Next Article in Journal
Herbaceous and Woody Root Biomass, Seasonal Changes in Root Turnover, and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal and Ectomycorrhizal Colonization during Primary Succession in Post-Mining Sites
Previous Article in Journal
Complex Evolutionary History of the South American Fox Genus Lycalopex (Mammalia, Carnivora, Canidae) Inferred from Multiple Mitochondrial and Nuclear Markers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Chloroplast Genomics and Phylogenetic Analysis of Persicaria amphibia (Polygonaceae)

Plant Research Team, Animal and Plant Research Department, Nakdonggang National Institute of Biological Resources, Sangju 37242, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2022, 14(8), 641; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14080641
Submission received: 15 July 2022 / Revised: 5 August 2022 / Accepted: 8 August 2022 / Published: 11 August 2022

Abstract

:
Persicaria amphibia (L.) Delarbre, also known as water knotweed, belongs to the Polygonaceae family and has two types: terrestrial and aquatic. We report the chloroplast genome of P. amphibia obtained through de novo assembly of Illumina paired-end reads produced by total DNA sequencing. We analyzed the complete chloroplast (cp) genome of P. amphibia and found it to be 159,455 bp in length, with a large single-copy region (LSC, 84,281 bp), a small single-copy region (SSC, 13,258 bp), and a pair of inverted repeats (IR, 30,956 bp). It contains 79 protein-coding, 29 tRNA and 4 rRNA genes. Comparative analysis of nine Persicaria cp genomes showed a similar genome structure and gene content. However, ycf3 intron II was lost in three Persicaria species (P. hydropiper, P. japonica, and P. pubescens) and the SC/IR regions of four species (P. amphibia, P. hydropiper, P. japonica, and P. pubescens) included the rps19 gene. Phylogenetic analysis of the nine Persicaria species revealed that P. amphibia is sister to P. hydropiper, P. japonica, and P. pubescens. Moreover, we found sequence divergence regions; the largest were rps16-trnQ, trnQ-psbK, trnW-trnP, ndhF-rpl32, and rpl32-trnL regions. This study could be useful for phylogenetic tree analysis of Persicaria and for the identification of Persicaria species.

1. Introduction

Persicaria Mill. is a genus in the tribe Persicarieae (family Polygonaceae) that contains approximately 130 species distributed worldwide [1,2]. Based on the macromorphological classification, Persicaria is included in the genus Polygonum [3]. However, ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase large subunit (rbcL) analysis of Polygonaceae showed that the Polygonoideae subfamily is paraphyletic, and is subdivided into two tribes: Polygoneae and Persicarieae [4].
Persicaria amphibia, a species belonging to the genus Persicaria, is native to the Northern Hemisphere. It has been described in both aquatic and terrestrial forms, and exhibits complex patterns in leaf morphological variation [5]. P. amphibia can grow in aquatic environments as well as terrestrial habitats and has different leaf types. The terrestrial form is erect and has hairy leaves with wavy edges. The aquatic form is hairless with oblong flat leaves. Previous phylogenetic analyses of Persicaria used markers of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, and chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) rbcL and trnL-F [6], which showed that P. amphibia formed a clade and was sister to sect. Echinocaulon in two cp markers, whereas it was sister to sect. Tovara in the ITS marker.
Chloroplasts provide energy to almost all green plants. The chloroplast genome is typically quadripartite in structure, containing a large single copy region (LSC) and a small single copy region (SSC), separated by a pair of inverted repeats (IR) [7] in which organization, gene contents and structures are highly conserved [8]. However, some plants have unique structures owing to gene loss [9,10,11], rearrangement [12,13,14], and inversions [15,16]. Recently, cp genome sequences have been used for evolutionary [17,18], taxonomic [19], DNA marker [20,21], and phylogenetic analyses [22,23,24]. NCBI has uploaded and studied the chloroplast genomes of Persicaria species such as P. chinensis (NC_050358) [25], P. pubescens (MK234901), P. hydropiper (MK234902), P. japonica (NC_056952), P. filiformis (NC_058319), P. aviculare (NC_058892), P. perfoliata (NC_060649), P. runcinata (NC_061176), and P. maackiana (NC_061657).
In this study, we sequenced the complete cp genome of P. amphibia and compared it with previously published cp genomes of Persicaria species. The aims of this study were to: (1) evaluate the phylogenetic position of P. amphibia, (2) evaluate the sequence divergence, and (3) suggest useful markers for future phylogenetic studies in Persicaria species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling, DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Fresh leaves of P. amphibia were were collected from Gyodongdo, Ganghwa, South Korea, and specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of the Nakdonggang National Institute of Biological Resources (NNIBR). The total DNA content was extracted using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). Genomic DNA was sequenced using the Illumina Truseq Nano DNA kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), as per the manufacturer’s protocol. Approximately 4.0 Gb of raw data were generated. A total of 31,825,998 reads of the 150 bp paired-end sequence were generated.

2.2. Assembly and Annotation

The chloroplast genome was assembled using GetOrganelle [26]. The GeSeq [27] was used to annotate the P. amphibia genome. tRNA gene sequences were obtained using tRNAscan-SE [28]. Finally, all published plastid genomes of Persicaria were compared using Geneious Prime [29]. OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW) was used to draw a circular map of the chloroplast genome of P. amphibia [30]. The chloroplast genome of P. amphibia was deposited in GenBank (Table 1).

2.3. Repeat and Divergence Hotspot Analysis

REPuter was used to visualize forward, palindrome, reverse, and complement sequences with a minimum repeat size of 30 base pairs (bp) and a sequence identity greater than 90% [31]. Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were detected using MISA [32]. SSRs with minimum numbers of repetitions of 10, 5, 4, 3, 3, 3 for mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta- and hexa-nucleotides were detected. The alignment of nine Persicaria complete chloroplast genome sequences was visually compared using the Shuffle-LAGAN model of mVISATA [33]. The nucleotide diversity (Pi) was determined using DnaSP [34]. The step size was set to 200 bp and the window length was set to 600 bp.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

Seventy-seven protein-coding genes of nine Persicaria species (Table 1) and one outgroup (NC_58892, Polygonum aviculare) were compiled into a single file of 66,731 bp and aligned using MAFFT [35]. Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were conducted using RAxML v.8 [36] with the GTR+GAMMA I model with 1000 bootstrap replications.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristic of the P. amphibia cp Genome

The complete cp genome of P. amphibia (NCBI accession number: ON938209) comprises 159,455 bp with a quadripartite structure and two IRs (30,956 bp) separated by the LSC (84,281 bp) and SSC (13,258 bp) regions (Figure 1, Table 1). The average GC content was 38.2%. The cp genome of P. amphibia encoded a total of 113 genes, including 79 protein-coding genes, 29 tRNA genes, and 4 rRNA genes (Table 1). The IR region contained 18 duplicated genes, including seven protein-coding genes (ycf1, rps7, ndhB, ycf2, rpl23, rpl2, and rps19), seven tRNA genes (trnN-GUU, trnR-ACG, trnA-UGC, trnI-GAU, trnV-GAC, trnL-CAA, and trnI-CAU), and four rRNA genes (rrn5, rrn4.5, rrn23, and rrn16).
Fifteen genes (rps16, atpF, rpoC1, petB, petD, rpl16, rpl2, ndhB, ndhA, trnA-UGC, trnI-GAU, trnV-UAC, trnL-UAA, trnG-UCC, and trnK-UUU) had one intron, whereas three genes (ycf3, clpP, and rps12) contained two introns.

3.2. Comparison of Other Persicaria Species

Nine Persicaria cp genomes showed a typical quadripartite structure, consisting of a pair of IRs (30,778–31,135 bp), separated by the LSC (84,281–85,439 bp) and SSC (12,879 13,385 bp) regions (Table 1). The cp genome of P. aviculare exhibits the longest genome, and P. hydropiper is smaller than other Persicaria species (Table 1). Nine Persicaria species had the same number of genes (79 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNA, and 4 rRNA genes). However, the second intron of ycf3 was lost in three species (P. pubescens, P. japonica and P. hydropiper Figure 2).
The IR/LSC and IR/SSC junctions of nine Persicaria cp genomes were compared. We found two different junction types: IR/LSC and IR/SSC. Type 1 in four species (P. amphibia, P. filiformis, P. perfoliate, and P. maackiana) of IR included the intact rps19 gene. Type 2 in the other Persicaria species (except for P. amphibia, P. filiformis, P. perfoliate, and P. maackiana) of IR included the partial rps19 gene. The intact ycf1 gene was duplicated in IR regions (IRa and IRb). The junctions of IRb and SSC were located in the ndhF gene, and the junction of SSC/IRA was located between the rps15 and ycf1 genes (Figure 3). However, the total length of IR regions in all of the species was similar (Table 1).

3.3. Repeat Sequence Analysis

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were detected using MISA [32]. P. amphibia had 38 repeats. P. chinensis had the highest number of SSRs (59), whereas P. amphibia and P. pubescens (38) had a smaller number of SSRs than other Persicaria species. Most SSRs were A/T mononucleotide repeats (Figure 4A).
Repeats (forward, palindrome, reverse, and complement) were identified using REPuter [31]. A total of 25 repeats were present in P. amphibia (13 palindrome and 12 forward repeats). The SSRs of other Persicaria species were in the range of 19–28. Most of the repeats ranged in size from 30 to 48 bp. P. japonica had two long repeats, 154 and 156 (Figure 4B).

3.4. Sequences Divergence Hotspots in Persicaria

The cp genomes of nine Persicaria species were compared using mVISTA [33]. The results show that protein-coding genes were more conserved than the non-coding regions, and SC regions had lower variation than IR regions (Figure 5).
The number of polymorphic sites and nucleotide diversity were determined using DnaSP [34]. In the complete cp genome, there were 8470 polymorphic sites, and nucleotide diversity (Pi) was found to be 0.02746. The Pi value was calculated with 200 bp steps. These values ranged from 0 to 0.08875 (Figure 6). The high divergence regions were rps16-trnQ, rpl32-trnL, trnW-trnP, trnQ-psbK, and ndhF-rpl32, three of which (rps16-trnQ, trnW-trnP, and trnQ-psbK) were located in the LSC region, and two (rpl32-trnL and ndhF-rpl32) were located in the SSC region. The rps16-trnQ region exhibited the highest nucleotide diversity (0.0875, Figure 6).

3.5. Phylogenetic Analysis

The ML phylogenetic tree of the nine Persicaria species was constructed based on 77 protein-coding genes (66,732 bp, Figure 7). Persicaria is monophyletic (BS = 100), and is divided into two clades: (1) P. runcinata and P. chinensis; and (2) P. filiformis, P. amphibia, P. hydropiper, P. japonica, and P. pubescens. P. amphibia was sister to P. hydropiper, P. japonica, and P. pubescens, with a high bootstrap value (BS = 100).

4. Discussion

Chloroplast genomes are highly conserved in structures and genes. However, previous studies have reported that gene loss in the chloroplast genome occurs in several lineages, including Geraniaceae [37,38], Orobanchaceae [39,40,41,42], Fabaceae [43,44], and Pinaceae [45]. Studies have also shown that introns of clpP [44,46], rps12 [46], and rpl16 [44] are missing in angiosperms. The gene of ycf3 normally contains three exons and two introns located in the LSC region of the chloroplast genome. The ycf3 gene encodes photosystem I, a complex in the thylakoid membrane of plants [47,48,49]. A previous study reported the loss of ycf3 intron II in Grammica and Cuscuta nitida [50]. Our results reveal that among the nine Persicaria species, three species (P. pubescens, P. japonica, and P. hydropiper) lost ycf3 intron II, and P. amphibia is sister to these three species. Longevialle et al. [47] suggested that splicing of ycf3 intron II has an impact on gene ORGANELL TRANSCRIPT PROCESSING 51 (OPT51) that specifically promotes the splicing of the only group II intron.
IR/SC junctions are variable sites in the cp genome, such as IR expansion and contraction [51,52,53,54]. Comparison of SC/IR junctions in the nine species showed two types: First, an intact rps19 gene in the IR region of four species (P. amphibia, P. hydropiper, P. japonica, and P. pubescens); and second, a partial rps19 gene in the IR region of the remaining five species. Previous studies have suggested that partial gene duplication or the contraction and expansion of IR regions causes variable types of rps19 gene [55,56,57]. However, the IR regions in the nine Persicaria are extremely similar in length (Table 1). This suggests that rps19 in Persicaria is more likely to be partially duplicated.
Previous analysis of cpDNA regions (rbcL, trnL-F, and matK) of Persicaria [6] revealed that P. amphibia is a sister species to the sect. Eupersicaria, such as P. punctate, and P. hydropiper. However, P. amphibia did not show the same results using the nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) ITS data, indicating that P. amphibia is sister to sect. Tovara (P. filiformis and P. virginiana). Our results show that P. amphibia is a sister species to P. hydropiper, P. japonica, and P. pubescens.
Persicaria plants are highly variable in their morphological characters. For example, P. amphibia has variable morphological characteristics, and some authors have reported two varieties, such as P. amphibia var. emersa and P. amphibia var. stipulacea. Additionally, the genus Persicaria was reported to exhibit self-fertilization and hybridization [1,58]. Partridge [59] suggested that P. amphibia has economic qualities as feed for wild animals, herbal medicine and as an ornamental garden plant. Recently, molecular phylogenetic analysis was used to identify plants [60,61]. Previously, cpDNA (matK, rbcL) and nrDNA ITS regions have been used for species identification and phylogenetic analyses [52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65]. In Persicaria, previous studies have used cpDNA (matK, rbcL), nrDNA ITS, and LEAFY regions. However, the relationships between the genus Persicaria are not well supported [1,4,5,6]. Our results reveal that the highest sequence divergence regions were rps16-trnQ, trnQ-psbK, trnW-trnP, ndhF-rpl32, and rpl32-trnL in Persicaria species. These variable DNA regions could be used as molecular markers and will be helpful in the phylogenetic analysis of Persicaria species.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we analyzed the complete cp genome sequence of P. amphibia. It comprises an LSC (84,281 bp), an SSC (13,258 bp), and two IR regions (30,956 bp), and contains 79 protein-coding genes, 29 tRNA genes, and four rRNA genes. Comparative cp genome analysis of the nine Persicaria species showed that all have a similar gene structure and content. However, ycf3 intron II is lost in P. hydropiper, P. japonica, and P. pubescens. Additionally, we found that the SC/IR junctions in four species (P. amphibia, P. hydropiper, P. japonica, and P. pubescens) had an intact rps19 gene. Phylogenetic relationships based on 77 protein-coding genes showed that P. amphibia is sister to P. hydropiper, P. japonica, and P. pubescens. We found five sequence divergence regions (rps16-trnQ, trnQ-psbK, trnW-trnP, ndhF-rpl32, and rpl32-trnL) that will be useful markers for the further phylogenetic analysis of the genus Persicaria.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.C. and Y.H.; methodology, K.C.; software, K.C.; validation, K.C., Y.H. and J.-K.H.; formal analysis, K.C.; investigation, K.C., Y.H. and J.-K.H.; resources, K.C., Y.H. and J.-K.H.; data curation, K.C.; writing—original draft preparation, K.C.; writing—review and editing, K.C., Y.H. and J.-K.H., visualization; K.C., supervision; K.C., project administration; K.C., funding acquisition; Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the grant [NNIBR202201102] from the Nakdonggang National Institute of Biological Resources, funded by the Ministry of Environment, Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kim, S.-T.; Sultan, S.E.; Donoghue, M.J. Allopolyploid speciation in Persicaria (Polygonaceae): Insights from a low-copy nuclear region. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 12370–12375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sanchez, A.; Schuster, T.M.; Kron, K.A. A large-Scale phylogeny of Polygonaceae based on molecular data. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2009, 170, 1044–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Decraene, L.-P.R.; Akeroyd, J.R. Generic limits in Polygonum and related genera (Polygonaceae) on the basis of floral characters. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1988, 98, 321–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Galasso, G.; Ban, E.; Grassi, F.; Sgorbati, S.; Labra, M. Molecular Phylogeny of Polygonum L. s.l. (Polygonoideae, Polygonaceae), Focusing on European Taxa: Preliminary Results and Systematic Considerations Based on rbcL Plastidial Sequence Data. Atti Soc. Ital. Nat. Mus. Civ. Stor.Nat. Milano 2009, 150, 113–148. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gitsopoulos, T.K.; Vasilakoglou, I.; Tsoktouridis, G. Persicaria Amphibia, a serious terrestrial weed in Northern Greece: A combined molecular and morphological approach to identification and taxonomy. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2013, 27, 4236–4242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, S.-T.; Donoghue, M.J. Molecular phylogeny of Persicaria (Persicarieae, Polygonaceae). Syst. Bot. 2008, 33, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wicke, S.; Schneeweiss, G.M.; dePamphilis, C.W.; Müller, K.F.; Quandt, D. The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: Gene content, gene order, gene function. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 76, 273–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dobrogojski, J.; Adamiec, M.; Luciński, R. The chloroplast genome: A review. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2020, 42, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, S.-S.; Fu, P.-C.; Zhou, X.-J.; Cheng, Y.-W.; Zhang, F.-Q.; Chen, S.-L.; Gao, Q.-B. The complete plastome sequences of seven species in Gentiana Sect. Kudoa (Gentianaceae): Insights into plastid gene loss and molecular evolution. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Frailey, D.C.; Chaluvadi, S.R.; Vaughn, J.N.; Coatney, C.G.; Bennetzen, J.L. Gene loss and genome rearrangement in the plastids of five hemiparasites in the family Orobanchaceae. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cauz-Santos, L.A.; da Costa, Z.P.; Callot, C.; Cauet, S.; Zucchi, M.I.; Bergès, H.; van den Berg, C.; Vieira, M.L.C. A repertory of rearrangements and the loss of an inverted repeat region in Passiflora chloroplast genomes. Genome Biol. Evol. 2020, 12, 1841–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, H.O.; Joh, H.J.; Kim, K.; Lee, S.-C.; Kim, N.-H.; Park, J.Y.; Park, H.-S.; Park, M.-S.; Kim, S.; Kwak, M.; et al. Dynamic chloroplast genome rearrangement and DNA barcoding for three Apiaceae species known as the medicinal herb “Bang-Poong”. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Han, T.; Li, M.; Li, J.; Lv, H.; Ren, B.; Chen, J.; Li, W. Comparison of chloroplast genomes of Gynura species: Sequence variation, genome rearrangement and divergence studies. BMC Genomics 2019, 20, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Oulo, M.A.; Yang, J.-X.; Dong, X.; Wanga, V.O.; Mkala, E.M.; Munyao, J.N.; Onjolo, V.O.; Rono, P.C.; Hu, G.-W.; Wang, Q.-F. Complete chloroplast genome of Rhipsalis baccifera, the only cactus with natural distribution in the Old World: Genome rearrangement, intron gain and loss, and implications for phylogenetic studies. Plants 2020, 9, 979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liao, Y.-Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Lü, T.-F.; Mbichi, R.W.; Wan, T.; Liu, F. The Complete chloroplast genome of Myriophyllum Spicatum reveals a 4-Kb inversion and new insights regarding plastome evolution in Haloragaceae. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 3090–3102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Choi, K.S.; Ha, Y.-H.; Gil, H.-Y.; Choi, K.; Kim, D.-K.; Oh, S.-H. Two Korean endemic Clematis chloroplast genomes: Inversion, reposition, expansion of the inverted repeat region, phylogenetic analysis, and nucleotide substitution rates. Plants 2021, 10, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Clegg, M.T.; Gaut, B.S.; Learn, G.H.; Morton, B.R. Rates and patterns of chloroplast DNA evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 6795–6801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, R.-J.; Cheng, C.-L.; Chang, C.-C.; Wu, C.-L.; Su, T.-M.; Chaw, S.-M. Dynamics and evolution of the inverted repeat-large single copy iunctions in the chloroplast genomes of Monocots. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Song, Y.; Zhao, W.; Xu, J.; Li, M.; Zhang, Y. Chloroplast genome evolution and species identification of Styrax (Styracaceae). BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, e5364094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Choi, K.S.; Chung, M.G.; Park, S. The complete chloroplast genome sequences of three Veroniceae species (Plantaginaceae): Comparative analysis and highly divergent regions. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Raman, G.; Park, K.T.; Kim, J.-H.; Park, S. Characteristics of the completed chloroplast genome sequence of Xanthium spinosum: Comparative analyses, identification of mutational hotspots and phylogenetic implications. BMC Genomics 2020, 21, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jansen, R.K.; Kaittanis, C.; Saski, C.; Lee, S.-B.; Tomkins, J.; Alverson, A.J.; Daniell, H. Phylogenetic analyses of Vitis (Vitaceae) based on complete chloroplast genome sequences: Effects of taxon sampling and phylogenetic methods on resolving relationships among Rosids. BMC Evol. Biol. 2006, 6, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yang, J.-B.; Tang, M.; Li, H.-T.; Zhang, Z.-R.; Li, D.-Z. Complete Chloroplast genome of the genus Cymbidium: Lights into the species identification, phylogenetic implications and population genetic analyses. BMC Evol. Biol. 2013, 13, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhai, W.; Duan, X.; Zhang, R.; Guo, C.; Li, L.; Xu, G.; Shan, H.; Kong, H.; Ren, Y. Chloroplast genomic data provide new and robust insights into the phylogeny and evolution of the Ranunculaceae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2019, 135, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yu, B.; Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Lan, X.; Qu, X. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Polygonum chinense L. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2020, 5, 2139–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jin, J.-J.; Yu, W.-B.; Yang, J.-B.; Song, Y.; dePamphilis, C.W.; Yi, T.-S.; Li, D.-Z. GetOrganelle: A fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biol. 2020, 21, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tillich, M.; Lehwark, P.; Pellizzer, T.; Ulbricht-Jones, E.S.; Fischer, A.; Bock, R.; Greiner, S. GeSeq—Versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W6–W11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chan, P.P.; Lin, B.Y.; Mak, A.J.; Lowe, T.M. TRNAscan-SE 2.0: Improved detection and functional classification of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, 9077–9096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones-Havas, S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C.; et al. Geneious basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1647–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Greiner, S.; Lehwark, P.; Bock, R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW) version 1.3.1: Expanded toolkit for the graphical visualization of organellar genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W59–W64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kurtz, S.; Choudhuri, J.V.; Ohlebusch, E.; Schleiermacher, C.; Stoye, J.; Giegerich, R. REPuter: The manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, 4633–4642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Beier, S.; Thiel, T.; Münch, T.; Scholz, U.; Mascher, M. MISA-Web: A web server for microsatellite prediction. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 2583–2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Frazer, K.A.; Pachter, L.; Poliakov, A.; Rubin, E.M.; Dubchak, I. VISTA: Computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, W273–W279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rozas, J.; Ferrer-Mata, A.; Sánchez-DelBarrio, J.C.; Guirao-Rico, S.; Librado, P.; Ramos-Onsins, S.E.; Sánchez-Gracia, A. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 3299–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Katoh, K. MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast fourier Transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 3059–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chris Blazier, J.; Guisinger, M.M.; Jansen, R.K. Recent loss of plastid-encoded ndh genes within Erodium (Geraniaceae). Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 76, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Weng, M.-L.; Blazier, J.C.; Govindu, M.; Jansen, R.K. Reconstruction of the ancestral plastid genome in Geraniaceae reveals a correlation between genome rearrangements, repeats, and nucleotide substitution rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014, 31, 645–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, X.; Zhang, T.-C.; Qiao, Q.; Ren, Z.; Zhao, J.; Yonezawa, T.; Hasegawa, M.; Crabbe, M.J.C.; Li, J.; Zhong, Y. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of holoparasite Cistanche deserticola (Orobanchaceae) reveals gene loss and horizontal gene transfer from its host Haloxylon ammodendron (Chenopodiaceae). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Samigullin, T.H.; Logacheva, M.D.; Penin, A.A.; Vallego-Roman, C.M. Complete plastid genome of the recent holoparasite Lathraea squamaria reveals earliest stages of plastome reduction in Orobanchaceae. PLoS ONE. 2016, 11, e0150718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhou, T.; Ruhsam, M.; Wang, J.; Zhu, H.; Li, W.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Y.; Xu, F.; Wang, X. The complete chloroplast genome of Euphrasia regelii, pseudogenization of ndh genes and the phylogenetic relationships within Orobanchaceae. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Choi, K.-S.; Park, S. Complete plastid and mitochondrial genomes of Aeginetia indica reveal intracellular gene transfer (IGT), horizontal gene transfer (HGT), and cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Downie, S.R.; Llanas, E.; Katz-Downie, D.S. Multiple independent losses of the rpoC1 intron in angiosperm chloroplast DNA’s. Syst. Bot. 1996, 21, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, C.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, Z.; Yang, G.; Peng, J.; Peng, X. Initial characterization of the chloroplast genome of Vicia sepium, an important wild resource plant, and related inferences about its evolution. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ni, Z.; Ye, Y.; Bai, T.; Xu, M.; Xu, L.-A. Complete chloroplast genome of Pinus massoniana (Pinaceae): Gene rearrangements, loss of ndh genes, and short inverted repeats contraction, expansion. Molecules 2017, 22, 1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jansen, R.K.; Wojciechowski, M.F.; Sanniyasi, E.; Lee, S.-B.; Daniell, H. Complete plastid genome sequence of the Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and the phylogenetic distribution of rps12 and clpP intron losses among Legumes (Leguminosae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2008, 48, 1204–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. De Longevialle, A.F.; Hendrickson, L.; Taylor, N.L.; Delannoy, E.; Lurin, C.; Badger, M.; Millar, A.H.; Small, I. The Pentatricopeptide repeat gene OTP51 with two LAGLIDADG motifs is required for the cis-splicing of plastid ycf3 intron 2 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2008, 56, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Albus, C.A.; Ruf, S.; Schöttler, M.A.; Lein, W.; Kehr, J.; Bock, R. Y3IP1, a nucleus-encoded thylakoid protein, cooperates with the plastid-encoded ycf3 protein in photosystem I assembly of Tobacco and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 2838–2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, X.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, A.; Lu, C. Pentatricopeptide repeat protein PHOTOSYSTEM I BIOGENESIS FACTOR2 is required for splicing of ycf3. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 1741–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. McNeal, J.R.; Kuehl, J.V.; Boore, J.L.; Leebens-Mack, J.; dePamphilis, C.W. Parallel loss of plastid introns and their maturase in the genus Cuscuta. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Saski, C.; Lee, S.-B.; Fjellheim, S.; Guda, C.; Jansen, R.K.; Luo, H.; Tomkins, J.; Rognli, O.A.; Daniell, H.; Clarke, J.L. Complete chloroplast genome sequences of Hordeum vulgare, Sorghum bicolor and Agrostis stolonifera, and comparative analyses with other grass genomes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2007, 115, 571–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Choi, K.S.; Park, S. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Aster spathulifolius (Asteraceae); genomic features and relationship with Asteraceae. Gene 2015, 572, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Choi, I.-S.; Choi, B.-H. The distinct plastid genome structure of Maackia fauriei (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae) and its systematic implications for genistoids and tribe Sophoreae. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chen, N.; Sha, L.-N.; Wang, Y.-L.; Yin, L.-J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, D.-D.; Kang, H.-Y.; Zhang, H.-Q.; Zhou, Y.-H.; et al. Variation in plastome sizes accompanied by evolutionary history in monogenomic Triticeae (Poaceae: Triticeae). Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 741063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lu, R.-S.; Li, P.; Qiu, Y.-X. The complete chloroplast genomes of three Cardiocrinum (Liliaceae) species: Comparative genomic and phylogenetic analyses. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 7, 2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wu, C.-X.; Zhai, C.-C.; Fan, S.-J. Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of Rumex nepalensis (Polygonaceae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2020, 5, 2458–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yang, Q.; Fu, G.-F.; Wu, Z.-Q.; Li, L.; Zhao, J.-L.; Li, Q.-J. Chloroplast genome evolution in four Montane Zingiberaceae taxa in China. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 12, 774482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Timson, J. A study of hybridization in Polygonum Section Persicaria. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. Bot. 1965, 59, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Patridge, J.W. Persicaria amphibia (L.) Gray (Polygonum amphibium L.). J. Ecol. 2001, 89, 487–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zaman, W.; Ye, J.; Saqib, S.; Liu, Y.; Shan, Z.; Hao, D.; Chen, Z.; Xiao, P. Predicting potential medicinal plants with phylogenetic topology: Inspiration from the research of traditional Chinese medicine. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 281, 114515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zaman, W.; Ye, J.; Ahmad, M.; Saqib, S.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Chen, Z. Phylogenetic exploration of traditional Chinese medicinal plants: A cse study on Lamiaceae. Pak. J. Bot. 2022, 54, 1033–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tamura, M.N.; Yamashita, J.; Fuse, S.; Haraguchi, M. Molecular phylogeny of monocotyledons inferred from combined analysis of plastid matK and rbcL gene sequences. J. Plant Res. 2004, 117, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Topik, H.; Yukawa, T.; Ito, M. Molecular phylogenetics of subtribe Aeridinae (Orchidaceae): Insights from plastid matK and nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. J. Plant Res. 2005, 118, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Tokuoka, T. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Euphorbiaceae sensu stricto based on plastid and nuclear DNA sequences and ovule and seed character evolution. J. Plant Res. 2007, 120, 511–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kim, J.S.; Hong, J.-K.; Chase, M.W.; Fay, M.F.; Kim, J.-H. Familial relationships of the monocot order Liliales based on a molecular phylogenetic analysis using four plastid loci: matK, rbcL, atpB and atpF-H. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2013, 172, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The complete chloroplast genome of P. amphibia (A). Genes drawn inside the circle are transcribed clockwise, and those outside are counterclockwise. The darker gray in the inner circle corresponds to GC contents. Aquatic form of P. amphibia (B) and terrestrial form of P. amphibia (C).
Figure 1. The complete chloroplast genome of P. amphibia (A). Genes drawn inside the circle are transcribed clockwise, and those outside are counterclockwise. The darker gray in the inner circle corresponds to GC contents. Aquatic form of P. amphibia (B) and terrestrial form of P. amphibia (C).
Diversity 14 00641 g001
Figure 2. The sequences of ycf3 gene among nine Persicaria species. The yellow boxes indicate the exon and red boxes indicate the loss of ycf3 intron II.
Figure 2. The sequences of ycf3 gene among nine Persicaria species. The yellow boxes indicate the exon and red boxes indicate the loss of ycf3 intron II.
Diversity 14 00641 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of the LSC/IR and IR/SSC junction among nine Persicaria cp genomes.
Figure 3. Comparison of the LSC/IR and IR/SSC junction among nine Persicaria cp genomes.
Diversity 14 00641 g003
Figure 4. Analyses of repeat sequences in the Persicaria chloroplast genomes. (A) Frequency of SSRs determined by the MISA program. (B) Frequency of repeat sequences determined by REPuter.
Figure 4. Analyses of repeat sequences in the Persicaria chloroplast genomes. (A) Frequency of SSRs determined by the MISA program. (B) Frequency of repeat sequences determined by REPuter.
Diversity 14 00641 g004
Figure 5. Visualization of the alignment of the 9 Persicaria chloroplast genomes. The top grey arrow shows genes in order and the position of each gene. The blue and sky boxes indicate protein-coding genes and rRNA.
Figure 5. Visualization of the alignment of the 9 Persicaria chloroplast genomes. The top grey arrow shows genes in order and the position of each gene. The blue and sky boxes indicate protein-coding genes and rRNA.
Diversity 14 00641 g005
Figure 6. Comparison of the nucleotide variability (Pi) values in nine Persicaria chloroplast genomes.
Figure 6. Comparison of the nucleotide variability (Pi) values in nine Persicaria chloroplast genomes.
Diversity 14 00641 g006
Figure 7. Phylogenetic tree reconstruction of 9 Persicaria species and one outgroup based on the 77 protein-coding genes (66,732 bp). Number above branches are bootstrap value.
Figure 7. Phylogenetic tree reconstruction of 9 Persicaria species and one outgroup based on the 77 protein-coding genes (66,732 bp). Number above branches are bootstrap value.
Diversity 14 00641 g007
Table 1. Comparison of features of nine Persicaria cp genomes.
Table 1. Comparison of features of nine Persicaria cp genomes.
Persicaria amphibiaPersicaria pubescensPersicaria hydropiperPersicaria chienesisPersicaria japonicaPersicaria filiformisPersicaria
perfoliata
Persicaria runcinataPersicaria maackiana
Length
Total159,455 bp159,502 bp159,054 bp159,981 bp159,747 bp159,741 bp160,585 bp159,220 bp160,595 bp
LSC84,281 bp84,555 bp83,835 bp84,347 bp85,013 bp84,432 bp85,439 bp84,461 bp85,376 bp
SSC13,258 bp13,385 bp13,357 bp12,890 bp13,178 bp13,073 bp12,879 bp12,807 bp13,055 bp
IR30,956 bp30,781 bp30,931 bp30,872 bp30,778 bp31,118 bp31,135 bp30,884 bp31,082 bp
Genes
Total113113113113113113113113113
Protein-coding genes797979797979797979
tRNA292929292929292929
rRNA444444444
GC contents38.2%38.2%38.2%38.0%38.1%37.8%37.5%37.9%37.9%
Accession numberThis study
(ON938209)
MK234901MK234902NC_050358NC_056952NC_058319NC_060649NC_061176NC_061657
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choi, K.; Hwang, Y.; Hong, J.-K. Comparative Chloroplast Genomics and Phylogenetic Analysis of Persicaria amphibia (Polygonaceae). Diversity 2022, 14, 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14080641

AMA Style

Choi K, Hwang Y, Hong J-K. Comparative Chloroplast Genomics and Phylogenetic Analysis of Persicaria amphibia (Polygonaceae). Diversity. 2022; 14(8):641. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14080641

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choi, KyoungSu, Yong Hwang, and Jeong-Ki Hong. 2022. "Comparative Chloroplast Genomics and Phylogenetic Analysis of Persicaria amphibia (Polygonaceae)" Diversity 14, no. 8: 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14080641

APA Style

Choi, K., Hwang, Y., & Hong, J. -K. (2022). Comparative Chloroplast Genomics and Phylogenetic Analysis of Persicaria amphibia (Polygonaceae). Diversity, 14(8), 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14080641

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop