Next Article in Journal
Fantastic Ferulic Acid Esterases and Their Functions
Previous Article in Journal
Immunological Markers Associated with Skin Manifestations of EGPA
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Complete Mitochondrial (mtDNA) Genome Analysis of Economically Significant Fish Cirrhinus cirrhosus in Bangladesh

by
Tajmirul Huda
1,
Md. Alamgir Kabir
2,* and
Md. Golam Rabbane
1,*
1
Fisheries Genetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
2
Aquaculture Genomics Laboratory, Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(15), 7473; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157473 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 4 March 2025 / Revised: 24 April 2025 / Accepted: 9 May 2025 / Published: 2 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

Complete mitochondrial DNA genome annotation of an ecologically and commercially important fish species Cirrhinus cirrhosus was executed with next-generation sequencing (NGS) for nucleotide and phylogenetic analyses. The findings of this study showed that the Cirrhinus cirrhosus mitochondrial genome contained 16,593 bp, including 13 protein-coding genes, 2 ribosomal RNA genes, 22 tRNA genes, and a D-loop region. The overall base composition was 32% adenine, 25% thiamine, 16% guanine, and 27% cytosine. This mitochondrial DNA exhibits an AT biasness, with 56% AT content in its genome. Significant fluctuations were identified in the AT and GC skew values of the ND6 gene, indicating that the selection and mutation forces acting on this gene might be different from those acting on other genes. The Ka/Ks ratios of most protein-coding genes were less than 1, indicating very strong natural selection pressure. Phylogenetic analysis of Cirrhinus cirrhosus with Cirrhinus mrigala and Bangana tungting suggested a closer evolutionary relationship among these species, which might have shared a more recent common ancestor. It has been also found that the genera Labeo and Cirrhinus are not monophyletic.

1. Introduction

Cirrhinus cirrhosus, known as Mrigal carp, has contributed almost 0.45% of the total riverine fish production in Bangladesh in 2021–2022 [1]. This species plays an important role in polyculture systems [2]. They inhabit the bottom layer and feed on detritus [3]. Due to facing different challenges, including seasonal variations, ecosystem degradation, pesticide and aquatic pollution, illnesses, exotic species introduction, the elimination of breeding grounds, and illegal fishing methods, their population is in danger of extinction. The IUCN has already listed them as a vulnerable species [4]. This species is still available both at natural and artificial sources. Among them, the Padma River is one of the most important. Although the Padma River contributes a large amount to the annual production of fish in Bangladesh, the biodiversity is declining day by day due to climate change, pollution, and human-induced factors [5]. However, Cirrhinus cirrhosus from this river has not recently been studied regarding its mitochondrial genome sequence, a commonly utilized molecular tool in population genetic structure research.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analysis, which contains important information about genetic diversity, species identification, and evolutionary relationships, is widely used as a tool for population genetics research because of its rapid evolution and maternal inheritance [6,7]. A more thorough study of the genetic information of this species is necessary for their proper conservation and management. Whole-mtDNA sequencing is introduced in fish genetics, as previously used techniques of sequencing are mostly dependent on the availability of databases for that species, which are sometimes difficult to obtain [8]. The next-generation sequencing (NGS) method is much more efficient in sequencing the mitochondrial nucleotide [9].
Thus, this work was carried out using next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis to find out the mitochondrial DNA genome sequence of Cirrhinus cirrhosus of the Padma River. These results could be considered in order to comprehend the nucleotide and phylogenetic analyses of Cirrhinus cirrhosus in Bangladesh.

2. Results

2.1. Mitochondrial Genome Assembly

A total of 78,977,894 reads were produced using next-generation sequencing. Low-quality reads as well as the adapter sequences were removed from the sequence. Finally, with these high-quality reads, the whole mitochondrial genome of C. cirrhosus was sequenced. The sequencing depth is shown in Figure 1.
The size of the mitochondrial genome of C. cirrhosus was 16,593 bp. It encoded 13 protein-coding genes (PGCs), 2 ribosomal RNA genes, 22 tRNA genes, and a D-loop region. It was very similar in size with the other members of the carp species. The skewness of this mitochondrial DNA was presented in Figure 2 along with a circular map was formed using the NGS data (Figure 3). There were intergenic nucleotides present in the genome of the species ranging from 1 to 33 bp, and the size of the genes ranged from 67 to 1824 bp (Table 1). The whole mitogenome of C. cirrhosus was submitted to GenBank (Accession no. PQ526798).
Most of the genes had higher AT content than GC content. Among them, trnW had the highest AT content (72%), and trnM had the lowest (42%). trnV, trnL, trnM, and trnY had greater GC content than AT (Table 2). trnM possessed the highest GC content (58%). The whole mitogenome of Cirrhinus cirrhosus had 56% AT content, which indicates the adenine and thymine richness of this species.
In the case of AT skew, the majority of the genes showed positive values, which confirmed the AT richness. Nine genes in the mitogenome (trnQ, trnA, trnN, trnY, COX1, trnS, ND3, ND6, trnE, and tRNA-pro) showed negative values in the AT skew (Table 2). Looking into the GC skew values, most of the genes were found to have negative values. Twelve genes were found with positive GC skew values, which eventually indicated GC richness. The D-loop region also showed AT richness, like the other genes.

2.2. Protein-Coding Genes

There was a total of 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs) present in the genome of the experimental fish. They were ND1, ND2, COX1, COX2, ATP8, ATP6, COX3, ND3, ND4L, ND4, ND5, ND6, and Cyt B (Table 1). These PCGs comprised 68.8% of the total mitogenome, which was 11,410 bp in size. Most of the genes had intergenic nucleotides except for ND2, COX3, ND3, and ND4L. Among them, ND5 (1824 bp) was the largest, and ATP8 (165 bp) was the smallest gene. All the PCGs were forward-transcribed genes except ND6. This gene preferred reverse transcription. The GC content of the genome was found to be 44%, and the rest of it was AT content (Figure 3). So, it clearly shows the AT preference condition. As PCGs are the functional portion of a genome, it is common to have AT-rich content. More than one codon that coded specific amino acids was found in almost all the PCGs, but methionine and trypsin were found with only one codon for each that coded them: ATG-coded methionine and TGG-coded trypsin. The amino acids with more than one codon showed great deviations in the RSCU scores (Figure 4).

2.3. Transfer RNA Genes, Ribosomal RNA Genes, and Control Region

In total, 22 tRNA genes were found in the mitochondrial genome of Cirrhinus cirrhosus (Table 1, Figure 2). Twenty-two tRNA had a total of 1562 bp, which covered 9.4% of the whole mitogenome. Among them, trnC(gcc) was the shortest one and had only 67 bp (Table 1). There were two genes that had the largest sequence of 76 bp (Table 1). They were trnL(uaa) and trnK(uuu). Two rRNA genes were identified in the genome, which were 12s rRNA and 16s rRNA genes. 12s rRNA (s-rRNA) was situated between trnF and trnV and 957 bp in size (Table 1). 16s rRNA (l-rRNA), the largest rRNA, was found between trnV and trnL (Table 1). A non-coding control region was observed in the mitogenome of the experimental species. It is referred as the D-loop region. The D-loop had a length of 928 bp and was found between tRNA-pro and trnF (Table 1). This region had no coding functions. It is known as the control region, as it controls the replication and transcription of the genome.

2.4. Selective Pressure Analysis

In the majority of PCGs, the Ka/Ks ratio, which is defined as the ratio of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site to non-synonymous substitutions per non-synonymous site, was much lower than 1 (Figure 5). It can be deduced from this that these genes were undergoing high levels of purifying selection, also known as negative selection. This means that non-synonymous mutations were being eliminated because of the detrimental consequences they had on the function of the protein. With both zero Ka and Ks values for the ATP8 and ND4L genes, the Ka/Ks ratio was zero (Figure 5). This implies that among the 13 PCGs, these genes were highly conserved and under the most purifying selection.
The p-values that were related to the Ka/Ks ratios were greater for the genes ND1, COX3, ND4, and ND6 (Table 3). This indicated that the ratios did not differ significantly from what would be predicted under the assumption of neutral evolution. Based on this information, it appeared that these genes may be subject to a lower level of selective pressure in comparison to the other PCGs. The p-values were quite small (<0.05) for the majority of the PCGs with very low Ka/Ks ratios, therefore verifying the statistically significant purifying selection observed. These results imply that most of the mitochondrial protein-coding genes in Cirrhinus cirrhosus were strongly under evolutionary constraints to preserve their functional integrity.

2.5. Nucleotide Diversity

Figure 6 indicates the nucleotide diversity across different regions of the mitochondrial genome of Cirrhinus cirrhosus. The whole mitochondrial genome was not similarly distributed in the sense of diversity. Various regions of the genome showed various nucleotide percentages, which indicated some conserved regions and some regions of genetic variability.
The first locations, which ranged from 650 to almost 13,000, showed generally low nucleotide diversity values, suggesting that these areas were quite conserved across the examined sequences. The nucleotide diversity showed moderate peaks at numerous places, including about 5200, 8464, and 13,021 bp, which indicated regions with increased genetic variety. These positions were located in the middle of the genome (Figure 6). Around position 15,625, a large surge in the diversity of nucleotides was discovered (Figure 6). According to this, there was a section of the genome that exhibited a significant degree of genetic diversity, which belongs to the CYTB gene, indicating that it might have been subject to different selective pressures or might have played a role in adaptive divergence within the species. This graph (Figure 6) revealed the various degrees of nucleotide diversity across the mitochondrial genome of Cirrhinus cirrhosus. Low-diversity regions indicated evolutionary conservation, while higher-diversity regions, especially the CYTB gene, highlighted areas of genetic heterogeneity and potential adaptive relevance.

2.6. Phylogenetic Analysis

Starting with a common ancestor, the phylogenetic tree traced different species from which branches emerged. With bootstrap values of 100, the Labeo rohita species (MN533506.1; KR185963.1) developed a clear clade, showing rather high confidence in their tight evolutionary relationship (Figure 7). Strong support for their grouping was indicated by the clade comprising Catla catla (JQ838172.1; KY419138.1), with a 100-bootstrap value. Strong support with bootstrap values of 100 was shown by the clade including Labeo dussumieri (NC031622.1), Labeo gonius (KT001152.1), and Labeo fimbriatus (KP025676.1). Labeo pangusia (NC029451) generated a clear branch. Separated on a different branch, Incisilabeo behri (NC031607.1) indicated its unique evolutionary background inside the group (Figure 7).
With Bangana tungting (KF752481.1) and Cirrhinus mrigala (MT136763.1), Cirrhinus cirrhosus (NC0 33964.1) created a clade displaying bootstrap values of 91 and 99, thereby demonstrating great confidence in their tight association (Figure 7). Comparatively to the other species in the tree, the close grouping of Cirrhinus cirrhosus with Cirrhinus mrigala and Bangana tungting revealed a closer evolutionary link among these species, which might have shared a more recent common ancestor. The tree included Cyprinus carpio (AP009047.1) as an outgroup, which helped root the tree and provided a reference point (Figure 7). The close clustering of Cirrhinus cirrhosus with Cirrhinus mrigala and Bangana tungting suggested a closer evolutionary relationship among these species, which might have shared a more recent common ancestor compared to the other species in the tree. There were multiple sequences present for the one species in the NCBI, which formed different clades despite being the same species. The analysis showed that the genera Labeo and Cirrhinus are not monophyletic, as they formed clades with different species.

3. Discussion

The complete mitogenome of Cirrhinus cirrhosus (16,593 bp) was quite similar to other carp species like Cyprinus carpio (16,606 bp) and Carassius auratus (16,580 bp) [10,11]. The mitogenome also contains 13 protein-coding genes, 2 ribosomal RNA genes, 22 tRNA genes, and a D-loop region that is consistent with the structure of other teleost fish mitogenomes [12,13]. In addition, the presence of intergenic nucleotides ranging from 1 to 33 base pairs and gene sizes ranging from 67 to 1824 base pairs are consistent with the compact character of vertebrate mitochondrial genomes [13].
The C. cirrhosus mitogenome is AT rich, which covers 56% of the whole mitogenome, with most genes displaying positive AT skew values. It is most likely a result of the high metabolic rate and body temperature of this species, as it is found in the subcontinent [14]. Most of the tRNA genes have more AT content than GC. Reportedly due, in part, to adenine’s function in preserving the tRNA secondary structure, the AT-rich region is especially strong in tRNAs [11]. The asymmetric character of mitochondrial DNA replication and transcription is supposed to affect this pattern by producing an excess of guanine in the coding strand [15]. It is hypothesized that the varying mutation rates experienced by the leading and lagging strands during replication produce the positive GC skew [15]. Consistent with its function in promoter activity, the D-loop region is responsible for the control of mitochondrial DNA replication and transcription and also exhibits an AT richness [13]. C. cirrhosus and other carp species have similar mitogenome structures and nucleotide contents, which points to a shared evolutionary past inside the family Cyprinidae.
The content of the genes and organization are remarkably conserved. Except for ND2, COX3, ND3, and ND4L, most of the protein-coding genes have intergenic nucleotides between them. These intergenic sections’ varying lengths, from 1 to 33 base pairs, help to define the mitogenome’s compact character. Reflecting the variety in gene sizes within the mitochondrial genome, ND5, the biggest protein-coding gene, is 1824 bp in length; the smallest, ATP8, is just 165 bp. Except for ND6, which is reverse transcribed, the main forward transcription of the protein-coding genes is a normal feature of vertebrate mitochondrial genomes [16]. The strand-specific mutation patterns seen in mitochondrial DNA are hypothesized to affect this asymmetric transcription [15]. The C. cirrhosus mitogenome has 44% total GC content; the remaining 56% is AT content. As reported in other teleost fishes [17] and reptiles [18], the preference for AT-rich codons in the protein-coding genes is in line with this genome-wide AT bias. Like other teleost fish, a total 22 tRNA genes were identified in the mitochondrial genome of C. cirrhosus [13]. Through their delivery of amino acids to the ribosome during translation, these tRNA genes are essential for mitochondrial protein synthesis [19]. Consistent with the results in other fish mitochondrial genomes, the variance in tRNA gene lengths—trnC(gcc) being the smallest at 67 base pairs and trnL(uaa) and trnK(uuu) being the longest at 76 base pairs—is clear cut. There were two highly conserved rRNA genes found in the C. cirrhosus mitogenome: 12S rRNA (s-rRNA) and 16S rRNA (l-rRNA). Both small and large ribosomal subunits depend on these rRNA genes, which also are required for mitochondrial protein synthesis [20]. While the 16S rRNA gene between trnV and trnL helps to generate the large ribosomal subunit, the 12S rRNA gene between trnF and trnV is in charge of the structural integrity of the small ribosomal subunit [20]. The D-loop, a region also referred to as the control region of the mitochondrial genome of C. cirrhosus, is similar to other vertebrates. It is a non-coding, regulating sequence. Important regulating factors in these 928 base-pair regions between tRNA-Pro and trnF include sites for transcription initiation and the origin of replication [21]. Particularly in teleost fishes, the inclusion of 22 tRNA genes, 2 rRNA genes, and a D-loop region in the mitochondrial genome of C. cirrhosus conforms with the usual organization of vertebrate mitochondrial genomes [13].
The Ka/Ks ratio, also known as the dN/dS ratio, is a frequently used statistic to quantify the mechanism and degree of selection operating on coding sequences [22]. In the majority of PCGs, the Ka/Ks ratio was significantly lower than 1, indicating that these genes were receiving strong levels of purifying selection [23]. Purifying selection, also known as negative selection, serves to eliminate non-synonymous mutations that are deleterious to the function of the encoded protein [24]. These data show that most mitochondrial protein-coding genes in C. cirrhosus are under substantial evolutionary constraints to maintain their functional integrity. The ATP8 and ND4L genes both have zero Ka and Ks values, resulting in a Ka/Ks ratio of zero. This means that these genes are highly conserved and under the most intensive purifying selection among the 13 PCGs [25]. The remarkable conservation of these genes may be owing to their crucial involvement in the functioning of the mitochondrial electron transport chain and ATP production [21]. The p-values linked with the Ka/Ks ratios for the genes ND1, COX3, ND4, and ND6 were higher. This implies that among the other PCGs, these genes might be susceptible to less selective pressure [25]. The great purifying selection operating on most protein-coding genes and the vital roles these areas play in mitochondrial function most certainly contribute to this conservation [26]. The most obvious aspect of the nucleotide diversity plot is the significant increase in diversity near position 15,625, which relates to the Cyt B gene. This result implies that the Cyt B gene might have been subject to various selective pressures or might have contributed to adaptive divergence within C. cirrhosus [27].
The tree illustrated that Labeo rohita formed a well-supported clade, which was strongly supported by bootstrap values of 100. This high confidence indicated a close evolutionary relationship among the different Labeo rohita samples (MN533506.1; KR185963.1). Similarly, the Catla catla clade also exhibited strong support, confirming the tight evolutionary relationship among the samples (JQ838172.1; KY419138.1). This indicated that Catla catla maintained genetic consistency across different populations, reflecting stable evolutionary traits within this species. The clade comprising Labeo dussumieri, Labeo gonius, and Labeo fimbriatus also showed robust support. This strong bootstrap value underscored the close genetic relationships and possible shared evolutionary paths among these species. The distinct branch formation by Labeo pangusia indicated its clear genetic demarcation from other species, suggesting unique evolutionary adaptations or historical separation events. Interestingly, Incisilabeo behri formed a separate branch, indicating its unique evolutionary lineage within the group. This separation pointed to distinct genetic characteristics and potential adaptive differences. In another well-supported clade, Cirrhinus mrigala, Cirrhinus cirrhosus, and Bangana tungting formed a cluster with bootstrap values of 91 and 99, respectively. This clade revealed a close evolutionary relationship among these species, suggesting they might have shared a recent common ancestor. The clustering indicated that these species underwent recent evolutionary divergence, possibly driven by similar environmental pressures or geographical proximities. The positioning of Cyprinus carpio as an outgroup allowed for clearer insights into the divergence and evolutionary pathways of the Cyprinidae family members.
The findings of the study could contribute to the management and protection of mitogenome resources of C. cirrhosus, as well as development of molecular techniques for species identification for the preservation and sustainable growth of aquaculture in Bangladesh. Furthermore, mitogenome characterization of wild C. cirrhosus collected from the Padma River will be a valuable and precious resource in molecular evolutionary biology for improving commercially important native species in Bangladesh. To create stronger and more reliable relationships with mitogenomic and other genetic markers, it is recommended to expand the sample size and include more molecular marker information, such as nuclear DNA, microsatellites, minisatellites, AFLP, RFLP, RAPD, and morphology. Also, effective initiatives should be taken to compare the mitogenomic diversities of different important aquatic habitats, such as different rivers or lakes, to understand their genetic evolution. In order to conserve and manage this commercially significant fish species effectively, these findings should be applied for species identification, diversity assessment, and genetic connection analysis.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Ethics Statement

All authors declare that all experiments have been ethically examined and approved by the Ethical Review and Clearance Committee of the Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Dhaka, with the ethical clearance certificate numbered as Ref. No. 285/Biol.Scs and dated 26 September 2024.

4.2. Sample Collection, DNA Extraction, and Quality Assessment

The Cirrhinus cirrhosus fish were collected from the Padma River of Paba Upazila in Rajshahi district (88°30′42.157″ E–24°21′51.348″ N), Bangladesh, from May to June 2024. The live fish species was transported to the Fisheries Genetics and Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Fisheries, University of Dhaka. After species confirmation morphometrically, the tissue samples were collected primarily from the muscle with sharp sterile scissors. The pooled 25 mg of muscle tissue was used to extract DNA using an automated DNA extractor (model: Maxwell 16; origin: Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to manufacturer’s guidelines. Three hundred microliters of nuclease-free water were used to homogenize the tissue samples. The elution tube was then filled with 300 μL of elution buffer. For 35 min, DNA kits were washed in the Maxwell® 16 MDx Research Instrument (Promega, USA) Automatic Nucleic Acid Purification System. Then, the samples were preserved at −20 °C in a freezer for further analysis.

4.3. Next-Generation Sequencing

For sequencing, high-quality genomic DNA was cut into smaller fragments, which was followed by end repair, adapter ligation, PCR amplification, and quality assessment. To sequence on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), the pooled libraries were denatured and diluted to the suitable loading concentration. The prepared library pool was put onto the flow cell. Cluster formation was conducted using the Illumina cBot system, which generated clusters of identical DNA fragments on the surface of the flow cell. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform, producing 150 bp paired-end reads. The sequencing run was completed according to the manufacturer’s specifications, assuring great coverage and accuracy. Fastp v0.36 was originally used to evaluate the raw sequencing readings taken for a quality test. The cleaned reads were aligned to a reference mitochondrial genome using Bowtie2 v2.1.0.

4.4. Mitogenome Assembly and Annotation

The aligned reads were assembled into contigs using SPAdes v3.15, which is particularly suitable for assembling short-read sequences. For comparison, assembly was also performed using megahit v1.2.9, which is optimized for large and complex metagenomic data sets. The quality of the assembled contigs was evaluated using QUAST (Quality Assessment Tool for Genome Assemblies). The initial contigs generated by SPAdes and megahit were further processed to close gaps and extend contigs using GapFiller v1.11. The final assembly of the mitochondrial genome was refined using GetOrganelle v1.7.5.3, which specifically targets organellar genomes. The assembled mitochondrial genome was annotated by aligning it to known mitochondrial sequences using NCBI BLAST+ v2.28. The BLAST results were used to identify conserved genes and other functional elements in the mitochondrial genome. Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs) were identified in the mitochondrial genome using misa v2.1. The rates of synonymous (Ks) and non-synonymous (Ka) substitutions were calculated using KaKs Calculator v3.0. AT and GC skew values were calculated using the following formulas: AT skew = (A − T)/(A + T) and GC skew = (G − C)/(G + C).

4.5. Phylogenetic Analysis

The mitochondrial genome sequences of Cirrhinus cirrhosus and closely related species were aligned using ClustalW 2.1 to prepare for phylogenetic tree construction. MEGA 11 was employed to construct maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees using the best-fit model. Bootstrap values were taken in several thousands to have more accurate results. A total of 21 sequences were used in the phylogenetic analysis of this study. Among them, one is the sequence achieved from the study, and the others were collected from the NCBI database to understand the phylogenetic relationship of the studied species with other species from the same family.

5. Conclusions

The findings of this study showed that the C. cirrhosus mitochondrial DNA genome is similar with other vertebrate mitochondrial genomes. This genome annotation and phylogenetic information will provide a baseline for further proper conservation and management of this important fish species.

Author Contributions

T.H., M.A.K. and M.G.R. contributed to the experimental design. T.H. was involved in the sample collection and preprocessing. M.A.K. and M.G.R. contributed to the data analysis and image editing. T.H. drafted the manuscript. M.A.K. and M.G.R. reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been partially supported by the National Science and Technology (NST) Fellowship for master’s students. The APC (Article Processing Charge) has been paid by the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This information has been added in the Section Ethics statement 4.1.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The whole mitogenome of C. cirrhosus are available in GenBank (Accession no. PQ526798). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PQ526798.

Acknowledgments

We are to grateful to University of Dhaka for funding the APC of this manuscript. We want to express our gratitude to National Science and Technology (NST) for the fellowship. We are thankful to Invent Technologies Ltd. (Dhaka, Bangladesh) for their cooperation during this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that none of the work reported in this study could have been influenced by any known competing financial interests or personal relationships.

References

  1. DoF. Yearbook of Fisheries Statistics of Bangladesh, 2021–2022; Fisheries Resources Survey System (FRSS), Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Biswas, G.; Jena, J.K.; Singh, S.K.; Patmajhi, P.; Muduli, H.K. Effect of feeding frequency on growth, survival and feed utilization in mrigal, Cirrhinus mrigala, and rohu, Labeo rohita, during nursery rearing. Aquaculture 2006, 254, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chauhan, T.; Lal, K.K.; Mohindra, V.; Singh, R.K.; Punia, P.; Gopalakrishnan, A.; Sharma, P.C.; Lakra, W.S. Evaluating genetic differentiation in wild populations of the Indian major carp, Cirrhinus mrigala (Hamilton-Buchanan, 1882): Evidence from allozyme and microsatellite markers. Aquaculture 2007, 269, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. UCN Bangladesh Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary; IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2015; p. xvi+122.
  5. Aktera, R.; Sharifb, S.H.; Khanc, M.R. An overview of fish biodiversity and socioeconomic situation of the Padma river’s fisher community in Bangladesh. Big Data Agric. (BDA) 2022, 4, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jahan, H.; Chakraborty, M.; Alam, M.S.; Begum, R.A. Characterization of complete mitochondrial genome of Labeo rohita from Bangladesh. Bioresearch Commun. (BRC) 2024, 10, 1539–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Singh, M.; Saini, V.P.; Mohindra, V.; Ojha, M.L.; Lal, K.K.; Singh, R.K. Complete mitochondrial genome of golden variant of freshwater fish Labeo rajasthanicus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae): Endemic to India. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2023, 8, 1364–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schroeter, J.C.; Maloy, A.P.; Rees, C.B.; Bartron, M.L. Fish mitochondrial genome sequencing: Expanding genetic resources to support species detection and biodiversity monitoring using environmental DNA. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2020, 12, 433–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, R.; Zhu, T.; Luo, Q. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of the Freshwater Fish Onychostoma ovale (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae): Genome Characterization and Phylogenetic Analysis. Genes 2023, 14, 1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ye, X.; Lv, Y.; Wei, L.; Huang, J.; Wen, Y.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, S.; Yang, Z.; Liu, K. The complete mitochondrial genome of Jinbian carp Cyprinus carpio (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2018, 3, 1096–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, C.; Li, B.; Ma, L.; Zhao, Y.; Kong, X. The complete mitogenome of natural triploid Carassius auratus in Qihe River. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 2014, 27, 605–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Luo, L.; Xu, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, R.; Guo, K.; Xu, W.; Zhao, Z. Complete Mitochondrial Genome Sequence and Phylogenetic Analysis of Procambarus clarkii and Cambaroides dauricus from China. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Satoh, T.P.; Miya, M.; Mabuchi, K.; Nishida, M. Structure and variation of the mitochondrial genome of fishes. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Joseph, J.; Sreeedharan, S.; George, S.; Antony, M.M. The complete mitochondrial genome of an endemic cichlid Etroplus canarensis from Western Ghats, India (Perciformes: Cichlidae) and molecular phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2022, 49, 3033–3044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Reyes, A.; Gissi, C.; Pesole, G.; Saccone, C. Asymmetrical directional mutation pressure in the mitochondrial genome of mammals. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998, 15, 957–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Desjardins, P.; Morais, R. Sequence and gene organization of the chicken mitochondrial genome: A novel gene order in higher vertebrates. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 212, 599–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chang, Y.-S.; Huang, F.-L.; Lo, T.-B. The complete nucleotide sequence and gene organization of carp (Cyprinus carpio) mitochondrial genome. J. Mol. Evol. 1994, 38, 138–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Montaña-Lozano, P.; Balaguera-Reina, S.A.; Prada-Quiroga, C.F. Comparative analysis of codon usage of mitochondrial genomes provides evolutionary insights into reptiles. Gene 2023, 851, 146999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Temperley, R.J.; Wydro, M.; Lightowlers, R.N.; Chrzanowska-Lightowlers, Z.M. Human mitochondrial mRNAs—Like members of all families, similar but different. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Bioenerg. 2010, 1797, 1081–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sharma, M.R.; Koc, E.C.; Datta, P.P.; Booth, T.M.; Spremulli, L.L.; Agrawal, R.K. Structure of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome reveals an expanded functional role for its component proteins. Cell 2003, 115, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fernández-Silva, P.; Enriquez, J.A.; Montoya, J. Replication and transcription of mammalian mitochondrial DNA. Exp. Physiol. 2003, 88, 41–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kryazhimskiy, S.; Plotkin, J.B. The population genetics of dN/dS. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4, e1000304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kimura, M. Preponderance of synonymous changes as evidence for the neutral theory of molecular evolution. Nature 1977, 267, 275–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nei, M.; Gojobori, T. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1986, 3, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nei, M.; Kumar, S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nabholz, B.; Glémin, S.; Galtier, N. The erratic mitochondrial clock: Variations of mutation rate, not population size, affect mtDNA diversity across birds and mammals. BMC Evol. Biol. 2013, 13, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nabholz, B.; Glémin, S.; Galtier, N. Strong variations of mitochondrial mutation rate across mammals—The longevity hypothesis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The sequencing depth of C. cirrhosus in terms of genome position of mitochondrial DNA.
Figure 1. The sequencing depth of C. cirrhosus in terms of genome position of mitochondrial DNA.
Ijms 26 07473 g001
Figure 2. AT and GC skews of the mitogenome of Cirrhinus cirrhosus. Blue bars represent AT skew, and red bars represent GC skew.
Figure 2. AT and GC skews of the mitogenome of Cirrhinus cirrhosus. Blue bars represent AT skew, and red bars represent GC skew.
Ijms 26 07473 g002
Figure 3. The mitochondrial genome of Cirrhinus cirrhosus. The organelle circle diagram is divided into three parts from the inside to the outside, including the GC content, base sequencing depth, and genetic component display. The inner circle of the gene elements is the forward-transcribed genes, and the outer circle is the reverse-transcribed genes.
Figure 3. The mitochondrial genome of Cirrhinus cirrhosus. The organelle circle diagram is divided into three parts from the inside to the outside, including the GC content, base sequencing depth, and genetic component display. The inner circle of the gene elements is the forward-transcribed genes, and the outer circle is the reverse-transcribed genes.
Ijms 26 07473 g003
Figure 4. Codon bias histogram. The abscissa represents the type of amino acid translated by the codon, and the ordinate represents the codon bias score calculated for the amino acid.
Figure 4. Codon bias histogram. The abscissa represents the type of amino acid translated by the codon, and the ordinate represents the codon bias score calculated for the amino acid.
Ijms 26 07473 g004
Figure 5. Ka, Ks, and Ka/Ks values of the 13 PGCs of Cirrhinus cirrhosus.
Figure 5. Ka, Ks, and Ka/Ks values of the 13 PGCs of Cirrhinus cirrhosus.
Ijms 26 07473 g005
Figure 6. Nucleotide diversity across the mitochondrial genome of Cirrhinus cirrhosus.
Figure 6. Nucleotide diversity across the mitochondrial genome of Cirrhinus cirrhosus.
Ijms 26 07473 g006
Figure 7. Phylogenetic relationship of the Cyprinidae family.
Figure 7. Phylogenetic relationship of the Cyprinidae family.
Ijms 26 07473 g007
Table 1. Gene annotations of the complete mitochondrial genome of Cirrhinus cirrhosus.
Table 1. Gene annotations of the complete mitochondrial genome of Cirrhinus cirrhosus.
GeneGene TypeLocationIntergenic NucleotidesSize
trnF(gaa)tRNA1–69069
s-rRNArRNA70–10260957
trnV(uac)tRNA1027–1098072
l-rRNArRNA1099–278601688
trnL(uaa)tRNA2787–2862076
ND1CDS2864–38381975
trnI(gau)tRNA3843–3914472
trnQ(uug)tRNA3913–3983−271
trnM(cau)tRNA3985–4053169
ND2CDS4054–509801045
trnW(uca)tRNA5099–5169071
trnA(ugc)tRNA5172–5240269
trnN(guu)tRNA5242–5314173
trnC(gca)tRNA5348–54143367
trnY(gua)tRNA5415–5484070
COX1CDS5486–703611551
trnS(uga)tRNA7037–7107071
trnD(guc)tRNA7111–7182372
COX2CDS7196–788613691
trnK(uuu)tRNA7887–7962076
ATP8CDS7964–81281165
ATP6CDS8122–8804−7683
COX3CDS8805–95900786
trnG(ucc)tRNA9591–9662072
ND3CDS9663–10,0110349
trnR(ucg)tRNA10,012–10,081070
ND4LCDS10,082–10,3780297
ND4CDS10,372–11,752−71381
trnH(gug)tRNA11,753–11,821069
trnS(gcu)tRNA11,822–11,890069
trnL(uag)tRNA11,892–11,964173
ND5CDS11,968–13,79131824
ND6CDS13,788–14,309−4522
trnE(uuc)tRNA14,310–14,378069
CYTBCDS14,384–15,52451141
trnT(ugu)tRNA15,525–15,596072
tRNA-ProtRNA15,596–15,665−170
D-loopmisc_feature15,666–16,5930928
Table 2. Nucleotide compositions of mitochondrial genes of Cirrhinus cirrhosus.
Table 2. Nucleotide compositions of mitochondrial genes of Cirrhinus cirrhosus.
GeneTotal BasesNumber of Individual BasesPercentage of Bases (%)Percentage ContentAT SkewGC Skew
ATGCATGCAT%GC%
trnF(gaa)69261414153722202159410.3−0.03
s-rRNA9573051842102583122212653470.24−0.10
trnV(uac)72201518192722252649510.14−0.02
l-rRNA16886243343284023622192358420.30−0.10
trnL(uaa)76191820192524262549510.020.02
ND19752922351413072926143155450.10−0.37
trnI(gau)72191817182626232552480.02−0.02
trnQ(uug)7117241911233626155941−0.170.26
trnM(cau)69151317242121243442580.07−0.17
ND210453532181213533323113356440.23−0.48
trnW(uca)71261814133627191863370.180.03
trnA(ugc)692326137333918107228−0.060.3
trnN(guu)7315232114203328195347−0.210.2
trnC(gca)67201618132926261955450.110.16
trnY(gua)7012192514172835204555−0.220.28
COX11551416446277412263117265743−0.03−0.19
trnS(uga)7116202114223029195248−0.110.2
trnD(guc)72252112143431161965350.08−0.07
COX26912151751111903126162757430.10−0.26
trnK(uuu)76231817183025222355450.12−0.02
ATP8165594119463527112762380.18−0.41
ATP6683208184902013028132958420.06−0.38
COX37862241991252382827153055450.05−0.31
trnG(ucc)72252112143431161965350.08−0.07
ND3349969853102272915295644−0.01−0.31
trnR(ucg)70201814182827202555450.05−0.12
ND4L297787548962626163252480.01−0.33
ND413814493451814063226132958420.13−0.38
trnH(gug)69261910143729142066340.15−0.16
trnS(gcu)69231813153328182161390.12−0.07
trnL(uag)73231916153128212059410.090.03
ND518246124632205293326122959410.13−0.41
ND65225922717660114533115644−0.580.49
trnE(uuc)6918241710263624146238−0.140.25
CYTB11413393051613362928142957430.05−0.35
trnT(ugu)72181816202526222751490−0.11
tRNA-Pro701724209243628126040−0.170.37
D-loop9283203091171823435121969310.017−0.21
Table 3. Ka/Ks statistics table.
Table 3. Ka/Ks statistics table.
SequenceKaKsKa/Ksp-Value (Fisher)SubstitutionsSyn-SubsNon-syn-Subs
ND10.001550.0044980.3446360.58074220.8826081.11739
ND21.75 × 10−50.0175350.0010.00195732.985960.014036
COX11.39 × 10−50.0138910.0010.00062343.984420.01558
COX21.25 × 10−50.0124760.0010.02337621.99410.005899
ATP80000000
ATP62.26 × 10−50.0225630.0010.00210443.989570.010428
COX30.0018670.0068310.2733770.5493720.9228921.07711
ND33.42 × 10−50.0341790.0010.0068832.991820.008185
ND4L0000000
ND40.0021980.0186890.1175840.00521774.817372.18263
ND52.09 × 10−50.0209230.0013.87 × 10−676.971380.028618
ND61.37 × 10−50.0136840.0010.05370410.9941840.005816
CYTB3.50 × 10−50.0350130.0011.40 × 10−687.97050.029501
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huda, T.; Kabir, M.A.; Rabbane, M.G. Complete Mitochondrial (mtDNA) Genome Analysis of Economically Significant Fish Cirrhinus cirrhosus in Bangladesh. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 7473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157473

AMA Style

Huda T, Kabir MA, Rabbane MG. Complete Mitochondrial (mtDNA) Genome Analysis of Economically Significant Fish Cirrhinus cirrhosus in Bangladesh. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(15):7473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157473

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huda, Tajmirul, Md. Alamgir Kabir, and Md. Golam Rabbane. 2025. "Complete Mitochondrial (mtDNA) Genome Analysis of Economically Significant Fish Cirrhinus cirrhosus in Bangladesh" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 15: 7473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157473

APA Style

Huda, T., Kabir, M. A., & Rabbane, M. G. (2025). Complete Mitochondrial (mtDNA) Genome Analysis of Economically Significant Fish Cirrhinus cirrhosus in Bangladesh. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(15), 7473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157473

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop