Next Article in Journal
Onvansertib and Navitoclax Combination as a New Therapeutic Option for Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
AdipoRon’s Impact on Alzheimer’s Disease—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Unusual Genomic and Biochemical Features of Paenarthrobacter lasiusi sp. nov—A Novel Bacterial Species Isolated from Lasius niger Anthill Soil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Analysis of Immune Response Genes Induced by a Virulent or Attenuated Strain of Babesia bigemina

by
Grecia Martínez-García
1,2,
Karel Estrada
3,
José J. Lira-Amaya
1,
Rebeca M. Santamaria-Epinosa
1,
María E. Lopez-Arellano
1,
Edda L. Sciutto-Conde
4,
Carmen Rojas-Martinez
1,
Jesus A. Alvarez-Martínez
1,
Alejandro Sánchez-Flores
3 and
Julio V. Figueroa-Millán
1,*
1
Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Salud Animal e Inocuidad, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Jiutepec 62550, Mexico
2
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
3
Unidad Universitaria de Secuenciación Masiva y Bioinformática, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca 62209, Mexico
4
Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(2), 487; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020487
Submission received: 14 November 2024 / Revised: 30 December 2024 / Accepted: 7 January 2025 / Published: 8 January 2025

Abstract

RNA-seq technology has been widely used for the characterization of the transcriptome profile induced by several diseases in both humans and animals. In the present study, RNA-seq was used to identify the differential expression of genes associated with the immune response in cattle infected with two different strains of Babesia bigemina, both derived from the same Mexican field isolate, which exhibit distinct phenotypic characteristics: the virulent strain, capable of producing acute clinical signs, and the attenuated strain, capable of stimulating a protective immune response when used as an immunogen with an efficacy greater than 80%. The differential gene expression analysis performed revealed a total of 620 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). However, the intersection of the edgeR and DESeq2 programs used in the bioinformatics analysis only identified 247 DEGs, of which 108 genes were enriched to be closely correlated with the bovine immune response based on gene ontology terms; most of the DEGs obtained encode proteins associated with the major histocompatibility complex, immunoglobulins, and T-cell surface receptors. The infection caused by the attenuated strain induced higher transcription of immune response genes compared to the infection caused by the virulent strain; nonetheless, in both infections, a greater down-regulation than up-regulation was observed. Different immunoglobulin-associated genes were found to be up-regulated in the group inoculated with the attenuated strain, whereas these were down-regulated in the virulent strain-inoculated group. In addition, an up-regulation of the HSPA6, CD163, and SLC11a1 genes was observed in the group inoculated with the virulent strain, previously reported in other Apicomplexan infections. The findings provide relevant information that could contribute to clarifying the immune response associated with an acute bovine babesiosis infection by B. bigemina.

1. Introduction

Ticks and tick-borne diseases are major health and economic problems affecting livestock production in tropical and subtropical regions of the world [1]. Among tick-borne diseases, babesiosis stands out as the most important arthropod-borne bovine disease and the second-most important vector-borne hemotropic disease in free-living animals [2,3]. Bovine babesiosis is caused by intraerythrocytic protozoans of the genus Babesia, with Babesia bigemina and B. bovis being the most relevant due to their wide distribution, which is intricately linked to the distribution of their vector, the cattle tick of the genus Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) [2]. The signs of clinical infection include fever, dehydration, anorexia, depression, weakness, lethargy, prostration, and sudden death in some cases. In infections caused by B. bigemina, hemolytic anemia and hemoglobinuria are common because of erythrocyte destruction, despite parasitaemias detected by blood smears only affecting 3% of infected erythrocytes [2,4]. Acute disease occurs within the first 7–14 days after protozoan inoculation; meanwhile, a chronic or persistent infection takes place once the disease is resolved, which usually occurs after the first two weeks [5]. Once the Babesia parasites are inoculated, the bovine immune response is deployed. Immune cells, such as activated monocytes, neutrophils, and natural killer cells, are important for starting the response. They release antimicrobial agents, secrete cytokines that regulate the inflammatory response, and phagocytize the pathogen [2,6]. Until now, B. bovis has mostly served as a study model for understanding the mechanisms of immunity against bovine babesiosis. The release of several cytokines, including interleukin-1beta (IL-1b), 12 (IL-12), 15 (IL-15), 18 (IL-18) and 4 (IL4), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interferon α (IFNα) and γ (IFNγ), as well as reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as nitric oxide (NO), has been reported [5,7]. While some studies have been carried out in B. bigemina infections, showing the expression of several cytokines such as TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOs), it is imperative to conduct additional investigations to unravel the mechanism by which infected cattle respond to this parasite [8,9].
The severity of the disease can be prevented or reduced by vaccination; cattle immunization is regarded as the most effective approach for the prevention and control of bovine babesiosis [2,10]. In Mexico, a live attenuated strain of Babesia bigemina (BIS) was developed. BIS was derived from a parental virulent Mexican field isolate, and virulence loss was achieved by in vitro cultivation adaptation. BIS has been used as an immunogen in several studies under controlled and field conditions, showing an efficacy of at least 80% in vaccinated cattle exposed to virulent strains. However, only the clinical effects and humoral immune response have been evaluated [10,11,12]. It is thus imperative to evaluate the expression of genes associated with the immune response provided by BIS versus that of a virulent B. bigemina strain. In order to understand the molecular mechanisms elucidated by both strains on the cattle host and to discern the differences and resemblances among the immune responses evoked, we used RNA-seq technology to assess the responses in this study.
Recent studies have demonstrated the usefulness of next-generation sequencing (NGS), specifically RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), for transcriptomic profile analyses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from bovines exposed to virulent pathogens and vaccines that protect them against those pathogens [13,14,15,16]. RNA-seq analysis enables the identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) among two or more groups of individuals subjected to specific pathological or physiological conditions [17]. Furthermore, the molecular function, biological process, and cellular component of which a gene is part can be predicted through gene ontology analysis [18]. Therefore, RNA-seq allows us to determine the genes that are involved in the molecular pathways associated with the established immune response to pathogen infection. Regarding its use in bovine babesiosis, RNA-seq has been used to characterize the transcriptome induced in the salivary glands of Rhipicephalus annulatus infected with B. bigemina [19], and to assess gene regulation of B. bovis life stages in its vertebrate and tick hosts [20]. Most recently, it has been used in the comparison of the transcriptome exhibited by virulent and attenuated Babesia bigemina strains, both derived from the same parasite field isolate [21]. However, until now, no research has been conducted regarding the bovine transcriptome in relation to the immune response induced by a B. bigemina or B. bovis infection. Under these precedents, the objective of the present study was to analyze the transcriptomic profile related to the immune response involved during the acute phase of babesiosis in cattle inoculated with a virulent or attenuated strain of Babesia bigemina, comparing those profiles with the transcriptomic profile of a healthy cattle group and with each other. To accomplish this aim, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that might be involved in the cattle response to B. bigemina were identified by using RNA-seq technology applied to samples of buffy coat cells derived from peripheral blood.

2. Results

2.1. Sequencing

Paired-end libraries were constructed for each buffy coat sample of the three different experimental groups. Group I (GI) was inoculated with a virulent strain of B. bigemina, group II (GII) was inoculated with an attenuated strain of B. bigemina, and group III (GIII) was the non-inoculated control group. The number of reads obtained from sequencing performed on NextSeq 500 Illumina® (San Diego CA, USA) ranged from 17,431,266 to 18,832,282 (Table 1). The sequence quality of each sample evaluated with FastQC software (v0.11.5) was good, Phred values ranged from 32 to 36, the GC content was 47 to 55%, and the sequence length was 76 bp.

2.2. RNA Sequencing (RNA-Seq) Analysis

The reads for each sequenced sample were aligned separately to the Bos taurus reference genome (GCF_002263795.1). The number of sequences mapped from each sample ranged from 1,118,703 to 15,724,796 (Table 1). A total of 60,094 different transcripts were identified, including messenger RNA (mRNA) and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA). A pairwise comparison was conducted among the three experimental groups for gene expression analysis with the WEB server IDEAMEX, using the edgeR (v3.40.2) and DESeq2 (v1.38.3) programs. To identify the differentially expressed genes, a logFC > 1 and an adjusted p-value of 0.05 were used. The comparisons made were GI vs. GIII, GII vs. GIII, and GI vs. GII. A total of 620 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified across the three experimental groups, resulting in the identification of 202, 332, and 86 DEGs between GI vs. GIII, GII vs. GIII, and GI vs. GII, respectively (Figure 1). However, considering the intersection of DESeq2 and edgeR programs, only a total of 247 DEGs were identified and were subsequently used for further analysis, of which 86, 127, and 34 DEGs corresponded to GI vs. GIII, GII vs. GIII, and GI vs. GII comparisons, respectively. The differentially expressed genes found in the intersection between the DESeq2 and edgeR programs from each group paired with each one of the biological replicates are shown in heatmaps (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). The gene expression level relative to a Z score can be observed through a color representation; higher scores are depicted in purple tones, while lower scores are depicted in red tones.
The selection of DEGs related to the bovine immune response (BIR) was performed by searching the NCBI platform (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene, accessed on 27 May 2023). Different characteristics of the differentially expressed transcripts were identified, such as the gene name that corresponds to them, the encoded protein, and especially their possible immune function according to the gene ontology derived from the NCBI Reference Sequence. The gene ontology (GO) terms focus on molecular functions, metabolic processes, and cellular components; in addition, a gene homology search was carried out when the bovine genes did not have a GO description associated with them, with the purpose of linking the genes with their potential immunological function. The DEGs associated with bovine immune responses identified between the comparison of groups GI and GIII are listed in Table 2: a total of 28 genes were detected, with 24 genes down-regulated and 4 genes up-regulated. Among the principal down-regulated genes identified in the virulent strain-inoculated group are the following: RAB27A, a member of the RAS oncogene family (RAB27A); major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ alpha 5 (BOLA-DQA5); megakaryocyte and platelet inhibitory receptor G6b (MPIG6B); and short transmembrane mitochondrial protein 1 (STMP1). Heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 6 (HSPA6), CD163 molecule (CD163), signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1), and solute carrier family 11 member 1 (SLC11A1) were the up-regulated genes detected in the above-mentioned group.
The analysis conducted with groups GII and GIII (Table 3) came up with the highest number of DEGs linked to BIR, with 63 DEGs, 35 of which were down-regulated and 28 up-regulated. In this comparison, RAB27A, pro-platelet basic protein (PPBP), CD83 molecule (CD83), and sulfiredoxin 1 (SRXN1) were the main down-regulated genes. Among the up-regulated genes, TCR gamma alternate reading frame protein (TARP), T-cell receptor gamma chain C region C10.5 (LOC100335205), and C-C motif chemokine ligand 4 (CCL4) were found. Finally, the comparative analysis of groups GI and GII is presented in Table 4, with 17 DEGs identified, 13 of which were down-regulated and 4 up-regulated. The main genes that are down-regulated correspond to immunoglobulins: immunoglobulin heavy variable 4-59 (LOC100300806); joining chain of multimeric IgA and IgM (JCHAIN); immunoglobulin heavy variable 4-38-2 (LOC100300716); and Ig heavy chain Mem5-like (LOC100297192). The up-regulated genes included HSPA6; MHC class I heavy chain (LOC507917); NFkB inhibitor delta (NFkBID); and major histocompatibility complex, class I (LOC512672).
In summary, the differential expression analysis performed revealed 108 genes encoding proteins associated with the bovine (Bos taurus) humoral immune response against B. bigemina; of these, 72 and 36 genes were down- and up-regulated, respectively. The vast majority of these encode proteins of the immunoglobulin (Ig) structure, proteins associated with the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), and T-cell surface receptors. Furthermore, several of the identified transcripts encode the Ras-associated protein, Rab-27A. Although several genes are repeatedly represented, the transcripts to which they belong are different. Therefore, the proteins encoded represent isoforms of the same protein. The relevant features and gene ontology information for every differentially expressed gene can be found in Supplementary Table S1. Additionally, enrichment of GO terms (Webgestalt platform) was performed with the total number of DEGs found by the intersection of the edgeR and DESeq2 programs. This includes all the genes identified by analyzing the cells present in the buffy coat of each experimental group (see Supplementary Table S2).

3. Discussion

The next-generation sequencing technology, “RNA-seq”, allows the characterization and analysis of the transcriptional profiles of eukaryotic organisms [22]. RNA-seq results are highly accurate in quantifying gene expression levels compared to real-time PCR (qPCR) testing, and have also demonstrated a high degree of reproducibility between results from biological and technical samples [22,23]. Transcriptomics profiling can be used to compare gene expression between two or more groups of individuals, for example, to analyze samples derived from individuals during the acute phase of a disease, recovered from the disease, or healthy individuals without disease manifestations. Likewise, the information obtained has the potential to be utilized to identify biomarkers useful in the diagnosis and prognosis of diseases [24]. In the present study, the transcriptomic profile expressed by buffy coat cells of peripheral blood derived from bovines experimentally infected with a virulent or attenuated strain of B. bigemina was analyzed by RNA-seq. Although several cytokines and molecules that play a role in bovine babesiosis, such as IL-1β, IL-12, IL-15, IL-18, TNF-α, IFNα, IFNγ, and NO, have been identified [5,9], until now, there is insufficient evidence for the immune molecular response induced by B. bigemina during the acute phase of the disease or for the gene expression induced by an attenuated B. bigemina strain with immunogenic capacity.
The Bos taurus genome (GCF_002263795.1) used as a reference for transcript mapping comprises 37,073 genes, of which 21,667 encode proteins and 145 are T-cell receptor and immunoglobulin gene segments, with 63,675 mRNAs and 14,296 ncRNAs (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/GCF_002263795.1/, accessed on 29 May 2023). The data derived from this study revealed 60,094 transcripts, covering 77% of the total transcripts reported in the reference genome. Based upon the analyzed data, 108 out of the 247 DEGs identified by the intersection of DESeq and edgeR programs on the three comparisons performed encode proteins related to the immune response. The principal DEGs identified encode for proteins associated with the major histocompatibility complex, T-cell surface receptors, and immunoglobulins. These findings may be due to the number of days elapsed from inoculation until peripheral blood sampling was performed (samples were taken on 8 days post-inoculation, 8 dpi), when the inflammatory response is predominant [5], with precursor genes for cell differentiation and humoral immune response, as well as genes involved in phagocytosis. The B. bigemina virulent-strain-inoculated group showed the highest number of genes sub-expressed, with 24 out of 28 DEGs down-regulated and 4 of 28 DEGs up-regulated. In contrast, 35 out of 63 down-regulated and 28 of 63 up-regulated DEGs were found in the B. bigemina attenuated-strain-inoculated group. Similar results have been identified in clinical infections caused by other apicomplexa parasites. For example, in children with various conditions of Plasmodioum falciparum infection, widespread down-regulation of gene expression in blood cells has also been reported. The highest number of differentially expressed genes was observed in cerebral malaria as compared to severe malarial anemia, where a considerable number of these DEGs were sub-expressed, which has been proposed as a probable response to the effects of hypoxia [25]. Birds infected with a highly virulent strain of Plasmodium relictum have demonstrated a similar trend in gene expression. Over half of the DEGs identified were found to exhibit negative expression 20 dpi, despite the significant overexpression observed after the initial 8 dpi [26]. The gene expression patterns associated with the immune response can change quickly within hours. Vahey et al. [27] reported a significant alteration in the expression of genes associated with the inflammatory response following a third vaccination with the RTS,S subunit recombinant vaccine against malaria. The differential expression of 63 genes was assessed on the vaccine application day as well as 24 and 72 h afterwards. A gene down-regulation profile was observed on vaccination day, but 24 h after the vaccine application, the pattern changed to up-regulation; however, a similar pattern of expression to the vaccination day was observed 72 h later. Hence, the analysis of gene expression in an individual’s transcriptome provides a precise depiction of the genes that are being expressed at the time of sample collection.
The down-regulation of the identified DEGs caused by B. bigemina infection may lead to immunosuppression. Previous findings have reported generalized immunosuppression due to other infections caused by Apicomplexan parasites, such as Plasmodium spp., Trypanosoma spp., and Leishmania spp., which may be reflected as a decreased humoral response [28]. Immunosuppression can be attributed to numerous factors, including infection severity, antigenic variation of parasite strains, and high production of non-specific IgM or, conversely, decreased levels of IgM and IgG, as well as mitogens and soluble antigens [29,30]. The comparison of gene expression made between the attenuated and virulent inoculated groups also revealed a greater number of differentially expressed genes, with 13 out of 17 DEGs down-regulated and 4 of 17 up-regulated. Some of the identified genes expressed negatively belong to the immunoglobulin class of proteins, such as the heavy and light chains and the joining chain of multimeric IgA and IgM. Sub-expression of genes was notoriously observed in the virulent B. bigemina strain-inoculated group, indicating a probable decrease in the expression of genes associated with the establishment of an adequate humoral response in bovines infected with the virulent strains, as compared to those inoculated with the attenuated B. bigemina strain previously used as a live attenuated immunogen.
The RAB27A gene was one of the main transcripts found to be down-regulated in both B. bigemina-inoculated groups; it is involved in organelle transport related to lysosomes and secretory granule release. RAB27A has several functions, such as antigen processing and presentation, blood coagulation, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, degranulation of cytotoxic T cells and NK cells, positive regulation of phagocytosis, and positive regulation of the biosynthetic process of reactive oxygen species [31,32]. In eosinophils, it participates in the release of eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) and major basic protein (MBP), crucial molecules for the inflammation process; meanwhile, in neutrophils, it is essential for the activation of the phagocytosis process [33,34]. The decreased expression of various RAB27A isotherms may be linked to elevated activation of T lymphocytes and macrophages, the main characteristic of hemophagocytic syndrome that can develop due to excessive inflammation induced by some infections. RAB27A deficiency is also related to hepatosplenomegaly, neutropenia, and immunodeficiency [34]. The phagocytic activity of neutrophils and monocytes constitutes the initial line of defense against Babesia infections, alongside the release of cytokines and chemokines by these cells [5]. The bovine leukocyte antigen (BoLA)-DQA5, another down-regulated gene detected in this study, is expected to participate in various immune processes like those in the human leukocyte antigens (HLA) system. BoLA-DQA5 could be actively participating in the processing and presentation of antigens through MHC class II; in the production of immunoglobulins and the immune response mediated by these molecules; in the positive regulation of T cell activation; as well as in the immune homeostasis maintenance within signaling pathways of the inflammatory and immune response, as well as in various signaling pathways of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade related to cellular stress [35,36]. The down-regulation of the BoLA-DQA5 gene in bovine inflammatory diseases such as Epstein–Barr virus infection, inflammatory bowel disease, subclinical endometriosis, and clinical mastitis has been reported. In the last disease, the role of a miRNA called “miR-29c” in the down-regulation of BoLA-DQA5 has been proven. However, it is imperative to conduct additional investigations to ascertain the mechanism of action of this leukocyte antigen [36]. Reduced expression of some homologous genes, such as BOLA-DQA2 and BOLA-DQB, was also identified. The Sulfiredoxin 1 gene was down-regulated in both B. bigemina-inoculated groups. The sulfiredoxin-1 (SRXN1) participates in the cellular response to oxidative stress caused by free radicals released, interfering with the correct functioning of cells subjected to stress [37]. Oxidative stress is one of the principal effects caused by Apicomplexas infections. In Babesia spp., the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and NO is part of the response mechanism for the elimination of parasites [38]. Activated macrophages in the spleen are the cells responsible for the production of babesiacidal molecules such as ROS and nitrogen intermediates, which together with their phagocytic action achieve the elimination of circulating parasites. Other cells capable of releasing NO are monocytes and phagocytic neutrophils [5]. The HSPA6 gene (coding for heat shock protein, Hsp70) was significantly overexpressed in the B. bigemina virulent-strain-infected group, which presented the highest increase in rectal temperature during experimental infection. HSPA6 is involved in the cellular response to heat, as well as in the cellular response to unfolded and refolding proteins. In addition, it participates in antigen presentation, stimulates and causes the maturation of antigen-presenting cells, such as macrophages and dendritic cells, and acts as a chaperone for several Toll-like receptors involved in the innate response [39]. The CD163 and STAT1 genes were also up-regulated by the presence of the B. bigemina virulent strain. The CD163 molecule is expressed in monocytes and macrophages, participates in the elimination process of hemoglobin/haptoglobin complexes, and has been identified in cattle macrophages infected with Theileria parva [40]. In addition, CD163 expression has been reported in P. falciparum infections. CD163 is used as a molecular marker associated with parasitemia, and its expression is directly associated with increased parasitemia in infected individuals. It is also likely to be directly linked to lactate levels and inversely to hemoglobin levels [25]. The latter was identified in our study, since the hemoglobin beta gene (HBB) was found to be down-regulated (logFC of −2.27 and p-value of 2.08 × 10−2) in the same group inoculated with the virulent strain. Conversely, CD163 showed a logFC of 2.76 with a p-value of 1.74 × 10−3. Free hemoglobin is present during acute infections of B. bigemina due to the hemolysis generated by parasite proliferation and the massive destruction of both infected and uninfected erythrocytes by the immune system. The outcome of this disorder could flow into hemolytic anemia and hemoglobinuria, clinical manifestations characteristic of bovine babesiosis [2]. Other cell surface markers such as CD9, CD74, CD79a and CD79b, CD83, and CD247 were also found to be differentially expressed in both B. bigemina-infected groups. As for the STAT1 gene, it intervenes in the innate immune response, acting in the positive regulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome complex assembly, which positively regulates the production of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β [41]. Monocytes and macrophages produce IL-1β, important for stimulating innate and acquired immunity against tick-borne pathogens [42]. STAT1 has also been identified in fibroblasts exposed to Toxoplasma gondii, as a signal transducer acting on a regulator of IFNγ expression [43].
Other DEGs of interest that may be closely related to Babesia-induced responses include solute carrier family 11 member 1 (SLC11A1), involved in the defense response to protozoa; platelet factor 4 precursor (PF4), which has demonstrated antimicrobial activity against P. falciparum; thioredoxin domain-containing protein 5 precursor (TXNDC5), whose expression is induced by the presence of hypoxia and which probably protects hypoxic cells from apoptosis; and TRAF3-interacting JNK activator modulator isoform 2 (TRAF3IP3), involved in the positive regulation of IFNα production. For instance, SLC11A1, also known as NRAMP1, is expressed by macrophages, monocytes, and lymphocytes. NRAMP1 has multiple effects on macrophage activation, acts as a regulator and transporter of intracellular metals, and is present in lysosomes, endosomes, and phagosomes. It has been reported to be involved during infections caused by intracellular pathogens, such as Toxoplasma spp. and Leishmania spp.; it is suggested to inhibit the growth of pathogens by limiting the entry of metals into cells [44,45]. The restriction of ion metals like iron and manganese, which are essential for host cells and pathogens, respectively, is known as nutritional immunity. Iron participates in different metabolic pathways, principally in ATP production, while manganese is utilized by pathogens to produce superoxide dismutase, an enzyme necessary to confront the oxidative mechanisms generated by the host to kill the pathogens [45]. Human platelets release the PF4 chemokine upon contact with erythrocytes infected with mature P. falciparum parasites, usually infected with the merozoite intraerythrocytic phase. PF4 attaches to parasitized erythrocytes through the atypical chemokine receptor 1, also known as DARC; PF4 is internalized, causing the death of the intracellular parasite. The antimicrobial activity of PF4 has been documented in other Plasmodium species, including P. vivax, P. knowlesi, and P. chabaudi [46,47]. Previous studies have revealed the presence of the DARC receptor in the erythrocytes of Bos taurus and Bos indicus [48], indicating that the administration of PF4 during an infection with Babesia spp. may be feasible, although new research is needed to verify whether there is an anti-Babesia effect due to the release of PF4 by bovine platelets when in contact with erythrocytes parasitized by B. bigemina. Finally, the TXNDC5 gene, also known as ERp46, is associated with cell proliferation and migration, apoptosis, and antioxidant stress [49]. TXNDC5 is overexpressed under hypoxic conditions and autoimmune diseases, functions as a stress survival factor, and is involved in angiogenesis in response to TNF-α and in the inflammatory response through the NF-κB signaling pathway [50]. Though TXNDC5 was up-regulated in the B. bigemina attenuated-strain-inoculated group, parasitemia was barely perceptible.
Other highly up-regulated transcripts, with logFC values ranging from 3.12 to 12.03, not associated with the immune response identified in the comparison made between the GI and GII groups, were genes encoding for histones, actins, and tubulin; genes such as H3C10 (logFC 9.63), LOC112445463 (logFC 8.76), and H1-2 (logFC 3.12), as well as ACTA1 (logFC 12.03 and 6.85), ACTBL2 (logFC 7.95), and TUBA8 (logFC 5.13), were identified. This could be the result of the high parasitemia presented in the virulent-strain-inoculated group, promoting greater cell proliferation and mobility.
The enrichment performed through the gene ontology search allowed the identification of differentially expressed genes associated with the immune response, even though some of these genes have only been previously identified and ontologically characterized in the human genome. Although several immune response genes were identified in this study, it cannot be assumed that these were expressed exclusively in response to the infection with B. bigemina. Although the experimental cattle were free of infectious diseases before the start of the experiment, and even though the group of uninfected cattle was housed in the same facilities, the development of future experimental research is necessary to verify and/or validate the participation of the reported genes in this study as the exclusive bovine response to a pathogen such as B. bigemina. In conclusion, infection with the attenuated strain induces a higher transcription of genes associated with the immune response, compared to the virulent strain infection; however, in both infections, there was a higher up-regulation of genes than down-regulation, being more notable with the virulent strain. Standing out for their function, genes related to immunoglobulin production were up-regulated in the group inoculated with the attenuated strain, while in the group inoculated with the virulent strain, these were down-regulated. Furthermore, an increase in the expression of genes such as HSPA6, CD163, and SLC11a1 was observed in the group inoculated with the virulent strain. These genes have previously been associated with the immune response employed by hosts against other Apicomplexan parasites.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Biological Samples

4.1.1. Babesia bigemina Strains

The B. bigemina strains used were originally isolated from a clinical case of babesiosis in Mexico. The attenuated strain (BIS) has been used as an immunogen in previous studies to prevent the clinical manifestation of babesiosis, with a demonstrated efficacy of at least 80% [12,51]. Its virulence was decreased by an indefinite number of in vitro culture passages with the Microaerophilic Stationary Phase (MASP) system; since then, it has been alternately maintained in cryopreservation and in vitro culture [51,52,53]. Meanwhile, the virulent strain of B. bigemina is maintained in cryopreservation and has been reactivated on several occasions by alternate passages in splenectomized and spleen-intact cattle; its potential to continue being transmitted by vector ticks has also been confirmed [53].

4.1.2. Experimental Animals

Nine Bos taurus cattle, over one year old, free of infectious diseases such as brucellosis, tuberculosis, IBR and BDV, were provided from a geographic region free of R. microplus ticks. Bovines were confirmed to be free of B. bigemina and B. bovis by an indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and nested PCR (nPCR), as previously described [12,54]. The animals were randomly divided into three groups of three bovines: group I (GI) was inoculated with the virulent B. bigemina strain, group II (GII) was inoculated with the attenuated B. bigemina strain, and group III (GIII) was the non-inoculated control group. The GI and GII groups were inoculated intramuscularly with 1 × 108 erythrocytes infected with B. bigemina of each specific strain. Bovines were handled in accordance with the good management practices for the health and welfare of experimental animals at CENID-SAI. The Institutional Subcommittee for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals from the FMVZ-UNAM approved the experimentation protocol carried out (SICUAE.MC-202114-2).

4.1.3. Buffy Coat Cell Isolation

Blood collection from the experimental cattle was carried out on 8 dpi, except in the case of one bovine belonging to group II, which was carried out on 7 dpi, at peak parasitemia. GI bovines had an average rectal temperature of 40 °C with a decrease in their packed cell volume (PCV) value, in addition to presenting parasitized erythrocytes by microscopic examination, with an average parasitemia of ≥8%. Meanwhile, GII presented barely countable parasitemia (≤0.1%), without fever and a minimal decrease in their PCV value. Sampling of each animal was performed by jugular venipuncture with a whole-blood collection bag containing CAD as an anticoagulant solution. Subsequently, the packed cell volume from blood was separated by centrifugation at 450× g for 30 min at room temperature: the plasma was removed, while the buffy coat was isolated from the cell pack and stored at −80 °C until use. Blood samples from GIII (non-inoculated group) were collected and handled according to the above procedure.

4.2. RNA Extraction

The frozen buffy coat samples were mixed at a 1:10 volume ratio with the RNAlater®-ICE Frozen Tissue Transition Solution reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), following the specifications set by the supplier, and were kept at −20 °C for at least 24 h. Subsequently, the stabilizer was removed, and the total RNA was isolated with the RNeasy® Mini Kit (Qiagen®, Hilden, Germany), following the kit protocol provided by the manufacturer. The genomic DNA present in the samples was removed with a DNase I enzyme from the same manufacturer (RNase-Free DNase Set®, Hilden, Germany). The concentration and purity of the total RNA isolated from each sample were measured by spectrophotometry with the NP80 equipment (NanoPhotometer® Implen, Munich, Germany). Likewise, the integrity of samples was visualized using the 1% agarose gel electrophoresis technique.

4.3. Library Preparation and Sequencing

A sample of total RNA from each bovine with a minimum total concentration of 3 µg was used. cDNA library preparation and RNA-seq sequencing were performed at the Unidad Universitaria de Secuenciación Masiva y Bioinformática (UUSMB) of the Instituto de Biotecnología, UNAM. Library construction was carried out following the TruSeq Stranded mRNA Sample Preparation Kit protocol from Illumina® (San Diego CA, USA). After that, the cDNA libraries were analyzed to determine their average size by a capillary electrophoresis assay using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent®, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Library concentration was determined with the Qubit 1X dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Invitrogen®, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and by qPCR using Step One equipment (Applied Biosystems®, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The constructed libraries were normalized to a concentration of 4 nM, and sequencing was performed on NextSeq 500 Illumina® (San Diego CA, USA), generating sequences of 2 × 75 cycles with a total of approximately 10 million reads/sample. The data obtained were demultiplexed and converted into FASTQ files with bcl2fastq2 v2.20 software (Illumina®).

4.4. RNA-Seq Analysis

The quality control of the sequence reads obtained was performed using FastQC (v0.11.5), and good-quality reads of each sample were mapped to the B. taurus reference genomes (GCF_002263795.1) with BWA software (v0.7.17-r1188). The mapped sequences were filtered and sorted, and optical duplicates were marked. The counting and normalization of the mappings were carried out using the Express program (v1.5.1). Differential expression (DE) analysis was conducted with the WEB server “IDEAMEX Integrated Differential Expression Analysis MultiEXperiment” [55], with the edgeR (v3.40.2) and DESeq2 (v1.38.3) programs, and R version 4.2.3. To determine the differentially expressed genes, an adjusted p-value < 0.05 and a logarithm of the fold change (logFC) > 1 were used as cut-off values. Finally, a rigorous search on the NCBI platform (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene) was carried out to determine the characteristics of every differentially expressed gene, with the aim of identifying the genes associated with the bovine immune response. Likewise, an enrichment of GO terms was carried out, with the WEB server “Webgestalt (WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit)”, considering the intersection of the DEGs predicted by edgeR and DESeq2.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26020487/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: G.M.-G. and J.V.F.-M.; obtaining biological material: G.M.-G., J.J.L.-A., R.M.S.-E., J.A.A.-M. and C.R.-M.; methodology, G.M.-G., J.J.L.-A. and R.M.S.-E.; bioinformatic and software analysis, G.M.-G., K.E. and A.S.-F.; writing—original draft preparation, G.M.-G. and J.V.F.-M.; writing—review and editing, G.M.-G., K.E., M.E.L.-A., E.L.S.-C. and J.V.F.-M.; project administration, J.V.F.-M.; funding acquisition, J.V.F.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was financially supported by INIFAP Proyectos Fiscales No. 11481036208, and CONAHCYT, project No. A1-S-43508.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The cattle used to obtain infected erythrocytes with Babesia bigemina (virulent and attenuated strains) were maintained under strict guidelines of animal welfare, following the criteria for the caring and handling of experimental animals of the Official Mexican Standard Policies (NOM-051-ZOO-1995, NOM-033-Z00-1995 and NOM-062-ZOO-1999). This study received approval by the Institutional Subcommittee for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals (SICUAE.DC-2022/1-3) at FMVZ-UNAM.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials. Nucleotide sequence data reported in this paper are available in the NCBI SRA database under the BioProject accession number PRJNA1185254 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA1185254, accessed on 29 May 2023).

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the Graduate Doctoral Program in Animal Production and Health Sciences at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, UNAM, for providing academic training to Grecia Martínez-García and to CONAHCYT for the scholarship support provided via CVU 955971. Likewise, the personnel of the mass sequencing unit at IBT-UNAM are highly acknowledged for their collaboration. Tomas V. Santamaria-Espinosa is especially acknowledged for technical assistance during the clinical monitoring of cattle infected with B. bigemina.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Almazan, C.; Tipacamu, G.A.; Rodriguez, S.; Mosqueda, J.; Perez de Leon, A. Immunological control of ticks and tick-borne diseases that impact cattle health and production. Front. Biosci. 2018, 23, 1535–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bock, R.E.; Jackson, L.; De Vos, A.J.; Jorgensen, W. Babesiosis of cattle. Parasitology 2004, 4, 247–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gohil, S.; Herrmann, S.; Günther, S.; Cooke, B.M. Bovine babesiosis in the 21st century: Advances in biology and functional genomics. Int. J. Parasitol. 2013, 43, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alvarez, J.A.; Rojas, C.; Figueroa, J.V. Diagnostic tools for the identification of Babesia sp. in persistently infected cattle. Pathogens 2019, 8, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gallego-Lopez, G.M.; Cooke, B.M.; Suarez, C.E. Interplay between attenuation- and virulence-factors of Babesia bovis and their contribution to the establishment of persistent infections in cattle. Pathogens 2019, 8, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bastos, R.G.; Laughery, J.M.; Ozubek, S.; Alzan, H.F.; Taus, N.S.; Ueti, M.W.; Suarez, C.E. Identification of novel immune correlates of protection against acute bovine babesiosis by superinfecting cattle with in vitro culture attenuated and virulent Babesia bovis strains. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 1045608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Suarez, C.E.; Alzan, H.F.; Silva, M.G.; Rathinasamy, V.; Poole, W.A.; Cooke, B.M. Unravelling the cellular and molecular pathogenesis of bovine babesiosis: Is the sky the limit? Int. J. Parasitol. 2019, 49, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. García, T.D.; Figueroa, M.J.; Ramos, A.J.; Rojas, M.C.; Cantó, A.G.; Falcón, N.A.; Alvarez, M.J. Immune response to Babesia bigemina infection in pregnant cows. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2004, 1026, 144–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Attia, M.M.; Khalifa, M.M. Virulence of Babesia bigemina in infected cattle (Bos taurus): Molecular and immunological studies. Res. Vet. Sci. 2023, 156, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alvarez, J.A.; Rojas, C.; Figueroa, J.V. An Overview of Current Knowledge on in vitro Babesia Cultivation for Production of Live Attenuated Vaccines for Bovine Babesiosis in Mexico. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bautista-Garfias, C.R.; Lozano, A.R.; Martínez, C.R.; Alvarez, M.J.A.; Millán, J.V.; García, G.R.; Castañeda-Arriola, R.; Aguilar-Figueroa, B.R. Co-immunization of cattle with a vaccine against babesiosis and Lactobacillus casei increases specific IgG1 levels to Babesia bovis and B. bigemina. Parasitol. Int. 2015, 64, 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rojas-Martínez, C.; Rodríguez-Vivas, R.I.; Figueroa-Millán, J.V.; Bautista-Garfias, C.R.; Castañeda-Arriola, R.O.; Lira-Amaya, J.J.; Urióstegui-Vargas, P.; Carrasco-Ojeda, J.J.; Alvarez-Martínez, J.A. Bovine babesiosis: Cattle protected in the field with a frozen vaccine containing Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina cultured in vitro with a serum-free medium. Parasitol. Int. 2018, 67, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. García-Campos, A.; Correia, C.N.; Naranjo-Lucena, A.; Garza-Cuartero, L.; Farries, G.; Browne, J.A.; MacHugh, D.E.; Mulcahy, G. Fasciola hepatica infection in cattle: Analyzing responses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) using a transcriptomics approach. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, W.; Mao, L.; Shu, X.; Liu, R.; Hao, F.; Li, J.; Liu, M.; Yang, L.; Zhang, W.; Sun, M.; et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals differential immune related genes expression in bovine viral diarrhea virus-2 infected goat peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lopez, B.I.; Santiago, K.G.; Lee, D.; Ha, S.; Seo, K. RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) based transcriptome analysis in immune response of Holstein cattle to killed vaccine against Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus type I. Animals 2020, 10, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tirumurugaan, K.G.; Pawar, R.M.; Dhinakar Raj, G.; Thangavelu, A.; Hammond, J.A.; Parida, S. RNAseq reveals the contribution of interferon stimulated genes to the increased host defense and decreased PPR viral replication in cattle. Viruses 2020, 12, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stark, R.; Grzelak, M.; Hadfield, J. RNA sequencing: The teenage years. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019, 20, 631–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ashburner, M.; Ball, C.A.; Blake, J.A.; Botstein, D.; Butler, H.; Cherry, J.M.; Davis, A.P.; Dolinski, K.; Dwight, S.S.; Eppig, J.T.; et al. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Antunes, S.; Couto, J.; Ferrolho, J.; Sanches, G.S.; Merino Charrez, J.O.; de la Cruz Hernández, N.; Mazuz, M.; Villar, M.; Shkap, V.; de la Fuente, J.; et al. Transcriptome and proteome response of Rhipicephalus annulatus tick vector to Babesia bigemina infection. Front. Physiol. 2009, 10, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ueti, M.W.; Johnson, W.C.; Kappmeyer, L.S.; Herndon, D.R.; Mousel, M.R.; Reif, K.E.; Taus, N.S.; Ifeonu, O.O.; Silva, J.C.; Suarez, C.E.; et al. Transcriptome dataset of Babesia bovis life stages within vertebrate and invertebrate hosts. Data Brief. 2020, 33, 106533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Santamaria, R.M.; Estrada, K.; López, M.E.; Rojas, E.; Martínez, G.; Alcalá, Y.; Rojas, C.; Álvarez, J.A.; Lira, J.J.; Santamaria, T.V.; et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of Babesia bigemina attenuated vaccine and virulent strains of Mexican origin. Vaccines 2024, 12, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, Z.; Gerstein, M.; Snyder, M. RNA-Seq: A revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rahmatallah, Y.; Emmert-Streib, F.; Glazko, G. Gene set analysis approaches for RNA-seq data: Performance evaluation and application guideline. Brief. Bioinform. 2016, 17, 393–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. de Jong, E.; Bosco, A. Unlocking immune-mediated disease mechanisms with transcriptomics. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2021, 49, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Boldt, A.B.W.; van Tong, H.; Grobusch, M.P.; Kalmbach, Y.; Dzeing Ella, A.; Kombila, M.; Meyer, C.G.; Kun, J.F.J.; Kremsner, P.G.; Velavan, T.P. The blood transcriptome of childhood malaria. EBioMedicine 2019, 40, 614–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Videvall, E.; Palinauskas, V.; Valkiūnas, G.; Hellgren, O. Host Transcriptional Responses to High- and Low-Virulent Avian Malaria Parasites. Am. Nat. 2020, 195, 1070–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vahey, M.T.; Wang, Z.; Kester, K.E.; Cummings, J.; Heppner, D.G., Jr.; Nau, M.E.; Ofori-Anyinam, O.; Cohen, J.; Coche, T.; Ballou, W.R.; et al. Expression of genes associated with immunoproteasome processing of major histocompatibility complex peptides is indicative of protection with adjuvanted RTS,S malaria vaccine. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 201, 580–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nussenzweig, R.S. Parasitic disease as a cause of immunosuppression. N. Engl. J. Med. 1982, 306, 423–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Askonas, B.A. Interference in general immune function by parasite infections; African trypanosomiasis as a model system. Parasitology 1984, 88, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Morilla, G.A. Inmunología de la babesiosis. Cienc. Vet. 1981, 3, 239–275. [Google Scholar]
  31. Catz, S.D. The role of Rab27a in the regulation of neutrophil function. Cell. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 1301–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ostrowski, M.; Carmo, N.B.; Krumeich, S.; Fanget, I.; Raposo, G.; Savina, A.; Moita, C.F.; Schauer, K.; Hume, A.N.; Freitas, R.P.; et al. Rab27a and Rab27b control different steps of the exosome secretion pathway. Nat. Cell. Biol. 2010, 12, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qing, B.; Li, M.; Peng, D.; Wang, J.; Song, S.; Mo, L.; Li, G.; Yang, P. Characterization of the immune suppressive functions of eosinophils. Cell. Immunol. 2024, 401–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Small, A.G.; Perveen, K.; Putty, T.; Patel, N.; Quinn, P.; Wechalekar, M.D.; Hii, C.S.; Quach, A.; Ferrante, A. Neutrophils Require Activation to Express Functional Cell-Surface Complement Receptor Immunoglobulin. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 840510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bakela, K.; Athanassakis, I. Soluble major histocompatibility complex molecules in immune regulation: Highlighting class II antigens. Immunology 2018, 153, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yang, J.; Hu, Q.C.; Wang, J.P.; Ren, Q.Q.; Wang, X.P.; Luoreng, Z.M.; Wei, D.W.; Ma, Y. RNA-Seq Reveals the Role of miR-29c in Regulating Inflammation and Oxidative Stress of Bovine Mammary Epithelial Cells. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 865415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ramesh, A.; Varghese, S.S.; Doraiswamy, J.; Malaiappan, S. Role of sulfiredoxin in systemic diseases influenced by oxidative stress. Redox Biol. 2014, 2, 1023–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bosch, S.S.; Kronenberger, T.; Meissner, K.A.; Zimbres, F.M.; Stegehake, D.; Izui, N.M.; Schettert, I.; Liebau, E.; Wrenger, C. Oxidative stress control by apicomplexan parasites. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 351289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hagymasi, A.T.; Dempsey, J.P.; Srivastava, P.K. Heat-Shock Proteins. Curr. Protoc. 2022, 2, e592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fry, L.M.; Schneider, D.A.; Frevert, C.W.; Nelson, D.D.; Morrison, W.I.; Knowles, D.P. East Coast Fever Caused by Theileria parva Is Characterized by Macrophage Activation Associated with Vasculitis and Respiratory Failure. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shao, B.Z.; Xu, Z.Q.; Han, B.Z.; Su, D.F.; Liu, C. NLRP3 inflammasome and its inhibitors: A review. Front. Pharmacol. 2015, 6, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Torina, A.; Villari, S.; Blanda, V.; Vullo, S.; La Manna, M.P.; Shekarkar, A.M.; Di Liberto, D.; de la Fuente, J.; Sireci, G. Innate Immune Response to Tick-Borne Pathogens: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Induced in the Hosts. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kim, S.K.; Fouts, A.E.; Boothroyd, J.C. Toxoplasma gondii dysregulates IFN-gamma-inducible gene expression in human fibroblasts: Insights from a genome-wide transcriptional profiling. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 5154–5165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Blackwell, J.M.; Goswami, T.; Evans, C.A.; Sibthorpe, D.; Papo, N.; White, J.K.; Searle, S.; Miller, E.N.; Peacock, C.S.; Mohammed, H.; et al. SLC11A1 (formerly NRAMP1) and disease resistance. Cell. Microbiol. 2001, 3, 773–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wessling-Resnick, M. Nramp1 and Other Transporters Involved in Metal Withholding during Infection. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 18984–18990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. McMorran, B.J.; Wieczorski, L.; Drysdale, K.E.; Chan, J.A.; Huang, H.M.; Smith, C.; Mitiku, C.; Beeson, J.G.; Burgio, G.; Foote, S.J. Platelet factor 4 and Duffy antigen required for platelet killing of Plasmodium falciparum. Science 2012, 338, 1348–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Moskovitz, R.; Pholcharee, T.; DonVito, S.M.; Guloglu, B.; Lowe, E.; Mohring, F.; Moon, R.W.; Higgins, M.K. Structural basis for DARC binding in reticulocyte invasion by Plasmodium vivax. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Antonangelo, B.F.A.T.; Colombi, D.; Curi, R.A.; Braz, S.K.A.; Oliveira, M.T.; da Lígia, M.S.L.S. Detection and quantification of Duffy antigen on bovine red blood cell membranes using a polyclonal antibody. Pesq. Vet. Bras. 2012, 32, 936–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, X.; Li, H.; Chang, X. The role and mechanism of TXNDC5 in diseases. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2022, 27, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jiao, M.; Zhang, Y.; Song, X.; Xu, B. The role and mechanism of TXNDC5 in disease progression. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1354952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sachman, R.B.; Lozano, L.; Lira, J.J.; Martínez, G.; Rojas, C.; Álvarez, A.; Figueroa, J.V. Comparative genomic study of attenuated and virulent strains of Babesia bigemina. Pathogens 2021, 10, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Vega, C.A.; Buening, G.M.; Green, T.J.; Carson, C.A. In vitro cultivation of Babesia bigemina. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1985, 46, 416–420. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Figueroa, J.V.; Cantó, G.J.; Álvarez, J.A.; Loza, G.R.; Ramos, J.A.; Vega, C.A. Capacidad protectora en bovinos de una cepa de Babesia bigemina derivada del cultivo in vitro. Tec. Pecu. Méx. 1998, 36, 95–100. [Google Scholar]
  54. Figueroa, J.V.; Chieves, L.P.; Johnson, G.S.; Buening, G.M. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction based assay for the detection of Babesia bigemina, Babesia bovis and Anaplasma marginale DNA in bovine blood. Vet. Parasitol. 1993, 50, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jiménez-Jacinto, V.; Sanchez-Flores, A.; Vega-Alvarado, L. Integrative Differential Expression Analysis for Multiple EXperiments (IDEAMEX): A Web Server Tool for Integrated RNA-Seq Data Analysis. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Venn diagrams. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified with edgeR and DESeq2 programs: (a) comparison between the group inoculated with a virulent strain of B. bigemina (GI) and the non-inoculated control group (GIII); (b) comparison between the group inoculated with an attenuated strain of B. bigemina (GII) and the non-inoculated control group (GIII); (c) comparison between the group inoculated with a virulent strain of B. bigemina (GI) and the group inoculated with the attenuated strain of B. bigemina (GII).
Figure 1. Venn diagrams. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified with edgeR and DESeq2 programs: (a) comparison between the group inoculated with a virulent strain of B. bigemina (GI) and the non-inoculated control group (GIII); (b) comparison between the group inoculated with an attenuated strain of B. bigemina (GII) and the non-inoculated control group (GIII); (c) comparison between the group inoculated with a virulent strain of B. bigemina (GI) and the group inoculated with the attenuated strain of B. bigemina (GII).
Ijms 26 00487 g001
Figure 2. Heatmap. Differentially expressed genes between virulent-strain-inoculated (V_1, V_2, V3) and non-inoculated (C_1, C_2, C_3) bovines. The level of gene expression is represented by colors regarding a Z score: the higher score levels of expression are represented in purple tones, and the lower score levels of expression are represented in red tones.
Figure 2. Heatmap. Differentially expressed genes between virulent-strain-inoculated (V_1, V_2, V3) and non-inoculated (C_1, C_2, C_3) bovines. The level of gene expression is represented by colors regarding a Z score: the higher score levels of expression are represented in purple tones, and the lower score levels of expression are represented in red tones.
Ijms 26 00487 g002
Figure 3. Heatmap. Differentially expressed genes between attenuated-strain-inoculated (A_1, A_2, A3) and non-inoculated (C_1, C_2, C_3) bovines. The level of gene expression is represented by colors regarding a Z score: the higher score levels of expression are represented in purple tones, and the lower score levels of expression are represented in red tones.
Figure 3. Heatmap. Differentially expressed genes between attenuated-strain-inoculated (A_1, A_2, A3) and non-inoculated (C_1, C_2, C_3) bovines. The level of gene expression is represented by colors regarding a Z score: the higher score levels of expression are represented in purple tones, and the lower score levels of expression are represented in red tones.
Ijms 26 00487 g003
Figure 4. Heatmap. Differentially expressed genes between virulent-strain-inoculated (V_1, V_2, V3) and attenuated-strain-inoculated (A_1, A_2, A3) bovines. The level of gene expression is represented by colors regarding a Z score: the higher score levels of expression are represented in purple tones, and the lower score levels of expression are represented in red tones.
Figure 4. Heatmap. Differentially expressed genes between virulent-strain-inoculated (V_1, V_2, V3) and attenuated-strain-inoculated (A_1, A_2, A3) bovines. The level of gene expression is represented by colors regarding a Z score: the higher score levels of expression are represented in purple tones, and the lower score levels of expression are represented in red tones.
Ijms 26 00487 g004
Table 1. Summary of the sequencing and FastQC analysis performed. The sequence reads were mapped to the Bos taurus cattle reference genome (GCF_002263795.1). Description of the inoculated experimental groups: virulent strain of B. bigemina (GI), attenuated strain of B. bigemina (GII), and non-inoculated control group (GIII).
Table 1. Summary of the sequencing and FastQC analysis performed. The sequence reads were mapped to the Bos taurus cattle reference genome (GCF_002263795.1). Description of the inoculated experimental groups: virulent strain of B. bigemina (GI), attenuated strain of B. bigemina (GII), and non-inoculated control group (GIII).
GroupSample IDTotal Number of ReadsPhred Value
(Average)
Reads Length (bp)Mean GC Content (%)Mapped
Sequences
GIV_117,979,636337651–5511,426,710
V_218,832,282347651–551,118,703
V_317,928,270347651–552,338,818
GIIA_118,097,878337651–5515,724,796
A_217,894,634337651–5515,225,955
A_318,148,942337647–5114,490,409
GIIIC_117,979,610337647–5113,518,261
C_218,407,034337647–5113,342,950
C_317,431,266337651–5514,263,462
Table 2. Differentially expressed genes associated with immune response. Comparison between the cattle inoculated with a virulent strain of B. bigemina (GI) and non-inoculated (GIII) cattle.
Table 2. Differentially expressed genes associated with immune response. Comparison between the cattle inoculated with a virulent strain of B. bigemina (GI) and non-inoculated (GIII) cattle.
TranscriptlogFCp-ValueGen SymbolGen NameEncoded ProteinProtein Name
Down-
regulated
XM_024997861.1−4.952.62 × 10−9RAB27ARAB27A, member of RAS oncogene familyXP_024853629.1ras-related protein Rab-27A isoform X3
XM_024997858.1−4.735.32 × 10−9RAB27ARAB27A, member of RAS oncogene familyXP_024853626.1ras-related protein Rab-27A isoform X1
XM_024997860.1−4.717.80 × 10−9RAB27ARAB27A, member of RAS oncogene familyXP_024853628.1ras-related protein Rab-27A isoform X1
XM_024997856.1−4.482.27 × 10−8RAB27ARAB27A, member of RAS oncogene familyXP_024853624.1ras-related protein Rab-27A isoform X3
NM_001101270.1−4.336.27 × 10−8RAB27ARAB27A, member of RAS oncogene familyNP_001094740.1ras-related protein Rab-27A
XM_024997857.1−4.221.55 × 10−7RAB27ARAB27A, member of RAS oncogene familyXP_024853624.1ras-related protein Rab-27A isoform X3
XM_024997859.1−4.172.22 × 10−7RAB27ARAB27A, member of RAS oncogene familyXP_024853627.1ras-related protein Rab-27A isoform X3
NM_001012675.2−4.138.77 × 10−4BOLA-DQA5major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ alpha 5NP_001012693.2major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ alpha 5 precursor
XM_024983736.1−3.193.47 × 10−5MPIG6Bmegakaryocyte and platelet inhibitory receptor G6bXP_024839504.1protein G6b isoform X1
XM_015459849.2−2.964.91 × 10−3BOLA-DQA5major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ alpha 5XP_015315335.1major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ alpha 5 isoform X1
XM_015459896.2−2.893.32 × 10−4MPIG6Bmegakaryocyte and platelet inhibitory receptor G6bXP_015315382.2protein G6b isoform X2
NM_001078081.2−2.854.78 × 10−4MPIG6Bmegakaryocyte and platelet inhibitory receptor G6bNP_001071549.1megakaryocyte and platelet inhibitory receptor G6b precursor
NM_001130930.1−2.825.84 × 10−4STMP1short transmembrane mitochondrial protein 1NP_001124402.1short transmembrane mitochondrial protein 1
XM_024983649.1−2.771.17 × 10−2MAPK14mitogen-activated protein kinase 14XP_024839417.1mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 isoform X3
XM_002696068.6−2.751.75 × 10−2CD79BCD79b moleculeXP_002696114.1B-cell antigen receptor complex-associated protein beta chain isoform X2
NM_001101062.1−2.712.37 × 10−3PF4platelet factor 4NP_001094532.1platelet factor 4 precursor
NM_001101251.2−2.692.66 × 10−2IFI30IFI30 lysosomal thiol reductaseNP_001094721.1gamma-interferon-inducible lysosomal thiol reductase precursor
NM_001205988.1−2.671.99 × 10−3SRXN1sulfiredoxin 1NP_001192917.1sulfiredoxin-1
NM_174266.4−2.62.17 × 10−3CD79ACD79a moleculeNP_776691.2B-cell antigen receptor complex-associated protein alpha chain precursor
NM_001034735.1−2.55.50 × 10−3CD74CD74 moleculeNP_001029907.1HLA class II histocompatibility antigen gamma chain
XM_005209610.3−2.261.59 × 10−2CD74CD74 moleculeXP_005209667.1HLA class II histocompatibility antigen gamma chain isoform X1
NM_001192560.1−2.221.33 × 10−2GRAP2GRB2-related adaptor protein 2NP_001179489.1GRB2-related adapter protein 2
NM_001034517.2−2.22.36 × 10−2LAMTOR5late endosomal/lysosomal adaptor, MAPK and MTOR activator 5NP_001029689.1regulator complex protein LAMTOR5
NM_001034255.2−2.181.72 × 10−2CFDcomplement factor DNP_001029427.1complement factor D precursor
Up-
regulated
XM_002685850.58.355.67 × 10−8HSPA6heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 6XP_002685896.1heat shock 70 kDa protein 6
XM_010805535.12.761.74 × 10−3CD163CD163 moleculeXP_010803837.1scavenger receptor cysteine-rich type 1 protein M130 isoform X1
XM_005202573.42.561.11 × 10−2STAT1signal transducer and activator of transcription 1XP_005202630.1signal transducer and activator of transcription 1-alpha/beta
NM_174652.22.173.11 × 10−2SLC11A1solute carrier family 11 member 1NP_777077.1natural resistance-associated macrophage protein 1
Table 3. Differentially expressed genes associated with immune response. Comparison between the cattle inoculated with an attenuated strain of B. bigemina (GII) and non-inoculated (GIII) cattle.
Table 3. Differentially expressed genes associated with immune response. Comparison between the cattle inoculated with an attenuated strain of B. bigemina (GII) and non-inoculated (GIII) cattle.
TranscriptlogFCp-ValueGen SymbolGen NameEncoded ProteinProtein Name
Down-
regulated
XM_024997856.1−4.731.14 × 10−11RAB27ARAB27A, member of RAS oncogene familyXP_024853624.1ras-related protein Rab-27A isoform X3
XM_024997857.1−4.47.16 × 10−10RAB27ARAB27A, member of RAS oncogene familyXP_024853624.1ras-related protein Rab-27A isoform X3
XM_024997861.1−4.194.41 × 10−9RAB27ARAB27A, member of RAS oncogene familyXP_024853629.1ras-related protein Rab-27A isoform X3
NM_001101270.1−4.167.78 × 10−9RAB27ARAB27A, member of RAS oncogene familyNP_001094740.1ras-related protein Rab-27A
XM_024997858.1−3.913.36 × 10−9RAB27ARAB27A, member of RAS oncogene familyXP_024853626.1ras-related protein Rab-27A isoform X1
XM_024997859.1−3.881.59 × 10−4RAB27ARAB27A, member of RAS oncogene familyXP_024853627.1ras-related protein Rab-27A isoform X3
XM_024997860.1−3.743.57 × 10−8RAB27ARAB27A, member of RAS oncogene familyXP_024853628.1ras-related protein Rab-27A isoform X1
XM_002688351.4−3.221.36 × 10−5PPBPpro-platelet basic proteinXP_002688397.1platelet basic protein
NM_001046590.1−3.161.46 × 10−4CD83CD83 moleculeNP_001040055.1CD83 antigen precursor
NM_001205988.1−3.112.08 × 10−7SRXN1sulfiredoxin 1NP_001192917.1sulfiredoxin-1
XM_010818124.3−2.721.32 × 10−4MAPK14mitogen-activated protein kinase 14XP_010816426.1mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 isoform X4
NM_001101062.1−2.662.41 × 10−4PF4platelet factor 4NP_001094532.1platelet factor 4 precursor
XM_024983649.1−2.625.35 × 10−4MAPK14mitogen-activated protein kinase 14XP_024839417.1mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 isoform X3
XM_024983652.1−2.532.26 × 10−3MAPK14mitogen-activated protein kinase 14XP_024839420.1mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 isoform X7
NM_001034517.2−2.523.73 × 10−4LAMTOR5late endosomal/lysosomal adaptor, MAPK and MTOR activator 5NP_001029689.1regulator complex protein LAMTOR5
NM_001078081.2−2.523.90 × 10−4MPIG6Bmegakaryocyte and platelet inhibitory receptor G6bNP_001071549.1megakaryocyte and platelet inhibitory receptor G6b precursor
XM_024991787.1−2.471.27 × 10−3GRAP2GRB2 related adaptor protein 2XP_024847555.1GRB2-related adapter protein 2 isoform X1
NM_001130930.1−2.331.84 × 10−3STMP1short transmembrane mitochondrial protein 1NP_001124402.1short transmembrane mitochondrial protein 1
NM_001102174.1−2.32.09 × 10−3MAPK14mitogen-activated protein kinase 14NP_001095644.1mitogen-activated protein kinase 14
NM_173900.2−2.296.37 × 10−3CD9CD9 moleculeNP_776325.1CD9 antigen
NM_001192560.1−2.284.60 × 10−4GRAP2GRB2-related adaptor protein 2NP_001179489.1GRB2-related adapter protein 2
XM_015459896.2−2.261.01 × 10−3MPIG6Bmegakaryocyte and platelet inhibitory receptor G6bXP_015315382.2protein G6b isoform X2
XM_024983736.1−2.268.38 × 10−3MPIG6Bmegakaryocyte and platelet inhibitory receptor G6bXP_024839504.1protein G6b isoform X1
XM_024983650.1−2.243.52 × 10−3MAPK14mitogen-activated protein kinase 14XP_024839418.1mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 isoform X4
NM_001012676.3−2.221.66 × 10−3BOLA-DQBmajor histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ betaNP_001012694.2major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ beta precursor
NM_001012675.2−2.183.42 × 10−3BOLA-DQA5major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ alpha 5NP_001012693.2major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ alpha 5 precursor
XM_010818123.2−2.155.92 × 10−3MAPK14mitogen-activated protein kinase 14XP_010816425.1mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 isoform X1
XM_024983651.1−2.11.18 × 10−2MAPK14mitogen-activated protein kinase 14XP_024839419.1mitogen-activated protein kinase 14 isoform X5
NM_001101246.1−2.091.01 × 10−2MTURNmaturin, neural progenitor differentiation regulator homologNP_001094716.1maturin
XM_024983852.1−2.081.50 × 10−3BOLA-DQA2major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ alpha 2XP_024839620.1major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ alpha 2
NM_001193019.1−1.982.17 × 10−2NFKBIDNFKB inhibitor deltaNP_001179948.1NF-kappa-B inhibitor delta
NM_001130746.2−1.949.97 × 10−3NFKBIENFKB inhibitor epsilonNP_001124218.1NF-kappa-B inhibitor epsilon
XM_015459849.2−1.91.10 × 10−2BOLA-DQA5major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ alpha 5XP_015315335.1major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ alpha 5 isoform X1
XM_005207393.4−1.822.75 × 10−2GRAP2GRB2-related adaptor protein 2XP_005207450.1GRB2-related adapter protein 2 isoform X1
NM_001101164.2−1.781.04 × 10−2EGLN3egl-9 family hypoxia-inducible factor 3NP_001094634.1prolyl hydroxylase EGLN3
Up-
regulated
XM_003585963.53.54.42 × 10−7TARPTCR gamma alternate reading frame proteinXP_003586011.2uncharacterized protein LOC100335800 isoform X1
XM_024991132.13.061.34 × 10−6LOC100335205T-cell receptor gamma chain C region C10.5XP_024846900.1T-cell receptor gamma chain C region C10.5 isoform X2
NM_001075147.22.599.94 × 10−4CCL4C-C motif chemokine ligand 4NP_001068615.1C-C motif chemokine 4 precursor
XM_024985324.12.591.09 × 10−4LOC618541uncharacterized LOC618541XP_024841092.1uncharacterized protein LOC618541 isoform X1
NM_001281911.12.553.34 × 10−4TARPTCR gamma alternate reading frame proteinNP_001268840.1uncharacterized protein LOC100335800
XM_024985322.12.443.85 × 10−4LOC618541uncharacterized LOC618541XP_024841090.1uncharacterized protein LOC618541 isoform X1
XM_024991133.12.371.52 × 10−4LOC100335205T-cell receptor gamma chain C region C10.5XP_024846901.1T-cell receptor gamma chain C region C10.5 isoform X3
NM_001046060.22.251.65 × 10−3GIMAP4GTPase, IMAP family member 4NP_001039525.1GTPase IMAP family member 4
XM_024985326.12.257.58 × 10−4LOC618541uncharacterized LOC618541XP_024841094.1uncharacterized protein LOC618541 isoform X2
XM_024985321.12.231.03 × 10−3LOC618541uncharacterized LOC618541XP_024841089.1uncharacterized protein LOC618541 isoform X1
XM_010800704.32.213.44 × 10−4LOC100300806immunoglobulin heavy variable 4-59XP_010799006.3immunoglobulin heavy variable 4-59 isoform X1
XM_024994697.12.173.73 × 10−3TCF7transcription factor 7XP_024850465.1transcription factor 7 isoform X5
XM_024985323.12.169.03 × 10−4LOC618541uncharacterized LOC618541XP_024841091.1uncharacterized protein LOC618541 isoform X1
XM_024985319.12.091.03 × 10−3IL32interleukin 32XP_024841087.1uncharacterized protein IL32 isoform X3
XM_005203420.42.069.33 × 10−4CD247CD247 moleculeXP_005203477.1T-cell surface glycoprotein CD3 zeta chain isoform X1
NM_174012.22.051.10 × 10−2CD247CD247 moleculeNP_776437.1T-cell surface glycoprotein CD3 zeta chain precursor
XM_005224639.42.031.43 × 10−3IL32interleukin 32XP_005224696.1interleukin-32 isoform X1
XM_024990601.11.976.77 × 10−3GIMAP4GTPase, IMAP family member 4XP_024846369.1GTPase IMAP family member 4 isoform X1
NM_175773.31.951.04 × 10−2JCHAINjoining chain of multimeric IgA and IgMNP_786967.1immunoglobulin J chain precursor
XM_005205826.31.945.01 × 10−3GIMAP4GTPase, IMAP family member 4XP_005205883.1GTPase IMAP family member 4 isoform X1
NM_001024476.21.911.89 × 10−2TRAF3IP3TRAF3-interacting protein 3NP_001019647.2TRAF3-interacting JNK-activating modulator isoform 2
XM_024991131.11.883.02 × 10−2LOC100335205T-cell receptor gamma chain C region C10.5XP_024846899.1T-cell receptor gamma chain C region C10.5
XM_015471200.21.863.26 × 10−3IL2RBinterleukin 2 receptor subunit betaXP_015326686.2interleukin-2 receptor subunit beta
XM_002683998.61.851.73 × 10−2LOC100300716immunoglobulin heavy variable 4-38-2XP_002684044.5immunoglobulin heavy variable 4-38-2
XM_024991134.11.857.11 × 10−3LOC100335205T-cell receptor gamma chain C region C10.5XP_024846902.1T-cell receptor gamma chain C region C10.5 isoform X4
XM_024994696.11.751.69 × 10−2TCF7transcription factor 7XP_024850464.1transcription factor 7 isoform X3
NM_001046549.21.728.58 × 10−3TUBBtubulin beta class INP_001040014.1tubulin beta-5 chain
NM_001206732.11.712.92 × 10−2TXNDC5thioredoxin domain-containing 5NP_001193661.1thioredoxin domain-containing protein 5 precursor
Table 4. Differentially expressed genes associated with immune response. Comparison between the cattle inoculated with a virulent strain of B. bigemina (GI) and attenuated strain of B. bigemina (GII).
Table 4. Differentially expressed genes associated with immune response. Comparison between the cattle inoculated with a virulent strain of B. bigemina (GI) and attenuated strain of B. bigemina (GII).
TranscriptlogFCp-ValueGen SymbolGen NameEncoded ProteinProtein Name
Down-
regulated
XM_010800704.3−3.653.42 × 10−5LOC100300806immunoglobulin heavy variable 4-59XP_010799006.3immunoglobulin heavy variable 4-59 isoform X1
NM_175773.3−3.495.92 × 10−5JCHAINjoining chain of multimeric IgA and IgMNP_786967.1immunoglobulin J chain precursor
XM_002683998.6−3.485.85 × 10−5LOC100300716immunoglobulin heavy variable 4-38-2XP_002684044.5immunoglobulin heavy variable 4-38-2
NM_001319884.1−3.41.58 × 10−4LOC100297192Ig heavy chain Mem5-likeNP_001306813Ig heavy chain Mem5-like precursor
XM_024989147.1−3.352.19 × 10−4LOC112441460immunoglobulin lambda-1 light chainXP_024844915.1immunoglobulin lambda-1 light chain
XM_024977848.1−3.322.77 × 10−4LOC112441499immunoglobulin lambda-1 light chainXP_024833616.2immunoglobulin lambda-1 light chain
XM_005222343.4−3.172.52 × 10−4LOC104968484immunoglobulin heavy variable 4-59XP_005222400.3immunoglobulin heavy variable 4-59
NM_001083800.1−2.922.72 × 10−3LOC789205immunoglobulin lambda-1 light chain-likeNP_001077269.1immunoglobulin lambda-1 light chain-like precursor
NM_001103102.2−2.863.57 × 10−3SPNSialophorinNP_001096572Leukosialin
NM_001046618.1−2.74.41 × 10−3PTPRCAPprotein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type C-associated proteinNP_001040083.1protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type C-associated protein precursor
NM_001205186.1−2.571.86 × 10−2LOC524810IgMNP_001192115.1IgM precursor
XM_005227324.4−2.321.87 × 10−2LSP1lymphocyte-specific protein 1XP_005227381.1lymphocyte-specific protein 1 isoform X1
XM_024985319.1−2.222.95 × 10−2IL32interleukin 32XP_024841087.1uncharacterized protein IL32 isoform X3
Up-
regulated
XM_002685850.58.43.90 × 10−4HSPA6heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 6XP_002685896.1heat shock 70 kDa protein 6
XM_015459910.23.762.61 × 10−3LOC507917MHC class I heavy chainXP_015315396.1BOLA class I histocompatibility antigen, alpha chain BL3-6 isoform X1
NM_001193019.12.482.13 × 10−2NFKBIDNFKB inhibitor deltaNP_001179948.1NF-kappa-B inhibitor delta
NM_001076841.12.33.41 × 10−2LOC512672major histocompatibility complex, class INP_001070309.1major histocompatibility complex, class I precursor
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martínez-García, G.; Estrada, K.; Lira-Amaya, J.J.; Santamaria-Epinosa, R.M.; Lopez-Arellano, M.E.; Sciutto-Conde, E.L.; Rojas-Martinez, C.; Alvarez-Martínez, J.A.; Sánchez-Flores, A.; Figueroa-Millán, J.V. Comparative Analysis of Immune Response Genes Induced by a Virulent or Attenuated Strain of Babesia bigemina. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020487

AMA Style

Martínez-García G, Estrada K, Lira-Amaya JJ, Santamaria-Epinosa RM, Lopez-Arellano ME, Sciutto-Conde EL, Rojas-Martinez C, Alvarez-Martínez JA, Sánchez-Flores A, Figueroa-Millán JV. Comparative Analysis of Immune Response Genes Induced by a Virulent or Attenuated Strain of Babesia bigemina. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(2):487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020487

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martínez-García, Grecia, Karel Estrada, José J. Lira-Amaya, Rebeca M. Santamaria-Epinosa, María E. Lopez-Arellano, Edda L. Sciutto-Conde, Carmen Rojas-Martinez, Jesus A. Alvarez-Martínez, Alejandro Sánchez-Flores, and Julio V. Figueroa-Millán. 2025. "Comparative Analysis of Immune Response Genes Induced by a Virulent or Attenuated Strain of Babesia bigemina" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 2: 487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020487

APA Style

Martínez-García, G., Estrada, K., Lira-Amaya, J. J., Santamaria-Epinosa, R. M., Lopez-Arellano, M. E., Sciutto-Conde, E. L., Rojas-Martinez, C., Alvarez-Martínez, J. A., Sánchez-Flores, A., & Figueroa-Millán, J. V. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Immune Response Genes Induced by a Virulent or Attenuated Strain of Babesia bigemina. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(2), 487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020487

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop