Approach to the “Missing” Diarylsilylene: Formation, Characterization, and Intramolecular C–H Bond Activation of Blue Diarylsilylenes with Bulky Rind Groups ^†

Abstract

The treatment of the bulky Rind-based dibromosilanes, (Rind)₂SiBr₂ (2) [Rind = 1,1,7,7-tetra-R¹-3,3,5,5-tetra-R²-s-hydrindacen-4-yl: EMind (a: R¹ = Et, R² = Me) and Eind (b: R¹ = R² = Et)], with two equivalents of ^tBuLi in Et₂O at low temperatures resulted in the formation of blue solutions derived from the diarylsilylenes, (Rind)₂Si: (3). Upon warming the solutions above −20 °C, the blue color gradually faded, accompanying the decomposition of 3 and yielding cyclic hydrosilanes (4) via intramolecular C–H bond insertion at the Si(II) center. The molecular structures of the bulky Eind-based 3b and 4b were confirmed by X-ray crystallography. Thus, at −20 °C, blue crystals were formed (Crystal-A), which were identified as mixed crystals of 3b and 4b. Additionally, colorless crystals of 4b as a singular component were isolated (Crystal-B), whose structure was also determined by an X-ray diffraction analysis. Although the isolation of 3 was difficult due to their thermally labile nature, their structural characteristics and electronic properties were discussed based on the experimental findings complemented by computational results. We also examined the hydrolysis of 3b to afford the silanol, (Eind)₂SiH(OH) (5b).

1. Introduction

In 1989, Jutzi and co-workers reported the synthesis of decamethylsilicocene, (Me₅C₅)₂Si:, as the first thermally stable divalent silicon species [1]. Since then, various neutral Si(II) compounds, known as silylenes, have been synthesized, employing bulky substituents for steric protection and/or coordination with Lewis bases [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Notably, the isolable cyclic two-coordinate silylenes, N-heterocyclic silylene (A) and dialkylsilylene (B), were reported by West’s and Kira’s groups in 1994 and 1999, respectively (Figure 1) [17,18]. Subsequent advancements led to the synthesis and characterization of heteroatom-substituted acyclic silylenes, represented by a boron- and nitrogen-substituted silylene (C) [19], a sulfur-substituted silylene (D) [20], and a nitrogen- and silicon-substituted silylene (E) [21]. Moreover, new members of the two-coordinate silylene family, such as a cyclic (alkyl)(amino)silylene (F) [22], a cyclic (amino)(ylide)silylene (G) [23], an acyclic (imino)(siloxy)silylene (H) [24], and an acyclic (vinyl)(silyl)silylene (I) [25], have been successfully isolated by introducing substituents with distinctive electronic effects. Also, a newly modified cyclic dialkylsilylene (J) was developed by Iwamoto’s group, which was allowed to transform into a genuine silanone [26]. Despite the increasing interest in the synthesis and reaction chemistry of silylenes due to their inherent unsaturated nature, the isolation of aryl-substituted silylenes, i.e., diarylsilylenes, as stable compounds at room temperature remains an elusive goal.

Historically, in 1981, West, Fink, and Michl reported the generation of a transient blue dimesitylsilylene, (Mes)₂Si: (K) (Mes = 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl), in a 3-methylpentane (3-MP) matrix at −196 °C by photolysis of a trisilane, (Mes)₂Si(SiMe₃)₂ [Scheme 1a] [27]. When the matrix is melted at higher temperatures, the dimerization of the silylene K affords a tetramesityldisilene, (Mes)₂Si=Si(Mes)₂, as the first stable disilene molecule. As shown in Scheme 1b, Tokitoh, Suzuki, and Okazaki found in 1993 that the cis- and trans-disilenes, (Tbt)(Mes)Si=Si(Mes)(Tbt) (Tbt = 2,4,6-tris[bis(trimethylsilyl)methyl]phenyl), undergo thermal cleavage of the Si=Si double bond in solution to form a diarylsilylene, (Tbt)(Mes)Si: (L), establishing an equilibrium between dissociation and association with the disilene at temperatures exceeding 70 °C [28]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no crystalline diarylsilylene has been known until now.

For more than about 15 years, our research has been centered on investigating the chemistry of low-coordinated element–organic compounds using the bulky aryl groups derived from the rigid fused-ring 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7-octa-R-substituted s-hydrindacene skeleton, called the “Rind” groups (Figure 2). The readily accessible Rind groups offer several advantages over other bulky groups, including adjustability of the physical properties through the outer R¹ groups and control of the steric bulkiness via the inner R² groups [29].

During the course of our studies, we have synthesized a series of isolable two-coordinate Ge(II) compounds, diarylgermylenes, (Rind)₂Ge: (M), featuring the bulky Rind groups [Rind = EMind (a: R¹ = Et, R² = Me), Eind (b: R¹ = R² = Et), and MPind (c: R¹ = Me, R² = ⁿPr)] [30,31,32]. These compounds were obtained as purple-to-blue crystals at room temperature by the reaction of GeCl₂·dioxane with two equivalents of (Rind)Li, and their structures were determined by an X-ray crystallographic analysis. Notably, the bulky Eind-based germylene, (Eind)₂Ge: (M-b), reacted with trimethylamine N-oxide (Me₃N⁺–O^–) or N₂O gas to afford an isolable monomeric germanone, (Eind)₂Ge=O, with the planar three-coordinate Ge(IV) atom and a terminal oxygen atom [31,33]. Additionally, we successfully isolated a Sn(II) analog, diarylstannylene, (EMind)₂Sn: (N-a), as purple crystals by a similar reaction of SnBr₂·dioxane with two equivalents of (EMind)Li [34]. These experimental findings prompted us to further investigate the “missing” diarylsilylenes through the incorporation of the bulky Rind groups. It is also noteworthy that one-coordinate compounds of heavier Group 14 elements have recently been isolated employing the modified M^sFluind group [29,35,36].

In this article, we report the formation and characterization of diarylsilylenes, (Rind)₂Si: (3), bearing the less bulky EMind (a) and the bulky Eind (b) groups. Although the isolation of 3 posed challenges due to their thermally labile nature, we extensively examined their structural attributes and electronic properties, drawing insights from both the experimental observations and computational data. We also report the thermal reaction and hydrolysis of 3b, resulting in the formation of the cyclic hydrosilane 4b and silanol 5b through activation of the C–H and O–H bonds at the Si(II) center.

2. Results and Discussion

In a previous study, we reported the synthesis and structures of the sterically congested dihydrosilanes, (Rind)₂SiH₂ (1), and dibromosilanes, (Rind)₂SiBr₂ (2), with the two large Rind groups [Rind = EMind (a) and Eind (b)] attached to the Si(IV) center [37]. We then conducted a modified coupling reaction between the Eind-substituted chlorodihydrosilane, (Eind)SiH₂Cl, and (Eind)Li, on a larger scale than before, resulting in the formation of colorless crystals of (Eind)₂SiH₂ (1b) with an isolated yield of up to 73%. Following the bromination of the Si–H bonds in 1b using N-bromosuccinimide (NBS), (Eind)₂SiBr₂ (2b) was obtained in a 64% yield.

After obtaining sufficient quantities of the two types of sterically congested molecules of 2, i.e., the less bulky EMind-based 2a and the bulky Eind-based 2b, we proceeded to investigate the reduction of 2 for the transformation to the diarylsilylenes, (Rind)₂Si: (3). As illustrated in Scheme 2, the treatment of 2 with two equivalents of ^tBuLi in Et₂O at lower temperatures yielded blue solutions originating from 3 [Figure 3a]. After attempting various reducing agents, we finally found that employing two equivalents of ^tBuLi towards 2 in Et₂O at lower temperatures proved the most efficient for the conversion to 3 [38]. However, unfortunately, as the solutions warmed above approximately −20 °C, the vibrant blue hue began to fade, signaling the thermal degradation of 3. Visually, the bulky Eind-based 3b appeared to be more stable at −20 °C compared to the less bulky EMind-based 3a. It is conceivable that differences in the steric bulkiness of the two Rind groups influence the thermal stability of the Si(II) compounds in solution.

Confirmation of the formation of the diarylsilylenes 3 was achieved by UV-vis spectroscopy. Following stirring of the blue solutions for 2 h at temperatures below −20 °C, the reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness while maintaining temperatures below −20 °C. Precooled toluene was then added to the blue residues, and the resulting suspensions were centrifuged to eliminate any insoluble materials. The obtained blue supernatants were used for the UV-vis measurements. The UV-vis spectra of these supernatants in toluene exhibited an absorption maximum (λ_max) at 605 nm for 3a [Figure S1] and 618 nm for 3b [Figure S2]. These observed values are close to the previously reported absorption peaks of dimesitylsilylene, (Mes)₂Si: (K), in a low-temperature matrix (λ_max = 577 nm) [39], and in cyclohexane at 25 °C by laser flash photolysis (LFP) (λ_max = 580 nm) [40]. In addition, the absorption peaks of these diarylsilylenes are significantly red-shifted compared to those of diphenylsilylene, Ph₂Si:, in a low-temperature matrix (λ_max = 505 nm) [39], and in hexane at 25 °C by LFP (λ_max = 520 nm) [41]. The origin of these absorption bands is ascribed to the forbidden n → 3p transition, which may be affected by the introduction of electron-donating alkyl substituents on the phenyl groups bound to the Si(II) center. The above experimental observations are consistent with the theoretical calculations of 3 in a singlet state (vide infra).

Upon standing the toluene solution containing 3b at −20 °C, blue crystals precipitated (Crystal-A) [Figure 3b]. The single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD) analysis elucidated the composition of a mixed crystal containing 3b and a cyclic hydrosilane (4b) formed via intramolecular C–H bond activation at the Si(II) center (Figure 4). Consequently, the central silicon atom (Si1) and the carbon atoms (C55 and C56) from one of the proximate ethyl groups are disordered over the two positions in Crystal-A with occupancy factors of 0.289(3) for 3b and 0.711(3) for 4b. The position of the hydrogen atom (H1) attached to the silicon atom of 4b was determined using difference Fourier maps and isotropically refined. Unfortunately, attempts to crystallize 3a in a pure form were unsuccessful. Also, despite efforts to induce crystallization by cooling the solution containing 3a to temperatures below −20 °C, no crystals were formed.

The ORTEP drawings of 3b and 4b are shown in Figure 4. Despite the challenges in refining accurate metric parameters due to the inherent disorder of the Si and C atoms, the structures and connectivity of both 3b and 4b were confirmed. In the solid state, the diarylsilylene 3b exhibits a discrete monomeric structure characterized by a bent two-coordinate geometry, attributed to the presence of a non-bonding pair of electrons at the Si(II) center. The C–Si–C bond angle in 3b [112.3(2)°] is smaller than those observed in the related Si(IV) compounds, 1b [123.60(17)°] and 2b [116.60(13)°] (

Table 1. Selected structural parameters.

Compounds	Si–C (Å)	C(sp2)–Si–C(sp2) (°)
experimental
1b [37]	1.950(4), 1.938(5)	123.60(17)
2b [37]	1.934 (3)	116.60(13)
3b (Crystal-A)	1.941(5), 2.004(5)	112.3(2)
4b (Crystal-A)	1.919(2), 1.873(3),	119.57(12)
	1.904(4)
4b (Crystal-B)	1.899(3), 1.909(2),	122.11(11)
	1.964(3)
5b	1.9090(11), 1.9228(12)	122.05(5)
calculations
3b (singlet)	1.9470, 1.9489	112.00
3b (triplet)	1.8980, 1.8926	127.95
4b	1.9099, 1.9012,	119.50
	1.9358
5b	1.9294, 1.9174	121.32

) [37]. A similar relationship is observed in the C–Ge–C bond angles between the bulky Eind-based Ge(II) compound, germylene, (Eind)₂Ge: (M-b) [111.98(5)°], and Ge(IV) compounds, including the germanone, (Eind)₂Ge=O [124.27(2)°], germanol, (Eind)₂GeH(OH) [123.04(6)°], and dibromogermane, (Eind)₂GeBr₂ [120.4(6)°] [32,42]. It is emphasized that while 3b constitutes a minor fraction in the mixed crystal, we have achieved the first determination of the crystal structure of the diarylsilylene.

As already mentioned, upon heating the solutions containing 3 from −20 °C to room temperature, they underwent a gradual color change from blue to colorless due to the thermal decomposition of 3 (Scheme 2). In the case of the bulky Eind-based 3b, we obtained a complex mixture mainly containing 4b and (Eind)H, together with some unidentified silicon compounds. Colorless crystals of 4b were obtained in an 11% yield, and the structure was characterized by NMR spectroscopy [Figures S5−S10] and SC-XRD analysis. In the ¹H NMR spectrum of 4b in C₆D₆, a broad doublet signal due to the newly formed Si–H bond was found at δ = 6.43 ppm with a vicinal coupling with the methine proton [³J(¹H–¹H) = 4.2 Hz]. The ²⁹Si NMR resonance was observed at δ = −11.9 ppm, appearing as a doublet with the ¹J(²⁹Si–¹H) coupling constant of 201 Hz. In the ¹³C NMR spectrum of 4b, each carbon displayed non-equivalence, which is consistent with the asymmetrical structure induced by the intramolecular cyclization. In the thermal decomposition reaction of the less bulky EMind-based 3a in solution, a more complex mixture was generated compared to that of 3b. In the ²⁹Si NMR spectrum of the reaction mixture, a doublet signal appeared at δ = −14.8 ppm [¹J(²⁹Si–¹H) = 196 Hz], comparable to that of 3b, suggesting the formation of a cyclic hydrosilane 4a. However, due to the overly complex mixture, it was not feasible to isolate 4a.

A similar intramolecular C–H bond insertion reaction was previously reported for the diarylsilylenes such as (Mes)₂Si: (K) [43] and (Tbt)(Mes)Si: (L) [28]. In the cases of K and L, the relatively reactive benzylic C–H bond of the Mes and Tbt groups are incorporated into the silylene center. On the other hand, in the case of 3, the less reactive alkyl group’s C–H bond of the Rind groups is inserted into the silylene center, thus indicating that the Si(II) center of the diarylsilylenes possesses an extremely high reactivity. It is worthy of note that such an intramolecular C–H bond insertion has not been observed in the Eind-based germylene M-b at room temperature.

The structure of 4b was ultimately characterized by the SC-XRD analysis, as shown in Figure 5 (Crystal-B). The H atom bound to the Si atom was located from the difference Fourier maps and isotropically refined. The crystal systems and space groups are different between Crystal-A [monoclinic, C2/c (#15)] and Crystal-B [triclinic, P–1 (#2)]. In the two crystal structures of 4b [Figure 4b and Figure 5], while the orientation of the ethyl groups differs, the molecular frameworks are identical to each other. Thus, the molecule of 4b possesses three chiral centers located at the Si1A, C55A, and C39 atoms for Crystal-A and Si1, C13, and C3 atoms for Crystal-B. In both Crystal-A and Crystal-B, a pair of enantiomers is present in the unit cell, thus making them racemic compounds. Based on these results, the Si(II) center was intramolecularly inserted into one of the methylene C–H bonds of the inner ethyl group with stereoselectivity, arising from the severe steric congestion between the bulky Eind groups. The selected structural parameters are summarized in Table 1. The Si–C bond lengths and C–Si–C bond angles of 4b exhibit slight differences between Crystal-A and Crystal-B, probably due to the disorder analysis in the co-crystal and/or the crystal packing configuration.

We also tried to measure the ²⁹Si NMR signal of 3b at low temperature. Following a procedure similar to the UV-vis spectrum measurements of 3, precooled deuterated toluene (C₇D₈, toluene-d₈) was introduced into the blue reaction mixture containing 3b. The resultant blue suspension in C₇D₈ was then subjected to the low-temperature ²⁹Si NMR measurements [Figures S3 and S4]. In the ²⁹Si NMR spectrum measured at −20 °C, the distinctive downfield resonance was observed at δ = 513.1 ppm, assignable to 3b, accompanied by some additional signals in the upfield region ranging from δ = 0 to −35 ppm, attributable to unidentified Si(IV) compounds (Figure 6). The ²⁹Si NMR chemical shift of 3b (δ = 513.1 ppm) is between those of the two-coordinate cyclic dialkylsilylenes B (δ = 567.4 ppm) [18] and acyclic heteroatom-substituted silylenes C (δ = 439.7 ppm in C₆D₆ at 25 °C) [19] and E (δ = 438.2 and 467.5 ppm in C₆D₆ at 20 °C) [21]. Notably, the experimental chemical shift value aligns with the GIAO-calculated value of 3b in a singlet state (vide infra).

To clarify the electronic properties of the diarylsilylenes, DFT computations at the (U)B3LYP-D3/6-31G(d,p) level were performed for 3 using the Gaussian 09 suite of programs [44]. The singlet states exhibit a lower energy level compared to the triplet states; the singlet–triplet energy differences (ΔE_ST) were calculated to be 20.3 kcal mol⁻¹ for 3a and 21.5 kcal mol⁻¹ for 3b. The optimized structure of 3b in the singlet state is analogous to the X-ray crystal structure (Table 1). Thus, the C–Si–C bond angle of the calculated singlet state of 3b (112.00°) is comparable to that of the experimental XRD analysis in 3b [112.3(2)°]. Furthermore, DFT calculations were conducted for 4b, an isomer of 3b. The optimized geometry of 4b almost matches the X-ray crystal structures (Table 1). The Si(IV) compound 4b was found to be 56.1 kcal mol⁻¹ more stable than the Si(II) compound 3b, accompanying the formation of the new Si–C and Si–H bonds. The calculated C(sp²)–Si–C(sp²) bond angle increased with the C–H bond insertion, 119.50° for 4b versus 112.00° for 3b. The calculated Si–C(sp²) bond distances in 4b [1.9099 and 1.9012 Å] are slightly shorter than those in 3b [1.9470 and 1.9489 Å]. These data are consistent with the increased s-character of the Si atomic orbitals directed to the aryl groups by the intramolecular C–H bond insertion reaction involving the singlet silylene [45].

The frontier molecular orbitals (MOs) of the singlet state of 3b are displayed in Figure 7. The HOMO mainly represents the non-bonding pair of electrons on the Si atom, while the LUMO involves the empty 3p orbital of the Si atom. The HOMO–LUMO energy gaps (ΔE) are estimated to be 2.886 eV for 3a and 2.962 eV for 3b. According to the TD-DFT calculations, the weak absorption peaks were evaluated to be 620 nm (f = 0.0207; n–p) for 3a and 590 nm (f = 0.0210; n–p) for 3b, corresponding to the forbidden HOMO → LUMO transition, which align well with the UV-vis data (λ_max = 605 nm for 3a and λ_max = 618 nm for 3b) (vide supra). The ²⁹Si chemical shift of 3b was calculated to be δ = 511.1 ppm by the gauge-independent atomic orbital (GIAO) method, which is in good agreement with the experimental value for the ²⁹Si chemical shift (δ = 513.1 ppm) (vide supra).

As a preliminary step, investigations into the reactivity of the diarylsilylenes 3 have also been initiated. For example, upon treatment of the Et₂O solution containing 3b with oxygen-free water at −20 °C, a silanol, (Eind)₂SiH(OH) (5b), was obtained as the major product in a 44% isolated yield (Scheme 2) [46,47]. The identification of 5b was supported by the spectroscopic data [Figures S11–S14], while the molecular structure was validated by the SC-XRD analysis (Figure 8). In the ¹H NMR spectrum of 5b in CDCl₃, the Si–H signal was found at δ = 6.75 ppm along with satellite signals [¹J(²⁹Si–¹H) = 216 Hz]. The O–H signal due to the silanol moiety (SiO–H) also appeared at δ = 2.02 ppm. The ²⁹Si NMR resonance of 5b was observed at δ = −23.2 ppm, appearing as a doublet with a ¹J(²⁹Si–¹H) coupling constant of 216 Hz. In the IR spectrum of 5b (KBr, pellet), a relatively sharp SiO–H vibration peak appears at 3672 cm⁻¹, together with a weak Si–H stretching vibration at 2227 cm⁻¹. These observed stretching frequencies for 5b are higher than those reported for (Mes)₂SiH(OH) at 3201 cm⁻¹ (SiO–H) and 2157 cm⁻¹ (Si–H) [48].

The ORTEP drawing of 5b is shown in Figure 8. The hydroxy group is disordered over the two positions in the crystal with occupancy factors of 0.525(3) and 0.475(3). Nevertheless, the H atoms bound to the Si and O atoms were located from the difference Fourier maps and isotropically refined. The silanol 5b exhibits a monomeric structure with no intermolecular O–H···O hydrogen bonding in the crystal, which is in sharp contrast to the fact that a tetrameric molecular arrangement was observed for (Mes)₂SiH(OH) via intermolecular hydrogen bonding in the crystal [48]. The difference in the steric bulkiness between the Eind group and Mes group significantly influences the aggregation behavior of the silanols in the solid state. Refining the accurate metric parameters of 5b was difficult due to the disorder of the O atom. The C–Si–C bond angle of 5b [122.05(5)°] is similar to that of 1b [123.60(17)°] and larger than that of 2b [116.60(13)°] [37], contingent upon the steric environments surrounding the Si(IV) center (Table 1). These bond angles of the Si(IV) compounds are larger than those of the Si(II) compound 3b [112.3(2)°] because of the disappearance of the non-bonding pair of electrons on the silicon atom. DFT studies were also performed to evaluate the structure of 5b. As summarized in Table 1, the optimized structure reproduces the X-ray structure. The SiO–H and Si–H stretching frequencies are calculated as 3882 and 2321 cm⁻¹ for 5b, in good qualitative agreement with the experimental values.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Procedures

The air- and/or moisture-sensitive compounds were handled using either standard Schlenk-line techniques or within a glove box under an inert argon atmosphere. Anhydrous diethylether (Et₂O), THF, hexane, and toluene were dried by passage through columns of activated alumina and supported copper catalyst supplied by Nikko Hansen & Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Deuterated benzene (C₆D₆, benzene-d₆) and toluene (C₇D₈, toluene-d₈) were dried and degassed over a potassium mirror in vacuo prior to use. 4-Bromo-1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7-octaethyl-s-hydrindacene, (Eind)Br [29], (Eind)SiH₂Cl [37], and (EMind)₂SiBr₂ [37] were prepared by the literature procedures. All other chemicals and gases were used as received.

The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements were carried out using JEOL RESONANCE JNM-ECS400 (JEOL RESONANCE Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and JNM-AL400 spectrometers (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) (399.8 MHz for ¹H, 100.5 MHz for ¹³C and 79.4 MHz for ²⁹Si) and BRUKER AVANCE NEO 600 OneBay spectrometer (600.1 MHz for ¹H, 150.9 MHz for ¹³C and 119.2 MHz for ²⁹Si). Chemical shifts (δ) are given as dimensionless numbers and relative to ¹H or ¹³C NMR chemical shifts of the solvents (residual CHCl₃ in CDCl₃, ¹H(δ) = 7.26 and ¹³C(δ) = 77.16; residual C₆D₅H in C₆D₆, ¹H(δ) = 7.16 and ¹³C(δ) = 128.06). The ²⁹Si NMR spectra were referenced using the external standard of tetramethylsilane (Me₄Si) [²⁹Si(δ) = 0.0]. The absolute values of the coupling constants are given in Hertz (Hz), regardless of their signs. Multiplicities are abbreviated as singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet (t), quartet (q), multiplet (m), and broad (br). The UV-vis spectra were obtained using a Shimadzu UV-3101(PC)S spectrometer (Shimadzu corporation, Kyoto, Japan). The infrared spectra were measured by a JASCO FT/IR-4100 spectrometer. The mass spectra were recorded by a JEOL JMS-T100LC AccuTOF LC-plus 4G (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) mass spectrometer (ESI-MS) with a DART source. The elemental analyses (C and H) were performed at the Materials Characterization Support Team, RIKEN Center for Emergent Matter Science and the Microanalytical Laboratory at the Institute for Chemical Research (Kyoto University). Melting points (mp) were determined by a Stanford Research Systems OptiMelt instrument (SRS, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

3.1.1. Synthesis of (Eind)₂SiH₂ (1b)

To a solution of (Eind)Br (3.49 g, 7.56 mmol) in Et₂O (40 mL), ^tBuLi (1.62 M in pentane, 10.3 mL, 16.7 mmol) was added at −78 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and concentrated in vacuo. To a solution of the resulting (Eind)Li in THF (15 mL), a solution of (Eind)SiH₂Cl (3.38 g, 7.56 mmol) in THF (15 mL) was added at 0 °C. The mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred overnight. After the volatiles were removed in vacuo, hexane (200 mL) was added to the residual solid. The resulting suspension was filtered through a plug of Celite^®. After the filtrate was concentrated on a rotary evaporator, the residual solid was recrystallized from hexane to afford 1b as colorless crystals (4.37 g, 5.51 mmol, 73%). The NMR data are consistent with those previously reported [37]. DART-HRMS (positive-mode) Calcd. for C₅₆H₉₂Si: 792.6968. Found: 792.6958. Melting point 77–80 °C (dec.).

3.1.2. Synthesis of (Eind)₂SiBr₂ (2b)

To a solution of 1b (460 mg, 0.580 mmol) in hexane (20 mL), N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) (220 mg, 1.24 mmol) was added at 0 °C under an argon atmosphere. The mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature. After stirring overnight at room temperature, the resulting suspension was filtered to remove any insoluble materials. The filtrate was concentrated, and the residual solid was recrystallized from hexane to afford 2b as colorless crystals (355 mg, 0.373 mmol, 64%). The NMR data are consistent with those previously reported [37].

3.1.3. Reduction of (EMind)₂SiBr₂ (2a) for UV-Vis Measurement of 3a

To a solution of 2a (328 mg, 0.391 mmol) in Et₂O (8 mL), ^tBuLi (1.62 M in pentane, 0.51 mL, 0.83 mmol) was added at −78 °C. After stirring for 2 h at −40 °C, the volatiles were removed in vacuo while maintaining temperatures below −20 °C. Precooled toluene (5 mL) was added to the residue, and the resulting suspension was centrifuged to remove any insoluble materials. The obtained supernatant was used for the UV-vis measurement. Compound 3a: UV-vis (toluene, −20 °C) λ_max = 605 nm.

3.1.4. Reduction of (Eind)₂SiBr₂ (2b) for UV-Vis Measurement of 3b

To a solution of 2b (391 mg, 0.411 mmol) in Et₂O (10 mL), ^tBuLi (1.62 M in pentane, 0.49 mL, 0.79 mmol) was added at −78 °C. After stirring for 2 h at −40 °C, the volatiles were removed in vacuo while maintaining temperatures below −20 °C. Precooled toluene (10 mL) was added to the residue, and the resulting suspension was centrifuged to remove any insoluble materials. The obtained supernatant was used for the UV-vis measurement. Compound 3b: UV-vis (toluene, −20 °C) λ_max = 618 nm.

3.1.5. Reduction of (Eind)₂SiBr₂ (2b) for XRD Measurement of Crystal-A

To a solution of 2b (373 mg, 0.392 mmol) in Et₂O (11 mL), ^tBuLi (1.62 M in pentane, 0.48 mL, 0.78 mmol) was added at −78 °C. After stirring for 2 h at −40 °C, the volatiles were removed in vacuo while maintaining temperatures below –20 °C. Precooled toluene (5 mL) was added to the residue, and the resulting suspension was centrifuged to remove any insoluble materials. The obtained supernatant was concentrated to about 2 mL, and upon standing at −20 °C, blue crystals precipitated (Crystal-A), which was used for XRD measurement.

3.1.6. Reduction of (Eind)₂SiBr₂ (2b) for ²⁹Si NMR Measurement of 3b

To a solution of 2b (307 mg, 0.323 mmol) in Et₂O (5 mL), ^tBuLi (1.62 M in pentane, 0.38 mL, 0.62 mmol) was added at −78 °C. After stirring for 1 h at −40 °C, the volatiles were removed in vacuo while maintaining temperatures below −30 °C. After precooled deuterated toluene (C₇D₈, 1.0 mL) at −50 °C was added to the residue, the resulting suspension was used for the ²⁹Si NMR measurement. Compound 3b: ²⁹Si NMR (119.2 MHz, C₇D₈, −20 °C) δ = 513.1.

3.1.7. Reduction of (EMind)₂SiBr₂ (2a) for Thermal Reaction of 3a

To a solution of 2a (107 mg, 0.128 mmol) in Et₂O (3 mL), ^tBuLi (1.62 M in pentane, 0.20 mL, 0.32 mmol) was added at −78 °C. The mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred overnight. After the volatiles were removed in vacuo, hexane (5 mL) was added to the residual solid. The resulting suspension was filtered to remove any insoluble materials. The filtrate was concentrated, and the residual solid was used for the NMR measurements, indicating the formation of a complex mixture containing 4a and (EMind)H, together with some unidentified silicon compounds. Compound 4a: ²⁹Si NMR (119.2 MHz, C₆D₆, 25 °C) δ = −14.8 ppm (d, ¹J_Si−H = 196 Hz).

3.1.8. Reduction of (Eind)₂SiBr₂ (2b) for Thermal Reaction of 3b

To a solution of 2b (310 mg, 0.326 mmol) in Et₂O (7 mL), ^tBuLi (1.62 M in pentane, 0.39 mL, 0.63 mmol) was added at −78 °C. The mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred overnight. After the volatiles were removed in vacuo, hexane (7 mL) was added to the residual solid. The resulting suspension was filtered to remove any insoluble materials. The filtrate was concentrated, and the residual solid was used for the NMR measurements, indicating the formation of a complex mixture mainly containing 4b and (Eind)H, together with some unidentified silicon compounds. After the Kugelrohr distillation, the obtained solid was recrystallized from a mixed solvent of hexane and ethanol to afford 4b as colorless crystals (27.5 mg, 34.7 mmol, 11%). Compound 4b: ¹H NMR (600.1 MHz, C₆D₆, 25 °C) δ = 0.40–3.30 (m, 87 H, CH₂CH₃, CH₂CH₃, CH₂, CH), 6.43 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1 H, SiH), 6.81 (s, 1 H, ArH), 6.85 (s, 1 H, ArH). ¹³C NMR (150.9 MHz, C₆D₆, 25 °C) δ = 9.21, 9.24, 9.39, 9.45, 9.50, 9.57, 9.66, 9.79, 9.90, 10.08, 10.16, 10.46, 10.73, 10.77, 12.10, 12.19, 30.23, 30.64, 30.72, 30.81, 31.24, 31.26, 32.53, 33.22, 33.23, 33.51, 33.69, 34.40, 34.62, 35.56, 35.60, 36.36, 41.98, 43.40, 43.81, 45.09, 47.27, 47.97, 49.24, 51.38, 52.89, 53.74, 53.89, 54.42, 121.18, 122.80, 129.48, 129.93, 142.74, 149.18, 149.34, 150.05, 153.62, 156.66, 157.07, 166.07. ²⁹Si NMR (119.2 MHz, C₆D₆, 25 °C) δ = −11.9 ppm (d, ¹J_Si–H = 201 Hz). Anal. Calcd. for C₅₆H₉₀Si: C, 84.99; H, 11.16. Found: C, 84.43; H, 11.28. DART-HRMS (positive-mode) Calcd. for C₅₆H₉₀Si + H: 791.6885. Found: 791.6862. Melting point 141–143 °C (dec.).

3.1.9. Hydrolysis of 3b for Synthesis of 5b

To a solution of 2b (206 mg, 0.217 mmol) in Et₂O (9 mL), ^tBuLi (1.62 M in pentane, 0.34 mL, 0.55 mmol) was added at −78 °C. After stirring for 2 h at −30 °C, degassed H₂O (5.00 mL, 277 mmol) was added to the mixture at −30 °C. The mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature, then the volatiles were removed in vacuo. The residual solid was dissolved in hexane and filtered through a short silica gel column. After the filtrate was concentrated, the residue was recrystallized from hexane to afford 5b as colorless crystals (77.0 mg, 95.1 mmol, 44%). Compound 5b: ¹H NMR (600.1 MHz, CDCl₃, 25 °C) δ = 0.60 (br. s, 24 H, CH₂CH₃), 0.80 (br. s, 24 H, CH₂CH₃), 1.25 (br. s, 4 H, CH₂CH₃), 1.51–1.55 (m, 8 H, CH₂CH₃), 1.60–1.74 (m, 20 H, CH₂CH₃, CH₂), 1.80 (br. s, 8 H, CH₂CH₃), 2.02 (br. s, 1 H, OH), 6.75 (s, 1 H, SiH, satellite, ¹J(Si–H) = 216 Hz), 6.69 (s, 2 H, ArH). ¹³C NMR (150.9 MHz, CDCl₃, 25 °C) δ = 9.07, 9.09, 10.06, 10.14, 32.27, 32.44, 32.78, 32.85, 41.82, 47.46, 54.01, 122.55, 135.42, 149.32, 154.08. ²⁹Si NMR (119.2 MHz, CDCl₃, 25 °C) δ = −23.2 ppm (d, ¹J_Si–H = 216 Hz). IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): ν = 3672 (SiO–H), 2227 (Si–H). Anal. Calcd. for C₅₆H₉₂OSi: C, 83.10; H, 11.46. Found: C, 83.18; H, 11.86. DART-HRMS (positive-mode) Calcd. for C₅₆H₉₂OSi: 808.6917. Found: 808.6902. Melting point 166–169 °C (dec.).

3.2. X-ray Crystallographic Studies of Crystal-A, Crystal-B, and 5b

Single crystals of Crystal-A (co-crystal of 3b and 4b) were grown from toluene at −20 °C for the X-ray diffraction measurements. Single crystals suitable for the X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained from a mixed solvent of hexane and ethanol for Crystal-B (4b) and from hexane for 5b. Intensity data were collected using a Rigaku AFC-10 diffractometer with a Saturn724+ CCD detector for Crystal-A and a Rigaku XtaLAB P200 with a PILATUS200 K detector (Rigaku corporation, Tokyo, Japan) for Crystal-B and 5b. The diffraction data were collected using MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). The specimens were cooled at 100 K in a cold nitrogen stream during the measurements. Bragg spots were integrated and scaled with the programs of CrystalClear [49] for Crystal-A and CrysAlisPro [50] for Crystal-B and 5b. The structure was solved by a direct method with the programs of SIR2008 [51] for Crystal-A and SHELXT-2018/2 [52] for Crystal-B and 5b. All the structures were refined with a least-squares method on F² using SHELXL-2019/3 software [53]. The anisotropic temperature factors were applied to all the non-hydrogen atoms. The Si–H and O–H hydrogen atoms were located on the difference Fourier maps and refined isotropically. Positions of all the C–H hydrogen atoms in ordered moieties were also located on the difference Fourier maps, while those in disordered moieties were calculated geometrically. All the C–H hydrogen atoms were refined as riding models. The detailed crystallographic data have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre: Deposition code CCDC 2336975 (co-crystal of 3b and 4b), 2336976 (4b), and 2336978 (5b). A copy of the data can be obtained free of charge via https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures/ (accessed on 2 March 2024).

3.2.1. Crystal-A (Co-Crystal of 3b and 4b)

C₅₆H₉₀Si, M = 791.36, crystal size 0.28 × 0.18 × 0.11 mm, monoclinic, space group C2/c (#15), a = 32.720(7) Å, b = 18.594(4) Å, c = 16.662(4) Å, β = 104.756(3)°, V = 9803(4) ų, Z = 8, D_x = 1.072 g cm⁻³, μ(Mo Kα) = 0.082 mm⁻¹, 40,049 reflections collected, 11,249 unique reflections, and 540 refined parameters. The final R(F) value was 0.0757 [I > 2σ(I)]. The final R_w(F²) value was 0.1823 (all data). The goodness of fit on F² was 1.098.

3.2.2. Crystal-B (4b)

C₅₆H₉₀Si, M = 791.36, crystal size 0.26 × 0.09 × 0.04 mm, triclinic, space group P–1 (#2), a = 10.1298(6) Å, b = 10.1400(6) Å, c = 24.4558(13) Å, α = 84.557(5)°, β = 85.566(5)°, γ = 78.612(5)°, V = 2447.0(2) ų, Z = 2, D_x = 1.074 g cm⁻³, μ(Mo Kα) = 0.083 mm⁻¹, 20736 reflections collected, 11460 unique reflections, and 534 refined parameters. The final R(F) value was 0.0768 [I > 2σ(I)]. The final R_w(F²) value was 0.1914 (all data). The goodness of fit on F² was 1.023.

3.2.3. (Eind)₂SiH(OH) (5b)

C₅₆H₉₂OSi, M = 809.38, crystal size 0.27 × 0.18 × 0.12 mm, monoclinic, space group P2₁/c (#14), a = 12.9236(3) Å, b = 18.9633(4) Å, c = 20.6577(5) Å, β = 102.518(2)°, V = 4942.3(2) ų, Z = 4, D_x = 1.088 g cm⁻³, μ(Mo Kα) = 0.084 mm⁻¹, 122903 reflections collected, 12940 unique reflections, and 563 refined parameters. The final R(F) value was 0.0455 [I > 2σ(I)]. The final R_w(F²) value was 0.1147 (all data). The goodness of fit on F² was 1.048.

4. Conclusions

We investigated the synthesis of the diarylsilylenes, (Rind)₂Si: (3), supported by two bulky Rind groups at the Si(II) center. The Rind-based dibromosilanes, (Rind)₂SiBr₂ (2), reacted with two equivalents of ^tBuLi in E_t2O at lower temperatures to produce the blue-colored solutions containing 3 below −20 °C. The formation of 3 was characterized by the UV-vis spectra with the absorption peaks appearing at λ_max = 605 nm (3a) and 618 nm (3b) in toluene at −20 °C, attributed to the forbidden n → 3p transition. Moreover, the ²⁹Si NMR signal assignable to 3b was observed at δ = 513.1 ppm in C₇D₈ at −20 °C. These experimental data are in good agreement with the theoretical calculations of 3 in the singlet state. While isolating 3 posed challenges due to its thermally unstable nature, we obtained co-crystals of 3b with the cyclic hydrosilane 4b, formed through the intramolecular C–H bond insertion into the silylene center. The molecular structures of 3b and 4b were confirmed by X-ray crystallography, with the former being the first determination of the crystal structure of the diarylsilylene. Additionally, we examined the hydrolysis reaction of 3b, resulting in the formation of the bulky silanol compound, (Eind)₂SiH(OH) (5b), which exhibits a monomeric structure in the solid state.

The accessibility of 3 offers a new perspective for understanding the electronic nature of the divalent Si(II) species and the diverse transformations originating from unsaturated, two-coordinate silylenes, thereby unveiling a new facet of low-valent silicon chemistry. Further studies about the reactivities of the diarylsilylenes are currently underway.