Next Article in Journal
Knowing the Enemy: Inducible Defences in Freshwater Zooplankton
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Nature Reserve Management Effort Using an Expert-Based Threat Analysis Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

More Knot Worms: Four New Polygordius (Annelida) Species from the Pacific and Caribbean

by
Chrissy A. Tustison
1,*,
Patricia A. Ramey-Balci
2,3,* and
Greg W. Rouse
1,*
1
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0202, USA
2
Department Molecular Biology and Genetics, Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, Sarıyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkey
3
Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, NS B2Y 4A2, Canada
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:23D8E38E-4496-41F2-A4BC-A09251DD0F98
Diversity 2020, 12(4), 146; https://doi.org/10.3390/d12040146
Submission received: 3 March 2020 / Revised: 26 March 2020 / Accepted: 27 March 2020 / Published: 7 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Marine Diversity)

Abstract

:
Polygordius is a clade of marine annelids mainly seen in coarse-grained habitats. They are notable for their smooth bodies, lacking in chaetae or obvious segments, and they resemble Nematoda or Nemertea. Though Polygordius taxa are found in all oceans of the world, identifying species based only on morphological characters can be challenging due to their relatively uniform external appearances. Diversity within the clade has likely been markedly underestimated. Where morphological characters are inconspicuous or even unreliable, molecular methods can provide clarity in delimiting species. In this study, morphological methods (examination under light and scanning electron microscopy) were integrated with molecular analyses (sequencing of Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, 16S rRNA and Histone H3 gene fragments) to establish the systematic placement of Polygordius specimens collected from Australia, Belize, French Polynesia, Indonesia, Japan, and the U.S. west coast. These analyses revealed three new species of Polygordius from the Pacific Ocean (P. erikae n. sp., P. kurthcarolae n. sp., and P. kurthsusanae n. sp.) as well as one new species from the Caribbean Sea (P. jenniferae n. sp.). These new species are formally described, and a previously known Japanese species, P. pacificus Uchida, 1936, is redescribed. This study establishes the first molecular data set for Polygordius species from the Pacific region, as well as the first formal description of a Caribbean species of Polygordius. Phylogenetic relationships within Polygordius are summarized and discussed.

1. Introduction

Polygordius Schneider, 1868 [1], the only genus in Polygordiidae Czerniavsky, 1881 [2], is a clade whose members are all smooth-bodied marine annelids found living in the interstitial spaces of relatively coarse sediments ranging from the intertidal zone to continental slope environments worldwide [3,4]. Their tendency to tie themselves in knots when collected, and the etymological link to the legendary Gordian Knot, led us to coin the common name “knot worms” for this paper. Although 17 species and two subspecies have been described from the Atlantic, Pacific, Indian, and Southern Oceans, only 14 species are considered valid [3] (Table 1), and most of these have been described from the north Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea [5].
Distinguishing features of Polygordius include a rounded or conical prostomium that tapers anteriorly into paired palps of varying length and proximity to one another, which are innervated and function as sensory receptors [7,8]. The prostomium also bears paired dorsolaterally-positioned nuchal organs used for sensory perception [6]. Completing the head is the peristomium, and its division from the prostomium is marked by a deep or shallow “head fold” situated in front of the ventral mouth [7,9]. The trunk shows no signs of external segmentation and is reminiscent of nematodes or ribbon worms (Nemertea), though the septa of the segments can be seen internally with the appropriate lighting. The trunk, which can have 200 or more segments, terminates in a pygidium that may be either inflated or cylindrical, and in many species of Polygordius it is encircled by pygidial glands that serve an adhesive function in the sediments [10]. These glands vary in size, shape, and number between different species [7]. Pygidial appendages/cirri may also be present either terminally or subterminally, with the tip of the pygidium forming distinctive anal lobes [4].
Identifying Polygordius species based on morphological characters alone can be challenging. Their long, cylindrical bodies appear relatively similar to one another under visual inspection, and the distinguishing features useful for morphology-based discrimination of species are small, requiring examination under scanning electron microscopy [3]. Even annelid species with larger and more conspicuous external features may be difficult to describe based on morphological methods alone [11], and species richness and diversity within Annelida in general and Polygordius specifically are likely much greater than is presently documented due to such challenges [10,12]. Molecular data can reveal both synonymous and cryptic species [5] and, combined with morphology-based techniques, provides a powerful tool for delineating species with greater accuracy.
After the first adult Polygordius was described, P. lacteus Schneider, 1868, the genus spent much of its history misinterpreted as a primitive group owing to a lack of annelid features such as chaetae and parapodia [4]. Polygordius was the first clade to be placed in the taxon Archiannelida by Hatschek [13]. He established the group for what he presumed to be the earliest annelid lineages, but Archiannelida was subsequently revealed as an invalid, polyphyletic taxon [3,4,14]. Polygordius is now viewed as a derived group that has adapted well to life in the interstitial environment [11,15]. Recent molecular systematic studies relate them most closely to Protodrilida [15], or Phyllodocida [11] as part of Errantia.
Ramey-Balci et al. [5] published the first phylogenetic hypotheses within Polygordius, focusing on European and Atlantic species. Their work confirmed six valid species, while synonymizing two, thus clarifying the diversity present in the region of study and providing a foundation for the use of molecular methods to understand evolutionary relationships within Polygordius. However, molecular data for Polygordius from other regions are lacking, and they have not been established for species outside of the Atlantic Ocean. In this study, we have generated molecular and morphological data for three new species of Polygordius from the Pacific Ocean as well as the first known species from the Caribbean Sea. We provide data for several other specimens that we do not describe here, owing to a lack of complete specimens. We also redescribe Polygordius pacificus Uchida, 1935 [16] from Japan. We summarize the evolutionary relationships of these new species in relation to each other and the established species from the Atlantic Ocean.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Specimens

Specimens for all new species described in this study were collected from coarse sediments in locations across the Pacific Ocean and Caribbean Sea including French Polynesia, the east coast of Australia, Belize, and Japan. Specimens were collected over a depth range of 1–18 m and across a time span from 1996 to 2015 (Figure 1).

2.2. List of Museum Abbreviations

AM, Australian Museum, Sydney, Australia; MNHN, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France; MV, Museum Victoria, Melbourne, Australia; NTM, Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory, Darwin, Australia; SMF, Senckenberg Museum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; SIO-BIC, Scripps Institution of Oceanography Benthic Invertebrates Collection, La Jolla, CA, USA; UMUTZ, University Museum, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; USNM, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, USA; YPM, Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; ZMB, Zoological Museum of Berlin, Berlin, Germany; ZMH, Zoological Museum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; ZUEC, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas “Adão José Cardoso”, Campinas, Brazil.

2.3. Comparative Material Examined

2.3.1. Type Material

Polygordius arafura Avery, Ramey, Wilson 2009 [10]: holotype (NTM W22253), Arafura Sea, Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia, Station SS05/2005 007GR011 (39°50.1’ S, 135°17.8’ W), 83 m, calcareous poorly-sorted muddy fine sand, collected 4 May 2005; Polygordius kiarama Avery, Ramey, Wilson 2009 [10]: holotype (MV F165641), New South Wales, Coniston, S. of Port Kembla, Australia (34°28’ S, 150°53’ E), collected 3 August 2006; Polygordius jouinae Ramey, Fiege and Leander, 2006 [12]: holotype (YPM 38050), north-western Atlantic Ocean, United States, New Jersey, Tuckerton, Beach Haven Ridge, LEO-15 Station 9 (39°27.7’ N, 74°15.8’ W), ~12 m, coarse sand, collector P.A. Ramey, 19 May 2005; Polygordius eschaturus brevipapillosus Jouin and Rao, 1987 [17]: holotype (MNHN 1392) and paratype (MNHN 1164), Indian Ocean, North Andaman Island, south island beach (12°58.10’ N, 92°59.28’ E), 5 cm below surface, near low water mark, sandy sediment (400–700 mm), collector G.C. Rao, 28 April 1974; Polygordius pacificus floreanensis Schmidt and Westheide, 1977 [18]: holotype (ZMH P-13668), South Pacific Ocean, Galapagos Islands, Floreana, black beach, eulittoral, coarse black lava sand, leg. June 1972.

2.3.2. Nontype Material

Polygordius appendiculatus Fraipont, 1887 [19]: Mediterranean Sea, Island of Ischia (Italy), (40°45.1’ N, 13°56.0’ E), 7.5 m, coarse sand, grab, collector P.A. Ramey-Balci, 3 May 2011. Five specimens and 3 pygidia: SMF 22970, fixed in 70% ethanol, 1 complete specimen, I48; SMF 22248, SEM stub no. 1204b, head-pygidium-2 middle sections, I34; SMF 22244, SEM stub no. 1213, head-pygidium, I17; SMF 22971, SEM stub no. 1214, head-pygidium-middle section, I11; SMF 22972 SEM stub no. 1215, head-pygidium-2 middle sections, I12; SMF 22973, SEM stub no. 1216, 2 pygidia, I54 and I55; SMF 22974, SEM stub no. 1217, 1 pygidium, I22; Polygordius triestinus Hempelmann, 1906 [9]: Mediterranean Sea, northern Adriatic Sea, Rovinj (Croatia), Valdibora Harbour (RLV), collector B. Mikac, 20 September 2010. 3 specimens and 1 pygidium: SMF 22978, fixed in 70% ethanol, 1 complete specimen, RLV/2 (45°05.2’ N, 13°38.2’ E); SMF 22979, fixed in 70% ethanol, 2 complete specimens, SEM stub no. 1196, 1 complete specimen and 1 pygidium RLV/1 (45°05.2’ N 13°38.3’ E); Polygordius eschaturus Du-Bois Reymond Marcus 1948 [20]: South Atlantic Ocean, Praia de Estaleirinho (Estaleirinho beach), Santa Catarina, Brazil (27°3.14’ S, 48°35.24’ W), collector M. Di Domenico, 10 October 2010. 2 specimens, 1 head, and 2 pygidiums: ZUEC 13537, SEM stub no. 1168, head; 13535, SEM stub no. 1186, head-pygidium; 13536, SEM stub no. 1188, pygidium; 13541/13542, SEM stub no. 1172/1173, head-pygidium; 13538, SEM stub no. 1169, pygidium.

2.4. Light and Scanning Electron Microscopy

Specimens of all new species described in this study were examined using light microscopy (Leica S8 Apo stereomicroscope and Canon EOS Rebel T6s camera, using Adobe Photoshop software, version 21.1.0) to measure more prominent morphological features (e.g., body length and width) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to examine minute features such as the number, size, and shape of the pygidial glands and anal lobes which are necessary for morphology-based discernment of species. Measurements were taken as follows: total length, from the base of the palps to the tip of the pygidium where it terminates in the anal lobes; prostomium length, which is the distance from the base of the palps to the top of the head fold (ventral transverse groove separating the prostomium and peristomium); body and pygidial width, measured at the widest section of the trunk and pygidium (at pygidial inflation) respectively; “glandular belt width”, is the width of the ring of glands encircling the pygidium; gland width, measured in the middle region of several well-fixed glands; and the length of “elongate/enlarged anal lobes”, which is the distance from the base of the anal lobe to the tip of the elongate/enlarged extension (= lobe + pygidial cirrus). In order to determine whether the prostomium is “conical” or “rounded” the fixed specimen must be lying relatively flat, ventral-side-up or laterally. If the prostomium length is > its width, it is considered “conical”, whereas, if the prostomium width ≥ its length, it is “rounded”. Specimens were prepared for SEM examination using a procedure adapted from the air-drying technique outlined by Murtey and Ramasamy [21]. Specimens were first moved from their respective preservatives (either ethanol or formalin) to water, then postfixed in osmium tetroxide for 80 min. Specimens were washed in water 4–5 times at 60-minute intervals followed by overnight immersion. After washing, specimens were dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol and hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS), beginning with immersion in 70% ethanol for 20 min, followed by two changes of 95% ethanol at 20-minute intervals, and two changes of 100% ethanol at 20-minute intervals. After immersion in pure ethanol, 50% HDMS was added to each specimen for a 20-minute interval, then 75% HDMS for a 20-minute interval, and finally three changes of 100% HDMS at 20-minute intervals. Specimens were allowed to dry overnight before being mounted on aluminum stubs, sputter-coated with gold-palladium (Au-Pd), and examined under a Zeiss EVO 10 scanning electron microscope.

2.5. DNA Extraction, Amplification, and Sequencing

DNA was extracted from samples of each specimen’s trunk tissue using the Zymo Research DNA-Tissue Miniprep Kit. All successful extractions were completed using the protocol outlined by the manufacturer. Two mitochondrial genes were then amplified and sequenced for the majority of specimens in this study: the 16S rRNA gene (16S) and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI). The nuclear gene Histone H3 (H3) was also amplified and sequenced in order to compare specimens with more fragmented DNA (Table 2). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify a section of each target gene in a 25 µL solution of H2O (8.5 µL), taq DNA polymerase (12.5 µL), primer sets (1 ul each), and template DNA (2 ul). (In some cases, volumes were adjusted based on the concentration of DNA in the extraction.) The following primer sets were used:
16S:
Arl 5’-CGCCTGTTTATCAAAAACAT-3’;
brH 5’- CCGGTCTGAACTCAGATCACGT-3’ [22];
COI:
LCO1490 5’-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3’;
HCO2198 5’-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3’ [23];
polyLCO 5’-GAYTATWTTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3’;
polyHCO 5’-TAMACTTCWGGGTGACCAAARAATCA-3’ [24];
Polyg347F 5’-CTGTGCCCACTCCTTTTTCT-3’;
Polyg546R 5’- TACCGCTCATGCATTCCTAA-3’ (this study);
H3:
H3F 5’-ATGGCTCGTACCAAGCAGACVGC-3’;
H3R 5’-AT ATCCTTRGGCATRATRGTGAC-3’ [25].
The following cycling profiles were used for 16S amplification: (1) initial denaturation at 95 °C (3 min), followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C (40 s), annealing at 50 °C (40 s), elongation at 72 °C (50 s), and final extension at 72 °C (5 min); (2) initial denaturation at 95 °C (3 minutes), followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C (40 s), annealing at 55 °C (40 s), elongation at 68 °C (50 s), and final extension at 72 °C (5 min). For COI amplification, cycling profiles used were as follows: (1) initial denaturation at 95 °C (3 min), followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C (40 s), annealing at 42 °C (45 s), elongation at 72 °C (50 s), and final extension at 72 °C (5 min); (2) initial denaturation at 94 °C (3 min), followed by 5 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C (30 s), annealing at 47 °C (45 s), elongation at 72 °C (60 s), then 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C (30 s), annealing at 52 °C (45 s), elongation at 72 °C (60 s), and final extension at 72 °C (5 min); (3) initial denaturation at 95 °C (3 min), followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C (40 s), annealing at 49 °C (40 s), elongation at 72 °C (50 s), and final extension at 72 °C (5 min). Finally, for H3 amplification, the following profile was used: initial denaturation at 95 °C (3 min), followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C (30 s), annealing at 53 °C (45 s), elongation at 72 °C (45 s), and final extension at 72 °C (5 min). Successful PCR products were purified using the ExoSAP-IT protocol (USB, Affymetrix), sequencing was conducted by Eurofins Genomics (Louisville, KY), and sequences were then assembled and edited using Geneious software (version 11.1.5).

2.6. Molecular Methods and Analysis

Sequences from previously published Polygordius species were obtained from GenBank (Table 2). Where sequences were available from multiple regions, then ones from nearest the type locality were chosen. Sequences were aligned using MAFFT [28] and then concatenated using SequenceMatrix v.1.8 [29]. A maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was performed on this data set using RAxML v.8.1.22 [30], partitioned by gene (and codon for COI), under the model GTR+G. Node support was assessed via the thorough bootstrapping (with 1000 pseudoreplicates). The protodrilid Protodrilus pythonius Di Domenico, Martínez, Lana and Worsaae, 2013 [26] was used as an outgroup, based on recent phylogenetic results [11,15]. Haplotype networks were generated for the COI data obtained for three of the new species using the TCS algorithm [31] in PopArt [32]. Uncorrected pairwise distances for COI were calculated using PAUP* [33].

3. Results and Discussion

Species Delimitation and Phylogeny

Table 3 shows uncorrected pairwise distances for COI sequences for available data on GenBank for five known Polygordius species (from type localities) and the new samples for this study. Most distances among species are minimally 20% or more. The minimum distance found for any previously known species was between P. lacteus and P. neapolitanus Fraipont, 1887 [19] (15%). With respect to the new data, the undescribed Polygordius sp. from southern California was found to be 13% divergent from P. jenniferae n. sp. from Belize. Polygordius sp. from Indonesia was 17% divergent from P. jouinae (NE United States). Polygordius sp. from Washington was closest in distance and phylogeny (Figure 2) to a clade of three species from Germany and Italy, with P. lacteus being closest in distance (19%). Polygordius eschaturus from Brazil was 19% divergent from P. pacificus (Japan). The Pacific clade of three new Polygordius species from Australia and French Polynesia (P. erikae n. sp. P. kurthcarolae n. sp. and P. kurthsusanae n. sp.) were all at least 20% divergent from each other. These distances support the recognition of eight new species level taxa in Polygordius. One of these is recognized here as the known species P. pacificus and redescribed below. Sequences for Polygordius sp. (California), Polygordius sp. (Indonesia), and Polygordius sp. (Washington) were each obtained from incomplete individuals that were lacking pygidia, so these are not formally described here. The other species did have at least one complete specimen and so these are formally described below.
For the new species with multiple individuals, P. erikae n. sp., P. kurthcarolae n. sp., and P. kurthsusanae n. sp., haplotype networks for COI were made and these are shown in Figure 2. The two sequences for P. erikae n. sp. were both from the same locality (Lord Howe Island, NSW, Australia) but were 2% divergent from each other. We do not consider this to be enough to separate them, since this distance, while marked for specimens from the same locality, is within what is “normal” annelid intraspecific variation in annelids [34]. The maximum distance among the four COI sequences for P. kurthsusanae n. sp., all in one sand sample from Moorea, French Polynesia was also relatively high, for intraspecific distance, at 2.5%. Polygordius kurthcarolae n. sp. has a type locality on the Great Barrier Reef (Australia) and the two COI sequences from the type locality were identical. A Polygordius from Tetiaroa Atoll, French Polynesia, was 2% divergent from these Australian sequences, so to be consistent, we regard this specimen to be P. kurthcarolae n. sp., even over 6000 km away.
The maximum likelihood phylogeny based on the three gene fragments (mostly missing H3) is shown in Figure 2. The outgroup Protodrilus pythonius is not shown to save space, but the root position is based on its inclusion. A well-supported clade comprising P. triestinus (Croatia), P. jouinae (NE United States), and Polygordius sp. (Indonesia) was recovered as the sister group to the remaining Polygordius, but support was low. Within this major clade, P. eschaturus (Brazil) was the well supported sister group to P. pacificus (Japan) and this clade was then the sister group to the remaining Polygordius, which had two main subclades. One comprised the remaining European species from Germany and Italy, P. appendiculatus, P. lacteus, and P. neapolitanus, which formed a clade that was sister group to Polygordius sp. (Washington). The remaining clade of Polygordius was well-supported and comprised mainly Pacific terminals, including the three new Pacific species (P. erikae n. sp., P. kurthcarolae n. sp., and P. kurthsusanae n. sp.). These formed a poorly supported clade, though there was strong support for P. kurthcarolae n. sp. and P. kurthsusanae n. sp. as sister taxa. The new species from Belize (P. jenniferae n. sp.) was the well-supported sister group to Polygordius sp. (California). Overall, the tree had only a few poorly supported nodes, so the lack of any clear biogeographic patterns is somewhat surprising. The Atlantic/European/Mediterranean terminals were placed in three regions of the tree and none were close to the Caribbean P. jenniferae n. sp., which showed fairly low COI divergence from Polygordius sp. (California). The Australian/French Polynesian species did form a discrete clade. The phylogeny lacks sequence data for many of the known Polygordius species and further sequence data may make for more comprehensible biogeographical patterns. This paper includes the first data for Pacific and Caribbean Polygordius after the initial molecular study that focused on European/Atlantic region [5]. Obtaining sequences for Polygordius known from regions such as Antarctica and the Indian Ocean will be valuable for continuing phylogenetic studies.

4. Taxonomy

POLYGORDIIDAE Czerniavsky, 1881 [2]
Polygordius, Schneider, 1868 [1]

4.1. Polygordius jenniferae n. sp.

4.1.1. Material

Holotype (SIO-BIC A12260): complete adult (head/pygidium sections): on SEM stub (previously fixed in ethanol), molecular COI and 16S sequences are available at GenBank (MT263733, MT260193), North Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea, off Carrie Bow Cay, Belize (16°48’6.08’’ N; 88°4’47.00’’ W), 18 m water depth in coarse sandy sediments, collector G. Rouse & N. Tuttle, 7 September 2015.

4.1.2. Etymology

Polygordius jenniferae n. sp. is named after the lead author’s sister.

4.1.3. Description

Body measuring 48.4 mm in length and 0.47 mm wide (Figure 3A). Number of segments ~145. Prostomium conical with blunt tip (length 0.18 mm) and paired palps (length 0.18 mm), (Figure 4A). Length ratio of palp to prostomium 1:1 (Figure 3B and Figure 4A). Pigment spots/“eyespots” absent. Head fold deep (Figure 4B). Pair of oval, nuchal organs positioned laterally at posterior margin of prostomium (Figure 4A). Ventrally positioned mouth with dorso-median fold that is subtriangular with deep cleft (Figure 4B). Pygidium inflated (width 0.28 mm), (Figure 3C and Figure 4C,D). Pygidial glands present, ~40–54 elongate glands positioned close together longitudinally along body creating a thick glandular belt (width 30 µm), (Figure 4D). Ratio of gland length to width ~3:1 (length 30 µm; width 10–15 µm) (Figure 4D). Pygidial appendages present. Three pygidial cirri attached subterminally between the glandular belt and anus including one dorsal median and two ventro-lateral (Figure 4C,D). Anus terminal with 6–12 anal lobes (Figure 4C). Dimensions of holotype are given in Table 4.

4.1.4. Remarks

Polygordius jenniferae n. sp. (Caribbean Sea) is distinguished from most other Polygordius by having pygidial glands and subterminal pygidial appendages (Table 1). Polygordius jenniferae n. sp. is most closely related to Polygordius sp. (California), which is 13% divergent (Table 3), making these two species well-supported sister groups. Unfortunately, the Polygordius sp. (California) lacked a posterior end so could not be compared with P. jenniferae n. sp. in this sense. Morphologically, the most similar species to P. jenniferae n. sp. include P. kiarama from Australia and P. appendiculatus from the Mediterranean Sea (Table 3 and Table 4). Although it cannot be determined unequivocally that the pygidial appendages of P. ijimai (Misaki, Japan) are subterminal (vs. terminal), they are described as being “filiform”, which is consistent with the appearance of subterminal pygidial cirri, and thus we also consider P. ijimai as similar to the new species (Table 4) [7,10]. Polygordius jenniferae n. sp. can be distinguished from these three species in having ~40–54 elongate pygidial glands, 3 pygidial cirri including two inserted ventro-laterally and one dorsal-median, 6–12 anal lobes, and a conical/blunt (not pointed) prostomium (Table 4). Polygordius kiarama has ~20 oval pygidial glands, 2 ventro-lateral pygidial cirri, and 7–8 anal lobes. Polygordius appendiculatus has ~30 round glands, 2 pygidial cirri positioned laterally, 5 anal lobes, a rounded prostomium with a palp: prostomium length ratio of 2:1 (vs. 1:1 for P. jenniferae n. sp.), and pigment/“eyespots” which are absent in the new species. Polygordius ijimai has 8 anal lobes, longer palps (1 mm vs. 0.18 mm), and is a relatively larger species (70–77 mm × 0.60–0.80 mm vs. 48 mm × 0.47 mm), (Table 4). Of the new species described herein, also having pygidial glands and subterminal pygidial appendages, P. erikae n. sp. (southeastern Australia) can be distinguished from P. jenniferae n. sp. in having ~40–52 oval glands, 2 ventro-lateral cirri, 5 anal lobes, and a rounded prostomium, and P. kurthcarolae n. sp. (northeastern Australia) has ~54–60 round glands, 2 ventro–lateral cirri, and 7–8 anal lobes. The genetic distance matrix indicated that the divergence value between P. jenniferae n. sp. and either of these new species is 20% (Table 3).

4.2. Polygordius erikae n. sp.

4.2.1. Material

Holotype (AM W.53108): complete adult (head/pygidium sections): on SEM stub (previously fixed in ethanol), with molecular COI and 16S sequences available at GenBank (MT263740, MT260195), Southwest Pacific Ocean, Little Island off of Ned’s Beach, Lord Howe Island, New South Wales, Australia (31°31’0.48’’ S, 159°3’49.68’’ E), 3–5 m water depth, collector G. Rouse & N. Wilson, 8 April 2011. Paratype (SIO-BIC A12259): complete adult (head/pygidium sections): ethanol fixed, with molecular COI and 16S sequences available at GenBank (MT263739, MT260196), collected in the same location as holotype, collector G. Rouse & N. Wilson, 3 April 2011.

4.2.2. Etymology

Polygordius erikae n. sp. is named after the lead author’s sister.

4.2.3. Description

Body 15.9–21.4 mm in length and 0.18–0.21 mm wide (Figure 5A). Number of segments ~56. Prostomium rounded (length 0.11–0.13 mm) with paired palps 0.11–0.16 mm in length, (Figure 6A). Length ratio of palp to prostomium 1:1 (Figure 5B and Figure 6A). Pigment spots/“eyespots” absent. Head fold deep. Pair of oval, nuchal organs positioned laterally at posterior margin of prostomium (Figure 6A). Ventrally positioned mouth. Pygidium inflated (width 0.17 mm), (Figure 5A,C and Figure 6B,C). Pygidial glands present, ~40–52 oval glands positioned close together encircling the pygidium (width 17 µm), (Figure 6B–D). Ratio of gland length to width ~1.7:1 (length 17 µm; width 10 µm) (Figure 6D). Pygidial appendages present. Two pygidial cirri attached subterminally between the glandular belt and anus positioned ventro-laterally (Figure 5C and Figure 6B,C). Anus terminal with 5 anal lobes (Figure 6B). Dimensions of holotype given in Table 4.

4.2.4. Remarks

The new species from Australia and French Polynesia (P. erikae n. sp., P. kurthcarolae n. sp. and P. kurthsusanae n. sp.) formed a distinct clade (Figure 2), within which each species was distinguished by at least 20% divergence from the others (Table 3). Polygordius erikae n. sp. is not markedly similar to either P. kurthcarolae n. sp. or P. kurthsusanae n. sp. but its pygidial glands and subterminal pygidial cirri resembles P. appendiculatus, P. ijimai (see remarks of P. jenniferae n. sp., discussing interpretation of morphological characters for this species), and P. kiarama (Table 3 and Table 4). It can be clearly distinguished from these species by the following characteristics including ~40–52 oval glands, 2 ventro-lateral cirri, 5 anal lobes, and a rounded prostomium (Table 4). In comparison, P. appendiculatus is easily distinguished from the new species in that it has ~30 round glands, a palp: prostomium length ratio of 2:1, and pigment/“eyespots” (Table 4). Polygordius ijimai has three pygidial cirri including two inserted ventro-laterally and one dorsal-median, whereas, P. erikae n. sp. has two ventral-lateral cirri (Table 4) Polygordius erikae n. sp. is most similar to P. kiarama, for which there is unfortunately no DNA data available. Although both species have oval pygidial glands, there are fewer in number for P. kiarama (20 vs. 40–52), which also has 7–8 anal lobes compared to 5 for P. erikae n. sp. The prostomium of P. kiarama is conical and blunt (not pointed), whereas it is rounded in P. erikae. (Table 4).

4.3. Polygordius kurthcarolae n. sp.

4.3.1. Material

Holotype (AM W.53109): head section: on SEM stub (previously fixed in ethanol), with molecular CO1 and H3 sequences available at GenBank (MT263736, MT263747), Pacific Ocean, off One Tree Island, at entrance to 2nd Lagoon, Great Barrier Reef, Australia (23°29’54.50’’ S, 152°3’53.82’’ E), 5 m water depth in coral rubble and gravel, G. Rouse, 18 November 1996. Paratypes: complete adult (SIO-BIC A12263), head/pygidium sections on SEM stub (previously fixed in formalin), collected in the same sample/location/date as holotype; piece of body near pygidium (SIO-BIC A12261), on SEM stub (previously fixed in ethanol), with molecular CO1 and 16S sequences available at GenBank (MT263735, MT260191), collected in the same sample/location/date as holotype. Non-type: Anterior end (USNM 1434789): fixed in ethanol, DNA extraction located at USNM, with molecular CO1 and 16S sequences available at GenBank (MT263738, MT260192), South Pacific Ocean, Tetiaroa Atoll, Society Islands, north of Vaiare Pass, French Polynesia (17°30’15.84’’S, 149°45’28.8’’ W, 7 m water depth in coral rubble, 6 February 2012.

4.3.2. Etymology

Polygordius kurthcarolae n. sp. is named to commemorate Carol Marie Kurth in honor of her wedding. We celebrate her tying the knot with a new knot worm.

4.3.3. Description

Body 42.3 mm in length and 0.50 mm wide (Figure 7A and Figure 8A). Number of segments ~158. Prostomium rounded (length 0.15–0.21 mm) with paired palps 0.14–0.25 mm in length, (Figure 8A,B and Figure 9A–C). Length ratio of palp to prostomium 1:1. Pigment spots/“eyespots” absent. Head fold deep (Figure 9A–C). Pair of oval, nuchal organs positioned laterally at posterior margin of prostomium (Figure 9A,B). Ventrally positioned mouth with dorso-median fold that is subtriangular with deep cleft (Figure 9C). Pygidium inflated (width 0.35 mm), (Figure 8A,C and Figure 9D,E). Pygidial glands present, ~54–60 round glands encircling the pygidium (width 10–13µm), (Figure 9D–F). Pygidial appendages present. Two pygidial cirri attached subterminally between the glandular belt and anus positioned ventro-laterally (Figure 8A and Figure 9D–E). Anus terminal with 7–8 anal lobes (Figure 9D). Dimensions of holotype given in Table 4.

4.3.4. Remarks

Polygordius kurthcarolae n. sp. is the well supported sister taxon to P. kurthsusanae n. sp. (Figure 2) though they are morphologically very distinct. Polygordius kurthcarolae n. sp. (Great Barrier Reef, Australia) is distinguished from most other Polygordius species by having pygidial glands and subterminal pygidial appendages (Table 1). Morphologically similar species include P. appendiculatus, P. kiarama, and P. ijimai (see remarks of P. jenniferae n. sp., discussing interpretation of morphological characters for this latter species), which also have pygidial glands and subterminal pygidial appendages (Tables 3,4). Polygordius kurthcarolae n. sp. can be distinguished from these three species by the following characteristics including ~54–60 round glands, 2 ventro–lateral cirri, and 7–8 anal lobes (Table 4). Although P. appendiculatus also has round glands, there are fewer of them in P. appendiculatus (30 vs. 54–60). Several other morphological characteristics of P. appendiculatus including 5 anal lobes, a palp: prostomium length ratio of 2:1, and the presence of pigment/“eyespots” differentiate it from P. kurthcarolae n. sp. (Table 4). Polygordius ijimai differs from the new species in that it has elongate pygidial glands and three pygidial cirri including two inserted ventro-laterally and one dorsal-median as compared to 2 ventro–lateral cirri in P. kurthcarolae n. sp. (Table 4). The prostomium of Polygordius kiarama is conical and blunt (not pointed), and the pygidium has ~20 oval pygidial glands as opposed to the new species which has a rounded prostomium and ~54–60 round glands. Moreover, P. kiarama is much smaller (3.8–11.6 mm × 0.28–0.30), compared to P. kurthcarolae n. sp. (42 mm × 0.50 mm), (Table 4). Polygordius erikae n. sp. differs from P. kurthcarolae n. sp., in that it has ~40–52 oval glands, 2 ventro-lateral cirri, and 5 anal lobes (Table 4). The genetic distance matrix indicated that the divergence value between these two new species is 22% (Table 3). All three new Pacific species (P. erikae n. sp., P. kurthcarolae n. sp., and P. kurthsusanae n. sp.) formed a distinct, though weakly supported, clade (Figure 2).

4.4. Polygordius kurthsusanae n. sp.

Polygordius n. sp. Andrade et al. (2015)

4.4.1. Material

Holotype (SIO-BIC A12287): complete adult (head/pygidium sections): on SEM stub (previously fixed in ethanol), with molecular CO1 and 16S sequences available at GenBank (MT263744, MT260188), South Pacific Ocean, off of Moorea, at station #BIZ-509, off of the channel MPA marker, French Polynesia (17°28’33.96’’ S, 149°49’51.6’’ W), 10–11 m water depth in coarse coral sand, collector G. Rouse and N. Wilson, 7 November 2010. Paratypes): complete adult (SIO-BIC A12288), head/pygidium sections on SEM stub (previously fixed in formalin), collected in the same sample/ location/date as holotype; head section (SIO-BIC A12289): on SEM stub (previously fixed in ethanol), with molecular COI and 16S sequences available at GenBank (MT263743, MT260189), collected in the same sample/location/date as holotype; Several specimens (SIO-BIC A2757) and DNA extraction (USNM1432890), COI and 16S sequences available at GenBank (MT263742, MT260187).

4.4.2. Etymology

Polygordius kurthsusanae n. sp. is named in honor of Susan Anne Kurth, who along with her sister Carol, “tied the knot” in 2019.

4.4.3. Description

Body 58.5 mm in length and 0.40–0.46 mm wide (Figure 10A). Number of segments ~146. Prostomium conical with blunt tip (length 0.20–0.25 mm), and paired palps 0.30 mm in length, (Figure 10B and Figure 11A,B,E,F). Length ratio of palp to prostomium 1.5:1. Pigment spots/“eyespots” absent. Head fold deep. Pair of oval, nuchal organs positioned laterally at posterior margin of prostomium (Figure 11A,E). Ventrally positioned mouth with subtriangular dorso-median fold (Figure 11F). Pygidium not inflated to minimally inflated (width 0.20 mm), (Figure 10A,C and Figure 11C,D,G,H). Pygidial glands and appendages absent (Figure 11C,D,G,H). Anus terminal with 4–5 anal lobes (Figure 11C,G). Dimensions of holotype are given in Table 3.

4.4.4. Remarks

Polygordius kurthsusanae n. sp. (French Polynesia) is the well-supported sister taxon to P. kurthcarolae n. sp. (Figure 2), but can be distinguished from it and most other Polygordius species in that it lacks pygidial glands and appendages (Table 1). Morphologically, the most similar species also lacking pygidial glands and appendages include P. arafura from Australia, P. jouinae from New Jersey, USA, and P. triestinus from the Adriatic Sea (Table 1). Polygordius kurthsusanae n. sp. can, however, be clearly distinguished from these three species (Table 5). Polygordius arafura, for which there is unfortunately no DNA available, has shorter palps (0.04–0.06 mm) with a palp to prostomium length ratio of ~0.5:1 compared to 0.25 mm and ~1.5:1 respectively, for P. kurthsusanae n. sp. (Table 5). The median fold in P. arafura is subtriangular with a deep-cleft and is subtriangular without a deep-cleft in the new species. Polygordius arafura also has 7–8 anal lobes, whereas P. kurthsusanae n. sp. has 4–5. All three of these previously described species have a conical prostomium that is pointed at the tip, whereas, the “tip” is blunt in P. kurthsusanae n. sp. (Table 5). Moreover, P. kurthsusanae n. sp. is a relatively large species (58.5 mm × 0.40-0.46 mm), compared to P. arafura (2.4–11.6 mm × 0.08–0.18 mm), P. jouinae (13–43 mm × 0.23–0.38 mm), and P. triestinus (30 mm) (Table 5). Polygordius kurthsusanae n. sp. was included in the phylogenomic analysis of annelid relationships by Andrade et al. 2015 [11] as Polygordius n. sp. The transcriptome of this species is available on GenBank (SRR2005365).

4.5. Polygordius pacificus Uchida, 1935

4.5.1. Material

(SIO-BIC A12284): complete adult (head/pygidium sections): on SEM stub (previously fixed in ethanol), with molecular 16S sequence available at GenBank (MT260199), Northwest Pacific Ocean, off of Shirahama, Japan, by Fredrik Pleijel in front of the Seto Marine Laboratory (33°41’29.04’’ N, 135°20’11.04’’ E), collected from beach pebbles in the intertidal zone (1 m), 5 November 2008. Complete adult (head/pygidium sections) (SIO-BIC A12286): on SEM stub (previously fixed in ethanol), with molecular 16S sequence available at GenBank (MT260200), collected in the same sample/location/date as SIO-BIC A12284; head section (SIO-BIC A12285): previously fixed in ethanol, with molecular 16S sequence available at GenBank (MT260198), collected in the same sample/location/date as SIO-BIC A12284; complete adult (head/pygidium sections) (SIO-BIC A12266): on SEM stub (previously fixed in ethanol), with molecular 16S and H3 sequences available at GenBank (MT260201, MT263748), collected in the same location as SIO-BIC A12284, by Greg Rouse and Fredrik Pleijel, 26 May 1998; pygidium section (SIO-BIC A12265): on SEM stub (previously fixed in ethanol), with molecular H3 sequence available at GenBank (MT263749), collected in the same location as SIO-BIC A12284, 26 May 1998. Other material (SIO-BIC A12402): three complete individuals fixed in formalin, one head section fixed in ethanol, one individual sequenced, with molecular COI and 16S sequences available at GenBank (MT263741, MT260197), collected in the same location as SIO-BIC A12284, by Greg Rouse and Fredrik Pleijel, 26 May 1998.

4.5.2. Redescription

Body measuring 18.15–20.75 mm in length and 0.25–0.46 mm wide. Number of segments ~90–108. Prostomium rounded (length 0.09–0.11 mm) with paired palps (length 0.18–0.23 mm), (Figure 12A,E–F). Length ratio of palp to prostomium 2:1. Pigment spots/“eyespots” absent. Head fold deep (Figure 12E,F). Pair of oval, nuchal organs positioned laterally at posterior margin of prostomium (Figure 12E). Ventrally positioned mouth with elongate dorso-median fold on upper lip (Figure 12F). Pygidium inflated (width 0.30–0.38 mm), (Figure 12B–D,H). Pygidial glands present, ~44–75 elongate glands positioned close together longitudinally along the body creating a thick glandular belt (width 100 µm), (Figure 12B–D,H). Ratio of gland length to width ~7–10:1 (length 100 µm; width 10–15 µm). Terminal pygidial appendages present. Anus terminal with 6 anal lobes of which 2–3 are elongate/enlarged (length 20 µm), (Figure 12C,G,H).

4.5.3. Remarks

The type locality for Polygordius pacificus is near the Misaki Marine Biological Station, Honshu Japan. This is the same type locality as P. ijimai [35]. In the original description it was also noted that P. pacificus also sampled at the coast of the Japanese Sea [16]. The type material has apparently been lost (Eijiroh Nishi pers. comm.). The samples of Polygordius pacificus used in this study were also from Honshu, though 450 km south of the type locality. Given the distance from the type locality we do not nominate any of our specimens as a neotype.
Based on findings in the present study, P. pacificus is distinguished from most other Polygordius species by having pygidial glands and terminal pygidial appendages (Table 1). Morphologically similar species/subspecies include P. pacificus floreanensis, Polygordius eschaturus, P. eschaturus brevipapillosus, and P. madrasensis Aiyar and Alikunhi, 1944 [36], which also have pygidial glands and terminal pygidial appendages (Table 1). Of these, P. pacificus is most similar to P. pacificus floreanensis, P. eschaturus, and P. eschaturus brevipapillosus since they all have elongate pygidial glands (Table 6), whereas, P. madrasensis has oval glands (Aiyar and Alikunhi 1944 [36]). Polygordius pacificus can be easily distinguished from P. pacificus floreanensis by its rounded prostomium and ~2:1 palp to prostomium length ratio, whereas the prostomium of P. pacificus floreanensis is conical with a palp to prostomium length ratio of ~1:1 (Table 6). Unfortunately, examination of the single type specimen available for P. pacificus floreanensis could not provide details regarding the number of pygidial glands and anal lobes useful for species distinction, since SEM is needed to observe these and was not possible. Polygordius pacificus has 2–3 elongate/enlarged anal lobes similar to both Polygordius eschaturus and P. eschaturus brevipapillosus which have 2 and 2–3 elongate lobes respectively. The elongate lobes of these two species, however, are much longer (length 50–70 and 80 µm, respectively) than those of P. pacificus (length 40 µm), (Table 6). It is important to note that terminal pygidial cirri were absent in the original species description of P. pacificus (Table 6). This is not surprising, given that we only observed these with SEM. Furthermore, their morphology varied depending on fixation/condition of the specimen(s). In a relatively well-fixed individual, three of the six lobes appear enlarged (Figure 12B,C, 3 enlarged) rather than elongate (Figure 12G,H, 2 elongate). In the case of enlarged lobes, the tip of the lobe/pygidial cirrus is situated such that it is directed/turned “inward and downward” covering the anal opening (Figure 12B,C). The genetic distance matrix indicated that the divergence value between P. pacificus and P. eschaturus is 19%, making P. eschaturus a sister group to P. pacificus within their clade, but clearly denoting separate species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.A.T. and G.W.R.; Formal analysis, C.A.T., P.A.R.-B. and G.W.R.; Investigation, C.A.T., P.A.R.-B. and G.W.R.; Methodology, C.A.T., P.A.R.-B. and G.W.R.; Supervision, G.W.R.; Writing – original draft, C.A.T., P.A.R.-B. and G.W.R.; Writing – review & editing, C.A.T., P.A.R.-B. and G.W.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We thank Janice and Matt Kurth for their support of the Scripps Benthic Invertebrate Collection and the production of this paper. We also thank Dewy White for supporting C.A.T. through the production of this paper with a seadragon-oriented goal in mind.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and the Moorea Biocode Project for supporting the fieldwork by GWR in French Polynesia and Chris Meyer and Makiri Sei and the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution for providing additional sequence data for Polygordius kurthsusanae and Polygordius kurthcarolae. Thanks to Ryan Lauter and Zachariah Kobrinsky for their work collecting rubble samples from Tetiaroa, French Polynesia, which yielded the specimen of Polygordius kurthcarolae and to David Liittschwager for his beautiful photograph of the specimen. Thanks to Nerida Wilson and Pat Krug for help in the field at Lord Howe Island, Fredrik Pleijel at One Tree Island and Japan and to Paul Jensen and Nick Tuttle at Carrie Bow Cay in Belize. Chris Law kindly provided the unpublished COI sequence for Polygordius sp. (Washington). Thank you to Avery Hatch and Charlotte Seid for their support in locating samples and sequencing specimens and to Eijiroh Nishi for investigating the existence of type specimens for Polygordius pacificus,

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schneider, A. Ueber Bau und Entwicklung von Polygordius. Arch. Anat. Physiol. Med. Leipzig 1868, 1868, 51–60. [Google Scholar]
  2. Czerniavsky, V. Material ad zoographiam Ponticam comparatam. Fasc. III Vermes. Bulletin de la Société Impériale des naturalistes de Moscou (= Byulletin’ Moskovskogo obshchestva ispytatelei prirody) 1881, 55, 211–363. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ramey-Balci, P.; Purschke, G.; Fiege, D. Polygordiidae. In Handbook of Zoology; Purschke, G., Böggemann, M., Westheide, W., Eds.; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2020; Volume 3, in press. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rouse, G.W.; Pleijel, F. Polychaetes; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2001; pp. 279–281. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ramey-Balcı, P.; Fiege, D.; Struck, T.H. Molecular phylogeny, morphology, and distribution of Polygordius (Polychaeta: Polygordiidae) in the Atlantic and Mediterranean. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2018, 127, 919–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Purschke, G. Ultrastructure of the nuchal organs in polychaetes (Annelida)- New results and review. Acta Zool. 1997, 78, 123–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rota, E.; Carchini, G. A new Polygordius (Annelida: Polycheata) from the Terra Nova Bay, Ross Sea, Antarctica. Polar Biol. 1999, 21, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wilkens, V.; Purschke, G. Central nervous system and sense organs, with special reference to photoreceptor-like sensory elements, in Polygordius appendiculatus (Annelida), an interstitial polychaete with uncertain phylogenetic affinities. Invertebr. Biol. 2009, 128, 46–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hempelmann, F. Zur Morphologie von Polygordius lacteus Schn. und Polygordius triestinus Woltereck nov. spec. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie 1906, 84, 527–618. [Google Scholar]
  10. Avery, L.; Ramey, P.A.; Wilson, R.S. New Polygordiidae (Polychaeta) from the Australian region. Zootaxa 2009, 2068, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Andrade, S.C.S.; Novo, M.; Kawauchi, G.Y.; Worsaae, K.; Pleijel, F.; Giribet, G.; Rouse, G.W. Articulating “archiannelids”: Phylogenomics and annelid relationships, with emphasis on meiofaunal taxa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 2860–2875. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ramey, P.A.; Fiege, D.; Leander, B.S. A new species of Polygordius (Polychaeta: Polygordiidae): from the inner continental shelf and in bays and harbours of the north-eastern United States. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 2006, 86, 1025–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Hatschek, B. Studien über die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Anneliden: Ein Beitrag zur Morphologie der Bilaterien. Arbeiten aus dem Zoologischen Institute der Universität Wien und der Zoologischen Station in Triest 1878, 1, 277–404. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hermans, C.O. The systematic position of the Archiannelida. Syst. Zool. 1969, 18, 85–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Struck, T.H.; Golombek, A.; Weigert, A.; Franke, F.A.; Westheide, W.; Purschke, G.; Bleidorn, C.; Halanych, K.M. The evolution of annelids reveals two adaptive routes to the interstitial realm. Curr. Biol. 2015, 25, 1993–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Uchida, T. Eine Neue Urannelidenart, Polygordius pacificus n. sp. Proceedings of the Imperial Academy 1935, 11, 119–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jouin, C.; Rao, G.C. Morphological studies on some Polygordiidae and Saccocirridae (Polychaeta) from the Indian Ocean. Cah. Biol. Mar. 1987, 28, 389–402. [Google Scholar]
  18. Schmidt, P.; Westheide, W. Interstitielle Fauna von Galapagos. XVII. Polygordiidae, Saccocirridae, Protodrilidae, Nerillidae, Dinophilidae (Polychaeta). Mikrofauna des Meeresbodens 1977, 62, 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fraipont, J. Le genre Polygordius. Fauna Flora Golf. Neapel 1887, 14, 1–130. [Google Scholar]
  20. Marcus, E. du B.-R.. Further Archiannelids from Brazil. Comunicaciones Zoologicas del Museo de Historia Natural de Montevideo 1948, 2, pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  21. Murtey, M.D.; Ramasamy, P. Sample Preparations for Scanning Electron Microscopy—Life Sciences. In Modern Electron Microscopy in Physical and Life Sciences; Janecek, M., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2016; pp. 161–185. [Google Scholar]
  22. Palumbi, S.R. Nucleic acids II: The polymerase chain reaction. In Molecular Systematics; Hillis, D.M., Moritz, C., Mable, B.K., Eds.; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, Massachusetts, MA, USA, 1996; Volume 2, pp. 205–247. ISBN 9780878932825. [Google Scholar]
  23. Folmer, O.; Black, M.; Hoeh, W.R.; Lutz, R.A.; Vrijenhoek, R.C. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1994, 3, 294–299. [Google Scholar]
  24. Carr, C.M.; Hardy, S.M.; Brown, T.M.; Macdonald, T.A.; Hebert, P.D.N. A tri-oceanic perspective: DNA barcoding reveals geographic structure and cryptic diversity in Canadian polychaetes. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e22232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Colgan, D.J.; McLauchlan, A.; Wilson, G.D.F.; Livingston, S.; Macaranas, J.; Edgecombe, G.D.; Cassis, G.; Gray, M.R. Molecular phylogenetics of the Arthropoda: relationships based on histone H3 and U2 snRNA DNA sequences. Aust. J. Zool. 1998, 46, 419–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Di Domenico, M.; Martínez, A.; Lana, P. da C.; Worsaae, K. Protodrilus (Protodrilidae, Annelida) from the southern and southeastern Brazilian coasts. Helgol. Mar. Res. 2013, 67, 733–748. [Google Scholar]
  27. Rousset, V.; Pleijel, F.; Rouse, G.W.; Erseus, C.; Siddall, M.E. A molecular phylogeny of annelids. Cladistics 2007, 23, 41–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Vaidya, G.; Lohman, D.J.; Meier, R. SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 2011, 27, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Stamatakis, A. RAxML Version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Clement, M.; Posada, D.; Crandall, K.A. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 2000, 9, 1657–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Leigh, J.W.; Bryant, D. POPART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2015, 6, 1110–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Swofford, D.L. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2002; Available online: https://paup.phylosolutions.com (accessed on 20 February 2020).
  34. Nygren, A. Cryptic polychaete diversity: a review. Zool. Scr. 2014, 43, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Izuka, A. On a new Polygordius from Misaki (P. ijimai n. sp.). Annot. Zool. Jpn. 1903, 4, 137–139. [Google Scholar]
  36. Aiyar, R.G. & Alikunhi, K.H. On some Archiannelids of the Madras Coast. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. India. 1944, 113–140. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Geographic distribution (based on known collection records) for Polygordius species in the Pacific Ocean, Indian Ocean, and Caribbean Sea. Green star, P. jenniferae n. sp. (type locality). Purple star, P. erikae n. sp. (type locality). Red star, P. kurthcarolae n. sp. (type locality). Orange star, P. kurthsusanae n. sp. (type locality). Blue star, P. pacificus (collection record). Grey triangle, P. ijimai and P. pacificus (type locality). Brown circle, Polygordius sp. (Washington). Yellow circle, Polygordius sp. (California). Purple circle, Polygordius sp. (Indonesia). Green circle, P. “triestinussensu Jouin (New Caledonia)—this is an unconfirmed identification given limited information. Purple triangle, P. kiarama (type locality). Red triangle, P. arafura (type locality). Green triangle, P. pacificus floreanensis (type locality).
Figure 1. Geographic distribution (based on known collection records) for Polygordius species in the Pacific Ocean, Indian Ocean, and Caribbean Sea. Green star, P. jenniferae n. sp. (type locality). Purple star, P. erikae n. sp. (type locality). Red star, P. kurthcarolae n. sp. (type locality). Orange star, P. kurthsusanae n. sp. (type locality). Blue star, P. pacificus (collection record). Grey triangle, P. ijimai and P. pacificus (type locality). Brown circle, Polygordius sp. (Washington). Yellow circle, Polygordius sp. (California). Purple circle, Polygordius sp. (Indonesia). Green circle, P. “triestinussensu Jouin (New Caledonia)—this is an unconfirmed identification given limited information. Purple triangle, P. kiarama (type locality). Red triangle, P. arafura (type locality). Green triangle, P. pacificus floreanensis (type locality).
Diversity 12 00146 g001
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood phylogeny obtained with the molecular combined data (COI, 16S, and H3) and with the protodrilid Protodrilus pythonius as outgroup (not shown). Values at nodes are shown as ML bootstrap values. Haplotype networks for COI data for three of the new species are shown next to P. erikae n. sp., P. kurthcarolae n. sp., and P. kurthsusanae n. sp. respectively. F.P. = French Polynesia and * = holotype.
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood phylogeny obtained with the molecular combined data (COI, 16S, and H3) and with the protodrilid Protodrilus pythonius as outgroup (not shown). Values at nodes are shown as ML bootstrap values. Haplotype networks for COI data for three of the new species are shown next to P. erikae n. sp., P. kurthcarolae n. sp., and P. kurthsusanae n. sp. respectively. F.P. = French Polynesia and * = holotype.
Diversity 12 00146 g002
Figure 3. Light microscopy (LM) images of Polygordius jenniferae n. sp. holotype (SIO-BIC A12260), collected from Belize: (A) Live, complete adult specimen in two pieces. (B) Live, lateral view of head. (C) View of pygidium, photographed after fixation in ethanol. Abbreviations: c, cirri; hf, head fold; pp, paired palps; pr, prostomium; py, pygidium; s, segments.
Figure 3. Light microscopy (LM) images of Polygordius jenniferae n. sp. holotype (SIO-BIC A12260), collected from Belize: (A) Live, complete adult specimen in two pieces. (B) Live, lateral view of head. (C) View of pygidium, photographed after fixation in ethanol. Abbreviations: c, cirri; hf, head fold; pp, paired palps; pr, prostomium; py, pygidium; s, segments.
Diversity 12 00146 g003
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of Polygordius jenniferae n. sp. holotype (SIO-BIC A12260), collected from Belize, showing details of morphological characters: (A) Lateral view of head. (B) Ventral view of head. (C) Posterior view, tip of pygidium. (D) Lateral view of pygidium. (D-inset) Magnified view of pygidial glands. Abbreviations: al, anal lobes; c, cirri; g, gland; gb, glandular belt; hf, head fold; mf, median fold; no, nuchal organ, pp, paired palps.
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of Polygordius jenniferae n. sp. holotype (SIO-BIC A12260), collected from Belize, showing details of morphological characters: (A) Lateral view of head. (B) Ventral view of head. (C) Posterior view, tip of pygidium. (D) Lateral view of pygidium. (D-inset) Magnified view of pygidial glands. Abbreviations: al, anal lobes; c, cirri; g, gland; gb, glandular belt; hf, head fold; mf, median fold; no, nuchal organ, pp, paired palps.
Diversity 12 00146 g004
Figure 5. Light microscopy (LM) images of Polygordius erikae n. sp. holotype (AM W.53108), collected from Lord Howe Island, Australia, photographed alive before fixation in ethanol: (A) Complete adult specimen including head and pygidium. (B) Dorsal view of head. (C) View of pygidium. Abbreviations: c, cirri; hf, head fold; pp, paired palps; pr, prostomium; py, pygidium; s, segments.
Figure 5. Light microscopy (LM) images of Polygordius erikae n. sp. holotype (AM W.53108), collected from Lord Howe Island, Australia, photographed alive before fixation in ethanol: (A) Complete adult specimen including head and pygidium. (B) Dorsal view of head. (C) View of pygidium. Abbreviations: c, cirri; hf, head fold; pp, paired palps; pr, prostomium; py, pygidium; s, segments.
Diversity 12 00146 g005
Figure 6. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of Polygordius erikae n. sp. holotype (AM W.53108), collected from Lord Howe Island, Australia, showing details of morphological characters: (A) Lateral view of head. (B) Partial posterior view of pygidium showing anal lobes. (C )Lateral view of pygidium. (D) Magnified view of pygidial glands. Abbreviations: al, anal lobes; c, cirri; g, gland; gb, glandular belt; hf, head fold; no, nuchal organ, pp, paired palps.
Figure 6. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of Polygordius erikae n. sp. holotype (AM W.53108), collected from Lord Howe Island, Australia, showing details of morphological characters: (A) Lateral view of head. (B) Partial posterior view of pygidium showing anal lobes. (C )Lateral view of pygidium. (D) Magnified view of pygidial glands. Abbreviations: al, anal lobes; c, cirri; g, gland; gb, glandular belt; hf, head fold; no, nuchal organ, pp, paired palps.
Diversity 12 00146 g006
Figure 7. Light microscopy (LM) image of Polygordius kurthcarolae n. sp. (USNM 1434789), collected from Tetiaroa Atoll, French Polynesia, photographed by David Liittschwager, photographed alive before fixation in ethanol: (A) Incomplete adult specimen including head and trunk but missing pygidium. Abbreviations: i, incomplete; pp, paired palps; pr, prostomium; s, segments.
Figure 7. Light microscopy (LM) image of Polygordius kurthcarolae n. sp. (USNM 1434789), collected from Tetiaroa Atoll, French Polynesia, photographed by David Liittschwager, photographed alive before fixation in ethanol: (A) Incomplete adult specimen including head and trunk but missing pygidium. Abbreviations: i, incomplete; pp, paired palps; pr, prostomium; s, segments.
Diversity 12 00146 g007
Figure 8. Light microscopy (LM) images of Polygordius kurthcarolae n. sp. specimens, collected from One Tree Island, Australia, photographed after fixation in formalin (A12263) and after fixation in ethanol (W.53109, A12261): (A) SIO-BIC A12263, complete adult specimen including head and pygidium (in two pieces). (B) AM W.53109 (holotype), lateral view of head. (C) SIO-BIC A12261, view of pygidium. Abbreviations: al, anal lobes; c, cirri; hf, head fold; mo, mouth; pp, paired palps; pr, prostomium; py, pygidium; s, segments.
Figure 8. Light microscopy (LM) images of Polygordius kurthcarolae n. sp. specimens, collected from One Tree Island, Australia, photographed after fixation in formalin (A12263) and after fixation in ethanol (W.53109, A12261): (A) SIO-BIC A12263, complete adult specimen including head and pygidium (in two pieces). (B) AM W.53109 (holotype), lateral view of head. (C) SIO-BIC A12261, view of pygidium. Abbreviations: al, anal lobes; c, cirri; hf, head fold; mo, mouth; pp, paired palps; pr, prostomium; py, pygidium; s, segments.
Diversity 12 00146 g008
Figure 9. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of Polygordius kurthcarolae n. sp. specimens, collected from One Tree Island, Australia, showing details of morphological characters: (A) AM W.53109 (holotype), ventral lateral view of head. (B) SIO-BIC A12263, lateral view of head. (C) SIO-BIC A12263, ventral view of head. (D) SIO-BIC A12263, lateral view of pygidium. (E) SIO-BIC A12263, partial posterior view of pygidium showing anal lobes. (F) SIO-BIC A12263, magnified view of pygidial glands. Abbreviations: al, anal lobes; c, cirri; g, gland; gb, glandular belt; hf, head fold; mf, median fold; no, nuchal organ, pp, paired palps.
Figure 9. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of Polygordius kurthcarolae n. sp. specimens, collected from One Tree Island, Australia, showing details of morphological characters: (A) AM W.53109 (holotype), ventral lateral view of head. (B) SIO-BIC A12263, lateral view of head. (C) SIO-BIC A12263, ventral view of head. (D) SIO-BIC A12263, lateral view of pygidium. (E) SIO-BIC A12263, partial posterior view of pygidium showing anal lobes. (F) SIO-BIC A12263, magnified view of pygidial glands. Abbreviations: al, anal lobes; c, cirri; g, gland; gb, glandular belt; hf, head fold; mf, median fold; no, nuchal organ, pp, paired palps.
Diversity 12 00146 g009
Figure 10. Light microscopy (LM) images of Polygordius kurthsusanae n. sp. specimen (SIO-BIC A12288), collected from Moorea, French Polynesia, photographed alive before fixation in formalin: (A) Complete adult specimen including head and pygidium. (B) Lateral view of head. (C) View of pygidium. Abbreviations: gc, gut content; hf, head fold; pp, paired palps; pr, prostomium; py, pygidium; s, segments.
Figure 10. Light microscopy (LM) images of Polygordius kurthsusanae n. sp. specimen (SIO-BIC A12288), collected from Moorea, French Polynesia, photographed alive before fixation in formalin: (A) Complete adult specimen including head and pygidium. (B) Lateral view of head. (C) View of pygidium. Abbreviations: gc, gut content; hf, head fold; pp, paired palps; pr, prostomium; py, pygidium; s, segments.
Diversity 12 00146 g010
Figure 11. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of Polygordius kurthsusanae n. sp. specimens, collected from Moorea, French Polynesia, showing details of morphological characters: (A) SIO-BIC A12287 (holotype), lateral view of head. (B) SIO-BIC A12287 (holotype), ventral view of head. (C) SIO-BIC A12287 (holotype), posterior view, tip of pygidium. (D) SIO-BIC A12287 (holotype), lateral view of pygidium. (E) SIO-BIC A12288, lateral view of head. (F) SIO-BIC A12288, ventral view of head. (G) SIO-BIC A12288, posterior view, tip of pygidium. (H) SIO-BIC A12288, lateral view of pygidium. Abbreviations: al, anal lobes; hf, head fold; mf, median fold; no, nuchal organ, pp, paired palps.
Figure 11. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of Polygordius kurthsusanae n. sp. specimens, collected from Moorea, French Polynesia, showing details of morphological characters: (A) SIO-BIC A12287 (holotype), lateral view of head. (B) SIO-BIC A12287 (holotype), ventral view of head. (C) SIO-BIC A12287 (holotype), posterior view, tip of pygidium. (D) SIO-BIC A12287 (holotype), lateral view of pygidium. (E) SIO-BIC A12288, lateral view of head. (F) SIO-BIC A12288, ventral view of head. (G) SIO-BIC A12288, posterior view, tip of pygidium. (H) SIO-BIC A12288, lateral view of pygidium. Abbreviations: al, anal lobes; hf, head fold; mf, median fold; no, nuchal organ, pp, paired palps.
Diversity 12 00146 g011
Figure 12. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of Polygordius pacificus specimens, collected from Shirahama, Japan, showing details of morphological characters: (A) SIO-BIC A12284, lateral view of head (nuchal organ obscured). (B) SIO-BIC A12284, lateral view of pygidium. (C) SIO-BIC A12284, posterior view, tip of pygidium. (D) SIO-BIC A12286, lateral view of pygidium. (E) SIO-BIC A12266, lateral view of head. (F) SIO-BIC A12266, ventral lateral view of head. (G) SIO-BIC A12266, posterior view, tip of pygidium. (H) SIO-BIC A12266, lateral view of pygidium. (H-inset) Magnified view of pygidial glands. Abbreviations: al, anal lobes; eal, elongate/enlarged anal lobes; g, gland; gb, glandular belt; hf, head fold; mf, median fold; no, nuchal organ; pc, pygidial cirri; pp, paired palps.
Figure 12. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of Polygordius pacificus specimens, collected from Shirahama, Japan, showing details of morphological characters: (A) SIO-BIC A12284, lateral view of head (nuchal organ obscured). (B) SIO-BIC A12284, lateral view of pygidium. (C) SIO-BIC A12284, posterior view, tip of pygidium. (D) SIO-BIC A12286, lateral view of pygidium. (E) SIO-BIC A12266, lateral view of head. (F) SIO-BIC A12266, ventral lateral view of head. (G) SIO-BIC A12266, posterior view, tip of pygidium. (H) SIO-BIC A12266, lateral view of pygidium. (H-inset) Magnified view of pygidial glands. Abbreviations: al, anal lobes; eal, elongate/enlarged anal lobes; g, gland; gb, glandular belt; hf, head fold; mf, median fold; no, nuchal organ; pc, pygidial cirri; pp, paired palps.
Diversity 12 00146 g012
Table 1. Grouping of valid Polygordius species according to pygidial morphology based on findings of the present study (updated from [6]). Pygidial appendages/cirri refer to an extension/structure located either subterminally in the region between the glandular belt and anus or terminally from an anal lobe, thereby creating an elongate/enlarged lobe. Terminal pygidial appendages/cirri have also been previously referred to as anal cirri, pygidial papillae, anal papillae, and caudal appendages. Undetermined = description is incomplete or cannot be interpreted with confidence for this character.
Table 1. Grouping of valid Polygordius species according to pygidial morphology based on findings of the present study (updated from [6]). Pygidial appendages/cirri refer to an extension/structure located either subterminally in the region between the glandular belt and anus or terminally from an anal lobe, thereby creating an elongate/enlarged lobe. Terminal pygidial appendages/cirri have also been previously referred to as anal cirri, pygidial papillae, anal papillae, and caudal appendages. Undetermined = description is incomplete or cannot be interpreted with confidence for this character.
PygidiumPygidial Appendages/
Cirri Absent
Pygidial Appendages/
Cirri Subterminal
Pygidial Appendages/
Cirri Terminal
Pygidial Appendages
Undetermined
Pygidial glands presentP. antarcticus
P. lacteus
P. neapolitanus
P. appendiculatus
P. kiarama
P. leo
P. jenniferae n. sp.
P. kurthcarolae n.sp.
P. erikae n.sp.
P. eschaturus
P. eschaturus brevipapillosus
P. madrasensis
P. pacificus
P. pacificus floreanensis
P. ijimai
Pygidial glands absentP. arafura
P. jouinae
P. triestinus
P. kurthsusanae n. sp.
Pygidial glands undeterminedP. uroviridis
Table 2. Species names, localities, voucher information, and GenBank accession numbers for specimens used in this study. Museum abbreviations: see materials and methods. Names of new species described in this study appear in bold italics. Accession numbers of new sequences submitted to GenBank during this study appear in bold. COI = Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit I. Blank = no sequence.
Table 2. Species names, localities, voucher information, and GenBank accession numbers for specimens used in this study. Museum abbreviations: see materials and methods. Names of new species described in this study appear in bold italics. Accession numbers of new sequences submitted to GenBank during this study appear in bold. COI = Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit I. Blank = no sequence.
TaxaLocationVoucherCOI16S rRNAHistone H3
Protodrilus pythoniusBrazil(Di Domenico et al.) [26]KC763840KJ451298
Polygordius appendiculatusItaly(Ramey et al. 2018) [5]MG603453MG603479
Polygordius eschaturusBrazil(Ramey et al. 2018) [5]MG603404MG603559
Polygordius jouinaeUSA, New Jersey(Ramey et al. 2018) [5]MG603410MG603509
Polygordius lacteusGermany(Ramey et al. 2018) [5], (Rousset et al. 2007) [27]KT883951MG603540DQ779757
Polygordius neapolitanusItaly(Ramey et al. 2018) [5]MG603433MG603521
Polygordius triestinusCroatia(Ramey et al. 2018) [5] MG603537
Polygordius erikae n. sp.AustraliaAM W.53108, A12259MT263739-740MT260195-196
Polygordius jenniferae n. sp.BelizeSIO-BIC A12260MT263733MT260193
Polygordius kurthcarolae n. sp.AustraliaAM W.53109, SIO-BIC A12261, USNM1434789MT263735-6,8MT260191-192MT263747
Polygordius kurthsusanae n. sp.French PolynesiaUSNM1432890, SIO-BIC A12287, A12289 MT263742-744MT260187-189
Polygordius pacificusJapanSIO-BIC A12402, A12265-6, A12284-6 MT263741MT260197-201MT263748-749
Polygordius sp.IndonesiaSIO-BIC A4058MT263745MT260202
Polygordius sp.USA, CaliforniaSIO-BIC A12290MT263734MT260194
Polygordius sp.USA, WashingtonSIO-BIC A11847MT263746KF511815KF511879
Table 3. Uncorrected interspecific distances for Polygordius taxa used in this study based on COI data. Sequences for holotypes are used for the new species and specimens from type localities are used for previously published data (see Table 2). Distances in bold are discussed in the text.
Table 3. Uncorrected interspecific distances for Polygordius taxa used in this study based on COI data. Sequences for holotypes are used for the new species and specimens from type localities are used for previously published data (see Table 2). Distances in bold are discussed in the text.
TaxalacteusappendiculatusneapolitanusjouinaeeschaturusWashingtonCaliforniapacificusIndonesiaerikaejenniferaekurthcarolae
P. lacteus-
P. appendiculatus0.18-
P. neapolitanus0.150.20-
P. jouinae0.220.210.25 -
P. eschaturus0.230.210.220.22-
P. Washington0.190.230.230.240.21-
P. California0.230.200.220.240.250.24 -
P. pacificus0.220.200.200.230.190.230.21 -
P. Indonesia0.240.210.230.170.220.220.230.23 -
P. erikae n. sp.0.240.220.230.230.210.230.190.210.24 -
P. jenniferae n. sp.0.210.200.220.220.230.240.130.220.210.20 -
P. kurthcarolae n. sp.0.240.230.240.250.250.240.200.220.240.220.20 -
P. kurthsusanae n. sp.0.240.250.260.240.230.260.230.260.240.220.210.23
Table 4. Characters of P. jenniferae n. sp., P. kurthcarolae n. sp., and P. erikae n. sp. with morphologically most similar species of the genus. Morphological information for P. appendiculatus, P. kiarama, and P. ijimai was taken from the original species descriptions unless otherwise indicated. Brackets {}= paratype material.
Table 4. Characters of P. jenniferae n. sp., P. kurthcarolae n. sp., and P. erikae n. sp. with morphologically most similar species of the genus. Morphological information for P. appendiculatus, P. kiarama, and P. ijimai was taken from the original species descriptions unless otherwise indicated. Brackets {}= paratype material.
Character/SpeciesP. jenniferae n. spP. kurthcarolae n. spP. erikae n. spP. appendiculatus Fraipont, 1887 [19]P. kiarama Avery, Ramey, Wilson, 2009 [10]P. ijimai Izuka, 1903 [35]
Prostomium shapeconical (blunt)roundedrounded rounded (F, RC)conical (blunt)n.d.
Palp length (mm)0.180.14 {0.25}0.16 {0.11}0.24–0.41(RC)0.10–0.221.0
Prostomium length (mm)0.180.15 {0.21}0.13 {0.11}n.d.0.08–0.14n.d.
Ratio (palp:prostomium)1:1~1:11:12:1 (F), >1:1 (RC)1.2–2.0:1n.d.
Pigment spots (eyespots)absentabsentabsent2; 1or 2 (RC)absentabsent
Head folddeepdeepdeep deepn.d.
Median fold shapesubtriangular with deep-cleftsubtriangular with deep-cleftn.d.n.d.n.d.
Pygidium shape/width (mm)inflated/0.28inflated/n.d. {0.35}inflated/0.17inflated/n.d.inflated/0.12–0.40inflated/n.d.
Pygidial glands (no)40–54n.d. {54–60}40–52 {n.d.}30 (RC)20n.d.
Pygidial gland shape/orientationelongate/longitudinaln.d. {round/n.a}oval/longitudinalround (F, RC)/ n.a.oval/longitudinalelongate/n.d.
Glandular belt (width) (µm)30n.d. {10–13}17n.d.n.dn.d.
Gland (width) (µm)10–15n.d. {10–13}10n.d. n.d.
Gland ratio length:width3:1n.d. {1:1}1.7:11:12:1n.d.
Subterminal pygidial cirri (no)3 n.d {2}2 223
Subterminal pygidial cirri insertion point2 ventro-lateral, 1 dorsal medianventro-lateralventro-laterallateralventro-lateral2 ventro-lateral, 1 dorsal median
Anal lobes (no.)6–12n.d. {7–8}55;5 (RC)7–88
Body length (mm)48.4n.d. {42.3}21.4 {15.9}max 20;20–45 (RC)3.8–11.670–77
Body width (mm)0.47n.d.{0.50}0.21 {0.18}0.25;0.12–0.31 (RC)0.3–0.280.6–0.8
Segment (no.)145n.d {158}56 {n.d.}95–12530–74n.d.
Type localityoff Carrie Bow Cay, Caribbean Sea, BelizeOne Tree Island Reef, Coral Sea, Northeastern AustraliaLord Howe, Island, Tasman Sea, Southwestern AustraliaMediterranean Sea, Gulf of NaplesS of Port Kembla, Southeastern AustraliaMisaki Mar. Biol. Lab., Japan
RegionNorth Atlantic South PacificSouth PacificNorth Atlantic South PacificNorth Pacific
Latitude16°48’6.08’’ N23°29’54.50’’ S31°31’0.47’’ S 35°28’0’’ S
Longitude88°4’47.00’’ W 152°3’53.82’’ E159°3’49.67’’ E 150°53’0’’ En.d.
Sediment typecoarse sandcoral rubble, graveln.d.coarse sandsandy, well sortedsand, pebbles, shell-hash
Depth range (m)1853–5n.d.21–1650lower intertidal
(RC) = for data taken from Rota and Carchini (1999) [7]; (F) = observed character based on Figure only, no = number; max = maximum, n.d. = no data.
Table 5. Characters of P. kurthsusanae n. sp with morphologically most similar species of the genus. Morphological information for P. triestinus, P. arafura, and P. jouinae was taken from the original species descriptions. Brackets {}= paratype material.
Table 5. Characters of P. kurthsusanae n. sp with morphologically most similar species of the genus. Morphological information for P. triestinus, P. arafura, and P. jouinae was taken from the original species descriptions. Brackets {}= paratype material.
Character/SpeciesP. kurthsusanae n. sp P. triestinus Woltereck in
Hempelmann, 1906 [9]
P. arafura Avery, Ramey,
Wilson, 2009 [10]
P. jouinae Ramey,
Fiege & Leander, 2006 [12]
Prostomium shapeconical {blunt}conical (pointed)conical (pointed)conical (pointed)
Palp length (mm)0.30 {n.d.*}n.d.0.04–0.060.11–0.15
Prostomium length (mm)0.20 {0.25}n.d.0.06–0.120.11–0.15
Ratio (palp:prostomium)1.5:1n.d.0.5–0.861:1
Pigment spots (eyespots)absentabsent absent absent
Head folddeepshallowdeepshallow
Median fold shapesubtriangularn.d.subtrian. deep cleft (F)n.d.
Pygidium shape/width (mm)not inflated to minimally inflated /0.20 {0.20}not inflatednot inflated to minimally inflatednot inflated to minimally inflated
Pygidial glands (no)absentabsentabsentabsent
Pygidial appendages/cirri pygidial cirri absentabsentabsentabsent
Anal lobes (no.)4–5n.d.7–87
Body length (mm)n.d. {58.5}max 302.4–11.613–43
Body width (mm)0.46 {0.40}n.d.0.08–0.180.23–0.38
Segment (no.)n.d. {146}n.d.27–7482–93
Type localityMoorea Island, French PolynesiaNorthern Adriatic Sea, ItalyAustralia, Gulf of Carpentaria Beach Haven Ridge, Tuckerton, New Jersey
RegionSouth PacificNorth AtlanticSouth PacificNorth Atlantic
Latitude17°28’34.0’’ Sn.d.9°50’6’’ S39°27’42’’ N
Longitude149°49’51.6’’ Wn.d.135°17’48’’ E74°15’48’’ W
Sediment typecoarse coral sandmudmuddy-sandsand
Depth range (m)10–11n.d.69–925–152
(F) = observed character based on Figure only; no = number; n.d. = no data; * = palp broken.
Table 6. Characters of P. pacificus Uchida, 1935 [16] and specimens designated in the present study as compared to morphologically most similar species/subspecies including P. pacificus floreanensis, P. eschaturus, and P. eschaturus brevipapillosus. Morphological information was taken from the original species descriptions unless otherwise indicated.
Table 6. Characters of P. pacificus Uchida, 1935 [16] and specimens designated in the present study as compared to morphologically most similar species/subspecies including P. pacificus floreanensis, P. eschaturus, and P. eschaturus brevipapillosus. Morphological information was taken from the original species descriptions unless otherwise indicated.
Character/SpeciesP. pacificusP. pacificus Uchida, 1935 [16]P. pacificus floreanensis Schmidt & Westheide 1977 [18]P. eschaturus Marcus, 1948 [20]P. eschaturus brevipapillosus Jouin & Rao, 1987 [17]
Prostomium shaperoundedn.d.conical (F, P)rounded (F)rounded (F)
Palp length (mm)0.18–0.23n.d.0.10–0.2250.15–0.220.20–0.25
Prostomium length (mm)0.09–0.11
n.d.0.10 (P)n.d.n.d
Ratio (palp:prostomium)~2:1n.d.~1:1n.d.n.d.
Pigment spots (eyespots)absentabsentabsentabsentabsent
Head folddeepn.d.n.d.deep (F)deep
Median fold shapeelongaten.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
Pygidium shape/width (mm)inflated/0.35–0.38inflated/n.d.inflated/0.16inflated/max 0.30inflated/0.20–0.53
Pygidial glands (no)44–75n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
Pygidial gland shape/orientationelongate/
longitudinal
elongate/
ongitudinal
elongate/longitudinalelongate/longitudinalelongate/longitudinal
Glandular belt (width) (µm)100150 (F)30 (F)n.d.108
Gland (width) (µm)10–15n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.
Gland ratio length:width7–10:15:1 (F)5:1 (F)n.d.n.d.
Terminal pygidial appendages/cirripresentabsentn.d.presentpresent
Anal lobes (total no.)66–8n.d.n.d.6–8
Elongate & enlarged anal lobes no./length (µm)2-3/40n.d.n.d.2/50–702–3/80
Body length (mm)18.15-20.7530–354.9–23max 4018–50
Body width (mm)0.25–0.460.40–0.500.110.210.15–0.50
Segment (no.)90-108n.d35–75120-180110–160
Type localitySeto Mar. Biol. Lab., Japan*Misaki Mar. Biol. Lab., JapanFloreana Isl., Galapagos São Sebastião Isl., BrazilAndaman Islands, India
RegionNW PacificNW PacificSE PacificSW AtlanticIndian Ocean
Latitude33°41’29.04’’ Nn.d.n.d.n.d.12°58’06’’ N
Longitude135°20’11.04’’ Wn.d.n.d.n.d.92°59’17’’ E
Sediment typepebblesfine sandcoarse sandcoarse sandcoarse sand & shell-hash
Depth range (m)intertidallower intertidal lower intertidalintertidallower intertidal
(F) = observed character based on Figure only, (P) = personal observation in type; no = number; n.d. = no data. *Not type locality; a new collection locality.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tustison, C.A.; Ramey-Balci, P.A.; Rouse, G.W. More Knot Worms: Four New Polygordius (Annelida) Species from the Pacific and Caribbean. Diversity 2020, 12, 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12040146

AMA Style

Tustison CA, Ramey-Balci PA, Rouse GW. More Knot Worms: Four New Polygordius (Annelida) Species from the Pacific and Caribbean. Diversity. 2020; 12(4):146. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12040146

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tustison, Chrissy A., Patricia A. Ramey-Balci, and Greg W. Rouse. 2020. "More Knot Worms: Four New Polygordius (Annelida) Species from the Pacific and Caribbean" Diversity 12, no. 4: 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12040146

APA Style

Tustison, C. A., Ramey-Balci, P. A., & Rouse, G. W. (2020). More Knot Worms: Four New Polygordius (Annelida) Species from the Pacific and Caribbean. Diversity, 12(4), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12040146

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop