Next Article in Journal
Multi-Omics Analysis Reveals the Distinct Features of Metabolism Pathways Supporting the Fruit Size and Color Variation of Giant Pumpkin
Previous Article in Journal
Optimizing Neural Networks for Chemical Reaction Prediction: Insights from Methylene Blue Reduction Reactions
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Ficin Immobilized on Carboxymethyl Chitosan on Biofilms of Oral Pathogens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Roles of DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 in Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC19606 Virulence and Antibiotic Response

1
Master Program in Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970374, Taiwan
2
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970374, Taiwan
3
International College, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970374, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(7), 3862; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073862
Submission received: 15 February 2024 / Revised: 26 March 2024 / Accepted: 28 March 2024 / Published: 29 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofilm Antimicrobial Strategies: Outlook and Future Perspectives)

Abstract

:
Acinetobacter baumannii is a major cause of nosocomial infections, and its highly adaptive nature and broad range of antibiotic resistance enable it to persist in hospital environments. A. baumannii often employs two-component systems (TCSs) to regulate adaptive responses and virulence-related traits. This study describes a previously uncharacterized TCS in the A. baumannii ATCC19606 strain, consisting of a transcriptional sensor, DJ41_1407, and its regulator, DJ41_1408, located adjacent to GacA of the GacSA TCS. Markerless mutagenesis was performed to construct DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 single and double mutants. DJ41_1408 was found to upregulate 49 genes and downregulate 43 genes, most of which were associated with carbon metabolism and other metabolic pathways, such as benzoate degradation. MEME analysis revealed a putative binding box for DJ41_1408, 5′TGTAAATRATTAYCAWTWAT3′. Colony size, motility, biofilm-forming ability, virulence, and antibiotic resistance of DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 single and double mutant strains were assessed against wild type. DJ41_1407 was found to enhance motility, while DJ41_1408 was found to upregulate biofilm-forming ability, and may also modulate antibiotic response. Both DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 suppressed virulence, based on results from a G. mellonella infection assay. These results showcase a novel A. baumannii TCS involved in metabolism, with effects on motility, biofilm-forming ability, virulence, and antibiotic response.

1. Introduction

Acinetobacter baumannii is a Gram-negative bacterium that can act as an opportunistic pathogen in humans [1], and which is notorious for causing a wide range of severe nosocomial infections [2,3,4]. Among these, ventilator-associated pneumonia and bloodstream infections are regarded as the most significant, with high mortality rates [5]. A. baumannii is also categorized as an ESKAPE pathogen, known for high levels of antibiotic resistance [6]. Furthermore, due to its ability to form biofilms, A. baumannii can survive on artificial surfaces for prolonged durations, thereby enabling its persistence within hospital settings [7].
A. baumannii commonly employs two-component systems (TCSs) to regulate adaptive responses and virulence-related traits. Most TCSs in bacteria can regulate gene expression related to antibiotic resistance, virulence, biofilm formation [8], and motility [9], and 16 sensor kinases and 17 response regulators have been annotated in A. baumannii to date, with studies previously conducted on one hybrid sensor kinase, A1S_2811 [10], and nine TCS, AdeSR [11], BaeSR [12], BfmSR [13], CntAB [14], EmaSR [15], GacSA [16], OmpR-EnvZ [17,18], PmrAB [19], and StkSR [20] (AmsSR [21]). Of these TCSs, many were found to regulate gene expression related to antibiotic resistance. For example, AdeSR was found to regulate the expression of the RND-type efflux pump AdeABC in A. baumannii BM4454 [22], while BaeSR was shown to regulate the expression of major efflux pumps, including AdeABC, AdeIJK, and MacAB-TolC, to cause decreased tigecycline susceptibility in A. baumannii ATCC17978 [23,24]. PmrAB was found to regulate colistin and polymyxin resistance via modification of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) lipid A in both A. baumannii ATCC17978 and AB0057 [25,26]. Another function often found to be regulated by TCSs is biofilm-forming ability, and in A. baumannii ATCC19606, BfmRS was shown to regulate the csuA/BABCDE usher–chaperone assembly system, which produces pili involved in biofilm formation [27], while EmaSR [15] was also found to enhance biofilm-forming ability. Bacterial motility and virulence are often regulated by TCS as well, and BfmRS was shown to regulate expression of the K locus, a critical virulence factor in A. baumannii ATCC17978 that includes genes responsible for exopolysaccharide synthesis, including those contributing to capsule production [28]. In addition, EmaSR was found to regulate genes related to motility and virulence in A. baumannii ATCC19606 [15], and OmpR-EnvZ (E. coli orthologs) was found to be associated with motility and virulence in A. baumannii AB5075 [18]. And in A. baumannii ATCC17978, A1S_2811 was shown to regulate surface motility through the chaperone/usher pili-associated csuA/ABCDE operon [10].
Previous research has revealed that GacSA is a global regulator in A. baumannii, controlling the expression of 674 genes associated with virulence, biofilm formation, pili production, resistance against human serum, motility, and the metabolism of aromatic compounds in A. baumannii ATCC17978 [29,30]. In A. baumannii, GacSA does not exist as a contiguous operon, unlike other well-characterized TCSs such as AdeRS, BaeSR, PmrAB, and BfmRS. Each gene of GacSA is located at different positions on the chromosome; however, the response regulator, GacA, was found to transcribe in the same direction of an adjacent sensor kinase and response regulator of unknown function, termed DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408, respectively, in A. baumannii ATCC19606. In this study, we sought to identify the relationship between DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408, and understand their functions in A. baumannii ATCC19606.

2. Results

2.1. Exploring the Potential Roles of DJ41_1407, and DJ41_1408 in A. baumannii ATCC19606

In the A. baumannii ATCC19606 genome, gacA, DJ41_1407, and DJ41_1408 are located adjacently, and have very small intergenic regions, suggesting that they are transcribed as an operon (Figure S1A). We were able to amplify the intergenic regions between gacA and DJ41_1407, and DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408, using A. baumannii ATCC19606 cDNA as a template (Figure S1B), and thereby confirming their transcription as a single operon. In addition, in silico analysis predicted a putative histidine kinase domain for self-phosphorylation in DJ41_1407, as well as a putative response regulator domain for phosphorylation in DJ41_1408 (Figure S1C,D), suggesting that they may form a TCS. Notably, in the more commonly studied A. baumannii ATCC17978, frameshift mutations in the DJ41_1408 homologue cause its premature termination, and thus the protein is not documented. We therefore elected to investigate DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 using the A. baumannii ATCC19606 strain.

2.2. DJ41_1408 Transcriptome Analysis

Single (∆DJ41_1407, ∆DJ41_1408) and double (∆DJ41_1407/08) mutant strains were developed and confirmed (Figure S2), and comparative analysis of gene expression was conducted between the wild-type and ∆DJ41_1408 strains. Transcriptome analysis results were presented in the form of log2 expression ratios (wild-type/∆DJ41_1408), representing the fold-change in expression. A total of 92 genes exhibited expression ratio values greater than 2.0 or less than −2.0. Among these, 49 genes were upregulated, denoted by positive expression ratios (+), while 43 genes were downregulated, indicated by negative expression ratios (−). Gene ontology analysis (Figure 1A) and KEGG classification (Figure 1B) showed that DJ41_1408 predominantly influenced genes related to carbon metabolism and other metabolic pathways, such as benzoate or other aromatic compound degradation (Figure 1C,D). Notably, two gene clusters shown to be upregulated in transcriptome analysis, ranging from 1.4 to 2.8 in terms of log2 ratio, were identified as being associated with benzoate degradation (Figure 1C,D). This suggests that DJ41_1408 may be involved in regulating benzoate degradation, but further research will be needed to ascertain this.

2.3. Possible Binding Region of DJ41_1408

To identify a possible binding site for DJ41_1408, MEME analysis was conducted to search for regulatory regions within the promoters of differentially expressed genes. A 20-base pair region characterized by the sequence 5′TGTAAATRATTAYCAWTWAT3′ on the positive strand was suggested to be the DJ41_1408 binding site (Figure 2A). This sequence was also found to be consistent with those located in the upstream region of genes with opposite transcriptional orientation. Interestingly, a similar sequence was observed in the upstream region of DJ41_1408 itself, suggesting that it has the capability to regulate its own gene expression, a feature commonly found in most characterized TCSs. The putative DJ41_1408 binding box was identified within the upstream region between positions −130 to −149 of DJ41_1408, displaying a specific sequence of 5′CCTAAACCAGTTCCATTAAT3′ (Figure 2B). However, further research is needed to ascertain the binding characteristics, as well as whether other proteins may be involved in the binding process.

2.4. DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 Regulate Motility but Not Colony Size

Morphological differences (Figure 3A) between A. baumannii ATCC19606 wild-type and mutant strains were analysed with ImageJ 1.53t, revealing similar colony sizes, and indicating that DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 do not affect this aspect. A motility assay was also conducted. A. baumannii ATCC19606 wild-type and mutant strains were incubated on 0.25% agar plates, and the motility area of each strain was recorded. Upon quantification, the motility areas of ∆DJ41_1407 and ∆DJ41_1407/08 were approximately 1.5-fold smaller than wild-type at both 72 h and 96 h post-incubation, and the results were statistically significant; however, there was no significant difference in the motility area of ∆DJ41_1408 compared to wild-type throughout the assay (Figure 3B). The results suggest that DJ41_1407 may be important for the motility of A. baumannii.

2.5. DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 Regulate Biofilm Formation and Virulence

A biofilm formation assay was performed to determine whether DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 regulate this capability. A. baumannii ATCC19606 wild-type and mutant strains were cultured in 96-well plates for 12 h, and 1% crystal violet was used to stain the biofilm matrix. Results showed that the intensity of crystal violet, which serves as an indicator of biofilm mass, decreased by 1.5-fold in ∆DJ41_1408 compared to the wild type, and the results were statistically significant, while ∆DJ41_1407 and ∆DJ41_1407/08 had a similar biofilm mass as the wild type (Figure 4A). This suggests that DJ41_1408 plays a key role in the biofilm-forming ability of A. baumannii.
The biofilm-forming ability of bacteria is one of the factors that significantly influences virulence, and to investigate whether DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 affect the virulence of A. baumannii, an infection assay using Galleria mellonella larvae was conducted. G. mellonella larvae were infected with 5 × 106 CFU/larva of A. baumannii ATCC19606 wild-type and mutant strains, and the survival rate of larvae was recorded every 24 h. At 24 h post-infection, the survival rate of larvae infected with wild-type and ∆DJ41_1407 strainsstrain was 50%, while for ∆DJ41_1408 and ∆DJ41_1407/08 strains, the survival rate decreased to 20%. Thereafter, survival rates of larvae infected with wild-type, ∆DJ41_1408, and ∆DJ41_1407/08 strains remained steady until the end of the 4-day infection period, with no further declines observed. As for larvae infected with ∆DJ41_1407, the survival rate gradually decreased to 20% upon 3 days post-infection, and then remained steady with no further declines thereafter (Figure 4B). This outcome suggests that DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 can play a role in inhibiting the virulence of A. baumannii.

2.6. DJ41_1408 Modulates Antibiotic Response

To investigate whether DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 contribute to A. baumannii antibiotic resistance, the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of different antibiotics to bacterial strains were assessed, using a standardized broth microdilution method, with antibiotic solutions serially diluted 2-fold. Accordingly, wild-type and mutant strains were treated with apramycin, gentamycin, kanamycin, tetracycline, polymyxin B, and colistin. The results of this assay revealed that there was a 2-fold decrease in the MIC for ∆DJ41_1408 to gentamicin and kanamycin in comparison to the wild-type strain, while the MIC of all antibiotics for ∆DJ41_1407 remained the same as that of the wild-type strain (Table 1). Both kanamycin and gentamicin are aminoglycosides that bind irreversibly to the 30S bacterial ribosome and disrupt protein synthesis, resulting in cell death. These findings suggest that DJ41_1408 is involved in modulating the aminoglycoside response in A. baumannii ATCC19606, but further studies will be needed to confirm if DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 are involved in antibiotic resistance, and if so, through which underlying mechanisms.

3. Discussion

DJ41_1408 was found to modulate the aminoglycoside response in A. baumannii ATCC19606, although it is not yet certain whether the effect rises to the level of conferring antibiotic resistance. In A. baumannii, several TCSs have already been implicated in conferring resistance to antibiotics. For example, AdeSR enhances resistance to aminoglycosides by regulating the expression of the RND-type efflux pump AdeABC [22]. In other bacteria such as E. coli, the CpxAR TCS has been reported to be involved in polymyxin B resistance, even in the absence of the AcrB efflux pump [31]. Further studies are needed to ascertain whether DJ41_1408 can indeed induce aminoglycoside resistance, and if so, to elucidate the underlying mechanisms involved. In A. baumannii ATCC19606, it is possible that DJ41_1408 may regulate aminoglycoside resistance through efflux pump-related genes, such as the identified gene cluster DJ41_1868-DJ41_1870, for which the ∆DJ41_1408 strain demonstrated decreased expression levels ranging from 2.4 to 4.2 in terms of log2 ratio (Figure 1A). However, further research is needed to understand the detailed mechanisms.
This study showed that mutation of DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 increases A. baumannii ATCC19606 virulence (Figure 4B). In A. baumannii, the BfmRS TCS is known to affect virulence via regulation of the csuA/BABCDE usher–chaperone assembly system, which produces pili involved in biofilm formation [27], while the GacSA TCS was previously found to regulate the phenylacetic acid (PAA) pathway that is essential for full virulence [30,32]. Conversely, in other bacteria such as Salmonella enterica, CpxR/A represses the expression of virulence genes by affecting the stability of the transcriptional regulator HilD [33], while in Staphylococcus aureus, the SrrAB TCS may repress virulence under low-oxygen conditions [34]. It is uncertain as to the mechanisms employed by DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 to regulate virulence in A. baumannii ATCC19606, but from this study, effects on biofilm formation (Figure 4A) were observed, and this may play a role in virulence, for which further investigation is warranted.
Motility assay results showed that DJ41_1407 enhanced the motility of A. baumannii ATCC19606 (Figure 3B). In A. baumannii, OmpR-EnvZ was found to regulate motility [18], and the hybrid sensor kinase A1S_2811 was reported to regulate surface motility and biofilm formation via the chaperone/usher pili-associated csuA/ABCDE operon and the AbaI-dependent quorum-sensing pathway-associated A1S_0112-0119 operon [10]. In other bacteria, such as avian pathogenic E. coli, KdpD/KdpE contributed to the expression of some flagella-related genes involved with flagella formation and motility [35], while in Dickeya oryzae, ArcBA was found to modulate cell motility and biofilm formation [36]. Interestingly, the recent research in A. baumannii strain MAR002 has shown that virulence is decreased when impairments in surface-associated motility occur, but not when twitching motility is affected [37]. It is uncertain as to the type(s) of motility affected by DJ41_1407 in A. baumannii ATCC19606, and the exact mechanisms involved in motility increase and the implications for virulence and persistence require further investigation.
In conclusion, this study identified a novel sensor (DJ41_1407) and regulator (DJ41_1408) located in the same transcript as GacA in A. baumannii ATCC19606, and demonstrated that this TCS can influence motility, biofilm formation, virulence, and antibiotic resistance.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacteria Strains, Plasmids, and Media

The bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 2, while the plasmids and primers used in mutant construction are listed in Table 3 and Table 4. LB (lysogeny broth) medium and agar were used to grow bacterial strains either statically or with shaking at 200 rpm at 37 °C.

4.2. Markerless Mutation

PCR was performed using the corresponding primers to amplify the upstream 1 kb and downstream 1 kb of DJ41_1407 or DJ41_1408, respectively (Figure S2). The upstream and downstream 1 kb fragment were then each inserted into the suicide plasmid pK18mobsacB, which was then transformed into E. coli S17-1λπ. The derived recombinant plasmid was subsequently transformed into A. baumannii through conjugation. Culturing on LB plates containing 50 μg/mL ampicillin and 50 μg/mL kanamycin was performed to select A. baumannii with the pK18mobsacB plasmid integrated into chromosomes, indicative of first homologous recombination. Colony PCR was then performed to amplify the upstream to downstream fragment for selection of colonies that successfully underwent 1st homologous recombination. Selected colonies were then cultured in LB medium containing 20% sucrose. SacB protein translated from the pK18mobsacB plasmid digests sucrose into leaven, which is lethal for bacterial survival, and therefore 2nd homologous recombination will occur, with 50% possibility for the deletion of gene fragments to be mutated [41]. Mutation confirmation results are shown in Figure S2.

4.3. Transcriptome Analysis Preparation

Bacterial strains were cultured in LB medium containing 50 μg/mL ampicillin at 37 ℃ for 12–14 h, and then subcultured with initial OD600 of 0.1 for 3 h. After 3 h, the bacterial solution was aliquoted to OD600 of 0.6 for every microcentrifuge tube, and centrifuged at 13,000× g for 10 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed, and the pellet was resuspended with 1 mL Thermo Fisher TRIzol™ Reagent (Invitrogen, CA USA). After resuspension, the sample was stored at −80 °C and then sent to Welgene Biotech Co., Ltd., (Taipei, Taiwan) for transcriptome analysis.

4.4. Galleria Mellonella Larvae Infection Assay

Bacterial strains were cultured in LB medium at 37 °C for 12–14 h. The bacterial solution was then washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline buffer (PBS, 0.14 M NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 8.1 mM Na2HPO4, 1.5 mM KH2PO4) to remove LB medium, and then diluted to 5 × 108 CFU/mL. Larvae that were infected only with PBS and heat-killed wild-type served as the control group (n = 10). Heat-killed wild-type was prepared by heating the bacterial solution at 100 °C for 5 min. Using Hamilton syringes [Hamilton® syringe, 700 series, 701N], 10 mL of diluted bacterial solutions was injected into G. mellonella larvae through the last left pro-leg of the abdominal region. The final bacterial concentration was 5 × 106 CFU/larva. Infected larvae were incubated at 37 °C. Scores for survival (alive/dead) and melanisation were measured every 24 h for 96 h [42].

4.5. Biofilm Formation Assay

Bacteria were cultured at 37 °C for 12–14 h. The optical density of overnight cultures was measured and adjusted to OD600 = 1. Bacteria were then cultured in 96-well plates from OD600 = 0.1 for 12–14 h, after which 1% crystal violet was added into the bacterial solution and stained for 30 min. All bacterial solutions were removed from each well and rinsed with ddH2O twice. The 96-well plate was allowed to dry for 15 min. The stained biofilm in each well was dissolved with 300 mL 95% ethanol for 30 min and measured with OD595 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA; MultiskanTM SkyHigh) [43].

4.6. Motility Assay

Overnight bacterial culture was adjusted to OD600 = 1.0, and 2 mL of bacterial solution was dropped at the centre of a 0.25% LB agar plate. The LB plate was incubated at 37 °C in the dark, and images were taken at 24 h-intervals for at least 96 h. Motility areas were analysed with ImageJ 1.53t [10].

4.7. MIC Test

The antibiotic resistance of each strain was assessed by liquid minimum inhibition assay [39,44]. Antibiotics were inoculated into 96-well microtiter plates with 2-fold serial dilution. The strains were cultured in 3 mL of LB medium at 37 °C overnight. Diluted overnight cultures with an OD600 of 0.1 were then inoculated into 96-well microtiter plates. Optical density was measured after overnight culture, and the MIC was defined as the lowest antibiotic concentration inhibiting bacterial proliferation. Bacterial strains were treated with apramycin, gentamycin, kanamycin, tetracycline, polymyxin B, and colistin. Each desired antibiotic experimental group was serially performed with six replicates [39].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25073862/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.-H.L.; methodology, G.-H.L.; software, G.-H.L.; validation, Y.-H.T.; formal analysis, G.-H.L. and Y.-H.T.; investigation, G.-H.L. and Y.-H.T.; resources, G.-H.L.; data curation, Y.-H.T.; writing—original draft preparation, G.-H.L. and Y.-H.T.; writing—review and editing, G.-H.L. and Y.-H.T.; visualization, G.-H.L. and Y.-H.T.; supervision, G.-H.L.; project administration, G.-H.L.; funding acquisition, G.-H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant from the Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation awarded to Guang-Huey Lin, grant number TCMF-SP110-02 and the National Science and Technology Council under grant number MOST111-2635B320-001-MY2. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data for this study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the support from the Core Facility Centre, Tzu Chi University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lastoria, L.C.; Caldeira, S.M.; Moreira, R.G.; Akazawa, R.T.; Maion, J.C.; Fortaleza, C.M. Ecological competition and the incidence of Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections in a teaching hospital in Southeastern Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2014, 47, 583–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. McConnell, M.J.; Actis, L.; Pachón, J. Acinetobacter baumannii: Human infections, factors contributing to pathogenesis and animal models. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 130–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Roca, I.; Espinal, P.; Vila-Farrés, X.; Vila, J. The Acinetobacter baumannii Oxymoron: Commensal Hospital Dweller Turned Pan-Drug-Resistant Menace. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bergogne-Bérézin, E.; Towner, K.J. Acinetobacter spp. as nosocomial pathogens: Microbiological, clinical, and epidemiological features. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1996, 9, 148–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dijkshoorn, L.; Nemec, A.; Seifert, H. An increasing threat in hospitals: Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5, 939–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Boucher, H.W.; Talbot, G.H.; Bradley, J.S.; Edwards, J.E.; Gilbert, D.; Rice, L.B.; Scheld, M.; Spellberg, B.; Bartlett, J. Bad bugs, no drugs: No ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 48, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Espinal, P.; Martí, S.; Vila, J. Effect of biofilm formation on the survival of Acinetobacter baumannii on dry surfaces. J. Hosp. Infect. 2012, 80, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Roy, S.; Chowdhury, G.; Mukhopadhyay, A.K.; Dutta, S.; Basu, S. Convergence of Biofilm Formation and Antibiotic Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii Infection. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 793615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shan, W.; Kan, J.; Cai, X.; Yin, M. Insights into mucoid Acinetobacter baumannii: A review of microbiological characteristics, virulence, and pathogenic mechanisms in a threatening nosocomial pathogen. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 261, 127057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, R.; Lv, R.; Xiao, L.; Wang, M.; Du, Z.; Tan, Y.; Cui, Y.; Yan, Y.; Luo, Y.; Yang, R.; et al. A1S_2811, a CheA/Y-like hybrid two-component regulator from Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC17978, is involved in surface motility and biofilm formation in this bacterium. Microbiologyopen 2017, 6, e00510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhou, D.; He, J.; Chen, Q.; Xu, Q.; Wu, S.; Zhang, W.; Yao, Y.; Fu, Y.; et al. Alteration of adeS Contributes to Tigecycline Resistance and Collateral Sensitivity to Sulbactam in Acinetobacter baumannii. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0459422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, X.; Chang, Y.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, W.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Weng, S.; Leptihn, S.; Jiang, Y.; Yu, Y.; et al. Mutation in the two-component regulator BaeSR mediates cefiderocol resistance and enhances virulence in Acinetobacter baumannii. mSystems 2023, 8, e0129122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Perez Mora, B.; Giordano, R.; Permingeat, V.; Calderone, M.; Arana, N.; Müller, G.; Rodríguez, R.E.; Krasauskas, R.; Mussi, M.A. BfmRS encodes a regulatory system involved in light signal transduction modulating motility and desiccation tolerance in the human pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Massmig, M.; Reijerse, E.; Krausze, J.; Laurich, C.; Lubitz, W.; Jahn, D.; Moser, J. Carnitine metabolism in the human gut: Characterization of the two-component carnitine monooxygenase CntAB from Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 13065–13078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shu, H.Y.; Huang, Y.W.; Tsai, P.Y.; Hsieh, K.S.; Lin, G.H. Role of EmaSR in Ethanol Metabolism by Acinetobacter baumannii. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Feng, Z.; Wang, L.; Guan, Q.; Chu, X.; Luo, Z.-Q. Acinetobacter baumannii coordinates central metabolism, plasmid dissemination, and virulence by sensing nutrient availability. mBio 2023, 14, e0227623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Trebosc, V.; Lucchini, V.; Narwal, M.; Wicki, B.; Gartenmann, S.; Schellhorn, B.; Schill, J.; Bourotte, M.; Frey, D.; Grünberg, J.; et al. Targeting virulence regulation to disarm Acinetobacter baumannii pathogenesis. Virulence 2022, 13, 1868–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tipton, K.A.; Rather, P.N. An ompR-envZ Two-Component System Ortholog Regulates Phase Variation, Osmotic Tolerance, Motility, and Virulence in Acinetobacter baumannii Strain AB5075. J. Bacteriol. 2017, 199, e00705–e00716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Park, J.; Kim, M.; Shin, B.; Kang, M.; Yang, J.; Lee, T.K.; Park, W. A novel decoy strategy for polymyxin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. eLife 2021, 10, e66988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Giles, S.K.; Stroeher, U.H.; Papudeshi, B.; Edwards, R.A.; Carlson-Jones, J.A.; Roach, M.; Brown, M.H. The StkSR Two-Component System Influences Colistin Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Casella, L.G.; Torres, N.J.; Tomlinson, B.R.; Shepherd, M.; Shaw, L.N. The novel two-component system AmsSR governs alternative metabolic pathway usage in Acinetobacter baumannii. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1139253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marchand, I.; Damier-Piolle, L.; Courvalin, P.; Lambert, T. Expression of the RND-type efflux pump AdeABC in Acinetobacter baumannii is regulated by the AdeRS two-component system. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 3298–3304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lin, M.F.; Lin, Y.Y.; Yeh, H.W.; Lan, C.Y. Role of the BaeSR two-component system in the regulation of Acinetobacter baumannii adeAB genes and its correlation with tigecycline susceptibility. BMC Microbiol. 2014, 14, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lin, M.F.; Lin, Y.Y.; Lan, C.Y. The Role of the Two-Component System BaeSR in Disposing Chemicals through Regulating Transporter Systems in Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Adams, M.D.; Nickel, G.C.; Bajaksouzian, S.; Lavender, H.; Murthy, A.R.; Jacobs, M.R.; Bonomo, R.A. Resistance to colistin in Acinetobacter baumannii associated with mutations in the PmrAB two-component system. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 3628–3634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Arroyo, L.A.; Herrera, C.M.; Fernandez, L.; Hankins, J.V.; Trent, M.S.; Hancock, R.E. The pmrCAB operon mediates polymyxin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 17978 and clinical isolates through phosphoethanolamine modification of lipid A. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 3743–3751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tomaras, A.P.; Flagler, M.J.; Dorsey, C.W.; Gaddy, J.A.; Actis, L.A. Characterization of a two-component regulatory system from Acinetobacter baumannii that controls biofilm formation and cellular morphology. Microbiology 2008, 154 Pt 11, 3398–3409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Geisinger, E.; Isberg, R.R. Antibiotic modulation of capsular exopolysaccharide and virulence in Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bhuiyan, M.S.; Ellett, F.; Murray, G.L.; Kostoulias, X.; Cerqueira, G.M.; Schulze, K.E.; Mahamad Maifiah, M.H.; Li, J.; Creek, D.J.; Lieschke, G.J.; et al. Acinetobacter baumannii phenylacetic acid metabolism influences infection outcome through a direct effect on neutrophil chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 9599–9604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cerqueira, G.M.; Kostoulias, X.; Khoo, C.; Aibinu, I.; Qu, Y.; Traven, A.; Peleg, A.Y. A global virulence regulator in Acinetobacter baumannii and its control of the phenylacetic acid catabolic pathway. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 210, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Weatherspoon-Griffin, N.; Yang, D.; Kong, W.; Hua, Z.; Shi, Y. The CpxR/CpxA two-component regulatory system up-regulates the multidrug resistance cascade to facilitate Escherichia coli resistance to a model antimicrobial peptide. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 32571–32582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Teufel, R.; Mascaraque, V.; Ismail, W.; Voss, M.; Perera, J.; Eisenreich, W.; Haehnel, W.; Fuchs, G. Bacterial phenylalanine and phenylacetate catabolic pathway revealed. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 14390–14395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. De la Cruz, M.A.; Pérez-Morales, D.; Palacios, I.J.; Fernández-Mora, M.; Calva, E.; Bustamante, V.H. The two-component system CpxR/A represses the expression of Salmonella virulence genes by affecting the stability of the transcriptional regulator HilD. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yarwood, J.M.; McCormick, J.K.; Schlievert, P.M. Identification of a novel two-component regulatory system that acts in global regulation of virulence factors of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 1113–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xue, M.; Raheem, M.A.; Gu, Y.; Lu, H.; Song, X.; Tu, J.; Xue, T.; Qi, K. The KdpD/KdpE two-component system contributes to the motility and virulence of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. Res. Vet. Sci. 2020, 131, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lv, M.; Ye, S.; Hu, M.; Xue, Y.; Liang, Z.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, J. Two-component system ArcBA modulates cell motility and biofilm formation in Dickeya oryzae. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1033192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jeong, G.J.; Khan, F.; Tabassum, N.; Kim, Y.M. Motility of Acinetobacter baumannii: Regulatory systems and controlling strategies. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 108, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. de Lorenzo, V.; Fernández, S.; Herrero, M.; Jakubzik, U.; Timmis, K.N. Engineering of alkyl- and haloaromatic-responsive gene expression with mini-transposons containing regulated promoters of biodegradative pathways of Pseudomonas. Gene 1993, 130, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, S.J.; Shu, H.Y.; Lin, G.H. Regulation of tert-Butyl Hydroperoxide Resistance by Chromosomal OhrR in A. baumannii ATCC 19606. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bouvet, P.J.; Grimont, P.A. Taxonomy of the genus Acinetobacter with the recognition of Acinetobacter baumannii sp. nov., Acinetobacter haemolyticus sp. nov., Acinetobacter johnsonii sp. nov., and Acinetobacter junii sp. nov. and emended descriptions of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Acinetobacter lwoffii. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1986, 36, 228–240. [Google Scholar]
  41. Schäfer, A.; Tauch, A.; Jäger, W.; Kalinowski, J.; Thierbach, G.; Pühler, A. Small mobilizable multi-purpose cloning vectors derived from the Escherichia coli plasmids pK18 and pK19: Selection of defined deletions in the chromosome of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Gene 1994, 145, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tsai, C.J.; Loh, J.M.; Proft, T. Galleria mellonella infection models for the study of bacterial diseases and for antimicrobial drug testing. Virulence 2016, 7, 214–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lin, H.R.; Shu, H.Y.; Lin, G.H. Biological roles of indole-3-acetic acid in Acinetobacter baumannii. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 216, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard, 7th ed.; [M7-A7]; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Transcriptome analysis of differential gene expression between the A. baumannii ATCC19606 wild-type and DJ41_1408 mutant strains. (A) Differential gene expression by gene ontology classification, in which only clusters with more than 2 genes are displayed. (B) Differential gene expression by KEGG classification, in which only clusters with more than 2 genes are displayed. (C) Fold-change in gene expression for DJ41_332-DJ41_340 and DJ41_2252-DJ41_2255, gene clusters involved in benzoate degradation. Black lines indicate individual transcriptional units, and white or grey arrows represent transcription direction. (D) DJ41_332-DJ41_340 and DJ41_2252-DJ41_2255 annotation in the A. baumannii ATCC19606 benzoate degradation pathway. Black text: gene number; red text: gene name; blue text: log2 expression ratio (wild-type/∆DJ41_1408).
Figure 1. Transcriptome analysis of differential gene expression between the A. baumannii ATCC19606 wild-type and DJ41_1408 mutant strains. (A) Differential gene expression by gene ontology classification, in which only clusters with more than 2 genes are displayed. (B) Differential gene expression by KEGG classification, in which only clusters with more than 2 genes are displayed. (C) Fold-change in gene expression for DJ41_332-DJ41_340 and DJ41_2252-DJ41_2255, gene clusters involved in benzoate degradation. Black lines indicate individual transcriptional units, and white or grey arrows represent transcription direction. (D) DJ41_332-DJ41_340 and DJ41_2252-DJ41_2255 annotation in the A. baumannii ATCC19606 benzoate degradation pathway. Black text: gene number; red text: gene name; blue text: log2 expression ratio (wild-type/∆DJ41_1408).
Ijms 25 03862 g001aIjms 25 03862 g001b
Figure 2. Putative DJ41_1408 binding box analysis by MEME. (A) Conservation of the DJ41_1408 binding box. (B) The exact sequence of the DJ41_1408 binding box in promoter regions of different genes, which were analysed using MEME to identify highly conserved sequences. Positions represent the location of the conserved sequence at the upstream of analysed genes, and the first base pair of the start codon was considered as +1. The highly conserved sequence may be the binding site of DJ41_1408. MEME link: https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme (accessed on 13 April 2023).
Figure 2. Putative DJ41_1408 binding box analysis by MEME. (A) Conservation of the DJ41_1408 binding box. (B) The exact sequence of the DJ41_1408 binding box in promoter regions of different genes, which were analysed using MEME to identify highly conserved sequences. Positions represent the location of the conserved sequence at the upstream of analysed genes, and the first base pair of the start codon was considered as +1. The highly conserved sequence may be the binding site of DJ41_1408. MEME link: https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme (accessed on 13 April 2023).
Ijms 25 03862 g002
Figure 3. (A) Photographs of A. baumannii ATCC19606 wild-type and mutant strain colonies were taken at 12 h post-cultivation. The white scale bar represents 3 mm. ImageJ 1.53t was used to analyse the diameter of colonies, using the scale bar as a standard, and with 10 colony replicates measured in each strain. (B) Measured motility area of A. baumannii ATCC19606 and mutant strains. Photographs were taken at 72 h post-cultivation, and ImageJ 1.53t was used to analyse the motility area of all strains. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.001.
Figure 3. (A) Photographs of A. baumannii ATCC19606 wild-type and mutant strain colonies were taken at 12 h post-cultivation. The white scale bar represents 3 mm. ImageJ 1.53t was used to analyse the diameter of colonies, using the scale bar as a standard, and with 10 colony replicates measured in each strain. (B) Measured motility area of A. baumannii ATCC19606 and mutant strains. Photographs were taken at 72 h post-cultivation, and ImageJ 1.53t was used to analyse the motility area of all strains. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.001.
Ijms 25 03862 g003
Figure 4. (A) Biofilm-forming ability of A. baumannii ATCC19606 wild-type and mutant strains. OD570 represents biofilm formation ability. * p < 0.05. (B) G. mellonella survival rates after infection with A. baumannii ATCC19606 wild-type and mutant strains. Kaplan–Meier survival curves are shown, with each curve representing a single representative experiment performed with 10 larvae.
Figure 4. (A) Biofilm-forming ability of A. baumannii ATCC19606 wild-type and mutant strains. OD570 represents biofilm formation ability. * p < 0.05. (B) G. mellonella survival rates after infection with A. baumannii ATCC19606 wild-type and mutant strains. Kaplan–Meier survival curves are shown, with each curve representing a single representative experiment performed with 10 larvae.
Ijms 25 03862 g004
Table 1. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of different antibiotics against bacterial strains.
Table 1. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of different antibiotics against bacterial strains.
STRAINAPRGENKANTETPMBCST
Wild-type50100250.786.255
∆DJ41_140750100250.786.255
∆DJ41_1408505012.50.786.255
∆DJ41_1407∆DJ41_1408505012.50.786.255
APR: apramycin, GEN: gentamicin, KAN: kanamycin, TET: tetracycline, PMB: polymyxin B, CST: colistin. Bold underline: A 2-fold lower MIC in comparison to wild type. The unit of antibiotics used was mg/mL.
Table 2. Bacterial strains used in this study.
Table 2. Bacterial strains used in this study.
BacteriaDescriptionReferences or Source
E. coli
DH5αF, supE44, hsdR17, recA1, gyrA96, endA1, thi-1, relA1, deoR, λATCC53868
DH5α/pK18-∆DJ41_1408Kanr, DH5α containing pK18_∆DJ41_1408This study
DH5α/pK18-∆DJ41_1407-08Kanr, DH5α containing pK18-∆DJ41_1407-08This study
S17-1λπthi-1, thr, leu, tonA, lacY, supE, recA, RP4-2 (Km::Tn7,Tc::Mu-1), Smr, lpir[38]
S17-1λπ/pK18-∆DJ41_1407Kanr, S17-1λπ containing pK18_∆DJ41-1407[39]
S17-1λπ/pK18-∆DJ41_1408Kanr, S17-1λπ containing pK18_∆DJ41_1408This study
S17-1λπ/pK18-∆DJ41_1407-08Kanr, S17-1λπ containing pK18-∆DJ41_1407-08This study
A. baumannii
ATCC19606Ampr, clinical isolate, wild type[40]
∆DJ41_1407Ampr, deletion of DJ41_1407[39]
∆DJ41_1408Ampr, deletion of DJ41_1408This study
∆DJ41_1407∆DJ41_1408Ampr, deletion of DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408This study
Table 3. Primers used in this study.
Table 3. Primers used in this study.
PrimerSequence (5′-3′)ApplicationReference or Source
pK18-DJ41_1408UP_FAATTCGAGCTCGGTACCCGGGATATTAACCGTTATATCTTAconstruct and confirm mutantThis study
pK18-DJ41_1408DO_RGTAAAACGACGGCCAGTGCCACGTCCGTGATAACTATGTCGconstruct and confirm mutantThis study
DJ41_1408UP-DJ41_1408DO_FAAATGGCAGAACAGCAACCGGAGACAGAACAGGAAGTAconstruct mutantThis study
DJ41_1408DO-DJ41_1408UP_RTACTTCCTGTTCTGTCTCCGGTTGCTGTTCTGCCATTTconstruct mutantThis study
pK18-DJ41_1407UP_FGAGCTCGGTACCCGGGGTGGTTGAGAACTGACGAATconstruct and confirm mutantThis study
DJ41_1408DO-DJ41_1407UP_RTACTTCCTGTTCTGTCTCCGACGAAAAATCGTATGGGACAconstruct mutantThis study
DJ41_1407UP-DJ41_1408DO_FTGTCCCATACGATTTTTCGTCGGAGACAGAACAGGAAGTAconstruct mutantThis study
1406_up380-FGAGCTCGGTACCCGGGACGGGTTATTGACGAGTTCTconfirm mutantThis study
1408_do250-RGTGCTTGGGTTATGGGTGAAconfirm mutantThis study
AbEraS+R_intergenic region-qFGCGATTCGTTAC GGTTTGATamplify intergenic region[39]
AbEraS+R_intergenic region-qRAGGAATATAAGGCAGGTTGCTGamplify intergenic region[39]
1407/08-IGR-qFGGGGCATGCTTCAGAATAGAamplify intergenic regionThis study
1407/08-IGR-qRTAATCCCCATTCGTGCAAGTamplify intergenic regionThis study
Table 4. Plasmids used in this study.
Table 4. Plasmids used in this study.
PlasmidsDescriptionReferences or Source
pK18mobsacBKanr, mobilizable suicide vector, sacB, oriT[41]
pK18-∆DJ41_1407Kanr, pK18mobsacB containing DJ41_1407 upstream and downstream 1 kb fragments[39]
pK18-∆DJ41_1408Kanr, pK18mobsacB containing DJ41_1408 upstream and downstream 1 kb fragmentsThis study
pK18-∆DJ41_1407-08Kanr, pK18mobsacB containing DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 upstream and downstream 1 kb fragmentsThis study
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Toh, Y.-H.; Lin, G.-H. Roles of DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 in Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC19606 Virulence and Antibiotic Response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3862. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073862

AMA Style

Toh Y-H, Lin G-H. Roles of DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 in Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC19606 Virulence and Antibiotic Response. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(7):3862. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073862

Chicago/Turabian Style

Toh, Yee-Huan, and Guang-Huey Lin. 2024. "Roles of DJ41_1407 and DJ41_1408 in Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC19606 Virulence and Antibiotic Response" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 7: 3862. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073862

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop