Next Article in Journal
Using Integrated Network Pharmacology and Metabolomics to Reveal the Mechanisms of the Combined Intervention of Ligustrazine and Sinomenine in CCI-Induced Neuropathic Pain Rats
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Analysis of Tea FK506-Binding Proteins (FKBPs) Reveals That CsFKBP53 Enhances Cold-Stress Tolerance in Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana
Previous Article in Journal
Physiological and Transcriptional Responses of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) to Waterlogging Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
GAPDH Gene Family in Populus deltoides: Genome-Wide Identification, Structural Analysis, and Expression Analysis Under Drought Stress
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 26
Issue 6
10.3390/ijms26062606
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Phenotype Assessment and Putative Mechanisms of Ammonium Toxicity to Plants

by
Lin-Bei Xie
1,†,
Li-Na Sun
1,†,
Zhong-Wei Zhang
1,
Yang-Er Chen
2,
Ming Yuan
2 and
Shu Yuan
1,*
1
College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
2
College of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(6), 2606; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062606
Submission received: 16 January 2025 / Revised: 6 March 2025 / Accepted: 9 March 2025 / Published: 13 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Physiology and Molecular Nutrition)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3−) are the primary inorganic nitrogen (N) sources that exert influence on plant growth and development. Nevertheless, when NH4+ constitutes the sole or dominant N source, it can inhibit plant growth, a process also known as ammonium toxicity. Over multiple decades, researchers have shown increasing interest in the primary causes, mechanisms, and detoxification strategies of ammonium toxicity. Despite this progress, the current investigations into the mechanisms of ammonium toxicity remain equivocal. This review initially presents a comprehensive assessment of phenotypes induced by ammonium toxicity. Additionally, this review also recapitulates the existing mechanisms of ammonium toxicity, such as ion imbalance, disruption of the phytohormones homeostasis, ROS (reactive oxygen species) burst, energy expenditure, and rhizosphere acidification. We conclude that alterations in carbon–nitrogen (C-N) metabolism induced by high NH4+ may be one of the main reasons for ammonium toxicity and that SnRK1 (Sucrose non-fermenting 1-related kinase) might be involved in this process. The insights proffered in this review will facilitate the exploration of NH4+ tolerance mechanisms and the development of NH4+-tolerant crops in agricultural industries.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen (N) is a crucial macronutrient for plants and plays a significant role in influencing crop yields and characteristics [1]. It is a fundamental constituent of proteins, nucleic acids, chlorophyll, and enzymes [1,2]. The productivity of crops is greatly dependent on the application of nitrogen fertilizers [1,2]. The manufacturing and utilization of nitrogen fertilizers require substantial energy consumption, and an overabundance of nitrogen generates adverse effects on the environment [1,2]. Therefore, enhancing the N use efficiency (NUE) of plants is imperative for the advancement of sustainable agricultural industry [2].
In agriculture, both nitrate (NO3−)- and ammonium (NH4+)-based fertilizers are widely employed [2,3]. The absorption of NH4+ or NO3− by higher plants mainly occurs through AMTs (ammonium transporters) and NRTs (nitrate transporters), respectively. The uptake of NH4+ at high concentrations is achieved via the non electrogenic influx of NH3 across the plasma membrane (PM) by diffusion, with H+ remaining in the apoplast. NH3 is reprotonated to form NH4+ after entering the root cells [4,5]. The NO3− transmembrane transport is an active process promoted by the H+ potential derived from the action of PM H+-ATPase and requires energy, while the transport of NH4+ is a passive process and requires less energy [2,6,7]. Thus, when both NO3− and NH4+ are present at the same time, plants are more likely to absorb NH4+ because of the lower energy expenditure [8,9]. However, as the preferred N source for plants, an excessive amount of NH4+ as the main or sole N source will lead to retardation in plant growth [10]. The large-scale application of ammonium fertilizer over recent decades has led to serious acidification of large areas of farmland [11] and inhibited the soil nitrification rate [12]. It affects plant growth and nitrogen uptake [13,14], and causes the local disappearance of NH4+-sensitive species of trees, grasses, aquatic plants, and even fishes [15]. For example, a recent investigation demonstrated that NH4+ exposure inhibits the growth of lettuce, a widely consumed vegetable [16]. Additionally, with the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere likely to double by the end of this century due to its current rise from 322 ppm in 1969 to >400 ppm today [17], elevated CO2may lead to inhibition of NO3− uptake rather than NH4+ uptake [18].
Thus, it is of paramount significance to investigate the mechanisms of ammonium toxicity for the sustainable development of agriculture. Nevertheless, existing studies have only demonstrated that the causes of ammonium toxicity mainly encompass rhizosphere acidification, ion imbalance, reactive oxygen species(ROS) accumulation, excessive energy consumption, etc. [1,10,15]. However, none of these are the direct reasons for ammonium toxicity. A large number of proteins and genes are implicated therein, but how these molecules respond to high NH4+ stresses remains ambiguous. On the other hand, the main results of ammonium toxicity also remain elusive, as most previous studies have paid attention to root morphological change, but not growth inhibition and developmental arrest of the whole plant seedling. In this review, we mainly focus on the mechanisms and mitigation measures to ammonium toxicity and present a comprehensive assessment system for the symptoms of ammonium toxicity.

2. Comprehensive Evaluation System of Symptoms in Ammonium Toxicity

Researchers have indicated that the common symptoms of ammonium toxicity in most plant species include hindered plant growth, alterations in root structure, and leaf chlorosis [10,19,20,21,22,23]. Nevertheless, most studies on this subject remain limited in quantification to root morphological changes. Therefore, the development of a systematic approach for assessing ammonium toxicity is necessary.
High ammonium can induce significant alterations in root structure through intricate mechanisms. High NH4+ hinders phloem function and impedes primary root elongation due to inadequate sucrose distribution to the root growth zone [24]. However, no notable changes in lateral root development were detected in the above report, which may be attributed to the relatively low ammonium concentration (5 mM) used by the authors [24]. Root elongation is closely associated with the auxin (Indole Acetic Acid, IAA) level, as Di and co-authors identified that elevated NH4+ levels inhibited root elongation via an auxin transporter PIN5-mediated pathway [25,26]. Previous studies also indicated that ammonium toxicity can lead to modifications in lateral roots, reduced root/shoot ratios, and diminished fresh root weight [21,22,27,28]. When evaluating the effects of ammonium toxicity on plant roots, multiple indexes, such as primary root elongation, lateral root growth and development, root/shoot ratio, and fresh root weight, should all be taken into consideration.
Moreover, ammonium toxicity also impacts stem growth, as evidenced by Hachiya et al. [21], who observed a significant reduction in fresh stem weights of wild type plants under high ammonium stress. While ammonium-insensitive 2 (ami2)mutants exhibited higher stem fresh weights compared to the wild type. Similarly, Li et al. [29] demonstrated that ammonium toxicity inhibited stem growth.
In addition to the roots and stem, leaf development is also significantly hindered under ammonium stresses [10]. An early study showed that in Arabidopsis thaliana, ammonium stress was observed to trigger a chloroplast retrograde signal leading to leaf chlorosis, whereas activating abscisic acid (ABA) signaling could prevent leaves from chloroplast damage [30]. Furthermore, defects in Dolichol Phosphate Mannose Synthase 1 (DPMS1)also resulted in both leaf chlorosis and the inhibition of root elongation in the presence of excess NH4+ [31]. Besides Arabidopsis, ammonium stress can also cause chlorosis of barley leaves [32]. Similarly, recent studies also showed that leaf growth and development were inhibited under ammonium toxicity [21,29].
Furthermore, high ammonium stress has been shown to significantly reduce plant biomass and yield [21,22,33,34,35,36]. And high NH4+ induced late flowering [37]. And in some conditions, high ammonium can even lead to death of the whole plant seedling [4,10,38] (Table 1).
The multifaceted effects of ammonium toxicity on plant growth and development necessitate a thorough evaluation encompassing a wide array of indicators, rather than a narrow focus on roots. Here we suggest that both root phenotypes and shoot phenotypes should be considered when determining the severity of ammonium toxicity. Otherwise, we may identify some mutants that are only related to root development, but not to ammonium toxicity directly.

3. Putative Mechanisms of Ammonium Toxicity

3.1. Alleviation of Ammonium Toxicity in NO3−-Dependent Pathway

The ratio of NO3− and NH4+ plays a significant role in mitigating ammonium toxicity in various plant species, including maize, wheat, tomato, cucumber, and Arabidopsis [39,40,41,42]. This phenomenon, known as NO3−-dependent alleviation of NH4+ toxicity, demonstrates that a minimal presence of NO3−, as low as 0.1 mM, can effectively counteract the toxic effects of 5–10 mM NH4+ in plants [39,40,41,42]. Sun et al. [22] and Zheng et al. [34] found that increasing the concentration of NO3−negated the ammonium toxicity phenotypes of the slah3 (Slow anion channel-associated 1 homologue 3) mutant. These studies further elucidated that the exogenous application of NO3− or the efflux of NO3− by SLAH3 significantly alleviated the ammonium toxicity. The nitrate transporterNRT1.1 is also involved in this process. Under high ammonium stress, NRT1.1 facilitates the co-inward transport of NO3−/H+, leading to a reduction in extracellular H+ concentration and inhibition of rhizosphere acidification, thereby alleviating toxicity [36]. However, due to the low extracellular NO3− concentration, sustained inhibition of rhizosphere acidification is not achieved. Consequently, plants utilize SLAH3 to enhance the efflux of intracellular NO3− to maintain a high activity of NRT1.1-mediated co-inward transport of NO3−/H+. Through synergistic activation of the NRT1.1-SLAH3 complex, an efficient transmembrane cycling of NO3− is induced, effectively inhibiting rhizosphere acidification and mitigating ammonium toxicity [36].
NO3− can also mitigate ammonium toxicity by regulating rhizosphere and intracellular pH and enhancing ammonium assimilation in Brassica napus [43], suggesting that NO3− alleviates ammonium toxicity primarily through the inhibition of rhizosphere acidification [42,44,45].
In addition, NO3− may function as a signaling molecule to modulate the signal pathways of phytohormones. For instance, a low level (0.1 mM) of NO3− was sufficient to enhance IAA and cytokinin levels but decrease ABA levels under high-NH4+ (5 mM) conditions [40] (Table 2).
However, the key genes identified in the above studies maybe merely related to nitrate absorption/transport, rather than directly related to ammonium toxicity. The mechanisms of toxicity caused by a high ratio of ammonium to nitrate and by a solely ammonium treatment may be significantly different. We must pay attention to this discrimination in future research. In the following discussion, we only focus on toxic mechanisms of the sole ammonium treatment.

3.2. High NH4+-Induced ROS Accumulation

Ammonium toxicity, as an abiotic stress, can induce perturbations in ROS homeostasis in vivo [4]. Li et al. [30] observed a significant increase in hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation within chloroplasts under ammonium stress. And a recent study has demonstrated that high NH4+ leads to dysregulation of C-N metabolism, impairment of the photosynthetic electron transport chain, and excessive ROS accumulation in oilseed rape leaves [35]. Liu et al. [24] found that a solely ammonium treatment triggered the generation of ROS, resulting in callose deposition and disruption of phloem function. The application of exogenous ROS scavengers, such as dimethyl thiourea (DMTU) and 4-hydroxy-TEMPO (TEMPO), significantly attenuated the deposition of ROS [24]. However, using some other ROS scavengers, like ascorbic acid (ASA) and glutathione (GSH), may lead to stunted plant growth, possibly due to their potential to enhance hydroxyl radical production under Fe-rich conditions through the Fenton reactions [46]. A recent study demonstrated that vitamin B6 was involved in the regulation of ammonium toxicity [47]. High NH4+ triggered the accumulation of ROS in roots, particularly an enrichment of H2O2 in the extended and mature areas of root tips. The synthetic deficient mutant of vitamin B6exhibited heightened sensitivity to ammonium exposure. Moreover, supplementation with exogenous vitamin B6 or enhancement of endogenous synthetic vitamin B6 significantly bolstered root tolerance to ammonium [47]. VB6 is an antioxidant compound that can alleviate the toxic effects induced by high ammonium [47].
In addition to exogenous ROS scavengers, peroxidase also contributes to the elimination of excessive ROS induced by high ammonium [48]. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and catalase (CAT) also play pivotal roles in the antioxidant system [48].
However, the mechanism by which high ammonium activates an ROS signal remains inadequately elucidated. Significant enhancement of respiratory activity has been observed upon exposure to high NH4+ concentrations. Ammonium supplies the necessary energy and carbon skeletons essential for NH4+ transport and assimilation in the roots. Nevertheless, the modified respiratory activity in plants supplied with NH4+ may induce mitochondrial ROS production, thereby inducing another kind of oxidative stress [49] (Table 2).
Nitrate reductase, through the mitochondrial amidoxime reducing component (mARC), has been shown to produce the second messenger nitric oxide (NO) from nitrate, an important general regulator [50,51]. High levels of NH4+ induced NO accumulation and stimulated the accumulation of GSNOR (S-nitrosoglutathione reductase) in roots. GSNOR over-expression improved root tolerance to NH4+, while loss of GSNOR further induced NO accumulation, and enhanced root growth sensitivity to NH4+ [23].

3.3. High Ammonium-Induced Ion Imbalance

NH4+ can compete with and inhibit the uptake of essential cations, which are important for signal transduction and activities of a number of key enzymes [36]. A recent study revealed a new mechanism by which ammonium toxicity may induce iron (Fe)accumulation and itssubsequent adverse effects [25]. Under high ammonium stress, the expression of Low Phosphate Root 2 (LPR2), a gene encoding ferroxidase located in cell walls, was found to be up-regulated, which accelerated the transformation from Fe2+ to Fe3+, and ultimately led to the deposition of Fe3+ in the phloem. Fe3+accumulation resulted in an ROS burst, and was accompanied by callose accumulation, which inhibited the function of phloem and ultimately inhibited root elongation [25]. Coleto et al. [52] found that the double mutant of two MYB transcription factors, myb28and myb29, was very sensitive to ammonium stress. Under ammonium stress, the Fe content in stems was significantly lower than that in roots, while Fe in roots was higher than that in the wildtype, suggesting a defect of root-to-shoot Fe translocation in the mutant [52]. The above studies imply that high ammonium stress can disrupt Fe homeostasis in plants. However, this disruption is not directly caused by high NH4+, but rather by the impact of high ammonium stress on iron-related genes and enzymes, such as Fe transporters, LPR2, MYB28,and MYB29, as well as genes encoding proteins involved in Fe solubilization in the soil, like BGLU42 (β-Glucosidase42), F6H1 (Feruloyl-Coa6-Hydroxylase 1) and FRO2 (Ferric Reduction Oxidase 2) [52]. On the other hand, reducing Fe supply may alleviate ammonium toxicity. Liu et al. [24] discovered that primary root growth retardation could be significantly alleviated when the Fe supply concentration was less than 50 μM. Li et al. [16] also reported that the accumulation of iron in plant tissues is a crucial factor leading to decreased ammonium nitrogen use efficiency (AUE) under high ammonium conditions. Appropriately reducing the iron content in Arabidopsis and lettuce under high ammonium conditions was beneficial for enhancing growth, nitrogen content, and nitrogen use index (UI) during the vegetative growth stage. Inhibiting ammonium-induced LPR2 gene expression can reduce both iron accumulation and ammonium effluence, thereby improving plant AUE and growth under high ammonium conditions [16]. Coleto et al. [52] found that when myb28 and myb29 plants were grown with a higher Fe supply (200 μM vs 100 μM), the ammonium-sensitive phenotype was fully restored.
Besides Fe, high ammonium stress is also linked with other metal ions. Potassium (K+) is recognized as a vital macronutrient crucial for growth and development of plants [53]. Moreover, an adequate supply of K+ has been shown to improve the resilience of crop plants against a range of biotic and abiotic stresses, such as salt and drought [54]. Previous research has demonstrated that NH4+ reduces the primary influx of K+ from the external environment and suppresses its accumulation in plant tissues [55]. However, the detailed molecular mechanism by which high ammonium disturbs the homeostasis of K+ is not yet fully understood. Recent studies revealed that high NH4+ inhibited K+ absorption and induced NO (nitric oxide) accumulation through regulating SNO1 (Sensitive to Nitric Oxide 1)/SOS4 (Salt Overly Sensitive 4), thereby inhibiting primary root growth [23]. These findings suggest that high ammonium does not directly disturb K+ homeostasis, but rather affects the root development and inhibits K+ absorption consequently. On the other hand, an increase in K+ concentration can effectively alleviate ammonium toxicity [55,56,57,58,59,60,61]. Nevertheless, plant growth was impeded when the concentration of potassium reached 40mM, irrespective of the nitrogen source [55]. Balkos et al. [62] also showed that, in rice, increased K+ supply reduced futile NH4+ cycling at the plasma membrane, diminishing the excessive rates of both unidirectional influx and efflux. Similarly, this study also found that when the K+ concentration was too high (>40 mM), plant growth was hindered regardless of the N source [62]. The findings suggest that the maximal biomass is attained when NH4+ is used instead of NO3−, particularly in association with a moderately high supply of K+, indicating a preference of rice forNH4+ as a N source when K+ levels are optimized. Furthermore, decreases in root positive charges (Na+, K+, NH4+, Ca2+, Mg2+) and negative charges (Cl−, SO42− and PO43−) were observed at high NH4+ availability [63] (Table 2).

3.4. High NH4+ Induced Disruption of Phytohormone Homeostasis

Recent studies have demonstrated that high ammonium can lead to disruptions in phytohormone levels [1,49]. The inhibition of root growth by NH4+ is associated with a reduction in free IAA content in the roots of Arabidopsis [32]. Di et al. [64] observed significant differences in NH4+ tolerance between two rice cultivars, Kas (Kasalath) and Kos (Koshihikari), attributing this disparity to the high capacity for auxin biosynthesis and superior maintenance of auxin levels under high ammonium stress in the NH4+-tolerant cultivar, Kos. Additionally, Di et al. [25] demonstrated that high NH4+ induced the expression of WRKY46 in Arabidopsis, which subsequently led to the down-regulation of the primary root growth gene NUDX9(GDP-D-Mannose Pyrophosphohydrolase 9) and IAA-conjugating genes. This resulted in increased protein n-glycosylation in the root, leading to higher free IAA content and lower NH4+ efflux. However, when NH4+ stress was alleviated or removed, the accumulation of free IAA negatively regulated WRKY46 expression and positively regulated IAA-binding gene expression, thereby maintaining low levels of IAA content in the roots [25]. Furthermore, the high NH4+ disturbs the subcellular IAA homeostasis by upregulating the expression of PIN5 (PIN-formed 5). Knockout of PIN5 resulted in elevated cytoplastic IAA accumulation and reduced NH4+ efflux under highNH4+ stress [26]. Furthermore, the coordinated signaling activity of auxin and brassinosteroids (BRs) is critical for optimal plant growth and development. NH4+ as the sole N source repressed BR signaling and response, which in turn inhibited auxin response and transport [65].
Ethylene has a negative effect on NH4+ tolerance in Arabidopsis. In the wild type, NH4+ stress enhanced the expression of ACS (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase) and ACO (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase), the two key genes responsible for ethylene synthesis. After ethylene was perceived, the signal was transduced through the transcription factor EIN3. EIN3 regulated ROS accumulation, which led to oxidative stress in shoots under ammonium stress [29].
The involvement of ABA in ammonium toxicity has been noted. The plastid metalloprotease AMOS1/EGY1 (Ammonium Overly Sensitive1/Ethylene-dependent, Gravitropism-deficient, and Yellow-green-like protein1) were identified as key components in incorporating ABA into the ammonium signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Transcriptome analysis revealed that 90% of the genes activated by ammonium were regulated by AMOS1/EGY1 [30]. Furthermore, a majority of AMOS1/EGY1-dependent and ammonium-activated genes contain a core motif of ABA-responsive elements in their promoters. Therefore, it was proposed that ammonium triggers a chloroplast retrograde signal leading to leaf chlorosis, while the AMOS1/EGY1-dependent response engages the ABA signaling pathway to protect leaves from chloroplast damage [30]. These results indicate that, although phytohormones are involved in ammonium toxicity, the disruption of phytohormone homeostasis may be a result of oxidative stress, rather than a direct reason for ammonium stress.

3.5. Rhizosphere Acidification

The process of the uptake of NH4+ leads to the enhancement of the activity of AMT-coupled PM H+-ATPases to exude H+ from the root cells to maintain a balanced cellular charge and prevent cytoplast acidification [7,66,67]. Therefore, the transport of NH4+ induces acidification of the rhizosphere and transient alkalinization of the cytosol [22,36,49]. Accordingly, studies have demonstrated that elevating the pH of the medium through the utilization of buffer solutions (Morpholineethanesulfonic acid, MES) or employing H+-ATPase inhibitor N,N’-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide can effectively mitigate the symptoms of ammonium toxicity [22,36].
NH4+ is primarily assimilated into amino acids through the glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) pathways. The activity of GS can be stimulated by the increased K+, which enhances the assimilation in the root of cucumber [45] and rice [60] and thus alleviates ammonium toxicity. Researches demonstrated that α-ketoglutarate and 2-oxaloacetate derived from the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle play a crucial role in facilitating amino acid biosynthesis by providing components for the GS/GOGAT cycle to enhance NH4+ assimilation [10,68] (Figure 1). Additionally, studies have shown that supplementing with α-ketoglutarate can mitigate toxicity symptoms in tomato [69]. These findings suggest that enhancement of NH4+ assimilation may serve as a detoxification mechanism in plants. Hachiya et al. [21] also found that the excess assimilation process of ammonium in cells is the main cause of ammonium toxicity, which produces large quantities of H+, leading to acidification stress and plant growth inhibition. Moreover, the use of alkaline NH3 solution in the medium can reduce the acidification of cells and effectively alleviate the ammonium toxicity [21]. Similarly, Poucet et al. [70] also noted that the production of one Gln molecule through NH4+ assimilation mediated by GS results in the generation of two H+, leading to acidification. Furthermore, the symptoms of ammonium toxicity could be alleviated after the exogenous addition of L-methionine sulfoximine, an inhibitor of GS. Ma et al. [19] found that exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) treatment limited NH4+ accumulation in rice seedlings, reduced NH4+ toxicity symptoms and promoted plant growth via inhibiting increases in GS/NADH-GOGAT activity when the concentration of NH4+ was more than 3 mM. GABA addition also reduced rhizosphere acidification and alleviated the inhibition of Ca, Mg, Fe and Zn absorption caused by excessive NH4+ [19] (Table 2).
However, a recent study has shown that rhizosphere acidification may not be the main reason for ammonium toxicity. Weil et al. [71] found that application of calcium carbonate buffering improved growth in solutions containing ammonium, but the plants did not restore their growth and nutrient accumulation to the levels achieved with solely nitrate nutrition. Similar results have been reported by many other studies [21,22,34,36,72]. These findings suggest that the acidification of the rhizosphere may not be the sole factor contributing to ammonium toxicity.

3.6. High NH4+ Induces Imbalance in C-N Metabolism

In plant cells, the TCA cycle initiates with the combination of acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate to form citrate. The oxidation of citrate then produces reducing agents that facilitate adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis through oxidative phosphorylation. Excessive amounts of NH4+ promote the biosynthesis of free amino acids, a process in which a large amount of C skeletons derived from the TCA cycle are consumed, thus leading to a C-N imbalance (Figure 1), as observed in rice [49,73]. Du et al. [42] reported that the solely ammonium treatment significantly decreased root growth, protein content and the concentrations of most intermediates and the activity of enzymes from the TCA cycle. Additionally, the ammonium treatment increased the activities of invertase, sucrose synthase, and trehalose 6-phosphate synthase, which accelerated glycolysis. Then, substantial quantities of carbohydrates were remobilized from leaves to roots to sustain the energy expenditure needed for NH4+ assimilation [73]. An early study showed that, in the ammonium-sensitive crop barley, high levels of external ammonium induced a significant NH4+ efflux, and such futile NH4+ cycling placed an energy burden (carbohydrate consuming) on plant growth [74]. These results indicate that the imbalance in C-N metabolism caused by ammonium stress may be one of the main reasons for ammonium toxicity. Furthermore, the relationships between ion imbalance, disruption of phytohormone homeostasis, accumulation of ROS, and C-N metabolism imbalance warrant further investigations (Table 2).
Table 2. Effects of external and intrinsic regulators on plant response to high-NH4+ stress.
Table 2. Effects of external and intrinsic regulators on plant response to high-NH4+ stress.
RegulatorPathways/MechanismsSpeciesReference
NO3−Nitrate interacts with NRT1.1 to promote NO3− cycling across the membrane.Arabidopsis[22]
Nitrate inhibits acidification and promotes NH4+ assimilation.oilseed rape[43]
Nitrate modulates phytohormone pathways.wheat[40]
ROSROS scavengers reduce ROS deposition in the phloem.Arabidopsis[24]
VB6 reduces H2O2 accumulation upon ammonium toxicity.Arabidopsis[47]
Heme oxygenase OsSE5boosts the activities of ROS-scavenging enzymes.rice[48]
Ammonium toxicity inhibits photosystems and electron transfer, thus inducing ROS accumulation.oilseed rape[35]
IronThe cell wall-localized ferroxidase LPR2leads to Fe and callose deposition in the phloem.Arabidopsis[24]
High NH4+-induced iron accumulation triggers excess NH4+ efflux.Arabidopsis, lettuce[16]
The myb28,myb29 double mutant shows altered Fe accumulation and is highly hypersensitive to ammonium nutrition.Arabidopsis[52]
PotassiumK+ competitively inhibits the uptake and accumulation of NH4+ and optimizes NH4+ metabolism.rice[55]
K+ leads to higher carbon and energy availability and improves ion homeostasis.pea[63]
K+ supply reduces futile NH4+ cycling at the plasma membrane.rice[62]
Increase in K+ concentration can effectively alleviate ammonium toxicity.Arabidopsis, rice, barley[55,56,57,58,59,60,61]
PhytohormoneAmmonium toxicity decreases free IAA content in roots by inhibiting the transcription of auxin-biosynthesis genes.rice[64]
WRKY46promotes ammonium tolerance by repressing IAA-conjugating genes.Arabidopsis[25]
High NH4+ disturbs the subcellular IAA homeostasis by upregulating the expression of PIN5.Arabidopsis[26]
Ammonium toxicity repressing BR signaling, thus inhibiting auxin response and transport.Arabidopsis[65]
Plants over-expressing EIN3 (a key regulator of ethylene responses) are more sensitive to NH4+toxicity.Arabidopsis[29]
ABA signaling is required for the regulation of expression of NH4+-responsive genes.Arabidopsis[30]
Rhizosphere pH and the TCA cycleAMTs enhance the activity of AMT-coupled H+-ATPases to exude H+ from the root cells.Arabidopsis, rice[7,66,67]
Medium buffer MES and N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide elevate medium pH and inhibit H+-ATPase activity.Arabidopsis[22,36]
α-ketoglutarate and 2-oxaloacetate furnish components for the GS/GOGAT cycle to promote NH4+ assimilation, thus preventing NH4+ toxicity.Arabidopsis, Lycopersicon esculentum, Myriophyllum aquaticum[10,68,69]
Application of an alkaline solution efficiently alleviates ammonium toxicity with a concomitant reduction in shoot acidity.Arabidopsis[21]
GABA limits NH4+ accumulation, inhibits increases in GS/NADH-GOGAT activity and reduces rhizosphere acidification caused by excessive NH4+.rice[19]
Through synergistic activation of the NRT1.1-SLAH3 complex, efficient transmembrane cycling of NO3− is induced, effectively inhibiting rhizosphere acidification.Arabidopsis[36]
C-N metabolismUpon ammonium toxicity, increased activities of invertase, sucrose synthase, and trehalose 6-phosphate synthase leads to enhanced glycolysis and a significant energy expenditure.rice[73]
Insufficient sucrose distribution caused by impaired phloem function under high ammonium stress is the reason for the inhibition of root elongation.Arabidopsis[24]
SnRK1.1 works upstream of SLAH3 to regulate hypocotyl growth during skotomorphogenesis in response to changes in sugar levels induced by ammonium toxicity.Arabidopsis[22]
The SNF1-related protein kinase 1 SnRK1, a crucial regulator of C and energy metabolism in plants, is analogous to the yeast SNF1 (Sucrose Non-Fermenting-1) and mammalian AMPK (Adenosine-Monophosphate-activated Protein Kinase). This eukaryotic AMPK/SNF1/SnRK1 protein kinase is commonly composed of a heterotrimeric complex comprising an α catalytic subunit (including KIN10, KIN11 and KIN12 in Arabidopsis) and two regulatory subunits (β and γ) [37,75,76]. Besides a large number of reports in yeast and mammals, many researchers have also studied the role of SnRK1 in plants. As an important energy sensor in plants, SnRK1 participates in many physiological processes of plants, such as flowering [37,75,76] and stress responses [77]. However, the participation of SnRK1 in addressing ammonium toxicity has not been extensively documented. Sun et al. [22] demonstrated that under high ammonium stress, SnRK1.1 (KIN10) translocated from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, where it accumulated and relieved the inhibition of SLAH3. The resulting NO3− efflux through SLAH3 helps alleviate rhizosphere acidification stress induced by high NH4+ (Figure 2). Interestingly, sucrose also plays a role in ammonium toxicity, with 0.5% sucrose leading to the most significant recovery of an ammonium-stressed phenotype [22]. These researchers found that the SnRK1.1 over-expression lines did not exhibit phenotype differences compared to the wild type when grown without sucrose; the over-expression lines showed significantly shortened hypocotyls with 1% sucrose in Col-0 background, but not in slah3-4 background, indicating that SnRK1.1 works upstream of SLAH3 to regulate hypocotyl growth during skotomorphogenesis in response to sugar signals [22]. Liu et al. [24] also reported the relationship between sucrose and ammonium toxicity. They found that the insufficient sucrose supply caused by impaired phloem function under high ammonium stress inhibited root elongation. Insufficient sucrose supply not only directly leads to C depletion but also results in failure to meet the energy demands for futile transmembrane NH4+ cycling, also indicating the C-N metabolism imbalance in ammonium toxicity [78,79]. Furthermore, SnRK1 has been suggested to be a major energy sensor in plants and has been reported to be activated by carbon deficiency stresses [80]. During carbon deficiency or nitrate depletion, SnRK1.1 phosphorylates the transcription factor NLP7 (NIN-like protein 7) at Ser-125 and Ser-306 and promotes its degradation, therefore repressing nitrate-responsive gene expression and inhibiting plant growth [81] (Figure 2). However, the nlp7 mutant showed a similar sensitivity to ammonium toxicity, compared with the wild-type plants [82]. Thus, downstream of SnRK1.1, the key transcription factors responsive to ammonium toxicity still need to be identified.

3.7. High NH4+ May Change Rhizosphere Microorganisms

The benefits of plant growth-promotingmicroorganisms (PGPMs) as plant inoculants areinfluenced by a wide range of environmental factors, including ammonium [83]. The microbial consortia product (MCP) inoculants stimulated root and shoot growth and improved the acquisition of macronutrients only on a freshly collected field soil with high organic matter content, exclusively in combination with stabilized ammonium fertilization [83]. When the nitrate fertilization was replaced by ammonium, five out of seven investigated phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms (PSM) inoculants exerted beneficial effects on plant growth and reached up to 88% of the shoot biomass production of a control supplied with soluble triple-superphosphate [84]. Whether excessive ammonium may be toxic to some rhizosphere bacteria or reduce the metabolites from these bacteria that arenecessary for plants needs further investigations. So far, we cannot conclude that alternations in PGPMsis one of the reasons for ammonium toxicity. Nevertheless, this is an interesting future direction for research.

4. Perspectives on Future Studies

Ammonium is the preferred N source for most plants. Yet when utilized as the exclusive nitrogen source, it can impede growth. Despite numerous studies investigating the mechanisms of ammonium toxicity, the primary reasons for plant growth inhibition under high ammonium stress are still not fully understood. Excessive use of fertilizers has led to considerable environmental contamination and has negative consequences for the growth and yield of crops, vegetables, and fruits. Consequently, it is crucial to comprehend the precise mechanisms of ammonium toxicity and then devise efficient mitigation strategies to enhance agricultural productivity.
Signs of ammonium toxicity do not appear as a singular symptom but as complex phenotypes on the whole seedling. Nevertheless, numerous researchers focus exclusively on root elongation, disregarding alterations in stems, leaves, and total biomass. In this review, we suggest a comprehensive assessment to determine the severity of ammonium toxicity.
Some plants (e.g., Arabidopsis) show lethal phenotypes when grown under solely high-level ammonium conditions. Therefore, a large number of studies adopted treatments with high ratios of ammonium to nitrate. Nevertheless, the toxic mechanisms of a high ratio of ammonium to nitrate may be much different from those of a solely ammonium treatment. Here we suggest that genes/proteins identified from high-ratio conditions should be verified under the solely ammonium condition.
Ammonium stress commonly results in the accumulation of ROS [24,35,46,47,48,49], just as other environmental stresses do, and numerous studies have demonstrated that high ammonium causes disturbances in ion levels [16,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63] and phytohormones homeostasis [25,26,27,28,29,30,64,65]. However, the disruption of phytohormone homeostasis may be a result of oxidative stress, rather than a direct reason for ammonium stress. A recent review has suggested that ROS generation is a downstream response to C-N metabolism disruption induced by ammonium stress, indicating that the accumulation of ROS is not the primary cause of ammonium toxicity [49].
The uptake of ammonium by root cells and its subsequent assimilation lead to the generation of a significant quantity of H+, causing acidification of the rhizosphere and potential damage to cell walls and membranes. However, enhancing pH value by exogenous chemical treatments did not result in a complete recovery of plant growth under high ammonium conditions [21,22,34,36,71,72]. This implies that rhizosphere acidification may be only a contributing factor to ammonium toxicity. Early studies showed that the transmembrane transport of NH4+ consumes a lot of energy, while recent studies concluded that the process of NH4+ entering cells under high ammonium is a passive transport pathway, which does not consume energy, and NH4+ can be directly incorporated into C chains without a process of reduction [49,85]. Thus, excessive energy expenditure may also not be the main reason for ammonium toxicity.
Moreover, high ammonium was found to disrupt the TCA cycle and cause a C-N metabolic imbalance [42,86], which is thought to be one of the primary causes of ammonium toxicity [49]. However, it should be noted that, besides high NH4+, high NO3−also induces an imbalance in C-N metabolism, as nitrate is ultimately reduced to ammonium through nitrate reductase and nitrite reductase for its assimilation [37,76]. The ammonium toxicity cannot be only attributed to C-N metabolism imbalance. An application of extra C to regulate the C:N ratio cannot mitigate ammonium toxicity completely [86].
SnRK1 has been suggested to be involved in this regulatory pathway. Nevertheless, despite its significance as a crucial regulatory factor in plants under environmental stresses, there is limited literature indicating the role of SnRK1 in ammonium toxicity and the direct experimental evidence is still lacking. SnRK1 mainly includes two subunits, KIN10 and KIN11. They exhibit functional redundancy, and the transgenic Arabidopsis over-expressing KIN10 only showed a week phenotype under the ammonium stress [22]. On the other hand, the kin10, kin11 double mutant is lethal [87]. Therefore, conditional (chemical-inducible) knockdown mutants [88] may be constructed or VIGS (Virus Induced Gene Silencing) technology [87] may be adopted.
In future research, the identification of genes associated with ammonium toxicity, methods of comparative transcriptomics may be a focus. For example, a pair of plants preferring NH4+ and NO3−, respectively, may be selected. Both plants could then be subjected to a high ratio of ammonium to nitrate or a solely ammonium treatment. Then genes expressed more inNH4+-preferring plants than in NO3−-preferring plants could be identified by RNA-seq, and these genes may be associated with the tolerance to ammonium toxicity. Nevertheless, as mentioned above, genes/proteins identified from the high-ratio condition should be verified under the solely ammonium condition.

5. Conclusions

Most previous studies paid attention to root morphological change under high ammonium treatments, but not growth inhibition or development arrest of the whole plant seedling. In this review, we summarized multiple adverse effects of excessive ammonium on the whole plant seedling and suggest that both root phenotypes and shoot phenotypes should be considered when determining the severity of ammonium toxicity.
Previous studies demonstrated that ROS burst, rhizosphere acidification, disruption of metal ion homeostasis and phytohormone homeostasis are the key mechanisms of ammonium toxicity. However, through our analysis, we conclude that none of them are the direct reasons for ammonium toxicity. Furthermore, we point out that the mechanisms of toxicity caused by a high ratio of ammonium to nitrate and the solely ammonium treatment may be significantly different. C-N metabolism imbalance plays a more important role in high ammonium stress response, where the signaling role of SnRK1warrants further investigations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, L.-B.X., L.-N.S. and S.Y.; writing—review and editing, Z.-W.Z., Y.-E.C. and M.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program (2023ZHCG0073 and 2025YFHZ0111) and the Ya’an Science and Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship Seed Cultivation Program (ykz202310).

Conflicts of Interest

The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Xiao, C.; Fang, Y.; Wang, S.; He, K. The alleviation of ammonium toxicity in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2023, 65, 1362–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Xu, G.; Fan, X.; Miller, A. Plant nitrogen assimilation and use efficiency. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 153–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, H.; Hu, B.; Chu, C.C. Nitrogen use efficiency in crops: Lessons from Arabidopsis and rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2477–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ludewig, U.; Neuhäuser, B.; Dynowski, M. Molecular mechanisms of ammonium transport and accumulation in plants. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 2301–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Situmorang, A. Elucidation of the Ammonium Major Facilitator (AMF) Family in Plants. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. Xu, F.; Yu, F. Sensing and regulation of plant extracellular pH. Trends Plant Sci. 2023, 28, 1422–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hachiya, T.; Sakakibara, H. Interactions between nitrate and ammonium in their uptake, allocation, assimilation, and in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2501–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Giordano, M.; Goodman, C.A.; Huang, F.; Raven, J.A.; Ruan, Z. A mechanistic study of the influence of nitrogen and energy availability on the NH4+ sensitivity of nitrogen assimilation in Synechococcus. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 5596–5611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kaviraj, M.; Kumar, U.; Snigdha, A.; Chatterjee, S. Nitrate reduction to ammonium: A phylogenetic, physiological, and genetic aspects in Prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Arch. Microbiol. 2024, 206, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Esteban, R.; Ariz, I.; Cruz, C.; Moran, J.F. Review: Mechanisms of ammonium toxicity and the quest for tolerance. Plant Sci. 2016, 248, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guo, J.H.; Liu, X.J.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, J.L.; Han, W.X.; Zhang, W.F.; Christie, P.; Goulding, K.W.T.; Vitousek, P.M.; Zhang, F.S. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science 2010, 327, 1008–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, J.; Tu, X.S.; Zhang, H.M.; Cui, J.Y.; Ni, K.; Chen, J.L.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, J.B.; Chang, S.X. Effects of ammonium-based nitrogen addition on soil nitrification and nitrogen gas emissions depend on fertilizer-induced changes in pH in a tea plantation soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 747, 141340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fan, W.G.; Ge, H.M. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer of different forms and ratios on the growth, nitrogen absorption and utilization of young navel orange trees grafted on Poncirustrifoliata. Sci. Agr. Sin. 2015, 48, 2666–2675. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang, M.; Long, Q.; Li, W.L.; Wang, Z.C.; He, X.H.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.Z.; Xiong, H.Y.; Guo, C.Y.; Zhang, G.C.; et al. Mapping the environmental cost of a typical Citrus-producing County in China: Hotspot and optimization. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, B.H.; Li, G.J.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Baluška, F.; Shi, W.M. Ammonium stress in Arabidopsis: Signaling, genetic loci, and physiological targets. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, G.J.; Zhang, L.; Wu, J.L.; Wang, Z.Y.; Wang, M.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Shi, W.M. Plant iron status regulates ammonium-use efficiency through protein N-glycosylation. Plant Physiol. 2024, 195, 1712–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2014; p. 1535. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rubio-Asensio, J.S.; Bloom, A.J. Inorganic nitrogen form: A major player in wheat and Arabidopsis responses to elevated CO2. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2611–2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ma, X.L.; Zhu, C.H.; Yang, N.; Gan, L.J.; Xia, K. γ-Aminobutyric acid addition alleviates ammonium toxicity by limiting ammonium accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa) seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 2016, 158, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Y.; von Wirén, N. Ammonium as a signal for physiological and morphological responses in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 3777–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hachiya, T.; Inaba, J.; Wakazaki, M.; Sato, M.; Toyooka, K.; Miyagi, A.; Kawai-Yamada, M.; Sugiura, D.; Nakagawa, T.; Kiba, T.; et al. Excessive ammonium assimilation by plastidic glutamine synthetase causes ammonium toxicity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sun, D.; Fang, X.; Xiao, C.Z.M.; Huang, X.; Su, J.; Li, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Luan, S.; He, K. Kinase SnRK1.1 regulates nitrate channel SLAH3 engaged in nitrate-dependent alleviation of ammonium toxicity. Plant Physiol. 2021, 186, 731–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, L.; Song, H.; Li, B.H.; Wang, M.; Di, D.W.; Lin, X.Y.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Shi, W.M.; Li, G.J. Induction of S-nitrosoglutathione reductase protects root growth from ammonium toxicity by regulating potassium homeostasis in Arabidopsis and rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 4548–4564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, X.X.; Zhang, H.H.; Zhu, Q.Y.; Ye, J.Y.; Zhu, Y.X.; Jing, X.T.; Du, W.X.; Zhou, M.; Lin, X.Y.; Zheng, S.J.; et al. Phloem iron remodels root development in response to ammonium as the major nitrogen source. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Di, D.W.; Sun, L.; Wang, M.; Wu, J.J.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Fang, S.; Chu, J.F.; Shi, W.M.; Li, G.J. WRKY46 promotes ammonium tolerance in Arabidopsis by repressing NUDX9 and indole-3-acetic acid-conjugating genes and by inhibiting ammonium efflux in the root elongation zone. New Phytol. 2021, 232, 190–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Di, D.W.; Wu, J.J.; Ma, M.K.; Li, G.J.; Wang, M.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Shi, W.M. PIN5 is involved in regulating NH4+ efflux and primary root growth under high-ammonium stress via mediating intracellular auxin transport. Plant Soil 2023, 505, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, B.H.; Li, Q.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Shi, W.M. Roles of abscisic acid and auxin in shoot-supplied ammonium inhibition of root system development. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 1451–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  28. Li, B.H.; Li, Q.; Su, Y.; Chen, H.; Xiong, L.M.; Mi, G.H.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Shi, W.M. Shoot-supplied ammonium targets the root auxin influx carrier AUX1 and inhibits lateral root emergence in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 933–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, G.J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, M.; Di, D.W.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Shi, W.M. The Arabidopsis AMOT1/EIN3 gene plays an important role in the amelioration of ammonium toxicity. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 1375–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, B.H.; Li, Q.; Xiong, L.M.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Krämer, U.; Shi, W.M. Arabidopsis plastid AMOS1/EGY1 integrates abscisic acid signaling to regulate global gene expression response to ammonium stress. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160, 2040–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jadid, N.; Mialoundama, A.S.; Heintz, D.; Ayoub, D.; Erhardt, M.; Mutterer, J.; Meyer, D.; Alioua, A.; Dorsselaer, A.V.; Rahier, A.; et al. Dolichol Phosphate Mannose Synthase1 mediates the biogenesis of isoprenyl-linked glycans and influences development, stress response, and ammonium hypersensitivity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 1985–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, Q.; Li, B.H.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Shi, W.M. Root growth inhibition by NH4+ in Arabidopsis is mediated by the root tip and is linked to NH4+ efflux and GMPase activity. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 1529–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sarasketa, A.; González-Moro, M.B.; González-Murua, C.; Marino, D. Nitrogen source and external medium pH interaction differentially affects root and shoot metabolism in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zheng, X.; He, K.; Kleist, T.; Chen, F.; Luan, S. Anion channel SLAH3 functions in nitrate-dependent alleviation of ammonium toxicity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 474–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Li, S.; Yan, L.; Riaz, M.; White, P.J.; Yi, C.; Wang, S.L.; Shi, L.; Xu, F.S.; Wang, C.; Cai, H.M.; et al. Integrated transcriptome and metabolome analysis reveals the physiological and molecular responses of allotetraploid rapeseed to ammonium toxicity. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 189, 104550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xiao, C.; Sun, D.; Liu, B.; Fang, X.; Li, P.; Jiang, Y.; He, M.; Li, J.; Luan, S.; He, K. Nitrate transporter NRT1.1 and anion channel SLAH3 form a functional unit to regulate nitrate-dependent alleviation of ammonium toxicity. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64, 942–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yuan, S.; Zhang, Z.W.; Zheng, C.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Wang, Y.; Feng, L.Y.; Niu, G.; Wang, C.Q.; Wang, J.H.; Feng, H.; et al. Arabidopsis cryptochrome 1 functions in nitrogen regulation of flowering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 7661–7666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. de Graaf, M.C.C.; Bobbink, R.; Verbeek, P.J.M.; Roelofs, J.G.M. Differential effects of ammonium and nitrate on three heathland species. Plant Ecol. 1998, 135, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Roosta, H.R.; Schjoerring, J.K. Effects of nitrate and potassium on ammonium toxicity in cucumber plants. J. Plant Nutr. 2008, 31, 1270–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Garnica, M.; Houdusse, F.; Zamarreno, A.; Garcia-Mina, J. The signal effect of nitrate supply enhances active forms of cytokinins and indole acetic content and reduces abscisic acid in wheat plants grown with ammonium. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 167, 1264–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hachiya, T.; Watanabe, C.; Fujimoto, M.; Ishikawa, T.; Takahara, K.; Kawai-Yamada, M.; Uchimiya, H.; Uesono, Y.; Terashima, I.; Noguchi, K. Nitrate addition alleviates ammonium toxicity without lessening ammonium accumulation, organic acid depletion and inorganic cation depletion in Arabidopsis thaliana shoots. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 577–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Du, W.; Zhang, Y.; Si, J.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, S.; Xia, H.; Kong, L. Nitrate alleviates ammonium toxicity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by regulating tricarboxylic acid cycle and reducing rhizospheric acidification and oxidative damage. Plant Signal. Behav. 2021, 16, 1991687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, S.; Yan, L.; Zhang, W.; Yi, C.; Haider, S.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Shi, L.; Xu, F.; Ding, G. Nitrate alleviates ammonium toxicity in Brassica napus by coordinating rhizosphere and cell pH and ammonium assimilation. Plant J. 2024, 117, 786–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhu, Y.; Qi, B.; Hao, Y.; Liu, H.; Sun, G.; Chen, R.; Song, S. Appropriate NH4+/NO3− ratio triggers plant growth and nutrient uptake of flowering chinese cabbage by optimizing the pH value of nutrient solution. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 656144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Coleto, I.; Marín-Peña, A.J.; Urbano-Gámez, J.A.; González-Hernández, A.I.; Shi, W.; Li, G.; Marino, D. Interaction of ammonium nutrition with essential mineral cations. J. Exp. Bot. 2023, 74, 6131–6144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shen, Z.; Fan, L.; Yang, S.; Yao, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, W. Fe-based carbonitride as Fenton-like catalyst for the elimination of organic contaminants. Environ. Res. 2021, 198, 110486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Liu, Y.; Maniero, R.; Giehl, R.; Melzer, M.; Steensma, P.; Krouk, G.; Fitzpatrick, T.; von Wiren, N. PDX1.1-dependent biosynthesis of vitamin B6 protects roots from ammonium-induced oxidative stress. Mol. Plant. 2022, 15, 820–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Guo, H.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, J.; Guan, W.; Xu, S.; Shen, W.; Xu, G.; Xie, Y.; Foyer, C. L-cysteine desulfhydrase-related H2S production is involved in OsSE5-promoted ammonium tolerance in roots of Oryza sativa. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 1777–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kong, L.G.; Zhang, Y.X.; Zhang, B.; Li, H.W.; Wang, Z.S.; Si, J.S.; Fan, S.J.; Feng, B. Does energy cost constitute the primary cause of ammonium toxicity in plants? Planta 2022, 256, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Maiber, L.; Koprivova, A.; Bender, D.; Kopriva, S.; Fischer-Schrader, K. Characterization of the amidoxime reducing components ARC1 and ARC2 from Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS J. 2022, 289, 5656–5669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tejada-Jimenez, M.; Leon-Miranda, E.; Llamas, A. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii—A reference microorganism for eukaryotic molybdenum metabolism. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Coleto, I.; Bejarano, I.; Marin-Pena, A.J.; Medina, J.; Rioja, C.; Burow, M.; Marino, D. Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factors MYB28 and MYB29 shape ammonium stress responses by regulating Fe homeostasis. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 1021–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, Y.; Wu, W.H. Regulation of potassium transport and signaling in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2017, 39, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zörb, C.; Senbayram, M.; Peiter, E. Potassium in agriculture-Status and perspectives. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 656–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Szczerba, M.W.; Britto, D.T.; Ali, S.A.; Balkos, K.D.; Kronzucker, H.J. NH4+-stimulated and -inhibited components of K+ transport in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 3415–3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kabange, N.R.; Park, S.Y.; Lee, J.Y.; Shin, D.; Lee, S.M.; Kwon, Y.; Cha, J.K.; Cho, J.H.; Duyen, D.V.; Ko, J.M.; et al. New insights into the transcriptional regulation of genes involved in the nitrogen use efficiency under potassium chlorate in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wang, Z.F.; Mi, T.W.; Gao, Y.Q.; Feng, H.Q.; Wu, W.H.; Wang, Y. STOP1 regulates LKS1 transcription and coordinates K+/NH4+ balance in Arabidopsis response to low-K+ stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 23, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Aluko, O.O.; Li, C.; Yuan, G.; Nong, T.; Xiang, H.; Wang, Q.; Li, X.; Liu, H. Differential effects of ammonium (NH4+) and potassium (K+) nutrition on photoassimilate partitioning and growth of tobacco seedlings. Plants 2022, 11, 3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, J.; Xia, H.; Gao, Y.; Pan, D.; Sun, J.; Liu, M.; Tang, Z.; Li, Z. Potassium deficiency causes more nitrate nitrogen to be stored in leaves for low-K sensitive sweet potato genotypes. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1069181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, C.; Aluko, O.O.; Shi, S.; Mo, Z.; Nong, T.; Shi, C.; Li, Z.; Wang, Q.; Liu, H. Determination of optimal NH4+/K+ concentration and corresponding ratio critical for growth of tobacco seedlings in a hydroponic system. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1152817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Singh, K.; Gupta, S.; Singh, A.P. Review: Nutrient-nutrient interactions governing underground plant adaptation strategies in a heterogeneous environment. Plant Sci. 2024, 342, 112024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Balkos, K.D.; Britto, D.T.; Kronzucker, H.J. Optimization of ammonium acquisition and metabolism by potassium in rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. IR-72). Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 23–34. [Google Scholar]
  63. Ariz, I.; Artola, E.; Asensio, A.C.; Cruchaga, S.; Aparicio-Tejo, P.M.; Moran, J.F. High irradiance increases NH4+ tolerance in Pisum sativum: Higher carbon and energy availability improve ion balance but not N assimilation. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 1009–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Di, D.W.; Sun, L.; Zhang, X.N.; Li, G.J.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Shi, W.M. Involvement of auxin in the regulation of ammonium tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Soil. 2018, 432, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Devi, L.L.; Pandey, A.; Gupta, S.; Singh, A.P. The interplay of auxin and brassinosteroid signaling tunes root growth under low and different nitrogen forms. Plant Physiol. 2022, 89, 1757–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, J.; Li, J.; Deng, C.; Liu, Z.; Yin, K.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Zhao, R.; Zhao, N.; Zhou, X.; et al. Effect of NaCl on ammonium and nitrate uptake and transport in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive poplars. Tree Physiol. 2024, 44, tpae020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kempinski, C.F.; Hafar, R.; Barth, C. Toward the mechanism of NH4+ sensitivity mediated by Arabidopsis GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 847–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Wang, R.; Xu, S.; Sun, H.; Feng, S.; Jiang, C.; Zhou, S.; Wu, S.; Zhuang, G.; Chen, B.; Bai, Z.; et al. Complex regulatory network allows Myriophyllum aquaticum to thrive under high-concentration ammonia toxicity. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Liu, X.; Wu, L.; Si, Y.; Zhai, Y.; Niu, M.; Han, M.; Su, T. Regulating effect of exogenous α-ketoglutarate on ammonium assimilation in poplar. Molecules 2024, 29, 1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Poucet, T.; González-Moro, M.B.; Cabasson, C.; Beauvoit, B.; Gibon, Y.; Dieuaide-Noubhani, M.; Marino, D. Ammonium supply induces differential metabolic adaptive responses in tomato according to leaf phenological stage. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 3185–3199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Weil, S.; Barker, A.V.; Zandvakili, O.R.; Etemadi, F. Plant growth and calcium and potassium accumulation in lettuce under different nirogen regimes of ammonium and nitrate nutrition. J. Plant Nutr. 2020, 44, 270–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xie, Y.; Lv, Y.; Jia, L.; Zheng, L.; Li, Y.; Zhu, M.; Tian, M.; Wang, M.; Qi, W.; Luo, L.; et al. Plastid-localized amino acid metabolism coordinates rice ammonium tolerance and nitrogen use efficiency. Nat. Plants 2023, 9, 1514–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yang, S.; Hao, D.; Jin, M.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Huang, Y.; Chen, T.; Su, Y. Internal ammonium excess induces ROS-mediated reactions and causes carbon scarcity in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Coskun, D.; Britto, D.T.; Li, M.; Becker, A.; Kronzucker, H.J. Rapid ammonia gas transport accounts for futile transmembrane cycling under NH3/NH4+ toxicity in plant roots. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 1859–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Sanagi, M.; Aoyama, S.; Kubo, A.; Lu, Y.; Sato, Y.; Ito, S.; Abe, M.; Mitsuda, N.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Kiba, T.; et al. Low nitrogen conditions accelerate flowering by modulating the phosphorylation state of FLOWERING BHLH 4 in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2022942118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zhang, Z.W.; Fu, Y.F.; Zhou, Y.H.; Wang, C.Q.; Lan, T.; Chen, G.D.; Zeng, J.; Chen, Y.E.; Yuan, M.; Yuan, S.; et al. Nitrogen and nitric oxide regulate Arabidopsis flowering differently. Plant Sci. 2019, 284, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yan, J.; Niu, F.; Liu, W.Z.; Zhang, H.; Wang, B.; Lan, W.; Che, Y.; Yang, B.; Luan, S.; Jiang, Y.Q. Arabidopsis CIPK14 positively regulates glucose response. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 450, 1679–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Simon, N.M.L.; Kusakina, J.; Fernández-López, Á.; Chembath, A.; Belbin, F.E.; Dodd, A.N. The energy-signaling Hub SnRK1 is important for sucrose-induced hypocotyl elongation. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 1299–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hamasaki, H.; Kurihara, Y.; Kuromori, T.; Kusano, H.; Nagata, N.; Yamamoto, Y.Y.; Shimada, H.; Matsui, M. SnRK1 kinase and the NAC transcription factor SOG1 are components of a novel signaling pathway mediating the low energy response triggered by ATP depletion. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, Q.; Chai, L.; Tong, N.; Yu, H.; Jiang, W. Potential carbohydrate regulation mechanism underlying starvation-induced abscission of tomato flower. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, H.; Han, C.; Wang, J.G.; Chu, X.; Shi, W.; Yao, L.; Chen, J.; Hao, W.; Deng, Z.; Fan, M.; et al. Regulatory functions of cellular energy sensor SnRK1 for nitrate signalling through NLP7 repression. Nat. Plants 2022, 8, 1094–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cheng, Y.H.; Durand, M.; Brehaut, V.; Hsu, F.C.; Kelemen, Z.; Texier, Y.; Krapp, A.; Tsay, Y.F. Interplay between NIN-LIKE PROTEINs 6 and 7 in nitrate signaling. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 3049–3068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bradáčová, K.; Sittinger, M.; Tietz, K.; Neuhäuser, B.; Kandeler, E.; Berger, N.; Ludewig, U.; Neumann, G. Maize inoculation with microbial consortia: Contrasting effects on rhizosphere activities, nutrient acquisition and early growth in different soils. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mpanga, I.K.; Nkebiwe, P.M.; Kuhlmann, M.; Cozzolino, V.; Piccolo, A.; Geistlinger, J.; Berger, N.; Ludewig, U.; Neumann, G. The form of N supply determines plant growth promotion by P-solubilizing microorganisms in maize. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Bittsánszky, A.; Pilinszky, K.; Gyulai, G.; Komives, T. Overcoming ammonium toxicity. Plant Sci. 2015, 231, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Ariz, I.; Asensio, A.C.; Zamarreño, A.M.; García-Mina, J.M.; Aparicio-Tejo, P.M.; Moran, J.F. Changes in the C/N balance caused by increasing external ammonium concentrations are driven by carbon and energy availabilities during ammonium nutrition in pea plants: The key roles of asparagine synthetase and anaplerotic enzymes. Physiol. Plant. 2013, 148, 522–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Baena-González, E.; Rolland, F.; Thevelein, J.M.; Sheen, J. A central integrator of transcription networks in plant stress and energy signalling. Nature 2007, 448, 938–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Liu, K.H.; Niu, Y.; Konishi, M.; Wu, Y.; Du, H.; Sun Chung, H.; Li, L.; Boudsocq, M.; McCormack, M.; Maekawa, S.; et al. Discovery of nitrate-CPK-NLP signalling in central nutrient-growth networks. Nature 2017, 545, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 26 02606 g001
Figure 1. A schematic representation illustrating the assimilation of excessive NH4+ that results in the substantial consumption of intermediates from the TCA cycle, thereby causing an imbalance in C-N metabolism. α-KGDH,α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; CA, citrate; CoASH, coenzyme A; FAD, flavin adenine dinucleotide; Gln, glutamine; Glu, glutamate; GOGAT, glutamate synthase; GS, glutamine synthetase; IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; MDH, L-malate dehydrogenase; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NADP, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; OAA, oxalacetic acid; SDH, succinate dehydrogenase. The red box illustrates that, under ammonium stress, an increased level of α-ketoglutarate is involved in the biosynthesis of Glu, leading to an imbalance in C-N metabolism.
Figure 1. A schematic representation illustrating the assimilation of excessive NH4+ that results in the substantial consumption of intermediates from the TCA cycle, thereby causing an imbalance in C-N metabolism. α-KGDH,α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; CA, citrate; CoASH, coenzyme A; FAD, flavin adenine dinucleotide; Gln, glutamine; Glu, glutamate; GOGAT, glutamate synthase; GS, glutamine synthetase; IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; MDH, L-malate dehydrogenase; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NADP, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; OAA, oxalacetic acid; SDH, succinate dehydrogenase. The red box illustrates that, under ammonium stress, an increased level of α-ketoglutarate is involved in the biosynthesis of Glu, leading to an imbalance in C-N metabolism.
Ijms 26 02606 g001
Ijms 26 02606 g002
Figure 2. A proposed model elucidating the role of SnRK1 in ammonium toxicity. The excessive uptake and assimilation of NH4+ result in an increased production of H+ via H+-ATPase, which subsequently leads to the acidification of the rhizosphere and inflicts cellular damage and toxicity. Furthermore, the over-assimilation of NH4+ depletes numerous intermediates from the TCA cycle, thereby disrupting the balance of C-N metabolism. However, the relationships between metabolic imbalance and ion imbalance, disruption of phytohormone homeostasis and accumulation of ROS remain inadequately understood. Under normal conditions, SnRK1.1 phosphorylates SLAH3 to inhibit its activity; under high-ammonium conditions, SnRK1.1 migrates to the nucleus, which releases the inhibition on SLAH3 and leads to nitrate efflux. A potential role of the energy sensor SnRK1 in C-N metabolism imbalance under ammonium stress has been proposed; however, the downstream transcription factors (TFs) still need to be identified. AMT, ammonium transporters; NRT1.1, nitrate transporter 1.1; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SLAH3, Slow anion channel-associated 1 homologue 3; SnRK1, SNF1-related protein kinase 1; TCA, tricarboxylic acid.
Figure 2. A proposed model elucidating the role of SnRK1 in ammonium toxicity. The excessive uptake and assimilation of NH4+ result in an increased production of H+ via H+-ATPase, which subsequently leads to the acidification of the rhizosphere and inflicts cellular damage and toxicity. Furthermore, the over-assimilation of NH4+ depletes numerous intermediates from the TCA cycle, thereby disrupting the balance of C-N metabolism. However, the relationships between metabolic imbalance and ion imbalance, disruption of phytohormone homeostasis and accumulation of ROS remain inadequately understood. Under normal conditions, SnRK1.1 phosphorylates SLAH3 to inhibit its activity; under high-ammonium conditions, SnRK1.1 migrates to the nucleus, which releases the inhibition on SLAH3 and leads to nitrate efflux. A potential role of the energy sensor SnRK1 in C-N metabolism imbalance under ammonium stress has been proposed; however, the downstream transcription factors (TFs) still need to be identified. AMT, ammonium transporters; NRT1.1, nitrate transporter 1.1; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SLAH3, Slow anion channel-associated 1 homologue 3; SnRK1, SNF1-related protein kinase 1; TCA, tricarboxylic acid.
Ijms 26 02606 g002
Table 1. A comprehensive assessment to the impacts of ammonium toxicity.
Table 1. A comprehensive assessment to the impacts of ammonium toxicity.
TissuesSymptomsNH4+ ConcentrationSpeciesReferences
RootsInhibition of primary root elongation5–30 mMArabidopsis, rice[24,25,26,31]
Modifications in lateral roots, reduced root/shoot ratio and diminished fresh root weight5–80 mMArabidopsis[21,22,27,28]
StemsInhibition of stem growth and reduced stem fresh weight10–50 mMArabidopsis[21,29]
LeavesLeaf chlorosis20–60 mMArabidopsis, barley[30,31,32]
Flowers and seedsReduced plant biomass and yield5–20 mMArabidopsis, oilseed rape[21,22,33,34,35,36]
High NH4+-induced late flowering40 mMArabidopsis[37]
Whole plantWhole seedling death>1 mMArnica montana, Cirsium dissectum, Calluna vulgaris[4,10,38]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xie, L.-B.; Sun, L.-N.; Zhang, Z.-W.; Chen, Y.-E.; Yuan, M.; Yuan, S. Phenotype Assessment and Putative Mechanisms of Ammonium Toxicity to Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2606. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062606

AMA Style

Xie L-B, Sun L-N, Zhang Z-W, Chen Y-E, Yuan M, Yuan S. Phenotype Assessment and Putative Mechanisms of Ammonium Toxicity to Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(6):2606. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062606

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xie, Lin-Bei, Li-Na Sun, Zhong-Wei Zhang, Yang-Er Chen, Ming Yuan, and Shu Yuan. 2025. "Phenotype Assessment and Putative Mechanisms of Ammonium Toxicity to Plants" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 6: 2606. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062606

APA Style

Xie, L.-B., Sun, L.-N., Zhang, Z.-W., Chen, Y.-E., Yuan, M., & Yuan, S. (2025). Phenotype Assessment and Putative Mechanisms of Ammonium Toxicity to Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(6), 2606. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062606

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop