Next Article in Journal
Optimizing Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Asymmetric Acute Lung Injury in a Porcine Model: The Role of Transpulmonary Pressure
Previous Article in Journal
MicroRNA-125b-5p Drives MMP-2 Expression via Activation of RAGE-38MAPK-p65/p50NF-κB Axis: A Novel Mechanism in Human Lung Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Puroindoline, Gpc-B1, Starch Synthase Genes, and Gluten Proteins in Regulating End-Use Quality in Wheat
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Heterologous Biosynthesis of Crocin I in Solanum lycopersicum L.

1
State Key Laboratory for Quality Ensurance and Sustainable Use of Dao-Di Herbs, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100193, China
2
State Key Laboratory for Quality Ensurance and Sustainable Use of Dao-Di Herbs, Artemisinin Research Center, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing 100700, China
3
Guangxi Crop Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology Laboratory, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Science, Nanning 530007, China
4
Yuelushan Laboratory, Changsha 410128, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(20), 9984; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26209984 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 30 July 2025 / Revised: 5 October 2025 / Accepted: 7 October 2025 / Published: 14 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular and Genetic Advances in Plant Breeding)

Abstract

Crocins are high-value apocarotenoid pigments with broad applications in pharmaceuticals, foods, and personal-care products, and they exhibit diverse bioactivities, including antioxidant, antidepressant, and antidementia effects. In this study, we achieved the heterologous biosynthesis of crocins in Solanum lycopersicum L. by introducing the GjCCD4a, GjALDH2C3, GjUGT74F8 and GjUGT94E13 of Gardenia jasminoides J.Ellis to the binary expression vector via in-fusion technology and self-cleaving 2A peptides. Following Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, the engineered tomato plants predominantly produced main active ingredient crocin I, which accounted for 97–99% of the total crocins. The transgenic fruits displayed mixed red-and-golden colouration. These results highlight S. lycopersicum as a promising chassis for crocin I biosynthesis, helping to address supply constraints and enabling colour-trait breeding through synthetic biology.

1. Introduction

Crocins are water-soluble apocarotenoid pigments first discovered in saffron. The fruit of Gardenia jasminoides J.Ellis, a plant used both medicinally and as food [1], also accumulates crocins. These compounds have been reported to exhibit a range of health benefits, including antidepressant [2], anti-inflammatory [3], hepatoprotective [4], and neuroprotective effects [5], as well as therapeutic potential in Alzheimer’s disease [6]. However, due to limited resources, crocins currently suffer from high costs, which restricts their clinical research and application, as well as food development. Additionally, crocins are unstable and prone to degradation under factors such as high temperature, light exposure, and pH variations [7,8]. This instability further limits their applications, while the challenges in preservation further drive up costs.
Carotenoids are produced in plastids and serve as photoprotective pigments in photosynthesis, while crocins are synthesized using carotenoids such as lycopene, β-carotene, and zeaxanthin as substrates. The main substrates of carotenoids come from the methylerythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway, but the isopentenylpyrophosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP), produced by the mevalonic acid (MVA) pathway in the cytoplasm, can enter plastids [9]. DMAPP and IPP, mainly from the MEP pathway, react to generate geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP). Phytoene synthase (PSY) is the rate-limiting enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of GGPP to phytoene. Then, lycopene is generated under the catalysis of phytoene desaturase (PDS), ξ-carotene isomerase (Z-ISO), ξ-carotene desaturase (ZDS), and carotenoid isomerase (CRTISO) [10]. This process further generates another two carotenoids: β-carotene and zeaxanthin (Figure 1). Carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase (CCD) of G. jasminoides can utilize lycopene, β-carotene, and zeaxanthin to produce crocetin dialdehyde and oxidized to form crocetin under the action of GjALDH2C3. GjUGT74F8 can use crocin IV as a substrate to generate crocin II, while GjUGT94E13 can glycosylate crocetin, crocin III, and crocin IV to produce crocin I [11]. Carotenoids are protective agents of photosynthesis and widely exist in various plant tissues [12]. The synthesis of crocins through plant chassis may be an important way to promote its application and solve the shortage of resource problems. Its primary components, crocin I and crocin II, are the detection markers specified in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia [13] and represent the main active constituents of saffron [14,15,16,17]. While crocin I is the most abundant crocin component found in saffron and Gardeniae Fructus, the separation and purification of crocin I has remained a subject of considerable scientific interest [18,19]. Perhaps by means of synthetic biology, we could simplify the purification process of crocin I.
The carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase GjCCD4a from G. jasminoides exhibits higher catalytic activity than the saffron ortholog CsCCD2L in Nicotiana benthamiana [20]. When G. jasminoides’ crocin biosynthetic genes were expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana, crocin I accounted for up to 84% of the total crocins, and crocin II reached up to 75% in the T1 transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana lines [11]. Nicotiana benthamiana harbours endogenous glycosyltransferases capable of catalyzing crocetin, but these enzymes preferentially facilitate the synthesis of crocin II. As a result, previous studies have typically reported higher levels of crocin II than crocin I in transgenic systems [21,22,23]. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is an excellent candidate chassis for synthesizing crocin I. There is no conclusive evidence that endogenous glycosyltransferases catalyze the synthesis of crocin II, and it is one of the most widely cultivated and consumed vegetables globally. Furthermore, because crocins are chemically unstable and degrade upon processing, the fresh consumption of tomatoes can help preserve the bioactivity of crocins. In addition, tomato cultivation covers a wide area and generates a large amount of agricultural waste from nonedible parts. If constitutive promoters are used to drive the expression of crocins, the nonedible parts can be used for saffron extraction to solve the resource problem of crocins. Moreover, colour is a key determinant of S. lycopersicum fruit quality, and breeding for novel colours has always been a major focus of research; crocin accumulation could contribute desirable hues that enhance consumer appeal [24,25].
In this study, we constructed a vector containing four genes for the synthesis of crocins from G. jasminoides, including GjCCD4a, GjALDH2C3, and GjUGT74F8 and GjUGT94E13. These genes were expressed in S. lycopersicum plants (S. lycopersicum cv. ‘Micro-Tom’) under the control of combinatorial promoters. The resulting transgenic S. lycopersicumes were capable of synthesizing crocin I, which constituted ≥97% of the total crocins. Additionally, crocins were detected in the stems and leaves of transgenic plants, offering a novel source of raw material for crocin extraction and contributing to the resolution of resource limitations.

2. Results

2.1. Multigene Vector Construction and Transient Expression Assays

After three rounds of vector construction, the four genes involved in crocins biosynthesis were successfully assembled into the pCAMBIA1300 vector (Figure S1). PCR amplification of the four biosynthetic genes, along with the hygromycin resistance gene, confirmed the successful construction of the multigene vector (Figure 2A). To verify the functionality of the assembled vector, transient expression assays were conducted in both Nicotiana benthamiana and S. lycopersicum. Following the methods established in our preliminary studies, leaf samples from Nicotiana benthamiana and fruit samples from S. lycopersicum were collected 5 days post-infiltration for HPLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis. As shown in Figure 2C,D and Figure S2, the main active compounds crocin I and crocin II accumulated in both Nicotiana benthamiana leaves and S. lycopersicum fruits tissues transformed with the AU-CU multigene expression vector. Notably, after ethanol decolourization, Nicotiana benthamiana leaves exhibited a golden colouration attributed to crocin accumulation (Figure 2B).

2.2. Genetic Transformation and Molecular Identification

S. lycopersicum is one of the most widely consumed vegetables globally, and its predominant pigment, lycopene, serves as a substrate for GjCCD4a, enabling heterologous crocin biosynthesis while potentially modifying fruit colour. In this study, cotyledons and hypocotyls were used as explants for genetic transformation, with hypocotyls exhibiting the higher regeneration rate. The transformation process is illustrated in Figure 3. Notably, some hygromycin-resistant seedlings displayed an albino phenotype (Figure S3).
A total of seven transgenic S. lycopersicum lines were confirmed by molecular identification and designated S5, S7, S10, S13, S15, S24, and S25 (Figure 4A). Among these, lines S7 and S13 exhibited golden-yellow leaves, while the other lines showed no obvious phenotypic changes. However, both S7 and S13 failed to survive post-transplantation due to poor initial growth and subsequent fungal leaf spot disease. Consequently, only PCR validation and qualitative crocin detection were performed on their leaves. Of the five surviving transgenic lines, only three non-albino plants (S5, S10, and S15) successfully produced fruit. As shown in Figure 3, although fruit colouration was predominantly masked by endogenous lycopene, the transgenic S. lycopersicum fruits exhibited a golden-red hue compared to the non-transgenic controls. The qRT-PCR analysis revealed that GjALDH2C3 had the highest relative expression among the four transgenes, followed by its tandem gene GjUGT94E13, while GjCCD4a and GjUGT74F8 showed lower expression levels. Notably, line S10 exhibited the highest overall transgene expression, whereas S5 had the lowest (Figure 4B).

2.3. HPLC-MS/MS Analysis

Among the seven obtained transgenic S. lycopersicum lines, only three lines—S5, S10, and S15—successfully set fruit; HPLC-MS/MS analysis was performed on both leaves and fruits of these lines. In the leaves, only crocin I and trans-crocin IV were detected, with crocin I accounting for 83%, 93%, and 92% of the total crocins content in S5, S10, and S15, respectively. As shown in Figure 5A, the highest crocin I concentration in leaves reached 5752 ng/g fresh weight (FW). In the fruits, crocin I was the predominant form, representing 97%, 98%, and 99% of total crocins in S5, S10, and S15, respectively. The highest crocin I content in fruits reached 37,132 ng/g FW (Figure 5B). The retention times of trans-crocin I and cis-crocin I were 6.03 and 7.31 min, respectively (Figure 5C). Due to the sterility of the fruiting transgenic plants, LC-MS/MS data for the T1 generation were not available. However, earlier qualitative analyses of leaf samples from lines S7, S13, S5, and S10 showed that S7 and S13 accumulated significantly higher crocin levels than S5 and S10 (Figure 5D). These results suggest that continued screening of positive transgenic lines may yield plants with even higher crocin content.

3. Discussion

This study constructed a single vector carrying four genes for crocins biosynthesis. In S. lycopersicum fruits, crocin I accounted for 97–99% of total crocins. Compared to wild-type S. lycopersicum, the transgenic S. lycopersicum exhibit a golden-red hue, although the golden colouration from crocins was still overshadowed by the red of lycopene. Unlike the three fruiting lines, S. lycopersicum lines S13 and S7 exhibited noticeable golden colouration in leaves. Nevertheless, this indicates that the potential of this vector for crocin synthesis in S. lycopersicum remains underexploited. Subsequent efforts could involve the screening of more positive plants and utilizing trait segregation in the T1 generation to obtain lines with higher content.
Notably, by transforming the two downstream glycosyltransferase genes GjUGT74F8 and GjUGT94E13, this study significantly improved substrate conversion efficiency, addressing the issue of a low proportion of the main active component crocin I in transgenic plants during crocin synthesis [23]. In N. benthamiana, expressing only the carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase (CCD) can synthesize crocin II and a small amount of crocin I. However, S. lycopersicum’s endogenous glycosyltransferases likely function differently from those in N. benthamiana. When the expression level of GjUGT74F8 was lower than GjUGT94E13, the content of crocin II was too low to be detected in leaves. In S. lycopersicum fruit, crocin I constituted the highest proportion of total crocins, reaching up to 99%. If the expression level of GjUGT74F8 was dominant, the proportion of crocin II in transgenic S. lycopersicum would be expected to increase substantially. Transforming GjUGT74F8 or GjUGT94E13 alone into N. benthamiana or S. lycopersicum could yield transgenic lines producing high proportions of crocin I or III, respectively, which holds significant value for monomer extraction and purification.
Based on this experimental analysis, the current vector also has room for optimization. For instance, fruit-specific promoters should be used in S. lycopersicum, particularly for driving the expression of the key enzyme CCD [26,27]. Furthermore, incorporating key enzyme genes in the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway is crucial, such as adding lycopene β-cyclase (LCYB) to promote the conversion of lycopene to β-carotene, or adding PSY, the rate-limiting enzyme for carotenoid synthesis. Carotenoids and chlorophyll compete for substrates, potentially affecting chlorophyll synthesis, inhibiting plant growth, and reducing downstream conversion efficiency. Crocin synthesis consumes carotenoids, which act as photoprotective factors, and carotenoids compete with chlorophyll for substrates. This substrate competition might explain the occurrence of albino seedlings in S. lycopersicum lines. Subsequently, this vector was also transformed into lettuce, resulting in a large number of albino seedlings (unpublished), which might be related to lettuce’s inherently low chlorophyll content. Therefore, future modifications of vectors for crocin synthesis in green tissues could consider introducing the key enzyme GGPPS for both carotenoid and chlorophyll synthesis. Rationally engineered NtGGPPS1 has been shown to simultaneously and significantly increase carotenoid and chlorophyll content in N. benthamiana [28]. Additionally, the rate-limiting enzymes of the MVA pathway, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGR), and the MEP pathway, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase (DXS), could be incorporated.
Efficient genes play a key role in enabling the host plant to compete for substrates to enhance the synthesis of target products. CCDs, catalyzing the first step of crocin formation, undoubtedly hold a core position in crocin biosynthesis. Besides the carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases from Crocus sativus and the GjCCD4a from G. jasminoides used in this study, previous research has shown that CCDs from Bixa orellana, Buddleja davidii, and Crocus ancyrensis can cleave carotenoids to produce crocetin dialdehyde [29]. Many CCDs have been verified to cleave lycopene, β-carotene, or zeaxanthin. It was initially believed that CsCCD2L from saffron could only cleave zeaxanthin, but recent studies indicate CsCCD2L also cleaves β-carotene and lycopene, albeit with extremely low affinity. In comparison, GjCCD4a exhibits higher affinity for the upstream β-carotene [30,31]. This might explain why Nicotiana benthamiana overexpressing GjCCD4a contains higher levels of various crocin components than Nicotiana benthamiana overexpressing CsCCD2L. Therefore, GjCCD4a is more suitable for crocin synthesis in most plants. Based on this, crocin yield could be increased by boosting β-carotene content in the host plant. Besides introducing foreign genes, direct modification of the host is possible, such as knocking out the α-carotene branch or creating high-β-carotene S. lycopersicum germplasm through multi-site mutations, drawing from β-carotene mutants [31,32]. Different CCDs can be selected for different hosts; if a host has higher zeaxanthin content, CsCCD2L could also be used. Future efforts could involve engineering CCDs based on the host; for example, CCDs with higher affinity for lycopene have not yet been reported.
Significant progress has been made in the heterologous synthesis of crocins in plants, but practical extraction and application still face challenges. To replace saffron as a source for extraction, it is essential first to achieve high and stable expression of crocin biosynthetic genes in host plants. This requires a large number of transgenic experiments for the screening of transgenic lines in order to obtain strains with optimal performance and favourable growth characteristics. Second, the growth rate and biomass of the host plant are crucial. Selecting suitable host plants that require less land resources and yield more extractable material is particularly important. The relatively rare golden colour of crocins, combined with their high economic value, makes them highly meaningful for colour breeding. The future exploration of synthetic biology for producing high-value pigment crocins in plant hosts and their application in developing personalized horticultural varieties remains valuable.
S. lycopersicum, with high content in this study, died due to diseases and other reasons during planting. Through a large number of genetic transformation experiments and the screening of homozygous offspring, we expect to obtain S. lycopersicum plants with higher crocin content. Additionally, the transgenic plants exhibit issues with fruit development. To address the fertility problems in these transgenic lines, they will be crossbred with tomato germplasms that demonstrate normal development and high β-carotene content. The successful expression of crocin in S. lycopersicum, a model crop, provides a reference for crocin in healthy colour breeding of fruits and vegetables. In addition to S. lycopersicum, there are many plants rich in carotenoid, especially some edible crops, such as carrots, corn, cucumbers, etc., which can not only convert carotenoid from edible parts into saffron but also can be used for extracting saffron from nonedible parts. Citrus, mango, pineapple, etc., can also be considered to be transferred, which can not only enrich the colour but also improve the health function of fruits.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material, Chemicals and Strains

Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. ‘Micro-Tom’ S. lycopersicumwas was used for genetic transformation. The Escherichia coli strains DH5α andXL10-Gold, as well as Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101, were purchased from WeidiBio (Shanghai, China).

4.2. Multigene Expression Vector Construction

We obtained four genes of crocins synthesis through chemical synthesis, including GjCCD4a, GjALDH2C3, GjUGT74F8, and GjUGT94E13. In the second round of gene assembly, the ligated dual-gene fragments were individually connected to the CaMV 35S promoter with the HSP terminator and the Arabidopsis thaliana UBQ10 promoter with the E9 terminator, respectively, and assembled into the pCAMBIA1300 vector, generating two dual-gene expression cassettes: 35S:GjALDH2C2-P2A-GjUGT94E13:Thsp and UBQ10:GjCCD4a-P2A-GjUGT74F8:Te9. In the third round, the two gene expression cassettes, 35S::GjALDH2C3-P2A-GjUGT94E13::Thsp and AtUBQ10::GjCCD4a-P2A-GjUGT74F8::Te9, were assembled into the pCAMBIA1300 vector. The resulting multigene vector, named AU-CU, had the following structure: 35S::GjALDH2C3-P2A-GjUGT94E13::Thsp::AtUBQ10::GjCCD4a-P2A-GjUGT74F8::Te9. All primers used for multigene vector construction are listed in the Table S1.

4.3. Transient Expression

An aliquot (200 μL) of A. tumefaciens GV3101 harbouring AU-CU was inoculated into 3 mL YEB medium containing the appropriate antibiotics and incubated overnight at 28 °C with shaking (180 rpm). The culture was transferred to 20 mL fresh YEB (supplemented with 50 μg/mL kanamycin, 25 μg/mL rifampicin, 40 μM acetosyringone, and 10 mM MES) and grown for 4–6 h. Cells were collected by centrifugation (4000× g, 10 min), washed twice with half-volume infiltration buffer (10 mM MES, 200 μM acetosyringone, 10 mM MgCl2), and resuspended in infiltration buffer to OD600 = 0.8. After a 2–4 h dark incubation, suspensions were infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves and S. lycopersicum fruits. Infiltrated tissues were kept in darkness for 24 h and then maintained under a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod at 25 °C. Samples were collected 5 days post-infiltration.

4.4. S. lycopersicum Plants Transformation

Sterilize Micro-Tom seeds in 10% NaClO for 10 min, followed by three rinses with sterile distilled water. Subsequently, immerse the seeds in 75% (v/v) ethanol for 30 s, and then rinse thoroughly four times with sterile distilled water. After sterilization, place the seeds on sterile filter paper to dry. Sow the seeds on solid MS medium and germinate under standard growth conditions. Use leaves, cotyledons, and hypocotyls of Micro-Tom plants as explants. Cut the leaves and cotyledons into pieces, approximately 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm in size, and cut the hypocotyls into segments, approximately 0.5 to 0.6 cm in length. Then, transfer to the pre-culture medium (MS with 1 mg/L 6-BA + 0.2 mg/L NAA) for pre-culturing for 24 h. After pre-culturing, co-culture the explants with strain GV3101 carrying AU-CU vector for 30 min and then transfer to the co-culture medium (MS with 1 mg/L 6-BA + 0.2 mg/L NAA + 0.1 mM AS) for 2 days. Then, transfer the explants to the selection medium (2.0 mg/L ZT, 0.2 mg/L IAA, 10 mg/L Hyg, and 500 mg/L carbenicillin). After sprouting, transfer the shoots to the elongation medium (1.0 mg/L ZT, 0.05 mg/L IAA, 500 mg/L Cef, 10 mg/L Hyg, and 500 mg/L carbenicillin) to grow regenerated shoots to a length of 1 cm. Finally, transfer the shoots to the rooting medium, which consists of 1/2 strength MS medium containing 0.1 mg/L IAA, 10 mg/L Hyg, and 300 mg/L carbenicillin. Rooted plantlets were subsequently acclimatized and transferred to soil under greenhouse conditions.

4.5. PCR Detection of Transgenic

Genomic DNA was extracted from leaves of hygromycin-resistant and wild-type plants using a commercial Plant Genomic DNA Kit. Gene-specific primers were used to amplify GjCCD4a, GjALDH2C3, GjUGT94E13, and GjUGT74F8 to verify genomic integration by PCR. All the primers used for PCR detection are shown in Table S2.

4.6. Quantitative Detection of Gene Expression

In order to determine the relative expression levels of the four genes in wild-type and transgenic S. lycopersicum. Total RNA was extracted from leaves of wild-type and transgenic plants using a CWBIO RNA extraction kit. The extracted RNA was subjected to reverse transcription using HiScript III 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (+gDNA wiper) (Nanjing Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China), which enabled the removal of genomic DNA contamination during the process. The obtained first-strand cDNA was then subjected to quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) using Taq Pro Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Nanjing Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) on a BIO-RAD CFX96 Real-Time System (Hercules, CA, USA). Actin gene was used as a reference gene to normalize the gene expression data. Conditions for qRT-PCR cycling were 95 °C for 30 s followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 3 s and annealing/extension at 55 °C for 10 s. The primers used for qRT-PCR were listed in Table S3.

4.7. Analysis of Mogrosides by HPLC-MS/MS

The entire S. lycopersicum fruit was ground, and 0.2 g of the sample was weighed. Then, 20 mL of 80% methanol was added. S. lycopersicum. Perform ultrasonic extraction in an ice bath for 1 h and replenish the weight loss. Centrifuge at 6000 rpm for 10 min, collect the supernatant with a syringe, filter it through a membrane, and set aside for later use. HPLC-MS/MS analysis was performed according to the method described by Xie et al. [11].
For quantitative analysis of S. lycopersicum fruits and leaves, an Agilent Poroshell 120 SB-C18 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 2.7 μm) was employed (Santa Clara, CA, USA). For transient samples and qualitative analysis of S. lycopersicum leaves, an Agilent Poroshell 120 SB-C18 column (100 mm × 3.0 mm, 2.7 μm) was used. Both columns maintained at 30 °C. The mass spectrometry system comprised an AB Sciex 4500 QTRAP (Framingham, MA, USA) equipped with an electrospray ionization source (ESI), with ion source temperature at 550 °C and dwell time at 100 ms. In negative ion mode, the entrance potential (EP) and collision cell exit potential (CXP) were −10 V and −15 V, respectively; in positive ion mode, the EP and CXP were both 10 V. Electrospray voltage was set at 5.5 kV and −4.5 kV for positive and negative ion modes, respectively. Nebulizing gases (GS1 and GS2) were pressurized at 55 psi each, with curtain gas (CUR) at 35 psi. Mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water, and mobile phase B was acetonitrile, delivered at 0.3 mL/min. The HPLC conditions of mogrosides analysis were as follows: 5% B for 0 min; 10% B for 1 min; 40% B for 5 min; 95% B for 2 min; maintain at 95% B for 2 min; 5% B for 10s; and 5% B for 4 min 10 s. The analytical parameters for crocetin and crocins I–V determined by HPLC-MS/MS are summarized in Table 1.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26209984/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.M. and L.X.; methodology, L.X., J.L., C.W. and C.M.; formal analysis, L.X., X.J. and Y.Z.; resources, J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.X.; writing—review and editing, L.X., J.L., C.W., Z.L. and X.M.; supervision, Z.L.; project administration, X.M. and Z.L.; funding acquisition, Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7252244), the Guangxi Key R&D Program (GuiKe AB25069119), and the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2021-I2M-1-071).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that all data in this experiment are available in the main text and Supplementary data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Xu, Z.; Chen, S.; Wang, Y.; Tian, Y.; Wang, X.; Xin, T.; Li, Z.; Hua, X.; Tan, S.; Sun, W.; et al. Crocus genome reveals the evolutionary origin of crocin biosynthesis. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2024, 14, 1878–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China, 11th ed.; Medical Science Press: Beijing, China, 2020; Volume 1, p. 135.
  3. Ghasemnejad-Berenji, M. Immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory potential of crocin in COVID-19 treatment. J. Food Biochem. 2021, 45, e13718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Akbari, G.; Mard, S.A.; Dianat, M.; Mansouri, E. The Hepatoprotective and MicroRNAs Downregulatory Effects of Crocin Following Hepatic Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rats. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 1702967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Salama, R.M.; Abdel-Latif, G.A.; Abbas, S.S.; El Magdoub, H.M.; Schaalan, M.F. Neuroprotective effect of crocin against rotenone-induced Parkinson’s disease in rats: Interplay between PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway and enhanced expression of miRNA-7 and miRNA-221. Neuropharmacology 2020, 164, 107900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Finley, J.W.; Gao, S. A Perspective on Crocus sativus L. (Saffron) Constituent Crocin: A Potent Water-Soluble Antioxidant and Potential Therapy for Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 1005–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Allahdad, Z.; Khammari, A.; Karami, L.; Ghasemi, A.; Sirotkin, V.A.; Haertlé, T.; Saboury, A. Binding studies of crocin to β-Lactoglobulin and its impacts on both components. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 108, 106003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fan, H.; Fu, G.; Feng, S.; He, X.; Cai, W.; Wan, Y. Fabrication of casein-crocin nanocomplexes: Interaction mechanism, impact on stability and bioavailability of crocin. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 136, 108279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Barja, M.V.; Rodriguez-Concepcion, M. Plant geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthases: Every (gene) family has a story. aBIOTECH 2021, 2, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rodriguez-Concepcion, M.; Avalos, J.; Bonet, M.L.; Boronat, A.; Gomez-Gomez, L.; Hornero-Mendez, D.; Limon, M.C.; Meléndez-Martínez, A.J.; Olmedilla-Alonso, B.; Palou, A.; et al. A global perspective on carotenoids: Metabolism, biotechnology, and benefits for nutrition and health. Prog. Lipid Res. 2018, 70, 62–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xie, L.; Luo, Z.; Jia, X.; Mo, C.; Huang, X.; Suo, Y.; Cui, S.; Zang, Y.; Liao, J.; Ma, X. Synthesis of Crocin I and Crocin II by Multigene Stacking in Nicotiana benthamiana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Demmig-Adams, B.; López-Pozo, M.; Stewart, J.J.; Adams, W.W. Zeaxanthin and Lutein: Photoprotectors, Anti-Inflammatories, and Brain Food. Molecules 2020, 25, 3607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tao, W.; Ruan, J.; Wu, R.; Zhao, M.; Zhao, T.; Qi, M.; Yau, S.S.Y.; Yao, G.; Zhang, H.; Hu, Y.; et al. A natural carotenoid crocin exerts antidepressant action by promoting adult hippocampal neurogenesis through Wnt/β-catenin signaling. J. Adv. Res. 2023, 43, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Du, Y.; Wang, Y.-L.; Chen, L.; Li, Q.-E.; Cheng, Y. Anti-depressant-like effects of rannasangpei and its active ingredient crocin-1 on chronic unpredictable mild stress mice. Front. Pharmacol. 2023, 14, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xiao, Q.; Xiong, Z.; Yu, C.; Zhou, J.; Shen, Q.; Wang, L.; Xie, X.; Fu, Z. Antidepressant activity of crocin-I is associated with amelioration of neuroinflammation and attenuates oxidative damage induced by corticosterone in mice. Physiol. Behav. 2019, 212, 112699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, L.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, C.; Yin, J.; Kuang, L.; He, W.; Hua, D. Reactive oxygen species-responsive nanodrug of natural crocin-i with prolonged circulation for effective radioprotection. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2022, 213, 112441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xie, X.; Xiao, Q.; Xiong, Z.; Yu, C.; Zhou, J.; Fu, Z. Crocin-I ameliorates the disruption of lipid metabolism and dysbiosis of the gut microbiota induced by chronic corticosterone in mice. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 6779–6791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jiang, Y.; Lin, S.; Li, Q.; Tong, Y.; Wang, P. Purification of Crocin-I from Gardenia Yellow by Macroporous Resin Columns In-Series and Its Antidepressant-Like Effect. J. Chem. 2022, 2022, 7651553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hooshyari Ardakani, M.; Nosengo, C.; Felletti, S.; Catani, M.; Cavazzini, A.; De Luca, C.; Rezadoost, H. Enhancing the purification of crocin-I from saffron through the combination of multicolumn countercurrent chromatography and green solvents. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2024, 416, 2553–2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zheng, X.; Mi, J.; Balakrishna, A.; Liew, K.X.; Ablazov, A.; Sougrat, R.; Al-Babili, S. Gardenia carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4a is an efficient tool for biotechnological production of crocins in green and non-green plant tissues. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 2202–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Martí, M.; Diretto, G.; Aragonés, V.; Frusciante, S.; Ahrazem, O.; Gómez-Gómez, L.; Daròs, J.-A. Efficient production of saffron crocins and picrocrocin in Nicotiana benthamiana using a virus-driven system. Metab. Eng. 2020, 61, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ahrazem, O.; Zhu, C.; Huang, X.; Rubio-Moraga, A.; Capell, T.; Christou, P.; Gómez-Gómez, L. Metabolic Engineering of Crocin Biosynthesis in Nicotiana Species. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 861140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lobato-Gómez, M.; Drapal, M.; Fernández-Muñoz, R.; Presa, S.; Espinosa, A.; Fraser, P.D.; Gómez-Gómez, L.; Orzaez, D.; Granell, A. Maximizing saffron apocarotenoid production in varied tomato fruit carotenoid contexts. Plant J. 2024, 120, 966–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Busch, J.M.; Savage, G.P.; Searle, B.P. Sensory evaluation and physico-chemical measurements of tomatoes commonly consumed in New Zealand. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2008, 32, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jürkenbeck, K.; Spiller, A.; Meyerding, S.G.H. Tomato attributes and consumer preferences–a consumer segmentation approach. Br. Food J. 2019, 122, 328–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Frusciante, S.; Demurtas, O.C.; Sulli, M.; Mini, P.; Aprea, G.; Diretto, G.; Karcher, D.; Bock, R.; Giuliano, G. Heterologous expression of Bixa orellana cleavage dioxygenase 4—3 drives crocin but not bixin biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2022, 188, 1469–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ahrazem, O.; Diretto, G.; Rambla, J.L.; Rubio-Moraga, Á.; Lobato-Gómez, M.; Frusciante, S.; Argandoña, J.; Presa, S.; Granell, A.; Gómez-Gómez, L. Engineering high levels of saffron apocarotenoids in tomato. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhac074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dong, C.; Qu, G.; Guo, J.; Wei, F.; Gao, S.; Sun, Z.; Jin, L.; Sun, X.; Rochaix, J.-D.; Miao, Y.; et al. Rational design of geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase enhances carotenoid production and improves photosynthetic efficiency in Nicotiana tabacum. Sci. Bull. 2022, 67, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, J.; Smith, J.J.; Tian, L.; DellaPenna, D. The Evolution and Function of Carotenoid Hydroxylases in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 463–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, Y.; Li, S.; Zhou, Z.; Sun, L.; Sun, J.; Shen, C.; Gao, R.; Song, J.; Pu, X. The Functional Characteristics and Soluble Expression of Saffron CsCCD2. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, C.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, M.; Yang, M.; Dai, S.; Meng, Q.; Lv, W.; Zhuang, K. ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE 3-LIKE 2 regulates β-carotene and ascorbic acid accumulation in tomatoes during ripening. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 2067–2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, M.; Deng, L.; Guo, S.; Yuan, G.; Li, C.; Li, C. Alternative transcription and feedback regulation suggest that SlIDI1 is involved in tomato carotenoid synthesis in a complex way. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhab045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Biosynthetic pathway of crocins in the fruits of G. jasminoides. The enzyme expressed by the gene on the recombinant expression vector is marked in red. GjALDH2C2, aldehyde dehydrogenase; GjCCD4a, carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases; GjUGT94E13 and GjUGT74F8, UDP glucosyltransferases; MEP, methylerythritol 4-phosphate; IPP, isopentenyl diphosphate; DMAPP, dimethylallyl diphosphate; GGPP, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate; GPPS, geranyl diphosphate synthase; FPPS, farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase; GGPPS, geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase; PSY, phytoene synthase; PDS, phytoene desaturase; ZISO, ζ-carotene isomerase; ZDS, ζ-carotene desaturase; CRTISO, carotenoid isomerase; LCYE, lycopene ε-cyclase; LCYB, lycopene β-cyclase.
Figure 1. Biosynthetic pathway of crocins in the fruits of G. jasminoides. The enzyme expressed by the gene on the recombinant expression vector is marked in red. GjALDH2C2, aldehyde dehydrogenase; GjCCD4a, carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases; GjUGT94E13 and GjUGT74F8, UDP glucosyltransferases; MEP, methylerythritol 4-phosphate; IPP, isopentenyl diphosphate; DMAPP, dimethylallyl diphosphate; GGPP, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate; GPPS, geranyl diphosphate synthase; FPPS, farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase; GGPPS, geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase; PSY, phytoene synthase; PDS, phytoene desaturase; ZISO, ζ-carotene isomerase; ZDS, ζ-carotene desaturase; CRTISO, carotenoid isomerase; LCYE, lycopene ε-cyclase; LCYB, lycopene β-cyclase.
Ijms 26 09984 g001
Figure 2. Transient transformation of Nicotiana benthamiana leaves with AU-CU vector. (A) PCR identification results of GjALDH2C2, GjUGT94E13, GjCCD4a, GjUGT74F8, and Hyg on the AU-CU multigene vector. The DNA marker is 2000 bp. (B) Phenotype of crocins accumulation in transiently transformed Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. (C,D) Extracted ion chromatograms of crocin I (C) and II (D) detected by HPLC-MS/MS in transiently expressed Nicotiana benthamiana leaves.
Figure 2. Transient transformation of Nicotiana benthamiana leaves with AU-CU vector. (A) PCR identification results of GjALDH2C2, GjUGT94E13, GjCCD4a, GjUGT74F8, and Hyg on the AU-CU multigene vector. The DNA marker is 2000 bp. (B) Phenotype of crocins accumulation in transiently transformed Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. (C,D) Extracted ion chromatograms of crocin I (C) and II (D) detected by HPLC-MS/MS in transiently expressed Nicotiana benthamiana leaves.
Ijms 26 09984 g002
Figure 3. Process of Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of multigene Vector AU-CU into S. lycopersicum: (A) pre-culture; (B) co-culture; (C) differentiation and selection culture; (D) adventitious bud formation; (E,F) regenerated plantlet culture; (G) transgenic tomato fruit; (H) wild-type tomato fruit.
Figure 3. Process of Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of multigene Vector AU-CU into S. lycopersicum: (A) pre-culture; (B) co-culture; (C) differentiation and selection culture; (D) adventitious bud formation; (E,F) regenerated plantlet culture; (G) transgenic tomato fruit; (H) wild-type tomato fruit.
Ijms 26 09984 g003
Figure 4. Molecular identification of transgenic S. lycopersicum. (A) PCR detection of crocins biosynthesis genes. The first swimming lane was a 2000 bp marker, and the second lane was the wild type, followed by transgenic S. lycopersicum lines S5, S7, S10, S13, S15, S24, and S25 from right to left. (B) Analysis of relative expression levels of crocins biosynthesis genes in transgenic S. lycopersicum lines S5, S10, and S15. Leactin was used as the internal reference gene, with the expression level of the wild type (SWT) set to 1. The data are presented as the mean values ± SDs; n = 3 represents three biologically independent samples.
Figure 4. Molecular identification of transgenic S. lycopersicum. (A) PCR detection of crocins biosynthesis genes. The first swimming lane was a 2000 bp marker, and the second lane was the wild type, followed by transgenic S. lycopersicum lines S5, S7, S10, S13, S15, S24, and S25 from right to left. (B) Analysis of relative expression levels of crocins biosynthesis genes in transgenic S. lycopersicum lines S5, S10, and S15. Leactin was used as the internal reference gene, with the expression level of the wild type (SWT) set to 1. The data are presented as the mean values ± SDs; n = 3 represents three biologically independent samples.
Ijms 26 09984 g004
Figure 5. HPLC-MS/MS analysis of transgenic S. lycopersicum: (A) analysis of crocins accumulation in leaves of transgenic S. lycopersicum lines S5, S10, and S15; (B) analysis of crocin accumulation in fruits of transgenic S. lycopersicum plant lines S5, S10, and S15; (C) HPLC-MS/MS extracted ion chromatogram of crocin I in fruits of transgenic S. lycopersicum plant lines S5, S10, and S15; (D) HPLC/MS-MS extracted ion chromatogram of crocin I in leaves of transgenic S. lycopersicum plant lines S5, S10, S7, and S13. The data are presented as the mean values ± SDs; n.d.: not detected. n = 3 represents three biologically independent samples.
Figure 5. HPLC-MS/MS analysis of transgenic S. lycopersicum: (A) analysis of crocins accumulation in leaves of transgenic S. lycopersicum lines S5, S10, and S15; (B) analysis of crocin accumulation in fruits of transgenic S. lycopersicum plant lines S5, S10, and S15; (C) HPLC-MS/MS extracted ion chromatogram of crocin I in fruits of transgenic S. lycopersicum plant lines S5, S10, and S15; (D) HPLC/MS-MS extracted ion chromatogram of crocin I in leaves of transgenic S. lycopersicum plant lines S5, S10, S7, and S13. The data are presented as the mean values ± SDs; n.d.: not detected. n = 3 represents three biologically independent samples.
Ijms 26 09984 g005
Table 1. The HPLC-MS/MS parameters for crocins and crocetin.
Table 1. The HPLC-MS/MS parameters for crocins and crocetin.
AnalytesMolecular WeightQ1 (m/z)Q3 (m/z)DP (V)CE (V)
Crocin I976.7999.3675.0; 347.012050
Crocin II814.8837.3675.0; 347.012050
Crocin III652.7675.3347.0; 351.212045
Crocin IV652.7675.3347.0; 351.212035
Crocin V490.5513.3351.312050
Crocetin328.4327.1239.1; 119.2−60−20
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xie, L.; Liao, J.; Wang, C.; Jia, X.; Zang, Y.; Mo, C.; Ma, X.; Luo, Z. Heterologous Biosynthesis of Crocin I in Solanum lycopersicum L. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 9984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26209984

AMA Style

Xie L, Liao J, Wang C, Jia X, Zang Y, Mo C, Ma X, Luo Z. Heterologous Biosynthesis of Crocin I in Solanum lycopersicum L. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(20):9984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26209984

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xie, Lei, Jingjing Liao, Chongnan Wang, Xunli Jia, Yimei Zang, Changming Mo, Xiaojun Ma, and Zuliang Luo. 2025. "Heterologous Biosynthesis of Crocin I in Solanum lycopersicum L." International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 20: 9984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26209984

APA Style

Xie, L., Liao, J., Wang, C., Jia, X., Zang, Y., Mo, C., Ma, X., & Luo, Z. (2025). Heterologous Biosynthesis of Crocin I in Solanum lycopersicum L. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(20), 9984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26209984

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop