Next Article in Journal
Brain Metabolism of Allopregnanolone and Isoallopregnanolone in Male Rat Brain
Previous Article in Journal
Treatment of Dyslipidemia in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Review of Current Evidence and Knowledge Gaps
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nido-Carborane Derivatives of (S)-Ornithine and (S)-Lysine as Potential Boron Delivery Agents: Synthesis and In Vitro Evaluation

by
Dmitry A. Gruzdev
1,*,
Galina L. Levit
1,
Vera V. Musiyak
1,
Angelina A. Telegina
1,
Ilya N. Ganebnykh
1,
Marina A. Ezhikova
1,
Mikhail I. Kodess
1,
Olga I. Solovieva
2,3,
Tatiana Y. Gusel’nikova
3,
Ivan A. Razumov
2 and
Victor P. Krasnov
1
1
Postovsky Institute of Organic Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences (Ural Branch), Ekaterinburg 620066, Russia
2
Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences (Siberian Branch), Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
3
Department of Physics, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(17), 8560; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178560
Submission received: 25 July 2025 / Revised: 1 September 2025 / Accepted: 2 September 2025 / Published: 3 September 2025

Abstract

Derivatives of natural amino acids are selectively absorbed by many types of tumour cells. This makes the use of amino acids, especially polyfunctional ones, attractive as a basis in the design of low-toxicity agents for targeted boron delivery for boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) of tumours. We synthesized a series of new (S)-ornithine and (S)-lysine derivatives containing a 7,8-dicarba-nido-undecaborane (nido-carborane) residue attached to the amino group in the side chain or alpha position. The MTT assay demonstrated moderate cytotoxicity of the lysine and ornithine derivatives containing a nido-carborane residue in the side chain. It has been found that sodium salt of Nε-(nido-carboran-7-yl)acetyl-(S)-lysine is capable of accumulation by MDA-MB-231 (human breast carcinoma) and SK-Mel 28 (human melanoma) cell lines, providing a boron concentration of up to 0.67 µg/106 cells in in vitro experiments. This (S)-lysine derivative containing a nido-carborane residue in the side chain can be considered as a promising compound for in-depth study in vivo experiments aimed at designing an efficient boron delivery agent for BNCT.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Natural amino acids are widely used in the design of prodrugs and medicinal agents for targeted delivery [1,2,3]. The introduction of fragments of polyfunctional amino acids allows optimizing the pharmacokinetic parameters of bioactive compounds and reducing their toxicity. In particular, the structural fragment of (S)-lysine has been used in the synthesis of water-soluble derivatives of amphetamine [4,5,6,7], diazepam [8,9,10,11,12], midazolam [13,14], derivatives of ketoprofen [15,16,17] and methotrexate [18], which are capable of overcoming the blood–brain barrier; as well as efficient antitumour [19,20,21,22,23,24,25] and antibacterial agents [26,27,28,29]. Many tumour cells are characterized by high activity of ornithine decarboxylase involved in the biosynthesis of polyamines [30,31,32]. This makes it possible to design new (S)-ornithine-based pharmaceuticals for cancer therapy and diagnostics [19,33,34,35,36,37,38].
Treatment of tumour diseases is one of the most important problems of modern medicine. Despite the successes and development of therapeutic methods, the incidence of cancer remains high [39]. One of the efficient modern approaches to cancer treatment is boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). This method is based on the combined use of boron-containing agents of different nature and irradiation with thermal or epithermal neutrons [40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. An important requirement that guarantees the possibility of using the method is the selective delivery of boron compounds to tumour cells. One of the ways to design pharmaceuticals for targeted delivery of boron is to obtain conjugates of natural molecules containing residues of polyhedral boron-containing molecules, primarily dicarba-closo-dodecaborane and dicarba-nido-undecaborane (carboranes), as well as dodecaborate [47,48,49,50,51,52].
We have previously shown that carborane-containing folic acid conjugates have low toxicity and are capable of selective accumulation in U87 MG human glioblastoma cells (up to 7.0 µg B/106 cells) [53]. There are several examples of tumour-selective boron delivery agents, for example, carborane derivatives of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) [54,55], glucose [56,57], and short peptides [58,59].
Natural polyfunctional amino acids are an important class of tumour-tropic molecules, since cancer cells are characterized by high activity of metabolic processes and actively use amino acids in their vital functions [60,61].
A series of lysine derivatives containing closo-carborane moieties were synthesized in the context of the search for efficient agents for targeted boron delivery in BNCT [62]. Modification of lysine residues using carborane- and dodecaborane-containing building blocks made it possible to prepare boron-containing analogues of neuropeptide Y [63,64,65,66,67,68], [Tyr3]-octreotate [69], transferrin derivatives [70], ghrelin receptor agonists [71], and other peptides [72,73,74]. A number of boron-containing ligands of PSMA, which were capable of accumulating in cells, were obtained by acylation of the amino group in the side chain of lysine with carborane-based acids [54,55]. Lysine was used as a linker fragment in the design of a monodisperse closomer drug delivery system [75], derivatives of cell-membrane penetrating peptides [76,77], as well as modified boron carbide nanoparticles [78]. Previously, we demonstrated the possibility of synthesizing lysine derivatives containing one or two closo-carborane residues [79,80], and also prepared a bis-nido-carboranyl derivative of the tumour-tropic KRGD peptide with low cytotoxicity [81].
This paper describes the synthetic routes for simple in structure water-soluble nido-carborane-containing derivatives of (S)-lysine and (S)-ornithine with free carboxyl and amino groups in the alpha position or in the side chain, and also provides an assessment of the cytotoxicity of some of the obtained compounds and their accumulation in cells.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization of the Obtained Compounds

(closo-Carboran-1-yl)acetic acid (1) was used as the starting carborane-containing building block. Previously, we have shown that, starting from compound 1, carborane conjugates with natural molecules such as adenine [82], amino acids [83], and folic acid [53] can be easily synthesized. To obtain derivatives of (S)-lysine and (S)-ornithine containing one residue of nido-carborane in the side chain or at the α-amino group, we used an approach based on acylation of tert-butyl Nα-Boc or Nω-Boc amino esters followed by deboronation and removal of protecting groups in one step. We have previously demonstrated that the simultaneous removal of several protecting groups at the last stage of synthesis is convenient for obtaining carboranyl derivatives of polyfunctional amino acids [84,85], as well as lysine and ornithine derivatives with substituents in the side chain [79,86].
Amino esters Nα-Boc-Orn-OtBu (2a) and Nα-Boc-Lys-OtBu (2b) obtained from the corresponding Nω-Cbz derivatives by analogy with known procedures [87,88,89] were coupled to acid 1 using the mixed anhydride method (Scheme 1). Amides 3a and 3b were isolated in 61 and 68% yields, respectively. The structure of compound 3b, determined by X-ray diffraction, is shown in Figure 1.
Treatment of dicarba-closo-dodecaborane derivatives, which are highly lipophilic compounds, with cesium fluoride or other fluorides is a convenient method for converting them into the corresponding dicarba-nido-undecaborane derivatives [90,91,92], which in the form of salts are often characterized by high solubility in water. We have previously used CsF treatment to prepare a number of nido-carborane derivatives, including planar-chiral ones [82,83,93]. Refluxing the protected closo-carborane derivatives 3a,b with excess CsF in ethanol followed by removal of protecting groups under acidic conditions smoothly led to the corresponding nido-derivatives 4a,b which were isolated as internal salts in moderate yields (Scheme 1). Their treatment with sodium carbonate afforded sodium salts of Nω-carboranyl amino acids 5a and 5b in a quantitative yield.
To obtain Nα-carboranylacetyl derivatives, it was necessary to synthesize suitably protected (S)-ornithine and (S)-lysine. This synthesis involved more steps. In the case of the ornithine derivative, we carried out the following sequential processes: transformation of amino ester 6 into Nδ-Cbz-Nα-trifluoroacetyl derivative 7, removal of the Cbz group by hydrogenolysis, and introduction of the Boc group to form compound 8 (Scheme 2). Removal of the trifluoroacetyl protecting group in compound 8 under mild alkaline conditions by analogy with the known approach [94] gave amino ester 9a in 40% overall yield relative to amino ester 6. The choice of this synthetic route for compound 9a with a free amino group in the α-position was due to the instability of readily available Nδ-Boc-(S)-ornithine under the esterification conditions and the limited availability of Nα-Cbz-(S)-ornithine.
In contrast, Nα-Cbz-(S)-lysine is a commercially available starting material. At first, it was converted to tert-butyl amino ester 10 according to the known procedure [95]; further transformation of compound 10 to Nε-Boc derivative 11 followed by the removal of the Cbz protecting group afforded amino ester 9b in 53% overall yield relative to compound 10 (Scheme 3). It should be noted that hydrogenation of compound 11 required more drastic reaction conditions than those used for preparing compounds 2a,b and deprotection of compound 7 (hydrogen pressure of 25 atm in the presence of 20% catalyst by weight).
Acylation of compounds 9a and 9b with acid 1 by the carbodiimide method smoothly afforded amides 12a,b (Scheme 4). Successive treatment of compounds 12a,b with CsF and concentrated hydrochloric acid in 1,4-dioxane afforded nido-carboranyl amino acids 13a and 13b as zwitterions. Similarly to amino acids 4a,b, compounds 13a,b readily formed sodium salts 14a,b upon treatment with an equivalent amount of Na2CO3.
(nido-Carboran-7-yl)acetyl derivatives of (S)-ornithine and (S)-lysine 4a,b and 13a,b, isolated as zwitterions, are solids without a clear melting point. These compounds are slightly soluble in water and have a high tendency to form solvates with ethyl acetate, the content of which in the samples dried to constant weight reached 50 mol.% (according to elemental analysis and 1H NMR spectroscopy). Sodium salts 5a,b and 14a,b are finely crystalline compounds stable upon storage for several months. Their solubility in water is 5–7 mg/mL.
In the molecules of 7-monosubstituted nido-carboranes there is a chiral plane. As a result of the treatment of closo-carborane derivatives 3a,b and 12a,b with CsF, the deboronation of the B(3)H and B(6)H vertices occurs with equal probability. Therefore, compounds 4, 5, 13 and 14 are mixtures of two diastereomers in a ratio of approximately 1:1. In the case of amino acid derivatives substituted at the α-amino group (compounds 13a,b and 14a,b), two chirality elements (the asymmetric carbon atom of the amino acid and the chiral plane in the nido-carborane residue) are close to each other, and individual diastereomers are clearly distinguishable in the NMR spectra (see the Supplementary Materials, Figures S35–S46). At the same time, the NMR spectra of the Nε-derivatives of (S)-lysine 4b and 5b contain a single set of signals. The signals from bridging hydrogen atoms in nido-carborane residues of compounds 4, 5, 13 and 14 were in the upper field (δ −2.6…−2.8 ppm); the signals of CH groups in nido-carborane residues of compounds 4 and 13 were shifted upfield compared to the corresponding signals in the 1H NMR spectra of closo-derivatives 3 and 12 (δ 1.83–1.86 and 5.05–5.12 ppm, respectively). The 11B NMR spectra of compounds 4, 5, 13 and 14 contained sets of clearly distinguishable signals in the range δ −10.4…−37.5 ppm, which is characteristic of non-symmetrical mono-substituted nido-carborane derivatives [53,82,96,97]. The mass spectra of closo- and nido-carborane derivatives showed characteristic cluster peaks, which is associated with the presence of ten or nine boron atoms at different ratios of 10B and 11B isotopes (see the Supplementary Materials, Figures S47–S59).

2.2. In Vitro Evaluation

To test the ability to deliver boron into cells, we chose sodium salts of (S)-ornithine and (S)-lysine derivatives 5a,b with unsubstituted functional groups at the alpha-position. We assumed that the presence of unmodified NH2 and CO2H groups at the alpha-position may promote more active transport into cells, for example, with the participation of the large neutral L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) [15,16,98,99,100].

2.2.1. Toxicity Assay

The toxicity profile of compound 5b and its homologue 5a was studied in the MTT assay [101] on healthy (nontransformed) cells (BJ-5ta human foreskin fibroblasts) and tumour cells (DU 145 human prostate carcinoma, MDA-MB-231 human breast carcinoma, SK-Mel-28 human melanoma, T98G and U87 MG human glioblastomas) (Figure 2, Table 1). The antitumour agent cisplatin was used as a positive control (at concentrations 10 times lower than those of compounds 5a,b). Cell viability in negative control samples (without tested compounds in growth medium) was 100 ± 11%.
The cells were incubated in the presence of the test compounds for 72 h. It has been shown that sodium salts 5a,b do not exhibit a significant effect on the survival of BJ-5ta fibroblasts and various human tumour cells at a concentration of 0.125 mg/mL and below (Figure 2). At the same time, the sodium salt of Nε-(nido-carboran-7-yl)acetyl-(S)-lysine (5b) was less toxic to healthy BJ-5ta cells than to tumour cells (Table 1). The (S)-ornithine derivative 5a was less toxic to tumour cells than compound 5b; however, it was characterized by greater cytotoxicity towards BJ-5ta fibroblasts.

2.2.2. Evaluation of Boron Accumulation

Evaluation of boron accumulation in tumour and healthy cells is an important step in the design of potential agents for BNCT. Candidate compounds should provide selective boron accumulation in tumour cells accompanied by minimal cytotoxicity.
To test the ability to deliver boron into cells, we chose sodium salt of the (S)-lysine derivative 5b demonstrating lower toxicity towards healthy cells than its homologue 5a. In addition, it is known that Nε-acetylated (S)-lysine derivatives are good substrates for histone deacetylase that is actively expressed by various tumour cells [24,102,103].
Incubation of cells of different lines in the presence of (S)-lysine derivative 5b (at a concentration of 0.5 µg/mL) was carried out for 8 h to minimize the cytotoxic effect. The highest level of boron concentration was observed in MDA-MB-231 human breast carcinoma cells (up to 0.67 µg B/106 cells after incubation for 8 h) (Figure 3).
The level of boron accumulation in SK-Mel 28 melanoma cells was slightly lower (up to 0.54 µg B/106 cells after 1 h of incubation). The highest boron concentrations in cells using compound 5b exceeded the level of boron accumulation in melanoma and breast cancer cells previously achieved using boronophenylalanine (BPA) and sodium borocaptate (BSH), clinically used agents for BNCT [104,105,106]. T98G and U87 MG glioblastoma cells, DU 145 prostate carcinoma cells, and BJ-5ta foreskin fibroblasts were characterized by low levels of compound 5b accumulation.
It is noteworthy that the previously synthesized bis-amide of folic acid containing nido-carborane residues was selectively accumulated by U87 MG human glioblastoma cells, while the level of accumulation by MDA-MB-231 and SK-Mel 28 cell lines was low [53]. This indicates differences in the mechanism of transport of conjugates based on folic acid and (S)-lysine into cells.
The high demand of tumour cells for nutrients is largely ensured by amino acid transporters, primarily the large neutral L-amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) and the alanine/serine/cysteine transporter 2 (ASCT2) [61,107,108]. In particular, LAT1 and ASCT2 have broad substrate specificity for amino acids and their derivatives and are actively expressed by human breast cancer cells (including MDA-MB-231) [109,110,111,112,113]. Human melanoma cells typically express high levels of LAT1 and are sensitive to LAT1-targeted therapy [114,115,116,117]. Moreover, it is known that SK-Mel 28 human melanoma cells are characterized by low activity of the ASCT2 transporter [118]. In addition, it is known that melanoma cells are able to accumulate boron-containing amino acids (e.g., 10B-BPA) via active transport [119,120,121]. Apparently, a significant level of accumulation of boron-containing amino acid 5b by MDA-MB-231 and SK-Mel 28 cells is due to LAT1-mediated transport through the cell membrane. In recent years, good prospects for using BNCT for combating triple-negative breast cancers and melanoma using BPA and boron-containing nanoparticles have been demonstrated [122,123,124,125]. Therefore, design of efficient agents for boron delivery to melanoma and breast carcinoma cells is an important step in the development of BNCT.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry General Section

(1,2-Dicarba-closo-dodecaboran-1-yl)acetic acid (1) [126], tert-butyl Nα-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)-(S)-ornithinate (2a) [83], tert-butyl Nα-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)-(S)-lysinate (2b) [84], tert-butyl Nδ-benzyloxycarbonyl-(S)-ornithinate (6) [127] and tert-butyl Nα-benzyloxycarbonyl-(S)-lysinate (10) [95] were obtained as described previously. Other reagents are commercially available. Solvents were purified according to traditional methods [128] and used freshly distilled.
Melting points were obtained on a SMP3 apparatus (Barloworld Scientific, Staffordshire, UK) and are uncorrected. Optical rotations were measured on a Perkin Elmer 341 polarimeter (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The 1H, 11B, 13C and 19F NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE 500 instrument (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) (500, 160, 126 and 470 MHz, respectively) at ambient temperature using TMS and C6F6 as internal standards and BF3·Et2O as an external standard. The NMR spectra of the compounds were obtained; see the Supplementary Materials, Figures S1–S46. Microanalyses were carried out using a Perkin Elmer 2400 II automatic analyser (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Analytical TLC was performed using Sorbfil plates (Imid, Krasnodar, Russia). Flash column chromatography was performed using Silica gel 60 (230–400 mesh) (Alfa Aesar, Heysham, Lancashire, UK). The high-resolution mass spectra were obtained on a Bruker maXis Impact HD mass spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany), electrospray ionization in positive or negative mode with direct sample inlet (4 L/min flow rate).
Single crystal of compound 3b was obtained by spontaneous crystallization from MeOH. The XRD experiments were performed on an Xcalibur 3 automated X-ray diffractometer (Oxford Diffraction, Milton Park Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK) with CCD detector according to standard procedure (MoKα-irradiation, graphite monochromator, ω-scans with 1° step at T = 295 (2) K). Empirical absorption correction was applied. The solution and refinement of the structures were accomplished with using OLEX2-1.3 software package [129]. The structures were solved by direct method in SHELXS programme and refined by SHELXL by full-matrix least-squared method for non-hydrogen atoms [130]. The H atoms at B–H and C–H bonds were placed in the calculated positions and refined in the “rider” model; the H atoms at N–H bonds were refined independently in isotropic approximation. The X-ray diffraction data were deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC no. 2472575). Copies of the data can be obtained, free of charge, on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK [fax: +44(0)1223 336033 or e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk].

3.2. Synthesis

General Procedure for the Synthesis of tert-Butyl Nα-Boc-Nω-(closo-carboranyl)acetylamino Esters 3a,b. Ethyl chloroformate (0.17 mL, 1.80 mmol) was added to a solution of compound 1 (0.36 g, 1.80 mmol) and N-methylmorpholine (0.20 mL, 1.80 mmol) in THF (15 mL) with stirring at −12 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at −12 °C for 20 min, then a solution of compound 2a or 2b (1.80 mmol) and N,N-diethylaniline (0.54 g, 3.60 mmol) in THF (20 mL) was added. The resulting suspension was stirred at room temperature for 24 h, then evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, and EtOAc (45 mL) was added to the residue. The resulting solution was washed successively with 10% citric acid solution (3 × 20 mL), saturated NaCl solution (3 × 20 mL), 5% NaHCO3 solution (3 × 20 mL), and water (2 × 20 mL). The organic layer was dried with Na2SO4 and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (eluent hexane–EtOAc from 9:1 to 1:1).
tert-Butyl Nα-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-Nδ-(1,2-dicarba-closo-dodecaboran-1-yl)acetyl-(S)-ornithinate (3a). Yield 0.52 g (61%), colourless solid, mp. 64–66 °C. [α]D20 −9.5 (c 0.5, EtOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) (conformers I and II, 85:15) δ (ppm): 1.3–2.8 (m, 10H, 10 × BH), 1.36 (s, 1.35H, tBu (II)), 1.38 (s, 7.65H, tBu (I)), 1.39 (s, 7.65H, tBu (I)), 1.42 (s, 1.35H, tBu (II)), 1.39–1.54 (m, 3H, 2 × H-4, H-3B), 1.60–1.67 (m, 1H, H-3A), 2.96–3.06 (m, 2H, 2 × H-5), 3.09 (s, 2H, CH2 acetyl), 3.65–3.70 (m, 0.15H, H-2 (II)), 3.77 (br. td, J = 8.3, 5.0 Hz, 0.85H, H-2 (I)), 5.12 (s, 1H, CH carborane), 6.77 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 0.15H, NH-2 (II)), 7.10 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 0.85H, NH-2 (I)), 8.22 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H, NH-5). 11B{1H} NMR (160 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): −13.1 (2B), −11.0 (3B), −10.1 (3B), −6.0 (1B), −3.2 (1B). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) (predominant conformer) δ (ppm): 25.31, 27.56 (3C), 28.11 (4C), 38.26, 42.24, 53.98, 61.19, 71.41, 77.96, 80.15, 155.44, 165.39, 171.61. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M − H] calcd for [C18H3911B10N2O5]: 473.3824, found: 473.3823.
tert-Butyl Nα-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-Nε-(1,2-dicarba-closo-dodecaboran-1-yl)acetyl-(S)-lysinate (3b). Yield 0.60 g (68%), colourless solid, mp. 155–156 °C. [α]D20 −14.6 (c 0.9, MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) (conformers I and II, 85:15) δ (ppm): 1.3–2.9 (m, 10H, 10 × BH), 1.24–1.41 (m, 4H, 2 × H-4, 2 × H-5), 1.35 (s, 1.35H, tBu (II)), 1.38 (s, 7.65H, tBu (I)), 1.39 (s, 7.65H, tBu (I)), 1.41 (s, 1.35H, tBu (II)), 1.49–1.62 (m, 2H, 2 × H-3), 2.96–3.07 (m, 2H, 2 × H-6), 3.09 (s, 2H, CH2 acetyl), 3.63–3.68 (m, 0.15H, H-2 (II)), 3.73 (ddd, J = 9.0, 7.8, 5.1 Hz, 0.85H, H-2 (I)), 5.12 (s, 1H, CH carborane), 6.73 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 0.15H, NH-2 (II)), 7.05 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 0.85H, NH-2 (I)), 8.21 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H, NH-5). 11B{1H} NMR (160 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): −13.0 (2B), −11.0 (3B), −10.1 (3B), −6.0 (1B), −3.2 (1B). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) (predominant conformer) δ (ppm): 22.89, 27.59 (3C), 28.12 (3C), 28.19, 30.21, 38.39, 42.21, 54.25, 61.16, 71.44, 77.92, 80.07, 155.47, 165.36, 171.78. Calcd (%) for C19H42B10N2O5 (486.65): C 46.89, H 8.70, N 5.76. Found (%): C 47.15, H 8.64, N 5.71.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Nω-(nido-Carboranyl)acetylamino acids 4a,b. CsF (0.39 g, 2.55 mmol) was added to a solution of compound 3a or 3b (0.85 mmol) in EtOH (25 mL). The reaction mixture was refluxed for 16 h, then cooled to room temperature and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in water (50 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 15 mL). The organic layers were washed with saturated NaCl solution (2 × 20 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in dioxane (12 mL), then conc. HCl (2.1 mL, 25.5 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h, then evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in water (15 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The organic layers were washed with water (3 × 10 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (eluent CHCl3–EtOH–NH4OH from 8:2:0.5 to 4:6:0.5). Fractions containing the target compound were evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in 0.2 M HCl (20 mL), extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The organic layers were washed with saturated NaCl solution (2 × 10 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure.
Nδ-(7,8-Dicarba-nido-undecaboran-7-yl)acetyl-(S)-ornithine (4a). Yield 0.13 g (50%), colourless solid, mp. 91–93 °C. [α]D20 +9.4 (c 0.5, EtOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) (diastereomers I and II, appr. 1:1) δ (ppm): −2.73 (br. s, 0.5H, BHB (I)), −2.63 (br. s, 0.5H, BHB (II)), −0.6 … 2.3 (br. m, 9H, 9 × BH), 1.40–1.58 (m, 2H, 2 × H-3), 1.68–1.82 (m, 2H, 2 × H-4), 1.85 (s, 1H, CH carborane), 2.050 (d, J = 14.7 Hz, 0.5H, HB acetyl (I)), 2.054 (d, J = 14.7 Hz, 0.5H, HB acetyl (II)), 2.40 (d, J = 14.7 Hz, 1H, HA acetyl (I and II)), 3.04 (q, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H, 2 × H-5), 3.92 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H, H-2), 7.46 (t, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H, NH), 8.18 (s, 3H, NH3+), 13.80 (br.s, 1H, CO2H). 11B NMR (160 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): −37.1 (d, J = 134 Hz, 1B), −33.3 (d, J = 125 Hz, 1B), −22.0 (d, J = 110 Hz, 1B), −18.8 … −16.9 (m, 3B), −14.3 (d, J = 120 Hz, 1B), −10.8 (d, J = 130 Hz, 2B). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 24.92, 27.56, 37.79, 45.36, 46.30 (br. s), 51.81, 54.72 (br. s), 170.98 (2C). HRMS (ESI): m/z [M − H] calcd for [C9H2411B9N2O3]: 306.2645, found: 306.2643.
Nε-(7,8-Dicarba-nido-undecaboran-7-yl)acetyl-(S)-lysine, Solvate with EtOAc (4b). Yield 0.18 g (58%), colourless semisolid. [α]D20 +5.9 (c 0.9, MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): −2.72 (br. s, 1H, BHB), −0.6…2.4 (br. m, 9H, 9 × BH), 1.30–1.46 (m, 4H, 2 × CH2), 1.74–1.83 (m, 2H, 2 × H-3), 1.86 (br.s, 1H, CH carborane), 2.03 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1H, HB acetyl), 2.38 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1H, HA acetyl), 2.97–3.06 (m, 2H, 2 × H-6), 3.88 (br. s, 1H, H-2), 7.34 (t, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H, NH), 8.17 (s, 3H, NH3+), 13.80 (s, 1H, CO2H). 11B{1H} NMR (160 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): −37.1 (1B), −33.3 (1B), −22.0 (br. s, 1B), −18.4 (2B), −17.2 (1B), −14.2 (br. s, 1B), −10.8 (2B). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 21.69, 28.67, 29.61, 37.88, 45.41, 46.20 (br. s), 51.85, 54.93 (br. s), 170.79, 171.02. Calcd (%) for C10H27B9N2O3 × 0.5EtOAc (364.68): C 39.52, H 8.57, N 7.68. Found (%): C 39.74, H 8.35, N 7.38.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Sodium Salts of Nω-(nido-Carboranyl)acetyl-amino Acids 5a,b. A solution of Na2CO3 (0.016 g, 0.15 mmol) in water (1 mL) was added to a solution of compound 4a or 4b (0.30 mmol) in EtOH (5 mL). The reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was dried in vacuo over P2O5 at 70 °C.
Sodium Nδ-(7,8-Dicarba-nido-undecaboran-7-yl)acetyl-(S)-ornithinate (5a). Yield 0.098 g (100%). Colourless semisolid. [α]D20 −3.1 (c 0.3, H2O). 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ (ppm): −3.05 … −2.35 (br. s, 1H, BHB), −0.4…2.5 (m, 9H, BH), 1.56–1.71 (m, 2H, 2 × H-3), 1.88–2.01 (m, 2H, 2 × H-4), 2.09 (s, 1H, CH carborane), 2.37 (d, J = 14.6 Hz, 1H, HB acetyl), 2.57 (d, J = 14.6 Hz, 1H, HA acetyl), 3.19–3.31 (m, 2H, 2 × H-5), 3.83 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H, H-2). 11B NMR (160 MHz, D2O) δ (ppm): −37.4 (d, J = 138 Hz, 1B), −33.4 (d, J = 130 Hz, 1B), −21.4 (d, J = 146 Hz, 1B), −19.6 (d, J = 140 Hz, 1B), −18.7 (d, J = 160 Hz, 1B), −17.0 (d, J = 135 Hz, 1B), −14.2 (d, J = 154 Hz, 1B), −11.8 (d, J = 114 Hz, 1B), −11.1 (d, J = 115 Hz, 1B). 13C NMR (126 MHz, D2O) δ (ppm): 27.16, 30.58, 41.29, 47.78, 49.92 (br. s), 56.86, 59.05 (br. s), 176.64, 177.75. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M − Na] calcd for [C9H2411B9N2O3]: 306.2645, found: 306.2644.
Sodium Nε-(7,8-Dicarba-nido-undecaboran-7-yl)acetyl-(S)-lysinate (5b). Yield 0.103 g (100%). Colourless semisolid. [α]D20 +2.4 (c 0.5, MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ (ppm): −3.05 … −2.35 (br. s, 1H, BHB), −0.4 … 2.5 (m, 9H, BH), 1.42–1.53 (m, 2H, 2 × H-4), 1.57–1.62 (m, 2H, 2 × H-5), 1.82–1.97 (m, 2H, 2 × H-3), 2.09 (s, 1H, CH carborane), 2.35 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1H, HB acetyl), 2.56 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1H, HA acetyl), 3.16–3.27 (m, 2H, 2 × H-6), 3.75 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H, H-2). 11B{1H} NMR (160 MHz, D2O) δ (ppm): −37.4 (1B), −33.4 (1B), −21.4 (1B), −19.6 (1B), −18.6 (m, 1B), −17.0 (1B), −14.2 (1B), −11.7 (1B), −11.2 (1B). 13C NMR (126 MHz, D2O) δ (ppm): 24.75, 30.93, 32.87, 41.48, 47.83, 49.87 (br. s), 57.53, 59.27 (br. s), 177.44, 177.62. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [C10H2711B9N2NaO3]+: 345.2768, found: 345.2764; [M + Na]+ calcd for [C10H2611B9N2Na2O3]+: 367.2587, found: 367.2584.
tert-Butyl Nδ-Benzyloxycarbonyl-Nα-trifluoroacetyl-(S)-ornithinate (7). Trifluoroacetic anhydride (0.63 mL, 4.50 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of compound 6 (1.32 g, 4.09 mmol) and triethylamine (1.83 mL, 13.10 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (11 mL) with stirring at −5 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at −5 °C for 10 min, then at 10 °C for 24 h, CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was added and the mixture was washed successively with 10% citric acid solution (3 × 10 mL), saturated NaCl solution (2 × 10 mL), 5% NaHCO3 solution (2 × 10 mL) and water (10 mL). The organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel (eluent benzene–EtOAc from 95:5 to 85:15). Yield 1.40 g (82%). Colourless solid, mp. 68–70 °C. [α]D20 −23.4 (c 1.3, MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 1.40 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.42–1.49 (m, 2H, 2 × H-4), 1.65–1.74 (m, 1H, H-3B), 1.76–1.84 (m, 1H, H-3A), 2.98–3.02 (m, 2H, 2 × H-5), 4.16 (ddd, J = 9.4, 7.3, 5.1 Hz, 1H, H-2), 5.00 (s, 2H, CH2,Bn), 7.28 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 1H, NH-5), 7.30–7.38 (m, 5H, Bn), 9.70 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, NH-2). 19F NMR (470 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 88.45 (s, CF3). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 25.93, 27.10, 27.45 (3C), 39.5 (overlapped with DMSO-d6 signal), 53.16, 65.07, 81.18, 115.74 (q, J = 287.9 Hz), 127.62 (2C), 127.66, 128.25 (2C), 137.18, 156.04, 156.47 (q, J = 36.9 Hz), 169.39. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [C19H26F3N2O5]+: 419.1788, found: 419.1787.
tert-Butyl Nδ-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-Nα-trifluoroacetyl-(S)-ornithinate (8). 10% Pd/C (0.15 g) was added to a solution of compound 7 (1.03 g, 2.45 mmol) in EtOH (40 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature under H2 (8 atm.) for 8 h. The solution was filtered; the filtrate was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in DMF (5 mL); triethylamine (0.68 mL, 4.90 mmol) and a solution of Boc2O (0.59 g, 2.70 mmol) in DMF (6.5 mL) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h, then EtOAc (25 mL) was added. The solution was washed successively with 10% citric acid solution (3 × 10 mL) and saturated NaCl solution (2 × 10 mL). The organic layer was dried with MgSO4 and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel (eluent benzene–EtOAc from 95:5 to 9:1). Yield 0.88 g (93%). Colourless solid, mp. 97–98 °C. [α]D20 –27 (c 0.8, MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) (predominant conformer) δ (ppm): 1.37 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.40 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.38–1.44 (m, 2H, 2 × H-4), 1.63–1.71 (m, 1H, H-3B), 1.73–1.82 (m, 1H, H-3A), 2.90–2.93 (m, 2H, 2 × H-5), 4.13–4.18 (m, 1H, H-2), 6.81 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H, NH-5), 9.68 (br. d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H, NH-2). 19F NMR (470 MHz, DMSO-d6) (predominant conformer) δ (ppm): 88.45 (s, CF3). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) (predominant conformer) δ (ppm): 26.02, 27.08, 27.45 (3C), 28.16 (3C), 39.05, 53.16, 77.35, 81.14, 115.73 (q, J = 288.0 Hz), 155.55, 156.45 (q, J = 36.6 Hz), 169.44. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for [C16H27F3N2NaO5]+: 407.1764, found: 407.1762.
tert-Butyl Nδ-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-(S)-ornithinate (9a). 1 M NaOH (2.8 mL, 2.80 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of compound 8 (0.43 g, 1.13 mmol) in EtOH (2.8 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 6 h, then water (15 mL) was added and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The organic layers were washed with saturated NaCl solution (2 × 10 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. Yield 0.17 g (53%). Colourless oil. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) (predominant conformer) δ (ppm): 1.44 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.46 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.50–1.60 (m, 3H, 2 × H-4 and H-3B), 1.61 (s, 2H, NH2), 1.69–1.76 (m, 1H, H-3A), 3.09–3.19 (m, 2H, 2 × H-5), 3.32 (dd, J = 6.9, 5.3 Hz, 1H, H-2), 4.73 (br. s, 1H, NH-5). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) (predominant conformer) δ (ppm): 26.33, 28.05 (3C), 28.41 (3C), 32.16, 40.31, 54.71, 79.06, 81.05, 155.96, 175.21. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [C14H29N2O4]+: 289.2122, found: 289.2121.
tert-Butyl Nα-Benzyloxycarbonyl-Nε-tert-butoxycarbonyl-(S)-lysinate (11). Boc2O (0.26 g, 1.18 mmol) was added to a solution of compound 10 (0.36 g, 1.07 mmol) and triethylamine (0.30 mL, 2.14 mmol) in DMF (5 mL) with stirring. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h, then EtOAc (20 mL) was added. The solution was washed successively with 10% citric acid solution (3 × 15 mL) and saturated NaCl solution (2 × 15 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel (eluent hexane–EtOAc from 9:1 to 8:2). Yield 0.25 g (53%). Colourless oil. [α]D20 −14.3 (c 0.9, MeOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) (predominant conformer) δ (ppm): 1.23–1.38 (m, 4H, 2 × H-4 and 2 × H-5), 1.36 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.38 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.49–1.66 (m, 2H, 2 × H-3), 2.84–2.91 (m, 2H, 2 × H-6), 3.81–3.85 (m, 1H, H-2), 5.01 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H, HB-Bn), 5.05 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H, HA-Bn), 6.75 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H, NH-6), 7.29–7.38 (m, 5H, Bn), 7.55 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, NH-2). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) (predominant conformer) δ (ppm): 22.64, 27.56 (3C), 28.19 (3C), 28.91, 30.40, 39.3 (overlapped with DMSO-d6), 54.49, 65.29, 77.25, 80.31, 127.64 (2C), 127.71, 128.23 (2C), 136.96, 155.49, 156.01, 171.53. Calcd (%) for C23H26N2O6 (436.55): C 63.28, H 8.31, N 6.42. Found (%): C 63.39, H 8.29, N 6.71.
tert-Butyl Nε-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-(S)-lysinate (9b). 10% Pd/C (0.04 g) was added to a solution of compound 11 (0.20 g, 0.46 mmol) in EtOH (7 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature under H2 (25 atm.) for 6 h. The solution was filtered; the filtrate was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. Yield 0.14 g (100%). Colourless oil. NMR spectra were identical to the published ones [131]. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [C15H31N2O4]+: 303.2278, found: 303.2280.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of tert-Butyl Nω-Boc-Nα-(closo-carboranyl)acetylamino Esters 12a,b. EDC×HCl (0.14 g, 0.72 mmol) was added to a solution of compound 1 (0.12 g, 0.60 mmol), amino ester 9a or 9b (0.60 mmol), HOBt hydrate (0.09 g, 0.60 mmol), and triethylamine (0.18 mL, 1.32 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h, then CH2Cl2 (15 mL) was added. The solution was successively washed with 10% citric acid solution (3 × 10 mL), saturated NaCl solution (3 × 10 mL), 5% NaHCO3 solution (2 × 10 mL), and water (10 mL). The organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel (eluent hexane–EtOAc from 8:2 to 7:3).
tert-Butyl Nδ-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-Nα-(1,2-dicarba-closo-dodecaboran-1-yl)acetyl-(S)-ornithinate (12a). Yield 0.19 g (67%). Colourless solid, mp. 109–114 °C. [α]D20 –15.7 (c 0.5, EtOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 1.3–2.9 (m, 10H, 10 × BH), 1.35–1.43 (m, 20H, 2 × tBu and 2 × H-4), 1.48–1.56 (m, 1H, H-3B), 1.60–1.67 (m, 1H, H-3A), 2.91 (q, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H, 2 × H-5), 3.19 (s, 2H, CH2 acetyl), 4.04–4.08 (m, 1H, H-2), 5.05 (s, 1H, CH carborane), 6.83 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H, NH-5), 8.54 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, NH-2). 11B{1H} NMR (160 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): −14.5 … −10.5 (br. m, 5B), −10.0 (3B), −6.0 (1B), −3.1 (1B). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 25.81, 27.50 (3C), 28.17 (3C), 28.26, 39.5 (overlapped by DMSO), 41.70, 52.64, 61.18, 71.23, 77.33, 80.73, 155.53, 165.53, 170.61. Calcd (%) for C18H40B10N2O5 (472.63): C 45.74, H 8.53, N 5.93. Found (%): C 45.78, H 8.46, N 5.73.
tert-Butyl Nε-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-Nα-(1,2-dicarba-closo-dodecaboran-1-yl)acetyl-(S)-lysinate (12b). Yield 0.22 g (77%). Colourless hygroscopic solid, mp. 55–58 °C. [α]D20 −18.0 (c 0.6, EtOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) (predominant conformer) δ (ppm): 1.0–2.9 (br. m. 10H, 10 × BH), 1.24–1.28 (m, 2H, 2 × H-4), 1.33–1.43 (m, 2H, 2 × H-5), 1.37 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.40 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.50–1.57 (m, 1H, H-3B), 1.60–1.67 (m, 1H, H-3A), 2.88 (td, J = 7.2, 6.7 Hz 2H, 2 × H-6), 3.19 (s, 2H, acetyl), 4.04 (td, J = 7.8, 5.8 Hz, 1H, H-2), 5.05 (s, 1H, CH carborane), 6.75 (t, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H, NH-6), 8.52 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, NH-2). 11B{1H} NMR (160 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): −13.0 (br. s, 2B), −10.9 (br. s, 3B), −10.0 (3B), −5.9 (1B), −3.1 (1B). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 22.37, 27.51 (3C), 28.18 (3C), 28.89, 30.55, 39.5 (overlapped with DMSO-d6), 41.71, 52.74, 61.19, 71.24, 77.25, 80.71, 155.48, 165.53, 170.68. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [C19H4311B10N2O5]+: 489.4119, found: 489.4127.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Nα-(nido-Carboranyl)acetylamino Acids 13a,b. CsF (0.16 g, 1.08 mmol) was added to a solution of compound 12a or 12b (0.36 mmol) in EtOH (10 mL). The reaction mixture was refluxed for 16 h, then cooled to room temperature and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in water (15 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The organic layers were washed with saturated NaCl solution (2 × 10 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in dioxane (5.0 mL) and conc. HCl (1.8 mL, 21.6 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h, then evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in water (10 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 8 mL). The organic layers were washed with water (3 × 10 mL), dried with Na2SO4, and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (eluent CHCl3–EtOH–NH4OH 2.5:7:0.5). The fractions containing the target compound were evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in 0.2 M HCl (10 mL), the solution was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 8 mL). The organic layer was washed with saturated NaCl solution (2 × 10 mL), dried with Na2SO4, and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was dried in vacuo over P2O5 at 80 °C.
Nα-(7,8-Dicarba-nido-undecaboran-7-yl)acetyl-(S)-ornithine, Solvate with EtOAc (13a). Yield 0.09 g (76%). Colourless semisolid. Contains 25 mol% EtOAc according to 1H NMR. [α]D20 −11.7 (c 0.4, 1 M HCl). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) (diastereomers I and II, appr. 1:1) δ (ppm): −2.71 (br. s, 0.5H, BHB (I)), −2.61 (br. s, 0.5H, BHB (II)), −0.5…2.4 (br. m, 9H, 9 × BH), 1.56–1.66 (m, 3H, 2 × H-4 and H-3B), 1.77–1.85 (m, 2H, H-3A and CH carborane), 2.10 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 0.5H, HB acetyl (I)), 2.15 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 0.5H, HB acetyl (II)), 2.46–2.50 (m, 1H, HA acetyl (I and II)), 2.78–2.82 (m, 2H, 2 × H-5), 4.21–4.25 (m, 1H, H-2), 7.5–7.8 (m, 4H, NH, NH3+), 12.65 (br. s, 1H, CO2H). 11B{1H} NMR (160 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): −37.1 (1B), −33.2 (1B), −21.8 (1B), −18.6 (1B), −16.7 (1B), −14.1 (1B), −10.6 (2B). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) (diastereomers I and II) δ (ppm): 23.58 (I), 23.64 (II), 28.29 (I), 28.36 (II), 38.54 (I and II), 45.12 (I), 45.19 (II), 46.08 (br. s, I and II), 51.06 (I and II), 54.72 (br. s, I and II), 170.99 (I), 171.11 (II), 173.26 (I), 173.32 (II). HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [C9H2611B9N2O3]+: 309.2790, found: 309.2787.
Nα-(7,8-Dicarba-nido-undecaboran-7-yl)acetyl-(S)-lysine, Solvate with EtOAc (13b). Yield 0.08 g (66%). Colourless semisolid. Contains 33 mol% EtOAc according to 1H NMR. [α]D20 −11.6 (c 0.4, 1 M HCl). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) (diastereomers I and II, appr. 1:1) δ (ppm): −3.0 … −2.4 (br. s, 1H, BHB, I and II), −0.5…2.4 (br. m, 9H, 9 × BH), 1.36–1.46 (m, 2H, 2 × H-4), 1.51–1.63 (m, 3H, 2 × H-5 and H-3B), 1.69–1.78 (m, 1H, H-3A), 1.83 (s, 0.5H, CH carborane (I)), 1.86 (s, 0.5H, CH carborane (II)), 2.06 (d, J = 14.7 Hz, 0.5H, HB acetyl (I)), 2.16 (d, J = 14.8 Hz, 0.5H, HB acetyl (II)), 2.42 (d, J = 14.8 Hz, 0.5H, HA acetyl (II)), 2.50 (m, 0.5H, HA acetyl (I), overlapped with DMSO-d6), 2.79 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, 2 × H-6), 4.18–4.25 (m, 1H, H-2), 7.53 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 0.5H, NH (I)), 7.57 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 0.5H, NH (II)), 7.63 (br. s, 3H, NH3+), 12.54 (s, 1H, CO2H). 11B{1H} NMR (160 MHz, DMSO-d6) (diastereomers I and II, appr. 1:1) δ (ppm): −37.0 (1B), −33.2 (1B), −21.8 (1B), −19.0 (0.5B (I)), −18.3 (0.5B (II)), −17.1 (0.5B (I)), −16.3 (0.5B (II)), −14.1 (1B), −10.7 (2B). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) (diastereomers I and II) δ (ppm): 22.13 (I and II), 26.52 (I and II), 30.78 (I), 30.81 (II), 38.70 (I and II), 45.21 (I), 45.29 (II), 45.57 (br. s, I), 46.00 (br. s, II), 51.07 (I), 51.15 (II), 54.68 (br. s, I), 55.42 (br. s, II), 170.90 (I and II), 173.46 (I and II). HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for [C10H2811B9N2O3]+: 323.2948, found: 323.2947.
General Procedure for the Synthesis of Sodium salts of Nα-(closo-Carboranyl)acetylamino Acids 14a,b. A solution of Na2CO3 (9.7 mg, 0.09 mmol) in water (1 mL) was added to a solution of compound 13a or 13b (0.18 mmol) in EtOH (5 mL) with stirring at room temperature. The reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was dried in vacuo over P2O5 at 70 °C.
Sodium Nα-(1,2-Dicarba-nido-dodecaboran-1-yl)acetyl-(S)-ornithinate (14a). Yield 0.06 g (100%). Colourless solid, mp. 208–212 °C. [α]D20 −6.8 (c 0.4, 1 M NaOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) (diastereomers I and II, appr. 1:1) δ (ppm): −2.76 (br. s, 0.5H, BHB (I)), −2.64 (br. s, 0.5H, BHB (II)), −0.5…2.7 (br. m, 9H, 9 × BH), 1.72–1.85 (m, 3H, 2 × H-4 and H-3B), 1.89–1.94 (m, 1H, H-3A), 2.09 (s, 1H, CH carborane), 2.34 (d, J = 15.1 Hz, 0.5H, HB acetyl (I)), 2.50 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 0.5H, HB acetyl (II)), 2.60 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 0.5H, HA acetyl (II)), 2.70 (d, J = 15.1 Hz, 0.5H, HA acetyl (I)), 3.03–3.11 (m, 2H, 2 × H-5), 4.22–4.26 (m, 1H, H-2). 11B{1H} NMR (160 MHz, D2O) δ (ppm): −37.3 (1B), −33.2 (1B), −20.7 (br. s, 2B), −19.0 (1B), −15.9 (1B), −14.0 (1B), −12.0 (1B), −10.7 (1B). 13C NMR (126 MHz, D2O) (diastereomers I and II) δ (ppm): 25.90 (I), 26.00 (II), 31.56 (I), 31.60 (II), 41.90 (I and II), 47.95 (I), 48.02 (II), 49.08 (br. s, I and II), 56.81 (I), 56.88 (II), 59.69 (br. s, I and II), 177.16 (I and II), 180.63 (I), 180.78 (II). HRMS (ESI): m/z [M − Na] calcd for [C9H2411B9N2O3]: 307.2645, found: 307.2646.
Sodium Nα-(1,2-Dicarba-nido-dodecaboran-1-yl)acetyl-(S)-lysinate (14b). Yield 0.06 g (100%). Colourless solid, mp. 208–213 °C. [α]D20 −7.0 (c 0.4, 1 M NaOH). 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) (diastereomers I and II, appr. 1:1) δ (ppm): −2.77 (br. s, 0.5H, BHB (I)), −2.64 (br. s, 0.5H, BHB (II)), −0.4…2.6 (br. m, 9H, 9 × BH), 1.48–1.60 (m, 2H, 2 × H-4), 1.68–1.80 (m, 3H, 2 × H-5 and H-3B), 1.86–1.93 (m, 1H, H-3A), 2.10 (s, 0.5H, CH carborane (I)), 2.11 (s, 0.5H, CH carborane (II)), 2.32 (d, J = 14.8 Hz, 0.5H, HB acetyl (I)), 2.51 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 0.5H, HB acetyl (II)), 2.57 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 0.5H, HA acetyl (II)), 2.71 (d, J = 14.8 Hz, 0.5H, HA acetyl (I)), 3.06 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, 2 × H-6), 4.20–4.25 (m, 1H, H-2), 7.54 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 0.5H, NH (I)), 7.76 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 0.5H, NH (II)). 11B{1H} NMR (160 MHz, D2O) (diastereomers I and II, appr. 1:1) δ (ppm): −37.3 (1B (I and II)), −33.2 (1B (I and II)), −20.7 (1.5B (I and II)), −19.7 (0.5B (II)), −19.1 (0.5B (I)), −18.6 (0.5B (II)), −16.5 (0.5B (I)), −15.7 (0.5B (II)), −13.9 (br. s, 1B (I and II)), −11.8 (1B (I)), −10.8 (1B (II)). 13C NMR (126 MHz, D2O) (diastereomers I and II) δ (ppm): 24.70 (I), 24.79 (II), 29.13 (I and II), 34.00 (I), 34.10 (II), 42.14 (I and II), 48.03 (I and II), 49.15 (br. s, I and II), 57.03 (I), 57.11 (II), 59.24 (br. s, I), 60.24 (br. s, II), 177.05 (I), 177.11 (II), 181.30 (I), 181.41 (II). HRMS (ESI): m/z [M − Na] calcd for [C10H2611B9N2O3]: 321.2803, found: 321.2802.

3.3. Cell Lines

The following cell lines were used: BJ-5ta human foreskin fibroblasts (ATCCCRL-4001™), U87 MG human glioblastoma (ATCCHTB-14™), T98G human glioblastoma (ATCCCRL-1690™), SK-Mel-28 human melanoma (ATCCHTB-72™), MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma (ATCCCRM-HTB-26™), and DU 145 prostate adenocarcinoma (ATCCHTB-81™) stored in the SPF-vivarium cryobank at the Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Siberian Branch), Novosibirsk. Cells were cultured in 5% CO2 in DMEM/F12 (1:1) nutrient medium (Biolot, St. Petersburg, Russia) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). Cells were counted on a Countess automatic cell counter (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA).

3.4. MTT Cytotoxicity Assay

Cells were seeded in 96-well plates in the amount of 2 × 104 cells per well and cultivated for 24 h. Stock solutions of compounds 5a and 5b in 0.5% aqueous NaHCO3 (concentration 5.0 mg/mL) were prepared under stirring for 10 min, then incubated at 37 °C for 20 min, and sonicated on a Sonicator Q700 ultrasonic homogenizer (Qsonica L.C.C, Newtown, CT, USA) for 30 min. A solution of the commercial anticancer agent Cisplatin (Cisplatin Teva, Pharmachemie B.V., Haarlem, the Netherlands) with an initial concentration of 0.50 mg/mL was used as a positive control. Nutrient medium without additives was used as a negative control. The stock solutions of compounds 5a,b were added to the nutrient medium with cells in a volume of 1/5 of the total volume of the medium in the well, as a result of which the concentration of compounds 5a and 5b in the medium was 1.00 mg/mL; cisplatin concentration 0.10 mg/mL. Then, a series of twofold dilutions of stock solutions was prepared and added to the nutrient medium with cells in such a way as to obtain nutrient media with the concentration of compounds 5a and 5b of 0.50, 0.25, 0.125, 0.063, 0.031, 0.016, and 0.008 mg/mL. The concentration of cisplatin in the positive control samples was 0.10000, 0.0500, 0.0250, 0.0125, 0.0063, 0.0031, 0.0016, and 0.0008 mg/mL. The duration of cell incubation was 3 days at 37 °C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. After that, the culture medium was removed from each well, a solution of MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] in DMEM/F12 (1:1) culture medium (MTT concentration 0.5 mg/mL) was added and incubated for 4 h; then the supernatant was removed and the formazan precipitate was dissolved in DMSO (100 µL). The optical density of the resulting solutions was determined on a Multiskan Sky High Microplate Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at a wavelength of 595 nm. Cell viability was determined based on optical density; cell viability in the negative control was taken as 100%. Experiments were performed in three parallel runs (for detailed information on cell viability of various cell lines, see the Supporting Information, Table S1).

3.5. Boron Uptake and Accumulation Assay

Stock solution of compound 5b was prepared in 0.5% aqueous NaHCO3 (concentration 5.0 mg/mL). BJ-5ta, SK-Mel 28, T98G, DU 145, MDA-MB-231, and U87 MG cells were cultured in 5 mL of nutrient medium at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere until a monolayer was obtained (from 3 × 106 up to 5 × 106 cells). The nutrient medium was removed, a mixture of the nutrient medium (4.75 mL in the case of U87 MG cells or 4.50 mL in other cases) and the stock solution of compound 5b (0.25 mL in the case of U87 MG cells or 0.50 mL in other cases) was added to the cells and incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cells cultured without the addition of test compound were used as controls.
After the cells were incubated for various times (10 min, 30 min, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, and 8 h), the culture medium was separated from the cells, and the cells were removed from the substrate with a trypsin–versene solution (1:1) (Biolot, St. Petersburg, Russia), and the number of cells was counted (the number of cells used for assay, see the Supplementary Materials, Table S2). The resulting cell suspension was divided into three equal parts, centrifuged (1000 rpm, 5 min), the cells were separated from the supernatant. 16 M Nitric acid (1.0 mL) was added to the resulting cells, the mixture was kept at 95 ± 1 °C for 30–40 min, then cooled to 20 °C, and deionized water (3.0 mL) was added. The boron content in the obtained solutions was determined on an iCAP 6500 DUO high-resolution atomic emission spectrometer with inductively coupled plasma (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the procedure described in [132].

4. Conclusions

Thus, we synthesized for the first time the (S)-lysine and (S)-ornithine derivatives containing a (nido-carboran-7-yl)acetic acid moiety at the amino group either in the side chain or at the alpha position of amino acid. Sodium salts of nido-carboranyl derivatives of lysine and ornithine are soluble in water (5–7 mg/mL) and exhibited moderate cytotoxicity against BJ-5ta human foreskin fibroblasts and tumour cells of various lines. It has been shown that sodium salt of Nε-(nido-carboran-7-yl)acetyl-(S)-lysine accumulates well in MDA-MB-231 (human breast carcinoma) and SK-Mel 28 (human melanoma) cell lines, providing a boron concentration of up to 0.67 µg/106 cells in in vitro experiments. The obtained results form the basis for further testing of toxicity and biodistribution in experiments on laboratory animals.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26178560/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.A.G.; methodology, D.A.G. and V.P.K.; investigation, D.A.G., V.V.M., A.A.T., I.N.G., M.A.E., M.I.K., O.I.S., T.Y.G. and I.A.R.; writing—original draft preparation, D.A.G.; writing—review and editing, G.L.L., M.I.K. and I.A.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (theme no. 124020200038-6 in part of the compounds synthesis and no. 124020500023-9 in part of in vitro evaluation).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

Equipment of the Center for Joint Use “Spectroscopy and Analysis of Organic Compounds” at the Postovsky Institute of Organic Synthesis of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Ural Branch) was used.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Vig, B.S.; Huttunen, K.M.; Laine, K.; Rautio, J. Amino acids as promoieties in prodrug design and development. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2013, 65, 1370–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vale, N.; Ferreira, A.; Matos, J.; Fresca, P.; Gouveia, M.J. Amino Acids in the Development of Prodrugs. Molecules 2018, 23, 2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Singh, Y.; Saklani, S.; Tantra, T.; Thareja, S. Amino Acid Derived Prodrugs: An Approach to Improve the Bioavailability of Clinically Approved Drugs. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2021, 21, 2170–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Frampton, J.E. Lisdexamfetamine: A Review in ADHD in Adults. CNS Drugs 2016, 30, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ermer, J.C.; Pennick, M.; Frick, G. Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate: Prodrug Delivery, Amphetamine Exposure and Duration of Efficacy. Clin. Drug Investig. 2016, 36, 341–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Comiran, E.; Kessler, F.H.; Fröehlich, P.E.; Limberger, R.P. Lisdexamfetamine: A pharmacokinetic review. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 89, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Armanious, A.J.; Asare, A.; Mitchison, D.; James, M.H. Patients perceptions of lisdexamfetamine as a treatment for binge eating disorder: An exploratory qualitative and quantitative analysis. Psychiatry Res. Commun. 2024, 4, 100195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lallement, G.; Renault, F.; Baubichon, D.; Peoc’h, M.; Burckhart, M.-F.; Galonnier, M.; Clarençon, D.; Jourdil, N. Compared efficacy of diazepam or avizafone to prevent soman-induced electroencephalographic disturbances and neuropathology in primates: Relationship to plasmatic benzodiazepine pharmacokinetics. Arch. Toxicol. 2000, 74, 480–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abbara, C.; Rousseau, J.M.; Turcant, A.; Lallement, G.; Comets, E.; Bardot, I.; Clair, P.; Diquet, B. Bioavailability of diazepam after intramuscular injection of its water-soluble prodrug alone or with atropine–pralidoxime in healthy volunteers. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2009, 157, 1390–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kapoor, M.; Winter, T.; Lis, L.; Georg, G.I.; Siegel, R.A. Rapid Delivery of Diazepam from Supersaturated Solutions Prepared Using Prodrug/Enzyme Mixtures: Toward Intranasal Treatment of Seizure Emergencies. AAPS J. 2014, 16, 577–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rautiola, D.; Maglalang, P.D.; Cheryala, N.; Nelson, K.M.; Georg, G.I.; Fine, J.M.; Svitak, A.L.; Faltesek, K.A.; Hanson, L.R.; Mishra, U.; et al. Intranasal co-administration of a diazepam prodrug with a converting enzymes results in rapid absorption of diazepam in rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2019, 370, 796–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rautiola, D.; Updyke, J.L.; Nelson, K.M.; Siegel, R.A. Diazepam Prodrug Stabilizes Human Aminopeptidase B during Lyophilization. Mol. Pharm. 2020, 17, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Siegel, R.A.; Kapoor, M.; Cheryala, N.; Georg, G.I.; Cloyd, J.C. Water-soluble benzodiazepine prodrug/enzyme combinations for intranasal rescue therapies. Epilepsy Behav. 2015, 49, 347–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kapoor, M.; Cheryala, N.; Rautiola, D.; Georg, G.I.; Cloyd, J.C.; Siegel, R.A. Chirally Pure Prodrugs and Their Converting Enzymes Lead to High Supersaturation and Rapid Transcellular Permeation of Benzodiazepines. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 105, 2365–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gynther, M.; Jalkanen, A.; Lehtonen, M.; Forsberg, M.; Laine, K.; Ropponen, J.; Leppänen, J.; Knuuti, J.; Rautio, J. Brain uptake of ketoprofen–lysine prodrug in rats. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 399, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Puris, E.; Gynther, M.; Huttunen, J.; Petsalo, A.; Huttunen, K.M. L-type amino acid transporter 1 utilizing prodrugs: How to achieve effective brain delivery and low systemic exposure of drugs. J. Control. Release 2017, 261, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Montaser, A.; Lehtonen, M.; Gynther, M.; Huttunen, K.M. L-Type Amino Acid Transporter 1-Utilizing Prodrugs of Ketoprofen Can Efficiently Reduce Brain Prostaglandin Levels. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Singh, V.K.; Subudhi, B.B. Development and characterization of lysine-methotrexate conjugate for enhanced brain delivery. Drug Deliv. 2016, 23, 2327–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Levit, G.L.; Radina, L.B.; Krasnov, V.P.; Gopko, V.F.; Peretolchina, N.M. Nω-Alkylnitrosocarbamoyl-α,ω-diaminocarboxylic acids. 2. Synthesis and antitumor activity of nitroso derivatives of Nω-(2-chloroethyl)-carbamoyl-α,ω-diaminocarboxylic acids. Pharm. Chem. J. 1996, 30, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Levit, G.L.; Radina, L.B.; Krasnov, V.P.; Gopko, V.F.; Nikiforova, N.V.; Peretolchina, N.M. Nω-Alkylnitrosocarbamoyl-α,ω-diaminocarboxylic acids. 3. Synthesis and antitumor activity of Nε-nitroso-Nε-[N’-(2-chloroethyl)carbamoyl]-L-lysine and Nε-[N’-(2-chloroethyl)-N’-nitrosocarbamoyl]-L-lysine. Pharm. Chem. J. 1996, 30, 306–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Burns, M.R.; Graminski, G.F.; Weeks, R.S.; Chen, Y.; O’Brien, T.G. Lipophilic Lysine–Spermine Conjugates Are Potent Polyamine Transport Inhibitors for Use in Combination with a Polyamine Biosynthesis Inhibitor. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 1983–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ueki, N.; Lee, S.; Sampson, N.S.; Hayman, M.J. Selective cancer targeting with prodrugs activated by histone deacetylases and a tumour-associated protease. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ueki, N.; Wang, W.; Swenson, C.; McNaughton, C.; Sampson, N.S.; Hayman, M.J. Synthesis and Preclinical Evaluation of a Highly Improved Anticancer Prodrug Activated by Histone Deacetylases and Cathepsin L. Theranostics 2016, 6, 808–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tenora, L.; Alt, J.; Dash, R.P.; Gadiano, A.J.; Novotná, K.; Veeravalli, V.; Lam, J.; Kirkpatrick, Q.R.; Lemberg, K.M.; Majer, P.; et al. Tumor-Targeted Delivery of 6-Diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine (DON) Using Substituted Acetylated Lysine Prodrugs. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 3524–3538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, M.; Qu, K.; Zhao, P.; Yin, X.; Meng, Y.; Herdewijn, P.; Liu, C.; Zhang, L.; Xia, X. Synthesis and anticancer evaluation of acetylated-lysine conjugated gemcitabine prodrugs. RSC Med. Chem. 2023, 14, 1572–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bera, S.; Zhanel, G.G.; Schweizer, F. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of amphiphilic lysine-ligated neomycin B conjugates. Carbohydr. Res. 2011, 346, 560–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Alwan, S.M.; Abdul-Wahab, A.-H.H. Synthesis of new derivatives of Ceftazidime as possible Prodrugs. Iraqi J. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 22, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lyu, Y.; Domalaon, R.; Yang, X.; Schweizer, F. Amphiphilic lysine conjugated to tobramycin synergizes legacy antibiotics against wild-type and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Pept. Sci. 2019, 111, e23091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Konai, M.M.; Haldar, J. Lysine-Based Small Molecule Sensitizes Rifampicin and Tetracycline against Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ACS Infect. Dis. 2020, 6, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Deng, W.; Jiang, X.; Mei, Y.; Sun, J.; Ma, R.; Liu, X.; Sun, H.; Tian, H.; Sun, X. Role of ornithine decarboxylase in breast cancer. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2008, 40, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, H.I.; Schultz, C.R.; Buras, A.L.; Friedman, E.; Fedorko, A.; Seamon, L.; Chandramouli, G.V.R.; Maxwell, G.L.; Bachmann, A.S.; Risinger, J.I. Ornithine decarboxylase as a therapeutic target for endometrial cancer. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0189044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Filisola-Villaseñor, J.G.; Arroyo-Sánchez, B.I.; Navarro-González, L.J.; Morales-Ríos, E.; Olin-Sandoval, V. Ornithine decarboxylase and its role in cancer. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2025, 765, 110321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ishiwata, K.; Abe, Y.; Matsuzawa, T.; Ido, T. Tumor Uptake Studies of D,L-[5-14C]Ornithine and D,L-2-Difluoromethyl[5-14C]Ornithine. Nucl. Med. Biol. 1988, 15, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Turkman, N.; Gelovani, J.G.; Alauddin, M.M. Radiosynthesis of N5-[18F]fluoroacetylornithine (N5-[18F]FAO) for PET imaging of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) in malignant tumors. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2011, 54, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. LoGiudice, N.; Le, L.; Abuan, I.; Leizorek, Y.; Roberts, S.C. Alpha-Difluoromethylornithine, an Irreversible Inhibitor of Polyamine Biosynthesis, as a Therapeutic Strategy against Hyperproliferative and Infectious Diseases. Med. Sci. 2018, 6, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, H.; Zhao, Q.; Dong, W.; Yang, L.; Lu, K.; Guo, X.; Liu, H.; Wei, H.; Cheng, Y.; Wu, Z.; et al. Radiosynthesis and evaluation of N5-(2-18F-fluoropropanyl) ornithine as a potential agent for tumor PET imaging. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2021, 94–95, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, H.; Qin, K.; Shi, D.; Wu, P.; Hao, X.; Liu, H.; Gao, J.; Li, J.; Wu, Z.; Li, S. A new 68Ga-labeled ornithine derivative for PET imaging of ornithine metabolism in tumors. Amino Acids 2023, 55, 595–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tangella, A.V.; Gajre, A.S.; Chirumamilla, P.C.; Rathhan, P.V. Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) and Neuroblastoma: A Review. Cureus 2023, 15, e37680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bray, F.; Laversanne, M.; Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA-Cancer J. Clin. 2024, 74, 229–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Barth, R.F.; Soloway, A.H.; Fairchild, R.G. Boron Neutron Capture Therapy for Cancer. Sci. Am. 1990, 263, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Coderre, J.A.; Turcotte, J.C.; Riley, K.J.; Binns, P.J.; Harling, O.K.; Kiger, W.S., III. Boron Neutron Capture Therapy: Cellular Targeting of High Linear Energy Transfer Radiation. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2003, 2, 355–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kozień, D.; Szermer-Olearnik, B.; Rapak, A.; Szczygiel, A.; Anger-Góra, N.; Boratyński, J.; Pajtasz-Piasecka, E.; Bućko, M.M.; Pędzich, Z. Boron-Rich Boron Carbide Nanoparticles as a Carrier in Boron Neutron Capture Therapy: Their Influence on Tumor and Immune Phagocytic Cells. Materials 2021, 14, 3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Seneviratne, D.; Advani, P.; Trifiletti, D.M.; Chumsri, S.; Beltran, C.J.; Bush, A.F.; Vallow, L.A. Exploring the Biological and Physical Basis of Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) as a Promising Treatment Frontier in Breast Cancer. Cancers 2022, 14, 3009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Miao, L.; Li, Y. Boron Neutron Capture Therapy: Current Status and Challenges. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 788770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jin, W.H.; Seldon, C.; Butkus, M.; Sauerwein, W.; Giap, H.B. A Review of Boron Neutron Capture Therapy: Its History and Current Challenges. Int. J. Part. Ther. 2022, 9, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Barth, R.F.; Gupta, N.; Kawabata, S. Evaluation of sodium borocaptate (BSH) and boronophenylalanine (BPA) as boron delivery agents for neutron capture therapy (NCT) of cancer: An update and a guide for the future clinical evaluation of new boron delivery agents for NCT. Cancer Commun. 2024, 44, 893–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gruzdev, D.A.; Levit, G.L.; Krasnov, V.P.; Charushin, V.N. Carborane-containing amino acids and peptides: Synthesis, properties and applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 433, 213753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Coghi, P.; Li, J.; Hosmane, N.S.; Zhu, Y. Next generation of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) agents for cancer treatment. Med. Res. Rev. 2023, 43, 1809–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Luo, T.; Huang, W.; Chu, F.; Zhu, T.; Feng, B.; Huang, S.; Hou, J.; Zhu, L.; Zhu, S.; Zeng, W. The Dawn of a New Era: Tumor-Targeting Boron Agents for Neutron Capture Therapy. Mol. Pharm. 2023, 20, 4942–4970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Järvinen, J.; Pulkkinen, H.; Rautio, J.; Timonen, J.M. Amino Acid-Based Boron Carriers in Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT). Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xu, H.; Liu, J.; Li, R.; Lin, J.; Gui, L.; Wang, Y.; Jin, Z.; Xia, W.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, S.; et al. Novel promising boron agents for boron neutron capture therapy: Current status and outlook on the future. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 511, 215795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Couto, M.; Cerecetto, H. Advancements in the Synthesis and Biological Properties of Carboranes and High-Boron Related Compounds: A Comprehensive Exploration with Emphasis on BNCT Applications. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2024, 35, e-20240109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gruzdev, D.A.; Telegina, A.A.; Levit, G.L.; Solovieva, O.I.; Gusel’nikova, T.Y.; Razumov, I.A.; Krasnov, V.P.; Charushin, V.N. Carborane-Containing Folic Acid bis-Amides: Synthesis and In Vitro Evaluation of Novel Promising Agents for Boron Delivery to Tumour Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. El-Zaria, M.E.; Genady, A.R.; Janzen, N.; Petlura, C.I.; Beckford Vera, D.R.; Valliant, J.F. Preparation and evaluation of carborane-derived inhibitors of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA). Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 4950–4961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Youn, S.; Kim, K.I.; Ptacek, J.; Ok, K.; Novakova, Z.; Kim, Y.H.; Koo, J.H.; Barinka, C.; Byun, Y. Carborane-containing urea-based inhibitors of glutamate carboxypeptidase II: Synthesis and structural characterization. Bioorga. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 5232–5236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Matović, J.; Järvinen, J.; Sokka, I.K.; Imlimthan, S.; Raitanen, J.-E.; Montaser, A.; Maaheimo, H.; Huttunen, K.M.; Peräniemi, S.; Airaksinen, A.J.; et al. Exploring the Biochemical Foundations of a Successful GLUT1-Targeting Strategy to BNCT: Chemical Synthesis and In Vitro Evaluation of the Entire Positional Isomer Library of ortho-Carboranylmethyl-Bearing Glucoconjugates. Mol. Pharm. 2021, 18, 285–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Matović, J.; Bahrami, K.; Stockmann, P.; Sokka, I.K.; Khng, Y.C.; Sarparanta, M.; Hey-Hawkins, E.; Rautio, J.; Ekholm, F.S. Sweet Battle of the Epimers—Continued Exploration of Monosaccharide-Derived Delivery Agents for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. Mol. Pharm. 2023, 20, 3127–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kimura, S.; Masunaga, S.-i.; Harada, T.; Kawamura, Y.; Ueda, S.; Okuda, K.; Nagasawa, H. Synthesis and evaluation of cyclic RGD-boron cluster conjugates to develop tumor-selective boron carriers for boron neutron capture therapy. Bioorga. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 1721–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hoppenz, P.; Els-Heindl, S.; Kellert, M.; Kuhnert, R.; Saretz, S.; Lerchen, H.-G.; Köbberling, J.; Riedl, B.; Hey-Hawkins, E.; Beck-Sickinger, A. A Selective Carborane-Functionalized Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Agonist as Boron Delivery Agent for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 1446–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Chen, J.; Cui, L.; Lu, S.; Xu, S. Amino acid metabolism in tumor biology and therapy. Cell Death Dis. 2024, 15, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Scalise, M.; Console, L.; Rovella, F.; Galluccio, M.; Pochini, L.; Indiveri, C. Membrane Transporters for Amino Acids as Players of Cancer Metabolic Rewiring. Cells 2020, 9, 2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Morin, C.; Thimon, C. Synthesis and Evaluation of Boronated Lysine and Bis(carboranylated) γ-Amino Acids as Monomers for Peptide Assembly. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 2004, 3828–3832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ahrens, V.M.; Frank, R.; Stadlbauer, S.; Beck-Sickinger, A.G.; Hey-Hawkins, E. Incorporation of ortho-Carbaboranyl-Nε-Modified L-Lysine into Neuropeptide Y Receptor Y1- and Y2-Selective Analogues. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 2368–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hofmann, S.; Frank, R.; Hey-Hawkins, E.; Beck-Sickinger, A.G.; Schmidt, P. Manipulating Y receptor subtype activation of short neuropeptide Y analogs by introducing carbaboranes. Neuropeptides 2013, 47, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ahrens, V.M.; Frank, R.; Boehnke, S.; Schütz, C.L.; Hampel, G.; Iffland, D.S.; Bings, N.H.; Hey-Hawkins, E.; Beck-Sickinger, A.G. Receptor-Mediated Uptake of Boron-Rich Neuropeptide Y Analogues for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. ChemMedChem 2015, 10, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Frank, R.; Ahrens, V.M.; Boehnke, S.; Beck-Sickinger, A.G.; Hey-Hawkins, E. Charge-Compensated Metallacarborane Building Blocks for Conjugation with Peptides. ChemBioChem 2016, 17, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kellert, M.; Worm, D.J.; Hoppenz, P.; Sárosi, M.B.; Lönnecke, P.; Riedl, B.; Koebberling, J.; Beck-Sickinger, A.G.; Hey-Hawkins, E. Modular triazine-based carborane-containing carboxylic acids—Synthesis and characterization of potential boron neutron capture therapy agents made of readily accessible building blocks. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 10834–10844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Worm, D.J.; Hoppenz, P.; Els-Heindl, S.; Kellert, M.; Kuhnert, R.; Saretz, S.; Köbberling, J.; Riedl, B.; Hey-Hawkins, E.; Beck-Sickinger, A.G. Selective Neuropeptide Y Conjugates with Maximized Carborane Loading as Promising Boron Delivery Agents for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 2358–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Betzel, T.; Heß, T.; Waser, B.; Reubi, J.-C.; Roesch, F. closo-Borane Conjugated Regulatory Peptides Retain High Biological Affinity: Synthesis of closo-Borane Conjugated Tyr3-Octreotate Derivatives for BNCT. Bioconju. Chem. 2008, 19, 1796–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kikuchi, S.; Kanoh, D.; Sato, S.; Sakurai, Y.; Suzuki, M.; Nakamura, H. Maleimide-functionalized closo-dodecaborate albumin conjugates (MID-AC): Unique ligation at cysteine and lysine residues enables efficient boron delivery to tumor for neutron capture therapy. J. Control. Release 2016, 237, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Worm, D.J.; Els-Heindl, S.; Kellert, M.; Kuhnert, R.; Saretz, S.; Koebberling, J.; Riedl, B.; Hey-Hawkins, E.; Beck-Sickinger, A.G. A stable meta-carborane enables the generation of boron-rich peptide agonists targeting the ghrelin receptor. J. Pept. Sci. 2018, 24, e3119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Varadarajan, A.; Hawthorne, M.F. Novel Carboranyl Amino Acids and Peptides: Reagents for Antibody Modification and Subsequent Neutron-Capture Studies. Bioconju. Chem. 1991, 2, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Umano, M.; Uechi, K.; Uriuda, T.; Murayama, S.; Azuma, H.; Shinohara, A.; Liu, Y.; Ono, K.; Kirihata, M.; Yanagie, H.; et al. Tumor accumulation of ε-poly-lysines-based polyamines conjugated with boron clusters. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2011, 69, 1765–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lützenburg, T.; Neundorf, I.; Scholz, M. Direct carborane-peptide conjugates: Synthesis and evaluation as non-natural lipopeptide mimetics. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2018, 213, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sarma, S.J.; Khan, A.A.; Goswami, L.N.; Jalisatgi, S.S.; Hawthorne, M.F. A Trimodal Closomer Drug-Delivery System Tailored with Tracing and Targeting Capabilities. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 12715–12723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Michiue, H.; Sakurai, Y.; Kondo, N.; Kitamatsu, M.; Bin, F.; Nakajima, K.; Hirota, Y.; Kawabata, S.; Nishiki, T.; Ohmori, I.; et al. The acceleration of boron neutron capture therapy using multi-linked mercaptoundecahydrododecaborate (BSH) fused cell-penetrating peptide. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 3396–3405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lützenburg, T.; Burdina, N.; Scholz, M.S.; Neundorf, I. Improving Membrane Activity and Cargo Delivery Efficacy of a Cell-Penetrating Peptide by Loading with Carboranes. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kozień, D.; Krygowska, K.; Żeliszewska, P.; Szczygiel, A.; Rudawska, A.; Szermer-Olearnik, B.; Rusiniak, P.; Wątor, K.; Węgierek-Ciura, K.; Jeleń, P.; et al. Surface-Modified Ceramic Boron Carbide as a Platform for Specific Targeting in Tumour Environments. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gruzdev, D.A.; Levit, G.L.; Bazhov, I.V.; Demin, A.M.; Sadretdinova, L.S.; Ol’shevskaya, V.A.; Kalinin, V.N.; Krasnov, V.P.; Chupakhin, O.N. Synthesis of novel carboranyl derivatives of α-amino acids. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2010, 59, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gruzdev, D.A.; Chulakov, E.N.; Levit, G.L.; Krasnov, V.P. Synthesis of purine conjugates with bis-carboranyl derivatives of (S)-lysine or (S)-glutamic acid. Tetrahedron Lett. 2023, 127, 154686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gruzdev, D.A.; Vakhrushev, A.V.; Demin, A.M.; Baryshnikova, M.A.; Levit, G.L.; Krasnov, V.P.; Charushin, V.N. Synthesis of closo- and nido-carborane derivatives of the KRGD peptide. J. Organomet. Chem. 2024, 1008, 123052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gruzdev, D.A.; Telegina, A.A.; Ol’shevskaya, V.A.; Andronova, V.L.; Galegov, G.A.; Zarubaev, V.V.; Levit, G.L.; Krasnov, V.P. New nido-carborane-containing conjugates of purine: Synthesis and antiviral activity. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2022, 71, 2375–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gruzdev, D.A.; Telegina, A.A.; Chulakov, E.N.; Levit, G.L.; Krasnov, V.P. (7,8-Dicarba-nido-undecaboran-7-yl)acetic acid: Synthesis of individual enantiomers and the first example of the determination of the absolute configuration of chiral monosubstituted nido-carborane. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 17338–17347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Gruzdev, D.A.; Levit, G.L.; Olshevskaya, V.A.; Krasnov, V.P. Synthesis of ortho-Carboranyl Derivatives of (S)-Asparagine and (S)-Glutamine. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 53, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Gruzdev, D.A.; Telegina, A.A.; Levit, G.L.; Krasnov, V.P. N-Aminoacyl-3-amino-nido-carboranes as a Group of Boron-Containing Derivatives of Natural Amino Acids. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 87, 5437–5441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Musiyak, V.V.; Gruzdev, D.A.; Kravchenko, M.A.; Vakhrusheva, D.V.; Levit, G.L.; Krasnov, V.P.; Charushin, V.N. Synthesis and antimycobacterial activity of purine conjugates with (S)-lysine and (S)-ornithine. Mendeleev Commun. 2019, 29, 11–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Clement, B.; Schnörwangen, E.; Kämpchen, T.; Mordvintcev, P.; Mülsch, A. Synthesis of 15Nω-Hydroxy-L-aginine and ESR and 15N-NMR Studies for the Elucidation of the Molecular Mechanism of Enzymic Nitric Oxide Formation from L-Arginine. Arch. Pharm. 1994, 327, 793–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Fekner, T.; Li, X.; Lee, M.M.; Chan, M.K. A Pyrrolysine Analogue for Protein Click Chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1633–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Shetty, D.; Jeong, J.M.; Ju, C.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Lee, J.-Y.; Lee, Y.-S.; Lee, D.S.; Chung, J.-K.; Lee, M.C. Synthesis and evaluation of macrocyclic amino acid derivatives for tumor imaging by gallium-68 positron emission tomography. Bioorga. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 7338–7347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fox, M.A.; Gill, W.R.; Herbertson, P.L.; MacBride, J.A.H.; Wade, K.; Colquhoun, H.M. Deboronation of C-substituted ortho- and meta-closo-carboranes using “wet” fluoride ion solutions. Polyhedron 1996, 15, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yoo, J.; Hwang, J.-W.; Do, Y. Facile and Mild Deboronation of o-Carboranes Using Cesium Fluoride. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 568–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. El-Zaria, M.E.; Janzen, N.; Valliant, J.F. Room-Temperature Synthesis of Re(I) and Tc(I) Metallocarboranes. Organometallics 2012, 31, 5940–5949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Telegina, A.A.; Gruzdev, D.A.; Levit, G.L.; Krasnov, V.P. Synthesis of a novel planar-chiral nido-carborane amino acid. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2021, 70, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Barton, J.N.; Piwinski, J.J.; Skiles, J.W.; Regan, J.R.; Menard, P.R.; Desai, R.; Golec, F.S.; Reilly, L.W.; Goetzen, T.; Ueng, D.-N.; et al. Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors. 9. Novel [[N-(1-Carboxy-3-phenylpropyl)amino]acyl]glycine Derivatives with Diuretic Activity. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33, 1600–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Baut, D.A.; Tanaka, N.; Yokoo, R.; Usuki, T. Preparation of isodesmosine-KLH conjugate for ELISA system. Chirality 2020, 32, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Janoušek, Z.; Kaszynski, P. Heterodisubstituted 1,10-dicarba-closo-decaboranes from substituted nido-carborane precursors. Polyhedron 1999, 18, 3517–3526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Tok, O.L.; Holub, J.; Růžička, A.; Růžičková, Z.; Štíbr, B. Direct synthesis of dicarbollides. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 8524–8529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yanagida, O.; Kanai, Y.; Chairoungdua, A.; Kim, D.K.; Segawa, H.; Nii, T.; Cha, S.H.; Matsuo, H.; Fukushima, J.; Fukasawa, Y.; et al. Human L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1): Characterization of function and expression in tumor cell lines. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1514, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Singh, N.; Ecker, G.F. Insights into the Structure, Function, and Ligand Discovery of the Large Neutral Amino Acid Transporter 1, LAT1. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chien, H.-C.; Colas, C.; Finke, K.; Springer, S.; Stoner, L.; Zur, A.A.; Venteicher, B.; Campbell, J.; Hall, C.; Flint, A.; et al. Reevaluating the Substrate Specificity of the L-Type Amino Acid Transporter (LAT1). J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 7358–7373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Mosmann, T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Weichert, W. HDAC expression and clinical prognosis in human malignancies. Cancer Lett. 2009, 280, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Liang, T.; Wang, F.; Elhassan, R.M.; Cheng, Y.; Tang, X.; Chen, W.; Fang, H.; Hou, X. Targeting histone deacetylases for cancer therapy: Trends and challenges. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2023, 13, 2425–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Čemažar, M.; Škrk, J.; Mitrovič, B.; Serša, G. Changed delivery of boron to tumours using electroporation for boron neutron capture therapy with BSH. Br. J. Radiol. 2000, 73, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Carpano, M.; Perona, M.; Rodriguez, C.; Nievas, S.; Olivera, M.; Santa Cruz, G.A.; Brandizzi, D.; Cabrini, R.; Pisarev, M.; Juvenal, G.; et al. Experimental studies of boronophenylalanine (10BPA) biodistribution for the individual application of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) for malignant melanoma treatment. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2015, 93, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hermawan, A.; Susidatri, R.A.; Ramadani, R.D.; Qodria, L.; Utomo, R.Y.; Ishimura, M.; Hattori, Y.; Ohta, Y.; Kirihata, M.; Meiyanto, E. Cellular uptake evaluation of pentagamaboronon-0 (PGB-0) for boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) against breast cancer cells. Investig. New Drugs 2019, 37, 1292–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Fuchs, B.C.; Bode, B.P. Amino acid transporters ASCT2 and LAT1 in cancer: Partners in crime? Semin. Cancer Biol. 2005, 15, 254–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Jakobsen, S.; Nielsen, C.U. Exploring Amino Acid Transporters as Therapeutic Targets for Cancer: An Examination of Inhibitor Structures, Selectivity Issues, and Discovery Approaches. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Shennan, D.B.; Thomson, J.; Barber, M.C.; Travers, M.T. Functional and molecular characteristics of system L in human breast cancer cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2003, 1611, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Liang, Z.; Cho, H.T.; Williams, L.; Zhu, A.; Liang, K.; Huang, K.; Wu, H.; Jiang, C.; Hong, S.; Crowe, R.; et al. Potential Biomarker of L-type Amino Acid Transporter 1 in Breast Cancer Progression. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2011, 45, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Van Geldermalsen, M.; Wang, Q.; Nagarajah, R.; Marshall, A.D.; Thoeng, A.; Gao, D.; Ritchie, W.; Feng, Y.; Bailey, C.G.; Deng, N.; et al. ASCT2/SLC1A5 controls glutamine uptake and tumour growth in triple-negative basal-like breast cancer. Oncogene 2016, 35, 3201–3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Yamaga, T.; Suehiro, J.; Wada, Y.; Sakurai, H. Induction of CTH expression in response to amino acid starvation confers resistance to anti-LAT1 therapy in MDA-MB-231 cells. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Wang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Fu, H.; Han, Y.; Li, X.; Zou, Q.; Yuan, S.; Sun, L. ASCT2 Regulates Fatty Acid Metabolism to Trigger Glutamine Addiction in Basal-like Breast Cancer. Cancers 2024, 16, 3028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Fukumoto, S.; Hanazono, K.; Fu, D.-R.; Endo, Y.; Kadosawa, T.; Iwano, H.; Uchide, T. A new treatment for human malignant melanoma targeting L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1): A pilot study in a canine model. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 439, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Shimizu, A.; Kyoichi, K.; Kato, M.; Yasuda, M.; Takahashi, A.; Tominaga, H.; Oriuchi, N.; Nagamori, S.; Kanai, Y.; Oyama, T.; et al. Prognostic significance of L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) expression in cutaneous melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2015, 25, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Srisongkram, T.; Weerapreeyakul, N.; Kärkkäinen, J.; Rautio, J. Role of L-Type Amino Acid Transporter 1 (LAT1) for the Selective Cytotoxicity of Sesamol in Human Melanoma Cells. Molecules 2019, 24, 3869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Shi, Z.; Kaneda-Nakashima, K.; Ohgaki, R.; Xu, M.; Okanishi, H.; Endou, H.; Nagamori, S.; Kanai, Y. Inhibition of cancer-type amino acid transporter LAT1 suppresses B16-F10 melanoma metastasis in mouse models. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 13943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Gandhirajan, R.K.; Meyer, D.; Sagwal, S.K.; Weltmann, K.-D.; von Woedtke, T.; Bekeschus, S. The amino acid metabolism is essential for evading physical plasma-induced tumour cell death. Br. J. Cancer 2021, 124, 1854–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Coderre, J.A.; Glass, J.D.; Fairchild, R.G.; Roy, U.; Cohen, S.; Fand, I. Selective Targeting of Boronophenylalanine to Melanoma in BALB/c Mice for Neutron Capture Therapy. Cancer Res. 1987, 47, 6377–6383. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  120. Mishima, Y.; Honda, C.; Ichihashi, M.; Obara, H.; Hiratsuka, J.; Fukuda, H.; Karashima, H.; Kobayashi, T.; Kanda, K.; Yoshino, K. Treatment of malignant melanoma by single thermal neutron capture therapy with melanoma-seeking 10B-compound. Lancet 1989, 334, 388–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Fukuda, H.; Honda, C.; Wadabayashi, N.; Kobayashi, T.; Yoshino, K.; Hiratsuka, J.; Takahashi, J.; Akaizawa, T.; Abe, Y.; Ichihashi, M.; et al. Pharmacokinetics of 10B-boronophenylalanine in tumours, skin and blood of melanoma patients: A study of boron neutron capture therapy for malignant melanoma. Melanoma Res. 1999, 9, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Hiratsuka, J.; Kamitani, N.; Tanaka, R.; Tokiya, R.; Yoden, E.; Sakurai, Y.; Suzuki, M. Long-term outcome of cutaneous melanoma patients treated with boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). J. Radiat. Res. 2020, 61, 945–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Lan, K.-W.; Huang, W.-Y.; Chiu, Y.-L.; Hsu, F.-T.; Chien, Y.-C.; Hsiau, Y.-Y.; Wang, T.-W.; Keng, P.Y. In vivo investigation of boron-rich nanodrugs for treating triple-negative breast cancers via boron neutron capture therapy. Biomater. Adv. 2023, 155, 213699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Fujimoto, T.; Maekawa, Y.; Hori, S.; Oguro, A.; Hori, A.; Fujita, I.; Sakurai, Y.; Tanaka, H.; Ito, T.; Yahiro, S.; et al. Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) for left axillary lymph node metastasis of recurrent breast cancer. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2025, 219, 111715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kashihara, T.; Nakamura, S.; Yamazaki, N.; Takahashi, A.; Namikawa, K.; Ogata, D.; Nakano, E.; Okuma, K.; Kaneda, T.; Mori, T.; et al. Boron neutron capture therapy for cutaneous angiosarcoma and malignant melanoma: First in-human phase I clinical trial. Radiother. Oncol. 2025, 202, 110607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Haushalter, R.C.; Butler, W.M.; Rudolph, R.W. The Preparation and Characterization of Several meso-Tetracarboranylporphyrins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 2620–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Gruber, B.; Balk, S.; Stadlbauer, S.; König, B. Dynamic Interface Imprinting: High-Affinity Peptide Binding Sites Assembled by Analyte-Induced Recruiting of Membrane Receptors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10060–10063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Armarego, W.L.F.; Chai, C.L.L. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals, 6th ed.; Butterworth Heinemann: Waltham, MA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  129. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT—Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Adv. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Pedatella, S.; Cerchia, C.; Manfra, M.; Cioce, A.; Bolognese, A.; Lavecchia, A. Antitumor agents 7. Synthesis, antiproliferative activity and molecular modeling of new L-lysine-conjugated pyridophenoxazinones as potent DNA-binding ligands and topoisomerase IIα inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 187, 111960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Tsygankova, A.R.; Kanygin, V.V.; Kasatova, A.I.; Zav’yalov, E.L.; Gusel’nikova, T.Y.; Kichigin, A.I.; Mukhamadiyarov, R.A. Determination of boron by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. Biodistribution of 10B in tumor-bearing mice. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2020, 69, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Nω-(nido-carboran-7-yl)acetyl derivatives of (S)-ornithine and (S)-lysine. (a) Compound 2a (or 2b), EtOCOCl, NMM, PhNEt2, THF, −12 °C to rt, 24 h. (b) CsF (3 equiv.), EtOH, Δ, 16 h. (c) HCl conc., 1,4-dioxane, rt, 3 h. (d) Na2CO3, H2O/EtOH, rt, 0.5 h.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Nω-(nido-carboran-7-yl)acetyl derivatives of (S)-ornithine and (S)-lysine. (a) Compound 2a (or 2b), EtOCOCl, NMM, PhNEt2, THF, −12 °C to rt, 24 h. (b) CsF (3 equiv.), EtOH, Δ, 16 h. (c) HCl conc., 1,4-dioxane, rt, 3 h. (d) Na2CO3, H2O/EtOH, rt, 0.5 h.
Ijms 26 08560 sch001
Figure 1. ORTEP structure of compound 3b (thermal ellipsoids of 50% probability).
Figure 1. ORTEP structure of compound 3b (thermal ellipsoids of 50% probability).
Ijms 26 08560 g001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of tert-butyl Nδ-Boc-(S)-ornithinate (9a). (a) TFAA, NEt3, CH2Cl2, −5 °C to +10 °C, 24 h; (b) H2 (8 atm), 10% Pd/C, EtOH, rt, 8 h. (c) Boc2O, NEt3, DMF, rt, 16 h. (d) 1 M NaOH, EtOH, rt, 6 h.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of tert-butyl Nδ-Boc-(S)-ornithinate (9a). (a) TFAA, NEt3, CH2Cl2, −5 °C to +10 °C, 24 h; (b) H2 (8 atm), 10% Pd/C, EtOH, rt, 8 h. (c) Boc2O, NEt3, DMF, rt, 16 h. (d) 1 M NaOH, EtOH, rt, 6 h.
Ijms 26 08560 sch002
Scheme 3. Synthesis of tert-butyl Nε-Boc-(S)-lysinate (9b). (a) Boc2O, NEt3, DMF, rt, 24 h. (b) H2 (25 atm), 10% Pd/C, EtOH, rt, 6 h.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of tert-butyl Nε-Boc-(S)-lysinate (9b). (a) Boc2O, NEt3, DMF, rt, 24 h. (b) H2 (25 atm), 10% Pd/C, EtOH, rt, 6 h.
Ijms 26 08560 sch003
Scheme 4. Synthesis of Nα-(nido-carboran-7-yl)acetyl derivatives of (S)-ornithine and (S)-lysine. (a) Compound 9a (or 9b), EDC×HCl, HOBt, NEt3, CH2Cl2, rt, 24 h. (b) CsF, EtOH, Δ, 16 h. (c) HCl conc., 1,4-dioxane, rt, 3 h. (d) Na2CO3, H2O/EtOH, rt, 0.5 h.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of Nα-(nido-carboran-7-yl)acetyl derivatives of (S)-ornithine and (S)-lysine. (a) Compound 9a (or 9b), EDC×HCl, HOBt, NEt3, CH2Cl2, rt, 24 h. (b) CsF, EtOH, Δ, 16 h. (c) HCl conc., 1,4-dioxane, rt, 3 h. (d) Na2CO3, H2O/EtOH, rt, 0.5 h.
Ijms 26 08560 sch004
Figure 2. Effect of compounds 5a and 5b on the viability of various cell lines in vitro within 72 h of co-incubation: (a) BJ-5ta human foreskin fibroblasts, (b) DU 145 human prostate carcinoma, (c) MDA-MB-231 human breast carcinoma, (d) SK-Mel-28 human melanoma.
Figure 2. Effect of compounds 5a and 5b on the viability of various cell lines in vitro within 72 h of co-incubation: (a) BJ-5ta human foreskin fibroblasts, (b) DU 145 human prostate carcinoma, (c) MDA-MB-231 human breast carcinoma, (d) SK-Mel-28 human melanoma.
Ijms 26 08560 g002
Figure 3. Cellular uptake of compound 5b by various cells in vitro (p = 0.95, n = 3).
Figure 3. Cellular uptake of compound 5b by various cells in vitro (p = 0.95, n = 3).
Ijms 26 08560 g003
Table 1. CC50 values (mg/mL) for sodium salts of nido-carborane-containing amino acids 5a and 5b after a 72 h incubation with cells (MTT assay, n = 3).
Table 1. CC50 values (mg/mL) for sodium salts of nido-carborane-containing amino acids 5a and 5b after a 72 h incubation with cells (MTT assay, n = 3).
CompoundCell Line
BJ-5taDU 145MDA-MB-231SK-Mel 28T98GU87MG
5a0.821.000.911.76n.d.n.d.
5b1.780.570.680.560.270.45
n.d.—not determined.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gruzdev, D.A.; Levit, G.L.; Musiyak, V.V.; Telegina, A.A.; Ganebnykh, I.N.; Ezhikova, M.A.; Kodess, M.I.; Solovieva, O.I.; Gusel’nikova, T.Y.; Razumov, I.A.; et al. Nido-Carborane Derivatives of (S)-Ornithine and (S)-Lysine as Potential Boron Delivery Agents: Synthesis and In Vitro Evaluation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178560

AMA Style

Gruzdev DA, Levit GL, Musiyak VV, Telegina AA, Ganebnykh IN, Ezhikova MA, Kodess MI, Solovieva OI, Gusel’nikova TY, Razumov IA, et al. Nido-Carborane Derivatives of (S)-Ornithine and (S)-Lysine as Potential Boron Delivery Agents: Synthesis and In Vitro Evaluation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(17):8560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178560

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gruzdev, Dmitry A., Galina L. Levit, Vera V. Musiyak, Angelina A. Telegina, Ilya N. Ganebnykh, Marina A. Ezhikova, Mikhail I. Kodess, Olga I. Solovieva, Tatiana Y. Gusel’nikova, Ivan A. Razumov, and et al. 2025. "Nido-Carborane Derivatives of (S)-Ornithine and (S)-Lysine as Potential Boron Delivery Agents: Synthesis and In Vitro Evaluation" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 17: 8560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178560

APA Style

Gruzdev, D. A., Levit, G. L., Musiyak, V. V., Telegina, A. A., Ganebnykh, I. N., Ezhikova, M. A., Kodess, M. I., Solovieva, O. I., Gusel’nikova, T. Y., Razumov, I. A., & Krasnov, V. P. (2025). Nido-Carborane Derivatives of (S)-Ornithine and (S)-Lysine as Potential Boron Delivery Agents: Synthesis and In Vitro Evaluation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(17), 8560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178560

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop