Next Article in Journal
Orally Administered Zinc Gluconate Induces Tight Junctional Remodeling and Reduces Passive Transmucosal Permeability Across Human Intestine in a Patient-Based Study
Previous Article in Journal
Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disease: Pathophysiology, Clinical Patterns, and Therapeutic Challenges of Intractable and Severe Forms
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Vivo Versus In Vitro Somatostatin Receptor Expression in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Correlation Studies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Theranostic Radiopharmaceuticals of Somatostatin Receptors for Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors: Agonists Versus Antagonists—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

1
Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Philipps Universität Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany
2
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital OWL, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, 33617 Bielefeld, Germany
3
Division of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Philipps Universität Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(17), 8539; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178539
Submission received: 25 June 2025 / Revised: 14 August 2025 / Accepted: 22 August 2025 / Published: 2 September 2025

Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a rare and heterogeneous class of neoplastic lesions, but their prevalence has increased significantly over the past three decades. These tumors are aggressive and difficult to treat. Improving diagnostic efficiency and treatment effectiveness is important for patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Radiopharmaceutical therapeutic diagnostics combines diagnosis and treatment technology and has broad prospects in precision medicine, especially for the early diagnosis and treatment of tumors. To compare the diagnostic advantages of radiolabeled somatostatin receptor agonists and antagonists for liver metastases from NETs and the disease control rate in NET patients. Systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to 29 October 2024. Clinical trials of somatostatin receptor agonists and antagonists for NET diagnosis or treatment. Following PRISMA guidelines, data were independently extracted by two researchers. Pooled diagnostic or treatment effects and 95% CIs were reported using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Effect of somatostatin receptor agonists and antagonists in detecting liver metastases and disease control rate. Risk Ratio (RR) for liver metastasis detection and Effect Size (ES) for disease control rate were calculated. From 5291 articles, 52 were included in the meta-analysis. Radiolabeled somatostatin receptor antagonists were significantly more effective than agonists in detecting liver lesions (RR = 11.57, 95% CI: 4.10, 32.67). Disease control rates were higher with antagonists (ES = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83, 0.96) compared to agonists (ES = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.78, 0.85, z = 2.12, p = 0.03). Radiolabeled somatostatin receptor antagonists outperform agonists in diagnosing hepatic lesions and controlling disease in NETs, highlighting their clinical superiority. This meta-analysis provides critical insights into the diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy of somatostatin receptor antagonists, and may offer a potential paradigm shift in the management of neuroendocrine tumors. Nevertheless, the smaller number of studies on antagonists may limit the generalizability of the findings and underscore the need for further clinical trials to validate these results.
Keywords: neuroendocrine tumors; somatostatin receptor; agonists; antagonists neuroendocrine tumors; somatostatin receptor; agonists; antagonists

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Q.; Librizzi, D.; Bagheri, S.; Ebrahimifard, A.; Hojjat Shamami, A.; Rinke, A.; Eilsberger, F.; Luster, M.; Hooshyar Yousefi, B. Theranostic Radiopharmaceuticals of Somatostatin Receptors for Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors: Agonists Versus Antagonists—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8539. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178539

AMA Style

Wang Q, Librizzi D, Bagheri S, Ebrahimifard A, Hojjat Shamami A, Rinke A, Eilsberger F, Luster M, Hooshyar Yousefi B. Theranostic Radiopharmaceuticals of Somatostatin Receptors for Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors: Agonists Versus Antagonists—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(17):8539. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178539

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Qi, Damiano Librizzi, Shamim Bagheri, Ali Ebrahimifard, Azimeh Hojjat Shamami, Anja Rinke, Friederike Eilsberger, Markus Luster, and Behrooz Hooshyar Yousefi. 2025. "Theranostic Radiopharmaceuticals of Somatostatin Receptors for Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors: Agonists Versus Antagonists—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 17: 8539. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178539

APA Style

Wang, Q., Librizzi, D., Bagheri, S., Ebrahimifard, A., Hojjat Shamami, A., Rinke, A., Eilsberger, F., Luster, M., & Hooshyar Yousefi, B. (2025). Theranostic Radiopharmaceuticals of Somatostatin Receptors for Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors: Agonists Versus Antagonists—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(17), 8539. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178539

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop