Circulating Naïve Regulatory T Cell Subset Displaying Increased STAT5 Phosphorylation During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Is Associated with Clinical Pregnancy and Progesterone Levels
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Study Population
2.2. Correlation Between All Tregs, Defined as CD25+ CD127lo/− Cells and Phenotypically Suppressive Subsets in Peripheral Blood from Women Undergoing IVF Procedures
2.3. Frequency of Circulating Naïve Treg Subset, Which Is Decreased in Women Who Did Not Conceive After COH, Is Associated with AMH Levels
2.4. Increased STAT5 Phosphorylation Levels in the nTreg Subset in Women Undergoing COH Are Associated with Lower AMH Levels
2.5. Unsupervised Cell Clustering Analyses Showed Decreased Naïve Treg Subset Lacking CXCR5 Expression in Women Who Did Not Conceive
2.6. CXCR5-Negative Naïve Treg Subset Is Associated with Clinical Pregnancy After COH, Regardless of the Woman’s Age, and Correlates with Progesterone Levels
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Study Population
4.2. Samples Collection and Hormonal Analysis
4.3. COH and FET Procedures
4.4. Preparation of EDTA-Anticulated/Whole Blood Samples for Analysis of Basal STAT5 Signaling/Phosphorylation
4.5. Combined Surface/Intracellular Staining for Analysis on a Flow Cytometer
4.6. Surface Immunophenotyping Using a 13-Colour Panel
4.7. Unsupervised Analysis by Flow Cytometry
4.8. Statistical Analysis
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cimadomo, D.; Rienzi, L.; Conforti, A.; Forman, E.; Canosa, S.; Innocenti, F.; Poli, M.; Hynes, J.; Gemmell, L.; Vaiarelli, A.; et al. Opening the black box: Why do euploid blastocysts fail to implant? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 2023, 29, 570–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rocca, C.L.; Carbone, E.; Moscato, G.; Longobardi, S. The immunology of pregnancy: Regulatory T cells control maternal immune tolerance toward the fetus. Immunol. Lett. 2014, 162, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakaguchi, S.; Yamaguchi, T.; Nomura, T.; Ono, M. Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell 2008, 133, 775–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ohl, K.; Tenbrock, J. Regulatory T cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. Eur. J. Immunol. 2015, 45, 344–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ruocco, M.G.; Chaouat, G.; Florez, L.; Bensussan, A.; Klatzmann, D. Regulatory T-Cells in Pregnancy: Historical Perspective, State of the Art, and Burning Questions. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Kwak-Kim, J.; Wang, W. Memory regulatory T cells in pregnancy. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1209706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foyle, K.L.; Chin, P.Y.; Merkwirth, C.; Wilson, J.; Hosking, S.L.; Green, E.S.; Chong, M.Y.; Zhang, B.; Moldenhauer, L.M.; Ferguson, G.D.; et al. IL-2 Complexed with Anti–IL-2 Antibody Expands the Maternal T-Regulatory Cell Pool and Alleviates Fetal Loss in Abortion-Prone Mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2024, 194, 2128–2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keller, C.C.; Eikmans, M.; van der Hoorn, M.L.P.; Lashley, L.E. Recurrent miscarriages and the association with regulatory T cells: A systematic review. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2020, 139, 103105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerin, L.R.; Prins, J.R.; Robertson, S.A. Regulatory T-cells and immune tolerance in pregnancy: A new target for infertility treatment? Hum. Reprod. Update 2009, 15, 517–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Astarita, J.L.; Dominguez, C.X.; Tan, C.; Guillen, J.; Pauli, M.L.; Labastida, R.; Valle, J.; Kleinschek, M.; Lyons, J.; Zarrin, A.A. Treg specialization and functions beyond immune suppression. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2023, 211, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, J.Z.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, X.; Wang, J.; Sun, H.; Hu, Y. An increase of Treg cells in the peripheral blood is associated with a better in vitro fertilization treatment outcome. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2012, 68, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.J.; Liu, F.J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.M.; Qu, Q.L.; Li, F.H.; Hao, C.F. Periodic elevation of regulatory T cells on the day of embryo transfer is associated with better in vitro fertilization outcome. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2017, 119, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schlossberger, V.; Schober, L.; Rehnitz, J.; Schaier, M.; Zeier, M.; Meuer, S.; Schmitt, E.; Toth, B.; Strowitzki, T.; Steinborn, A. The success of assisted reproduction technologies in relation to composition of the total regulatory T cell (Treg) pool and different Treg subsets. Hum. Reprod. 2013, 28, 3062–3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Arruvito, L.; Sanz, M.; Banham, A.H.; Fainboim, L. Regulatory T cells expand during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle and are modulated by estradiol. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 2572–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Evans, J.; Salamonsen, L.A. Too much of a good thing? Experimental evidence suggests prolonged exposure to hCG is detrimental to endometrial receptivity. Hum. Reprod. 2013, 28, 1610–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gavrić, K.; Kozar, N.; Reljić, M. Outcome of vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer performed on days 5–7 after urine LH detection. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2022, 44, 630–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Badell, M.; Kawwass, J. The impact of endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A review. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2022, 20, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lasrado, N.; Jia, T.; Massilamany, C.; Franco, R.; Illes, Z.; Reddy, J. Mechanisms of sex hormones in autoimmunity: Focus on EAE. Biol. Sex Differ. 2020, 11, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, C.; Liu, H.; Pang, B.; Wu, H.; Lin, X.; Zhen, Y.; Yi, H. Supraphysiological estradiol promotes human T follicular helper cell differentiation and favours humoural immunity during in vitro fertilization. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 6524–6534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baumgarten, S.C.; Wyatt, M.A.; Ainsworth, A.J.; Fedyshyn, B.; Van Oort, C.C.; Shenoy, C.C.; Enninga, E.A.L. Evaluation of the maternal systemic immune system during frozen euploid embryo transfer according to cycle outcome. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2024, 164, 104261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fonseca, V.R.; Agua-Doce, A.; Maceiras, A.R.; Pierson, W.; Ribeiro, F.; Romão, V.C.; Pires, A.R.; da Silva, S.L.; Fonseca, J.E.; Sousa, A.E.; et al. Human blood Tfr cells are indicators of ongoing humoral activity not fully licensed with suppressive function. Sci. Immunol. 2017, 2, eaan1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Robertson, S.A.; Care, A.S.; Moldenhauer, L.M. Regulatory T cells in embryo implantation and the immune response to pregnancy. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 128, 4224–4235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miyara, M.; Yoshioka, Y.; Kitoh, A.; Shima, T.; Wing, K.; Niwa, A.; Parizot, C.; Taflin, C.; Heike, T.; Valeyre, D.; et al. Functional Delineation and Differentiation Dynamics of Human CD4+ T Cells Expressing the FoxP3 Transcription Factor. Immunity 2009, 30, 899–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Silva, S.L.; Albuquerque, A.S.; Serra-Caetano, A.; Foxall, R.B.; Pires, A.R.; Matoso, P.; Fernandes, S.M.; Ferreira, J.; Cheynier, R.; Victorino, R.M.; et al. Human naïve regulatory T-cells feature high steady-state turnover and are maintained by IL-7. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 12163–12175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagner, M.I.; Jöst, M.; Spratte, J.; Schaier, M.; Mahnke, K.; Meuer, S.; Zeier, M.; Steinborn, A. The role of recent thymic emigrant-regulatory T-cell (RTE-Treg) differentiation during pregnancy. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2015, 93, 858–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kimmig, S.; Przybylski, G.K.; Schmidt, C.A.; Laurisch, K.; Möwes, B.; Radbruch, A.; Thiel, A. Two subsets of naive T helper cells with distinct T cell receptor excision circle content in human adult peripheral blood. J. Exp. Med. 2002, 195, 789–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, E.S.; Moldenhauer, L.M.; Groome, H.M.; Sharkey, D.J.; Chin, P.Y.; Care, A.S.; Robker, R.L.; McColl, S.R.; Robertson, S.A. Regulatory T cells are paramount effectors in progesterone regulation of embryo implantation and fetal growth. JCI Insight 2023, 8, e162995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kallikourdis, M.; Betz, A.G. Periodic Accumulation of Regulatory T Cells in the Uterus: Preparation for the Implantation of a Semi-Allogeneic Fetus? PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robertson, S.A. Seminal Fluid and the Generation of Regulatory T Cells for Embryo Implantation. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2013, 69, 315–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikolaeva, M.; Babayan, A.; Stepanova, E.; Arefieva, A.; Dontsova, T.; Smolnikova, V.; Sukhikh, G. The Link Between Seminal Cytokine Interleukin 18, Female Circulating Regulatory T Cells, and IVF/ICSI Success. Reprod. Sci. 2019, 26, 1034–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tilburgs, T.; Roelen, D.L.; van der Mast, B.J.; de Groot-Swings, G.M.; Kleijburg, C.; Scherjon, S.A.; Claas, F.H. Evidence for a Selective Migration of Fetus-Specific CD4+CD25bright Regulatory T Cells from the Peripheral Blood to the Decidua in Human Pregnancy. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 5737–5745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baecher-Allan, C.; Brown, J.A.; Freeman, G.J.; Hafler, D.A. CD4+ CD25high regulatory cells in human peripheral blood. J. Immunol. 2001, 167, 1245–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, W.; Putnam, A.L.; Xu-Yu, Z.; Szot, G.L.; Lee, M.R.; Zhu, S.; Gottlieb, P.A.; Kapranov, P.; Gingeras, T.R.; Fazekas de St Groth, B.; et al. CD127 expression inversely correlates with FoxP3 and suppressive function of human CD4+ T reg cells. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203, 1701–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muyayalo, K.P.; Song, S.; Liu, C.Y.; Gong, G. HLA-DR+ CD45RA− Tregs and CD28− Treg-like cells: Potential immunologic biomarkers for reproductive aging. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2023, 89, e13591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmud, S.A.; Manlove, L.S.; Farrar, M.A. Interleukin-2 and STAT5 in regulatory T cell development and function. JAK-STAT 2013, 2, e23154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cakmak, H.; Franciosi, F.; Zamah, A.M.; Cedars, M.I.; Conti, M. Dynamic secretion during meiotic reentry integrates the function of the oocyte and cumulus cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 2424–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baskind, N.E.; Orsi, N.M.; Sharma, V. Impact of exogenous gonadotropin stimulation on circulatory and follicular fluid cytokine profiles. Int. J. Reprod. Med. 2014, 2014, 218769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moldenhauer, L.M.; Foyle, K.L.; Wilson, J.J.; Wong, Y.Y.; Sharkey, D.J.; Green, E.S.; Barry, S.C.; Hull, M.L.; Robertson, S.A. A disrupted FOXP3 transcriptional signature underpins systemic regulatory T cell insufficiency in early pregnancy failure. iScience 2024, 27, 108994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Wang, H.; Ba, X.; Shen, P.; Lin, W.; Wang, Y.; Qin, K.; Huang, Y.; Tu, S. Follicular regulatory T cells: A novel target for immunotherapy? Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2020, 9, e1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wing, J.B.; Tekgüç, M.; Sakaguchi, S. Control of Germinal Center Responses by T-Follicular Regulatory Cells. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Severance, A.L.; Kinder, J.M.; Xin, L.; Burg, A.R.; Way, S.S. Maternal-fetal conflict averted by progesterone-induced FOXP3+ regulatory T cells. iScience 2022, 25, 104379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.H.; Ulrich, B.; Cho, J.; Park, J.; Kim, C.H. Progesterone promotes differentiation of human cord blood fetal T cells into T regulatory cells but suppresses their differentiation into Th17 cells. J. Immunol. 2011, 187, 1778–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okimura, H.; Kobayashi, R.; Mori, N.; Hattori, T.; Yamashita, Y.; Nishimura, F.; Furukawa, E.; Sugimoto, M.; Yoshida, K.; Nishino, K.; et al. Changes in the proportion of regulatory T cell subpopulations during menstrual cycle and early pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2022, 88, e13636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gardner, D.K.; Schoolcraft, W.B. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In Toward Reproductive Certainty: Fertility and Genetics Beyond 1999; Jansen, R., Mortimer, D., Eds.; Parthenon Publishing: London, UK, 1999; pp. 378–388. [Google Scholar]
- Kozar, N.; Gavrić Lovrec, V.; Kovačič, B.; Reljič, M. Predictive value of AMH in late reproductive age: A retrospective cohort study. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 21073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




| COH Cycles | FET Cycles | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Pregnant | Not-Pregnant | p | Pregnant | Not-Pregnant | p |
| Demographics and basal hormonal levels | ||||||
| Age, years | 33.0 [30.0–36.0] | 35.0 [31.0–36.0] | 0.489 | 32.0 [29.0–34.0] | 31.5 [30.0–33.0] | 0.856 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 22.0 [20.0–25.0] | 22.0 [21.0–25.0] | 0.623 | 23.0 [20.0–25.0] | 22.0 [20.0–23.0] | 0.402 |
| AMH, ng/mL | 2.86 [2.11–3.84] | 2.95 [1.78–4.25] | 0.755 | 4.68 [3.66–6.18] | 3.81 [2.32–5.15] | 0.077 |
| FSH, IU/L | 5.90 [4.55–7.35] | 6.00 [5.40–6.20] | 0.909 | 5.52 [4.90–6.60] | 5.80 [4.90–6.75] | 0.887 |
| LH, IU/L | 3.70 [2.45–4.85] | 4.20 [3.20–5.70] | 0.240 | 4.15 [3.00–5.10] | 5.15 [3.20–6.15] | 0.233 |
| Measurements on ET day | ||||||
| Endometrial thickness, mm | 10.0 [8.0–12.7] | 10.0 [9.0–12.0] | 0.724 | 8.5 [8.0–10.0] | 8.0 [7.0–9.0] | 0.021 |
| Estradiol (E2), ng/mL | 4.14 [2.79–5.41] | 3.16 [1.81–5.80] | 0.385 | 0.41 [0.32–0.53] | 0.45 [0.33–0.50] | 0.982 |
| Progesterone (P4), ng/mL | 346.8 [271.0–447.4] | 296.8 [121.4–420.6] | 0.106 | 38.1 [29.2–45.3] | 38.1 [24.6–58.0] | 0.864 |
| Pregnancy outcome, n (%) | ||||||
| Pregnant | 35 (70.0%) | 28 (60.9%) | ||||
| Not-pregnant | 15 (30.0%) | 18 (39.1%) | ||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Rakić, K.; Goropevšek, A.; Kozar, N.; Kovačič, B.; Čurič, S.; Zakelšek, A.; Homšak, E.; Reljič, M. Circulating Naïve Regulatory T Cell Subset Displaying Increased STAT5 Phosphorylation During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Is Associated with Clinical Pregnancy and Progesterone Levels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020922
Rakić K, Goropevšek A, Kozar N, Kovačič B, Čurič S, Zakelšek A, Homšak E, Reljič M. Circulating Naïve Regulatory T Cell Subset Displaying Increased STAT5 Phosphorylation During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Is Associated with Clinical Pregnancy and Progesterone Levels. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(2):922. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020922
Chicago/Turabian StyleRakić, Ksenija, Aleš Goropevšek, Nejc Kozar, Borut Kovačič, Sara Čurič, Andreja Zakelšek, Evgenija Homšak, and Milan Reljič. 2026. "Circulating Naïve Regulatory T Cell Subset Displaying Increased STAT5 Phosphorylation During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Is Associated with Clinical Pregnancy and Progesterone Levels" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 2: 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020922
APA StyleRakić, K., Goropevšek, A., Kozar, N., Kovačič, B., Čurič, S., Zakelšek, A., Homšak, E., & Reljič, M. (2026). Circulating Naïve Regulatory T Cell Subset Displaying Increased STAT5 Phosphorylation During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Is Associated with Clinical Pregnancy and Progesterone Levels. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(2), 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020922

