Next Article in Journal
Maternal Exposure to Low-Dose BDE-47 Induced Weight Gain and Impaired Insulin Sensitivity in the Offspring
Previous Article in Journal
Divergent Processing of Cell Stress Signals as the Basis of Cancer Progression: Licensing NFκB on Chromatin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genomic Analysis of Cronobacter condimenti s37: Identification of Resistance and Virulence Genes and Comparison with Other Cronobacter and Closely Related Species

by
Anna Berthold-Pluta
1,
Ilona Stefańska
2,
Stephen Forsythe
3,
Tamara Aleksandrzak-Piekarczyk
4,
Lidia Stasiak-Różańska
1 and
Monika Garbowska
1,*
1
Department of Technology and Food Assessment, Division of Milk Technology, Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland
2
Department of Preclinical Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland
3
FoodMicrobe.com Ltd., Keyworth, Nottinghamshire NG12 5GY, UK
4
Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences (IBB PAS), 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(16), 8622; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168622
Submission received: 2 July 2024 / Revised: 3 August 2024 / Accepted: 5 August 2024 / Published: 7 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology)

Abstract

:
Cronobacter condimenti are environmental commensals that have not been associated with any clinical infections. To date, they are the least understood and described Cronobacter species within the genus. The objective of this study was to use a draft genome sequence (DGS) of the Cronobacter condimenti strain s37 to screen for genes encoding for antibiotic resistance, virulence, response to environmental stress, and biofilm formation. The strain was isolated in Poland from commercial small radish sprouts. This is the second genome of this species available in the GenBank database. The comparative genome analysis (cgMLST) of C. condimenti s37 with other Cronobacter spp. including the pathogenic species C. sakazakii and the plant-associated closely related genera Franconibacter and Siccibacter was also performed. The assembled and annotated genome of the C. condimenti s37 genome was 4,590,991 bp in length, with a total gene number of 4384, and a GC content of 55.7%. The s 37 genome encoded for genes associated with resistance to stressful environmental conditions (metal resistance genes: zinc, copper, osmotic regulation, and desiccation stress), 17 antimicrobial resistance genes encoding resistance to various classes of antibiotics and 50 genes encoding for the virulence factors. The latter were mainly genes associated with adhesion, chemotaxis, hemolysis, and biofilm formation. Cg-MLST analysis (3991 genes) revealed a greater similarity of C. condimenti s37 to S. turicensis, F. pulveris, and C. dublinensis than to other species of the genus Cronobacter. Studies on the diversity, pathogenicity, and virulence of Cronobacter species isolated from different sources are still insufficient and should certainly be continued. Especially the analysis of rare strains such as s37 is very important because it provides new information on the evolution of these bacteria. Comparative cgMLST analysis of s37 with other Cronobacter species, as well as closely related genera Franconibacter and Siccibacter, complements the knowledge on their adaptability to specific environments such as desiccation.

1. Introduction

The genus Cronobacter spp. belongs to the family Enterobacteriaceae and currently includes seven species, such as C. sakazakii, C. malonaticus, C. turicensis, C. muytjensii, C. dublinensis, C. condimenti, and C. universalis. Cronobacter species can cause serious illness (mortality rates ranging from 40% to 80%) in newborns and infants, including necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, and meningitis. Many of these infections are caused by consuming contaminated powdered infant formula (PIF) [1]. In 2022, in the United States, Cronobacter was associated with infections in infants, including two deaths, after consuming PIF [2]. These pathogens also cause diseases in adults, such as wound and urinary tract infections, sepsis, vaginitis, pneumonia, and foodborne gastroenteritis, but clinical symptoms in adults are milder than in newborns [3,4]. Infections caused by Cronobacter spp. are rare [2]. Generally, these bacteria exhibit several typically pathogenic features, such as the ability to invade human intestinal cells and cross the blood–brain barrier, multiply in macrophages, and evade the host immune response [5].
Cronobacter condimenti was first isolated in Slovakia and the type strain is 1330T (CECT 7863T, LMG 26250T) [6]. C. condimenti are environmental commensals that have not been associated with any clinical infections. Due to the rarity of their isolation, they are the least understood and described Cronobacter species within the genus to date. The majority of Cronobacter isolates from clinical sources causing serious disease are C. sakazakii and C. malonaticus, with C. turicensis, C. universalis, C. dublinensis, and C. muytjensii being less frequently reported. Bacteria of the genus Cronobacter, although initially associated only with neonatal infections, are now recognized as causing infections mainly in adults [7,8,9].
The first isolate of C. condimenti (1330T) was from spiced sausages. Given that members of the Cronobacter genus are not frequently isolated from meat products, it was probable but unproven that C. condimenti was from the spice ingredient of the sausages. The phenotypic characteristics of the reference strain C. condimenti 1330T have shown that, unlike other Cronobacter, this species is immobile, produces indole from tryptophan, and has more limited sources of carbon utilization compared to other Cronobacter species (e.g., they do not use inositol, putrescine, maltitol, or palatinose) [6].
The most closely related genera to Cronobacter are Franconibacter and Siccibacter. Strains within these latter genera were previously regarded as members of the Cronobacter genus. However, Stephan et al. [10] based on phylogenetic evidence and genome analysis proposed the genus Franconibacter, which currently includes F. pulveris, F. helveticus (previously C. pulveris and C. helveticus, respectively), and F. daqui (the reference strain was isolated in 2017 from Daqu by Gao et al. [11] and the genus Siccibacter, which includes S. turicensis (formerly C. zurichensis) and, since 2015, S. colletis [12]). One of the main reasons for their initial inclusion in the Cronobacter genus is that they have similar biochemical properties (for example, α-glucosidase activity, which is used as a marker in some diagnostic media for Cronobacter) [13]. The Rapid ID32E and Vitek 2 GN systems are based on biochemical identification and misidentify strains of the genera Franconibacter and Siccibacter as Cronobacter spp. [14]. Currently, the only means of correctly identifying strains of the genera Franconibacter and Siccibacter is DNA sequence analysis, particularly using the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme developed for Cronobacter species [7]. This approach analyzes seven housekeeping genes, including the fusA gene encoding elongation factor G. The phylogenetic analysis of fusA is considered to best reflect the whole-genome phylogeny of Cronobacter and related genera. However, the MLST database reveals that Cronobacter and Franconibacter share alleles in this gene, invalidating identification based on single-locus sequencing.
Franconibacter and Siccibacter strains have been isolated mainly from fruit powders, spices, and herbs and less often from powdered infant formula (PIF). To date, there has only been one clinical report of infection from Siccibacter and none from Franconibacter [15]. Due to their close relatedness, Franconibacter (39 strains) and Siccibacter (19 strains) are included in the PubMLST Cronobacter database.
The genus Cronobacter has undergone a significant transformation during evolution, with species such as C. sakazakii and C. malonaticus exhibiting more pathogenic characteristics, while others have less impact on human health. Information on the diversity, pathogenicity, and virulence of Cronobacter spp. isolated from different sources is still insufficient and is currently being studied. Our current knowledge on Cronobacter infections includes various virulence factors, such as adherence and invasiveness in cell lines, sialic acid utilization, capsule and endotoxin production, genes encoding iron uptake systems, fimbriae, flagella, invasion, outer membranes, and serum resistance [3]. Furthermore, the literature data indicate that Cronobacter bacteria exhibit resistance to various antibiotics [1,4], and the presence of antibiotic resistance genes, plasmids, and mobile genetic elements have also been reported [16].
The objective of this study was to use a draft genome sequence (DFG) for the detection of genes that confer resistance to antibiotics (ARGs), virulence (VGs), response to environmental stress, and biofilm formation in C. condimenti s37 that had been isolated from small radish sprouts [17], which allows for more precise molecular epidemiological studies. To the best of our knowledge, C. condimenti s37 is the second genome sequenced strain and the fourth documented isolate of this species. Studies on the diversity, pathogenicity and virulence of Cronobacter spp. isolated from different sources are still insufficient and should certainly be continued. Especially the analysis of rare strains such as s37 is very important because it provides new information on the evolution of these bacteria. In addition, the comparative genome analysis (cgMLST) of strain s37 with other Cronobacter spp. as well as with the species of Franconibacter and Siccibacter, available in the PubMLST database, was also performed, to obtain a broader view of the evolution of the strain isolated from the commercial sprouts. Comparison with closely related genera such as Franconibacter and Siccibacter can provide information concerning the ecology of Cronobacter species as well as why these bacteria are able to survive under stressful environmental conditions.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. General Features of C. condimenti s37 Genome

The genome of C. condimenti s37 was assembled and annotated, revealing a total size of 4,590,991 bp. It contains 4200 protein-coding genes, 88 pseudogenes, 96 RNAs, and has a GC content of 55.7%. A total of 444,972 high-quality paired-end reads were generated, leading to an assembly with 48 contigs and 43 scaffolds with an average final sequence coverage of 30x. The N50 lengths of the contigs and scaffolds were 353,823 kb and 532,226 kb, respectively. The longest scaffold was 956,796 bp, while the shortest was 288 bp.
The draft genome was evaluated using the BUSCO tool with the bacteria_odb10 and enterobacterales_odb10 databases. The completeness scores were high: 97.6% for bacteria_odb10 and 99.1% for enterobacterales_odb10 (Figure S1). The genomic characteristics of the s37 strain are collated in Table 1, while the functional traits, as identified by the RAST server, are shown in Figure 1.
The coding sequences of C. condimenti s37 include genes involved in resistance to heavy metals such as cobalt, zinc, and cadmium, as well as genes related to copper resistance and potassium homeostasis. Additionally, genes for responding to osmotic and oxidative stress, several phage-associated traits, and antibiotic resistance were identified.
Among the genes that make up the C. condimenti s37 genome, there were those responsible for typical Cronobacter phenotypic features related to the reduction of nitrate, utilization of D-mannose, L-arabinose, D-xylose, D-mannitol, sucrose, and cellobiose. There was also the presence of five from eight of the genetic determinants of the biochemical characteristics used previously for Cronobacter biotyping, namely, indole (tryptophanase), malonate, myo-inositol, utilization of 4-aminobutyrate, and production of α-methyl glucoside, and the absence of three: utilization of dulcitol, palatinose, and putrescine. Hamby et al. [18], using a limited range of strains, proposed the ability to ferment inositol as a feature distinguishing pathogenic Cronobacter strains from non-pathogenic strains. This association is doubtful given that the inositol monophosphatase gene is found in the C. condimenti s37 as well as C. universalis and C. dublinensis, previously reported by Grim et al. [19].

2.2. Genome Comparison of C. condiment s37 with Other Cronobacter and Closely Related Species

The genome of C. condimenti s37 was compared with that of C. condimenti LMG 26250T and other representatives of the genus Cronobacter, as well as Franconibacter and Siccibacter. These representatives included C. sakazakii ATCC BAA-894, C. malonaticus LMG 23826T, C. turicensis LMG23827T, C. muytjensii CIP 103581, C. dublinensis LMG 23823T, C. universalis NCTC 9529T, F. helveticus LMG 23733, F. pulveris Fp-G-601/05T, F. daqui LMG 29914T, S. colletis NCTC 14934T, and S. turicensis LMG 23730T strains. The aim was to use strains representing the diversity across the three genera in order to identify genes of phenotypic and pathogenic interest, as well as those unique to the C. condimenti s37 strain.
The genome of C. condimentii s37 was found to contain 3991 loci, of which 44.8% (1788) were common to all 13 compared genomes (Table S1). The core genome in C. condimenti s37 accounted for 2216 (55.5%) core loci, of which 1788 were present in all strains included in cgMLST analysis. Because the draft genome can have sequence gaps, some genes may have incomplete fragments or were unannotated. This may result in some underestimation of the size of the core genome. The remaining 1775 (44.5%) loci in s37 strain genome were auxiliary or accessory genes, which were found in at least one of the compared genomes of other strains of genus Cronobacter and closely related species.
Paralogous loci detected in cgMLST analysis are presented in Table 2, indicating the loci with multiple hits in every isolate (except those where the gene was absent). Among these genes were genes unique to C. condimenti (s37, LMG 26250T) and C. dublinensis 1210, including those encoding proteins for the contact-dependent growth inhibition system (CDI). CDIs are responsible for the direct physical contact of one bacterial cell with other cells nearby by delivering toxins via a receptor. These systems have been found in many microorganisms, including clinically important human pathogens. The main purpose of these systems in bacteria is to provide them with a competitive advantage for population growth under certain environmental conditions [20]. Furthermore, the closely related Franconibacter species lacked the PTS sugar transporter subunit IIC gene, found in C. condimenti s37 as well as in other Cronobacter and Siccibacter genera.
cgMLST analysis revealed that a large number (3780 out of 3991/94.7%) of loci in the s37 strain had identical alleles to those previously described in C. condimenti LMG26250T. The strain s37 unlike the reference strain C. condimenti LMG26250T is mobile. Both strains possess the same flagellar genes; however, different alleles were found in the genes encoding the fimbria/pilus outer membrane usher protein (AFK62_RS06490|AFK62_06490) and the flagellar basal-body MS-ring/collar protein FliF (AFK62_RS12145|fliF|AFK62_12150). The bacterial flagellum is a complex macromolecular structure that drives bacterial motility and plays various roles in virulence, including assisting in colonization and invasion or biofilm formation. FliF is an inner-membrane protein that forms two ring-shaped structures (MS rings) required for flagellum assembly [21]. Furthermore, different alleles were observed in the loci two-component system sensor histidine kinase RcsC (AFK62_RS13235|rcsC|AFK62_13245). This kinase is a component of the Rcs signaling pathway, which controls various physiological functions, including envelope synthesis, cell division, and motility in prokaryotes. The Rcs regulatory cascade, which involves a multistep process between the two membrane-bound hybrid sensor kinases RcsC and RcsD and the global regulator RcsB, is one of the most complex regulatory systems in bacteria to date [22]. Moreover, C. condimenti s37 had proteins related to the type VI secretion system (T6SS) that differed from those identified in C. condimenti LMG26250T. These proteins include type VI secretion system tip protein TssI/VgrG (AFK62_RS00520|tssI|AFK62_00520, AFK62_RS00555|tssI|AFK62_00555, AFK62_RS00670|tssI| AFK62_00670), type VI secretion system protein TssA (AFK62_RS07290|tssA|AFK62_07290), and type VI secretion system ATPase TssH (AFK62_RS14105|tssH|AFK62_14125). The T6SS system was originally discovered in plant bacteria (Rhizobium leguminosarum) and has diverse functions in bacteria, including antibacterial and anti-host activities, mediating the uptake of metal ions, resistance to environmental stress, inhibition of bacterial infections in the host, and regulation of bacterial biofilm formation [23]. In the case of s37, rearrangement hot spot (Rhs) proteins differed from those found in the C. condimenti LMG26250T genome. These included RHS repeat-associated core domain-containing proteins (AFK62_RS00575|AFK62_00575 and AFK62_RS00680|AFK62_00680), as well as RHS domain-containing proteins (AFK62_RS00690|AFK62_00690, AFK62_RS00700|AFK62_00700, and AFK62_RS22660|AFK62_00710). Rhs proteins are widely distributed in bacteria and eukaryotes, but their functions remain poorly understood. In enterobacteria, Rhs proteins have been shown to consist of four distinct regions, and the core may vary among family members [24].
Interestingly, some alleles of C. condimenti s37 were more similar to those of strains belonging to other closely related genera (Franconibacter and Siccibacter) (Figure 2, Table S1). The similarity of Cronobacter with Franconibacter and Siccibacter in terms of phenotypic characteristics has been demonstrated in previous studies [13,14]. In our study, we found a relatively high similarity of C. condimenti s37 to S. turicensis LMG23730T, F. pulveris Fp-G-601/05T, and C. dublinensis LMG23823T based on allele sequence comparison and cg-MLST analysis (Figure 2 and Figure 3).

2.3. Genes Involved in Resistance to Environmental Stress

A number of key stress response genes were investigated. Bacteria adapt to heavy metal stress by developing various resistance mechanisms via intracellular metal-binding proteins. The sequence of C. condimenti s37 was found to contain several genes (zntB, zupT, znuA, znuC, and znuB) encoding for zinc transporter ZntB, zinc transporter ZupT, zinc ABC transporter substrate-binding protein ZnuA, zinc ABC transporter ATP-binding protein ZnuC, and Zinc ABC transporter permease subunit ZnuB. These genes are involved in zinc transport to the cytosol and outside the cytoplasm [25]. Zn is known to be a common toxic metal that co-selects for antibiotic resistance, especially when genes associated with resistance are clustered on the same genetic element [25].
In addition to the zinc resistance genes, the s37 strain genome encoded for copper homeostasis and transport, i.e., cueO (multicopper oxidase CueO), copA (copper-exporting P-type ATPase CopA), pcoA (multicopper oxidase PcoA), and pcoR (copper response-regulating transcription factor PcoR). The Cue transport system is composed of a gene encoding for periplasmic protein CopA exhibiting laccase (EC. 1.10.3.2) activity and the CueO protein which is responsible for cell periplasm protection against copper-induced damages and the reduction of Cu(I) toxicity by transporting it to the periplasm and oxidizing to less toxic Cu(II) [26]. The pco encodes for resistance to copper and contains seven genes, pcoABCDRSE. PcoA, found in the analyzed s37 strain, belongs to the family of multicopper oxidases and is deemed to be a central protein of the Pco system.
The exceptional resistance of C. sakazakii to very low water activity, low pH, high temperature, and the presence of osmotically active factors in the environment has been extensively described in the literature [27,28]. The genomic sequence of C. condimenti s37 was found to contain various stress-response genes associated with resistance to these environmental conditions.
The study showed that the s37 strain encodes for various factors responsible for osmotic regulation, i.e., osmotically inducible protein (OsmY), aquaporin Z, hyperosmotic potassium uptake protein (TrkH) and potassium uptake protein (TrkA and TrkG), transporters ProP and ProuU (ProVWX), glutathione-regulated potassium-efflux system protein (KefBCFG), as well as choline dehydrogenase and betaine-aldehyde dehydrogenase (BetA and BetB). In addition, it encoded genes for heat/cold shock stress factors, such as suppressor proteins (DnaJ and DnaK) and heat shock proteins (YciA, YciH, and GrpE).
The primary response of C. sakazakii to low water activity conditions consists in the rapid accumulation of potassium glutamate in cells, which increases internal osmotic pressure and is expected to counteract high external osmotic pressure of the low-moisture environment [27]. Genes encoding for the proteins associated with osmotic response, such as Aquaporin Z, DnaJ, and ProQ, were identified in C. sakazakii strains derived from dried food products, like, e.g., seasonings [8] and milk powder [16]. The secondary response of C. sakazakii to osmotic stress consists in the substitution of potassium glutamate with osmoprotective agents being safer to a cell, like, e.g., proline, glycine betaine, carnitine, and trehalose [27]. In the case of E. coli, the capture of these agents is facilitated by transporters ProP and ProU [29], which have broad substrate specificities, transporting proline, glycine betaine, and related compounds [27]. Sequence data obtained in our study demonstrated that the s37 strain possessed the proP gene and also the second major osmoprotective system, i.e., ProU, consisting of two membrane-bound proteins (ProV and ProW) and a protein bound with periplasm (ProX), coded by the proVWX operon. The proP gene and the proVWX operon were shown to be highly upregulated in C. sakazakii strains exposed to drying [27,29].
Choline is one of the important solutes involved in the cellular response to adverse environmental conditions. The BetA and BetB proteins are involved in the conversion of choline to betaine; first, with the participation of choline dehydrogenase (BetA), choline is converted to betaine aldehyde, and then, betaine aldehyde is converted to betaine, which is catalyzed by betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BetB). Both betA and betB genes were identified in the s37 strain. Previously, these genes were identified in C. sakazakii by Aly et al. [16], Du et al. [27], and Hu et al. [30].
Glutathione-gated potassium-efflux systems (Kef) can control K+ efflux and prevent the prolonged exposure of a cell to excess potassium ions. In this study, kefBCFG genes were identified in the s37 strain. The genes of this system were previously detected in C. sakazakii strains isolated from milk powder and salad mix [16]. As Du et al. [27] showed, the kefB expression was up to 12-fold higher in the strain with strong desiccation tolerance. These findings indicate that this regulatory system may be more developed in the genus Cronobacter, accounting for its characteristic high resistance to drying. Analyses conducted in the present study identified also two constitutive low-affinity K+ transport systems: TrkH (an integral membrane protein), trkA, and trkE encoding regulatory proteins, and a Kdp-inducible high-affinity P-type ATPase system which has a high specificity for K+ (kdpABCDE) in the C. condimenti s37 strain. Aly et al. [16] and Srikumar et al. [29] reported similar findings regarding C. sakazakii strains.
In early studies on the genus Cronobacter, Iversen and Forsythe [31] hypothesized that this group of microorganisms were commensals associated with the plant environment. Supporting this hypothesis, several plant ecosystem-related genomic features were detected, including the metabolism of plant-associated sugars. In the C. condimenti s37 genome, the maltose transporter operon (malGFEI and malKMT), several α- and β-glucosidases, and genes for the transport and utilization of xylose (xylose ABC transporter), which is a precursor of hemicellulose, and for oligogalacturonate breakdown, the principal component of pectin, were found. The genes (xylA) indicating the capability for xylose degradation were earlier reported by Chase et al. [32] and Jang et al. [33] for C. sakazakii strains and by Joseph et al. [34] for C. condimenti LMG26250T. In addition to these features, several other genomic regions and operons have been discovered that are likely to be related to the functioning of microbes in the plant environment. These include galactose/methyl galactoside ABC transporter (galMTE and mglABC) and L-rhamnose ABC transporter (rhaTSM). The same genomic regions and operons were found by Grim et al. [19] in C. muytjensii and C. dublinensis. This finding can support the hypothesis that plants are the primary environmental niche for the Cronobacter genus bacteria, as it had been previously suggested by Iversen and Forsythe [31].

2.4. Genes Involved in Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)

Antimicrobial resistance was identified by BLAST searching the sequence genome of C. condimenti s37 against CARD database sequence data. As shown in Table 3, the genome of C. condimenti s37 was found to possess 17 genes related to resistance (including, i.a., msbA, marA, acrAB, kpnEFH, fosA8, adeF, emrR, rsmA, EF-Tu, glpT, and D-alanine-D-alanine ligase gene), belonging to 11 families associated with resistance and to 13 various classes of antibiotics, including beta-lactams, tetracyclines, macrolides, phenicols, quinolones, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, peptide antibiotics, rifamycins, nitroimidazoles, phosphonic acid derivatives, diaminopyrimidine derivatives, and elphamycins, and also genes of resistance to disinfectants and antiseptics. The low similarity of the matching region identity for some genes at the level of 30–50% is due to the limited number of sequences in the CARD database used for comparison. The nucleotide sequences of the s37 strain found in the CARD database as vanG, qacJ, and adeF showed a similarity of 88% to resistance genes encoding van ligase and multidrug efflux transporters in other bacteria (Blastn search analysis). Stevens et al. [35] identified 18 predicted AMR genes in all examined C. sakazakii strains, including 13 AMR genes, the same as in our study. One of the bacterial multidrug resistance mechanisms is the so-called efflux pump system by which the drugs are removed from the cell. Active efflux pumps enhance the virulence of many bacteria, improving their survival in hosts and allowing for cell invasion [16]. In the s37 strain, the acrAB operon, encoding proteins involved in this type of system, was detected [8,32]. The gene encoding for the acrAB operon was also reported by Jang et al. [33] in the genome of C. sakazakii isolated from plant-derived food products and by Chase et al. [32] in the strain C. sakazakii GP1999 isolated from tomato rhizoplane/rhizosphere continuum. The fosfomycin resistance gene (fosA) found in C. condimenti s37 was also reported by Jang et al. [33] in C. sakazakii isolates.

2.5. Genes Involved in Pathogenicity

The VFBD database identified 50 genes encoding virulence factors in the C. condimenti s37 strain, including those associated with adhesion, chemotaxis, and biofilm formation (Table S2).
In C. sakazakii, the virulence genes ompA, ompX, nanA, nanK, nanT, hha, flhA, and hfq are involved in enhancing their adhesion and invasion [16,36,37]. Among the virulence-associated determinants, hemolysin type III gene (hlyIII), which was also reported in the genome of various strains of Cronobacter genus bacteria, was identified [6,38].
Also interesting is the presence in s37 of the genes involved in the utilization of sialic acid derivative N-acetylneuraminic acid (N-acetylneuraminic acid outer membrane channel protein NanC, nanC). Sialic acid is found in the mucin of the gut wall and the gangliosides of the brain [39]. The sialic acid utilization genes (nanAKT) are almost exclusively found in the C. sakazakii species and one branch of C. turicensis [36].
The genes ompA, ompC, ompL, and ompW, encoding porin proteins, were also identified in s37 strain. In Gram-negative bacteria, these proteins are engaged in the interaction with the cells and immune system of the host [40]. It is assumed that the outer membrane proteins OmpA and OmpX are important players in the crossing of the blood–brain barrier by C. sakazakii [38,41]. The literature data also indicate that the ompW gene contributes to C. sakazakii survival under conditions of osmotic and oxidative stress and that it is associated with enhanced biofilm formation [42,43]. In the genome of the strain s37, genes encoding a two-component regulatory system were also identified, encoded by the envZ and ompR genes, which are likely involved in regulating the expression of porin-encoding genes. The fliR and flhA genes, that were detected in C. condimenti s37, are mainly responsible for the structural elements of the flagellum. Flagella are involved in multiple mechanisms of bacterial adhesion and pathogenicity [16]. Furthermore, both C. condimenti strains harbor genes encoding the type IV pilus protein PilT, which is known to mediate flagellum-independent motility, referred to as twitching or gliding motility, and are associated with the virulence of various pathogens. In the genome of the strain s37, the type VI secretion system (T6SS) unique sequence such as the vgrG gene was also found, also acting as an effector. This system is associated with cytotoxicity and host cell invasion and allows for the pathogen to grow within macrophages [6,44]. Genes encoding identical secretion systems were detected in Cronobacter species [6,16].
Because iron is an important growth factor for bacteria, they have various mechanisms of its uptake from the environment, i.e., they produce siderophores outside the cell, which are iron-chelating compounds (e.g., enterobactin). In the s37 genome, enterobactin gene cluster (entABCDFS) and, additionally, siderophores of another type (fhuABCDE) were detected. Similar findings were reported for the majority of the Cronobacter strains studied by Joseph et al. [6] and for F. helveticus [45]. In plant growth-promoting bacteria, the siderophore enterobactin supports plant development by strengthening their resistance to pathogens [45]. Cronobacter species also express two ferrous transport systems, Feo (encoded by feoABC) and Efe (encoded by efeOB), which serve for Fe2+ uptake from the environment. In turn, the expression of these systems is suppressed by the interaction of iron uptake regulator proteins (Fur) binding to the appropriate promoter sites. The Fur proteins are involved in controlling intracellular iron concentration in many bacteria [9]. The presence of the feoABC and efeOB genes was also identified in the s37 strain in the present study.
Biofilms play an important role in bacterial pathogenicity by acting as an adhesive agent, allowing for the cells to adhere to various abiotic and biotic surfaces, and also as a barrier protecting the cells from stress conditions, such as shortages of water or nutrients or the presence of antimicrobial agents. Hence, the biofilm-forming ability is a crucial trait associated with the pathogenicity of microorganisms and also with their capability to withstand food preservation and production conditions. Genes linked with the ability to form biofilms in the genome of the s37 strain, that include biosynthesis genes, like those of the colanic acid biosynthesis process (wcaABCDEFLMK), and those linked to the biosynthesis of flagella (flhABCDE, flgA-N, and fliE-TZ) were found. Genes encoding for enzymes responsible for EPS production and transport are usually clustered in large operons, like the wca operon, controlling colanic acid EPS biosynthesis and containing fucose and glucuronic acid [6,37]. Colanic acid is known to be one of the components of exopolysaccharides of Cronobacter species, the formation of which supports adhesion to the surface and increases resistance to stress factors (heat, drying, and low pH) [46]. Bacterial flagella have been shown to play an important role in biofilm formation, ensuring cell motility and surface colonization [47].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

The study was conducted with C. condimenti s37, originally isolated in 2016 in Poland from commercial small radish sprouts [17]. The strain is currently stored in the collection of the Division of Milk Technology at Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Poland. The Cronobacter spp. strain was stored frozen on Tryptone Soy Broth (TSB) (Oxoid Argenta, Poznań, Poland) with 10% glycerol, at a temperature of −40 °C. It was recovered from the frozen state by transferring 0.1 mL of a defrosted culture into 10 mL of sterile TSB and incubation at 35 °C for 24 h. Afterwards, the strain was inoculated onto Tryptone Soy Agar (TSA) medium (Oxoid Argenta, Poznań, Poland). The motility of C. condimenti s37 was determined using soft-agar tubes (0.4% agar) and E. coli ATCC 25922 and S. aureus ATTC 29213 strains as positive and negative controls, respectively.
The genome of C. condimenti s37 was compared with that of C. condimenti LMG 26250T and other representatives of the genus Cronobacter (C. sakazakii ATCC BAA-894, C. malonaticus LMG 23826T, C. turicensis LMG23827T, C. muytjensii CIP 103581, C. dublinensis LMG 23823T, and C. universalis NCTC 9529T), as well as Franconibacter (F. helveticus LMG 23733, F. pulveris Fp-G-601/05T, F. daqui LMG 29914T), and Siccibacter (S. colletis NCTC 14934T and S. turicensis LMG 23730T). Characteristic features (such as source of isolation, country, phenotypic features, sequence types, and clonal complexes) of bacterial strains used in the cgMLST analysis are available in the public PubMLST database (www.pubmlst.org/cronobacter/) (accessed on 2 August 2024).

3.2. Draft Genome Sequence of C. condimenti s37

Genomic DNA from C. condimenti s37 was extracted from 500 µL of a 1-day (37 °C, 18 h) broth culture in TSB using the GenEluteTM Bacterial Genomic DNA kit (Sigma-Aldrich), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), employing v3 chemistry and generating 300 bp paired-end reads with dual indexed Nextera XT libraries (Illumina). The mean insert size was approximately 250–300 bp. Quality control of the raw sequence data was performed using FastQC v0.11.8 [48]. Adapter trimming and quality filtering was performed by Trimmomatic v0.33 [49], retaining only reads with a quality score above Q30 for further analysis. De novo assembly was performed using Velvet v.1.2.10 [50], with quality assessment conducted using QUAST v4.0 [51]. The high quality of the genome assembly was confirmed via BUSCO (Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs) analysis (v5.2.2) [52]. The DNA sequence was annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (v.6.6) [53] and the functional features of s37 were identified using Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) [54].

3.3. Core Genome-MLST Analysis

Core genome multilocus (cgMLST) allele differences were identified using the BIGSdb MLST Genome Comparator feature of the Cronobacter PubMLST database (www.pubmlst.org/cronobacter/ [55], accessed on 2 August 2024). The genome of the C. condimenti strain LMG 26250T was used as the reference genome (reference number NZ_CP012264), and the remaining representative genomes of the genus Cronobacter (C. sakazakii ATCC BAA-894, C. malonaticus LMG 23826T, C. turicensis LMG23827T, C. muytjensii CIP 103581, C. dublinensis LMG 23823T, and C. universalis NCTC 9529T), the genus Franconibacter (F. helveticus LMG 23733, F. pulveris Fp-G-601/05T, and F. daqui LMG 29914T), and the genus Sicibacter (S. colletis NCTC 14934T and S. turicensis LMG 23730T) were obtained from the PubMLST database, which was used to construct a comparative genome MLST scheme consisting of 3991 targets. cgMLST analysis and splits tree construction were performed using the genomes of the above-mentioned bacterial strains and default settings. The distance matrix was calculated in BIGSdb Genome Comparator [55]. Incomplete loci were ignored in pairwise comparisons unless the locus was missing in one isolate. Paralogous loci were excluded from the distance matrix calculation.
A description of the species, source, MLST sequence type, and PubMLST ID used in the comparative genome analysis is given in Table 4.

3.4. Antimicrobial Resistance Genes and Virulence Factors of C. condimenti s37

The C. condimenti s37 genome sequence was analyzed for the presence of resistance and virulence genes using the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD, https://card.mcmaster.ca) and the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB, http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs [56], accessed on 2 August 2024), respectively.

4. Conclusions

The present study was focused on the draft genome of C. condimenti strain s37. This is the second genome sequenced strain in the species and the third reported isolate of the species. Assembly and annotation of the genome resulted in a genome of 4,590,991 bp, with a total number of genes of 4384, and a GC content of 55.7%. The genome sequence of C. condimenti s37 included genes responsible for heavy metal resistance, resistance to copper and potassium homeostasis, stress response associated with osmotic and oxidative stresses, resistance to antibiotics, and pathogenicity. Based on the cg-MLST analysis, a greater similarity of the s37 alleles to S. turicensis LMG23730T, F. pulveris Fp-G-601/05T, and C. dublinensis LMG23823T was determined than to other representatives of the genus Cronobacter, i.e., C. sakazakii, C. malonaticus, C. turicensis, and C. universalis.
This study gives a molecular basis to understand the ability of environmental strains of Cronobacter to survive stressful conditions. In genome s37, genetic fragments which encode factors for enhanced environmental persistence and plant commensalism as well as numerous features that could aid in potential virulence were found. Studies on the diversity, pathogenicity, and virulence of Cronobacter spp. isolated from different sources are still insufficient and should certainly be continued. Especially the analysis of rare strains such as s37 is very important because it provides new information on the evolution of these bacteria. Comparative cgMLST analysis of bacteria such as s37 with other Cronobacter spp., as well as closely related genera Franconibacter and Siccibacter, complements the current knowledge on their adaptability to specific environments such as desiccation.
The characterization of strains isolated from foods of plant origin is very important to verify the association with cases of infections that were not caused by PIF in adults. The genetic determinants of antibiotic resistance in Cronobacter bacteria should be constantly investigated due to the acquisition of resistance observed in some strains and multidrug resistance observed not only in strains of clinical origin. Although C. condimenti is not a pathogenic member of the Cronobacter genus, understanding its virulence-related features may prove useful in characterizing the entire genus.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25168622/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B.-P. and M.G.; methodology, A.B.-P., I.S., T.A.-P. and M.G.; investigation, I.S., S.F., A.B.-P. and M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B.-P. and M.G.; writing—review and editing, A.B.-P., I.S., S.F., L.S.-R. and M.G.; visualization, M.G. and I.S.; supervision, M.G.; funding acquisition, A.B.-P. and M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The publication was (co) financed by Science Development Fund of the Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW.

Data Availability Statement

The genome of the Cronobacter condimenti s37 strain has been deposited in the DDBJ/ENA/GenBank databases under accession numbers RQEO01000001-RQEO01000043, with BioProject: PRJNA506216, and BioSample: SAMN10450162. It is also listed as ID number 1896 in the Cronobacter PubMLST database.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express special thanks to Keith Jolley of the University of Oxford for his help with the PubMLST.org comparative genomic analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

Author SJ Forsythe was employed by the company foodmicrobe.com. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, H.; Fu, S.; Song, D.; Qin, X.; Zhang, W.; Man, C.; Yang, X.; Jiang, Y. Identification, Typing and Drug Resistance of Cronobacter spp. in Powdered Infant Formula and Processing Environment. Foods 2023, 12, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. CDC. FDA Investigation of Cronobacter Infections: Powdered Infant Formula (February 2022). FDA, 2022. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/food/outbreaks-foodborne-illness/fda-investigation-Cronobacter-infections-powdered-infant-formula-february-2022 (accessed on 2 August 2024).
  3. Cechin, C.F.; Carvalho, G.G.; Bastos, C.P.; Kabuki, D.Y. Cronobacter spp. in foods of plant origin: Occurrence, contamination routes, and pathogenic potential. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 12398–12412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cechin, C.F.; Carvalho, G.G.; Kabuki, D.Y. Occurrence, genetic characterization, and antibiotic susceptibility of Cronobacter spp. isolated from low water activity functional foods in Brazil. Food Microbiol. 2024, 122, 104570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Phair, K.; Pereira, S.G.; Kealey, C.; Fanning, S.; Brady, D.B. Insights into the mechanisms of Cronobacter sakazakii virulence. Microb Pathog. 2022, 169, 105643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Joseph, S.; Cetinkaya, E.; Drahovska, H.; Levican, A.; Fiqueras, M.J.; Forsythe, S.J. Cronobacter condimenti sp. nov., isolated from spiced meat, and Cronobacter universalis sp. nov., a species designation for Cronobacter sp. Genomospecies 1, recovered from a leg infection, water and food ingredients. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012, 62, 1277–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Forsythe, S.J. Updates on the Cronobacter genus. Ann. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 9, 23–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Jang, H.; Woo, J.; Lee, Y.; Negrete, F.; Finkelstein, S.; Chase, H.R.; Addy, N.; Ewing, L.; Gilles Beaubrun, J.J.; Patel, I.; et al. Draft genomes of Cronobacter sakazakii strains isolated from dried spices bring unique insights into the diversity of plant-associated strains. Stand. Genom. Sci. 2018, 13, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ling, N.; Jiang, X.; Forsythe, S.; Zhang, D.; Shen, Y.; Ding, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Q.; Ye, Y. Food Safety Risks and Contributing Factors of Cronobacter spp. Engineering 2022, 12, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stephan, R.; Grim, C.J.; Gopinath, G.R.; Mammel, M.K.; Sathyamoorthy, V.; Trach, L.H.; Chase, H.R.; Fanning, S.; Tall, B.D. Re-examination of the taxonomic status of Enterobacter helveticus, Enterobacter pulveris and Enterobacter turicensis as members of the genus Cronobacter and their reclassification in the genera Franconibacter gen. nov. and Siccibacter gen. nov. as Franconibacter helveticus comb. nov., Franconibacter pulveris comb. nov. and Siccibacter turicensis comb. nov, respectively. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 3402–3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, Z.; Su, C.; Yang, X.; Sun, D.; Zeng, C.; Chen, M.; Hu, W.; Zhang, C. Franconibacter daqui sp. nov., a facultatively alkaliphilic species isolated from a Daqu sample. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 4962–4966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jackson, E.E.; Masood, N.; Ibrahim, K.; Urvoy, N.; Hariri, S.; Forsythe, S.J. Description of Siccibacter colletis sp. nov., a novel species isolated from plant material, and emended description of Siccibacter turicensis. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65 Pt 4, 1335–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Svobodová, B.; Vlach, J.; Junková, P.; Karamonová, L.; Blažková, M.; Fukal, L. Novel method for reliable identification of Siccibacter and Franconibacter strains: From “pseudo-Cronobacter” to new Enterobacteriaceae genera. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e00234-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jackson, E.E.; Forsythe, S.J. Comparative study of Cronobacter identification according to phenotyping methods. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lepuschitz, S.; Pekard-Amenitsch, S.; Haunold, R.; Schill, S.; Schriebl, A.; Mach, R.; Allerberger, F.; Ruppitsch, W.; Forsythe, S.J. Draft genome sequence of the first documented clinical Siccibacter turicensis isolate in Austria. Genome Announc. 2018, 6, e00380-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Aly, M.A.; Domig, K.J.; Kneifel, W.; Reimhult, E. Whole Genome Sequencing-Based Comparison of Food Isolates of Cronobacter sakazakii. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Berthold-Pluta, A.; Garbowska, M.; Stefańska, I.; Pluta, A. Microbiological quality of selected ready-to-eat leaf vegetables, sprouts and non-pasteurized fresh fruit-vegetable juices including the presence of Cronobacter spp. Food Microbiol. 2017, 65, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hamby, S.E.; Joseph, S.; Forsythe, S.J.; Chuzhanova, N. In Silico identification of pathogenic strains of Cronobacter from biochemical reveals association of inositol fermentation with pathogenicity. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Grim, C.J.; Kotewicz, M.L.; Power, K.A.; Gopinath, G.; Franco, A.A.; Jarvis, K.G.; Yan, Q.; Jackson, S.A.; Sathyamoorthy, V.; Hu, L.; et al. Pan-genome analysis of the emerging foodborne pathogen Cronobacter spp. suggests a species-level bidirectional divergence driven by niche adaptation. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ikryannikova, L.N.; Kurbatov, L.K.; Gorokhovets, N.V.; Zamyatnin, A.A. Contact-Dependent Growth Inhibition in Bacteria: Do Not Get Too Close! Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mariano, G.; Faba-Rodriguez, R.; Bui, S.; Zhao, W.; Ross, J.; Tzokov, S.B.; Bergeron, J.R.C. Oligomerization of the FliF Domains Suggests Coordinated Assembly of the Bacterial Flagellum MS Ring. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 781960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rogov, V.V.; Rogova, N.Y.; Bernhard, F.; Koglin, A.; Löhr, F.; Dötsch, V. A New Structural Domain in the Escherichia coli RcsC Hybrid Sensor Kinase Connects Histidine Kinase and Phosphoreceiver Domains. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 364, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yin, R.; Cheng, J.; Lin, J. The role of the type VI secretion system in the stress resistance of plant-associated bacteria. Stress Biol. 2024, 4, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Koskiniemi, S.; Lamoureux, J.G.; Nikolakakis, K.C.; t’Kint de Roodenbeke, C.; Kaplan, M.D.; Low, D.A.; Hayes, C.S. Rhs proteins from diverse bacteria mediate intercellular competition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 7032–7037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Blencowe, D.K.; Morby, A.P. Zn(II) metabolism in prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 291–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rensing, C.; Grass, G. Escherichia coli mechanisms of copper homeostasis in a changing environment. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Du, X.-J.; Wang, X.-Y.; Dong, X.; Li, P.; Wang, S. Characterization of the Desiccation Tolerance of Cronobacter sakazakii Strains. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, L.; Forsythe, S.J.; Yang, X.; Fu, S.; Man, C.; Jiang, Y. Stress resistance of Cronobacter spp. affecting control of its growth during food production. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 11348–11367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Srikumar, S.; Cao, Y.; Yan, Q.; Van Hoorde, K.; Nguyen, S.; Cooney, S.; Gopinath, G.R.; Tall, B.D.; Sivasankaran, S.K.; Lehner, A.; et al. RNA sequencing-based transcriptional overview of xerotolerance in Cronobacter sakazakii SP291. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hu, S.; Yu, Y.; Wu, X.; Xia, X.; Xiao, X.; Wu, H. Comparative proteomic analysis of Cronobacter sakazakii by iTRAQ provides insights into response to desiccation. Food Res. Int. 2017, 100, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Iversen, C.; Forsythe, S. Risk profile of Enterobacter sakazakii, an emergent pathogen associated with infant milk formula. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2003, 14, 443–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chase, H.R.; Gopinath, G.R.; Eshwar, A.K.; Stoller, A.; Fricker-Feer, C.; Gangiredla, J.; Patel, I.R.; Cinar, H.N.; Jeong, H.; Lee, C.; et al. Comparative genomic characterization of the highly persistent and potentially virulent Cronobacter sakazakii ST83, CC65 strain H322 and other ST83 strains. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jang, H.; Addy, N.; Ewing, L.; Beaubrun, J.; Lee, Y.; Woo, J.; Negrete, F.; Finkelstein, S.; Tall, B.D.; Lehner, A.; et al. Whole-genome sequences of Cronobacter sakazakii isolates obtained from foods of plant origin and dried-food manufacturing environments. Genome Announc. 2018, 6, e00223-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Joseph, S.; Desai, P.; Ji, Y.; Cummings, C.A.; Shih, R.; Degoricija, L.; Rico, A.; Brzoska, P.; Hamby, S.E.; Masood, N.; et al. Comparative analysis of genome sequences covering the seven Cronobacter species. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e49455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Stevens, M.J.A.; Cernela, N.; Stephan, R.; Lehner, A. Comparative genomics of Cronobacter sakazakii strains from a powdered infant formula plant reveals evolving populations. LWT 2023, 184, 115034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Joseph, S.; Hariri, S.; Masood, N.; Forsythe, S.J. Sialic acid utilization by Cronobacter sakazakii. Microb. Inform. Exp. 2013, 3, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Singh, N.; Goel, G.; Raghav, M. Insights into virulence factors determining the pathogenicity of Cronobacter sakazakii. Virulence 2015, 6, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gan, X.; Li, M.; Xu, J.; Yan, S.; Wang, W.; Li, F. Emerging of Multidrug-Resistant Cronobacter sakazakii Isolated from Infant Supplementary Food in China. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e01197-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Severi, E.; Hood, D.W.; Thomas, G.H. Sialic acid utilization by bacterial pathogens. Microbiology 2007, 153, 2817–2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Choi, U.; Lee, C.-R. Distinct roles of outer membrane porins in antibiotic resistance and membrane integrity in Escherichia coli. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kim, K.; Kim, K.-P.; Choi, J.; Lim, J.-A.; Lee, J.; Hwang, S.; Ryu, S. Outer membrane proteins A (OmpA) and X (OmpX) are essential for basolateral invasion of Cronobacter sakazakii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 5188–5198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, X.; Gao, J.; Ling, N.; Zeng, H.; Tong, L.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Q.; Ye, Y. Short communication: Roles of outer membrane protein W on survival, cellular morphology, and biofilm formation of Cronobacter sakazakii in response to oxidative stress. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 2017–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ye, Y.; Ling, N.; Gao, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, M.; Tong, L.; Zeng, H.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Q. Roles of outer membrane protein W (OmpW) on survival, morphology, and biofilm formation under NaCl stresses in Cronobacter sakazakii. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 3844–3850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhou, Y.; Tao, Y.; Yu, H.; Ni, J.; Zeng, L.; Teng, Q.; Kim, K.S.; Zhao, G.P.; Guo, X.; Yao, Y. Hcp Family Proteins Secreted via the Type VI Secretion System Coordinately Regulate Escherichia coli K1 Interaction with Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells. Inf. Immun. 2012, 80, 1243–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, X. Prospecting the plant growth—promoting activities of endophytic bacteria Franconibacter sp. YSD YN2 isolated from Cyperus esculentus L. var. sativus leaves. Ann. Microbiol. 2022, 72, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Aly, M.A.; Reimhult, E.; Kneifel, W.; Domig, K.J. Characterization of biofilm formation by Cronobacter spp. isolates of different food origin under model conditions. J. Food Prot. 2019, 82, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Öztürk, F.Y.; Darcan, C.; Kariptaş, E. The Determination, Monitoring, Molecular Mechanisms and Formation of Biofilm in E. coli. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2023, 54, 259–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Andrews, S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. 2010. Available online: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc (accessed on 2 August 2024).
  49. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zerbino, D.R.; Birney, E. Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008, 18, 821–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gurevich, A.; Saveliev, V.; Vyahhi, N.; Tesler, G. QUAST: Quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 1072–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Manni, M.; Berkeley, M.R.; Seppey, M.; Simão, F.A.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO Update: Novel and Streamlined Workflows along with Broader and Deeper Phylogenetic Coverage for Scoring of Eukaryotic, Prokaryotic, and Viral Genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 4647–4654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tatusova, T.; DiCuccio, M.; Badretdin, A.; Chetvernin, V.; Nawrocki, E.P.; Zaslavsky, L.; Lomsadze, A.; Pruitt, K.D.; Borodovsky, M.; Ostell, J. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 6614–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Aziz, R.K.; Bartels, D.; Best, A.A.; DeJongh, M.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Formsma, K.; Gerdes, S.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M.; et al. The RAST server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Jolley, K.A.; Maiden, M.C.J. BIGSdb: Scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 595. Available online: https://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/11/595 (accessed on 2 August 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schäffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Subsystem category distribution of C. condimenti s37. (A)—the percentage of subsystem coverage (green bar corresponds to the percentage of proteins involved). (B)—the fraction and count (parenthesis in legend) of each subsystem feature (functional traits identified by the RAST server).
Figure 1. Subsystem category distribution of C. condimenti s37. (A)—the percentage of subsystem coverage (green bar corresponds to the percentage of proteins involved). (B)—the fraction and count (parenthesis in legend) of each subsystem feature (functional traits identified by the RAST server).
Ijms 25 08622 g001
Figure 2. Distance matrix of Cronobacter species and closely related organisms (distances between taxa are calculated as the number of loci with different allele sequences).
Figure 2. Distance matrix of Cronobacter species and closely related organisms (distances between taxa are calculated as the number of loci with different allele sequences).
Ijms 25 08622 g002
Figure 3. cgMLST analysis of Cronobacter species and closely related organisms (Splits Tree).
Figure 3. cgMLST analysis of Cronobacter species and closely related organisms (Splits Tree).
Ijms 25 08622 g003
Table 1. General genome features of C. condimenti s37.
Table 1. General genome features of C. condimenti s37.
FeatureC. condimenti s37
Genome size (bp)4,590,991
GC content (%)55.7
Number of genes (total)4384
Total number of RNA96
Table 2. Potentially paralogous loci in the cgMLST analysis of 7 Cronobacter species, 3 Franconibacter species, and 2 Siccibacter species.
Table 2. Potentially paralogous loci in the cgMLST analysis of 7 Cronobacter species, 3 Franconibacter species, and 2 Siccibacter species.
LocusProductIsolatesIsolate Count
AFK62_RS01850efflux RND transporter permease subunitCronobacter sakazakii a
Cronobacter malonaticus b
Cronobacter turicensis c
Cronobacter muytjensii d
Cronobacter dublinensis e
Cronobacter condimenti f
Cronobacter condimenti s37
Cronobacter universalis g
Franconibacter helveticus h
Franconibacter pulveris
Franconibacter daqui i
Siccibacter colletis j
Siccibacter turicensis k
13
AFK62_RS03000organic hydroperoxide resistance protein
AFK62_RS05310multidrug efflux RND transporter permease subunit AcrB
AFK62_RS09870general stress protein
AFK62_RS11360L-serine ammonia-lyase
AFK62_RS11405transcription antiterminator/RNA stability regulator CspE
AFK62_RS15790L-serine ammonia-lyase
AFK62_RS16240transketolase
AFK62_RS17895maltose/maltodextrin ABC transporter ATP-binding protein MalK
AFK62_RS08905PTS sugar transporter subunit IICCronobacter sakazakii a
Cronobacter malonaticus b
Cronobacter turicensis c
Cronobacter muytjensii d
Cronobacter dublinensis e
Cronobacter condimenti f
Cronobacter condimenti s37
Cronobacter universalis g
Siccibacter colletis j
Siccibacter turicensis k
10
AFK62_RS11020contact-dependent growth inhibition system immunity proteinCronobacter dublinensis e
Cronobacter condimenti f
Cronobacter condimenti s37
3
AFK62_RS11030contact-dependent growth inhibition system immunity proteinCronobacter dublinensis e
Cronobacter condimenti f
Cronobacter condimenti s37
3
AFK62_RS22640hypothetical proteinCronobacter dublinensis e
Cronobacter condimenti f
Cronobacter condimenti s37
3
AFK62_RS05535hypothetical proteinCronobacter condimenti f
Cronobacter condimenti s37
2
AFK62_RS05550hypothetical proteinCronobacter condimenti f
Cronobacter condimenti s37
2
a C. sakazakii ATCC BAA-894. b C. malonaticus species type strain—LMG23826T. c C. turicensis species type strain—LMG23827T. d C. muytjensii species type strain—CIP103581. e C. dublinensis species type strain—LMG23823T. f C. condimenti species type strain—LMG26250T. g C. universalis species type strain—NCTC9529T. h F. helveticus species type strain—LMG23733. i F. daqui species type strain—LMG29914T. j S. colletis species type strain—NCTC 14934T. k S. turicensis species type strain—LMG23730T.
Table 3. Antimicrobial resistance genes identified in C. condimenti s37 using resistance gene identifier database (CARD).
Table 3. Antimicrobial resistance genes identified in C. condimenti s37 using resistance gene identifier database (CARD).
Antimicrobial Resistance Gene (AMR Gene)AMR Gene FamilyDrug ClassResistance MechanismIdentity of Matching Region (%)Length of Reference Sequence (%)
vanGglycopeptide resistance gene cluster, D-alanine--D-alanine ligaseglycopeptide antibioticantibiotic target alteration36.59104.87
msbAATP-binding cassette (ABC) antibiotic efflux pumpnitroimidazole antibioticantibiotic efflux92.27100.00
qacJsmall multidrug resistance (SMR) antibiotic efflux pumpdisinfecting agents and antisepticsantibiotic efflux45.63101.87
marAresistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) antibiotic efflux pump, General Bacterial Porin with reduced permeability to beta-lactamsfluoroquinolone antibiotic, monobactam, carbapenem, cephalosporin, glycylcycline, cephamycin, penam, tetracycline antibiotic, rifamycin antibiotic, phenicol antibiotic, penem, disinfecting agents, and antisepticsantibiotic efflux, reduced permeability to antibiotic89.5297.64
Klebsiella pneumoniae kpnFsmall multidrug resistance (SMR) antibiotic efflux pumpmacrolide antibiotic, aminoglycoside antibiotic, cephalosporin, tetracycline antibiotic, peptide antibiotic, rifamycin antibiotic, disinfecting agents, and antisepticsantibiotic efflux73.39100.00
Klebsiella pneumoniae kpnEsmall multidrug resistance (SMR) antibiotic efflux pumpmacrolide antibiotic, aminoglycoside antibiotic, cephalosporin, tetracycline antibiotic, peptide antibiotic, rifamycin antibiotic, disinfecting agents, and antisepticsantibiotic efflux73.1199.17
fosA8fosfomycin thiol transferasephosphonic acid antibioticantibiotic inactivation58.8295.74
H-NSmajor facilitator superfamily (MFS) antibiotic efflux pump, resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) antibiotic efflux pumpmacrolide antibiotic, fluoroquinolone antibiotic, cephalosporin, cephamycin, penam, tetracycline antibioticantibiotic efflux91.91100.00
adeFresistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) antibiotic efflux pumpfluoroquinolone antibiotic, tetracycline antibioticantibiotic efflux41.798.02
emrRmajor facilitator superfamily (MFS) antibiotic efflux pumpfluoroquinolone antibioticantibiotic efflux91.43100.00
Klebsiella pneumoniae kpnHmajor facilitator superfamily (MFS) antibiotic efflux pumpmacrolide antibiotic, fluoroquinolone antibiotic, aminoglycoside antibiotic, carbapenem, cephalosporin, penam, peptide antibiotic, penemantibiotic efflux92.19100.00
rsmAresistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) antibiotic efflux pumpfluoroquinolone antibiotic, diaminopyrimidine antibiotic, phenicol antibioticantibiotic efflux85.25100.00
CRPresistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) antibiotic efflux pumpmacrolide antibiotic, fluoroquinolone antibiotic, penamantibiotic efflux99.05100.00
Escherichia coli EF-Tu mutants conferring resistance to Pulvomycinelfamycin resistant EF-Tuelfamycin antibioticantibiotic target alteration98.2296.33
Haemophilus influenzae PBP3 conferring resistance to beta-lactam antibioticsPenicillin-binding protein mutations conferring resistance to beta-lactam antibioticscephalosporin, cephamycin, penamantibiotic target alteration52.0496.39
Escherichia coli glpT with mutation conferring resistance to fosfomycinantibiotic-resistant GlpTphosphonic acid antibioticantibiotic target alteration92.4399.56
Escherichia coli AcrAB-TolC with MarR mutations conferring resistance to ciprofloxacin and tetracyclineresistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) antibiotic efflux pumpfluoroquinolone antibiotic, cephalosporin, glycylcycline, penam, tetracycline antibiotic, rifamycin antibiotic, phenicol antibiotic, disinfecting agents, and antisepticsantibiotic target alteration, antibiotic efflux84.72113.19
Table 4. List of species, sources, MLST sequence types, and PubMLST ID of strains which were used in the comparative genome analysis.
Table 4. List of species, sources, MLST sequence types, and PubMLST ID of strains which were used in the comparative genome analysis.
SpeciesStrainSourceMLST Sequence TypePubMLST ID
Cronobacter sakazakiiATCC BAA-894Powdered formula15
Cronobacter malonaticusLMG 23826TClinical761
Cronobacter turicensisLMG23827TClinical19110
Cronobacter muytjensiiCIP 103581Clinical81598
Cronobacter dublinensisLMG 23823TEnvironmental106146
Cronobacter condimentiLMG 26250TFood981554
Cronobacter condimentis37Small radish sprouts981896
Cronobacter universalisNCTC 9529TWater5484
Franconibacter helveticusLMG 23733Fruit powder217643
Franconibacter pulverisFp-G-601/05TFruit powder231611
Franconibacter daquiLMG 29914TFood ingredient7663273
Siccibacter colletisNCTC 14934TFood ingredient2271165
Siccibacter turicensisLMG 23730TFruit powder2161179
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Berthold-Pluta, A.; Stefańska, I.; Forsythe, S.; Aleksandrzak-Piekarczyk, T.; Stasiak-Różańska, L.; Garbowska, M. Genomic Analysis of Cronobacter condimenti s37: Identification of Resistance and Virulence Genes and Comparison with Other Cronobacter and Closely Related Species. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8622. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168622

AMA Style

Berthold-Pluta A, Stefańska I, Forsythe S, Aleksandrzak-Piekarczyk T, Stasiak-Różańska L, Garbowska M. Genomic Analysis of Cronobacter condimenti s37: Identification of Resistance and Virulence Genes and Comparison with Other Cronobacter and Closely Related Species. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(16):8622. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168622

Chicago/Turabian Style

Berthold-Pluta, Anna, Ilona Stefańska, Stephen Forsythe, Tamara Aleksandrzak-Piekarczyk, Lidia Stasiak-Różańska, and Monika Garbowska. 2024. "Genomic Analysis of Cronobacter condimenti s37: Identification of Resistance and Virulence Genes and Comparison with Other Cronobacter and Closely Related Species" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 16: 8622. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168622

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop