Next Article in Journal
Influence of Chronic Kidney Disease on Platelet Reactivity Response to Clopidogrel and Ticagrelor
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Donor Age, Donor Body Mass Index, and Harvesting Site on Cell Preparations from Human Adipose Tissue
Previous Article in Special Issue
Non-Coding RNA Profile in the Progression of Carotid Atherosclerosis: A Systematic Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 27
Issue 3
10.3390/ijms27031358
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Atorvastatin Protects Against Deleterious Carfilzomib-Induced Transcriptional Changes in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes

by
Marwa Tantawy
1,2,
Danxin Wang
1,
Mohammed Gbadamosi
1,
Fahong Yu
3,
Yanping Zhang
4,
Mohammed E. Alomar
5,6,
Kenneth H. Shain
7,
Rachid C. Baz
7,
Katelyn A. Bruno
2,8 and
Yan Gong
1,2,*
1
Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
2
Cardio-Oncology Working Group, University of Florida Health Cancer Institute, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
3
Bioinformatics at Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
4
Gene Expression & Genotyping at Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
5
Cardio-Oncology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33216, USA
6
Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
7
Department of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33216, USA
8
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(3), 1358; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031358
Submission received: 22 December 2025 / Revised: 22 January 2026 / Accepted: 27 January 2026 / Published: 29 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cardiomyocytes Among Physiology and Pathophysiology: Molecular Insights and Therapeutic Implications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

The mechanisms underlying carfilzomib (CFZ)-induced cardiotoxicity remain incompletely elucidated. In this study, we used human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) to characterize the transcriptional impact of CFZ and to evaluate whether atorvastatin could prevent these deleterious transcriptional changes. hiPSC-CMs were treated with 1 µM CFZ, CFZ + atorvastatin, atorvastatin, or vehicle control, followed by RNA sequencing, differential expression analyses, and pathway analyses. Transcriptomic profiling revealed a marked upregulation of genes in multiple proteasome subunits, including ATPase components (PSMC1, PSMC4, PSMC5, PSMC6) and non-ATPase regulatory subunits (PSMD1, PSMD2, PSMD12), suggesting a strong compensatory activation of proteostasis and protein quality-control pathways in response to CFZ exposure. In addition, several of the most significantly altered genes were those implicated in cardiomyopathy and heart failure, such as BAG3 and FLNC, and many heat-shock proteins, indicating the activation of cardiac stress–response pathways relevant to CFZ-associated cardiotoxicity. Atorvastatin co-treatment partially reversed a subset of CFZ-induced transcriptional changes, particularly within cholesterol biosynthesis and lipid-regulatory pathways (e.g., ACAT2 and ACTA1) but did not restore the CFZ-mediated downregulation of sarcomeric genes. Together, these findings define a multifactorial signature of deleterious CFZ-induced transcriptional changes and suggest that atorvastatin may provide partial metabolic, but not structural, cardio protection.

1. Introduction

The proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib (CFZ) has been used as the backbone for first-line combination therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), the second-most common hematologic cancer [1,2]. However, despite its effectiveness, CFZ is associated with significant cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs), including hypertension, arrhythmias, and heart failure, with incidence estimates ranging from 8 to 18% [3]. A critical clinical implication of this cardiotoxicity is treatment interruption, which is associated with cancer recurrence [4]. Studies have shown that the early detection of and intervention for cardiotoxicity induced by other cancer therapies (i.e., anthracyclines) can improve long-term outcomes [5,6]. It is crucial to understand the underlying pathophysiological and inherent compensatory mechanisms of CFZ-related CVAEs to develop effective strategies for the early detection and management of high-risk patients [4].
Statins are a group of lipid-lowering drugs that inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis by inhibiting 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase [7] and have been approved and widely used for over 30 years to prevent coronary artery disease and stroke [8,9]. Statins also have pleiotropic effects beyond their cholesterol-lowering properties, such as reducing vascular and systemic inflammation [10,11], decreasing the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [12], and improving endothelial function and nitric oxide bioavailability [13,14]. Different studies, including the recently published STOP-CA randomized clinical trial, have demonstrated that statins can reduce cardiac functional impairment in patients with cancer treated with anthracyclines [15,16,17,18]. More importantly, a mouse study reported that atorvastatin prevented CFZ-mediated left ventricular dysfunction and molecular deficits in mice with cardiometabolic syndrome [19]. We hypothesize that atorvastatin may also protect against CFZ-related CVAE in humans. We used a human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte (hiPSC-CM) model to test this hypothesis. hiPSCs can self-renew and differentiate into various cell types, including cardiomyocytes [20,21]. The advantages of hiPSC-CMs include the perfect genetic homology between each line and their human counterpart, providing a more physiologically relevant model compared to immortalized cardiac cell lines, and their demonstrated utility for high-throughput applications [22]. hiPSC-CMs exposed to other cardiotoxic medications such as doxorubicin, kinase inhibitors, and trastuzumab were able to recapitulate the phenotypes of cardiac dysfunction, such as decreased cardiomyocyte viability and contractility, impaired mitochondrial and metabolic function, and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production [22,23,24]. In this study, we aimed to investigate the underlying mechanisms of CFZ-CVAEs by characterizing the transcriptional impact of CFZ treatment on hiPSC-CMs and to evaluate whether atorvastatin could prevent these deleterious transcriptional changes, using RNA sequencing analyses followed by pathway analyses.

2. Results

2.1. Validation of Pluripotent State Prior to Cardiomyocyte Differentiation

To confirm that the starting cell population had not yet undergone cardiomyocyte differentiation, we assessed the expression of key cardiac structural and mitochondrial genes in undifferentiated hiPSCs. Undifferentiated hiPSCs showed negligible expression of sarcomeric markers (MYH6, MYH7, MYL2, TNNT2) and mitochondrial regulators (ATP2A2, MFN1, MFN2), consistent with their pluripotent and non-cardiac phenotype (Supplementary Figure S1). The absence of these lineage-specific transcripts confirms that cardiomyocyte-enriched gene expression patterns observed in later experimental stages resulted from controlled differentiation rather than baseline expression in the parental hiPSC population. This validation step ensures that all downstream transcriptomic effects reflect true responses of differentiated cardiomyocytes rather than undifferentiated stem cells.

2.2. Establishing the Optimal Carfilzomib Dose for hiPSC-CM Experiments

To determine the optimal concentration of CFZ for subsequent transcriptomic and functional analyses, we performed a dose–response experiment using 0.1 µM and 1.0 µM CFZ in hiPSC-CMs, guided by previous literature reporting CFZ cardiotoxicity within this concentration range [25]. Quantitative PCR analysis of key mitochondrial and sarcomeric genes demonstrated a clear dose-dependent effect. The mitochondrial regulators ATP2A2, MFN1, and MFN2 exhibited progressive upregulation with increasing CFZ concentrations, indicating early activation of mitochondrial stress–response programs. In contrast, core sarcomeric genes (MYH6, MYH7, and TNNT2) exhibited marked dose-dependent downregulation, reflecting impairment of cardiomyocyte contractile machinery. Based on these consistent transcriptional alterations and in alignment with prior studies evaluating CFZ cardiotoxicity in vitro, we selected 1.0 µM CFZ for all subsequent experiments to ensure robust and reproducible transcriptional responses while avoiding excessive cytotoxicity (Supplementary Figure S2).

2.3. Differentially Expressed Genes in CFZ vs. Control

To evaluate the impact of CFZ on global gene expression, we conducted a differential expression analysis comparing CFZ-treated hiPSC-CMs (n = 7) to controls (n = 8) using the DESeq2 framework. The dataset comprised 36,245 transcripts, ~11,000 of which had significant adjusted p-values. Differential expression was defined by a threshold of fold change (FC) ≥ 2 or ≤0.5 (or log2FC ≥ 1 or ≤ −1) and FDR-adjusted p-value < 0.05. Global gene expression profile analysis identified 6025 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), including 3871 downregulated genes (Supplementary Table S1) and 2154 upregulated genes (Supplementary Table S2), in CFZ-treated hiPSC-CMs compared to controls. A volcano plot summarizing the distribution of fold changes and statistical significance is shown in Figure 1.
Among the top 100 DEGs in hiPSC-CMs treated with CFZ compared to controls, 98 were upregulated and 2 were downregulated. The most significantly upregulated genes were the following: (1) genes in the ubiquitin proteasomal system, including proteasome 26S subunit, non-ATPase 2 (PSMD2) (log2FC = 2.67, padj = 2.32 × 10−458), protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type N (PTPRN) (log2FC = 5.84, padj = 1.14 × 10−340), and heat shock protein genes such as HSPA6 (log2FC = 8.80, padj = 4.98 × 10−231) and HSPA1B (log2FC = 5.20, padj = 2.13 × 10−222); (2) genes in the Nrf2 pathway or nuclear receptors pathway, including sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1) (log2FC = 4.06, padj = 1.22 × 10−257), MAF basic leucine zipper transcription factor F (MAFF) (log2FC = 4.08, padj = 1.98 × 10−176), and heparin-binding EGF-liking growth factor (HBEGF) (log2FC = 3.99, padj = 1.78 × 10−173); (3) genes involved in apoptosis modulation and signaling pathways, such as BAG cochaperone 3 (BAG3) (log2FC = 3.95, padj = 3.64 × 10−250), or the MAPK signaling pathway, such as filamin-C (FLNC) (log2FC = 3.92, padj = 2.19 × 10−238) and dual specificity phosphatase 1 (DUSP1) (log2FC = 4.56, padj = 1.39 × 10−158) (Supplementary Table S2). Among the most significantly downregulated genes were CXXC finger protein 4 (CXXC4) (log2FC = −2.58, padj = 1.24 × 10−101), calpain 6 (CAPN6) (log2FC = −2.89, padj = 3.60 × 10−84), high mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 3 (HMGN3) (log2FC = −2.32, padj = 2.91 × 10−80), and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) (log2FC = −2.34, padj = 3.15 × 10−76) (Supplementary Table S1).
To further characterize the transcriptional response to CFZ, we generated a heatmap of the top 50 differentially expressed genes between CFZ-treated and control hiPSC-CMs (Figure 2). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering clearly separated CFZ-treated samples from controls, indicating a robust and highly consistent treatment-specific signature across biological replicates. Most of the top DEGs were strongly upregulated in CFZ-treated cells (orange/red) and relatively suppressed in controls (blue), including multiple proteasome subunits.

2.4. Functional Enrichment of CFZ-Induced Gene Expression Changes

Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis revealed that CFZ treatment profoundly disrupts mitochondrial function, lipid metabolism, and cardiac structural pathways in hiPSC-CMs. Mitochondrial-related GO terms showed significant enrichment, including mitochondrial genome maintenance (GO:0000002; p = 0.0043), suggesting impaired mitochondrial DNA stability and replication, as well as pathways involved in outer mitochondrial membrane organization (GO:1901028, GO:1901030; p = 0.039 and 0.053, respectively) and mitochondrial protein processing (GO:0034982; p = 0.053), indicating altered mitochondrial turnover and heightened susceptibility to apoptosis (Supplementary Figure S3). CFZ also dysregulated multiple lipid metabolic processes, with enrichment of regulation of lipoprotein lipase activity (GO:0051004; p = 0.0138), negative regulation of lipoprotein lipase activity (GO:0051005; p = 0.05), positive regulation of cholesterol storage (GO:0010886; p = 0.05), and membrane lipid catabolic process (GO:0046466; p = 0.053), highlighting disturbances in cholesterol handling and membrane lipid remodeling (Supplementary Figure S4). In addition, cardiac-related GO terms demonstrated strong enrichment, particularly negative regulation of cardiac muscle cell differentiation (GO:2000726; p = 0.052), reflecting suppression of genes required for cardiomyocyte maturation, contractility, and electrical stability. Collectively, these pathway disruptions suggest that CFZ impairs mitochondrial homeostasis, lipid metabolism, and cardiac structural development, providing mechanistic insight into the reduced contractile performance and cardiotoxicity associated with CFZ treatment (Supplementary Table S3).

2.5. Transcriptomic Clustering Reveals Metabolic Reprogramming with Limited Sarcomeric Recovery in Cardiomyocytes Treated with CFZ + Atorvastatin

Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the top 50 differentially expressed genes between CFZ + atorvastatin and CFZ-treated hiPSC-CMs revealed two distinct expression clusters corresponding to each treatment condition, indicating a strong transcriptional shift upon atorvastatin co-treatment, as shown in Figure 3 and Supplementary Table S4. Genes associated with lipid and cholesterol metabolism, including 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) (log2FC = 0.96, padj = 2.19 × 10−32), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase 1 (HMGCS1) (log2FC = 1.21, padj = 2.21 × 10−17), Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor (LDLR) (log2FC = 0.74, padj = 3.57 × 10−9), acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase 2 (ACAT2) (log2FC = 1.32, padj = 2.57 × 10−8), and insulin induced gene 1 (INSIG1) (log2FC = 1.26, padj = 4.96 × 10−8), were upregulated in the CFZ + atorvastatin-treated hiPSC-CMs compared to the cells treated with CFZ alone, consistent with reactivation of the mevalonate and cholesterol biosynthesis pathways. In contrast, sarcomeric and contractile genes such as actin alpha 1 (ACTA1) (log2FC = −1.95, padj = 7.89 × 10−7), myosin heavy chain 11 (MYH11) (log2FC = −1.96, padj = 0.0026), and myosin heavy chain (MYH2) (log2FC = −3.63, padj = 0.014) remained suppressed, suggesting that atorvastatin primarily restored metabolic pathways rather than structural cardiac programs. Additionally, modest upregulation of stress–response and signaling genes such as von Willebrand factor (VWF) (log2FC = 1.35, padj = 3.67 × 10−5) and CYLD lysine 63 deubiquitinate (CYLD) (log2FC = 0.37, padj = 0.0037), and partial reductions in inflammatory mediators such as interferon induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 2 (IFIT2) (log2FC = −1.23, padj = 0.011) and corticotropin releasing hormone binding protein (CRHBP) (log2FC = −1.39, padj = 0.0072) were observed, reflecting a mixed protective adaptation at the transcriptional level (Supplementary Table S4).

2.6. Atorvastatin Reverses a Subset of CFZ-Induced Transcriptional Alterations

To investigate whether atorvastatin mitigates the molecular effects of CFZ treatment, we performed a comparative differential expression analysis between the CFZ vs. control and CFZ + atorvastatin vs. CFZ conditions, as shown in the volcano plot Figure 4. A small subset of genes (n = 12) exhibited significant changes in opposite directions across the two contrasts, indicating directional reversal of CFZ-induced transcriptional effects by atorvastatin co-treatment (Table 1). Among these, eight genes (ACAT2, PAX2, PLA2G3, VSX2, PCDHA2, DERL3, NDST4, and TMEM178B) were downregulated by CFZ but upregulated upon atorvastatin co-treatment. These genes are functionally enriched in lipid metabolic regulation (ACAT2, PLA2G3), endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and protein quality control (DERL3), and cellular signaling and transcriptional regulation (PAX2, VSX2, TMEM178B), suggesting that atorvastatin may restore metabolic and ER homeostasis disrupted by CFZ exposure. Conversely, four genes (ACTA1, CRHBP, IFIT2, and PTGER2) were upregulated by CFZ but suppressed by atorvastatin co-treatment. These genes are associated with sarcomeric contractile function (ACTA1), stress–response signaling (CRHBP, IFIT2), and prostaglandin receptor-mediated inflammation (PTGER2). Their downregulation following atorvastatin treatment indicates a potential attenuation of CFZ-induced cellular stress and contractile dysregulation. The gene expression levels of ACAT2 and ACTA1 are demonstrated in Figure 5 as examples. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that, while most CFZ-responsive genes remain unaltered by atorvastatin, a discrete subset shows reversal of CFZ-induced expression patterns, supporting the notion that atorvastatin may exert protective transcriptional effects against CFZ-mediated cardiotoxicity, particularly through pathways involved in lipid metabolism, ER stress resolution, and cytoskeletal maintenance.

2.7. Validation of RNA-Seq Findings by qPCR

To evaluate the effects of CFZ and atorvastatin on cardiac structural and mitochondrial gene expression, we performed qPCR analysis of ATP2A2, MFN1, MFN2, MYH6, MYH7, MYL2, and TNNT2 across four experimental conditions: control, CFZ alone, atorvastatin alone, and CFZ + atorvastatin. CFZ treatment markedly suppressed the expression of key sarcomeric genes (MYH6, MYH7, MYL2, TNNT2), which was consistent with the impaired contractile gene programs observed in our RNA-seq analysis. Atorvastatin alone had a minimal impact on these cardiac markers, indicating limited transcriptional influence in atorvastatin-treated cardiomyocytes. Importantly, co-treatment with CFZ + atorvastatin did not restore sarcomeric gene expression, suggesting that atorvastatin is unable to rescue CFZ-induced transcriptional suppression of structural genes. In contrast, mitochondrial and calcium-handling genes (ATP2A2, MFN1, MFN2) showed modest increases with atorvastatin and partial normalization in the CFZ + atorvastatin condition, indicating that statins may preferentially modulate metabolic pathways rather than structural cardiac programs. Together, these qPCR findings validate our transcriptomic results, demonstrating that atorvastatin exerts a metabolic protective effect but does not reverse CFZ-induced downregulation of cardiac contractile genes (Supplementary Figure S5).

3. Discussion

In this study, we investigated the transcriptomic effects of CFZ on hiPSC-CMs and assessed whether atorvastatin could mitigate deleterious CFZ-induced transcriptional alterations. We observed striking transcriptional changes induced by CFZ that are consistent with proteasome inhibition. More importantly, our results demonstrated that CFZ profoundly disrupts cardiomyocyte homeostasis by altering pathways essential for cardiac metabolism, lipid regulation, mitochondrial function, oxidative stress regulation, apoptosis, and sarcomeric integrity, which are mechanisms that closely mirror the cardiovascular adverse events observed clinically, including heart failure, arrhythmias, and cardiomyopathy. We also observed that atorvastatin co-treatment partially reversed a subset of CFZ-induced transcriptional changes, particularly within cholesterol biosynthesis and lipid-regulatory pathways (e.g., ACAT2 and ACTA1) but did not restore CFZ-mediated downregulation of sarcomeric genes.
The ubiquitin proteasome pathway is the major cellular proteolytic pathway for maintaining cellular proteome stability and proper cellular function and viability [26]. In patients with MM, malignant plasma cells produce excessive amounts of immunoglobulins, inducing significant proteotoxic stress, and are highly dependent on proteasome activity to survive, making them sensitive to proteasome inhibition [4]. By selectively and irreversibly binding the β5 subunit of the 26S proteasome and blocking its chymotrypsin-like activity that normally degrades poly-ubiquitinated proteins [27], CFZ can delay proliferation and induce cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow of patients with MM [28]. Terminally differentiated cardiomyocytes are post-mitotic cells and thus especially sensitive to proteasome inhibition [29]. In addition, the high metabolic demand of the heart increases the burden of proteostasis. Therefore, proteasome inhibition may be deleterious for the heart [4].
In our study of hiPSC-CMs, among the most prominent transcriptomic changes induced by CFZ treatment were the significant upregulation of multiple proteasome subunits, including ATPase components (PSMC1, PSMC4, PSMC5, PSMC6) and non-ATPase regulatory subunits (PSMD1, PSMD2, PSMD12), which indicates a robust compensatory response to proteasome inhibition. These genes are essential for substrate recognition, unfolding, and degradation, suggesting that CFZ-treated hiPSC-CMs activate proteostasis and protein quality-control pathways to counteract the accumulation of misfolded proteins [30]. Among other notable upregulated genes were SQSTM1, BAG3, FLNC, HSPA6, and HSPA1B. SQSTM1 acts as a ubiquitin-binding scaffold that redirects the overload of poly-ubiquitinated proteins toward autophagy [31]. BAG3, together with the stress-inducible Hsp70 isoforms (HSPA6 and HSPA1B), forms a chaperone-assisted selective autophagy complex [32]. Our results confirmed that CFZ’s blockage of the proteasome elicits a multilayered adaptive network to rebuild proteasome capacity or reroute the surplus of ubiquitinated proteins into autophagy. Importantly, several of these genes have been directly implicated in cardiovascular disease and heart failure and have been identified in a previous hiPSC-CM study [25], including BAG3 [33,34,35] and multiple heat-shock proteins (HSPA1A/B/L, HSPH1, HSPB8) [36]. These genes mediate essential processes such as sarcomere maintenance, mitochondrial respiration, oxidative stress defense, apoptosis, and proteostasis—all of which are disrupted in CFZ-induced cardiotoxicity. Their consistent upregulation in CFZ-treated samples further confirms the activation of cardiac stress–response pathways known to contribute to heart failure. More importantly, genetic variants in the BAG3 and FLNC genes have been associated with cardiomyopathies in both familial and population studies. Multiple rare variants in the BAG3 gene have been identified as causative of dilated cardiomyopathy in different cohorts [37,38,39]. Truncating FLNC mutations are associated with high-risk dilated and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies [40] and familial restrictive cardiomyopathy [41]. A novel combination of a BAG3 (c.601G.A; p.Gly204Arg) and FLNC (c.5707G>A; p.Glu1903Lys) genetic variant was found to express a pediatric restrictive cardiomyopathy phenotype [42]. In light of the literature, our findings suggest that there might be shared pathophysiological mechanisms between CFZ-induced cardiotoxicity and genetic cardiomyopathies.
CFZ-treated hiPSC-CMs also exhibited extensive downregulation of genes critical for cardiac structure and contractility, including MYH6, MYH7, MYL2, and TNNT2 [43]. Suppression of these sarcomeric genes is strongly associated with impaired contraction, reduced force generation, and cardiomyocyte differentiation—all features reported in patients who develop CFZ-associated systolic dysfunction and heart failure [3,44]. These transcriptomic findings align with clinical and preclinical studies demonstrating impaired cardiac output, altered calcium handling, and structural remodeling after CFZ exposure [45,46].
In addition to structural gene suppression, CFZ significantly altered mitochondrial pathways. The enrichment of mitochondrial genome maintenance, outer membrane organization, and mitochondrial protein processing pathways suggests that CFZ disrupts mitochondrial homeostasis [25,47,48]. Mitochondrial instability is directly linked to reduced ATP production [49], bioenergetic failure [50,51,52], and increased ROS, which are established drivers of heart failure pathogenesis [53]. Oxidative stress emerged as a key feature of the CFZ transcriptomic signature. Genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation, oxidative RNA/DNA demethylation, and oxidative stress-induced apoptosis were significantly enriched [54,55]. These pathways reflect mitochondrial-derived ROS accumulation and redox imbalance—mechanisms known to contribute to cardiomyocyte apoptosis and left ventricular dysfunction [53]. These findings are consistent with prior studies showing that CFZ increases oxidative stress markers, reduces mitochondrial membrane potential, and triggers cardiomyocyte injury [53,56]. Apoptotic pathways were also robustly represented among CFZ-regulated genes. Enrichment of intrinsic apoptotic signaling, caspase activation, and execution-phase apoptosis supports the idea that CFZ induces programmed cell death in cardiomyocytes [57,58]. Apoptosis is a hallmark of many forms of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and correlates strongly with clinical cardiac dysfunction [53,59,60].
Due to the beneficial effects of statins demonstrated in preventing cardiotoxicity induced by other cardiotoxic drugs [15,16,17,18], we also evaluated whether atorvastatin could prevent the deleterious CFZ-induced transcriptional changes in hiPSC-CMs. Atorvastatin co-treatment upregulated genes involved in cholesterol biosynthesis and lipid homeostasis, including HMGCR, HMGCS1 and LDLR, consistent with compensatory up-regulations of these genes in a classic feedback response. Notably, ACAT2 was markedly suppressed by CFZ and but was restored by atorvastatin co-treatment. However, atorvastatin did not rescue CFZ-induced downregulation of sarcomeric genes, such as MYH6, MYH7, MYL2, and TNNT2. This indicates that, while atorvastatin may correct metabolic disturbances, it does not reverse the structural deterioration or contractile gene suppression that underlies CFZ-induced systolic dysfunction. This difference underscores the complexity of CFZ cardiotoxicity and suggests that atorvastatin therapy alone may offer partial metabolic protection but not full preservation of cardiac function.
Collectively, our findings support a multifactorial model of CFZ-induced cardiotoxicity in which several interconnected mechanisms contribute to cardiomyocyte injury. CFZ exposure disrupts mitochondrial function, leading to impaired energy production and increased vulnerability to metabolic stress. This mitochondrial instability is accompanied by excessive oxidative stress and accumulation of ROS, which further damages cellular components and exacerbates redox imbalance. In parallel, CFZ activates intrinsic apoptotic pathways, promoting programmed cell death and loss of viable cardiomyocytes. These molecular disturbances are compounded by the marked suppression of key structural and contractile genes essential for maintaining sarcomere integrity and cardiac mechanical function. Additionally, CFZ alters lipid and cholesterol metabolism, a process fundamental for membrane stability, mitochondrial health, and cellular signaling. Together, these molecular signatures closely mirror the clinical phenotypes observed in CFZ-treated patients, including reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, diminished contractile reserve, arrhythmia, and heart failure. Notably, the partial restoration of metabolic pathways by atorvastatin—particularly those related to cholesterol regulation, ER stress mitigation, and mitochondrial stabilization—suggests a promising, though incomplete, cardioprotective potential that warrants further investigation.
It is important to acknowledge some limitations. This study used a single hiPSC line and focused on acute (24 h) drug exposure, which may not fully capture chronic or cumulative toxicity. Additional investigations using electrophysiology, contractility, calcium imaging, and mitochondrial respiration are needed to confirm the functional consequences of the transcriptomic changes observed here. Further studies should evaluate dose- and timing-dependent atorvastatin effects, compare multiple statins, and investigate combination therapies targeting both metabolic and structural injury mechanisms. Another limitation of the current study is that we focused on CFZ-induced gene expression changes without evaluating the changes at the protein or metabolomic level. Integrative analysis incorporating proteomic and metabolomic profiles would be the focus of our future investigations.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocyte Differentiation

hiPSCs (line SCTi003-A from StemCell Technologies, Cambridge, MA, USA) were differentiated toward cardiomyocytes using small molecules or growth factors based on the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, hiPSCs were cultured on Matrigel®-coated plates in mTeSR™ Plus. For dissociation, cells were washed with D-PBS, treated with Gentle Cell Dissociation Reagent for 8–10 min at 37 °C, and resuspended in mTeSR™ medium with 10 μM Y-27632. Following centrifugation (300× g, 5 min), cells were seeded at a density of 3.58*105 cells/well onto Matrigel®-coated plates. After 24 h of incubation, the medium was refreshed, and cells were cultured to >95% confluency before differentiation. Cardiomyocyte differentiation was initiated once the hiPSCs reached >95% confluency. On Day 0, the culture medium was replaced with the STEMdiff™ Ventricular Cardiomyocyte Differentiation Medium A, supplemented with Matrigel® (1:100). The medium was changed every two days, using Medium B on Day 2, Medium C on Days 4 and 6, and STEMdiff™ Cardiomyocyte Maintenance Medium from Day 8 onward. Beating cardiomyocytes were observed by Day 8, and cells were ready for assays by Day 15. For long-term maintenance, the medium was changed every 2 days using Cardiomyocyte Maintenance Medium.

4.2. Drug Preparation and Treatment

The stock solution of CFZ (Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX, USA) was 10 mmol/L. Based on the pharmacokinetic profile of CFZ, the peak plasma concentration is 5.88 µmol/L. Following the initial testing at 1, 2, 10, and 20 µmol/L, a dose range of 0.01 to 10 µmol/L was established [25]. A concentration of 1 µmol/L for CFZ was determined for all the following experiments. On the day of each experiment, CFZ was diluted in STEMdiff™ Cardiomyocyte Maintenance Medium to achieve a 2× final concentration and kept on ice in the dark. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at 0.2% (v/v), equivalent to the highest drug concentration, was used as a vehicle control. Atorvastatin (Selleck Chemicals, Houston, TX, USA) at 10 µmol/L was evaluated as a potential cardioprotective agent against deleterious CFZ-induced transcriptional changes, with its stock solution (10 mmol/L) prepared similarly to CFZ.
hiPSC-CMs were treated on Day 15 of differentiation with the following conditions: (1) CFZ alone (1 µM), (2) atorvastatin alone (1 µM), (3) CFZ + atorvastatin (same concentration), and (4) untreated controls. All treatments were adjusted to contain equivalent concentrations of DMSO (0.2% v/v). Cells were incubated with drugs for 24 h, after which total RNA was harvested on Day 16 using the RNeasy Fibrous Tissue Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

4.3. Quantitative Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction

Total RNA was extracted using the Zymo total RNA mini kit (Zymo, Irvine, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. One microgram of total RNA was used for complementary DNA synthesis using the High-Capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and the reaction mixture was incubated using a VeritiPro thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) as follows: 37 °C for 1 h and 95 °C for 5 min. The reaction mixture was further diluted, and 10 ng of complementary DNA as the template was subjected to quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which was performed in triplicate for each gene using a Taqman Fast Advanced Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions included an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 20 s, and 40 cycles of 2 steps with 1 s of denaturation at 95 °C followed by 20 s of annealing at 60 °C, using the QuantStudio™ 12K Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The messenger RNA levels of the genes examined were normalized to GAPDH. The primers used for qPCR are listed in Supplementary Table S5.

4.4. RNA Library and RNA Sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from hiPSC-CMs exposed to different treatment conditions—control (n = 8), CFZ (n = 7), atorvastatin (n = 5), and CFZ + atorvastatin (n = 7)—using the RNeasy Fibrous Tissue Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). The RNA integrity and quality were confirmed prior to library preparation and sequencing. The sample quality was assessed using Agilent TapeStation 4200 (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). One hundred nanograms of total RNA was used for library construction using the NEB Ultra II Directional RNA-seq library preparation kit for Illumina according to the manufacturer’s protocol. First, mRNA was isolated from 100 ng of total RNA using the NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (New England Biolabs, catalog #E7490, Ipswich, MA, USA). This was followed by RNA library construction with the NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs, catalog #E7760, Ipswich, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s user guide. Briefly, RNA was fragmented in NEBNext First Strand Synthesis Buffer under incubation at 94 °C for the desired time. This step was followed by first-strand cDNA synthesis using reverse transcriptase and random hexamer primers. ds-cDNA was synthesized using the 2nd strand master mix provided in the kit, followed by end-repair and adaptor ligation. At this point, Illumina adaptors were ligated to the sample. Finally, each library (uniquely barcoded) was enriched through 12 cycles of amplification and purified using Agencourt AMPure beads (Beckman Coulter, catalog #A63881, Brea, CA, USA). A total of 27 barcoded libraries were sized on the TapeStation 4200 and quantified with the Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Finally, these 27 individual libraries were pooled in equimolar concentration and sequenced on a NovaSeq X 10B flow cell with a run of 2 × 150 cycles. One lane generated 1.25 billion paired-end reads with an average Q30% ≥ 92.5% and Cluster PF = 85.4%. FastQ files were generated using the BCL2fastQ function in the Illumina BaseSpace portal. One NovaSeq X 2 × 150-cycle lane resulted in an average of 50 million demultiplexed, paired-end reads when sequencing a pool of 27 samples. RNA-seq libraries were constructed at the University of Florida Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research (ICBR) Gene Expression Core (https://biotech.ufl.edu/gene-expression-genotyping/, RRID:SCR_019145) and sequenced at the UF ICBR NextGen Sequencing Core using the NovaSeq X Sequencer (Illumina, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on variance-stabilized transformed (VST) expression data to visualize sample clustering. The PCA plot revealed that samples segregated along the second principal component based on sequencing batch, independent of treatment conditions. We performed these experiments in two different batches, and our analysis confirmed the presence of a batch effect. To mitigate its influence on downstream differential expression analysis, batch information was incorporated as a covariate in the DESeq2 design formula (batch + condition), a widely accepted strategy for adjusting for unwanted variation [61,62].

4.5. RNA-Seq Analysis and Differential Expression Analysis

Transcriptomic data was processed through a standardized RNA-seq analysis pipeline. The raw sequencing reads underwent quality control using FastQC, and adapter trimming with Trim Galore. Transcript-level quantification was performed using Salmon [63], a lightweight and accurate tool for transcript abundance estimation. The quantified transcripts were aggregated to gene-level counts using tximport [64] in R, with reference to the GENCODE human gene annotation database. Differential expression analysis was conducted using DESeq2 [62], incorporating batch effects and treatment conditions in the design formula. Pairwise comparisons were performed between treatment groups to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs), with significance defined as an adjusted p-value < 0.05 (Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery (FDR) correction) and an absolute log2 fold change (FC) > 1. The results were visualized using volcano plots and MA plots generated with ggplot2 [65], and heatmaps of the top DEGs created using pheatmap. Gene identifiers were mapped to gene symbols using biomaRt [66]. Functional enrichment analyses for biological processes such as apoptosis, oxidative stress, cardiotoxicity, lipid metabolism, and mitochondrial pathways were performed using the enrichR package [67], leveraging curated pathway databases.

5. Conclusions

In this hiPSC-CM study, we found that CFZ induces extensive transcriptomic remodeling consistent with clinically observed cardiovascular toxicity, driven by mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and repression of contractile genes. Atorvastatin partially mitigates CFZ-induced metabolic disturbances—especially cholesterol-related pathways—but does not reverse structural gene downregulation. These findings underscore the need for multi-target cardioprotective strategies and support further evaluation of statins as a potential cardioprotective agent in reducing CFZ-associated cardiac risk.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms27031358/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T., D.W. and Y.G.; methodology, M.T.; validation, M.T.; formal analysis, M.T.; resources, F.Y., Y.Z., M.E.A., K.H.S., R.C.B. and K.A.B.; data curation, F.Y. and Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T. and Y.G.; writing—review and editing, D.W., Y.Z., M.G., K.A.B. and Y.G.; visualization, M.T.; supervision, Y.G.; funding acquisition, M.T., D.W. and Y.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported in part by the University of Florida College of Pharmacy Recurring Opportunity Seed Program for Education and Research (PROSPER) award. The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CFZCarfilzomib
CVAECardiovascular adverse event
hiPSC-CMsHuman induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes
ROSReactive oxygen species
MMMultiple myeloma

References

  1. Siegel, R.L.; Kratzer, T.B.; Giaquinto, A.N.; Sung, H.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2025, 75, 10–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rajkumar, S.V. Multiple myeloma: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am. J. Hematol. 2024, 99, 1802–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Waxman, A.J.; Clasen, S.; Hwang, W.T.; Garfall, A.; Vogl, D.T.; Carver, J.; O’Quinn, R.; Cohen, A.D.; Stadtmauer, E.A.; Ky, B.; et al. Carfilzomib-Associated Cardiovascular Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2018, 4, e174519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Georgiopoulos, G.; Makris, N.; Laina, A.; Theodorakakou, F.; Briasoulis, A.; Trougakos, I.P.; Dimopoulos, M.A.; Kastritis, E.; Stamatelopoulos, K. Cardiovascular Toxicity of Proteasome Inhibitors: Underlying Mechanisms and Management Strategies. JACC Cardio Oncol. 2023, 5, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Koutsoukis, A.; Ntalianis, A.; Repasos, E.; Kastritis, E.; Dimopoulos, M.A.; Paraskevaidis, I. Cardio-oncology: A Focus on Cardiotoxicity. Eur. Cardiol. 2018, 13, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Henry, M.L.; Niu, J.; Zhang, N.; Giordano, S.H.; Chavez-MacGregor, M. Cardiotoxicity and Cardiac Monitoring Among Chemotherapy-Treated Breast Cancer Patients. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2018, 11, 1084–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Istvan, E.S.; Deisenhofer, J. Structural mechanism for statin inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. Science 2001, 292, 1160–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cannon, C.P.; Braunwald, E.; McCabe, C.H.; Rader, D.J.; Rouleau, J.L.; Belder, R.; Joyal, S.V.; Hill, K.A.; Pfeffer, M.A.; Skene, A.M.; et al. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 1495–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sacks, F.M.; Pfeffer, M.A.; Moye, L.A.; Rouleau, J.L.; Rutherford, J.D.; Cole, T.G.; Brown, L.; Warnica, J.W.; Arnold, J.M.; Wun, C.C.; et al. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996, 335, 1001–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ridker, P.M.; Danielson, E.; Fonseca, F.A.; Genest, J.; Gotto, A.M.; Kastelein, J.J.; Koenig, W.; Libby, P.; Lorenzatti, A.J.; MacFadyen, J.G.; et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 2195–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kinlay, S.; Schwartz, G.G.; Olsson, A.G.; Rifai, N.; Leslie, S.J.; Sasiela, W.J.; Szarek, M.; Libby, P.; Ganz, P.; Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) Study Investigators. High-dose atorvastatin enhances the decline in inflammatory markers in patients with acute coronary syndromes in the MIRACL study. Circulation 2003, 108, 1560–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wassmann, S.; Laufs, U.; Bäumer, A.T.; Müller, K.; Ahlbory, K.; Linz, W.; Itter, G.; Rösen, R.; Böhm, M.; Nickenig, G. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors improve endothelial dysfunction in normocholesterolemic hypertension via reduced production of reactive oxygen species. Hypertension 2001, 37, 1450–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Oesterle, A.; Laufs, U.; Liao, J.K. Pleiotropic Effects of Statins on the Cardiovascular System. Circ. Res. 2017, 120, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Laufs, U.; Fata, V.L.; Liao, J.K. Inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA reductase blocks hypoxia-mediated down-regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 31725–31729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dehnavi, S.; Kiani, A.; Sadeghi, M.; Biregani, A.F.; Banach, M.; Atkin, S.L.; Jamialahmadi, T.; Sahebkar, A. Targeting AMPK by Statins: A Potential Therapeutic Approach. Drugs 2021, 81, 923–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Acar, Z.; Kale, A.; Turgut, M.; Demircan, S.; Durna, K.; Demir, S.; Meriç, M.; Ağaç, M.T. Efficiency of atorvastatin in the protection of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, 58, 988–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Neilan, T.G.; Quinaglia, T.; Onoue, T.; Mahmood, S.S.; Drobni, Z.D.; Gilman, H.K.; Smith, A.; Heemelaar, J.C.; Brahmbhatt, P.; Ho, J.S.; et al. Atorvastatin for Anthracycline-Associated Cardiac Dysfunction: The STOP-CA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2023, 330, 528–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hundley, W.G.; D’Agostino, R.; Crotts, T.; Craver, K.; Hackney, M.H.; Jordan, J.H.; Ky, B.; Wagner, L.I.; Herrington, D.M.; Yeboah, J.; et al. Statins and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Following Doxorubicin Treatment. NEJM Evid. 2022, 1, EVIDoa2200097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Efentakis, P.; Varela, A.; Lamprou, S.; Papanagnou, E.-D.; Chatzistefanou, M.; Christodoulou, A.; Davos, C.H.; Gavriatopoulou, M.; Trougakos, I.; Dimopoulos, M.A.; et al. Implications and hidden toxicity of cardiometabolic syndrome and early-stage heart failure in carfilzomib-induced cardiotoxicity. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2024, 181, 2964–2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Burridge, P.W.; Holmström, A.; Wu, J.C. Chemically Defined Culture and Cardiomyocyte Differentiation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Curr. Protoc. Human. Genet. 2015, 87, 21.3.1–21.3.15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Takahashi, K.; Tanabe, K.; Ohnuki, M.; Narita, M.; Ichisaka, T.; Tomoda, K.; Yamanaka, S. Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors. Cell 2007, 131, 861–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Burridge, P.W.; Li, Y.F.; Matsa, E.; Wu, H.; Ong, S.G.; Sharma, A.; Holmström, A.; Chang, A.C.; Coronado, M.J.; Ebert, A.D.; et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes recapitulate the predilection of breast cancer patients to doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 547–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kitani, T.; Ong, S.G.; Lam, C.K.; Rhee, J.W.; Zhang, J.Z.; Oikonomopoulos, A.; Ma, N.; Tian, L.; Lee, J.; Telli, M.L.; et al. Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Model of Trastuzumab-Induced Cardiac Dysfunction in Patients With Breast Cancer. Circulation 2019, 139, 2451–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sharma, A.; Burridge, P.W.; McKeithan, W.L.; Serrano, R.; Shukla, P.; Sayed, N.; Churko, J.M.; Kitani, T.; Wu, H.; Holmström, A.; et al. High-throughput screening of tyrosine kinase inhibitor cardiotoxicity with human induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaaf2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Forghani, P.; Rashid, A.; Sun, F.; Liu, R.; Li, D.; Lee, M.R.; Hwang, H.; Maxwell, J.T.; Mandawat, A.; Wu, R.; et al. Carfilzomib Treatment Causes Molecular and Functional Alterations of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e022247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pohl, C.; Dikic, I. Cellular quality control by the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy. Science 2019, 366, 818–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jayaweera, S.P.E.; Wanigasinghe Kanakanamge, S.P.; Rajalingam, D.; Silva, G.N. Carfilzomib: A Promising Proteasome Inhibitor for the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 740796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yee, A.J. The role of carfilzomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Ther. Adv. Hematol. 2021, 12, 20406207211019612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Willis, M.S.; Townley-Tilson, W.H.; Kang, E.Y.; Homeister, J.W.; Patterson, C. Sent to destroy: The ubiquitin proteasome system regulates cell signaling and protein quality control in cardiovascular development and disease. Circ. Res. 2010, 106, 463–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Haertle, L.; Buenache, N.; Cuesta Hernández, H.N.; Simicek, M.; Snaurova, R.; Rapado, I.; Martinez, N.; López-Muñoz, N.; Sánchez-Pina, J.M.; Munawar, U.; et al. Genetic Alterations in Members of the Proteasome 26S Subunit, AAA-ATPase (PSMC) Gene Family in the Light of Proteasome Inhibitor Resistance in Multiple Myeloma. Cancers 2023, 15, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kumar, A.V.; Mills, J.; Lapierre, L.R. Selective Autophagy Receptor p62/SQSTM1, a Pivotal Player in Stress and Aging. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 793328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tedesco, B.; Vendredy, L.; Timmerman, V.; Poletti, A. The chaperone-assisted selective autophagy complex dynamics and dysfunctions. Autophagy 2023, 19, 1619–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fang, X.; Bogomolovas, J.; Wu, T.; Zhang, W.; Liu, C.; Veevers, J.; Stroud, M.J.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, X.; Mu, Y.; et al. Loss-of-function mutations in co-chaperone BAG3 destabilize small HSPs and cause cardiomyopathy. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 3189–3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Knezevic, T.; Myers, V.D.; Gordon, J.; Tilley, D.G.; Sharp, T.E.; Wang, J.; Khalili, K.; Cheung, J.Y.; Feldman, A.M. BAG3: A new player in the heart failure paradigm. Heart Fail. Rev. 2015, 20, 423–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lakda, S.; Davies, R.H.; Hingorani, A.D.; Paliwal, N. A systematic review of GWAS on CMR imaging traits: Genetic insights into cardiovascular structure, function, and diseases. eBioMedicine 2025, 121, 105992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Patnaik, S.; Nathan, S.; Kar, B.; Gregoric, I.D.; Li, Y.-P. The Role of Extracellular Heat Shock Proteins in Cardiovascular Diseases. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Norton, N.; Li, D.; Rieder, M.J.; Siegfried, J.D.; Rampersaud, E.; Züchner, S.; Mangos, S.; Gonzalez-Quintana, J.; Wang, L.; McGee, S.; et al. Genome-wide studies of copy number variation and exome sequencing identify rare variants in BAG3 as a cause of dilated cardiomyopathy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 88, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Domínguez, F.; Cuenca, S.; Bilińska, Z.; Toro, R.; Villard, E.; Barriales-Villa, R.; Ochoa, J.P.; Asselbergs, F.; Sammani, A.; Franaszczyk, M.; et al. Dilated Cardiomyopathy Due to BLC2-Associated Athanogene 3 (BAG3) Mutations. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 72, 2471–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Franaszczyk, M.; Bilinska, Z.T.; Sobieszczańska-Małek, M.; Michalak, E.; Sleszycka, J.; Sioma, A.; Małek, Ł.; Kaczmarska, D.; Walczak, E.; Włodarski, P.; et al. The BAG3 gene variants in Polish patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: Four novel mutations and a genotype-phenotype correlation. J. Transl. Med. 2014, 12, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ortiz-Genga, M.F.; Cuenca, S.; Dal Ferro, M.; Zorio, E.; Salgado-Aranda, R.; Climent, V.; Padrón-Barthe, L.; Duro-Aguado, I.; Jiménez-Jáimez, J.; Hidalgo-Olivares, V.M.; et al. Truncating FLNC Mutations Are Associated With High-Risk Dilated and Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathies. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 68, 2440–2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brodehl, A.; Ferrier, R.A.; Hamilton, S.J.; Greenway, S.C.; Brundler, M.A.; Yu, W.; Gibson, W.T.; McKinnon, M.L.; McGillivray, B.; Alvarez, N.; et al. Mutations in FLNC are Associated with Familial Restrictive Cardiomyopathy. Hum. Mutat. 2016, 37, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kumar, V.; Kumar, P.; Chauhan, L.; Dwivedi, A.; Ramamurthy, H.R. Novel combination of FLNC (c.5707G>A; p. Glu1903Lys) and BAG3 (c.610G>A; p.Gly204Arg) genetic variant expressing restrictive cardiomyopathy phenotype in an adolescent girl. J. Genet. 2022, 101, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Oberwallner, B.; Brodarac, A.; Anić, P.; Šarić, T.; Wassilew, K.; Neef, K.; Choi, Y.-H.; Stamm, C. Human cardiac extracellular matrix supports myocardial lineage commitment of pluripotent stem cells. Eur. J. Cardio-Thorac. Surg. 2015, 47, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Danhof, S.; Schreder, M.; Rasche, L.; Strifler, S.; Einsele, H.; Knop, S. ‘Real-life’ experience of preapproval carfilzomib-based therapy in myeloma—analysis of cardiac toxicity and predisposing factors. Eur. J. Haematol. 2016, 97, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Holmberg, S.R.; Williams, A.J. Patterns of interaction between anthraquinone drugs and the calcium-release channel from cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum. Circ. Res. 1990, 67, 272–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chang, Y.-F.; Su, W.-C.; Su, C.-C.; Chung, M.-W.; Chang, J.; Li, Y.-Y.; Kao, Y.-J.; Chen, W.-P.; Daniels, M.J. High-Throughput Optical Controlling and Recording Calcium Signal in iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes for Toxicity Testing and Phenotypic Drug Screening. J. Vis. Exp. 2022, 181, e63175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jannuzzi, A.T.; Arslan, S.; Yilmaz, A.M.; Sari, G.; Beklen, H.; Méndez, L.; Fedorova, M.; Arga, K.Y.; Karademir Yilmaz, B.; Alpertunga, B. Higher proteotoxic stress rather than mitochondrial damage is involved in higher neurotoxicity of bortezomib compared to carfilzomib. Redox Biol. 2020, 32, 101502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jannuzzi, A.T.; Korkmaz, N.S.; Gunaydin Akyildiz, A.; Arslan Eseryel, S.; Karademir Yilmaz, B.; Alpertunga, B. Molecular Cardiotoxic Effects of Proteasome Inhibitors Carfilzomib and Ixazomib and Their Combination with Dexamethasone Involve Mitochondrial Dysregulation. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 2023, 23, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fiore, C.; Trézéguet, V.; Le Saux, A.; Roux, P.; Schwimmer, C.; Dianoux, A.C.; Noel, F.; Lauquin, G.J.M.; Brandolin, G.; Vignais, P.V. The mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier: Structural, physiological and pathological aspects. Biochimie 1998, 80, 137–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Zhuang, L.; Jia, K.; Chen, C.; Li, Z.; Zhao, J.; Hu, J.; Zhang, H.; Fan, Q.; Huang, C.; Xie, H.; et al. DYRK1B-STAT3 Drives Cardiac Hypertrophy and Heart Failure by Impairing Mitochondrial Bioenergetics. Circulation 2022, 145, 829–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Da Dalt, L.; Cabodevilla, A.G.; Goldberg, I.J.; Norata, G.D. Cardiac lipid metabolism, mitochondrial function, and heart failure. Cardiovasc. Res. 2023, 119, 1905–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hinton, A.; Claypool, S.M.; Neikirk, K.; Senoo, N.; Wanjalla, C.N.; Kirabo, A.; Williams, C.R. Mitochondrial Structure and Function in Human Heart Failure. Circ. Res. 2024, 135, 372–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chen, Q.; Zheng, A.; Xu, X.; Shi, Z.; Yang, M.; Sun, S.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Xiao, Q.; et al. Nrf3-Mediated Mitochondrial Superoxide Promotes Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis and Impairs Cardiac Functions by Suppressing Pitx2. Circulation 2025, 151, 1024–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Deavall, D.G.; Martin, E.A.; Horner, J.M.; Roberts, R. Drug-Induced Oxidative Stress and Toxicity. J. Toxicol. 2012, 2012, 645460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Angsutararux, P.; Luanpitpong, S.; Issaragrisil, S. Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity: Overview of the Roles of Oxidative Stress. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2015, 2015, 795602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chouchani, E.T.; Pell, V.R.; Gaude, E.; Aksentijević, D.; Sundier, S.Y.; Robb, E.L.; Logan, A.; Nadtochiy, S.M.; Ord, E.N.J.; Smith, A.C.; et al. Ischaemic accumulation of succinate controls reperfusion injury through mitochondrial ROS. Nature 2014, 515, 431–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rezvani, M. Apoptosis-related genes expressed in cardiovascular development and disease: An EST approach. Cardiovasc. Res. 2000, 45, 621–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhu, Q.; Luo, Y.; Wen, Y.; Wang, D.; Li, J.; Fan, Z. Semaglutide inhibits ischemia/reperfusion-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis through activating PKG/PKCε/ERK1/2 pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2023, 647, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Makin, G.; Hickman, J.A. Apoptosis and cancer chemotherapy. Cell Tissue Res. 2000, 301, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Yaomura, T.; Tsuboi, N.; Urahama, Y.; Hobo, A.; Sugimoto, K.; Miyoshi, J.U.N.; Matsuguchi, T.; Reiji, K.; Matsuo, S.; Yuzawa, Y. Serine/threonine kinase, Cot/Tpl2, regulates renal cell apoptosis in ischaemia/reperfusion injury. Nephrology 2008, 13, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Varet, H.; Brillet-Guéguen, L.; Coppée, J.Y.; Dillies, M.A. SARTools: A DESeq2- and EdgeR-Based R Pipeline for Comprehensive Differential Analysis of RNA-Seq Data. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Patro, R.; Duggal, G.; Love, M.I.; Irizarry, R.A.; Kingsford, C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 417–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Soneson, C.; Love, M.I.; Robinson, M.D. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: Transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Research 2016, 4, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ginestet, C. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A Stat. Soc. 2011, 174, 245–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Durinck, S.; Spellman, P.T.; Birney, E.; Huber, W. Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 1184–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chen, E.Y.; Tan, C.M.; Kou, Y.; Duan, Q.; Wang, Z.; Meirelles, G.V.; Clark, N.R.; Ma’ayan, A. Enrichr: Interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinform. 2013, 14, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 27 01358 g001
Figure 1. Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes in carfilzomib-treated hiPSC-CMs compared with controls. Volcano plot illustrating transcriptome-wide differential gene expression following 24-h treatment of hiPSC-CMs with 1 µM carfilzomib (CFZ). Each point represents a gene, plotted by log2 fold change (x-axis) and −log10(adjusted p-value) (y-axis). Significantly upregulated genes (log2FC ≥ 1 and FDR-adjusted p value < 0.05) are shown in red, while significantly downregulated genes (log2FC ≤ −1 and FDR-adjusted p value < 0.05) are shown in blue. Non-significant genes are visualized in gray. CFZ treatment induced substantial transcriptional remodeling, characterized by a large cluster of downregulated structural and sarcomeric genes, alongside marked upregulation of stress–response, proteostasis, and lipid-regulatory pathways. Threshold lines indicate log2FC = ±1 and FDR = 0.05. Differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq2.
Figure 1. Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes in carfilzomib-treated hiPSC-CMs compared with controls. Volcano plot illustrating transcriptome-wide differential gene expression following 24-h treatment of hiPSC-CMs with 1 µM carfilzomib (CFZ). Each point represents a gene, plotted by log2 fold change (x-axis) and −log10(adjusted p-value) (y-axis). Significantly upregulated genes (log2FC ≥ 1 and FDR-adjusted p value < 0.05) are shown in red, while significantly downregulated genes (log2FC ≤ −1 and FDR-adjusted p value < 0.05) are shown in blue. Non-significant genes are visualized in gray. CFZ treatment induced substantial transcriptional remodeling, characterized by a large cluster of downregulated structural and sarcomeric genes, alongside marked upregulation of stress–response, proteostasis, and lipid-regulatory pathways. Threshold lines indicate log2FC = ±1 and FDR = 0.05. Differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq2.
Ijms 27 01358 g001
Ijms 27 01358 g002
Figure 2. Heatmap showing the top 50 differentially expressed genes between carfilzomib-treated and control hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Rows represent genes, and columns represent samples, with the expression Z-score-scaled across samples. Carfilzomib-treated cells cluster distinctly from controls and show marked upregulation of proteasome- and stress–response genes (e.g., PSMC5, PSMD1, HSPA1A) and downregulation of metabolic and regulatory genes. Batch annotations indicate that clustering is driven primarily by treatment conditions.
Figure 2. Heatmap showing the top 50 differentially expressed genes between carfilzomib-treated and control hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Rows represent genes, and columns represent samples, with the expression Z-score-scaled across samples. Carfilzomib-treated cells cluster distinctly from controls and show marked upregulation of proteasome- and stress–response genes (e.g., PSMC5, PSMD1, HSPA1A) and downregulation of metabolic and regulatory genes. Batch annotations indicate that clustering is driven primarily by treatment conditions.
Ijms 27 01358 g002
Ijms 27 01358 g003
Figure 3. Heatmap of the top 50 differentially expressed genes comparing carfilzomib + atorvastatin treatment of hiPSC-CMs to carfilzomib alone. Samples cluster distinctly by treatment, indicating a clear transcriptional shift with atorvastatin co-treatment. Key lipid-regulatory genes (HMGCR, HMGCS1, INSIG1, ACAT2) show marked upregulation with atorvastatin, reflecting activation of cholesterol and metabolic pathways, whereas sarcomeric and contractile genes (ACTA1, MYH11, MYLPF) remain suppressed. This pattern suggests that atorvastatin primarily restores metabolic processes without fully rescuing carfilzomib-induced structural gene downregulation.
Figure 3. Heatmap of the top 50 differentially expressed genes comparing carfilzomib + atorvastatin treatment of hiPSC-CMs to carfilzomib alone. Samples cluster distinctly by treatment, indicating a clear transcriptional shift with atorvastatin co-treatment. Key lipid-regulatory genes (HMGCR, HMGCS1, INSIG1, ACAT2) show marked upregulation with atorvastatin, reflecting activation of cholesterol and metabolic pathways, whereas sarcomeric and contractile genes (ACTA1, MYH11, MYLPF) remain suppressed. This pattern suggests that atorvastatin primarily restores metabolic processes without fully rescuing carfilzomib-induced structural gene downregulation.
Ijms 27 01358 g003
Ijms 27 01358 g004
Figure 4. Volcano plot highlighting differentially expressed genes between carfilzomib + atorvastatin and carfilzomib-treated hiPSC-CMs compared with carfilzomib vs. controls.
Figure 4. Volcano plot highlighting differentially expressed genes between carfilzomib + atorvastatin and carfilzomib-treated hiPSC-CMs compared with carfilzomib vs. controls.
Ijms 27 01358 g004
Ijms 27 01358 g005
Figure 5. Expression of top genes treated with control, carfilzomib, or carfilzomib + atorvastatin. (a) ACAT2 gene; (b) ACTA1 gene. CFZ: carfilzomib. CFZ: carfilzomib. In box plots, the boxes contain the middle 50% of the data with the first quartile on the bottom and the third quartile on the top; the whiskers represent 1.5 times above or below the interquartile range. The dot denotes outlier, i.e., an observation that falls outside the range of the whiskers.
Figure 5. Expression of top genes treated with control, carfilzomib, or carfilzomib + atorvastatin. (a) ACAT2 gene; (b) ACTA1 gene. CFZ: carfilzomib. CFZ: carfilzomib. In box plots, the boxes contain the middle 50% of the data with the first quartile on the bottom and the third quartile on the top; the whiskers represent 1.5 times above or below the interquartile range. The dot denotes outlier, i.e., an observation that falls outside the range of the whiskers.
Ijms 27 01358 g005
Table 1. Differentially expressed genes reversed by atorvastatin in CFZ-treated hiPSC-CMs.
Table 1. Differentially expressed genes reversed by atorvastatin in CFZ-treated hiPSC-CMs.
Gene SymbolGene NameGene IDCFZ vs. ControlsCFZ + Atorvastatin vs. CFZ
Log2 Fold ChangepadjLog2 Fold Changepadj
ACAT2acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase 2ENSG00000120437−1.207.53 × 10−101.322.57 × 10−8
ACTA1actin alpha 1, skeletal muscleENSG000001436322.311.68 × 10−13−1.957.89 × 10−7
PAX2paired box 2ENSG00000075891−4.575.45 × 10−291.850.0047
CRHBPcorticotropin releasing hormone binding proteinENSG000001457081.711.79 × 10−7−1.390.0072
IFIT2interferon induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 2ENSG000001199221.207.15 × 10−5−1.230.011
PLA2G3phospholipase A2 group IIIENSG00000100078−1.971.06 × 10−81.420.012
VSX2visual system homeobox 2ENSG00000119614−4.691.23 × 10−102.940.017
PCDHA2protocadherin alpha 2ENSG00000204969−1.200.00361.550.018
PTGER2prostaglandin E receptor 2 (EP2)ENSG000001253841.020.0148−1.590.018
DERL3derlin 3ENSG00000099958−2.823.01 × 10−251.110.020
NDST4N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 4ENSG00000138653−6.474.64 × 10−143.500.020
TMEM178Btransmembrane protein 178BENSG00000261115−2.284.35 × 10−121.220.045
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tantawy, M.; Wang, D.; Gbadamosi, M.; Yu, F.; Zhang, Y.; Alomar, M.E.; Shain, K.H.; Baz, R.C.; Bruno, K.A.; Gong, Y. Atorvastatin Protects Against Deleterious Carfilzomib-Induced Transcriptional Changes in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 1358. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031358

AMA Style

Tantawy M, Wang D, Gbadamosi M, Yu F, Zhang Y, Alomar ME, Shain KH, Baz RC, Bruno KA, Gong Y. Atorvastatin Protects Against Deleterious Carfilzomib-Induced Transcriptional Changes in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(3):1358. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031358

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tantawy, Marwa, Danxin Wang, Mohammed Gbadamosi, Fahong Yu, Yanping Zhang, Mohammed E. Alomar, Kenneth H. Shain, Rachid C. Baz, Katelyn A. Bruno, and Yan Gong. 2026. "Atorvastatin Protects Against Deleterious Carfilzomib-Induced Transcriptional Changes in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 3: 1358. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031358

APA Style

Tantawy, M., Wang, D., Gbadamosi, M., Yu, F., Zhang, Y., Alomar, M. E., Shain, K. H., Baz, R. C., Bruno, K. A., & Gong, Y. (2026). Atorvastatin Protects Against Deleterious Carfilzomib-Induced Transcriptional Changes in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(3), 1358. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031358

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop