Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification of LOX Gene Family and Its Expression Analysis under Abiotic Stress in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrogenolysis of Glycerol over NiCeZr Catalyst Modified with Mg, Cu, and Sn at the Surface Level
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 6
10.3390/ijms25063485
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Formation of Pre-PCTA/DT Intermediates from 2-Chlorothiophenol on Silica Clusters: A Quantum Mechanical Study

by
Fei Xu
1,2,*,
Xiaotong Wang
1,
Ying Li
1,
Yongxia Hu
1,
Ying Zhou
1 and
Mohammad Hassan Hadizadeh
1,3,*
1
Environment Research Institute, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
2
Shenzhen Research Institute of Shandong University, Shenzhen 518057, China
3
Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Synergetic Innovation Center of Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(6), 3485; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063485
Submission received: 13 February 2024 / Revised: 5 March 2024 / Accepted: 8 March 2024 / Published: 20 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Environmental Toxicology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Silica (SiO2), accounting for the main component of fly ash, plays a vital role in the heterogeneous formation of polychlorinated thianthrenes/dibenzothiophenes (PCTA/DTs) in high-temperature industrial processes. Silica clusters, as the basic units of silica, provide reasonable models to understand the general trends of complex surface reactions. Chlorothiophenols (CTPs) are the most crucial precursors for PCTA/DT formation. By employing density functional theory, this study examined the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate from 2-CTP adsorbed on the dehydrated silica cluster ((SiO2)3) and the hydroxylated silica cluster ((SiO2)3O2H4). Additionally, this study investigated the formation of pre-PCTA/DTs, the crucial intermediates involved in PCTA/DT formation, from the coupling of two adsorbed 2-chlorothiophenolates via the Langmuir–Hinshelwood (L–H) mechanism and the coupling of adsorbed 2-chlorothiophenolate with gas-phase 2-CTP via the Eley–Rideal (E–R) mechanism on silica clusters. Moreover, the rate constants for the main elementary steps were calculated over the temperature range of 600–1200 K. Our study demonstrates that the 2-CTP is more likely to adsorb on the termination of the dehydrated silica cluster, which exhibits more effective catalysis in the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate compared with the hydroxylated silica cluster. Moreover, the E–R mechanism mainly contributes to the formation of pre-PCTAs, whereas the L–H mechanism is prone to the formation of pre-PCDTs on dehydrated and hydroxylated silica clusters. Silica can act as a relatively mild catalyst in facilitating the heterogeneous formation of pre-PCTA/DTs from 2-CTP. This research provides new insights into the surface-mediated generation of PCTA/DTs, further providing theoretical foundations to reduce dioxin emission and establish dioxin control strategies.

1. Introduction

Polychlorinated thianthrenes/dibenzothiophenes (PCTA/DTs) represent structural analogues of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin/benzofurans (PCDD/Fs), in which the oxygen atoms are replaced by sulfur atoms [1]. Owing to their structural similarity, PCTA/DTs display high toxicity, long-lasting environmental persistence and physicochemical characteristics, making them classified as highly toxic persistent organic pollutants (POPs) that destroy human health and the ecosystem [2]. PCTA/DTs have been widely detected in various environmental matrices, such as soil and water sediments [3,4], pulp mill effluents [5], industrial gas samples [6], automobile exhaust [7] and petroleum refineries [8]. In some regions, higher concentrations of PCTA/DTs have been detected compared to those of PCDD/Fs [9]. Considering the high toxicity and widespread distribution of PCTA/DTs, the elucidation of the PCTA/DT formation mechanism is essential to reduce the presence of PCTA/DTs in the environment, thereby preventing potential public health threats posed by PCTA/DTs.
High relationships between concentrations of PCTA/DTs and PCDD/Fs in the environmental samples suggest similar origins and formation mechanisms of PCTA/DTs with PCDD/Fs [10,11,12]. In terms of PCTA/DT emissions, it is widely recognized that the dominant sources of PCTA/DTs in the environment are multiple combustion and industrial thermal processes, especially municipal waste incinerations [13,14,15,16]. The heterogeneous reactions in the post-flame and cool zone contribute to 70% of PCTA/DT formation [16]. Currently, the surface-mediated formation mechanism of PCTA/DTs can be divided into two categories: de novo synthesis in which residual carbon can react with halogen and sulfur elements on the surface of combustion-generated fly ash and precursor synthesis involving the catalytical coupling of chlorinated organic molecules [17,18]. Chlorothiophenols (CTPs) are important for the surface-mediated formation of PCTA/DTs because they are commonly demonstrated as crucial intermediates in de novo synthesis and predominant precursors in precursor synthesis [10,18,19,20]. Under pyrolysis or oxidative conditions, CTPs can chemically adsorb on the catalytic surface leading to the formation of chlorothiophenolates, which is the initial and crucial step in the heterogeneous formation of PCTA/DTs [21,22]. For the subsequent steps in forming the pre-PCTA/DTs, the important intermediates involved in PCTA/DT formation, the Eley–Rideal (E–R) mechanism and the Langmuir–Hinshelwood (L–H) mechanism, have been proposed [22,23]. The former refers to the reactions of surface-bound species with gaseous species, while the latter involves the coupling of two adsorbed surface species. Varieties of experimental research have proved that the L–H mechanism is responsible for the formation of PCDTs and the E–R mechanism is mainly related to the formation of PCTAs [17,22,23,24,25]. Nganai et al. [25] have elucidated differences between the L–H and E–R mechanisms, which contribute to different rate orders during the oxidation of 2-chlorophenol on the CuO/Silica surface. Typically, L–H reactions exhibit lower reaction orders compared to similar reactions in the E–R mechanism [25]. However, there are still a lot of uncertainties about the detailed heterogeneous mechanism of PCTA/DTs. A key goal is to identify the determining step in both L–H and E–R mechanisms and to determine their relative favorability. Another consideration is whether the formed PCTA/DTs remain adsorbed on the surface or are promptly released into the gas phase. Quantum chemical calculations serve as a valuable tool to bridge knowledge gaps by calculating thermodynamic and kinetic parameters for elementary steps involved in the heterogeneous formation of PCTA/DTs, thus identifying energetically favorable reaction pathways.
During industrial thermal processes, a substantial volume of fly ash, the solid residue, is generated. Notably, fly ash exhibits remarkably catalytic capabilities in the heterogenous formation of PCTA/DTs. These catalytic effects can be attributed to the coexistence of residual organic species, particulate components (such as SiO2) and metal oxides (such as Cu, Al and Fe) in the fly ash [26,27,28]. Silica (SiO2) comprises 5−50% of fly ash and can function as a supporting substrate for transition metals [29]. Generally, varieties of transition metal compounds are regarded as the main catalytic promoters for the heterogeneous formation of dioxin [30,31,32,33,34]. However, it is reasonable to assume that silica, as the most abundant component in fly ash, plays an important role in the surface-mediated formation of PCTA/DTs. An intriguing question is whether neat silica can catalyze the formation of PCTA/DTs. Mosallanejad et al. provided experimental and theoretical evidence that PCDD/Fs can be formed from a series of chlorophenols (CPs) with the mild catalysis of neat silica, even in the absence of transition metals [35]. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy by Alderman and Dellinge has detected the formation of chlorophenolates on silica surfaces, which represent crucial intermediates in the formation of PCDD/Fs [36]. Meanwhile, Pan et al. [37] corroborated the formation of chemisorbed 2-chlorophenolate on dehydrated and hydroxylated silica clusters from a theoretical aspect. Despite the fact that numerous laboratory and theoretical studies have been conducted, studies still lack a detailed formation mechanism of PCTA/DTs catalyzed by neat silica surfaces. It has been proved that employing the silica cluster model as the starting point is reasonable for investigating the complex influence of neat silica on PCTA/DT formation. Due to the presence of a significant amount of water vapor in waste incinerators and industrial systems, some silica clusters can be hydroxylated and converted to hydroxylated silica clusters. This realization has spurred us to conduct a more in-depth investigation into the heterogeneous formation of PCTA/DT from CTP precursors on neat silica clusters, focusing on the underlying mechanistic aspects.
To this end, the present contribution has employed density functional theory (DFT) to investigate the heterogeneous formation of pre-PCTA/DTs from 2-CTP with the assistance of silica clusters. In this study, the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate via the adsorption and S-H dissociation of 2-CTP on the dehydrated and hydroxylated silica clusters has been investigated. Moreover, we further explored all possible formation routes of pre-PCTA/DT intermediates from the coupling of two adsorbed 2-chlorothiophenolates via the L–H mechanism and the coupling of adsorbed 2-chlorothiophenolate with gas-phase 2-CTP via the E–R mechanism on the dehydrated and hydroxylated silica clusters. Moreover, the vital roles of those two kinds of silica clusters in the heterogeneous formation of pre-PCTA/DTs were clarified. The rate constants for the main elementary steps were calculated over the temperature range of 600–1200 K using TST theory with Wigner tunneling correction. This research establishes a solid theoretical foundation for our comprehension of intricate mechanisms behind the heterogeneous generation of PCTA/DTs, providing in-depth insights and important input parameters for the control and prediction model of PCTA/DTs.

2. Results

2.1. Silica Clusters

Although hydroxylated silica accounts for a significant portion of silica in ambient conditions, it can easily undergo dehydroxylation reactions under high-temperature conditions [38]. In this study, Figure 1 displays two types of silica clusters, the dehydrated silica cluster ((SiO2)3) and the hydroxylated silica cluster ((SiO2)3O2H4), which have proved reasonable for investigating the formation of dioxin-like compounds [35,37]. It is also important to note that the silica cluster models employed in this work are approximations of real surfaces. These models allow us to explore the intricate influence of neat silica on PCTA/DT formation, providing valuable insights despite their simplifications. It can be seen that both the (SiO2)3 and (SiO2)3O2H4 clusters contain two rhombic Si-O rings, which have been detected in the surface or the interior of amorphous and crystalline silica [39,40]. In Figure 1a, the (SiO2)3 cluster comprises two tricoordinate silicon atoms (labeled as Si1) and one tetracoordinate silicon atom (labeled as Si2). Additionally, there are four saturated oxygen atoms (labeled as O1) and two unsaturated oxygen atoms (labeled as O2) in this cluster. Among them, Si1 and O2 atoms are located at the termination of the cluster, whereas Si2 and O1 atoms are positioned in the central region. Figure 1b illustrates the structure of the (SiO2)3O2H4 cluster, which is characterized by the existence of four hydroxyl groups connecting with terminal Si1 atoms. Different from the (SiO2)3 cluster, the (SiO2)3O2H4 cluster is composed of three tetracoordinate Si1 and Si2 atoms along with six fully saturated O1 and O2 atoms.

2.2. The Formation of 2-Chlorothiophenolate on Silica Clusters

Figure 2a illustrates the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate from the initial 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3 cluster embedded with potential barriers ΔE (in kcal/mol) and reaction heats ΔH (in kcal/mol). Figure 2b supplements the corresponding potential energy profile. The formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate consists of two elementary steps, the adsorption of 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3 cluster and the dissociation of H atom of the sulfhydryl group in the adsorbed 2-CTP (S-H dissociation), finally leading the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate. This can be supported by experimental study, in which the generation of 2,3,6-trichlorophenoxy radicals via hydrogen abstraction from 2,3,6-trichlorophenols was elucidated during the PCDD formation process over a Cu(II)O/silica matrix [20]. As shown in Figure 2a, three possible pathways (pathways 1−3) were considered for the adsorption and S-H dissociation of 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3 cluster. For the adsorption process, three adsorption complexes, IM1, IM3 and IM5, were obtained from pathway 1, pathway 2 and pathway 3 with adsorption energies of −22.74 kcal/mol, −2.42 kcal/mol and −22.87 kcal/mol, respectively. The 2-CTPs in IM1 and IM5 adsorb on the Si1 atoms of (SiO2)3 cluster (S-Si1 coupling), while the 2-CTP in IM3 attaches on the Si2 atom of (SiO2)3 cluster (S-Si2 coupling). For the subsequent S-H dissociation (Figure 2a), in pathway 1 and pathway 2, the H atoms in both IM1 and IM3 transfer from the S atom of the initial 2-CTP to the O1 atoms of the (SiO2)3 cluster. Simultaneously, the O1-Si1 bond in IM1 and the O1-Si2 bond in IM3 are broken. This simultaneous hydrogen transfer and bond-breaking process lead to the formation of IM2 in pathway 1 and IM4 in pathway 2. Differently, in pathway 3, the S-H bond of IM5 is broken with the H atom directly attached to the O2 atom, leading to the formation of IM6.
We further explored the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate from the initial 2-CTP on the hydroxylated silica cluster ((SiO2)3O2H4 cluster), as illustrated in Figure 3a,b. Similar to the (SiO2)3 cluster, the adsorption and S-H dissociation of 2-CTP to form 2-chlorothiophenolate on the (SiO2)3O2H4 cluster can take place through pathways 4−6. Pathway 4 and pathway 5 are similar to pathway 1 and pathway 2, respectively, leading to the formation of IM8 and IM10. However, pathway 6 is slightly different from pathway 3. Specifically, after the 2-CTP adsorbs on the (SiO2)3O2H4 cluster via S-Si1 coupling to form IM11, the H atom in IM11 is detached and connects with the hydroxyl group of the (SiO2)3 cluster to eliminate H2O, resulting in the formation of IM12. This formation mechanism is in concordance with the experimental observation from an in situ FTIR measurement, in which the formation of 2-chlorophenolate on silica is related to the loss of surface hydroxyl groups [36]. Additionally, Figure 4 presents all optimized geometries of intermediates and transition states involved in the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate from initial 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3 cluster and (SiO2)3O2H4 cluster, and Table S1 lists crucial parameters for transition states.

2.3. Formation of Pre-PCDT Intermediates via the L–H Mechanism

Following the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate in IM6 via the most favorable pathway 3, the (SiO2)3 cluster can continue to adsorb the second 2-CTP to form another 2-chlorothiophenolate. Then, the coupling of two formed 2-chlorothiophenolates leads to the formation of pre-PCDT intermediates via the L–H mechanism. Figure 5 and Figure 6 demonstrate the formation routes of pre-PCDT intermediates embedded with potential barriers ΔE (kcal/mol) and reaction heats ΔH (kcal/mol) from the coupling of two adsorbed 2-chlorothiophenolates via the L–H mechanism on the (SiO2)3 cluster. As shown in Figure 5, the second 2-CTP adsorbs on the Si2 atom in IM6 with an adsorption energy of 9.17 kcal/mol, resulting in the formation of IM13. Subsequently, the second 2-CTP adsorbed in IM13 undergoes two kinds of S-H dissociation to form the second 2-chlorothiophenolate. In pathway 7, the detached H atom transfers from the S atom of the second 2-CTP to the O1 atom of the (SiO2)3 cluster, where O1 is far away from the initial 2-CTP and the Si2-O1 bond is broken at the same time, resulting in the formation of IM14. In pathway 8, the H atom detaches from the S atom of the second 2-CTP to the O1 atom of the (SiO2)3 cluster, where O1 is located between the two formed 2-chlorothiophenolates, and the Si2-O1 bond is broken immediately, resulting in the formation of IM15.
The subsequent reactions of IM14 shown in Figure 6a primarily proceed via the ortho–ortho coupling of 2-chlorothiophenolates to form pre-PCDT intermediates. Three C/C coupling modes are proposed based on three possible pathways (pathways 9−11). In the initial step of pathway 9, a simultaneous process occurs involving the coupling of two carbon (hydrogen)-centered radical mesomeres (CH/CH for short) and the abstraction of a hydrogen atom connected with the ortho carbon by another H atom (H abstraction). This concurrent reaction results in the formation of the pre-PCDT intermediate, IM16. In the subsequent step, the IM16 undergoes a five-membered ring H shift, where the H atom originally attached with the ortho carbon atom of the initial 2-CTP moves to the S atom of the second 2-CTP. Meanwhile, the S-C bond is broken, leading to the formation of the pre-PCDT intermediate, IM17. In pathway 10, the carbon (hydrogen)-centered radical mesomere recombines with the carbon (chlorine)-centered radical mesomere (CH/CCl for short) and the Cl atom connected with ortho C is eliminated simultaneously (Cl elimination), forming the pre-PCDT intermediate, IM18. In pathway 11, the coupling of two carbon (chlorine)-centered radical mesomeres (CCl/CCl for short) and the Cl elimination simultaneously take place to generate the pre-PCDT intermediate, IM19.
Similar to the subsequent reactions of IM14, as shown in Figure 6b, IM15 can undergo CH/CCl and CCl/CCl couplings, accompanied by the Cl eliminations, finally resulting in the formation of IM23 in pathway 13 and IM24 in pathway 14, respectively. Differently, in pathway 12, the H abstraction step and C/CH coupling of IM15 need to occur separately, which is not a synergistic reaction. Thus, pathway 12 has one more step than pathway 9. Finally, pathway 12 concludes with the H shift step, forming the pre-PCDT intermediate, IM22.

2.4. Formation of Pre-PCTA/DT Intermediates via the E–R Mechanism

In addition to the L–H mechanism, the initially formed 2-chlorothiophenolate can directly react with the gas-phase 2-CTP to generate pre-PCTA/DT intermediates via the E–R mechanism. Figure 7 demonstrates the formation routes of pre-PCTA/DT intermediates embedded with the potential barriers ΔE (kcal/mol) and reaction heats ΔH (kcal/mol) from the coupling of adsorbed 2-chlorothiophenolate on (SiO2)3 cluster with gas-phase 2-CTP via the E–R mechanism. In Figure 7, pathway 15 and pathway 16 are similar, in which C/C couplings occur to form pre-PCDT intermediates. Specifically, in pathway 15, CH/CCl coupling and the Cl elimination occur synergistically, resulting in the formation of the pre-PCDT intermediate, IM25. In pathway 16, CCl/CCl coupling and the Cl elimination occur simultaneously, resulting in the formation of a pre-PCDT intermediate, IM26. Pathway 17 and pathway 18 are identical, in which S/C couplings take place to form pre-PCTA intermediates. In pathway 17, the recombination of the sulfur-centered mesomere with the carbon (hydrogen)-centered radical mesomere (S/CH for short) and H2 elimination take place simultaneously to form the pre-PCTA intermediate, IM27. In pathway 18, the coupling of the sulfur-centered mesomere with the carbon (chlorine)-centered radical mesomere (S/CCl for short) and Cl elimination occur simultaneously to form the pre-PCTA intermediate, IM28. Figure S1 shows all the optimized structures of important transition states in the L–H and E–R mechanisms. In order to compare the formation mechanism of pre-PCTA/DT intermediates on (SiO2)3 with that on (SiO2)3O2H4 clusters, the formation routes of pre-PCTA/DT intermediates from the coupling of adsorbed 2-chlorothiophenolate on the (SiO2)3O2H4 cluster with gas-phase 2-CTP via the E–R mechanism are listed in Figure S2 of the Supporting Information. Similarly, four pre-PCTA/DT intermediates (IM34−IM37) can be obtained from four pathways (pathways 23−26). In order to investigate the effect of entropy on the formation of pre-PCTA/DT intermediates, Table S3 illustrates the Gibbs free energy ΔG (kcal/mol) and free energy barrier ΔG≠ (kcal/mol) for the crucial elementary reactions involved in the formation of pre-PCTA/DT intermediates from 2-CTP on (SiO2)3 and (SiO2)3O2H4 clusters.

2.5. Rate Constant Calculations

Due to the limitation of the detection methods, it is challenging to measure the rate constants of elementary reactions in experimental research. Theoretical methods can provide powerful support for accurate calculations of rate constants. This study calculated the rate constants for the main elementary steps involved in the heterogeneous formation of pre-PCTA/DT intermediates from 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3 cluster and (SiO2)3O2H4 clusters, with the temperature ranging from 600 K to 1200 K. The corresponding values are calculated and listed in Table S2. The relationship between the reaction rate constant and temperature was molded using the Arrhenius formulas, as illustrated in Table 1, providing the relevant factors, pre-exponential factors and activation energies.

3. Discussion

3.1. The Formation of 2-Chlorothiophenolate on Silica Clusters

Three pathways have been designed to explore the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate from the initial 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3 cluster, as shown in Figure 2. The IM5 (adsorption energy −22.87 kcal/mol) has much lower adsorption energy than IM1 (adsorption energy −22.74 kcal/mol) and IM3 (adsorption energy −2.42 kcal/mol). Consequently, IM5 in pathway 3 demonstrates a greater formation potential and exhibits more stability than IM1 in pathway 1 and IM3 in pathway 2. Additionally, in subsequent S-H dissociation steps, pathway 3 requires crossing a lower potential barrier of 7.58 kcal/mol than the values of 22.01 kcal/mol and 13.33 kcal/mol in pathway 1 and pathway 2, respectively. Moreover, pathway 3 (reaction heat −43.97 kcal/mol) exhibits higher exothermicity than pathway 1 (reaction heat −2.01 kcal/mol) and pathway 2 (reaction heat −24.70 kcal/mol). Therefore, pathway 3 is more thermodynamically favorable than pathway 1 and pathway 2, and the formation of IM6 is preferred over IM2 and IM4. These imply that the terminal Si1 atom of the (SiO2)3 cluster is more prone to the adsorption of 2-CTP compared to the middle Si2 atom, and the O2 atom is more conducive to the S-H dissociation of adsorbed 2-CTP to form 2-chlorothiophenolate than the O1 atom. These findings are consistent with results obtained in a prior theoretical investigation conducted by Pan et al., which focused on the reaction of 2-CP catalyzed by the (SiO2)3 cluster [37]. It is worth noting that a previous study by Xu et al. reported that the S-H dissociation of 2-CTP in the gas phase is a highly endothermic process, with a value of 86.51 kcal/mol [41]. However, the dissociation process undergoes a significant shift towards exothermicity in the presence of a (SiO2)3 cluster. Consequently, the existence of the (SiO2)3 cluster can facilitate the dissociation of the S-H bond of the adsorbed 2-CTP to form 2-chlorothiophenolate to some extent. For the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolates from 2-CTPs on (SiO2)3O2H4, pathways 4−6 are identified, as shown in Figure 3. Based on a similar analysis with the (SiO2)3 cluster, it can be concluded that the adsorption and S-H dissociation of 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3O2H4 cluster preferentially proceed through pathway 5 instead of pathway 4 and pathway 6, resulting in a preferred formation of IM10 compared to IM8 and IM12. It can be inferred that the 2-CTP is more likely to adsorb on the middle Si2 atom than the terminal Si1 atom in the (SiO2)3O2H4 cluster, and the O1 atom exhibits higher activity for the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate compared to the O2 atom. These are different from the (SiO2)3 cluster discussed above. However, similar to the (SiO2)3 cluster, the presence of the (SiO2)3O2H4 cluster also exhibits mild catalysis for the conversion of 2-CTP to 2-chlorothiophenolate.
Upon comparing pathway 3 with pathway 5, it is evident that the adsorption energy for IM5 in pathway 3 is −22.87 kcal/mol, which is notably lower than the value of −3.33 kcal/mol for IM9 involved in pathway 5. In addition, the subsequent S-H dissociation in pathway 3 carries a lower potential barrier than that of pathway 5 by 17.96 kcal/mol. Obviously, pathway 3 is favored over pathway 5, suggesting that the (SiO2)3 cluster is more effective in catalyzing the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate than the (SiO2)3O2H4 cluster. This may be attributed to the presence of unsaturated O2 and Si1 atoms on the terminal sites of the (SiO2)3 cluster, which enhances the reactivity of the (SiO2)3 cluster. However, the hydroxyl groups in the (SiO2)3O2H4 cluster are saturated, resulting in a relative inertness towards the reaction with 2-CTP. However, (SiO2)3O2H4 clusters, under high-temperature conditions, can transform into (SiO2)3 clusters, which exhibit higher catalytic activity and promote the conversion of 2-CTP to 2-chlorothiophenolate.

3.2. Formation of Pre-PCDT Intermediates via the L–H Mechanism

After the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate in IM6 via the most favorable pathway 3, the second 2-CTP can adsorb on the (SiO2)3 cluster via S-Si2 coupling to form the second 2-chlorothiophenolat (Figure 5). A comparison of pathway 7 with pathway 8 shows that the S-H dissociation step in pathway 7 has a slightly lower potential barrier of 10.75 kcal/mol than the value of 11.13 kcal/mol in the S-H dissociation step in pathway 8. In addition, the S-H dissociation step in pathway 7 is more exothermic (−27.34 kcal/mol) than the S-H dissociation step in pathway 8 (−23.07 kcal/mol). So, pathway 7 is mildly favored over pathway 8. The formation potential of IM14 is slightly higher than that of IM15.
Figure 6a shows the pre-PCDT formation from the coupling of two 2-chlorothiophenolates via the L–H mechanism. The ranking for the potential barrier values of the three C-C coupling modes is as follows: CH/CH coupling and H abstraction (66.74 kcal/mol) > CH/CCl coupling and Cl elimination (85.20 kcal/mol) > CCl/CCl coupling and Cl elimination (106.04 kcal/mol). In addition, the CH/CH coupling and H abstraction step in pathway 9 are exothermic by -8.82 kcal/mol, while the CH/CCl coupling and Cl elimination in pathway 10 and CCl/CCl coupling and Cl elimination in pathway 11 are endothermic by 76.69 kcal/mol and 91.62 kcal/mol, respectively. Thus, pathway 9 is energetically more favorable than pathways 10 and 11 in Figure 6a, resulting in the formation of IM17. For the same reason, pathway 12 is more energetically favorable than pathways 13 and 14 in Figure 6b, resulting in the formation of IM22.
In pathway 9, the CH/CH coupling and H abstraction step have the highest potential barrier of 66.74 kcal/mol and represent the rate-determining step. Similarly, the H abstraction step is the rate-determining step of pathway 12. Although pathway 9 has one step less than pathway 12, the rate-determining step of pathway 9 presents a much higher potential barrier than that in pathway 12. Thus, pathway 9 and pathway 12 are competitive. Both IM17 and IM22 are possible pre-PCDT intermediates from the coupling of two adsorbed 2-chlorothiophenolates on the (SiO2)3 cluster via the L–H mechanism. The formed pre-PCDTs can subsequently undergo the ring-close reactions, finally leading to the formation of PCDTs. These theoretical results can provide reasonable explanations for the experimental results in which the L–H mechanism mainly contributes to the formation of PCDTs.

3.3. Formation of Pre-PCTA/DT Intermediates via the E–R Mechanism

For the pre-PCDT formation via the E–R mechanism in Figure 7, the CH-CCl coupling and Cl elimination step in pathway 15 have a potential barrier of 71.11 kcal/mol, which is lower than the value of 78.97 kcal/mol of the CCl-CCl coupling and Cl elimination step in pathway 16. In addition, the CH-CCl coupling and Cl elimination step in pathway 15 (70.04 kcal/mol) are less endothermic than the CCl-CCl coupling and Cl elimination step in pathway 16 (73.33 kcal/mol). Thus, pathway 15 is favored over pathway 16. For the same reason, for the pre-PCTA formation via the E–R mechanism in Figure 7, pathway 18 is favored over pathway 17. A comparison of pathway 15 with pathway 18 shows that the potential barrier in pathway 18 is much lower than that in pathway 15 by about 17 kcal/mol. Thus, pathway 18 is favored over pathway 15. Meanwhile, the formation potential of IM28 (pre-PCTA intermediate) is higher than that of IM25 (pre-PCDT intermediate). In other words, the pre-PCTA formation is much easier than the pre-PCDT formation from the 2-CTP as a precursor on the (SiO2)3 cluster via the E–R mechanism. The formed pre-PCTAs can undergo HCl elimination to form the ring-structural PCTAs, which agrees well with the experimental observations where the E–R mechanism is responsible for the formation of PCTAs. A similar conclusion can be reached for the pre-PCTA/DT formation on the (SiO2)3O2H4 clusters via the E–R mechanism in Figure S2.
A comparison of Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7 shows that the rate-determining step involved in the formation of pre-PCDTs via the L–H mechanism requires a similar potential barrier as that involved in the formation of pre-PCTAs via the E–R mechanism. However, the preferred formation routes of pre-PCDTs via the L–H mechanism involve four or five elementary steps, whereas the formation of pre-PCTAs via the E–R mechanism involves one elementary process. Thus, the formation of pre-PCTAs via the E–R mechanism is preferred over the formation of pre-PCDTs from the L–H mechanism. This conclusion may be supported indirectly by the experimental results: PCDDs are the major dioxin products, rather than PCDFs, in the heterogeneous pyrolysis of 2-CP by neat silica [35].
In general, the formation of pre-PCTA/DTs from 2-CTP needs to occur cross a 50–60 kcal/mol potential barrier with a catalyst of silica clusters. This implies that while the silica can catalyze the formation of PCTA/DTs from 2-CTP, its catalytic activity is relatively mild. Considering the high concentration of silica in fly ash, the catalyst effect of silica should not be ignored.

3.4. Rate Constant Calculations

The results obtained from the rate constant are consistent with the thermodynamic analysis discussed above. For instance, as shown in Table S2, at 800 K, the rate constants for the S-H dissociation in pathways 1−3 are 7.62 × 106 s−1 (TS1), 1.99 × 108 s−1 (TS2) and 3.28 × 1011 s−1 (TS3), respectively. The highest rate constant value for pathway 3 reveals its preference over pathway 1 and pathway 2. This reaffirms the energetic conclusion that pathway 3 is favored over pathway 1 and pathway 2. Similarly, at 1200 K, as shown in S2, the rate constant for the S-H dissociation in pathway 5 is 8.99 × 105 s−1 (TS5), which is larger than the values of 8.36 × 106 s−1 (TS4) in pathway 4 and 1.52 × 105 s−1 (TS6) in pathway 6. This is in accordance with the thermal analysis in which pathway 5 is preferred over pathway 4 and pathway 6.
The consistency between kinetic and energetic analysis can also be reached for the subsequent formation of pre-PCTA/DT intermediates through the L–H and E–R mechanisms. For a given temperature, the rate constant of Cl elimination, and the S-C coupling step involved in pathway 18, is larger than that of the corresponding steps involved in pathways 15−17. For example, at 1000 K, the rate constant for the Cl elimination and S-C coupling step in pathway 18 is 4.96 × 10−27 s−1 (TS21), which is 4−11 orders of magnitude larger than the values involved in pathways 15−17. It can be deduced that the E–R mechanism accounts for the formation of pre-PCTAs, which is in line with the thermodynamic analysis. The same conclusions can be reached for the formation of pre-PCDT intermediates through the L–H mechanism. In general, these consistencies can be reached for all crucial elementary reactions involved in the heterogeneous reaction of PCTA/DTs from 2-CTP on silica clusters.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Density Functional Theory

All high-accuracy quantum calculations were carried out using the Gaussian 09 software package (Wallingford, CT, USA) [42]. The MPWB1K method, which is based on the modified Perdew and Wang exchange functional (MPW) and Becke’s correlation functional (B95), has been used for the prediction of transition geometry and thermochemical kinetics [43]. The geometrical parameters of reactants, intermediates, transition states and products involved in the formation of pre-PCTA/DTs from 2-CTP on (SiO2)3 and (SiO2)3O2H4 clusters were obtained at the MPWB1K level with a standard 6-31+G(d,p) basis set [43]. To determine the thermal contributions to the free energy, the harmonic vibrational frequencies of reactants, intermediates, transition states and products were also calculated at the same level to obtain the zero-point energy (ZPE). The harmonic vibrational frequency calculations show that the transition states have exactly one imaginary frequency, while the reactants, intermediates and products have no imaginary frequencies. Intrinsic reaction coordination (IRC) analysis was performed to obtain the minimum energy path (MEP) and verify that each transition state connects the designed reactants and products [44]. The single-point energies of reactants, intermediates, transition states and products were calculated using a more flexible basis set, 6-311+G(3df,2p), to yield more reliable reaction heats and potential barriers. The zero-point energy (ZPE) correction was finally included in the values of reaction heats and potential barriers.

4.2. Kinetic Calculations

Based on the TST theory with Wigner tunneling correction within the KiSThelP program [45], the rate constants of the crucial elementary steps involved in the formation of PCTA/DTs from 2-CTP on (SiO2)3 and (SiO2)3O2H4 clusters were calculated over the temperature range of 600−1200 K on the MPWB1K/6-31+G(d,p)//MPWB1K/6-311+G(3df,2p) level. In KiSThelP, the equation usually presented for the conventional TST is
k T S T = σ k b T h Q T S ( T ) N A Q R ( T ) e V ≠ k b T
where σ is the reaction path degeneracy, kb is Boltzmann’s constant, T is the temperature, h is Planck’s constant and NA is Avogadro’s number (it disappears for unimolecular reactions rate constants with units of s-1). V≠ is the difference in zero-point excluded potential energy between the transition state (TS, assumed to be located at the saddle point on the PES) and the reactant(s) (zero-point energy contributions are included in the partition functions). QTS and QR denote the total partition functions of the TS and the reactant(s) with the translational partition functions expressed per unit volume. QTS excludes the reaction coordinate.

4.3. Accuracy Verification

It is crucial to validate theoretical calculations for ongoing work. Initially, optimized geometries and vibrational frequencies of thiophenol, 4-chlorotriophenol and dibenzothiophene at the MPWB1K/6-31+G(d,p) level were compared with experimental data, showing consistent results within 1.0% for geometries and 9.0% for vibrational frequencies [46,47,48,49]. By employing the MPWB1K/6-311+G(3df,2p)//MPWB1K/6-31+G(d,p) level, reaction enthalpy for thiophenol + thiophenol → dibenzothiophene + H2S + H2 was calculated, yielding −7.60 kcal/mol at 298.15 K and 1.0 atm, which is close to the experimental value (−7.74 kcal/mol) based on the measured standard enthalpies [50]. For the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate from initial 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3 cluster (IM5 → IM6 via TS3), single-point energies for IM5, IM6 and TS3 were calculated at the B2PLYP/def2tzvp level. Moreover, the potential barrier and reaction heat for IM5 → IM6 via TS3 were calculated at the M062X/6-311+G(3df,2p)//M062X/6-31+G(d,p) level. All results align with those obtained by MPWB1K/6-311+G(3df,2p)//MPWB1K/6-31+G(d,p) with the relative deviation within 7%. Thus, the MPWB1K/6-311+G(3df,2p)//MPWB1K/6-31+G(d,p) level ensures accurate calculations for heterogenous PCTA/DT formation from 2-CTP precursors on silica clusters.

5. Conclusions

In this work, we have investigated the heterogeneous formation mechanism of pre-PCTA/DTs from 2-CTP on the dehydrated and hydroxylated silica clusters through DFT calculations. Moreover, the rate constants for the main elementary steps involved in the heterogonous formation of pre-PCTA/DTs were calculated over the temperature range of 600–1200 K. The following conclusions were drawn:
(1)
The adsorption and S-H dissociation of 2-CTP to form 2-chlorothiophenolate preferentially occur at the end of the dehydrated silica cluster, while those processes primarily take place in the middle of the hydroxylated silica cluster. Comparatively, the dehydrated silica cluster is more effective in catalyzing the conversion of 2-CTP to 2-chlorothiophenolate than the hydroxylated silica cluster.
(2)
2-CTP, as a precursor adsorbed on the dehydrated silica cluster, can lead to the formation of pre-PCDTs via the L–H mechanism, while the E–R mechanism can result in the generation of pre-PCTAs. The formation of pre-PCTAs via the E–R mechanism is more prone to occur than the formation of pre-PCDTs through the L–H mechanism.
(3)
The silica is a relatively mild catalyst that can facilitate the conversion of 2-CTP to pre-PCTA/DTs. However, considering the high concentration of silica in fly ash, the catalytic effect of silica cannot be ignored.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25063485/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.X.; methodology, X.W.; software, Y.L.; validation, Y.H., Y.Z. and M.H.H.; formal analysis, F.X. and X.W.; investigation, X.W.; resources, Y.L.; data curation, Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, F.X., X.W. and Y.H.; writing—review and editing, F.X. and X.W.; visualization, Y.Z.; supervision, F.X. and M.H.H.; project administration, F.X. and M.H.H.; funding acquisition, F.X. and M.H.H.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the NSFC (National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant numbers 22076103, 22236004, 21976107 and 42350410435) and Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (grant number 2023A1515012043).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Benz, T.; Hagenmaier, H.; Lindig, C.; She, J. Occurrence of the sulphur analogue of octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the environment and investigations on its potential source. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1992, 344, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nakai, S.; Kishita, S.; Nomura, Y.; Hosomi, M. Polychlorinated dibenzothiophenes in Japanese environmental samples and their photodegradability and dioxin-like endocrine-disruption potential. Chemosphere 2007, 67, 1852–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, X.; Qin, L.; Qu, R.; Feng, M.; Wei, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, Z. Occurrence of polychlorinated diphenyl sulfides (PCDPSs) in surface sediments and surface water from the Nanjing section of the Yangtze River. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2014, 48, 11429–11436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhu, Z.; Dai, Y.; Zhang, R.; Shi, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, B.; Feng, M. Occurrence, distribution and partitioning of polychlorinated dibenzothiophenes (PCDTs) in Chaohu Lake, Southeast China. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 277, 116751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sinkkonen, S.; Kolehmainen, E.; Paasivirta, J.; Koistinen, J.; Lahtipera, M.; Lammi, R. Identification and level estimation of chlorinated neutral aromatic sulfur compounds and their alkylated derivatives in pulp mill effluents and sediments. Chemosphere 1994, 28, 2049–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aurell, J.; Fick, J.; Haglund, P.; Marklund, S. Effects of sulfur on PCDD/F formation under stable and transient combustion conditions during MSW incineration. Chemosphere 2009, 76, 767–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wiedmann, T.; Riehle, U.; Kurz, J.; Ballschmiter, K. HRGC-MS of polychlorinated phenanthrenes (PCPhen), dibenzothiophenes (PCDT), dibenzothianthrenes (PCTA), and phenoxathiins (PCPT). Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1997, 359, 176–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sato, S.; Matsumura, A.; Urushigawa, Y.; Metwally, M.; Al-Muzaini, S. Structural analysis of weathered oil from Kuwait’s environment. Environ. Int. 1998, 24, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pruell, R.; Rubinstein, N.; Taplin, B.; LiVolsi, J.; Bowen, R. Accumulation of polychlorinated organic contaminants from sediment by three benthic marine species. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1993, 24, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dar, T.; Altarawneh, M.; Dlugogorski, B.Z. Quantum chemical study on formation of PCDT/TA from 2-chlorothiophenol precursor. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2013, 47, 11040–11047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Qu, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Shi, X.; Xu, F.; Wang, W. Mechanistic and kinetic studies on the homogeneous gas-phase formation of PCDD/Fs from 2, 4, 5-trichlorophenol. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2009, 43, 4068–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xu, F.; Shi, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q. Mechanistic and kinetic studies on the homogeneous gas-phase formation of PCTA/DTs from 2, 4-dichlorothiophenol and 2, 4, 6-trichlorothiophenol. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 20449–20467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, H.; Liu, W.; Tang, C.; Lei, R.; Zhu, W. Emission profiles and formation pathways of 2, 3, 7, 8-substituted and non-2, 3, 7, 8-substituted polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in secondary copper smelters. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 649, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sinkkonen, S.; Vattulainen, A.; Aittola, J.P.; Paasivirta, J.; Tarhanen, J.; Lahtiperä, M. Metal reclamation produces sulphur analogues of toxic dioxins and furans. Chemosphere 1994, 28, 1279–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bei, J.; Xu, X.; Zhan, M.; Li, X.; Jiao, W.; Khachatryan, L.; Wu, A. Revealing the mechanism of dioxin formation from municipal solid waste gasification in a reducing atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2022, 56, 14539–14549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Stanmore, B. The formation of dioxins in combustion systems. Combust. Flame 2004, 136, 398–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, M.; Liu, G.; Yang, L.; Zheng, M. Framework of the Integrated Approach to Formation Mechanisms of Typical Combustion Byproducts-Polyhalogenated Dibenzo-p-dioxins/Dibenzofurans (PXDD/Fs). Environ. Sci. Tech. 2023, 57, 2217–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nganai, S.; Lomnicki, S. Surface catalysed PCDD/F formation from precursors-high PCDF yield does not indicate de novo mechanism! Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 61, 208–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sun, Q.; Altarawneh, M.; Dlugogorski, B.Z.; Kennedy, E.M.; Mackie, J.C. Catalytic effect of CuO and other transition metal oxides in formation of dioxins: Theoretical investigation of reaction between 2, 4, 5-trichlorophenol and CuO. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2007, 41, 5708–5715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, L.; Liu, G.; Zheng, M.; Zhao, Y.; Jin, R.; Wu, X.; Xu, Y. Molecular mechanism of dioxin formation from chlorophenol based on electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2017, 51, 4999–5007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lomnicki, S.; Truong, H.; Vejerano, E.; Dellinger, B. Copper oxide-based model of persistent free radical formation on combustion-derived particulate matter. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2008, 42, 4982–4988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khachatryan, L.; Lomnicki, S.; Dellinger, B. An expanded reaction kinetic model of the CuO surface-mediated formation of PCDD/F from pyrolysis of 2-chlorophenol. Chemosphere 2007, 68, 1741–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nganai, S.; Dellinger, B.; Lomnicki, S. PCDD/PCDF ratio in the precursor formation model over CuO surface. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2014, 48, 13864–13870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nganai, S.; Lomnicki, S.M.; Dellinger, B. Formation of PCDD/Fs from the copper oxide-mediated pyrolysis and oxidation of 1, 2-dichlorobenzene. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2011, 45, 1034–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lomnicki, S.; Dellinger, B. A detailed mechanism of the surface-mediated formation of PCDD/F from the oxidation of 2-chlorophenol on a CuO/silica surface. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 4387–4395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, G.; Jiang, X.; Wang, M.; Dong, S.; Zheng, M. Comparison of PCDD/F levels and profiles in fly ash samples from multiple industrial thermal sources. Chemosphere 2015, 133, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhou, H.; Meng, A.; Long, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Y. A review of dioxin-related substances during municipal solid waste incineration. Waste Manag. 2015, 36, 106–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wu, X.; Zheng, M.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, H.; Yang, L.; Jin, R.; Xu, Y.; Xiao, K.; Liu, W.; Liu, G. Thermochemical formation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans on the fly ash matrix from metal smelting sources. Chemosphere 2018, 191, 825–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fujimori, T.; Tanino, Y.; Takaoka, M. Coexistence of Cu, Fe, Pb, and Zn oxides and chlorides as a determinant of chlorinated aromatics generation in municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2014, 48, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Liu, L.; Li, W.; Xiong, Z.; Xia, D.; Yang, C.; Wang, W.; Sun, Y. Synergistic effect of iron and copper oxides on the formation of persistent chlorinated aromatics in iron ore sintering based on in situ XPS analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 366, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Wang, M.; Liu, G.; Jiang, X.; Zheng, M.; Yang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Jin, R. Thermochemical formation of polybrominated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans mediated by secondary copper smelter fly ash, and implications for emission reduction. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2016, 50, 7470–7479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, S.; Liu, G.; Yang, L.; Liu, X.; Wang, M.; Qin, L.; Zheng, M. Metal-catalyzed formation of organic pollutants intermediated by organic free radicals. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2022, 56, 14550–14561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Vejerano, E.; Lomnicki, S.M.; Dellinger, B. Formation and stabilization of combustion-generated, environmentally persistent radicals on Ni (II) O supported on a silica surface. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2012, 46, 9406–9411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nganai, S.; Lomnicki, S.; Dellinger, B. Ferric oxide mediated formation of PCDD/Fs from 2-monochlorophenol. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2009, 43, 368–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mosallanejad, S.; Dlugogorski, B.Z.; Kennedy, E.M.; Stockenhuber, M.; Lomnicki, S.M.; Assaf, N.W.; Altarawneh, M. Formation of PCDD/Fs in oxidation of 2-chlorophenol on neat silica surface. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2016, 50, 1412–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Alderman, S.L.; Dellinger, B. FTIR investigation of 2-chlorophenol chemisorption on a silica surface from 200 to 500 C. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 7725–7731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Pan, W.; Zhong, W.; Zhang, D.; Liu, C. Theoretical study of the reactions of 2-chlorophenol over the dehydrated and hydroxylated silica clusters. J. Phys. Chem. A 2012, 116, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Longo, R.C.; Ueda, H.; Cho, K.; Ranjan, A.; Ventzek, P.L. Mechanisms for graphene growth on SiO2 using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition: A density functional theory study. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 9492–9503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang, D.; Zhang, R. A structural model of one-dimensional thin silica nanowires. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 394, 437–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hosono, H.; Ikuta, Y.; Kinoshita, T.; Kajihara, K.; Hirano, M. Physical disorder and optical properties in the vacuum ultraviolet region of amorphous SiO2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 175501–175505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, F.; Shi, X.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, W. Formation of chlorotriophenoxy radicals from complete series reactions of chlorotriophenols with H and OH radicals. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 18714–18731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G.A.; et al. Gaussian 09, Revision A.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D.G. Hybrid meta density functional theory methods for thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, and noncovalent interactions: The MPW1B95 and MPWB1K models and comparative assessments for hydrogen bonding and van der Waals interactions. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 6908–6918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fukui, K. The path of chemical reactions-the IRC approach. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Canneaux, S.; Bohr, F.; Henon, E. KiSThelP: A program to predict thermodynamic properties and rate constants from quantum chemistry results. J. Comput. Chem. 2014, 35, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Larson, N.W.; Nicolaisen, F.M. Far-infrared gas spectra of phenol, 4-fluorophenol, thiophenol and some deuterated species: Barrier to internal rotation. J. Mol. Struct. 1974, 22, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nyquist, R.A.; Evans, J.C. The vibrational spectra of p-chlorobenzenethiol. Spectrochim. Acta 1961, 17, 795–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xu, H.; Han, Z.; Zhang, D.J.; Liu, C.B. Theoretical elucidation of the dual role of [HMIm]BF4 ionic liquid as catalyst and extractant in the oxidative desulfurization of dibenzothiophene. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2015, 398, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lee, S.Y. Density functional theory calculation of molecular structure and vibrational spectra of dibenzothiophene in the ground and the lowest triplet state. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 8093–8097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Johnson, R.D., III. NIST Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database, NIST Standard Reference Database; Department of Commerce, USA, Release 16a, August. 2013. Available online: http://cccbdb.nist.gov/ (accessed on 28 August 2015).
Ijms 25 03485 g001
Figure 1. Optimized geometries for (a) the dehydrated silica cluster ((SiO2)3) and (b) the hydroxylated silica cluster ((SiO2)3O2H4) at the MPWB1K/6-31+G(d,p) level. Red, gray and white spheres represent O, Si and H atoms, respectively.
Figure 1. Optimized geometries for (a) the dehydrated silica cluster ((SiO2)3) and (b) the hydroxylated silica cluster ((SiO2)3O2H4) at the MPWB1K/6-31+G(d,p) level. Red, gray and white spheres represent O, Si and H atoms, respectively.
Ijms 25 03485 g001
Ijms 25 03485 g002
Figure 2. (a) The formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate from initial 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3 cluster embedded with the potential barriers ΔE (in kcal/mol) and reaction heats ΔH (in kcal/mol); (b) potential energy profile for the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate from initial 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3 cluster.
Figure 2. (a) The formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate from initial 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3 cluster embedded with the potential barriers ΔE (in kcal/mol) and reaction heats ΔH (in kcal/mol); (b) potential energy profile for the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate from initial 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3 cluster.
Ijms 25 03485 g002
Ijms 25 03485 g003
Figure 3. (a) The formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate from initial 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3O2H4 cluster embedded with the potential barriers ΔE (in kcal/mol) and reaction heats ΔH (in kcal/mol); (b) the potential energy profile for the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate from initial 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3O2H4 cluster.
Figure 3. (a) The formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate from initial 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3O2H4 cluster embedded with the potential barriers ΔE (in kcal/mol) and reaction heats ΔH (in kcal/mol); (b) the potential energy profile for the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate from initial 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3O2H4 cluster.
Ijms 25 03485 g003
Ijms 25 03485 g004aIjms 25 03485 g004b
Figure 4. Optimized geometries involved in the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate from initial 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3 cluster and the (SiO2)3O2H4 cluster.
Figure 4. Optimized geometries involved in the formation of 2-chlorothiophenolate from initial 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3 cluster and the (SiO2)3O2H4 cluster.
Ijms 25 03485 g004aIjms 25 03485 g004b
Ijms 25 03485 g005
Figure 5. The formation of the second 2-chlorothiophenolate from the second 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3 cluster embedded with potential barriers ΔE (kcal/mol) and reaction heats ΔH (kcal/mol).
Figure 5. The formation of the second 2-chlorothiophenolate from the second 2-CTP on the (SiO2)3 cluster embedded with potential barriers ΔE (kcal/mol) and reaction heats ΔH (kcal/mol).
Ijms 25 03485 g005
Ijms 25 03485 g006
Figure 6. Formation routes of pre-PCDT intermediates embedded with potential barriers ΔE (kcal/mol) and reaction heats ΔH (kcal/mol) from the coupling of two adsorbed 2-chlorothiophenolates on the (SiO2)3 cluster via the L–H mechanism starting with (a) IM 14 and (b) IM15.
Figure 6. Formation routes of pre-PCDT intermediates embedded with potential barriers ΔE (kcal/mol) and reaction heats ΔH (kcal/mol) from the coupling of two adsorbed 2-chlorothiophenolates on the (SiO2)3 cluster via the L–H mechanism starting with (a) IM 14 and (b) IM15.
Ijms 25 03485 g006
Ijms 25 03485 g007
Figure 7. Formation routes of pre-PCTA/DT intermediates embedded with the potential barriers ΔE (kcal/mol) and reaction heats ΔH (kcal/mol) from the coupling of adsorbed 2-chlorothiophenolate on the (SiO2)3 cluster with gas-phase 2-CTP via the E–R mechanism starting with (a) IM16 and (b) IM29.
Figure 7. Formation routes of pre-PCTA/DT intermediates embedded with the potential barriers ΔE (kcal/mol) and reaction heats ΔH (kcal/mol) from the coupling of adsorbed 2-chlorothiophenolate on the (SiO2)3 cluster with gas-phase 2-CTP via the E–R mechanism starting with (a) IM16 and (b) IM29.
Ijms 25 03485 g007
Table 1. Arrhenius equations for key elementary reactions involved in the formation of pre-PCTA/DT intermediates from 2-CTP on (SiO2)3 and (SiO2)3O2H4 clusters. (Units are s−1 and cm−3 molecule−1 s−1 for unimolecular and bimolecular reactions, respectively).
Table 1. Arrhenius equations for key elementary reactions involved in the formation of pre-PCTA/DT intermediates from 2-CTP on (SiO2)3 and (SiO2)3O2H4 clusters. (Units are s−1 and cm−3 molecule−1 s−1 for unimolecular and bimolecular reactions, respectively).
ReactionsArrhenius Formulas
IM1 → IM2 via TS1k(T) = (8.63 × 1012) exp (−11,138/T)
IM3 → IM4 via TS2k(T) = (8.24 × 1011) exp (−6651/T)
IM5 → IM6 via TS3k(T) = (4.55 × 1013) exp (−3936/T)
IM7 → IM8 via TS4k(T) = (8.84 × 1011) exp (−13,886/T)
IM9 → IM10 via TS5k(T) = (3.33 × 1010) exp (−12,643/T)
IM11 → IM12 via TS6k(T) = (1.63 × 1010) exp (−13,915/T)
IM13 → IM14 via TS7k(T) = (1.46 × 1013) exp (−5576/T)
IM13 → IM15 via TS8k(T) = (1.53 × 1012) exp (−5482/T)
IM14 → IM18 + Cl via TS11k(T) = (1.61 × 1012) exp (−43,242/T)
IM14 → IM19+ Cl via TS12k(T) = (3.10 × 1012) exp (−53,879/T)
IM15 → IM20 + H2 via TS13k(T) = (5.44 × 10−14) exp (−25,324/T)
IM15 → IM23 + Cl via TS16k(T) = (1.16 × 1012) exp (−40,134/T)
IM15 → IM24 + Cl via TS17k(T) = (3.19 × 1011) exp (−47,477/T)
IM6 + 2-CTP → IM25 + Cl via TS18k(T) = (1.03 × 10−14) exp (−37,954/T)
IM6 + 2-CTP → IM26 + Cl via TS19k(T) = (5.02 × 10−15) exp (−41,857/T)
IM6 + 2-CTP → IM27 + H2 via TS20k(T) = (1.88 × 10−15) exp (−52,003/T)
IM6 + 2-CTP → IM28 + Cl via TS21k(T) = (2.75 × 10−14) exp (−29,308/T)
IM29 + 2-CP → IM30 + Cl via TS22k(T) = (7.78 × 10−16) exp (−33,859/T)
IM29 + 2-CP → IM31 + Cl via TS23k(T) = (7.83 × 10−16) exp (−38,866/T)
IM29 + 2-CP → IM32 + H2 via TS24k(T) = (1.61 × 10−16) exp (−56,864/T)
IM29 + 2-CP → IM33 + Cl via TS25k(T) = (2.05 × 10−15) exp (−33,514/T)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, F.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Hu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Hadizadeh, M.H. Formation of Pre-PCTA/DT Intermediates from 2-Chlorothiophenol on Silica Clusters: A Quantum Mechanical Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3485. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063485

AMA Style

Xu F, Wang X, Li Y, Hu Y, Zhou Y, Hadizadeh MH. Formation of Pre-PCTA/DT Intermediates from 2-Chlorothiophenol on Silica Clusters: A Quantum Mechanical Study. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(6):3485. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063485

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Fei, Xiaotong Wang, Ying Li, Yongxia Hu, Ying Zhou, and Mohammad Hassan Hadizadeh. 2024. "Formation of Pre-PCTA/DT Intermediates from 2-Chlorothiophenol on Silica Clusters: A Quantum Mechanical Study" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 6: 3485. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063485

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop