Next Article in Journal
Adaptive Changes in Endurance Athletes: A Review of Molecular, Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Findings
Previous Article in Journal
Tibolone Improves Motor Recovery and Regulates Neuroinflammation and Gliosis in a Model of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prenatal Alcohol Exposure Disrupts CXCL16 Expression in Rat Hippocampus: Temporal and Sex Differences
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Genetic Polymorphisms of ALDH2 and ADH1B in Alcohol-Induced Liver Injury: Molecular Mechanisms of Inflammation and Disease Progression in East Asian Populations

Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kita-gun 761-0793, Kagawa, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(17), 8328; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178328
Submission received: 18 July 2025 / Revised: 16 August 2025 / Accepted: 26 August 2025 / Published: 28 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Alcohol and Inflammation)

Abstract

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is a major cause of liver-related mortality worldwide; however, only a subset of heavy drinkers develop progressive disease, suggesting a role for host genetics. In East Asian populations, functional polymorphisms in alcohol-metabolizing enzymes, such as alcohol dehydrogenase 1B (ADH1B) and aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2), are common and significantly affect acetaldehyde metabolism. ADH1B accelerates ethanol oxidation, whereas ALDH2 impairs acetaldehyde detoxification and increases oxidative stress, inflammation, and liver injury. Based on genotype combinations, individuals were stratified into five alcohol sensitivity groups with differing risks of cirrhosis and cancer. Although ALDH2 deficiency often suppresses alcohol intake via aversive reactions, paradoxically, continued drinking increases the risk of liver and gastrointestinal cancers. Genetic risk stratification may inform personalized prevention and precision of public health approaches. However, expansion of direct-to-consumer genetic testing has raised ethical and educational challenges. Understanding the interaction between alcohol metabolism and genetic variations is crucial for identifying high-risk individuals and guiding tailored interventions in East Asian populations.

1. Introduction

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is a leading cause of liver-related mortality worldwide and can lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma [1,2,3,4,5]. Only 35% of heavy drinkers develop advanced ALD, suggesting the involvement of additional contributing factors [6,7]. Several risk factors for ALD have been identified, including sex, obesity, drinking patterns, dietary factors, genetic predispositions unrelated to sex, and smoking [8]. In East Asia, genetic polymorphisms in the alcohol-metabolizing enzymes alcohol dehydrogenase 1B (ADH1B) and aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) are highly prevalent, leading to substantial individual differences in drinking behavior and susceptibility to ALD [9]. High- and low-activity variants of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and the low-activity variant of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) promote acetaldehyde accumulation, leading to a phenotype characterized by facial flushing and discomfort after alcohol consumption (Table 1) [10,11]. Acetaldehyde is crucial in the progression of ALD through mechanisms such as DNA damage, enhanced oxidative stress, and the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines [12]. Furthermore, alcohol consumption disrupts the intestinal barrier, allowing bacterial endotoxins to translocate into the liver. This triggers hepatic immune dysregulation via Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling, which is considered a central pathogenic mechanism driving chronic inflammation and fibrosis [13]. Individuals with ALDH2 polymorphisms have a markedly reduced capacity to metabolize acetaldehyde, potentially leading to more complex and severe disease manifestations, such as malignant tumors, myocardial infarction, and dementia [14,15,16,17,18]. This review focuses on the genetic polymorphisms of ADH1B and ALDH2 and outlines the molecular mechanisms underlying alcohol metabolism and hepatic inflammation. Furthermore, we discuss the unique genetic background and disease susceptibility observed in East Asian populations, emphasizing the potential applications in personalized medicine and public health interventions.

2. Methods

We retrieved published articles from PubMed and MDPI from peer-reviewed journals. The search was conducted using keywords related to ALD and genetic polymorphisms, such as alcohol, alcoholic hepatitis, cirrhosis, East Asian, ALDH2, ADH1B, acetaldehyde, and direct-to-consumer genetic testing (n = 3605). Following the initial search, the articles’ reference lists were reviewed, and potentially eligible articles were selected. We selected literature that could be viewed in full text. Articles that were not reported in English or in which the participant was diagnosed with a liver disease other than ALD were excluded. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. In total, 82 papers were extracted.

3. Ethanol Metabolism in the Liver

Ethanol metabolism occurs primarily in the liver and involves a two-step oxidation process that converts ethanol to harmless acetate. Ethanol is oxidized to acetaldehyde by ADH, using NAD+ as a coenzyme and producing NADH. Although there are multiple isoforms of ADH, ADH1B is the principal enzyme responsible for ethanol metabolism in humans, and its enzymatic activity varies significantly depending on genetic polymorphisms [9,19]. The generated acetaldehyde is converted into acetate using ALDH2. ALDH2 is located in mitochondria and is important in the rapid detoxification of acetaldehyde. If ALDH2 activity is reduced, acetaldehyde accumulates in the body and exerts toxic effects [9]. Even small amounts of alcohol can trigger a strong “flushing response,” characterized by facial flushing, palpitations, and nausea.
ALDH2 and ADH1B are key enzymes involved in alcohol metabolism, and individual differences in their activities directly affect the pharmacokinetics of ethanol and acetaldehyde.
The genes encoding these enzymes have functional polymorphisms that are particularly prevalent in East Asian populations [3,7].
The progression of ALD is primarily driven by chronic inflammatory responses caused by the direct effects of ethanol and cellular damage induced by its metabolic byproducts [8,9].

3.1. The Direct Hepatotoxic Effects of Alcohol

3.1.1. Increased Oxidative Stress

Under moderate alcohol consumption conditions, ethanol is primarily metabolized by ADH; however, excessive alcohol intake induces the expression of cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1), a microsomal drug-metabolizing enzyme [20]. During heavy alcohol consumption, if blood ethanol concentrations are elevated, ethanol is metabolized by CYP2E1, which has a higher Km than ADH, leading to the generation of free radicals and induction of cellular damage [21]. CYP2E1 metabolizes ethanol to acetaldehyde in an NADPH-dependent manner; however, it enhances NADPH oxidase activity, leading to increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), mitochondrial dysfunction, and ultimately cell death [21,22].

3.1.2. Inhibition of Lipid Metabolism

The mechanisms by which excessive alcohol consumption leads to hepatic lipid accumulation include the suppression of gluconeogenesis due to increased redox potential (elevated NADH/NAD+ ratio) resulting from alcohol metabolism [20], reduced fatty acid β-oxidation through downregulation of PPARα expression [23], enhanced fatty acid and triglyceride synthesis via inhibition of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and the induction of SREBP1c [24], mobilization of free fatty acids from peripheral tissues [25], and impaired very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) secretion [24]. These processes, together with oxidative stress, lead to excessive lipid accumulation in the hepatic parenchyma, resulting in alcohol-induced fatty liver disease, which serves as a precursor to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

3.1.3. Disruption of the Intestinal Barrier and Translocation of Lipopolysaccharide to the Liver

Dysbiosis and impairment of the intestinal barrier function contribute to chronic liver disease through dysregulated gut–liver axis signaling [26,27,28,29]. Alcohol impairs intestinal barrier function, allowing lipopolysaccharides (LPS) derived from the gut microbiota to translocate into the bloodstream [30,31,32]. This LPS is recognized by Toll-like receptor 4 expressed on hepatic Kupffer cells, leading to their activation and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-1β. These cytokines directly induce hepatocellular injury by triggering apoptosis and necrosis [27]. Activated Kupffer cells release pro-inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species, such as superoxide and nitric oxide, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and hepatocellular necrosis [33]. TNF-α, IL-1, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) released from Kupffer cells stimulate hepatic stellate cells, leading to increased expression of type I collagen and the promotion of fibrogenesis [34].

3.2. Hepatotoxic Effects of Acetaldehyde

3.2.1. Direct Cytotoxicity to Hepatocytes

Acetaldehyde is highly reactive and binds to intracellular proteins, DNA, and lipids in hepatocytes, thereby impairing cellular function and leading to the necrosis and apoptosis of HCC. Acetaldehyde forms acetaldehyde–protein adducts that can trigger immune responses and promote inflammation [35,36].

3.2.2. Increased Risk of Carcinogenesis

Acetaldehyde is classified as a carcinogen and increases the risk of various cancers, including liver cancer [37,38,39]. This is because acetaldehyde binds to DNA and proteins, leading to genetic mutations and abnormal cell proliferation [38,39,40,41]. Acetaldehyde can directly damage the DNA by the formation of mutagenic DNA adducts and interstrand crosslinks [42]. This disrupts normal DNA replication and induces genetic mutations. By binding to proteins, acetaldehyde interferes with normal cellular functions and signaling pathways, thereby contributing to the promotion of carcinogenesis [43].The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies acetaldehyde associated with alcohol consumption as a group 1 carcinogen [44].

3.2.3. Promotion of Fibrosis

Acetaldehyde induces the production of TGF-β1 and, through activation of the MAPK pathway and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), promotes the activation of hepatic stellate cells and gene expression of type I collagen [45,46,47]. The persistence of these processes contributes to the progression of liver fibrosis, ultimately leading to cirrhosis [47].
Inflammation in alcohol-associated liver disease is driven by multiple factors, including the disruption of the gut microbiota, accumulation of metabolic byproducts, activation of immune cells, and sustained release of cytokines. Acetaldehyde plays a central role in the intensity and persistence of this inflammatory response, and individual genetic backgrounds—particularly polymorphisms in ALDH2 and ADH1B, which are involved in acetaldehyde metabolism—have a significant influence [48,49].

4. Impact of ALDH2 and ADH1B Polymorphisms on Liver Disease Progression

4.1. Association Between ADH1B and Liver Disease

ADH1B converts ethanol to acetaldehyde. The ADH1B*2 variant (Arg47His mutation) exhibits approximately 80–100-fold higher enzymatic activity than the low-activity *1 allele, thereby accelerating the conversion of ethanol to acetaldehyde [48]. The high-activity ADH1B*2 variant is common among East Asians, including the Japanese and Chinese populations, with >80% of individuals carrying this allele [9]. Individuals with the ADH1B*2 variant experienced a more rapid and pronounced increase in blood acetaldehyde levels. If they carry the low-activity form of ALDH2, acetaldehyde accumulation becomes more pronounced [48]. Because many unpleasant reactions after alcohol consumption are associated with the accumulation of acetaldehyde in the blood, individuals carrying the ADH1B*2 allele may be more likely to avoid excessive alcohol intake, which may offer protection against alcohol use disorders [50]. Conversely, among individuals with alcohol dependence, the ADH1B*2 allele is associated with an increased risk of liver cirrhosis, with an age-adjusted odds ratio for cirrhosis of 1.58 (95% confidence interval; 1.19–2.09) [51]. In the group with high-titer anti-HCV antibodies and the ADH1B*2/*2 genotype, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for liver cirrhosis was 8.83 (95% confidence interval; 3.76–20.8) [51].
Although this may seem contradictory, individuals with alcohol dependence often carry the high-activity form of ALDH2, which enables the rapid breakdown of acetaldehyde and reduces unpleasant symptoms. In such cases, the ADH1B*2 allele is believed to increase the risk of liver cirrhosis.

4.2. Association Between ALDH2 and Liver Disease

The ALDH2*2 polymorphism (Glu504Lys mutation) is the most common variant in the ALDH gene family. It is virtually absent in individuals of European descent but is found in approximately 8% of the global population. Notably, approximately 40–50% of East Asians carry the ALDH2*2 polymorphism, which results in markedly reduced enzymatic activity [52,53]. The low-activity variant of the ALDH2 gene (ALDH2*2) results in an almost complete loss of enzymatic activity in homozygous individuals, whereas heterozygous carriers retain only approximately 10–20% of normal activity. Consequently, even small amounts of alcohol can trigger a strong “flushing reaction,” including facial flushing, palpitations, and nausea. In individuals with low ALDH2 activity, acetaldehyde detoxification is insufficient, leading to a stronger activation of the inflammatory pathways described earlier. However, because of the associated unpleasant symptoms, alcohol consumption tends to be self-limited; therefore, the low-activity ALDH2 variant is associated with a reduced risk of liver cirrhosis (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.61–0.99) [49]. Therefore, ALDH2 polymorphisms are considered an important protective factor against ALD in East Asian populations [49].
However, individuals with the active form of ALDH2 (*1/*1 genotype) have been reported to have a higher risk of developing alcohol-related liver cirrhosis than those with the low-activity *1/*2 genotype (AOR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.01–2.02) [49,51]. This is due to their ability to tolerate larger amounts of alcohol, leading to a greater chronic burden on the liver and a higher frequency of cirrhosis [51,54]. Recent studies have suggested that p53 suppresses ethanol-induced fatty liver by inhibiting the activity of ALDH2 [55]. On the other hand, some studies have shown that ALDH2 deficiency or genetic variants are risk factors for alcohol-induced gut dysbiosis and liver injury [56]. Gene therapy using adeno-associated virus to supplement the dysfunctional mitochondrial ALDH2 enzyme with a functional ALDH2*1 allele has attracted attention as a means to restore ALDH2 enzymatic activity [57].The role of ALDH2 in ALD varies across studies, highlighting the need for further investigation.
Thus, genetic polymorphisms in ADH1B and ALDH2 significantly influence individual alcohol metabolic capacity and susceptibility to alcohol-induced inflammation and liver injury (Figure 1). Generally, individuals with the ADH1B*2 variant or the low-activity ALDH2 variant tend to consume less alcohol because of the toxic and unpleasant effects of acetaldehyde, which offers protection against alcohol dependence and alcohol-related hepatocellular carcinoma. However, if such individuals consume alcohol, they may be at increased risk of developing certain types of cancer [39,40]. It is difficult to predict disease development based on a single polymorphism; rather, a combination of genetic polymorphisms in ADH1B and ALDH2 may be associated with various diseases [58].

4.3. Classification into Five Groups Based on Alcohol Sensitivity

The rate of acetaldehyde accumulation and clearance can be determined by combining the polymorphisms of the two enzymes ALDH2 and ADH1B. The degree of genetic regulation of alcohol sensitivity can be classified into five groups based on decreasing alcohol tolerance (Figure 2, Table 2) [41,43]:
  • Group I: ALDH2*1/*1 and ADH1B*1/*1;
  • Group II: ALDH2*1/*1 and ADH1B*1/*2 or *2/*2;
  • Group III: ALDH2*1/*2 and ADH1B*1/*1;
  • Group IV: ALDH2*1/*2 and ADH1B*1/*2 or *2/*2;
  • Group V: ALDH2*2/*2 and ADH1B*1/*1, *1/*2, or *2/*2.
The ALDH2*2allele plays a role in suppressing alcohol consumption, whereas the ADH1B*1allele is associated with promoting alcohol consumption [59].

4.3.1. Group I: ALDH2*1/*1 (Active Type) + ADH1B*1/*1 (Low-Activity Type)

The group with the lowest alcohol sensitivity, i.e., the most tolerant of alcohol, had the highest risk of depression, anxiety, and alcohol dependence [58,60]. With this combination, acetaldehyde is produced slowly and rapidly, making it less likely to accumulate in the body and triggering a flushing reaction. Consequently, individuals tend to consume larger amounts of alcohol and are more likely to maintain heavy drinking over time. Consequently, chronic alcohol exposure persists in the liver and increases the risk of liver cirrhosis [51].

4.3.2. Group II: ALDH2*1/*1 (Active Type) + ADH1B*1/*2 or *2/*2 (High-Activity Type)

The low-to-moderate-sensitivity group is characterized by efficient acetaldehyde metabolism and a lower likelihood of experiencing unpleasant symptoms during alcohol consumption. Consequently, individuals tend to consume larger amounts of alcohol and may unknowingly continue high-risk drinking, which may increase their risk of liver cirrhosis [61]. This group is believed to have an increased risk of alcohol-related liver cirrhosis owing to its synergistic effect with hepatitis C infection [51]. It was also associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (OR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.11–1.63) [62].

4.3.3. Group III: ALDH2*1/*2 (Heterozygous) + ADH1B*1/*1 (Low-Activity Type)

In the moderate-to-high alcohol sensitivity group, acetaldehyde production is slow, but its breakdown is significantly delayed, leading to the sustained accumulation of acetaldehyde after alcohol consumption. This genotype combination occurs in approximately 3–5% of the East Asian population (Japan, China, and Korea) [9]. Among drinkers, the risk of esophageal cancer is increased (OR = 3.02, 95% CI: 1.54–5.91), as is the risk of cancers of the pharynx, larynx, and nasal cavity (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.20–2.02) [63]. It is associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer (OR = 4.00, 95% CI: 1.81–8.87, p = 0.001) [64]. In Vietnam, this combination has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of alcohol-related liver cirrhosis [61].

4.3.4. Group IV: ALDH2*1/*2 (Heterozygous) + ADH1B*1/*2 or *2/*2 (High-Activity Type)

In the high-alcohol sensitivity group, acetaldehyde is rapidly produced but slowly breaks down, thereby rapidly increasing blood acetaldehyde levels. Even small amounts of alcohol can easily trigger a “flushing reaction,” including facial flushing, palpitations, nausea, and headaches. This genotype combination is found in approximately 30–50% of the East Asian population [52,53]. It is a risk factor for malignancies of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and esophagus (OR = 10.31, 95% CI: 5.45–18.85) [43,48,49]. No significant increase in risk was observed among never or infrequent drinkers [59]. The combination of ALDH2*1/*2 (heterozygous) and ADH1B*1/*2 is considered a risk factor for smoking [65].
In individuals with genotypes that lead to acetaldehyde accumulation, the risk of liver cirrhosis is lower [61], whereas some studies have suggested a higher risk of hepatocellular carcinoma [66]. However, these findings are inconsistent across studies.

4.3.5. Group V: ALDH2*2/*2 (Homozygous) + Any ADH1B Genotype (*1/*1, *1/*2, or *2/*2)

This is the group with the highest alcohol sensitivity (strong flushing reaction). Regardless of the ADH1B genotype, acetaldehyde accumulates almost completely in the body, and even small amounts of alcohol trigger a strong flushing reaction. The prevalence varies by study; however, approximately 1–8% of the East Asian population falls into this category [9].
Alcohol consumption in this group is generally low, which helps prevent the development of alcohol dependence [67], and considered protective against alcohol-related liver disease [54,61,68].
Continued alcohol consumption in individuals with ALDH2-deficient hepatocytes leads to the excessive production of harmful oxidized mitochondrial DNA via extracellular vesicles, which has been associated with an increased risk of alcohol-related HCC through fibrosis in patients and mouse models [69,70]. Furthermore, in heavy drinkers, individuals carrying the ALDH2 Lys allele had an odds ratio of 3.57 (95% CI: 2.04–6.27) for gastric cancer compared with Glu/Glu carriers [71].
The impact of ALDH2*2 varies depending on the stage of alcohol involvement. Although it may be protective against the progression to heavy drinking, it can become a risk factor under conditions of sustained or excessive alcohol consumption. The association between the ALDH2 and ADH1B genotypes and cancer risk varies across studies, and stratification based on alcohol consumption status is essential to clarify these discrepancies. Genetic polymorphisms in ALDH2 and ADH1B are key determinants of individual alcohol sensitivity and are significant in the progression and natural history of liver disease. Risk stratification based on these genetic factors is becoming increasingly necessary for the prevention and early intervention of liver disease.
On the other hand, as previously described, the ALDH2*2 allele (inactive type) is highly prevalent in East Asia (particularly China, Korea, and Japan), but it is rarely observed in other regions such as Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and the Americas [72]. Large-scale epidemiological studies conducted in East Asian populations have demonstrated that the ALDH2*2 allele markedly increases the risk of esophageal and head and neck cancers; however, in European and African populations, where the allele frequency is extremely low, sufficient investigation has not been conducted. The ADH1B*2 allele (fast-metabolizing type) is observed at a very high frequency in East Asia, whereas its frequency is very low in Europe (approximately 6%) and somewhat higher in African populations (approximately 19%). It has been reported to exert a protective effect against alcohol dependence [73]. Since the active ADH polymorphism observed in 70% of East Asians and 6% of Europeans is ADH1B*2 allele, whereas the variant found in 19% of Africans is ADH1B3, a simple comparison between populations is difficult [73]. The grouping based on genetic polymorphisms shown in Table 2 has been frequently reported in East Asian populations; however, in other regions, particularly regarding ALDH2 polymorphisms, sufficient validation has not been conducted, and further studies are needed to determine its applicability.

5. Risk Stratification and Preventive Guidance Based on Genetic Polymorphisms

Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing refers to genetic tests sold directly to consumers without the involvement of healthcare providers [74]. It is attracting attention as a tool for preventive public health education [75]. Despite the absence of symptoms, knowing one’s genetic profile can lead to increased risk awareness, such as recognizing that “alcohol consumption may be harmful for me,” which may promote behavioral changes, such as reduced alcohol intake and increased willingness to seek medical attention. In prospective studies, the ALDH2*2 genetic polymorphism was shown to reduce the risk of alcohol-related problems among Asian university students [75,76]. Recognizing individual genetic polymorphisms at a young age using DTC testing may contribute to the prevention of various alcohol-related problems. Several concerns are associated with DTC testing [77,78]. DTC testing does not provide the genetic counseling necessary for consumers to interpret the results and make informed decisions based on them [74,79]. Consequently, there is a risk of misunderstanding or excessive anxiety [78,80]. The general public shows strong interest in receiving genetic feedback related to outcomes, such as alcohol dependence and mental health; however, there may be a lack of understanding of its implications [81]. Personalized healthcare integrated with smartphones and digital tools is in increasing demand [78,82]. Moving forward, it will be important for healthcare professionals with accurate knowledge to utilize digital tools and other means to provide educational activities based on the information accessible to the public.

6. Conclusions and Future Directions

Genetic polymorphisms in ALDH2 and ADH1B significantly influence alcohol metabolism and the accumulation of toxic metabolites, thereby determining the risk of various alcohol-related diseases, including liver disease. These genetic variants are common among East Asian populations, making personalized prevention strategies and medical interventions particularly important. Early identification of individuals with high alcohol sensitivity based on their genotype allows for tailored advice and guidance regarding drinking behavior (Figure 1). In particular, individuals carrying the low-activity ALDH2*2 variant are prone to acetaldehyde accumulation, even with small amounts of alcohol, placing them at an increased risk of esophageal cancer, liver cirrhosis, and head and neck cancers. Alcohol restriction and targeted cancer screening may be beneficial in high-risk individuals.
However, caution is warranted when interpreting the results of DTC genetic testing, as genetic factors alone cannot fully predict the risk of alcohol-related diseases. Misinterpretation of genetic predisposition may result in inappropriate drinking behaviors. Therefore, it is essential to establish systems that provide professional genetic counseling and guidance.
Thus, there is a growing need to integrate ALDH2 and ADH1B polymorphism data into precision prevention strategies aligned with personalized medicine and broader population-level approaches known as precision public health. Through genotype-based risk stratification, the health risks associated with alcohol consumption can be minimized, contributing to primary prevention and early detection of the disease (Figure 2).

Author Contributions

T.T., writing—original draft preparation; T.T., K.O., M.N., A.M., K.F., J.T. and H.K. writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Rie Yano and Hiroki Tai for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ADH1BAlcohol dehydrogenase 1B
ALDH2Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2
ALDAlcohol-associated liver disease
DTCDirect-to-consumer (genetic testing)
HCCHepatocellular carcinoma
GIGastrointestinal
ROSReactive oxygen species
TNF-αTumor necrosis factor-alpha
IL-1βInterleukin-1 beta
NAD+Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (oxidized form)
NADHNicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (reduced form)
PPARαPeroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha
AMPKAMP-activated protein kinase
SREBP1cSterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c
VLDLVery-low-density lipoprotein
LPSLipopolysaccharide
TLR4Toll-like receptor 4
DNADeoxyribonucleic acid
CIConfidence interval
OROdds ratio

References

  1. Hernandez-Evole, H.; Jimenez-Esquivel, N.; Pose, E.; Bataller, R. Alcohol-associated liver disease: Epidemiology and management. Ann. Hepatol. 2024, 29, 101162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, D.Q.; Terrault, N.A.; Tacke, F.; Gluud, L.L.; Arrese, M.; Bugianesi, E.; Loomba, R. Global epidemiology of cirrhosis—Aetiology, trends and predictions. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023, 20, 388–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yoshiji, H.; Nagoshi, S.; Akahane, T.; Asaoka, Y.; Ueno, Y.; Ogawa, K.; Kawaguchi, T.; Kurosaki, M.; Sakaida, I.; Shimizu, M.; et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for Liver Cirrhosis 2020. J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 56, 593–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mezzano, G.; Juanola, A.; Cardenas, A.; Mezey, E.; Hamilton, J.P.; Pose, E.; Graupera, I.; Gines, P.; Sola, E.; Hernaez, R. Global burden of disease: Acute-on-chronic liver failure, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 2022, 71, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, N.; Xue, F.; Wu, X.N.; Zhang, W.; Hou, J.J.; Xiang, J.X.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, X.F. The global burden of alcoholic liver disease: A systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2019. Alcohol Alcohol. 2023, 58, 485–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mackowiak, B.; Fu, Y.; Maccioni, L.; Gao, B. Alcohol-associated liver disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2024, 134, e176345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wu, X.; Fan, X.; Miyata, T.; Kim, A.; Cajigas-Du Ross, C.K.; Ray, S.; Huang, E.; Taiwo, M.; Arya, R.; Wu, J.; et al. Recent Advances in Understanding of Pathogenesis of Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 2023, 18, 411–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Gao, B.; Bataller, R. Alcoholic liver disease: Pathogenesis and new therapeutic targets. Gastroenterology 2011, 141, 1572–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Eng, M.Y.; Luczak, S.E.; Wall, T.L. ALDH2, ADH1B, and ADH1C genotypes in Asians: A literature review. Alcohol. Res. Health 2007, 30, 22–27. [Google Scholar]
  10. Verster, J.C.; Vermeulen, S.A.; Loo, A.; Balikji, S.; Kraneveld, A.D.; Garssen, J.; Scholey, A. Dietary Nutrient Intake, Alcohol Metabolism, and Hangover Severity. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cho, Y.; Lin, K.; Lee, S.H.; Yu, C.; Valle, D.S.; Avery, D.; Lv, J.; Jung, K.; Li, L.; Smith, G.D.; et al. Genetic influences on alcohol flushing in East Asian populations. BMC Genom. 2023, 24, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Setshedi, M.; Wands, J.R.; Monte, S.M. Acetaldehyde adducts in alcoholic liver disease. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2010, 3, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tang, X.H.; Melis, M.; Mai, K.; Gudas, L.J.; Trasino, S.E. Fenretinide Improves Intestinal Barrier Function and Mitigates Alcohol Liver Disease. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 630557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lamb, R.J.; Griffiths, K.; Lip, G.Y.H.; Sorokin, V.; Frenneaux, M.P.; Feelisch, M.; Madhani, M. ALDH2 polymorphism and myocardial infarction: From alcohol metabolism to redox regulation. Pharmacol. Ther. 2024, 259, 108666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chang, Y.C.; Lee, H.L.; Yang, W.; Hsieh, M.L.; Liu, C.C.; Lee, T.Y.; Huang, J.Y.; Nong, J.Y.; Li, F.A.; Chuang, H.L.; et al. A common East-Asian ALDH2 mutation causes metabolic disorders and the therapeutic effect of ALDH2 activators. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Seike, T.; Chen, C.H.; Mochly-Rosen, D. Impact of common ALDH2 inactivating mutation and alcohol consumption on Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2023, 15, 1223977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, C.H.; Kraemer, B.R.; Mochly-Rosen, D. ALDH2 variance in disease and populations. Dis. Model. Mech. 2022, 15, dmm049601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhai, Z.; Yamauchi, T.; Shangraw, S.; Hou, V.; Matsumoto, A.; Fujita, M. Ethanol Metabolism and Melanoma. Cancers 2023, 15, 1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, C.H.; Wang, W.L.; Hsu, M.H.; Mochly-Rosen, D. Alcohol Consumption, ALDH2 Polymorphism as Risk Factors for Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancer Progression and Prognosis. Life 2022, 12, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Contreras-Zentella, M.L.; Villalobos-Garcia, D.; Hernandez-Munoz, R. Ethanol Metabolism in the Liver, the Induction of Oxidant Stress, and the Antioxidant Defense System. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lu, Y.; Cederbaum, A.I. CYP2E1 and oxidative liver injury by alcohol. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2008, 44, 723–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Harjumaki, R.; Pridgeon, C.S.; Ingelman-Sundberg, M. CYP2E1 in Alcoholic and Non-Alcoholic Liver Injury. Roles of ROS, Reactive Intermediates and Lipid Overload. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Seitz, H.K.; Moreira, B.; Neuman, M.G. Pathogenesis of Alcoholic Fatty Liver a Narrative Review. Life 2023, 13, 1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. You, M.; Arteel, G.E. Effect of ethanol on lipid metabolism. J. Hepatol. 2019, 70, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Steiner, J.L.; Lang, C.H. Alcohol, Adipose Tissue and Lipid Dysregulation. Biomolecules 2017, 7, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dukic, M.; Radonjic, T.; Jovanovic, I.; Zdravkovic, M.; Todorovic, Z.; Kraisnik, N.; Arandelovic, B.; Mandic, O.; Popadic, V.; Nikolic, N.; et al. Alcohol, Inflammation, and Microbiota in Alcoholic Liver Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. An, L.; Wirth, U.; Koch, D.; Schirren, M.; Drefs, M.; Koliogiannis, D.; Niess, H.; Andrassy, J.; Guba, M.; Bazhin, A.V.; et al. The Role of Gut-Derived Lipopolysaccharides and the Intestinal Barrier in Fatty Liver Diseases. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2022, 26, 671–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Eom, J.A.; Jeong, J.J.; Han, S.H.; Kwon, G.H.; Lee, K.J.; Gupta, H.; Sharma, S.P.; Won, S.M.; Oh, K.K.; Yoon, S.J.; et al. Gut-microbiota prompt activation of natural killer cell on alcoholic liver disease. Gut Microbes 2023, 15, 2281014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tadokoro, T.; Morishita, A.; Himoto, T.; Masaki, T. Nutritional Support for Alcoholic Liver Disease. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Rao, R. Endotoxemia and gut barrier dysfunction in alcoholic liver disease. Hepatology 2009, 50, 638–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dubinkina, V.B.; Tyakht, A.V.; Odintsova, V.Y.; Yarygin, K.S.; Kovarsky, B.A.; Pavlenko, A.V.; Ischenko, D.S.; Popenko, A.S.; Alexeev, D.G.; Taraskina, A.Y.; et al. Links of gut microbiota composition with alcohol dependence syndrome and alcoholic liver disease. Microbiome 2017, 5, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Swanson, G.R.; Garg, K.; Shaikh, M.; Keshavarzian, A. Increased Intestinal Permeability and Decreased Resiliency of the Intestinal Barrier in Alcoholic Liver Disease. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2024, 15, e00689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kolios, G.; Valatas, V.; Kouroumalis, E. Role of Kupffer cells in the pathogenesis of liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 12, 7413–7420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Khomich, O.; Ivanov, A.V.; Bartosch, B. Metabolic Hallmarks of Hepatic Stellate Cells in Liver Fibrosis. Cells 2019, 9, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tuma, D.J. Role of malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde adducts in liver injury. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2002, 32, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Subramaniyan, V.; Chakravarthi, S.; Jegasothy, R.; Seng, W.Y.; Fuloria, N.K.; Fuloria, S.; Hazarika, I.; Das, A. Alcohol-associated liver disease: A review on its pathophysiology, diagnosis and drug therapy. Toxicol. Rep. 2021, 8, 376–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Visapaa, J.P.; Gotte, K.; Benesova, M.; Li, J.; Homann, N.; Conradt, C.; Inoue, H.; Tisch, M.; Horrmann, K.; Vakevainen, S.; et al. Increased cancer risk in heavy drinkers with the alcohol dehydrogenase 1C*1 allele, possibly due to salivary acetaldehyde. Gut 2004, 53, 871–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Seitz, H.K.; Becker, P. Alcohol metabolism and cancer risk. Alcohol. Res. Health 2007, 30, 38–47. [Google Scholar]
  39. Seitz, H.K.; Stickel, F. Acetaldehyde as an underestimated risk factor for cancer development: Role of genetics in ethanol metabolism. Genes. Nutr. 2010, 5, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Vijayraghavan, S.; Porcher, L.; Mieczkowski, P.A.; Saini, N. Acetaldehyde makes a distinct mutation signature in single-stranded DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, 7451–7464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Smedra, A.; Berent, J. The Influence of the Oral Microbiome on Oral Cancer: A Literature Review and a New Approach. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hoes, L.; Dok, R.; Verstrepen, K.J.; Nuyts, S. Ethanol-Induced Cell Damage Can Result in the Development of Oral Tumors. Cancers 2021, 13, 1492–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Osna, N.A.; Rasineni, K.; Ganesan, M.; Donohue, T.M., Jr.; Kharbanda, K.K. Pathogenesis of Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease. J. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 2022, 12, 1492–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Personal habits and indoor combustions. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2012; Volume 100, pp. 1–538. [Google Scholar]
  45. Svegliati-Baroni, G.; Inagaki, Y.; Rincon-Sanchez, A.R.; Else, C.; Saccomanno, S.; Benedetti, A.; Ramirez, F.; Rojkind, M. Early response of alpha2(I) collagen to acetaldehyde in human hepatic stellate cells is TGF-beta independent. Hepatology 2005, 42, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ceni, E.; Crabb, D.W.; Foschi, M.; Mello, T.; Tarocchi, M.; Patussi, V.; Moraldi, L.; Moretti, R.; Milani, S.; Surrenti, C.; et al. Acetaldehyde inhibits PPARgamma via H2O2-mediated c-Abl activation in human hepatic stellate cells. Gastroenterology 2006, 131, 1235–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wang, J.H.; Batey, R.G.; George, J. Role of ethanol in the regulation of hepatic stellate cell function. World J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 12, 6926–6932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vilar-Gomez, E.; Sookoian, S.; Pirola, C.J.; Liang, T.; Gawrieh, S.; Cummings, O.; Liu, W.; Chalasani, N.P. ADH1B*2 Is Associated With Reduced Severity of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Adults, Independent of Alcohol Consumption. Gastroenterology 2020, 159, 929–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. He, L.; Deng, T.; Luo, H. Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) Polymorphism and the Risk of Alcoholic Liver Cirrhosis among East Asians: A Meta-Analysis. Yonsei Med. J. 2016, 57, 879–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, D.; Zhao, H.; Gelernter, J. Strong association of the alcohol dehydrogenase 1B gene (ADH1B) with alcohol dependence and alcohol-induced medical diseases. Biol. Psychiatry 2011, 70, 504–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yokoyama, A.; Mizukami, T.; Matsui, T.; Yokoyama, T.; Kimura, M.; Matsushita, S.; Higuchi, S.; Maruyama, K. Genetic polymorphisms of alcohol dehydrogenase-1B and aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 and liver cirrhosis, chronic calcific pancreatitis, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension among Japanese alcoholic men. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2013, 37, 1391–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, H.; Borinskaya, S.; Yoshimura, K.; Kal’ina, N.; Marusin, A.; Stepanov, V.A.; Qin, Z.; Khaliq, S.; Lee, M.Y.; Yang, Y.; et al. Refined geographic distribution of the oriental ALDH2*504Lys (nee 487Lys) variant. Ann. Hum. Genet. 2009, 73, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wang, W.; Wang, C.; Xu, H.; Gao, Y. Aldehyde Dehydrogenase, Liver Disease and Cancer. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 16, 921–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chang, B.; Hao, S.; Zhang, L.; Gao, M.; Sun, Y.; Huang, A.; Teng, G.; Li, B.; Crabb, D.W.; Kusumanchi, P.; et al. Association Between Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2 Glu504Lys Polymorphism and Alcoholic Liver Disease. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2018, 356, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yao, P.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, H.; Jiang, P.; Li, W.; Du, W. p53 protects against alcoholic fatty liver disease via ALDH2 inhibition. EMBO J. 2023, 42, e112304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rungratanawanich, W.; Lin, Y.; Wang, X.; Kawamoto, T.; Chidambaram, S.B.; Song, B.J. ALDH2 deficiency increases susceptibility to binge alcohol-induced gut leakiness, endotoxemia, and acute liver injury in mice through the gut-liver axis. Redox Biol. 2023, 59, 102577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Montel, R.A.; Munoz-Zuluaga, C.; Stiles, K.M.; Crystal, R.G. Can gene therapy be used to prevent cancer? Gene therapy for aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 deficiency. Cancer Gene Ther. 2022, 29, 889–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yoshimasu, K.; Mure, K.; Hashimoto, M.; Takemura, S.; Tsuno, K.; Hayashida, M.; Kinoshita, K.; Takeshita, T.; Miyashita, K. Genetic alcohol sensitivity regulated by ALDH2 and ADH1B polymorphisms is strongly associated with depression and anxiety in Japanese employees. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015, 147, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Yang, S.J.; Yokoyama, A.; Yokoyama, T.; Huang, Y.C.; Wu, S.Y.; Shao, Y.; Niu, J.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X.Q.; et al. Relationship between genetic polymorphisms of ALDH2 and ADH1B and esophageal cancer risk: A meta-analysis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 16, 4210–4220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hishimoto, A.; Fukutake, M.; Mouri, K.; Nagasaki, Y.; Asano, M.; Ueno, Y.; Nishiguchi, N.; Shirakawa, O. Alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase polymorphisms and risk for suicide: A preliminary observation in the Japanese male population. Genes Brain Behav. 2010, 9, 498–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hoang, Y.T.T.; Nguyen, Y.T.; Vu, L.T.; Bui, H.T.T.; Nguyen, Q.V.; Vu, N.P.; Nguyen, T.D.; Nguyen, H.H. Association of ADH1B rs1229984, ADH1C rs698, and ALDH2 rs671 with Alcohol abuse and Alcoholic Cirrhosis in People Living in Northeast Vietnam. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2023, 24, 2073–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Choi, C.K.; Shin, M.H.; Cho, S.H.; Kim, H.Y.; Zheng, W.; Long, J.; Kweon, S.S. Association between ALDH2 and ADH1B Polymorphisms and the Risk for Colorectal Cancer in Koreans. Cancer Res. Treat. 2021, 53, 754–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Chang, T.G.; Yen, T.T.; Wei, C.Y.; Hsiao, T.H.; Chen, I.C. Impacts of ADH1B rs1229984 and ALDH2 rs671 polymorphisms on risks of alcohol-related disorder and cancer. Cancer Med. 2023, 12, 747–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Masaoka, H.; Ito, H.; Soga, N.; Hosono, S.; Oze, I.; Watanabe, M.; Tanaka, H.; Yokomizo, A.; Hayashi, N.; Eto, M.; et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) and alcohol dehydrogenase 1B (ADH1B) polymorphisms exacerbate bladder cancer risk associated with alcohol drinking: Gene-environment interaction. Carcinogenesis 2016, 37, 583–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Masaoka, H.; Ito, H.; Gallus, S.; Watanabe, M.; Yokomizo, A.; Eto, M.; Matsuo, K. Combination of ALDH2 and ADH1B polymorphisms is associated with smoking initiation: A large-scale cross-sectional study in a Japanese population. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017, 173, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, Z.Y.; Lin, X.H.; Guo, H.Y.; Shi, X.; Zhang, D.Y.; Sun, J.L.; Zhang, G.C.; Xu, R.C.; Wang, F.; Yu, X.N.; et al. Multi-Omics profiling identifies aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 as a critical mediator in the crosstalk between Treg-mediated immunosuppression microenvironment and hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2024, 20, 2763–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lee, H.C.; Lee, H.S.; Jung, S.H.; Yi, S.Y.; Jung, H.K.; Yoon, J.H.; Kim, C.Y. Association between polymorphisms of ethanol-metabolizing enzymes and susceptibility to alcoholic cirrhosis in a Korean male population. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2001, 16, 745–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Chao, Y.C.; Liou, S.R.; Chung, Y.Y.; Tang, H.S.; Hsu, C.T.; Li, T.K.; Yin, S.J. Polymorphism of alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase genes and alcoholic cirrhosis in Chinese patients. Hepatology 1994, 19, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Seo, W.; Gao, Y.; He, Y.; Sun, J.; Xu, H.; Feng, D.; Park, S.H.; Cho, Y.E.; Guillot, A.; Ren, T.; et al. ALDH2 deficiency promotes alcohol-associated liver cancer by activating oncogenic pathways via oxidized DNA-enriched extracellular vesicles. J. Hepatol. 2019, 71, 1000–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tsai, M.C.; Yang, S.S.; Lin, C.C.; Wang, W.L.; Hsu, Y.C.; Chen, Y.S.; Hu, J.T.; Lin, J.Y.; Yu, M.L.; Lin, C.W. Association of Heavy Alcohol Intake and ALDH2 rs671 Polymorphism with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Mortality in Patients with Hepatitis B Virus-Related Cirrhosis. JAMA Netw. Open 2022, 5, e2223511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ishioka, K.; Masaoka, H.; Ito, H.; Oze, I.; Ito, S.; Tajika, M.; Shimizu, Y.; Niwa, Y.; Nakamura, S.; Matsuo, K. Association between ALDH2 and ADH1B polymorphisms, alcohol drinking and gastric cancer: A replication and mediation analysis. Gastric Cancer 2018, 21, 936–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhong, Z.; Hou, J.; Li, B.; Zhang, Q.; Li, C.; Liu, Z.; Yang, M.; Zhong, W.; Zhao, P. Genetic Polymorphisms of the Mitochondrial Aldehyde Dehydrogenase ALDH2 Gene in a Large Ethnic Hakka Population in Southern China. Med. Sci. Monit. 2018, 24, 2038–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Polimanti, R.; Gelernter, J. ADH1B: From alcoholism, natural selection, and cancer to the human phenome. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2018, 177, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mathews, R.; Hall, W.; Carter, A. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for addiction susceptibility: A premature commercialisation of doubtful validity and value. Addiction 2012, 107, 2069–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Owaki, Y.; Yoshimoto, H.; Saito, G.; Dobashi, S.; Kushio, S.; Nakamura, A.; Goto, T.; Togo, Y.; Mori, K.; Hokazono, H. Effectiveness of genetic feedback on alcohol metabolism to reduce alcohol consumption in young adults: An open-label randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2024, 22, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Luczak, S.E.; Yarnell, L.M.; Prescott, C.A.; Myers, M.G.; Liang, T.; Wall, T.L. Effects of ALDH2*2 on alcohol problem trajectories of Asian American college students. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2014, 123, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Mullins, V.A.; Bresette, W.; Johnstone, L.; Hallmark, B.; Chilton, F.H. Genomics in Personalized Nutrition: Can You “Eat for Your Genes”? Nutrients 2020, 12, 3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Roberts, J.S.; Ostergren, J. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Personal Genomics Services: A Review of Recent Empirical Studies. Curr. Genet. Med. Rep. 2013, 1, 182–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Orth, M. Direct to Consumer Laboratory Testing (DTCT)—Opportunities and Concerns. EJIFCC 2021, 32, 209–215. [Google Scholar]
  80. Onstwedder, S.M.; Jansen, M.E.; Cornel, M.C.; Rigter, T. Policy Guidance for Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Services: Framework Development Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2024, 26, e47389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Driver, M.N.; Kuo, S.I.; Dick, D.M.; on behalf of the Spit For Science Working Group. Interest in Genetic Feedback for Alcohol Use Disorder and Related Substance Use and Psychiatric Outcomes among Young Adults. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. The All of Us Research Program Investigators; Denny, J.C.; Rutter, J.L.; Goldstein, D.B.; Philippakis, A.; Smoller, J.W.; Jenkins, G.; Dishman, E. The “All of Us” Research Program. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 668–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Alcohol metabolism and mechanisms of alcohol-induced liver injury associated with genetic polymorphisms in alcohol-metabolizing enzymes. Ethanol is metabolized in the liver via a two-step enzymatic process. Ethanol is oxidized to acetaldehyde by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), and acetaldehyde is detoxified to acetate and water by ALDH. Genetic polymorphisms in ADH1B and ALDH2 significantly influence the activity of these enzymes, resulting in variable accumulation of acetaldehyde and individual differences in alcohol sensitivity and disease risk.
Figure 1. Alcohol metabolism and mechanisms of alcohol-induced liver injury associated with genetic polymorphisms in alcohol-metabolizing enzymes. Ethanol is metabolized in the liver via a two-step enzymatic process. Ethanol is oxidized to acetaldehyde by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), and acetaldehyde is detoxified to acetate and water by ALDH. Genetic polymorphisms in ADH1B and ALDH2 significantly influence the activity of these enzymes, resulting in variable accumulation of acetaldehyde and individual differences in alcohol sensitivity and disease risk.
Ijms 26 08328 g001
Figure 2. Genetic polymorphisms in alcohol metabolism and their clinical implications. The table classifies individuals into five groups based on their ADH1B and ALDH2 genotypes, alcohol sensitivity, and flushing response. These groupings correlate with specific clinical risks, such as alcohol dependence, cirrhosis, and upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Alcohol-induced hepatic damage is mediated by the direct hepatotoxic effects of ethanol, the accumulation of acetaldehyde, and disruption of the gut barrier. Understanding these genotype-based differences can inform risk stratification and promote personalized public health interventions, particularly in East Asian populations in which ALDH2 polymorphisms are highly prevalent. → represents a moderate flushing response, ↑ represents a severe flushing response, and ↑↑ represents a very severe flushing response.
Figure 2. Genetic polymorphisms in alcohol metabolism and their clinical implications. The table classifies individuals into five groups based on their ADH1B and ALDH2 genotypes, alcohol sensitivity, and flushing response. These groupings correlate with specific clinical risks, such as alcohol dependence, cirrhosis, and upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Alcohol-induced hepatic damage is mediated by the direct hepatotoxic effects of ethanol, the accumulation of acetaldehyde, and disruption of the gut barrier. Understanding these genotype-based differences can inform risk stratification and promote personalized public health interventions, particularly in East Asian populations in which ALDH2 polymorphisms are highly prevalent. → represents a moderate flushing response, ↑ represents a severe flushing response, and ↑↑ represents a very severe flushing response.
Ijms 26 08328 g002
Table 1. Functional polymorphisms of ADH1B and ALDH2 and their impact on enzymatic activity.
Table 1. Functional polymorphisms of ADH1B and ALDH2 and their impact on enzymatic activity.
GeneSNP
(Amino Acid Change)
GenotypeEnzymatic
Activity
Characteristics
ADH1Brs1229984 (Arg47His)*1/*1 (Arg/Arg)LowSlow conversion of ethanol to acetaldehyde
*1/*2 (Arg/His)Intermediate–HighIncreased enzymatic activity
*2/*2 (His/His)HighRapid production of acetaldehyde
ALDH2rs671 (Glu504Lys)*1/*1 (Glu/Glu)Active (normal)Normal conversion of acetaldehyde to acetate
*1/*2 (Glu/Lys)LowApproximately 10–20% activity; associated with facial flushing, etc.
*2/*2 (Lys/Lys)Inactive (deficient)Near-zero activity; strong alcohol intolerance
Table 2. Grouping based on alcohol sensitivity. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; GI, gastrointestinal.
Table 2. Grouping based on alcohol sensitivity. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; GI, gastrointestinal.
GroupADH1B GenotypeALDH2 GenotypeFrequencyAlcohol SensitivityFlush ReactionDisease Risk Feature
I*1/*1*1/*15–10%LowestNoneHigh risk of alcohol dependence and cirrhosis
II*1/*2 or *2/*2*1/*150%LowNoneHigh risk of cirrhosis
III*1/*1*1/*23–5%MediumMildHigh risk of HCC and upper GI cancers
IV*1/*2 or *2/*2*1/*230–50%HighStrongHigh risk of HCC and upper GI cancers
VAny*2/*21–8%HighestVery StrongLow cirrhosis risk but high cancer risk with binge
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tadokoro, T.; Oura, K.; Nakahara, M.; Fujita, K.; Tani, J.; Morishita, A.; Kobara, H. Genetic Polymorphisms of ALDH2 and ADH1B in Alcohol-Induced Liver Injury: Molecular Mechanisms of Inflammation and Disease Progression in East Asian Populations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8328. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178328

AMA Style

Tadokoro T, Oura K, Nakahara M, Fujita K, Tani J, Morishita A, Kobara H. Genetic Polymorphisms of ALDH2 and ADH1B in Alcohol-Induced Liver Injury: Molecular Mechanisms of Inflammation and Disease Progression in East Asian Populations. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(17):8328. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178328

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tadokoro, Tomoko, Kyoko Oura, Mai Nakahara, Koji Fujita, Joji Tani, Asahiro Morishita, and Hideki Kobara. 2025. "Genetic Polymorphisms of ALDH2 and ADH1B in Alcohol-Induced Liver Injury: Molecular Mechanisms of Inflammation and Disease Progression in East Asian Populations" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 17: 8328. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178328

APA Style

Tadokoro, T., Oura, K., Nakahara, M., Fujita, K., Tani, J., Morishita, A., & Kobara, H. (2025). Genetic Polymorphisms of ALDH2 and ADH1B in Alcohol-Induced Liver Injury: Molecular Mechanisms of Inflammation and Disease Progression in East Asian Populations. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(17), 8328. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178328

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop