Next Article in Journal
Karst Dolines Support Highly Diversified Soil Collembola Communities—Possible Refugia in a Warming Climate?
Next Article in Special Issue
Coupling Relationship between Ecosystem Service Value and Socioeconomic Development in the Qinba Mountains, China
Previous Article in Journal
Land-Use Types Influence the Community Composition of Soil Mesofauna in the Coastal Zones of Bohai Bay, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Ecological Engineering on Waterbird Diversity in Different Habitats within the Xianghai Nature Reserve
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Invasive Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) Increases Methane Emissions from a Subtropical Lake in the Yangtze River in China

1
Institute of Wetland Research, Hubei Academy of Forestry, Wuhan 430075, China
2
Hubei Honghu Wetland Ecosystem Research Station, Honghu 433200, China
3
Faculty of Forestry, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2022, 14(12), 1036; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121036
Submission received: 13 October 2022 / Revised: 14 November 2022 / Accepted: 14 November 2022 / Published: 26 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecosystem Observation, Simulation and Assessment)

Abstract

:
Lakes represent an important source of atmospheric methane (CH4); however, there are few studies on which lake-dwelling invasive aquatic plants generate CH4. Therefore, in this study, CH4 emissions were measured using a floating chamber and gas chromatography in a subtropical lake in China. We considered four community zones of invasive plants (Eichhornia crassipes), emergent vegetation (Zizania latifolia), floating-plant (Trapa natans) and open-water zones. The results indicate that the flux of CH4 emissions varied between −5.38 and 102.68 mg m−2 h−1. The higher emission values were attributed to lake eutrophication. Moreover, the flux of CH4 emissions in the invasive plant zone was 140–220% higher than that in the open-water and the floating-plant zones. However, there was no significant difference in CH4 emissions between the invasive plant and the emergent vegetation zones. This may be due to a higher production of plants, as well as the rapid reproductive rate of the invasive plants. Finally, CH4 emissions were positively associated with the air and water temperature; however, the emissions were also negatively associated with water depth. Our results suggest that invasive plants enhance freshwater CH4 emissions, thus contributing to global warming.

1. Introduction

Despite the fact that lake ecosystems cover approximately 3.7% of the Earth’s continental land area [1,2], they are believed to be a major source of the greenhouse gas (GHG) methane (CH4) [3,4]. The greenhouse effect of CH4 is approximately 28-fold higher than that of CO2 for the century-long time scale, accounting for approximately 20% of total global warming [3,5]. The CH4 concentration in the atmosphere, which is mainly caused by human activity, has increased by 150% since pre-industrial times and continues to increase. This may further enhance global warming to a greater extent [5,6].
Top-down and bottom-up estimates for global CH4 emissions are 576 and 727 Tg yr−1, respectively, of which CH4 emissions from freshwater wetlands (including lakes and rivers) account for 308 Tg yr−1 [5]. CH4 emissions between and within lakes exhibit high spatiotemporal variability [7,8], and it is estimated that CH4 emissions from lakes account for 8–48 Tg yr−1, with approximately 50% of the flux being attributed to tropical/subtropical regions [3,9]. Although several studies have determined the CH4 emissions from these lakes are largely the result of a warming climate, invasive alien plants, pollution and enclosure aquaculture [10,11,12,13], there are few studies on the contribution of human activity (e.g., introduction of alien plants) to CH4 emissions from lakes. In addition, these studies suggest that current and future increases in CH4 emissions will intensify climate change [12,13,14]; therefore, it is necessary to further explore CH4 emissions from lakes.
The free-floating water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) is one of the world’s most invasive aquatic plants. It causes significant ecological and socio-economic effects [15]. As an ornamental plant originating from tropical South America, this invasive water hyacinth weed was introduced into China in the 1900s [16], and it has subsequently been extensively cultivated as animal feed since the 1950s. It is distributed widely in the aquatic ecosystems of the Yangtze River in China [16]. The water hyacinth commonly forms dense, interlocking mat-forming floating aquatic plants on the water surface. This results from a rapid reproductive rate, complex root structure and a doubling of its biomass within five days [10,15,17,18]. The water hyacinth mats prevent the transfer of oxygen from the air to the water’s surface and block the light required for photosynthesis by phytoplankton and submersed vegetation [15,18]. The water hyacinths on the water surface can prevent light penetration into the water column below [18], which decreases the temperature (water and sediment) [19,20]. Finally, changes in these factors affect the spatiotemporal variability of CH4 production and emissions from the lake and impact whole-lake emission estimates on an annual basis [3,7,10]. Therefore, it is important to study the influence of the invasive water hyacinth weed on CH4 emissions in these lakes.
Hong Lake is the seventh largest shallow lake in China and the largest natural lake in Hubei Province, which is located within the middle reaches of the Yangtze River [21]. Because of the abundant natural resources in Hong Lake, rapid socio-economic development has caused the lake to undergo a variety of environmental changes over the past few decades, including a shrinking water area, deterioration of water quality and a decline in biodiversity [21,22,23]. Several studies have confirmed that CH4 emissions from the invasive Spartina altrniflora weed have significantly increased compared with the CH4 emissions from the native plant community [24,25,26]. Banik et al. [27] also reported that the invasive water hyacinth has clearly increased CH4 emissions from the freshwater ecosystems in India, which were estimated to reach 1.2 Tg yr−1. Conversely, Attermeyer et al. [10] reported that CH4 emissions from invasive water hyacinth zones were reduced compared with those from open-water zones. This was caused by the oxidation of CH4 catalysed by methanotrophic bacteria. Therefore, the influence of invasive aquatic plants on CH4 emission rates in freshwater ecosystems requires further examination.
In the present study, we focused on the effects of the invasive water hyacinth on CH4 emissions in a shallow lake in subtropical China. CH4 emissions in the shallow lake were measured with floating chambers and a gas chromatography method. In addition, to reveal the scope of its influence, we analysed the relationship between ecological factors (water depth, temperature and dissolved oxygen from water) and CH4 emissions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study area Description

The study was conducted at the Hong Lake Natural Reserve (113°12′–113°26′ N, 29°40′–29°58′ E) towards the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. Hong Lake has a surface area of 344 km2 with an open-water area of 308 km2, a littoral area of 36 km2 and a mean water depth of 1.5 m [21,28]. Hong Lake was listed as an internationally important wetland in the Ramsar convention in 2008 and was entered into the China Wetland Ecosystem Research Network in 2014. The region is characterised by a north subtropical humid monsoon climate, with a mean annual temperature of 15.9 °C–16.6 °C. The minimum and maximum mean monthly temperatures were 3.8 °C in January and 28.9 °C in July and/or August, respectively. The annual average evaporation is 1000–1300 mm and the mean annual precipitation is 1174 mm, 74% of which occurs between April and October [21].
According to the change in water depth and the vegetation type from the littoral zone to the open water, four zones in the study region were selected to monitor CH4 emission flux between April and October of 2021 (Figure 1). The first site (OPs) was the open water of the lake in which no vegetation grew. The second site (ECs) was an area invaded by an alien species of water hyacinth (E. crassipes), which covered 100% of the area. The third site (TNs) was covered by the floating plant Trapa natans (T. natans), with a total vegetation coverage of 95%. The fourth site (ZLs) consisted of the emergent aquatic plant Zizania latifolia (Z. Latifolia), with a total vegetation coverage of 90% and sparse areas containing Nelumbo nucifera and T. natans.

2.2. CH4 Measurements

CH4 flux measurements were taken at four sites in Hong Lake from April to December 2021. The measurements were carried out using floating chambers [29], which included three plastic opaque chambers (height above the water level 30 cm, volume 28.8 L) made of acrylic organic glass. The outside of the chamber contained a rubber plastic film to prevent an increase in the inner temperature of the chamber (Figure 2). In addition, the open-end of the chamber was fitted with a cystosepiment and tyre as floating equipment. The headspace of the chamber was equipped with a fan to mix the air and one sampling port and a temperature sensor. Before sampling, three chambers were placed upside down 50 to 100 cm apart on the water surface. Gas samples were drawn from each chamber every 5 min for 15 min with 60 mL polypropylene syringes equipped with three-way stopcocks and then transferred to a gas bag.
Within one week, the CH4 concentration of all samples was determined by a gas chromatography instrument (Agilent, 7890A, GC system, Agilent Co., Wilmington, DE, USA) equipped with a flame ionisation CH4 detector from the Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The fluxes were calculated using linear regression based on the concentration change as a function of time. 91% of all fluxes had a r-squared value of 0.70 or above (of which, 53% had a r-squared value of 0.9 or above). CH4 flux at each site was calculated using the following equation:
F = d c d t × M V 0 × T 0 T × V A × 60
F, flux at the time of chamber closure (mg m−2 h−1);
dc/dt, time derivative (slope) CH4 concentration change over time (ppm min−1);
M, molecular mass of CH4 (g mol−1);
V0, ideal gas mole volume (0.0224 m3 mol−1);
T0, absolute temperature (273.15 K);
T, absolute temperature inside of chamber at sampling (K);
V, chamber volume (m3) above the water surface;
A, chamber area (m2).

2.3. Measurement of Environmental Factors

The water depth at each site was measured with a ruler and bamboo during sampling. The air temperature was measured using a digital thermometer (TM-902C, Factory of Lihuajin Instrument, Guangzhou, China). Conductivity, water temperature, pH and DO concentration at a water depth of 10 cm were measured using a portable multi-parameter water quality meter (Multi 3630 IDS, WTW Co., Munich, Germany).
At each site, the plants were sampled in September 2021 to measure biomass. Three 50 cm × 50 cm plots were randomly selected for these measurements. The plant samples were oven-dried at 70 °C for 48 h, and then weighed. In addition, three soil samples at each site were collected at a depth of 10 cm, and all soil samples were transferred to the laboratory, air-dried indoors and then dried at 70 °C for 48 h. The samples were milled and passed through a 0.125 mm sieve to determine the organic carbon concentration (SOC, g kg−1) using the wet oxidation method with K2CrO7, and the soil pH was measured using the potentiometric method. In addition, total nitrogen (TN) concentration (g kg−1) was measured using the Kjeldahl method with H2SO4 digestion. The total phosphorus (TP) concentration of the soil was determined by colorimetry by alkali fusion with NaOH.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The significant differences in CH4 fluxes at the four sites were analysed using SPSS software (18.0 version) based on Bonferroni’s test as obtained by one-way analysis of variance. The relationship between CH4 fluxes and environmental variables was determined using Pearson’s rank correlation. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Environmental Factors

The mean air temperature at the ECs, OPs and ZLs sites from April to December was not significantly different (p > 0.05), with mean values of 26.5 °C, 25.5 °C and 26.9 °C, respectively, whereas the mean air temperature at the ECs and ZLs sites was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of the TNs site (mean value of 24.7 °C, p < 0.05) (Figure 3a). The mean water temperature at the ECs, OPs and ZLs sites was not significantly different (p > 0.05), with mean values of 23.5 °C, 23.2 °C and 23.2 °C, respectively, but it was higher (p < 0.05) than that at the TNs site (23.0 °C) (Figure 3b). The mean water depth at the ECs, OPs, TNs and ZLs sites was 151, 192, 141 and 97.8 cm, respectively, and significant differences were observed (p < 0.05); however, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the ECs and TNs sites (Figure 3c). The mean pH of the water at the ECs site (7.9) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than that at the OPs and TNs sites (8.5 and 8.2, respectively), and higher (p < 0.05) compared with that at the ZLs site (7.5) (Figure 3d). The mean DO at the ECs site (7.0 mg L−1) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than that at the Ops site (8.6 mg L−1), but significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of the ZLs site (3.2 mg·L−1). There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the ECs and TNs sites (mean value of 7.6 mg L−1) (Figure 3e). The mean conductivity of water at the ECs site (352.5 μS cm−1) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that at the OPs (339.5 μS cm−1) and TNs sites (347.6 μS cm−1); however, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the ECs and ZLs sites (355.5 μS cm−1) (Figure 3f).
The vegetation biomass at the ECs site was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that at the Ops site, but lower than that at the ZLs site, and higher than that at the TNs site, whereas there were no significant differences among the ECs, TNs and ZLs sites (p > 0.05) (Table 1). The soil pH in the ZLs site was significantly lower than that of the Ops site (p < 0.05), and no significant differences were observed for the others (p > 0.05). The SOC and TP concentration in the top 10 cm of the soil at the ZLs were significantly higher than those at the OPs and ECs (p < 0.05); however, there were no significant differences between the ZLs and TNs sites (p > 0.05). Finally, the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio and the TP concentration were not significantly different between the sites (p > 0.05) (Table 1).

3.2. CH4 Emission Fluxes

Temporal variations in CH4 emission fluxes were recorded at the four sites, and the peak values occurred in the spring and/or summer, whereas the lowest values occurred in winter. The CH4 emission fluxes at the ECs, OPs, TNs and ZLs sites ranged from 0.15 to 102.68, 0.12 to 59.75, −5.38 to 43.14 and 0.06 to 90.19 mg m−2 h−1, respectively (Figure 4).
Mean CH4 emissions at the ECs, OPs, TNs and ZLs sites from April to December were 23.16, 9.68, 7.08 and 19.48 mg m−2 h−1, respectively (Figure 5). The highest CH4 emissions were observed at the ECs site. These differences indicate that the invasive plant, E. crassipes, exerts an enormous influence on CH4 emissions at Hong Lake. A one-way analysis of variance showed that there was a significant difference in CH4 emissions between the ECs and TNs sites (P = 0.03), slight differences between the ECs and OPs sites (p < 0.1) and no significant differences between the ECs and ZLs sites (p > 0.10).

3.3. Dependence of CH4 Fluxes on Environmental Factors

CH4 emission fluxes at all four sites were significantly positively correlated with air and water temperature (Figure 6a, p < 0.01), and significantly negatively correlated with water depth (Figure 6b, p < 0.01). The CH4 emission fluxes had no significant correlation with the DO concentration in the water (Figure 7, p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

In this study, CH4 emission fluxes at Hong Lake ranged from −5.38 to 102.68 mg m−2 h−1 (Figure 4). The results indicate that this shallow lake releases a large amount of CH4 into the atmosphere, but the flux values matched the ranges recorded in other lakes in tropical and subtropical regions (ranging from −1.7 to 326 mg m−2 h−1) [27,30]. Moreover, Gondwe and Masamba [31] reported that the maximum diffusive CH4 emission rates in tropical wetlands varied between 0.24 and 293 mg m−2 h−1, with a mean of 23.2 mg m−2 h−1. The CH4 flux at Hong Lake was one to two orders of magnitude higher than that at Dong Lake in the Yangtze River in China (ranging from 0.06 to 5.53 mg m−2 h−1) [32], and higher than that at lakes in North America (ranging from 0.002 to 0.826 mg m−2 h−1) [29,33] and a reservoir in the boreal region (ranging from 18 to 36 mg m−2 h−1) [34]. A hydro-electric reservoir in French Guyana released CH4 at flux intensities ranging from 8 to 35 mg m−2 h−1 [35].
Over the last five decades, Hong Lake has been extensively altered by flood regulation, irrigation, fish aquaculture and water supply demands [23]. This has resulted in a deterioration of water quality and caused the TP and TN to exceed their protective targets (TP ≤ 0.05 mg L−1 and TN ≤ 1.0 mg L−1) [21]. According to a report in 2004, approximately 80% (250 km2) of the lake has been used for large-scale aquaculture since the 1990s [36]. In 2017, the area used for aquaculture decreased to 40% of the lake area as a consequence of wetland protection and a restoration project at Hong Lake beginning in 2004 [21,23]. Based on our measurements, the TP at the lake was 0.088 mg L−1 in August and 0.239 mg L−1 in November 2021, which could have altered the CH4 emissions of the lake [3]. Many studies have found that eutrophic lakes release more CH4 emissions into the atmosphere [14,37,38]. Zhou et al. [37] reported that emission values ranged from 0.1 to 351.9 mg h−2 h−1 for shallow lakes in the Yangtze River Basin and were related to more enriched waters. Pickard et al. [12] also reported that severe pollution in urban lakes resulted in higher CH4 emissions, including a large amount of untreated sewage input, with the highest flux recorded at 335 mg m−2 h−1.
We consulted internal data from the Administration of the Hong Lake National Nature Reserve, beginning with the water hyacinth weed invasion in the 1990s. The coverage of the invading hyacinth increased from approximately 1300 ha in 2009 to 6000 ha in 2014, but decreased to 1200 ha in 2017 because of a project to remove water hyacinth from the lake. To date, it covers approximately 300 ha of the lake (Figure 8). The invasive water hyacinth weed exhibited high growth rates and a mean net CO2 exchange (−3.4 to −5.4 g C-CO2 m−2 d−1, negative values indicate ecosystem CO2 uptake) compared with open water (2.3 to 5.1 g C-CO2 m−2 d−1, positive values indicate ecosystem efflux) [39]. However, the extensive water hyacinth coverage of the lake surface resulted in the eutrophication of the lake [40]. Furthermore, the large water hyacinth mats prevented the transfer of oxygen from the atmosphere to the water and decreased oxygen production by other plants and algae [10,15]. This changes other ecological factors, such as the DO concentration in water and sediment temperature of the lake [19,20], which may be linked to CH4 production and emissions from the lake [10]. In the present study, CH4 emission fluxes at the ECs site were 139–227% higher on average than those at the OPs and TNs sites, and were approximately 20% higher than that at the ZLs site, although there was no significant difference between the ECs and ZLs sites (Figure 5). Our results are consistent with those of previous studies [27]. For the ECs site, higher CH4 release rates during sampling may be explained by higher biomass. Wang et al. [30] found that the vegetation in the inundated area played an important role in CH4 production and represented ”hotspots” of CH4 fluxes in water systems. Table 1 shows that the plant biomass in the ECs and the ZLs sites was higher than that in the OPs and TNs sites, and the former two sites had increased CH4 release into the atmosphere. In general, numerous studies indicate that vegetation is a key factor of CH4 release in wetlands and is attributed to primary production, which supplies organic matter to the sediment and induces the production of CH4 by methanogenic bacteria [41,42]. For example, Furlanetto et al. [43] reported that higher CH4 emissions in eutrophic lakes were attributed to higher organic matter concentration, resulting from higher primary production rates. Other studies indicated that CH4 emissions were positively correlated with net primary production in two lakes [3,32]. Our results reveal that the invasive plants strongly enhance freshwater CH4 emissions through an increase in plant productivity, thus contributing to global warming. Therefore, to reduce CH4 emissions, we suggest the extensive removal of water hyacinth in lakes through wetland protection and restoration projects.
CH4 is produced in sediment under anoxic conditions by methanogens and is released into the atmosphere through three pathways, including ebullition, diffusion and plant-mediated emissions [3,44,45]. Two studies showed that lower DO concentrations in water overlaying the sediment in the lake and marsh resulted in higher CH4 production [46,47] and greater CH4 emissions [10,48]. In the present study, the mean DO concentration at the four sites of the lake, from highest to lowest, was as follows: OPs > TNs > ECs > ZLs (Figure 3e). Thus, lower DO concentrations were observed in surface water with areas covered by macrophytes, which may have caused an increase in CH4 emission fluxes at the ZLs and the ECs, compared with the TNs and Ops (Figure 4 and Figure 5). The results indicate that CH4 emissions had no significant correlation with DO concentration in the lake water, but the emissions decreased with increasing DO concentration in the lake water (Figure 7). For example, Bolpagni et al. [49] reported that the oxygen saturation in a stand of T. natans was lower than that in control areas that were devoid of plants, indicating vegetation could lead to a reduction in anoxic conditions and an increase in CH4 emissions, although the aerenchyma in the plants may contribute to the transport of CH4 from the water column into the atmosphere. In contrast, Attermeyer et al. [10] reported that the lower DO concentrations in the surface water of areas covered by E. crassipes led to a significantly lower flux of CH4 emissions compared with that of open water, because the CH4 in the surface water beneath the vegetation was oxidised by methanotrophic bacteria. Thus, the effect of DO concentrations in water on CH4 emissions requires further study.
Air and water temperatures are important factors that limit the seasonal variation in CH4 emissions [6,8,32,50]. It is well-established that methanogenesis in lake sediments increases exponentially with temperature because of the increased microbial activity at higher temperatures [10,51,52]. Figure 4 shows that the highest CH4 emission fluxes occurred in June and July (Summer) at the three sites (ECs, OPs and TNs), whereas the lowest were seen in December (Winter). Figure 6a indicates that CH4 emissions increase exponentially with air and water temperatures in Hong Lake (N = 40, p < 0.01), but R2 was much lower. Although the highest CH4 emissions occurred in April (Spring) for the ZLs site, the results suggest that other factors affect the CH4 emissions at Hong Lake, such as water depth, plant growth and the availability of organic matter in sediments [6,45,53].
Water depth or the water table level in wetlands is usually a major factor affecting the spatial and temporal variation in the CH4 emission flux [42,48,53]. We observed a negative correlation between CH4 emission fluxes and water depth at all sites; however, R2 was also much lower (Figure 6b). The results are consistent with the findings of several previous studies [8,53]. Because Hong Lake is a shallow lake with a mean water depth of 1.5 m [28], the variation in water depth in the lake from April to December ranged from 48 cm to 293 cm (Figure 3c). However, emergent plants, including Z. latifolia and N. nucifera plants, which were more dominant in the ZLs site compared with the other three sites, could extend their root systems into deeper and more anaerobic sediment and transport CH4-rich gas into the atmosphere [53].

5. Conclusions

In this study, we determined how the invasive water hyacinth weed affects CH4 emissions in subtropical Chinese lakes. The results indicate that CH4 emissions in the zones invaded by water hyacinth were 20%–220% higher than those in the exotic-plant- free areas, because of the higher productivity of the invasive water hyacinth. The CH4 emission fluxes at Hong Lake ranged from −5.38 mg m−2 h−1 (a sink of atmospheric CH4) to 102.68 mg m−2 h−1 (a larger source of atmospheric CH4). In addition, the results indicate that CH4 emissions exhibited a weaker correlation with water temperature, water depth and dissolved oxygen concentration. Therefore, it is essential to further intensively study the CH4 emissions of lakes in tropical and subtropical regions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, W.Z., S.X., Y.S., X.X., H.L., W.O. and J.Y.; formal analysis, W.Z., Y.S., H.L. and J.Y.; funding acquisition, W.Z. and Y.S.; investigation, W.Z., S.X., X.X., W.O. and J.Y.; supervision, S.X., H.L. and W.O.; validation, W.Z.; writing—original draft, W.Z.; writing—review and editing, W.Z. and H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Foundation of China (NO. 31971474, 31800374).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yanxia Zuo for their valuable field and laboratory analyses assistance from the Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The authors would like to thank local fishermen and the staff from Administration of Hong Lake National Nature Reserve for their help in collecting data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest relevant to this study.

References

  1. Downing, J.A.; Prairie, Y.T.; Cole, J.J.; Duarte, C.M.; Tranvik, L.J.; Striegl, R.G.; McDowell, W.H.; Kortelainen, P.; Caraco, N.F.; Melack, J.M.; et al. The global abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2006, 51, 2388–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Verpoorter, C.; Kutser, T.; Seekell, D.A.; Tranvik, L.J. A global inventory of lakes based on high-resolution satellite imagery. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2014, 41, 6396–6402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bastviken, D.; Cole, J.J.; Pace, M.L.; Tranvik, L.J. Methane emissions from lakes: Dependence of lake characteristics, two regional assessments, and a global estimate. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycl. 2004, 18, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bastviken, D.; Tranvik, L.J.; Downing, J.A.; Crill, P.M.; Enrich-Prast, A. Freshwater Methane Emissions Offset the Continental Carbon Sink. Science 2011, 331, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. IPCC. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis; Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S.L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M.I., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 1–2391. [Google Scholar]
  6. Aben, R.C.H.; Barros, N.; van Donk, E.; Frenken, T.; Hilt, S.; Kazanjian, G.; Lamers, L.P.M.; Peeters, E.T.H.M.; Roelofs, J.G.M.; Domis, L.N.D.S.; et al. Cross continental increase in methane ebullition under climate change. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Yang, H.; Xie, P.; Ni, L.; Flower, R.J. Underestimation of CH4 Emission from Freshwater Lakes in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 4203–4204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Natchimuthu, S.; Sundgren, I.; Gålfalk, M.; Klemedtsson, L.; Crill, P.; Danielsson, Å.; Bastviken, D. Spatio-temporal variability of lake CH4 fluxes and its influence on annual whole lake emission estimates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2015, 61, S13–S26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Johnson, M.S.; Matthews, E.; Du, J.; Genovese, V.; Bastviken, D. Methane Emission from Global Lakes: New Spatiotemporal Data and Observation-Driven Modeling of Methane Dynamics Indicates Lower Emissions. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2022, 127, e2022JG006793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Attermeyer, K.; Flury, S.; Jayakumar, R.; Fiener, P.; Steger, K.; Arya, V.; Wilken, F.; van Geldern, R.; Premke, K. Invasive floating macrophytes reduce greenhouse gas emissions from a small tropical lake. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Marotta, H.; Pinho, L.; Gudasz, C.; Bastviken, D.; Tranvik, L.J.; Prast, A.E. Greenhouse gas production in low-latitude lake sediments responds strongly to warming. Nat. Clim. Change 2014, 4, 467–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pickard, A.; White, S.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Carvalho, L.; Dobel, A.; Drewer, J.; Jamwal, P.; Helfter, C. Greenhouse gas budgets of severely polluted urban lakes in India. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 798, 149019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Jia, L.; Zhang, Z.; Xiao, W.; Liu, S.; Zhao, J.; Xie, Y.; Lee, X. Methane emission of a lake aquaculture farm and its response to ecological restoration. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2022, 330, 107883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Palma-Silva, C.; Marinho, C.C.; Albertoni, E.F.; Giacomini, I.B.; Barros, M.P.F.; Furlanetto, L.M.; Trindade, C.R.T.; Esteves, F.D.A. Methane emissions in two small shallow neotropical lakes: The role of temperature and trophic level. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 81, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Villamagna, A.M.; Murphy, B.R. Ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes): A review. Freshw. Biol. 2010, 55, 282–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ding, J.; Ren, W.; Fu, W.; Zhang, G. Water hyacinth in China: Its Distribution, Problems and Control Status. In Biological and Integrated Control of Water Hyacinth, Eichhornia Crassipes; Julien, M.H., Hill, M.P., Center, T.D., Jianqing, D., Eds.; Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra, ACT, Australia, 2001; pp. 29–32. [Google Scholar]
  17. Owens, C.S.; Madsen, J.D. Low temperature limits of water hyacinth. J. Aquat. Plant Manag. 1995, 33, 63–68. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hu, W.; Salomonsen, J.; Xu, F.-L.; Pu, P. A model for the effects of water hyacinths on water quality in an experiment of physico-biological engineering in Lake Taihu, China. Ecol. Model 1998, 107, 171–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rai, D.N.; Munshi, J.D. The influence of thick floating vegetation (Water hyacinth: Eichhornia crassipes) on the physic-chemical environment of a fresh water wetland. Hydrobiologia 1979, 62, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wilson, J.R.; Holst, N.; Rees, M. Determinants and patterns of population growth in water hyacinth. Aquat. Bot. 2005, 81, 51–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, T.; Ban, X.; Wang, X.; Cai, X.; Li, E.; Wang, Z.; Yang, C.; Lu, X. Analysis of nutrient transport and ecological response in Honghu Lake, China by using a mathematical model. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 575, 418–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhou, W.C.; Shi, Y.H.; Pan, L. Current status and controlling strategies of water pollution in Honghu Lake wetland in Jianghan plain of Middle Reaches of Yangtze River. Wetl. Sci. Manag. 2019, 15, 31–34. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. Han, M.; Dsouza, M.; Zhou, C.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Chen, C.; Yao, Q.; Zhong, C.; Zhou, H.; A Gilbert, J.; et al. Agricultural Risk Factors Influence Microbial Ecology in Honghu Lake. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2019, 17, 76–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tong, C.; Morris, J.T.; Huang, J.; Xu, H.; Wan, S. Changes in pore-water chemistry and methane emission following the invasion of Spartina alterniflora into an oliogohaline marsh. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2017, 63, 384–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yin, S.; An, S.; Deng, Q.; Zhang, J.; Ji, H.; Cheng, X. Spartina alterniflora invasions impact CH4 and N2O fluxes from a salt marsh in eastern China. Ecol. Eng. 2015, 81, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, Y.; Ding, W.; Cai, Z.; Valerie, P.; Han, F. Response of methane emission to invasion of spartina alterniflora and exogenous n deposition in the coastal salt marsh. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 4588–4594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Banik, A.; Sen, M.; Sen, S.P. Methane emissions from water hyacinth-infested freshwater ecosystems. Chemosphere 1993, 27, 1539–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Z.; Du, Y.; Yang, C.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, E.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, X. Occurrence and ecological hazard assessment of selected antibiotics in the surface waters in and around Lake Honghu, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 609, 1423–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bellido, J.L.; Tulonen, T.; Kankaala, P.; Ojala, A. CO2 and CH4 fluxes during spring and autumn mixing periods in a boreal lake (Pääjärvi, southern Finland). J. Geophy. Res. 2009, 114, G04007. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang, H.; Lu, J.; Wang, W.; Yang, L.; Yin, C. Methane fluxes from the littoral zone of hypereutrophic Taihu Lake, China. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 2006, 111, D17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gondwe, M.J.; Masamba, W.R.L. Spatial and temporal dynamics of diffusive methane emissions in the Okavango Delta, northern Botswana, Africa. Wetl. Eco. Manag. 2014, 22, 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xing, Y.; Xie, P.; Yang, H.; Ni, L.; Wang, Y.; Rong, K. Methane and carbon dioxide fluxes from a shallow hypereutrophic subtropical Lake in China. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 5532–5540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fernandez, J.M.; Townsend-Small, A.; Zastepa, A.; Watson, S.B.; Brandes, J.A. Methane and nitrous oxide measured throughout Lake Erie over all seasons indicate highest emissions from the eutrophic Western Basin. J. Great Lakes Res. 2020, 46, 1604–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Eugster, W.; DelSontro, T.; Sobek, S. Eddy covariance flux measurements confirm extreme CH4 emission from a Swiss hydropower reservoir and resolve their short-term variability. Biogeosciences 2011, 8, 2815–2831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Abril, G.; Guérin, F.; Richard, S.; Delmas, R.; Galy-Lacaux, C.; Gosse, P.; Tremblay, A.; Varfalvy, L.; Dos Santos, M.A.; Matvienko, B. Carbon dioxide and methane emissions and the carbon budget of a 10-year old tropical reservoir (Petit Saut, French Guiana). Glob. Biogeochem. Cycl. 2005, 19, GB4007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lu, S.; Wang, S.H.; Yuan, W.B.; Wen, Y.L. Lake environment evolution of Honghu and consideration on development of wetland ecological industry. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 218, 157–159. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhou, Y.; Song, K.; Han, R.; Riya, S.; Xu, X.; Yeerken, S.; Geng, S.; Ma, Y.; Terada, A. Nonlinear response of methane release to increased trophic state levels coupled with microbial processes in shallow lakes. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 265, 114919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sun, H.; Yu, R.; Liu, X.; Cao, Z.; Li, X.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhuang, S.; Ge, Z.; Zhang, L.; et al. Drivers of spatial and seasonal variations of CO2 and CH4 fluxes at the sediment water interface in a shallow eutrophic lake. Water Res. 2022, 222, 118916. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Peixoto, R.B.; Marotta, H.; Bastviken, D.; Enrich-Prast, A. Floating Aquatic Macrophytes Can Substantially Offset Open Water CO2 Emissions from Tropical Floodplain Lake Ecosystems. Ecosystems 2016, 19, 724–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mwamburi, J. Spatial variations in sedimentary organic matter in surficial lake sediments of Nyanza Gulf (Lake Victoria, Kenya) after invasion of water hyacinth. Lakes Reserv. Sci. Policy Manag. Sustain. Use 2016, 21, 94–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Whiting, G.J.; Chanton, J.P. Primary production control of methane emission from wetlands. Nature 1993, 364, 794–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Juutinen, S.; Alm, J.; Larmola, T.; Huttunen, J.T.; Morero, M.; Martikainen, P.J.; Silvola, J. Major implication of the littoral zone for methane release from boreal lakes. Global Biogeochem. Cycl. 2003, 28, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Furlanetto, L.M.; Marinho, C.C.; Palma-Silva, C.; Albertoni, E.F.; Figueiredo-Barros, M.P.; de Assis Estevesb, F. Methane levels in shallow subtropical lake sediments: Dependence on the trophic status of the lake and allochthonous input. Limnologica 2012, 42, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Capone, D.G.; Kiene, R.P. Comparison of microbial dynamics in marine and freshwater sediments: Contrasts in anaerobic carbon catabolism. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1998, 33, 725–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ding, W.; Cai, Z.; Tsuruta, H.; Li, X. Key factors affecting spatial variation of methane emissions from freshwater marshes. Chemosphere 2003, 51, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Flury, S.; McGinnis, D.F.; Gessner, M.O. Methane emissions from a freshwater marsh in response to experimentally simulated global warming and nitrogen enrichment. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 2010, 115, G1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Maruya, Y.; Nakayama, K.; Sasaki, M.; Komai, K. Effect of dissolved oxygen on methane production from bottom sediment in a eutrophic stratified lake. J. Environ. Sci. 2023, 125, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhou, W.; Cui, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, W. Methane emissions from natural and drained peatlands in the Zoigê, eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. J. Forestry Res. 2017, 28, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bolpagni, R.; Pierobon, E.; Longhi, D.; Nizzoli, D.; Bartoli, M.; Tomasellli, M.; Viaroli, P. Diurnal exchanges of CO2 and CH4 across the water–atmosphere interface in a water chestnut meadow (Trapa natans L.). Aquat. Bot. 2007, 87, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xiao, Q.; Zhang, M.; Hu, Z.; Gao, Y.; Hu, C.; Liu, C.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, J.; Xiao, W.; et al. Spatial variations of methane emission in a large shallow eutrophic lake in subtropical climate. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2017, 122, 1597–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zeikus, J.G.; Winfrey, M.R. Temperature limitation of methanogenesis in aquatic sediments. Appl. Environ. Microb. 1976, 31, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Duc, N.T.; Crill, P.; Bastviken, D. Implications of temperature and sediment characteristics on methane formation and oxidation in lake sediments. Biogeochemistry 2010, 100, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hirota, M.; Tang, Y.; Hu, Q.; Hirata, S.; Kato, T.; Mo, W.; Cao, G.; Mariko, S. Methane emissions from different vegetation zones in a Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau wetland. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2004, 36, 737–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The study was conducted at Hong Lake in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River.
Figure 1. The study was conducted at Hong Lake in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River.
Diversity 14 01036 g001
Figure 2. The measuring chambers at the invasive water hyacinth site (ECs) of Hong Lake.
Figure 2. The measuring chambers at the invasive water hyacinth site (ECs) of Hong Lake.
Diversity 14 01036 g002
Figure 3. The spatial dynamics of environmental factors, including (a) air temperature, (b) water temperature, (c) water depth, (d) pH, (e) dissolved oxygen concentration and (f) water conductivity in the four community study zones.
Figure 3. The spatial dynamics of environmental factors, including (a) air temperature, (b) water temperature, (c) water depth, (d) pH, (e) dissolved oxygen concentration and (f) water conductivity in the four community study zones.
Diversity 14 01036 g003
Figure 4. Seasonal variations in CH4 emission fluxes at the four sites.
Figure 4. Seasonal variations in CH4 emission fluxes at the four sites.
Diversity 14 01036 g004
Figure 5. Mean CH4 emission fluxes at the four sites (* indicated the significant levels at 0.05).
Figure 5. Mean CH4 emission fluxes at the four sites (* indicated the significant levels at 0.05).
Diversity 14 01036 g005
Figure 6. The correlation between CH4 emissions, temperature (air and water) and water depth.
Figure 6. The correlation between CH4 emissions, temperature (air and water) and water depth.
Diversity 14 01036 g006
Figure 7. The correlation between CH4 emissions and dissolved oxygen concentration.
Figure 7. The correlation between CH4 emissions and dissolved oxygen concentration.
Diversity 14 01036 g007
Figure 8. The area covered with water hyacinth in Hong Lake.
Figure 8. The area covered with water hyacinth in Hong Lake.
Diversity 14 01036 g008
Table 1. The physicochemical characteristics at the four sites.
Table 1. The physicochemical characteristics at the four sites.
SitesVegetationSoil
TypesBiomass (g m−2)pHSOC/g kg−1TN/g kg−1C:N RatioTP/g kg−1
Open water (OPs)No grown vegetations8.12 ± 0.05a16.63 ± 1.54a1.33 ± 0.14a12.54 ± 0.21a0.64 ± 0.01a
Invasive plant (ECs)E. crassipes270.02 ± 20.64a7.96 ± 0.04ab29.10 ± 1.71a2.42 ± 0.05a12.01 ± 0.65a0.63 ± 0.01a
Floating plant (TNs)T. natans211.08 ± 17.63a7.57 ± 0.29ab46.47 ± 11.31ab3.44 ± 0.78ab13.37 ± 0.49a0.61 ± 0.01a
Emergent aquatic plant (ZLs)Z. latifolia, N. nucifera, T. natans618.30 ± 187.50a7.03 ± 0.07b56.63 ± 2.84b4.49 ± 0.30b12.61 ± 0.17a0.67 ± 0.01a
Note: different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference exists among the three sites. Significance level: 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, W.; Xiang, S.; Shi, Y.; Xu, X.; Lu, H.; Ou, W.; Yang, J. Invasive Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) Increases Methane Emissions from a Subtropical Lake in the Yangtze River in China. Diversity 2022, 14, 1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121036

AMA Style

Zhou W, Xiang S, Shi Y, Xu X, Lu H, Ou W, Yang J. Invasive Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) Increases Methane Emissions from a Subtropical Lake in the Yangtze River in China. Diversity. 2022; 14(12):1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121036

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Wenchang, Shanshan Xiang, Yuhu Shi, Xiuhuan Xu, Huicui Lu, Wenhui Ou, and Jiawei Yang. 2022. "Invasive Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) Increases Methane Emissions from a Subtropical Lake in the Yangtze River in China" Diversity 14, no. 12: 1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14121036

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop