Next Article in Journal
In Vitro Insights into Bacteriocin-Mediated Modulation of Chicken Cecal Microbiota
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Genetic Architecture for Common Scab (Streptomyces scabei L.) Resistance in Diploid Potatoes
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanism of Transcription Factor ChbZIP1 Enhanced Alkaline Stress Tolerance in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advances in Protein Kinase Regulation of Stress Responses in Fruits and Vegetables

1
College of Agricultural Engineering and Food Science, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China
2
School of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Management and Technology, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
3
Integrative Agriculture Department, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(2), 768; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020768
Submission received: 19 December 2024 / Revised: 15 January 2025 / Accepted: 15 January 2025 / Published: 17 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Plant Pathology and Abiotic Stress)

Abstract

:
Fruits and vegetables (F&Vs) are essential in daily life and industrial production. These perishable produces are vulnerable to various biotic and abiotic stresses during their growth, postharvest storage, and handling. As the fruit detaches from the plant, these stresses become more intense. This unique biological process involves substantial changes in a variety of cellular metabolisms. To counter these stresses, plants have evolved complex physiological defense mechanisms, including regulating cellular activities through reversible phosphorylation of proteins. Protein kinases, key components of reversible protein phosphorylation, facilitate the transfer of the γ-phosphate group from adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to specific amino acid residues on substrates. This phosphorylation alters proteins’ structure, function, and interactions, thereby playing a crucial role in regulating cellular activity. Recent studies have identified various protein kinases in F&Vs, underscoring their significant roles in plant growth, development, and stress responses. This article reviews the various types of protein kinases found in F&Vs, emphasizing their roles and regulatory mechanisms in managing stress responses. This research sheds light on the involvement of protein kinases in metabolic regulation, offering key insights to advance the quality characteristics of F&Vs.

1. Introduction

Fruits and vegetables (F&Vs) are essential components of our diet, playing crucial roles in daily consumption and industrial production. However, recent industrialization and climate change have increasingly exposed F&Vs to various abiotic stresses, such as salt stress, drought, high temperatures, low temperatures, and biotic stresses, including viruses, microorganisms, and pests [1]. These stresses significantly impact F&Vs’ physiology, impeding their growth and development and ultimately reducing productivity [2]. For example, excessive salt in the soil can lead to ion toxicity and suppress photosynthesis in F&Vs, thereby limiting their growth and development. Approximately 7% of global soils are impacted by salinization [3]. Drought negatively affects nutrient absorption and yield, with global losses estimated at USD 166 billion over the past 27 years [4]. Climate change has also significantly influenced the growth and development of F&Vs. The continuous rise in global temperatures, with an estimated 0.3 °C rise in surface temperatures over the next decade, poses challenges such as delayed seed germination, disrupted fruit set, and various induced morphological and physiological changes, ultimately resulting in decreased productivity [5,6]. Under low-temperature conditions, cold-sensitive F&Vs are prone to damage such as skin indentation, flesh browning, and delayed ripening [7]. Diseases, particularly pathogenic infections, significantly threaten the growth and quality of F&Vs, compromising not only the quality of the produce but also consumer health [8]. To withstand these stresses, F&Vs have developed various regulatory mechanisms over long-term evolution. Therefore, understanding stress tolerance mechanisms is crucial for ensuring optimal growth and yield of F&Vs. This knowledge will aid in the development of stress-tolerant varieties, thereby promoting the stability and sustainability of horticultural crops.
Reversible phosphorylation of proteins is a crucial post-translational modification process and a widely recognized regulatory mechanism involved in nearly all physiological and pathological processes [9]. Recent studies have highlighted the key regulatory roles of this process in the growth, development, and stress responses of F&Vs. Protein kinases, integral to reversible protein phosphorylation, catalyze the transfer of the γ-phosphate group from adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to the side chains of serine (Ser), threonine (Thr), and tyrosine (Tyr) on substrates, initiating protein phosphorylation reactions [10]. This process leads to structural changes in proteins that modulate their activity. Through mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades, protein phosphorylation can transmit and amplify external signals by modulating gene expression through the regulation of transcription factors, ion channels, and other pathways [11]. Many protein kinases have been identified in various F&Vs, demonstrating their involvement in the growth, development, and stress responses in plants through various mechanisms. However, a comprehensive overview of the types of protein kinases in the F&Vs and their regulatory roles in stress responses is still lacking. Thus, this article introduces the types of protein kinases in F&Vs, emphasizing their roles and regulatory mechanisms in stress responses and offering valuable insights on the metabolic regulation of F&Vs and the enhancement of their quality characteristics.

2. Classification of Protein Kinases

Protein kinases represent a vast family of plant proteins that play diverse roles and contribute to critical structural modifications. Consequently, classification of protein kinases aids in understanding their structures and functions. Initially, protein kinases were classified into Ser/Thr and Tyr kinases based on their substrate specificity for phosphorylating Ser, Thr, and Tyr residues, respectively. This classification was further refined by Lehti-Shiu and Shiu [12], who identified protein kinases from 25 plant genomes and grouped them into the following categories: AGC (which includes cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA), cGMP-dependent protein kinase G (PKG), and phospholipid-dependent protein kinase C (PKC)), calcium/calmodulin-regulated kinases (CaMK), CMGC (which includes cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), glycogen synthase kinases (GSKs), and CDK-like kinases (CLKs)), casein kinase 1 (CK1), sterility (STE), tyrosine kinase (TK), tyrosine kinase-like kinases (TKL), and others.

2.1. AGC

AGC kinases are characterized by their Ser/Thr protein kinase nature and sequence similarity to the catalytic kinase domains of PKA, PKG, and PKC [13]. PKA functions as a tetrameric enzyme composed of two regulatory subunits and two catalytic subunits, and is further classified into PKA type I and type II based on distinct regulatory subunits. The PKA regulatory subunits form dimers through interactions at their N-terminus dimerization/docking domains [14]. Among the three types of PKA catalytic subunits (Cα, Cβ, and Cγ), Cα and Cβ are the dominant forms with multiple splice variants [15]. Plant PKGs exhibit a unique structure, encompassing both protein kinase and phosphatase domains, with a type 2C protein phosphatase domain that distinguishes them from those found in animals [16]. PKC is categorized into three groups based on activator sensitivity: conventional PKC (including PKCα, PKCβ, and PKCγ), novel PKC (including PKCδ, PKCε, PKCη, and PKCθ), and atypical PKC (including of PKCζ and PKCλ/ɩ) [17]. Structurally, the PKC polypeptide chain features four conserved domains (C1–C4). The N-terminus regulatory domain (comprising C1 and C2) regulates kinase activity and subcellular localization, whereas the C-terminus catalytic domain (comprising C3 and C4) binds to ATP and substrate proteins [18]. Recent studies have demonstrated the crucial role of AGC kinases in various F&Vs, including tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) [19] and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) [20]. These kinases are particularly important for phosphorylating auxin efflux carriers, which affects plant growth and development by modulating auxin transport [21].

2.2. CaMK

CaMK includes calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) and sucrose non-fermenting 1-related protein kinase (SnRK) families. CDPK is a monomeric protein with a molecular mass ranging from 40 to 90 kDa [22] and consists of four distinct domains: N-terminus and C-terminus variable domains, a Ser/Thr kinase domain, an autoinhibitory junction, and a regulatory calmodulin-like domain with Ca2+-binding EF-hands [23]. CDPK plays a crucial role as a receptor for Ca2+ signal transduction in plant cells due to its Ca2+-binding activity [24]. SnRKs are categorized into three subfamilies: SnRK1, SnRK2, and SnRK3. SnRK1 features a highly conserved N-terminus protein kinase domain, while SnRK2 and SnRK3, which are unique to plants, have a highly conserved N-terminus kinase domain and a C-terminus variable regulatory domain in SnRK2 [25]. SnRK3, also known as calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs), includes N-terminus protein kinase domains and a C-terminus regulatory domain (NAF domain) [26]. Numerous CaMKs have been identified in various F&Vs (Table 1).

2.3. CMGC

CMGC kinases derive their name from CDKs, MAPKs, GSKs, and CLKs. CDKs typically comprise 200–350 amino acid residues, with a molecular weight of approximately 30–45 kDa. Structurally, they are characterized by a β-folded amino-terminal region and an α-helical C-terminus domain [69]. CDKs can be further divided into CDKA–CDKG and CDKLIKE, with CDKAs and CDKBs primarily involved in cell cycle regulation [70]. Various CDKs are activated at specific times during the cell cycle, driving cells through the cell cycle by phosphorylating substrates. In addition to regulating the cell cycle, CDKs are involved in transcription and messenger RNA (mRNA) processing [71]. The MAPK cascades, including MAPK, MAPK kinase (MAPKK), and MAPKK kinase (MAPKKK), constitute highly conserved signal transduction pathways in all eukaryotes. Generally, the MAPK pathway involves a phosphorylation cascade, starting with MAPKKK acting on MAPKK, which then phosphorylates MAPK, leading to sequential signal transduction and specific physiological and biochemical responses [72]. Numerous MAPKs have been identified in F&Vs (Table 1). GSKs, a type of Ser/Thr protein kinase, are encoded by a multigene family in plants and are involved in various processes of plant growth and development [73]. CLKs mainly consist of four subtypes CLK1-4 and are known as “LAMMER” kinases due to a unique conserved amino acid sequence, “EHLAMMERILG”, found in their catalytic domain. The differences among them lie in the variations in the ATP-binding sites and their respective functions. CLKs phosphorylate Tyr and Ser/Thr residues, modulate the physiological properties of protein substrates, and play crucial roles in regulating pre-mRNA splicing and signal transduction processes [74].

2.4. CK1

The CK1 family is evolutionarily conserved across eukaryotes and is characterized by a highly conserved catalytic domain and a variable domain primarily located at the C-terminus [75]. CK1 plays pivotal roles in various biological processes, such as DNA damage response, cytokinesis, cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, immune responses, biotic stress responses, and flowering time regulation [76,77]. However, the specific biological functions of CK1 members in F&Vs remain largely unknown and most of the CK1 family members have yet to be identified.

2.5. STE

STE kinases include STE7, STE11, and STE20, which are upstream regulators of MAPKs [78]. In the signal transduction pathway, STE7, STE11, and STE20 function as MAPKK, MAPKKK, and MAPKKKK, respectively [79,80]. The STE7 family directly phosphorylates MAPK, the STE11 family phosphorylates STE7 kinases, and many STE20 members target STE11 kinases [81].

2.6. TK

TKs are a large family of kinases categorized as receptor tyrosine kinases and non-receptor tyrosine kinases, based on their localization in the cell membrane [82]. These kinases catalyze the transfer of the γ-phosphate from ATP to protein tyrosine residues. A defining characteristic is the typical TK domain at their carboxyl terminus, which possesses a core catalytic structure capable of self-phosphorylation, and substrate phosphorylation. However, each TK contains unique domains, motifs, and residues that confer distinct catalytic or regulatory properties [83].

2.7. TKL

TKLs are a diverse group of Ser/Thr protein kinases that resemble TKs in sequence but lack the distinct motifs found in tyrosine kinases. They represent the most abundant kinase group in plant, accounting for approximately 80% of the plant kinome [84].

3. Regulation of Protein Kinase in F&V Stress Responses

3.1. The Role of Protein Kinases in the Salt Stress Response of F&Vs

Salt stress is a prevalent abiotic stress factor that significantly impacts the growth and development of F&Vs, adversely affecting various aspects, and ultimately compromising growth, development, and yield [85]. Several studies using transcriptome analysis have demonstrated that protein kinases are the key components of signal transduction pathways and play crucial roles in the salt stress response of F&Vs. For instance, Wei et al. [86] identified approximately 42 differentially expressed genes enriched in the MAPK signaling pathway in tomato seedlings in response to salt stress. Inhibition of MAPK phosphorylation with SB203580 reduced the levels of hormones, such as jasmonic acid (JA) and abscisic acid (ABA), as well as inhibited the activities of antioxidant enzymes, indicating MAPK’s role in the salt stress response of tomato seedlings. Irrigating tomato seedlings with 100 mmol L−1 NaCl solution for 7 days demonstrated that the overexpression of SlMAPK3 alleviated the inhibition of salt stress on the fresh weight, seedling height, seminal root length and seed germination of tomato plants. And the overexpression of SlMAPK3 in tomatoes enhanced the clearance of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and upregulated the expression of genes associated with the ethylene signaling pathway, thereby improving tomato tolerance to salt stress [87]. After 10 days of cultivating grape callus on MS medium containing NaCl, it was found that the overexpressed VvMAPK9 grape callus grew faster and exhibited lower electrical conductivity compared to the wild-type grape callus. Thus, overexpression of VvMAPK9 in grapes increased callus tolerance to salt stress [32]. Additionally, the response of F&Vs to salt stress is significantly regulated by CDPKs. Under salt stress conditions, overexpression of VaCPK21 in cultured grape cells and its heterologous expression in Arabidopsis seedlings led to a significant upregulation of resistance-related genes and enhanced salt stress resistance [88]. The salt overly sensitive (SOS) pathway is a well-known salt resistance signaling pathway in plants, in which calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) serve as Ca2+ receptors to specifically activate CIPKs. Studies have demonstrated that overexpression of SlCBL4 or SlCIPK24 [89], as well as heterologous expression of the CBL-CIPK gene MdSOS2L1 in tomatoes, can enhance salt tolerance [90]. Furthermore, the heterologous expression of peach PpSnRK1a in tomatoes could enhance the ABA signal transduction system, ROS metabolism, and leaf lipid peroxidation, thereby increasing the plant’s ability to withstand salt stress [91]. These studies highlight the significant role of protein kinases in mediating the response of F&Vs to salt stress (Figure 1), providing valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying salt stress in F&Vs and strategies for enhancing their salt tolerance.

3.2. The Role of Protein Kinases in the Temperature Stress Response of F&Vs

Temperature plays a crucial role in the growth and development of F&Vs. High temperatures can impede normal growth, increase transpiration, weaken photosynthesis, and, in severe cases, cause dehydration symptoms that may lead to plant death [92]. Conversely, prolonged exposure to low temperatures can damage plant cells, causing chilling injuries or frost damage [93].
Protein kinases play a crucial role in the perception and transduction of temperature signals in F&Vs. For example, lettuce treated under high-temperature conditions (33 ± 2 °C daytime/25 ± 2 °C night) showed that silencing of LsMAPK4 resulted in slower stem growth and significantly inhibited accelerated bolting, indicating that LsMPAK4 might be a potential regulator of bolting in lettuce and could promote bolting under high-temperature [94]. In tomatoes, studies have demonstrated that knocking out SlMPK3 enhances tolerance to high temperatures [44], while overexpression of SlMPK3 inhibits plant growth and reduces the activity of antioxidant enzymes, indicating that SlMPK3 negatively regulates tomato’s high-temperature resistance. Additionally, the knockout of the CDPK gene CPK28 in tomatoes led to ROS accumulation, protein oxidation, and decreased antioxidant enzyme activity under high-temperature stress, suggesting a positive role for CPK28 in the tomato plant’s response to high temperatures [95]. Under low-temperature stress, overexpression of the necrotic dwarf gene (NDW), a receptor-like protein kinase gene, was found to reverse the semi-dwarf and necrotic phenotypes induced by low temperatures in tomato plants, highlighting the crucial role of NDW in tomato resistance to low temperatures [96]. Furthermore, after 8 days of low temperature culture, heterologous overexpression of SpCPK33 in tomato plants showed stronger cold resistance and reduced leaf wilting by decreasing the malondialdehyde content and ROS levels compared with wild-type plants [97]. In bananas, overexpression of MusaMPK5 promoted stem growth, increased fresh weight, and enhanced resistance to low temperatures [98]. In peaches, 17 PpCDPKs were identified in the genome, with significant changes in the expression of most PpCDPKs observed during cold storage. Transcriptome analysis revealed that PpCDPK2, PpCDPK7, PpCDPK10, and PpCDPK13 are closely associated with postharvest low-temperature stress in peaches [37]. Overall, these findings underscore the important roles of protein kinases in the responses of various F&Vs to both high and low-temperature stresses, as illustrated in Figure 1.

3.3. The Role of Protein Kinases in the Drought Tolerance of F&Vs

Drought stress significantly impacts the growth, development, and yield of F&Vs. Zhu et al. [99] reported that using CRISPR-Cas9 to generate CPK27-knocked out tomato lines and suspending water supply for 10 days to simulate drought stress resulted in severe leaf atrophy in the knockout plants, indicating that CPK27 positively regulates plant drought tolerance in tomato plant. Furthermore, overexpression of CaDIK1 [100], CaCIPK3 [101], and CaCIPK7 [102] could enhance the antioxidant capacity and drought tolerance of pepper. In tomatoes, overexpression of SlMAPK3 improved the photosynthetic capacity of leaves and increases the content of chlorophyll, proline, and sugar, thereby improving drought tolerance [103]. Under drought stress, SlMAPK3-overexpressing tomato exhibited higher relative water content, SOD content, lower POD content, and stronger drought tolerance [104]. VaCIPK02 regulated drought stress in grapes by interacting with ABA receptor proteins and modulating ABA accumulation [105]. These findings highlight the crucial regulatory role of protein kinases in the drought resistance mechanisms of F&Vs (Figure 1).

3.4. The Role of Protein Kinases in Disease Resistance of F&Vs

F&Vs are vulnerable to various pests and pathogenic microorganisms throughout their growth, development, and postharvest stages [106]. In response to these challenges, F&Vs have developed diverse defense mechanisms. Notably, protein kinases have been a key focus of research aimed at understanding their role in the disease resistance mechanisms of F&Vs.
CDPK and CDPK-related kinases (CRK) play various roles in plant defense. For instance, SlCDPK18 and SlCDPK10 positively regulated tomato resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae and Pseudomonas oryzae syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000. Similarly, SlCRK6 enhanced tomato resistance to Pst DC3000 and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum [22]. Protein kinases have also been extensively investigated for their role in fungal resistance in F&Vs. Botrytis cinerea, the causative agent of gray mold, severely affects tomatoes and poses threats during their growth, development, and postharvest stages [107]. Research has identified tomato protein kinase 1b (TPK1b) as a crucial regulator in tomato defense against gray mold. TPK1b could be phosphorylated by the receptor-like kinase 1 (PORK1), which was an ortholog of tomato PEPR1/2. The inhibition of PORK1 resulted in decreased phosphorylation of TPK1b, thereby compromising tomato resistance to gray mold [108]. Additionally, NDW and SlMAPKKK43 played crucial positive regulatory roles in tomato resistance to gray mold. When isolated leaves and fruits of transgenic tomato lines were inoculated with Botrytis cinerea, it was found that the lesion area in SlMAPKKK43 knocked out plants was significantly larger than that in wild-type plants. Phosphorylation validation revealed that SlMAPKKK43 positively regulated tomato resistance to gray mold by phosphorylating SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 [109]. In pears, 108 PbrMAPKKKs were identified, with the expression of PbrMAPKKK12/13/53/60/65/82/83/96 positively correlating with resistance to pear black spot disease. Conversely, silencing PbrMAPKKK6 resulted in increased resistance to black spot disease in pears [110]. In muskmelons, infection by Penicillium led to a rapid increase in the expression and activity of HmCDPK2, peaking at 12 h post-treatment [111]. In bananas, Panama disease, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense Tropical Race 4 (Foc TR4), resulted in significant upregulation of MaCDPK1-4 and MaCDPK6 expression, with MaCDPK2 and MaCDPK4 showing the highest expression levels and increased sensitivity to Foc TR4 [30]. These findings suggest that MaCDPK2 and MaCDPK4 may play critical roles in banana resistance to Panama disease. Studies on F&Vs’ viral resistance have demonstrated that following tomato infection with tomato spotted wilt virus, 1022 proteins undergo significant changes, including the upregulation of CDPK and SnRK2, which are involved in activating the ABA signaling pathway [112].
These findings reveal the critical role of protein kinases in disease resistance and highlight their importance for improving disease resistance (Figure 1) and increasing yields of F&Vs.

4. The Mechanisms of Protein Kinases Regulate the Response of F&Vs to Stress

4.1. Regulation of Protein Kinases on the Antioxidant System

The growth and development of F&Vs are intricately regulated by a combination of internal and external factors. Under normal growth conditions, F&Vs generate ROS as part of their metabolic processes, playing essential roles in physiological functions such as cell signaling, hormone regulation, and cell wall synthesis [113]. However, exposure to adverse environments can result in excessive accumulation of ROS, leading to damage to the biological molecules and cell structures of F&Vs [114]. To counteract the oxidative damage caused by stress, F&Vs have evolved a sophisticated antioxidant system that includes a series of antioxidant enzymes, non-enzymatic antioxidants, and signaling molecules. Studies have shown that protein kinases participate in the stress response of F&Vs by regulating ROS metabolism. For example, in tomatoes, SlMAPK3 positively regulated the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and disease-related enzymes to inhibit ROS accumulation and enhance resistance to salt, drought, and gray mold [72,88]. Under cold stress, the overexpression of SpCPK33 significantly increased the activities of SOD, POD, and CAT, suppressed ROS accumulation, and improved the cold tolerance of wild tomatoes [82]. Conversely, under heat stress conditions, mutations in CPK28 resulted in ROS accumulation and increased protein oxidation while reducing the activities of APX and other antioxidant enzymes [95]. Additionally, SlMPK3 negatively regulated the heat tolerance of tomatoes by inhibiting the activity of the antioxidant defense system [44]. Under salt stress, VvMAPK9 in grapes enhanced the salt tolerance of callus tissues by increasing the activities of POD and SOD [32], whereas MdSOS2L1 in apples enhanced salt tolerance by boosting antioxidant metabolites, such as anthocyanins and malic acid [90]. In peaches, PpCDPK7 interacted with a respiratory burst oxidase homolog on the cell membrane, triggering the Ca2+-ROS signaling pathway to maintain cellular ROS homeostasis, thereby alleviating cold damage in fruit [37]. Additionally, ROS acts as signaling molecule that transmits stress signals to activate protein kinases. These kinases then regulate the transcription of various downstream genes through a series of phosphorylation events, modulating oxidative damage and coordinating the responses of F&Vs to various stressors [115]. These findings underscore the crucial role of protein kinases in regulating the antioxidant system and ROS metabolism to mediate the stress responses of F&Vs.

4.2. Interaction of Protein Kinases with Hormone Signaling Pathways

Phytohormones play crucial roles in the growth, development, and stress responses of F&Vs, with protein kinases exhibiting close and regulatory interactions with these hormones [116,117]. Protein kinases serve as intermediaries in hormone signaling, converting hormone signals into cellular physiological responses. Upon hormone binding to its receptor, specific protein kinases are activated, resulting in changes to their phosphorylation activities [118]. These activated kinases can then phosphorylate other proteins, initiating a cascade of signaling events. Additionally, protein kinases modulate various components of hormone signaling pathways by interacting with hormone receptors, regulating receptor activity and stability, and phosphorylating transcription factors within these pathways, thereby influencing gene expression.
For instance, overexpression of SlMAPK3 in tomatoes could induce the expression of genes in the SOS pathway (SlSOS1, SlSOS2, SlSOS3) and the ethylene signaling pathway (SlACS2, SlEIN2, SlERF2), thereby contributing to the salt stress response of tomato plants [87]. ABA, a pivotal plant hormone that regulates growth, development, water balance, and stress responses, involves various protein kinases in signaling pathways [119]. For example, NDW in tomato plants positively regulated ABA synthesis and the expression of genes related to signal transduction, thereby promoting plant growth and cold resistance [96]. Heterologous expression of PpSnRK1α in tomato seedlings significantly increased the expression of genes related to ABA signaling, thereby improving salt tolerance [91]. In peppers, overexpression of CaCIPK7 elevated the transcription levels of CaNCED3 (a key gene in ABA synthesis) and downstream resistance genes (CaRAB18, CaRD29B, CaDREB), thereby enhancing drought tolerance [102]. In apples, overexpression of MdMRLK2 upregulated ABA levels but downregulated SA levels. MdMRLK2 bound to the hypersensitive-induced response protein MdHIR1, inhibiting its action and negatively regulating apple resistance to Valsa mali [120]. Additionally, JA and methyl jasmonate (MeJA) are endogenous hormones and stress-signaling compounds widely distributed in plants [121]. Studies have demonstrated that JA can activate specific protein kinases to transmit signals that trigger diverse physiological responses within the cells. Knocking out SlMAPK3 in tomato seedlings reduced the expression of the JA-synthesizing gene SlLoxC and downstream defense genes in its signaling pathway (SlPI I and SlPI II), whereas MeJA promoted the expression of CaCIPK3. Overexpression of CaCIPK3 upregulated the expression of key genes in the JA synthesis and signaling pathways (CaAOC and CaMYC), thereby positively regulating drought resistance [101]. These studies together demonstrate that protein kinases modulate stress response processes in F&Vs by interacting with phytohormones.

4.3. Interaction of Protein Kinases with Transcription Factors

Transcriptional regulation is a fundamental process that coordinates normal plant development and the stress response. Transcription factors play vital roles in regulating gene transcription by specifically binding to cis-acting elements in gene regulatory regions [122]. Several studies have indicated that protein kinases are involved in the metabolic and stress response processes of F&Vs by regulating transcription factors. Protein kinases can interact directly or indirectly with transcription factors, leading to their phosphorylation. This phosphorylation can affect the transcription factors’ DNA-binding ability, subcellular localization, stability, and interactions with other proteins. Through this mechanism, protein kinases can modulate the function of transcription factors, thereby influencing gene expression. Conversely, transcription factors can regulate the expression levels of protein kinase genes, thereby affecting the production and activity of protein kinases. Under salt stress, increased osmotic stress leads to a rise in Ca2+ concentration, subsequently activate protein kinases, such as CDPKs and CIPKs. These activated protein kinases transmit osmotic stress signals to downstream transcription factors, including NAM, ATAF1/2, and CUC2 (NAC family), tryptophan-arginine-lysine-tyrosine (WRKY transcription factors), and v-myb avian myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog (MYB family), which regulate gene expression to enhance the salt tolerance of F&Vs [123]. Cold stress triggered the phosphorylation of SlBBX17 by SlMPK1 and SlMPK2, promoting its interaction with the transcription factor HY5. This led to elevated HY5 levels and the induction of C-repeat binding factor gene expression, ultimately increasing the cold resistance of tomato seedlings [124]. Additionally, MusaMPK5 phosphorylated two stress-related NAC transcription factors, NAC042 and SNAC67, to improve the cold resistance of bananas [98]. In summary, the intricate interplay between protein kinases and transcription factors plays a crucial role in mediating the development and stress responses in F&Vs.

4.4. Regulation of Protein Kinases on Specific Proteins

The accumulation of heat shock response-related genes in F&Vs under high-temperature stress serves as a critical defense mechanism. Heat shock proteins (HSPs), including HSP100, HSP90, HSP70, HSP60, and small HSPs, are essential molecular chaperones that play crucial roles in maintaining protein homeostasis and ensuring plant survival under heat stress [125]. For instance, Yu et al. [28] demonstrated that SlMAPK3 negatively regulated heat tolerance in tomato plants. Notably, SlMAPK3 mutants showed significantly higher transcript levels of SlHSP70, SlHSP90, and SlHSP100 compared to wild-type plants, suggesting that SlHSPs may be involved in the SlMAPK3-mediated heat response. In addition to heat stress, disease resistance-related proteins such as SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 also play important roles in the immune response of tomatoes [109]. Protein-protein interaction assays and phosphorylation assessments indicated that tomato CPK27 directly interacted with and phosphorylated tonoplast sugar transporter 2, thereby regulating the accumulation of soluble sugars, which contributed to drought tolerance in tomato plants [99]. Furthermore, SlMAPK3 could also regulate drought tolerance in tomato plants by interacting with SlASR4 [104]. Under high-salt conditions, F&Vs experience disruptions in intracellular salt ion balance. In response, protein kinases regulate ion channels and proton pumps in both the plasma and vacuolar membranes. This regulation helps adjust ion concentrations in the cytoplasm, thereby regulating cellular osmotic pressure, controlling stomatal movement, and maintaining cellular homeostasis [126]. An imbalance in intracellular ion concentrations can cause necrosis of plant roots and leaves [127]. Overexpression of SlCIPK24 could increase the deposition of Na+ and K+ in roots under salt stress by isolating excess Na+ in the vacuoles, thereby mitigating its detrimental effects in the cytoplasm [89].
These studies demonstrate the diverse mechanisms through which protein kinases regulate the stress response in F&Vs (Figure 2). However, the specific mechanisms by which they perceive and transmit certain stress signals require further investigation. Additional research is necessary to better understand how these mechanisms can be leveraged to improve the yield and quality of F&Vs.

5. Conclusions

Protein kinases are diverse and abundant, playing crucial roles in the growth, development, stress responses, and signal transduction processes of F&Vs. However, numerous protein kinases and their associated genes involved in the stress response of F&Vs have been identified; the focus has mainly been on MAPK and CDPK. Other protein kinases, such as PKA and PKC, which are more commonly studied in animals, remain less explored in plants. Moreover, although protein kinases function through multiple signaling pathways, there is a lack of comprehensive research on how these pathways interact when exposed to the same stimuli. Future investigations are warranted to gain a deeper understanding of the interactions between protein kinases and their specific regulatory mechanisms. In the future, advanced tools such as multi-omics integrated analysis, CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology, cell sequencing technology, fluorescence staining, and mass spectrometry can facilitate a comprehensive exploration of protein kinases in F&Vs. This exploration will reveal their regulatory mechanisms in plant metabolism, offering crucial theoretical insights into enhancing the quality characteristics of F&Vs.

Author Contributions

Y.S.: writing—review and editing, writing—original draft, investigation, conceptualization; F.L.: writing—review and editing, funding acquisition; M.A.: conceptualization, writing—review and editing; X.L.: conceptualization, writing—review and editing; X.Z.: writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition; Z.F.R.A.: funding acquisition, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32172278 and 32272384) and a project under the United Arab Emirates University (UAEU) Program for Advanced Research (UPAR) (No. 12R059).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sardar, A. Genetic amelioration of fruit and vegetable crops to increase biotic and abiotic stress resistance through CRISPR genome editing. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1260102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Majeed, Y.; Zhu, X.; Cho, N.; UI-Ain, N.; Raza, A.; Haider, F.U.; Si, H.J. Harnessing the role of mitogen-activated protein kinases against abiotic stresses in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 932923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Singh, H.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, A.; Kyriacou, M.C.; Colla, G.; Rouphael, Y. Grafting tomato as a tool to improve salt tolerance. Agronomy 2020, 10, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hendrawan, V.S.; Komori, D.; Kim, W. Possible factors determining global-scale patterns of crop yield sensitivity to drought. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0281287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Aleem, S.; Sharif, I.; Amin, E.; Tahir, M.; Parveen, N.; Aslam, R.; Najeebullah, M.; Shahid, M.T.H. Heat tolerance in vegetables in the current genomic era: An overview. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 92, 497–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hoshikawa, K.; Pham, D.; Ezura, H.; Schafleitner, R.; Nakashima, K. Genetic and molecular mechanisms conferring heat stress tolerance in tomato plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 786688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xiao, L.; Jiang, X.Y.; Deng, Y.C.; Xu, K.H.; Duan, X.W.; Wan, K.; Tang, X.M. Study on characteristics and lignification mechanism of postharvest banana fruit during chilling injury. Foods 2023, 12, 1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, B.; Bi, Y. The role of signal production and transduction in induced resistance of harvested fruit and vegetables. Food Qual. Saf. 2021, 5, fyab011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lardon, R.; Trinh, H.K.; Xu, X.Y.; Vu, L.D.; van de Cotte, B.; Pernisova, M.; Vanneste, S.; De Smet, I.; Geelen, D. Histidine kinase inhibitors impair shoot regeneration in Arabidopsis thaliana via cytokinin signaling and SAM patterning determinants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 894208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Seok, S.H. Structural insights into protein regulation by phosphorylation and substrate recognition of protein kinases/phosphatases. Life 2021, 11, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. He, X.W.; Wang, C.Z.; Wang, H.B.; Li, L.G.; Wang, C. The function of MAPK cascades in response to various stresses in horticultural plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lehti-Shiu, M.D.; Shiu, S.H. Diversity, classification and function of the plant protein kinase superfamily. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B-Biol. Sci. 2012, 367, 2619–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, X.L.; Yang, K.; Wei, X.N.; Zhang, Q.F.; Rong, W.; Du, L.P.; Ye, X.J.; Qi, L.; Zhang, Z.Y. The wheat AGC kinase TaAGC1 is a positive contributor to host resistance to the necrotrophic pathogen Rhizoctonia cerealis. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 6591–6603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Götz, F.; Roske, Y.; Schulz, M.S.; Autenrieth, K.; Bertinetti, D.; Faelber, K.; Zühlke, K.; Kreuchwig, A.; Kennedy, E.J.; Krause, G.; et al. AKAP18: PKA-RIIα structure reveals crucial anchor points for recognition of regulatory subunits of PKA. Biochem. J. 2016, 473, 1881–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, H.Y.; Kong, Q.B.; Wang, J.; Jiang, Y.F.; Hua, H. Complex roles of Camp-PKA-CREB signaling in cancer. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 2020, 9, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shen, Q.W.; Zhan, X.Q.; Yang, P.; Li, J.; Chen, J.; Tang, B.; Wang, X.; Hong, Y. Dual activities of plant cGMP-dependent protein kinase and its roles in gibberellin signaling and salt stress. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 3073–3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Marrocco, V.; Bogomolovas, J.; Ehler, E.; Dos Remedios, C.G.; Yu, J.; Gao, C.; Lange, S. PKC and PKN in heart disease. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2019, 128, 212–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rui, M.; Nasti, R.; Bignardi, E.; Della Volpe, S.; Rossino, G.; Rossi, D.; Collina, S. PKC in regenerative therapy: New insights for old targets. Pharmaceuticals 2017, 10, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Devarenne, T.P.; Ekengren, S.K.; Pedley, K.F.; Martin, G.B. Adi3 is a Pdk1-interacting AGC kinase that negatively regulates plant cell death. EMBO J. 2006, 25, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aono, A.H.; Pimenta, R.J.G.; Dambroz, C.M.D.; Costa, F.C.L.; Kuroshu, R.M.; de Souza, A.P.; Pereira, W.A. Genome-wide characterization of the common bean kinome: Catalog and insights into expression patterns and genetic organization. Gene 2023, 855, 147127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhang, Y.Y.; Yao, W.J.S.; Wang, F.; Su, Y.H.; Zhang, D.J.; Hu, S.W.; Zhang, X.S. AGC protein kinase AGC1-4 mediates seed size in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 825–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, J.P.; Xu, Y.P.; Munyampundu, J.P.; Liu, T.Y.; Cai, X.Z. Calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) and CDPK-related kinase (CRK) gene families in tomato: Genome-wide identification and functional analyses in disease resistance. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2016, 291, 661–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bredow, M.; Monaghan, J. Regulation of plant immune signaling by calcium-dependent protein kinases. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2019, 32, 6–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, Q.; Huang, Y.; Cui, L.; Gan, C.X.; Qiu, Z.M.; Yan, C.H.; Deng, X.H. Genome-wide identification of the CDPK gene family and their involvement in taproot cracking in radish. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, Z.X.; Zhu, Y.X.; Wu, G.Q.; Wei, M. The role of SnRK2 in the response to stress, the growth and development of plants. Chin. J. Biotechnol. 2022, 38, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zheng, H.F.; Xie, Y.L.; Mu, C.H.; Cheng, W.L.; Bai, Y.C.; Gao, J. Deciphering the regulatory role of PheSnRK genes in Moso bamboo: Insights into hormonal, energy, and stress responses. BMC Genom. 2024, 25, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Khurana, A.; Akash; Roychowdhury, A. Identification of phosphorus starvation inducible SnRK genes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021, 30, 987–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, W.Q.; Wang, L.; Zhao, R.R.; Sheng, J.P.; Zhang, S.J.; Li, R.; Shen, L. Knockout of SlMAPK3 enhances tolerance to heat stress involving ROS homeostasis in tomato plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Y.Y.; Zhang, H.X.; Liang, S.B.; Chen, X.L.; Liu, J.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, A.X. Identification of CDPK gene family in Solanum habrochaites and its function analysis under stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Li, J.; Jiang, M.M.; Ren, L.; Liu, Y.; Chen, H.Y. Identification and characterization of CBL and CIPK gene families in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Mol. Genet. Genom. 2016, 291, 1769–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhang, K.; Han, Y.T.; Zhao, F.L.; Hu, Y.; Gao, Y.R.; Ma, Y.F.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, Y.J.; Wen, Y.Q. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the CDPK gene family in grape, Vitis spp. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ji, X.M.; Sui, C.C.; Yu, Y.Y.; Liu, X.L.; Li, B.; Sun, Q.H. Grape VvMAPK9 positively regulates salt tolerance in Arabidopsis and grape callus through regulating the antioxidative system. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 2022, 148, 609–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, J.Y.; Chen, N.N.; Cheng, Z.M.; Xiong, J.S. Genome-wide identification, annotation and expression profile analysis of SnRK2 gene family in grapevine. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2016, 22, 478–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xi, Y.; Liu, J.Y.; Dong, C.; Cheng, Z.M. The CBL and CIPK gene family in grapevine (Vitis vinifera): Genome-wide analysis and expression profiles in response to various abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cai, H.Y.; Cheng, J.B.; Yan, Y.; Xiao, Z.L.; Li, J.Z.; Mou, S.L.; Qiu, A.L.; Lai, Y.; Guan, D.Y.; He, S.L. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of calcium-dependent protein kinase and its closely related kinase genes in Capsicum annuum. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liu, Z.Q.; Shi, L.P.; Liu, Y.Y.; Tang, Q.; Shen, L.; Yang, S.; Cai, J.S.; Yu, H.X.; Wang, R.Z.; Wen, J.Y.; et al. Genome-wide identification and transcriptional expression analysis of mitogen-activated protein kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase genes in Capsicum annuum. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, L.Y.; Xie, B.; Hou, Y.Y.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Zheng, Y.H.; Jin, P. Genome-wide identification of the CDPK gene family reveals the CDPK-RBOH pathway potential involved in improving chilling tolerance in peach fruit. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 191, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Li, M.Y.; Hu, W.; Ren, L.C.; Jia, C.H.; Liu, J.H.; Miao, H.X.; Guo, A.P.; Xu, B.Y.; Jin, Z.Q. Identification, expression, and interaction network analyses of the CDPK gene family reveal their involvement in the development, ripening, and abiotic stress response in banana. Biochem. Genet. 2020, 58, 40–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hu, W.; Yan, Y.; Shi, H.T.; Liu, J.H.; Miao, H.X.; Tie, W.W.; Ding, Z.H.; Ding, X.P.; Wu, C.L.; Liu, Y.; et al. The core regulatory network of the abscisic acid pathway in banana: Genome-wide identification and expression analyses during development, ripening, and abiotic stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Asif, M.H.; Lakhwani, D.; Pathak, S.; Bhambhani, S.; Bag, S.K.; Trivedi, P.K. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the mitogen-activated protein kinase gene family from banana suggest involvement of specific members in different stages of fruit ripening. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2014, 14, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wu, P.; Wang, W.L.; Duan, W.K.; Li, Y.; Hou, X.L. Comprehensive analysis of the CDPK-SnRK superfamily genes in chinese cabbage and its evolutionary implications in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yin, X.; Wang, Q.L.; Chen, Q.; Xiang, N.; Yang, Y.Q.; Yang, Y.P. Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of the calcineurin B-like protein and calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinase gene families in turnip (Brassica rapa var. rapa). Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Huang, Z.N.; Tang, J.; Duan, W.K.; Wang, Z.; Song, X.M.; Hou, X.L. Molecular evolution, characterization, and expression analysis of SnRK2 gene family in Pak-choi (Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis). Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, M.; Liu, Y.H.; He, Q.; Chai, M.N.; Huang, Y.M.; Chen, F.Q.; Wang, X.M.; Liu, Y.Q.; Cai, H.Y.; Qin, Y. Genome-wide investigation of calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family in pineapple: Evolution and expression profiles during development and stress. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Aslam, M.; Fakher, B.; Jakada, B.H.; Zhao, L.H.; Cao, S.J.; Cheng, Y.; Qin, Y. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of CBL-CIPK gene family in pineapple (Ananas comosus) and the role of AcCBL1 in abiotic and biotic stress response. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhang, Y.T.; Ye, Y.Y.; Jiang, L.Y.; Lin, Y.X.; Gu, X.J.; Chen, Q.; Sun, B.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. Genome-wide characterization of snf1-related protein kinases (SnRKs) and expression analysis of SnRK1.1 in strawberry. Genes 2020, 11, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Crizel, R.L.; Perin, E.C.; Vighi, I.L.; Woloski, R.; Seixas, A.; da Silva Pinto, L.; Rombaldi, C.V.; Galli, V. Genome-wide identification, and characterization of the CDPK gene family reveal their involvement in abiotic stress response in Fragaria x ananassa. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 11040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Li, M.Y.; Li, B.H.; Yang, M.; Wang, L.X.; Hou, G.Y.; Lin, Y.X.; Zhang, Y.T.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Q.; Wang, Y.; et al. Genome-wide identification and expression of MAPK gene family in cultivated strawberry and their involvement in fruit developing and ripening. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhou, H.Y.; Ren, S.Y.; Han, Y.F.; Zhang, Q.; Qin, L.; Xing, Y. Identification and analysis of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades in Fragaria vesca. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Xiong, Y.F.; Lin, D.H.; Ma, S.W.; Wang, C.H.; Lin, S.K. Genome-wide identification of the calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family in Fragaria vesca and expression analysis under different biotic stresses. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2022, 164, 283–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Song, Q.M.; Li, D.Y.; Dai, Y.; Liu, S.X.; Huang, L.; Hong, Y.B.; Zhang, H.J.; Song, F.M. Characterization, expression patterns and functional analysis of the MAPK and MAPKK genes in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wang, G.; Wang, T.; Jia, Z.H.; Xuan, J.P.; Pan, D.L.; Guo, Z.R.; Zhang, J.Y. Genome-wide bioinformatics analysis of MAPK gene family in kiwifruit (Actinidia Chinensis). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhu, S.N.; Mo, Y.X.; Yang, Y.Y.; Liang, S.Q.; Xian, S.Q.; Deng, Z.X.; Zhao, M.Y.; Liu, S.Y.; Liu, K.D. Genome-wide identification of MAPK family in papaya (Carica papaya) and their involvement in fruit postharvest ripening. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ren, Y.; Ge, D.P.; Dong, J.M.; Guo, L.H.; Yuan, Z.H. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of MAPK and MAPKK gene family in pomegranate (Punica Granatum L.). Agronomy 2020, 10, 1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wei, C.L.; Liu, X.Q.; Long, D.P.; Guo, Q.; Fang, Y.; Bian, C.K.; Zhang, D.Y.; Zeng, Q.W.; Xiang, Z.H.; Zhao, A.C. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of mulberry MAPK gene family. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 77, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Shu, B.; Jue, D.W.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, D.J.; Liu, C.Y.; Wu, Q.S.; Luo, C. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the citrus calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) genes in response to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization and drought. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2020, 34, 1304–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, H.F.; Yang, B.; Liu, W.Z.; Li, H.W.; Wang, L.; Wang, B.Y.; Deng, M.; Liang, W.W.; Deyholos, M.K.; Jiang, Y.Q. Identification and characterization of CBL and CIPK gene families in canola (Brassica napus L). BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Xu, X.W.; Liu, M.; Lu, L.; He, M.; Qu, W.Q.; Xu, Q.; Qi, X.H.; Chen, X.H. Genome-wide analysis and expression of the calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family in cucumber. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2015, 290, 1403–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Luo, Y.Y.; Niu, Y.; Gao, R.; Wang, C.L.; Liao, W.B.A. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of SnRK gene family under abiotic stress in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Agronomy 2022, 12, 1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, J.; Pan, C.T.; Wang, Y.; Ye, L.; Wu, J.; Chen, L.F.; Zou, T.; Lu, G. Genome-wide identification of MAPK, MAPKK, and MAPKKK gene families and transcriptional profiling analysis during development and stress response in cucumber. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, H.F.; Wei, C.H.; Yang, X.Z.; Chen, H.J.; Yang, Y.C.; Mo, Y.L.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, J.X.; Yang, J.Q.; et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of calcium dependent protein kinase and its related kinase gene families in melon (Cucumis melo L.). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gao, Y.L.; Zhang, Y.F.; Ji, X.; Wang, J.X.; Suo, N.N.; Liu, J.C.; Huo, X.W. Identification of Dioscorea opposite Thunb CDPK gene family reveals that DoCDPK20 is related to heat resistance. Peer J. 2023, 11, e16110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Li, H.B.; Wu, H.; Huang, W.F.; Liu, J.X.; Deng, J.X.; Li, C.H.; Mao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.K.; Zheng, J. The CDPK gene family in mustard (Brassica juncea L.): Genome-wide identification and expression analysis under cold stress. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Shen, X.J.; Guo, X.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, Y.Z.; Wang, Y.T.; Peng, X.; Wei, Y.; Zhai, Z.F.; Zhao, W.; et al. Cloning and expression profiling of the PacSnRK2 and PacPP2C gene families during fruit development, ABA treatment, and dehydration stress in sweet cherry. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 119, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Shao, Y.; Qin, Y.; Zou, Y.J.; Ma, F.W. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of the SnRK2 gene family in Malus prunifolia. Gene 2014, 552, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhang, S.Z.; Xu, R.R.; Luo, X.C.; Jiang, Z.S.; Shu, H.R. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of MAPK and MAPKK gene family in Malus domestica. Gene 2013, 531, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Tang, J.; Lin, J.; Li, H.; Li, X.G.; Yang, Q.S.; Cheng, Z.M.; Chang, Y.H. Characterization of CIPK family in Asian pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd) and co-expression analysis related to salt and osmotic stress responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zheng, W.; Dong, X.M.; Yu, X.F.; Zhang, Q.Y. Characterization and tissue-specific as well as heat-stress expression analysis of CBL-interacting protein kinase genes in Dimocarpus longan Lour. Turk. J. Bot. 2019, 43, 724–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Babus, G.; Gohil, D.S.; Choudhury, S.R. Genome-wide identification, evolutionary and expression analysis of the cyclin-dependent kinase gene family in peanut. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Takatsuka, H.; Umeda-hara, C.; Umeda, M. Cyclin-dependent kinase-activating kinases CDKD;1 and CDKD;3 are essential for preserving mitotic activity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2015, 82, 1004–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liao, Y.F.; Feng, Y.; Shen, J.; Hornicek, F.J.; Duan, Z. The roles and therapeutic potential of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) in sarcoma. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016, 35, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, Z.; Li, J.; Jia, C.; Xu, B.; Jin, Z. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of eight calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) genes from banana (Musa acuminata L. AAA group, cv. Cavendish). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2016, 104, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bittner, T.; Nadler, S.; Schulze, E.; Fischer-Iglesias, C. Two homolog wheat glycogen synthase kinase 3/shaggy-like kinases are involved in brassinosteroid signaling. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Bullock, A.N.; Das, S.; Debreczeni, J.E.; Rellos, P.; Fedorov, O.; Niesen, F.H.; Guo, K.; Papagrigoriou, E.; Amos, A.L.; Cho, S.; et al. Kinase domain insertions define distinct roles of CLK kinases in SR protein phosphorylation. Cell Press. 2009, 17, 352–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhang, J.H.; Sun, H.L.; Zhao, X.Y.; Liu, X.M. Arabidopsis casein kinase 1-like 8 enhances NaCl tolerance, early flowering, and the expression of flowering-related genes. J. Plant Interact. 2016, 11, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Saito, A.N.; Matsuo, H.; Kuwata, K.; Ono, A.; Kinoshita, T.; Yamaguchi, J.; Nakamichi, N. Structure-function study of a novel inhibitor of the casein kinase 1 family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Direct. 2019, 3, e00172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wang, Z.; Kang, J.; Armando Casas-Mollano, J.; Dou, Y.C.; Jia, S.G.; Yang, Q.C.; Zhang, C.; Cerutti, H. MLK4-mediated phosphorylation of histone H3T3 promotes flowering by transcriptional silencing of FLC/MAF in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2021, 105, 1400–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Gaji, R.Y.; Sharp, A.K.; Brown, A.M. Protein kinases in Toxoplasma gondii. Int. J. Parasitol. 2021, 51, 415–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Jin, C.; Kim, S.K.; Willis, S.D.; Cooper, K.F. The MAPKKKs Ste11 and Bck1 jointly transduce the high oxidative stress signal through the cell wall integrity MAP kinase pathway. Microb. Cell 2015, 2, 329–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Yuan, Q.F.; Chen, M.J.; Yan, Y.Q.; Gu, Q.N.; Huang, J.B.; Zheng, L. Chste7 is required for vegetative growth and various plant infection processes in Colletotrichum higginsianum. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 7496569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Gao, G.Y.; Fu, T.; Song, Y.W.; Kim, K.S. MAPKK CsSTE7 is critical for appressorium formation and pathogenicity in pepper anthracnose fungus, Colletotrichum scovillei. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2024, 90, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Siveen, K.S.; Prabhu, K.S.; Achkar, I.W.; Kuttikrishnan, S.; Shyam, S.; Khan, A.Q.; Merhi, M.; Dermime, S.; Uddin, S. Role of non receptor tyrosine kinases in hematological malignances and its targeting by natural products. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Sun, G.; Ayrapetov, M.K. Dissection of the catalytic and regulatory structure-function relationships of csk protein tyrosine kinase. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023, 11, 1148352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Baier, A.; Szyszka, R. Compounds from natural sources as protein kinase inhibitors. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Fujita, M. Plant responses and tolerance to salt stress: Physiological and molecular interventions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Wei, L.J.; Feng, L.; Liu, Y.Y.; Liao, W.B. Mitogen-activated protein kinase is involved in salt stress response in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) seedlings. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Shu, P.; Li, Y.J.; Li, Z.Y.; Sheng, J.P.; Shen, L. SlMAPK3 enhances tolerance to salt stress in tomato plants by scavenging ROS accumulation and up-regulating the expression of ethylene signaling related genes. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2022, 193, 104698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Dubrovina, A.S.; Kiselev, K.V.; Khristenko, V.S.; Aleynova, O.A. VaCPK21, a calcium-dependent protein kinase gene of wild grapevine Vitis amurensis Rupr. is involved in grape response to salt stress. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 2016, 124, 137–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cho, J.H.; Sim, S.C.; Kim, K.N. Calcium sensor SlCBL4 associates with SlCIPK24 protein kinase and mediates salt tolerance in Solanum lycopersicum. Plants 2021, 10, 2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hu, D.G.; Ma, Q.J.; Sun, C.H.; Sun, M.H.; You, C.X.; Hao, Y.J. Overexpression of MdSOS2L1, a CIPK protein kinase, increases the antioxidant metabolites to enhance salt tolerance in apple and tomato. Physiol. Plantarum. 2016, 156, 201–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Wang, W.R.; Liang, J.H.; Wang, G.F.; Sun, M.X.; Peng, F.T.; Xiao, Y.S. Overexpression of PpSnRK1α in tomato enhanced salt tolerance by regulating ABA signaling pathway and reactive oxygen metabolism. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Evrard, A.; Kumar, M.; Lecourieux, D.; Lucks, J.; von Koskull-Döring, P.; Hirt, H. Regulation of the heat stress response in Arabidopsis by MPK6-targeted phosphorylation of the heat stress factor HsfA2. Peer J. 2013, 1, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Geng, B.H.; Wang, Q.; Huang, R.S.; Liu, Y.J.; Guo, Z.F.; Lu, S.Y. A novel LRR-RLK (CTLK) confers cold tolerance through regulation on the C-repeat-binding factor pathway, antioxidants, and proline accumulation. Plant J. 2021, 108, 1679–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, T.Z.; Liu, M.J.; Wu, Y.; Tian, Y.F.; Han, Y.Y.; Liu, C.J.; Hao, J.H.; Fan, S.X. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of MAPK gene family in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) and functional analysis of LsMAPK4 in high temperature-induced bolting. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hu, Z.J.; Li, J.X.; Ding, S.T.; Cheng, F.; Li, X.; Jiang, Y.P.; Yu, J.Q.; Foyer, C.H.; Shi, K. The protein kinase CPK28 phosphorylates ascorbate peroxidase and enhances thermotolerance in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2021, 186, 1302–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Xu, W.; Gao, S.H.; Song, J.W.; Yang, Q.H.; Wang, T.T.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Zhang, J.H.; Li, H.X.; Yang, C.X.; Ye, Z.B. NDW, encoding a receptor-like protein kinase, regulates plant growth, cold tolerance and susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea in tomato. Plant Sci. 2020, 301, 110684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hu, J.H.; Wang, B.K.; Yang, T.; Li, N.; Yang, H.T.; Yu, Q.H.; Wang, J. A calcium-dependent protein kinase gene SpCPK33 from Solanum pennellii associated with increased cold tolerance in tomato. J. Plant Physiol. 2022, 279, 153834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Tak, H.; Negi, S.; Rajpurohit, Y.S.; Misra, H.S.; Ganapathi, T.R. MusaMPK5, a mitogenactivated protein kinase is involved in regulation of cold tolerance in banana. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 146, 112–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Zhu, C.A.; Jing, B.Y.; Lin, T.; Li, X.Y.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, Y.H.; Yu, J.Q.; Hu, Z.J. Phosphorylation of sugar transporter TST2 by protein kinase CPK27 enhances drought tolerance in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2024, 195, 1005–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lim, J.; Lim, C.W.; Lee, S.C. Pepper novel serine-threonine kinase CaDIK1 regulates drought tolerance via modulating ABA sensitivity. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ma, X.; Li, Y.; Gai, W.X.; Li, C.; Gong, Z.H. The CaCIPK3 gene positively regulates drought tolerance in pepper. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Ma, X.; Yu, Y.N.; Li, Y.; Gong, Z.H. The CBL-interacting protein kinase CaCIPK7 enhances drought resistance in pepper. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 310, 111726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Muhammad, T.; Zhang, J.; Ma, Y.L.; Li, Y.S.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, Y. Overexpression of a mitogen-activated protein kinase SlMAPK3 positively regulates tomato tolerance to cadmium and drought stress. Molecules 2019, 24, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Huang, X.; Wei, J.M.; Feng, W.Z.; Luo, Q.; Tan, G.F.; Li, Y.Z. Interaction between SlMAPK3 and SlASR4 regulates drought resistance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Mol. Breed. 2023, 43, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Xu, W.R.; Shen, W.; Ma, J.J.; Ya, R.; Zheng, Q.L.; Wu, N.; Yu, Q.H.; Yao, W.K.; Zhang, N.B.; Zhang, J.X. Role of an Amur grape CBL-interacting protein kinase VaCIPK02 in drought tolerance by modulating ABA signaling and ROS production. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 172, 103999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Malik, J.; Moosa, A.; Zulfiqar, F.; Aslam, M.N.; Albalawi, M.A.; Almowallad, S.; Mahmood, T.; Alasmari, A.; Yong, J.W.H. Biocontrol potential of lipopeptides produced by the novel Bacillus altitudinis strain TM22A against postharvest Alternaria rot of tomato. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 191, 115541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Shen, Q.; Li, H.S.; Wang, Q.F.; Wang, J.Q.; Ge, J.R.; Yang, X.Y.; Wang, X.Y.; Li, X.M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, R.M.; et al. Alleviating effects of linalool fumigation on Botrytis cinerea infections in postharvest tomato fruit. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Xu, S.M.; Liao, C.J.; Jaiswal, N.; Lee, S.; Yun, D.J.; Lee, S.Y.; Garvey, M.; Kaplan, I.; Mengiste, T. Tomato pepr1 ortholog receptor-like kinase1 regulates responses to systemin, necrotrophic fungi, and insect herbivory. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 2214–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Dong, X.N.; Lu, H.M.; Zhao, L.Q.; He, B.Q.; Zhang, J.J.; Zhao, B.; Guo, Y.D.; Zhang, N. SlMAPKKK43 regulates tomato resistance to gray mold. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2024, 51, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhang, Z.; Chen, Q.M.; Jia, L.T.; Qian, M.; Qiao, Q.H.; Huang, X.S.; Zhang, S.L. Genome-wide identification of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) and their functional analysis in response to black spot. Hortic. Plant J. 2023, 9, 681–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ning, M.; Tang, F.X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, X.X.; Yang, L.P.; Cai, W.C.; Shan, C.H. Effects of Penicillium infection on the expression and activity of CDPK2 in postharvest Hami melon treated with calcium chloride. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2019, 106, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Gupta, R.; Min, C.W.; Kim, S.W.; Yoo, J.S.; Moon, A.R.; Shin, A.Y.; Kwon, S.Y.; Kim, S.T. A TMT-based quantitative proteome analysis to elucidate the TSWV induced signaling cascade in susceptible and resistant cultivars of Solanum lycopersicum. Plants 2020, 9, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Ali, S.; Tyagi, A.; Bae, H. ROS interplay between plant growth and stress biology: Challenges and future perspectives. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 203, 108032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Li, M.P.; Kim, C. Chloroplast ROS and stress signaling. Plant Commun. 2022, 3, 100264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Hamel, L.P.; Nicole, M.C.; Sritubtim, S.; Morency, M.J.; Ellis, M.; Ehlting, J.; Beaudoin, N.; Barbazuk, B.; Klessig, D.; Lee, J.; et al. Ancient signals: Comparative genomics of plant MAPK and MAPKK gene families. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Xu, W.W.; Huang, W.C. Calcium-dependent protein kinases in phytohormone signaling pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Moosa, A.; Zulfiqar, F.; Siddique, K.H. Transcriptional and biochemical profiling of defense enzymes in Citrus sinensis during salicylic acid and cinnamon mediated suppression of green and blue mold. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1048433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zhang, J.; Hafeez, M.T.; Di, D.W.; Wu, L.; Zhang, L. Precise control of ABA signaling through post-translational protein modification. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 88, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hasan, M.M.; Liu, X.D.; Waseem, M.; Yao, G.Q.; Alabdallah, N.M.; Jahan, M.S.; Fang, X.W. ABA activated SnRK2 kinases: An emerging role in plant growth and physiology. Plant Signal. Behav. 2022, 17, e2071024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Jing, Y.Y.; Zhan, M.H.; Li, C.R.; Pei, T.T.; Wang, Q.; Li, P.M.; Ma, F.W.; Liu, C.H. The apple FERONIA receptor-like kinase MdMRLK2 negatively regulates Valsa canker resistance by suppressing defence responses and hypersensitive reaction. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2022, 23, 1170–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Hewedy, O.A.; Elsheery, N.I.; Karkour, A.M.; Elhamouly, N.; Arafa, R.A.; Mahmoud, G.A.; Dawood, M.F.A.; Hussein, W.E.; Mansour, A.; Amin, D.H.; et al. Jasmonic acid regulates plant development and orchestrates stress response during tough times. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2023, 208, 105260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Grau, J.; Francozorrilla, J.M. TDTHub, a web server tool for the analysis of transcription factor binding sites in plants. Plant J. 2022, 111, 1203–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Deinlein, U.; Stephan, A.B.; Horie, T.; Luo, W.; Xu, G.; Schroeder, J.I. Plant salt-tolerance mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Song, J.N.; Lin, R.; Tang, M.J.; Wang, L.Y.; Fan, P.X.; Xia, X.J.; Yu, J.Q.; Zhou, Y.H. SlMPK1 and SlMPK2 mediated SlBBX17 phosphorylation positively regulates CBF-dependent cold tolerance in tomato. New Phytol. 2023, 239, 1887–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hahn, A.; Bublak, D.; Schleiff, E.; Scharf, K.D. Crosstalk between Hsp90 and Hsp70 chaperones and heat stress transcription factors in tomato. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 741–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Van Kleeff, P.J.M.; Gao, J.; Mol, S.; Zwart, N.; Zhang, H.; Li, K.W.; De Boer, A.H. The Arabidopsis GORK K+ -channel is phosphorylated by calcium-dependent protein kinase 21 (CPK21), which in turn is activated by 14-3-3 proteins. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 125, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Almeida, D.M.; Oliveira, M.M.; Saibo, N.J.M. Regulation of Na+ and K+ homeostasis in plants: Towards improved salt stress tolerance in crop plants. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2017, 40, 326–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The role of protein kinases in various stress responses of F&Vs.
Figure 1. The role of protein kinases in various stress responses of F&Vs.
Ijms 26 00768 g001
Figure 2. The mechanism of protein kinases in regulating the response of F&Vs to stress. Different-colored arrows represent diverse regulatory mechanisms: red represents the regulation of protein kinases in the antioxidant system; yellow represents the interaction of protein kinases with hormone signaling pathways; green represents the interaction of protein kinases with transcription factors; purple represents the regulation of protein kinases on specific proteins. Arrows indicate promotion, while lines with endlines indicate inhibition. Colorful points represent different ions passing through the ion channel.
Figure 2. The mechanism of protein kinases in regulating the response of F&Vs to stress. Different-colored arrows represent diverse regulatory mechanisms: red represents the regulation of protein kinases in the antioxidant system; yellow represents the interaction of protein kinases with hormone signaling pathways; green represents the interaction of protein kinases with transcription factors; purple represents the regulation of protein kinases on specific proteins. Arrows indicate promotion, while lines with endlines indicate inhibition. Colorful points represent different ions passing through the ion channel.
Ijms 26 00768 g002
Table 1. Protein kinases identified in F&Vs.
Table 1. Protein kinases identified in F&Vs.
SpeciesProtein KinaseNumbersReferences
Solanum lycopersicumAGC17[19]
CDPK29[22]
SnRK12[27]
SnRK28
SnRK330
MAPK16[28]
Solanum habrochaitesCDPK33[29]
Solanum melongenaCIPK15[30]
Vitis viniferaCDPK19[31]
MAPK14[32]
SnRK28[33]
CIPK20[34]
Capsicum annuumCDPK31[35]
MAPK19[36]
Prunus persicaCDPK17[37]
Musa nanaCDPK44[38]
SnRK211[39]
Musa acuminataMAPK25[40]
Brassica rapaCDPK41[41]
CIPK51[42]
SnRK215[43]
Ananas comosusCDPK17[44]
CIPK21[45]
Fragaria ananassaSnRK11[46]
SnRK29
SnRK316
CDPK11[47]
MAPK43[48]
Fragaria vescaMAPK12[49]
CDPK19[50]
Citrullus lanatusMAPK15[51]
Actinidia ChinensisMAPK18[52]
Carica papayaMAPK9[53]
Punica GranatumMAPK18[54]
Morus albaMAPK10[55]
Citrus reticulataCDPK29[56]
Raphanus sativusCDPK37[24]
Brassica napusCDPK25[57]
Cucumis sativusCDPK19[58]
SnRK11[59]
SnRK210
SnRK319
Cucumis meloMAPK14[60]
CDPK18[61]
Dioscorea oppositeCDPK29[62]
Brassica junceaCDPK101[63]
Prunus aviumSnRK26[64]
Malus prunifoliaSnRK212[65]
Malus domesticaMAPK26[66]
Pyrus bretschneideriCIPK28[67]
Dimocarpus longanCIPK8[68]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, Y.; Li, F.; Ali, M.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Ahmed, Z.F.R. Advances in Protein Kinase Regulation of Stress Responses in Fruits and Vegetables. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 768. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020768

AMA Style

Song Y, Li F, Ali M, Li X, Zhang X, Ahmed ZFR. Advances in Protein Kinase Regulation of Stress Responses in Fruits and Vegetables. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(2):768. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020768

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Yanan, Fujun Li, Maratab Ali, Xiaoan Li, Xinhua Zhang, and Zienab F. R. Ahmed. 2025. "Advances in Protein Kinase Regulation of Stress Responses in Fruits and Vegetables" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 2: 768. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020768

APA Style

Song, Y., Li, F., Ali, M., Li, X., Zhang, X., & Ahmed, Z. F. R. (2025). Advances in Protein Kinase Regulation of Stress Responses in Fruits and Vegetables. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(2), 768. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020768

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop