Next Article in Journal
P2X7 Receptor-Induced Human Mast Cell Degranulation Is Enhanced by Interleukin 33
Previous Article in Journal
Members of the Capsicum annuum CaTrxh Family Respond to High Temperature and Exhibit Dynamic Hetero/Homo Interactions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium Limits TLR-4-Triggered Inflammatory Response in Raw264.7 Macrophages by Activating RasGRP3
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 3
10.3390/ijms25031728
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Alleviative Effect of Geniposide on Lipopolysaccharide-Stimulated Macrophages via Calcium Pathway

by
Hyun-Ju Kim
and
Wansu Park
*
Department of Pathology, College of Korean Medicine, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(3), 1728; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25031728
Submission received: 26 December 2023 / Revised: 26 January 2024 / Accepted: 29 January 2024 / Published: 31 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Macrophage Activation, Natural Products and Inflammatory Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, we investigated how geniposide (a bioactive ingredient of gardenia fruit) acts on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated macrophages. Griess reagent assay, Fluo-4 calcium assay, dihydrorhodamine 123 assay, multiplex cytokine assay, quantitative RT-PCR, and flow cytometry assay were used for this study. Data showed that geniposide at concentrations of 10, 25, and 50 μM reduced significantly the levels of nitric oxide, intracellular Ca2+, and hydrogen peroxide in LPS-activated RAW 264.7. Multiplex cytokine assay showed that geniposide at concentrations of 10, 25, and 50 μM meaningfully suppressed levels of IL-6, G-CSF, MCP-1, and MIP-1α in RAW 264.7 provoked by LPS; additionally, geniposide at concentrations of 25 and 50 μM meaningfully suppressed the levels of TNF-α, IP-10, GM-CSF, and MIP-1β. Flow cytometry assay showed that geniposide reduces significantly the level of activated P38 MAPK in RAW 264.7 provoked by LPS. Geniposide meaningfully suppressed LPS-induced transcription of inflammatory target genes, such as Chop, Jak2, Fas, c-Jun, c-Fos, Stat3, Nos2, Ptgs2, Gadd34, Asc, Xbp1, Nlrp3, and Par-2. Taken together, geniposide exerts alleviative effects in LPS-stimulated macrophages via the calcium pathway.

1. Introduction

Immunity is an essential process for health and human life. Innate immunity protects the human body from invading microbial pathogens (i.e., bacteria). Inflammation is an early host defense response to pathogenic infections [1]. But then, uncontrolled inflammation is dangerous to host survival [2], and excessive inflammation sometimes leads to not only acute inflammatory diseases but also chronic inflammatory disorders [3]. Acute inflammation is caused by neutrophils and monocytes that immediately respond to bacterial pathogens or injured tissues and is mediated by vasoactive amines and eicosanoids. Acute inflammation lasts only a few days and then resolves but sometimes develops into abscess formation or chronic inflammation. Chronic inflammation is caused by acute inflammation that persists due to non-degradable pathogens, viral infection, or autoimmune reactions and involves monocytes, macrophages, lymphocytes, plasma cells, and fibroblasts. It is mediated by interferons, cytokines, growth factors, chemokines, reactive oxygen species, and hydrolytic enzymes. Chronic inflammation lasts for months or sometimes years, causing tissue destruction, fibrosis, and necrosis, and can lead to body pain, myalgia, chronic fatigue, insomnia, depression, gastrointestinal complications, weight loss (or gain), atherosclerosis, allergy, and cancers. As macrophages play an important role not only in acute inflammation but also in chronic inflammation, this study established them as an in vitro model of infectious agent-induced cellular inflammation. P38 MAPK controls macrophage plasticity by inducing endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) and glucose intolerance in infected hosts [4]. It is well known that cytokines and chemokines may contribute to the exacerbation of inflammatory diseases such as atherosclerosis [5,6]. Thus, the regulation of inflammation has become increasingly important for treating inflammatory diseases [7]. Representative cytokines associated with inflammatory diseases include interleukin-6 (IL-6). Not only cytokines but also nitric oxide (NO) are important factors involved in the inflammatory response process of macrophages [8]. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) is also an important cytokine associated with endotoxemia [9]. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS, endotoxin) can stimulate immune cells like macrophages, which produce cytokines and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) is also one of the increased chemokines in endotoxemia. Excessive cytokines in infectious diseases may have a serious outcome in patients. Thus, LPS-induced macrophages are regarded as being useful for studying the anti-inflammatory effect of potential therapeutic agents. TNF-α-converting enzyme (TACE) is a sheddase responsible for cleaving membrane TNF, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) mediate LPS-induced upregulation of TACE activity via P38 MAPK activation in monocytes [10]. Many studies have reported that ERS-related pathways, including C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) and protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2), might be upregulated through P38 MAPK phosphorylation, which is related to growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible gene 34 (GADD34) [11,12,13,14]. CHOP activation is also linked to X-box-binding protein 1 (XBP1). Recently, macrophage inflammatory proteins (MIPs) have been recognized as important in the amplification process of inflammatory phenomena. Interferon-inducible protein (IP)-10 is also increased during inflammation. In addition, it is known that not only cytokines and chemokines but also growth factors, such as increased blood levels in inflammatory diseases, worsen the condition.
Geniposide (Figure 1) is a major ingredient in the herb gardenia [13]. The herb gardenia, a fruit of Gardenia jasminoides, is widely used in Asian countries such as Korea, China, India, Japan, Vietnam, Taiwan, and Myanmar to treat inflammatory disorders [15,16,17]. Geniposide is known to suppress inducible nitric oxide synthase in macrophages induced by LPS as well as cyclooxygenase-2 [16]. Cyclooxygenase-2 is also reduced by geniposide in macrophages. Cheng et al. suggested geniposide inhibits cytokines levels in RAW 264.7 induced by LPS as well as reduces the plaque size and serum TNF-α level in ApoE−/− mice via microRNA-101/mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1/P38 signaling [18]. Geniposide was reported to reduce atherosclerotic plaques in rabbits via the MAPK pathway [19]. Despite such studies, the effects of geniposide on ERS-related cytokine production of LPS-provoked macrophages are still unknown. In a previous study, we reported that natural products alleviate the inflammatory response of macrophages caused by LPS through the calcium-CHOP signaling pathway [20]. However, we have not yet reported the effect of geniposide on the inflammatory response of macrophages
The main purpose of this study was to determine the effect geniposide has on the inflammatory response of macrophages caused by lipopolysaccharide and, if it exhibits anti-inflammatory effects, the detailed signaling mechanisms (such as ERS-related p38 MAPK) involved. Effects of geniposide on cytokines, H2O2, and NO in LPS-provoked RAW 264.7. In addition, quantitative PCR was carried out to measure mRNA expression of ERS-related genes such as Chop, Janus kinase 2 (Jak2), first apoptosis signal receptor (Fas), c-Jun, c-Fos, Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (Stat)-1, Stat-3, nitric oxide synthase 2 (Nos2), cyclooxygenase-2 (Ptgs2), Gadd34, Apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain (Asc), Xbp1, Nlrp3 (cryopyrin), and Par-2 in RAW 264.7. Finally, geniposide has been shown to suppress the levels of cytokines, H2O2, and NO in LPS-provoked RAW 264.7 through the calcium pathway.

2. Results

2.1. Effect of Geniposide on Cell Viability

Exposure to geniposide at concentrations of 10, 25, and 50 µM did not decrease the viability of RAW 264.7 after 24 h and 48 h treatment. Cell viabilities in RAW 264.7 treated for 24 h with geniposide at concentrations of 10, 25, and 50 µM were 112.75 ± 6.78%, 120.37 ± 3.22%, and 126.31 ± 3.25% of the normal group (media only), respectively (Figure 2A); for 48 h treatment, cell viabilities were 104.87 ± 5.32%, 109.26 ± 3.75%, and 112.44 ± 2.45% of the normal group, respectively (Figure 2B). Geniposide did not show significant changes in the cell viability of RAW 264.7 stimulated with LPS (Figure 2C). Cell viabilities of RAW 264.7 treated with geniposide at concentrations of 10, 25, and 50 µM were 95.04 ± 12.01%, 96.17 ± 12.64%, and 97.53 ± 12.6% of the control group treated with LPS only, respectively. This finding indicates that geniposide does not reduce the production of inflammatory factors by causing cytotoxicity and consequently inhibiting the transcription of inflammation-related genes.

2.2. Effect of Geniposide on the Level of Hydrogen Peroxide, NO, and Ca2+

Geniposide significantly inhibited the production of hydrogen peroxide in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 for 24 h and 48 h of treatment (Figure 3A,B). Geniposide significantly inhibited NO levels in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 (IC50:135.9 µM) (Figure 3C). Geniposide also significantly inhibited Ca2+ release in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 (IC50: 503.5 µM) (Figure 3D). Baicalein, a flavonoid, and aglycon hydrolyzed from baicalin, inhibited hydrogen peroxide generation, NO production, and Ca2+ release in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7. Considering the inhibitory effect of baicalein, it is estimated that the inhibitory effect of geniposide on Ca2+ release in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 is also related to the anti-inflammatory effect of geniposide.

2.3. Effect of Geniposide on Cytokines Production

Geniposide significantly decreased the production of IL-6, TNF-α, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, MIP-2, and LIX (CXCL5) in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 (Figure 4). However, the effect of geniposide at a concentration of 50 µM on the production of MIP-2 and LIX was not statistically significant.
Data revealed that geniposide exhibited IC50 values of 1454, 310.3, 1289, 65.55, 128.6, 925.8, 91.08, 846.2, 1949, and 2569 µM for IL-6, TNF-α, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IP-10, LIX, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and MIP-2, respectively. Data suggest that geniposide exhibits anti-inflammatory effects in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 by reducing various cytokines, leading to amelioration of the hyper-inflammatory syndrome, known as cytokine storm, caused by endotoxemia. The already known inhibitory effect of baicalein on cytokine production could also be confirmed.

2.4. Effect of Geniposide on Inflammatory Target Genes Expressions

Geniposide significantly affected the transcription of Chop, Jak2, Fas, c-Jun, c-Fos, Stat-3, Nos2, Ptgs2, Gadd34, Asc, Xbp1, Nlrp3, and Par-2 genes (Figure 5 and Figure 6). However, statistical significance was not confirmed for the inhibitory effect on Stat-1. These data indicated that geniposide inhibited the production of inflammatory mediators via the ERS/CHOP-related pathway. The already known inhibitory effect of baicalein on the expression of ERS-related genes could also be confirmed.

2.5. Effect of Geniposide on P38 MAPK Phosphorylation

Geniposide meaningfully decreased the level of phosphorylated P38 MAPK in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 (Figure 7). These data indicate that geniposide exerts anti-inflammatory effects on LPS-provoked RAW 264.7 via the calcium pathway. The already known inhibitory effect of baicalein on P38 activation was also confirmed.

3. Discussion

Research on natural products for treating various inflammatory diseases continues [21]. Geniposide is a major constituent of the herb gardenia, which has been used to treat inflammatory disorders, fever, hypertension, edema, jaundice, and dysphoria for centuries [13,14,22]. Since geniposide is a major component of gardenia, if the inhibitory effect of geniposide on infectious inflammatory reactions is revealed in more detail, it will help develop anti-inflammatory substances using gardenia or develop new treatments to prevent worsening inflammatory diseases caused by infection.
Shi et al. reported that geniposide inhibited nitric oxide synthase in LPS-provoked macrophages, as well as cyclooxygenase-2 [14]. Interesting reports have been made about the anti-asthmatic properties of geniposide [23], anti-tumor activity of geniposide [24], anti-angiogenic activity of the herb gardenia [25], and anti-inflammatory activity of geniposide in oxygen/glucose-deprived rat microglial cells [26]. Liu et al. reported that geniposide inhibits IL-6 and IL-8 production in LPS-induced human umbilical vein endothelial cells by blocking P38 and ERK 1/2 signaling [27]. However, the complete mechanism underlying the bioactivity of geniposide remains unresolved.
LPS can stimulate immune cells like macrophages to secrete various inflammatory factors, including NO, cytokines, prostaglandins, and reactive oxygen species. Excessive production of inflammatory mediators in infectious diseases may have a serious outcome in patients. The production of large amounts of inflammatory factors from activated macrophages is associated with the exacerbation of sepsis [14,28]. Thus, LPS-provoked macrophages are regarded as being useful in the search for new anti-inflammatory agents.
Although many studies have evaluated the pharmacological activities of geniposide, its specific effects on cytokines secreted from LPS-provoked macrophages have not been fully reported until now. Therefore, the effects of geniposide on ERS-related cytokine production in LPS-provoked RAW 264.7 were investigated in this study.
Uncontrolled inflammation can develop into acute inflammatory diseases and further chronic inflammatory diseases such as diabetes [29]. Sepsis is a representative disease characterized by uncontrolled inflammation and a hyperinflammatory response (cytokine storm). Hu et al. have reported that sepsis is a systemic response that results from a harmful host response to infection [30].
Sun and Bhatia reported that MIP-1α, MCP-1, and MIP-2 are elevated after acute pancreatitis induced by cerulein in a mouse model. They also suggested that MIP-1α, MCP-1, and MIP-2 play a role in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis [31]. IL-6, an important factor in B-cell maturation and autoantibody production, induces articular and systemic symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis [32]. MCP-1 is hypersecreted in airway hyper-reactivity and chronic airway inflammatory diseases, such as asthma [33]. The exaggerated allergic inflammation with airway hyper-responsiveness can be accompanied by an increase in G-CSF and KC [34]. GM-CSF and IL-5 are clinically important in the pathophysiology of allergies and asthma [35]. During lung inflammation, levels of MCP-1, IP-10, G-CSF, and GM-CSF are increased in the bronchoalveolar fluid [36]. In the current study, geniposide at concentrations of 10, 25, and 50 μM meaningfully suppressed the production of IL-6, G-CSF, MCP-1, and MIP-1α in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 and geniposide at concentrations of 25 and 50 μM meaningfully suppressed levels of TNF-alpha, IP-10, GM-CSF, and MIP-1β. These experimental results indicate that various hyperinflammatory phenomena caused by endotoxins can be alleviated by geniposide. More research is needed to determine which inflammatory diseases geniposide will have a valid effect on.
Interestingly, the current data showed that geniposide significantly inhibited the levels of intracellular Ca2+, NO, and hydrogen peroxide in LPS-provoked RAW 264.7; geniposide decreased significantly the transcription of Chop, Jak2, Fas, c-Jun, c-Fos, Stat-3, Nos2, Ptgs2, Gadd34, Asc, Xbp1, Nlrp3, and Par-2 genes as well as P38 MAPK phosphorylation. LPS stimulation is well known to make RAW 264.7 produce cytokines and ROS via P38 MAPK activation [37]. Because ROS-mediated up-regulation of TACE activity in LPS-stimulated monocytes might progress via P38 MAPK activation [10], the inhibitory effects of geniposide on ROS production and expression of ERS-related genes in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 could be interpreted as geniposide inhibiting cytokine production, such as TNF-α and MCP-1, through regulation of ERS-related P38 signaling (Figure 8).
CHOP (GADD153) in stressed cells is activated by P38 MAPK [38]. LPS causes ERS with the overexpression of Chop [39]. During inflammation, a characteristic phenomenon occurs in which intracellular calcium concentration increases while ER calcium storage decreases [40]. CHOP-amplified cytoplasmic calcium is known to activate ROS generation via Camk2a activation [41]. ERS-induced calcium release might be related to Camk2a and Stat1 activation in macrophages [42]. In addition to CHOP, GADD34 [11,12], XBP1 [13], and PAR-2 [14] may also be upregulated through P38 MAPK phosphorylation in ERS reaction [11,12,13,14]. ASC and NLRP3 play an important role in inflammasome complex activation caused by infectious pathogens and in infection-induced macrophage activation [43]. Interestingly, the induction of ASC and NLRP3 inflammasomes plays an intermediate role in a series of inflammatory cascades from ERS to pyroptosis, which begins with ROS production and subsequently results in cellular injury [44]. In this study, it was not possible to determine whether XBP1 directly activates the transcription factor activity of CHOP. Since oxidative stress and ERS can cause each other, additional investigation is needed to determine whether geniposide suppresses ERS through the regulation of oxidative stress or whether it suppresses oxidative stress through the regulation of ERS. These results indicate that geniposide could modulate M1-type polarization in LPS-stimulated macrophages, which might be induced by ERS in bacterial infections [45]. Further studies are needed to verify the effects of geniposide on the conversion of M1 to M2 macrophages. Finally, geniposide significantly inhibited the levels of NO, ROS, IL-6, TNF-α, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 via the calcium pathway. A shortfall of this study was the inability to use primary peritoneal or bone marrow-derived macrophages. Another shortcoming of this study is the inability to confirm the protein levels of CHOP, STAT-3, PTGS2, NOS2, GADD34, XBP1, PAR-2, Asc, and NLRP3, as well as the phosphorylation of STATs. It is also unfortunate that in this study, the concentration and treatment time of LPS that stimulates RAW 264.7 were not treated differently. Regrettably, the anti-inflammatory efficacy of geniposide could not be confirmed using animal test models due to the lack of research time and equipment. More research is needed to elucidate the medicinal benefits of geniposide in inflammatory disorders.

4. Materials and Methods

The experimental technique implemented in this study is based on previous reports [20,21], and detailed information is provided in the Supplementary Materials including Table S1 and Sections S1.1–S1.10.

4.1. Materials

Chemicals for these experiments, including DMEM, were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). The treatment concentrations of geniposide (10~50 µM) were determined according to previous studies [18]. As in the previous study [20], baicalein, which is well known for its anti-inflammatory effects, was used as a positive control. Because the activation time of p38 MAPK in cells is due to stimulating factors, LPS and geniposide were administered simultaneously within a few hours.

4.2. Methods

4.2.1. Cell Culture and Cell Viability

RAW 264.7 was obtained from the Korea Cell Line Bank (Seoul, Republic of Korea) and cultured in DMEM. In some cases, drug candidates may reduce the production of inflammatory factors, such as cytokines, by being toxic to macrophages; therefore, it is meaningful to investigate the effects of candidate substances on the cell viability of macrophages. Cell viability was measured using the MTT assay [20].

4.2.2. Levels of H2O2, NO, and Ca2+ in Cells

Since ROS, such as H2O2, play an important role in mediating and amplifying inflammatory responses and changing related immune cells, it is meaningful to investigate the effect on the generation of ROS in verifying the anti-inflammatory effect. The production of H2O2 was measured by the dihydrorhodamine (DHR) 123 assay [21]. Nitric oxide, one of the active nitrogen species, dilates blood vessels and activates local blood flow to help the aggregation of immune cells in the immune inflammatory response; therefore, increased nitric oxide production naturally leads to amplification of the inflammatory response. Therefore, most substances that exhibit anti-inflammatory effects often suppress the amount of nitric oxide produced by macrophages. The NO level was measured using the Griess reagent assay [20]. Increased release of intracellular calcium, especially from the endoplasmic reticulum, is an important trigger for triggering an inflammatory response along with ERS. Therefore, suppressing the increase in intracellular calcium release exhibits an anti-inflammatory effect that is involved in the ERS mechanism. Intracellular Ca2+ release was measured using Fluo-4 NW Calcium Assay Kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) [20].

4.2.3. Levels of Inflammatory Cytokines

With the recent development of advanced multiplex screening assays, it has become possible to simultaneously measure the amount of various cytokines in single-cell culture supernatants. In conducting experimental research, if the production of various cytokines can be measured simultaneously in the same cell culture supernatant, changes in the inflammatory response due to potential anti-inflammatory substances can be more accurately identified. The production of cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, MIPs, G-CSF, etc.) was measured using the MILLIPLEX MAP Mouse Cytokine/Chemokine Magnetic Bead Panel kit (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) [20].

4.2.4. Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR for Inflammatory Genes

CHOP protein is a transcription factor that is activated in association with ERS and P38 MAPK activation and promotes the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Inflammation-related genes, such as Fas and Stat, are also associated with ERS and increased intracellular calcium release. GADD34, XBP1, and PAR-2 might be upregulated through P38 MAPK phosphorylation in the ERS reaction. The expression of Nos2 is increased during inflammatory responses, resulting in increased production of nitric oxide. Increased expression of Ptgs2 leads to increased production of prostaglandin E2 and promotes an inflammatory response. JAK2 cooperates with STAT1 and STAT3 to generate cellular signaling pathways and provides important clues to understanding various inflammatory diseases. The induction of ASC and NLRP3 inflammasomes plays an intermediate role in a series of inflammatory cascades from ERS to pyroptosis. c-Jun and c-Fos play important roles in regulating inflammation-related gene expression. The transcription of target genes such as Chop, Jak2, Fas, c-Jun, c-Fos, Stat-1, Stat-3, Nos2, Ptgs2, Gadd34, Xbp1, Par-2, Nlrp3, and Asc was evaluated using quantitative real-time RT-PCR [20].

4.2.5. Phosphorylation of P38 MAPK

P38 MAPK is known to mediate inflammatory responses. It is activated by ROS, increases the production of NO, increases the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, expands the intracellular response of ERS, and activates nuclear factor Kappa B, which causes inflammatory cascade and apoptosis. Flow cytometry was used to check phosphorylated P38 MAPK with an Attune NxT flow cytometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) [20].

4.2.6. Statistical Analysis

GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for statistical analysis, including one-way analysis of variance.

5. Conclusions

Geniposide significantly inhibited levels of Ca2+, NO, H2O2, IL-6, TNF-α, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and phosphorylated P38 MAPK as well as mRNA expression of Chop, Jak2, Fas, c-Jun, c-Fos, Stat3, Nos2, Ptgs2, Gadd34, Asc, Xbp1, Nlrp3, and Par-2 in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7, which means that the anti-inflammatory activity of geniposide in macrophages takes place through the calcium pathway.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25031728/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.P.; Methodology, W.P.; Formal analysis, W.P.; Investigation, H.-J.K. and W.P.; Writing—original draft, H.-J.K. and W.P.; Writing—review & editing, W.P.; Funding acquisition, W.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (2017R1A2B4004933).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, Y.C.; Zou, X.B.; Chai, Y.F.; Yao, Y.M. Macrophage Polarization in Inflammatory Diseases. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2014, 10, 520–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lariccia, V.; Magi, S.; Serfilippi, T.; Toujani, M.; Gratteri, S.; Amoroso, S. Challenges and Opportunities from Targeting Inflammatory Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Narrative Review. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, J.; Jiang, M.; Chen, X.; Montaner, L.J. Cytokine Storm and Leukocyte Changes in Mild Versus Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Review of 3939 COVID-19 Patients in China and Emerging Pathogenesis and Therapy Concepts. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2020, 108, 17–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Roy, R.K.; Sharma, U.; Wasson, M.K.; Jain, A.; Hassan, M.I.; Prakash, H. Macrophage Activation Syndrome and COVID 19: Impact of MAPK Driven Immune-Epigenetic Programming by SARS-CoV-2. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 763313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bacchiega, B.C.; Bacchiega, A.B.; Usnayo, M.J.; Bedirian, R.; Singh, G.; Pinheiro, G.D. Interleukin 6 Inhibition and Coronary Artery Disease in a High-Risk Population: A Prospective Community-Based Clinical Study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6, e005038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhou, Y.; Little, P.J.; Xu, S.; Kamato, D. Curcumin Inhibits Lysophosphatidic Acid Mediated MCP-1 Expression via Blocking ROCK Signalling. Molecules 2021, 26, 2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Schett, G.; Neurath, M.F. Resolution of Chronic Inflammatory Disease: Universal and Tissue-Specific Concepts. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Netea, M.G.; Balkwill, F.; Chonchol, M.; Cominelli, F.; Donath, M.Y.; Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E.J.; Golenbock, D.; Gresnigt, M.S.; Heneka, M.T.; Hoffman, H.M.; et al. A Guiding Map for Inflammation. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 826–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, R.; Li, Y.; Gao, Y.; Tu, D.; Wilson, B.; Song, S.; Feng, J.; Hong, J.S.; et al. A Novel Role of NLRP3-Generated IL-1beta in the Acute-Chronic Transition of Peripheral Lipopolysaccharide-Elicited Neuroinflammation: Implications for Sepsis-Associated Neurodegeneration. J. Neuroinflamm. 2020, 17, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Scott, A.J.; O’Dea, K.P.; O’Callaghan, D.; Williams, L.; Dokpesi, J.O.; Tatton, L.; Handy, J.M.; Hogg, P.J.; Takata, M. Reactive Oxygen Species and p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Mediate Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha-Converting Enzyme (TACE/ADAM-17) Activation in Primary Human Monocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 35466–35476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Emadali, A.; Nguyen, D.T.; Rochon, C.; Tzimas, G.N.; Metrakos, P.P.; Chevet, E. Distinct Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Responses are Triggered during Human Liver Transplantation. J. Pathol. 2005, 207, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Oh-Hashi, K.; Maruyama, W.; Isobe, K. Peroxynitrite Induces GADD34, 45, and 153 VIA p38 MAPK in Human Neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y Cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2001, 30, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhou, C.M.; Luo, L.M.; Lin, P.; Pu, Q.; Wang, B.; Qin, S.; Wu, Q.; Yu, X.J.; Wu, M. Annexin A2 Regulates Unfolded Protein Response Via IRE1-XBP1 Axis in Macrophages during P. Aeruginosa Infection. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2021, 110, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Boileau, C.; Amiable, N.; Martel-Pelletier, J.; Fahmi, H.; Duval, N.; Pelletier, J.P. Activation of Proteinase-Activated Receptor 2 in Human Osteoarthritic Cartilage Upregulates Catabolic and Proinflammatory Pathways Capable of Inducing Cartilage Degradation: A Basic Science Study. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2007, 9, R121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Koo, H.J.; Lim, K.H.; Jung, H.J.; Park, E.H. Anti-Inflammatory Evaluation of Gardenia Extract, Geniposide and Genipin. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 103, 496–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shi, Q.; Cao, J.; Fang, L.; Zhao, H.; Liu, Z.; Ran, J.; Zheng, X.; Li, X.; Zhou, Y.; Ge, D.; et al. Geniposide Suppresses LPS-Induced Nitric Oxide, PGE2 and Inflammatory Cytokine by Downregulating NF-kappaB, MAPK and AP-1 Signaling Pathways in Macrophages. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2014, 20, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xiaofeng, Y.; Qinren, C.; Jingping, H.; Xiao, C.; Miaomiao, W.; Xiangru, F.; Xianxing, X.; Meixia, H.; Jing, L.; Jingyuan, W.; et al. Geniposide, an Iridoid Glucoside Derived from Gardenia Jasminoides, Protects Against Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Acute Lung Injury in Mice. Planta Med. 2012, 78, 557–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cheng, S.; Zhou, F.; Xu, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, M.; Su, Z.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, L.; Jia, Y. Geniposide Regulates the miR-101/MKP-1/p38 Pathway and Alleviates Atherosclerosis Inflammatory Injury in ApoE(−/−) Mice. Immunobiology 2019, 224, 296–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jin, Z.; Li, J.; Pi, J.; Chu, Q.; Wei, W.; Du, Z.; Qing, L.; Zhao, X.; Wu, W. Geniposide Alleviates Atherosclerosis by Regulating Macrophage Polarization Via the FOS/MAPK Signaling Pathway. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 125, 110015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, D.-H.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kim, Y.-J.; Kim, H.-J.; Park, W. Rubi Fructus Water Extract Alleviates LPS-Stimulated Macrophage Activation via an ERS-Induced Calcium/CHOP Signaling Pathway. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hsieh, S.C.; Fang, S.H.; Rao, Y.K.; Tzeng, Y.M. Inhibition of Pro-Inflammatory Mediators and Tumor Cell Proliferation by Anisomeles Indica Extracts. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 118, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tseng, T.H.; Chu, C.Y.; Huang, J.M.; Shiow, S.J.; Wang, C.J. Crocetin Protects Against Oxidative Damage in Rat Primary Hepatocytes. Cancer Lett. 1995, 97, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liaw, J.; Chao, Y.C. Effect of in Vitro and in Vivo Aerosolized Treatment with Geniposide on Tracheal Permeability in Ovalbumin-Induced Guinea Pigs. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2001, 433, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lee, M.J.; Hsu, J.D.; Wang, C.J. Inhibition of 12-O-Tetradecanoylphorbol-13-Acetate-Caused Tumor Promotion in Benzoa.Pyrene-Initiated CD-1 Mouse Skin by Geniposide. Anticancer Res. 1995, 15, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Park, E.H.; Joo, M.H.; Kim, S.H.; Lim, C.J. Antiangiogenic Activity of Gardenia Jasminoides Fruit. Phytother. Res. 2003, 17, 961–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, J.; Hou, J.; Zhang, P.; Li, D.; Zhang, C.; Liu, J. Geniposide Reduces Inflammatory Responses of Oxygen-Glucose Deprived Rat Microglial Cells Via Inhibition of the TLR4 Signaling Pathway. Neurochem. Res. 2012, 37, 2235–2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, H.T.; He, J.L.; Li, W.M.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Y.X.; Yin, J.; Du, Y.G.; Yu, C. Geniposide Inhibits Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-8 Production in Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells by Blocking p38 and ERK1/2 Signaling Pathways. Inflamm. Res. 2010, 59, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Russell, J.A. Management of Sepsis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355, 1699–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Spite, M.; Norling, L.V.; Summers, L.; Yang, R.; Cooper, D.; Petasis, N.A.; Flower, R.J.; Perretti, M.; Serhan, C.N. Resolvin D2 is a Potent Regulator of Leukocytes and Controls Microbial Sepsis. Nature 2009, 461, 1287–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hu, Z.; Murakami, T.; Suzuki, K.; Tamura, H.; Kuwahara-Arai, K.; Iba, T.; Nagaoka, I. Antimicrobial Cathelicidin Peptide LL-37 Inhibits the LPS/ATP-Induced Pyroptosis of Macrophages by Dual Mechanism. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e85765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sun, J.; Bhatia, M. Blockade of Neurokinin-1 Receptor Attenuates CC and CXC Chemokine Production in Experimental Acute Pancreatitis and Associated Lung Injury. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2007, 292, G143–G153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dayer, J.M.; Choy, E. Therapeutic Targets in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Interleukin-6 Receptor. Rheumatology 2010, 49, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, Y.; Xu, C.B.; Cardell, L.O. Long-Term Exposure to IL-1beta Enhances Toll-IL-1 Receptor-Mediated Inflammatory Signaling in Murine Airway Hyperresponsiveness. Eur. Cytokine Netw. 2009, 20, 148–156. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sheller, J.R.; Polosukhin, V.V.; Mitchell, D.; Cheng, D.S.; Peebles, R.S.; Blackwell, T.S. Nuclear Factor Kappa B Induction in Airway Epithelium Increases Lung Inflammation in Allergen-Challenged Mice. Exp. Lung Res. 2009, 35, 883–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Brahmachari, S.; Pahan, K. Role of Cytokine p40 Family in Multiple Sclerosis. Minerva Med. 2008, 99, 105–118. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Srivastava, M.; Jung, S.; Wilhelm, J.; Fink, L.; Buhling, F.; Welte, T.; Bohle, R.M.; Seeger, W.; Lohmeyer, J.; Maus, U.A. The Inflammatory versus Constitutive Trafficking of Mononuclear Phagocytes into the Alveolar Space of Mice is Associated with Drastic Changes in their Gene Expression Profiles. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 1884–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Liu, H.; Xu, R.; Feng, L.; Guo, W.; Cao, N.; Qian, C.; Teng, P.; Wang, L.; Wu, X.; Sun, Y.; et al. A Novel Chromone Derivative with Anti-Inflammatory Property Via Inhibition of ROS-Dependent Activation of TRAF6-ASK1-p38 Pathway. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, X.Z.; Ron, D. Stress-Induced Phosphorylation and Activation of the Transcription Factor CHOP (GADD153) by p38 MAP Kinase. Science 1996, 272, 1347–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Endo, M.; Mori, M.; Akira, S.; Gotoh, T. C/EBP Homologous Protein (CHOP) is Crucial for the Induction of Caspase-11 and the Pathogenesis of Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammation. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 6245–6253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Stout, B.A.; Melendez, K.; Seagrave, J.; Holtzman, M.J.; Wilson, B.; Xiang, J.; Tesfaigzi, Y. STAT1 Activation Causes Translocation of Bax to the Endoplasmic Reticulum during the Resolution of Airway Mucous Cell Hyperplasia by IFN-Gamma. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 8107–8116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tabas, I.; Seimon, T.; Timmins, J.; Li, G.; Lim, W. Macrophage Apoptosis in Advanced Atherosclerosis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1173 (Suppl. S1), E40–E45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Timmins, J.M.; Ozcan, L.; Seimon, T.A.; Li, G.; Malagelada, C.; Backs, J.; Backs, T.; Bassel-Duby, R.; Olson, E.N.; Anderson, M.E.; et al. Calcium/calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase II Links ERS with Fas and Mitochondrial Apoptosis Pathways. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 2925–2941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Bryan, N.B.; Dorfleutner, A.; Rojanasakul, Y.; Stehlik, C. Activation of Inflammasomes Requires Intracellular Redistribution of the Apoptotic Speck-Like Protein Containing a Caspase Recruitment Domain. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 3173–3182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Menu, P.; Mayor, A.; Zhou, R.; Tardivel, A.; Ichijo, H.; Mori, K.; Tschopp, J. ER Stress Activates the NLRP3 Inflammasome Via an UPR-Independent Pathway. Cell. Death Dis. 2012, 3, e261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lim, Y.J.; Yi, M.H.; Choi, J.A.; Lee, J.; Han, J.Y.; Jo, S.H.; Oh, S.M.; Cho, H.J.; Kim, D.W.; Kang, M.W.; et al. Roles of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Mediated Apoptosis in M1-Polarized Macrophages during Mycobacterial Infections. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 25 01728 g001
Figure 1. The structural formula of geniposide.
Figure 1. The structural formula of geniposide.
Ijms 25 01728 g001
Ijms 25 01728 g002
Figure 2. Effect of geniposide on cell viability after 24 h (A) and 48 h (B) treatment in RAW 264.7 as well as cell viability after 24 h treatment in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7 (C). Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. Values are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments (n = 9). Significant differences were examined using the Kruskal-Wallis test. ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor.
Figure 2. Effect of geniposide on cell viability after 24 h (A) and 48 h (B) treatment in RAW 264.7 as well as cell viability after 24 h treatment in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7 (C). Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. Values are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments (n = 9). Significant differences were examined using the Kruskal-Wallis test. ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor.
Ijms 25 01728 g002
Ijms 25 01728 g003
Figure 3. Effect of geniposide on hydrogen peroxide production for 24 h (A) and 48 h (B) treatment in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7 as well as NO production for 24 h treatment (C) and calcium release for 18 h treatment (D). Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. BA denotes baicalein (25 µM). Values are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using a one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor; * p < 0.05 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con.
Figure 3. Effect of geniposide on hydrogen peroxide production for 24 h (A) and 48 h (B) treatment in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7 as well as NO production for 24 h treatment (C) and calcium release for 18 h treatment (D). Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. BA denotes baicalein (25 µM). Values are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using a one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor; * p < 0.05 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con.
Ijms 25 01728 g003
Ijms 25 01728 g004
Figure 4. Effect of geniposide on the production of IL-6 (A), TNF-α (B), G-CSF (C), GM-CSF (D), IP-10 (E), MCP-1 (F), MIP-1α (G), MIP-1β (H), MIP-2 (I), and LIX (J) in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7. Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. BA denotes baicalein (25 µM). Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using a one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor; * p < 0.05 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con.
Figure 4. Effect of geniposide on the production of IL-6 (A), TNF-α (B), G-CSF (C), GM-CSF (D), IP-10 (E), MCP-1 (F), MIP-1α (G), MIP-1β (H), MIP-2 (I), and LIX (J) in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7. Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. BA denotes baicalein (25 µM). Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using a one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor; * p < 0.05 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con.
Ijms 25 01728 g004
Ijms 25 01728 g005
Figure 5. Effect of geniposide on the mRNA expression of Chop (A), Jak2 (B), Fas (C), c-Jun (D), c-Fos (E), and Stat-1 (F) in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7. Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. BA denotes baicalein (25 µM). Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using a one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. # p < 0.05 vs. Nor; ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor; * p < 0.05 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con.
Figure 5. Effect of geniposide on the mRNA expression of Chop (A), Jak2 (B), Fas (C), c-Jun (D), c-Fos (E), and Stat-1 (F) in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7. Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. BA denotes baicalein (25 µM). Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using a one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. # p < 0.05 vs. Nor; ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor; * p < 0.05 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con.
Ijms 25 01728 g005
Ijms 25 01728 g006
Figure 6. Effect of geniposide on the mRNA expression of Nos2 (A), Ptgs2 (B), Gadd34 (C), Asc (D), Xbp1 (E), Stat-3 (F), Nlrp3 (G), and Par-2 (H) in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7. Nor represents the normal group treated with medium only. Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. BA denotes baicalein (25 µM). Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using a one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. # p < 0.05 vs. Nor; ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor; * p < 0.05 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con.
Figure 6. Effect of geniposide on the mRNA expression of Nos2 (A), Ptgs2 (B), Gadd34 (C), Asc (D), Xbp1 (E), Stat-3 (F), Nlrp3 (G), and Par-2 (H) in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7. Nor represents the normal group treated with medium only. Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone). GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. BA denotes baicalein (25 µM). Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using a one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. # p < 0.05 vs. Nor; ## p < 0.01 vs. Nor; ### p < 0.001 vs. Nor; * p < 0.05 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con.
Ijms 25 01728 g006
Ijms 25 01728 g007
Figure 7. Effects of geniposide on the level of phosphorylated P38 MAPK in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7. The level of phosphorylated P38 MAPK was measured using Flow Cytometric Analysis. Values are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using a one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone); BA, baicalein (25 µM); p-P38, phosphorylated P38 MAPK. GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. # p < 0.05 vs. Nor; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con.
Figure 7. Effects of geniposide on the level of phosphorylated P38 MAPK in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7. The level of phosphorylated P38 MAPK was measured using Flow Cytometric Analysis. Values are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Significant differences were examined using a one-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Nor, normal group (media only); Con, control group (1 µg/mL of LPS alone); BA, baicalein (25 µM); p-P38, phosphorylated P38 MAPK. GN10, GN25, and GN50 indicate 10, 25, and 50 µM of geniposide, respectively. # p < 0.05 vs. Nor; *** p < 0.001 vs. Con; ** p < 0.01 vs. Con.
Ijms 25 01728 g007
Ijms 25 01728 g008
Figure 8. A diagram showing the effects of geniposide on lipopolysaccharide-provoked RAW 264.7 through the calcium pathway. Arrows mean increasing.
Figure 8. A diagram showing the effects of geniposide on lipopolysaccharide-provoked RAW 264.7 through the calcium pathway. Arrows mean increasing.
Ijms 25 01728 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, H.-J.; Park, W. Alleviative Effect of Geniposide on Lipopolysaccharide-Stimulated Macrophages via Calcium Pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1728. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25031728

AMA Style

Kim H-J, Park W. Alleviative Effect of Geniposide on Lipopolysaccharide-Stimulated Macrophages via Calcium Pathway. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(3):1728. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25031728

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Hyun-Ju, and Wansu Park. 2024. "Alleviative Effect of Geniposide on Lipopolysaccharide-Stimulated Macrophages via Calcium Pathway" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 3: 1728. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25031728

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop