Next Article in Journal
Molecular Mechanisms of Herbicide Resistance in Rapeseed: Current Status and Future Prospects for Resistant Germplasm Development
Previous Article in Journal
Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma and Body Mass Index: The Role of Immune System in Tumor Microenvironment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

U11/U12 Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein TaU11/U12-35K Interacts with TaHis and Negatively Contributes to Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in Wheat

1
School of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Wheat-Maize Double Cropping and High-Efficiency Production, Henan Engineering Research Center of Crop Genome Editing, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China
2
Henan International Joint Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement and Soil Remediation, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China
3
Center of Wheat Research, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 450003, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(17), 8288; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178288
Submission received: 30 July 2025 / Revised: 20 August 2025 / Accepted: 23 August 2025 / Published: 26 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB), caused by Fusarium graminearum (F. graminearum), has become one of the most devastating wheat diseases, severely impacting both grain yield and quality. The resistance gene TaHis (encoding a histidine-rich calcium-binding protein), located at the major FHB resistance locus Fhb1, has been demonstrated to confer FHB resistance in wheat, although its underlying mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we screened a wheat yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) library and identified TaU11/U12-35K, a core component of the U12-type spliceosome (U11/U12 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein), as a novel interacting partner of TaHis. Their physical interaction was further confirmed by both Y2H and bimolecular fluorescence complementation assays. Barley stripe mosaic virus-induced gene silencing (BSMV-VIGS)-mediated knockdown of TaU11/U12-35K significantly enhanced FHB resistance in both resistant (Bainong 4299) and susceptible (Bainong 5819) cultivars compared to controls. Expression profiling revealed that TaU11/U12-35K was significantly downregulated upon F. graminearum infection in both cultivars, with consistently lower basal expression levels in Bainong 4299, suggesting a negative correlation between TaU11/U12-35K expression and FHB resistance. Collectively, our results demonstrate that TaU11/U12-35K physically interacts with TaHis and functions as a negative regulator of FHB resistance. This study provides new insights into the molecular mechanism of TaHis-mediated FHB resistance in wheat.

1. Introduction

Wheat (Triticum aestivum. L), a staple crop critical for global food security, is increasingly threatened by F. graminearum, the primary causal agent of Fusarium head blight (FHB) [1]. This devastating disease not only reduces grain yield but also contaminates harvests with deoxynivalenol (DON), a mycotoxin harmful to human health [2]. Climate change has exacerbated FHB outbreaks by expanding the pathogen’s suitable habitat, further jeopardizing wheat production worldwide [3,4]. During infection, F. graminearum colonizes wheat spikes, secreting DON to disrupt host defenses and accelerate disease spread [5,6]. DON triggers premature cell death, enabling the pathogen to shift from biotrophic to necrotrophic growth, thereby enhancing its virulence [7,8,9]. Understanding the molecular basis of wheat resistance to FHB is therefore essential for developing durable disease control strategies.
Genetic studies have identified Fhb1 on chromosome 3BS as the most effective and widely deployed quantitative trait locus (QTL) for FHB resistance [10]. The cloning of Fhb1 revealed it encodes TaHis (a histidine-rich calcium-binding protein, His), though its mode of action remains debated. Competing models have emerged: Li et al. proposed that resistance stems from a gain-of-function mutation caused by a partial deletion in TaHisS [11], whereas Su et al. attributed resistance to reduced expression of the susceptibility allele (TaHisS/TaHRCS) via allelic variation (TaHisR/TaHRCR) [12]. This mechanistic divergence highlights the complexity of TaHis-mediated resistance and suggests potential cultivar-specific resistance pathways.
Recent advances have begun to unravel TaHis/TaHRC’s role in defense signaling networks. In susceptible wheat, TaHisS interacts with the calcium transporter TaCAXIP4, disrupting Ca2+ homeostasis and suppressing the NADPH oxidase-dependent oxidative burst, a critical component of early defense responses [13]. Strikingly, He et al. demonstrated that TaHisS/TaHRCS undergoes liquid–liquid phase separation via its intrinsically disordered region (IDR), forming nuclear condensates that sequester splicing factors and alter the expression of defense-related genes (e.g., PR1/PR5). The resistance allele TaHisR/TaHRCR, lacking a functional IDR, fails to form these condensates, thereby maintaining proper immune gene regulation [14]. These findings position TaHis as a central regulator at the intersection of calcium signaling and transcriptional reprogramming during pathogen attack.
To further elucidate TaHis’s resistance mechanism, we employed yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screening using TaHisR as bait and identified TaU11/U12-35K, a U11/U12 spliceosome component, as a novel interacting partner. This physical interaction was confirmed by both Y2H and bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays. Functional studies using BSMV-mediated virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) revealed that TaU11/U12-35K knockdown enhances FHB resistance in both resistant and susceptible wheat cultivars, suggesting it acts as a negative regulator of immunity. Intriguingly, TaU11/U12-35K expression is significantly downregulated during F. graminearum infection, with resistant cultivars exhibiting constitutively lower transcript levels—a pattern reminiscent of TaHisS/TaHRCS suppression in Fhb1 lines. These findings support a model wherein the TaHisR–TaU11/U12-35K interaction modulates spliceosome activity to sustain defense gene expression, providing new insights into the molecular basis of Fhb1-mediated resistance.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of the TaU11/U12-35K Gene

The TaHis CDS (825 bp) was PCR-amplified from Bainong 4299 cDNA with TaHis-F/R, then recombined into pGBKT7 to generate the bait vector pGBKT7-TaHis. Yeast two-hybrid screening of the Bainong 4299 cDNA library identified 40 positive clones. Plasmids were rescued via E. coli transformation, sequenced, and subjected to BLASTn/BLASTp (NCBI/Ensembl Plants). Insert cDNA from four clones encoded the same protein. ORF Finder analysis of the inserted cDNA revealed a 1260 bp ORF encoding 419 amino acids, identified as the coding sequence (CDS) for this protein. Alignment with NCBI and Ensembl Plant databases showed 100% amino acid sequence identity with the U11/U12 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein 35 kDa protein-like (TraesCS5D02G304800) in wheat, hence it was named TaU11/U12-35K.

2.2. Y2H Validation of TaHis-TaU11/U12-35K

The TaU11/U12-35K CDS (1260 bp) was amplified from Bainong 4299 cDNA with AD-TaU11/U12-35K-F/R, then cloned into pGADT7 via homologous recombination to generate pGADT7-TaU11/U12-35K. For Y2H assays, we co-transformed Y2HGold yeast cells with the following plasmid combinations: experimental group (pGBKT7-TaHis + pGADT7-TaU11/U12-35K), negative controls (pGBKT7-TaHis + pGADT7, pGADT7-TaU11/U12-35K + pGBKT7, and pGBKT7-Lam + pGADT7-T), and positive control (pGBKT7-53 + pGADT7-T). Transformants were cultured at 30 °C for 3–5 days on selection media. Both the experimental group and positive control exhibited robust growth on double dropout medium (SD/-Leu/-Trp) and developed blue coloration on quadruple dropout medium (SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His/-Ade/X-α-Gal). In contrast, while all negative controls grew on double dropout medium, none survived on the quadruple dropout medium (Figure 1). These results demonstrate a specific protein–protein interaction between TaHis and TaU11/U12-35K in the yeast system.

2.3. BiFC Validation of TaHis-TaU11/U12-35K Interaction

TaHis and TaU11/U12-35K CDSs were amplified with BiFC-specific primers (TaHis-F/R; TaU11/U12-35K-F/R) and Gateway-cloned into YN/YC vectors to generate fusion constructs YN-TaHis and YC-TaU11/U12-35K. The recombinant vectors were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 and subsequently co-infiltrated into Nicotiana benthamiana leaves using the following experimental design: experimental group (YN-TaHis + YC-TaU11/U12-35K), positive control (YN-TaPFT + YC-TaRBL), and negative control (YN-TaHis + YC). Following 72 h of incubation, we observed distinct yellow fluorescent signals in both the experimental group and positive control under confocal microscopy. In contrast, no fluorescence was detected in the negative control. These results provide compelling in planta evidence for a specific interaction between TaU11/U12-35K and TaHis proteins in living plant cells (Figure 2).

2.4. Silencing of TaU11/U12-35K Enhances Wheat FHB Resistance

To investigate the role of TaU11/U12-35K in FHB resistance, we employed the BSMV-VIGS system in both the FHB-resistant cultivar Bainong 4299 and susceptible cultivar Bainong 5819. The experimental design included: a TaU11/U12-35K experimental group BSMV: TaU11/U12-35K (α+β+γ-TaU11/U12-35K), a negative control group BSMV:00 (α+β+γ), and a positive control group BSMV: PDS (α+β+γ-PDS). Fifteen days after silencing, the positive control exhibited the typical photo-bleaching phenotype (Figure 3a and Figure 4a), confirming successful VIGS system operation. At anthesis, we challenged the TaU11/U12-35K-silenced and control plants with F. graminearum conidial suspensions. Quantitative analysis revealed that TaU11/U12-35K silencing achieved approximately 50% reduction in transcript levels in both cultivars (Figure 3b and Figure 4b). Notably, the silencing of TaU11/U12-35K significantly enhanced FHB resistance in both genotypes, with more pronounced effects observed in Bainong 4299 (Figure 3c and Figure 4c). The quantification of infected spikelets at 7, 12, and 19 dpi in both cultivars corroborated the aforementioned results (Figure 3d and Figure 4d). Collectively, our molecular and phenotypic evidence strongly suggests that TaU11/U12-35K likely functions as a susceptibility factor in wheat-FHB interactions.

2.5. Differential Expression of TaU11/U12-35K Gene in Resistant and Susceptible Wheat

To characterize the FHB-responsive expression pattern of TaU11/U12-35K, we conducted time-course analyses in spikelets of Bainong 4299 and Bainong 5819 wheat cultivars following inoculation with F. graminearum. Tissue samples were collected at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 hpi for RT-qPCR analysis. The results revealed distinct cultivar-specific expression dynamics (Figure 5): in Bainong 4299, rapid downregulation was observed, with maximal suppression (89% reduction) at 12 hpi, and gradual recovery to near-baseline levels occurred by 72 hpi. Whereas, in Bainong 5819, transient upregulation occurred during early infection (3–6 hpi), subsequent decline reached maximum suppression (75% reduction) at 24 hpi. Comparative analysis showed that, except at 0 h, the expression level of TaU11/U12-35K at the same time points was significantly higher in Bainong 5819 than in Bainong 4299. However, there was a striking reversal at 72 hpi, where Bainong 4299 showed 2.24-fold higher expression than Bainong 5819. These temporal expression patterns suggest TaU11/U12-35K may participate in early susceptibility mechanisms in the vulnerable cultivar and late-stage defense responses in the resistant genotype.

3. Discussion

Alternative splicing (AS), a crucial post-transcriptional regulatory mechanism in plants, significantly enhances proteomic diversity and adaptive responses to environmental challenges [15,16,17]. Through mechanisms including exon skipping (ES) and intron retention (IR), plants generate distinct splice isoforms to fine-tune their defense responses against diverse biotic stresses, including bacterial, fungal, and viral pathogens [18]. Emerging evidence reveals AS plays a dual role in plant immunity, as exemplified by the potato late blight resistance gene RB which undergoes infection-induced AS reprogramming to produce full-length resistance proteins, while pathogen effectors like Phytophthora sojae’s PsAvr3c and P. infestans’ SRE3 manipulate host AS machinery to promote infection [19,20,21]. In wheat–F. graminearum interactions, a novel AS-mediated susceptibility mechanism where the susceptibility allele TaHis-S promotes liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS), enhancing interactions with splicing factor TaSR45a and recruiting excessive splice factors into nuclear condensates that increase aberrant AS events (IR/ES) and disrupt defense-related transcriptomes. Conversely, the resistance allele TaHis-R suppresses LLPS to maintain splice factor availability and canonical splicing patterns of defense genes, with TaHis-R-mediated AS fidelity correlating with stable defense gene expression and FHB resistance [14]. These findings collectively establish that while plants employ AS to enhance immunity, pathogens like F. graminearum can subvert this mechanism, and maintaining spliceosome stability emerges as a critical determinant of disease outcomes and potential breeding target for FHB resistance.
To further elucidate the molecular mechanism of the FHB resistance gene TaHis-R, we employed it as bait to screen a wheat Y2H cDNA library, which led to the identification of its interaction with the small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) TaU11/U12-35K. This protein–protein interaction was subsequently confirmed by BiFC assay. U11/U12-35K represents a core component of the U12-dependent spliceosome in plants and plays a crucial role in alternative splicing, particularly in the processing of U12-type introns [22]. Studies have demonstrated that U11/U12-35K facilitates 5’ splice site selection during U12-type intron splicing through its interaction with SR proteins, exhibiting functional analogy to U1-70K in U2-type intron splicing [22]. Functional characterization via VIGS demonstrated that knockdown of TaU11/U12-35K in both Bainong 4299 and Bainong 5819 cultivars significantly enhanced FHB resistance while reducing target gene expression, suggesting TaU11/U12-35K acts as a susceptibility factor that negatively regulates host immunity. Temporal expression profiling revealed that TaU11/U12-35K transcript levels were substantially downregulated following F. graminearum infection in both cultivars, with consistently higher basal expression observed in the susceptible genotype throughout most infection time points. This inverse correlation between TaU11/U12-35K expression and FHB resistance suggests that during pathogen infection, F. graminearum may hijack TaU11/U12-35K to reprogram host pre-mRNA splicing by increasing aberrant splicing events (e.g., intron retention and exon skipping), thereby promoting susceptibility.
Our findings collectively demonstrate that TaHis-R likely coordinates immune-metabolic balance by directly suppressing TaU11/U12-35K activity, representing a novel regulatory mechanism underlying wheat FHB resistance through modulation of spliceosomal function. This study provides important insights into how resistance proteins can counteract pathogen manipulation of host splicing machinery to maintain disease resistance.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant and Fungal Materials

FHB-resistant wheat cultivar Bainong 4299 (Fhb1+) and FHB-susceptible cultivar Bainong 5819 (Fhb1-) were bred and maintained by Henan Institute of Science and Technology. N. benthamiana plants and the F. graminearum strain were preserved by the Henan Engineering Research Center for Genome Editing of Major Food Crops. Bainong 4299 and Bainong 5819 were used for gene amplification, gene expression, and VIGS studies. Wheat seeds were placed on moist filter paper in Petri dishes and incubated at 21 °C for 96 h for germination. Germinated seeds were transplanted into pots containing seedling substrate and grown under artificial greenhouse conditions: 18–25 °C, 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod. Wild-type N. benthamiana plants were also grown in an artificial greenhouse under conditions set to: 20–24 °C, 14 h light/10 h dark photoperiod. The F. graminearum isolate used in this study was a field isolate originating from Henan Province, China. Following Buerstmayr [23], F. graminearum was inoculated onto potato dextrose agar (PDA) solid medium and cultured at 25 °C for 4 days, then transferred to mung bean liquid medium for spore induction.

4.2. Wheat RNA Extraction, cDNA Synthesis, and Gene Amplification

Total RNA was extracted from all wheat spike samples using the Trizol method, followed by further purification with an RNase-Free DNase I kit. Purified RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the PrimeScript™ II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara, Dalian, China). Specific primers TaHis-F/R (Table 1) were designed based on the TaHis gene sequence reported by Li [11] to amplify TaHis using 2×Es Taq MasterMix enzyme. Primer sequences used in this study are listed in Table 1. Sequencing and primer synthesis were performed by Genecreate Biotech (Wuhan, China).

4.3. Yeast Two-Hybrid (Y2H) Interaction Validation

The full-length TaHis sequence was amplified by PCR using primers listed in Table 1. The fragment was inserted into pGBKT7 to generate the bait vector pGBKT7-TaHis. After testing for autoactivation and toxicity in yeast, the Matchmaker™ Gold Yeast Two-Hybrid System was used to screen the wheat cDNA library with pGBKT7-TaHis, identifying the interacting protein TaU11/U12-35K. The full-length coding region of TaU11/U12-35K was PCR-amplified using specific primers (Table 1) based on Bainong 4299 cDNA and inserted into the pGADT7 vector to generate pGADT7-TaU11/U12-35K. The recombinant vectors were co-transformed into Y2HGold yeast cells as follows: experimental group (pGBKT7-TaHis + pGADT7-TaU11/U12-35K), negative control groups (pGBKT7-TaHis + pGADT7, pGBKT + pGADT7-TaU11/U12-35K, and pGBKT7 + pGADT7), and positive control group (pGBKT7-53 + pGADT7-T). Positive transformants were selected on SD/-Leu/-Trp medium at 30 °C for 2–3 days. Subsequently, protein interaction was tested on SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His/-Ade medium containing X-α-Gal as a substrate, incubated at 30 °C for 4–5 days.

4.4. Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) Assay

The BiFC assay was performed as previously described by Song et al. [24]. The coding sequences (CDSs) of TaHis and TaU11/U12-35K were amplified by PCR (Table 1) and inserted into the BiFC vectors pEarleyGate202-nYFP (containing the N-terminal fragment of YFP, YN) to generate TaHis-YN and pEarleyGate201-cYFP (containing the C-terminal fragment of YFP, YC) to generate TaU11/U12-35K-YC. Constructs were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. The experimental group (TaHis-YN + TaU11/U12-35K-YC), positive control, and negative control (TaHis-YN + YC) were co-infiltrated into leaves of 4-week-old N. benthamiana plants using agrobacterium-mediated transient expression. Infiltrated plants were incubated at 25 °C for 4 days before observation. Yellow fluorescent signals were observed using a laser scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany).

4.5. Functional Validation of TaU11/U12-35K Gene Using BSMV-VIGS

A silencing fragment of TaU11/U12-35K was amplified using primers BSMV-TaU11/U12-35K-F/R (Table 1). The γ vector was cut with Sma I and then joined to the fragment using recombination to make γ-TaU11/U12-35K. The α, γ, γ-PDS, and γ-TaU11/U12-35K vectors were linearized with Mlu I, and the β vector was linearized with Spe I. The linearized DNA fragments were purified and subjected to in vitro transcription with the mMESSAGE mMACHINE T7 transcription kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). At the wheat booting stage, uniformly growing spikes were selected. A mixture containing 10 μL each of the α, β, and γ-PDS/γ-TaU11/U12-35K transcripts (1:1:1 ratio), an equal volume of DEPC water, and 225 μL FES buffer was prepared on ice. Under sterile conditions, 15 μL of the mixture was used to inoculate the spikes via the fingertip-rubbing method. Inoculated spikes were sprayed with DEPC water and covered with black plastic bags to maintain humidity for 24 h. Seven days later (at anthesis), spikes were inoculated with F. graminearum spore suspension. Disease assessment and spike sampling (stored at −80 °C) were performed at 7, 14, and 19 days post-inoculation (dpi). RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis followed Section 2.2 (cDNA stored at −20 °C). TaU11/U12-35K expression was quantified by RT-qPCR using qTaU11/U12-35K-F/R primers and ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), with Tubulin as the internal reference gene. The PCR reaction volume was 20 μL, containing the corresponding reagents. Amplification was performed on a QuantStudio 6 Flex system according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with three technical replicates and three biological replicates. Relative gene expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method.

4.6. Analysis of TaU11/U12-35K Gene Expression Pattern Induced by FHB

Following Zhang [25], the F. graminearum spore suspension was prepared at a concentration of 1 × 105 conidia/mL. Bainong 4299 and Bainong 5819 wheat cultivars were inoculated at anthesis using the single-floret injection method. Spikelet samples were collected at different time points (0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h post-inoculation, hpi), with one pair of spikelets sampled per time point (stored at −80 °C). RNA extraction and reverse transcription followed Section 2.2, and the resulting cDNA was aliquoted and stored at −20 °C. RT-qPCR analysis of TaU11/U12-35K gene expression was performed using qTaU11/U12-35K-F/R primers (Table 1), the above cDNA as template, and ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), with the Tubulin gene as the internal reference. RT-qPCR was conducted following the method described in Section 2.5.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we screened a wheat yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) library and identified TaU11/U12-35K, a core component of the U12-type spliceosome (U11/U12 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein), as a novel interacting partner of TaHis. Their physical interaction was further confirmed by both Y2H and bimolecular fluorescence complementation assays. BSMV-VIGS-mediated knockdown of TaU11/U12-35K significantly enhanced FHB resistance in both resistant (Bainong 4299) and susceptible (Bainong 5819) cultivars compared to controls. Expression profiling revealed that TaU11/U12-35K was significantly downregulated upon F. graminearum infection in both cultivars, with consistently lower basal expression levels in Bainong 4299, suggesting a negative correlation between TaU11/U12-35K expression and FHB resistance. Collectively, our results demonstrate that TaU11/U12-35K physically interacts with TaHis and functions as a negative regulator of FHB resistance. This study provides new insights into the molecular mechanism of TaHis-mediated FHB resistance in wheat.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.S. and Z.R.; Data curation, Y.G. and M.Z.; Formal analysis, M.Z.; Funding acquisition, H.H.; Investigation, A.L., D.L. and J.D.; Project administration, P.S.; Resources, Q.L.; Software, P.H. and Y.G.; Supervision, Z.R.; Visualization, P.H.; Writing—original draft, P.S. and A.L.; Writing—review & editing, H.H. and Z.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32171995).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Su, P.S. Research Advances in Wheat FHB Resistance Mechanism. Curr. Biotechnol. 2021, 11, 599–609. [Google Scholar]
  2. Xu, M.; Wang, Q.; Wang, G.; Zhang, X.; Liu, H.; Jiang, C. Combatting Fusarium head blight: Advances in molecular interactions between Fusarium graminearum and wheat. Phytopathol. Res. 2022, 4, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hafeez, A.N.; Arora, S.; Ghosh, S.; Gilbert, D.; Bowden, R.L.; Wulff, B.B. Creation and judicious application of a wheat resistance gene atlas. Mol. Plant 2021, 14, 1053–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ma, Z.; Xie, Q.; Li, G.; Jia, H.; Zhou, J.; Kong, Z.; Li, N.; Yuan, Y. Germplasms, genetics and genomics for better control of disastrous wheat Fusarium head blight. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 1541–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Johns, L.E.; Bebber, D.P.; Gurr, S.J.; Brown, N.A. Emerging health threat and cost of Fusarium mycotoxins in European wheat. Nat. Food 2022, 3, 1014–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bai, G.H.; Desjardins, A.E.; Plattner, R.D. Deoxynivalenol-nonproducing Fusarium graminearum causes initial infection, but does not cause disease spread in wheat spikes. Mycopathologia 2002, 153, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Maier, F.J.; Miedaner, T.; Hadeler, B.; Felk, A.; Salomon, S.; Lemmens, M.; Kassner, H.; Schäfer, W. Involvement of trichothecenes in fusarioses of wheat, barley and maize evaluated by gene disruption of the trichodiene synthase (Tri5) gene in three field isolates of different chemotype and virulence. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2006, 7, 449–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jansen, C.; von Wettstein, D.; Schäfer, W.; Kogel, K.-H.; Felk, A.; Maier, F.J. Infection patterns in barley and wheat spikes inoculated with wild-type and trichodiene synthase gene disrupted Fusarium graminearum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 16892–16897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bönnighausen, J.; Schauer, N.; Schäfer, W.; Bormann, J. Metabolic profiling of wheat rachis node infection by Fusarium graminearum—Decoding deoxynivalenol-dependent susceptibility. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Ma, H.; Huang, L.; Ding, F.; Du, Y.; Jia, H.; Li, G.; Kong, Z.; Ran, C.; et al. Pyramiding of Fusarium Head Blight Resistance Quantitative Trait Loci, Fhb1, Fhb4, and Fhb5, in Modern Chinese Wheat Cultivars. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 694023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, G.; Zhou, J.; Jia, H.; Gao, Z.; Fan, M.; Luo, Y.; Zhao, P.; Xue, S.; Li, N.; Yuan, Y.; et al. Mutation of a histidine-rich calcium-binding–protein gene in wheat confers resistance to Fusarium head blight. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 1106–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Su, Z.; Bernardo, A.; Tian, B.; Chen, H.; Wang, S.; Ma, H.; Cai, S.; Liu, D.; Zhang, D.; Li, T.; et al. A deletion mutation in TaHRC confers Fhb1 resistance to Fusarium head blight in wheat. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 1099–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, H.; Su, Z.; Tian, B.; Hao, G.; Trick, H.N.; Bai, G. TaHRC suppresses the calcium-mediated immune response and triggers wheat Fusarium head blight susceptibility. Plant Physiol. 2022, 190, 1566–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. He, Y.; Yang, X.; Xia, X.; Wang, Y.; Dong, Y.; Wu, L.; Jiang, P.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, C.; Ma, H.; et al. A phase-separated protein hub modulates resistance to Fusarium head blight in wheat. Cell Host Microbe 2024, 32, 710–726.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chaudhary, S.; Jabre, I.; Reddy, A.S.; Staiger, D.; Syed, N.H. Perspective on Alternative Splicing and Proteome Complexity in Plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 496–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pan, Q.; Shai, O.; Lee, L.J.; Frey, B.J.; Blencowe, B.J. Deep surveying of alternative splicing complexity in the human transcriptome by high-throughput sequencing. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 1413–1415, Addendum in Nat. Genet. 2009, 41, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marquez, Y.; Brown, J.W.; Simpson, C.; Barta, A.; Kalyna, M. Transcriptome survey reveals increased complexity of the alternative splicing landscape in Arabidopsis. Genome Res. 2012, 22, 1184–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhu, J.; Guo, W.; Chen, J.; Sun, Z. Decoding alternative splicing: A key player in plant biotic stress resistance. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2025; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, B.; Huang, J.; Kong, L.; Gao, C.; Zhao, F.; Shen, J.; Wang, T.; Li, K.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; et al. Alternative splicing of a potato disease resistance gene maintains homeostasis between growth and immunity. Plant Cell 2024, 36, 3729–3750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, J.; Lu, X.; Wu, H.; Xie, Y.; Peng, Q.; Gu, L.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y.; Reddy, A.S.; Dong, S. Phytophthora Effectors Modulate Genome-wide Alternative Splicing of Host mRNAs to Reprogram Plant Immunity. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1470–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, J.; Gu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, T.; Kong, G.; Kong, L.; Guo, B.; Qiu, M.; Wang, Y.; Jing, M.; et al. An oomycete plant pathogen reprograms host pre-mRNA splicing to subvert immunity. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lorković, Z.J.; Lehner, R.; Forstner, C.; Barta, A. Evolutionary conservation of minor U12-type spliceosome between plants and humans. RNA 2005, 11, 1095–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Buerstmayr, H.; Lemmens, M.; Hartl, L.; Doldi, L.; Steiner, B.; Stierschneider, M.; Ruckenbauer, P. Molecular mapping of QTLs for Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat. I. Resistance to fungal spread (Type II resistance). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 104, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Song, P.W.; Deng, J.L.; Du, Y.X.; Chen, J.M.; Jing, Y.T.; Liu, J.T.; Li, A.; Hu, H.Y. Interaction identification between wheat mRNA splicing factor TaSR and TaHis and their gene expression analysis. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin. 2024, 39, 166–172. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang, Y.; Dhaliwal, S.; Bamforth, J.; Kurera, S.; Abbasi, M.; Holden, S.; Fetterley, V.; Alfonso, A.S.; Bamrah, R.; Walkowiak, S.; et al. First report of Fusarium graminearum causing Fusarium head blight of wheat and barley in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia, Canada. Plant Dis. 2023, 107, 2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Yeast two-hybrid validation of the interaction between TaHis and TaU11/U12-35K. Shown are the experimental group (pGBKT7-TaHis + pGADT7-TaU11/U12-35K), negative controls (pGBKT7-TaHis + pGADT7, pGADT7-TaU11/U12-35K + pGBKT7, and pGBKT7-Lam + pGADT7-T), and positive control (pGBKT7-53 + pGADT7-T). Yeast transformants were plated on SD/-Trp/-Leu and SD/-Trp/-Leu/-Ade/-His media supplemented with X-α-Gal. Dilution factors (1, 10−1, 10−2, 10−3) are indicated.
Figure 1. Yeast two-hybrid validation of the interaction between TaHis and TaU11/U12-35K. Shown are the experimental group (pGBKT7-TaHis + pGADT7-TaU11/U12-35K), negative controls (pGBKT7-TaHis + pGADT7, pGADT7-TaU11/U12-35K + pGBKT7, and pGBKT7-Lam + pGADT7-T), and positive control (pGBKT7-53 + pGADT7-T). Yeast transformants were plated on SD/-Trp/-Leu and SD/-Trp/-Leu/-Ade/-His media supplemented with X-α-Gal. Dilution factors (1, 10−1, 10−2, 10−3) are indicated.
Ijms 26 08288 g001
Figure 2. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) analysis of the TaU11/U12-35K and His interaction in N. benthamiana epidermal cells. Shown are the experimental group (YN-TaHis + YC-TaU11/U12-35K), positive control (YN-TaPFT + YC-TaRBL), and negative control (YN-TaHis + YC). Representative images display YFP fluorescence in single confocal sections (left), corresponding transmission light images (middle), and merged views (right). The fluorescent signal is yellow (YFP), and the cellular structure is gray (transmission light).
Figure 2. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) analysis of the TaU11/U12-35K and His interaction in N. benthamiana epidermal cells. Shown are the experimental group (YN-TaHis + YC-TaU11/U12-35K), positive control (YN-TaPFT + YC-TaRBL), and negative control (YN-TaHis + YC). Representative images display YFP fluorescence in single confocal sections (left), corresponding transmission light images (middle), and merged views (right). The fluorescent signal is yellow (YFP), and the cellular structure is gray (transmission light).
Ijms 26 08288 g002
Figure 3. Effects of TaU11/U12-35K silencing (VIGS) in wheat cultivar Bainong 5819 and FHB assessment: (a) Spikelet phenotypes at 15 days post-inoculation (dpi) with BSMV:00 (control) and BSMV: PDS constructs. (b) Relative TaU11/U12-35K expression in control and silenced plants at 19 dpi (pre-pathogen inoculation for VIGS groups). (c) Disease symptoms on control (left) and TaU11/U12-35K-silenced (right) spikes at 19 dpi. (d) Disease progression quantified by number of diseased panicles in TaU11/U12-35K-silenced plants at 7, 12, and 19 dpi. Error bars represent the standard deviation from three replicated experiments. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments within the same variety (p < 0.05; ANOVA).
Figure 3. Effects of TaU11/U12-35K silencing (VIGS) in wheat cultivar Bainong 5819 and FHB assessment: (a) Spikelet phenotypes at 15 days post-inoculation (dpi) with BSMV:00 (control) and BSMV: PDS constructs. (b) Relative TaU11/U12-35K expression in control and silenced plants at 19 dpi (pre-pathogen inoculation for VIGS groups). (c) Disease symptoms on control (left) and TaU11/U12-35K-silenced (right) spikes at 19 dpi. (d) Disease progression quantified by number of diseased panicles in TaU11/U12-35K-silenced plants at 7, 12, and 19 dpi. Error bars represent the standard deviation from three replicated experiments. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments within the same variety (p < 0.05; ANOVA).
Ijms 26 08288 g003
Figure 4. Effects of TaU11/U12-35K silencing (VIGS) in wheat cultivar Bainong 4299 and FHB assessment: (a) Spikelet phenotypes at 15 days post-inoculation (dpi) with BSMV:00 (control) and BSMV: PDS constructs. (b) Relative TaU11/U12-35K expression in control and silenced plants at 19 dpi (pre-pathogen inoculation for VIGS groups). (c) Disease symptoms on control (left) and TaU11/U12-35K-silenced (right) spikes at 23 dpi. (d) Disease progression quantified by number of diseased panicles in TaU11/U12-35K-silenced plants at 7, 12, and 19 dpi. Error bars represent the standard deviation from three replicated experiments. Lower case letters indicate significant differences between treatments within the same variety (p < 0.05; ANOVA).
Figure 4. Effects of TaU11/U12-35K silencing (VIGS) in wheat cultivar Bainong 4299 and FHB assessment: (a) Spikelet phenotypes at 15 days post-inoculation (dpi) with BSMV:00 (control) and BSMV: PDS constructs. (b) Relative TaU11/U12-35K expression in control and silenced plants at 19 dpi (pre-pathogen inoculation for VIGS groups). (c) Disease symptoms on control (left) and TaU11/U12-35K-silenced (right) spikes at 23 dpi. (d) Disease progression quantified by number of diseased panicles in TaU11/U12-35K-silenced plants at 7, 12, and 19 dpi. Error bars represent the standard deviation from three replicated experiments. Lower case letters indicate significant differences between treatments within the same variety (p < 0.05; ANOVA).
Ijms 26 08288 g004
Figure 5. Temporal expression profile of TaU11/U12-35K in Bainong4299 and Bainong5819 cultivars following F. graminearum inoculation. Relative transcript levels (normalized to Actin) were measured at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 hpi. Error bars represent standard deviation from three biological replicates. Lowercase letters (a,b) indicate significant differences between cultivars at each time point (p < 0.05); uppercase letters (A,B) denote highly significant differences (p < 0.01) based on pairwise Student’s t-tests. (p-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method.).
Figure 5. Temporal expression profile of TaU11/U12-35K in Bainong4299 and Bainong5819 cultivars following F. graminearum inoculation. Relative transcript levels (normalized to Actin) were measured at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 hpi. Error bars represent standard deviation from three biological replicates. Lowercase letters (a,b) indicate significant differences between cultivars at each time point (p < 0.05); uppercase letters (A,B) denote highly significant differences (p < 0.01) based on pairwise Student’s t-tests. (p-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method.).
Ijms 26 08288 g005
Table 1. Primer sets used in this study.
Table 1. Primer sets used in this study.
Primer NamePrimer Sequence (5′—3′)
TaU11/U12-35K-F
TaU11/U12-35K-R
TaHis-F
TaHis-R
AD-TaU11/U12-35K-F
AD-TaU11/U12-35K-R
BD-TaHis-F
BD-TaHis-R
BIFC-TaU11/U12-35K-F
BIFC-TaU11/U12-35K-R
BIFC-TaHis-F
BIFC-TaHis-R
BSMV-TaU11/U12-35K-F
BSMV-TaU11/U12-35K-R
qTubulin-F
qTubulin-R
qActin-F
qActin-R
qTaU11/U12-35K-F
qTaU11/U12-35K-R
ATGAGGGTCGGCGTCG
CCTCTGCTCCCGATGAG
ATCTGTATATTTGGACAACCATGTA
TTACACGAGTTGCTTCCCGT
GGAGGCCAGTGAATTCATGAGAGTCGGCGTCGGCGGGA
CGAGCTCGATGGATCCTTACTGGCTATAATCTCGGCTC
CATGGAGGCCGAATTCATGTCTATATTTGGACAACCATGTA
GCAGGTCGACGGATCCTTACACGAGTTCCTTCCCGT
GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC ATGAGGGTCGGCGTCGGCG
GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTC CCTCTGCTCCCGATGAGAT
GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTCATGTGTATATTTGGACAACCATGTA
GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCCACGAGTTGCTTCCCGTC
TAGCTGATTAATTAACCCGGG AACTGAAGACGACGCAGGTC
TAGCTGAGCGGCCGCCCCGGG TACCTCTGCTCCCGATGAGAT
ATCTCCAACTCCACCAGTGTCG
TCATCGCCCTCATCACCGTC
TGACCGTATGAGCAAGGAG
CCAGACAACTCGCAACTTAG
CTAGGAGGAGGACTTGGAGGAA
CAAAACGTGTCATATACCGCCC
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, P.; Li, A.; Deng, J.; Li, D.; Hu, P.; Guan, Y.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Q.; Hu, H.; Ru, Z. U11/U12 Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein TaU11/U12-35K Interacts with TaHis and Negatively Contributes to Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in Wheat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8288. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178288

AMA Style

Song P, Li A, Deng J, Li D, Hu P, Guan Y, Zhang M, Liu Q, Hu H, Ru Z. U11/U12 Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein TaU11/U12-35K Interacts with TaHis and Negatively Contributes to Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in Wheat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(17):8288. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178288

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Puwen, Ao Li, Jiale Deng, Dan Li, Ping Hu, Yuanyuan Guan, Meng Zhang, Qili Liu, Haiyan Hu, and Zhengang Ru. 2025. "U11/U12 Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein TaU11/U12-35K Interacts with TaHis and Negatively Contributes to Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in Wheat" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 17: 8288. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178288

APA Style

Song, P., Li, A., Deng, J., Li, D., Hu, P., Guan, Y., Zhang, M., Liu, Q., Hu, H., & Ru, Z. (2025). U11/U12 Small Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein TaU11/U12-35K Interacts with TaHis and Negatively Contributes to Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in Wheat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(17), 8288. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178288

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop