Next Article in Journal
The Importance of Mitochondrial Processes in the Maturation and Acquisition of Competences of Oocytes and Embryo Culture
Previous Article in Journal
Interaction Between Glucagon-like Peptide 1 and Its Analogs with Amyloid-β Peptide Affects Its Fibrillation and Cytotoxicity
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Review of the Contribution of Mitochondrial DNA Mutations and Dysfunction in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Supported by Secondary Database Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Cofilin(s) and Mitochondria: Function Beyond Actin Dynamics

1
Institute of Fundamental Medicine, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, 10/1 Minin Sq., 603005 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
2
Oslo University Hospital, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
3
Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center (MTC), Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 9, Q8C, 17165 Stockholm, Sweden
4
Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, Federal Research Center of Fundamental and Translational Medicine (IMBB FRC FTM), 2/12, Timakova Street, 630117 Novosibirsk, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(9), 4094; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094094
Submission received: 10 March 2025 / Revised: 18 April 2025 / Accepted: 24 April 2025 / Published: 25 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mitochondrial Function in Health and Diseases)

Abstract

ADF/cofilins form a family of small, widely expressed actin-binding proteins, regulating actin dynamics in various cellular and physiological processes in all eukaryotes, from yeasts to animals. Changes in the expression of the ADF/cofilin family proteins have been demonstrated under various pathological conditions. The well-established role of cofilin in migration, invasion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, apoptosis, resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, immune escape, and transcriptional dysregulation in malignant tumors is primarily attributed to its actin-modifying activity. Moreover, drugs targeting this function of cofilin have been developed for cancer treatment. However, its multilevel regulation, highly diverse effects across various pathological conditions, and conflicting data on the functional consequences of altered cofilin expression have prompted us to explore additional roles of cofilin—beyond actin modulation—particularly its involvement in lipid metabolism and mitochondrial homeostasis. Here, we review recent data on the expression of ADF/cofilin family proteins in various pathologies, account for the mutations and post-translational modifications of these proteins and their functional consequences, dwell on the role of K63-type ubiquitination of cofilin for its involvement in lipid metabolism and mitochondrial homeostasis, more specifically, a process of mitochondrial division or mitofission, point out conflicting data in cofilin research, and describe prospects for future studies of cofilin functions.

1. Introduction

Mitochondria are dynamic organelles, and permanent fission and fusion are essential to maintain their function in energy metabolism, calcium homeostasis, regulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and apoptosis [1]. The process of mitochondrial fission, its mechanics, and the factors involved in this process are increasingly coming into focus as a causative factor in oncogenic cell transformations and neurodegeneration. It is now becoming clear that mitochondrial fission can drive both pathological processes, i.e., promoting the survival of transformed, neoplastic cells, and ensure homeostasis of normal cells, providing energy and protection from oxidative stress. Whether it depends on specific cellular factors, their interactions, and/or the rate of this process requires further research. It is very important to characterize as many cellular factors involved in mitochondrial dynamics as possible, under different cellular conditions and stimuli. Cofilin is one such cellular factor [2,3,4,5].
The ubiquitous cellular protein cofilin attracted the interest of researchers almost 50 years ago [6]. Since then, several cofilin homologues were identified. ADF/cofilins are a family of small, widely expressed actin-binding proteins, regulating actin dynamics in various cellular and physiological processes in all eukaryotes, from yeasts to animals [7,8,9,10]. More precisely, cofilin depolymerizes filamentous actin (F-actin), producing monomeric, globular actin (G-actin). Mammals express all three members of the ADF/cofilin family: cofilin-1, cofilin-2, and ADF (actin depolymerizing factor, also called destrin) [7]. Non-muscle cells and tissues mostly express cofilin-1 and ADF, but their expression level may vary. Certain cell types express all three ADF/cofilins [11,12]. Cofilin-2 is found primarily in muscle [13], but also in brain and liver [14], oligodendrocytes, and keratinocytes [11,12]. While the three ADF/cofilin proteins share some overlapping functions, each performs unique functions in vivo. GWAS data analysis performed separately for cofilin-1, cofilin-2, and ADF, shows that all three proteins are associated with completely different phenotypes [15]. Mice deficient in cofilin-1 display early embryonic lethality and defects in actin-dependent morphogenic processes [16]. Such mutants are also lethal in yeast. ADF inactivation leads to corneal defects [16,17]. Although ADF and cofilin-1 share 70% of sequence identity and some overlapping functions, cofilin-1 is the major non-muscle isoform of ADF/cofilin in various cell types [11] (Figure 1).
In the molecular structure of cofilin, two actin-binding sites are present. One site binding both monomeric (G) and filamentous (F) actin, the second site interacts only with F-actin. Binding of cofilin to the actin filament causes a change in the orientation of actin subunits, which results in actin filament severing [8].
Cofilin-1 expression is regulated by microRNAs (miRNAs), as recently reviewed [22]. MiR-342 targets cofilin in human breast cancer cells, miR-429 targets cofilin in colon cancer cells, and miR-182-5p binds to cofilin mRNA in human bladder cancer cells. miR-134 was reported to suppress translation of cofilin [23]. Other miRNAs, such as miR-138 and miR-384, modulate the activity and expression of cofilin in ovarian cancer [24] and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by targeting LIMK1 kinase [25]. These miRNAs all act as inhibitors of cofilin activity either by directly targeting cofilin or its upstream effector, LIMK1 kinase.
Changes in the expression of the ADF/cofilin family proteins have been demonstrated under various pathological conditions. Mutations in the cofilin-2 gene can cause a variety of pathologies in different organisms. In humans, it was shown to cause myopathies [26]. In mice, its deficiency causes disruptive accumulation of F-actin in skeletal muscles [9] and abnormalities of the sarcomeric architecture. The cofilin-1 gene is overexpressed in metabolic syndrome in humans [27] and may be involved in neurodegeneration, as was demonstrated in Aplysia [28]. Cofilin activity was found to be changed in Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and Huntington’s diseases, spinal muscular atrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, prion diseases, and deletion-duplication syndromes [29]. The mRNA levels and expression of cofilin-1 was higher in most tumor tissues, as compared to normal in various types of cancer, such as non-small cell lung cancer, prostate cancer, vulvar squamous cell carcinoma, hepatoblastoma, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and bladder cancer [30,31,32]. At the same time, an increased methylation level of the cofilin-1 promoter regions was present in colon and rectal adenocarcinoma tissues, according to the TCGA database [33,34]. The overexpression of cofilin was shown to be correlated with proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and poor survival. However, in esophageal carcinoma, tumor size, infiltration depth, and patient age were not found to be associated with the expression level of cofilin. Instead, cofilin expression correlated with various degrees of tumor differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and clinical stages [35]. In prostate cancer, there was no association between the expression of cofilin-1 and other clinicopathological variables, such as age and pathological stage. Downregulation of the cofilin-1 gene expression increases the percentage of apoptotic cells in the T24 and RT4 bladder cancer cell lines [32]. The established role for cofilin in migration, invasion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), apoptosis, radiotherapy and chemotherapy resistance, immune escape, and transcriptional dysregulation of malignant tumors [22] is explained mainly by the cofilin-controlled mechanic activity of cells, like proliferation [36], cell migration [16,36,37,38,39,40], cell adhesion [41,42], and colony formation [31]. With this in mind, the cofilin gene might become a novel target in the strategy of diagnosis and even treatment of cancer, which warrants a careful study of all aspects of cofilin activity.
Details of derailed cofilin signaling, which leads to actin filament severing, depolymerization, nucleation, and bundling, are currently under active investigation. The initial understanding that cofilin depolymerizes actin fibers has now been refined. Cofilin exerts its highest actin severing activity when the cofilin:actin ratio is around 1:800 [43]. When the cofilin:actin ratio is higher than that, i.e., when more cofilin molecules are expressed, cofilin stabilizes F-actin, in which all subunits have undergone cofilin-induced rotation [43]. Cofilin can also induce nucleation of actin. Inactive, phosphorylated cofilin (p-cofilin) does not significantly bind to F-actin, and its actin severing or depolymerization activity is low [44].
Interestingly, although elevated cofilin expression is generally associated with increased cell motility [16,30,31,32,45], glioblastoma cells overproducing cofilin have decreased motility as compared to cells producing a moderate amount of cofilin [46]. The ADF/cofilin complex is accumulated in confluent cells, and this causes G1 phase arrest in the cell cycle progression in a variety of cell lines [47]. It is possible that this effect is mediated by other cofilin functions independent of its involvement in cytoskeleton reorganization [22] and may be modulated by its multiple post-translational modifications and multiple interacting cellular factors.

2. Post-Translational Modifications of Cofilin

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) play important roles in regulating cofilin-1 function by allowing local control for enhanced versatility. Thus, the same ubiquitous cytoplasmic protein cofilin is involved in a multitude of cellular processes, sensing local pH, oxidative stress, and others [48,49], being spatiotemporally orchestrated by numerous extra- and intra-cellular factors [22]. The multitude of PTMs of cofilin, such as phosphorylation [50], acetylation [51], ubiquitination [37], S-nitrosylation [52], ISG15-ylation, etc., and their combinations [44], in addition to the various expression levels of cofilin, is probably what allows this protein to transmit diverse signals to the cellular environment in very precise ways. Phosphorylation is a major type of PTM, and it is also the best studied. It regulates a variety of cellular signaling pathways in control of cell growth, division, differentiation, motility, and cell death [53].
The best studied PTM of cofilin is its phosphorylation. Cofilin is phosphorylated at the Serine 3 (S3) position by the LIM and TES kinases [54]. They can indirectly control filamentous (F-actin) stability through changing the level of cofilin phosphorylation, thereby decreasing the stability of active cofilin, as their overexpression in cells leads to F-actin accumulation [41,55]. Chronophin (CIN) and Slingshot (SSH) are specific cofilin phosphatases that dephosphorylate cofilin at the S3 position, thus protecting it from degradation [56]. The more generic serine/threonine phosphatases type 1 (PP1) and type 2A (PP2A) have also been reported to dephosphorylate cofilin [45]. Moreover, it was established that phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) can directly dephosphorylate and activate cofilin-1, leading to depolymerization of F-actin [57] (Figure 2).
Additionally, cofilin is phosphorylated at Threonine 63 (T63), Tyrosine 82 (Y82), and S108 [58]. Phosphorylation of Y68 and Y140 has also been demonstrated [59]. Phosphorylation at Y68 triggers degradation of cofilin via the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway and, consequently, counteracts the cellular functions of cofilin in reducing cellular F-actin contents and cell spreading. Another example of cross-regulated post-translational modification of cofilin is neddylation-stimulated phosphorylation [60]. Cross-regulation serves as a general mechanism of post-translational modification [61,62,63].
Like other cellular molecules which participate in inactivation of ROS (glutathione, lipoic acid, thioredoxin), cofilin contains several thiol (SH) groups which, under conditions of oxidative stress, mediate oxidation of cysteine (C) residues leading to the appearance of cofilin dimers due to formation of disulfide bridges, which can cross-link actin filaments. Stable actin-cofilin rods save cellular ATP, which is not used during the active polymerization process. This facilitates faster cell recovery from stress. The intermolecular disulfide bonds mediate formation of dimers, trimers, and oligomers of cofilin [64].
Figure 2. Regulation of cofilin activity. Cofilin is phosphorylated at the S3 position by the LIM and TES kinases [54]. Chronophin (CIN), Slingshot phosphatase (SSH) and tensin homolog (PTEN), and serine/threonine phosphatases type 1 (PP1) and type 2A (PP2A) dephosphorylate cofilin at the S3 position and activate cofilin, leading to depolymerization of filamentous actin (F-actin) [56]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) lead to oxidation of cofilin [48,49]. Phosphorylation of cofilin at Y68 triggers degradation of cofilin via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway [59]. Cofilin can be modified by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins (SUMO or NEDD8) [65].
Figure 2. Regulation of cofilin activity. Cofilin is phosphorylated at the S3 position by the LIM and TES kinases [54]. Chronophin (CIN), Slingshot phosphatase (SSH) and tensin homolog (PTEN), and serine/threonine phosphatases type 1 (PP1) and type 2A (PP2A) dephosphorylate cofilin at the S3 position and activate cofilin, leading to depolymerization of filamentous actin (F-actin) [56]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) lead to oxidation of cofilin [48,49]. Phosphorylation of cofilin at Y68 triggers degradation of cofilin via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway [59]. Cofilin can be modified by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins (SUMO or NEDD8) [65].
Ijms 26 04094 g002
Ubiquitin modifications of cofilin are not fully understood, especially in terms of specifying which specific lysine (K) in cofilin can covalently bind ubiquitin molecules in specific cells under specific conditions. Recently, a lysine-less mutant cofilin-125KR was created where all lysine was mutated [65].
It was shown that K112 of cofilin binds NEDD8, a ubiquitin-like molecule [60]. The lysines K45,53,144,164 [47] have been suggested as additional sites of cofilin ubiquitination [66]. Obviously, the proximity of the ubiquitination and phosphorylation sites suggests that modification may take place competitively. However, to resolve this question, a 3D structure will be required.
Thus, modifications of cofilin, especially the ubiquitination and the sequential coupled modifications (for example, phosphorylation and ubiquitination and vice versa), still await exploration at the molecular level to gain further insights in the dynamic regulation of cofilin activity.
Of the many PTMs of cofilin, the phosphorylation at S3 position is of key importance since it generates inactive phospho-cofilin, which is recognized as a degradation signal by the proteasome system.
The significance of PTMs of cofilin unrelated to its degradation still awaits further exploration. The K63 ubiquitin-branched modification of cofilin is one such PTM, probably mediated by the AIP4 ubiquitin ligase [38]. The K63 ubiquitinated proteins usually mediate the formation of inducible protein complexes that convey a variety of signals depending on the protein composition in the complexes [67,68,69].
The use of mass spectrometry-based proteomics has greatly accelerated the discovery of new PTMs and their sites of action on various proteins [70]. The most recent cofilin-1 modification reported describes N-terminal α-amino SUMOylation of cofilin-1, which is critical for its regulation of actin depolymerization [65].
However, cofilin-mediated actin dynamics can drive motility without post-translational regulation [8,65].

3. The Mitochondrial Localization of Cofilin

The localization of cofilin in mitochondria was reported several years ago, when its increased expression was noticed in connection with the Warburg effect in tumor cells [71]. In the following years, many papers have documented the translocation of cofilin to mitochondria upon treatments that initiate apoptotic or necrotic cell death, as recently reviewed [8].
Moreover, regions in cofilin were identified, which are critical for mitochondrial localization (in mammalian cells, specific amino acids at position 15–30 at the N-terminus and at position 106–166 at the C-terminus), which suggests that cofilin-1 indeed can bind to mitochondria directly [72]. It is therefore perplexing that cofilin is still not included in the Inventory of Mammalian Mitochondrial Proteins [73].
Since then, the functional consequences of cofilin involvement in mitochondrial dysfunction has become a focus of active studies as cofilin affects many aspects of mitochondrial homeostasis. Cofilin found in the mitochondrial fraction of cells was characterized as unphosphorylated [72,74], oxidized [48,72], or modified with the K63 branched ubiquitin chains [75]. In general, cofilin expression in pathological conditions has been associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, mediating cell death or cell division.
Most of the published data up to now on the association of cofilin with mitochondria attribute the cofilin-mediated effect on mitochondria and, in general, on cells, mainly, to actin reorganization. Cofilin controls mitochondrial traffic along the microtubules and actin [8]. Cofilin regulates mitochondrial morphology and function via redistribution of phospho-cofilin, cofilin, and its ubiquitinated proteoforms between the cytoplasm and mitochondria. This has been shown to correlate with changes in tissue respiration activity and mitophagy in mouse brain nerve cells [75].
Mitochondria are dynamic organelles, and permanent fission and fusion are essential to maintain their function in energy metabolism, calcium homeostasis, regulation of ROS, and apoptosis. Under oxidative stress, active and oxidized cofilin can be translocated into the mitochondria [76].
By regulating the actin cytoskeleton, cofilin induces mitochondrial fission, the first step in mitophagy. The molecular mechanism of cofilin-induced mitochondrial fission is being elucidated. First of all, cofilin itself is recruited to mitochondria in the mitochondrial fission process [2,3,4,5]. Cofilin recruits the dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1), a key factor in the mitochondrial fission machinery [77,78], to mitochondria. Cofilin is activated in this process by differentiation-inducing factor 1 (DIF-1) as it activates pyridoxal phosphatase (or CIN) via AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Cofilin can be activated by two other phosphatases: by PP1/PP2A via Src-Akt-mTOR and PTEN-PI3K pathways, and by SSH. Cofilin knockdown inhibits mitochondrial fission and decreases the protein levels of mitofusin 2 (MFN2), a crucial factor required for mitophagy [79]. Cofilin potentiates mitochondrial fission as well as PINK1/PARK2-dependent mitophagy [4,80]. Mitochondrial fission may activate the release of cytochrome c and caspase-9, resulting in apoptosis. Moreover, cofilin-1 was shown to participate directly in the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore and releasing cytochrome c, leading to apoptosis progression, independent of its role in mitochondrial dynamics [49]. Apoptosis can also be initiated by the cofilin/p53 pathway [76] (Figure 3).
Thus, it has now become clear that cofilin, in addition to its actin depolymerizing activity, also affects several metabolic functions. Interestingly, in response to environmental challenges, cofilin uses its actin depolymerizing activity and mitochondria-coupled activity independent from each other [81]. Cofilin localizes on the mitochondria and enters the mitochondria. The functional consequences of these processes are under active investigation. One of the most speculative issues discussed currently is how actin enters into mitochondria and the role it plays there [8]. Cofilin may serve to deliver G-actin into mitochondria.

4. Cofilin Mediated Mitochondrial Dysfunction During Neurodegeneration

Effects of deranged cofilin activity on mitochondria were reported in neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [28], and were characterized by neuronal degeneration and death, as well as by distorted synapse formation, oxidative stress, etc. [3,11,44,76].
This deranged cofilin activity mainly resulted in the generation of abnormal cytoplasmic structures. In neurons, these structures caused abnormal distribution of cellular organelles, such as mitochondria or early endosomes, loss of pre- and postsynaptic compartments, and therefore, reduced synaptic transmission and impaired neuronal plasticity [82]. A complex relationship between mitochondrial function (ATP synthesis, ROS level, autophagy) and cofilin ubiquitination was shown in the nerve cells [83].
In Parkinson’s disease (PD) cofilin-1 binds to α-synuclein and promotes its aggregation. These aggregates are observed at the onset and progression of PD. Cofilin facilitates the prion-like transmission of α-synuclein-fibrils into neurons [84]. Apart from general distortion of cytoskeletal organization by these aggregates, these structures cause mitochondrial dysfunction [85].
In Alzheimer’s disease, which is characterized by proteinopathies like rod shaped actin bundles (rods), amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide, and hyperphosphorylated tau, cofilin translocates to mitochondria inducing neurotoxicity. Activated cofilin (not phosphorylated at the S3 position) acts as a bridge between actin and microtubule dynamics by displacing tau from microtubules, thereby destabilizing tau-induced microtubule assembly, mis-sorting tau, and promoting tauopathy [86]. K63-dependent ubiquitination of cofilin was suggested to influence the level of cofilin, autophagy activation, actin dynamics, and bundle organization in the nerve cells [87].
Under AD pathological conditions, cellular ROS causes oxidation of cysteine residues of cofilin at positions 39, 80, 139, and 147 and of the methionine residue at position 115. At the same time, the four cysteines at these positions are important sites in cofilin for oxidation-mediated regulation of mitochondrial translocation [49]. Under these circumstances and concomitant with dephosphorylation of Serine 3 (S3), cofilin is prone to form cofilin-actin rods. ATP depletion is a major trigger for cofilin-actin rod formation at a stoichiometric ratio of 1:1 [88].
Cofilin-actin rods have also been suggested to possess protective properties under stress conditions [89]. They may protect against loss of the mitochondrial membrane potential and decline of cellular ATP level. Through rod formation, actin dynamics are alleviated, and energy can be used for other processes, enhancing the cellular resilience during stress exposure [90]. At later stages of the stress response, however, disrupted actin dynamics may counteract this positive energy-saving effect.
Mitochondrial translocation of cofilin was also observed in paradigms of apoptosis, as cofilin colocalization with mitochondria and subsequent release of cytochrome c is an early step in the cell death cascade [72,74]. It is the oxidized cofilin that is recruited to mitochondria in this case. The mechanism of cell death is described as oxidative cell death, more precisely, oxytosis and ferroptosis, at least in neurons [3]. ROS overproduction is induced by the formation of amyloid β (Aβ) plaques, which is promoted by the scaffolding protein RanBP9. This protein also delays clearance of cytosolic Ca2+ in a process involving the translocation of cofilin into mitochondria and oxidative mechanisms. This leads to neurodegenerative changes reminiscent of those seen in AD. RanBP9, cofilin, and Aβ mimic and potentiate each other in AD pathology [5].
The molecular mechanisms of cofilin-mediated distortion of mitochondrial function are beginning to unravel further. In neurons, cofilin depletion interferes with Drp1 accumulation at mitochondria [77] and cofilin-Drp1 interaction at the mitochondrial membrane and mitochondrial division [78]. At the same time, it was shown in mouse embryonic fibroblasts that maturation and activation of Drp1 oligomers at the mitochondrial surface, induced by cofilin depletion, increased mitochondrial fragmentation without impairing mitochondrial function in mouse embryonic fibroblasts [91]. To explain these discrepancies, the authors hypothesized that cofilin may control Drp1 accumulation in mitochondria and mitochondrial fission in an alternative manner during cell death and disease and during development. Dephosphorylation at S3 led to mitochondrial transactivation of cofilin and an interplay with Drp1 to enhance fragmentation of the organelle [77]. In yeast, it was demonstrated that cofilin mutants, deficient in actin binding, can enhance mitochondrial respiration, indicating that cofilin may also exert actin-independent effects on mitochondrial function [81].

5. Cofilin Mediated Mitochondrial Dysfunction During Tumorigenesis

ADF/cofilin family members are expressed at elevated levels in most tumor tissues and are thus regarded as oncogenes [22,92,93,94], as comprehensively reviewed recently [22]. Elevated levels of dephosphorylated cofilin were detected in different cancers.
The best studied mechanisms of cofilin involvement in tumorigenic processes are the cofilin-controlled turnover of cell surface receptors leading to increased oncogenic signaling; for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the cofilin-controlled actin turnover leading to increased migration of tumor cells has been best studied. In cofilin-knockout cells, it was demonstrated that the cell cycle was arrested in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, lamellipodia formation was impaired, and invasion and metastasis were reduced [95]. Another study found that the serum levels of cofilin immune complexes were significantly higher in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients than in healthy controls [96].
Cofilin localization at the mitochondria deserves more detailed investigation, especially its involvement in interaction with lipid droplets. C39, C80, C139, and C147 are the four important sites of cofilin for oxidation-mediated regulation of mitochondrial translocation [49,72] as well as its participation in the regulation of mitochondria-mediated apoptosis [97].
Mitochondrial homeostasis, controlled by mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial fission, and mitochondrial autophagy processes, is one of the areas of focus in the development of cofilin-targeted drugs to target cancer cells and induce tumor cell apoptosis [98].
The factors controlling cofilin and Drp1 activities, being the main mediators of these processes, are the focus for the development of anti-cancer drugs. As PTEN/PI3K [99] and Src/Akt/mTOR [36] signaling pathways control the PP1/PP2A phosphatases that act upon cofilin [45], inhibitors of PI3K and Akt activities are used to inactivate cofilin. As a result, dephosphorylated cofilin translocates to the outer membrane of the mitochondria where it binds directly to F-actin and depolymerizes it, producing G-actin. The G-actin bound to cofilin enters the mitochondria and causes cytochrome c leakage into the cytoplasm [77]. This leads to activation of apoptosis-inducing proteases, starting with caspase 9 [99].
The interaction of Drp1 and cofilin is a target for drug development as it mediates mitochondrial fission. Drugs have been developed to target the PINK1/PARK2 pathway, which regulates the Drp1 phosphorylation and the GDP/GTP status of this GTPase [100,101]. The PINK1/PARK2 pathway is the key pathway that regulates mitochondrial autophagy [80]. As cofilin is involved in mitochondrial autophagy induction [79], drugs affecting the PINK1/PARK2 pathway are investigated with the prospect to suppress mitophagy in tumor cells.

6. Cofilin and Lipid Metabolism

Cofilin, in addition to affecting the morphology and movement of mitochondria, can affect their interorganelle interactions. One of these is the interaction of mitochondria with lipid droplets (LDs), which has recently gained attention [102]; this is also suggested by our preliminary data. In general, evidence is accumulating about the involvement of cofilin in lipid metabolism. As has been shown in yeast, cofilin-regulated actin dynamics lead to disruption of lipid homeostasis, accumulation of lipid droplets, and development of necrosis along with disruption of cell wall integrity and vacuole fragmentation. Briefly, cofilin activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase Slt complex with a voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) located in the mitochondrial outer membrane, which is called Porin 1 in yeast. This also provides evidence for a link between actin regulation and mitochondrial signaling [103] (Figure 4).
The members of the perilipin (PLIN) family PLIN1 and PLIN5 were shown to be involved in mitochondria-LD interactions. MFN2 specifically interacts with PLIN1 to form a protein complex tethering mitochondria to LDs. The acyl-CoA synthetase FATP4 (ACSVL4) was identified as a novel mitochondrial interactor of PLIN5 for channeling fatty acids from LDs to mitochondria and subsequent oxidation [104,105]. Adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) was shown to liberate arachidonic acid from triacylglycerols (TAGs) stored in LDs, providing the substrate for prostaglandin (PG) production by the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-localized protein Pxt. Besides, arachidonic acid may be incorporated into phospholipids on LDs, ER, or other membranes [106]. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) was identified as an inhibitor of actin polymerization by activation of cofilin-1. This process is mediated by the protein phosphatase activity of PTEN [107].
Figure 4. Cofilin is involved in lipid metabolism via prostaglandin (PG)-dependent and independent pathways, mainly affecting actin dynamics. Cofilin may be involved in the direct interaction between lipid droplets (LDs) and mitochondria. Cofilin activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) with a voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) located in the mitochondrial outer membrane [103]. Adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) releases arachidonic acid from triacylglycerols stored in lipid droplets, the substrate for PG synthesis [106]. Scaffolding protein 14-3-3β serves as a link between seipin (ER protein) and cofilin-mediated cytoskeleton reorganization [108]. Membrane-bound dephosphorylated cofilin can be activated through the cleavage of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) by phospholipase C (PLC) [39].
Figure 4. Cofilin is involved in lipid metabolism via prostaglandin (PG)-dependent and independent pathways, mainly affecting actin dynamics. Cofilin may be involved in the direct interaction between lipid droplets (LDs) and mitochondria. Cofilin activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) with a voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) located in the mitochondrial outer membrane [103]. Adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) releases arachidonic acid from triacylglycerols stored in lipid droplets, the substrate for PG synthesis [106]. Scaffolding protein 14-3-3β serves as a link between seipin (ER protein) and cofilin-mediated cytoskeleton reorganization [108]. Membrane-bound dephosphorylated cofilin can be activated through the cleavage of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) by phospholipase C (PLC) [39].
Ijms 26 04094 g004
Cofilin is involved in lipid storage signaling during adipogenesis by binding the cytoskeletal 14-3-3β protein in a spatiotemporal manner and mediating its interaction with the ER-resident protein seipin [108].
In addition, membrane-bound dephosphorylated cofilin can be activated through the cleavage of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) by phospholipase C (PLC). As a result, active cofilin alters actin remodeling in the cytoplasm [39]. There is an intriguing possibility that ubiquitinated cofilin K63 may also affect lipid droplet levels by mediating their contacts with mitochondria through an as yet unknown cellular factor that ensures fatty acid entry into mitochondria [109]. In general, cofilin-1 depletion was reported to disrupt adipogenesis and lipid storage by inhibiting actin dynamics [110].
The involvement of lipid metabolism in tumor progression has been noted before and has been recently reviewed [111,112]. Moreover, the view that altered metabolism may be a driving force behind tumor initiation has now gained acceptance [112]. The tumor promoting role of altered lipid metabolism in cancers is now widely accepted as a favored means by which cancer cells may obtain energy, components for membranes, and a means of hijacking signaling molecules needed for proliferation, survival, invasion and metastasis, all of which may determine the response to cancer therapy.
Disturbed lipid metabolism in tumor cells is often characterized by the accumulation of lipid droplets. Lipid droplets are now recognized as cellular organelles and are the subject of current studies [113]. However, the functions of lipid droplets in cellular homeostasis and inflammatory signaling are far from being clear and require further research. This field of research is rapidly expanding and was already summarized in reviews over recent years [114,115,116].
The presence and function of LDs in the central nervous system has recently gained attention, especially in the context of neurodegeneration [117]. LDs are promising targets for novel investigations of neurological disease diagnosis and therapeutics. Further study on LDs and lipid metabolism will be essential in advancing the knowledge of cerebral metabolism, as well as the multifaceted etiologies of neurological disease. Therapeutic treatments could be targeted at restoring lipid balance, decreasing droplet levels, or improving other aspects of lipid metabolic pathways [118,119].
The dynamic contacts that tether lipid droplets to mitochondria are mediated through protein complexes, the identification of which is in urgent demand [102]. LDs not only bind organelles in a dynamic mode but also actively move [110] along actin networks and microtubules, apparently requiring the cofilin activity. This movement also requires tight regulation to be functional. The loss of proper contacts between mitochondria and lipid droplets is directly involved in tumorigenesis [113].
How contacts between lipid droplet and mitochondria affect the inflammatory response is an open question. Data obtained so far suggest that lipid droplets, as cell organelles and sources of lipid derivatives, can play opposite roles in inflammation, either promoting it or protecting against it, depending on cell type, cellular context, etc. [114,115]. Thus, it is a promising direction to study the involvement of cofilin in lipid metabolism and inflammatory processes.
The ubiquitous expression of cofilin and its involvement in many signaling pathways are reasons that viruses have highjacked cofilin signaling [38,120,121].
Deregulated expression and functions of cofilins are currently best studied in neurodegenerative pathologies and during tumorigenesis. However, a role of cofilin in metabolic disorders is now beginning to emerge, which is not surprising considering the control exercised by cofilin over mitochondrial traffic, mitochondrial division (fission), and mitochondrial membrane permeabilization.
Despite a great deal of knowledge about the functions of cofilin, some of its mechanisms of action remain a mystery and require further study. In this regard, it is relevant to elucidate the underlying mechanism of cofilin binding to mitochondria, and how cofilin may control contacts between mitochondria and other organelles.

7. Conclusions

Cofilin has emerged as a biomarker which is often targeted in different pathological conditions (Table 1). Specifically, its functional involvement in mitochondrial fission makes it interesting to investigate in connection with wound healing processes as it requires mitochondrial activity that is initiated by the fission processes.
All this motivates researchers to focus on the involvement of cofilin in metabolic processes occurring in different pathologies.
To elucidate the mechanics of altered metabolism in various pathologies, the proteome of the lipid droplet-mitochondria complex and, particularly, cofilin modified with K63 ubiquitin elongated chains deserves careful investigation in light of the proposed molecular mechanism linking lipid droplets and mitochondria [122]. An even more important task would be to reveal the dynamics of cofilin-mediated changes in mitochondrial metabolism.
The elucidation of inducible protein complexes on the mitochondrial membrane, at the interface between mitochondria and lipid droplets, and other preconditions for the formation of such complexes, can help create new drugs against malignant tumors.
Table 1. Functions of cofilin in the nerve and cancer cells.
Table 1. Functions of cofilin in the nerve and cancer cells.
FunctionNerve CellsCancer CellsReferences
Actin dynamics and cytoskeleton remodelingRegulates dendritic spine morphology via actin filament reorganization, synaptic plasticity, and cognitive functionsDrives cell migration and invasion via formation of lamellipodia/invadopodia[22,123,124,125,126]
Controls axon guidance and long-term potentiation (LTP)Promotes metastasis by regulating cytoskeleton remodeling and EMT
Mitochondrial dynamicsOxidized cofilin translocates to mitochondria, initiating the release of cytochrome c, caspase activation, and apoptosisRegulates cancer cell apoptosis depending on its activation state (phosphorylated/dephosphorylated)[22,49,72,91]
Mitochondrial fission mediated by both cofilin and Drp1Drp1-dependent mitochondrial fission is a target for drug development
Redox regulationServes as a cellular redox sensor. Oxidized cofilin forms rods with actin during ATP depletion (ischemia, Alzheimer’s disease)Cancer cells modulate ROS to maintain cofilin in active/inactive states for invasion[11,29]
Cofilin-actin rods disrupt axonal transport and mitochondrial functions, impair synaptic functionRedox homeostasis affects cofilin-driven migration and survival
Lipid signalingPIP2 binding at the plasma membraneMembrane PIP2 hydrolysis releases and activates cofilin[8,127]
PIP2 hydrolysis by PLC regulates cofilin activity and indirectly modulates synaptic vesicle traffickingSupports proliferation and survival
Lipid droplet dynamicsPotentially mediates LD-ER/mitochondria tethering via actin cytoskeletonPotentially modulates actin-LD interaction[106,112,118,128]
LDs contribute to the pathogenesis of neurodegenerationLDs promote cancer cell adaptation to oxidative stress and starvation
Regulatory pathwaysPhosphorylation/dephosphorylation (LIMK1/SSH etc.)Phosphorylation/dephosphorylation (PTEN/PI3K and Src/Akt/mTOR signaling etc.)[8,36,38,56]
UbiquitinationUbiquitination
PathologyNeurodegenerationCancer[22,42,44,76]
The involvement of cofilin in mitochondrial homeostasis, lipid metabolism, and the interaction between actin and microtubules of cytoskeleton, suggests that cofilin may play a role in the interactions of mitochondria with other organelles, such as lipid droplets. It would be interesting to investigate whether K63 ubiquitination of cofilin plays a functional role in this [11].
The functional effects of inducible cofilin translocations from the cytoplasm are gaining attention. It is now known that translocation of cofilin into mitochondria leads to a decrease in membrane potential [49]; if it translocates into the nucleus, it may affect DNA repair [129], and if it translocates to the cell surface, it may function as an autoantigen [130]. Thus, the role of cofilin in mediating mitochondrial contacts with lipid droplets deserves further investigation.
Deciphering how cofilin may control mitochondrial functions may reveal mechanisms that will help protect cells from unwanted signal rearrangement and metabolic changes and substantiate metabolically induced restoration of mitochondrial functions, i.e., through nutritional manipulation, used as an anti-cancer treatment.
The numerous controversies surrounding the involvement of cofilin in pathological processes have yet to be resolved. For example, cofilin is overexpressed in malignancies, but induction of cofilin activities and/or its increased expression is still suggested as a treatment of cancers or a means to inhibit migration of tumor cells [40]. However, cofilin expression in malignant tissues has also been reported as decreased [42]. Cells are arrested in G1 phase both when cofilin is knocked out and when its levels are elevated in confluent cells. These discrepancies may arise due to yet unknown mechanisms of cofilin expression regulation and/or use of different cell lines in the studies.
Recent advances in experimental techniques (mass spectrometry, microscopy, bioinformatics analysis) will certainly help to delineate the pleiotropic actions of cofilin, aid in identifying new post-translational modifications of cofilin, and further elucidate the role of known ones in the dynamic regulation of cellular homeostasis under stress. It will help to discover other proteins mediating mitochondria-lipid droplet contacts in addition to the very few that are known currently.
Drugs, peptides, or other substances targeting the critical amino acid residues of cofilin that control the interactions between mitochondria and lipid droplets might offer new potential therapeutic strategies for neurodegenerative disorders and tumors.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, L.M. and T.K.; writing—review and editing, L.M., T.K. and M.G.; editing the final version of the manuscript, T.K., L.M., M.G., I.M. and V.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was conducted within the framework of the program “Priority-2030” of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ADAlzheimer’s disease
ADFActin depolymerizing factor
AMPKAMP-activated protein kinase
ATGLAdipose triglyceride lipase
CINChronophin
CCysteine
DIF-1Differentiation-inducing factor 1
Drp1Dynamin-related protein 1
EGFREpidermal growth factor receptor
EMTEpithelial-mesenchymal transition
EREndoplasmic reticulum
F-actinFilamentous actin
G-actinGlobular actin
KLysine
LDLipid droplet
LIMKLIM kinase
LTPLong-term potentiation
MFN2Mitofusin 2
PDParkinson’s disease
PGProstaglandin
PI(4,5)P2Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate
PLCPhospholipase C
PLINPerilipin
PP1Serine/threonine phosphatase type 1
PP2ASerine/threonine phosphatase type 2A
PTENPhosphatase and tensin homolog
PTMPost-translational modification
ROSReactive oxygen species
SSerine
SSHSlingshot phosphatase
TThreonine
TESKTES kinase
VDACVoltage-dependent anion channel
YTyrosine

References

  1. Moura, J.P.; Oliveira, P.J.; Urbano, A.M. Mitochondria: An Overview of Their Origin, Genome, Architecture, and Dynamics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Mol. Basis Dis. 2025, 1871, 167803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tang, Q.; Ji, Q.; Tang, Y.; Chen, T.; Pan, G.; Hu, S.; Bao, Y.; Peng, W.; Yin, P. Mitochondrial Translocation of Cofilin-1 Promotes Apoptosis of Gastric Cancer BGC-823 Cells Induced by Ursolic Acid. Tumor Biol. 2014, 35, 2451–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hoffmann, L.; Rust, M.B.; Culmsee, C. Actin(g) on Mitochondria—A Role for Cofilin1 in Neuronal Cell Death Pathways. Biol. Chem. 2019, 400, 1089–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, G.-B.; Zhang, H.-W.; Fu, R.-Q.; Hu, X.-Y.; Liu, L.; Li, Y.-N.; Liu, Y.-X.; Liu, X.; Hu, J.-J.; Deng, Q.; et al. Mitochondrial Fission and Mitophagy Depend on Cofilin-Mediated Actin Depolymerization Activity at the Mitochondrial Fission Site. Oncogene 2018, 37, 1485–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Roh, S.; Woo, J.A.; Lakshmana, M.K.; Uhlar, C.; Ankala, V.; Boggess, T.; Liu, T.; Hong, Y.; Mook-Jung, I.; Kim, S.J.; et al. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Calcium Deregulation by the RanBP9-cofilin Pathway. FASEB J. 2013, 27, 4776–4789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nishida, E.; Maekawa, S.; Sakai, H. Cofilin, a Protein in Porcine Brain That Binds to Actin Filaments and Inhibits Their Interactions with Myosin and Tropomyosin. Biochemistry 1984, 23, 5307–5313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alsegiani, A.S.; Shah, Z. The Role of Cofilin in Age-Related Neuroinflammation. Neural Regen. Res. 2020, 15, 1451–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bamburg, J.R.; Minamide, L.S.; Wiggan, O.; Tahtamouni, L.H.; Kuhn, T.B. Cofilin and Actin Dynamics: Multiple Modes of Regulation and Their Impacts in Neuronal Development and Degeneration. Cells 2021, 10, 2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kremneva, E.; Makkonen, M.H.; Skwarek-Maruszewska, A.; Gateva, G.; Michelot, A.; Dominguez, R.; Lappalainen, P. Cofilin-2 Controls Actin Filament Length in Muscle Sarcomeres. Dev. Cell 2014, 31, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ono, S. Cofilin-Induced Structural Changes in Actin Filaments Stay Local. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 3349–3351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kanellos, G.; Frame, M.C. Cellular Functions of the ADF/Cofilin Family at a Glance. J. Cell Sci. 2016, 129, 3211–3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zuchero, J.B.; Fu, M.; Sloan, S.A.; Ibrahim, A.; Olson, A.; Zaremba, A.; Dugas, J.C.; Wienbar, S.; Caprariello, A.V.; Kantor, C.; et al. CNS Myelin Wrapping Is Driven by Actin Disassembly. Dev. Cell 2015, 34, 152–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ono, S.; Minami, N.; Abe, H.; Obinata, T. Characterization of a Novel Cofilin Isoform That Is Predominantly Expressed in Mammalian Skeletal Muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 15280–15286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bamburg, J.R. Proteins of the ADF/Cofilin Family: Essential Regulators of Actin Dynamics. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 1999, 15, 185–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sollis, E.; Mosaku, A.; Abid, A.; Buniello, A.; Cerezo, M.; Gil, L.; Groza, T.; Güneş, O.; Hall, P.; Hayhurst, J.; et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog: Knowledgebase and Deposition Resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D977–D985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bellenchi, G.C.; Gurniak, C.B.; Perlas, E.; Middei, S.; Ammassari-Teule, M.; Witke, W. N-Cofilin Is Associated with Neuronal Migration Disorders and Cell Cycle Control in the Cerebral Cortex. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 2347–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Moon, A.L.; Janmey, P.A.; Louie, K.A.; Drubin, D.G. Cofilin Is an Essential Component of the Yeast Cortical Cytoskeleton. J. Cell Biol. 1993, 120, 421–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. The UniProt Consortium; Bateman, A.; Martin, M.-J.; Orchard, S.; Magrane, M.; Adesina, A.; Ahmad, S.; Bowler-Barnett, E.H.; Bye-A-Jee, H.; Carpentier, D.; et al. UniProt: The Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, D609–D617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sievers, F.; Wilm, A.; Dineen, D.; Gibson, T.J.; Karplus, K.; Li, W.; Lopez, R.; McWilliam, H.; Remmert, M.; Söding, J.; et al. Fast, Scalable Generation of High-quality Protein Multiple Sequence Alignments Using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sievers, F.; Higgins, D.G. Clustal Omega for Making Accurate Alignments of Many Protein Sequences. Protein Sci. 2018, 27, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lappalainen, P. Essential Functions and Actin-Binding Surfaces of Yeast Cofilin Revealed by Systematic Mutagenesis. EMBO J. 1997, 16, 5520–5530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Wu, L.; Qi, Q.; Liu, Y.; Li, G.; Li, J.; Liu, H.; Wu, H. Cofilin: A Promising Protein Implicated in Cancer Metastasis and Apoptosis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 599065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Schratt, G.M.; Tuebing, F.; Nigh, E.A.; Kane, C.G.; Sabatini, M.E.; Kiebler, M.; Greenberg, M.E. A Brain-Specific microRNA Regulates Dendritic Spine Development. Nature 2006, 439, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, P.; Zeng, M.; Zhao, Y.; Fang, X. Upregulation of Limk1 Caused by microRNA-138 Loss Aggravates the Metastasis of Ovarian Cancer by Activation of Limk1/Cofilin Signaling. Oncol. Rep. 2014, 32, 2070–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yu, H.-X.; Wang, X.-L.; Zhang, L.-N.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, W. MicroRNA-384 Inhibits the Progression of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma through Blockade of the LIMK1/Cofilin Signaling Pathway by Binding to LIMK1. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 109, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ockeloen, C.W.; Gilhuis, H.J.; Pfundt, R.; Kamsteeg, E.J.; Agrawal, P.B.; Beggs, A.H.; Dara Hama-Amin, A.; Diekstra, A.; Knoers, N.V.A.M.; Lammens, M.; et al. Congenital Myopathy Caused by a Novel Missense Mutation in the CFL2 Gene. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2012, 22, 632–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tabur, S.; Oztuzcu, S.; Oguz, E.; Demiryürek, S.; Dagli, H.; Alasehirli, B.; Ozkaya, M.; Demiryürek, A.T. Evidence for Elevated (LIMK2 and CFL1) and Suppressed (ICAM1, EZR, MAP2K2, and NOS3) Gene Expressions in Metabolic Syndrome. Endocrine 2016, 53, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jang, D.-H.; Han, J.-H.; Lee, S.-H.; Lee, Y.-S.; Park, H.; Lee, S.-H.; Kim, H.; Kaang, B.-K. Cofilin Expression Induces Cofilin-Actin Rod Formation and Disrupts Synaptic Structure and Function in Aplysia Synapses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 16072–16077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bamburg, J.R.; Bernstein, B.W. Actin Dynamics and Cofilin-actin Rods in Alzheimer Disease. Cytoskeleton 2016, 73, 477–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lu, L.; Fu, N.; Luo, X.; Li, X.-Y.; Li, X.-P. Overexpression of Cofilin 1 in Prostate Cancer and the Corresponding Clinical Implications. Oncol. Lett. 2015, 9, 2757–2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, F.; Wu, D.; He, F.; Fu, H.; Xu, J.; Chen, J.; Zhang, S.; Wang, W. Study on the Significance of Cofilin 1 Overexpression in Human Bladder Cancer. Tumori J. 2017, 103, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, F.; Wu, D.; Fu, H.; He, F.; Xu, C.; Zhou, J.; Li, D.; Li, G.; Xu, J.; Wu, Q.; et al. Cofilin 1 Promotes Bladder Cancer and Is Regulated by TCF7L2. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 92043–92054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sousa-Squiavinato, A.C.M.; Vasconcelos, R.I.; Gehren, A.S.; Fernandes, P.V.; De Oliveira, I.M.; Boroni, M.; Morgado-Díaz, J.A. Cofilin-1, LIMK1 and SSH1 Are Differentially Expressed in Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer and According to Consensus Molecular Subtypes. Cancer Cell Int. 2021, 21, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sun, Y.; Ma, Y.; Zhao, T.; Li, M.; Mao, Y.; Yang, Z. Epigenetic Regulation Mechanisms of the Cofilin-1 Gene in the Development and Differentiation of Bovine Primary Myoblasts. Genes 2022, 13, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, Y.; Liao, R.; Li, H.; Liu, L.; Chen, X.; Chen, H. Expression of Cofilin-1 and Transgelin in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Med. Sci. Monit. Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res. 2015, 21, 2659–2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, J.; Yang, R.; Yang, H.; Chen, S.; Wang, L.; Li, M.; Yang, S.; Feng, Z.; Bi, J. NCAM Regulates the Proliferation, Apoptosis, Autophagy, EMT, and Migration of Human Melanoma Cells via the Src/Akt/mTOR/Cofilin Signaling Pathway. J. Cell. Biochem. 2020, 121, 1192–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhuang, H.; Li, Q.; Zhang, X.; Ma, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Yi, X.; Chen, R.; Han, F.; Zhang, N.; et al. Downregulation of Glycine Decarboxylase Enhanced Cofilin-Mediated Migration in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 120, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gainullin, M.R.; Zhukov, I.Y.; Zhou, X.; Mo, Y.; Astakhova, L.; Ernberg, I.; Matskova, L. Degradation of Cofilin Is Regulated by Cbl, AIP4 and Syk Resulting in Increased Migration of LMP2A Positive Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Samstag, Y.; John, I.; Wabnitz, G.H. Cofilin: A Redox Sensitive Mediator of Actin Dynamics during T-cell Activation and Migration. Immunol. Rev. 2013, 256, 30–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hou, M.; Liu, X.; Cao, J.; Chen, B. SEPT7 Overexpression Inhibits Glioma Cell Migration by Targeting the Actin Cytoskeleton Pathway. Oncol. Rep. 2016, 35, 2003–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Toshima, J.; Toshima, J.Y.; Amano, T.; Yang, N.; Narumiya, S.; Mizuno, K. Cofilin Phosphorylation by Protein Kinase Testicular Protein Kinase 1 and Its Role in Integrin-Mediated Actin Reorganization and Focal Adhesion Formation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2001, 12, 1131–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sousa-Squiavinato, A.C.M.; Rocha, M.R.; Barcellos-de-Souza, P.; De Souza, W.F.; Morgado-Diaz, J.A. Cofilin-1 Signaling Mediates Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Promoting Actin Cytoskeleton Reorganization and Cell-Cell Adhesion Regulation in Colorectal Cancer Cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Mol. Cell Res. 2019, 1866, 418–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Andrianantoandro, E.; Pollard, T.D. Mechanism of Actin Filament Turnover by Severing and Nucleation at Different Concentrations of ADF/Cofilin. Mol. Cell 2006, 24, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Namme, J.N.; Bepari, A.K.; Takebayashi, H. Cofilin Signaling in the CNS Physiology and Neurodegeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Oleinik, N.V.; Krupenko, N.I.; Krupenko, S.A. ALDH1L1 Inhibits Cell Motility via Dephosphorylation of Cofilin by PP1 and PP2A. Oncogene 2010, 29, 6233–6244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yap, C.T.; Simpson, T.I.; Pratt, T.; Price, D.J.; Maciver, S.K. The Motility of Glioblastoma Tumour Cells Is Modulated by Intracellular Cofilin Expression in a Concentration-Dependent Manner. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 2005, 60, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tsai, C.-H.; Chiu, S.-J.; Liu, C.-C.; Sheu, T.-J.; Hsieh, C.-H.; Keng, P.C.; Lee, Y.-J. Regulated Expression of Cofilin and the Consequent Regulation of P27kip1 Are Essential for G1 Phase Progression. Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 2365–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hoffmann, L.; Waclawczyk, M.S.; Tang, S.; Hanschmann, E.-M.; Gellert, M.; Rust, M.B.; Culmsee, C. Cofilin1 Oxidation Links Oxidative Distress to Mitochondrial Demise and Neuronal Cell Death. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Klamt, F.; Zdanov, S.; Levine, R.L.; Pariser, A.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Yu, L.-R.; Veenstra, T.D.; Shacter, E. Oxidant-Induced Apoptosis Is Mediated by Oxidation of the Actin-Regulatory Protein Cofilin. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11, 1241–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Casanova-Sepúlveda, G.; Boggon, T.J. Regulation and Signaling of the LIM Domain Kinases. Bioessays 2025, 47, e2400184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xu, J.; Guan, X.; Jia, X.; Li, H.; Chen, R.; Lu, Y. In-Depth Profiling and Quantification of the Lysine Acetylome in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with a Trapped Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometer. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2022, 21, 100255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhang, H.; Lechuga, T.J.; Tith, T.; Wang, W.; Wing, D.A.; Chen, D. S-Nitrosylation of Cofilin-1 Mediates Estradiol-17β-Stimulated Endothelial Cytoskeleton Remodeling. Mol. Endocrinol. 2015, 29, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Vallée, B.; Doudeau, M.; Godin, F.; Bénédetti, H. Characterization at the Molecular Level Using Robust Biochemical Approaches of a New Kinase Protein. J. Vis. Exp. JoVE 2019, 148, 59820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sarmiere, P.D.; Bamburg, J.R. Regulation of the Neuronal Actin Cytoskeleton by ADF/Cofilin. J. Neurobiol. 2004, 58, 103–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Huang, T.Y.; DerMardirossian, C.; Bokoch, G.M. Cofilin Phosphatases and Regulation of Actin Dynamics. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2006, 18, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mizuno, K. Signaling Mechanisms and Functional Roles of Cofilin Phosphorylation and Dephosphorylation. Cell. Signal. 2013, 25, 457–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Vitolo, M.I.; Boggs, A.E.; Whipple, R.A.; Yoon, J.R.; Thompson, K.; Matrone, M.A.; Cho, E.H.; Balzer, E.M.; Martin, S.S. Loss of PTEN Induces Microtentacles through PI3K-Independent Activation of Cofilin. Oncogene 2013, 32, 2200–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Prudent, R.; Demoncheaux, N.; Diemer, H.; Collin-Faure, V.; Kapur, R.; Paublant, F.; Lafanechère, L.; Cianférani, S.; Rabilloud, T. A Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Cofilin Phosphorylation in Myeloid Cells and Its Modulation Using the LIM Kinase Inhibitor Pyr1. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0208979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yoo, Y.; Ho, H.J.; Wang, C.; Guan, J.-L. Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Cofilin at Y68 by V-Src Leads to Its Degradation through Ubiquitin–Proteasome Pathway. Oncogene 2010, 29, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vogl, A.M.; Phu, L.; Becerra, R.; Giusti, S.A.; Verschueren, E.; Hinkle, T.B.; Bordenave, M.D.; Adrian, M.; Heidersbach, A.; Yankilevich, P.; et al. Global Site-Specific Neddylation Profiling Reveals That NEDDylated Cofilin Regulates Actin Dynamics. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2020, 27, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Beltrao, P.; Albanèse, V.; Kenner, L.R.; Swaney, D.L.; Burlingame, A.; Villén, J.; Lim, W.A.; Fraser, J.S.; Frydman, J.; Krogan, N.J. Systematic Functional Prioritization of Protein Posttranslational Modifications. Cell 2012, 150, 413–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hunter, T. The Age of Crosstalk: Phosphorylation, Ubiquitination, and Beyond. Mol. Cell 2007, 28, 730–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Akimov, V.; Rigbolt, K.T.G.; Nielsen, M.M.; Blagoev, B. Characterization of Ubiquitination Dependent Dynamics in Growth Factor Receptor Signaling by Quantitative Proteomics. Mol. Biosyst. 2011, 7, 3223–3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pfannstiel, J.; Cyrklaff, M.; Habermann, A.; Stoeva, S.; Griffiths, G.; Shoeman, R.; Faulstich, H. Human Cofilin Forms Oligomers Exhibiting Actin Bundling Activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 49476–49484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Weng, W.; Gu, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Deng, Q.; Zhou, J.; Cheng, J.; Zhu, M.X.; Feng, J.; Huang, O.; et al. N-Terminal α-Amino SUMOylation of Cofilin-1 Is Critical for Its Regulation of Actin Depolymerization. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wang, L.; Zhang, R. Towards Computational Models of Identifying Protein Ubiquitination Sites. Curr. Drug Targets 2019, 20, 565–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Buneeva, O.; Medvedev, A. Atypical Ubiquitination and Parkinson’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cao, L.; Liu, X.; Zheng, B.; Xing, C.; Liu, J. Role of K63-Linked Ubiquitination in Cancer. Cell Death Discov. 2022, 8, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Madiraju, C.; Novack, J.P.; Reed, J.C.; Matsuzawa, S. K63 Ubiquitination in Immune Signaling. Trends Immunol. 2022, 43, 148–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, H.; Weng, W.; Guo, R.; Zhou, J.; Xue, J.; Zhong, S.; Cheng, J.; Zhu, M.X.; Pan, S.-J.; Li, Y. Olig2 SUMOylation Protects against Genotoxic Damage Response by Antagonizing P53 Gene Targeting. Cell Death Differ. 2020, 27, 3146–3161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Unwin, R.D.; Craven, R.A.; Harnden, P.; Hanrahan, S.; Totty, N.; Knowles, M.; Eardley, I.; Selby, P.J.; Banks, R.E. Proteomic Changes in Renal Cancer and Co-ordinate Demonstration of Both the Glycolytic and Mitochondrial Aspects of the Warburg Effect. Proteomics 2003, 3, 1620–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chua, B.T.; Volbracht, C.; Tan, K.O.; Li, R.; Yu, V.C.; Li, P. Mitochondrial Translocation of Cofilin Is an Early Step in Apoptosis Induction. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003, 5, 1083–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rath, S.; Sharma, R.; Gupta, R.; Ast, T.; Chan, C.; Durham, T.J.; Goodman, R.P.; Grabarek, Z.; Haas, M.E.; Hung, W.H.W.; et al. MitoCarta3.0: An Updated Mitochondrial Proteome Now with Sub-Organelle Localization and Pathway Annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D1541–D1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rehklau, K.; Gurniak, C.B.; Conrad, M.; Friauf, E.; Ott, M.; Rust, M.B. ADF/Cofilin Proteins Translocate to Mitochondria during Apoptosis but Are Not Generally Required for Cell Death Signaling. Cell Death Differ. 2012, 19, 958–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kovaleva, T.F.; Maksimova, N.S.; Pchelin, P.V.; Pershin, V.I.; Tkachenko, N.M.; Gainullin, M.R.; Mukhina, I.V. A New Cofilin-Dependent Mechanism for the Regulation of Brain Mitochondria Biogenesis and Degradation. Sovrem. Tehnol. Med. 2020, 12, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lapeña-Luzón, T.; Rodríguez, L.R.; Beltran-Beltran, V.; Benetó, N.; Pallardó, F.V.; Gonzalez-Cabo, P. Cofilin and Neurodegeneration: New Functions for an Old but Gold Protein. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, G.; Zhou, J.; Budhraja, A.; Hu, X.; Chen, Y.; Cheng, Q.; Liu, L.; Zhou, T.; Li, P.; Liu, E.; et al. Mitochondrial Translocation and Interaction of Cofilin and Drp1 Are Required for Erucin-Induced Mitochondrial Fission and Apoptosis. Oncotarget 2014, 6, 1834–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hu, J.; Zhang, H.; Li, J.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Shen, L.; Shi, J.; Gao, N. ROCK1 Activation-Mediated Mitochondrial Translocation of Drp1 and Cofilin Are Required for Arnidiol-Induced Mitochondrial Fission and Apoptosis. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Inoue, T.; Miura, K.; Han, R.; Seto-Tetsuo, F.; Arioka, M.; Igawa, K.; Tomooka, K.; Sasaguri, T. Differentiation-Inducing Factor 1 Activates Cofilin through Pyridoxal Phosphatase and AMP-Activated Protein Kinase, Resulting in Mitochondrial Fission. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2023, 152, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Springer, W.; Kahle, P.J. Regulation of PINK1-Parkin-Mediated Mitophagy. Autophagy 2011, 7, 266–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kotiadis, V.N.; Leadsham, J.E.; Bastow, E.L.; Gheeraert, A.; Whybrew, J.M.; Bard, M.; Lappalainen, P.; Gourlay, C.W. Identification of New Surfaces of Cofilin That Link Mitochondrial Function to the Control of Multi-Drug Resistance. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 2288–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cichon, J.; Sun, C.; Chen, B.; Jiang, M.; Chen, X.A.; Sun, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, G. Cofilin Aggregation Blocks Intracellular Trafficking and Induces Synaptic Loss in Hippocampal Neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 3919–3929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kovaleva, T.F.; Maksimova, N.S.; Zhukov, I.Y.; Pershin, V.I.; Mukhina, I.V.; Gainullin, M.R. Cofilin: Molecular and Cellular Functions and Its Role in the Functioning of the Nervous System. Neurochem. J. 2019, 13, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yan, M.; Meng, L.; Dai, L.; Zhang, X.; Chen, G.; Zheng, Y.; Zha, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, Z. Cofilin 1 Promotes the Aggregation and Cell-to-Cell Transmission of α-Synuclein in Parkinson’s Disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 529, 1053–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ordonez, D.G.; Lee, M.K.; Feany, M.B. α-Synuclein Induces Mitochondrial Dysfunction through Spectrin and the Actin Cytoskeleton. Neuron 2018, 97, 108–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kang, D.E.; Woo, J.A. Cofilin, a Master Node Regulating Cytoskeletal Pathogenesis in Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2019, 72, S131–S144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Maximova, N.S.; Pershin, V.I.; Tkachenko, N.M.; Gainullin, M.; Mukhina, I.V.; Kovaleva, T.F. Study of the Effect of a Proteasome Inhibitor on Actin Cytoskeleton Remodeling in the Nerve Cells by Fluorescence Imaging. In Proceedings of the Saratov Fall Meeting 2019: Optical and Nano-Technologies for Biology and Medicine, Saratov, Russia, 23–27 September 2019; Tuchin, V.V., Genina, E.A., Eds.; SPIE: Saratov, Russia, 2020; pp. 86–94. [Google Scholar]
  88. Minamide, L.S.; Maiti, S.; Boyle, J.A.; Davis, R.C.; Coppinger, J.A.; Bao, Y.; Huang, T.Y.; Yates, J.; Bokoch, G.M.; Bamburg, J.R. Isolation and Characterization of Cytoplasmic Cofilin-Actin Rods. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 5450–5460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Munsie, L.N.; Desmond, C.R.; Truant, R. Cofilin Nuclear-Cytoplasmic Shuttling Affects Cofilin-Actin Rod Formation During Stress. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 3977–3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Bernstein, B.W.; Chen, H.; Boyle, J.A.; Bamburg, J.R. Formation of Actin-ADF/Cofilin Rods Transiently Retards Decline of Mitochondrial Potential and ATP in Stressed Neurons. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2006, 291, C828–C839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rehklau, K.; Hoffmann, L.; Gurniak, C.B.; Ott, M.; Witke, W.; Scorrano, L.; Culmsee, C.; Rust, M.B. Cofilin1-Dependent Actin Dynamics Control DRP1-Mediated Mitochondrial Fission. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e3063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Paraschiakos, T.; Li, J.; Scholz, J.; Han, S.-J.; Deckers, M.; Pogenberg, V.; Faix, J.; Windhorst, S. A High Affinity Sybody Blocks Cofilin-1 Binding to F-Actin in Vitro and in Cancer Cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2025, 236, 116866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Izdebska, M.; Zielińska, W.; Hałas-Wiśniewska, M.; Grzanka, A. Involvement of Actin and Actin-Binding Proteins in Carcinogenesis. Cells 2020, 9, 2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lv, S.; Chen, Z.; Mi, H.; Yu, X. Cofilin Acts as a Booster for Progression of Malignant Tumors Represented by Glioma. Cancer Manag. Res. 2022, 14, 3245–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wu, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Cui, S.; Wang, Y.; Wu, X. The Role of Cofilin-l in Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Marker of Carcinogenesis, Progression and Targeted Therapy. Oncol. Rep. 2016, 35, 2743–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Satoh, M.; Takano, S.; Sogawa, K.; Noda, K.; Yoshitomi, H.; Ishibashi, M.; Mogushi, K.; Takizawa, H.; Otsuka, M.; Shimizu, H.; et al. Immune-complex Level of Cofilin-1 in Sera Is Associated with Cancer Progression and Poor Prognosis in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Sci. 2017, 108, 795–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zdanov, S.; Klamt, F.; Shacter, E. Importance of Cofilin Oxidation for Oxidant-Induced Apoptosis. Cell Cycle 2010, 9, 1675–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sousa-Squiavinato, A.C.M.; Morgado-Díaz, J.A. A Glimpse into Cofilin-1 Role in Cancer Therapy: A Potential Target to Improve Clinical Outcomes? Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Rev. Cancer 2024, 1879, 189087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Li, G.; Cheng, Q.; Liu, L.; Zhou, T.; Shan, C.; Hu, X.; Zhou, J.; Liu, E.; Li, P.; Gao, N. Mitochondrial Translocation of Cofilin Is Required for Allyl Isothiocyanate-Mediated Cell Death via ROCK1/PTEN/PI3K Signaling Pathway. Cell Commun. Signal. 2013, 11, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Gao, Q.; Tian, R.; Han, H.; Slone, J.; Wang, C.; Ke, X.; Zhang, T.; Li, X.; He, Y.; Liao, P.; et al. PINK1-Mediated Drp1S616 Phosphorylation Modulates Synaptic Development and Plasticity via Promoting Mitochondrial Fission. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, M.; Luan, S.; Fan, X.; Wang, J.; Huang, J.; Gao, X.; Han, D. The Emerging Multifaceted Role of PINK1 in Cancer Biology. Cancer Sci. 2022, 113, 4037–4047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Fan, H.; Tan, Y. Lipid Droplet–Mitochondria Contacts in Health and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Davis, J.; Meyer, T.; Smolnig, M.; Smethurst, D.G.J.; Neuhaus, L.; Heyden, J.; Broeskamp, F.; Edrich, E.S.M.; Knittelfelder, O.; Kolb, D.; et al. A Dynamic Actin Cytoskeleton Is Required to Prevent Constitutive VDAC-Dependent MAPK Signalling and Aberrant Lipid Homeostasis. iScience 2023, 26, 107539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cui, L.; Liu, P. Two Types of Contact Between Lipid Droplets and Mitochondria. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 618322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Miner, G.E.; So, C.M.; Edwards, W.; Ragusa, J.V.; Wine, J.T.; Wong Gutierrez, D.; Airola, M.V.; Herring, L.E.; Coleman, R.A.; Klett, E.L.; et al. PLIN5 Interacts with FATP4 at Membrane Contact Sites to Promote Lipid Droplet-to-Mitochondria Fatty Acid Transport. Dev. Cell 2023, 58, 1250–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Giedt, M.S.; Thomalla, J.M.; White, R.P.; Johnson, M.R.; Lai, Z.W.; Tootle, T.L.; Welte, M.A. Adipose Triglyceride Lipase Promotes Prostaglandin-Dependent Actin Remodeling by Regulating Substrate Release from Lipid Droplets. Development 2023, 150, dev201516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Serezani, C.H.; Kane, S.; Medeiros, A.I.; Cornett, A.M.; Kim, S.-H.; Marques, M.M.; Lee, S.-P.; Lewis, C.; Bourdonnay, E.; Ballinger, M.N.; et al. PTEN Directly Activates the Actin Depolymerization Factor Cofilin-1 During PGE 2 -Mediated Inhibition of Phagocytosis of Fungi. Sci. Signal. 2012, 5, ra12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yang, W.; Thein, S.; Wang, X.; Bi, X.; Ericksen, R.E.; Xu, F.; Han, W. BSCL2/Seipin Regulates Adipogenesis through Actin Cytoskeleton Remodelling. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 23, 502–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wang, J.; Fang, N.; Xiong, J.; Du, Y.; Cao, Y.; Ji, W.-K. An ESCRT-Dependent Step in Fatty Acid Transfer from Lipid Droplets to Mitochondria through VPS13D−TSG101 Interactions. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Pfisterer, S.G.; Gateva, G.; Horvath, P.; Pirhonen, J.; Salo, V.T.; Karhinen, L.; Varjosalo, M.; Ryhänen, S.J.; Lappalainen, P.; Ikonen, E. Role for Formin-like 1-Dependent Acto-Myosin Assembly in Lipid Droplet Dynamics and Lipid Storage. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Cui, Y.; Man, S.; Tao, J.; Liu, Y.; Ma, L.; Guo, L.; Huang, L.; Liu, C.; Gao, W. The Lipid Droplet in Cancer: From Being a Tumor-supporting Hallmark to Clinical Therapy. Acta Physiol. 2024, 240, e14087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Safi, R.; Menéndez, P.; Pol, A. Lipid Droplets Provide Metabolic Flexibility for Cancer Progression. FEBS Lett. 2024, 598, 1301–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Petan, T. Lipid Droplets in Cancer. In Organelles in Disease; Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology; Pedersen, S.H.F., Barber, D.L., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 185, pp. 53–86. ISBN 978-3-031-22594-9. [Google Scholar]
  114. Jarc, E.; Petan, T. A Twist of FATe: Lipid Droplets and Inflammatory Lipid Mediators. Biochimie 2020, 169, 69–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Pereira-Dutra, F.S.; Bozza, P.T. Lipid Droplets Diversity and Functions in Inflammation and Immune Response. Expert Rev. Proteom. 2021, 18, 809–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Zadoorian, A.; Du, X.; Yang, H. Lipid Droplet Biogenesis and Functions in Health and Disease. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2023, 19, 443–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Welte, M.A. Expanding Roles for Lipid Droplets. Curr. Biol. 2015, 25, R470–R481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Farmer, B.C.; Walsh, A.E.; Kluemper, J.C.; Johnson, L.A. Lipid Droplets in Neurodegenerative Disorders. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Yin, F. Lipid Metabolism and Alzheimer’s Disease: Clinical Evidence, Mechanistic Link and Therapeutic Promise. FEBS J. 2023, 290, 1420–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Wang, Y.; Song, X.; Wang, Y.; Huang, L.; Luo, W.; Li, F.; Qin, S.; Wang, Y.; Xiao, J.; Wu, Y.; et al. Dysregulation of Cofilin-1 Activity—The Missing Link between Herpes Simplex Virus Type-1 Infection and Alzheimer’s Disease. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 46, 381–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Smith, L.K.; Babcock, I.W.; Minamide, L.S.; Shaw, A.E.; Bamburg, J.R.; Kuhn, T.B. Direct Interaction of HIV Gp120 with Neuronal CXCR4 and CCR5 Receptors Induces Cofilin-Actin Rod Pathology via a Cellular Prion Protein- and NOX-Dependent Mechanism. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Yang, L.; Ding, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, S.; Huo, C.; Wang, Y.; Yu, J.; Zhang, P.; Na, H.; Zhang, H.; et al. The Proteomics of Lipid Droplets: Structure, Dynamics, and Functions of the Organelle Conserved from Bacteria to Humans. J. Lipid Res. 2012, 53, 1245–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Rust, M.B. ADF/Cofilin: A Crucial Regulator of Synapse Physiology and Behavior. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2015, 72, 3521–3529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Sidani, M.; Wessels, D.; Mouneimne, G.; Ghosh, M.; Goswami, S.; Sarmiento, C.; Wang, W.; Kuhl, S.; El-Sibai, M.; Backer, J.M.; et al. Cofilin Determines the Migration Behavior and Turning Frequency of Metastatic Cancer Cells. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 179, 777–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Flynn, K.C.; Hellal, F.; Neukirchen, D.; Jacob, S.; Tahirovic, S.; Dupraz, S.; Stern, S.; Garvalov, B.K.; Gurniak, C.; Shaw, A.E.; et al. ADF/Cofilin-Mediated Actin Retrograde Flow Directs Neurite Formation in the Developing Brain. Neuron 2012, 76, 1091–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ben Zablah, Y.; Merovitch, N.; Jia, Z. The Role of ADF/Cofilin in Synaptic Physiology and Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 594998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Van Rheenen, J.; Song, X.; Van Roosmalen, W.; Cammer, M.; Chen, X.; DesMarais, V.; Yip, S.-C.; Backer, J.M.; Eddy, R.J.; Condeelis, J.S. EGF-Induced PIP2 Hydrolysis Releases and Activates Cofilin Locally in Carcinoma Cells. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 179, 1247–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Liao, P.-C.; Yang, E.J.; Borgman, T.; Boldogh, I.R.; Sing, C.N.; Swayne, T.C.; Pon, L.A. Touch and Go: Membrane Contact Sites Between Lipid Droplets and Other Organelles. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 852021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Chang, C.-Y.; Leu, J.-D.; Lee, Y.-J. The Actin Depolymerizing Factor (ADF)/Cofilin Signaling Pathway and DNA Damage Responses in Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 4095–4120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Cui, L.; Elzakra, N.; Xu, S.; Xiao, G.G.; Yang, Y.; Hu, S. Investigation of Three Potential Autoantibodies in Sjogren’s Syndrome and Associated MALT Lymphoma. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 30039–30049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structural alignment of the amino acid sequences of cofilin isoforms [18,19,20]. All three proteins from the cofilin family consist entirely of a single globular ADF homology domain (ADF-H), but several of their amino acids are different (labeled by a colon or a dot), sharing >70% sequence identity within an organism (labeled with asterisks). The nuclear localization signal is located at the N-terminus (at positions 30–40), followed by cysteines forming intramolecular bonds at positions C39–80, C139–147. These disulfide bonds serve as a mitochondrial targeting signal for cofilin. In the middle of the cofilin sequence and further on, closer to the C-terminus, there are nine residues scattered over a rather extended sequence (58 aa) responsible for binding filamentous actin (F-actin); four of them at this site, closer to the C-terminus, also bind globular actin (G-actin) [21].
Figure 1. Structural alignment of the amino acid sequences of cofilin isoforms [18,19,20]. All three proteins from the cofilin family consist entirely of a single globular ADF homology domain (ADF-H), but several of their amino acids are different (labeled by a colon or a dot), sharing >70% sequence identity within an organism (labeled with asterisks). The nuclear localization signal is located at the N-terminus (at positions 30–40), followed by cysteines forming intramolecular bonds at positions C39–80, C139–147. These disulfide bonds serve as a mitochondrial targeting signal for cofilin. In the middle of the cofilin sequence and further on, closer to the C-terminus, there are nine residues scattered over a rather extended sequence (58 aa) responsible for binding filamentous actin (F-actin); four of them at this site, closer to the C-terminus, also bind globular actin (G-actin) [21].
Ijms 26 04094 g001
Figure 3. Role of cofilin in mitochondria metabolism. LIM and TES kinases phosphorylate and inactivate cofilin [54]. Cofilin is activated by chronophin (CIN), Slingshot (SSH), and serine/threonine phosphatases type 1 (PP1) and type 2A (PP2A) [56]. Differentiation-inducing factor 1 (DIF-1) activates chronophin via AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) [79]. The K63 ubiquitin-branched modification of cofilin is likely mediated by the AIP4 ubiquitin ligase [38]. Under oxidative stress, active and oxidized cofilin can be translocated into the mitochondria [72,74]. Cofilin recruits the dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) [77,78] to mitochondria. Cofilin potentiates mitochondrial fission as well as PINK1/PARK2-dependent mitophagy [4]. Mitochondrial fission may lead to the release of cytochrome c and activation of caspase resulting in apoptosis. Apoptosis can also be initiated by the cofilin/p53 pathway [76].
Figure 3. Role of cofilin in mitochondria metabolism. LIM and TES kinases phosphorylate and inactivate cofilin [54]. Cofilin is activated by chronophin (CIN), Slingshot (SSH), and serine/threonine phosphatases type 1 (PP1) and type 2A (PP2A) [56]. Differentiation-inducing factor 1 (DIF-1) activates chronophin via AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) [79]. The K63 ubiquitin-branched modification of cofilin is likely mediated by the AIP4 ubiquitin ligase [38]. Under oxidative stress, active and oxidized cofilin can be translocated into the mitochondria [72,74]. Cofilin recruits the dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) [77,78] to mitochondria. Cofilin potentiates mitochondrial fission as well as PINK1/PARK2-dependent mitophagy [4]. Mitochondrial fission may lead to the release of cytochrome c and activation of caspase resulting in apoptosis. Apoptosis can also be initiated by the cofilin/p53 pathway [76].
Ijms 26 04094 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kovaleva, T.; Gainullin, M.; Mukhina, I.; Pershin, V.; Matskova, L. Cofilin(s) and Mitochondria: Function Beyond Actin Dynamics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 4094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094094

AMA Style

Kovaleva T, Gainullin M, Mukhina I, Pershin V, Matskova L. Cofilin(s) and Mitochondria: Function Beyond Actin Dynamics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(9):4094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094094

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kovaleva, Tatiana, Murat Gainullin, Irina Mukhina, Vladimir Pershin, and Liudmila Matskova. 2025. "Cofilin(s) and Mitochondria: Function Beyond Actin Dynamics" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 9: 4094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094094

APA Style

Kovaleva, T., Gainullin, M., Mukhina, I., Pershin, V., & Matskova, L. (2025). Cofilin(s) and Mitochondria: Function Beyond Actin Dynamics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(9), 4094. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094094

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop