Next Article in Journal
Clinical and Biochemical Characterization of Hereditary ATTR Amyloidosis Caused by a Novel Transthyretin Variant V121A (p.V141A)
Previous Article in Journal
Computational Search for Inhibitors of SOD1 Mutant Infectivity as Potential Therapeutics for ALS Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
Agronomic and Metabolic Responses of Citrus clementina to Long-Term Irrigation with Saline Reclaimed Water as Abiotic Factor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

The Nitro-Oxidative Response Is Induced in the Leaves of Barley Plants Exposed to Barium

Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(10), 4661; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26104661
Submission received: 13 April 2025 / Revised: 6 May 2025 / Accepted: 10 May 2025 / Published: 13 May 2025

Abstract

:
Barium (Ba) is classified as a non-essential element, meaning that it does not play a requisite role in the physiological processes of living organisms, but it poses a significant health risk to them. Plants that grow in Ba-rich soils, particularly near barite outcrops or mining waste, often accumulate high levels of Ba. Excess Ba in plant cells can lead to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which contributes to oxidative stress. Typically, nitric oxide (NO) can help alleviate heavy metal stress; however, under certain conditions, elevated levels of superoxide and nitric oxide may result in nitrosative and nitrative stress. This study investigated whether exposing barley plants to barium acetate (300 μM and 600 μM) triggers a nitro-oxidative response in spring barley plants. The molecular and biochemical analyses revealed fluctuations in the gene expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes and a steady rise in hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in the leaves. Lower Ba concentrations and shorter exposures increased NO levels, while higher concentrations and more prolonged exposure reduced them, affecting nitrogen metabolism. These findings highlight the toxicological risks posed by Ba, especially for cultivated plants, and underscore the need for further research on its impact on plant physiology and the potential risks to human health.

1. Introduction

Barium (Ba) is a dense alkaline earth metal that shares similarities with calcium and magnesium [1,2]. Despite its metallic properties, Ba is deemed non-essential for living organisms and presents significant health risks [3]. Barium can pose a challenge to plants and animals. Although the impact of Ba on human health has been partially studied, its effects on plants are much less well-known.
Exposure to Ba can result in a range of harmful effects on humans, particularly impacting the cardiovascular and renal systems. Health issues linked to Ba exposure may include cardiac arrhythmia, acute hypertension, and kidney dysfunction, such as hypokalemia, as well as gastrointestinal disturbances. In severe cases, Ba exposure can lead to neurological disorders and, ultimately, may even be fatal. Research indicates that Ba has the potential to induce oncogenic changes in human cells and to amplify the carcinogenic effects of arsenic [4,5,6,7,8]. Additionally, Ba exposure can disrupt the delicate equilibrium between pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic signaling pathways, thereby hindering the apoptosis of cancerous cells [9,10].
In addition to being a health hazard, Ba also has a negative effect on plant growth and development. The risk of plant exposure to Ba is increased by industrial activities, primarily the mining and refining of Ba ore and the production of Ba salts [2]. Over the past fifty years, Ba compounds have been extensively utilized across various industrial and medical sectors, such as the petroleum and steel industries, as well as gastrointestinal radiography [7]. Furthermore, Ba is utilized in the production of industrial soaps, explosives, fire extinguishers, drilling fluids, and insecticides; therefore, the area potentially exposed to Ba contamination is quite large.
Plants growing in soils with high Ba content, particularly in areas near barite (BaSO4) outcrops or mine spoils, can themselves exhibit elevated levels of Ba [1]. Studies have shown that the concentration of Ba in the aboveground tissues of these plants can match or even surpass that found in their root systems [11]. Interestingly, some plant species, like Indigofera cordifolia, have demonstrated remarkable resilience to elevated levels of trace metal elements, enabling them to thrive in environments adversely affected by barite, although they accumulated high Ba contents [12]. Moreover, the increasing intensity of atmospheric phenomena linked to climate change, such as powerful winds and heavy rainfall, could transport Ba particles into neighboring agricultural areas, thereby being a risk factor for crops. This concern remains insufficiently examined, and there is a significant gap in the research in regard to addressing the effects of Ba exposure on crops, especially in those crops that are important from the point of view of food and feed security. Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), one of the first domesticated crops, ranks fourth in the world in terms of crop production, after wheat, rice, and maize. It is cultivated worldwide in many countries and regions, mainly in temperate climates in both the northern and southern hemispheres [13]. Europe is estimated to account for about 65% of world barley production. Barley was originally used as a food for humans and, later, with the increasing use of wheat in the human diet, barley came to be used as animal feed, as well as a key crop for malting [14]. It is noteworthy that because barley is a diploid, it is also an important model plant for research on the molecular aspects, biochemistry, and developmental biology of cereals [15].
Exposure to Ba and its accumulation in plant cells beyond a specific threshold can lead to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Similarly, under normal cell conditions, nitric oxide (NO) concentrations are typically in the nanomolar range, serving as a sink for superoxide and mitigating oxidative stress. However, in certain pathological conditions, both superoxide and NO concentration levels can rise, resulting in nitrosative and nitrative stress, which often precedes oxidative stress. When superoxide levels equal or exceed those of NO, oxidative stress occurs. Hence, the co-occurrence of nitrosative and oxidative stress, and their undoubted interaction prompted some scientists to formulate the new term: “nitro-oxidative” stress [16]. Based on our previous findings indicating significant redox disturbances in plants subjected to various environmental stresses, we formulated a research hypothesis that the exposure of barley plants to elevated Ba concentrations triggers a nitro-oxidative response. We want to stress the importance of this study to researchers of plant stress biology, particularly those focused on redox mechanisms. The proposed integrated approach could uncover previously unknown mechanisms that drive responses to redox imbalances caused by various environmental challenges, significantly advancing our understanding of these complex processes.

2. Results and Discussion

The expression of genes that encode antioxidant enzymes, namely SOD, CAT, and APX, was changed by the Ba treatment and was lower than in the control for the first 48 h of treatment. SOD expression (Figure 1A) in the 300 µM Ba treatment initially decreased abruptly after 24 h of treatment and then increased gradually to reach a level higher than the control after 72 h, although this finding was not statistically significant. The opposite trends were observed in the 600 µM Ba treatment, where a greater decrease in SOD expression was observed with time, reaching the lowest value after 72 h of treatment. The changes in SOD activity (Figure 1B) showed similar trends. Although the decrease in SOD activity with the 300 µM Ba treatment was noticeable only after 48 h, it was probably due to slow enzyme degradation, while its synthesis was inhibited [17]. However, at 72 h, the SOD activity increased by more than 80% compared to the control, which corresponded to its high expression at this time point. Higher Ba concentrations caused a faster decrease in SOD activity, which was already visible after 24 h. The lower SOD activity due to the 600 µM Ba treatment was maintained throughout the experiment, reaching a minimum level at 72 h, which was about 40% lower than the control.
CAT expression (Figure 1C) was lower than in the control for both treatments for the first 48 h, then increased significantly after 72 h of treatment, reaching a value twice as high as the control. However, the CAT activity did not fluctuate as much (Figure 1D). For the 300 µM Ba treatment, the CAT activity was the highest after 24 h, then it decreased, but it remained 11–18% higher than in the control, although these differences were not statistically significant. For the 600 µM Ba treatment, a steady increase in CAT activity was observed for 48 h (after 24 h by 25%, after 48 h by 46%), while after 72 h, despite the increase in expression, there was a decrease in activity, which remained slightly higher than the control, although the difference was not significant.
The APX expression (Figure 1E) in the treatment with 300 µM Ba gradually decreased for the first 48 h, reaching the lowest value at 48 h. In the treatment with 600 µM Ba, a more rapid decrease in relative expression was observed, which remained at a constant level for 48 h. On the third day, the level of relative APX expression in both treatments returned to a level similar to the control. The changes in APX activity showed similar trends to the expression changes, but they were much milder (Figure 1F). At 24 h, at both Ba concentrations, the APX activity was reduced by about 12%. At 48 h, the APX activity at a concentration of 300 µM Ba decreased by 34%, while at 600 µM Ba it increased to the control values. After 72 h, the APX activity at both Ba concentrations was comparable and about 31–34% higher than in the control; however, the change was not significant.
The literature on the effect of Ba on redox homeostasis in plants is very limited. The results obtained so far mainly concern the study of antioxidant enzyme activity. It was observed that the activity of antioxidant enzymes in cucumber and soybean plants changed under the influence of Ba. The CAT activity increased in old leaves and the stems of cucumber plants [18]. Similar results were obtained in soybean plants, where the CAT activity increased under the influence of long-term Ba stress [19]. In our experiment, we observed an increase in CAT activity; however, the high expression combined with relatively low activity of CAT at 72 h may be linked to the structural misfolding of the enzyme due to its interaction with Ba. This phenomenon is similar to what has been observed with cadmium (Cd) [20]. In turn, in regard to Ba treatment, the APX activity increased in cucumber stems and roots, but a decrease in the activity of this enzyme was observed in young and old leaves [18]. It seems that in barley, the APX activity after treatment with heavy metals depends on the metal concentration, as well as on the resistance of the cultivar and the plant’s growth phase. In the Tombari cultivar, the APX activity remained at the same level at both cadmium concentrations of 15 and 30 mg/kg [21]. Similarly, in the study on four cultivars of spring barley (Simfoniya, Mestnyj, Ca 220702, Malva) in most of them no significant differences in the APX activity in response to Cd were demonstrated [22].
An increase in the total SOD activity was observed in soybean plants in response to Ba exposure in the soil [19]. The dependence of SOD activity on the concentration of heavy metals was also demonstrated in barley treated with Cd. Lower doses caused no changes or a slight increase in the activity of this enzyme, while at high doses the inhibition of SOD activity was observed [23]. Similarly, in our studies, longer exposure to higher concentrations of Ba resulted in a decrease in SOD activity, while at lower concentrations, after 72 h, there was a significant increase in SOD activity.
It has been shown that ROS are generated in response to transition heavy metals via direct electron transfer; however, Ba is not one of them. Heavy metals can also disrupt redox homeostasis, which is caused by their interaction with functional groups of membrane proteins, as well as by substituting central metals in enzymes, which can lead to electron leakage. Furthermore, heavy metals can cause the inactivation of some antioxidant enzymes or the lowering of the concentration of low-molecular-weight antioxidants (e.g., glutathione, used for the synthesis of phytochelatins) [24].
The content of H2O2, which is a marker of ROS content, increased as a result of Ba treatment (Figure 1G). The content of H2O2 increased over time and, at each measurement point, was higher in the treatment with 600 µM Ba than in the 300 µM Ba treatment. Compared to the control, after 72 h, the H2O2 content increased more than 18 times in regard to the lower dose of Ba and more than 22 times in regard to the higher dose. Different results were observed for lipid peroxidation, indicating damage to biological membranes (Figure 1H). The concentration of 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) remained at a level similar to the control for the first 48 h of treatment and then decreased by approximately 18–19% in 72 h. No differences were observed between the treatments.
Previous studies have shown an increase in H2O2 content under the influence of Ba treatment in Panicum maximum [25], as well as under the influence of other metals, e.g., Cd in grasses [26,27]. However, increased ROS content does not always generate oxidative damage, such as lipid peroxidation, which was observed not only in barley, but also in soybean leaves, under the influence of Ba [19]. It appears that the applied concentrations of Ba induced a response associated with antioxidant mechanisms, such as an increase in the expression of genes encoding CAT and APX, which enabled the plants to effectively protect their cellular structures from excess ROS concentrations.
Nitrogen uptake and assimilation are key processes influencing plant metabolism, thus controlling plant growth and development, as well as the adaptation to stress conditions. It has been shown that both N uptake and assimilation can be impaired by a high concentration of heavy metals in the soil [28]. Nitrite and ammonium ions are the main sources of nitrogen for plants, as they are essential for various metabolic pathways. The conversion of NO3 to NH4+ is a two-step process. In the first step, NO3 is converted to NO2 by cytosolic nitrate reductase (NR) and, in the next step, NO2 is converted to NH4+ by plastidial nitrite reductase (NiR) [29].
The relative expression of NR fluctuated for 48 h, but the changes were not statistically significant (Figure 2A). At 24 h, an upward trend could be observed, followed by a decrease at 48 h, and then an increase in relative expression was observed again at 72 h. In the 300 µM Ba treatment, the expression level was comparable to the control after 72 h and, in the 600 µM Ba treatment, it was about 50% higher than the control, and the increase was statistically significant. The changes in NiR expression were far greater (Figure 2B). The relative expression of NiR reached negative values for all the treatments, reaching a minimum level after 48 h in the 600 µM Ba treatment. The expression of NiR was lower at the same time points in the treatment containing a higher concentration of Ba.
The analyses conducted so far have shown that heavy metals cause a decrease in NR activity in various plant species. In studies conducted on Vigna trilobata, wherein the effect of Ba on NR activity was examined, a decrease was also observed, although it was not very significant [30]. The mechanism by which enzymatic activity is inhibited can vary. For example, under Al toxicity, the inhibition occurs due to Al’s direct interaction with the functional -SH groups in the active sites of NR. In the presence of Cd or Cr, the inhibition of NR results from changes in chlorophyll biosynthesis, photosynthesis, and sugar metabolism [31,32,33]. It should be noted that the relatively small differences in the expression of the gene encoding NR observed in our work do not necessarily directly translate into changes in the activity of this enzyme. Moreover, the activity of NR may also be inhibited by the abovementioned mechanisms. Studies on the effect of heavy metals on NiR activity are very limited, since NiR has less impact on N assimilation. NiR is located in chloroplasts; therefore, heavy metals have less access to NiR than to cytosolic NR [28]. A decrease in NiR activity is observed in connection with the occurrence of heavy metals, e.g., in wheat seedlings under the influence of As [34]. It was indicated that the reduced NiR activity is the result of the reduced expression of genes encoding this enzyme rather than modifications in protein activity.
In response to Ba, the content of individual nitrogen forms also changed. The content of NO3 ions decreased as a result of Ba treatment (Figure 2C). After 24 h, the decrease was similar for both BA concentrations and reached about 75% of the level in the control. In the treatment with 300 µM of Ba, a reduced level was maintained throughout the experiment, while in the treatment with a concentration of 600 µM Ba, after 48 h, an increase in the content of nitrate ions was observed that reached almost 70% of the control level, which decreased again in 72 h. Different trends were noted for NO2 ions (Figure 2D). As a result of the treatment with 300 µM Ba, the content of NO2 ions increased significantly after 48 h and remained at a similar level for 72 h. In the treatment with 600 µM of Ba, an increase in the content of NO2 ions was observed after 24 h, after which the content of these ions decreased to a level similar to the control and increased again for 72 h. The content of NH4+ ions also changed over time in response to the treatment with Ba (Figure 2E). For the treatment with a concentration of 300 µM Ba, changes analogous to those in regard to the level of NO2 ions were observed, i.e., an increase in 48 h, which was maintained until the end of the experiment. As a result of the exposure to the treatment with 600 µM of Ba, increasing trends were observed after 24 h, but they were not statistically significant. A clear increase was observed after 48 h, and it was maintained until the end of the experiment. There were no differences in the NH4+ levels between the different Ba concentrations at 48 h and 72 h. There were also changes in the NO content (Figure 2F), which were dependent on the Ba concentration and duration of the treatment. For the treatment with a concentration of 300 µM Ba, an increase in the NO content of over 30% was observed, which was maintained for 48 h, after which it decreased to the control level. As a result of the application of the 600 µM Ba treatment, an increase in NO content by 40% was observed after 24 h, a decrease after 48 h to the control level, and a further, but smaller, increase by 17% was recorded compared to the control after 72 h of treatment.
The NO3 content varies under the influence of heavy metals. In rice treated with Ni, similar effects to those observed in our experiment with Ba were noted, where the NO3 content decreased and the NH4+ content increased [35]. Similar changes were also observed in other plant species [36], for example in Triticum aestivum [37], when exposed to Ni, as well as in Phaseolus vulgaris treated with Cd [38]. The decrease in NO3 content may stem from the reduced uptake and transport of NO3 from the roots. Conversely, in Vigna trilobata and Cyamopsis tetragonoloba exposed to high concentrations of Ba, an increase in NO3 content was observed [30,39]. However, there is currently no data on the effect of Ba on other forms of nitrogen content. Increased NH4+ accumulation can potentially be toxic and may lead to an osmotic imbalance and, consequently, metabolic disruptions [36]. The effect of Ba on NO2 content has yet to be described. It has been demonstrated that Cd stress significantly reduces the NO2 content in rice, while Mo has the opposite effect. NO2 is a molecule that can be converted to NH4+ by NiR, but can also be transformed into NO by NR [40]. Therefore, the balance between NO3, NO2, NH4+, and NO is complex and multifaceted. Nitric oxide plays a role in several plant developmental processes (e.g., root hair development), as well as in phytohormone and ROS signaling and helps to mitigate the effects of stress, including heavy metal toxicity. In response to heavy metals, NO reduces ROS levels by enhancing the activity of antioxidant enzymes and forming less stable peroxynitrite [41]. It has been found that Cd, As, Cu, Pb, Al, Zn, and Ni influence NO production; however, whether they increase or decrease NO content depends on the specific plant, organ, heavy metal concentration, and the duration of the treatment [42]. To date, the effect of Ba on NO accumulation has not been documented in any plant. Our studies suggest that lower Ba concentrations and shorter exposure times favor NO accumulation in barley, while higher concentrations and prolonged treatment result in decreased levels of this molecule, reducing it to values close to the control level or slightly above it.
The content of soluble protein increased slightly as a result of stress, but these changes were not statistically significant (Figure 3A). The highest protein content was observed after the application of the 300 µM Ba treatment for 72 h and was higher by about 60% than the control.
A significant change was observed in the azocaseinolytic activity (Figure 3B), which, in contrast to the soluble protein content, decreased in response to the Ba treatment. In regard to the 300 µM Ba treatment, the azocaseinolytic activity decreased steadily and, after 24 h, was lower by 19% than in the control, after 48 h by 38%, and after 72 h by 55%. The highest protein concentrations were observed with the lowest proteolytic activity. At a higher concentration of Ba, the initial decrease was stronger and amounted to over 31%; however, after 48 h, it increased, reaching a value close to the control, then decreased again and was almost identical to the value after 24 h of treatment. The content of carbonylated proteins, which are commonly considered to be a marker of oxidative damage to proteins, also changed (Figure 3C). At a concentration of 300 µM Ba, the content of carbonylated proteins increased slightly for the first 24 h, then decreased; however, the observed differences were not statistically significant compared to the control. Greater fluctuations were observed in the treatment with a concentration of 600 µM Ba, wherein, after 24 h, the content of carbonylated proteins was 57% lower than in the control, then it increased rapidly, reaching the maximum level after 48 h of treatment; after 72 h, the content of oxidized proteins was comparable in both treatments.
The content of soluble protein can indicate reversible and irreversible metabolic changes in response to heavy metal stress [43], as well as serve as one of the key osmoprotectants [44]. Research shows that maize varieties more tolerant to heavy metals (Cd, As) exhibit greater accumulation of soluble proteins, while sensitive varieties do not show such accumulation [44]. A study on the effect of Ba on Cyamopsis tetragonoloba, Vigna trilobata, Pigeon Pea, and Triticum aestivum revealed a decrease in protein content with an increasing Ba concentration; however, the applied Ba concentrations were much higher than those used in the other studies presented [30,39,45,46]. This may indicate similar trends to those observed in studies on Aspergillus niger, wherein low concentrations of heavy metals led to an increase in the soluble protein content, while high concentrations resulted in a decrease [47]. Despite the lack of significant changes in the protein content, notable differences in regard to proteolysis were observed, which was reduced. There is currently no information on the effect of Ba on proteolysis and carbonylation in plants; however, it has been shown that other heavy metals can influence these processes. In rye and triticale, Al treatment increased proteolysis [48]. The impact of heavy metals on proteolysis, however, is dependent on the type of metal. In studies on sunflower plants, among the metals tested, 100 μM of AlCl3, CoCl2, CuCl2, CrCl3, HgCl2, NiCl2, PbCl2, and ZnCl2, only Zn was found to increase proteolysis. At the same time, in these plants, only Co2+, Cu2+, Hg2+, and Ni2+ were observed to increase the content of carbonyl groups in proteins [49]. On the other hand, studies on Alyssum montanum shoots growing in the presence of heavy metals demonstrated an increased content of carbonylated proteins [50]. In our studies, we showed that Ba at both concentrations of 300 µM and 600 µM reduced protein hydrolysis, which intensified with the duration of stress, but it did not increase the oxidative damage to proteins.
The analysis of the correlation coefficients showed connections between the parameters studied (Figure 4). The highest positive correlation was found between the NO3 ion content and azocaseinolytic activity (0.82), APX and CAT expression (0.78), CAT expression and H2O2 content (0.77), and NH4+ and H2O2 ion content (0.70). The strongest negative correlations were observed for NiR expression and NH4+ content (−0.80), and TBARS and H2O2 content (−0.71). Lower, but significant, positive correlation coefficient values were also noted for: total soluble protein and NO2 (0.65), azocaseinolytic activity and TBARS (0.61), NR and APX expression (0.57), NH4+ and NO2 ion content (0.55), NO2 and H2O2 content (0.52), NO3 and TBARS content (0.52), H2O2 content and APX expression (0.50), NiR and APX expression (0.50), and NR expression and H2O2 content (0.44). Other negative, significant correlation coefficients were found for: TBARS content and CAT expression (−0.69), total soluble protein and azocaseinolytic activity (−0.66), H2O2 content and azocaseinolytic activity (−0.64), TBARS content and APX expression, NH4+/NO2 ion content and azocaseinolytic activity (−0.57), APX expression and NO content (−0.51), NR expression and NO3 content, SOD expression and NO content (−0.48), NiR expression and total protein (−0.44), and CAT expression and azocaseinolytic activity (−0.43). The only factor that did not show significant correlations with the remaining studied parameters was protein carbonylation.
The performed correlation analysis suggests that the relationship between ROS, protein, and nitrogen metabolism is complex. At the same time, the lack of studied interactions indicates the need for further research that would explain these strict dependencies. While there are premises for the occurrence of interactions between, for example, NO and ROS [41], the remaining important dependencies do not seem to be directly related. It is not without significance that, especially in cultivated plants, Ba toxicity can have a direct effect on farm animals and humans, which is why there is a need to continue research in this field [5].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material

The study was performed on spring barley seedlings (Hordeum vulgare L.) (BBCH 13), the Tilmor variety (provided by Danko Plant Breeders Ltd., Choryń, Poland), subjected to Ba in the form of barium acetate (Ba(C2H3O2)2). The seeds were germinated between two strips of filter paper (22 cm × 8 cm), rolled into cylindrical assemblies and, subsequently, incubated for 10 days in Knop’s solution, supplemented with Hoagland microelements. These experiments were conducted within a controlled environment in a climate chamber (Versatile Environmental Test chamber, MLR-325H, Panasonic), maintaining a temperature of 23 ± 2 °C for 16 h (day) and 18 °C for 8 h (night). The photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) was 100 ± 25 μmol m−2 s−1, with a relative humidity maintained at 70–80% throughout the experimental period.
On the tenth day, a part of the seedlings was harvested to serve as a control sample, then frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C for subsequent analysis. The remaining seedlings were divided, with one group transferred into a substrate solution containing 300 μM barium acetate, while the other was transferred into a substrate solution containing 600 μM barium acetate. After a period of 24, 48, and 72 h, a selection of these plants was harvested and preserved identically to the control samples.

3.2. Hydrogen Peroxide Content

The hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) levels were determined following the method proposed by Alexieva et al. [51]. Leaf tissues (100 mg) were homogenized in an ice bath, using 1 mL of 0.1% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA). The homogenate was then centrifuged at 12,000× g for 15 min. A total of 25 μL of the supernatant was combined with 25 μL of 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 50 μL of 1 M KI. The measurement was performed on a Nunc U-bottom 96-well plate (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), using a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader (Thermo Scientific). The absorbance was recorded at 390 nm, and the content of H2O2 was calculated as μM × g−1 FW, based on a standard curve.

3.3. Lipid Peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation was measured according to the method described by Heath and Packer [52]. Fresh leaves (100 mg) were homogenized in 0.1% trichloroacetic acid (TCA, w/v). The resulting homogenate was then centrifuged at 4 °C for 10 min at 13,200× g. From the supernatant, 0.5 mL was combined with 1.5 mL of 0.5% (w/v) 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA) dissolved in 20% TCA. This mixture was incubated at 95 °C for 25 min. After incubation, the samples were cooled on ice, and absorbance was measured at 532 nm and 600 nm (to account for nonspecific turbidity). The determination was performed on a Nunc U-bottom 96-well plate, using a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader. The lipid peroxidation results were expressed as TBARS, calculated using an extinction coefficient of 155 mM−1 × cm−1, and reported as nM × g−1 fresh weight (FW).

3.4. Nitrogen Metabolite Content

Nitric oxide (NO) formation was quantitatively assessed utilizing DAF-FM™ diacetate (4-amino-5-methylamino-2′,7′-difluororescein diacetate; Invitrogen Molecular Probes) (a modified version of the method by Arasimowicz-Jelonek et al. [53]). Leaf tissues, weighing 100 mg, were submerged in 1 mL of a 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), supplemented with 15 μM of DAF-FM™ diacetate. The samples were agitated at 300 rpm for 1 h in darkness at room temperature to facilitate the extraction of NO. Following incubation, the samples were subjected to centrifugation at 9000× g for 10 min at room temperature to remove the tissue debris. The supernatant was carefully transferred to a 96-well black plate (Thermo Scientific) for subsequent analysis. NO production was measured on black 96-well Immuno plates (Thermo Scientific), using a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader, with excitation at 485 nm and emission at 515 nm. The results on the nitric oxide formation were expressed in arbitrary units of fluorescence intensity (U) per gram of fresh weight (U × g−1 FW).
The extraction process for determining the ammonium, nitrate, and nitrite contents was performed according to a modified version of the method by Huang et al. [54]. Leaf samples (100 mg) were immersed in 1 mL of deionized water and shaken at 1000 rpm for 1 h at 45 °C. After shaking, the samples were centrifuged at 16,000× g for 20 min at 4 °C, and the supernatants were collected.
The ammonium (NH4+) content was determined by adding 10 μL of the supernatant to 190 μL of Nessler reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). The homogenates were incubated for 20 min at room temperature on a Nunc U-bottom 96-well plate. Absorbance was then measured at 404 nm, using a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader. The ammonium content was calculated using ammonium acetate to create a standard curve and was expressed as μmol per gram of fresh weight (μM × g−1 FW).
The content of nitrates (NO3) and nitrites (NO2) was determined using the Nitric Oxide Assay Kit (Invitrogen/Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The absorbance of both compounds was measured photometrically at 540 nm. The determination was performed on a Nunc U-bottom 96-well plate, using a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader. To calculate the results, standard curves were prepared using the standards provided in the kit. Nitrate and nitrite concentrations were expressed as µM × g⁻1 FW.

3.5. Protein Extraction

Protein extracts were prepared according to the method described by Labudda et al. (2018) [55], with some modifications. Leaf samples (100 mg) were homogenized in 1 mL of an ice-cold extraction buffer that contained 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5% (w/v) Triton X-100, 2% (w/v) polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). The homogenates were incubated on ice for 20 min and then centrifuged at 16,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C.
The total soluble protein content was measured using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 stain, following the protocol described by Spector (1978) [56], with bovine serum albumin as the protein standard. The total soluble protein content was expressed in mg of protein per gram of fresh weight (mg × g−1 FW).

3.6. Azocaseinolytic Activity

Leaf tissue (1 g) was ground into a powder in liquid nitrogen and extracted using 5 mL of pre-cooled extraction buffer (Tris–HCl, 50 mM, pH 7.2), containing 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol and 0.2 g of insoluble PVP. The homogenate was then filtered and centrifuged at 15,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was utilized for the enzyme assay. The reaction mixture consisted of 50 μL of the enzyme extract, 0.15 mL of 0.5% (w/v) azocasein, and 0.3 mL of citrate buffer (0.25 M, pH 5.0). After incubating for 2 h at 37 °C, the reaction was halted by adding 1 mL of 12% (w/v) TCA. The acid-soluble products were measured spectrophotometrically at 340 nm. One unit of azocaseinolytic activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that produced a 0.01 increase in absorbance. It was expressed as U × mg−1 protein × h−1.

3.7. Measurements of Antioxidant Enzyme Activity

The activity of SOD (EC 1.15.1.1) was measured following the protocol described by Kostyuk and Potapovich (1989) [57]. An assay buffer was prepared by mixing equal volumes of 67 mM potassium/sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) and 25 mM EDTA. The pH of this solution was adjusted to 10.0 using TEMED. Next, 200 μL of the assay buffer was combined with 20 μL of a supernatant that had been previously diluted with Milli-Q water at a ratio of 1:10. The SOD enzymatic assay was initiated by adding 20 μL of 2.5 μM quercetin into DMSO. The determination was conducted on a Nunc U-bottom 96-well plate, using a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader. The absorbance of the samples was recorded immediately and again after 20 min at 406 nm. SOD activity was expressed in arbitrary units, representing the amount of SOD that inhibits superoxide-driven oxidation of quercetin by 50% per min, per mg of protein.
The CAT (EC 1.11.1.6) activity was measured following the method by Góth (1991) [58], with some modifications. The reaction was initiated by adding 5 μL of the supernatant to 1 mL of a 0.03% (v/v) hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) solution, in 60 mM of Tris-HCl buffer, at pH 7.0. The samples were incubated at 37 °C for 3 min. After incubation, 0.5 mL of 4% (w/v) ammonium molybdate dissolved in 0.250 M sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and 0.450 mL of 0.25 M H2SO4 were added to the samples. The samples were then centrifuged for 5 min at 16,000× g, and the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 405 nm. Catalase activity was expressed as nM H2O2 × min−1 × mg−1 protein.
The APX (EC 1.11.1.11) activity was measured following the method described by Nakano and Asada (1981) [59]. Five μL of the enzymatic extract was mixed with a medium containing 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.2), 2 mM ascorbic acid (AsA), 5 mM EDTA, and 0.1 mM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). The APX activity was assessed at 25 °C on a Nunc U-bottom 96-well plate, using a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader. The absorbance was recorded at 290 nm over a period of 5 min, with readings taken every minute. APX activity was expressed in nM AsA × min−1 × mg−1 protein

3.8. Protein Carbonylation

The carbonyl group content was measured following the method described by Levine et al. [60]. Leaf samples weighing 400 mg were homogenized in 1.2 mL of cold 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), containing 1 mM of EDTA. The homogenate was then centrifuged at 6000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. In regard to the resulting supernatant, 200 μL of the supernatant was added to 800 μL of 10 mM 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) in 2.5 M HCl. The blank samples consisted of 1 mL of 2.5 M HCl.
After incubating for one hour at room temperature in the dark, 1 mL of 20% (w/v) TCA was added to the samples. The samples were then cooled on ice for 5 min and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The resulting pellet was washed three times with a 1:1 ethanol/ethyl acetate mixture, vortexed, and centrifuged again at 10,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C.
The pellet was subsequently dissolved in 1 mL of 6 M guanidine hydrochloride in 20 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 2.3). The samples were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The absorbance was measured at 375 nm using a UV–VIS Spectrophotometer Pharo 300 Spectroquant (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The carbonyl group content was calculated using a molar absorption coefficient for aliphatic hydrazones of 22,000 M−1 cm−1 and expressed in nM carbonyl per mg of protein (nM × mg−1 protein).

3.9. Total RNA Extraction

The isolation of the total RNA from barley shoots was performed using the GeneMATRIX Universal RNA Purification Kit (EURx), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This procedure included an additional treatment with RNase-free DNase I. The RNA content was estimated spectrophotometrically using an Eppendorf BioSpectrometr® basic, while its purity and integrity were verified by loading 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel and running horizontal electrophoresis in 1 × TBE buffer (89 mM Tris, 89 mM boric acid, 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.3).
For reverse transcription, 1 μg of the extracted total RNA samples was used in regard to the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Scientific). The thermal cycler conditions utilized were as follows: 10 min at 25 °C, 120 min at 37 °C, 5 min at 85 °C, and finally 10 min at 4 °C.

3.10. Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (Q-RT PCR)

A quantitative reverse transcription PCR (q-RT PCR) was performed using LightCycler 8-Tube Strips (Roche Diagnostics) on the LightCycler® 96 instrument (Roche Diagnostics). The reaction mixture was prepared following the standard protocol for the FastStart Essential DNA Green Master, also produced by Roche Diagnostics. The mixture included 1 μL of PCR-grade water, 0.5 μL of each primer (at a concentration of 0.1 mM), 5 μL of Master Mix, and 3 μL of a first-strand cDNA template, diluted at a ratio of 1:7.
The thermocycling conditions were set as follows: an initial step of 6 min at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C, 15 s at 58 °C, and 10 s at 72 °C. To verify the specificity of the amplification, melting curves were generated for each reaction, consisting of a 10 s hold at 95 °C, a 60 s hold at 65 °C, and a final 1 s hold at 95 °C.
Relative gene expression (RQ) was calculated using the formula 2−ΔΔCT [61]. All relative expression levels were log2 transformed, and the gene encoding actin was utilized as an internal control. A list of all the primers used for the real-time PCR can be found in Table 1.

3.11. Statistical Analysis

Representative experimental data from three independent biological replicates are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was assessed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s honest significant difference test (p < 0.05). Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the relationships between the observed traits (p < 0.05). All the statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 10 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

4. Conclusions

Our research investigated the effects of Ba on the physiological responses of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), with a particular emphasis on nitro-oxidative pathways. The findings demonstrated significant alterations in the expression of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes and increased hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) levels in response to Ba. Notably, exposure to lower concentrations of Ba, along with a shorter duration, resulted in elevated nitric oxide (NO) levels. In contrast, higher concentrations of Ba and extended exposure durations led to a reduction in NO levels, thereby influencing nitrogen metabolism. This study elucidates the risks associated with Ba exposure in cultivated species and highlights the need for further research to clarify its impact on plant physiology and potential implications for human health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.F., M.G. and M.N.; formal analysis, J.F., M.G., J.G. and M.N.; investigation, J.F., J.G., J.M., J.N., E.P. and Z.E.P.; data curation, J.G.; writing—original draft preparation, J.F., M.G. and J.G.; writing—review and editing, J.F., M.G. and M.L.; visualization, J.G.; supervision, M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
APXAscorbate Peroxidase
CATCatalase
DAF-FM DA 4-Amino-5-Methylamino-2′,7′-Difluorofluorescein Diacetate
DNPH2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine
EDTAEthylenediaminetetraacetic Acid
NiR Nitrite Reductase
NRNitrate Reductase
PMSFPhenylmethylsulfonyl Fluoride
PPFDPhotosynthetic Photon Flux Density
PVPPolyvinylpyrrolidone
ROS Reactive Oxygen Species
SODSuperoxide Dismutase
TBA2-Thiobarbituric Acid
TBARS2-Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances
TCATrichloroacetic Acid
TEMEDTetramethylethylenediamine

References

  1. Lu, Q.; Xu, X.; Liang, L.; Xu, Z.; Shang, L.; Guo, J.; Xiao, D.; Qiu, G. Barium Concentration, Phytoavailability, and Risk Assessment in Soil-Rice Systems from an Active Barium Mining Region. Appl. Geochem. 2019, 106, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Choudhury, H.; International Programme on Chemical Safety (Eds.) Barium and Barium Compounds: IPCS, International Programm on Chemical Safety (IPCS); Concise international chemical assessment document; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001; ISBN 978-92-4-153033-0. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lamb, D.T.; Matanitobua, V.P.; Palanisami, T.; Megharaj, M.; Naidu, R. Bioavailability of Barium to Plants and Invertebrates in Soils Contaminated by Barite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 4670–4676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Perry, H.M.; Kopp, S.J.; Perry, E.F.; Erlanger, M.W. Hypertension and Associated Cardiovascular Abnormalities Induced by Chronic Barium Feeding. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 1989, 28, 373–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Peana, M.; Medici, S.; Dadar, M.; Zoroddu, M.A.; Pelucelli, A.; Chasapis, C.T.; Bjørklund, G. Environmental Barium: Potential Exposure and Health-Hazards. Arch. Toxicol. 2021, 95, 2605–2612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ohgami, N.; Hori, S.; Ohgami, K.; Tamura, H.; Tsuzuki, T.; Ohnuma, S.; Kato, M. Exposure to Low-Dose Barium by Drinking Water Causes Hearing Loss in Mice. NeuroToxicology 2012, 33, 1276–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kravchenko, J.; Darrah, T.H.; Miller, R.K.; Lyerly, H.K.; Vengosh, A. A Review of the Health Impacts of Barium from Natural and Anthropogenic Exposure. Env. Geochem. Health 2014, 36, 797–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Çanlı, M. A New Perspective to Aberrations Caused by Barium and Vanadium Ions on Lens Culinaris Medik. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 160, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bowen, L.N.; Subramony, S.H.; Cheng, J.; Wu, S.S.; Okun, M.S. Elementary, My Dear Dr. Allen: The Case of Barium Toxicity and Pa Ping. Neurology 2010, 74, 1546–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, C.-S.; Liu, W.-G. Epidemiological investigation on barium poisoning in China. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi 2008, 26, 745–746. [Google Scholar]
  11. Llugany, M.; Poschenrieder, C.; Barceló, J. Assessment of Barium Toxicity in Bush Beans. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2000, 39, 440–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Raghu, V. Accumulation of Elements in Plants and Soils in and around Mangampeta and Vemula Barite Mining Areas, Cuddapah District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ. Geol. 2001, 40, 1265–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Langridge, P. Economic and Academic Importance of Barley. In The Barley Genome; Stein, N., Muehlbauer, G.J., Eds.; Compendium of Plant Genomes; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 1–10. ISBN 978-3-319-92527-1. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lukinac, J.; Jukić, M. Barley in the Production of Cereal-Based Products. Plants 2022, 11, 3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Patial, M.; Chauhan, R.; Chaudhary, H.K.; Pramanick, K.K.; Shukla, A.K.; Kumar, V.; Verma, R.P.S. Au-Courant and Novel Technologies for Efficient Doubled Haploid Development in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2023, 43, 575–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cipak Gasparovic, A.; Zarkovic, N.; Zarkovic, K.; Semen, K.; Kaminskyy, D.; Yelisyeyeva, O.; Bottari, S.P. Biomarkers of Oxidative and Nitro-oxidative Stress: Conventional and Novel Approaches. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 174, 1771–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fan, X.; Gu, C.; Cai, J.; Bian, Y.; Yang, X.; Sun, C.; Jiang, X. Study on Active Response of Superoxide Dismutase and Relevant Binding Interaction with Bioaccumulated Phthalates and Key Metabolites in Eisenia Fetida. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 223, 112559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sleimi, N.; Kouki, R.; Hadj Ammar, M.; Ferreira, R.; Pérez-Clemente, R. Barium Effect on Germination, Plant Growth, and Antioxidant Enzymes in Cucumis sativus L. Plants. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 2086–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Melo, L.C.A.; Alleoni, L.R.F.; Carvalho, G.; Azevedo, R.A. Cadmium- and Barium-toxicity Effects on Growth and Antioxidant Capacity of Soybean (Glycine max L.) Plants, Grown in Two Soil Types with Different Physicochemical Properties. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenk. 2011, 174, 847–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, R.; Liu, R.; Chen, Y. Molecular Mechanism on Cadmium-Induced Activity Changes of Catalase and Superoxide Dismutase. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 77, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bouhraoua, S.; Ferioun, M.; Boussakouran, A.; Belahcen, D.; Benali, T.; El Hachlafi, N.; Akhazzane, M.; Khabbach, A.; Hammani, K.; Louahlia, S. Physio-Biochemical Responses and Cadmium Partitioning Associated with Stress Tolerance in Hulless Barley Genotypes. Crops 2025, 5, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bitarishvili, S.; Dikarev, A.; Kazakova, E.; Bondarenko, E.; Prazyan, A.; Makarenko, E.; Babina, D.; Podobed, M.; Geras’kin, S. Growth, Antioxidant System, and Phytohormonal Status of Barley Cultivars Contrasting in Cadmium Tolerance. Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 59749–59764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, P.; Zang, J.; Shao, T.; Jiang, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; Liu, M. Cadmium Distribution and Transformation in Leaf Cells Involved in Detoxification and Tolerance in Barley. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 249, 114391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bhaduri, A.M.; Fulekar, M.H. Antioxidant Enzyme Responses of Plants to Heavy Metal Stress. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. De Souza Cardoso, A.A.; Monteiro, F.A. Sulfur Supply Reduces Barium Toxicity in Tanzania Guinea Grass (Panicum maximum) by Inducing Antioxidant Enzymes and Proline Metabolism. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rabêlo, F.H.S.; Silva, B.K.D.A.D.; Borgo, L.; Keunen, E.; Rossi, M.L.; Borges, K.L.R.; Santos, E.F.D.; Reis, A.R.D.; Martinelli, A.P.; Azevedo, R.A.; et al. Enzymatic Antioxidants—Relevant or Not to Protect the Photosynthetic System against Cadmium-Induced Stress in Massai Grass Supplied with Sulfur? Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 155, 702–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hsu, Y.T.; Kao, C.H. Toxicity in Leaves of Rice Exposed to Cadmium Is Due to Hydrogen Peroxide Accumulation. Plant Soil 2007, 298, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hussain, S.; Khaliq, A.; Noor, M.A.; Tanveer, M.; Hussain, H.A.; Hussain, S.; Shah, T.; Mehmood, T. Metal Toxicity and Nitrogen Metabolism in Plants: An Overview. In Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling in Soil; Datta, R., Meena, R.S., Pathan, S.I., Ceccherini, M.T., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 221–248. ISBN 9789811372636. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nascimento, V.; Nogueira, G.; Monteiro, G.; Júnior, W.; Melissa Nunes De Freitas, J.; Neto, C. Influence of Heavy Metals on the Nitrogen Metabolism in Plants. In Nitrogen in Agriculture—Physiological, Agricultural and Ecological Aspects [Working Title]; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  30. Arundhathi, A.; Marisamy, K.; Duraipandian, M.; Sevugaperumal, R.; Ramasubramanian, V. Comparison of the Metal Toxicity Due to Aluminium and Barium on the Growth Attributes of Vigna trilobata (L.) Verde. Bioeng. Biosci. 2016, 4, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vajpayee, P.; Tripathi, R.D.; Rai, U.N.; Ali, M.B.; Singh, S.N. Chromium (VI) Accumulation Reduces Chlorophyll Biosynthesis, Nitrate Reductase Activity and Protein Content in Nymphaea alba L. Chemosphere 2000, 41, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sharma, P.; Shanker Dubey, R. Modulation of Nitrate Reductase Activity in Rice Seedlings under Aluminium Toxicity and Water Stress: Role of Osmolytes as Enzyme Protectant. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 854–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huang, H.; Xiong, Z.-T. Toxic Effects of Cadmium, Acetochlor and Bensulfuron-Methyl on Nitrogen Metabolism and Plant Growth in Rice Seedlings. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2009, 94, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ghosh, S.; Saha, J.; Biswas, A.K. Interactive Influence of Arsenate and Selenate on Growth and Nitrogen Metabolism in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Seedlings. Acta Physiol. Plant 2013, 35, 1873–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cuena Boy, R. The use of caloric preparation supplement in chronic renal insufficiency: Much data and no proof. Rev. Clin. Esp. 2000, 200, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mishra, P.; Dubey, R.S. Nickel and Al-Excess Inhibit Nitrate Reductase but Upregulate Activities of Aminating Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Aminotransferases in Growing Rice Seedlings. Plant Growth Regul. 2011, 64, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gajewska, E.; Skłodowska, M. Nickel-Induced Changes in Nitrogen Metabolism in Wheat Shoots. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 1034–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gouia, H.; Habib Ghorbal, M.; Meyer, C. Effects of Cadmium on Activity of Nitrate Reductase and on Other Enzymes of the Nitrate Assimilation Pathway in Bean. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2000, 38, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Marisamy, K.; Sevugaperumal, R.; Ramasubramanian, V. Changes in growth, biochemical and enzymatic characteristics of Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub under metal stress due to barium. Int. J. Biol. Pharm. Res. 2015, 6, 935–938. [Google Scholar]
  40. Reda, M.; Janicka, M.; Kabała, K. Nitrate Reductase Dependent Synthesis of NO in Plants. In Nitric Oxide in Plant Biology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 95–110. ISBN 978-0-12-818797-5. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pande, A.; Mun, B.-G.; Methela, N.J.; Rahim, W.; Lee, D.-S.; Lee, G.-M.; Hong, J.K.; Hussain, A.; Loake, G.; Yun, B.-W. Heavy Metal Toxicity in Plants and the Potential NO-Releasing Novel Techniques as the Impending Mitigation Alternatives. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1019647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wei, L.; Zhang, M.; Wei, S.; Zhang, J.; Wang, C.; Liao, W. Roles of Nitric Oxide in Heavy Metal Stress in Plants: Cross-Talk with Phytohormones and Protein S-Nitrosylation. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 259, 113943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Singh, P.K.; Tewari, R.K. Cadmium Toxicity Induced Changes in Plant Water Relations and Oxidative Metabolism of Brassica juncea L. Plants. J. Environ. Biol. 2003, 24, 107–112. [Google Scholar]
  44. Anjum, S.A.; Tanveer, M.; Hussain, S.; Shahzad, B.; Ashraf, U.; Fahad, S.; Hassan, W.; Jan, S.; Khan, I.; Saleem, M.F.; et al. Osmoregulation and Antioxidant Production in Maize under Combined Cadmium and Arsenic Stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 11864–11875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gandhi, N.; Sridhar, J.; Pallavi, A.; Ashwini, K.; Vasavi, K.; Ravali, M.; Naveen, L.; Shailaja, V.; Supriya, T.; Kondaiah, B.; et al. Germination, Growth, Physiological and Biochemical Response of Pigeon Pea (Cajanus cajan) Under Varying Concentrations of Copper (Cu), Lead (Pb), Manganese (Mn) and Barium (Ba). Int. J. Res. Rev. 2020, 7, 321–347. [Google Scholar]
  46. Iqbal, J.; Naz, S. Effects of Barium on Germination, Seedling Growth, Soluble Protein and Izozymic Forms of Peroxidase in Wheat. Pak. J. Agric. Res. 1989, 10, 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  47. Deng, X.; Chen, R.; Zhuo, S.; Zhou, G.; Shi, Y. Bioleaching Characteristics of Heavy Metals from Polluted Soil with Indigenous Aspergillus Niger F2. J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy 2019, 13, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Szewińska, J.; Różańska, E.; Papierowska, E.; Labudda, M. Proteolytic and Structural Changes in Rye and Triticale Roots under Aluminum Stress. Cells 2021, 10, 3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pena, L.B.; Zawoznik, M.S.; Tomaro, M.L.; Gallego, S.M. Heavy Metals Effects on Proteolytic System in Sunflower Leaves. Chemosphere 2008, 72, 741–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Muszyńska, E.; Labudda, M.; Hanus-Fajerska, E. Changes in Proteolytic Activity and Protein Carbonylation in Shoots of Alyssum Montanum Ecotypes under Multi-Metal Stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 232, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Alexieva, V.; Sergiev, I.; Mapelli, S.; Karanov, E. The Effect of Drought and Ultraviolet Radiation on Growth and Stress Markers in Pea and Wheat. Plant Cell Environ. 2001, 24, 1337–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Heath, R.L.; Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in Isolated Chloroplasts. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 125, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Arasimowicz-Jelonek, M.; Jagodzik, P.; Płóciennik, A.; Sobieszczuk-Nowicka, E.; Mattoo, A.; Polcyn, W.; Floryszak-Wieczorek, J. Dynamics of Nitration during Dark-Induced Leaf Senescence in Arabidopsis Reveals Proteins Modified by Tryptophan Nitration. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 6853–6875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Huang, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Deng, X.W.; Wei, N. HY5 Regulates Nitrite Reductase 1 (NIR1) and Ammonium Transporter1;2 (AMT1;2) in Arabidopsis Seedlings. Plant Sci. 2015, 238, 330–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Labudda, M.; Różańska, E.; Czarnocka, W.; Sobczak, M.; Dzik, J.M. Systemic Changes in Photosynthesis and Reactive Oxygen Species Homeostasis in Shoots of Arabidopsis thaliana Infected with the Beet Cyst Nematode Heterodera schachtii. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 1690–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Spector, T. Refinement of the Coomassie Blue Method of Protein Quantitation. Anal. Biochem. 1978, 86, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kostyuk, V.A.; Potapovich, A.I. Superoxide--Driven Oxidation of Quercetin and a Simple Sensitive Assay for Determination of Superoxide Dismutase. Biochem. Int. 1989, 19, 1117–1124. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Góth, L. A Simple Method for Determination of Serum Catalase Activity and Revision of Reference Range. Clin. Chim. Acta 1991, 196, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nakano, Y.; Asada, K. Hydrogen Peroxide Is Scavenged by Ascorbate-Specific Peroxidase in Spinach Chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981, 22, 867–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Levine, R.L.; Williams, J.A.; Stadtman, E.P.; Shacter, E. [37] Carbonyl Assays for Determination of Oxidatively Modified Proteins. In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994; Volume 233, pp. 346–357. ISBN 978-0-12-182134-0. [Google Scholar]
  61. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Harb, A.; Awad, D.; Samarah, N. Gene Expression and Activity of Antioxidant Enzymes in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under Controlled Severe Drought. J. Plant Interact. 2015, 10, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The expression levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) (A), the activity of SOD (B), the expression levels of catalase (CAT) (C), the activity of CAT (D), the expression levels of ascorbate peroxidase (APX) (E), the activity of APX (F), the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content (G), and the amount of 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) (H), in the leaves of barley plants treated with the Ba solution. The results are shown as the mean  ±  SD. Different letters indicate homogeneous groups that are significantly different at p < 0.05, according to a two-way analysis of variance and a post hoc Tukey’s test.
Figure 1. The expression levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) (A), the activity of SOD (B), the expression levels of catalase (CAT) (C), the activity of CAT (D), the expression levels of ascorbate peroxidase (APX) (E), the activity of APX (F), the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content (G), and the amount of 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) (H), in the leaves of barley plants treated with the Ba solution. The results are shown as the mean  ±  SD. Different letters indicate homogeneous groups that are significantly different at p < 0.05, according to a two-way analysis of variance and a post hoc Tukey’s test.
Ijms 26 04661 g001
Figure 2. The expression levels of nitrate reductase (NR) (A) and nitrite reductase (NiR) (B) and the content of nitrate (NO3) (C), nitrite (NO2) (D), ammonium (NH4+) (E), and nitric oxide (NO) (F) in the leaves of barley plants treated with a Ba solution. The results are shown as the mean  ±  SD. Different letters indicate homogeneous groups that are significantly different at p < 0.05, according to a two-way analysis of variance and a post hoc Tukey’s test.
Figure 2. The expression levels of nitrate reductase (NR) (A) and nitrite reductase (NiR) (B) and the content of nitrate (NO3) (C), nitrite (NO2) (D), ammonium (NH4+) (E), and nitric oxide (NO) (F) in the leaves of barley plants treated with a Ba solution. The results are shown as the mean  ±  SD. Different letters indicate homogeneous groups that are significantly different at p < 0.05, according to a two-way analysis of variance and a post hoc Tukey’s test.
Ijms 26 04661 g002
Figure 3. The contents of total soluble protein (A), azocaseinolytic activity (B), and content of protein carbonyl groups (C) in the leaves of barley plants treated with a Ba solution. The results are shown as the mean  ±  SD. Different letters indicate homogeneous groups that are significantly different at p < 0.05, according to a two-way analysis of variance and a post hoc Tukey’s test.
Figure 3. The contents of total soluble protein (A), azocaseinolytic activity (B), and content of protein carbonyl groups (C) in the leaves of barley plants treated with a Ba solution. The results are shown as the mean  ±  SD. Different letters indicate homogeneous groups that are significantly different at p < 0.05, according to a two-way analysis of variance and a post hoc Tukey’s test.
Ijms 26 04661 g003
Figure 4. A heat map on the correlation coefficients between SOD, CAT, APX, H2O2, TBARS, NR, NiR, NO3, NO2, NH4+, NO, total soluble protein, azocaseinolytic activity, and protein carbonyl groups. Blank space means a value of correlation close to zero; ****—a significance level of p ≤ 0.0001, ***—a significance level of p ≤ 0.001, **—a significance level of p ≤ 0.01, and *—a significance level of p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4. A heat map on the correlation coefficients between SOD, CAT, APX, H2O2, TBARS, NR, NiR, NO3, NO2, NH4+, NO, total soluble protein, azocaseinolytic activity, and protein carbonyl groups. Blank space means a value of correlation close to zero; ****—a significance level of p ≤ 0.0001, ***—a significance level of p ≤ 0.001, **—a significance level of p ≤ 0.01, and *—a significance level of p ≤ 0.05.
Ijms 26 04661 g004
Table 1. Sequence of primers used in the q-RT PCR analysis; “-” in source column means sequences projected by the authors.
Table 1. Sequence of primers used in the q-RT PCR analysis; “-” in source column means sequences projected by the authors.
GeneAccession NumberSequenceSource
ActinAY145451.1F: TGCCATGTACGTCGCTATTC
R: GCTTCTCCTTGATGTCCCTTAC
-
CATU20778.1F: TGCAGGAGTACTGGCGTCTTCGACTT
R: AGATCCCGGGCACGAGGCCGGGGCC
[62]
SODAK252295F: ATGGTGAAGGCTGTTGCTGTGC
R: TCAGCCTTGAAGTCCGATGATCCC
[62]
APXAJ006358F: GGAGTTGTCGCCGTGGAGGTGTCCGGTG
R: CAAGATCACCCTGGTCGCGCATAGTAGC
[62]
NRX57844.1F: CGACGAGATACTACCCATCAAC
R: TCGATCTCTACCGACCAGAA
-
NiRX57844.1F: GCTGCCTCACCAAGAACA
R: ATCTTTGGGCTCCGACAAC
-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fidler, J.; Gietler, M.; Graska, J.; Nykiel, M.; Michalska, J.; Niziuk, J.; Pełszyk, E.; Perkowska, Z.E.; Labudda, M. The Nitro-Oxidative Response Is Induced in the Leaves of Barley Plants Exposed to Barium. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 4661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26104661

AMA Style

Fidler J, Gietler M, Graska J, Nykiel M, Michalska J, Niziuk J, Pełszyk E, Perkowska ZE, Labudda M. The Nitro-Oxidative Response Is Induced in the Leaves of Barley Plants Exposed to Barium. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(10):4661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26104661

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fidler, Justyna, Marta Gietler, Jakub Graska, Małgorzata Nykiel, Julia Michalska, Julia Niziuk, Emilia Pełszyk, Zuzanna Ewa Perkowska, and Mateusz Labudda. 2025. "The Nitro-Oxidative Response Is Induced in the Leaves of Barley Plants Exposed to Barium" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 10: 4661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26104661

APA Style

Fidler, J., Gietler, M., Graska, J., Nykiel, M., Michalska, J., Niziuk, J., Pełszyk, E., Perkowska, Z. E., & Labudda, M. (2025). The Nitro-Oxidative Response Is Induced in the Leaves of Barley Plants Exposed to Barium. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(10), 4661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26104661

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop