Next Article in Journal
The Latest Advances in Omics Technology for Assessing Tissue Damage: Implications for the Study of Sudden Cardiac Death
Next Article in Special Issue
Formation of Supramolecular Structures in Oxidation Processes Catalyzed by Heteroligand Complexes of Iron and Nickel: Models of Enzymes
Previous Article in Journal
Interneuron-Driven Ictogenesis in the 4-Aminopyridine Model: Depolarization Block and Potassium Accumulation Initiate Seizure-like Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chalcogen-Bonded [Se–N]2 Cyclic Supramolecular Synthons Enhanced by Halogen Bonds: Studies in the Gas Phase and Crystalline Phase
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 26
Issue 14
10.3390/ijms26146814
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Intermolecular Charge Transfer Induced Sensitization of Yb3+ in β-Diketone Coordination Compounds with Excellent Luminescence Efficiency

by
Trofim A. Polikovskiy
1,2,
Daniil D. Shikin
3,*,
Vladislav M. Korshunov
1,4,*,
Victoria E. Gontcharenko
1,5,
Mikhail T. Metlin
1,4,
Nikolay P. Datskevich
1,
Marat M. Islamov
3,
Victor O. Kompanets
6,
Sergey V. Chekalin
6,
Yuriy A. Belousov
1,3 and
Ilya V. Taydakov
1
1
P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 53 Leninskiy 1. Prospect, 119991 Moscow, Russia
2
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Institutsky Lane 9, 141700 Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia
3
Chemistry Department, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory Str., Building 1/3, 119991 Moscow, Russia
4
Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 5/1 2-ya Baumanskaya Str., 105005 Moscow, Russia
5
Faculty of Chemistry, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 20 Miasnitskaya Str., 101000 Moscow, Russia
6
Institute of Spectroscopy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5 Fizicheskaya Ul., 108840 Moscow, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(14), 6814; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146814
Submission received: 12 June 2025 / Revised: 4 July 2025 / Accepted: 8 July 2025 / Published: 16 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design of Functional Supramolecular Architectures Based on Coordination Compounds)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Achieving high quantum yields for Yb3+ ion emission in complexes with organic ligands is a challenging task, as most Yb3+ complexes with such ligands typically exhibit efficiencies below 3.5%. Our research demonstrates that the introduction of heavy atom-containing ancillary ligands, such as TPPO or TPAO, along with the careful engineering of the main β-diketone ligand, can increase the luminescence efficiency up to 20-fold by the alteration of the energy migration pathway. It is demonstrated that the combination of two distinct organic ligands leads to the blockage of singlet–triplet intersystem crossing (ISC), alongside electronic energy transfer from β-diketone to Yb3+ ions through charge transfer states. The synthesized complexes exhibit quantum yields of 6.5% and 7.0% in the solid state, which places them at the top globally among this class of materials with simple non-deuterated and non-fluorinated ligands.

1. Introduction

Yb3+ coordination complexes represent a highly promising class of near-infrared (NIR) luminophores owing to their unique photophysical properties. Yb3+, which exhibits a single narrow-band luminescence centered at ca. 980 nm, has garnered significant attention in various fields. These emitters find extensive use in biomedical applications [1,2]; they are used to create UV to NIR radiation converters and intensifiers for silicon photoreceivers [3], as well as in in luminescent thermometry [4,5], optoelectronics [5], lasers [6], and other high-tech applications [7,8]. Unfortunately, the relatively low luminescence quantum yields (Φ) of Yb3+ coordination compounds pose a significant challenge in their practical application. For the majority of known complexes, Φ does not exceed 3.5% [7]. This is attributed to the extremely low energy (10,250 cm−1) of the radiative 2F5/2 level of the ion. It results in the phonon quenching of emission on one hand, and, on the other, this resonance level lies much lower than the triplet state energies of most organic ligands. Only a few complexes have achieved Φ values of several percent [9,10,11,12,13]. Professor Zhang’s group achieved high yields of 10–23% [14] and a record value of 63% for heterometallic Yb-Co complexes with porphyrin ligands [15]. However, such heterometallic compounds are relatively expensive, and their synthesis is complicated [16,17].
Single-metal complexes with β-diketones, pyrazolonates, or aromatic carboxylates are much cheaper and have less complex synthetic methods, but the highest Φ values do not exceed several percent [18]. In most cases, relatively high quantum yields have been achieved only due to specific experimental conditions. In particular, complexes are dissolved in deuterated or fluorinated solvents [12,13]. For instance, Cameron mentioned [18] that the complex, which demonstrated only Φ = 1.2% in non-deuterated CH2Cl2, exhibited Φ = 6.5% with a fully deuterated ligand. Moreover, Cameron could not register the quantum yield for the powder complex due to its extremely low luminescence intensity (Φ was less than 0.1%). The required experimental conditions significantly limit the real-world application of monometallic Yb3+ compounds due to the highly expensive deuteration procedure [19] used to enhance the luminescence efficiency.
Alternatively, recent studies have shown that introducing triphenylphosphine oxide (TPPO) ligands in Yb3+ may increase the luminescence efficiency for solutions of complexes [12]. Hasegawa et al. have suggested that the further enhancement of Φ (in Eu3+ complexes) might be possible by substituting phosphorus with the heavier arsenic atom in the ancillary (triphenylarsine oxide, TPAO) ligand [20]. This improvement is attributed to the heavy atom effect, which generally enhances the efficiency of luminescence sensitization in the ligand. However, there is strong concentration quenching in the solid state, which limits the efficiency of monometallic Yb3+ compounds, so that achieving a Φ value of several percent for powders still remains a significant challenge.
To date, the impact of arsenic atoms on energy transfer processes and luminescence in Yb3+ compounds remains unexplored. It is important to note that the triplet state energy of TPAO is relatively high (26,500 cm−1) (see Supplementary Materials for details), making it unsuitable as an antenna ligand for Yb3+. Nevertheless, as an ancillary ligand, it can significantly influence the primary antenna ligand, as demonstrated in our previous work [21]. It has also been shown by us previously that the problem of the high energy gap between the excited state of the ligand and the emissive level of Ln3+ ions can be solved by an intermediate charge transfer (CT) state [22,23,24,25,26].
Lanthanide derivatives of 1-phenyl-3-methyl-4-acyl-pyrazol-5-ones (HQ) [27,28] are known as effective sensitizers of lanthanide luminescence, especially terbium [29,30] and dysprosium [31,32], due to their suitable triplet level energy, especially in the case of an aliphatic substituent at position R3 [28,33,34,35,36]. Moreover, lanthanide complexes with such ligands are known for the presence of CT states [22,37]. Such CT states can “bridge” energy to the Yb3+ 2F5/2 emissive level [23,38], thus enhancing the luminescence efficiency.
In this study, we synthesized the HQtBu ligand for the first time, along with Yb3+ complexes with this ligand. The potential of using TPAO as an ancillary ligand in Yb3+ ion complexes with a ligand from the β-diketone class was shown. We found that the ligand triplet state did not participate in energy migration from the ligand to the ion. However, the presence of the CT state, with energy close to T1 (19,200 cm−1), allowed for the efficient sensitization of Yb3+. The new complexes with TPPO (Yb-P) and TPAO (Yb-As) show record-high quantum yields upon β-diketone ligand excitation, presumably due to the alternative energy transfer pathway. A comparative analysis with complexes lacking ancillary ligands (Gd-H, Yb-H, Yb-D) and a Tb3+ analog (Tb-P) elucidates the observed enhancement in the quantum yield.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Crystal Structure

A total of six novel complexes [Ln(QtBu)3(H2O)] (Ln = Gd and Yb, Gd-H, and Yb-H, respectively), a deuterated analog of [Yb(QtBu)3(H2O)] Yb-D, [Ln(QtBu)3(TPPO)] (Ln = Tb and Yb, Tb-P, and Yb-P, respectively), and [Yb(QtBu)3(TPAO)] (Yb-As) (see Figure 1a) were synthesized from the new ligand 4-benzoyl-2-(tert-butyl)-5-methyl-2,4-dihydro-3H-pyrazol-3-one (HQtBu). The substances were characterized by elemental analyses, NMR and FTIR spectroscopy, single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD), and powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD). A detailed description of the synthesis and characterization of the ligand and complexes is given in Section 3.
The slow cooling of the saturated DMF solutions of Tb-P, Yb-P, and Yb-As led to the formation of single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction. According to the results of SCXRD, Tb-P, Yb-P, and Yb-As are isostructural; thus, further description will be given for the Yb-As crystal structure (see Figure 1b).
The complex Yb-As crystallizes as a neutral entity with formula [Yb(QtBu)3(TPAO)]. The ytterbium ion is coordinated by seven oxygen atoms—six from three bidentate pyrazolone ligands and one from the TPAO ligand—forming a capped octahedral coordination polyhedron.
The average Ln-O (pyrazolone) bond length is slightly elongated in Tb-P (2.32 Å) in comparison with Yb complexes (2.28 Å in Yb-As, 2.26 Å in Yb-P), which is consistent with the expected lanthanide contraction effect.
A comparative analysis of the experimental powder diffraction patterns for Tb-P, Yb-P, and Yb-As with the simulated pattern derived from SCXRD data confirmed the bulk phase purity for all synthesized complexes (see Figures S9–S11, Tables S1 and S2).

2.2. Luminescent Properties

The UV–Vis spectra of the compounds in the range of 260 to 400 nm exhibit remarkable similarity, as illustrated in Figure 2a. This suggests that all the observed absorption bands can be attributed to electronic transitions within the β-diketone ligand. The luminescence excitation spectra of all the complexes (see Figure 2c) display similar shapes, with maxima ranging from 350 to 370 nanometers. However, the low-energy edge of the excitation band in the Yb-P and Yb-As complexes is blue-shifted by 10 nm compared to those complexes that have no additional ligand. Thus, the TPPO and TPAO ligands influence the energy of the low-energy state centered on the diketone ligand. The luminescence spectra (see Figure 2d) of the complexes recorded at 77 K exhibit a narrow band corresponding to the 2F5/2→2F7/2 transition of the Yb3+ ion in the 950–1100 nm region. Notably, there is no ligand environment fluorescence or phosphorescence, indicating the efficient transfer of electronic excitation energy from the donor ligand to the acceptor ion. The emission band is split into several components, with the most intense peak centered at 976 nm and three weaker peaks observed between 1000 and 1040 nm for Yb-H. The Stark sub-bands of the deuterated Yb-D complex are better resolved in the spectrum, owing to the suppression of O-H phonon relaxation [31]. The introduction of the ancillary ligands leads to an increase in the number of Stark-splitting components of the emission band, ranging from four to five sub-bands for the Yb-As complex and from four to seven sub-bands for the Yb-P complex. This observation suggests that the presence of different ancillary ligands leads to variations in the symmetry of the coordination polyhedron.
The overall luminescence quantum yields (Φ) were measured using the absolute method under 365 nm excitation. The measured Φ values, namely 6.5% for Yb-P and 7.0% for Yb-As, represent exceptional results (see Table 1). The close luminescence lifetimes (τobs) of 31 and 35 μs support the similarity of the Φ values (see Figure S12). It is worth noting that this result is not attributed to the displacement of water molecules from the coordinating sphere, as the Φ of the deuterated complex Yb-D without an ancillary ligand (0.4%) is comparable to that of hydrated Yb-H (0.3%). Notably, the decay obtained for Yb-As dissolved in CDCl3 (see Figure S13) exhibits a similar lifetime of 35 μs, indicating no enhancement in luminescence efficiency.
To elucidate the nature of the observed phenomenon, we thoroughly investigated the optical properties of the compounds. The energy of the first excited triplet state of the diketone ligand was estimated as 19,200 cm−1 (see Figure S14). It is also important to ensure a fast S1→T1 intersystem crossing (ISC) process. Prof. Malta et al. have previously demonstrated that ISC energy transfer can be enhanced through an intermediate charge transfer state [26]. Notably, the diffuse reflectance (DR) spectra differ from the absorption spectra of the dissolved compounds, with a distinct broad shoulder appearing between 400 and 450 nm (see Figure 2b and Figure 3). We attribute this feature to a charge transfer state.
In order to investigate electronic charge transfer processes within the ligand environment, femtosecond transient absorption (fs-TA) measurements were performed with a pump wavelength of 320 nm. Since the TPAO absorption spectrum appears below 300 nm, it provides excitation through the β-diketone ligand. We observed a positive optical density change, corresponding to excited state absorption (ESA) [21], which was located within 420–660 nm. We also observed two spectral species spawned at a longer spectral region with a maximum at ca. 600 nm and at a short spectral region peaked at 510 nm. The former rapidly decreases within 400–500 fs, suggesting the Sn→Sm energy transition nature of the species. Then, the short-wavelength band intensity rises in the initial period with a lifetime of 0.4 ps, corresponding to the population of the S1 state by internal conversion Sn→S1, followed by subsequent relaxation for 6.5 ps. As seen from Figure 3B, all the ligand excited states are fully depopulated within 20 ps, suggesting the absence of long-living T1→Tn transitions [21,46]. As, generally, β-diketone compounds exhibit T1 state lifetimes of ca. 50–200 ps, we conclude that T1 does not participate in the electronic energy migration dynamics in our case. Notably, we have already reported similar behaviour for β-diketone compounds previously [46]. This suggests that only ligand singlet excited states are involved in electronic energy migration in the investigated compounds.
Due to the high S1→Yb3+ 2F5/2 energy gap (>15,000 cm−1), the luminescence quantum yields Φ measured for the dissolved compounds are low (<1%). Seemingly, there is an additional excited state observed for compounds in the solid state, which participates in energy transfer, thus enhancing the luminescence efficiency. We attribute this to a charge transfer state (see Figure 4 left).
Furthermore, luminescence spectra at ambient conditions and in vacuum (10−4 Torr) were obtained. Since the ground state of oxygen is triplet, the deaeration of the complex would lead to the enhancement of processes that involve energy transfer through the ligand triplet state. However, we observed no influence of deaeration on the luminescence intensity of complex Yb-As (see Supplementary Materials for details). This further suggests that triplet states are not involved in energy relaxation in the investigated complexes.

2.3. Charge Transfer Studies

To elucidate the nature of the CT state, DR spectra for the complexes under discussion and Tb-P were obtained. Due to high redox potential of Tb3+ ions, ligand-to-metal CT (LMCT) cannot occur in Tb3+ complexes. As the DR spectra of Yb-P, Yb-As, and Tb-P qualitatively resemble each other, we find that the present state is not of an LMCT nature. Furthermore, we obtained the excitation spectra of Yb-As dissolved in MeCN with different concentrations. The CT-related excitation band at 400–500 nm continuously becomes less intense upon dilution. The absorption spectra in solvents with different polarizability were also measured (see Figure S15) with a concentration of ca. 10−5 M/L (see Supplementary Materials for details). We observed no presence of CT-related bands. This phenomenon suggests an intermolecular type of CT state, since it is dependent on the average distance between molecules. Thus, we conclude that this state is of an intermolecular CT nature. Presumably, the CT occurs from an electron-rich t-Bu fragment to the diketone moiety between two different molecules.
However, an additional band is observed in the DR spectrum of Yb-H in comparison with Tb-P, which suggests the presence of an additional LMCT state, namely in Yb-H. This is supported by an additional spectral band in the excitation spectrum of Yb-H compared to Yb-P and Yb-As. Generally, it is well known that an LMCT state can suppress the luminescence efficiency, which we observed (Φ of Yb-P is significantly lower than Φ of Yb-P and Yb-As) [22,47,48,49]. Supposedly, ancillary ligands—TPPO and TPAO—suppress the LMCT state, thus reducing the luminescence quenching.
To summarize, the intermolecular CT state is not an intermediate state, as is usually described in the literature [26], but rather sensitizes Yb3+ 2F5/2 instead of a non-participating ligand T1 state. As far as we know, this is the first reported case of such an intricate energy relaxation pathway in β-diketone Yb3+ compounds, which may be responsible for the top-rated Φ values of Yb-P and Yb-As.

3. Methods and Materials

3.1. Synthesis of 4-Benzoyl-2-(tert-butyl)-5-methyl-2,4-dihydro-3H-pyrazol-3-one

In this study, 2-(tert-Butyl)-5-methyl-2,4-dihydro-3H-pyrazol-3-one was obtained from tert-butylhydrazine hydrochloride and ethyl 3-oxobutanoate according to a known synthetic procedure [50]. The ligand HQtBu was synthesized according to a modified procedure, described earlier by Jensen [51] (Scheme 1). To a solution of 4.83 g (31.3 mmol) of 2-(tert-butyl)-5-methyl-2,4-dihydro-3H-pyrazol-3-one in 35 mL of dry 1,4-dioxane, 3.52 g (62.8 mmol) of CaO calcined at 1000 °C was added. Then, to the resulting mixture, 3.65 mL (31.3 mmol) of benzoyl chloride was added dropwise with stirring over 30 min. After addition, the yellow mixture was stirred at reflux with the protection of moisture (drying tube) for 4 h and cooled to room temperature. Then, a mixture of 19.5 mL (226.9 mmol) of concentrated HCl and 56.0 mL of H2O was added to the reaction mixture. The obtained mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and diluted with water (50 mL), transferred to a separatory funnel, and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with a saturated NaHCO3 solution (1 × 35 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated to give an orange oil. The resulting oil was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, eluent CH2Cl2). The yield was 3.52 g (44%) of light yellow crystals. Anal. Calc. for C15H18N2O2: C, 69.74; H, 7.02; N, 10.84%. Found: C, 69.85; H, 7.13; N, 10.97%.
1H NMR δ (ppm, 400 MHz, CDCl3): 7.61–7.42 (m, 5H, Ph), 1.96 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.63 (s, 9H, t-Bu) (Figure S1).
13C NMR δ (ppm, 101 MHz, CDCl3): 193.83, 160.80, 145.42, 138.93, 131.45, 128.39, 127.72, 103.24, 59.15, 28.67, 15.81 (Figure S2).
IR ν (cm−1): 3434 br, 3058 m, 2977 m, 2932 m, 2872 m, 1603 vs, 1567 vs, 1497 m, 1481 m, 1459 m, 1447 s, 1421 s, 1396 m, 1385 m, 1367 s, 1324 w, 1293 w, 1261 m, 1251 m, 1225 s, 1181 m, 1121 m, 1103 m, 1078 w, 1041 w, 1029 w, 1001 w, 967 m, 931 w, 854 w, 811 m, 799 m, 789 m, 751 m, 702 s, 670 w, 647 w, 613 w, 579 w, 528 w, 486 vw, 407 vw (Figure S3).

3.2. Synthesis of Complexes

Gd-H and Yb-H were synthesized according to the following procedure (Scheme 2): 0.200 mmol of lanthanide chloride or nitrate was dissolved in 1 mL of water in a centrifugation tube. Then, 0.800 mL of a NH3 solution (12 M) was added, after which the volume was adjusted to 2 mL with water, and it was centrifuged (8000 rpm, 2 min). The precipitate was carefully washed with water (8 × 2 mL) and added to a solution of 0.600 mmol of HQtBu in 3 mL of 96% ethanol. The mixture was stirred and refluxed for 5 min and left overnight. The precipitate was separated by vacuum filtration, washed with 2 mL of 96% ethanol, and dried over P4O10.
Complexes Tb-P, Yb-P, and Yb-As were obtained in a similar way; however, the obtained hydroxide was added to a solution of 0.600 mmol of HQtBu and 0.400 mmol TPPO or TPAO in 2 mL of DMF. The resulting mixture was also stirred and refluxed for 5 min and left. Precipitated crystals were separated by vacuum filtration and dried over P4O10 without washing.
The deuterated analog of Yb-H (Yb-D) was synthesized by keeping 50 mg of the dry complex in a mixture of 200 μL of methanol-d4 and 200 μL of D2O in a desiccator with CaCl2 for 24 h [31]. For more complete substitution, the deuteration procedure was repeated twice. Further determination of the properties of Yb-D, due to rapid isotopic exchange, was carried out without characterization.

3.2.1. [Gd(QtBu)3(H2O)] (Gd-H)

Yellow solid. Yield 68%. Anal. Calc. for C45H53N6O7Gd: C, 57.06; H, 5.64; N, 8.87%. Found: C, 56.92; H, 5.60; N, 8.96%. IR ν (cm−1): 3380 br, 3060 m, 2975 m, 2929 m, 2873 m, 1599 vs, 1575 s, 1501 s, 1479 s, 1435 s, 1394 m, 1366 m, 1348 m, 1260 w, 1227 m, 1187 w, 1173 w, 1158 w, 1100 m, 1076 w, 1029 w, 1000 w, 968 m, 924 w, 861 m, 805 m, 766 m, 726 w, 701 m, 666 m, 642 w, 623 m, 581 w, 536 w, 485 w, 431 w (Figure S4).

3.2.2. [Yb(QtBu)3(H2O)] (Yb-H)

Light yellow powder. Yield 57%. Anal. Calc. for C45H53N6O7Yb: C, 56.13; H, 5.55; N, 8.73%. Found: C, 55.94; H, 5.62; N, 8.81%. IR ν (cm−1): 3399 br, 3061 w, 2978 m, 2931 m, 1631 s, 1596 vs, 1575 s, 1502 s, 1481 vs, 1437 s, 1396 m, 1368 m, 1354 m, 1295 w, 1261 w, 1229 m, 1188 w, 1173 w, 1159 w, 1104 m, 1075 w, 1030 w, 1000 w, 970 m, 931 w, 863 m, 805 w, 789 w, 766 m, 727 w, 703 m, 669 w, 643 w, 625 m, 583 w, 541 w, 491 w, 436 w, 404 w (Figure S5).

3.2.3. [Tb(QtBu)3(TPPO)] (Tb-P)

Light yellow crystals. Yield 81%. Anal. Calc. for C63H66PN6O7Tb: C, 62.58; H, 5.50; N, 6.95%. Found: C, 62.63; H, 5.44; N, 7.05%. IR ν (cm−1): 3059 w, 2976 w, 2959 w, 2928 w, 2870 w, 1629 m, 1595 vs, 1575 s, 1527 m, 1500 s, 1479 s, 1461 m, 1436 s, 1393 m, 1368 m, 1350 m, 1260 w, 1231 m, 1164 m, 1122 m, 1099 m, 1074 w, 1029 w, 1000 w, 970 m, 926 vw, 862 w, 805 w, 768 m, 757 w, 726 m, 710 m, 695 m, 665 w, 642 vw, 624 m, 583 vw, 542 s, 491 vw, 467 w, 435 w (Figure S6).

3.2.4. [Yb(QtBu)3(TPPO)] (Yb-P)

Light yellow crystals. Yield 85%. Anal. Calc. for C63H66PN6O7Yb: C, 61.86; H, 5.44; N, 6.87%. Found: C, 61.99; H, 5.63; N, 6.76%. IR ν (cm−1): 3059 w, 2976 w, 2961 w, 2929 w, 2871 vw, 1631 m, 1597 vs, 1575 s, 1526 w, 1501 s, 1481 s, 1437 s, 1394 w, 1368 m, 1353 m, 1260 vw, 1231 m, 1168 m, 1122 m, 1102 m, 1074 vw, 1029 vw, 1000 w, 971 m, 926 vw, 862 w, 805 w, 768 m, 758 w, 750 w, 726 m, 708 w, 696 m, 667 w, 642 vw, 625 w, 584 vw, 542 m, 492 vw, 466 vw, 436 w (Figure S7).

3.2.5. [Yb(QtBu)3(TPAO)] (Yb-As)

Light yellow crystals. Yield 64%. Anal. Calc. for C63H66AsN6O7Yb: C, 59.71; H, 5.25; N, 6.63%. Found: C, 59.89; H, 5.37; N, 6.46%. IR ν (cm−1): 3059 w, 2976 w, 2960 w, 2928 w, 1631 m, 1597 vs, 1576 s, 1527 w, 1501 s, 1481 s, 1438 s, 1394 w, 1368 m, 1352 m, 1261 vw, 1232 m, 1186 vw, 1176 vw, 1160 vw, 1101 m, 1089 w, 1028 vw, 1000 w, 971 m, 923 w, 909 m, 883 vw, 862 w, 805 w, 768 m, 746 m, 726 w, 696 m, 666 w, 642 vw, 625 w, 583 vw, 538 w, 479 w, 472 w, 463 w, 436 vw (Figure S8).
The crystal phase purity of the obtained samples was confirmed by PXRD data recorded using a Tongda TD3700 diffractometer (Tongda, Dandong, China) (40 kV, 30 mA, CuKα radiation, linear PSD detector) operated in the Bragg–Brentano geometry.
Using Olex2 software package (version 1.5, OlexSys, Regensburg, Germany) [52], the structures were solved with the SHELXT (version SHELXT-2015, Sheldrick, G. M., Göttingen, Germany) [53] structure solution program and refined with the least-squares method against F2 in anisotropic approximation for non-hydrogen atoms [54]. All hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions and refined within riding model. Main crystallographic details and refinement parameters are listed in Table S1.
The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a 400 Mercury Plus Varian (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) spectrometer operating at room temperature.
CHN compositions were estimated with the Elementar Anlysensysteme GmbH “Vario Macro CHN/CHNS” (Elementar Anlysensysteme GmbH, Langenselbold, Germany).
IR spectra were recorded on an IR-Fourier spectrometer, the FT-IR Spectrum One, from PerkinElmer (PerkinElmer, Shelton, CT, USA) in KBr tablets of the 400–4000 cm–1 region with a resolution of 0.5 cm–1.
Luminescence spectra, luminescence excitation, and luminescence decays were recorded using a Horiba Jobin-Yvon Fluorolog QM-75-22-C spectrofluorimeter (HORIBA, Kyoto, Japan) using a 75 W xenon arc lamp (PowerArc, HORIBA, Kyoto, Japan). A Hamamatsu H10330C (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan) cooled photomultiplier tube sensitive in the NIR region (950–1700 nm) was used as the detector. The spectra were measured at room temperature for powdered samples placed in quartz ampoules with a diameter of 2 mm. For pulsed excitation at 380 nm, a laser system based on a Nd:YAG laser, LQ529B (Solar LS, Minsk, Belarus), with a repetition rate of 20 Hz and 10 ns pulse duration was used. The excitation wavelength was selected with an optical parametric oscillator (OPO), LP604 (Solar LS, Minsk, Belarus), pumped by the second harmonic (532 nm) of the LQ529B. Laser pulses were directed into the Fluorolog spectrofluorimeter’s sample compartment via a custom-designed adaptor. For all optical measurements, the corresponding instrument response functions were taken into account. The experiments were performed in air at atmospheric pressure. Degradation of the optical properties was not observed during the experiments.
The luminescence quantum yields in the visible region were obtained using an absolute method on a home-made setup with a MgO-covered integrating sphere (diameter of 180 mm) and an FD-10G calibrated germanium photodiode detector with a linear amplifier and millivoltmeter; a CW emitting LED (365 nm) was used as an excitation source. Each sample was measured five times under slightly different experimental conditions, and the results were averaged. The average error for the quantum yield measurements was ±15% of the estimated value.
For the transient absorption (TA) experiments, MeOH solutions of the complexes with an optical density of ca. 0.2 were prepared. To avoid photodegradation, solutions were poured into a 1-mm-thick rotating cell. TA spectra were measured on an ultrafast spectrometer based on an optical parametric amplifier (TOPAS, Light Conversion, Vilnius, Lithuania) pumped at 800 nm by a Ti–sapphire femtosecond regenerative amplifier (Spitfire HP, Spectra Physics, Milpitas, CA, USA). The TA measurements were performed with the optical excitation of the ligands in the complexes. For this purpose, laser pulses at 320 nm with a 1 kHz repetition rate and duration of about 100 fs were used. Part of the laser beam from the output of the regenerative amplifier was focused into a water cell to generate a white-light continuum for the broadband probing of the absorption changes. The instrument response function recorded for the MeOH solvent has a characteristic time scale of 300 fs. The threshold irradiation power density was measured by the COHERENT Field Max II (Coherent, Saxonburg, PA, USA).
CCDC 2377318, 2377319, and 2382780 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk (accessed on 14 July 2025) (or from the CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; Fax: +44-1223-336033; E-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).

4. Conclusions

Our investigation of Yb3+ coordination compounds has demonstrated notable advancements in luminescence quantum yields (Φ) through the introduction of ancillary ligands—specifically TPPO and TPAO—and the rational design of a diketonate ligand. The ancillary ligands facilitated the achievement of record-high Φ values of 6.5% for Yb-P and 7.0% for Yb-As in the solid state. This can be attributed to the unusual relaxation pathway, where the ligand triplet state is not involved in energy migration, but, rather, an intermolecular CT state with close to T1 energy is observed. The reported quantum yields for Yb3+ complexes with non-porphyrin ligands are the highest reported to date. It is important to note that the presented values were obtained for polycrystalline samples of complexes with non-deuterated and non-fluorinated diketonate ligands, which were readily available through a straightforward and cost-effective synthesis process.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26146814/s1. Reference [55] is cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

T.A.P.: Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review and Editing; D.D.S.: Investigation, Methodology, Visualization; V.M.K.: Investigation, Methodology, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review and Editing; V.E.G.: Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing—Original Draft; M.T.M.: Formal Analysis, Conceptualization, Methodology; N.P.D.: Investigation, Methodology; M.M.I.: Investigation; V.O.K.: Investigation, Methodology; S.V.C.: Supervision; Y.A.B.: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Supervision, Project Administration; I.V.T.: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Funding Acquisition, Supervision, Project Administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation under project N° 25-13-00399. V.O. Kompanets and S.V. Chekalin acknowledge the support of the Institute of Spectroscopy of the Russian Academy of Sciences for the maintenance of the ultrafast spectroscopy setup through the research project FFUU-2025-0006.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available upon reasonable request from the authors. CCDC 2377318, 2377319, and 2382780 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk (accessed on 14 July 2025) (or from the CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; Fax: +44-1223-336033; E-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support from the Lomonosov Moscow State University Program of Development for providing access to the single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Bruker D8 Quest), FT-IR (Spectrum One PerkinElmer), and PXRD (Tongda TD3700) equipment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ahmed, Z.; Aderne, R.E.; Kai, J.; Chavarria, H.I.P.; Cremona, M. Ytterbium β-Diketonate Complexes for near Infra-Red Organic Light-Emitting Devices. Thin Solid Film. 2016, 620, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ahmed, Z.; Aderne, R.E.; Kai, J.; Resende, J.A.L.C.; Cremona, M. Synthesis and NIR-Optoelectronic Properties of a Seven-Coordinate Ytterbium Tris β-Diketonate Complex with C3 Geometrical Structure. Polyhedron 2016, 117, 518–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bettencourt-Dias, A. Small Molecule Luminescent Lanthanide Ion Complexes—Photophysical Characterization and Recent Developments. Curr. Org. Chem. 2007, 11, 1460–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bhat, S.A.; Iftikhar, K. Synthesis and NIR Photoluminescence Studies of Novel Yb(III) Complexes of Asymmetric Perfluoryl β-Diketone. J. Lumin. 2019, 208, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Biju, S.; Raj, D.B.A.; Reddy, M.L.P.; Kariuki, B.M. Synthesis, Crystal Structure, and Luminescent Properties of Novel Eu3+ Heterocyclic β-Diketonate Complexes with Bidentate Nitrogen Donors. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 10651–10660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Borda, P.; Crease, A.E.; Legzdins, P. The Determination of Lanthanides in Organometallic Complexes by the Closed Oxygen Flask Method. Microchem. J. 1973, 18, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bünzli, J.-C.G. On the Design of Highly Luminescent Lanthanide Complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 293–294, 19–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bünzli, J.G. Rising Stars in Science and Technology: Luminescent Lanthanide Materials. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 2017, 5058–5063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Metlin, M.T.; Goryachii, D.O.; Aminev, D.F.; Datskevich, N.P.; Korshunov, V.M.; Metlina, D.A.; Pavlov, A.A.; Mikhalchenko, L.V.; Kiskin, M.A.; Garaeva, V.V.; et al. Bright Yb3+ Complexes for Efficient Pure Near-Infrared OLEDs. Dye. Pigment. 2021, 195, 109701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abad Galán, L.; Wada, S.; Cameron, L.; Sobolev, A.N.; Hasegawa, Y.; Zysman-Colman, E.; Ogden, M.I.; Massi, M. Photophysical Investigation of Near Infrared Emitting Lanthanoid Complexes Incorporating Tris(2-Naphthoyl)Methane as a New Antenna Ligand. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 3768–3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Tsvirko, M.P.; Meshkova, S.B.; Venchikov, V.Y.; Topilova, Z.M.; Bol’shoi, D.V. Determination of Contributions of Various Molecular Groups to Nonradiative Deactivation of Electronic Excitation Energy in β-Diketonate Complexes of Ytterbium(III). Opt. Spectrosc. 2001, 90, 669–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mara, D.; Artizzu, F.; Smet, P.F.; Kaczmarek, A.M.; Van Hecke, K.; Van Deun, R. Vibrational Quenching in Near-Infrared Emitting Lanthanide Complexes: A Quantitative Experimental Study and Novel Insights. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 15944–15956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ning, Y.; Ke, X.-S.; Hu, J.-Y.; Liu, Y.-W.; Ma, F.; Sun, H.-L.; Zhang, J.-L. Bioinspired Orientation of β-Substituents on Porphyrin Antenna Ligands Switches Ytterbium(III) NIR Emission with Thermosensitivity. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 1897–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ning, Y.; Tang, J.; Liu, Y.-W.; Jing, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, J.-L. Highly Luminescent, Biocompatible Ytterbium(III) Complexes as near-Infrared Fluorophores for Living Cell Imaging. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 3742–3753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hu, J.-Y.; Ning, Y.; Meng, Y.-S.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Z.-Y.; Gao, S.; Zhang, J.-L. Highly Near-IR Emissive Ytterbium(III) Complexes with Unprecedented Quantum Yields. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 2702–2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kokozay, V.N.; Vassilyeva, O.Y.; Makhankova, V.G. Direct Synthesis of Heterometallic Complexes. In Direct Synthesis of Metal Complexes; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 183–237. ISBN 978-0-12-811061-4. [Google Scholar]
  17. Femoni, C.; Iapalucci, M.C.; Ruggieri, S.; Zacchini, S. From Mononuclear Complexes to Molecular Nanoparticles: The Buildup of Atomically Precise Heterometallic Rhodium Carbonyl Nanoclusters. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 2748–2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cameron, L.J. Shedding Light on the Structural and Luminescent Properties of Lanthanoid β-Triketonate Complexes. Master’s Thesis, Curtin University, Perth, Australia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, N.; Li, Y.; Wu, X.; Zhu, C.; Xie, J. Radical Deuteration. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 6291–6306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Fujii, T.; Kitagawa, Y.; Hasegawa, Y.; Imoto, H.; Naka, K. Drastic Enhancement of Photosensitized Energy Transfer Efficiency of a Eu(III) Complex Driven by Arsenic. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 8605–8612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Korshunov, V.M.; Metlina, D.A.; Kompanets, V.O.; Melnikov, A.A.; Freire, R.O.; Silva, G.S.; Chekalin, S.V.; Taydakov, I.V. Ultrafast Dynamics and Relaxation Pathways in Eu(III) Complexes with Fluorinated-Diketonate Ligands. Dye. Pigment. 2023, 218, 111474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Belousov, Y.A.; Metlin, M.T.; Metlina, D.A.; Kiskin, M.A.; Yakushev, I.A.; Polikovskiy, T.A.; Taydakov, I.V.; Drozdov, A.A.; Marchetti, F.; Pettinari, C. Self-Assembly of a Two-Dimensional Coordination Polymer Based on Silver and Lanthanide Tetrakis-Acylpyrazolonates: An Efficient New Strategy for Suppressing Ligand-to-Metal Charge Transfer Quenching of Europium Luminescence. Polymers 2023, 15, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Avagyan, N.A.; Lemport, P.S.; Polikovskiy, T.A.; Tsorieva, A.V.; Metlin, M.T.; Taydakov, I.V.; Zonov, R.V.; Lyssenko, K.A.; Vokuev, M.F.; Rodin, I.A.; et al. Large Energy Gap between Singlet and Triplet States Is No Longer a Problem: Intermediate Charge Transfer State Boosts Overall Quantum Yield up to 67% in Eu3+ Complexes. Rare Met. 2025, 44, 4279–4293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Avagyan, N.A.; Lemport, P.S.; Polikovskiy, T.A.; Tsorieva, A.V.; Metlin, M.T.; Taydakov, I.V.; Zonov, R.V.; Lyssenko, K.A.; Vokuev, M.F.; Rodin, I.A.; et al. 4,7-Substituted 1,10-Phenanthroline-2,9-Dicarboxamides: Photophysics of Ligands and Their Complexes with the Eu–Gd–Tb Triad. Dalton Trans. 2024, 53, 14469–14480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Faustino, W.M.; Malta, O.L.; De Sá, G.F. Intramolecular Energy Transfer through Charge Transfer State in Lanthanide Compounds: A Theoretical Approach. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 054109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kasprzycka, E.; Carneiro Neto, A.N.; Trush, V.A.; Malta, O.L.; Jerzykiewicz, L.; Amirkhanov, V.M.; Legendziewicz, J.; Gawryszewska, P. Spectroscopic Aspects for the Yb3+ Coordination Compound with a Large Energy Gap between the Ligand and Yb3+ Excited States. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2022, 274, 121072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Marchetti, F.; Pettinari, C.; Pettinari, R. Acylpyrazolone Ligands: Synthesis, Structures, Metal Coordination Chemistry and Applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005, 249, 2909–2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Belousov, Y.A.; Drozdov, A.A. Lanthanide Acylpyrazolonates: Synthesis, Properties and Structural Features. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2012, 81, 1159–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, Z.; Bian, M.; Lin, C.; Fu, X.; Yu, G.; Wei, H.; Liu, Z.; Bian, Z.; Huang, C. Efficient Green OLEDs Achieved by a Terbium(III) Complex with Photoluminescent Quantum Yield Close to 100%. Sci. China Chem. 2021, 64, 1504–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Girotto, E.; Pereira, A.; Arantes, C.; Cremona, M.; Bortoluzzi, A.J.; Salla, C.A.M.; Bechtold, I.H.; Gallardo, H. Efficient Terbium Complex Based on a Novel Pyrazolone Derivative Ligand Used in Solution-Processed OLEDs. J. Lumin. 2019, 208, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Belousov, Y.A.; Korshunov, V.M.; Metlin, M.T.; Metlina, D.A.; Kiskin, M.A.; Aminev, D.F.; Datskevich, N.P.; Drozdov, A.A.; Pettinari, C.; Marchetti, F.; et al. Towards Bright Dysprosium Emitters: Single and Combined Effects of Environmental Symmetry, Deuteration, and Gadolinium Dilution. Dye. Pigment. 2022, 199, 110078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, X.-L.; Li, J.; Zhu, C.; Han, B.; Liu, Y.; Yin, Z.; Li, F.; Liu, C.-M. An Intense Luminescent Dy(III) Single-Ion Magnet with the Acylpyrazolonate Ligand Showing Two Slow Magnetic Relaxation Processes. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 16992–16998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shi, M.; Li, F.; Yi, T.; Zhang, D.; Hu, H.; Huang, C. Tuning the Triplet Energy Levels of Pyrazolone Ligands to Match the 5D0 Level of Europium(III). Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 8929–8936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhou, D.; Li, Q.; Huang, C.; Yao, G.; Umetani, S.; Matsui, M.; Ying, L.; Yu, A.; Zhao, X. Room-Temperature Fluorescence, Phosphorescence and Crystal Structures of 4-Acyl Pyrazolone Lanthanide Complexes: Ln(L)3·2H2O. Polyhedron 1997, 16, 1381–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Taydakov, I.V.; Belousov, Y.A.; Lyssenko, K.A.; Varaksina, E.; Drozdov, A.A.; Marchetti, F.; Pettinari, R.; Pettinari, C. Synthesis, Phosphorescence and Luminescence Properties of Novel Europium and Gadolinium Tris-Acylpyrazolonate Complexes. Inorganica Chim. Acta 2020, 502, 119279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Polikovskiy, T.; Korshunov, V.; Gontcharenko, V.; Kiskin, M.; Belousov, Y.; Pettinari, C.; Taydakov, I. Dynamics of the Ligand Excited States Relaxation in Novel β-Diketonates of Non-Luminescent Trivalent Metal Ions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Belousov, Y.A.; Drozdov, A.A.; Shikin, D.D.; Tombesi, A.; Pettinari, R.; Marchetti, F.; Pettinari, C. Rare Earth Acylpyrazolonates-Synthesis, Structure, Luminescent Properties and Applications. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2025, 28, e202400568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Puntus, L.N.; Lyssenko, K.A.; Pekareva, I.S.; Bünzli, J.-C.G. Intermolecular Interactions as Actors in Energy-Transfer Processes in Lanthanide Complexes with 2,2′-Bipyridine. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 9265–9277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ahmed, Z.; Mahiya, K.; Iftikhar, K. Structures and Pure Near-Infrared Photophysics of Erbium and Ytterbium(III) Complexes Incorporating Fluorinated β-Diketone and Neutral Unidentate Ligands. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 13172–13181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ahmed, Z.; Iftikhar, K. Sensitization of Visible and NIR Emitting Lanthanide(III) Ions in Noncentrosymmetric Complexes of Hexafluoroacetylacetone and Unsubstituted Monodentate Pyrazole. J. Phys. Chem. A 2013, 117, 11183–11201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Jinnai, K.; Kabe, R.; Adachi, C. A Near-Infrared Organic Light-Emitting Diode Based on an Yb(III) Complex Synthesized by Vacuum Co-Deposition. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 5457–5460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Aebischer, A.; Gumy, F.; Bünzli, J.-C.G. Intrinsic Quantum Yields and Radiative Lifetimes of Lanthanide Tris(Dipicolinates). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Congiu, M.; Alamiry, M.; Moudam, O.; Ciorba, S.; Richardson, P.R.; Maron, L.; Jones, A.C.; Richards, B.S.; Robertson, N. Preparation and Photophysical Studies of [Ln(Hfac)3DPEPO], Ln = Eu, Tb, Yb, Nd, Gd; Interpretation of Total Photoluminescence Quantum Yields. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 13537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Shavaleev, N.M.; Scopelliti, R.; Gumy, F.; Bünzli, J.-C.G. Surprisingly Bright Near-Infrared Luminescence and Short Radiative Lifetimes of Ytterbium in Hetero-Binuclear Yb−Na Chelates. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 7937–7946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Deiters, E.; Gumy, F.; Bünzli, J.G. Acridone-Benzimidazole Ring-Fused Ligands: A New Class of Sensitizers of Lanthanide Luminescence via Low-Energy Excitation. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 2010, 2723–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tsorieva, A.V.; Korshunov, V.M.; Metlin, M.T.; Vlasova, T.S.; Gontcharenko, V.E.; Metlina, D.A.; Kompanets, V.O.; Chekalin, S.V.; Taydakov, I.V. Halogenated Dibenzoylmethane Eu3+ Complexes as Spectroscopic Markers: A Pioneering Photobleaching Strategy for Counterfeit Applications and Controlling Luminescence Efficiency. Mater. Chem. Front. 2025, 9, 809–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tsaryuk, V.I.; Zhuravlev, K.P. Role of LMCT States in Luminescence Excitation Processes in Europium Indolecarboxylates. Opt. Spectrosc. 2023, 131, 1103–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Faustino, W.M.; Malta, O.L.; Teotonio, E.E.S.; Brito, H.F.; Simas, A.M.; De Sá, G.F. Photoluminescence of Europium(III) Dithiocarbamate Complexes: Electronic Structure, Charge Transfer and Energy Transfer. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 2510–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. De Mello DonegÁ, C.; Ribeiro, S.J.L.; Gon Çalves, R.R.; Blasse, G. Luminescence and Non-Radiative Processes in Lanthanide Squarate Hydrates. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1996, 57, 1727–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Phelan, J.P.; Ellman, J.A. Catalytic Enantioselective Addition of Pyrazol-5-ones to Trisubstituted Nitroalkenes with an N-Sulfinylurea Organocatalyst. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 1713–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jensen, B.S.; Meier, H.; Lundquist, K.; Refn, S. The Synthesis of 1-Phenyl-3-Methyl-4-Acyl-Pyrazolones-5. Acta Chem. Scand. 1959, 13, 1668–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A Complete Structure Solution, Refinement and Analysis Program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT–Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. A Found. Adv. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. C Struct. Chem. 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhang, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Li, H.; Gao, T.; Yan, P. Visible Light Sensitized Near-Infrared Luminescence of Ytterbium via ILCT States in Quadruple-Stranded Helicates. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 4026–4034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 26 06814 g001
Figure 1. (a) Chemical structures of the complexes. (b) General view of the molecular structures of Tb-P, Yb-P, and Yb-As. Thermal ellipsoids of atomic displacement are at 50% probability. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.
Figure 1. (a) Chemical structures of the complexes. (b) General view of the molecular structures of Tb-P, Yb-P, and Yb-As. Thermal ellipsoids of atomic displacement are at 50% probability. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.
Ijms 26 06814 g001
Ijms 26 06814 g002
Figure 2. (a) UV–Vis spectra, (b) diffuse reflectance (DR), and (c) luminescence excitation (λem = 977 nm) spectra. (d) PL spectra recorded upon λexc = 360 nm at 77 K.
Figure 2. (a) UV–Vis spectra, (b) diffuse reflectance (DR), and (c) luminescence excitation (λem = 977 nm) spectra. (d) PL spectra recorded upon λexc = 360 nm at 77 K.
Ijms 26 06814 g002
Ijms 26 06814 g003
Figure 3. fs-TA counter map plot (A), TA kinetic traces at selected wavelengths (B), and TA spectra (C) measured for [Yb(QtBu)3(TPAO)].
Figure 3. fs-TA counter map plot (A), TA kinetic traces at selected wavelengths (B), and TA spectra (C) measured for [Yb(QtBu)3(TPAO)].
Ijms 26 06814 g003
Ijms 26 06814 g004
Figure 4. (left) Energy level diagram with possible electronic transitions for Yb3+ complexes. (right) Excitation spectra of Yb-As dissolved in MeCN at different concentrations and in solid state.
Figure 4. (left) Energy level diagram with possible electronic transitions for Yb3+ complexes. (right) Excitation spectra of Yb-As dissolved in MeCN at different concentrations and in solid state.
Ijms 26 06814 g004
Ijms 26 06814 sch001
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 4-benzoyl-2-(tert-butyl)-5-methyl-2,4-dihydro-3H-pyrazol-3-one.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 4-benzoyl-2-(tert-butyl)-5-methyl-2,4-dihydro-3H-pyrazol-3-one.
Ijms 26 06814 sch001
Ijms 26 06814 sch002
Scheme 2. Preparation of complexes.
Scheme 2. Preparation of complexes.
Ijms 26 06814 sch002
Table 1. Comparison of the best photophysical results for Yb3+ complexes.
Table 1. Comparison of the best photophysical results for Yb3+ complexes.
CompoundMediumτobs, μsΦ, %Reference
[Yb(QtBu)3(TPAO)]Powder357.0 aThis work
[Yb(QtBu)3(TPPO)]316.5 a
[Yb(tta)3(dpso)]·H2OCHCl3–2.40 b[1]
[Yb(tta)3(dbso)]·H2O1.41 b
[Yb(tta)3(bga)]·H2O1.33 b
[Yb(tta)3(TPPO)]·H2OCHCl3–1.92 b[2]
Na[YbL4]PowderRadiative lifetime (930 μs)1.3 a[26]
[Yb(hfaa)3(Hind)2]Powder13.40.55 a[39]
[Yb(hfaa)3(pz)2]CHCl3473.1 b[40]
Yb(DBM)3
(DPEPO)		Anhydrous DMSO42.60.4 b[41]
Na3[Yb(dpa)3]Tris-HCl2.231.5 b[42]
[Yb(hfac)3DPEPO]CH2Cl2222 a[43]
[NaYb(Lq)4]·H2OPowder193.1 a[44]
[NaYb(LqF)4]203.3 a
[NaYb(LqMe)4]223.7 a
[Yb(LAB2)3]Powder
CHCl3/MeOH		24.8
16.5		1.6 a
1.1 a		[45]
a—measured by absolute method. b—measured by relative method. QtBu—2-(tert-Butyl)-5-methyl-2,4-dihydro-3H-pyrazol-3-one; tta—thenoyltrifluoroacetone; dpso—diphenylsulfoxide; dbso—dibenzoylsulfoxide; bga—benzoguinamine; L—dimethyl(4-methylphenylsulfonyl)amidophosphate; hfaa—hexafluoroacetylacetone anion; Hind—indazole; pz—unsubstituted monodentate heterocyclic amine pyrazole; DBM—dibenzoylmethane; DPEPO—bis[2-(diphenylphosphino)phenyl]ether oxide; dpa—dipicolinic acid; hfac—hexafluoroacetylacetonate; Lq, LqF, LqMe—benzoxazole-substituted 8-hydroxyquinolines; LAB2—6-(3,5-dimethyl-10-oxo-5,10-dihydro-3H-imidazo[4,5-b]acridin-2-yl)-4-{2-[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethoxy}pyridine-2-carboxylic acid.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Polikovskiy, T.A.; Shikin, D.D.; Korshunov, V.M.; Gontcharenko, V.E.; Metlin, M.T.; Datskevich, N.P.; Islamov, M.M.; Kompanets, V.O.; Chekalin, S.V.; Belousov, Y.A.; et al. Intermolecular Charge Transfer Induced Sensitization of Yb3+ in β-Diketone Coordination Compounds with Excellent Luminescence Efficiency. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 6814. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146814

AMA Style

Polikovskiy TA, Shikin DD, Korshunov VM, Gontcharenko VE, Metlin MT, Datskevich NP, Islamov MM, Kompanets VO, Chekalin SV, Belousov YA, et al. Intermolecular Charge Transfer Induced Sensitization of Yb3+ in β-Diketone Coordination Compounds with Excellent Luminescence Efficiency. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(14):6814. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146814

Chicago/Turabian Style

Polikovskiy, Trofim A., Daniil D. Shikin, Vladislav M. Korshunov, Victoria E. Gontcharenko, Mikhail T. Metlin, Nikolay P. Datskevich, Marat M. Islamov, Victor O. Kompanets, Sergey V. Chekalin, Yuriy A. Belousov, and et al. 2025. "Intermolecular Charge Transfer Induced Sensitization of Yb3+ in β-Diketone Coordination Compounds with Excellent Luminescence Efficiency" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 14: 6814. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146814

APA Style

Polikovskiy, T. A., Shikin, D. D., Korshunov, V. M., Gontcharenko, V. E., Metlin, M. T., Datskevich, N. P., Islamov, M. M., Kompanets, V. O., Chekalin, S. V., Belousov, Y. A., & Taydakov, I. V. (2025). Intermolecular Charge Transfer Induced Sensitization of Yb3+ in β-Diketone Coordination Compounds with Excellent Luminescence Efficiency. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(14), 6814. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146814

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop