Next Article in Journal
BCAT1 Associates with DNA Repair Proteins KU70 and KU80 and Contributes to Regulate DNA Repair in T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL)
Next Article in Special Issue
zDHHC-Mediated S-Palmitoylation in Skin Health and Its Targeting as a Treatment Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Evolution of Theories on Doxorubicin-Induced Late Cardiotoxicity-Role of Topoisomerase
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Combination of Blue and Red Light with Terbinafine on Cell Viability and Reactive Oxygen Species in Human Keratinocytes: Potential Implications for Cutaneous Mycosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The RAGE Pathway in Skin Pathology Development: A Comprehensive Review of Its Role and Therapeutic Potential

by
Marcin Radziszewski
1,2,
Ryszard Galus
1,
Krzysztof Łuszczyński
1,3,
Sebastian Winiarski
2,
Dariusz Wąsowski
2,
Jacek Malejczyk
1,4,
Paweł Włodarski
1 and
Aneta Ścieżyńska
1,3,*
1
Department of Histology and Embryology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-004 Warsaw, Poland
2
Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland
3
Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Innovative Therapies, Military Institute of Medicine National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland
4
Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Siedlce, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(24), 13570; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252413570
Submission received: 25 November 2024 / Revised: 15 December 2024 / Accepted: 17 December 2024 / Published: 18 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dermatology: Advances in Pathophysiology and Therapies (2nd Edition))

Abstract

:
The receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily, is expressed in various cell types and mediates cellular responses to a wide range of ligands. The activation of RAGE triggers complex signaling pathways that drive inflammatory, oxidative, and proliferative responses, which are increasingly implicated in the pathogenesis of skin diseases. Despite its well-established roles in conditions such as diabetes, cancer, and chronic inflammation, the contribution of RAGE to skin pathologies remains underexplored. This review synthesizes current findings on RAGE’s involvement in the pathophysiology of skin diseases, including conditions such as psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and lichen planus, focusing on its roles in inflammatory signaling, tissue remodeling, and skin cancer progression. Additionally, it examines RAGE-modulating treatments investigated in dermatological contexts, highlighting their potential as therapeutic options. Given RAGE’s significance in a variety of skin conditions, further research into its mediated pathways may uncover new opportunities for targeted interventions in skin-specific RAGE signaling.

1. Introduction

The receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) is a multiligand cell surface receptor that plays a central role in mediating inflammation and immune responses. As part of the immunoglobulin superfamily, RAGE can bind a wide range of molecules, including advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPPs), S100/calgranulins, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), and amyloid-beta peptides [1]. Initially recognized for its role in diabetic complications and neurodegenerative diseases [1], growing evidence now suggests that the RAGE pathway is critically involved in the pathogenesis of various skin disorders [2].
The skin, being the largest organ and a key barrier against environmental insults, is constantly exposed to factors that trigger inflammatory responses. Chronic inflammation underpins many skin diseases, including autoimmune conditions such as lupus, psoriasis, and lichen planus, as well as infectious diseases and wound-healing disorders [3]. The RAGE pathway, known for its contribution to sustained inflammation, may serve as a key driver in these processes, influencing both local and systemic immune responses [2].
Despite its established role in other inflammatory and metabolic diseases [4,5], the study of RAGE in dermatological contexts remains in its early stages. Current research, although limited, suggests that RAGE and its related soluble forms may contribute to the onset and progression of various skin conditions, including inflammatory and autoimmune disorders, impaired wound healing, and microbial infections. These insights have opened new possibilities for targeting the RAGE pathway as a therapeutic strategy in the management of skin diseases.
This review provides a comprehensive overview of the RAGE pathway’s involvement in skin disorders, drawing from a systematic review of the literature (Supplementary Figure S1). By synthesizing current research, we examine the molecular mechanisms by which RAGE contributes to skin pathology, evaluate its potential as a diagnostic marker, and discuss emerging therapeutic prospects. Given the complexity and multifactorial nature of skin diseases, understanding RAGE’s role may offer new insights into disease pathogenesis and pave the way for innovative treatment strategies.

2. Receptor and Its Ligands

The RAGE gene encodes a receptor belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily, primarily recognized for binding advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) [6]. AGEs are heterogeneous molecules naturally formed throughout human life via a nonenzymatic reaction involving proteins, sugars, lipids, and nucleic acids [7]. However, this process can be accelerated by factors such as oxidative stress and hyperglycemia, commonly observed in several chronic diseases. RAGE is classified as a type I transmembrane glycoprotein that transduces extracellular signals into the cell, leading to the activation of pro-inflammatory gene expression [8].
In addition to binding various AGEs, RAGE functions as a pattern recognition receptor, analogous to Toll-like receptors (TLRs) [9]. It responds to a wide range of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) from damaged host cells and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) from infectious microorganisms [10]. Upon ligand binding, RAGE primarily initiates inflammatory cellular activation through the NF-κB transcription factor. Furthermore, it facilitates the recruitment of inflammatory cells by acting as an adhesive receptor, interacting with leukocyte β2-integrins [11]. The structure of the RAGE receptor and its primary ligands are depicted in Figure 1.
RAGE ligands can be broadly categorized as exogenous or endogenous. Exogenous ligands include a heterogeneous group of molecules derived from pathogens and foreign substances. In contrast, endogenous ligands are produced within the body and include AGEs, high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1), members of the S100 protein family, amyloid β peptide, and type I and type IV collagens [12].
HMGB1, also known as amphoterin or nerve axon growth factor, is a DNA-binding protein released by damaged and dying cells, functioning as a DAMP [13]. It binds to RAGE and TLRs on the surface of various immune cells, triggering the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines [14]. In addition to being passively released by dying cells, HMGB1 can be actively secreted by macrophages, dendritic cells, natural killer cells, and neutrophils in response to stimuli such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), interleukin-1 (IL-1), and endotoxins [15,16]. Beyond its role in inflammation, HMGB1 also acts as a transcription factor and contributes to chromatin remodeling [17].
The S100 family, also known as calgranulins, comprises calcium-binding proteins released by various cell types, playing roles in differentiation, proliferation, migration, and inflammation [18]. To date, 25 S100 proteins have been identified, though many remain incompletely characterized [18]. Several family members, including S100A1, S100A2, S100A4 (Metastasin), S100A5, S100A6, S100A7 (psoriasin), S100A8, S100A9, S100A8/S100A9 (Calprotectin), S100A11, S100A12, S100A13, S100A14, S100B, and S100P, are recognized as ligands for RAGE [19]. Notably, S100A7 (psoriasin) is overexpressed in hyperproliferative skin disorders, modulating cytokine and chemokine production [20]. In contrast, S100A4 (Metastasin) and S100A13 are implicated in promoting tumor cell survival and metastasis in cancers, including melanoma [19,21]. Additionally, S100A12, also known as extracellular newly identified RAGE-binding protein (EN-RAGE), may serve as an inflammatory marker [22].
Other RAGE ligands include β-amyloid peptides, which play a critical role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease [23,24], and type I and type IV collagens, which contribute to the dispersion of lung angiotensin type 1 stem cells [25]. RAGE also binds extracellular DNA, acting as a DAMP, with its activation being even more potent when complexed with HMGB1 [26]. Furthermore, RAGE interacts with various foreign molecules classified as PAMPs, emphasizing its role in the innate immune response, akin to that of TLRs [14].

3. Molecular Pathway and Isoforms of RAGE

It is believed that the membrane-bound form of the RAGE receptor must form oligomers to activate signaling pathways. Ligand binding primarily occurs through electrostatic interactions between the receptor’s positively charged surface and negatively charged ligands [27]. Upon binding, alterations in the receptor’s intracellular domain affect various adapter molecules, including Dia1, ERK1/2, and PKC [27,28]. Dia1 subsequently activates Rho family GTPases, such as Cdc42 and Rac1, which stimulate the NF-κB transcription factor via p38 kinase [28]. Additionally, RAGE activates NF-κB through the classical mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway involving Ras GTPase and ERK1/2 [12]. NF-κB activation can also occur via NADPH oxidase, which activates the PI3K and Akt pathways [27]. Furthermore, RAGE stimulation triggers the JAK/STAT pathway, which not only enhances NF-κB activity but also activates interferon-stimulated response elements (ISRE), further amplifying inflammation [29]. Notably, NF-κB induces RAGE receptor expression, creating a feedback loop that exacerbates the inflammatory response [29]. The gene expression profile activated by RAGE promotes the release of cytokines and chemokines, enhances cell survival and proliferation, and impairs differentiation [1]. Figure 2 outlines the intracellular processes triggered by RAGE activation.
In contrast to full-length RAGE (fl-RAGE), the soluble form of RAGE (sRAGE) lacks the transmembrane domain, allowing it to circulate freely in the bloodstream. Unlike membrane-bound RAGE, which facilitates direct cell signaling, sRAGE acts as a decoy receptor by binding RAGE ligands and preventing their interaction with membrane-bound RAGE, thereby inhibiting downstream signaling pathways [30]. A similar role is attributed to endogenous secretory RAGE (esRAGE), a soluble isoform actively secreted by cells and produced through the alternative splicing of the RAGE gene. Both sRAGE and esRAGE mitigate the harmful effects of RAGE activation by sequestering ligands, reducing inflammation and cellular damage in diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular disorders, and neurodegenerative conditions [31]. Elevated levels of sRAGE and esRAGE have been associated with these diseases, positioning them as potential biomarkers for disease progression [32,33]. While soluble RAGE forms possess protective properties, elevated levels may reflect disease severity, potentially serving as a compensatory mechanism to counteract further progression [34].
Another RAGE isoform is dominant-negative RAGE (dnRAGE), a membrane-bound receptor variant that lacks the cytoplasmic tail necessary for signal transduction. Although dnRAGE cannot participate in signaling, it retains its adhesive properties. Recent studies suggest that a shift from fl-RAGE to dnRAGE plays a role in metastasis and tumor progression. In lung adenocarcinoma, this shift is characterized by reduced fl-RAGE levels and elevated dnRAGE levels, accompanied by upregulated vimentin and decreased expression of proteins involved in cell polarization—factors that promote increased cell motility and invasiveness [35]. However, the mechanism by which dnRAGE inhibits or reverses fl-RAGE expression remains poorly understood. Additionally, dnRAGE may function as a decoy receptor, sequestering pro-inflammatory RAGE ligands and modulating inflammatory responses [11].
Additional RAGE isoforms can arise through alternative splicing or proteolytic processing, though these are less well characterized and typically represent variations of the primary forms [36]. Techniques such as quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR), using primers designed for unique transcript regions, and Western blotting, employing antibodies targeting specific receptor epitopes—such as the N-terminal, C-terminal, or transmembrane domains—are effective for differentiating between these isoforms [37,38].

4. RAGE Involvement in Skin Pathologies

Although RAGE is present in healthy human skin, its expression levels correlate with skin thickness and the concentrations of inflammatory markers such as TNFα, IL-1, and S100B [39]. In rodent models, the specific deletion of RAGE in keratinocytes has been shown to reduce TNFα expression and accelerate the resolution of inflammation [40]. Similarly, in HaCaT cells, exposure to AGEs and UVB light induces inflammaging, a chronic, low-grade inflammatory state associated with aging, characterized by increased RAGE expression and elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα [41].
Additionally, in inflamed skin, RAGE ligands, such as S100A7, are overexpressed in keratinocytes, as well as in dendritic and stromal cells within the dermis [42]. Recent studies by Han et al. demonstrated that echinacoside–zinc coordination polymers can reduce RAGE expression and mitigate skin inflammation [43]. Small-molecule drugs targeting RAGE ligands, such as HMGB1, are also proposed to reduce cutaneous inflammation [44].
Overall, RAGE plays a well-recognized role in chronic inflammation, with increasing evidence supporting its involvement in localized inflammatory processes within the skin, underscoring its potential as a therapeutic target in various dermatological conditions.

4.1. Psoriasis

Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune skin disorder characterized by the accelerated proliferation of keratinocytes, resulting in the formation of thick, erythematous, scaly plaques that are associated with inflammation and can affect various areas of the body. While the involvement of the RAGE pathway in psoriasis is not yet fully understood, the existing literature suggests that it plays a significant role in the disease’s pathogenesis. A recent study by Kang et al. demonstrated elevated levels of AGEs in both the serum and psoriatic plaques, highlighting that AGE accumulation in plaques stimulates IL-36α production in keratinocytes, which may subsequently activate Th17 cells—key drivers of psoriasis pathogenesis [45].
Similarly, Papagrigoraki et al. observed higher concentrations of AGEs in both the serum and psoriatic plaques of patients, suggesting that the AGE–RAGE axis may play a key role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Furthermore, they linked the release of AGEs from the skin to the elevated metabolic and cardiovascular risks observed in psoriatic patients [46]. The activation of the AGE–RAGE axis triggers the release of reactive oxygen species, leading to endothelial dysfunction, persistent inflammation in the coronary arteries and heart tissue, and direct myocardial damage [46]. Additionally, severe psoriasis was found to be inversely correlated with serum sRAGE concentration, likely due to an increased concentration of RAGE ligands that block the ligand-binding domain of RAGE, thereby reducing its availability [46].
Conversely, other studies analyzing the serum of psoriatic patients have reported not only increased levels of AGEs but also elevated sRAGE levels [47,48]. These findings underscore the complex and not fully understood role of sRAGE and esRAGE, which can simultaneously mitigate the disease by sequestering ligands while also serving as markers of disease severity. Further research is needed to delineate the distinct roles of RAGE isoforms in psoriasis. Table 1 provides an overview of current data on RAGE involvement in psoriasis from human-based studies, emphasizing its potential role in the disease’s pathogenesis. Interestingly, the expression of fl-RAGE in psoriatic plaques remains inconclusive, as studies have yet to provide definitive evidence.
Moreover, Strohbuecker et al. found that skin biopsies from psoriatic patients display elevated levels of the RAGE ligand HMGB1, alongside increases in IL-17 and CD3-positive cells, both of which are recognized as significant contributors to psoriasis development [49]. Additionally, peripheral blood samples from psoriatic patients revealed enhanced RAGE expression in CD4 and CD8-positive leukocytes [49], with the 2184G allele of the 2184A/G RAGE polymorphism identified as a significant psoriasis risk factor [50].
Several RAGE-binding calgranulins, including S100B, S100A2, S100A4, S100A7, S100A8, S100A9, and S100A12, have been found to be elevated in both the serum and skin biopsies of psoriatic patients [51,52,53,54,55,56]. Among these, S100A7 (psoriasin) is particularly noteworthy for its role in psoriasis. S100A7 not only inhibits keratinocyte differentiation but also promotes IL-6 release through NF-κB activation and stimulates IL-1 release via the p38 MAPK pathway [57,58]. Wolf et al. discovered that genetically modified mice with the epidermal overexpression of S100A7 exhibited heightened inflammatory responses to abrasion, resembling the cellular and cytokine profiles observed in psoriasis [42].
Despite the elevated concentration of S100A7 in psoriatic lesions, serum levels of this protein may decline as the disease progresses. This reduction could be attributed to an increase in anti-psoriasin antibodies, which may influence the overall dynamics of S100A7 within the body [59]. This observation underscores the complex interplay between local inflammation and systemic immune responses in psoriasis.
Table 1. Summary of current human-based studies on RAGE involvement in psoriasis, emphasizing its potential role in disease pathogenesis (↑—increased concentration, ↓—decreased concentration).
Table 1. Summary of current human-based studies on RAGE involvement in psoriasis, emphasizing its potential role in disease pathogenesis (↑—increased concentration, ↓—decreased concentration).
MaterialMethodStudy SizeMarkersYearAuthors [Ref.]
SerumELISA60↑AGEs2023Kang et al. [45]
SerumELISA75↑CML, ↑CEL, ↑sRAGE2022Damasiewicz-Bodzek et al. [47]
SerumELISA160↑AGEs, ↑sRAGE2022Karas et al. [48]
SerumELISA158↑HMGB1, ↑S100A7, ↑S100A122020Borsky et al. [54]
SerumELISA80↑AGEs, ↓sRAGE, ↓esRAGE2017Papagrigoraki et al. [46]
SerumELISA50↑S100B2017Salem et al. [51]
SerumELISA55↑S100A7, ↑S100A8/A9, ↑S100A122016Wilsmann-Theis et al. [55]
SerumELISA14↑S100A8/S100A9, ↓S10A72009Anderson et al. [59]
Peripheral leukocytesFlow cytometry32↑RAGE2019Strohbuecker et al. [49]
Peripheral leukocytesPCR272↑2184G RAGE allele2002Vasku et al. [50]
Skin biopsyIHC10↑AGEs2023Kang et al. [45]
Skin biopsyIHC14↑HMGB12019Strohbuecker et al. [49]
Skin biopsyIHC80↑AGEs2017Papagrigoraki et al. [46]
Skin biopsyIHC50↑S100B2017Salem et al. [51]
Skin biopsyPCR341↑S100A7, ↑S100A8, ↑S100A9, ↑S100A122016Wilsmann-Theis et al. [55]
Skin biopsyWestern Blot, PCR21↑S100A42010Zibert et al. [53]
Skin biopsyIHC14↑S100A72009Anderson et al. [59]
Abbreviations: advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1), immunohistochemistry (IHC), N6-Carboxyethyllysine (CEL), N6-Carboxymethyllysine (CML), Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), soluble RAGE (sRAGE), endogenous secretory RAGE (esRAGE).

4.2. Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by itchy, red, dry patches, often triggered by environmental factors and associated with a heightened immune response, commonly seen in individuals with a personal or family history of allergies. The literature on the RAGE pathway in AD is limited, with only a few human-based studies available.
Research by Hong et al. demonstrated that AD patients exhibit significantly elevated concentrations of AGEs in corneocytes from both lesional and non-lesional tissue; however, serum levels of AGEs were comparable to those in healthy controls [60]. In contrast to psoriasis, serum concentrations of sRAGE were found to be significantly lower in AD patients, a finding supported by subsequent studies [60,61]. Moreover, reduced sRAGE levels have been associated with the progression of urticarial conditions [62]. Table 2 summarizes the current data on the involvement of RAGE in AD based on human studies, emphasizing its potential role in the disease’s pathogenesis.
Additionally, Jin et al. demonstrated that S100A9 activates keratinocytes via the RAGE receptor, inducing IL-33 secretion and amplifying the Th2 immune response characteristic of AD. Their study also reported significantly elevated levels of S100A9 and the S100A8/A9 complex in both the lesional skin and serum of AD patients compared to healthy controls, whereas S100A8 levels alone remained relatively unchanged [63]. Similarly, increased levels of other calcium-binding proteins, such as S100A2 and S100A12, have been observed in AD [52,64].
Notably, S100A7 levels are elevated in lesional AD tissue, with immunostaining intensities comparable to those seen in psoriasis [65]. These findings underscore a complex interplay between RAGE ligands and immune responses in AD, highlighting the need for further research into their potential as therapeutic targets.
Table 2. Summary of current human-based studies on RAGE involvement in atopic dermatitis (AD), emphasizing its potential role in disease pathogenesis (↑—increased concentration, ↓—decreased concentration).
Table 2. Summary of current human-based studies on RAGE involvement in atopic dermatitis (AD), emphasizing its potential role in disease pathogenesis (↑—increased concentration, ↓—decreased concentration).
MaterialMethodStudy SizeMarkersYearAuthors [Ref.]
SerumELISA65↓sRAGE2023Eke-Gungor et al. [61]
SerumELISA41↓sRAGE, ↓esRAGE2020Hong et al. [60]
SerumELISA15↑S100A9, ↑S100A8/A92014Jin et al. [63]
Lesion washing fluidsELISA12↑S100A72009Gläser et al. [65]
Skin biopsyELISA41↑AGEs2020Hong et al. [60]
Skin biopsyIHC15↑S100A9, ↑S100A8/A92014Jin et al. [63]
Skin biopsyIHC, PCR51↑S100A122013Suárez-Fariñas et al. [64]
Skin biopsyIHC4↑S100A72009Gläser et al. [65]
Abbreviations: advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), endogenous secretory RAGE (esRAGE), immunohistochemistry (IHC), Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), soluble RAGE (sRAGE).

4.3. Lichen Planus

Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease characterized by flat, purple, pruritic plaques that can affect the skin, mucous membranes, and nails [66]. Although its pathogenesis remains unclear, LP has been associated with certain viral infections, including human herpesvirus type 7 (HHV-7) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) [67,68]. Additionally, various alarmins are suspected to contribute to disease development by promoting the recruitment of CD8+ T cells through pattern recognition receptors such as TLRs and RAGE, resulting in inflammatory infiltration within lesions [69]. Table 3 summarizes recent human studies examining the role of RAGE in LP and its potential contribution to disease pathogenesis. Notably, RAGE expression has only been assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC), and it remains unclear whether the isoform detected was fl-RAGE.
Recently, HMGB1 has emerged as a key DAMP involved in LP pathogenesis. In a study by De Carvalho et al., immunohistochemical analysis revealed elevated levels of HMGB1, TLR4, and RAGE in the dermis of cutaneous LP patients compared to healthy controls, while epidermal concentrations of these molecules were comparable between the groups [70]. However, serum HMGB1 levels were not elevated in the LP group, suggesting its involvement is primarily locoregional [70].
Similarly, in the mucosal form of the disease, histological examination revealed an increased expression of HMGB1, RAGE, and TLR4. These molecules were also elevated within the epithelial layers, with the most significant increases observed in the subepithelial inflammatory infiltrate [71].

4.4. Cholesteatoma

In cholesteatoma, abnormal growth of keratinizing squamous epithelium occurs within the middle ear, leading to chronic inflammation, debris accumulation, and recurrent infections [72]. Szczepański et al. conducted a comparative study involving cholesteatoma samples and skin specimens from the external auditory canal and retroauricular area. Their findings revealed a significantly elevated expression of RAGE and HMGB1 in cholesteatoma epithelium compared to normal skin [73]. Immunostaining demonstrated that RAGE expression in normal skin was either absent or weak, limited to the basal and granular layers and sebaceous glands. In contrast, all epithelial layers of the cholesteatoma samples exhibited RAGE positivity. The authors proposed that HMGB1 and RAGE overexpression in cholesteatoma promotes increased keratinocyte proliferation, survival, and migration via the activation of the PI3K/Akt/NF-κB, MAPK p44/p42, Erk1/2, and STAT3 signaling pathways, while also enhancing IL-8 release [73].
Further research supports the involvement of the RAGE pathway in cholesteatoma development. A study comparing plasma-derived small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) from cholesteatoma patients and healthy controls detected higher HMGB1 levels in the sEVs from the patient group [74]. Moreover, sEV-derived HMGB1 was found to more effectively stimulate keratinocyte proliferation and IL-6 production in a cell line model compared to pure HMGB1 particles [74].
Overall, the RAGE pathway appears to play a critical role in cholesteatoma development, although further studies are needed to validate these findings and clarify its precise mechanisms.

4.5. Skin Infection

In addition to studies linking the RAGE pathway to skin inflammation, several investigations have examined its role in skin infections. Achouiti et al. suggest that while RAGE plays a limited role in local host defense against skin infections, it may contribute to distant bacterial outgrowth [75]. In a rodent model of Staphylococcus aureus skin infection, RAGE-deficient mice exhibited significantly lower bacterial counts in distant organs, suggesting that RAGE may facilitate bacterial dissemination and growth in systemic infections [75].
Na et al. reported that RAGE-deficient mice infected with S. aureus developed smaller skin lesions and exhibited lower levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines [76]. However, RAGE deficiency also resulted in a higher number of abscesses and prolonged wound healing. The authors proposed that the absence of RAGE enhances the phagocytic activity of phagocytes, thereby reducing bacterial load in the skin and mitigating lesion severity. Figure 3 illustrates the key differences in response to S. aureus skin infection between RAGE-deficient and wild-type mice.
Further research into RAGE expression in leprosy patients revealed a predominantly pro-inflammatory role for the receptor, rather than an antimycobacterial effect. An analysis of RAGE and S100A12 expression in the skin and serum of leprosy patients suggested that targeting the RAGE pathway may help to prevent complications and tissue damage associated with the disease [77].
The role of the RAGE pathway in infection appears to vary depending on the site of infection and the type of pathogen involved [78,79,80]. One critical mechanism by which RAGE may influence infection is its ability to bind β2-integrins, promoting neutrophil infiltration into infected tissue [75].

4.6. Skin Fibrosis

The primary mechanism driving fibrotic changes across various tissues is the excessive secretion of extracellular matrix (ECM) components by activated myofibroblasts, coupled with their contractile activity. While the TGF-β-dependent SMAD pathway is a key promoter of ECM production and fibroblast survival, growing evidence suggests that the RAGE/NF-κB axis also plays a significant role in fibrosis development through ERK1/2- and MAPK-dependent fibroblast activation and increased TGF-β production [81,82]. The antifibrotic effects of sRAGE further underscore the involvement of the RAGE pathway in this process [83]. Additionally, the activation of the RAGE/NF-κB axis enhances the release of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), facilitating tissue remodeling [81,83]. However, in a profibrotic environment, the overall balance shifts toward ECM accumulation. Table 4 summarizes studies demonstrating the involvement of the RAGE pathway in skin fibrotic changes.
Recent studies highlight that the S100A4-dependent activation of RAGE and TLRs plays a critical role in fibrosis development in the lungs, liver, kidneys, and heart, and is also implicated in the progression of systemic sclerosis (SSc) [81]. Tomcik et al. observed that S100A4 induces an active fibroblast phenotype and stimulates the TGF-β/SMAD pathway [84]. Furthermore, their study showed that S100A4 deficiency in mouse models significantly reduces fibrosis, suggesting that S100A4-neutralizing antibodies could serve as a potential therapeutic target. Recent findings confirm that anti-S100A4 monoclonal antibodies can reverse fibrosis by reducing dermal thickness, decreasing myofibroblast counts, and lowering collagen accumulation in murine models of pre-established bleomycin-induced skin fibrosis [85,86].
Similarly, elevated levels of S100A9 have been detected in the skin tissues of mice with scleroderma, with its mechanism of action linked to the RAGE/ERK1/2/NF-κB signaling pathway [87]. In a rabbit model of hypertrophic scars, the pharmacological inhibition of S100A12, RAGE, and TLR4 limited fibroblast activation [88]. In a rodent model, alternatively activated macrophage-derived HMGB1 was shown to stimulate α2-antiplasmin (α2AP) production and fibrosis through the RAGE pathway and IL-4 secretion. Moreover, IL4Rα-neutralizing antibodies attenuated fibrotic changes in bleomycin-induced mice [89].
Table 4. Summary of research highlighting the role of the RAGE pathway in skin fibrosis (↑—increased concentration).
Table 4. Summary of research highlighting the role of the RAGE pathway in skin fibrosis (↑—increased concentration).
ModelMaterialConditionMethodMarkersYearAuthors [Ref.]
HumanSerumSystemic sclerosisELISA, PCR↑S100A8, ↑S100A92013Xu et al. [90]
HumanSerumSystemic sclerosisELISA↑HMGB1, ↑sRAGE, ↑IgG, ↑CRP2009Yoshizaki et al. [91]
HumanSerumSystemic sclerosisELISA↑CML2007Kaloudi et al. [92]
HumanSkin biopsySystemic sclerosisIHC, PCR, Western Blot↑S100A42015Tomcik et al. [84]
HumanSkin biopsySystemic sclerosisIHC↑S100A8, ↑S100A9, ↑RAGE2013Xu et al. [90]
HumanSkin biopsySystemic sclerosisIHC↑HMGB1, ↑RAGE2009Yoshizaki et al. [91]
HumanSkin biopsyHypertrophic scar and keloidIHC↑S100A122017Zhao et al. [88]
MurineSerumBleomycin-induced fibrosisELISA↑HMGB1, ↑sRAGE2009Yoshizaki et al. [91]
MurineSkin biopsyBleomycin-induced fibrosisIHC, Western Blot↑HMGB1, ↑iNOS, ↑IL-4, ↑Arg-1, ↑α2AP, ↑α-SMA, ↑type I collagen2020Kanno et al. [89]
MurineSkin biopsyBleomycin-induced fibrosisPCR, Western Blot↑S100A9, ↑IL-6, ↑IL-1β, ↑IL-8, ↑TNF-α2018Xu et al. [87]
MurineSkin biopsyBleomycin-induced fibrosisIHC, PCR, Western Blot↑S100A42015Tomcik et al. [84]
Abbreviations: Alpha-2-Antiplasmin (α2AP), Alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA), Arginase-1 (Arg-1), C-Reactive Protein (CRP), High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1), fImmunoglobulin G (IgG), immunohistochemistry (IHC), Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase (iNOS), Interleukin (IL), N6-Carboxymethyllysine (CML), Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), Receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), soluble RAGE (sRAGE).
In humans, the increased expression of S100A12 has been observed in the epidermis of hypertrophic and keloid scars [88]. Xu et al. demonstrated elevated levels of S100A8, S100A9, and RAGE in sclerotic skin through immunohistochemistry. Plasma concentrations of S100A8 and S100A9 were higher in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) compared to those with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lcSSc) and healthy controls. The transcription levels of these markers were elevated across all SSc cases [90]. Similarly, Yoshizaki et al. showed that the plasma levels of HMGB1 and sRAGE are increased in patients with SSc, with disease severity correlating with these serological changes [91].
Kaloudi et al. further observed higher serum levels of AGEs in SSc patients compared to healthy controls [92]. The deposition of AGEs in the dermis of SSc patients appears to contribute to the pathogenesis of calcinotic deposits, which are believed to exacerbate tissue ischemia and disease progression [93].
Overall, the RAGE pathway plays a significant role in skin fibrotic processes, making it a promising target for the development of future therapeutic interventions.

4.7. Diabetic Wound Formation and Healing

The RAGE pathway plays a well-recognized role in diabetic wound development, though certain mechanisms remain incompletely understood. The accumulation of AGEs disrupts collagen fibril formation, leading to decreased scar elasticity, increased tissue contraction, and delayed wound closure [94]. Furthermore, the AGEs-induced expression of MMP9 has been identified as a key pathogenic factor hindering wound healing in diabetes [95,96]. Glycosylated ECM components contribute to fibroblast apoptosis and cause cell cycle arrest, further complicating the healing process [97]. Additionally, 3-deoxyglucosone, an upregulated precursor of AGEs in diabetic wounds, promotes fibroblast apoptosis via a RAGE-independent pathway involving NAD(P)H oxidase 4 (Nox4) [98]. Figure 4 illustrates the pathogenic effects of AGEs accumulation in diabetic wound formation.
AGEs also influence ECM turnover by upregulating RAGE expression, enhancing both collagen production and MMP2 activity. The stimulation of the AGEs/RAGE axis in fibroblasts activates ERK1/2 and NF-κB signaling, leading to the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNFα and IL-8. However, these effects are moderated by TGF-β, which stimulates the production of GM-CSF and IL-6 and, in synergy with RAGE, modulates anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-2 and IL-4. This dynamic interplay between RAGE and TGF-β is critical for balancing the pro- and anti-inflammatory processes essential for wound healing and fibrosis [99].
RAGE activation by other ligands similarly enhances the production of collagen types I and III and activates MMP1a and MMP9, contributing to ECM turnover [100]. Interestingly, studies indicate that administering exogenous RAGE ligands may promote angiogenesis and accelerate wound healing. These ligands compete with endogenous molecules for binding to RAGE, TLR2, and TLR4 receptors, thereby inhibiting NF-κB activation, reducing inflammation, and fostering tissue repair [101].
While the impact of the AGEs/RAGE pathway on diabetic wound formation is well established, its precise mechanisms warrant further investigation. AGEs accumulation and their precursors appear to impair wound healing directly, whereas RAGE activation involves complex interactions with other pathways, particularly the TGF-β axis. Nonetheless, limiting RAGE overexpression in diabetic wounds holds therapeutic potential by reducing excessive tissue damage and promoting effective healing [102].

4.8. Skin Cancer Progression

The RAGE pathway is widely believed to play a significant role in promoting tumor growth and metastasis across various cancers, particularly those of pulmonary, breast, and prostate origin [103,104,105]. This is partly due to its involvement in chronic inflammation, which fosters a pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment, increases cytokine release, and helps tumors to evade immune surveillance [106]. Notably, studies have demonstrated that RAGE-deficient mice are resistant to induced skin carcinogenesis and unable to sustain inflammation, further underscoring the pathway’s role in cancer progression [107].
In the cutaneous environment, which is constantly exposed to carcinogenic UV radiation, the HMGB1/RAGE/ERK1/2 pathway has been shown to promote autophagy while inhibiting apoptosis in keratinocytes [108]. Additionally, the overexpression of the S100A8/A9 complex in squamous cell carcinoma activates the RAGE/ERK1/2 axis, driving keratinocyte proliferation and migration [109]. Recent studies suggest that HMGB1 and RAGE are also involved in the development of basal cell carcinoma and melanoma, although their roles differ across these skin cancer types [110,111,112].
Abe et al. demonstrated that AGEs, particularly those derived from glyceraldehyde and glycolaldehyde, promote the growth and migration of human melanoma cells [113]. Furthermore, HMGB1 and S100A9 have been identified as key RAGE and TLR4 ligands within the melanoma microenvironment. These ligands drive the conversion of monocytes into myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), which inhibit the anti-tumor T cell response [114,115]. The S100A8/A9 complex also promotes melanoma progression through MCAM-dependent NF-κB activation and ROS production, a mechanism that may surpass the significance of the RAGE-dependent pathway [116].
Additionally, UV radiation exposure increases HMGB1 secretion, which, through RAGE, activates NF-κB and IRF3-dependent transcription of PD-L1 in melanocytes. This mechanism reduces T cell cytotoxicity and prevents melanocyte apoptosis, further facilitating tumor progression [117,118].
Another RAGE ligand, S100A4, is highly overexpressed in the melanoma microenvironment [119]. Tumor cells actively secrete S100A4 via an endoplasmic reticulum–Golgi-dependent mechanism, enhancing melanoma’s metastatic potential [120]. The paracrine secretion of S100A4 is believed to induce RAGE-dependent endothelial dysfunction, facilitating melanoma cell migration [121]. Other S100 family proteins are also implicated in melanoma progression, though their roles vary. For instance, S100P and S100B have been associated with promoting metastasis, while S100A2 is underexpressed in certain cases, suggesting a more complex, context-dependent function in melanoma [122,123,124].
Moreover, the lower levels of sRAGE and esRAGE have been identified as prognostic markers associated with reduced survival in melanoma patients [125]. These findings highlight the intricate roles of the RAGE pathway and its ligands in melanoma progression, providing insights into potential therapeutic targets for skin cancers.

4.9. Skin Aging

Throughout life, metabolites such as AGEs accumulate in the body, which has prompted growing interest in strategies to inhibit AGEs aggregation as they are believed to contribute to the aging process [126]. AGEs have been shown to accumulate in dermal elastin and collagen, where they interact with dermal fibroblasts, stimulating RAGE- and TGF-β-dependent fibrotic changes that promote skin aging [127]. Additionally, the glycation of the ECM appears to influence monocyte lineage differentiation, favoring the development of dendritic and macrophage-like cells, which contribute to a microinflammatory environment [128].
Studies in murine models have observed that dermal levels of AGEs, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), TNF-α, and RAGE increase with age [129]. The RAGE pathway has also been implicated in melanogenesis and skin photoaging processes [130]. AGEs accumulation appears to make skin cells more susceptible to UV radiation by promoting the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [131]. Furthermore, dysregulated transfer RNA-derived small RNAs (tsRNAs) linked to the AGE/RAGE pathway may contribute to UV-induced skin photoaging [132].
Overall, current research highlights the detrimental effects of AGEs on skin health and underscores the role of the RAGE pathway in skin photoaging. Targeting the RAGE pathway may provide promising approaches for anti-aging treatments, particularly through topical therapies in dermatology and cosmetology.

4.10. Other Cutaneous Conditions

The RAGE pathway may also be involved in several other dermatological conditions, though the current literature on these pathologies remains limited, and further studies are needed to confirm its role. Elevated serum levels of HMGB1 and moesin in severe acne patients suggest that the RAGE axis could contribute to acne pathogenesis [133]. Some acne therapies may exert their effects by modulating TNFα and AGE/RAGE signaling pathways [134].
Additionally, HMGB1 has emerged as a novel marker for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), with elevated levels detected both in the serum and skin lesions of SLE patients [135,136]. Increased RAGE expression in the microvascular endothelium, fibroblasts, and inflammatory cells has also been observed in paraffin-embedded tissue samples from patients with acquired reactive perforating collagenosis [137].
Elevated serum levels of S100A12, along with a subsequent decrease following treatment, suggest the potential involvement of the RAGE pathway in the pathogenesis of Behçet’s and Kawasaki’s diseases [138]. Notably, RAGE’s roles in angiogenesis and inflammation offer potential therapeutic applications, particularly in improving the survival of pedicled flaps and skin grafts in plastic surgery [139,140].

5. RAGE as a Treatment Target

Since RAGE is a multiligand receptor involved in numerous signaling pathways, its activity can be modulated at various stages of its signaling cascade. Figure 5 illustrates several potential strategies for targeting the RAGE pathway. In addition to therapies specifically targeting RAGE, various drugs are known to downregulate RAGE expression as part of their broader effects.
Among RAGE-specific treatments, small molecule inhibitors such as FPS-ZM1 and TTP488 (Azeliragon) directly block the ligand-binding domain of RAGE, preventing activation by pro-inflammatory ligands [141,142]. Monoclonal antibodies targeting RAGE represent another promising strategy, as they specifically bind to the receptor and obstruct ligand interactions, significantly reducing RAGE-mediated signaling [143,144]. Another approach involves sRAGE, a naturally occurring decoy receptor that sequesters RAGE ligands in circulation, thereby decreasing their availability to interact with membrane-bound RAGE [145].
Further strategies focus on inhibiting RAGE ligands, targeting specific molecules such as AGEs, HMGB1, and S100 proteins to reduce their interaction with RAGE and subsequent receptor activation [146,147]. Gene-silencing techniques, including small interfering RNA (siRNA) and antisense oligonucleotides, have also demonstrated efficacy in reducing RAGE expression at the transcriptional level, decreasing receptor availability on cell surfaces [148].
The RAGE pathway can also be downregulated indirectly by non-specific RAGE inhibitors, such as natural compounds with anti-RAGE properties (e.g., polyphenols and flavonoids) and medications including metformin, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and angiotensin II receptor blockers (sartans) [149,150,151,152,153]. Additionally, anti-inflammatory agents targeting the NF-κB pathway and reactive oxygen species (ROS) inhibitors can modulate the RAGE signaling cascade, mitigating downstream inflammatory effects [154].
Given the pleiotropic effects of RAGE activation, RAGE inhibitors may influence a wide range of cell types and biological processes. While some clinical trials have demonstrated the safety of RAGE-specific inhibitors in non-dermatological diseases [155,156], these trials remain limited in number. Further data are needed to confirm their safety and efficacy for cutaneous applications. Topical formulations could offer a more targeted approach, potentially minimizing systemic side effects; however, additional clinical investigations are necessary to fully explore their potential in dermatological conditions.

5.1. RAGE-Modulating Therapies in Dermatology

While RAGE-targeting treatments with anti-inflammatory properties are not a novel concept in cutaneous pathologies, studies examining the effects of RAGE axis inhibition in dermatology remain limited and have primarily focused on non-specific RAGE modulators [157]. Table 5 summarizes the RAGE-targeting therapies studied to date for inflammatory dermatological conditions.
Network pharmacology has demonstrated that rutin and various active compounds found in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) can downregulate the RAGE pathway. In murine models of imiquimod-induced psoriasis, these compounds have been shown to reduce inflammatory markers and improve skin lesions [158,159,160]. Additionally, Liu et al. reported that lipoxin A4 and its analog BML-111 may alleviate psoriatic dermatitis by inhibiting HMGB1 production, subsequently reducing the levels of RAGE, TLR4, and NF-κB [161].
In the context of atopic dermatitis (AD), several agents have demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects by modulating the RAGE pathway, particularly through the HMGB1 ligand. In a mouse model, a two-week daily administration of resveratrol or quercetin significantly decreased the expression of HMGB1, RAGE, NF-κB, PI3K, ERK1/2, TNFα, and IL-1β [162,163]. Similarly, reduced inflammatory infiltration was observed in mice treated with glycyrrhizin, tannic acid, and Coffea arabica extract, all of which influence the HMGB1/RAGE/NF-κB pathway [164,165,166].
Furthermore, network pharmacology and molecular docking studies suggest that TCM bioactive compounds, including Tripterygium wilfordii and Huangbai liniment, may alleviate lichen planus (LP) symptoms by inhibiting the AGE/RAGE/NF-κB pathway [167,168]. Quercetin, a primary component of Huangbai liniment, has demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects in LP by acting through the HMGB1/RAGE/NF-κB pathway. In vitro studies on activated T cells indicated that quercetin concentrations above 40 μM induced significant apoptosis, reduced IL-6 levels, and increased IFN-γ expression, reinforcing its potential therapeutic applications [169].
Table 5. Summary of RAGE-affecting therapies studied to date for inflammatory dermatological conditions (↑—increase, ↓—decrease).
Table 5. Summary of RAGE-affecting therapies studied to date for inflammatory dermatological conditions (↑—increase, ↓—decrease).
ConditionModelMedicationType of MedicationOutcomeYearAuthors [Ref.]
PsoriasisHSFs, HaCaTsRutinNon-specific RAGE modulator↓proliferation, ↓TNFα, ↓IL-62023Wang et al. [158]
PsoriasisNHEKsLipoxin A4Non-specific RAGE modulator↓HMGB1, ↓RAGE, ↓TLR4, ↓ERK1/22017Liu et al. [161]
PsoriasisMurineShenling Baizhu powderNon-specific RAGE modulator↓PASI, ↓skin thickness, ↓proliferation, ↓IL-172024Tang et al. [160]
PsoriasisMurineXijiao Dihuang DecoctionNon-specific RAGE modulator↓PASI, ↓skin thickness, ↓angiogenesis, ↓MMP9, ↓STAS3, ↓VEGFA, ↓TNFα, ↓IL-62023Guo et al. [159]
PsoriasisMurineRutinNon-specific RAGE modulator↓PASI, ↓skin thickness, ↓inflammatory cells infiltration, ↓NFκB, ↓RAGE2023Wang et al. [158]
PsoriasisMurineBML-111Non-specific RAGE modulator↓PASI, ↓erythema, ↓skin thickness, ↓HMGB1, ↓RAGE, ↓TLR4, ↓ERK1/2, ↓NF-κB, ↓IL-1β, ↓TNFα, ↓IL-6, ↓IL-17a, ↓IL-17c, ↓IL-23, ↓IL-222017Liu et al. [161]
Atopic dermatitisHaCaTsCoffea arabicaNon-specific RAGE modulator↓ROS, ↓ERK1/2, ↓p38, ↓NFκB, ↓NLRP3, ↓TNFα, ↓IL-6, ↓HMGB1, ↓RAGE, ↑filaggrin, ↑claudin-12023Chang et al. [166]
Atopic dermatitisMouse mastocytoma cell lineGlycyrrhizinNon-specific RAGE modulator↓ERK1/2, ↓PI3K, ↓RAGE, ↓NFκB, ↓TNFα, ↓IL-6, ↓pAKT, ↓MC tryptase2018Wang et al. [164]
Atopic dermatitisMurineCoffea arabicaNon-specific RAGE modulator↓skin thickness, ↓erythema, ↓TNFα, ↓TSLP2023Chang et al. [166]
Atopic dermatitisMurineGlycyrrhizinNon-specific RAGE modulator↓IgE, ↓dermatitis, ↓mast cells, ↓HMGB1, ↓RAGE, ↓NFκB, ↓TNFα, ↓IL-62018Wang et al. [164]
Atopic dermatitisMurineTannic acidNon-specific RAGE modulator↓cell proliferation, ↓skin thickness, ↓neutrophil and mast cells infiltration, ↑PPARγ, ↓TNFα, ↓HMGB1, ↓RAGE, ↓ERK1/2, ↓NFκB, ↓COX2, ↓IL-1β, ↓IFNγ, ↓IL-42015Karuppagounder et al. [165]
Atopic dermatitisMurineQuercetinNon-specific RAGE modulator↓skin thickness, ↓inflammatory cells infiltration, ↑Nrf2, ↓HMGB1, ↓RAGE, ↓NFκB, ↓ERK1/2, ↓COX2, ↓TNFα, ↓IL-1β, ↓IL-2Rα, ↓IFNγ, ↓IL-42015Karuppagounder et al. [163]
Atopic dermatitisMurineResveratrolNon-specific RAGE modulator↓skin thickness, ↓inflammatory and mast cells infiltration, ↓GRP78, ↓CHOP, ↓cleaved caspase-7, ↓HMGB1, ↓RAGE, ↓NFκB, ↓PI3K, ↓ERK1/2, ↓COX2, ↓TNFα, ↓IL-1β, ↓IL-2Rα, ↓IFNγ, ↓IL-42014Karuppagounder et al. [162]
Lichen planusCD3+ T lymphocytesQuercetinNon-specific RAGE modulator↓proliferation, ↓migration, ↑apoptosis, ↑IFN-γ, ↓IL-62022Zhao et al. [169]
Abbreviations: 5(S)-6(R)-7-trihydroxyheptanoic acid methyl ester (BML-111), C/EBP Homologous Protein (CHOP), Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2), Glucose-Regulated Protein 78 (GRP78), High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1), Human Adult Keratinocytes (HaCaTs), Human Skin Fibroblast (HSFs), immunoglobulin E (IgE), Interferon gamma (IFNγ), Interleukin (IL), Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha (IL-2Rα), Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9), Nuclear Factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFκB), Nod-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3), Nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2 (Nrf2), Peroxisome Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2), Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase (PI3K), Proliferator-Activated Receptor gamma (PPARγ), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), reactive oxygen species (ROS), Suppressor of Tumorigenicity 3 (STAS3), Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin (TSLP), Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A (VEGFA), phosphorylated Protein Kinase B (pAKT).

5.2. Targeting RAGE to Improve Wound Healing

The most extensively studied indication for cutaneous RAGE inhibition is the enhancement of diabetic wound healing [102]. Table 6 provides an overview of anti-RAGE medications currently under investigation for their effectiveness in wound healing contexts.
Studies have shown that RAGE inhibition, achieved through blocking antibodies or the administration of sRAGE, significantly enhances diabetic wound healing in animal models [170,171,172]. Recognizing the short half-life of sRAGE in the proteolytic environment of wounds, Kang et al. developed a recombinant fusion protein comprising the binding domain of RAGE (vRAGE) linked to elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs), offering improved stability and efficacy [173]. Additionally, topical applications of sRAGE, antioxidants, and gold nanoparticles have demonstrated promising results in promoting healing in diabetic wounds, underscoring the accessibility of skin diseases to localized treatments [174,175,176,177].
Recent studies suggest that several plant-derived substances and active compounds from Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) may enhance wound healing by downregulating RAGE pathway activity [178,179,180,181,182]. Other compounds, including resveratrol, aminoguanidine, Centella cordifolia, ibrutinib, and N-acetyl-L-cysteine, have also been reported to improve wound healing by modulating RAGE expression [183,184,185,186,187]. Furthermore, small extracellular vesicles derived from human decidua-derived mesenchymal stem cells (dMSC-sEVs) and miRNA-221-3p found in endothelial progenitor cell-derived exosomes have demonstrated efficacy in inhibiting RAGE activity and enhancing dermal conditions in diabetic mice [188,189]. Notably, RAGE axis inhibition has also shown promise in improving wound healing in non-diabetic contexts [190].
Conversely, Ranzato et al. observed in cellular models that activating RAGE with HMGB1 may enhance wound healing capacity [191,192]. Subsequent murine studies have further reported that HMGB1 can promote wound healing through the RAGE pathway [193]. These findings highlight the complex role of the RAGE pathway in skin wound healing, suggesting that its effects may vary based on wound etiology. Tissue damage caused by diabetes differs significantly from that resulting from mechanical injuries or burns, which may explain the differing outcomes. Additionally, the impact of the RAGE pathway may depend on the specific ligands involved, as certain ligands can engage other receptors beyond RAGE, influencing multiple signaling pathways.
Table 6. A summary of anti-RAGE therapies currently being explored for their potential applications in wound healing (↑—increase, ↓—decrease).
Table 6. A summary of anti-RAGE therapies currently being explored for their potential applications in wound healing (↑—increase, ↓—decrease).
ConditionModelMedicationType of MedicationOutcomeYearAuthors [Ref.]
Non-diabetic woundHSFsTHC/HGFNon-specific RAGE modulator↓HMGB1, ↓RAGE, ↓pNF-κB, ↑BCL-2, ↓BAX, ↓cleaved caspase-3, ↓TNFα, ↓IL-6, ↓TGF-β, ↓α-SMA, ↑COL3A1, ↓FN1, ↓COL1A12024Xing et al. [176]
Diabetic woundHSFsDang-Gui-Si-Ni decoctionNon-specific RAGE modulator↓α-SMA, ↓collagen I, ↓Smad2, ↓AGEs, ↓RAGE, ↑TGF-β1, ↑Smad32024Zhang et al. [181]
Diabetic woundHSFsdMSC-sEVsNon-specific RAGE modulator↑proliferation, ↑migration, ↑α-SMA, ↑collagen I, ↑Smad, ↓RAGE2020Bian et al. [188]
Diabetic woundHaCaTsN-acetyl-L-cysteineNon-specific RAGE modulator↓AGEs, ↑cell viability, ↑cell migration ↓IL-6, ↓IL-8, ↓MMP9, ↓NF-κB,2017Yang et al. [187]
Diabetic woundPorcineAnti-RAGE antibodyRAGE-specific inhibitor↓wound size, ↑collagen, ↓RAGE, ↓Mac, ↓IL-62022Johnson et al. [170]
Non-diabetic woundMurineTHC/HGFNon-specific RAGE modulator↓fibrosis, ↑regular collagen fibers, ↑epidermis thickness, ↑angiogenesis, ↑CD31, ↑CD206, ↓INOS, ↓HMGB1, ↓RAGE, ↓TGF-β2024Xing et al. [176]
Diabetic woundMurineDang-Gui-Si-Ni decoctionNon-specific RAGE modulator↓wound size, ↓IL-1β, ↓IL-6, ↓TNFα, ↓AGEs, ↓RAGE, ↑INS, ↑Ang-1, ↑VEGF, ↑Tie-2, ↑TGF-β1, ↑Smad3, ↓Smad22024Zhang et al. [181]
Non-diabetic woundMurineCucurbitaceae seed oilsNon-specific RAGE modulator↓wound size, ↑epidermis thickness, ↓AGEs, ↓RAGE, ↑Nrf2, ↑HO-1, ↓TNF-α, ↓NF-κB, ↓NLRP3, ↓CX-43, ↓EGF2024Emad et al. [182]
Diabetic woundMurineResveratrolNon-specific RAGE modulator↓wound size, ↑epidermis thickness, ↓IL-1β, ↓IL-6, ↓IL-18, ↓TNF-α, ↓RAGE, ↓NF-κB2023Youjun et al. [183]
Diabetic woundMurinevRAGE-ELP/SDF1-ELPDecoy receptor/angiogenic chemokine↓wound size, ↑skin thickness, ↑CD312023Kang et al. [177]
Diabetic woundMurinePolygonatum kingianum (polygonati rhizome)Non-specific RAGE modulator↓wound size, ↓inflammatory infiltration, ↑angiogenesis, ↑skin thickness, ↓AGEs, ↓RAGE, ↑Nrf2, ↑HO-1, ↑CD34, ↑bFGF, ↑VEGF, ↓SOD, ↓GSH, ↓MMP-9, ↓MMP-2, ↑TIMP-2, ↓GSP, ↓GHb, ↓ICAM-1, ↑T-AOC, ↑SOD, ↑FINS, ↓MDA, ↓TNFα, ↓IL-6, ↓IL-2, ↓IFN-γ2022Pan-Yue et al. [180]
Diabetic woundMurinevRAGE-ELPDecoy receptor↓wound size, ↓epithelial gap2021Kang et al. [173]
Diabetic woundMurinedMSC-sEVsNon-specific RAGE modulator↓wound size, ↑collagen, ↑PCNA, ↑CXCR4, ↑α-SMA, ↓p212020Bian et al. [188]
Diabetic and non-diabetic woundMurinemiRNA-221-3pNon-specific RAGE modulator↓wound size, ↑VEGF, ↑CD31, ↑Ki672020Xu et al. [189]
Diabetic woundMurineIbrutinibBruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor↓wound size, ↓IL-1β, ↓TNF-α, ↓IL-6, ↓TLR2, ↓TLR4, ↓RAGE, ↓NF-κB2019Yang et al. [186]
Diabetic woundMurinesRAGE/SDF-1Decoy receptor/angiogenic chemokine↓wound size2016Olekson et al. [172]
Burn woundMurineThymosin beta 4Non-specific RAGE modulator↓wound size, ↑granulation, ↑Ki67, ↑angiogenesis, ↓TNFα, ↓IL-1β, ↑VEGF, ↓RAGE2014Kim et al. [190]
Diabetic woundMurineAminoguanidineNon-specific RAGE modulator↓inflammatory infiltrate, ↓AGEs, ↓RAGE, ↓NF-κB2013Tian et al. [184]
Diabetic woundMurineAuNP/EGCG/ALANon-specific RAGE modulator↓wound size, ↓RAGE, ↑VEGF, ↓monocyte infiltration2012Chen et al. [175]
Diabetic woundMurinesRAGEDecoy receptor↑neovascularization, ↑granulation, ↓epithelial gap2004Wear-Maggitti et al. [174]
Diabetic woundMurinesRAGEDecoy receptor↓wound size, ↓TNFα, ↓IL-6, ↓MMP2, ↓MMP3, ↓MMP9, ↑PDGF-B, ↑VEGF2001Goova et al. [171]
Abbreviations: advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), Alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA), Angiopoietin 1 (Ang-1), B-Cell Lymphoma 2 protein (BCL-2), BCL-2-Associated X Protein (BAX), Binding domain of RAGE linked to elastin-like polypeptides (vRAGE-ELPs), C-X-C Chemokine Receptor Type 4 (CXCR4), Collagen Type I Alpha 1 Chain (COL1A1), Collagen Type III Alpha 1 Chain (COL3A1), Cluster of Differentiation (CD), Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), Fibronectin 1 (FN1), Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), Fasting Insulin (FINS), Glutathione (GSH), Glycated Serum Protein (GSP), Glycosylated Hemoglobin (GHb), High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1), Heme Oxygenase 1 (HO-1), Human Adult Keratinocytes (HaCaTs), Human Skin Fibroblast (HSFs), Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase (iNOS), Insulin (INS), Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1 (ICAM-1), Interleukin (IL), Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP), Mothers Against Decapentaplegic Homolog (Smad), Malondialdehyde (MDA), Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2–Related Factor 2 (Nrf2), Phosphorylated Nuclear Factor Kappa B (pNF-κB), Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Subunit B (PDGF-B), Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA), Receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), small extracellular vesicles derived from human decidua-derived mesenchymal stem cells (dMSC-sEVs), Stromal Cell-Derived Growth Factor-1 Alpha-Elastin-Like Peptide (SDF1-ELP), Superoxide Dismutase (SOD), soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE), tetrahydrocurcumin and hepatocyte growth factor (THC/HGF), Total Antioxidant Capacity (T-AOC), Toll-Like Receptor (TLR), Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-β), tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin-like and EGF-like domains 2 (Tie-2), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF).

5.3. Anti-RAGE Therapy in Skin Cancer

In a murine lung cancer model, the administration of sRAGE significantly reduced both the growth and metastasis of implanted and spontaneously developing tumors [194]. This effect is believed to stem from the RAGE-dependent inhibition of critical signaling pathways, including p44/p42, p38, and SAP/JNK MAP kinases, which play essential roles in tumor proliferation, invasion, and MMP expression.
These findings have been extended to skin cancer research, where RAGE-neutralizing antibodies have demonstrated efficacy in inhibiting tumor formation in melanoma xenografts within athymic mice. In tumor-bearing mice, anti-RAGE treatment not only improved survival rates but also reduced lung metastasis [113]. Additionally, treatment with sRAGE has been shown to enhance endothelial integrity, potentially decreasing metastasis [121]. Table 7 provides a summary of RAGE-modulating therapies investigated for skin cancer treatment.
Several active compounds from Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) with anti-cancer properties have also shown potential for reducing angiogenesis in cancer by modulating the AGE/RAGE and PD-1 pathways in cell culture models [195]. Notably, Matsushita et al. reported a case in which MK615, an extract from Japanese apricot containing natural compounds such as triterpenoids, suppressed the in-transit metastasis of malignant melanoma and increased the tumor apoptotic index [196]. In further cell culture analyses, MK615 inhibited RAGE expression and suppressed HMGB1 release in melanoma cells.
Table 7. Summary of RAGE-modulating therapies investigated for skin cancer treatment (↑—increase, ↓—decrease).
Table 7. Summary of RAGE-modulating therapies investigated for skin cancer treatment (↑—increase, ↓—decrease).
ConditionModelMedicationType of MedicationOutcomeYearAuthors [Ref.]
MelanomaHuman melanoma cell line A375sRAGEDecoy receptor↓cell migration2016Herwig et al. [120]
MelanomaHuman melanoma cell line SK-MEL28MK615Non-specific RAGE modulator↓proliferation, ↑apoptosis, ↓RAGE, ↓HMGB12010Matsushita et al. [196]
MelanomaHuman melanoma cell line G361 and A375Anti-RAGE antibodyRAGE-specific inhibitor↓proliferation2004Abe et al. [113]
MelanomaMurineAnti-RAGE antibodyRAGE-specific inhibitor↓tumor size, ↓lung metastasis, ↑mice surivial2004Abe et al. [113]
Tumor angiogenesisHUVECsCentella asiaticaNon-specific RAGE modulator↓proliferation, ↓cell migration, ↓vascular tube formation2013Zhu et al. [122]
Abbreviations: extract from Japanese apricot (MK615), High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1), Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVECs), soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE).
These findings suggest that anti-RAGE therapies hold promise for melanoma patients, although their efficacy in other skin cancers remains largely unexplored. Continued research is needed to evaluate the potential of RAGE-targeting therapies across diverse types of skin cancer and to explore their mechanisms of action further.

5.4. Targeting RAGE to Decelerate Skin Aging

While UV radiation is well-known to accelerate skin aging, recent studies suggest that certain compounds may decelerate this process by suppressing the RAGE pathway. For instance, Han et al. demonstrated that plantamajoside, derived from Plantago asiatica, exerts anti-inflammatory and antioxidative effects in cultured human keratinocytes and fibroblasts by downregulating RAGE and NF-κB expression [197]. Other compounds reported to alleviate skin photoaging and glycation through the inhibition of the AGE/RAGE pathway include gentiopicroside, Chenopodium formosanum, Pogostemon cablin (patchouli), and Ba Zhen Tang [198,199,200,201]. Table 8 summarizes proposed RAGE modulation therapies aimed at decelerating skin aging.
Additionally, Li et al. observed that carnosine may counteract skin aging by promoting the macrophage-mediated clearance of senescent keratinocytes and fibroblasts through CD36- and RAGE-dependent activation of the AKT2 pathway [202]. Rodent studies further support that substances downregulating RAGE expression can reduce skin aging and photodamage [203].
Table 8. A summary of proposed RAGE modulation therapies for decelerating skin aging (↑—increase, ↓—decrease).
Table 8. A summary of proposed RAGE modulation therapies for decelerating skin aging (↑—increase, ↓—decrease).
ConditionModelMedicationType of MedicationOutcomeYearAuthors [Ref.]
AGEs exposure, UVB irradiationHaCaTsPlantamajosideNon-specific RAGE modulator↑cell viability, ↓ROS, ↓RAGE, ↓MMP1, ↓TNFα, ↓IL-1β, ↓NF-ĸB/p652016Han et al. [197]
AGEs exposure, UVB irradiationHSFsPlantamajosideNon-specific RAGE modulator↓RAGE, ↓MMP12016Han et al. [197]
AGEs exposure, UVB irradiationHSFsChenopodium formosanumNon-specific RAGE modulator↓ROS, ↑Nrf2, ↑HO-1, ↓MMP1, ↓MMP3, ↓MMP9, ↑TIMP-1, ↓MAPK, ↓AP-1, ↓RAGE, ↑collagen2022Lyu et al. [199]
UVB irradiationHaCaTsBa Zhen TangNon-specific RAGE modulator↓SA-β-gal, ↓p16INK4a2022Han et al. [201]
UVB irradiationMurineSchizonepeta tenuifoliaNon-specific RAGE modulator↓skin wrinkles, ↓skin thickness, ↑collagen, ↓MMPs, ↑TIMP-1, ↓skin dehydration, ↑hyaluronic acid, ↓MAPK, ↓NF-κB, ↓AGEs ↓RAGE2023Gu et al. [203]
MGO exposureCCC-ESF-1GentiopicrosideNon-specific RAGE modulator↓CML, ↑cell viability, ↑FN-1, ↑LM-5, ↑COL-1, ↓MMP2, ↓MMP9, ↓ROS, ↓IL-6, ↓IL-8, ↓IL-1β, ↓NF-κB, ↓RAGE2024Chen et al. [198]
Abbreviations: Activator Protein 1 (AP-1), advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), Collagen Type 1 (COL-1), Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor 2A (p16INK4a), Fibronectin 1 (FN-1), Heme Oxygenase-1 (HO-1), Human Adult Keratinocytes (HaCaTs), Human Embryonic Skin Fibroblast (CCC-ESF-1), Human Skin Fibroblasts (HSFs), Interleukin (IL), Laminin 5 (LM-5), Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP), Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK), Nε-Carboxymethyllysine (CML), Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 (Nrf2), Nuclear Factor Kappa-Light-Chain-Enhancer of Activated B Cells (NF-κB), receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE), reactive oxygen species (ROS), Senescence-Associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal), Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), Ultraviolet B (UVB).
However, most of these compounds act as non-specific RAGE inhibitors, impacting multiple pathways. RAGE-specific inhibitors have yet to be extensively studied for their effects on skin aging, underscoring the need for further research into their targeted applications in dermatology.

6. Conclusions

In conclusion, the RAGE pathway plays an integral role in skin homeostasis and is implicated in a variety of dermatological conditions, particularly those associated with immune dysregulation. The accumulation of AGEs and other RAGE ligands is central to the pathogenesis of numerous skin diseases, highlighting RAGE as a promising therapeutic target. Soluble forms of RAGE show potential both as therapeutic agents and as biomarkers for tracking disease progression; however, the role of dnRAGE in skin disorders remains largely unexplored and warrants further investigation. While RAGE-targeted strategies have been established for enhancing wound healing in diabetic contexts, the efficacy of specific anti-RAGE therapies for other skin conditions has yet to be validated. Despite these advances, the field faces significant limitations. For instance, fl-RAGE expression in skin cells from inflammatory skin diseases such as psoriasis or atopic dermatitis has not been thoroughly studied, leaving a critical gap in understanding its direct involvement in these conditions. Furthermore, most existing studies do not adequately distinguish between the roles of distinct RAGE isoforms, which hinders the development of targeted and effective therapies. Experimental models that accurately mimic the complexity of human skin diseases are also lacking, posing a challenge for translating preclinical findings into clinical applications. Future research should focus on addressing these limitations by elucidating the specific contributions of different RAGE isoforms in various skin disorders and developing advanced models for studying RAGE-related mechanisms. Additionally, investigating the interplay between RAGE and other inflammatory pathways could provide valuable insights into the broader context of immune-mediated skin diseases. Overcoming these challenges will be essential for advancing the field and unlocking the full therapeutic potential of targeting the RAGE pathway.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms252413570/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R. and A.Ś.; methodology, M.R., R.G., K.Ł., S.W., D.W., J.M., P.W.; formal analysis, M.R., R.G., K.Ł., S.W., D.W., J.M., P.W. and A.Ś.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R. and A.Ś.; writing—review and editing, M.R., R.G., K.Ł., S.W., D.W., J.M., P.W., A.Ś.; visualization, M.R.; supervision, A.Ś. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hudson, B.I.; Lippman, M.E. Targeting RAGE Signaling in Inflammatory Disease. Annu. Rev. Med. 2018, 69, 349–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Guarneri, F.; Custurone, P.; Papaianni, V.; Gangemi, S. Involvement of RAGE and Oxidative Stress in Inflammatory and Infectious Skin Diseases. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tampa, M.; Neagu, M.; Caruntu, C.; Constantin, C.; Georgescu, S.R. Skin Inflammation-A Cornerstone in Dermatological Conditions. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hu, H.; Jiang, H.; Ren, H.; Hu, X.; Wang, X.; Han, C. AGEs and chronic subclinical inflammation in diabetes: Disorders of immune system. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2015, 31, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Senatus, L.M.; Schmidt, A.M. The AGE-RAGE Axis: Implications for Age-Associated Arterial Diseases. Front. Genet. 2017, 8, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Neeper, M.; Schmidt, A.M.; Brett, J.; Yan, S.D.; Wang, F.; Pan, Y.C.; Elliston, K.; Stern, D.; Shaw, A. Cloning and expression of a cell surface receptor for advanced glycosylation end products of proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 14998–15004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Perrone, A.; Giovino, A.; Benny, J.; Martinelli, F. Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs): Biochemistry, Signaling, Analytical Methods, and Epigenetic Effects. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2020, 2020, 3818196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kierdorf, K.; Fritz, G. RAGE regulation and signaling in inflammation and beyond. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2013, 94, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Suresh, R.; Mosser, D.M. Pattern recognition receptors in innate immunity, host defense, and immunopathology. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2013, 37, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Teissier, T.; Boulanger, É. The receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) is an important pattern recognition receptor (PRR) for inflammaging. Biogerontology 2019, 20, 279–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chavakis, T.; Bierhaus, A.; Nawroth, P.P. RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end products): A central player in the inflammatory response. Microbes Infect. 2004, 6, 1219–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yue, Q.; Song, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Yang, L.; Li, J. Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products (RAGE): A Pivotal Hub in Immune Diseases. Molecules 2022, 27, 4922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Scaffidi, P.; Misteli, T.; Bianchi, M.E. Release of chromatin protein HMGB1 by necrotic cells triggers inflammation. Nature 2002, 418, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gąsiorowski, K.; Brokos, B.; Echeverria, V.; Barreto, G.E.; Leszek, J. RAGE-TLR Crosstalk Sustains Chronic Inflammation in Neurodegeneration. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 55, 1463–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Andersson, U.; Yang, H.; Harris, H. Extracellular HMGB1 as a therapeutic target in inflammatory diseases. Expert. Opin. Ther. Targets. 2018, 22, 263–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kang, R.; Zhang, Q.; Zeh, H.J., 3rd; Lotze, M.T.; Tang, D. HMGB1 in cancer: Good, bad, or both? Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 4046–4057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Naglova, H.; Bucova, M. HMGB1 and its physiological and pathological roles. Bratisl. Lek. Listy 2012, 113, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cerón, J.J.; Ortín-Bustillo, A.; López-Martínez, M.J.; Martínez-Subiela, S.; Eckersall, P.D.; Tecles, F.; Tvarijonaviciute, A.; Muñoz-Prieto, A. S-100 Proteins: Basics and Applications as Biomarkers in Animals with Special Focus on Calgranulins (S100A8, A9, and A12). Biology 2023, 12, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gonzalez, L.L.; Garrie, K.; Turner, M.D. Role of S100 proteins in health and disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2020, 1867, 118677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hattori, F.; Kiatsurayanon, C.; Okumura, K.; Ogawa, H.; Ikeda, S.; Okamoto, K.; Niyonsaba, F. The antimicrobial protein S100A7/psoriasin enhances the expression of keratinocyte differentiation markers and strengthens the skin’s tight junction barrier. Br. J. Dermatol. 2014, 171, 742–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, G.; Li, M.; Jin, J.; Bai, Y.; Yang, C. Knockdown of S100A4 decreases tumorigenesis and metastasis in osteosarcoma cells by repression of matrix metalloproteinase-9. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2011, 12, 2075–2080. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Ligthart, S.; Sedaghat, S.; Ikram, M.A.; Hofman, A.; Franco, O.H.; Dehghan, A. EN-RAGE: A novel inflammatory marker for incident coronary heart disease. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2014, 34, 2695–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yan, S.D.; Chen, X.; Fu, J.; Chen, M.; Zhu, H.; Roher, A.; Slattery, T.; Zhao, L.; Nagashima, M.; Morser, J.; et al. RAGE and amyloid-beta peptide neurotoxicity in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 1996, 382, 685–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lue, L.F.; Walker, D.G.; Brachova, L.; Beach, T.G.; Rogers, J.; Schmidt, A.M.; Stern, D.M.; Yan, S.D. Involvement of microglial receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) in Alzheimer’s disease: Identification of a cellular activation mechanism. Exp. Neurol. 2001, 171, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sparvero, L.J.; Asafu-Adjei, D.; Kang, R.; Tang, D.; Amin, N.; Im, J.; Rutledge, R.; Lin, B.; Amoscato, A.A.; Zeh, H.J.; et al. RAGE (Receptor for Advanced Glycation Endproducts), RAGE ligands, and their role in cancer and inflammation. J. Transl. Med. 2009, 7, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, L.; Yang, M.; Kang, R.; Dai, Y.; Yu, Y.; Gao, F.; Wang, H.; Sun, X.; Li, X.; Li, J.; et al. HMGB1-DNA complex-induced autophagy limits AIM2 inflammasome activation through RAGE. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 450, 851–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fritz, G. RAGE: A single receptor fits multiple ligands. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011, 36, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rouhiainen, A.; Kuja-Panula, J.; Tumova, S.; Rauvala, H. RAGE-mediated cell signaling. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013, 963, 239–263. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gutowska, K.; Czajkowski, K.; Kuryłowicz, A. Receptor for the Advanced Glycation End Products (RAGE) Pathway in Adipose Tissue Metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schmidt, A.M. Soluble RAGEs—Prospects for treating & tracking metabolic and inflammatory disease. Vascul Pharmacol. 2015, 72, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  31. Santilli, F.; Vazzana, N.; Bucciarelli, L.G.; Davì, G. Soluble forms of RAGE in human diseases: Clinical and therapeutical implications. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009, 16, 940–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sabbatinelli, J.; Castiglione, S.; Macrì, F.; Giuliani, A.; Ramini, D.; Vinci, M.C.; Tortato, E.; Bonfigli, A.R.; Olivieri, F.; Raucci, A. Circulating levels of AGEs and soluble RAGE isoforms are associated with all-cause mortality and development of cardiovascular complications in type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2022, 21, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, D.Q.; Wang, R.; Li, T.; Zhou, J.P.; Chang, G.Q.; Zhao, N.; Yang, L.N.; Zhai, H.; Yang, L. Reduced soluble RAGE is associated with disease severity of axonal Guillain-Barré syndrome. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tesarová, P.; Kalousová, M.; Jáchymová, M.; Mestek, O.; Petruzelka, L.; Zima, T. Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE)—Soluble form (sRAGE) and gene polymorphisms in patients with breast cancer. Cancer Investig. 2007, 25, 720–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Downs, C.A. Analysis of RAGE Proteome and Interactome in Lung Adenocarcinoma Using PANTHER and STRING Databases. Biol. Res. Nurs. 2021, 23, 698–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yonekura, H.; Yamamoto, Y.; Sakurai, S.; Petrova, R.G.; Abedin, M.J.; Li, H.; Yasui, K.; Takeuchi, M.; Makita, Z.; Takasawa, S.; et al. Novel splice variants of the receptor for advanced glycation end-products expressed in human vascular endothelial cells and pericytes, and their putative roles in diabetes-induced vascular injury. Biochem. J. 2003, 370 Pt 3, 1097–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Qin, J.; Goswami, R.; Dawson, S.; Dawson, G. Expression of the receptor for advanced glycation end products in oligodendrocytes in response to oxidative stress. J. Neurosci. Res. 2008, 86, 2414–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Grossin, N.; Wautier, M.P.; Picot, J.; Stern, D.M.; Wautier, J.L. Differential effect of plasma or erythrocyte AGE-ligands of RAGE on expression of transcripts for receptor isoforms. Diabetes Metab. 2009, 35, 410–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Iwamura, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Kitayama, Y.; Higuchi, K.; Fujimura, T.; Hase, T.; Yamamoto, H. Epidermal expression of receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is related to inflammation and apoptosis in human skin. Exp. Dermatol. 2016, 25, 235–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Leibold, J.S.; Riehl, A.; Hettinger, J.; Durben, M.; Hess, J.; Angel, P. Keratinocyte-specific deletion of the receptor RAGE modulates the kinetics of skin inflammation in vivo. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2013, 133, 2400–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sultana, R.; Parveen, A.; Kang, M.C.; Hong, S.M.; Kim, S.Y. Glyoxal-derived advanced glycation end products (GO-AGEs) with UVB critically induce skin inflammaging: In vitro and in silico approaches. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wolf, R.; Howard, O.M.; Dong, H.F.; Voscopoulos, C.; Boeshans, K.; Winston, J.; Divi, R.; Gunsior, M.; Goldsmith, P.; Ahvazi, B.; et al. Chemotactic activity of S100A7 (Psoriasin) is mediated by the receptor for advanced glycation end products and potentiates inflammation with highly homologous but functionally distinct S100A15. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 1499–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Han, J.; Sun, Y.; Wu, T.; Hou, X.; Zheng, S.; Zhang, H.; Lin, T.; Liu, H.; Sun, T. Echinacoside-Zinc Nanomaterial Inhibits Skin Glycation by Suppressing the Transcriptional Activation of the Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-Products. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 14123–14135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lamore, S.D.; Cabello, C.M.; Wondrak, G.T. HMGB1-directed drug discovery targeting cutaneous inflammatory dysregulation. Curr. Drug Metab. 2010, 11, 250–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kang, P.; Chen, J.; Wang, S.; Zhang, S.; Li, S.; Guo, S.; Song, P.; Liu, L.; Wang, G.; Gao, T.; et al. Advanced Glycation End Products-Induced Activation of Keratinocytes: A Mechanism Underlying Cutaneous Immune Response in Psoriasis. J. Innate Immun. 2023, 15, 876–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Papagrigoraki, A.; Del Giglio, M.; Cosma, C.; Maurelli, M.; Girolomoni, G.; Lapolla, A. Advanced Glycation End Products are Increased in the Skin and Blood of Patients with Severe Psoriasis. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2017, 97, 782–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Damasiewicz-Bodzek, A.; Nowak, A. Concentrations of N6-Carboxymethyllysine (CML), N6-Carboxyethyllysine (CEL), and Soluble Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-Products (sRAGE) Are Increased in Psoriatic Patients. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Karas, A.; Holmannova, D.; Borsky, P.; Fiala, Z.; Andrys, C.; Hamakova, K.; Svadlakova, T.; Palicka, V.; Krejsek, J.; Rehacek, V.; et al. Significantly Altered Serum Levels of NAD, AGE, RAGE, CRP, and Elastin as Potential Biomarkers of Psoriasis and Aging-A Case-Control Study. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Strohbuecker, L.; Koenen, H.; van Rijssen, E.; van Cranenbroek, B.; Fasse, E.; Joosten, I.; Körber, A.; Bergmann, C. Increased dermal expression of chromatin-associated protein HMGB1 and concomitant T-cell expression of the DNA RAGE in patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Psoriasis 2019, 9, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vasků, V.; Kanková, K.; Vasků, A.; Muzík, J.; Izakovicová Hollá, L.; Semrádová, V.; Vácha, J. Gene polymorphisms (G82S, 1704G/T, 2184A/G and 2245G/A) of the receptor of advanced glycation end products (RAGE) in plaque psoriasis. Arch. Dermatol Res. 2002, 294, 127–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Salem, S.A.M.; El-Khateeb, E.A.; Harvy, M.; Emam, H.M.E.; Abdelaal, W.; Nemr, R.E.; El-Hagry, O.O. Study of serum levels and skin expression of S100B protein in psoriasis. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2017, 92, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yoshioka, M.; Sawada, Y.; Saito-Sasaki, N.; Yoshioka, H.; Hama, K.; Omoto, D.; Ohmori, S.; Okada, E.; Nakamura, M. High S100A2 expression in keratinocytes in patients with drug eruption. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 5493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zibert, J.R.; Skov, L.; Thyssen, J.P.; Jacobsen, G.K.; Grigorian, M. Significance of the S100A4 protein in psoriasis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2010, 130, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Borsky, P.; Fiala, Z.; Andrys, C.; Beranek, M.; Hamakova, K.; Malkova, A.; Svadlakova, T.; Krejsek, J.; Palicka, V.; Borska, L.; et al. Alarmins HMGB1, IL-33, S100A7, and S100A12 in Psoriasis Vulgaris. Mediators Inflamm. 2020, 2020, 8465083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wilsmann-Theis, D.; Wagenpfeil, J.; Holzinger, D.; Roth, J.; Koch, S.; Schnautz, S.; Bieber, T.; Wenzel, J. Among the S100 proteins, S100A12 is the most significant marker for psoriasis disease activity. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2016, 30, 1165–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wolf, R.; Mirmohammadsadegh, A.; Walz, M.; Lysa, B.; Tartler, U.; Remus, R.; Hengge, U.; Michel, G.; Ruzicka, T. Molecular cloning and characterization of alternatively spliced mRNA isoforms from psoriatic skin encoding a novel member of the S100 family. FASEB J. 2003, 17, 1969–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lei, H.; Li, X.; Jing, B.; Xu, H.; Wu, Y. Human S100A7 Induces Mature Interleukin1α Expression by RAGE-p38 MAPK-Calpain1 Pathway in Psoriasis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Son, E.D.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, K.H.; Bin, B.H.; Bae, I.H.; Lim, K.M.; Yu, S.J.; Cho, E.G.; Lee, T.R. S100A7 (psoriasin) inhibits human epidermal differentiation by enhanced IL-6 secretion through IκB/NF-κB signalling. Exp. Dermatol. 2016, 25, 636–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Anderson, K.S.; Wong, J.; Polyak, K.; Aronzon, D.; Enerbäck, C. Detection of psoriasin/S100A7 in the sera of patients with psoriasis. Br. J. Dermatol. 2009, 160, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hong, J.Y.; Kim, M.J.; Hong, J.K.; Noh, H.H.; Park, K.Y.; Lee, M.K.; Seo, S.J. In vivo quantitative analysis of advanced glycation end products in atopic dermatitis-Possible culprit for the comorbidities? Exp. Dermatol. 2020, 29, 1012–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Eke-Gungor, H.; Sagiroglu, B.; Can-Coskun, Z.N.; Kocer, D.; Karakukcu, Ç. Serum sRAGE levels in children with atopic dermatitis: A prospective study. Postepy Dermatol. Alergol. 2023, 40, 766–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kasperska-Zajac, A.; Damasiewicz-Bodzek, A.; Tyrpień-Golder, K.; Zamlyński, J.; Grzanka, A. Circulating soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products is decreased and inversely associated with acute phase response in chronic spontaneous urticaria. Inflamm. Res. 2016, 65, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Jin, S.; Park, C.O.; Shin, J.U.; Noh, J.Y.; Lee, Y.S.; Lee, N.R.; Kim, H.R.; Noh, S.; Lee, Y.; Lee, J.H.; et al. DAMP molecules S100A9 and S100A8 activated by IL-17A and house-dust mites are increased in atopic dermatitis. Exp. Dermatol. 2014, 23, 938–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Suárez-Fariñas, M.; Dhingra, N.; Gittler, J.; Shemer, A.; Cardinale, I.; de Guzman Strong, C.; Krueger, J.G.; Guttman-Yassky, E. Intrinsic atopic dermatitis shows similar TH2 and higher TH17 immune activation compared with extrinsic atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 132, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gläser, R.; Meyer-Hoffert, U.; Harder, J.; Cordes, J.; Wittersheim, M.; Kobliakova, J.; Fölster-Holst, R.; Proksch, E.; Schröder, J.M.; Schwarz, T. The antimicrobial protein psoriasin (S100A7) is upregulated in atopic dermatitis and after experimental skin barrier disruption. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2009, 129, 641–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Usatine, R.P.; Tinitigan, M. Diagnosis and treatment of lichen planus. Am. Fam. Physician 2011, 84, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  67. Lodi, G.; Giuliani, M.; Majorana, A.; Sardella, A.; Bez, C.; Demarosi, F.; Carrassi, A. Lichen planus and hepatitis C virus: A multicentre study of patients with oral lesions and a systematic review. Br. J. Dermatol. 2004, 151, 1172–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. De Vries, H.J.; van Marle, J.; Teunissen, M.B.; Picavet, D.; Zorgdrager, F.; Bos, J.D.; Weel, J.; Cornelissen, M. Lichen planus is associated with human herpesvirus type 7 replication and infiltration of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Br. J. Dermatol. 2006, 154, 361–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. De Carvalho, G.C.; Domingues, R.; de Sousa Nogueira, M.A.; Calvielli Castelo Branco, A.C.; Gomes Manfrere, K.C.; Pereira, N.V.; Aoki, V.; Sotto, M.N.; Da Silva Duarte, A.J.; Sato, M.N. Up-regulation of Proinflammatory Genes and Cytokines Induced by S100A8 in CD8+ T Cells in Lichen Planus. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2016, 96, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. De Carvalho, G.C.; Hirata, F.Y.A.; Domingues, R.; Figueiredo, C.A.; Zaniboni, M.C.; Pereira, N.V.; Sotto, M.N.; Aoki, V.; da Silva Duarte, A.J.; Sato, M.N. Up-regulation of HMGB1 and TLR4 in skin lesions of lichen planus. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2018, 310, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Salem, A.; Almahmoudi, R.; Vehviläinen, M.; Salo, T. Role of the high mobility group box 1 signalling axes via the receptor for advanced glycation end-products and toll-like receptor-4 in the immunopathology of oral lichen planus: A potential drug target? Eur J Oral Sci. 2018, 126, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Rutkowska, J.; Özgirgin, N.; Olszewska, E. Cholesteatoma Definition and Classification: A Literature Review. J. Int. Adv. Otol. 2017, 13, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Szczepanski, M.J.; Luczak, M.; Olszewska, E.; Molinska-Glura, M.; Zagor, M.; Krzeski, A.; Skarzynski, H.; Misiak, J.; Dzaman, K.; Bilusiak, M.; et al. Molecular signaling of the HMGB1/RAGE axis contributes to cholesteatoma pathogenesis. J. Mol. Med. 2015, 93, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Łuczak, M.W.; Dżaman, K.; Zaręba, Ł.; Czerwaty, K.; Siewiera, J.; Głuszko, A.; Olszewska, E.; Brzost, J.; Kantor, I.; Szczepański, M.J.; et al. HMGB1 Carried by Small Extracellular Vesicles Potentially Plays a Role in Promoting Acquired Middle Ear Cholesteatoma. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 3469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Achouiti, A.; Van’t Veer, C.; de Vos, A.F.; van der Poll, T. The receptor for advanced glycation end products promotes bacterial growth at distant body sites in Staphylococcus aureus skin infection. Microbes Infect. 2015, 17, 622–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Na, M.; Mohammad, M.; Fei, Y.; Wang, W.; Holdfeldt, A.; Forsman, H.; Ali, A.; Pullerits, R.; Jin, T. Lack of Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products Leads to Less Severe Staphylococcal Skin Infection but More Skin Abscesses and Prolonged Wound Healing. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 218, 791–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kim, M.H.; Choi, Y.W.; Choi, H.Y.; Myung, K.B.; Cho, S.N. The expression of RAGE and EN-RAGE in leprosy. Br. J. Dermatol. 2006, 154, 594–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Taslimi, Y.; Agbajogu, C.; Brynjolfsson, S.F.; Masoudzadeh, N.; Mashayekhi, V.; Gharibzadeh, S.; Östensson, M.; Nakka, S.S.; Mizbani, A.; Rafati, S.; et al. Profiling inflammatory response in lesions of cutaneous leishmaniasis patients using a non-invasive sampling method combined with a high-throughput protein detection assay. Cytokine 2020, 130, 155056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Van Zoelen, M.A.; Schouten, M.; de Vos, A.F.; Florquin, S.; Meijers, J.C.; Nawroth, P.P.; Bierhaus, A.; van der Poll, T. The receptor for advanced glycation end products impairs host defense in pneumococcal pneumonia. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 4349–4356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Achouiti, A.; de Vos, A.F.; de Beer, R.; Florquin, S.; van ‘t Veer, C.; van der Poll, T. Limited role of the receptor for advanced glycation end products during Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteremia. J. Innate Immun. 2013, 5, 603–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. O’Reilly, S. S100A4 a classical DAMP as a therapeutic target in fibrosis. Matrix Biol. 2024, 127, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kim, J.; Park, J.C.; Lee, M.H.; Yang, C.E.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, W.J. High-Mobility Group Box 1 Mediates Fibroblast Activity via RAGE-MAPK and NF-κB Signaling in Keloid Scar Formation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 19, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Yammani, R.R.; Carlson, C.S.; Bresnick, A.R.; Loeser, R.F. Increase in production of matrix metalloproteinase 13 by human articular chondrocytes due to stimulation with S100A4: Role of the receptor for advanced glycation end products. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54, 2901–2911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tomcik, M.; Palumbo-Zerr, K.; Zerr, P.; Avouac, J.; Dees, C.; Sumova, B.; Distler, A.; Beyer, C.; Cerezo, L.A.; Becvar, R.; et al. S100A4 amplifies TGF-β-induced fibroblast activation in systemic sclerosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015, 74, 1748–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Švec, X.; Štorkánová, H.; Trinh-Minh, T.; Tran, M.C.; Štorkánová, L.; Hulejová, H.; Oreská, S.; Heřmánková, B.; Bečvář, R.; Pavelka, K.; et al. S100A4-neutralizing monoclonal antibody 6B12 counteracts the established experimental skin fibrosis induced by bleomycin. Rheumatology 2024, 63, 817–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Trinh-Minh, T.; Györfi, A.H.; Tomcik, M.; Tran-Manh, C.; Zhou, X.; Dickel, N.; Tümerdem, B.S.; Kreuter, A.; Burmann, S.N.; Borchert, S.V.; et al. Effect of Anti-S100A4 Monoclonal Antibody Treatment on Experimental Skin Fibrosis and Systemic Sclerosis-Specific Transcriptional Signatures in Human Skin. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024, 76, 783–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Xu, X.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, X.; Wang, D.; Liang, J.; Zhao, C.; Feng, X.; Wang, J.; Zou, H.; Sun, L. S100A9 aggravates bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis in mice via activation of ERK1/2 MAPK and NF-κB pathways. Iran. J. Basic. Med. Sci. 2018, 21, 194–201. [Google Scholar]
  88. Zhao, J.; Zhong, A.; Friedrich, E.E.; Jia, S.; Xie, P.; Galiano, R.D.; Mustoe, T.A.; Hong, S.J. S100A12 Induced in the Epidermis by Reduced Hydration Activates Dermal Fibroblasts and Causes Dermal Fibrosis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2017, 137, 650–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kanno, Y.; Shu, E.; Niwa, H.; Kanoh, H.; Seishima, M. Alternatively activated macrophages are associated with the α2AP production that occurs with the development of dermal fibrosis: The role of alternatively activated macrophages on the development of fibrosis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2020, 22, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Xu, X.; Wu, W.Y.; Tu, W.Z.; Chu, H.Y.; Zhu, X.X.; Liang, M.R.; Xue, Y.; Wang, J.C.; Zou, H.J. Increased expression of S100A8 and S100A9 in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. A correlation with organ involvement and immunological abnormalities. Clin. Rheumatol. 2013, 32, 1501–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yoshizaki, A.; Komura, K.; Iwata, Y.; Ogawa, F.; Hara, T.; Muroi, E.; Takenaka, M.; Shimizu, K.; Hasegawa, M.; Fujimoto, M.; et al. Clinical significance of serum HMGB-1 and sRAGE levels in systemic sclerosis: Association with disease severity. J. Clin. Immunol. 2009, 29, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Kaloudi, O.; Basta, G.; Perfetto, F.; Bartoli, F.; Del Rosso, A.; Miniati, I.; Conforti, M.L.; Generini, S.; Guiducci, S.; Abbate, R.; et al. Circulating levels of Nepsilon-(carboxymethyl)lysine are increased in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology 2007, 46, 412–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Davies, C.A.; Herrick, A.L.; Cordingley, L.; Freemont, A.J.; Jeziorska, M. Expression of advanced glycation end products and their receptor in skin from patients with systemic sclerosis with and without calcinosis. Rheumatology 2009, 48, 876–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Van Putte, L.; De Schrijver, S.; Moortgat, P. The effects of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) on dermal wound healing and scar formation: A systematic review. Scars Burn. Health 2016, 2, 2059513116676828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhu, P.; Ren, M.; Yang, C.; Hu, Y.X.; Ran, J.M.; Yan, L. Involvement of RAGE, MAPK and NF-κB pathways in AGEs-induced MMP-9 activation in HaCaT keratinocytes. Exp. Dermatol. 2012, 21, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhu, P.; Chen, C.; Wu, D.; Chen, G.; Tan, R.; Ran, J. AGEs-induced MMP-9 activation mediated by Notch1 signaling is involved in impaired wound healing in diabetic rats. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2022, 186, 109831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Niu, Y.; Xie, T.; Ge, K.; Lin, Y.; Lu, S. Effects of extracellular matrix glycosylation on proliferation and apoptosis of human dermal fibroblasts via the receptor for advanced glycosylated end products. Am. J. Dermatopathol. 2008, 30, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Loughlin, D.T.; Artlett, C.M. Precursor of advanced glycation end products mediates ER-stress-induced caspase-3 activation of human dermal fibroblasts through NAD(P)H oxidase 4. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Serban, A.I.; Stanca, L.; Geicu, O.I.; Munteanu, M.C.; Dinischiotu, A. RAGE and TGF-β1 Cross-Talk Regulate Extracellular Matrix Turnover and Cytokine Synthesis in AGEs Exposed Fibroblast Cells. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ren, X.; Ge, M.; Qin, X.; Xu, P.; Zhu, P.; Dang, Y.; Gu, J.; Ye, X. S100a8/NF-κB signal pathway is involved in the 800-nm diode laser-induced skin collagen remodeling. Lasers Med. Sci. 2016, 31, 673–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Pandolfi, F.; Altamura, S.; Frosali, S.; Conti, P. Key Role of DAMP in Inflammation, Cancer, and Tissue Repair. Clin. Ther. 2016, 38, 1017–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Chen, X.F.; Tang, W.; Lin, W.D.; Liu, Z.Y.; Lu, X.X.; Zhang, B.; Ye, F.; Liu, Z.M.; Zou, J.J.; Liao, W.Q. Receptor for advanced glycation end as drug targets in diabetes-induced skin lesion. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2017, 9, 330–342. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  103. Chen, M.C.; Chen, K.C.; Chang, G.C.; Lin, H.; Wu, C.C.; Kao, W.H.; Teng, C.J.; Hsu, S.L.; Yang, T.Y. RAGE acts as an oncogenic role and promotes the metastasis of human lung cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Kwak, T.; Drews-Elger, K.; Ergonul, A.; Miller, P.C.; Braley, A.; Hwang, G.H.; Zhao, D.; Besser, A.; Yamamoto, Y.; Yamamoto, H.; et al. Targeting of RAGE-ligand signaling impairs breast cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Oncogene 2017, 36, 1559–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Applegate, C.C.; Nelappana, M.B.; Nielsen, E.A.; Kalinowski, L.; Dobrucki, I.T.; Dobrucki, L.W. RAGE as a Novel Biomarker for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers 2023, 15, 4889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wen, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Yang, X.; Gao, Y.; Li, M.; Yang, H.; Liu, T.; Tang, H. Chronic inflammation, cancer development and immunotherapy. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 1040163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Gebhardt, C.; Riehl, A.; Durchdewald, M.; Németh, J.; Fürstenberger, G.; Müller-Decker, K.; Enk, A.; Arnold, B.; Bierhaus, A.; Nawroth, P.P.; et al. RAGE signaling sustains inflammation and promotes tumor development. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Mou, K.; Liu, W.; Han, D.; Li, P. HMGB1/RAGE axis promotes autophagy and protects keratinocytes from ultraviolet radiation-induced cell death. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2017, 85, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Iotzova-Weiss, G.; Dziunycz, P.J.; Freiberger, S.N.; Läuchli, S.; Hafner, J.; Vogl, T.; French, L.E.; Hofbauer, G.F. S100A8/A9 stimulates keratinocyte proliferation in the development of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin via the receptor for advanced glycation-end products. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120971. [Google Scholar]
  110. Nguyen, A.H.; Detty, S.Q.; Agrawal, D.K. Clinical Implications of High-mobility Group Box-1 (HMGB1) and the Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-products (RAGE) in Cutaneous Malignancy: A Systematic Review. Anticancer. Res. 2017, 37, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Olaoba, O.T.; Kadasah, S.; Vetter, S.W.; Leclerc, E. RAGE Signaling in Melanoma Tumors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Li Pomi, F.; Borgia, F.; Custurone, P.; Vaccaro, M.; Pioggia, G.; Gangemi, S. Role of HMGB1 in Cutaneous Melanoma: State of the Art. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Abe, R.; Shimizu, T.; Sugawara, H.; Watanabe, H.; Nakamura, H.; Choei, H.; Sasaki, N.; Yamagishi, S.; Takeuchi, M.; Shimizu, H. Regulation of human melanoma growth and metastasis by AGE-AGE receptor interactions. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2004, 122, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Hibino, T.; Sakaguchi, M.; Miyamoto, S.; Yamamoto, M.; Motoyama, A.; Hosoi, J.; Shimokata, T.; Ito, T.; Tsuboi, R.; Huh, N.H. S100A9 is a novel ligand of EMMPRIN that promotes melanoma metastasis. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Özbay Kurt, F.G.; Cicortas, B.A.; Balzasch, B.M.; De la Torre, C.; Ast, V.; Tavukcuoglu, E.; Ak, C.; Wohlfeil, S.A.; Cerwenka, A.; Utikal, J.; et al. S100A9 and HMGB1 orchestrate MDSC-mediated immunosuppression in melanoma through TLR4 signaling. J. Immunother. Cancer. 2024, 12, e009552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ruma, I.M.; Putranto, E.W.; Kondo, E.; Murata, H.; Watanabe, M.; Huang, P.; Kinoshita, R.; Futami, J.; Inoue, Y.; Yamauchi, A.; et al. MCAM, as a novel receptor for S100A8/A9, mediates progression of malignant melanoma through prominent activation of NF-κB and ROS formation upon ligand binding. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 2016, 33, 609–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wang, W.; Chapman, N.M.; Zhang, B.; Li, M.; Fan, M.; Laribee, R.N.; Zaidi, M.R.; Pfeffer, L.M.; Chi, H.; Wu, Z.H. Upregulation of PD-L1 via HMGB1-Activated IRF3 and NF-κB Contributes to UV Radiation-Induced Immune Suppression. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 2909–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zhang, K.; Anumanthan, G.; Scheaffer, S.; Cornelius, L.A. HMGB1/RAGE Mediates UVB-Induced Secretory Inflammatory Response and Resistance to Apoptosis in Human Melanocytes. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2019, 139, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Haase-Kohn, C.; Wolf, S.; Lenk, J.; Pietzsch, J. Copper-mediated cross-linking of S100A4, but not of S100A2, results in proinflammatory effects in melanoma cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 413, 494–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Herwig, N.; Belter, B.; Wolf, S.; Haase-Kohn, C.; Pietzsch, J. Interaction of extracellular S100A4 with RAGE prompts prometastatic activation of A375 melanoma cells. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2016, 20, 825–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Herwig, N.; Belter, B.; Pietzsch, J. Extracellular S100A4 affects endothelial cell integrity and stimulates transmigration of A375 melanoma cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 477, 963–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Zhu, L.; Ito, T.; Nakahara, T.; Nagae, K.; Fuyuno, Y.; Nakao, M.; Akahoshi, M.; Nakagawa, R.; Tu, Y.; Uchi, H.; et al. Upregulation of S100P, receptor for advanced glycation end products and ezrin in malignant melanoma. J. Dermatol. 2013, 40, 973–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Leclerc, E.; Heizmann, C.W.; Vetter, S.W. RAGE and S100 protein transcription levels are highly variable in human melanoma tumors and cells. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 2009, 28, F65–F75. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  124. Meghnani, V.; Wagh, A.; Indurthi, V.S.; Koladia, M.; Vetter, S.W.; Law, B.; Leclerc, E. The receptor for advanced glycation end products influences the expression of its S100 protein ligands in melanoma tumors. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2014, 57, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wagner, N.B.; Weide, B.; Reith, M.; Tarnanidis, K.; Kehrel, C.; Lichtenberger, R.; Pflugfelder, A.; Herpel, E.; Eubel, J.; Ikenberg, K.; et al. Diminished levels of the soluble form of RAGE are related to poor survival in malignant melanoma. Int. J. Cancer. 2015, 137, 2607–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Gkogkolou, P.; Böhm, M. Advanced glycation end products: Key players in skin aging? Dermatoendocrinology 2012, 4, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Lohwasser, C.; Neureiter, D.; Weigle, B.; Kirchner, T.; Schuppan, D. The receptor for advanced glycation end products is highly expressed in the skin and upregulated by advanced glycation end products and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2006, 126, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Pageon, H.; Zucchi, H.; Rousset, F.; Girardeau-Hubert, S.; Tancrede, E.; Asselineau, D. Glycation stimulates cutaneous monocyte differentiation in reconstructed skin in vitro. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2017, 162, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Hiramoto, K.; Imai, M.; Tanaka, S.; Ooi, K. Changes in the AGE/Macrophage/TNF-α Pathway Affect Skin Dryness during KK-Ay/Tajcl Mice Aging. Life 2023, 13, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Lee, E.J.; Kim, J.Y.; Oh, S.H. Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) promote melanogenesis through receptor for AGEs. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wondrak, G.T.; Roberts, M.J.; Jacobson, M.K.; Jacobson, E.L. Photosensitized growth inhibition of cultured human skin cells: Mechanism and suppression of oxidative stress from solar irradiation of glycated proteins. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2002, 119, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Yao, A.; Zhang, Y.; Ouyang, M.; Wen, L.; Lai, W. Expression profiles and functional analysis of transfer RNA-derived small RNAs (tsRNAs) in photoaged human dermal fibroblasts. Photochem. Photobiol. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Salem, R.M.; El-Fallah, A.A.; Shaker, R. HMGB1-RAGE-moesin axis may be indicted for acne vulgaris. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2022, 21, 1642–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Yan, Q.; Zhang, F.; Qiao, Z.; Jin, Y.; Zheng, R.; Wu, J. Investigating the mechanism of PAD in the treatment of acne based on network pharmacology and molecular docking: A review. Medicine 2024, 103, e38785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Urbonaviciute, V.; Voll, R.E. High-mobility group box 1 represents a potential marker of disease activity and novel therapeutic target in systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Intern. Med. 2011, 270, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Abdulahad, D.A.; Westra, J.; Limburg, P.C.; Kallenberg, C.G.; Bijl, M. HMGB1 in systemic lupus Erythematosus: Its role in cutaneous lesions development. Autoimmun. Rev. 2010, 9, 661–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Akoglu, G.; Sungu, N.; Karaismailoglu, E.; Aktas, A. Expression of the receptor for advanced glycation end products in acquired reactive perforating collagenosis. Indian. J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 2017, 83, 432–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Han, E.C.; Cho, S.B.; Ahn, K.J.; Oh, S.H.; Kim, J.; Kim, D.S.; Lee, K.H.; Bang, D. Expression of Pro-inflammatory Protein S100A12 (EN-RAGE) in Behçet’s Disease and Its Association with Disease Activity: A Pilot Study. Ann. Dermatol. 2011, 23, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Birgin, E.; Gebhardt, C.; Hetjens, S.; Fischer, S.; Rückert, F.; Reichenberger, M.A. Extracorporal Shock Wave Therapy Enhances Receptor for Advanced Glycated End-Product-Dependent Flap Survival and Angiogenesis. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2018, 80, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Joshi, A.A.; Wu, Y.; Deng, S.; Preston-Hurlburt, P.; Forbes, J.M.; Herold, K.C. RAGE antagonism with azeliragon improves xenograft rejection by T cells in humanized mice. Clin. Immunol. 2022, 245, 109165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Hong, Y.; Shen, C.; Yin, Q.; Sun, M.; Ma, Y.; Liu, X. Effects of RAGE-Specific Inhibitor FPS-ZM1 on Amyloid-β Metabolism and AGEs-Induced Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Rat Hippocampus. Neurochem. Res. 2016, 41, 1192–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Xue, J.; Jia, P.; Zhang, D.; Yao, Z. TTP488 ameliorates NLRP3-associated inflammation, viability, apoptosis, and ROS production in an Alzheimer’s disease cell model by mediating the JAK1/STAT3/NFκB/IRF3 pathway. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2021, 39, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Johnson, L.L.; Johnson, J.; Ober, R.; Holland, A.; Zhang, G.; Backer, M.; Backer, J.; Ali, Z.; Tekabe, Y. Novel Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products-Blocking Antibody to Treat Diabetic Peripheral Artery Disease. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e016696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Pullerits, R.; Bokarewa, M.; Dahlberg, L.; Tarkowski, A. Synovial fluid expression of autoantibodies specific for RAGE relates to less erosive course of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2007, 46, 1367–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Jeong, S.J.; Lim, B.J.; Park, S.; Choi, D.; Kim, H.W.; Ku, N.S.; Han, S.H.; Kim, C.O.; Choi, J.Y.; Song, Y.G.; et al. The effect of sRAGE-Fc fusion protein attenuates inflammation and decreases mortality in a murine cecal ligation and puncture model. Inflamm. Res. 2012, 61, 1211–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Ooi, H.; Nasu, R.; Furukawa, A.; Takeuchi, M.; Koriyama, Y. Pyridoxamine and Aminoguanidine Attenuate the Abnormal Aggregation of β-Tubulin and Suppression of Neurite Outgrowth by Glyceraldehyde-Derived Toxic Advanced Glycation End-Products. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 921611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Bresnick, A.R. S100 proteins as therapeutic targets. Biophys. Rev. 2018, 10, 1617–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Cai, X.G.; Xia, J.R.; Li, W.D.; Lu, F.L.; Liu, J.; Lu, Q.; Zhi, H. Anti-fibrotic effects of specific-siRNA targeting of the receptor for advanced glycation end products in a rat model of experimental hepatic fibrosis. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014, 10, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Yeh, W.J.; Hsia, S.M.; Lee, W.H.; Wu, C.H. Polyphenols with antiglycation activity and mechanisms of action: A review of recent findings. J. Food Drug Anal. 2017, 25, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Zhou, Z.; Tang, Y.; Jin, X.; Chen, C.; Lu, Y.; Liu, L.; Shen, C. Metformin Inhibits Advanced Glycation End Products-Induced Inflammatory Response in Murine Macrophages Partly through AMPK Activation and RAGE/NFκB Pathway Suppression. J. Diabetes Res. 2016, 2016, 4847812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Huang, J.S.; Guh, J.Y.; Chen, H.C.; Hung, W.C.; Lai, Y.H.; Chuang, L.Y. Role of receptor for advanced glycation end-product (RAGE) and the JAK/STAT-signaling pathway in AGE-induced collagen production in NRK-49F cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2001, 81, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Mahajan, N.; Bahl, A.; Dhawan, V. C-reactive protein (CRP) up-regulates expression of receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and its inflammatory ligand EN-RAGE in THP-1 cells: Inhibitory effects of atorvastatin. Int. J. Cardiol. 2010, 142, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Yamagishi, S.; Matsui, T.; Nakamura, K.; Takeuchi, M.; Inoue, H. Telmisartan inhibits advanced glycation end products (AGEs)-elicited endothelial cell injury by suppressing AGE receptor (RAGE) expression via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gammaactivation. Protein Pept. Lett. 2008, 15, 850–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Ramadass, V.; Vaiyapuri, T.; Tergaonkar, V. Small Molecule NF-κB Pathway Inhibitors in Clinic. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Sabbagh, M.N.; Agro, A.; Bell, J.; Aisen, P.S.; Schweizer, E.; Galasko, D. PF-04494700, an oral inhibitor of receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 2011, 25, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Galasko, D.; Bell, J.; Mancuso, J.Y.; Kupiec, J.W.; Sabbagh, M.N.; van Dyck, C.; Thomas, R.G.; Aisen, P.S.; Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study. Clinical trial of an inhibitor of RAGE-Aβ interactions in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2014, 82, 1536–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Mezentsev, A.V.; Bruskin, S.A.; Soboleva, A.G.; Sobolev, V.V.; Piruzian, E.S. Pharmacological control of receptor of advanced glycation end-products and its biological effects in psoriasis. Int. J. Biomed. Sci. 2013, 9, 112–122. [Google Scholar]
  158. Wang, M.; Ma, X.; Gao, C.; Luo, Y.; Fei, X.; Zheng, Q.; Ma, X.; Kuai, L.; Li, B.; Wang, R.; et al. Rutin attenuates inflammation by downregulating AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in psoriasis: Network pharmacology analysis and experimental evidence. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2023, 125 Pt. A, 111033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Guo, Y.; Gan, H.; Xu, S.; Zeng, G.; Xiao, L.; Ding, Z.; Zhu, J.; Xiong, X.; Fu, Z. Deciphering the Mechanism of Xijiao Dihuang Decoction in Treating Psoriasis by Network Pharmacology and Experimental Validation. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2023, 17, 2805–2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Tang, B.; Zheng, X.; Luo, Q.; Li, X.; Yang, Y.; Bi, Y.; Chen, Y.; Han, L.; Chen, H.; Lu, C. Network pharmacology and gut microbiota insights: Unraveling Shenling Baizhu powder’s role in psoriasis treatment. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1362161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Duan, X.; Poorun, D.; Xu, J.; Zhang, S.; Gan, L.; He, M.; Zhu, K.; Ming, Z.; et al. Lipoxin A4 and its analog suppress inflammation by modulating HMGB1 translocation and expression in psoriasis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Karuppagounder, V.; Arumugam, S.; Thandavarayan, R.A.; Pitchaimani, V.; Sreedhar, R.; Afrin, R.; Harima, M.; Suzuki, H.; Nomoto, M.; Miyashita, S.; et al. Resveratrol attenuates HMGB1 signaling and inflammation in house dust mite-induced atopic dermatitis in mice. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2014, 23, 617–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Karuppagounder, V.; Arumugam, S.; Thandavarayan, R.A.; Pitchaimani, V.; Sreedhar, R.; Afrin, R.; Harima, M.; Suzuki, H.; Nomoto, M.; Miyashita, S.; et al. Modulation of HMGB1 translocation and RAGE/NFκB cascade by quercetin treatment mitigates atopic dermatitis in NC/Nga transgenic mice. Exp. Dermatol. 2015, 24, 418–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, G.; Han, X. Glycyrrhizin ameliorates atopic dermatitis-like symptoms through inhibition of HMGB1. Int Immunopharmacol. 2018, 60, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Karuppagounder, V.; Arumugam, S.; Thandavarayan, R.A.; Pitchaimani, V.; Sreedhar, R.; Afrin, R.; Harima, M.; Suzuki, H.; Nomoto, M.; Miyashita, S.; et al. Tannic acid modulates NFκB signaling pathway and skin inflammation in NC/Nga mice through PPARγ expression. Cytokine 2015, 76, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Chang, Q.X.; Lyu, J.L.; Wu, P.Y.; Wen, K.C.; Chang, C.C.; Chiang, H.M. Coffea arabica Extract Attenuates Atopic Dermatitis-like Skin Lesions by Regulating NLRP3 Inflammasome Expression and Skin Barrier Functions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Huang, W.; Huang, X.; Yang, L.; Han, W.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Chen, R. Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking Analysis Exploring the Mechanism of Tripterygium wilfordii in the Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus. Medicina 2023, 59, 1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Chang, W.; Shi, J.; Li, L.; Zhang, P.; Ren, Y.; Yan, Y.; Ge, Y. Network pharmacology and molecular docking analysis predict the mechanisms of Huangbai liniment in treating oral lichen planus. Medicine 2024, 103, e39352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Zhao, Z.; Wang, L.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, C.; Wang, Y.; Ma, J.; Fan, Y. Reveals of quercetin’s therapeutic effects on oral lichen planus based on network pharmacology approach and experimental validation. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Johnson, J.M.; Takebe, Y.; Zhang, G.; Ober, R.; McLuckie, A.; Niedt, G.W.; Johnson, L.L. Blocking RAGE improves wound healing in diabetic pigs. Int. Wound J. 2023, 20, 678–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Goova, M.T.; Li, J.; Kislinger, T.; Qu, W.; Lu, Y.; Bucciarelli, L.G.; Nowygrod, S.; Wolf, B.M.; Caliste, X.; Yan, S.F.; et al. Blockade of receptor for advanced glycation end-products restores effective wound healing in diabetic mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2001, 159, 513–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Olekson, M.P.; Faulknor, R.A.; Hsia, H.C.; Schmidt, A.M.; Berthiaume, F. Soluble Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products Improves Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1 Activity in Model Diabetic Environments. Adv. Wound Care 2016, 5, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Kang, H.J.; Kumar, S.; D’Elia, A.; Dash, B.; Nanda, V.; Hsia, H.C.; Yarmush, M.L.; Berthiaume, F. Self-assembled elastin-like polypeptide fusion protein coacervates as competitive inhibitors of advanced glycation end-products enhance diabetic wound healing. J. Control. Release 2021, 333, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Wear-Maggitti, K.; Lee, J.; Conejero, A.; Schmidt, A.M.; Grant, R.; Breitbart, A. Use of topical sRAGE in diabetic wounds increases neovascularization and granulation tissue formation. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2004, 52, 519–521, discussion 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Chen, S.A.; Chen, H.M.; Yao, Y.D.; Hung, C.F.; Tu, C.S.; Liang, Y.J. Topical treatment with anti-oxidants and Au nanoparticles promote healing of diabetic wound through receptor for advance glycation end-products. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2012, 47, 875–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Xing, D.; Xia, G.; Tang, X.; Zhuang, Z.; Shan, J.; Fang, X.; Qiu, L.; Zha, X.; Chen, X.L. A Multifunctional Nanocomposite Hydrogel Delivery System Based on Dual-Loaded Liposomes for Scarless Wound Healing. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2024, 13, e2401619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Kang, H.J.; Kumar, S.; Dash, B.C.; Hsia, H.C.; Yarmush, M.L.; Berthiaume, F. Multifunctional Elastin-Like Polypeptide Fusion Protein Coacervates Inhibit Receptor-Mediated Proinflammatory Signals and Promote Angiogenesis in Mouse Diabetic Wounds. Adv Wound Care 2023, 12, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Geng, J.; Zhou, G.; Guo, S.; Ma, C.; Ma, J. Underlying Mechanism of Traditional Herbal Formula Chuang-Ling-Ye in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer through Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2024, 30, 448–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Wang, Y.; Ding, T.; Jiang, X. Network Pharmacology Study on Herb Pair Bletilla striata-Galla chinensis in the Treatment of Chronic Skin Ulcers. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2024, 30, 1354–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Qin, P.-Y.; Xu, Y.-J.; Zuo, X.-D.; Duan, J.-H.; Qiu, B.; Li, X.-F.; Li, J.-P.; Yu, J. Effect and mechanisms of Polygonatum kingianum (polygonati rhizome) on wound healing in diabetic rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 298, 115612. [Google Scholar]
  181. Zhang, S.; Xu, Y.; Zhang Junior, C.; Chen, X.; Zhu, J. Dang-Gui-Si-Ni decoction facilitates wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers by regulating expression of AGEs/RAGE/TGF-β/Smad2/3. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2024, 316, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Emad, A.M.; Mahrous, E.A.; Rasheed, D.M.; Gomaa, F.A.M.; Hamdan, A.M.E.; Selim, H.M.R.M.; Yousef, E.M.; Abo-Zalam, H.B.; El-Gazar, A.A.; Ragab, G.M. Wound Healing Efficacy of Cucurbitaceae Seed Oils in Rats: Comprehensive Phytochemical, Pharmacological, and Histological Studies Tackling AGE/RAGE and Nrf2/Ho-1 Cue. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Youjun, D.; Huang, Y.; Lai, Y.; Ma, Z.; Wang, X.; Chen, B.; Ding, X.; Tan, Q. Mechanisms of resveratrol against diabetic wound by network pharmacology and experimental validation. Ann. Med. 2023, 55, 2280811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Tian, M.; Qing, C.; Niu, Y.; Dong, J.; Cao, X.; Song, F.; Ji, X.; Lu, S. Effect of aminoguanidine intervention on neutrophils in diabetes inflammatory cells wound healing. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 2013, 121, 635–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Alqahtani, A.S.; Li, K.M.; Razmovski-Naumovski, V.; Kam, A.; Alam, P.; Li, G.Q. Attenuation of methylglyoxal-induced glycation and cellular dysfunction in wound healing by Centella cordifolia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 813–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Yang, X.; Cao, Z.; Wu, P.; Li, Z. Effect and Mechanism of the Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (Btk) Inhibitor Ibrutinib on Rat Model of Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Med. Sci. Monit. 2019, 25, 7951–7957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Yang, C.T.; Meng, F.H.; Chen, L.; Li, X.; Cen, L.J.; Wen, Y.H.; Li, C.C.; Zhang, H. Inhibition of Methylglyoxal-Induced AGEs/RAGE Expression Contributes to Dermal Protection by N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 41, 742–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Bian, X.; Li, B.; Yang, J.; Ma, K.; Sun, M.; Zhang, C.; Fu, X. Regenerative and protective effects of dMSC-sEVs on high-glucose-induced senescent fibroblasts by suppressing RAGE pathway and activating Smad pathway. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Xu, J.; Bai, S.; Cao, Y.; Liu, L.; Fang, Y.; Du, J.; Luo, L.; Chen, M.; Shen, B.; Zhang, Q. miRNA-221-3p in Endothelial Progenitor Cell-Derived Exosomes Accelerates Skin Wound Healing in Diabetic Mice. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2020, 13, 1259–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Kim, S.; Kwon, J. Thymosin beta 4 improves dermal burn wound healing via downregulation of receptor of advanced glycation end products in db/db mice. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1840, 3452–3459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Ranzato, E.; Patrone, M.; Pedrazzi, M.; Burlando, B. Hmgb1 promotes wound healing of 3T3 mouse fibroblasts via RAGE-dependent ERK1/2 activation. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2010, 57, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Ranzato, E.; Patrone, M.; Pedrazzi, M.; Burlando, B. HMGb1 promotes scratch wound closure of HaCaT keratinocytes via ERK1/2 activation. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2009, 332, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Tancharoen, S.; Gando, S.; Binita, S.; Nagasato, T.; Kikuchi, K.; Nawa, Y.; Dararat, P.; Yamamoto, M.; Narkpinit, S.; Maruyama, I. HMGB1 Promotes Intraoral Palatal Wound Healing through RAGE-Dependent Mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Taguchi, A.; Blood, D.C.; del Toro, G.; Canet, A.; Lee, D.C.; Qu, W.; Tanji, N.; Lu, Y.; Lalla, E.; Fu, C.; et al. Blockade of RAGE-amphoterin signalling suppresses tumour growth and metastases. Nature 2000, 405, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Zhao, B.; Li, Y.; Wang, B.; Liu, J.; Yang, Y.; Quan, Q.; An, Q.; Liang, R.; Liu, C.; Yang, C. Uncovering the Anti-Angiogenic Mechanisms of Centella asiatica via Network Pharmacology and Experimental Validation. Molecules 2024, 29, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Matsushita, S.; Tada, K.I.; Kawahara, K.I.; Kawai, K.; Hashiguchi, T.; Maruyama, I.; Kanekura, T. Advanced malignant melanoma responds to Prunus mume Sieb. Et. Zucc (Ume) extract: Case report and in vitro study. Exp. Ther. Med. 2010, 1, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Han, A.R.; Nam, M.H.; Lee, K.W. Plantamajoside Inhibits UVB and Advanced Glycation End Products-Induced MMP-1 Expression by Suppressing the MAPK and NF-κB Pathways in HaCaT Cells. Photochem. Photobiol. 2016, 92, 708–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Chen, C.; Liu, X.; Li, L.; Guo, M.; He, Y.; Dong, Y.; Meng, H.; Yi, F. Study of the mechanism by gentiopicroside protects against skin fibroblast glycation damage via the RAGE pathway. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 4685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Lyu, J.L.; Liu, Y.J.; Wen, K.C.; Chiu, C.Y.; Lin, Y.H.; Chiang, H.M. Protective Effect of Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum) Extract against UV- and AGEs-Induced Skin Aging via Alleviating Oxidative Stress and Collagen Degradation. Molecules 2022, 27, 2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Wu, J.; Pan, L. Study on the effect of Pogostemon cablin Benth on skin aging based on network pharmacology. Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Han, M.; Li, H.; Ke, D.; Tian, L.M.; Hong, Y.; Zhang, C.; Tian, D.Z.; Chen, L.; Zhan, L.R.; Zong, S.Q. Mechanism of Ba Zhen Tang Delaying Skin Photoaging Based on Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2022, 15, 763–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Li, X.; Yang, K.; Gao, S.; Zhao, J.; Liu, G.; Chen, Y.; Lin, H.; Zhao, W.; Hu, Z.; Xu, N. Carnosine Stimulates Macrophage-Mediated Clearance of Senescent Skin Cells Through Activation of the AKT2 Signaling Pathway by CD36 and RAGE. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 593832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Gu, M.J.; Lee, H.W.; Yoo, G.; Kim, D.; Choi, I.W.; Kim, Y.; Ha, S.K. Protective effect of Schizonepeta tenuifolia Briq. ethanolic extract against UVB-induced skin aging and photodamage in hairless mice. Front. Pharmacol. 2023, 14, 1176073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The cell membrane receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) consists of a VC1 domain, a C2 domain, and both transmembrane and intracellular regions. RAGE binds a range of endogenous danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and exogenous pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) through its positively charged VC1 domain. Key ligands include advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPPs), high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), S100 family proteins, beta-amyloid proteins, DNA, and collagen. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 14 November 2024).
Figure 1. The cell membrane receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) consists of a VC1 domain, a C2 domain, and both transmembrane and intracellular regions. RAGE binds a range of endogenous danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and exogenous pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) through its positively charged VC1 domain. Key ligands include advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPPs), high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), S100 family proteins, beta-amyloid proteins, DNA, and collagen. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 14 November 2024).
Ijms 25 13570 g001
Figure 2. RAGE forms oligomers to bind ligands, interacting with negatively charged molecules. Upon ligand binding, conformational changes occur in the receptor’s cytoplasmic tail, activating signaling adaptors such as diaphanous-1 (Dia1), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2), and protein kinase C (PKC). Dia1 subsequently activates small GTPases like Ras, Cdc42, and Rac1, which stimulate NF-κB signaling via the ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK pathways. NF-κB activation may also occur through the PI3K/Akt pathway, often triggered by reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated during RAGE signaling. Additionally, Dia1 can engage the JAK/STAT pathway, activating both NF-κB and interferon-stimulated response elements (ISRE), amplifying the inflammatory response. These cascades result in pro-inflammatory cellular changes and chemotaxis, recruiting additional inflammatory cells. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 14 November 2024).
Figure 2. RAGE forms oligomers to bind ligands, interacting with negatively charged molecules. Upon ligand binding, conformational changes occur in the receptor’s cytoplasmic tail, activating signaling adaptors such as diaphanous-1 (Dia1), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2), and protein kinase C (PKC). Dia1 subsequently activates small GTPases like Ras, Cdc42, and Rac1, which stimulate NF-κB signaling via the ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK pathways. NF-κB activation may also occur through the PI3K/Akt pathway, often triggered by reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated during RAGE signaling. Additionally, Dia1 can engage the JAK/STAT pathway, activating both NF-κB and interferon-stimulated response elements (ISRE), amplifying the inflammatory response. These cascades result in pro-inflammatory cellular changes and chemotaxis, recruiting additional inflammatory cells. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 14 November 2024).
Ijms 25 13570 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of RAGE-deficient and wild-type mice responses to subcutaneous Staphylococcus aureus injection reveals that RAGE facilitates distant bacterial migration and exacerbates local tissue damage during infection (↑—increase, ↓—decrease). Conversely, RAGE activation in infection-related wounds may support the healing process, indicating a dual role for the receptor depending on context. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 14 November 2024).
Figure 3. Comparison of RAGE-deficient and wild-type mice responses to subcutaneous Staphylococcus aureus injection reveals that RAGE facilitates distant bacterial migration and exacerbates local tissue damage during infection (↑—increase, ↓—decrease). Conversely, RAGE activation in infection-related wounds may support the healing process, indicating a dual role for the receptor depending on context. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 14 November 2024).
Ijms 25 13570 g003
Figure 4. Overview of RAGE pathway involvement in wound healing (↑—increase, ↓—decrease). The excessive accumulation of AGEs in the skin disrupts fibril formation and scar elasticity, leading to increased tissue contraction. AGEs induce fibroblast apoptosis and cause cell cycle arrest, while also contributing to RAGE overexpression in fibroblasts. This activates signaling pathways such as ERK1/2, MAPK, and NF-κB, promoting pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion (e.g., TNF-α and IL-8). RAGE activation enhances extracellular matrix (ECM) production, including collagen types I and III, and stimulates matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), impacting tissue remodeling and fibrosis. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 14 November 2024).
Figure 4. Overview of RAGE pathway involvement in wound healing (↑—increase, ↓—decrease). The excessive accumulation of AGEs in the skin disrupts fibril formation and scar elasticity, leading to increased tissue contraction. AGEs induce fibroblast apoptosis and cause cell cycle arrest, while also contributing to RAGE overexpression in fibroblasts. This activates signaling pathways such as ERK1/2, MAPK, and NF-κB, promoting pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion (e.g., TNF-α and IL-8). RAGE activation enhances extracellular matrix (ECM) production, including collagen types I and III, and stimulates matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), impacting tissue remodeling and fibrosis. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 14 November 2024).
Ijms 25 13570 g004
Figure 5. The RAGE pathway can be inhibited at three key intervention points: blocking RAGE ligands, inhibiting the receptor itself, and silencing the RAGE gene. Blue boxes highlight these intervention points, while red boxes illustrate various potential inhibitors of the RAGE pathway. Additional therapies can indirectly suppress contributing signaling pathways, providing complementary strategies for RAGE pathway inhibition. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 14 November 2024).
Figure 5. The RAGE pathway can be inhibited at three key intervention points: blocking RAGE ligands, inhibiting the receptor itself, and silencing the RAGE gene. Blue boxes highlight these intervention points, while red boxes illustrate various potential inhibitors of the RAGE pathway. Additional therapies can indirectly suppress contributing signaling pathways, providing complementary strategies for RAGE pathway inhibition. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 14 November 2024).
Ijms 25 13570 g005
Table 3. Summary of current human-based studies on RAGE involvement in lichen planus (LP), emphasizing its potential role in disease pathogenesis (↑—increased concentration).
Table 3. Summary of current human-based studies on RAGE involvement in lichen planus (LP), emphasizing its potential role in disease pathogenesis (↑—increased concentration).
MaterialMethodStudy SizeMarkersYearAuthors [Ref.]
SerumELISA50↑S100A8/A92016de Carvalho et al. [69]
Skin biopsy (dermis)IHC49↑HMGB1, ↑RAGE2018de Carvalho et al. [70]
Mucosa biopsyIHC45↑HMGB1, ↑RAGE2018Salem et al. [71]
Skin biopsyIHC50↑S100A82016de Carvalho et al. [69]
Skin biopsyPCR50↑S100A8, ↑S100A9, ↑S100A8/A92016de Carvalho et al. [69]
Abbreviations: Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1), immunohistochemistry (IHC), Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Radziszewski, M.; Galus, R.; Łuszczyński, K.; Winiarski, S.; Wąsowski, D.; Malejczyk, J.; Włodarski, P.; Ścieżyńska, A. The RAGE Pathway in Skin Pathology Development: A Comprehensive Review of Its Role and Therapeutic Potential. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 13570. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252413570

AMA Style

Radziszewski M, Galus R, Łuszczyński K, Winiarski S, Wąsowski D, Malejczyk J, Włodarski P, Ścieżyńska A. The RAGE Pathway in Skin Pathology Development: A Comprehensive Review of Its Role and Therapeutic Potential. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(24):13570. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252413570

Chicago/Turabian Style

Radziszewski, Marcin, Ryszard Galus, Krzysztof Łuszczyński, Sebastian Winiarski, Dariusz Wąsowski, Jacek Malejczyk, Paweł Włodarski, and Aneta Ścieżyńska. 2024. "The RAGE Pathway in Skin Pathology Development: A Comprehensive Review of Its Role and Therapeutic Potential" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 24: 13570. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252413570

APA Style

Radziszewski, M., Galus, R., Łuszczyński, K., Winiarski, S., Wąsowski, D., Malejczyk, J., Włodarski, P., & Ścieżyńska, A. (2024). The RAGE Pathway in Skin Pathology Development: A Comprehensive Review of Its Role and Therapeutic Potential. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(24), 13570. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252413570

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop