia (F. Hamilton, 1822) from Tripura. Imp. J. Interdiscip. Res. 2017, 3, 864–870. [Google Scholar]
  44. Majid, M.; Shinde, G. Two new species of the genus Senga Dollfus, 1934 (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) from freshwater fish at Jagannathpuri, Orissa. Indian J. Parasitol. 1984, 8, 169–172. [Google Scholar]
  45. Pardeshi, P.; Hiware, C. A new Pseudophyllidean Senga rupchandensis n. sp. from Channa striatus (Bloch, 1793) at Jalna District (MS), India. Recent Res. Sci. Technol. 2011, 3, 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  46. Amin, O.M.; Heckmann, R.A.; Nguyen, V.H.; Pham, V.L.; Pham, N.D. Revision of the genus Pallisentis (Acanthocephala: Quadrigyridae) with the erection of three new subgenera, the description of Pallisentis (Brevitritospinus) vietnamensis subgen. et sp. n., a key to species of Pallisentis, and the description of a new quadrigyrid genus, Pararaosentis gen. n. Comp. Parasitol. 2000, 67, 40–50. [Google Scholar]
  47. Gupta, S.P.; Verma, S. On three new Acanthocephala parasites of the genus Pallisentis Van Cleave, 1928 from fresh water fishes of Lucknow. Helminthologia 1980, 17, 269–282. [Google Scholar]
  48. Gautam, N.K.; Misra, P.K.; Saxena, A.M. Four new species of the genus Pallisentis (Quadrigyridae, Van Cleave, 1920) from freshwater fish in Uttar Pradesh, India. Acta Parasitol. 2019, 64, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Shareef, P.A.; Abidi, S.M.A. Cysteine protease is a major component in the excretory/secretory products of Euclinostomum heterostomum (Digenea: Clinostomidae). Parasitol. Res. 2014, 113, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kazacos, K.R.; Appel, G.O. Euclinostomum heterostomum metacercariae. PHSWA 1983, 50, 103–107. [Google Scholar]
  51. Britz, J.; Van As, J.; Saayman, J. Occurrence and distribution of Clinostomum tilapiae Ukoli, 1966 and Euclinostomum heterostomum (Rudolphi, 1809) metacercarial infections of freshwater fish in Venda and Lebowa, Southern Africa. J. Fish Biol. 1985, 26, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Suanyuk, N.; Mankhakhet, S.; Soliman, H.; Saleh, M.; El-Matbouli, M. Euclinostomum heterostomum infection in guppies Poecilia reticulata cultured in southern Thailand. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2013, 104, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ikisa, K.; Babatunde, B.; Hart, A. Histopathological variations in gills, liver and kidney of nile tilapia-Oreochromis niloticus exposed to benzalkoniumbhloride mixture with treated produced water. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 2019, 23, 1181–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Akiyoshi, H.; Inoue, A. Comparative histological study of teleost livers in relation to phylogeny. Zool. Sci. 2004, 21, 841–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Witeska, M. Anemia in teleost fishes. Bull. Eur. Assoc. Fish Pathol. 2015, 35, 149–160. [Google Scholar]
  56. Roychowdhury, P.; Aftabuddin, M.; Pati, M.K. Thermal stress altered growth performance and metabolism and induced anaemia and liver disorder in Labeo rohita. Aquac. Res. 2020, 51, 1406–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ahmed, M.; El-Ganainy, S.; El-Aziz, A.; Shaban, H. Morphological and Electrophoretic Differentiation of Two Clinostomatid Metacercariae Infecting Oreochromis niloticus from the River Nile at El-Minia District, Egypt. Egypt. Acad. J. Biol. Sci. E Med. Entomol. Parasitol. 2018, 10, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bhargavi, G.; Prasanna, D.; Rani, R.J. Invitro studies on antihelminthic activity of seeds of Butea frondosa on the metacercaria of Euclenostomum heterostomum a parasite of fresh water fish Channa punctatus. In Proceedings of the 22nd National Congress on Parasitology, Kalyani, India, 30 October–1 November 2010. [Google Scholar]
  59. Echi, P.; Iyaji, F.; Ejere, V.; Abuh, S. Dynamics of synchronized clinostomatids infections in cichlids. Environ. Conserv. J. 2014, 15, 49–54. [Google Scholar]
  60. Kaur, P.; Shrivastav, R.; Qureshi, T. Pathological effect on naturally infected kidneys of freshwater murrels by Euclinostomum heterostomum metacercariae. J. Parasit. Dis. 2016, 40, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Kaur, P.; Qureshi, T.; Shrivastav, R. Histo-architectural alterations induced by Euclinostomum heterostomum (metacercariae) infected liver of Channa punctata (Bloch). J. Parasit. Dis. 2012, 36, 197–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Laoprasert, T.; Naksuwon, S.; Maneepitaksanti, W.; Chinabut, S. Parasitic digenean Euclinostomum sp.(Trematoda: Clinostomatidae) in guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Thai Fisheries Gazette 2006, 59, 323–331. [Google Scholar]
  63. Reddy, B.L.; Benarjee, G.; Pradesh, A. Comparative liver histopathology of fresh water murrels due to trematode, Euclinostomum heterostomum. BioLife 2014, 2, 369–399. [Google Scholar]
  64. Mahdy, O.A.; Abdel-Maogood, S.Z.; Mohammed, F.F.; Salem, M.A. Effect of Verbesina Alternifolia and Mentha Piperita Oil Extracts on Newly Excysted Metacercaria of Euclinostomum heterostomum (Rudolphi, 1809) (Digenea: Clinostomatidae) from Naturally Infected Kidneys of Tilapia Zillii in Egypt. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol. 2017, 47, 513–521. [Google Scholar]
  65. Mashego, S.N.; Saayman, J.E. Digenetic trematodes and cestodes of Clarias gariepinus (Burchell. 1822) in Lebowa, South Africa with taxonomic notes. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 1989, 19, 17–20. [Google Scholar]
  66. Mohamed, I.R.; Wafaa, I.I.; Zakaria, S.M.; Rabab, M.A.; Fekry, M. Histological and Histochemical Changes in Liver and Kidney of Some Fishes Induced by Natural Larval Trematodes Infection. Researchgate 2008, 1–19. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335967409_Histological_and_Histochemical_Changes_in_Liver_and_Kidney_of_Some_Fishes_Induced_by_Natural_Larval_Trematodes_Infection (accessed on 19 February 2023).
  67. Onucha, E. Liver pathology of the african catfish, Clarias gariepinus infected with Euclinostomum clarias metacercariae in Anambra river basin, Nigeria. Anim. Res. Int. 2010, 7, 1151–1155. [Google Scholar]
  68. Pinky, K.; Rekha, S.; Dar, B.A.; Jha, G.N.; Qureshi, T.A. Suppression of ovarian development in freshwater fishes due to endo-helminthic infection. Indian J. Fish. 2015, 62, 128–132. [Google Scholar]
  69. Tayel, I.S.; Ahmed, M.N.; Ramadan, A.E. Histopathological alterations and parasitic infection in Oreochromis niloticus fish inhabiting the River Nile water. Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. Fish. 2020, 24, 233–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Adak, S.; Manna, B. Urea Excretion in Isoparorchis hypselobagri (Billet, 1898). Proc. Zool. Soc. 2013, 66, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Adak, S.; Manna, B. Study on the rate of ammonia excretion in Isoparorchis hypselobagri (Billet, 1898). Zool. Res. Hum. Welf. 2008, 27, 279–283. [Google Scholar]
  72. Alam, S. Parasite Diversity and Their Effects on Histological and Biochemical Components of Wallago attu (Bloch-Schneider, 1801) and Rita rita (Hamilton-Buchanan, 1822). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2019; p. 285. [Google Scholar]
  73. Choudhary, K.; Ray, S.; Agrawal, N. Record of Some Digeneans, Infecting Freshwater Fishes, Snails, and Amphibians in India, using 28S Ribosomal DNA Marker. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2019, 90, 501–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Farhana, R.; Khanum, H. The effect of parasitic infestation on tissues and organs of Mystus aor (Hamilton) and Mystus bleekeri (Day). In Advances in Parasitology: A Novel Approach towards a Disease-Free World, Proceedings of the 22nd National Congress of Parasitology, West Bengal, India, 30 October–1 November 2011; Department of Zoology, University of Kalyani: Kalyani, West Bengal, India, 2011; pp. 223–227. [Google Scholar]
  75. Simha, S.S. Studies on the trematode parasites of reptiles found in Hyderabad State. Z. Parasitenkd. 1958, 18, 161–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Praschag, P.; Ahmed, M.F.; Das, I.; Singh, S. Batagur kachuga (Errata Version Published in 2019). Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/ (accessed on 15 November 2020).
  77. Sohn, W.-M.; Na, B.-K. Morphological Characteristics and Fish Hosts of Isoparorchis sp. (Digenea: Isoparorchiidae) in Korea. Korean J. Parasitol. 2018, 56, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Vankara, A.P.; Mani, G.; Vijayalakshmi, C. A report on various digenetic metacercariae from the freshwater fishes of River Godavari, Rajahmundry. J. Parasit. Dis. 2011, 35, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Pardeshi, P.; Hiware, C. Histopathological studies on the intestine of the Mastacembelus armatus parasitized bytrematode, Genarchopsis paithanensis n. sp. BIOINFOLET Q. J. Life Sci. 2014, 11, 1209–1211. [Google Scholar]
  80. Vinatha, N.; Bikshapathi, V.; Babu, S.R. Post Helminthes infection changes in AAT and AIAT activity in the myotomal muscles of Channa punctatus. Sci. Res. Report. 2013, 3, 167–170. [Google Scholar]
  81. Kumar, P.A. Biochemical effects on protein and free amino acid metabolism in Catla catla and Labeo rohita due to Pallisentis nagpurensis infection. AIJRFANS Am. Int. J. Res. Form. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2014, 6, 82–85. [Google Scholar]
  82. Latha, J.N.; Ramesh, K.; Vanithadas, V. Studies on Enzymatic Activities by Gastro-Intestinal Helminthic Parasites in Channa Punctata (Snake Headed or Bloch). IJIAR Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev. 2019, 6, 807–812. [Google Scholar]
  83. Reddy, B.L.; Benarjee, G. Parasitic adaptation of fresh water fish, Channa striatus. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud. 2015, 2, 69–71. [Google Scholar]
  84. Li, C.-T.; Li, X.; Zhao, Y.-Q.; Zeng, B.-P. Morphological characteristics of Pallisentis celatus and pathological changes of the intestine in Monopterus allbus infected by Pallisentis celatus. J. South. Agric. 2014, 45, 1881–1885. [Google Scholar]
  85. Verma, S.K.; Saxena, A. Histopathological study of freshwater fish Channa punctatus (bloch, 1793) infected with acanthocephalan parasites from river Gomti, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh (India). Trends Fish. Res. 2018, 7, 57–64. [Google Scholar]
  86. Bhure, D.B.; Nanware, S.S. Hold-Fast Organs of Piscean and Avian Cestode Parasites with Special Emphasis on Histopathology. WSN World Sci. News 2016, 34, 109–120. [Google Scholar]
  87. Fartade, A.M.; Fartade, M.M. Histopathological study of fresh water fishes infected with ptychobothridean tapeworms parasite from Godavri basin MS (India). Int. J. Res. BioSci. 2016, 5, 39–42. [Google Scholar]
  88. Hassan, M.; Hadi, M.S.I.A.; Aziz, M.F.H.A.; Wahab, W.; Abdullah, F.; Deraman, S.; Zakariah, M.I. Histopathological changes in the intestine of Channa micropeltes infected with the cestode Senga rostellarae. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 370, 012055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kaur, P. Histo-pathological effect of Senga species (Cestode: Pseudophyllidea) in intestine of piscian hosts. WJPPS World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 3, 1506–1513. [Google Scholar]
  90. Nanware, S.S.; Bhure, D.B. Intestinal histopathology of Mastacembelus armatus parasitized by pseudophyllidean cestodes. Flora Fauna 2016, 22, 125–130. [Google Scholar]
  91. Shirsat, J.; More, V.; Wankhede, S. Histopathological changes caused by Senga sp. In Channa straitus. IJCRLS Int. J. Curr. Res. Life Sci. 2018, 7, 2659–2660. [Google Scholar]
  92. Wankhede, H.; Aade, U.; Kaldate, K. Histopathological study of ptychobothriidan tapeworm in freshwater fish Mastacembelus armatus (Lecepede, 1800) from Aurangabad district (ms). ISRJ Indian Streams Res. J. 2012, 2, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  93. Urabe, M. Life cycle of Genarchopsis goppo (Trematoda: Derogenidae) from Nara, Japan. J. Parasitol. 2001, 87, 1404–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Polakof, S.; Panserat, S.; Soengas, J.L.; Moon, T.W. Glucose metabolism in fish: A review. J. Comp. Physiol. B 2012, 182, 1015–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Arts, M.T.; Kohler, C.C. Health and condition in fish: The influence of lipids on membrane competency and immune response. In Lipids in Aquatic Ecosystems; Arts, M.T., Brett, M.T., Kainz, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 237–256. [Google Scholar]
  96. Randall, D.J.; Tsui, T.K.N. Ammonia toxicity in fish. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2002, 45, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Randall, D.J.; Wright, P.A. Ammonia distribution and excretion in fish. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 1987, 3, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Taraschewski, H. Acanthocephala. In Encyclopedia of Parasitology, 3rd ed.; Taraschewski, H., Mehlhorn, H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 3–39. [Google Scholar]
  99. Taraschewski, H. Host-parasite interactions in Acanthocephala: A morphological approach. Adv. Parasitol. 2000, 46, 1–179. [Google Scholar]
  100. Szalai, A.J.; Danell, G.; Dick, T.A. Intestinal leakage and precipitating antibodies in the serum of quillback, Carpiodes cyprinus (Lesueur), infected with Neoechinorhynchus carpiodi Dechtiar, 1968 (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae). J. Parasitol. 1988, 74, 415–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Taraschewski, H. Host-parasite interface of fish acanthocephalans. I. Acanthocephalus anguillae (Palaeacanthocephala) in naturally infected fishes: LM and TEM investigations. Dis. Aquat. Org. 1988, 4, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Bristol, J.R.; Mayberry, L.F.; Huber, D.; Ehrlich, I. Endoparasite fauna of trout in the Plitvice Lakes National Park. Vet. Arh. 1984, 54, 5–11. [Google Scholar]
  103. Buchmann, K. On the infection of Baltic cod (Gadus morhua L.) by the acanthocephalan Echinorhynchus gadi (Zoega) Müller. Nord. Vet. 1986, 38, 308–314. [Google Scholar]
  104. Kuchta, R.S.T. Bothriocephalidea In Planetary Biodiversity Inventory (2008–2017): Tapeworms from the Bowels of the Earth; Caira, J.N., Jensen, K., Eds.; Natural History Museum, The University of Kansas: Lawrence, KS, USA, 2017; Volume 25, pp. 29–47. [Google Scholar]
  105. Brabec, J.; Waeschenbach, A.; Scholz, T.; Littlewood, D.T.J.; Kuchta, R. Molecular phylogeny of the Bothriocephalidea (Cestoda): Molecular data challenge morphological classification. Int. J. Parasitol. 2015, 45, 761–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Shaharom, F. Fish Parasites of Lake Kenyir, Peninsular Malaysia; Penerbit UMT, Universiti Malaysia: Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia, 2012; Volume 1, pp. 1–173. [Google Scholar]
  107. Dawood, M.A. Nutritional immunity of fish intestines: Important insights for sustainable aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 2020, 13, 642–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Begam, M.; Sengupta, M. Immunomodulation of intestinal macrophages by mercury involves oxidative damage and rise of pro-inflammatory cytokine release in the fresh water fish Channa punctatus Bloch. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015, 45, 378–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Okamura, B.; Feist, S.W. Emerging diseases in freshwater systems. Freshw. Biol. 2011, 56, 627–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jones, S.R. The occurrence and mechanisms of innate immunity against parasites in fish. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2001, 25, 841–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Britton, J.R.; Pegg, J.; Williams, C.F. Pathological and ecological host consequences of infection by an introduced fish parasite. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Rowley, J.J.L.; Gleason, F.H.; Andreou, D.; Marshall, W.L.; Lilje, O.; Gozlan, R. Impacts of mesomycetozoean parasites on amphibian and freshwater fish populations. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2013, 27, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Kuchta, R.; Radačovská, A.; Bazsalovicsová, E.; Viozzi, G.; Semenas, L.; Arbetman, M.; Scholz, T. Host switching of zoonotic broad fish tapeworm (Dibothriocephalus latus) to salmonids, Patagonia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Kennedy, C.; Fitch, D. Colonization, larval survival and epidemiology of the nematode Anguillicola crassus, parasitic in the eel, Anguilla anguilla, in Britain. J. Fish Biol. 1990, 36, 117–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. NESP. 22 Australian Freshwater Fish at Risk of Extinction. Available online: https://www.nespthreatenedspecies.edu.au/news-and-media/media-releases/22-australian-freshwater-fish-at-risk-of-extinction (accessed on 11 March 2023).
  116. Lintermans, M.; Geyle, H.M.; Beatty, S.; Brown, C.; Ebner, B.C.; Freeman, R.; Hammer, M.P.; Humphreys, W.F.; Kennard, M.J.; Kern, P. Big trouble for little fish: Identifying Australian freshwater fishes in imminent risk of extinction. Pac. Conserv. Biol. 2020, 26, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Abd-Al-Aal, Z.; Amer, O.; Badawy, A.; El-Ashram, A. Digenetic trematodes of the little egret, Egretta garzetta, and possibility of transmission to Oreochromis niloticus at El-abbassa fish farms, Egypt. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture, Cairo, Egypt, 12–14 October 2008; pp. 1351–1364. [Google Scholar]
  118. DPI NSW. Tilapia. Available online: https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/fishing/aquatic-pests-diseases/freshwater-pests/species/tilapia (accessed on 8 June 2020).
  119. Webb, A.C. The Ecology of Invasions of Non-Indigenous Freshwater Fishes in Northern Queensland. Ph.D. Thesis, James Cook University, Brisbane, Australia, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  120. Caffara, M.; Locke, S.A.; Cristanini, C.; Davidovich, N.; Markovich, M.P.; Fioravanti, M.L. A combined morphometric and molecular approach to identifying metacercariae of Euclinostomum heterostomum (Digenea: Clinostomidae). J. Parasitol. 2016, 102, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Echi, P.C.; Eyo, J.E.; Okafor, F.C. Co-parasitism and morphometrics of three Clinostomatids (Digenea: Clinostomatidae) in Sarotherodon melanotheron from a tropical freshwater lake. Anim. Res. Int. 2009, 6, 982–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Falk, R.; Smirnov, M.; Ofek, T.; Cummings, D. Parasitological Survey of Cichlidae in the Sea-of-Galilee. Isr. J. Aquac.-Bamidgeh 2020, 72, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Gomon, M.F. Cichlidae. Available online: https://fishesofaustralia.net.au/home/family/273#moreinfo (accessed on 10 March 2023).
  124. Senapin, S.; Phiwsaiya, K.; Laosinchai, P.; Kowasupat, C.; Ruenwongsa, P.; Panijpan, B. Phylogenetic analysis of parasitic trematodes of the genus Euclinostomum found in Trichopsis and Betta fish. J. Parasitol. 2014, 100, 368–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. DPI. Identifying Liver Fluke Snails; Department of Primary Industry: Orange, Australia, 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  126. Kingsford, R.T.; Porter, J.L.; Brandis, K.J.; Ryall, S. Aerial surveys of waterbirds in Australia. Sci. Data 2020, 7, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Abro, M.M.; Dharejo, A.M.; Khan, M.M.; Birmani, N.A. Euclinostomum heterostomum (Rud., 1809) Travassos, 1928 (Trematodes: Clinostomidae: Euclinostominae): A New Record in Avian Host Little Cormorant (Aves: Phalacrocoracidae) of Pakistan. J. Adv. Biol. 2016, 8, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Dennis, E.A.; Sharp, M. Morphology of Euclinostomum heterostomum (Rudolphi, 1809) Trematoda: Clinostomatidae) from Bulbicus ibis. J. Helminthol. 1973, 47, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Jhansilakshmibai, K.; Madhavi, R. Euclinostomum heterostomum (Rudolphi, 1809) (Trematoda): Life-cycle, growth and development of the metacercaria and adult. Syst. Parasitol. 1997, 38, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Mansour, R.M. First record of Euclinostomum heterostomum from the naturally-infected heron “Ardeola ralloides” in Egypt: A light & scanning electron microscopy study. EJZ Egypt. J. Zool. 2019, 72, 22–31. [Google Scholar]
  131. Gomon, M.F. Glossogobius giuris Fishes of Australia. Available online: https://fishesofaustralia.net.au/home/species/129 (accessed on 27 November 2020).
  132. Bray, D.J. Glossogobius munroi. Available online: https://fishesofaustralia.net.au/home/species/5187 (accessed on 27 October 2020).
  133. Hoese, D.; Allen, G.R.; Hadiaty, R.K. Description of three new species of dwarf Glossogobius from New Guinea and northern Australia. Cybium 2017, 41, 179–193. [Google Scholar]
  134. Hoese, D.F.; Allen, G.R. A review of the amphidromous species of the Glossogobius celebius complex, with description of three new species. Cybium 2011, 35, 269–285. [Google Scholar]
  135. Hoese, D.F. The introduction of the gobiid fishes Acanthogobius flavimanus and Tridentiger trigonocephalus into Australia. Koolewong 1973, 2, 3–5. [Google Scholar]
  136. Abol-Munafi, A.B.; Ambak, M.A.; Ismail, P.; Tam, B. Molecular data from the cytochrome b for the phylogeny of Channidae (Channa sp.) in Malaysia. Biotechnology 2007, 6, 22–27. [Google Scholar]
  137. Fishtraderlau. Snakehead. Available online: http://www.aceforums.com.au/topic/46516-snakehead/ (accessed on 29 November 2020).
  138. Bagni, L.; Galli, C. Gabbia. Available online: https://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=818268 (accessed on 1 July 2021).
  139. ALA. Preserved Specimen of Stenocypris malcolmsonii. Available online: https://biocache.ala.org.au/occurrences/82178328-cbca-4117-8cfd-f9c43657f2fe (accessed on 22 February 2021).
  140. De Deckker, P. Ostracods of athalassic salt lakes. Dept. of Biogeography & Geomorphology, Australian National University, Canberra ACT. In Salt Lakes, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Athalassic (Inland) Salt Lakes, Adelaide, Australia, October 1979; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1981; p. 131. [Google Scholar]
  141. Martens, K.; Savatenalinton, S. A subjective checklist of the Recent, free-living, non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea). Zootaxa 2011, 2855, 1–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Christy, M.T.; Kirkpatrick, W. Striped Snakehead (Channa striata): An Invasive Animals CRC Project; Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development: Perth, Australia, 2017; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  143. Bashirullah, A.K. On the occurrence of the trematode, Isoparorchis hypselobagri (Billet 1898), in fishes and notes on its life history. Nor. J. Zool. 1972, 20, 2009–2012. [Google Scholar]
  144. Arthur, J.R.; Ahmed, A.T.A. Checklist of the Parasites of Fishes of Bangladesh; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2002; pp. 1–88. [Google Scholar]
  145. Sahadev, K.V.; Simha, S.S. A new host record for Isoparorchis hypselobagri. Geobios 1980, 7, 272–273. [Google Scholar]
  146. Rao, L.N.; Kameswari, M.; Rao, G.R.H. A yet undefined host of Isoparorchis hypselobagri Billet, 1898. Curr. Sci. 1979, 48, 320. [Google Scholar]
  147. Van Dyke, J.U.; Ferronato, B.D.O.; Spencer, R.-J. Current conservation status of Australian freshwater turtles. Aust. J. Zool. 2018, 66, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Hero, J.-M.; Morrison, C.; Gillespie, G.; Roberts, J.D.; Newell, D.; Meyer, E.; McDonald, K.; Lemckert, F.; Mahony, M.; Osborne, W. Overview of the conservation status of Australian frogs. Pac. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 12, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Chandler, A.C. The Prevalence and Epidemiology of Hookworm and other Helminthic Infections in India. Part IV. Assam and the Hill Areas of Eastern Bengal. IJMR Indian J. Med. Res. 1926, 14, 481–492. [Google Scholar]
  150. Faust, E.C. Human helminthology. In A Manual for Clinicians, Sanitarians and Medical Zoologists, 3rd ed.; Lea & Febiger: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1930; pp. 1–744. [Google Scholar]
  151. Chai, J.-Y. Miscellaneous Zoonotic Species. In Human Intestinal Flukes; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 491–520. [Google Scholar]
  152. Varma, T.; Ahluwalia, S. An unusual record of Isoparorchis hypselobagri (Billet 1898), a trematode parasite of fishes from the bile duct of a pig. Indian Vet. J. 1980, 57, 688–689. [Google Scholar]
  153. Cribb, T. Two new digenetic trematodes from Australian freshwater fishes with notes on previously described species. J. Nat. Hist. 1988, 22, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Reynolds, M.; Duarte, L.M.; Coltro, W.K.T.; Silva, M.F.; Gomez, F.J.V.; Garcia, C.D. Laser-engraved ammonia sensor integrating a natural deep eutectic solvent. Microchem. J. 2020, 157, 105067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Smales, L.R.; Barton, D.P.; Chisholm, L.A. Acanthocephalans from Australian elasmobranchs (Chondrichthyes) with a description of a new species in the genus Gorgorhynchus Chandler, 1934 (Rhadinorhynchidae). Syst. Parasitol. 2019, 96, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Bakker, T.C.; Mazzi, D.; Zala, S. Parasite induced changes in behavior and color make Gammarus pulex more prone to fish predation. Ecology 1997, 78, 1098–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Kaldonski, N.; Perrot-Minnot, M.-J.; Cézilly, F. Differential influence of two acanthocephalan parasites on the antipredator behaviour of their common intermediate host. Anim. Behav. 2007, 74, 1311–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Perrot-Minnot, M.-J.; Kaldonski, N.; Cézilly, F. Increased susceptibility to predation and altered anti-predator behaviour in an acanthocephalan-infected amphipod. Int. J. Parasitol. 2007, 37, 645–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Taraschewski, H.; Peters, W. Comparative investigations of the morphology and chemical composition of the eggshells of Acanthocephala. Parasitol. Res. 1992, 78, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Dezfuli, B.S.; Lui, A.; Squerzanti, S.; Lorenzoni, M.; Shinn, A.P. Confirmation of the hosts involved in the life cycle of an acanthocephalan parasite of Anguilla anguilla (L.) from Lake Piediluco and its effect on the reproductive potential of its amphipod intermediate host. Parasitol. Res. 2012, 110, 2137–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. George, P.V.; Nadakal, A.M. Studies on the life cycle of Pallisentis nagpurensis Bhalerao, 1931 (Pallisentidae; Acanthocephala) parasitic in the fish Ophiocephalus striatus (Bloch). Hydrobiologia 1973, 42, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Blair, D. Polyonchobothrium scleropagis n. sp. (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea) from the Australian osteoglossid fish Scleropages leichardti Günther. J. Helminthol. 1978, 52, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Shiel, R.; Walker, K.; Williams, W. Plankton of the lower River Murray, South Australia. Mar. Freshw. Res. 1982, 33, 301–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Mitchell, B.; Williams, W. Factors influencing the seasonal occurrence and abundance of the zooplankton in two waste stabilization ponds. Mar. Freshw. Res. 1982, 33, 989–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Geddes, M. Understanding zooplankton communities in farm dams: The importance of predation. In Limnology in Australia; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1986; pp. 387–401. [Google Scholar]
  166. Hołyńska, M. On species of the genus Thermocyclops (Copepoda: Cyclopidae) occurring in northern Queensland, Australia. Ann. Zool. 2006, 56, 335–367. [Google Scholar]
  167. Chaicharoen, R.; Sanoamuang, L.-O.; Hołyńska, M. A review of the genus Thermocyclops (Crustacea: Copepoda: Cyclopoida) in Cambodia. Zool. Stud. 2011, 50, 780–803. [Google Scholar]
  168. Gillespie, G.; Hero, J.-M. Potential impacts of introduced fish and fish translocations on Australian amphibians. In Declines and Disappearances of AUSTRALIAN Frogs; Campbell, A., Ed.; Environment Australia: Canberra, Australia, 1999; pp. 131–145. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The fish supply chain, risk points and possible outcomes for Australian aquatic and native species. In light blue are the basic steps in the fish supply chain and in grey the risk factors at each step which may contribute to parasites or intermediate hosts of parasites being introduced into the Australian environment. Inadequate cooking at the consumption step may cause illness but in some cases parasites may mature in humans who may then introduce immature parasite stages into the environment. If infected fish are used for other purposes such as bait, in the presence of a suitable intermediate, paratenic or definitive host, parasites may successfully complete their lifecycle by involving native aquatic or other species.
Figure 1. The fish supply chain, risk points and possible outcomes for Australian aquatic and native species. In light blue are the basic steps in the fish supply chain and in grey the risk factors at each step which may contribute to parasites or intermediate hosts of parasites being introduced into the Australian environment. Inadequate cooking at the consumption step may cause illness but in some cases parasites may mature in humans who may then introduce immature parasite stages into the environment. If infected fish are used for other purposes such as bait, in the presence of a suitable intermediate, paratenic or definitive host, parasites may successfully complete their lifecycle by involving native aquatic or other species.
Diversity 15 00470 g001
Figure 2. (AG). Parasites identified in imported fish. (AC) an egg-engorged mature digenean Genarchopsis paithanensis. The dark area in (A) and surrounding the ventral sucker in (B) is made up of hundreds of eggs. (C) heart shaped vitelline gland. (D) eggs in a mature segment of Senga sp. tapeworm. (E) shows the multiple invasive scolex hooks of Senga sp. which are situated in a circular crown on the scolex (F) the invasive proboscis hooks and collar spines of Pallisentis (Brevitritospinus) sp. and (G) Pallisentis (Pallisentis) sp.
Figure 2. (AG). Parasites identified in imported fish. (AC) an egg-engorged mature digenean Genarchopsis paithanensis. The dark area in (A) and surrounding the ventral sucker in (B) is made up of hundreds of eggs. (C) heart shaped vitelline gland. (D) eggs in a mature segment of Senga sp. tapeworm. (E) shows the multiple invasive scolex hooks of Senga sp. which are situated in a circular crown on the scolex (F) the invasive proboscis hooks and collar spines of Pallisentis (Brevitritospinus) sp. and (G) Pallisentis (Pallisentis) sp.
Diversity 15 00470 g002
Figure 3. Literature search flow, exclusion criteria and results from the literature search which was conducted via CSU PRIMO which maintains an account with all major scholarly journals.
Figure 3. Literature search flow, exclusion criteria and results from the literature search which was conducted via CSU PRIMO which maintains an account with all major scholarly journals.
Diversity 15 00470 g003
Figure 4. The respective basic life cycles for each parasite species. Black arrows indicate Euclinostomum sp. with a broken black line for zoonotic potential without proven cases of human infection; green arrows show Isoparorchis sp.; yellow arrows indicate Genarchopsis sp.; tan is Senga sp. and purple Pallisentis sp.
Figure 4. The respective basic life cycles for each parasite species. Black arrows indicate Euclinostomum sp. with a broken black line for zoonotic potential without proven cases of human infection; green arrows show Isoparorchis sp.; yellow arrows indicate Genarchopsis sp.; tan is Senga sp. and purple Pallisentis sp.
Diversity 15 00470 g004
Table 1. List and number of parasites found in Channa sp. from Country 22. The total number of parasites found for Pallisentis (B) sp. 1, Pallisentis (P) gomptii, Genarchopsis paithanensis and Genarchopsis sp. 1 in this Table are included in and not additional to the total number of parasites found for Pallisentis sp. or Genarchopsis sp.
Table 1. List and number of parasites found in Channa sp. from Country 22. The total number of parasites found for Pallisentis (B) sp. 1, Pallisentis (P) gomptii, Genarchopsis paithanensis and Genarchopsis sp. 1 in this Table are included in and not additional to the total number of parasites found for Pallisentis sp. or Genarchopsis sp.
Fish and Number (N=)Parasite SpeciesSite of InfectionNo. of Fish InfectedRange in Infected FishPrevalence (%)Total No. of Parasites FoundMean IntensityMean Abundance
Channa species (n = 103)Pallisentis sp. Van Cleave, 1928 in total96 Pallisentis (P) identified intestinal mesentery and intestinal wall. One Pallisentis (B) embedded in fish musculature370–1135.9972.620.94
Pallisentis (B.) sp. 1 Amin, Heckmann, Nguyen, Pham & Pham, 2000 1 1
Pallisentis (P.) gomptii Gupta & Verma, 1980 5 7
Genarchopsis sp. Ozaki, 1925 totalFree in abdominal cavity170–416.5362.10.34
Genarchopsis paithanensis Pardeshi & Hiware, 2012 3 3
Genarchopsis sp. 1 1 1
Senga sp. Dollfus, 1934Intestinal lumen50–104.851.00.04
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Williams, M.; Hernandez-Jover, M.; Shamsi, S. Parasites in Imported Edible Fish and a Systematic Review of the Pathophysiology of Infection and the Potential Threat to Australian Native Aquatic Species. Diversity 2023, 15, 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15040470

AMA Style

Williams M, Hernandez-Jover M, Shamsi S. Parasites in Imported Edible Fish and a Systematic Review of the Pathophysiology of Infection and the Potential Threat to Australian Native Aquatic Species. Diversity. 2023; 15(4):470. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15040470

Chicago/Turabian Style

Williams, Michelle, Marta Hernandez-Jover, and Shokoofeh Shamsi. 2023. "Parasites in Imported Edible Fish and a Systematic Review of the Pathophysiology of Infection and the Potential Threat to Australian Native Aquatic Species" Diversity 15, no. 4: 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15040470

APA Style

Williams, M., Hernandez-Jover, M., & Shamsi, S. (2023). Parasites in Imported Edible Fish and a Systematic Review of the Pathophysiology of Infection and the Potential Threat to Australian Native Aquatic Species. Diversity, 15(4), 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15040470

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop